###Instruction: Multi-class classification, answer with one of the labels:['no_consensus', 'delete', 'keep', 'comment', 'merge', 'redirect'] : ###Input:  Q96085049: Jane Austen (Q96085049) : (1655-1717) wife of Stephen Stringer : ( delete | history | links | entity usage | logs | discussion ) This is not THE Jane Austen , but rather another Jane Austen whose only claim to notability is being the great-grandmother of a barely notable British MP from the 1700s. The item provides no benefit to anyone and doesn't meet any of the criteria at Wikidata:Notability . Kaldari ( talk ) 22:53, 4 March 2021 (UTC) On hold This item is linked from 5 others. -- DeltaBot ( talk ) 23:01, 4 March 2021 (UTC) Keep The "barely notable" MP ( Thomas Knight (Q7791574) ) passes WD:N#1 , and Q96085049 is part of its structural data. I'd say Q96085049 serves the purpose of distinguishing the person from the more famous Jane Austen. If we delete this item, the existing links would have to be replaced with text values "Jane Austen" which would only be more confusing. The same cannot be said if all the Wikimedia pages and Wikidata items about the people in the lineage are to be deleted, though. whym ( talk ) 10:53, 8 March 2021 (UTC) Just to check in, the situation is the same after 4 months, as far as I can see. Thomas Knight (Q7791574) still has a sitelink and passes WD:N#1 . whym ( talk ) 12:22, 7 July 2021 (UTC) Not done per Whym. -- Emu ( talk ) 11:36, 24 July 2021 (UTC)