###Instruction: Multi-class classification, answer with one of the labels:['no_consensus', 'delete', 'keep', 'comment', 'merge', 'redirect'] : ###Input:  Q104713328: Deletion repuest 1 Nima Owji (Q104713328) : Developer, App Researcher : ( delete | history | links | entity usage | logs ) Not notable / please also delete Wikipedia page.
-- 65.21.244.25 09:05, 22 August 2021 (UTC) On hold This item is linked from 1 other. -- DeltaBot ( talk ) 09:11, 22 August 2021 (UTC) Keep Easily passes WD:N #2 with hundreds of news articles. Wikicheshmeh ( talk ) 16:22, 29 August 2021 (UTC) @ Emu : Clear decision to stay right now, right? Structural benefit via the data object Q108324433 which is clearly relevant through its Wikisource link. -- Gymnicus ( talk ) 09:29, 30 August 2021 (UTC) The crossed-out statement can be skipped because the Wikisource link of the data object Q108324433 has been removed because the Wikisource page has been deleted. So the question of relevance now arises for the data object Q108324433 and I have already suggested deleting it. -- Gymnicus ( talk ) 11:52, 30 August 2021 (UTC) The crossed-out statement can be skipped because the Wikisource link of the data object Q108324433 has been removed because the Wikisource page has been deleted. So the question of relevance now arises for the data object Q108324433 and I have already suggested deleting it. -- Gymnicus ( talk ) 11:52, 30 August 2021 (UTC) @ Emu :, the anonymous IP address who has requested for its deletion doesn't have other contributions and they've also requested to delete Nima Owji, 3 times in this week! Possible spam, right? Wikicheshmeh ( talk ) 11:39, 30 August 2021 (UTC) @ Wikicheshmeh : It doesn't matter who made the deletion requests. In addition, the IP may simply no longer find the request for deletion. This can happen by more than 222 deletion requests. -- Gymnicus ( talk ) 11:52, 30 August 2021 (UTC) Deletion request 2 Nima Owji (Q104713328) : Developer, App Researcher : ( delete | history | links | entity usage | logs ) Not notable
-- 65.21.244.25 00:36, 30 August 2021 (UTC) On hold This item is linked from 1 other. -- DeltaBot ( talk ) 00:41, 30 August 2021 (UTC) Keep I think what you're doing is vandalism! You've requested to delete this item 3 times and all of those other requests are still open. I think you have a personal animosity! As I mentioned in those 3 requests, this item meets WD:N #2 and #3 with hundrerds of news coverage! Click here to see the news coverage on Google Wikicheshmeh ( talk ) 03:47, 30 August 2021 (UTC) I noticed he hasn't contributed elsewhere so I think we have a personal animosity case! Isn't this against Wikidata rules? Wikicheshmeh ( talk ) 03:51, 30 August 2021 (UTC) delete:  clearly not notable. also delete the app that links to them. BrokenSegue ( talk ) 03:59, 30 August 2021 (UTC) BrokenSegue , doesn't he pass WD:N #2? I don't know about that app, but the person itself has a good amount of news coverage! Wikicheshmeh ( talk ) 04:02, 30 August 2021 (UTC) news just mentions them in passing. I don't know. seem fairly non-notable. i'm not super invested here though. BrokenSegue ( talk ) 04:05, 30 August 2021 (UTC) Hmm, I don't think so. If we talk about Wikipedia, yes, he is not notable enough. But this is Wikidata and I think having this item can be good. When he has over 300 news articles mentioning him, I guess that sounds like #2! Also, passes WD:N #3 because of Q108324433 Wikicheshmeh ( talk ) 04:07, 30 August 2021 (UTC) I noticed he hasn't contributed elsewhere so I think we have a personal animosity case! Isn't this against Wikidata rules? Wikicheshmeh ( talk ) 03:51, 30 August 2021 (UTC) delete:  clearly not notable. also delete the app that links to them. BrokenSegue ( talk ) 03:59, 30 August 2021 (UTC) BrokenSegue , doesn't he pass WD:N #2? I don't know about that app, but the person itself has a good amount of news coverage! Wikicheshmeh ( talk ) 04:02, 30 August 2021 (UTC) news just mentions them in passing. I don't know. seem fairly non-notable. i'm not super invested here though. BrokenSegue ( talk ) 04:05, 30 August 2021 (UTC) Hmm, I don't think so. If we talk about Wikipedia, yes, he is not notable enough. But this is Wikidata and I think having this item can be good. When he has over 300 news articles mentioning him, I guess that sounds like #2! Also, passes WD:N #3 because of Q108324433 Wikicheshmeh ( talk ) 04:07, 30 August 2021 (UTC) BrokenSegue , doesn't he pass WD:N #2? I don't know about that app, but the person itself has a good amount of news coverage! Wikicheshmeh ( talk ) 04:02, 30 August 2021 (UTC) news just mentions them in passing. I don't know. seem fairly non-notable. i'm not super invested here though. BrokenSegue ( talk ) 04:05, 30 August 2021 (UTC) Hmm, I don't think so. If we talk about Wikipedia, yes, he is not notable enough. But this is Wikidata and I think having this item can be good. When he has over 300 news articles mentioning him, I guess that sounds like #2! Also, passes WD:N #3 because of Q108324433 Wikicheshmeh ( talk ) 04:07, 30 August 2021 (UTC) news just mentions them in passing. I don't know. seem fairly non-notable. i'm not super invested here though. BrokenSegue ( talk ) 04:05, 30 August 2021 (UTC) Hmm, I don't think so. If we talk about Wikipedia, yes, he is not notable enough. But this is Wikidata and I think having this item can be good. When he has over 300 news articles mentioning him, I guess that sounds like #2! Also, passes WD:N #3 because of Q108324433 Wikicheshmeh ( talk ) 04:07, 30 August 2021 (UTC) Hmm, I don't think so. If we talk about Wikipedia, yes, he is not notable enough. But this is Wikidata and I think having this item can be good. When he has over 300 news articles mentioning him, I guess that sounds like #2! Also, passes WD:N #3 because of Q108324433 Wikicheshmeh ( talk ) 04:07, 30 August 2021 (UTC) I noticed he hasn't contributed elsewhere so I think we have a personal animosity case! Isn't this against Wikidata rules? Wikicheshmeh ( talk ) 03:51, 30 August 2021 (UTC) delete:  clearly not notable. also delete the app that links to them. BrokenSegue ( talk ) 03:59, 30 August 2021 (UTC) BrokenSegue , doesn't he pass WD:N #2? I don't know about that app, but the person itself has a good amount of news coverage! Wikicheshmeh ( talk ) 04:02, 30 August 2021 (UTC) news just mentions them in passing. I don't know. seem fairly non-notable. i'm not super invested here though. BrokenSegue ( talk ) 04:05, 30 August 2021 (UTC) Hmm, I don't think so. If we talk about Wikipedia, yes, he is not notable enough. But this is Wikidata and I think having this item can be good. When he has over 300 news articles mentioning him, I guess that sounds like #2! Also, passes WD:N #3 because of Q108324433 Wikicheshmeh ( talk ) 04:07, 30 August 2021 (UTC) BrokenSegue , doesn't he pass WD:N #2? I don't know about that app, but the person itself has a good amount of news coverage! Wikicheshmeh ( talk ) 04:02, 30 August 2021 (UTC) news just mentions them in passing. I don't know. seem fairly non-notable. i'm not super invested here though. BrokenSegue ( talk ) 04:05, 30 August 2021 (UTC) Hmm, I don't think so. If we talk about Wikipedia, yes, he is not notable enough. But this is Wikidata and I think having this item can be good. When he has over 300 news articles mentioning him, I guess that sounds like #2! Also, passes WD:N #3 because of Q108324433 Wikicheshmeh ( talk ) 04:07, 30 August 2021 (UTC) news just mentions them in passing. I don't know. seem fairly non-notable. i'm not super invested here though. BrokenSegue ( talk ) 04:05, 30 August 2021 (UTC) Hmm, I don't think so. If we talk about Wikipedia, yes, he is not notable enough. But this is Wikidata and I think having this item can be good. When he has over 300 news articles mentioning him, I guess that sounds like #2! Also, passes WD:N #3 because of Q108324433 Wikicheshmeh ( talk ) 04:07, 30 August 2021 (UTC) BrokenSegue , doesn't he pass WD:N #2? I don't know about that app, but the person itself has a good amount of news coverage! Wikicheshmeh ( talk ) 04:02, 30 August 2021 (UTC) news just mentions them in passing. I don't know. seem fairly non-notable. i'm not super invested here though. BrokenSegue ( talk ) 04:05, 30 August 2021 (UTC) Hmm, I don't think so. If we talk about Wikipedia, yes, he is not notable enough. But this is Wikidata and I think having this item can be good. When he has over 300 news articles mentioning him, I guess that sounds like #2! Also, passes WD:N #3 because of Q108324433 Wikicheshmeh ( talk ) 04:07, 30 August 2021 (UTC) news just mentions them in passing. I don't know. seem fairly non-notable. i'm not super invested here though. BrokenSegue ( talk ) 04:05, 30 August 2021 (UTC) Hmm, I don't think so. If we talk about Wikipedia, yes, he is not notable enough. But this is Wikidata and I think having this item can be good. When he has over 300 news articles mentioning him, I guess that sounds like #2! Also, passes WD:N #3 because of Q108324433 Wikicheshmeh ( talk ) 04:07, 30 August 2021 (UTC) news just mentions them in passing. I don't know. seem fairly non-notable. i'm not super invested here though. BrokenSegue ( talk ) 04:05, 30 August 2021 (UTC) Hmm, I don't think so. If we talk about Wikipedia, yes, he is not notable enough. But this is Wikidata and I think having this item can be good. When he has over 300 news articles mentioning him, I guess that sounds like #2! Also, passes WD:N #3 because of Q108324433 Wikicheshmeh ( talk ) 04:07, 30 August 2021 (UTC)