###Instruction: Multi-class classification, answer with one of the labels:['no_consensus', 'delete', 'keep', 'comment', 'merge', 'redirect'] : ###Input:  Q10571366: Lydda australis (Q10571366) : species of insect : ( delete | history | links | entity usage | logs ) The insect name Lydda aatralis (Distant, 1907) is a misspelling for Lydda australis (Distant, 1907), already on Wikidata as item Lydda australis (Q111733894) . The error apparently originated on the website FLOW and was repeated on other websites like GBIF . Details on the correct name Lydda australis can be found at the Australian Australian Faunal Directory .
-- Bernhard Zelazny ( talk ) 07:46, 24 October 2024 (UTC) Not deleted I went ahead and merged the 2 items, and tweaked the labels and some statements accordingly. I see you already went ahead and changed wiki species, now it looks like the wikipedia articles also need moving? ·addshore· talk to me! 09:29, 24 October 2024 (UTC) Thanks, there is no Wikipedia article for Lydda australis . I created the page "Lydda (planthopper)" for the genus Lydda a few days ago, but it does not mention Lydda australia (a rare species) or Lydda aatralis . Lydda is also the ancient Greek name for the Israeli city of Lod and a redirect on Wikipedia leads to the article for that city. Bernhard Zelazny ( talk ) 12:00, 24 October 2024 (UTC)