###Instruction: Multi-class classification, answer with one of the labels:['no_consensus', 'delete', 'keep', 'comment', 'merge', 'redirect'] : ###Input:  Q28062448: Q28062448 : no description : ( delete | history | links | entity usage | logs ) Doesn't seem to be notable, no external identifier or an article KCVelaga ( talk ) 12:07, 8 July 2019 (UTC) On hold This item is linked from 1 other. -- DeltaBot ( talk ) 12:10, 8 July 2019 (UTC) It's notable by Wikidata:Notability note 3. - yona b ( talk ) 09:43, 11 July 2019 (UTC) It's notable by Wikidata:Notability note 3. - yona b ( talk ) 09:43, 11 July 2019 (UTC) @ יונה בנדלאק : It has a very weird history. The page was created to support a deleted enwiki article which was a typo duplicate of Q19605177 . It was then used for a different person of that name as screenwriter of a film, claiming enwiki article Q18611428 as source. However the 2014 version of that article said that the screenwriter was Chinmay Kulkarni, which is supported by IMDB [1] . The error was introduced by this vandalism in 2015 [2] . As such, I consider this item complete nonsense, based on a typo and a false claim and it should be deleted. Please let me know if you have any objections to deletion. Sincerely, Taketa ( talk ) 06:09, 12 July 2019 (UTC) @ Taketa : after you remove he claim, He is not notable. I delete it. - yona b ( talk ) 17:22, 14 July 2019 (UTC) @ Taketa : after you remove he claim, He is not notable. I delete it. - yona b ( talk ) 17:22, 14 July 2019 (UTC)