###Instruction: Multi-class classification, answer with one of the labels:['no_consensus', 'delete', 'keep', 'comment', 'merge', 'redirect'] : ###Input:  Q54595346: Melodie Gore (Q54595346) : retired cosplayer and alternative model : ( delete | history | links | entity usage | logs ) First of all, she's not an adult actress as stated in the item. She made appearances in two alt porn films in non-sex roles and there are some nude photos can be found but this fact doesn't make her 'pornographic actress' in the general sense, so the item misleads the users. Among a minimal number of Google search results there are nothing that proves her notability in the sense of WD:N #2, all I can find on her is that she's just a alternative cosplay model, in short a next-door tattooed girl with ~4K subscribers at Facebook. The Commons category is the only thing that's justifying the existance of the item but everybody can upload there anything and categorize it. Wolverène ( talk ) 21:22, 27 December 2019 (UTC) Can be deleted if the Commonscat was deleted as well. Otherwise "structural need" due to the Commons infobox. — MisterSynergy ( talk ) 20:02, 15 March 2020 (UTC) Should this mean that items can be created about literally everyone who distinguished with Commons category with a Wikidata infobox? Such a fragile privilege, sounds like the infobox is a sort of 'indulgentia' for items for non-notable persons. -- Wolverène ( talk ) 05:57, 19 March 2020 (UTC) That has been discussed several times in the past two years roughly, and lots of Commons users have strongly lobbied for such an approach. I do not like it as well, as I think that the Commons project has a serious problem with promotional content and unsourced content which in turn spills to Wikidata as well, but this is how it is usually done currently. As a Wikidata admin, I am usually not going to file deletion requests for categories or files at Commons. However, if I think this should be done, I leave a note as above as a hint that someone else please does this. — MisterSynergy ( talk ) 20:10, 22 March 2020 (UTC) Should this mean that items can be created about literally everyone who distinguished with Commons category with a Wikidata infobox? Such a fragile privilege, sounds like the infobox is a sort of 'indulgentia' for items for non-notable persons. -- Wolverène ( talk ) 05:57, 19 March 2020 (UTC) That has been discussed several times in the past two years roughly, and lots of Commons users have strongly lobbied for such an approach. I do not like it as well, as I think that the Commons project has a serious problem with promotional content and unsourced content which in turn spills to Wikidata as well, but this is how it is usually done currently. As a Wikidata admin, I am usually not going to file deletion requests for categories or files at Commons. However, if I think this should be done, I leave a note as above as a hint that someone else please does this. — MisterSynergy ( talk ) 20:10, 22 March 2020 (UTC) That has been discussed several times in the past two years roughly, and lots of Commons users have strongly lobbied for such an approach. I do not like it as well, as I think that the Commons project has a serious problem with promotional content and unsourced content which in turn spills to Wikidata as well, but this is how it is usually done currently. As a Wikidata admin, I am usually not going to file deletion requests for categories or files at Commons. However, if I think this should be done, I leave a note as above as a hint that someone else please does this. — MisterSynergy ( talk ) 20:10, 22 March 2020 (UTC) On hold This item is linked from 1 other. — MisterSynergy ( talk ) 21:07, 16 May 2020 (UTC) There are on-going deletion processes for her images on Commons. If they're deleted, the category will be too. Esteban16 ( talk ) 17:23, 11 June 2020 (UTC) There are on-going deletion processes for her images on Commons. If they're deleted, the category will be too. Esteban16 ( talk ) 17:23, 11 June 2020 (UTC) Should this mean that items can be created about literally everyone who distinguished with Commons category with a Wikidata infobox? Such a fragile privilege, sounds like the infobox is a sort of 'indulgentia' for items for non-notable persons. -- Wolverène ( talk ) 05:57, 19 March 2020 (UTC) That has been discussed several times in the past two years roughly, and lots of Commons users have strongly lobbied for such an approach. I do not like it as well, as I think that the Commons project has a serious problem with promotional content and unsourced content which in turn spills to Wikidata as well, but this is how it is usually done currently. As a Wikidata admin, I am usually not going to file deletion requests for categories or files at Commons. However, if I think this should be done, I leave a note as above as a hint that someone else please does this. — MisterSynergy ( talk ) 20:10, 22 March 2020 (UTC) Not deleted ; they keep this content at Commons. —11:21, 2 September 2020 (UTC)