###Instruction: Multi-class classification, answer with one of the labels:['no_consensus', 'delete', 'keep', 'comment', 'merge', 'redirect'] : ###Input:  Q22302383: Maxima Chan Zuckerberg (Q22302383) : daughter of Mark Zuckerberg : ( delete | history | links | entity usage | logs ) Privacy violation, one-year old child. Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 10:50, 24 October 2016 (UTC) @ Sjoerddebruin : I don't see the privacy violation here, given the fact that its parents have gone public with details about the name, birth of the child, etc. I guess User:ValterVB felt the same, which is why he quickly undid his deletion earlier today. I guess you came here for discussion, opposed to deleting it yourself, and that's my opinion about it. It cannot be argued that the person (even if a baby) does not exist, can easily be referenced, and may well be notable in itself in time to come anyway (not that that's our beef, more moot). Otherwise, I couldn't care less what the Zuckerbergs do. Jared Preston ( talk ) 21:24, 24 October 2016 (UTC) Yes, I quickly revert my edit because I thinked that the fact is public, I can see the news on newspapers and fall under the 3th rule of notability guideline. I'm sorry for not having written before my opinion -- ValterVB ( talk ) 21:35, 24 October 2016 (UTC) Not deleted . Jared Preston ( talk ) 22:20, 31 October 2016 (UTC) Not deleted . Jared Preston ( talk ) 22:20, 31 October 2016 (UTC) Not deleted . Jared Preston ( talk ) 22:20, 31 October 2016 (UTC)