###Instruction: Multi-class classification, answer with one of the labels:['no_consensus', 'delete', 'keep', 'comment', 'merge', 'redirect'] : ###Input:  Q31040581: This item is a duplicate of Q253774 -- Khamul1 ( talk ) 16:54, 22 December 2019 (UTC) On hold This item is linked from 1 other. -- DeltaBot ( talk ) 17:00, 22 December 2019 (UTC) Oppose Q253774 is for the actual rebellion, whereas Q31040581 is for the related category, and properly linked to Q253774 . It also meets the notability policy as stucturally needed and as containing valid sitelink as described in the same policy ( edit conflict ) -- Kostas20142 ( talk ) 17:19, 22 December 2019 (UTC) I am sorry. It was a error. -- Khamul1 ( talk ) 17:15, 22 December 2019 (UTC) Oppose Q253774 is for the actual rebellion, whereas Q31040581 is for the related category, and properly linked to Q253774 . It also meets the notability policy as stucturally needed and as containing valid sitelink as described in the same policy ( edit conflict ) -- Kostas20142 ( talk ) 17:19, 22 December 2019 (UTC) Oppose Q253774 is for the actual rebellion, whereas Q31040581 is for the related category, and properly linked to Q253774 . It also meets the notability policy as stucturally needed and as containing valid sitelink as described in the same policy ( edit conflict ) -- Kostas20142 ( talk ) 17:19, 22 December 2019 (UTC) Not done two separate entites. nominator acknowledged his error. Quakewoody ( talk ) 18:27, 22 December 2019 (UTC)