###Instruction: Multi-class classification, answer with one of the labels:['no_consensus', 'delete', 'keep', 'comment', 'merge', 'redirect'] : ###Input:  Q64852607: Q64852607 : no description : ( delete | history | links | entity usage | logs ) Does not meet the notability policy David ( talk ) 13:38, 19 October 2019 (UTC) Updated thoughts - After spending a few minutes on Google. I am not sure how most of his hits would fit into a Wikidata item. But I definitely think he has notability. Quakewoody ( talk ) 14:52, 19 October 2019 (UTC) Prior to the nomination, someone removed a few pieces of data from the item - including the reference to the Forbes article. I have since restored them and added a few more. Quakewoody ( talk ) 14:52, 19 October 2019 (UTC) Prior to the nomination, someone removed a few pieces of data from the item - including the reference to the Forbes article. I have since restored them and added a few more. Quakewoody ( talk ) 14:52, 19 October 2019 (UTC)