###Instruction: Multi-class classification, answer with one of the labels:['no_consensus', 'delete', 'keep', 'comment', 'merge', 'redirect'] : ###Input:  Q109074322: Duke Town Cathedral (Q109074322) : tourist attraction Center in Calabar, Nigeria : ( delete | history | links | entity usage | logs ) Notability?
-- Dorades ( talk ) 18:24, 15 June 2023 (UTC) Discussion (including the discussion of other items) Please postpone the deletion request until Dammy Kaka has become active again and may fix all issues on his own.-- U. M. Owen ( talk ) 19:11, 16 June 2023 (UTC) I'd be happy to see these items kept, but at the moment they are completely without sources. Intention and accolades do not matter here, however. The items have to fulfill the notability criteria and that should be shown in the items. -- Dorades ( talk ) 12:23, 17 June 2023 (UTC) The items must comply the notability criteria and the ones I've checked do. It should be shown in the items to prevent anybody to delete the items in good faith because of ignorance that they meet the notability criteria, but those items are notable enough that it's easy to wipe out that ignorance.-- Pere prlpz ( talk ) 13:31, 21 June 2023 (UTC) Several of these items appear to be by @ James Rhoda and @ Ogundele1 , not Dammy Kaka, so I'm not sure why they were grouped like this.  Perhaps those users could help to improve them in order to establish notability. Bovlb ( talk ) 18:37, 31 July 2023 (UTC) I'd be happy to see these items kept, but at the moment they are completely without sources. Intention and accolades do not matter here, however. The items have to fulfill the notability criteria and that should be shown in the items. -- Dorades ( talk ) 12:23, 17 June 2023 (UTC) The items must comply the notability criteria and the ones I've checked do. It should be shown in the items to prevent anybody to delete the items in good faith because of ignorance that they meet the notability criteria, but those items are notable enough that it's easy to wipe out that ignorance.-- Pere prlpz ( talk ) 13:31, 21 June 2023 (UTC) The items must comply the notability criteria and the ones I've checked do. It should be shown in the items to prevent anybody to delete the items in good faith because of ignorance that they meet the notability criteria, but those items are notable enough that it's easy to wipe out that ignorance.-- Pere prlpz ( talk ) 13:31, 21 June 2023 (UTC) Several of these items appear to be by @ James Rhoda and @ Ogundele1 , not Dammy Kaka, so I'm not sure why they were grouped like this.  Perhaps those users could help to improve them in order to establish notability. Bovlb ( talk ) 18:37, 31 July 2023 (UTC) I'd be happy to see these items kept, but at the moment they are completely without sources. Intention and accolades do not matter here, however. The items have to fulfill the notability criteria and that should be shown in the items. -- Dorades ( talk ) 12:23, 17 June 2023 (UTC) The items must comply the notability criteria and the ones I've checked do. It should be shown in the items to prevent anybody to delete the items in good faith because of ignorance that they meet the notability criteria, but those items are notable enough that it's easy to wipe out that ignorance.-- Pere prlpz ( talk ) 13:31, 21 June 2023 (UTC) The items must comply the notability criteria and the ones I've checked do. It should be shown in the items to prevent anybody to delete the items in good faith because of ignorance that they meet the notability criteria, but those items are notable enough that it's easy to wipe out that ignorance.-- Pere prlpz ( talk ) 13:31, 21 June 2023 (UTC)