###Instruction: Multi-class classification, answer with one of the labels:['no_consensus', 'delete', 'keep', 'comment', 'merge', 'redirect'] : ###Input:  Q20998273: Wiechert (Q20998273) : family name : ( delete | history | links | entity usage | logs ) Merged with Q396810 -- Agatino Catarella ( talk ) 07:52, 25 November 2015 (UTC) Not done Family name and disambiguation should not be merged. Unmerged them. Lymantria ( talk ) 08:44, 25 November 2015 (UTC) Disagree . This is no real article on a family name. Nothing on the family name etymology, geographical repartition, or on anything else. Nothing distinguishes it from a disambiguation page. I suggest changing it into a real disambiguation page like on all other WPs. From a reader's point of view, current situation makes the English version of "Wiechert" isolated from the other versions of "Wiechert". -- Agatino Catarella ( talk ) 08:49, 25 November 2015 (UTC) On hold @ Jura1 : Please comment. Lymantria ( talk ) 09:02, 25 November 2015 (UTC) The content of the page can change. If enwiki declares it to be a stub, not a disambiguation page, we accept that and link it accordingly. Otherwise, we would keep re-doing sitelinks all day. You could use LUA at enwiki to include interwikis from the other item. --- Jura 09:44, 25 November 2015 (UTC) I'm fine with that answer. I can't code in LUA and won't learn, Wikipedia must remain a hobby and not look like my work. I will just drop a note on WP:en article's discussion page suggesting to either rewrite the page or to duplicate it. Thanks Jura1 and Lymantria for your time. -- Agatino Catarella ( talk ) 10:06, 25 November 2015 (UTC) Not done then. Mbch331 ( talk ) 12:21, 25 November 2015 (UTC) Disagree . This is no real article on a family name. Nothing on the family name etymology, geographical repartition, or on anything else. Nothing distinguishes it from a disambiguation page. I suggest changing it into a real disambiguation page like on all other WPs. From a reader's point of view, current situation makes the English version of "Wiechert" isolated from the other versions of "Wiechert". -- Agatino Catarella ( talk ) 08:49, 25 November 2015 (UTC) On hold @ Jura1 : Please comment. Lymantria ( talk ) 09:02, 25 November 2015 (UTC) The content of the page can change. If enwiki declares it to be a stub, not a disambiguation page, we accept that and link it accordingly. Otherwise, we would keep re-doing sitelinks all day. You could use LUA at enwiki to include interwikis from the other item. --- Jura 09:44, 25 November 2015 (UTC) I'm fine with that answer. I can't code in LUA and won't learn, Wikipedia must remain a hobby and not look like my work. I will just drop a note on WP:en article's discussion page suggesting to either rewrite the page or to duplicate it. Thanks Jura1 and Lymantria for your time. -- Agatino Catarella ( talk ) 10:06, 25 November 2015 (UTC) Not done then. Mbch331 ( talk ) 12:21, 25 November 2015 (UTC) On hold @ Jura1 : Please comment. Lymantria ( talk ) 09:02, 25 November 2015 (UTC) The content of the page can change. If enwiki declares it to be a stub, not a disambiguation page, we accept that and link it accordingly. Otherwise, we would keep re-doing sitelinks all day. You could use LUA at enwiki to include interwikis from the other item. --- Jura 09:44, 25 November 2015 (UTC) I'm fine with that answer. I can't code in LUA and won't learn, Wikipedia must remain a hobby and not look like my work. I will just drop a note on WP:en article's discussion page suggesting to either rewrite the page or to duplicate it. Thanks Jura1 and Lymantria for your time. -- Agatino Catarella ( talk ) 10:06, 25 November 2015 (UTC) Not done then. Mbch331 ( talk ) 12:21, 25 November 2015 (UTC) The content of the page can change. If enwiki declares it to be a stub, not a disambiguation page, we accept that and link it accordingly. Otherwise, we would keep re-doing sitelinks all day. You could use LUA at enwiki to include interwikis from the other item. --- Jura 09:44, 25 November 2015 (UTC) I'm fine with that answer. I can't code in LUA and won't learn, Wikipedia must remain a hobby and not look like my work. I will just drop a note on WP:en article's discussion page suggesting to either rewrite the page or to duplicate it. Thanks Jura1 and Lymantria for your time. -- Agatino Catarella ( talk ) 10:06, 25 November 2015 (UTC) Not done then. Mbch331 ( talk ) 12:21, 25 November 2015 (UTC) I'm fine with that answer. I can't code in LUA and won't learn, Wikipedia must remain a hobby and not look like my work. I will just drop a note on WP:en article's discussion page suggesting to either rewrite the page or to duplicate it. Thanks Jura1 and Lymantria for your time. -- Agatino Catarella ( talk ) 10:06, 25 November 2015 (UTC) Not done then. Mbch331 ( talk ) 12:21, 25 November 2015 (UTC) Disagree . This is no real article on a family name. Nothing on the family name etymology, geographical repartition, or on anything else. Nothing distinguishes it from a disambiguation page. I suggest changing it into a real disambiguation page like on all other WPs. From a reader's point of view, current situation makes the English version of "Wiechert" isolated from the other versions of "Wiechert". -- Agatino Catarella ( talk ) 08:49, 25 November 2015 (UTC) On hold @ Jura1 : Please comment. Lymantria ( talk ) 09:02, 25 November 2015 (UTC) The content of the page can change. If enwiki declares it to be a stub, not a disambiguation page, we accept that and link it accordingly. Otherwise, we would keep re-doing sitelinks all day. You could use LUA at enwiki to include interwikis from the other item. --- Jura 09:44, 25 November 2015 (UTC) I'm fine with that answer. I can't code in LUA and won't learn, Wikipedia must remain a hobby and not look like my work. I will just drop a note on WP:en article's discussion page suggesting to either rewrite the page or to duplicate it. Thanks Jura1 and Lymantria for your time. -- Agatino Catarella ( talk ) 10:06, 25 November 2015 (UTC) Not done then. Mbch331 ( talk ) 12:21, 25 November 2015 (UTC) On hold @ Jura1 : Please comment. Lymantria ( talk ) 09:02, 25 November 2015 (UTC) The content of the page can change. If enwiki declares it to be a stub, not a disambiguation page, we accept that and link it accordingly. Otherwise, we would keep re-doing sitelinks all day. You could use LUA at enwiki to include interwikis from the other item. --- Jura 09:44, 25 November 2015 (UTC) I'm fine with that answer. I can't code in LUA and won't learn, Wikipedia must remain a hobby and not look like my work. I will just drop a note on WP:en article's discussion page suggesting to either rewrite the page or to duplicate it. Thanks Jura1 and Lymantria for your time. -- Agatino Catarella ( talk ) 10:06, 25 November 2015 (UTC) Not done then. Mbch331 ( talk ) 12:21, 25 November 2015 (UTC) The content of the page can change. If enwiki declares it to be a stub, not a disambiguation page, we accept that and link it accordingly. Otherwise, we would keep re-doing sitelinks all day. You could use LUA at enwiki to include interwikis from the other item. --- Jura 09:44, 25 November 2015 (UTC) I'm fine with that answer. I can't code in LUA and won't learn, Wikipedia must remain a hobby and not look like my work. I will just drop a note on WP:en article's discussion page suggesting to either rewrite the page or to duplicate it. Thanks Jura1 and Lymantria for your time. -- Agatino Catarella ( talk ) 10:06, 25 November 2015 (UTC) Not done then. Mbch331 ( talk ) 12:21, 25 November 2015 (UTC) I'm fine with that answer. I can't code in LUA and won't learn, Wikipedia must remain a hobby and not look like my work. I will just drop a note on WP:en article's discussion page suggesting to either rewrite the page or to duplicate it. Thanks Jura1 and Lymantria for your time. -- Agatino Catarella ( talk ) 10:06, 25 November 2015 (UTC) Not done then. Mbch331 ( talk ) 12:21, 25 November 2015 (UTC) On hold @ Jura1 : Please comment. Lymantria ( talk ) 09:02, 25 November 2015 (UTC) The content of the page can change. If enwiki declares it to be a stub, not a disambiguation page, we accept that and link it accordingly. Otherwise, we would keep re-doing sitelinks all day. You could use LUA at enwiki to include interwikis from the other item. --- Jura 09:44, 25 November 2015 (UTC) I'm fine with that answer. I can't code in LUA and won't learn, Wikipedia must remain a hobby and not look like my work. I will just drop a note on WP:en article's discussion page suggesting to either rewrite the page or to duplicate it. Thanks Jura1 and Lymantria for your time. -- Agatino Catarella ( talk ) 10:06, 25 November 2015 (UTC) Not done then. Mbch331 ( talk ) 12:21, 25 November 2015 (UTC) The content of the page can change. If enwiki declares it to be a stub, not a disambiguation page, we accept that and link it accordingly. Otherwise, we would keep re-doing sitelinks all day. You could use LUA at enwiki to include interwikis from the other item. --- Jura 09:44, 25 November 2015 (UTC) I'm fine with that answer. I can't code in LUA and won't learn, Wikipedia must remain a hobby and not look like my work. I will just drop a note on WP:en article's discussion page suggesting to either rewrite the page or to duplicate it. Thanks Jura1 and Lymantria for your time. -- Agatino Catarella ( talk ) 10:06, 25 November 2015 (UTC) Not done then. Mbch331 ( talk ) 12:21, 25 November 2015 (UTC) I'm fine with that answer. I can't code in LUA and won't learn, Wikipedia must remain a hobby and not look like my work. I will just drop a note on WP:en article's discussion page suggesting to either rewrite the page or to duplicate it. Thanks Jura1 and Lymantria for your time. -- Agatino Catarella ( talk ) 10:06, 25 November 2015 (UTC) Not done then. Mbch331 ( talk ) 12:21, 25 November 2015 (UTC) The content of the page can change. If enwiki declares it to be a stub, not a disambiguation page, we accept that and link it accordingly. Otherwise, we would keep re-doing sitelinks all day. You could use LUA at enwiki to include interwikis from the other item. --- Jura 09:44, 25 November 2015 (UTC) I'm fine with that answer. I can't code in LUA and won't learn, Wikipedia must remain a hobby and not look like my work. I will just drop a note on WP:en article's discussion page suggesting to either rewrite the page or to duplicate it. Thanks Jura1 and Lymantria for your time. -- Agatino Catarella ( talk ) 10:06, 25 November 2015 (UTC) Not done then. Mbch331 ( talk ) 12:21, 25 November 2015 (UTC) I'm fine with that answer. I can't code in LUA and won't learn, Wikipedia must remain a hobby and not look like my work. I will just drop a note on WP:en article's discussion page suggesting to either rewrite the page or to duplicate it. Thanks Jura1 and Lymantria for your time. -- Agatino Catarella ( talk ) 10:06, 25 November 2015 (UTC) Not done then. Mbch331 ( talk ) 12:21, 25 November 2015 (UTC) I'm fine with that answer. I can't code in LUA and won't learn, Wikipedia must remain a hobby and not look like my work. I will just drop a note on WP:en article's discussion page suggesting to either rewrite the page or to duplicate it. Thanks Jura1 and Lymantria for your time. -- Agatino Catarella ( talk ) 10:06, 25 November 2015 (UTC) Not done then. Mbch331 ( talk ) 12:21, 25 November 2015 (UTC)