###Instruction: Multi-class classification, answer with one of the labels:['no_consensus', 'delete', 'keep', 'comment', 'merge', 'redirect'] : ###Input:  Q98380143: Q98380143 : no description : ( delete | history | links | entity usage | logs ) An invented person. No source mention this Numa Pompilius's son.
-- Romulanus ( talk ) 13:14, 26 August 2020 (UTC)  No longer linked. Here an example of the children of Numa Pompilius . Numa, sons of Numa Pompilius, doesn't exist. -- Romulanus ( talk ) 17:51, 26 August 2020 (UTC) Wouldn't it had made more sense if it was still linked so that admin could trace the links to determine an answer? I mean, think of it this way, if I go and remove the data from this Numa Pompilius person, he wouldn't pass notability either. Quakewoody ( talk ) 18:20, 26 August 2020 (UTC) I don't know and I think I still don't fully understand the delete requests in Wikidata. However, if you delete the entire content of Numa Pompilius, for example, I would be the first to undo your actions ;). The reason for including a link to a paper is to prove that Numa is an invention. Plutarch, the source for the four male children of Numa Pompilius (Pompo, Pinus, Calpus and Mamercus), does not mention him. -- Romulanus ( talk ) 23:12, 26 August 2020 (UTC)