###Instruction: Multi-class classification, answer with one of the labels:['no_consensus', 'delete', 'keep', 'comment', 'merge', 'redirect'] : ###Input:  Q5274326: Die Blutgräfin (Q5274326) : film to have been directed by Ulrike Ottinger : ( delete | history | links | entity usage | logs | discussion ) The project was cancelled, see en:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Die Blutgräfin (film) Gabbe ( talk ) 08:29, 6 May 2015 (UTC) Maybe add statements that indicate that? Otherwise we miss this kind of data in Wikidata. Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 08:41, 6 May 2015 (UTC) I'm not sure what you mean. I'm saying that item Die Blutgräfin (Q5274326) no longer fulfils the WD:N criteria. Does it? Or do you mean that the deletion on enwiki was handled inappropriately? Gabbe ( talk ) 05:56, 7 May 2015 (UTC) Yeah, but how do we document that a project has been canceled in Wikidata? Things like that seems relevant to me. On Wikipedia, you can write stuff like that in the article of the director... Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 08:00, 11 May 2015 (UTC) I agree with Sjoerddebruin, we should document this. -- Diego Grez ( talk ) 22:52, 19 May 2015 (UTC) The deletion on the enwiki seems to have been handled correctly but the item may be still relevant enough for Wikidata, even though with the loss of the enwiki entry there aren't any entries left. - cycŋ - ( talk • contribs • logs ) 08:49, 20 May 2015 (UTC) I added publication date = "no value" and "instance of: project". --- Jura 10:48, 20 May 2015 (UTC) Not deleted Lymantria ( talk ) 16:54, 21 May 2015 (UTC) I'm not sure what you mean. I'm saying that item Die Blutgräfin (Q5274326) no longer fulfils the WD:N criteria. Does it? Or do you mean that the deletion on enwiki was handled inappropriately? Gabbe ( talk ) 05:56, 7 May 2015 (UTC) Yeah, but how do we document that a project has been canceled in Wikidata? Things like that seems relevant to me. On Wikipedia, you can write stuff like that in the article of the director... Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 08:00, 11 May 2015 (UTC) I agree with Sjoerddebruin, we should document this. -- Diego Grez ( talk ) 22:52, 19 May 2015 (UTC) The deletion on the enwiki seems to have been handled correctly but the item may be still relevant enough for Wikidata, even though with the loss of the enwiki entry there aren't any entries left. - cycŋ - ( talk • contribs • logs ) 08:49, 20 May 2015 (UTC) I added publication date = "no value" and "instance of: project". --- Jura 10:48, 20 May 2015 (UTC) Not deleted Lymantria ( talk ) 16:54, 21 May 2015 (UTC) Yeah, but how do we document that a project has been canceled in Wikidata? Things like that seems relevant to me. On Wikipedia, you can write stuff like that in the article of the director... Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 08:00, 11 May 2015 (UTC) I agree with Sjoerddebruin, we should document this. -- Diego Grez ( talk ) 22:52, 19 May 2015 (UTC) I agree with Sjoerddebruin, we should document this. -- Diego Grez ( talk ) 22:52, 19 May 2015 (UTC) The deletion on the enwiki seems to have been handled correctly but the item may be still relevant enough for Wikidata, even though with the loss of the enwiki entry there aren't any entries left. - cycŋ - ( talk • contribs • logs ) 08:49, 20 May 2015 (UTC) I added publication date = "no value" and "instance of: project". --- Jura 10:48, 20 May 2015 (UTC) Not deleted Lymantria ( talk ) 16:54, 21 May 2015 (UTC) I'm not sure what you mean. I'm saying that item Die Blutgräfin (Q5274326) no longer fulfils the WD:N criteria. Does it? Or do you mean that the deletion on enwiki was handled inappropriately? Gabbe ( talk ) 05:56, 7 May 2015 (UTC) Yeah, but how do we document that a project has been canceled in Wikidata? Things like that seems relevant to me. On Wikipedia, you can write stuff like that in the article of the director... Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 08:00, 11 May 2015 (UTC) I agree with Sjoerddebruin, we should document this. -- Diego Grez ( talk ) 22:52, 19 May 2015 (UTC) The deletion on the enwiki seems to have been handled correctly but the item may be still relevant enough for Wikidata, even though with the loss of the enwiki entry there aren't any entries left. - cycŋ - ( talk • contribs • logs ) 08:49, 20 May 2015 (UTC) I added publication date = "no value" and "instance of: project". --- Jura 10:48, 20 May 2015 (UTC) Not deleted Lymantria ( talk ) 16:54, 21 May 2015 (UTC) Yeah, but how do we document that a project has been canceled in Wikidata? Things like that seems relevant to me. On Wikipedia, you can write stuff like that in the article of the director... Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 08:00, 11 May 2015 (UTC) I agree with Sjoerddebruin, we should document this. -- Diego Grez ( talk ) 22:52, 19 May 2015 (UTC) I agree with Sjoerddebruin, we should document this. -- Diego Grez ( talk ) 22:52, 19 May 2015 (UTC) The deletion on the enwiki seems to have been handled correctly but the item may be still relevant enough for Wikidata, even though with the loss of the enwiki entry there aren't any entries left. - cycŋ - ( talk • contribs • logs ) 08:49, 20 May 2015 (UTC) I added publication date = "no value" and "instance of: project". --- Jura 10:48, 20 May 2015 (UTC) Not deleted Lymantria ( talk ) 16:54, 21 May 2015 (UTC) Yeah, but how do we document that a project has been canceled in Wikidata? Things like that seems relevant to me. On Wikipedia, you can write stuff like that in the article of the director... Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 08:00, 11 May 2015 (UTC) I agree with Sjoerddebruin, we should document this. -- Diego Grez ( talk ) 22:52, 19 May 2015 (UTC) I agree with Sjoerddebruin, we should document this. -- Diego Grez ( talk ) 22:52, 19 May 2015 (UTC) The deletion on the enwiki seems to have been handled correctly but the item may be still relevant enough for Wikidata, even though with the loss of the enwiki entry there aren't any entries left. - cycŋ - ( talk • contribs • logs ) 08:49, 20 May 2015 (UTC) I added publication date = "no value" and "instance of: project". --- Jura 10:48, 20 May 2015 (UTC) Not deleted Lymantria ( talk ) 16:54, 21 May 2015 (UTC)