###Instruction: Multi-class classification, answer with one of the labels:['no_consensus', 'delete', 'keep', 'comment', 'merge', 'redirect'] : ###Input:  Q33820187: Marie-Pierre Vidonne (Q33820187) : researcher : ( delete | history | links | entity usage | logs ) Person requested not to have an item on Wikidata; is not linked to any other items. Spinster 💬 16:27, 15 September 2017 (UTC) @ Nomen ad hoc : Why was this created? Andy Mabbett ( Pigsonthewing ); Talk to Andy ; Andy's edits 19:15, 15 September 2017 (UTC) Hi there. I aimed to document about one of the figures of the project attempting to fill in the WP gender gap (see e. g. [1] ), while I though she matched the notability criterias (notably because of the several authority controls, whose I understood after a conversation with an experienced user they suffice). Nomen ad hoc ( talk ) 15:29, 16 September 2017 (UTC) . @ Spinster , Pigsonthewing , Nomen ad hoc : With the Bibliothèque nationale de France ID (P268) and IdRef ID (P269) identifiers she is notable according to WD:N . Did we ever have such a case before? Do we have other policies according to which we should delete/not delete such items? Wikipedias typically do not delete biographies upon the person’s request as far as I know. — MisterSynergy ( talk ) 06:13, 21 September 2017 (UTC) AFAICT, the only previous case is when an administrator deleted a bunch of items about speakers at a Wikimania, including himself, disregarding both objections from others, including their creator, and his own CoI. Clearly, that should not be regarded as a precedent. On en.WP, for example borderline notability cases may have articles about themselves deleted at their request, but clearly notable people cannot. Andy Mabbett ( Pigsonthewing ); Talk to Andy ; Andy's edits 14:52, 21 September 2017 (UTC) Hi there. I aimed to document about one of the figures of the project attempting to fill in the WP gender gap (see e. g. [1] ), while I though she matched the notability criterias (notably because of the several authority controls, whose I understood after a conversation with an experienced user they suffice). Nomen ad hoc ( talk ) 15:29, 16 September 2017 (UTC) . @ Spinster , Pigsonthewing , Nomen ad hoc : With the Bibliothèque nationale de France ID (P268) and IdRef ID (P269) identifiers she is notable according to WD:N . Did we ever have such a case before? Do we have other policies according to which we should delete/not delete such items? Wikipedias typically do not delete biographies upon the person’s request as far as I know. — MisterSynergy ( talk ) 06:13, 21 September 2017 (UTC) AFAICT, the only previous case is when an administrator deleted a bunch of items about speakers at a Wikimania, including himself, disregarding both objections from others, including their creator, and his own CoI. Clearly, that should not be regarded as a precedent. On en.WP, for example borderline notability cases may have articles about themselves deleted at their request, but clearly notable people cannot. Andy Mabbett ( Pigsonthewing ); Talk to Andy ; Andy's edits 14:52, 21 September 2017 (UTC) @ Spinster , Pigsonthewing , Nomen ad hoc : With the Bibliothèque nationale de France ID (P268) and IdRef ID (P269) identifiers she is notable according to WD:N . Did we ever have such a case before? Do we have other policies according to which we should delete/not delete such items? Wikipedias typically do not delete biographies upon the person’s request as far as I know. — MisterSynergy ( talk ) 06:13, 21 September 2017 (UTC) AFAICT, the only previous case is when an administrator deleted a bunch of items about speakers at a Wikimania, including himself, disregarding both objections from others, including their creator, and his own CoI. Clearly, that should not be regarded as a precedent. On en.WP, for example borderline notability cases may have articles about themselves deleted at their request, but clearly notable people cannot. Andy Mabbett ( Pigsonthewing ); Talk to Andy ; Andy's edits 14:52, 21 September 2017 (UTC) Hi there. I aimed to document about one of the figures of the project attempting to fill in the WP gender gap (see e. g. [1] ), while I though she matched the notability criterias (notably because of the several authority controls, whose I understood after a conversation with an experienced user they suffice). Nomen ad hoc ( talk ) 15:29, 16 September 2017 (UTC) . @ Spinster , Pigsonthewing , Nomen ad hoc : With the Bibliothèque nationale de France ID (P268) and IdRef ID (P269) identifiers she is notable according to WD:N . Did we ever have such a case before? Do we have other policies according to which we should delete/not delete such items? Wikipedias typically do not delete biographies upon the person’s request as far as I know. — MisterSynergy ( talk ) 06:13, 21 September 2017 (UTC) AFAICT, the only previous case is when an administrator deleted a bunch of items about speakers at a Wikimania, including himself, disregarding both objections from others, including their creator, and his own CoI. Clearly, that should not be regarded as a precedent. On en.WP, for example borderline notability cases may have articles about themselves deleted at their request, but clearly notable people cannot. Andy Mabbett ( Pigsonthewing ); Talk to Andy ; Andy's edits 14:52, 21 September 2017 (UTC) @ Spinster , Pigsonthewing , Nomen ad hoc : With the Bibliothèque nationale de France ID (P268) and IdRef ID (P269) identifiers she is notable according to WD:N . Did we ever have such a case before? Do we have other policies according to which we should delete/not delete such items? Wikipedias typically do not delete biographies upon the person’s request as far as I know. — MisterSynergy ( talk ) 06:13, 21 September 2017 (UTC) AFAICT, the only previous case is when an administrator deleted a bunch of items about speakers at a Wikimania, including himself, disregarding both objections from others, including their creator, and his own CoI. Clearly, that should not be regarded as a precedent. On en.WP, for example borderline notability cases may have articles about themselves deleted at their request, but clearly notable people cannot. Andy Mabbett ( Pigsonthewing ); Talk to Andy ; Andy's edits 14:52, 21 September 2017 (UTC) @ Spinster , Pigsonthewing , Nomen ad hoc : With the Bibliothèque nationale de France ID (P268) and IdRef ID (P269) identifiers she is notable according to WD:N . Did we ever have such a case before? Do we have other policies according to which we should delete/not delete such items? Wikipedias typically do not delete biographies upon the person’s request as far as I know. — MisterSynergy ( talk ) 06:13, 21 September 2017 (UTC) AFAICT, the only previous case is when an administrator deleted a bunch of items about speakers at a Wikimania, including himself, disregarding both objections from others, including their creator, and his own CoI. Clearly, that should not be regarded as a precedent. On en.WP, for example borderline notability cases may have articles about themselves deleted at their request, but clearly notable people cannot. Andy Mabbett ( Pigsonthewing ); Talk to Andy ; Andy's edits 14:52, 21 September 2017 (UTC) I have Deleted the item. Our deletion policy , still a draft/proposed policy, does not explicitly cover the case that has happened here: a subject requested deletion of the item about herself via User:Spinster , whom I trust to be known to the subject and whom I therefore deem eligible to nominate the item here. Besides other statements, the item contained two external identifiers Bibliothèque nationale de France ID (P268) and IdRef ID (P269) and two references with a web link to a newspaper, which made it formally notable according to #2 of our notability criteria . There were no sitelinks to any Wikimedia project (not notable according to #1), and the item was not in use by another item as well (no structural item according to #3). I followed User:Pigsonthewing ’s hint to English Wikipedia’s BLP page to find that other projects do permit deletion of such articles in certain cases. With the evaluation of notability as outlined above, I hereby rate the subject in question as “relatively unknown” due to the fact that it is not linked to other Wikidata content or Wikimedia projects. I use common sense according to Wikidata:Deletion policy#Deletion of items (Phase I) , 4th bullet point, in that I adopt for this case only the policy of English Wikipedia due to the lack of a local equivalent. In case one wants to contest this deletion, please feel free to show up on my talk page for further discussion. I suggest to have a project-wide discussion about the scenario of this case (subject requests deletion of the item about itself), to possibly expand our deletion policy (draft) by this aspect. I note that there are many cases which make a deletion impossible for sure. — MisterSynergy ( talk ) 18:49, 23 September 2017 (UTC) Deleted by MisterSynergy ( talk • contribs • logs ) -- DeltaBot ( talk ) 19:00, 23 September 2017 (UTC) Thank you. The person described in this item has indeed approached me in person (IRL), asking me to request deletion of her item. I did tell her that I expected there to be some discussion about this and that I could not guarantee her request to be honored. But I am happy on her behalf with the outcome. I also think that broader discussion about this, and perhaps a policy, might be a good idea, so I put a note here on the Deletion policy talk page . Feel free to chime in. Spinster 💬 19:19, 23 September 2017 (UTC) Thank you. A difficult case, but I think you made a good call. The lack of incoming links form other items is certainly sgnificant. Andy Mabbett ( Pigsonthewing ); Talk to Andy ; Andy's edits 19:45, 23 September 2017 (UTC) Thank you. The person described in this item has indeed approached me in person (IRL), asking me to request deletion of her item. I did tell her that I expected there to be some discussion about this and that I could not guarantee her request to be honored. But I am happy on her behalf with the outcome. I also think that broader discussion about this, and perhaps a policy, might be a good idea, so I put a note here on the Deletion policy talk page . Feel free to chime in. Spinster 💬 19:19, 23 September 2017 (UTC) Thank you. The person described in this item has indeed approached me in person (IRL), asking me to request deletion of her item. I did tell her that I expected there to be some discussion about this and that I could not guarantee her request to be honored. But I am happy on her behalf with the outcome. I also think that broader discussion about this, and perhaps a policy, might be a good idea, so I put a note here on the Deletion policy talk page . Feel free to chime in. Spinster 💬 19:19, 23 September 2017 (UTC)