###Instruction: Multi-class classification, answer with one of the labels:['no_consensus', 'delete', 'keep', 'comment', 'merge', 'redirect'] : ###Input:  Q2011943: Q2011943 : no description : ( delete | history | links | entity usage | logs ) Subject deleted as hoax on both nl:wiki as en:wiki. Wikidata entry no longer in use. Agora ( talk ) 13:43, 16 October 2019 (UTC) Without being able to find the deletion discussion for the articles; as it applies to Wikidata notability, I was wondering if anyone checked for any Identifiers in the art community (which I know exist but do not know what they are). Certainly anyone of that time period with any notability has the equivalent of an ISNI or Viaf (whatever they may be called in the art world), which would demonstrate notability for Wikidata. Quakewoody ( talk ) 14:40, 16 October 2019 (UTC) Dutch discussion here . "Notability" implies something actually existed, but for what it's worth, there are no matches in any of the mix&match ID databases for that name. Andrew Gray ( talk ) 18:44, 17 October 2019 (UTC) Dutch discussion here . "Notability" implies something actually existed, but for what it's worth, there are no matches in any of the mix&match ID databases for that name. Andrew Gray ( talk ) 18:44, 17 October 2019 (UTC)