###Instruction: Multi-class classification, answer with one of the labels:['no_consensus', 'delete', 'keep', 'comment', 'merge', 'redirect'] : ###Input:  Q111429678: Arthur Ceraj (Q111429678) : Austrian shopkeeper : ( delete | history | links | entity usage | logs ) Not meet WD:N . It is not clearly identifiable conceptual or material entity . SCP-2000 ( talk ) 14:57, 31 August 2022 (UTC) PS: Relevant Commons deletion request . SCP-2000 ( talk ) 14:59, 31 August 2022 (UTC) Keep They have a commons category link.  My understanding is that this is enough to satisfy N1 as currently written. Bovlb ( talk ) 23:24, 5 September 2022 (UTC) His images are displayed in Europeana not because he was or is in any way notable, but because the same person who uploaded the Ceraj photos to Wikimedia Commons submitted them to the Europeana 1914-1918 project , a “project to digitise and publish primary and secondary historical sources on the First World War”. It seems that Ceraj was someone living in the same Austrian / Styrian municipality as the uploader, or close by. -- Rosenzweig ( talk ) 13:28, 3 September 2022 (UTC) I'm finding this argument to be startlingly broad in scope.  You seem to be arguing that all people since record-keeping began are inherently notable to Wikidata, the only exception being those involved in self-promotion.  That's quite a strong claim, and seems to me to fall far from the centre of community consensus. Bovlb ( talk ) 23:23, 5 September 2022 (UTC) My argument is that those humans that "can be described using serious and publicly available references" are eligible for a Wikidata entry, excluding those involved in self-promotion. Over time we will load more and more databases of people, but right now, they are not a priority, we are prioritizing information dense databases of humans. The Peerage was the last large upload. We have not loaded all of VIAF and LCCN because there are too many information sparse people, they lack enough information to merge or disambiguate. -- RAN ( talk ) 02:57, 9 September 2022 (UTC) His images are displayed in Europeana not because he was or is in any way notable, but because the same person who uploaded the Ceraj photos to Wikimedia Commons submitted them to the Europeana 1914-1918 project , a “project to digitise and publish primary and secondary historical sources on the First World War”. It seems that Ceraj was someone living in the same Austrian / Styrian municipality as the uploader, or close by. -- Rosenzweig ( talk ) 13:28, 3 September 2022 (UTC) I'm finding this argument to be startlingly broad in scope.  You seem to be arguing that all people since record-keeping began are inherently notable to Wikidata, the only exception being those involved in self-promotion.  That's quite a strong claim, and seems to me to fall far from the centre of community consensus. Bovlb ( talk ) 23:23, 5 September 2022 (UTC) My argument is that those humans that "can be described using serious and publicly available references" are eligible for a Wikidata entry, excluding those involved in self-promotion. Over time we will load more and more databases of people, but right now, they are not a priority, we are prioritizing information dense databases of humans. The Peerage was the last large upload. We have not loaded all of VIAF and LCCN because there are too many information sparse people, they lack enough information to merge or disambiguate. -- RAN ( talk ) 02:57, 9 September 2022 (UTC) My argument is that those humans that "can be described using serious and publicly available references" are eligible for a Wikidata entry, excluding those involved in self-promotion. Over time we will load more and more databases of people, but right now, they are not a priority, we are prioritizing information dense databases of humans. The Peerage was the last large upload. We have not loaded all of VIAF and LCCN because there are too many information sparse people, they lack enough information to merge or disambiguate. -- RAN ( talk ) 02:57, 9 September 2022 (UTC) His images are displayed in Europeana not because he was or is in any way notable, but because the same person who uploaded the Ceraj photos to Wikimedia Commons submitted them to the Europeana 1914-1918 project , a “project to digitise and publish primary and secondary historical sources on the First World War”. It seems that Ceraj was someone living in the same Austrian / Styrian municipality as the uploader, or close by. -- Rosenzweig ( talk ) 13:28, 3 September 2022 (UTC) I'm finding this argument to be startlingly broad in scope.  You seem to be arguing that all people since record-keeping began are inherently notable to Wikidata, the only exception being those involved in self-promotion.  That's quite a strong claim, and seems to me to fall far from the centre of community consensus. Bovlb ( talk ) 23:23, 5 September 2022 (UTC) My argument is that those humans that "can be described using serious and publicly available references" are eligible for a Wikidata entry, excluding those involved in self-promotion. Over time we will load more and more databases of people, but right now, they are not a priority, we are prioritizing information dense databases of humans. The Peerage was the last large upload. We have not loaded all of VIAF and LCCN because there are too many information sparse people, they lack enough information to merge or disambiguate. -- RAN ( talk ) 02:57, 9 September 2022 (UTC) My argument is that those humans that "can be described using serious and publicly available references" are eligible for a Wikidata entry, excluding those involved in self-promotion. Over time we will load more and more databases of people, but right now, they are not a priority, we are prioritizing information dense databases of humans. The Peerage was the last large upload. We have not loaded all of VIAF and LCCN because there are too many information sparse people, they lack enough information to merge or disambiguate. -- RAN ( talk ) 02:57, 9 September 2022 (UTC) My argument is that those humans that "can be described using serious and publicly available references" are eligible for a Wikidata entry, excluding those involved in self-promotion. Over time we will load more and more databases of people, but right now, they are not a priority, we are prioritizing information dense databases of humans. The Peerage was the last large upload. We have not loaded all of VIAF and LCCN because there are too many information sparse people, they lack enough information to merge or disambiguate. -- RAN ( talk ) 02:57, 9 September 2022 (UTC)