###Instruction: Multi-class classification, answer with one of the labels:['no_consensus', 'delete', 'keep', 'comment', 'merge', 'redirect'] : ###Input:  Q11631101: Q11631101 : no description : ( delete | history | links | entity usage | logs ) The entry is pointless and doesn't serve a purpose.
-- Adamant1 ( talk ) 06:04, 15 May 2022 (UTC) Comment It's a Wikimedia Commons Category for Designed postmarks called commemorative stamps used at Japanese post offices. A bot generated item. This could be further liked to the related items. It's not harmful to keep it, plus there is need of someone who connect it to related items. That's my opinion. - BeLucky ( talk ) 06:55, 15 May 2022 (UTC) I might be wrong, but as far as I know a Wikidata entry can't be circular to be notable. If all it links to is itself/other Wikiprojects then I'd call that pointless and not worth keeping. That said, someone might be able to find a source discussing the topic and use it as a reference somehow. I looked but couldn't find any. Although admittedly I didn't do a super in-depth search. I actually have a book on the topic, but it's 99% pictures and I can't read Japanese. So I don't think it would be any help. Adamant1 ( talk ) 21:28, 2 June 2022 (UTC) Delete Commons category doesn't make it notable/being in WD scope. Identifier (Google Knowledge Graph ID) is incorrect. Wikidata has no other items called "commemorative postmarks of Foo country" Estopedist1 ( talk ) 05:07, 27 August 2022 (UTC) I might be wrong, but as far as I know a Wikidata entry can't be circular to be notable. If all it links to is itself/other Wikiprojects then I'd call that pointless and not worth keeping. That said, someone might be able to find a source discussing the topic and use it as a reference somehow. I looked but couldn't find any. Although admittedly I didn't do a super in-depth search. I actually have a book on the topic, but it's 99% pictures and I can't read Japanese. So I don't think it would be any help. Adamant1 ( talk ) 21:28, 2 June 2022 (UTC) Delete Commons category doesn't make it notable/being in WD scope. Identifier (Google Knowledge Graph ID) is incorrect. Wikidata has no other items called "commemorative postmarks of Foo country" Estopedist1 ( talk ) 05:07, 27 August 2022 (UTC) Delete Commons category doesn't make it notable/being in WD scope. Identifier (Google Knowledge Graph ID) is incorrect. Wikidata has no other items called "commemorative postmarks of Foo country" Estopedist1 ( talk ) 05:07, 27 August 2022 (UTC) I might be wrong, but as far as I know a Wikidata entry can't be circular to be notable. If all it links to is itself/other Wikiprojects then I'd call that pointless and not worth keeping. That said, someone might be able to find a source discussing the topic and use it as a reference somehow. I looked but couldn't find any. Although admittedly I didn't do a super in-depth search. I actually have a book on the topic, but it's 99% pictures and I can't read Japanese. So I don't think it would be any help. Adamant1 ( talk ) 21:28, 2 June 2022 (UTC) Delete Commons category doesn't make it notable/being in WD scope. Identifier (Google Knowledge Graph ID) is incorrect. Wikidata has no other items called "commemorative postmarks of Foo country" Estopedist1 ( talk ) 05:07, 27 August 2022 (UTC)