###Instruction: Multi-class classification, answer with one of the labels:['no_consensus', 'delete', 'keep', 'comment', 'merge', 'redirect'] : ###Input:  Q63384701: list of awards and nominations received by Basshunter (Q63384701) : Wikimedia list article : ( delete | history | links | entity usage | logs | discussion ) Conflation: The enwiki sitelink should be on a separate item for the list, all statements should be on Q383541 . Once the split completed, this can be deleted. --- Jura 18:55, 1 February 2022 (UTC) On hold This item is linked from 2 others. -- DeltaBot ( talk ) 19:00, 1 February 2022 (UTC) Not all statements but just award received (P166) and nominated for (P1411) . And where is Q62098823 and Q66112460 ? Eurohunter ( talk ) 21:00, 1 February 2022 (UTC) Yes all but the ones that should go on the new item for the enwiki sitelink. The statements with already deleted values can remain. --- Jura 10:50, 2 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : It doesn't make any sense or you are not enough precise . This is item for "list of awards and nominations received by Basshunter" so where would you like to move ENWP link? And why only ENWP? There is PLWP link too so they both should be moved eventualy but there is no point in this. All what can be done here is to just move award received (P166) and nominated for (P1411) to Basshunter (Q383541) and remove Q62098823 and Q66112460 or restore them. Eurohunter ( talk ) 14:47, 2 February 2022 (UTC) The item is currently a conflation of a list and the item for artist. Once deletion is decided, I will to the necessary changes and create the new item. --- Jura 15:12, 2 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : But for this reason list of awards and nominations received by Basshunter (Q63384701) can't be deleted in any way - there is no point. If you want to move properties then use moveClaim.js. I have moved award received (P166) and nominated for (P1411) to Basshunter (Q383541) so it is Fixed . Eurohunter ( talk ) 14:22, 3 February 2022 (UTC) You forgot P18. It's still a conflation potentially misleading users, oddly listed as sample on Property:P2354 . Once the split complete, it can be deleted. --- Jura 14:53, 3 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : What do you mean about image (P18) ? This is main image used for this item, ilustration of this list so what is wrong? See first random discographies I found for example Falco discography (Q10087) , Miranda Cosgrove discography (Q13118) , Texas discography (Q125194) . What about has list (P2354) ? President of the French Republic (Q191954) Wikimedia list related to this subject: list of presidents of France (Q29580) same as Basshunter (Q383541) Wikimedia list related to this subject: list of awards and nominations received by Basshunter (Q63384701) , list of songs recorded by Basshunter (Q11761784) , list of Basshunter live performances (Q6352124) . " list related to this subject " right? What is wrong? Eurohunter ( talk ) 10:49, 6 February 2022 (UTC) The discussion is about a list of awards. The illustration doesn't represent that. The image would more appropriately be on the item for the artist. No need to duplicate. If there are other malformed lists about Basshunter, please fix them, but we don't need to discuss them here. --- Jura 10:59, 6 February 2022 (UTC) I finished the split: Q110825249 . --- Jura 11:21, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : First explain Falco discography (Q10087) , Miranda Cosgrove discography (Q13118) , Texas discography (Q125194) and thousands of other. This is image for infobox. What is the problem? This split was totally non-sense. Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:31, 6 February 2022 (UTC) You split off most statements to the item for the artist, not me. I thought you understood that you have be conflating items. --- Jura 12:34, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : This is not any "conflation" in anyway. How even you got that idea? There is no any logic in this. How? You are trying to do something weird. This is single item for list of awards and nominations received by Basshunter. What is the problem again. Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:37, 6 February 2022 (UTC) Please explain why you moved these statements from the item we are discussing here after it was listed for deletion. --- Jura 12:40, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : Maybe I miss understood you but you told that somehow award received (P166) and nominated for (P1411) are missleading so I thought you mean that they are dedicated for human (Q5) than Wikimedia list article (Q13406463) so I have moved them. Should I restore them? Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:45, 6 February 2022 (UTC) No. They are clearly statements that go on items for humans (or other awardees) and not on items for a link to a Wikipedia list. This is why I consider that the item conflats two concepts. --- Jura 12:50, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : So yes it was a issue which was fixed now and this is the same item for list just it is fixed now and due to it isn't any conflation (this is not archive - and we don't need information about edit history in main space - we could say that). Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:11, 6 February 2022 (UTC) As it was added as a sample item to has list (P2354) , we should do full cleanup for conflation: i.e. split the content into clean items. Otherwise people may be using the incorrect item for the concept they thought they had been using. If it wasn't a model item, we might have done differently. --- Jura 13:16, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : What do you mean? It was and it still is has list (P2354) so? There is some lists and they are has list (P2354) to each other. Isn't it how has list (P2354) works? Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:29, 6 February 2022 (UTC) A sample list should be of high quality, otherwise people who use it as a model end up doing not so high quality things. --- Jura 13:32, 6 February 2022 (UTC) Not all statements but just award received (P166) and nominated for (P1411) . And where is Q62098823 and Q66112460 ? Eurohunter ( talk ) 21:00, 1 February 2022 (UTC) Yes all but the ones that should go on the new item for the enwiki sitelink. The statements with already deleted values can remain. --- Jura 10:50, 2 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : It doesn't make any sense or you are not enough precise . This is item for "list of awards and nominations received by Basshunter" so where would you like to move ENWP link? And why only ENWP? There is PLWP link too so they both should be moved eventualy but there is no point in this. All what can be done here is to just move award received (P166) and nominated for (P1411) to Basshunter (Q383541) and remove Q62098823 and Q66112460 or restore them. Eurohunter ( talk ) 14:47, 2 February 2022 (UTC) The item is currently a conflation of a list and the item for artist. Once deletion is decided, I will to the necessary changes and create the new item. --- Jura 15:12, 2 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : But for this reason list of awards and nominations received by Basshunter (Q63384701) can't be deleted in any way - there is no point. If you want to move properties then use moveClaim.js. I have moved award received (P166) and nominated for (P1411) to Basshunter (Q383541) so it is Fixed . Eurohunter ( talk ) 14:22, 3 February 2022 (UTC) You forgot P18. It's still a conflation potentially misleading users, oddly listed as sample on Property:P2354 . Once the split complete, it can be deleted. --- Jura 14:53, 3 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : What do you mean about image (P18) ? This is main image used for this item, ilustration of this list so what is wrong? See first random discographies I found for example Falco discography (Q10087) , Miranda Cosgrove discography (Q13118) , Texas discography (Q125194) . What about has list (P2354) ? President of the French Republic (Q191954) Wikimedia list related to this subject: list of presidents of France (Q29580) same as Basshunter (Q383541) Wikimedia list related to this subject: list of awards and nominations received by Basshunter (Q63384701) , list of songs recorded by Basshunter (Q11761784) , list of Basshunter live performances (Q6352124) . " list related to this subject " right? What is wrong? Eurohunter ( talk ) 10:49, 6 February 2022 (UTC) The discussion is about a list of awards. The illustration doesn't represent that. The image would more appropriately be on the item for the artist. No need to duplicate. If there are other malformed lists about Basshunter, please fix them, but we don't need to discuss them here. --- Jura 10:59, 6 February 2022 (UTC) I finished the split: Q110825249 . --- Jura 11:21, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : First explain Falco discography (Q10087) , Miranda Cosgrove discography (Q13118) , Texas discography (Q125194) and thousands of other. This is image for infobox. What is the problem? This split was totally non-sense. Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:31, 6 February 2022 (UTC) You split off most statements to the item for the artist, not me. I thought you understood that you have be conflating items. --- Jura 12:34, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : This is not any "conflation" in anyway. How even you got that idea? There is no any logic in this. How? You are trying to do something weird. This is single item for list of awards and nominations received by Basshunter. What is the problem again. Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:37, 6 February 2022 (UTC) Please explain why you moved these statements from the item we are discussing here after it was listed for deletion. --- Jura 12:40, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : Maybe I miss understood you but you told that somehow award received (P166) and nominated for (P1411) are missleading so I thought you mean that they are dedicated for human (Q5) than Wikimedia list article (Q13406463) so I have moved them. Should I restore them? Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:45, 6 February 2022 (UTC) No. They are clearly statements that go on items for humans (or other awardees) and not on items for a link to a Wikipedia list. This is why I consider that the item conflats two concepts. --- Jura 12:50, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : So yes it was a issue which was fixed now and this is the same item for list just it is fixed now and due to it isn't any conflation (this is not archive - and we don't need information about edit history in main space - we could say that). Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:11, 6 February 2022 (UTC) As it was added as a sample item to has list (P2354) , we should do full cleanup for conflation: i.e. split the content into clean items. Otherwise people may be using the incorrect item for the concept they thought they had been using. If it wasn't a model item, we might have done differently. --- Jura 13:16, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : What do you mean? It was and it still is has list (P2354) so? There is some lists and they are has list (P2354) to each other. Isn't it how has list (P2354) works? Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:29, 6 February 2022 (UTC) A sample list should be of high quality, otherwise people who use it as a model end up doing not so high quality things. --- Jura 13:32, 6 February 2022 (UTC) Not all statements but just award received (P166) and nominated for (P1411) . And where is Q62098823 and Q66112460 ? Eurohunter ( talk ) 21:00, 1 February 2022 (UTC) Yes all but the ones that should go on the new item for the enwiki sitelink. The statements with already deleted values can remain. --- Jura 10:50, 2 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : It doesn't make any sense or you are not enough precise . This is item for "list of awards and nominations received by Basshunter" so where would you like to move ENWP link? And why only ENWP? There is PLWP link too so they both should be moved eventualy but there is no point in this. All what can be done here is to just move award received (P166) and nominated for (P1411) to Basshunter (Q383541) and remove Q62098823 and Q66112460 or restore them. Eurohunter ( talk ) 14:47, 2 February 2022 (UTC) The item is currently a conflation of a list and the item for artist. Once deletion is decided, I will to the necessary changes and create the new item. --- Jura 15:12, 2 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : But for this reason list of awards and nominations received by Basshunter (Q63384701) can't be deleted in any way - there is no point. If you want to move properties then use moveClaim.js. I have moved award received (P166) and nominated for (P1411) to Basshunter (Q383541) so it is Fixed . Eurohunter ( talk ) 14:22, 3 February 2022 (UTC) You forgot P18. It's still a conflation potentially misleading users, oddly listed as sample on Property:P2354 . Once the split complete, it can be deleted. --- Jura 14:53, 3 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : What do you mean about image (P18) ? This is main image used for this item, ilustration of this list so what is wrong? See first random discographies I found for example Falco discography (Q10087) , Miranda Cosgrove discography (Q13118) , Texas discography (Q125194) . What about has list (P2354) ? President of the French Republic (Q191954) Wikimedia list related to this subject: list of presidents of France (Q29580) same as Basshunter (Q383541) Wikimedia list related to this subject: list of awards and nominations received by Basshunter (Q63384701) , list of songs recorded by Basshunter (Q11761784) , list of Basshunter live performances (Q6352124) . " list related to this subject " right? What is wrong? Eurohunter ( talk ) 10:49, 6 February 2022 (UTC) The discussion is about a list of awards. The illustration doesn't represent that. The image would more appropriately be on the item for the artist. No need to duplicate. If there are other malformed lists about Basshunter, please fix them, but we don't need to discuss them here. --- Jura 10:59, 6 February 2022 (UTC) I finished the split: Q110825249 . --- Jura 11:21, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : First explain Falco discography (Q10087) , Miranda Cosgrove discography (Q13118) , Texas discography (Q125194) and thousands of other. This is image for infobox. What is the problem? This split was totally non-sense. Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:31, 6 February 2022 (UTC) You split off most statements to the item for the artist, not me. I thought you understood that you have be conflating items. --- Jura 12:34, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : This is not any "conflation" in anyway. How even you got that idea? There is no any logic in this. How? You are trying to do something weird. This is single item for list of awards and nominations received by Basshunter. What is the problem again. Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:37, 6 February 2022 (UTC) Please explain why you moved these statements from the item we are discussing here after it was listed for deletion. --- Jura 12:40, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : Maybe I miss understood you but you told that somehow award received (P166) and nominated for (P1411) are missleading so I thought you mean that they are dedicated for human (Q5) than Wikimedia list article (Q13406463) so I have moved them. Should I restore them? Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:45, 6 February 2022 (UTC) No. They are clearly statements that go on items for humans (or other awardees) and not on items for a link to a Wikipedia list. This is why I consider that the item conflats two concepts. --- Jura 12:50, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : So yes it was a issue which was fixed now and this is the same item for list just it is fixed now and due to it isn't any conflation (this is not archive - and we don't need information about edit history in main space - we could say that). Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:11, 6 February 2022 (UTC) As it was added as a sample item to has list (P2354) , we should do full cleanup for conflation: i.e. split the content into clean items. Otherwise people may be using the incorrect item for the concept they thought they had been using. If it wasn't a model item, we might have done differently. --- Jura 13:16, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : What do you mean? It was and it still is has list (P2354) so? There is some lists and they are has list (P2354) to each other. Isn't it how has list (P2354) works? Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:29, 6 February 2022 (UTC) A sample list should be of high quality, otherwise people who use it as a model end up doing not so high quality things. --- Jura 13:32, 6 February 2022 (UTC) Yes all but the ones that should go on the new item for the enwiki sitelink. The statements with already deleted values can remain. --- Jura 10:50, 2 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : It doesn't make any sense or you are not enough precise . This is item for "list of awards and nominations received by Basshunter" so where would you like to move ENWP link? And why only ENWP? There is PLWP link too so they both should be moved eventualy but there is no point in this. All what can be done here is to just move award received (P166) and nominated for (P1411) to Basshunter (Q383541) and remove Q62098823 and Q66112460 or restore them. Eurohunter ( talk ) 14:47, 2 February 2022 (UTC) The item is currently a conflation of a list and the item for artist. Once deletion is decided, I will to the necessary changes and create the new item. --- Jura 15:12, 2 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : But for this reason list of awards and nominations received by Basshunter (Q63384701) can't be deleted in any way - there is no point. If you want to move properties then use moveClaim.js. I have moved award received (P166) and nominated for (P1411) to Basshunter (Q383541) so it is Fixed . Eurohunter ( talk ) 14:22, 3 February 2022 (UTC) You forgot P18. It's still a conflation potentially misleading users, oddly listed as sample on Property:P2354 . Once the split complete, it can be deleted. --- Jura 14:53, 3 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : What do you mean about image (P18) ? This is main image used for this item, ilustration of this list so what is wrong? See first random discographies I found for example Falco discography (Q10087) , Miranda Cosgrove discography (Q13118) , Texas discography (Q125194) . What about has list (P2354) ? President of the French Republic (Q191954) Wikimedia list related to this subject: list of presidents of France (Q29580) same as Basshunter (Q383541) Wikimedia list related to this subject: list of awards and nominations received by Basshunter (Q63384701) , list of songs recorded by Basshunter (Q11761784) , list of Basshunter live performances (Q6352124) . " list related to this subject " right? What is wrong? Eurohunter ( talk ) 10:49, 6 February 2022 (UTC) The discussion is about a list of awards. The illustration doesn't represent that. The image would more appropriately be on the item for the artist. No need to duplicate. If there are other malformed lists about Basshunter, please fix them, but we don't need to discuss them here. --- Jura 10:59, 6 February 2022 (UTC) I finished the split: Q110825249 . --- Jura 11:21, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : First explain Falco discography (Q10087) , Miranda Cosgrove discography (Q13118) , Texas discography (Q125194) and thousands of other. This is image for infobox. What is the problem? This split was totally non-sense. Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:31, 6 February 2022 (UTC) You split off most statements to the item for the artist, not me. I thought you understood that you have be conflating items. --- Jura 12:34, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : This is not any "conflation" in anyway. How even you got that idea? There is no any logic in this. How? You are trying to do something weird. This is single item for list of awards and nominations received by Basshunter. What is the problem again. Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:37, 6 February 2022 (UTC) Please explain why you moved these statements from the item we are discussing here after it was listed for deletion. --- Jura 12:40, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : Maybe I miss understood you but you told that somehow award received (P166) and nominated for (P1411) are missleading so I thought you mean that they are dedicated for human (Q5) than Wikimedia list article (Q13406463) so I have moved them. Should I restore them? Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:45, 6 February 2022 (UTC) No. They are clearly statements that go on items for humans (or other awardees) and not on items for a link to a Wikipedia list. This is why I consider that the item conflats two concepts. --- Jura 12:50, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : So yes it was a issue which was fixed now and this is the same item for list just it is fixed now and due to it isn't any conflation (this is not archive - and we don't need information about edit history in main space - we could say that). Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:11, 6 February 2022 (UTC) As it was added as a sample item to has list (P2354) , we should do full cleanup for conflation: i.e. split the content into clean items. Otherwise people may be using the incorrect item for the concept they thought they had been using. If it wasn't a model item, we might have done differently. --- Jura 13:16, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : What do you mean? It was and it still is has list (P2354) so? There is some lists and they are has list (P2354) to each other. Isn't it how has list (P2354) works? Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:29, 6 February 2022 (UTC) A sample list should be of high quality, otherwise people who use it as a model end up doing not so high quality things. --- Jura 13:32, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : It doesn't make any sense or you are not enough precise . This is item for "list of awards and nominations received by Basshunter" so where would you like to move ENWP link? And why only ENWP? There is PLWP link too so they both should be moved eventualy but there is no point in this. All what can be done here is to just move award received (P166) and nominated for (P1411) to Basshunter (Q383541) and remove Q62098823 and Q66112460 or restore them. Eurohunter ( talk ) 14:47, 2 February 2022 (UTC) The item is currently a conflation of a list and the item for artist. Once deletion is decided, I will to the necessary changes and create the new item. --- Jura 15:12, 2 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : But for this reason list of awards and nominations received by Basshunter (Q63384701) can't be deleted in any way - there is no point. If you want to move properties then use moveClaim.js. I have moved award received (P166) and nominated for (P1411) to Basshunter (Q383541) so it is Fixed . Eurohunter ( talk ) 14:22, 3 February 2022 (UTC) You forgot P18. It's still a conflation potentially misleading users, oddly listed as sample on Property:P2354 . Once the split complete, it can be deleted. --- Jura 14:53, 3 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : What do you mean about image (P18) ? This is main image used for this item, ilustration of this list so what is wrong? See first random discographies I found for example Falco discography (Q10087) , Miranda Cosgrove discography (Q13118) , Texas discography (Q125194) . What about has list (P2354) ? President of the French Republic (Q191954) Wikimedia list related to this subject: list of presidents of France (Q29580) same as Basshunter (Q383541) Wikimedia list related to this subject: list of awards and nominations received by Basshunter (Q63384701) , list of songs recorded by Basshunter (Q11761784) , list of Basshunter live performances (Q6352124) . " list related to this subject " right? What is wrong? Eurohunter ( talk ) 10:49, 6 February 2022 (UTC) The discussion is about a list of awards. The illustration doesn't represent that. The image would more appropriately be on the item for the artist. No need to duplicate. If there are other malformed lists about Basshunter, please fix them, but we don't need to discuss them here. --- Jura 10:59, 6 February 2022 (UTC) I finished the split: Q110825249 . --- Jura 11:21, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : First explain Falco discography (Q10087) , Miranda Cosgrove discography (Q13118) , Texas discography (Q125194) and thousands of other. This is image for infobox. What is the problem? This split was totally non-sense. Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:31, 6 February 2022 (UTC) You split off most statements to the item for the artist, not me. I thought you understood that you have be conflating items. --- Jura 12:34, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : This is not any "conflation" in anyway. How even you got that idea? There is no any logic in this. How? You are trying to do something weird. This is single item for list of awards and nominations received by Basshunter. What is the problem again. Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:37, 6 February 2022 (UTC) Please explain why you moved these statements from the item we are discussing here after it was listed for deletion. --- Jura 12:40, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : Maybe I miss understood you but you told that somehow award received (P166) and nominated for (P1411) are missleading so I thought you mean that they are dedicated for human (Q5) than Wikimedia list article (Q13406463) so I have moved them. Should I restore them? Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:45, 6 February 2022 (UTC) No. They are clearly statements that go on items for humans (or other awardees) and not on items for a link to a Wikipedia list. This is why I consider that the item conflats two concepts. --- Jura 12:50, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : So yes it was a issue which was fixed now and this is the same item for list just it is fixed now and due to it isn't any conflation (this is not archive - and we don't need information about edit history in main space - we could say that). Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:11, 6 February 2022 (UTC) As it was added as a sample item to has list (P2354) , we should do full cleanup for conflation: i.e. split the content into clean items. Otherwise people may be using the incorrect item for the concept they thought they had been using. If it wasn't a model item, we might have done differently. --- Jura 13:16, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : What do you mean? It was and it still is has list (P2354) so? There is some lists and they are has list (P2354) to each other. Isn't it how has list (P2354) works? Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:29, 6 February 2022 (UTC) A sample list should be of high quality, otherwise people who use it as a model end up doing not so high quality things. --- Jura 13:32, 6 February 2022 (UTC) The item is currently a conflation of a list and the item for artist. Once deletion is decided, I will to the necessary changes and create the new item. --- Jura 15:12, 2 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : But for this reason list of awards and nominations received by Basshunter (Q63384701) can't be deleted in any way - there is no point. If you want to move properties then use moveClaim.js. I have moved award received (P166) and nominated for (P1411) to Basshunter (Q383541) so it is Fixed . Eurohunter ( talk ) 14:22, 3 February 2022 (UTC) You forgot P18. It's still a conflation potentially misleading users, oddly listed as sample on Property:P2354 . Once the split complete, it can be deleted. --- Jura 14:53, 3 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : What do you mean about image (P18) ? This is main image used for this item, ilustration of this list so what is wrong? See first random discographies I found for example Falco discography (Q10087) , Miranda Cosgrove discography (Q13118) , Texas discography (Q125194) . What about has list (P2354) ? President of the French Republic (Q191954) Wikimedia list related to this subject: list of presidents of France (Q29580) same as Basshunter (Q383541) Wikimedia list related to this subject: list of awards and nominations received by Basshunter (Q63384701) , list of songs recorded by Basshunter (Q11761784) , list of Basshunter live performances (Q6352124) . " list related to this subject " right? What is wrong? Eurohunter ( talk ) 10:49, 6 February 2022 (UTC) The discussion is about a list of awards. The illustration doesn't represent that. The image would more appropriately be on the item for the artist. No need to duplicate. If there are other malformed lists about Basshunter, please fix them, but we don't need to discuss them here. --- Jura 10:59, 6 February 2022 (UTC) I finished the split: Q110825249 . --- Jura 11:21, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : First explain Falco discography (Q10087) , Miranda Cosgrove discography (Q13118) , Texas discography (Q125194) and thousands of other. This is image for infobox. What is the problem? This split was totally non-sense. Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:31, 6 February 2022 (UTC) You split off most statements to the item for the artist, not me. I thought you understood that you have be conflating items. --- Jura 12:34, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : This is not any "conflation" in anyway. How even you got that idea? There is no any logic in this. How? You are trying to do something weird. This is single item for list of awards and nominations received by Basshunter. What is the problem again. Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:37, 6 February 2022 (UTC) Please explain why you moved these statements from the item we are discussing here after it was listed for deletion. --- Jura 12:40, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : Maybe I miss understood you but you told that somehow award received (P166) and nominated for (P1411) are missleading so I thought you mean that they are dedicated for human (Q5) than Wikimedia list article (Q13406463) so I have moved them. Should I restore them? Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:45, 6 February 2022 (UTC) No. They are clearly statements that go on items for humans (or other awardees) and not on items for a link to a Wikipedia list. This is why I consider that the item conflats two concepts. --- Jura 12:50, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : So yes it was a issue which was fixed now and this is the same item for list just it is fixed now and due to it isn't any conflation (this is not archive - and we don't need information about edit history in main space - we could say that). Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:11, 6 February 2022 (UTC) As it was added as a sample item to has list (P2354) , we should do full cleanup for conflation: i.e. split the content into clean items. Otherwise people may be using the incorrect item for the concept they thought they had been using. If it wasn't a model item, we might have done differently. --- Jura 13:16, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : What do you mean? It was and it still is has list (P2354) so? There is some lists and they are has list (P2354) to each other. Isn't it how has list (P2354) works? Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:29, 6 February 2022 (UTC) A sample list should be of high quality, otherwise people who use it as a model end up doing not so high quality things. --- Jura 13:32, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : But for this reason list of awards and nominations received by Basshunter (Q63384701) can't be deleted in any way - there is no point. If you want to move properties then use moveClaim.js. I have moved award received (P166) and nominated for (P1411) to Basshunter (Q383541) so it is Fixed . Eurohunter ( talk ) 14:22, 3 February 2022 (UTC) You forgot P18. It's still a conflation potentially misleading users, oddly listed as sample on Property:P2354 . Once the split complete, it can be deleted. --- Jura 14:53, 3 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : What do you mean about image (P18) ? This is main image used for this item, ilustration of this list so what is wrong? See first random discographies I found for example Falco discography (Q10087) , Miranda Cosgrove discography (Q13118) , Texas discography (Q125194) . What about has list (P2354) ? President of the French Republic (Q191954) Wikimedia list related to this subject: list of presidents of France (Q29580) same as Basshunter (Q383541) Wikimedia list related to this subject: list of awards and nominations received by Basshunter (Q63384701) , list of songs recorded by Basshunter (Q11761784) , list of Basshunter live performances (Q6352124) . " list related to this subject " right? What is wrong? Eurohunter ( talk ) 10:49, 6 February 2022 (UTC) The discussion is about a list of awards. The illustration doesn't represent that. The image would more appropriately be on the item for the artist. No need to duplicate. If there are other malformed lists about Basshunter, please fix them, but we don't need to discuss them here. --- Jura 10:59, 6 February 2022 (UTC) I finished the split: Q110825249 . --- Jura 11:21, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : First explain Falco discography (Q10087) , Miranda Cosgrove discography (Q13118) , Texas discography (Q125194) and thousands of other. This is image for infobox. What is the problem? This split was totally non-sense. Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:31, 6 February 2022 (UTC) You split off most statements to the item for the artist, not me. I thought you understood that you have be conflating items. --- Jura 12:34, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : This is not any "conflation" in anyway. How even you got that idea? There is no any logic in this. How? You are trying to do something weird. This is single item for list of awards and nominations received by Basshunter. What is the problem again. Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:37, 6 February 2022 (UTC) Please explain why you moved these statements from the item we are discussing here after it was listed for deletion. --- Jura 12:40, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : Maybe I miss understood you but you told that somehow award received (P166) and nominated for (P1411) are missleading so I thought you mean that they are dedicated for human (Q5) than Wikimedia list article (Q13406463) so I have moved them. Should I restore them? Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:45, 6 February 2022 (UTC) No. They are clearly statements that go on items for humans (or other awardees) and not on items for a link to a Wikipedia list. This is why I consider that the item conflats two concepts. --- Jura 12:50, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : So yes it was a issue which was fixed now and this is the same item for list just it is fixed now and due to it isn't any conflation (this is not archive - and we don't need information about edit history in main space - we could say that). Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:11, 6 February 2022 (UTC) As it was added as a sample item to has list (P2354) , we should do full cleanup for conflation: i.e. split the content into clean items. Otherwise people may be using the incorrect item for the concept they thought they had been using. If it wasn't a model item, we might have done differently. --- Jura 13:16, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : What do you mean? It was and it still is has list (P2354) so? There is some lists and they are has list (P2354) to each other. Isn't it how has list (P2354) works? Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:29, 6 February 2022 (UTC) A sample list should be of high quality, otherwise people who use it as a model end up doing not so high quality things. --- Jura 13:32, 6 February 2022 (UTC) You forgot P18. It's still a conflation potentially misleading users, oddly listed as sample on Property:P2354 . Once the split complete, it can be deleted. --- Jura 14:53, 3 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : What do you mean about image (P18) ? This is main image used for this item, ilustration of this list so what is wrong? See first random discographies I found for example Falco discography (Q10087) , Miranda Cosgrove discography (Q13118) , Texas discography (Q125194) . What about has list (P2354) ? President of the French Republic (Q191954) Wikimedia list related to this subject: list of presidents of France (Q29580) same as Basshunter (Q383541) Wikimedia list related to this subject: list of awards and nominations received by Basshunter (Q63384701) , list of songs recorded by Basshunter (Q11761784) , list of Basshunter live performances (Q6352124) . " list related to this subject " right? What is wrong? Eurohunter ( talk ) 10:49, 6 February 2022 (UTC) The discussion is about a list of awards. The illustration doesn't represent that. The image would more appropriately be on the item for the artist. No need to duplicate. If there are other malformed lists about Basshunter, please fix them, but we don't need to discuss them here. --- Jura 10:59, 6 February 2022 (UTC) I finished the split: Q110825249 . --- Jura 11:21, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : First explain Falco discography (Q10087) , Miranda Cosgrove discography (Q13118) , Texas discography (Q125194) and thousands of other. This is image for infobox. What is the problem? This split was totally non-sense. Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:31, 6 February 2022 (UTC) You split off most statements to the item for the artist, not me. I thought you understood that you have be conflating items. --- Jura 12:34, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : This is not any "conflation" in anyway. How even you got that idea? There is no any logic in this. How? You are trying to do something weird. This is single item for list of awards and nominations received by Basshunter. What is the problem again. Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:37, 6 February 2022 (UTC) Please explain why you moved these statements from the item we are discussing here after it was listed for deletion. --- Jura 12:40, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : Maybe I miss understood you but you told that somehow award received (P166) and nominated for (P1411) are missleading so I thought you mean that they are dedicated for human (Q5) than Wikimedia list article (Q13406463) so I have moved them. Should I restore them? Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:45, 6 February 2022 (UTC) No. They are clearly statements that go on items for humans (or other awardees) and not on items for a link to a Wikipedia list. This is why I consider that the item conflats two concepts. --- Jura 12:50, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : So yes it was a issue which was fixed now and this is the same item for list just it is fixed now and due to it isn't any conflation (this is not archive - and we don't need information about edit history in main space - we could say that). Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:11, 6 February 2022 (UTC) As it was added as a sample item to has list (P2354) , we should do full cleanup for conflation: i.e. split the content into clean items. Otherwise people may be using the incorrect item for the concept they thought they had been using. If it wasn't a model item, we might have done differently. --- Jura 13:16, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : What do you mean? It was and it still is has list (P2354) so? There is some lists and they are has list (P2354) to each other. Isn't it how has list (P2354) works? Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:29, 6 February 2022 (UTC) A sample list should be of high quality, otherwise people who use it as a model end up doing not so high quality things. --- Jura 13:32, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : What do you mean about image (P18) ? This is main image used for this item, ilustration of this list so what is wrong? See first random discographies I found for example Falco discography (Q10087) , Miranda Cosgrove discography (Q13118) , Texas discography (Q125194) . What about has list (P2354) ? President of the French Republic (Q191954) Wikimedia list related to this subject: list of presidents of France (Q29580) same as Basshunter (Q383541) Wikimedia list related to this subject: list of awards and nominations received by Basshunter (Q63384701) , list of songs recorded by Basshunter (Q11761784) , list of Basshunter live performances (Q6352124) . " list related to this subject " right? What is wrong? Eurohunter ( talk ) 10:49, 6 February 2022 (UTC) The discussion is about a list of awards. The illustration doesn't represent that. The image would more appropriately be on the item for the artist. No need to duplicate. If there are other malformed lists about Basshunter, please fix them, but we don't need to discuss them here. --- Jura 10:59, 6 February 2022 (UTC) I finished the split: Q110825249 . --- Jura 11:21, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : First explain Falco discography (Q10087) , Miranda Cosgrove discography (Q13118) , Texas discography (Q125194) and thousands of other. This is image for infobox. What is the problem? This split was totally non-sense. Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:31, 6 February 2022 (UTC) You split off most statements to the item for the artist, not me. I thought you understood that you have be conflating items. --- Jura 12:34, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : This is not any "conflation" in anyway. How even you got that idea? There is no any logic in this. How? You are trying to do something weird. This is single item for list of awards and nominations received by Basshunter. What is the problem again. Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:37, 6 February 2022 (UTC) Please explain why you moved these statements from the item we are discussing here after it was listed for deletion. --- Jura 12:40, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : Maybe I miss understood you but you told that somehow award received (P166) and nominated for (P1411) are missleading so I thought you mean that they are dedicated for human (Q5) than Wikimedia list article (Q13406463) so I have moved them. Should I restore them? Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:45, 6 February 2022 (UTC) No. They are clearly statements that go on items for humans (or other awardees) and not on items for a link to a Wikipedia list. This is why I consider that the item conflats two concepts. --- Jura 12:50, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : So yes it was a issue which was fixed now and this is the same item for list just it is fixed now and due to it isn't any conflation (this is not archive - and we don't need information about edit history in main space - we could say that). Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:11, 6 February 2022 (UTC) As it was added as a sample item to has list (P2354) , we should do full cleanup for conflation: i.e. split the content into clean items. Otherwise people may be using the incorrect item for the concept they thought they had been using. If it wasn't a model item, we might have done differently. --- Jura 13:16, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : What do you mean? It was and it still is has list (P2354) so? There is some lists and they are has list (P2354) to each other. Isn't it how has list (P2354) works? Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:29, 6 February 2022 (UTC) A sample list should be of high quality, otherwise people who use it as a model end up doing not so high quality things. --- Jura 13:32, 6 February 2022 (UTC) The discussion is about a list of awards. The illustration doesn't represent that. The image would more appropriately be on the item for the artist. No need to duplicate. If there are other malformed lists about Basshunter, please fix them, but we don't need to discuss them here. --- Jura 10:59, 6 February 2022 (UTC) I finished the split: Q110825249 . --- Jura 11:21, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : First explain Falco discography (Q10087) , Miranda Cosgrove discography (Q13118) , Texas discography (Q125194) and thousands of other. This is image for infobox. What is the problem? This split was totally non-sense. Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:31, 6 February 2022 (UTC) You split off most statements to the item for the artist, not me. I thought you understood that you have be conflating items. --- Jura 12:34, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : This is not any "conflation" in anyway. How even you got that idea? There is no any logic in this. How? You are trying to do something weird. This is single item for list of awards and nominations received by Basshunter. What is the problem again. Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:37, 6 February 2022 (UTC) Please explain why you moved these statements from the item we are discussing here after it was listed for deletion. --- Jura 12:40, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : Maybe I miss understood you but you told that somehow award received (P166) and nominated for (P1411) are missleading so I thought you mean that they are dedicated for human (Q5) than Wikimedia list article (Q13406463) so I have moved them. Should I restore them? Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:45, 6 February 2022 (UTC) No. They are clearly statements that go on items for humans (or other awardees) and not on items for a link to a Wikipedia list. This is why I consider that the item conflats two concepts. --- Jura 12:50, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : So yes it was a issue which was fixed now and this is the same item for list just it is fixed now and due to it isn't any conflation (this is not archive - and we don't need information about edit history in main space - we could say that). Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:11, 6 February 2022 (UTC) As it was added as a sample item to has list (P2354) , we should do full cleanup for conflation: i.e. split the content into clean items. Otherwise people may be using the incorrect item for the concept they thought they had been using. If it wasn't a model item, we might have done differently. --- Jura 13:16, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : What do you mean? It was and it still is has list (P2354) so? There is some lists and they are has list (P2354) to each other. Isn't it how has list (P2354) works? Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:29, 6 February 2022 (UTC) A sample list should be of high quality, otherwise people who use it as a model end up doing not so high quality things. --- Jura 13:32, 6 February 2022 (UTC) I finished the split: Q110825249 . --- Jura 11:21, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : First explain Falco discography (Q10087) , Miranda Cosgrove discography (Q13118) , Texas discography (Q125194) and thousands of other. This is image for infobox. What is the problem? This split was totally non-sense. Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:31, 6 February 2022 (UTC) You split off most statements to the item for the artist, not me. I thought you understood that you have be conflating items. --- Jura 12:34, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : This is not any "conflation" in anyway. How even you got that idea? There is no any logic in this. How? You are trying to do something weird. This is single item for list of awards and nominations received by Basshunter. What is the problem again. Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:37, 6 February 2022 (UTC) Please explain why you moved these statements from the item we are discussing here after it was listed for deletion. --- Jura 12:40, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : Maybe I miss understood you but you told that somehow award received (P166) and nominated for (P1411) are missleading so I thought you mean that they are dedicated for human (Q5) than Wikimedia list article (Q13406463) so I have moved them. Should I restore them? Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:45, 6 February 2022 (UTC) No. They are clearly statements that go on items for humans (or other awardees) and not on items for a link to a Wikipedia list. This is why I consider that the item conflats two concepts. --- Jura 12:50, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : So yes it was a issue which was fixed now and this is the same item for list just it is fixed now and due to it isn't any conflation (this is not archive - and we don't need information about edit history in main space - we could say that). Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:11, 6 February 2022 (UTC) As it was added as a sample item to has list (P2354) , we should do full cleanup for conflation: i.e. split the content into clean items. Otherwise people may be using the incorrect item for the concept they thought they had been using. If it wasn't a model item, we might have done differently. --- Jura 13:16, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : What do you mean? It was and it still is has list (P2354) so? There is some lists and they are has list (P2354) to each other. Isn't it how has list (P2354) works? Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:29, 6 February 2022 (UTC) A sample list should be of high quality, otherwise people who use it as a model end up doing not so high quality things. --- Jura 13:32, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : First explain Falco discography (Q10087) , Miranda Cosgrove discography (Q13118) , Texas discography (Q125194) and thousands of other. This is image for infobox. What is the problem? This split was totally non-sense. Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:31, 6 February 2022 (UTC) You split off most statements to the item for the artist, not me. I thought you understood that you have be conflating items. --- Jura 12:34, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : This is not any "conflation" in anyway. How even you got that idea? There is no any logic in this. How? You are trying to do something weird. This is single item for list of awards and nominations received by Basshunter. What is the problem again. Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:37, 6 February 2022 (UTC) Please explain why you moved these statements from the item we are discussing here after it was listed for deletion. --- Jura 12:40, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : Maybe I miss understood you but you told that somehow award received (P166) and nominated for (P1411) are missleading so I thought you mean that they are dedicated for human (Q5) than Wikimedia list article (Q13406463) so I have moved them. Should I restore them? Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:45, 6 February 2022 (UTC) No. They are clearly statements that go on items for humans (or other awardees) and not on items for a link to a Wikipedia list. This is why I consider that the item conflats two concepts. --- Jura 12:50, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : So yes it was a issue which was fixed now and this is the same item for list just it is fixed now and due to it isn't any conflation (this is not archive - and we don't need information about edit history in main space - we could say that). Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:11, 6 February 2022 (UTC) As it was added as a sample item to has list (P2354) , we should do full cleanup for conflation: i.e. split the content into clean items. Otherwise people may be using the incorrect item for the concept they thought they had been using. If it wasn't a model item, we might have done differently. --- Jura 13:16, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : What do you mean? It was and it still is has list (P2354) so? There is some lists and they are has list (P2354) to each other. Isn't it how has list (P2354) works? Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:29, 6 February 2022 (UTC) A sample list should be of high quality, otherwise people who use it as a model end up doing not so high quality things. --- Jura 13:32, 6 February 2022 (UTC) You split off most statements to the item for the artist, not me. I thought you understood that you have be conflating items. --- Jura 12:34, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : This is not any "conflation" in anyway. How even you got that idea? There is no any logic in this. How? You are trying to do something weird. This is single item for list of awards and nominations received by Basshunter. What is the problem again. Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:37, 6 February 2022 (UTC) Please explain why you moved these statements from the item we are discussing here after it was listed for deletion. --- Jura 12:40, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : Maybe I miss understood you but you told that somehow award received (P166) and nominated for (P1411) are missleading so I thought you mean that they are dedicated for human (Q5) than Wikimedia list article (Q13406463) so I have moved them. Should I restore them? Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:45, 6 February 2022 (UTC) No. They are clearly statements that go on items for humans (or other awardees) and not on items for a link to a Wikipedia list. This is why I consider that the item conflats two concepts. --- Jura 12:50, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : So yes it was a issue which was fixed now and this is the same item for list just it is fixed now and due to it isn't any conflation (this is not archive - and we don't need information about edit history in main space - we could say that). Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:11, 6 February 2022 (UTC) As it was added as a sample item to has list (P2354) , we should do full cleanup for conflation: i.e. split the content into clean items. Otherwise people may be using the incorrect item for the concept they thought they had been using. If it wasn't a model item, we might have done differently. --- Jura 13:16, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : What do you mean? It was and it still is has list (P2354) so? There is some lists and they are has list (P2354) to each other. Isn't it how has list (P2354) works? Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:29, 6 February 2022 (UTC) A sample list should be of high quality, otherwise people who use it as a model end up doing not so high quality things. --- Jura 13:32, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : This is not any "conflation" in anyway. How even you got that idea? There is no any logic in this. How? You are trying to do something weird. This is single item for list of awards and nominations received by Basshunter. What is the problem again. Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:37, 6 February 2022 (UTC) Please explain why you moved these statements from the item we are discussing here after it was listed for deletion. --- Jura 12:40, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : Maybe I miss understood you but you told that somehow award received (P166) and nominated for (P1411) are missleading so I thought you mean that they are dedicated for human (Q5) than Wikimedia list article (Q13406463) so I have moved them. Should I restore them? Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:45, 6 February 2022 (UTC) No. They are clearly statements that go on items for humans (or other awardees) and not on items for a link to a Wikipedia list. This is why I consider that the item conflats two concepts. --- Jura 12:50, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : So yes it was a issue which was fixed now and this is the same item for list just it is fixed now and due to it isn't any conflation (this is not archive - and we don't need information about edit history in main space - we could say that). Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:11, 6 February 2022 (UTC) As it was added as a sample item to has list (P2354) , we should do full cleanup for conflation: i.e. split the content into clean items. Otherwise people may be using the incorrect item for the concept they thought they had been using. If it wasn't a model item, we might have done differently. --- Jura 13:16, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : What do you mean? It was and it still is has list (P2354) so? There is some lists and they are has list (P2354) to each other. Isn't it how has list (P2354) works? Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:29, 6 February 2022 (UTC) A sample list should be of high quality, otherwise people who use it as a model end up doing not so high quality things. --- Jura 13:32, 6 February 2022 (UTC) Please explain why you moved these statements from the item we are discussing here after it was listed for deletion. --- Jura 12:40, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : Maybe I miss understood you but you told that somehow award received (P166) and nominated for (P1411) are missleading so I thought you mean that they are dedicated for human (Q5) than Wikimedia list article (Q13406463) so I have moved them. Should I restore them? Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:45, 6 February 2022 (UTC) No. They are clearly statements that go on items for humans (or other awardees) and not on items for a link to a Wikipedia list. This is why I consider that the item conflats two concepts. --- Jura 12:50, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : So yes it was a issue which was fixed now and this is the same item for list just it is fixed now and due to it isn't any conflation (this is not archive - and we don't need information about edit history in main space - we could say that). Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:11, 6 February 2022 (UTC) As it was added as a sample item to has list (P2354) , we should do full cleanup for conflation: i.e. split the content into clean items. Otherwise people may be using the incorrect item for the concept they thought they had been using. If it wasn't a model item, we might have done differently. --- Jura 13:16, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : What do you mean? It was and it still is has list (P2354) so? There is some lists and they are has list (P2354) to each other. Isn't it how has list (P2354) works? Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:29, 6 February 2022 (UTC) A sample list should be of high quality, otherwise people who use it as a model end up doing not so high quality things. --- Jura 13:32, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : Maybe I miss understood you but you told that somehow award received (P166) and nominated for (P1411) are missleading so I thought you mean that they are dedicated for human (Q5) than Wikimedia list article (Q13406463) so I have moved them. Should I restore them? Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:45, 6 February 2022 (UTC) No. They are clearly statements that go on items for humans (or other awardees) and not on items for a link to a Wikipedia list. This is why I consider that the item conflats two concepts. --- Jura 12:50, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : So yes it was a issue which was fixed now and this is the same item for list just it is fixed now and due to it isn't any conflation (this is not archive - and we don't need information about edit history in main space - we could say that). Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:11, 6 February 2022 (UTC) As it was added as a sample item to has list (P2354) , we should do full cleanup for conflation: i.e. split the content into clean items. Otherwise people may be using the incorrect item for the concept they thought they had been using. If it wasn't a model item, we might have done differently. --- Jura 13:16, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : What do you mean? It was and it still is has list (P2354) so? There is some lists and they are has list (P2354) to each other. Isn't it how has list (P2354) works? Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:29, 6 February 2022 (UTC) A sample list should be of high quality, otherwise people who use it as a model end up doing not so high quality things. --- Jura 13:32, 6 February 2022 (UTC) No. They are clearly statements that go on items for humans (or other awardees) and not on items for a link to a Wikipedia list. This is why I consider that the item conflats two concepts. --- Jura 12:50, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : So yes it was a issue which was fixed now and this is the same item for list just it is fixed now and due to it isn't any conflation (this is not archive - and we don't need information about edit history in main space - we could say that). Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:11, 6 February 2022 (UTC) As it was added as a sample item to has list (P2354) , we should do full cleanup for conflation: i.e. split the content into clean items. Otherwise people may be using the incorrect item for the concept they thought they had been using. If it wasn't a model item, we might have done differently. --- Jura 13:16, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : What do you mean? It was and it still is has list (P2354) so? There is some lists and they are has list (P2354) to each other. Isn't it how has list (P2354) works? Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:29, 6 February 2022 (UTC) A sample list should be of high quality, otherwise people who use it as a model end up doing not so high quality things. --- Jura 13:32, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : So yes it was a issue which was fixed now and this is the same item for list just it is fixed now and due to it isn't any conflation (this is not archive - and we don't need information about edit history in main space - we could say that). Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:11, 6 February 2022 (UTC) As it was added as a sample item to has list (P2354) , we should do full cleanup for conflation: i.e. split the content into clean items. Otherwise people may be using the incorrect item for the concept they thought they had been using. If it wasn't a model item, we might have done differently. --- Jura 13:16, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : What do you mean? It was and it still is has list (P2354) so? There is some lists and they are has list (P2354) to each other. Isn't it how has list (P2354) works? Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:29, 6 February 2022 (UTC) A sample list should be of high quality, otherwise people who use it as a model end up doing not so high quality things. --- Jura 13:32, 6 February 2022 (UTC) As it was added as a sample item to has list (P2354) , we should do full cleanup for conflation: i.e. split the content into clean items. Otherwise people may be using the incorrect item for the concept they thought they had been using. If it wasn't a model item, we might have done differently. --- Jura 13:16, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : What do you mean? It was and it still is has list (P2354) so? There is some lists and they are has list (P2354) to each other. Isn't it how has list (P2354) works? Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:29, 6 February 2022 (UTC) A sample list should be of high quality, otherwise people who use it as a model end up doing not so high quality things. --- Jura 13:32, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : What do you mean? It was and it still is has list (P2354) so? There is some lists and they are has list (P2354) to each other. Isn't it how has list (P2354) works? Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:29, 6 February 2022 (UTC) A sample list should be of high quality, otherwise people who use it as a model end up doing not so high quality things. --- Jura 13:32, 6 February 2022 (UTC) Not all statements but just award received (P166) and nominated for (P1411) . And where is Q62098823 and Q66112460 ? Eurohunter ( talk ) 21:00, 1 February 2022 (UTC) Yes all but the ones that should go on the new item for the enwiki sitelink. The statements with already deleted values can remain. --- Jura 10:50, 2 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : It doesn't make any sense or you are not enough precise . This is item for "list of awards and nominations received by Basshunter" so where would you like to move ENWP link? And why only ENWP? There is PLWP link too so they both should be moved eventualy but there is no point in this. All what can be done here is to just move award received (P166) and nominated for (P1411) to Basshunter (Q383541) and remove Q62098823 and Q66112460 or restore them. Eurohunter ( talk ) 14:47, 2 February 2022 (UTC) The item is currently a conflation of a list and the item for artist. Once deletion is decided, I will to the necessary changes and create the new item. --- Jura 15:12, 2 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : But for this reason list of awards and nominations received by Basshunter (Q63384701) can't be deleted in any way - there is no point. If you want to move properties then use moveClaim.js. I have moved award received (P166) and nominated for (P1411) to Basshunter (Q383541) so it is Fixed . Eurohunter ( talk ) 14:22, 3 February 2022 (UTC) You forgot P18. It's still a conflation potentially misleading users, oddly listed as sample on Property:P2354 . Once the split complete, it can be deleted. --- Jura 14:53, 3 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : What do you mean about image (P18) ? This is main image used for this item, ilustration of this list so what is wrong? See first random discographies I found for example Falco discography (Q10087) , Miranda Cosgrove discography (Q13118) , Texas discography (Q125194) . What about has list (P2354) ? President of the French Republic (Q191954) Wikimedia list related to this subject: list of presidents of France (Q29580) same as Basshunter (Q383541) Wikimedia list related to this subject: list of awards and nominations received by Basshunter (Q63384701) , list of songs recorded by Basshunter (Q11761784) , list of Basshunter live performances (Q6352124) . " list related to this subject " right? What is wrong? Eurohunter ( talk ) 10:49, 6 February 2022 (UTC) The discussion is about a list of awards. The illustration doesn't represent that. The image would more appropriately be on the item for the artist. No need to duplicate. If there are other malformed lists about Basshunter, please fix them, but we don't need to discuss them here. --- Jura 10:59, 6 February 2022 (UTC) I finished the split: Q110825249 . --- Jura 11:21, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : First explain Falco discography (Q10087) , Miranda Cosgrove discography (Q13118) , Texas discography (Q125194) and thousands of other. This is image for infobox. What is the problem? This split was totally non-sense. Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:31, 6 February 2022 (UTC) You split off most statements to the item for the artist, not me. I thought you understood that you have be conflating items. --- Jura 12:34, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : This is not any "conflation" in anyway. How even you got that idea? There is no any logic in this. How? You are trying to do something weird. This is single item for list of awards and nominations received by Basshunter. What is the problem again. Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:37, 6 February 2022 (UTC) Please explain why you moved these statements from the item we are discussing here after it was listed for deletion. --- Jura 12:40, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : Maybe I miss understood you but you told that somehow award received (P166) and nominated for (P1411) are missleading so I thought you mean that they are dedicated for human (Q5) than Wikimedia list article (Q13406463) so I have moved them. Should I restore them? Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:45, 6 February 2022 (UTC) No. They are clearly statements that go on items for humans (or other awardees) and not on items for a link to a Wikipedia list. This is why I consider that the item conflats two concepts. --- Jura 12:50, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : So yes it was a issue which was fixed now and this is the same item for list just it is fixed now and due to it isn't any conflation (this is not archive - and we don't need information about edit history in main space - we could say that). Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:11, 6 February 2022 (UTC) As it was added as a sample item to has list (P2354) , we should do full cleanup for conflation: i.e. split the content into clean items. Otherwise people may be using the incorrect item for the concept they thought they had been using. If it wasn't a model item, we might have done differently. --- Jura 13:16, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : What do you mean? It was and it still is has list (P2354) so? There is some lists and they are has list (P2354) to each other. Isn't it how has list (P2354) works? Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:29, 6 February 2022 (UTC) A sample list should be of high quality, otherwise people who use it as a model end up doing not so high quality things. --- Jura 13:32, 6 February 2022 (UTC) Not all statements but just award received (P166) and nominated for (P1411) . And where is Q62098823 and Q66112460 ? Eurohunter ( talk ) 21:00, 1 February 2022 (UTC) Yes all but the ones that should go on the new item for the enwiki sitelink. The statements with already deleted values can remain. --- Jura 10:50, 2 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : It doesn't make any sense or you are not enough precise . This is item for "list of awards and nominations received by Basshunter" so where would you like to move ENWP link? And why only ENWP? There is PLWP link too so they both should be moved eventualy but there is no point in this. All what can be done here is to just move award received (P166) and nominated for (P1411) to Basshunter (Q383541) and remove Q62098823 and Q66112460 or restore them. Eurohunter ( talk ) 14:47, 2 February 2022 (UTC) The item is currently a conflation of a list and the item for artist. Once deletion is decided, I will to the necessary changes and create the new item. --- Jura 15:12, 2 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : But for this reason list of awards and nominations received by Basshunter (Q63384701) can't be deleted in any way - there is no point. If you want to move properties then use moveClaim.js. I have moved award received (P166) and nominated for (P1411) to Basshunter (Q383541) so it is Fixed . Eurohunter ( talk ) 14:22, 3 February 2022 (UTC) You forgot P18. It's still a conflation potentially misleading users, oddly listed as sample on Property:P2354 . Once the split complete, it can be deleted. --- Jura 14:53, 3 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : What do you mean about image (P18) ? This is main image used for this item, ilustration of this list so what is wrong? See first random discographies I found for example Falco discography (Q10087) , Miranda Cosgrove discography (Q13118) , Texas discography (Q125194) . What about has list (P2354) ? President of the French Republic (Q191954) Wikimedia list related to this subject: list of presidents of France (Q29580) same as Basshunter (Q383541) Wikimedia list related to this subject: list of awards and nominations received by Basshunter (Q63384701) , list of songs recorded by Basshunter (Q11761784) , list of Basshunter live performances (Q6352124) . " list related to this subject " right? What is wrong? Eurohunter ( talk ) 10:49, 6 February 2022 (UTC) The discussion is about a list of awards. The illustration doesn't represent that. The image would more appropriately be on the item for the artist. No need to duplicate. If there are other malformed lists about Basshunter, please fix them, but we don't need to discuss them here. --- Jura 10:59, 6 February 2022 (UTC) I finished the split: Q110825249 . --- Jura 11:21, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : First explain Falco discography (Q10087) , Miranda Cosgrove discography (Q13118) , Texas discography (Q125194) and thousands of other. This is image for infobox. What is the problem? This split was totally non-sense. Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:31, 6 February 2022 (UTC) You split off most statements to the item for the artist, not me. I thought you understood that you have be conflating items. --- Jura 12:34, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : This is not any "conflation" in anyway. How even you got that idea? There is no any logic in this. How? You are trying to do something weird. This is single item for list of awards and nominations received by Basshunter. What is the problem again. Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:37, 6 February 2022 (UTC) Please explain why you moved these statements from the item we are discussing here after it was listed for deletion. --- Jura 12:40, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : Maybe I miss understood you but you told that somehow award received (P166) and nominated for (P1411) are missleading so I thought you mean that they are dedicated for human (Q5) than Wikimedia list article (Q13406463) so I have moved them. Should I restore them? Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:45, 6 February 2022 (UTC) No. They are clearly statements that go on items for humans (or other awardees) and not on items for a link to a Wikipedia list. This is why I consider that the item conflats two concepts. --- Jura 12:50, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : So yes it was a issue which was fixed now and this is the same item for list just it is fixed now and due to it isn't any conflation (this is not archive - and we don't need information about edit history in main space - we could say that). Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:11, 6 February 2022 (UTC) As it was added as a sample item to has list (P2354) , we should do full cleanup for conflation: i.e. split the content into clean items. Otherwise people may be using the incorrect item for the concept they thought they had been using. If it wasn't a model item, we might have done differently. --- Jura 13:16, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : What do you mean? It was and it still is has list (P2354) so? There is some lists and they are has list (P2354) to each other. Isn't it how has list (P2354) works? Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:29, 6 February 2022 (UTC) A sample list should be of high quality, otherwise people who use it as a model end up doing not so high quality things. --- Jura 13:32, 6 February 2022 (UTC) Yes all but the ones that should go on the new item for the enwiki sitelink. The statements with already deleted values can remain. --- Jura 10:50, 2 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : It doesn't make any sense or you are not enough precise . This is item for "list of awards and nominations received by Basshunter" so where would you like to move ENWP link? And why only ENWP? There is PLWP link too so they both should be moved eventualy but there is no point in this. All what can be done here is to just move award received (P166) and nominated for (P1411) to Basshunter (Q383541) and remove Q62098823 and Q66112460 or restore them. Eurohunter ( talk ) 14:47, 2 February 2022 (UTC) The item is currently a conflation of a list and the item for artist. Once deletion is decided, I will to the necessary changes and create the new item. --- Jura 15:12, 2 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : But for this reason list of awards and nominations received by Basshunter (Q63384701) can't be deleted in any way - there is no point. If you want to move properties then use moveClaim.js. I have moved award received (P166) and nominated for (P1411) to Basshunter (Q383541) so it is Fixed . Eurohunter ( talk ) 14:22, 3 February 2022 (UTC) You forgot P18. It's still a conflation potentially misleading users, oddly listed as sample on Property:P2354 . Once the split complete, it can be deleted. --- Jura 14:53, 3 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : What do you mean about image (P18) ? This is main image used for this item, ilustration of this list so what is wrong? See first random discographies I found for example Falco discography (Q10087) , Miranda Cosgrove discography (Q13118) , Texas discography (Q125194) . What about has list (P2354) ? President of the French Republic (Q191954) Wikimedia list related to this subject: list of presidents of France (Q29580) same as Basshunter (Q383541) Wikimedia list related to this subject: list of awards and nominations received by Basshunter (Q63384701) , list of songs recorded by Basshunter (Q11761784) , list of Basshunter live performances (Q6352124) . " list related to this subject " right? What is wrong? Eurohunter ( talk ) 10:49, 6 February 2022 (UTC) The discussion is about a list of awards. The illustration doesn't represent that. The image would more appropriately be on the item for the artist. No need to duplicate. If there are other malformed lists about Basshunter, please fix them, but we don't need to discuss them here. --- Jura 10:59, 6 February 2022 (UTC) I finished the split: Q110825249 . --- Jura 11:21, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : First explain Falco discography (Q10087) , Miranda Cosgrove discography (Q13118) , Texas discography (Q125194) and thousands of other. This is image for infobox. What is the problem? This split was totally non-sense. Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:31, 6 February 2022 (UTC) You split off most statements to the item for the artist, not me. I thought you understood that you have be conflating items. --- Jura 12:34, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : This is not any "conflation" in anyway. How even you got that idea? There is no any logic in this. How? You are trying to do something weird. This is single item for list of awards and nominations received by Basshunter. What is the problem again. Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:37, 6 February 2022 (UTC) Please explain why you moved these statements from the item we are discussing here after it was listed for deletion. --- Jura 12:40, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : Maybe I miss understood you but you told that somehow award received (P166) and nominated for (P1411) are missleading so I thought you mean that they are dedicated for human (Q5) than Wikimedia list article (Q13406463) so I have moved them. Should I restore them? Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:45, 6 February 2022 (UTC) No. They are clearly statements that go on items for humans (or other awardees) and not on items for a link to a Wikipedia list. This is why I consider that the item conflats two concepts. --- Jura 12:50, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : So yes it was a issue which was fixed now and this is the same item for list just it is fixed now and due to it isn't any conflation (this is not archive - and we don't need information about edit history in main space - we could say that). Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:11, 6 February 2022 (UTC) As it was added as a sample item to has list (P2354) , we should do full cleanup for conflation: i.e. split the content into clean items. Otherwise people may be using the incorrect item for the concept they thought they had been using. If it wasn't a model item, we might have done differently. --- Jura 13:16, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : What do you mean? It was and it still is has list (P2354) so? There is some lists and they are has list (P2354) to each other. Isn't it how has list (P2354) works? Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:29, 6 February 2022 (UTC) A sample list should be of high quality, otherwise people who use it as a model end up doing not so high quality things. --- Jura 13:32, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : It doesn't make any sense or you are not enough precise . This is item for "list of awards and nominations received by Basshunter" so where would you like to move ENWP link? And why only ENWP? There is PLWP link too so they both should be moved eventualy but there is no point in this. All what can be done here is to just move award received (P166) and nominated for (P1411) to Basshunter (Q383541) and remove Q62098823 and Q66112460 or restore them. Eurohunter ( talk ) 14:47, 2 February 2022 (UTC) The item is currently a conflation of a list and the item for artist. Once deletion is decided, I will to the necessary changes and create the new item. --- Jura 15:12, 2 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : But for this reason list of awards and nominations received by Basshunter (Q63384701) can't be deleted in any way - there is no point. If you want to move properties then use moveClaim.js. I have moved award received (P166) and nominated for (P1411) to Basshunter (Q383541) so it is Fixed . Eurohunter ( talk ) 14:22, 3 February 2022 (UTC) You forgot P18. It's still a conflation potentially misleading users, oddly listed as sample on Property:P2354 . Once the split complete, it can be deleted. --- Jura 14:53, 3 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : What do you mean about image (P18) ? This is main image used for this item, ilustration of this list so what is wrong? See first random discographies I found for example Falco discography (Q10087) , Miranda Cosgrove discography (Q13118) , Texas discography (Q125194) . What about has list (P2354) ? President of the French Republic (Q191954) Wikimedia list related to this subject: list of presidents of France (Q29580) same as Basshunter (Q383541) Wikimedia list related to this subject: list of awards and nominations received by Basshunter (Q63384701) , list of songs recorded by Basshunter (Q11761784) , list of Basshunter live performances (Q6352124) . " list related to this subject " right? What is wrong? Eurohunter ( talk ) 10:49, 6 February 2022 (UTC) The discussion is about a list of awards. The illustration doesn't represent that. The image would more appropriately be on the item for the artist. No need to duplicate. If there are other malformed lists about Basshunter, please fix them, but we don't need to discuss them here. --- Jura 10:59, 6 February 2022 (UTC) I finished the split: Q110825249 . --- Jura 11:21, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : First explain Falco discography (Q10087) , Miranda Cosgrove discography (Q13118) , Texas discography (Q125194) and thousands of other. This is image for infobox. What is the problem? This split was totally non-sense. Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:31, 6 February 2022 (UTC) You split off most statements to the item for the artist, not me. I thought you understood that you have be conflating items. --- Jura 12:34, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : This is not any "conflation" in anyway. How even you got that idea? There is no any logic in this. How? You are trying to do something weird. This is single item for list of awards and nominations received by Basshunter. What is the problem again. Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:37, 6 February 2022 (UTC) Please explain why you moved these statements from the item we are discussing here after it was listed for deletion. --- Jura 12:40, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : Maybe I miss understood you but you told that somehow award received (P166) and nominated for (P1411) are missleading so I thought you mean that they are dedicated for human (Q5) than Wikimedia list article (Q13406463) so I have moved them. Should I restore them? Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:45, 6 February 2022 (UTC) No. They are clearly statements that go on items for humans (or other awardees) and not on items for a link to a Wikipedia list. This is why I consider that the item conflats two concepts. --- Jura 12:50, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : So yes it was a issue which was fixed now and this is the same item for list just it is fixed now and due to it isn't any conflation (this is not archive - and we don't need information about edit history in main space - we could say that). Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:11, 6 February 2022 (UTC) As it was added as a sample item to has list (P2354) , we should do full cleanup for conflation: i.e. split the content into clean items. Otherwise people may be using the incorrect item for the concept they thought they had been using. If it wasn't a model item, we might have done differently. --- Jura 13:16, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : What do you mean? It was and it still is has list (P2354) so? There is some lists and they are has list (P2354) to each other. Isn't it how has list (P2354) works? Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:29, 6 February 2022 (UTC) A sample list should be of high quality, otherwise people who use it as a model end up doing not so high quality things. --- Jura 13:32, 6 February 2022 (UTC) The item is currently a conflation of a list and the item for artist. Once deletion is decided, I will to the necessary changes and create the new item. --- Jura 15:12, 2 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : But for this reason list of awards and nominations received by Basshunter (Q63384701) can't be deleted in any way - there is no point. If you want to move properties then use moveClaim.js. I have moved award received (P166) and nominated for (P1411) to Basshunter (Q383541) so it is Fixed . Eurohunter ( talk ) 14:22, 3 February 2022 (UTC) You forgot P18. It's still a conflation potentially misleading users, oddly listed as sample on Property:P2354 . Once the split complete, it can be deleted. --- Jura 14:53, 3 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : What do you mean about image (P18) ? This is main image used for this item, ilustration of this list so what is wrong? See first random discographies I found for example Falco discography (Q10087) , Miranda Cosgrove discography (Q13118) , Texas discography (Q125194) . What about has list (P2354) ? President of the French Republic (Q191954) Wikimedia list related to this subject: list of presidents of France (Q29580) same as Basshunter (Q383541) Wikimedia list related to this subject: list of awards and nominations received by Basshunter (Q63384701) , list of songs recorded by Basshunter (Q11761784) , list of Basshunter live performances (Q6352124) . " list related to this subject " right? What is wrong? Eurohunter ( talk ) 10:49, 6 February 2022 (UTC) The discussion is about a list of awards. The illustration doesn't represent that. The image would more appropriately be on the item for the artist. No need to duplicate. If there are other malformed lists about Basshunter, please fix them, but we don't need to discuss them here. --- Jura 10:59, 6 February 2022 (UTC) I finished the split: Q110825249 . --- Jura 11:21, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : First explain Falco discography (Q10087) , Miranda Cosgrove discography (Q13118) , Texas discography (Q125194) and thousands of other. This is image for infobox. What is the problem? This split was totally non-sense. Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:31, 6 February 2022 (UTC) You split off most statements to the item for the artist, not me. I thought you understood that you have be conflating items. --- Jura 12:34, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : This is not any "conflation" in anyway. How even you got that idea? There is no any logic in this. How? You are trying to do something weird. This is single item for list of awards and nominations received by Basshunter. What is the problem again. Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:37, 6 February 2022 (UTC) Please explain why you moved these statements from the item we are discussing here after it was listed for deletion. --- Jura 12:40, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : Maybe I miss understood you but you told that somehow award received (P166) and nominated for (P1411) are missleading so I thought you mean that they are dedicated for human (Q5) than Wikimedia list article (Q13406463) so I have moved them. Should I restore them? Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:45, 6 February 2022 (UTC) No. They are clearly statements that go on items for humans (or other awardees) and not on items for a link to a Wikipedia list. This is why I consider that the item conflats two concepts. --- Jura 12:50, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : So yes it was a issue which was fixed now and this is the same item for list just it is fixed now and due to it isn't any conflation (this is not archive - and we don't need information about edit history in main space - we could say that). Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:11, 6 February 2022 (UTC) As it was added as a sample item to has list (P2354) , we should do full cleanup for conflation: i.e. split the content into clean items. Otherwise people may be using the incorrect item for the concept they thought they had been using. If it wasn't a model item, we might have done differently. --- Jura 13:16, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : What do you mean? It was and it still is has list (P2354) so? There is some lists and they are has list (P2354) to each other. Isn't it how has list (P2354) works? Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:29, 6 February 2022 (UTC) A sample list should be of high quality, otherwise people who use it as a model end up doing not so high quality things. --- Jura 13:32, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : But for this reason list of awards and nominations received by Basshunter (Q63384701) can't be deleted in any way - there is no point. If you want to move properties then use moveClaim.js. I have moved award received (P166) and nominated for (P1411) to Basshunter (Q383541) so it is Fixed . Eurohunter ( talk ) 14:22, 3 February 2022 (UTC) You forgot P18. It's still a conflation potentially misleading users, oddly listed as sample on Property:P2354 . Once the split complete, it can be deleted. --- Jura 14:53, 3 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : What do you mean about image (P18) ? This is main image used for this item, ilustration of this list so what is wrong? See first random discographies I found for example Falco discography (Q10087) , Miranda Cosgrove discography (Q13118) , Texas discography (Q125194) . What about has list (P2354) ? President of the French Republic (Q191954) Wikimedia list related to this subject: list of presidents of France (Q29580) same as Basshunter (Q383541) Wikimedia list related to this subject: list of awards and nominations received by Basshunter (Q63384701) , list of songs recorded by Basshunter (Q11761784) , list of Basshunter live performances (Q6352124) . " list related to this subject " right? What is wrong? Eurohunter ( talk ) 10:49, 6 February 2022 (UTC) The discussion is about a list of awards. The illustration doesn't represent that. The image would more appropriately be on the item for the artist. No need to duplicate. If there are other malformed lists about Basshunter, please fix them, but we don't need to discuss them here. --- Jura 10:59, 6 February 2022 (UTC) I finished the split: Q110825249 . --- Jura 11:21, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : First explain Falco discography (Q10087) , Miranda Cosgrove discography (Q13118) , Texas discography (Q125194) and thousands of other. This is image for infobox. What is the problem? This split was totally non-sense. Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:31, 6 February 2022 (UTC) You split off most statements to the item for the artist, not me. I thought you understood that you have be conflating items. --- Jura 12:34, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : This is not any "conflation" in anyway. How even you got that idea? There is no any logic in this. How? You are trying to do something weird. This is single item for list of awards and nominations received by Basshunter. What is the problem again. Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:37, 6 February 2022 (UTC) Please explain why you moved these statements from the item we are discussing here after it was listed for deletion. --- Jura 12:40, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : Maybe I miss understood you but you told that somehow award received (P166) and nominated for (P1411) are missleading so I thought you mean that they are dedicated for human (Q5) than Wikimedia list article (Q13406463) so I have moved them. Should I restore them? Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:45, 6 February 2022 (UTC) No. They are clearly statements that go on items for humans (or other awardees) and not on items for a link to a Wikipedia list. This is why I consider that the item conflats two concepts. --- Jura 12:50, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : So yes it was a issue which was fixed now and this is the same item for list just it is fixed now and due to it isn't any conflation (this is not archive - and we don't need information about edit history in main space - we could say that). Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:11, 6 February 2022 (UTC) As it was added as a sample item to has list (P2354) , we should do full cleanup for conflation: i.e. split the content into clean items. Otherwise people may be using the incorrect item for the concept they thought they had been using. If it wasn't a model item, we might have done differently. --- Jura 13:16, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : What do you mean? It was and it still is has list (P2354) so? There is some lists and they are has list (P2354) to each other. Isn't it how has list (P2354) works? Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:29, 6 February 2022 (UTC) A sample list should be of high quality, otherwise people who use it as a model end up doing not so high quality things. --- Jura 13:32, 6 February 2022 (UTC) You forgot P18. It's still a conflation potentially misleading users, oddly listed as sample on Property:P2354 . Once the split complete, it can be deleted. --- Jura 14:53, 3 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : What do you mean about image (P18) ? This is main image used for this item, ilustration of this list so what is wrong? See first random discographies I found for example Falco discography (Q10087) , Miranda Cosgrove discography (Q13118) , Texas discography (Q125194) . What about has list (P2354) ? President of the French Republic (Q191954) Wikimedia list related to this subject: list of presidents of France (Q29580) same as Basshunter (Q383541) Wikimedia list related to this subject: list of awards and nominations received by Basshunter (Q63384701) , list of songs recorded by Basshunter (Q11761784) , list of Basshunter live performances (Q6352124) . " list related to this subject " right? What is wrong? Eurohunter ( talk ) 10:49, 6 February 2022 (UTC) The discussion is about a list of awards. The illustration doesn't represent that. The image would more appropriately be on the item for the artist. No need to duplicate. If there are other malformed lists about Basshunter, please fix them, but we don't need to discuss them here. --- Jura 10:59, 6 February 2022 (UTC) I finished the split: Q110825249 . --- Jura 11:21, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : First explain Falco discography (Q10087) , Miranda Cosgrove discography (Q13118) , Texas discography (Q125194) and thousands of other. This is image for infobox. What is the problem? This split was totally non-sense. Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:31, 6 February 2022 (UTC) You split off most statements to the item for the artist, not me. I thought you understood that you have be conflating items. --- Jura 12:34, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : This is not any "conflation" in anyway. How even you got that idea? There is no any logic in this. How? You are trying to do something weird. This is single item for list of awards and nominations received by Basshunter. What is the problem again. Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:37, 6 February 2022 (UTC) Please explain why you moved these statements from the item we are discussing here after it was listed for deletion. --- Jura 12:40, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : Maybe I miss understood you but you told that somehow award received (P166) and nominated for (P1411) are missleading so I thought you mean that they are dedicated for human (Q5) than Wikimedia list article (Q13406463) so I have moved them. Should I restore them? Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:45, 6 February 2022 (UTC) No. They are clearly statements that go on items for humans (or other awardees) and not on items for a link to a Wikipedia list. This is why I consider that the item conflats two concepts. --- Jura 12:50, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : So yes it was a issue which was fixed now and this is the same item for list just it is fixed now and due to it isn't any conflation (this is not archive - and we don't need information about edit history in main space - we could say that). Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:11, 6 February 2022 (UTC) As it was added as a sample item to has list (P2354) , we should do full cleanup for conflation: i.e. split the content into clean items. Otherwise people may be using the incorrect item for the concept they thought they had been using. If it wasn't a model item, we might have done differently. --- Jura 13:16, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : What do you mean? It was and it still is has list (P2354) so? There is some lists and they are has list (P2354) to each other. Isn't it how has list (P2354) works? Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:29, 6 February 2022 (UTC) A sample list should be of high quality, otherwise people who use it as a model end up doing not so high quality things. --- Jura 13:32, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : What do you mean about image (P18) ? This is main image used for this item, ilustration of this list so what is wrong? See first random discographies I found for example Falco discography (Q10087) , Miranda Cosgrove discography (Q13118) , Texas discography (Q125194) . What about has list (P2354) ? President of the French Republic (Q191954) Wikimedia list related to this subject: list of presidents of France (Q29580) same as Basshunter (Q383541) Wikimedia list related to this subject: list of awards and nominations received by Basshunter (Q63384701) , list of songs recorded by Basshunter (Q11761784) , list of Basshunter live performances (Q6352124) . " list related to this subject " right? What is wrong? Eurohunter ( talk ) 10:49, 6 February 2022 (UTC) The discussion is about a list of awards. The illustration doesn't represent that. The image would more appropriately be on the item for the artist. No need to duplicate. If there are other malformed lists about Basshunter, please fix them, but we don't need to discuss them here. --- Jura 10:59, 6 February 2022 (UTC) I finished the split: Q110825249 . --- Jura 11:21, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : First explain Falco discography (Q10087) , Miranda Cosgrove discography (Q13118) , Texas discography (Q125194) and thousands of other. This is image for infobox. What is the problem? This split was totally non-sense. Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:31, 6 February 2022 (UTC) You split off most statements to the item for the artist, not me. I thought you understood that you have be conflating items. --- Jura 12:34, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : This is not any "conflation" in anyway. How even you got that idea? There is no any logic in this. How? You are trying to do something weird. This is single item for list of awards and nominations received by Basshunter. What is the problem again. Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:37, 6 February 2022 (UTC) Please explain why you moved these statements from the item we are discussing here after it was listed for deletion. --- Jura 12:40, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : Maybe I miss understood you but you told that somehow award received (P166) and nominated for (P1411) are missleading so I thought you mean that they are dedicated for human (Q5) than Wikimedia list article (Q13406463) so I have moved them. Should I restore them? Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:45, 6 February 2022 (UTC) No. They are clearly statements that go on items for humans (or other awardees) and not on items for a link to a Wikipedia list. This is why I consider that the item conflats two concepts. --- Jura 12:50, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : So yes it was a issue which was fixed now and this is the same item for list just it is fixed now and due to it isn't any conflation (this is not archive - and we don't need information about edit history in main space - we could say that). Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:11, 6 February 2022 (UTC) As it was added as a sample item to has list (P2354) , we should do full cleanup for conflation: i.e. split the content into clean items. Otherwise people may be using the incorrect item for the concept they thought they had been using. If it wasn't a model item, we might have done differently. --- Jura 13:16, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : What do you mean? It was and it still is has list (P2354) so? There is some lists and they are has list (P2354) to each other. Isn't it how has list (P2354) works? Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:29, 6 February 2022 (UTC) A sample list should be of high quality, otherwise people who use it as a model end up doing not so high quality things. --- Jura 13:32, 6 February 2022 (UTC) The discussion is about a list of awards. The illustration doesn't represent that. The image would more appropriately be on the item for the artist. No need to duplicate. If there are other malformed lists about Basshunter, please fix them, but we don't need to discuss them here. --- Jura 10:59, 6 February 2022 (UTC) I finished the split: Q110825249 . --- Jura 11:21, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : First explain Falco discography (Q10087) , Miranda Cosgrove discography (Q13118) , Texas discography (Q125194) and thousands of other. This is image for infobox. What is the problem? This split was totally non-sense. Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:31, 6 February 2022 (UTC) You split off most statements to the item for the artist, not me. I thought you understood that you have be conflating items. --- Jura 12:34, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : This is not any "conflation" in anyway. How even you got that idea? There is no any logic in this. How? You are trying to do something weird. This is single item for list of awards and nominations received by Basshunter. What is the problem again. Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:37, 6 February 2022 (UTC) Please explain why you moved these statements from the item we are discussing here after it was listed for deletion. --- Jura 12:40, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : Maybe I miss understood you but you told that somehow award received (P166) and nominated for (P1411) are missleading so I thought you mean that they are dedicated for human (Q5) than Wikimedia list article (Q13406463) so I have moved them. Should I restore them? Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:45, 6 February 2022 (UTC) No. They are clearly statements that go on items for humans (or other awardees) and not on items for a link to a Wikipedia list. This is why I consider that the item conflats two concepts. --- Jura 12:50, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : So yes it was a issue which was fixed now and this is the same item for list just it is fixed now and due to it isn't any conflation (this is not archive - and we don't need information about edit history in main space - we could say that). Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:11, 6 February 2022 (UTC) As it was added as a sample item to has list (P2354) , we should do full cleanup for conflation: i.e. split the content into clean items. Otherwise people may be using the incorrect item for the concept they thought they had been using. If it wasn't a model item, we might have done differently. --- Jura 13:16, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : What do you mean? It was and it still is has list (P2354) so? There is some lists and they are has list (P2354) to each other. Isn't it how has list (P2354) works? Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:29, 6 February 2022 (UTC) A sample list should be of high quality, otherwise people who use it as a model end up doing not so high quality things. --- Jura 13:32, 6 February 2022 (UTC) I finished the split: Q110825249 . --- Jura 11:21, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : First explain Falco discography (Q10087) , Miranda Cosgrove discography (Q13118) , Texas discography (Q125194) and thousands of other. This is image for infobox. What is the problem? This split was totally non-sense. Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:31, 6 February 2022 (UTC) You split off most statements to the item for the artist, not me. I thought you understood that you have be conflating items. --- Jura 12:34, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : This is not any "conflation" in anyway. How even you got that idea? There is no any logic in this. How? You are trying to do something weird. This is single item for list of awards and nominations received by Basshunter. What is the problem again. Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:37, 6 February 2022 (UTC) Please explain why you moved these statements from the item we are discussing here after it was listed for deletion. --- Jura 12:40, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : Maybe I miss understood you but you told that somehow award received (P166) and nominated for (P1411) are missleading so I thought you mean that they are dedicated for human (Q5) than Wikimedia list article (Q13406463) so I have moved them. Should I restore them? Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:45, 6 February 2022 (UTC) No. They are clearly statements that go on items for humans (or other awardees) and not on items for a link to a Wikipedia list. This is why I consider that the item conflats two concepts. --- Jura 12:50, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : So yes it was a issue which was fixed now and this is the same item for list just it is fixed now and due to it isn't any conflation (this is not archive - and we don't need information about edit history in main space - we could say that). Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:11, 6 February 2022 (UTC) As it was added as a sample item to has list (P2354) , we should do full cleanup for conflation: i.e. split the content into clean items. Otherwise people may be using the incorrect item for the concept they thought they had been using. If it wasn't a model item, we might have done differently. --- Jura 13:16, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : What do you mean? It was and it still is has list (P2354) so? There is some lists and they are has list (P2354) to each other. Isn't it how has list (P2354) works? Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:29, 6 February 2022 (UTC) A sample list should be of high quality, otherwise people who use it as a model end up doing not so high quality things. --- Jura 13:32, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : First explain Falco discography (Q10087) , Miranda Cosgrove discography (Q13118) , Texas discography (Q125194) and thousands of other. This is image for infobox. What is the problem? This split was totally non-sense. Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:31, 6 February 2022 (UTC) You split off most statements to the item for the artist, not me. I thought you understood that you have be conflating items. --- Jura 12:34, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : This is not any "conflation" in anyway. How even you got that idea? There is no any logic in this. How? You are trying to do something weird. This is single item for list of awards and nominations received by Basshunter. What is the problem again. Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:37, 6 February 2022 (UTC) Please explain why you moved these statements from the item we are discussing here after it was listed for deletion. --- Jura 12:40, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : Maybe I miss understood you but you told that somehow award received (P166) and nominated for (P1411) are missleading so I thought you mean that they are dedicated for human (Q5) than Wikimedia list article (Q13406463) so I have moved them. Should I restore them? Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:45, 6 February 2022 (UTC) No. They are clearly statements that go on items for humans (or other awardees) and not on items for a link to a Wikipedia list. This is why I consider that the item conflats two concepts. --- Jura 12:50, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : So yes it was a issue which was fixed now and this is the same item for list just it is fixed now and due to it isn't any conflation (this is not archive - and we don't need information about edit history in main space - we could say that). Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:11, 6 February 2022 (UTC) As it was added as a sample item to has list (P2354) , we should do full cleanup for conflation: i.e. split the content into clean items. Otherwise people may be using the incorrect item for the concept they thought they had been using. If it wasn't a model item, we might have done differently. --- Jura 13:16, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : What do you mean? It was and it still is has list (P2354) so? There is some lists and they are has list (P2354) to each other. Isn't it how has list (P2354) works? Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:29, 6 February 2022 (UTC) A sample list should be of high quality, otherwise people who use it as a model end up doing not so high quality things. --- Jura 13:32, 6 February 2022 (UTC) You split off most statements to the item for the artist, not me. I thought you understood that you have be conflating items. --- Jura 12:34, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : This is not any "conflation" in anyway. How even you got that idea? There is no any logic in this. How? You are trying to do something weird. This is single item for list of awards and nominations received by Basshunter. What is the problem again. Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:37, 6 February 2022 (UTC) Please explain why you moved these statements from the item we are discussing here after it was listed for deletion. --- Jura 12:40, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : Maybe I miss understood you but you told that somehow award received (P166) and nominated for (P1411) are missleading so I thought you mean that they are dedicated for human (Q5) than Wikimedia list article (Q13406463) so I have moved them. Should I restore them? Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:45, 6 February 2022 (UTC) No. They are clearly statements that go on items for humans (or other awardees) and not on items for a link to a Wikipedia list. This is why I consider that the item conflats two concepts. --- Jura 12:50, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : So yes it was a issue which was fixed now and this is the same item for list just it is fixed now and due to it isn't any conflation (this is not archive - and we don't need information about edit history in main space - we could say that). Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:11, 6 February 2022 (UTC) As it was added as a sample item to has list (P2354) , we should do full cleanup for conflation: i.e. split the content into clean items. Otherwise people may be using the incorrect item for the concept they thought they had been using. If it wasn't a model item, we might have done differently. --- Jura 13:16, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : What do you mean? It was and it still is has list (P2354) so? There is some lists and they are has list (P2354) to each other. Isn't it how has list (P2354) works? Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:29, 6 February 2022 (UTC) A sample list should be of high quality, otherwise people who use it as a model end up doing not so high quality things. --- Jura 13:32, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : This is not any "conflation" in anyway. How even you got that idea? There is no any logic in this. How? You are trying to do something weird. This is single item for list of awards and nominations received by Basshunter. What is the problem again. Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:37, 6 February 2022 (UTC) Please explain why you moved these statements from the item we are discussing here after it was listed for deletion. --- Jura 12:40, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : Maybe I miss understood you but you told that somehow award received (P166) and nominated for (P1411) are missleading so I thought you mean that they are dedicated for human (Q5) than Wikimedia list article (Q13406463) so I have moved them. Should I restore them? Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:45, 6 February 2022 (UTC) No. They are clearly statements that go on items for humans (or other awardees) and not on items for a link to a Wikipedia list. This is why I consider that the item conflats two concepts. --- Jura 12:50, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : So yes it was a issue which was fixed now and this is the same item for list just it is fixed now and due to it isn't any conflation (this is not archive - and we don't need information about edit history in main space - we could say that). Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:11, 6 February 2022 (UTC) As it was added as a sample item to has list (P2354) , we should do full cleanup for conflation: i.e. split the content into clean items. Otherwise people may be using the incorrect item for the concept they thought they had been using. If it wasn't a model item, we might have done differently. --- Jura 13:16, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : What do you mean? It was and it still is has list (P2354) so? There is some lists and they are has list (P2354) to each other. Isn't it how has list (P2354) works? Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:29, 6 February 2022 (UTC) A sample list should be of high quality, otherwise people who use it as a model end up doing not so high quality things. --- Jura 13:32, 6 February 2022 (UTC) Please explain why you moved these statements from the item we are discussing here after it was listed for deletion. --- Jura 12:40, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : Maybe I miss understood you but you told that somehow award received (P166) and nominated for (P1411) are missleading so I thought you mean that they are dedicated for human (Q5) than Wikimedia list article (Q13406463) so I have moved them. Should I restore them? Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:45, 6 February 2022 (UTC) No. They are clearly statements that go on items for humans (or other awardees) and not on items for a link to a Wikipedia list. This is why I consider that the item conflats two concepts. --- Jura 12:50, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : So yes it was a issue which was fixed now and this is the same item for list just it is fixed now and due to it isn't any conflation (this is not archive - and we don't need information about edit history in main space - we could say that). Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:11, 6 February 2022 (UTC) As it was added as a sample item to has list (P2354) , we should do full cleanup for conflation: i.e. split the content into clean items. Otherwise people may be using the incorrect item for the concept they thought they had been using. If it wasn't a model item, we might have done differently. --- Jura 13:16, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : What do you mean? It was and it still is has list (P2354) so? There is some lists and they are has list (P2354) to each other. Isn't it how has list (P2354) works? Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:29, 6 February 2022 (UTC) A sample list should be of high quality, otherwise people who use it as a model end up doing not so high quality things. --- Jura 13:32, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : Maybe I miss understood you but you told that somehow award received (P166) and nominated for (P1411) are missleading so I thought you mean that they are dedicated for human (Q5) than Wikimedia list article (Q13406463) so I have moved them. Should I restore them? Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:45, 6 February 2022 (UTC) No. They are clearly statements that go on items for humans (or other awardees) and not on items for a link to a Wikipedia list. This is why I consider that the item conflats two concepts. --- Jura 12:50, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : So yes it was a issue which was fixed now and this is the same item for list just it is fixed now and due to it isn't any conflation (this is not archive - and we don't need information about edit history in main space - we could say that). Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:11, 6 February 2022 (UTC) As it was added as a sample item to has list (P2354) , we should do full cleanup for conflation: i.e. split the content into clean items. Otherwise people may be using the incorrect item for the concept they thought they had been using. If it wasn't a model item, we might have done differently. --- Jura 13:16, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : What do you mean? It was and it still is has list (P2354) so? There is some lists and they are has list (P2354) to each other. Isn't it how has list (P2354) works? Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:29, 6 February 2022 (UTC) A sample list should be of high quality, otherwise people who use it as a model end up doing not so high quality things. --- Jura 13:32, 6 February 2022 (UTC) No. They are clearly statements that go on items for humans (or other awardees) and not on items for a link to a Wikipedia list. This is why I consider that the item conflats two concepts. --- Jura 12:50, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : So yes it was a issue which was fixed now and this is the same item for list just it is fixed now and due to it isn't any conflation (this is not archive - and we don't need information about edit history in main space - we could say that). Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:11, 6 February 2022 (UTC) As it was added as a sample item to has list (P2354) , we should do full cleanup for conflation: i.e. split the content into clean items. Otherwise people may be using the incorrect item for the concept they thought they had been using. If it wasn't a model item, we might have done differently. --- Jura 13:16, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : What do you mean? It was and it still is has list (P2354) so? There is some lists and they are has list (P2354) to each other. Isn't it how has list (P2354) works? Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:29, 6 February 2022 (UTC) A sample list should be of high quality, otherwise people who use it as a model end up doing not so high quality things. --- Jura 13:32, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : So yes it was a issue which was fixed now and this is the same item for list just it is fixed now and due to it isn't any conflation (this is not archive - and we don't need information about edit history in main space - we could say that). Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:11, 6 February 2022 (UTC) As it was added as a sample item to has list (P2354) , we should do full cleanup for conflation: i.e. split the content into clean items. Otherwise people may be using the incorrect item for the concept they thought they had been using. If it wasn't a model item, we might have done differently. --- Jura 13:16, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : What do you mean? It was and it still is has list (P2354) so? There is some lists and they are has list (P2354) to each other. Isn't it how has list (P2354) works? Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:29, 6 February 2022 (UTC) A sample list should be of high quality, otherwise people who use it as a model end up doing not so high quality things. --- Jura 13:32, 6 February 2022 (UTC) As it was added as a sample item to has list (P2354) , we should do full cleanup for conflation: i.e. split the content into clean items. Otherwise people may be using the incorrect item for the concept they thought they had been using. If it wasn't a model item, we might have done differently. --- Jura 13:16, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : What do you mean? It was and it still is has list (P2354) so? There is some lists and they are has list (P2354) to each other. Isn't it how has list (P2354) works? Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:29, 6 February 2022 (UTC) A sample list should be of high quality, otherwise people who use it as a model end up doing not so high quality things. --- Jura 13:32, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : What do you mean? It was and it still is has list (P2354) so? There is some lists and they are has list (P2354) to each other. Isn't it how has list (P2354) works? Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:29, 6 February 2022 (UTC) A sample list should be of high quality, otherwise people who use it as a model end up doing not so high quality things. --- Jura 13:32, 6 February 2022 (UTC) Not all statements but just award received (P166) and nominated for (P1411) . And where is Q62098823 and Q66112460 ? Eurohunter ( talk ) 21:00, 1 February 2022 (UTC) Yes all but the ones that should go on the new item for the enwiki sitelink. The statements with already deleted values can remain. --- Jura 10:50, 2 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : It doesn't make any sense or you are not enough precise . This is item for "list of awards and nominations received by Basshunter" so where would you like to move ENWP link? And why only ENWP? There is PLWP link too so they both should be moved eventualy but there is no point in this. All what can be done here is to just move award received (P166) and nominated for (P1411) to Basshunter (Q383541) and remove Q62098823 and Q66112460 or restore them. Eurohunter ( talk ) 14:47, 2 February 2022 (UTC) The item is currently a conflation of a list and the item for artist. Once deletion is decided, I will to the necessary changes and create the new item. --- Jura 15:12, 2 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : But for this reason list of awards and nominations received by Basshunter (Q63384701) can't be deleted in any way - there is no point. If you want to move properties then use moveClaim.js. I have moved award received (P166) and nominated for (P1411) to Basshunter (Q383541) so it is Fixed . Eurohunter ( talk ) 14:22, 3 February 2022 (UTC) You forgot P18. It's still a conflation potentially misleading users, oddly listed as sample on Property:P2354 . Once the split complete, it can be deleted. --- Jura 14:53, 3 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : What do you mean about image (P18) ? This is main image used for this item, ilustration of this list so what is wrong? See first random discographies I found for example Falco discography (Q10087) , Miranda Cosgrove discography (Q13118) , Texas discography (Q125194) . What about has list (P2354) ? President of the French Republic (Q191954) Wikimedia list related to this subject: list of presidents of France (Q29580) same as Basshunter (Q383541) Wikimedia list related to this subject: list of awards and nominations received by Basshunter (Q63384701) , list of songs recorded by Basshunter (Q11761784) , list of Basshunter live performances (Q6352124) . " list related to this subject " right? What is wrong? Eurohunter ( talk ) 10:49, 6 February 2022 (UTC) The discussion is about a list of awards. The illustration doesn't represent that. The image would more appropriately be on the item for the artist. No need to duplicate. If there are other malformed lists about Basshunter, please fix them, but we don't need to discuss them here. --- Jura 10:59, 6 February 2022 (UTC) I finished the split: Q110825249 . --- Jura 11:21, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : First explain Falco discography (Q10087) , Miranda Cosgrove discography (Q13118) , Texas discography (Q125194) and thousands of other. This is image for infobox. What is the problem? This split was totally non-sense. Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:31, 6 February 2022 (UTC) You split off most statements to the item for the artist, not me. I thought you understood that you have be conflating items. --- Jura 12:34, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : This is not any "conflation" in anyway. How even you got that idea? There is no any logic in this. How? You are trying to do something weird. This is single item for list of awards and nominations received by Basshunter. What is the problem again. Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:37, 6 February 2022 (UTC) Please explain why you moved these statements from the item we are discussing here after it was listed for deletion. --- Jura 12:40, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : Maybe I miss understood you but you told that somehow award received (P166) and nominated for (P1411) are missleading so I thought you mean that they are dedicated for human (Q5) than Wikimedia list article (Q13406463) so I have moved them. Should I restore them? Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:45, 6 February 2022 (UTC) No. They are clearly statements that go on items for humans (or other awardees) and not on items for a link to a Wikipedia list. This is why I consider that the item conflats two concepts. --- Jura 12:50, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : So yes it was a issue which was fixed now and this is the same item for list just it is fixed now and due to it isn't any conflation (this is not archive - and we don't need information about edit history in main space - we could say that). Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:11, 6 February 2022 (UTC) As it was added as a sample item to has list (P2354) , we should do full cleanup for conflation: i.e. split the content into clean items. Otherwise people may be using the incorrect item for the concept they thought they had been using. If it wasn't a model item, we might have done differently. --- Jura 13:16, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : What do you mean? It was and it still is has list (P2354) so? There is some lists and they are has list (P2354) to each other. Isn't it how has list (P2354) works? Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:29, 6 February 2022 (UTC) A sample list should be of high quality, otherwise people who use it as a model end up doing not so high quality things. --- Jura 13:32, 6 February 2022 (UTC) Yes all but the ones that should go on the new item for the enwiki sitelink. The statements with already deleted values can remain. --- Jura 10:50, 2 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : It doesn't make any sense or you are not enough precise . This is item for "list of awards and nominations received by Basshunter" so where would you like to move ENWP link? And why only ENWP? There is PLWP link too so they both should be moved eventualy but there is no point in this. All what can be done here is to just move award received (P166) and nominated for (P1411) to Basshunter (Q383541) and remove Q62098823 and Q66112460 or restore them. Eurohunter ( talk ) 14:47, 2 February 2022 (UTC) The item is currently a conflation of a list and the item for artist. Once deletion is decided, I will to the necessary changes and create the new item. --- Jura 15:12, 2 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : But for this reason list of awards and nominations received by Basshunter (Q63384701) can't be deleted in any way - there is no point. If you want to move properties then use moveClaim.js. I have moved award received (P166) and nominated for (P1411) to Basshunter (Q383541) so it is Fixed . Eurohunter ( talk ) 14:22, 3 February 2022 (UTC) You forgot P18. It's still a conflation potentially misleading users, oddly listed as sample on Property:P2354 . Once the split complete, it can be deleted. --- Jura 14:53, 3 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : What do you mean about image (P18) ? This is main image used for this item, ilustration of this list so what is wrong? See first random discographies I found for example Falco discography (Q10087) , Miranda Cosgrove discography (Q13118) , Texas discography (Q125194) . What about has list (P2354) ? President of the French Republic (Q191954) Wikimedia list related to this subject: list of presidents of France (Q29580) same as Basshunter (Q383541) Wikimedia list related to this subject: list of awards and nominations received by Basshunter (Q63384701) , list of songs recorded by Basshunter (Q11761784) , list of Basshunter live performances (Q6352124) . " list related to this subject " right? What is wrong? Eurohunter ( talk ) 10:49, 6 February 2022 (UTC) The discussion is about a list of awards. The illustration doesn't represent that. The image would more appropriately be on the item for the artist. No need to duplicate. If there are other malformed lists about Basshunter, please fix them, but we don't need to discuss them here. --- Jura 10:59, 6 February 2022 (UTC) I finished the split: Q110825249 . --- Jura 11:21, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : First explain Falco discography (Q10087) , Miranda Cosgrove discography (Q13118) , Texas discography (Q125194) and thousands of other. This is image for infobox. What is the problem? This split was totally non-sense. Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:31, 6 February 2022 (UTC) You split off most statements to the item for the artist, not me. I thought you understood that you have be conflating items. --- Jura 12:34, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : This is not any "conflation" in anyway. How even you got that idea? There is no any logic in this. How? You are trying to do something weird. This is single item for list of awards and nominations received by Basshunter. What is the problem again. Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:37, 6 February 2022 (UTC) Please explain why you moved these statements from the item we are discussing here after it was listed for deletion. --- Jura 12:40, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : Maybe I miss understood you but you told that somehow award received (P166) and nominated for (P1411) are missleading so I thought you mean that they are dedicated for human (Q5) than Wikimedia list article (Q13406463) so I have moved them. Should I restore them? Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:45, 6 February 2022 (UTC) No. They are clearly statements that go on items for humans (or other awardees) and not on items for a link to a Wikipedia list. This is why I consider that the item conflats two concepts. --- Jura 12:50, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : So yes it was a issue which was fixed now and this is the same item for list just it is fixed now and due to it isn't any conflation (this is not archive - and we don't need information about edit history in main space - we could say that). Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:11, 6 February 2022 (UTC) As it was added as a sample item to has list (P2354) , we should do full cleanup for conflation: i.e. split the content into clean items. Otherwise people may be using the incorrect item for the concept they thought they had been using. If it wasn't a model item, we might have done differently. --- Jura 13:16, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : What do you mean? It was and it still is has list (P2354) so? There is some lists and they are has list (P2354) to each other. Isn't it how has list (P2354) works? Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:29, 6 February 2022 (UTC) A sample list should be of high quality, otherwise people who use it as a model end up doing not so high quality things. --- Jura 13:32, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : It doesn't make any sense or you are not enough precise . This is item for "list of awards and nominations received by Basshunter" so where would you like to move ENWP link? And why only ENWP? There is PLWP link too so they both should be moved eventualy but there is no point in this. All what can be done here is to just move award received (P166) and nominated for (P1411) to Basshunter (Q383541) and remove Q62098823 and Q66112460 or restore them. Eurohunter ( talk ) 14:47, 2 February 2022 (UTC) The item is currently a conflation of a list and the item for artist. Once deletion is decided, I will to the necessary changes and create the new item. --- Jura 15:12, 2 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : But for this reason list of awards and nominations received by Basshunter (Q63384701) can't be deleted in any way - there is no point. If you want to move properties then use moveClaim.js. I have moved award received (P166) and nominated for (P1411) to Basshunter (Q383541) so it is Fixed . Eurohunter ( talk ) 14:22, 3 February 2022 (UTC) You forgot P18. It's still a conflation potentially misleading users, oddly listed as sample on Property:P2354 . Once the split complete, it can be deleted. --- Jura 14:53, 3 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : What do you mean about image (P18) ? This is main image used for this item, ilustration of this list so what is wrong? See first random discographies I found for example Falco discography (Q10087) , Miranda Cosgrove discography (Q13118) , Texas discography (Q125194) . What about has list (P2354) ? President of the French Republic (Q191954) Wikimedia list related to this subject: list of presidents of France (Q29580) same as Basshunter (Q383541) Wikimedia list related to this subject: list of awards and nominations received by Basshunter (Q63384701) , list of songs recorded by Basshunter (Q11761784) , list of Basshunter live performances (Q6352124) . " list related to this subject " right? What is wrong? Eurohunter ( talk ) 10:49, 6 February 2022 (UTC) The discussion is about a list of awards. The illustration doesn't represent that. The image would more appropriately be on the item for the artist. No need to duplicate. If there are other malformed lists about Basshunter, please fix them, but we don't need to discuss them here. --- Jura 10:59, 6 February 2022 (UTC) I finished the split: Q110825249 . --- Jura 11:21, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : First explain Falco discography (Q10087) , Miranda Cosgrove discography (Q13118) , Texas discography (Q125194) and thousands of other. This is image for infobox. What is the problem? This split was totally non-sense. Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:31, 6 February 2022 (UTC) You split off most statements to the item for the artist, not me. I thought you understood that you have be conflating items. --- Jura 12:34, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : This is not any "conflation" in anyway. How even you got that idea? There is no any logic in this. How? You are trying to do something weird. This is single item for list of awards and nominations received by Basshunter. What is the problem again. Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:37, 6 February 2022 (UTC) Please explain why you moved these statements from the item we are discussing here after it was listed for deletion. --- Jura 12:40, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : Maybe I miss understood you but you told that somehow award received (P166) and nominated for (P1411) are missleading so I thought you mean that they are dedicated for human (Q5) than Wikimedia list article (Q13406463) so I have moved them. Should I restore them? Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:45, 6 February 2022 (UTC) No. They are clearly statements that go on items for humans (or other awardees) and not on items for a link to a Wikipedia list. This is why I consider that the item conflats two concepts. --- Jura 12:50, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : So yes it was a issue which was fixed now and this is the same item for list just it is fixed now and due to it isn't any conflation (this is not archive - and we don't need information about edit history in main space - we could say that). Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:11, 6 February 2022 (UTC) As it was added as a sample item to has list (P2354) , we should do full cleanup for conflation: i.e. split the content into clean items. Otherwise people may be using the incorrect item for the concept they thought they had been using. If it wasn't a model item, we might have done differently. --- Jura 13:16, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : What do you mean? It was and it still is has list (P2354) so? There is some lists and they are has list (P2354) to each other. Isn't it how has list (P2354) works? Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:29, 6 February 2022 (UTC) A sample list should be of high quality, otherwise people who use it as a model end up doing not so high quality things. --- Jura 13:32, 6 February 2022 (UTC) The item is currently a conflation of a list and the item for artist. Once deletion is decided, I will to the necessary changes and create the new item. --- Jura 15:12, 2 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : But for this reason list of awards and nominations received by Basshunter (Q63384701) can't be deleted in any way - there is no point. If you want to move properties then use moveClaim.js. I have moved award received (P166) and nominated for (P1411) to Basshunter (Q383541) so it is Fixed . Eurohunter ( talk ) 14:22, 3 February 2022 (UTC) You forgot P18. It's still a conflation potentially misleading users, oddly listed as sample on Property:P2354 . Once the split complete, it can be deleted. --- Jura 14:53, 3 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : What do you mean about image (P18) ? This is main image used for this item, ilustration of this list so what is wrong? See first random discographies I found for example Falco discography (Q10087) , Miranda Cosgrove discography (Q13118) , Texas discography (Q125194) . What about has list (P2354) ? President of the French Republic (Q191954) Wikimedia list related to this subject: list of presidents of France (Q29580) same as Basshunter (Q383541) Wikimedia list related to this subject: list of awards and nominations received by Basshunter (Q63384701) , list of songs recorded by Basshunter (Q11761784) , list of Basshunter live performances (Q6352124) . " list related to this subject " right? What is wrong? Eurohunter ( talk ) 10:49, 6 February 2022 (UTC) The discussion is about a list of awards. The illustration doesn't represent that. The image would more appropriately be on the item for the artist. No need to duplicate. If there are other malformed lists about Basshunter, please fix them, but we don't need to discuss them here. --- Jura 10:59, 6 February 2022 (UTC) I finished the split: Q110825249 . --- Jura 11:21, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : First explain Falco discography (Q10087) , Miranda Cosgrove discography (Q13118) , Texas discography (Q125194) and thousands of other. This is image for infobox. What is the problem? This split was totally non-sense. Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:31, 6 February 2022 (UTC) You split off most statements to the item for the artist, not me. I thought you understood that you have be conflating items. --- Jura 12:34, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : This is not any "conflation" in anyway. How even you got that idea? There is no any logic in this. How? You are trying to do something weird. This is single item for list of awards and nominations received by Basshunter. What is the problem again. Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:37, 6 February 2022 (UTC) Please explain why you moved these statements from the item we are discussing here after it was listed for deletion. --- Jura 12:40, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : Maybe I miss understood you but you told that somehow award received (P166) and nominated for (P1411) are missleading so I thought you mean that they are dedicated for human (Q5) than Wikimedia list article (Q13406463) so I have moved them. Should I restore them? Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:45, 6 February 2022 (UTC) No. They are clearly statements that go on items for humans (or other awardees) and not on items for a link to a Wikipedia list. This is why I consider that the item conflats two concepts. --- Jura 12:50, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : So yes it was a issue which was fixed now and this is the same item for list just it is fixed now and due to it isn't any conflation (this is not archive - and we don't need information about edit history in main space - we could say that). Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:11, 6 February 2022 (UTC) As it was added as a sample item to has list (P2354) , we should do full cleanup for conflation: i.e. split the content into clean items. Otherwise people may be using the incorrect item for the concept they thought they had been using. If it wasn't a model item, we might have done differently. --- Jura 13:16, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : What do you mean? It was and it still is has list (P2354) so? There is some lists and they are has list (P2354) to each other. Isn't it how has list (P2354) works? Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:29, 6 February 2022 (UTC) A sample list should be of high quality, otherwise people who use it as a model end up doing not so high quality things. --- Jura 13:32, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : But for this reason list of awards and nominations received by Basshunter (Q63384701) can't be deleted in any way - there is no point. If you want to move properties then use moveClaim.js. I have moved award received (P166) and nominated for (P1411) to Basshunter (Q383541) so it is Fixed . Eurohunter ( talk ) 14:22, 3 February 2022 (UTC) You forgot P18. It's still a conflation potentially misleading users, oddly listed as sample on Property:P2354 . Once the split complete, it can be deleted. --- Jura 14:53, 3 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : What do you mean about image (P18) ? This is main image used for this item, ilustration of this list so what is wrong? See first random discographies I found for example Falco discography (Q10087) , Miranda Cosgrove discography (Q13118) , Texas discography (Q125194) . What about has list (P2354) ? President of the French Republic (Q191954) Wikimedia list related to this subject: list of presidents of France (Q29580) same as Basshunter (Q383541) Wikimedia list related to this subject: list of awards and nominations received by Basshunter (Q63384701) , list of songs recorded by Basshunter (Q11761784) , list of Basshunter live performances (Q6352124) . " list related to this subject " right? What is wrong? Eurohunter ( talk ) 10:49, 6 February 2022 (UTC) The discussion is about a list of awards. The illustration doesn't represent that. The image would more appropriately be on the item for the artist. No need to duplicate. If there are other malformed lists about Basshunter, please fix them, but we don't need to discuss them here. --- Jura 10:59, 6 February 2022 (UTC) I finished the split: Q110825249 . --- Jura 11:21, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : First explain Falco discography (Q10087) , Miranda Cosgrove discography (Q13118) , Texas discography (Q125194) and thousands of other. This is image for infobox. What is the problem? This split was totally non-sense. Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:31, 6 February 2022 (UTC) You split off most statements to the item for the artist, not me. I thought you understood that you have be conflating items. --- Jura 12:34, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : This is not any "conflation" in anyway. How even you got that idea? There is no any logic in this. How? You are trying to do something weird. This is single item for list of awards and nominations received by Basshunter. What is the problem again. Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:37, 6 February 2022 (UTC) Please explain why you moved these statements from the item we are discussing here after it was listed for deletion. --- Jura 12:40, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : Maybe I miss understood you but you told that somehow award received (P166) and nominated for (P1411) are missleading so I thought you mean that they are dedicated for human (Q5) than Wikimedia list article (Q13406463) so I have moved them. Should I restore them? Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:45, 6 February 2022 (UTC) No. They are clearly statements that go on items for humans (or other awardees) and not on items for a link to a Wikipedia list. This is why I consider that the item conflats two concepts. --- Jura 12:50, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : So yes it was a issue which was fixed now and this is the same item for list just it is fixed now and due to it isn't any conflation (this is not archive - and we don't need information about edit history in main space - we could say that). Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:11, 6 February 2022 (UTC) As it was added as a sample item to has list (P2354) , we should do full cleanup for conflation: i.e. split the content into clean items. Otherwise people may be using the incorrect item for the concept they thought they had been using. If it wasn't a model item, we might have done differently. --- Jura 13:16, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : What do you mean? It was and it still is has list (P2354) so? There is some lists and they are has list (P2354) to each other. Isn't it how has list (P2354) works? Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:29, 6 February 2022 (UTC) A sample list should be of high quality, otherwise people who use it as a model end up doing not so high quality things. --- Jura 13:32, 6 February 2022 (UTC) You forgot P18. It's still a conflation potentially misleading users, oddly listed as sample on Property:P2354 . Once the split complete, it can be deleted. --- Jura 14:53, 3 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : What do you mean about image (P18) ? This is main image used for this item, ilustration of this list so what is wrong? See first random discographies I found for example Falco discography (Q10087) , Miranda Cosgrove discography (Q13118) , Texas discography (Q125194) . What about has list (P2354) ? President of the French Republic (Q191954) Wikimedia list related to this subject: list of presidents of France (Q29580) same as Basshunter (Q383541) Wikimedia list related to this subject: list of awards and nominations received by Basshunter (Q63384701) , list of songs recorded by Basshunter (Q11761784) , list of Basshunter live performances (Q6352124) . " list related to this subject " right? What is wrong? Eurohunter ( talk ) 10:49, 6 February 2022 (UTC) The discussion is about a list of awards. The illustration doesn't represent that. The image would more appropriately be on the item for the artist. No need to duplicate. If there are other malformed lists about Basshunter, please fix them, but we don't need to discuss them here. --- Jura 10:59, 6 February 2022 (UTC) I finished the split: Q110825249 . --- Jura 11:21, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : First explain Falco discography (Q10087) , Miranda Cosgrove discography (Q13118) , Texas discography (Q125194) and thousands of other. This is image for infobox. What is the problem? This split was totally non-sense. Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:31, 6 February 2022 (UTC) You split off most statements to the item for the artist, not me. I thought you understood that you have be conflating items. --- Jura 12:34, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : This is not any "conflation" in anyway. How even you got that idea? There is no any logic in this. How? You are trying to do something weird. This is single item for list of awards and nominations received by Basshunter. What is the problem again. Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:37, 6 February 2022 (UTC) Please explain why you moved these statements from the item we are discussing here after it was listed for deletion. --- Jura 12:40, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : Maybe I miss understood you but you told that somehow award received (P166) and nominated for (P1411) are missleading so I thought you mean that they are dedicated for human (Q5) than Wikimedia list article (Q13406463) so I have moved them. Should I restore them? Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:45, 6 February 2022 (UTC) No. They are clearly statements that go on items for humans (or other awardees) and not on items for a link to a Wikipedia list. This is why I consider that the item conflats two concepts. --- Jura 12:50, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : So yes it was a issue which was fixed now and this is the same item for list just it is fixed now and due to it isn't any conflation (this is not archive - and we don't need information about edit history in main space - we could say that). Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:11, 6 February 2022 (UTC) As it was added as a sample item to has list (P2354) , we should do full cleanup for conflation: i.e. split the content into clean items. Otherwise people may be using the incorrect item for the concept they thought they had been using. If it wasn't a model item, we might have done differently. --- Jura 13:16, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : What do you mean? It was and it still is has list (P2354) so? There is some lists and they are has list (P2354) to each other. Isn't it how has list (P2354) works? Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:29, 6 February 2022 (UTC) A sample list should be of high quality, otherwise people who use it as a model end up doing not so high quality things. --- Jura 13:32, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : What do you mean about image (P18) ? This is main image used for this item, ilustration of this list so what is wrong? See first random discographies I found for example Falco discography (Q10087) , Miranda Cosgrove discography (Q13118) , Texas discography (Q125194) . What about has list (P2354) ? President of the French Republic (Q191954) Wikimedia list related to this subject: list of presidents of France (Q29580) same as Basshunter (Q383541) Wikimedia list related to this subject: list of awards and nominations received by Basshunter (Q63384701) , list of songs recorded by Basshunter (Q11761784) , list of Basshunter live performances (Q6352124) . " list related to this subject " right? What is wrong? Eurohunter ( talk ) 10:49, 6 February 2022 (UTC) The discussion is about a list of awards. The illustration doesn't represent that. The image would more appropriately be on the item for the artist. No need to duplicate. If there are other malformed lists about Basshunter, please fix them, but we don't need to discuss them here. --- Jura 10:59, 6 February 2022 (UTC) I finished the split: Q110825249 . --- Jura 11:21, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : First explain Falco discography (Q10087) , Miranda Cosgrove discography (Q13118) , Texas discography (Q125194) and thousands of other. This is image for infobox. What is the problem? This split was totally non-sense. Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:31, 6 February 2022 (UTC) You split off most statements to the item for the artist, not me. I thought you understood that you have be conflating items. --- Jura 12:34, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : This is not any "conflation" in anyway. How even you got that idea? There is no any logic in this. How? You are trying to do something weird. This is single item for list of awards and nominations received by Basshunter. What is the problem again. Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:37, 6 February 2022 (UTC) Please explain why you moved these statements from the item we are discussing here after it was listed for deletion. --- Jura 12:40, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : Maybe I miss understood you but you told that somehow award received (P166) and nominated for (P1411) are missleading so I thought you mean that they are dedicated for human (Q5) than Wikimedia list article (Q13406463) so I have moved them. Should I restore them? Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:45, 6 February 2022 (UTC) No. They are clearly statements that go on items for humans (or other awardees) and not on items for a link to a Wikipedia list. This is why I consider that the item conflats two concepts. --- Jura 12:50, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : So yes it was a issue which was fixed now and this is the same item for list just it is fixed now and due to it isn't any conflation (this is not archive - and we don't need information about edit history in main space - we could say that). Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:11, 6 February 2022 (UTC) As it was added as a sample item to has list (P2354) , we should do full cleanup for conflation: i.e. split the content into clean items. Otherwise people may be using the incorrect item for the concept they thought they had been using. If it wasn't a model item, we might have done differently. --- Jura 13:16, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : What do you mean? It was and it still is has list (P2354) so? There is some lists and they are has list (P2354) to each other. Isn't it how has list (P2354) works? Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:29, 6 February 2022 (UTC) A sample list should be of high quality, otherwise people who use it as a model end up doing not so high quality things. --- Jura 13:32, 6 February 2022 (UTC) The discussion is about a list of awards. The illustration doesn't represent that. The image would more appropriately be on the item for the artist. No need to duplicate. If there are other malformed lists about Basshunter, please fix them, but we don't need to discuss them here. --- Jura 10:59, 6 February 2022 (UTC) I finished the split: Q110825249 . --- Jura 11:21, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : First explain Falco discography (Q10087) , Miranda Cosgrove discography (Q13118) , Texas discography (Q125194) and thousands of other. This is image for infobox. What is the problem? This split was totally non-sense. Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:31, 6 February 2022 (UTC) You split off most statements to the item for the artist, not me. I thought you understood that you have be conflating items. --- Jura 12:34, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : This is not any "conflation" in anyway. How even you got that idea? There is no any logic in this. How? You are trying to do something weird. This is single item for list of awards and nominations received by Basshunter. What is the problem again. Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:37, 6 February 2022 (UTC) Please explain why you moved these statements from the item we are discussing here after it was listed for deletion. --- Jura 12:40, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : Maybe I miss understood you but you told that somehow award received (P166) and nominated for (P1411) are missleading so I thought you mean that they are dedicated for human (Q5) than Wikimedia list article (Q13406463) so I have moved them. Should I restore them? Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:45, 6 February 2022 (UTC) No. They are clearly statements that go on items for humans (or other awardees) and not on items for a link to a Wikipedia list. This is why I consider that the item conflats two concepts. --- Jura 12:50, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : So yes it was a issue which was fixed now and this is the same item for list just it is fixed now and due to it isn't any conflation (this is not archive - and we don't need information about edit history in main space - we could say that). Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:11, 6 February 2022 (UTC) As it was added as a sample item to has list (P2354) , we should do full cleanup for conflation: i.e. split the content into clean items. Otherwise people may be using the incorrect item for the concept they thought they had been using. If it wasn't a model item, we might have done differently. --- Jura 13:16, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : What do you mean? It was and it still is has list (P2354) so? There is some lists and they are has list (P2354) to each other. Isn't it how has list (P2354) works? Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:29, 6 February 2022 (UTC) A sample list should be of high quality, otherwise people who use it as a model end up doing not so high quality things. --- Jura 13:32, 6 February 2022 (UTC) I finished the split: Q110825249 . --- Jura 11:21, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : First explain Falco discography (Q10087) , Miranda Cosgrove discography (Q13118) , Texas discography (Q125194) and thousands of other. This is image for infobox. What is the problem? This split was totally non-sense. Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:31, 6 February 2022 (UTC) You split off most statements to the item for the artist, not me. I thought you understood that you have be conflating items. --- Jura 12:34, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : This is not any "conflation" in anyway. How even you got that idea? There is no any logic in this. How? You are trying to do something weird. This is single item for list of awards and nominations received by Basshunter. What is the problem again. Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:37, 6 February 2022 (UTC) Please explain why you moved these statements from the item we are discussing here after it was listed for deletion. --- Jura 12:40, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : Maybe I miss understood you but you told that somehow award received (P166) and nominated for (P1411) are missleading so I thought you mean that they are dedicated for human (Q5) than Wikimedia list article (Q13406463) so I have moved them. Should I restore them? Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:45, 6 February 2022 (UTC) No. They are clearly statements that go on items for humans (or other awardees) and not on items for a link to a Wikipedia list. This is why I consider that the item conflats two concepts. --- Jura 12:50, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : So yes it was a issue which was fixed now and this is the same item for list just it is fixed now and due to it isn't any conflation (this is not archive - and we don't need information about edit history in main space - we could say that). Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:11, 6 February 2022 (UTC) As it was added as a sample item to has list (P2354) , we should do full cleanup for conflation: i.e. split the content into clean items. Otherwise people may be using the incorrect item for the concept they thought they had been using. If it wasn't a model item, we might have done differently. --- Jura 13:16, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : What do you mean? It was and it still is has list (P2354) so? There is some lists and they are has list (P2354) to each other. Isn't it how has list (P2354) works? Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:29, 6 February 2022 (UTC) A sample list should be of high quality, otherwise people who use it as a model end up doing not so high quality things. --- Jura 13:32, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : First explain Falco discography (Q10087) , Miranda Cosgrove discography (Q13118) , Texas discography (Q125194) and thousands of other. This is image for infobox. What is the problem? This split was totally non-sense. Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:31, 6 February 2022 (UTC) You split off most statements to the item for the artist, not me. I thought you understood that you have be conflating items. --- Jura 12:34, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : This is not any "conflation" in anyway. How even you got that idea? There is no any logic in this. How? You are trying to do something weird. This is single item for list of awards and nominations received by Basshunter. What is the problem again. Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:37, 6 February 2022 (UTC) Please explain why you moved these statements from the item we are discussing here after it was listed for deletion. --- Jura 12:40, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : Maybe I miss understood you but you told that somehow award received (P166) and nominated for (P1411) are missleading so I thought you mean that they are dedicated for human (Q5) than Wikimedia list article (Q13406463) so I have moved them. Should I restore them? Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:45, 6 February 2022 (UTC) No. They are clearly statements that go on items for humans (or other awardees) and not on items for a link to a Wikipedia list. This is why I consider that the item conflats two concepts. --- Jura 12:50, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : So yes it was a issue which was fixed now and this is the same item for list just it is fixed now and due to it isn't any conflation (this is not archive - and we don't need information about edit history in main space - we could say that). Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:11, 6 February 2022 (UTC) As it was added as a sample item to has list (P2354) , we should do full cleanup for conflation: i.e. split the content into clean items. Otherwise people may be using the incorrect item for the concept they thought they had been using. If it wasn't a model item, we might have done differently. --- Jura 13:16, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : What do you mean? It was and it still is has list (P2354) so? There is some lists and they are has list (P2354) to each other. Isn't it how has list (P2354) works? Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:29, 6 February 2022 (UTC) A sample list should be of high quality, otherwise people who use it as a model end up doing not so high quality things. --- Jura 13:32, 6 February 2022 (UTC) You split off most statements to the item for the artist, not me. I thought you understood that you have be conflating items. --- Jura 12:34, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : This is not any "conflation" in anyway. How even you got that idea? There is no any logic in this. How? You are trying to do something weird. This is single item for list of awards and nominations received by Basshunter. What is the problem again. Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:37, 6 February 2022 (UTC) Please explain why you moved these statements from the item we are discussing here after it was listed for deletion. --- Jura 12:40, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : Maybe I miss understood you but you told that somehow award received (P166) and nominated for (P1411) are missleading so I thought you mean that they are dedicated for human (Q5) than Wikimedia list article (Q13406463) so I have moved them. Should I restore them? Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:45, 6 February 2022 (UTC) No. They are clearly statements that go on items for humans (or other awardees) and not on items for a link to a Wikipedia list. This is why I consider that the item conflats two concepts. --- Jura 12:50, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : So yes it was a issue which was fixed now and this is the same item for list just it is fixed now and due to it isn't any conflation (this is not archive - and we don't need information about edit history in main space - we could say that). Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:11, 6 February 2022 (UTC) As it was added as a sample item to has list (P2354) , we should do full cleanup for conflation: i.e. split the content into clean items. Otherwise people may be using the incorrect item for the concept they thought they had been using. If it wasn't a model item, we might have done differently. --- Jura 13:16, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : What do you mean? It was and it still is has list (P2354) so? There is some lists and they are has list (P2354) to each other. Isn't it how has list (P2354) works? Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:29, 6 February 2022 (UTC) A sample list should be of high quality, otherwise people who use it as a model end up doing not so high quality things. --- Jura 13:32, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : This is not any "conflation" in anyway. How even you got that idea? There is no any logic in this. How? You are trying to do something weird. This is single item for list of awards and nominations received by Basshunter. What is the problem again. Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:37, 6 February 2022 (UTC) Please explain why you moved these statements from the item we are discussing here after it was listed for deletion. --- Jura 12:40, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : Maybe I miss understood you but you told that somehow award received (P166) and nominated for (P1411) are missleading so I thought you mean that they are dedicated for human (Q5) than Wikimedia list article (Q13406463) so I have moved them. Should I restore them? Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:45, 6 February 2022 (UTC) No. They are clearly statements that go on items for humans (or other awardees) and not on items for a link to a Wikipedia list. This is why I consider that the item conflats two concepts. --- Jura 12:50, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : So yes it was a issue which was fixed now and this is the same item for list just it is fixed now and due to it isn't any conflation (this is not archive - and we don't need information about edit history in main space - we could say that). Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:11, 6 February 2022 (UTC) As it was added as a sample item to has list (P2354) , we should do full cleanup for conflation: i.e. split the content into clean items. Otherwise people may be using the incorrect item for the concept they thought they had been using. If it wasn't a model item, we might have done differently. --- Jura 13:16, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : What do you mean? It was and it still is has list (P2354) so? There is some lists and they are has list (P2354) to each other. Isn't it how has list (P2354) works? Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:29, 6 February 2022 (UTC) A sample list should be of high quality, otherwise people who use it as a model end up doing not so high quality things. --- Jura 13:32, 6 February 2022 (UTC) Please explain why you moved these statements from the item we are discussing here after it was listed for deletion. --- Jura 12:40, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : Maybe I miss understood you but you told that somehow award received (P166) and nominated for (P1411) are missleading so I thought you mean that they are dedicated for human (Q5) than Wikimedia list article (Q13406463) so I have moved them. Should I restore them? Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:45, 6 February 2022 (UTC) No. They are clearly statements that go on items for humans (or other awardees) and not on items for a link to a Wikipedia list. This is why I consider that the item conflats two concepts. --- Jura 12:50, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : So yes it was a issue which was fixed now and this is the same item for list just it is fixed now and due to it isn't any conflation (this is not archive - and we don't need information about edit history in main space - we could say that). Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:11, 6 February 2022 (UTC) As it was added as a sample item to has list (P2354) , we should do full cleanup for conflation: i.e. split the content into clean items. Otherwise people may be using the incorrect item for the concept they thought they had been using. If it wasn't a model item, we might have done differently. --- Jura 13:16, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : What do you mean? It was and it still is has list (P2354) so? There is some lists and they are has list (P2354) to each other. Isn't it how has list (P2354) works? Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:29, 6 February 2022 (UTC) A sample list should be of high quality, otherwise people who use it as a model end up doing not so high quality things. --- Jura 13:32, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : Maybe I miss understood you but you told that somehow award received (P166) and nominated for (P1411) are missleading so I thought you mean that they are dedicated for human (Q5) than Wikimedia list article (Q13406463) so I have moved them. Should I restore them? Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:45, 6 February 2022 (UTC) No. They are clearly statements that go on items for humans (or other awardees) and not on items for a link to a Wikipedia list. This is why I consider that the item conflats two concepts. --- Jura 12:50, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : So yes it was a issue which was fixed now and this is the same item for list just it is fixed now and due to it isn't any conflation (this is not archive - and we don't need information about edit history in main space - we could say that). Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:11, 6 February 2022 (UTC) As it was added as a sample item to has list (P2354) , we should do full cleanup for conflation: i.e. split the content into clean items. Otherwise people may be using the incorrect item for the concept they thought they had been using. If it wasn't a model item, we might have done differently. --- Jura 13:16, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : What do you mean? It was and it still is has list (P2354) so? There is some lists and they are has list (P2354) to each other. Isn't it how has list (P2354) works? Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:29, 6 February 2022 (UTC) A sample list should be of high quality, otherwise people who use it as a model end up doing not so high quality things. --- Jura 13:32, 6 February 2022 (UTC) No. They are clearly statements that go on items for humans (or other awardees) and not on items for a link to a Wikipedia list. This is why I consider that the item conflats two concepts. --- Jura 12:50, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : So yes it was a issue which was fixed now and this is the same item for list just it is fixed now and due to it isn't any conflation (this is not archive - and we don't need information about edit history in main space - we could say that). Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:11, 6 February 2022 (UTC) As it was added as a sample item to has list (P2354) , we should do full cleanup for conflation: i.e. split the content into clean items. Otherwise people may be using the incorrect item for the concept they thought they had been using. If it wasn't a model item, we might have done differently. --- Jura 13:16, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : What do you mean? It was and it still is has list (P2354) so? There is some lists and they are has list (P2354) to each other. Isn't it how has list (P2354) works? Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:29, 6 February 2022 (UTC) A sample list should be of high quality, otherwise people who use it as a model end up doing not so high quality things. --- Jura 13:32, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : So yes it was a issue which was fixed now and this is the same item for list just it is fixed now and due to it isn't any conflation (this is not archive - and we don't need information about edit history in main space - we could say that). Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:11, 6 February 2022 (UTC) As it was added as a sample item to has list (P2354) , we should do full cleanup for conflation: i.e. split the content into clean items. Otherwise people may be using the incorrect item for the concept they thought they had been using. If it wasn't a model item, we might have done differently. --- Jura 13:16, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : What do you mean? It was and it still is has list (P2354) so? There is some lists and they are has list (P2354) to each other. Isn't it how has list (P2354) works? Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:29, 6 February 2022 (UTC) A sample list should be of high quality, otherwise people who use it as a model end up doing not so high quality things. --- Jura 13:32, 6 February 2022 (UTC) As it was added as a sample item to has list (P2354) , we should do full cleanup for conflation: i.e. split the content into clean items. Otherwise people may be using the incorrect item for the concept they thought they had been using. If it wasn't a model item, we might have done differently. --- Jura 13:16, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : What do you mean? It was and it still is has list (P2354) so? There is some lists and they are has list (P2354) to each other. Isn't it how has list (P2354) works? Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:29, 6 February 2022 (UTC) A sample list should be of high quality, otherwise people who use it as a model end up doing not so high quality things. --- Jura 13:32, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : What do you mean? It was and it still is has list (P2354) so? There is some lists and they are has list (P2354) to each other. Isn't it how has list (P2354) works? Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:29, 6 February 2022 (UTC) A sample list should be of high quality, otherwise people who use it as a model end up doing not so high quality things. --- Jura 13:32, 6 February 2022 (UTC) Yes all but the ones that should go on the new item for the enwiki sitelink. The statements with already deleted values can remain. --- Jura 10:50, 2 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : It doesn't make any sense or you are not enough precise . This is item for "list of awards and nominations received by Basshunter" so where would you like to move ENWP link? And why only ENWP? There is PLWP link too so they both should be moved eventualy but there is no point in this. All what can be done here is to just move award received (P166) and nominated for (P1411) to Basshunter (Q383541) and remove Q62098823 and Q66112460 or restore them. Eurohunter ( talk ) 14:47, 2 February 2022 (UTC) The item is currently a conflation of a list and the item for artist. Once deletion is decided, I will to the necessary changes and create the new item. --- Jura 15:12, 2 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : But for this reason list of awards and nominations received by Basshunter (Q63384701) can't be deleted in any way - there is no point. If you want to move properties then use moveClaim.js. I have moved award received (P166) and nominated for (P1411) to Basshunter (Q383541) so it is Fixed . Eurohunter ( talk ) 14:22, 3 February 2022 (UTC) You forgot P18. It's still a conflation potentially misleading users, oddly listed as sample on Property:P2354 . Once the split complete, it can be deleted. --- Jura 14:53, 3 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : What do you mean about image (P18) ? This is main image used for this item, ilustration of this list so what is wrong? See first random discographies I found for example Falco discography (Q10087) , Miranda Cosgrove discography (Q13118) , Texas discography (Q125194) . What about has list (P2354) ? President of the French Republic (Q191954) Wikimedia list related to this subject: list of presidents of France (Q29580) same as Basshunter (Q383541) Wikimedia list related to this subject: list of awards and nominations received by Basshunter (Q63384701) , list of songs recorded by Basshunter (Q11761784) , list of Basshunter live performances (Q6352124) . " list related to this subject " right? What is wrong? Eurohunter ( talk ) 10:49, 6 February 2022 (UTC) The discussion is about a list of awards. The illustration doesn't represent that. The image would more appropriately be on the item for the artist. No need to duplicate. If there are other malformed lists about Basshunter, please fix them, but we don't need to discuss them here. --- Jura 10:59, 6 February 2022 (UTC) I finished the split: Q110825249 . --- Jura 11:21, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : First explain Falco discography (Q10087) , Miranda Cosgrove discography (Q13118) , Texas discography (Q125194) and thousands of other. This is image for infobox. What is the problem? This split was totally non-sense. Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:31, 6 February 2022 (UTC) You split off most statements to the item for the artist, not me. I thought you understood that you have be conflating items. --- Jura 12:34, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : This is not any "conflation" in anyway. How even you got that idea? There is no any logic in this. How? You are trying to do something weird. This is single item for list of awards and nominations received by Basshunter. What is the problem again. Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:37, 6 February 2022 (UTC) Please explain why you moved these statements from the item we are discussing here after it was listed for deletion. --- Jura 12:40, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : Maybe I miss understood you but you told that somehow award received (P166) and nominated for (P1411) are missleading so I thought you mean that they are dedicated for human (Q5) than Wikimedia list article (Q13406463) so I have moved them. Should I restore them? Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:45, 6 February 2022 (UTC) No. They are clearly statements that go on items for humans (or other awardees) and not on items for a link to a Wikipedia list. This is why I consider that the item conflats two concepts. --- Jura 12:50, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : So yes it was a issue which was fixed now and this is the same item for list just it is fixed now and due to it isn't any conflation (this is not archive - and we don't need information about edit history in main space - we could say that). Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:11, 6 February 2022 (UTC) As it was added as a sample item to has list (P2354) , we should do full cleanup for conflation: i.e. split the content into clean items. Otherwise people may be using the incorrect item for the concept they thought they had been using. If it wasn't a model item, we might have done differently. --- Jura 13:16, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : What do you mean? It was and it still is has list (P2354) so? There is some lists and they are has list (P2354) to each other. Isn't it how has list (P2354) works? Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:29, 6 February 2022 (UTC) A sample list should be of high quality, otherwise people who use it as a model end up doing not so high quality things. --- Jura 13:32, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : It doesn't make any sense or you are not enough precise . This is item for "list of awards and nominations received by Basshunter" so where would you like to move ENWP link? And why only ENWP? There is PLWP link too so they both should be moved eventualy but there is no point in this. All what can be done here is to just move award received (P166) and nominated for (P1411) to Basshunter (Q383541) and remove Q62098823 and Q66112460 or restore them. Eurohunter ( talk ) 14:47, 2 February 2022 (UTC) The item is currently a conflation of a list and the item for artist. Once deletion is decided, I will to the necessary changes and create the new item. --- Jura 15:12, 2 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : But for this reason list of awards and nominations received by Basshunter (Q63384701) can't be deleted in any way - there is no point. If you want to move properties then use moveClaim.js. I have moved award received (P166) and nominated for (P1411) to Basshunter (Q383541) so it is Fixed . Eurohunter ( talk ) 14:22, 3 February 2022 (UTC) You forgot P18. It's still a conflation potentially misleading users, oddly listed as sample on Property:P2354 . Once the split complete, it can be deleted. --- Jura 14:53, 3 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : What do you mean about image (P18) ? This is main image used for this item, ilustration of this list so what is wrong? See first random discographies I found for example Falco discography (Q10087) , Miranda Cosgrove discography (Q13118) , Texas discography (Q125194) . What about has list (P2354) ? President of the French Republic (Q191954) Wikimedia list related to this subject: list of presidents of France (Q29580) same as Basshunter (Q383541) Wikimedia list related to this subject: list of awards and nominations received by Basshunter (Q63384701) , list of songs recorded by Basshunter (Q11761784) , list of Basshunter live performances (Q6352124) . " list related to this subject " right? What is wrong? Eurohunter ( talk ) 10:49, 6 February 2022 (UTC) The discussion is about a list of awards. The illustration doesn't represent that. The image would more appropriately be on the item for the artist. No need to duplicate. If there are other malformed lists about Basshunter, please fix them, but we don't need to discuss them here. --- Jura 10:59, 6 February 2022 (UTC) I finished the split: Q110825249 . --- Jura 11:21, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : First explain Falco discography (Q10087) , Miranda Cosgrove discography (Q13118) , Texas discography (Q125194) and thousands of other. This is image for infobox. What is the problem? This split was totally non-sense. Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:31, 6 February 2022 (UTC) You split off most statements to the item for the artist, not me. I thought you understood that you have be conflating items. --- Jura 12:34, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : This is not any "conflation" in anyway. How even you got that idea? There is no any logic in this. How? You are trying to do something weird. This is single item for list of awards and nominations received by Basshunter. What is the problem again. Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:37, 6 February 2022 (UTC) Please explain why you moved these statements from the item we are discussing here after it was listed for deletion. --- Jura 12:40, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : Maybe I miss understood you but you told that somehow award received (P166) and nominated for (P1411) are missleading so I thought you mean that they are dedicated for human (Q5) than Wikimedia list article (Q13406463) so I have moved them. Should I restore them? Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:45, 6 February 2022 (UTC) No. They are clearly statements that go on items for humans (or other awardees) and not on items for a link to a Wikipedia list. This is why I consider that the item conflats two concepts. --- Jura 12:50, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : So yes it was a issue which was fixed now and this is the same item for list just it is fixed now and due to it isn't any conflation (this is not archive - and we don't need information about edit history in main space - we could say that). Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:11, 6 February 2022 (UTC) As it was added as a sample item to has list (P2354) , we should do full cleanup for conflation: i.e. split the content into clean items. Otherwise people may be using the incorrect item for the concept they thought they had been using. If it wasn't a model item, we might have done differently. --- Jura 13:16, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : What do you mean? It was and it still is has list (P2354) so? There is some lists and they are has list (P2354) to each other. Isn't it how has list (P2354) works? Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:29, 6 February 2022 (UTC) A sample list should be of high quality, otherwise people who use it as a model end up doing not so high quality things. --- Jura 13:32, 6 February 2022 (UTC) The item is currently a conflation of a list and the item for artist. Once deletion is decided, I will to the necessary changes and create the new item. --- Jura 15:12, 2 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : But for this reason list of awards and nominations received by Basshunter (Q63384701) can't be deleted in any way - there is no point. If you want to move properties then use moveClaim.js. I have moved award received (P166) and nominated for (P1411) to Basshunter (Q383541) so it is Fixed . Eurohunter ( talk ) 14:22, 3 February 2022 (UTC) You forgot P18. It's still a conflation potentially misleading users, oddly listed as sample on Property:P2354 . Once the split complete, it can be deleted. --- Jura 14:53, 3 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : What do you mean about image (P18) ? This is main image used for this item, ilustration of this list so what is wrong? See first random discographies I found for example Falco discography (Q10087) , Miranda Cosgrove discography (Q13118) , Texas discography (Q125194) . What about has list (P2354) ? President of the French Republic (Q191954) Wikimedia list related to this subject: list of presidents of France (Q29580) same as Basshunter (Q383541) Wikimedia list related to this subject: list of awards and nominations received by Basshunter (Q63384701) , list of songs recorded by Basshunter (Q11761784) , list of Basshunter live performances (Q6352124) . " list related to this subject " right? What is wrong? Eurohunter ( talk ) 10:49, 6 February 2022 (UTC) The discussion is about a list of awards. The illustration doesn't represent that. The image would more appropriately be on the item for the artist. No need to duplicate. If there are other malformed lists about Basshunter, please fix them, but we don't need to discuss them here. --- Jura 10:59, 6 February 2022 (UTC) I finished the split: Q110825249 . --- Jura 11:21, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : First explain Falco discography (Q10087) , Miranda Cosgrove discography (Q13118) , Texas discography (Q125194) and thousands of other. This is image for infobox. What is the problem? This split was totally non-sense. Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:31, 6 February 2022 (UTC) You split off most statements to the item for the artist, not me. I thought you understood that you have be conflating items. --- Jura 12:34, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : This is not any "conflation" in anyway. How even you got that idea? There is no any logic in this. How? You are trying to do something weird. This is single item for list of awards and nominations received by Basshunter. What is the problem again. Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:37, 6 February 2022 (UTC) Please explain why you moved these statements from the item we are discussing here after it was listed for deletion. --- Jura 12:40, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : Maybe I miss understood you but you told that somehow award received (P166) and nominated for (P1411) are missleading so I thought you mean that they are dedicated for human (Q5) than Wikimedia list article (Q13406463) so I have moved them. Should I restore them? Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:45, 6 February 2022 (UTC) No. They are clearly statements that go on items for humans (or other awardees) and not on items for a link to a Wikipedia list. This is why I consider that the item conflats two concepts. --- Jura 12:50, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : So yes it was a issue which was fixed now and this is the same item for list just it is fixed now and due to it isn't any conflation (this is not archive - and we don't need information about edit history in main space - we could say that). Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:11, 6 February 2022 (UTC) As it was added as a sample item to has list (P2354) , we should do full cleanup for conflation: i.e. split the content into clean items. Otherwise people may be using the incorrect item for the concept they thought they had been using. If it wasn't a model item, we might have done differently. --- Jura 13:16, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : What do you mean? It was and it still is has list (P2354) so? There is some lists and they are has list (P2354) to each other. Isn't it how has list (P2354) works? Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:29, 6 February 2022 (UTC) A sample list should be of high quality, otherwise people who use it as a model end up doing not so high quality things. --- Jura 13:32, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : But for this reason list of awards and nominations received by Basshunter (Q63384701) can't be deleted in any way - there is no point. If you want to move properties then use moveClaim.js. I have moved award received (P166) and nominated for (P1411) to Basshunter (Q383541) so it is Fixed . Eurohunter ( talk ) 14:22, 3 February 2022 (UTC) You forgot P18. It's still a conflation potentially misleading users, oddly listed as sample on Property:P2354 . Once the split complete, it can be deleted. --- Jura 14:53, 3 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : What do you mean about image (P18) ? This is main image used for this item, ilustration of this list so what is wrong? See first random discographies I found for example Falco discography (Q10087) , Miranda Cosgrove discography (Q13118) , Texas discography (Q125194) . What about has list (P2354) ? President of the French Republic (Q191954) Wikimedia list related to this subject: list of presidents of France (Q29580) same as Basshunter (Q383541) Wikimedia list related to this subject: list of awards and nominations received by Basshunter (Q63384701) , list of songs recorded by Basshunter (Q11761784) , list of Basshunter live performances (Q6352124) . " list related to this subject " right? What is wrong? Eurohunter ( talk ) 10:49, 6 February 2022 (UTC) The discussion is about a list of awards. The illustration doesn't represent that. The image would more appropriately be on the item for the artist. No need to duplicate. If there are other malformed lists about Basshunter, please fix them, but we don't need to discuss them here. --- Jura 10:59, 6 February 2022 (UTC) I finished the split: Q110825249 . --- Jura 11:21, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : First explain Falco discography (Q10087) , Miranda Cosgrove discography (Q13118) , Texas discography (Q125194) and thousands of other. This is image for infobox. What is the problem? This split was totally non-sense. Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:31, 6 February 2022 (UTC) You split off most statements to the item for the artist, not me. I thought you understood that you have be conflating items. --- Jura 12:34, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : This is not any "conflation" in anyway. How even you got that idea? There is no any logic in this. How? You are trying to do something weird. This is single item for list of awards and nominations received by Basshunter. What is the problem again. Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:37, 6 February 2022 (UTC) Please explain why you moved these statements from the item we are discussing here after it was listed for deletion. --- Jura 12:40, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : Maybe I miss understood you but you told that somehow award received (P166) and nominated for (P1411) are missleading so I thought you mean that they are dedicated for human (Q5) than Wikimedia list article (Q13406463) so I have moved them. Should I restore them? Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:45, 6 February 2022 (UTC) No. They are clearly statements that go on items for humans (or other awardees) and not on items for a link to a Wikipedia list. This is why I consider that the item conflats two concepts. --- Jura 12:50, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : So yes it was a issue which was fixed now and this is the same item for list just it is fixed now and due to it isn't any conflation (this is not archive - and we don't need information about edit history in main space - we could say that). Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:11, 6 February 2022 (UTC) As it was added as a sample item to has list (P2354) , we should do full cleanup for conflation: i.e. split the content into clean items. Otherwise people may be using the incorrect item for the concept they thought they had been using. If it wasn't a model item, we might have done differently. --- Jura 13:16, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : What do you mean? It was and it still is has list (P2354) so? There is some lists and they are has list (P2354) to each other. Isn't it how has list (P2354) works? Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:29, 6 February 2022 (UTC) A sample list should be of high quality, otherwise people who use it as a model end up doing not so high quality things. --- Jura 13:32, 6 February 2022 (UTC) You forgot P18. It's still a conflation potentially misleading users, oddly listed as sample on Property:P2354 . Once the split complete, it can be deleted. --- Jura 14:53, 3 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : What do you mean about image (P18) ? This is main image used for this item, ilustration of this list so what is wrong? See first random discographies I found for example Falco discography (Q10087) , Miranda Cosgrove discography (Q13118) , Texas discography (Q125194) . What about has list (P2354) ? President of the French Republic (Q191954) Wikimedia list related to this subject: list of presidents of France (Q29580) same as Basshunter (Q383541) Wikimedia list related to this subject: list of awards and nominations received by Basshunter (Q63384701) , list of songs recorded by Basshunter (Q11761784) , list of Basshunter live performances (Q6352124) . " list related to this subject " right? What is wrong? Eurohunter ( talk ) 10:49, 6 February 2022 (UTC) The discussion is about a list of awards. The illustration doesn't represent that. The image would more appropriately be on the item for the artist. No need to duplicate. If there are other malformed lists about Basshunter, please fix them, but we don't need to discuss them here. --- Jura 10:59, 6 February 2022 (UTC) I finished the split: Q110825249 . --- Jura 11:21, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : First explain Falco discography (Q10087) , Miranda Cosgrove discography (Q13118) , Texas discography (Q125194) and thousands of other. This is image for infobox. What is the problem? This split was totally non-sense. Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:31, 6 February 2022 (UTC) You split off most statements to the item for the artist, not me. I thought you understood that you have be conflating items. --- Jura 12:34, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : This is not any "conflation" in anyway. How even you got that idea? There is no any logic in this. How? You are trying to do something weird. This is single item for list of awards and nominations received by Basshunter. What is the problem again. Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:37, 6 February 2022 (UTC) Please explain why you moved these statements from the item we are discussing here after it was listed for deletion. --- Jura 12:40, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : Maybe I miss understood you but you told that somehow award received (P166) and nominated for (P1411) are missleading so I thought you mean that they are dedicated for human (Q5) than Wikimedia list article (Q13406463) so I have moved them. Should I restore them? Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:45, 6 February 2022 (UTC) No. They are clearly statements that go on items for humans (or other awardees) and not on items for a link to a Wikipedia list. This is why I consider that the item conflats two concepts. --- Jura 12:50, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : So yes it was a issue which was fixed now and this is the same item for list just it is fixed now and due to it isn't any conflation (this is not archive - and we don't need information about edit history in main space - we could say that). Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:11, 6 February 2022 (UTC) As it was added as a sample item to has list (P2354) , we should do full cleanup for conflation: i.e. split the content into clean items. Otherwise people may be using the incorrect item for the concept they thought they had been using. If it wasn't a model item, we might have done differently. --- Jura 13:16, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : What do you mean? It was and it still is has list (P2354) so? There is some lists and they are has list (P2354) to each other. Isn't it how has list (P2354) works? Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:29, 6 February 2022 (UTC) A sample list should be of high quality, otherwise people who use it as a model end up doing not so high quality things. --- Jura 13:32, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : What do you mean about image (P18) ? This is main image used for this item, ilustration of this list so what is wrong? See first random discographies I found for example Falco discography (Q10087) , Miranda Cosgrove discography (Q13118) , Texas discography (Q125194) . What about has list (P2354) ? President of the French Republic (Q191954) Wikimedia list related to this subject: list of presidents of France (Q29580) same as Basshunter (Q383541) Wikimedia list related to this subject: list of awards and nominations received by Basshunter (Q63384701) , list of songs recorded by Basshunter (Q11761784) , list of Basshunter live performances (Q6352124) . " list related to this subject " right? What is wrong? Eurohunter ( talk ) 10:49, 6 February 2022 (UTC) The discussion is about a list of awards. The illustration doesn't represent that. The image would more appropriately be on the item for the artist. No need to duplicate. If there are other malformed lists about Basshunter, please fix them, but we don't need to discuss them here. --- Jura 10:59, 6 February 2022 (UTC) I finished the split: Q110825249 . --- Jura 11:21, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : First explain Falco discography (Q10087) , Miranda Cosgrove discography (Q13118) , Texas discography (Q125194) and thousands of other. This is image for infobox. What is the problem? This split was totally non-sense. Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:31, 6 February 2022 (UTC) You split off most statements to the item for the artist, not me. I thought you understood that you have be conflating items. --- Jura 12:34, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : This is not any "conflation" in anyway. How even you got that idea? There is no any logic in this. How? You are trying to do something weird. This is single item for list of awards and nominations received by Basshunter. What is the problem again. Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:37, 6 February 2022 (UTC) Please explain why you moved these statements from the item we are discussing here after it was listed for deletion. --- Jura 12:40, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : Maybe I miss understood you but you told that somehow award received (P166) and nominated for (P1411) are missleading so I thought you mean that they are dedicated for human (Q5) than Wikimedia list article (Q13406463) so I have moved them. Should I restore them? Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:45, 6 February 2022 (UTC) No. They are clearly statements that go on items for humans (or other awardees) and not on items for a link to a Wikipedia list. This is why I consider that the item conflats two concepts. --- Jura 12:50, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : So yes it was a issue which was fixed now and this is the same item for list just it is fixed now and due to it isn't any conflation (this is not archive - and we don't need information about edit history in main space - we could say that). Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:11, 6 February 2022 (UTC) As it was added as a sample item to has list (P2354) , we should do full cleanup for conflation: i.e. split the content into clean items. Otherwise people may be using the incorrect item for the concept they thought they had been using. If it wasn't a model item, we might have done differently. --- Jura 13:16, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : What do you mean? It was and it still is has list (P2354) so? There is some lists and they are has list (P2354) to each other. Isn't it how has list (P2354) works? Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:29, 6 February 2022 (UTC) A sample list should be of high quality, otherwise people who use it as a model end up doing not so high quality things. --- Jura 13:32, 6 February 2022 (UTC) The discussion is about a list of awards. The illustration doesn't represent that. The image would more appropriately be on the item for the artist. No need to duplicate. If there are other malformed lists about Basshunter, please fix them, but we don't need to discuss them here. --- Jura 10:59, 6 February 2022 (UTC) I finished the split: Q110825249 . --- Jura 11:21, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : First explain Falco discography (Q10087) , Miranda Cosgrove discography (Q13118) , Texas discography (Q125194) and thousands of other. This is image for infobox. What is the problem? This split was totally non-sense. Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:31, 6 February 2022 (UTC) You split off most statements to the item for the artist, not me. I thought you understood that you have be conflating items. --- Jura 12:34, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : This is not any "conflation" in anyway. How even you got that idea? There is no any logic in this. How? You are trying to do something weird. This is single item for list of awards and nominations received by Basshunter. What is the problem again. Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:37, 6 February 2022 (UTC) Please explain why you moved these statements from the item we are discussing here after it was listed for deletion. --- Jura 12:40, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : Maybe I miss understood you but you told that somehow award received (P166) and nominated for (P1411) are missleading so I thought you mean that they are dedicated for human (Q5) than Wikimedia list article (Q13406463) so I have moved them. Should I restore them? Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:45, 6 February 2022 (UTC) No. They are clearly statements that go on items for humans (or other awardees) and not on items for a link to a Wikipedia list. This is why I consider that the item conflats two concepts. --- Jura 12:50, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : So yes it was a issue which was fixed now and this is the same item for list just it is fixed now and due to it isn't any conflation (this is not archive - and we don't need information about edit history in main space - we could say that). Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:11, 6 February 2022 (UTC) As it was added as a sample item to has list (P2354) , we should do full cleanup for conflation: i.e. split the content into clean items. Otherwise people may be using the incorrect item for the concept they thought they had been using. If it wasn't a model item, we might have done differently. --- Jura 13:16, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : What do you mean? It was and it still is has list (P2354) so? There is some lists and they are has list (P2354) to each other. Isn't it how has list (P2354) works? Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:29, 6 February 2022 (UTC) A sample list should be of high quality, otherwise people who use it as a model end up doing not so high quality things. --- Jura 13:32, 6 February 2022 (UTC) I finished the split: Q110825249 . --- Jura 11:21, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : First explain Falco discography (Q10087) , Miranda Cosgrove discography (Q13118) , Texas discography (Q125194) and thousands of other. This is image for infobox. What is the problem? This split was totally non-sense. Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:31, 6 February 2022 (UTC) You split off most statements to the item for the artist, not me. I thought you understood that you have be conflating items. --- Jura 12:34, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : This is not any "conflation" in anyway. How even you got that idea? There is no any logic in this. How? You are trying to do something weird. This is single item for list of awards and nominations received by Basshunter. What is the problem again. Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:37, 6 February 2022 (UTC) Please explain why you moved these statements from the item we are discussing here after it was listed for deletion. --- Jura 12:40, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : Maybe I miss understood you but you told that somehow award received (P166) and nominated for (P1411) are missleading so I thought you mean that they are dedicated for human (Q5) than Wikimedia list article (Q13406463) so I have moved them. Should I restore them? Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:45, 6 February 2022 (UTC) No. They are clearly statements that go on items for humans (or other awardees) and not on items for a link to a Wikipedia list. This is why I consider that the item conflats two concepts. --- Jura 12:50, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : So yes it was a issue which was fixed now and this is the same item for list just it is fixed now and due to it isn't any conflation (this is not archive - and we don't need information about edit history in main space - we could say that). Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:11, 6 February 2022 (UTC) As it was added as a sample item to has list (P2354) , we should do full cleanup for conflation: i.e. split the content into clean items. Otherwise people may be using the incorrect item for the concept they thought they had been using. If it wasn't a model item, we might have done differently. --- Jura 13:16, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : What do you mean? It was and it still is has list (P2354) so? There is some lists and they are has list (P2354) to each other. Isn't it how has list (P2354) works? Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:29, 6 February 2022 (UTC) A sample list should be of high quality, otherwise people who use it as a model end up doing not so high quality things. --- Jura 13:32, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : First explain Falco discography (Q10087) , Miranda Cosgrove discography (Q13118) , Texas discography (Q125194) and thousands of other. This is image for infobox. What is the problem? This split was totally non-sense. Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:31, 6 February 2022 (UTC) You split off most statements to the item for the artist, not me. I thought you understood that you have be conflating items. --- Jura 12:34, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : This is not any "conflation" in anyway. How even you got that idea? There is no any logic in this. How? You are trying to do something weird. This is single item for list of awards and nominations received by Basshunter. What is the problem again. Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:37, 6 February 2022 (UTC) Please explain why you moved these statements from the item we are discussing here after it was listed for deletion. --- Jura 12:40, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : Maybe I miss understood you but you told that somehow award received (P166) and nominated for (P1411) are missleading so I thought you mean that they are dedicated for human (Q5) than Wikimedia list article (Q13406463) so I have moved them. Should I restore them? Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:45, 6 February 2022 (UTC) No. They are clearly statements that go on items for humans (or other awardees) and not on items for a link to a Wikipedia list. This is why I consider that the item conflats two concepts. --- Jura 12:50, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : So yes it was a issue which was fixed now and this is the same item for list just it is fixed now and due to it isn't any conflation (this is not archive - and we don't need information about edit history in main space - we could say that). Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:11, 6 February 2022 (UTC) As it was added as a sample item to has list (P2354) , we should do full cleanup for conflation: i.e. split the content into clean items. Otherwise people may be using the incorrect item for the concept they thought they had been using. If it wasn't a model item, we might have done differently. --- Jura 13:16, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : What do you mean? It was and it still is has list (P2354) so? There is some lists and they are has list (P2354) to each other. Isn't it how has list (P2354) works? Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:29, 6 February 2022 (UTC) A sample list should be of high quality, otherwise people who use it as a model end up doing not so high quality things. --- Jura 13:32, 6 February 2022 (UTC) You split off most statements to the item for the artist, not me. I thought you understood that you have be conflating items. --- Jura 12:34, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : This is not any "conflation" in anyway. How even you got that idea? There is no any logic in this. How? You are trying to do something weird. This is single item for list of awards and nominations received by Basshunter. What is the problem again. Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:37, 6 February 2022 (UTC) Please explain why you moved these statements from the item we are discussing here after it was listed for deletion. --- Jura 12:40, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : Maybe I miss understood you but you told that somehow award received (P166) and nominated for (P1411) are missleading so I thought you mean that they are dedicated for human (Q5) than Wikimedia list article (Q13406463) so I have moved them. Should I restore them? Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:45, 6 February 2022 (UTC) No. They are clearly statements that go on items for humans (or other awardees) and not on items for a link to a Wikipedia list. This is why I consider that the item conflats two concepts. --- Jura 12:50, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : So yes it was a issue which was fixed now and this is the same item for list just it is fixed now and due to it isn't any conflation (this is not archive - and we don't need information about edit history in main space - we could say that). Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:11, 6 February 2022 (UTC) As it was added as a sample item to has list (P2354) , we should do full cleanup for conflation: i.e. split the content into clean items. Otherwise people may be using the incorrect item for the concept they thought they had been using. If it wasn't a model item, we might have done differently. --- Jura 13:16, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : What do you mean? It was and it still is has list (P2354) so? There is some lists and they are has list (P2354) to each other. Isn't it how has list (P2354) works? Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:29, 6 February 2022 (UTC) A sample list should be of high quality, otherwise people who use it as a model end up doing not so high quality things. --- Jura 13:32, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : This is not any "conflation" in anyway. How even you got that idea? There is no any logic in this. How? You are trying to do something weird. This is single item for list of awards and nominations received by Basshunter. What is the problem again. Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:37, 6 February 2022 (UTC) Please explain why you moved these statements from the item we are discussing here after it was listed for deletion. --- Jura 12:40, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : Maybe I miss understood you but you told that somehow award received (P166) and nominated for (P1411) are missleading so I thought you mean that they are dedicated for human (Q5) than Wikimedia list article (Q13406463) so I have moved them. Should I restore them? Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:45, 6 February 2022 (UTC) No. They are clearly statements that go on items for humans (or other awardees) and not on items for a link to a Wikipedia list. This is why I consider that the item conflats two concepts. --- Jura 12:50, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : So yes it was a issue which was fixed now and this is the same item for list just it is fixed now and due to it isn't any conflation (this is not archive - and we don't need information about edit history in main space - we could say that). Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:11, 6 February 2022 (UTC) As it was added as a sample item to has list (P2354) , we should do full cleanup for conflation: i.e. split the content into clean items. Otherwise people may be using the incorrect item for the concept they thought they had been using. If it wasn't a model item, we might have done differently. --- Jura 13:16, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : What do you mean? It was and it still is has list (P2354) so? There is some lists and they are has list (P2354) to each other. Isn't it how has list (P2354) works? Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:29, 6 February 2022 (UTC) A sample list should be of high quality, otherwise people who use it as a model end up doing not so high quality things. --- Jura 13:32, 6 February 2022 (UTC) Please explain why you moved these statements from the item we are discussing here after it was listed for deletion. --- Jura 12:40, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : Maybe I miss understood you but you told that somehow award received (P166) and nominated for (P1411) are missleading so I thought you mean that they are dedicated for human (Q5) than Wikimedia list article (Q13406463) so I have moved them. Should I restore them? Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:45, 6 February 2022 (UTC) No. They are clearly statements that go on items for humans (or other awardees) and not on items for a link to a Wikipedia list. This is why I consider that the item conflats two concepts. --- Jura 12:50, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : So yes it was a issue which was fixed now and this is the same item for list just it is fixed now and due to it isn't any conflation (this is not archive - and we don't need information about edit history in main space - we could say that). Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:11, 6 February 2022 (UTC) As it was added as a sample item to has list (P2354) , we should do full cleanup for conflation: i.e. split the content into clean items. Otherwise people may be using the incorrect item for the concept they thought they had been using. If it wasn't a model item, we might have done differently. --- Jura 13:16, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : What do you mean? It was and it still is has list (P2354) so? There is some lists and they are has list (P2354) to each other. Isn't it how has list (P2354) works? Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:29, 6 February 2022 (UTC) A sample list should be of high quality, otherwise people who use it as a model end up doing not so high quality things. --- Jura 13:32, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : Maybe I miss understood you but you told that somehow award received (P166) and nominated for (P1411) are missleading so I thought you mean that they are dedicated for human (Q5) than Wikimedia list article (Q13406463) so I have moved them. Should I restore them? Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:45, 6 February 2022 (UTC) No. They are clearly statements that go on items for humans (or other awardees) and not on items for a link to a Wikipedia list. This is why I consider that the item conflats two concepts. --- Jura 12:50, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : So yes it was a issue which was fixed now and this is the same item for list just it is fixed now and due to it isn't any conflation (this is not archive - and we don't need information about edit history in main space - we could say that). Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:11, 6 February 2022 (UTC) As it was added as a sample item to has list (P2354) , we should do full cleanup for conflation: i.e. split the content into clean items. Otherwise people may be using the incorrect item for the concept they thought they had been using. If it wasn't a model item, we might have done differently. --- Jura 13:16, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : What do you mean? It was and it still is has list (P2354) so? There is some lists and they are has list (P2354) to each other. Isn't it how has list (P2354) works? Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:29, 6 February 2022 (UTC) A sample list should be of high quality, otherwise people who use it as a model end up doing not so high quality things. --- Jura 13:32, 6 February 2022 (UTC) No. They are clearly statements that go on items for humans (or other awardees) and not on items for a link to a Wikipedia list. This is why I consider that the item conflats two concepts. --- Jura 12:50, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : So yes it was a issue which was fixed now and this is the same item for list just it is fixed now and due to it isn't any conflation (this is not archive - and we don't need information about edit history in main space - we could say that). Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:11, 6 February 2022 (UTC) As it was added as a sample item to has list (P2354) , we should do full cleanup for conflation: i.e. split the content into clean items. Otherwise people may be using the incorrect item for the concept they thought they had been using. If it wasn't a model item, we might have done differently. --- Jura 13:16, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : What do you mean? It was and it still is has list (P2354) so? There is some lists and they are has list (P2354) to each other. Isn't it how has list (P2354) works? Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:29, 6 February 2022 (UTC) A sample list should be of high quality, otherwise people who use it as a model end up doing not so high quality things. --- Jura 13:32, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : So yes it was a issue which was fixed now and this is the same item for list just it is fixed now and due to it isn't any conflation (this is not archive - and we don't need information about edit history in main space - we could say that). Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:11, 6 February 2022 (UTC) As it was added as a sample item to has list (P2354) , we should do full cleanup for conflation: i.e. split the content into clean items. Otherwise people may be using the incorrect item for the concept they thought they had been using. If it wasn't a model item, we might have done differently. --- Jura 13:16, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : What do you mean? It was and it still is has list (P2354) so? There is some lists and they are has list (P2354) to each other. Isn't it how has list (P2354) works? Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:29, 6 February 2022 (UTC) A sample list should be of high quality, otherwise people who use it as a model end up doing not so high quality things. --- Jura 13:32, 6 February 2022 (UTC) As it was added as a sample item to has list (P2354) , we should do full cleanup for conflation: i.e. split the content into clean items. Otherwise people may be using the incorrect item for the concept they thought they had been using. If it wasn't a model item, we might have done differently. --- Jura 13:16, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : What do you mean? It was and it still is has list (P2354) so? There is some lists and they are has list (P2354) to each other. Isn't it how has list (P2354) works? Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:29, 6 February 2022 (UTC) A sample list should be of high quality, otherwise people who use it as a model end up doing not so high quality things. --- Jura 13:32, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : What do you mean? It was and it still is has list (P2354) so? There is some lists and they are has list (P2354) to each other. Isn't it how has list (P2354) works? Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:29, 6 February 2022 (UTC) A sample list should be of high quality, otherwise people who use it as a model end up doing not so high quality things. --- Jura 13:32, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : It doesn't make any sense or you are not enough precise . This is item for "list of awards and nominations received by Basshunter" so where would you like to move ENWP link? And why only ENWP? There is PLWP link too so they both should be moved eventualy but there is no point in this. All what can be done here is to just move award received (P166) and nominated for (P1411) to Basshunter (Q383541) and remove Q62098823 and Q66112460 or restore them. Eurohunter ( talk ) 14:47, 2 February 2022 (UTC) The item is currently a conflation of a list and the item for artist. Once deletion is decided, I will to the necessary changes and create the new item. --- Jura 15:12, 2 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : But for this reason list of awards and nominations received by Basshunter (Q63384701) can't be deleted in any way - there is no point. If you want to move properties then use moveClaim.js. I have moved award received (P166) and nominated for (P1411) to Basshunter (Q383541) so it is Fixed . Eurohunter ( talk ) 14:22, 3 February 2022 (UTC) You forgot P18. It's still a conflation potentially misleading users, oddly listed as sample on Property:P2354 . Once the split complete, it can be deleted. --- Jura 14:53, 3 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : What do you mean about image (P18) ? This is main image used for this item, ilustration of this list so what is wrong? See first random discographies I found for example Falco discography (Q10087) , Miranda Cosgrove discography (Q13118) , Texas discography (Q125194) . What about has list (P2354) ? President of the French Republic (Q191954) Wikimedia list related to this subject: list of presidents of France (Q29580) same as Basshunter (Q383541) Wikimedia list related to this subject: list of awards and nominations received by Basshunter (Q63384701) , list of songs recorded by Basshunter (Q11761784) , list of Basshunter live performances (Q6352124) . " list related to this subject " right? What is wrong? Eurohunter ( talk ) 10:49, 6 February 2022 (UTC) The discussion is about a list of awards. The illustration doesn't represent that. The image would more appropriately be on the item for the artist. No need to duplicate. If there are other malformed lists about Basshunter, please fix them, but we don't need to discuss them here. --- Jura 10:59, 6 February 2022 (UTC) I finished the split: Q110825249 . --- Jura 11:21, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : First explain Falco discography (Q10087) , Miranda Cosgrove discography (Q13118) , Texas discography (Q125194) and thousands of other. This is image for infobox. What is the problem? This split was totally non-sense. Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:31, 6 February 2022 (UTC) You split off most statements to the item for the artist, not me. I thought you understood that you have be conflating items. --- Jura 12:34, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : This is not any "conflation" in anyway. How even you got that idea? There is no any logic in this. How? You are trying to do something weird. This is single item for list of awards and nominations received by Basshunter. What is the problem again. Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:37, 6 February 2022 (UTC) Please explain why you moved these statements from the item we are discussing here after it was listed for deletion. --- Jura 12:40, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : Maybe I miss understood you but you told that somehow award received (P166) and nominated for (P1411) are missleading so I thought you mean that they are dedicated for human (Q5) than Wikimedia list article (Q13406463) so I have moved them. Should I restore them? Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:45, 6 February 2022 (UTC) No. They are clearly statements that go on items for humans (or other awardees) and not on items for a link to a Wikipedia list. This is why I consider that the item conflats two concepts. --- Jura 12:50, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : So yes it was a issue which was fixed now and this is the same item for list just it is fixed now and due to it isn't any conflation (this is not archive - and we don't need information about edit history in main space - we could say that). Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:11, 6 February 2022 (UTC) As it was added as a sample item to has list (P2354) , we should do full cleanup for conflation: i.e. split the content into clean items. Otherwise people may be using the incorrect item for the concept they thought they had been using. If it wasn't a model item, we might have done differently. --- Jura 13:16, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : What do you mean? It was and it still is has list (P2354) so? There is some lists and they are has list (P2354) to each other. Isn't it how has list (P2354) works? Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:29, 6 February 2022 (UTC) A sample list should be of high quality, otherwise people who use it as a model end up doing not so high quality things. --- Jura 13:32, 6 February 2022 (UTC) The item is currently a conflation of a list and the item for artist. Once deletion is decided, I will to the necessary changes and create the new item. --- Jura 15:12, 2 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : But for this reason list of awards and nominations received by Basshunter (Q63384701) can't be deleted in any way - there is no point. If you want to move properties then use moveClaim.js. I have moved award received (P166) and nominated for (P1411) to Basshunter (Q383541) so it is Fixed . Eurohunter ( talk ) 14:22, 3 February 2022 (UTC) You forgot P18. It's still a conflation potentially misleading users, oddly listed as sample on Property:P2354 . Once the split complete, it can be deleted. --- Jura 14:53, 3 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : What do you mean about image (P18) ? This is main image used for this item, ilustration of this list so what is wrong? See first random discographies I found for example Falco discography (Q10087) , Miranda Cosgrove discography (Q13118) , Texas discography (Q125194) . What about has list (P2354) ? President of the French Republic (Q191954) Wikimedia list related to this subject: list of presidents of France (Q29580) same as Basshunter (Q383541) Wikimedia list related to this subject: list of awards and nominations received by Basshunter (Q63384701) , list of songs recorded by Basshunter (Q11761784) , list of Basshunter live performances (Q6352124) . " list related to this subject " right? What is wrong? Eurohunter ( talk ) 10:49, 6 February 2022 (UTC) The discussion is about a list of awards. The illustration doesn't represent that. The image would more appropriately be on the item for the artist. No need to duplicate. If there are other malformed lists about Basshunter, please fix them, but we don't need to discuss them here. --- Jura 10:59, 6 February 2022 (UTC) I finished the split: Q110825249 . --- Jura 11:21, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : First explain Falco discography (Q10087) , Miranda Cosgrove discography (Q13118) , Texas discography (Q125194) and thousands of other. This is image for infobox. What is the problem? This split was totally non-sense. Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:31, 6 February 2022 (UTC) You split off most statements to the item for the artist, not me. I thought you understood that you have be conflating items. --- Jura 12:34, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : This is not any "conflation" in anyway. How even you got that idea? There is no any logic in this. How? You are trying to do something weird. This is single item for list of awards and nominations received by Basshunter. What is the problem again. Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:37, 6 February 2022 (UTC) Please explain why you moved these statements from the item we are discussing here after it was listed for deletion. --- Jura 12:40, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : Maybe I miss understood you but you told that somehow award received (P166) and nominated for (P1411) are missleading so I thought you mean that they are dedicated for human (Q5) than Wikimedia list article (Q13406463) so I have moved them. Should I restore them? Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:45, 6 February 2022 (UTC) No. They are clearly statements that go on items for humans (or other awardees) and not on items for a link to a Wikipedia list. This is why I consider that the item conflats two concepts. --- Jura 12:50, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : So yes it was a issue which was fixed now and this is the same item for list just it is fixed now and due to it isn't any conflation (this is not archive - and we don't need information about edit history in main space - we could say that). Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:11, 6 February 2022 (UTC) As it was added as a sample item to has list (P2354) , we should do full cleanup for conflation: i.e. split the content into clean items. Otherwise people may be using the incorrect item for the concept they thought they had been using. If it wasn't a model item, we might have done differently. --- Jura 13:16, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : What do you mean? It was and it still is has list (P2354) so? There is some lists and they are has list (P2354) to each other. Isn't it how has list (P2354) works? Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:29, 6 February 2022 (UTC) A sample list should be of high quality, otherwise people who use it as a model end up doing not so high quality things. --- Jura 13:32, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : But for this reason list of awards and nominations received by Basshunter (Q63384701) can't be deleted in any way - there is no point. If you want to move properties then use moveClaim.js. I have moved award received (P166) and nominated for (P1411) to Basshunter (Q383541) so it is Fixed . Eurohunter ( talk ) 14:22, 3 February 2022 (UTC) You forgot P18. It's still a conflation potentially misleading users, oddly listed as sample on Property:P2354 . Once the split complete, it can be deleted. --- Jura 14:53, 3 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : What do you mean about image (P18) ? This is main image used for this item, ilustration of this list so what is wrong? See first random discographies I found for example Falco discography (Q10087) , Miranda Cosgrove discography (Q13118) , Texas discography (Q125194) . What about has list (P2354) ? President of the French Republic (Q191954) Wikimedia list related to this subject: list of presidents of France (Q29580) same as Basshunter (Q383541) Wikimedia list related to this subject: list of awards and nominations received by Basshunter (Q63384701) , list of songs recorded by Basshunter (Q11761784) , list of Basshunter live performances (Q6352124) . " list related to this subject " right? What is wrong? Eurohunter ( talk ) 10:49, 6 February 2022 (UTC) The discussion is about a list of awards. The illustration doesn't represent that. The image would more appropriately be on the item for the artist. No need to duplicate. If there are other malformed lists about Basshunter, please fix them, but we don't need to discuss them here. --- Jura 10:59, 6 February 2022 (UTC) I finished the split: Q110825249 . --- Jura 11:21, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : First explain Falco discography (Q10087) , Miranda Cosgrove discography (Q13118) , Texas discography (Q125194) and thousands of other. This is image for infobox. What is the problem? This split was totally non-sense. Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:31, 6 February 2022 (UTC) You split off most statements to the item for the artist, not me. I thought you understood that you have be conflating items. --- Jura 12:34, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : This is not any "conflation" in anyway. How even you got that idea? There is no any logic in this. How? You are trying to do something weird. This is single item for list of awards and nominations received by Basshunter. What is the problem again. Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:37, 6 February 2022 (UTC) Please explain why you moved these statements from the item we are discussing here after it was listed for deletion. --- Jura 12:40, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : Maybe I miss understood you but you told that somehow award received (P166) and nominated for (P1411) are missleading so I thought you mean that they are dedicated for human (Q5) than Wikimedia list article (Q13406463) so I have moved them. Should I restore them? Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:45, 6 February 2022 (UTC) No. They are clearly statements that go on items for humans (or other awardees) and not on items for a link to a Wikipedia list. This is why I consider that the item conflats two concepts. --- Jura 12:50, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : So yes it was a issue which was fixed now and this is the same item for list just it is fixed now and due to it isn't any conflation (this is not archive - and we don't need information about edit history in main space - we could say that). Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:11, 6 February 2022 (UTC) As it was added as a sample item to has list (P2354) , we should do full cleanup for conflation: i.e. split the content into clean items. Otherwise people may be using the incorrect item for the concept they thought they had been using. If it wasn't a model item, we might have done differently. --- Jura 13:16, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : What do you mean? It was and it still is has list (P2354) so? There is some lists and they are has list (P2354) to each other. Isn't it how has list (P2354) works? Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:29, 6 February 2022 (UTC) A sample list should be of high quality, otherwise people who use it as a model end up doing not so high quality things. --- Jura 13:32, 6 February 2022 (UTC) You forgot P18. It's still a conflation potentially misleading users, oddly listed as sample on Property:P2354 . Once the split complete, it can be deleted. --- Jura 14:53, 3 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : What do you mean about image (P18) ? This is main image used for this item, ilustration of this list so what is wrong? See first random discographies I found for example Falco discography (Q10087) , Miranda Cosgrove discography (Q13118) , Texas discography (Q125194) . What about has list (P2354) ? President of the French Republic (Q191954) Wikimedia list related to this subject: list of presidents of France (Q29580) same as Basshunter (Q383541) Wikimedia list related to this subject: list of awards and nominations received by Basshunter (Q63384701) , list of songs recorded by Basshunter (Q11761784) , list of Basshunter live performances (Q6352124) . " list related to this subject " right? What is wrong? Eurohunter ( talk ) 10:49, 6 February 2022 (UTC) The discussion is about a list of awards. The illustration doesn't represent that. The image would more appropriately be on the item for the artist. No need to duplicate. If there are other malformed lists about Basshunter, please fix them, but we don't need to discuss them here. --- Jura 10:59, 6 February 2022 (UTC) I finished the split: Q110825249 . --- Jura 11:21, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : First explain Falco discography (Q10087) , Miranda Cosgrove discography (Q13118) , Texas discography (Q125194) and thousands of other. This is image for infobox. What is the problem? This split was totally non-sense. Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:31, 6 February 2022 (UTC) You split off most statements to the item for the artist, not me. I thought you understood that you have be conflating items. --- Jura 12:34, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : This is not any "conflation" in anyway. How even you got that idea? There is no any logic in this. How? You are trying to do something weird. This is single item for list of awards and nominations received by Basshunter. What is the problem again. Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:37, 6 February 2022 (UTC) Please explain why you moved these statements from the item we are discussing here after it was listed for deletion. --- Jura 12:40, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : Maybe I miss understood you but you told that somehow award received (P166) and nominated for (P1411) are missleading so I thought you mean that they are dedicated for human (Q5) than Wikimedia list article (Q13406463) so I have moved them. Should I restore them? Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:45, 6 February 2022 (UTC) No. They are clearly statements that go on items for humans (or other awardees) and not on items for a link to a Wikipedia list. This is why I consider that the item conflats two concepts. --- Jura 12:50, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : So yes it was a issue which was fixed now and this is the same item for list just it is fixed now and due to it isn't any conflation (this is not archive - and we don't need information about edit history in main space - we could say that). Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:11, 6 February 2022 (UTC) As it was added as a sample item to has list (P2354) , we should do full cleanup for conflation: i.e. split the content into clean items. Otherwise people may be using the incorrect item for the concept they thought they had been using. If it wasn't a model item, we might have done differently. --- Jura 13:16, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : What do you mean? It was and it still is has list (P2354) so? There is some lists and they are has list (P2354) to each other. Isn't it how has list (P2354) works? Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:29, 6 February 2022 (UTC) A sample list should be of high quality, otherwise people who use it as a model end up doing not so high quality things. --- Jura 13:32, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : What do you mean about image (P18) ? This is main image used for this item, ilustration of this list so what is wrong? See first random discographies I found for example Falco discography (Q10087) , Miranda Cosgrove discography (Q13118) , Texas discography (Q125194) . What about has list (P2354) ? President of the French Republic (Q191954) Wikimedia list related to this subject: list of presidents of France (Q29580) same as Basshunter (Q383541) Wikimedia list related to this subject: list of awards and nominations received by Basshunter (Q63384701) , list of songs recorded by Basshunter (Q11761784) , list of Basshunter live performances (Q6352124) . " list related to this subject " right? What is wrong? Eurohunter ( talk ) 10:49, 6 February 2022 (UTC) The discussion is about a list of awards. The illustration doesn't represent that. The image would more appropriately be on the item for the artist. No need to duplicate. If there are other malformed lists about Basshunter, please fix them, but we don't need to discuss them here. --- Jura 10:59, 6 February 2022 (UTC) I finished the split: Q110825249 . --- Jura 11:21, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : First explain Falco discography (Q10087) , Miranda Cosgrove discography (Q13118) , Texas discography (Q125194) and thousands of other. This is image for infobox. What is the problem? This split was totally non-sense. Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:31, 6 February 2022 (UTC) You split off most statements to the item for the artist, not me. I thought you understood that you have be conflating items. --- Jura 12:34, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : This is not any "conflation" in anyway. How even you got that idea? There is no any logic in this. How? You are trying to do something weird. This is single item for list of awards and nominations received by Basshunter. What is the problem again. Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:37, 6 February 2022 (UTC) Please explain why you moved these statements from the item we are discussing here after it was listed for deletion. --- Jura 12:40, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : Maybe I miss understood you but you told that somehow award received (P166) and nominated for (P1411) are missleading so I thought you mean that they are dedicated for human (Q5) than Wikimedia list article (Q13406463) so I have moved them. Should I restore them? Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:45, 6 February 2022 (UTC) No. They are clearly statements that go on items for humans (or other awardees) and not on items for a link to a Wikipedia list. This is why I consider that the item conflats two concepts. --- Jura 12:50, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : So yes it was a issue which was fixed now and this is the same item for list just it is fixed now and due to it isn't any conflation (this is not archive - and we don't need information about edit history in main space - we could say that). Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:11, 6 February 2022 (UTC) As it was added as a sample item to has list (P2354) , we should do full cleanup for conflation: i.e. split the content into clean items. Otherwise people may be using the incorrect item for the concept they thought they had been using. If it wasn't a model item, we might have done differently. --- Jura 13:16, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : What do you mean? It was and it still is has list (P2354) so? There is some lists and they are has list (P2354) to each other. Isn't it how has list (P2354) works? Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:29, 6 February 2022 (UTC) A sample list should be of high quality, otherwise people who use it as a model end up doing not so high quality things. --- Jura 13:32, 6 February 2022 (UTC) The discussion is about a list of awards. The illustration doesn't represent that. The image would more appropriately be on the item for the artist. No need to duplicate. If there are other malformed lists about Basshunter, please fix them, but we don't need to discuss them here. --- Jura 10:59, 6 February 2022 (UTC) I finished the split: Q110825249 . --- Jura 11:21, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : First explain Falco discography (Q10087) , Miranda Cosgrove discography (Q13118) , Texas discography (Q125194) and thousands of other. This is image for infobox. What is the problem? This split was totally non-sense. Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:31, 6 February 2022 (UTC) You split off most statements to the item for the artist, not me. I thought you understood that you have be conflating items. --- Jura 12:34, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : This is not any "conflation" in anyway. How even you got that idea? There is no any logic in this. How? You are trying to do something weird. This is single item for list of awards and nominations received by Basshunter. What is the problem again. Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:37, 6 February 2022 (UTC) Please explain why you moved these statements from the item we are discussing here after it was listed for deletion. --- Jura 12:40, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : Maybe I miss understood you but you told that somehow award received (P166) and nominated for (P1411) are missleading so I thought you mean that they are dedicated for human (Q5) than Wikimedia list article (Q13406463) so I have moved them. Should I restore them? Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:45, 6 February 2022 (UTC) No. They are clearly statements that go on items for humans (or other awardees) and not on items for a link to a Wikipedia list. This is why I consider that the item conflats two concepts. --- Jura 12:50, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : So yes it was a issue which was fixed now and this is the same item for list just it is fixed now and due to it isn't any conflation (this is not archive - and we don't need information about edit history in main space - we could say that). Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:11, 6 February 2022 (UTC) As it was added as a sample item to has list (P2354) , we should do full cleanup for conflation: i.e. split the content into clean items. Otherwise people may be using the incorrect item for the concept they thought they had been using. If it wasn't a model item, we might have done differently. --- Jura 13:16, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : What do you mean? It was and it still is has list (P2354) so? There is some lists and they are has list (P2354) to each other. Isn't it how has list (P2354) works? Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:29, 6 February 2022 (UTC) A sample list should be of high quality, otherwise people who use it as a model end up doing not so high quality things. --- Jura 13:32, 6 February 2022 (UTC) I finished the split: Q110825249 . --- Jura 11:21, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : First explain Falco discography (Q10087) , Miranda Cosgrove discography (Q13118) , Texas discography (Q125194) and thousands of other. This is image for infobox. What is the problem? This split was totally non-sense. Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:31, 6 February 2022 (UTC) You split off most statements to the item for the artist, not me. I thought you understood that you have be conflating items. --- Jura 12:34, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : This is not any "conflation" in anyway. How even you got that idea? There is no any logic in this. How? You are trying to do something weird. This is single item for list of awards and nominations received by Basshunter. What is the problem again. Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:37, 6 February 2022 (UTC) Please explain why you moved these statements from the item we are discussing here after it was listed for deletion. --- Jura 12:40, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : Maybe I miss understood you but you told that somehow award received (P166) and nominated for (P1411) are missleading so I thought you mean that they are dedicated for human (Q5) than Wikimedia list article (Q13406463) so I have moved them. Should I restore them? Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:45, 6 February 2022 (UTC) No. They are clearly statements that go on items for humans (or other awardees) and not on items for a link to a Wikipedia list. This is why I consider that the item conflats two concepts. --- Jura 12:50, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : So yes it was a issue which was fixed now and this is the same item for list just it is fixed now and due to it isn't any conflation (this is not archive - and we don't need information about edit history in main space - we could say that). Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:11, 6 February 2022 (UTC) As it was added as a sample item to has list (P2354) , we should do full cleanup for conflation: i.e. split the content into clean items. Otherwise people may be using the incorrect item for the concept they thought they had been using. If it wasn't a model item, we might have done differently. --- Jura 13:16, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : What do you mean? It was and it still is has list (P2354) so? There is some lists and they are has list (P2354) to each other. Isn't it how has list (P2354) works? Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:29, 6 February 2022 (UTC) A sample list should be of high quality, otherwise people who use it as a model end up doing not so high quality things. --- Jura 13:32, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : First explain Falco discography (Q10087) , Miranda Cosgrove discography (Q13118) , Texas discography (Q125194) and thousands of other. This is image for infobox. What is the problem? This split was totally non-sense. Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:31, 6 February 2022 (UTC) You split off most statements to the item for the artist, not me. I thought you understood that you have be conflating items. --- Jura 12:34, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : This is not any "conflation" in anyway. How even you got that idea? There is no any logic in this. How? You are trying to do something weird. This is single item for list of awards and nominations received by Basshunter. What is the problem again. Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:37, 6 February 2022 (UTC) Please explain why you moved these statements from the item we are discussing here after it was listed for deletion. --- Jura 12:40, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : Maybe I miss understood you but you told that somehow award received (P166) and nominated for (P1411) are missleading so I thought you mean that they are dedicated for human (Q5) than Wikimedia list article (Q13406463) so I have moved them. Should I restore them? Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:45, 6 February 2022 (UTC) No. They are clearly statements that go on items for humans (or other awardees) and not on items for a link to a Wikipedia list. This is why I consider that the item conflats two concepts. --- Jura 12:50, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : So yes it was a issue which was fixed now and this is the same item for list just it is fixed now and due to it isn't any conflation (this is not archive - and we don't need information about edit history in main space - we could say that). Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:11, 6 February 2022 (UTC) As it was added as a sample item to has list (P2354) , we should do full cleanup for conflation: i.e. split the content into clean items. Otherwise people may be using the incorrect item for the concept they thought they had been using. If it wasn't a model item, we might have done differently. --- Jura 13:16, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : What do you mean? It was and it still is has list (P2354) so? There is some lists and they are has list (P2354) to each other. Isn't it how has list (P2354) works? Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:29, 6 February 2022 (UTC) A sample list should be of high quality, otherwise people who use it as a model end up doing not so high quality things. --- Jura 13:32, 6 February 2022 (UTC) You split off most statements to the item for the artist, not me. I thought you understood that you have be conflating items. --- Jura 12:34, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : This is not any "conflation" in anyway. How even you got that idea? There is no any logic in this. How? You are trying to do something weird. This is single item for list of awards and nominations received by Basshunter. What is the problem again. Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:37, 6 February 2022 (UTC) Please explain why you moved these statements from the item we are discussing here after it was listed for deletion. --- Jura 12:40, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : Maybe I miss understood you but you told that somehow award received (P166) and nominated for (P1411) are missleading so I thought you mean that they are dedicated for human (Q5) than Wikimedia list article (Q13406463) so I have moved them. Should I restore them? Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:45, 6 February 2022 (UTC) No. They are clearly statements that go on items for humans (or other awardees) and not on items for a link to a Wikipedia list. This is why I consider that the item conflats two concepts. --- Jura 12:50, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : So yes it was a issue which was fixed now and this is the same item for list just it is fixed now and due to it isn't any conflation (this is not archive - and we don't need information about edit history in main space - we could say that). Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:11, 6 February 2022 (UTC) As it was added as a sample item to has list (P2354) , we should do full cleanup for conflation: i.e. split the content into clean items. Otherwise people may be using the incorrect item for the concept they thought they had been using. If it wasn't a model item, we might have done differently. --- Jura 13:16, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : What do you mean? It was and it still is has list (P2354) so? There is some lists and they are has list (P2354) to each other. Isn't it how has list (P2354) works? Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:29, 6 February 2022 (UTC) A sample list should be of high quality, otherwise people who use it as a model end up doing not so high quality things. --- Jura 13:32, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : This is not any "conflation" in anyway. How even you got that idea? There is no any logic in this. How? You are trying to do something weird. This is single item for list of awards and nominations received by Basshunter. What is the problem again. Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:37, 6 February 2022 (UTC) Please explain why you moved these statements from the item we are discussing here after it was listed for deletion. --- Jura 12:40, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : Maybe I miss understood you but you told that somehow award received (P166) and nominated for (P1411) are missleading so I thought you mean that they are dedicated for human (Q5) than Wikimedia list article (Q13406463) so I have moved them. Should I restore them? Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:45, 6 February 2022 (UTC) No. They are clearly statements that go on items for humans (or other awardees) and not on items for a link to a Wikipedia list. This is why I consider that the item conflats two concepts. --- Jura 12:50, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : So yes it was a issue which was fixed now and this is the same item for list just it is fixed now and due to it isn't any conflation (this is not archive - and we don't need information about edit history in main space - we could say that). Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:11, 6 February 2022 (UTC) As it was added as a sample item to has list (P2354) , we should do full cleanup for conflation: i.e. split the content into clean items. Otherwise people may be using the incorrect item for the concept they thought they had been using. If it wasn't a model item, we might have done differently. --- Jura 13:16, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : What do you mean? It was and it still is has list (P2354) so? There is some lists and they are has list (P2354) to each other. Isn't it how has list (P2354) works? Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:29, 6 February 2022 (UTC) A sample list should be of high quality, otherwise people who use it as a model end up doing not so high quality things. --- Jura 13:32, 6 February 2022 (UTC) Please explain why you moved these statements from the item we are discussing here after it was listed for deletion. --- Jura 12:40, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : Maybe I miss understood you but you told that somehow award received (P166) and nominated for (P1411) are missleading so I thought you mean that they are dedicated for human (Q5) than Wikimedia list article (Q13406463) so I have moved them. Should I restore them? Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:45, 6 February 2022 (UTC) No. They are clearly statements that go on items for humans (or other awardees) and not on items for a link to a Wikipedia list. This is why I consider that the item conflats two concepts. --- Jura 12:50, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : So yes it was a issue which was fixed now and this is the same item for list just it is fixed now and due to it isn't any conflation (this is not archive - and we don't need information about edit history in main space - we could say that). Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:11, 6 February 2022 (UTC) As it was added as a sample item to has list (P2354) , we should do full cleanup for conflation: i.e. split the content into clean items. Otherwise people may be using the incorrect item for the concept they thought they had been using. If it wasn't a model item, we might have done differently. --- Jura 13:16, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : What do you mean? It was and it still is has list (P2354) so? There is some lists and they are has list (P2354) to each other. Isn't it how has list (P2354) works? Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:29, 6 February 2022 (UTC) A sample list should be of high quality, otherwise people who use it as a model end up doing not so high quality things. --- Jura 13:32, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : Maybe I miss understood you but you told that somehow award received (P166) and nominated for (P1411) are missleading so I thought you mean that they are dedicated for human (Q5) than Wikimedia list article (Q13406463) so I have moved them. Should I restore them? Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:45, 6 February 2022 (UTC) No. They are clearly statements that go on items for humans (or other awardees) and not on items for a link to a Wikipedia list. This is why I consider that the item conflats two concepts. --- Jura 12:50, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : So yes it was a issue which was fixed now and this is the same item for list just it is fixed now and due to it isn't any conflation (this is not archive - and we don't need information about edit history in main space - we could say that). Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:11, 6 February 2022 (UTC) As it was added as a sample item to has list (P2354) , we should do full cleanup for conflation: i.e. split the content into clean items. Otherwise people may be using the incorrect item for the concept they thought they had been using. If it wasn't a model item, we might have done differently. --- Jura 13:16, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : What do you mean? It was and it still is has list (P2354) so? There is some lists and they are has list (P2354) to each other. Isn't it how has list (P2354) works? Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:29, 6 February 2022 (UTC) A sample list should be of high quality, otherwise people who use it as a model end up doing not so high quality things. --- Jura 13:32, 6 February 2022 (UTC) No. They are clearly statements that go on items for humans (or other awardees) and not on items for a link to a Wikipedia list. This is why I consider that the item conflats two concepts. --- Jura 12:50, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : So yes it was a issue which was fixed now and this is the same item for list just it is fixed now and due to it isn't any conflation (this is not archive - and we don't need information about edit history in main space - we could say that). Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:11, 6 February 2022 (UTC) As it was added as a sample item to has list (P2354) , we should do full cleanup for conflation: i.e. split the content into clean items. Otherwise people may be using the incorrect item for the concept they thought they had been using. If it wasn't a model item, we might have done differently. --- Jura 13:16, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : What do you mean? It was and it still is has list (P2354) so? There is some lists and they are has list (P2354) to each other. Isn't it how has list (P2354) works? Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:29, 6 February 2022 (UTC) A sample list should be of high quality, otherwise people who use it as a model end up doing not so high quality things. --- Jura 13:32, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : So yes it was a issue which was fixed now and this is the same item for list just it is fixed now and due to it isn't any conflation (this is not archive - and we don't need information about edit history in main space - we could say that). Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:11, 6 February 2022 (UTC) As it was added as a sample item to has list (P2354) , we should do full cleanup for conflation: i.e. split the content into clean items. Otherwise people may be using the incorrect item for the concept they thought they had been using. If it wasn't a model item, we might have done differently. --- Jura 13:16, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : What do you mean? It was and it still is has list (P2354) so? There is some lists and they are has list (P2354) to each other. Isn't it how has list (P2354) works? Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:29, 6 February 2022 (UTC) A sample list should be of high quality, otherwise people who use it as a model end up doing not so high quality things. --- Jura 13:32, 6 February 2022 (UTC) As it was added as a sample item to has list (P2354) , we should do full cleanup for conflation: i.e. split the content into clean items. Otherwise people may be using the incorrect item for the concept they thought they had been using. If it wasn't a model item, we might have done differently. --- Jura 13:16, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : What do you mean? It was and it still is has list (P2354) so? There is some lists and they are has list (P2354) to each other. Isn't it how has list (P2354) works? Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:29, 6 February 2022 (UTC) A sample list should be of high quality, otherwise people who use it as a model end up doing not so high quality things. --- Jura 13:32, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : What do you mean? It was and it still is has list (P2354) so? There is some lists and they are has list (P2354) to each other. Isn't it how has list (P2354) works? Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:29, 6 February 2022 (UTC) A sample list should be of high quality, otherwise people who use it as a model end up doing not so high quality things. --- Jura 13:32, 6 February 2022 (UTC) The item is currently a conflation of a list and the item for artist. Once deletion is decided, I will to the necessary changes and create the new item. --- Jura 15:12, 2 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : But for this reason list of awards and nominations received by Basshunter (Q63384701) can't be deleted in any way - there is no point. If you want to move properties then use moveClaim.js. I have moved award received (P166) and nominated for (P1411) to Basshunter (Q383541) so it is Fixed . Eurohunter ( talk ) 14:22, 3 February 2022 (UTC) You forgot P18. It's still a conflation potentially misleading users, oddly listed as sample on Property:P2354 . Once the split complete, it can be deleted. --- Jura 14:53, 3 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : What do you mean about image (P18) ? This is main image used for this item, ilustration of this list so what is wrong? See first random discographies I found for example Falco discography (Q10087) , Miranda Cosgrove discography (Q13118) , Texas discography (Q125194) . What about has list (P2354) ? President of the French Republic (Q191954) Wikimedia list related to this subject: list of presidents of France (Q29580) same as Basshunter (Q383541) Wikimedia list related to this subject: list of awards and nominations received by Basshunter (Q63384701) , list of songs recorded by Basshunter (Q11761784) , list of Basshunter live performances (Q6352124) . " list related to this subject " right? What is wrong? Eurohunter ( talk ) 10:49, 6 February 2022 (UTC) The discussion is about a list of awards. The illustration doesn't represent that. The image would more appropriately be on the item for the artist. No need to duplicate. If there are other malformed lists about Basshunter, please fix them, but we don't need to discuss them here. --- Jura 10:59, 6 February 2022 (UTC) I finished the split: Q110825249 . --- Jura 11:21, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : First explain Falco discography (Q10087) , Miranda Cosgrove discography (Q13118) , Texas discography (Q125194) and thousands of other. This is image for infobox. What is the problem? This split was totally non-sense. Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:31, 6 February 2022 (UTC) You split off most statements to the item for the artist, not me. I thought you understood that you have be conflating items. --- Jura 12:34, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : This is not any "conflation" in anyway. How even you got that idea? There is no any logic in this. How? You are trying to do something weird. This is single item for list of awards and nominations received by Basshunter. What is the problem again. Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:37, 6 February 2022 (UTC) Please explain why you moved these statements from the item we are discussing here after it was listed for deletion. --- Jura 12:40, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : Maybe I miss understood you but you told that somehow award received (P166) and nominated for (P1411) are missleading so I thought you mean that they are dedicated for human (Q5) than Wikimedia list article (Q13406463) so I have moved them. Should I restore them? Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:45, 6 February 2022 (UTC) No. They are clearly statements that go on items for humans (or other awardees) and not on items for a link to a Wikipedia list. This is why I consider that the item conflats two concepts. --- Jura 12:50, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : So yes it was a issue which was fixed now and this is the same item for list just it is fixed now and due to it isn't any conflation (this is not archive - and we don't need information about edit history in main space - we could say that). Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:11, 6 February 2022 (UTC) As it was added as a sample item to has list (P2354) , we should do full cleanup for conflation: i.e. split the content into clean items. Otherwise people may be using the incorrect item for the concept they thought they had been using. If it wasn't a model item, we might have done differently. --- Jura 13:16, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : What do you mean? It was and it still is has list (P2354) so? There is some lists and they are has list (P2354) to each other. Isn't it how has list (P2354) works? Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:29, 6 February 2022 (UTC) A sample list should be of high quality, otherwise people who use it as a model end up doing not so high quality things. --- Jura 13:32, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : But for this reason list of awards and nominations received by Basshunter (Q63384701) can't be deleted in any way - there is no point. If you want to move properties then use moveClaim.js. I have moved award received (P166) and nominated for (P1411) to Basshunter (Q383541) so it is Fixed . Eurohunter ( talk ) 14:22, 3 February 2022 (UTC) You forgot P18. It's still a conflation potentially misleading users, oddly listed as sample on Property:P2354 . Once the split complete, it can be deleted. --- Jura 14:53, 3 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : What do you mean about image (P18) ? This is main image used for this item, ilustration of this list so what is wrong? See first random discographies I found for example Falco discography (Q10087) , Miranda Cosgrove discography (Q13118) , Texas discography (Q125194) . What about has list (P2354) ? President of the French Republic (Q191954) Wikimedia list related to this subject: list of presidents of France (Q29580) same as Basshunter (Q383541) Wikimedia list related to this subject: list of awards and nominations received by Basshunter (Q63384701) , list of songs recorded by Basshunter (Q11761784) , list of Basshunter live performances (Q6352124) . " list related to this subject " right? What is wrong? Eurohunter ( talk ) 10:49, 6 February 2022 (UTC) The discussion is about a list of awards. The illustration doesn't represent that. The image would more appropriately be on the item for the artist. No need to duplicate. If there are other malformed lists about Basshunter, please fix them, but we don't need to discuss them here. --- Jura 10:59, 6 February 2022 (UTC) I finished the split: Q110825249 . --- Jura 11:21, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : First explain Falco discography (Q10087) , Miranda Cosgrove discography (Q13118) , Texas discography (Q125194) and thousands of other. This is image for infobox. What is the problem? This split was totally non-sense. Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:31, 6 February 2022 (UTC) You split off most statements to the item for the artist, not me. I thought you understood that you have be conflating items. --- Jura 12:34, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : This is not any "conflation" in anyway. How even you got that idea? There is no any logic in this. How? You are trying to do something weird. This is single item for list of awards and nominations received by Basshunter. What is the problem again. Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:37, 6 February 2022 (UTC) Please explain why you moved these statements from the item we are discussing here after it was listed for deletion. --- Jura 12:40, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : Maybe I miss understood you but you told that somehow award received (P166) and nominated for (P1411) are missleading so I thought you mean that they are dedicated for human (Q5) than Wikimedia list article (Q13406463) so I have moved them. Should I restore them? Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:45, 6 February 2022 (UTC) No. They are clearly statements that go on items for humans (or other awardees) and not on items for a link to a Wikipedia list. This is why I consider that the item conflats two concepts. --- Jura 12:50, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : So yes it was a issue which was fixed now and this is the same item for list just it is fixed now and due to it isn't any conflation (this is not archive - and we don't need information about edit history in main space - we could say that). Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:11, 6 February 2022 (UTC) As it was added as a sample item to has list (P2354) , we should do full cleanup for conflation: i.e. split the content into clean items. Otherwise people may be using the incorrect item for the concept they thought they had been using. If it wasn't a model item, we might have done differently. --- Jura 13:16, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : What do you mean? It was and it still is has list (P2354) so? There is some lists and they are has list (P2354) to each other. Isn't it how has list (P2354) works? Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:29, 6 February 2022 (UTC) A sample list should be of high quality, otherwise people who use it as a model end up doing not so high quality things. --- Jura 13:32, 6 February 2022 (UTC) You forgot P18. It's still a conflation potentially misleading users, oddly listed as sample on Property:P2354 . Once the split complete, it can be deleted. --- Jura 14:53, 3 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : What do you mean about image (P18) ? This is main image used for this item, ilustration of this list so what is wrong? See first random discographies I found for example Falco discography (Q10087) , Miranda Cosgrove discography (Q13118) , Texas discography (Q125194) . What about has list (P2354) ? President of the French Republic (Q191954) Wikimedia list related to this subject: list of presidents of France (Q29580) same as Basshunter (Q383541) Wikimedia list related to this subject: list of awards and nominations received by Basshunter (Q63384701) , list of songs recorded by Basshunter (Q11761784) , list of Basshunter live performances (Q6352124) . " list related to this subject " right? What is wrong? Eurohunter ( talk ) 10:49, 6 February 2022 (UTC) The discussion is about a list of awards. The illustration doesn't represent that. The image would more appropriately be on the item for the artist. No need to duplicate. If there are other malformed lists about Basshunter, please fix them, but we don't need to discuss them here. --- Jura 10:59, 6 February 2022 (UTC) I finished the split: Q110825249 . --- Jura 11:21, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : First explain Falco discography (Q10087) , Miranda Cosgrove discography (Q13118) , Texas discography (Q125194) and thousands of other. This is image for infobox. What is the problem? This split was totally non-sense. Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:31, 6 February 2022 (UTC) You split off most statements to the item for the artist, not me. I thought you understood that you have be conflating items. --- Jura 12:34, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : This is not any "conflation" in anyway. How even you got that idea? There is no any logic in this. How? You are trying to do something weird. This is single item for list of awards and nominations received by Basshunter. What is the problem again. Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:37, 6 February 2022 (UTC) Please explain why you moved these statements from the item we are discussing here after it was listed for deletion. --- Jura 12:40, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : Maybe I miss understood you but you told that somehow award received (P166) and nominated for (P1411) are missleading so I thought you mean that they are dedicated for human (Q5) than Wikimedia list article (Q13406463) so I have moved them. Should I restore them? Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:45, 6 February 2022 (UTC) No. They are clearly statements that go on items for humans (or other awardees) and not on items for a link to a Wikipedia list. This is why I consider that the item conflats two concepts. --- Jura 12:50, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : So yes it was a issue which was fixed now and this is the same item for list just it is fixed now and due to it isn't any conflation (this is not archive - and we don't need information about edit history in main space - we could say that). Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:11, 6 February 2022 (UTC) As it was added as a sample item to has list (P2354) , we should do full cleanup for conflation: i.e. split the content into clean items. Otherwise people may be using the incorrect item for the concept they thought they had been using. If it wasn't a model item, we might have done differently. --- Jura 13:16, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : What do you mean? It was and it still is has list (P2354) so? There is some lists and they are has list (P2354) to each other. Isn't it how has list (P2354) works? Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:29, 6 February 2022 (UTC) A sample list should be of high quality, otherwise people who use it as a model end up doing not so high quality things. --- Jura 13:32, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : What do you mean about image (P18) ? This is main image used for this item, ilustration of this list so what is wrong? See first random discographies I found for example Falco discography (Q10087) , Miranda Cosgrove discography (Q13118) , Texas discography (Q125194) . What about has list (P2354) ? President of the French Republic (Q191954) Wikimedia list related to this subject: list of presidents of France (Q29580) same as Basshunter (Q383541) Wikimedia list related to this subject: list of awards and nominations received by Basshunter (Q63384701) , list of songs recorded by Basshunter (Q11761784) , list of Basshunter live performances (Q6352124) . " list related to this subject " right? What is wrong? Eurohunter ( talk ) 10:49, 6 February 2022 (UTC) The discussion is about a list of awards. The illustration doesn't represent that. The image would more appropriately be on the item for the artist. No need to duplicate. If there are other malformed lists about Basshunter, please fix them, but we don't need to discuss them here. --- Jura 10:59, 6 February 2022 (UTC) I finished the split: Q110825249 . --- Jura 11:21, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : First explain Falco discography (Q10087) , Miranda Cosgrove discography (Q13118) , Texas discography (Q125194) and thousands of other. This is image for infobox. What is the problem? This split was totally non-sense. Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:31, 6 February 2022 (UTC) You split off most statements to the item for the artist, not me. I thought you understood that you have be conflating items. --- Jura 12:34, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : This is not any "conflation" in anyway. How even you got that idea? There is no any logic in this. How? You are trying to do something weird. This is single item for list of awards and nominations received by Basshunter. What is the problem again. Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:37, 6 February 2022 (UTC) Please explain why you moved these statements from the item we are discussing here after it was listed for deletion. --- Jura 12:40, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : Maybe I miss understood you but you told that somehow award received (P166) and nominated for (P1411) are missleading so I thought you mean that they are dedicated for human (Q5) than Wikimedia list article (Q13406463) so I have moved them. Should I restore them? Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:45, 6 February 2022 (UTC) No. They are clearly statements that go on items for humans (or other awardees) and not on items for a link to a Wikipedia list. This is why I consider that the item conflats two concepts. --- Jura 12:50, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : So yes it was a issue which was fixed now and this is the same item for list just it is fixed now and due to it isn't any conflation (this is not archive - and we don't need information about edit history in main space - we could say that). Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:11, 6 February 2022 (UTC) As it was added as a sample item to has list (P2354) , we should do full cleanup for conflation: i.e. split the content into clean items. Otherwise people may be using the incorrect item for the concept they thought they had been using. If it wasn't a model item, we might have done differently. --- Jura 13:16, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : What do you mean? It was and it still is has list (P2354) so? There is some lists and they are has list (P2354) to each other. Isn't it how has list (P2354) works? Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:29, 6 February 2022 (UTC) A sample list should be of high quality, otherwise people who use it as a model end up doing not so high quality things. --- Jura 13:32, 6 February 2022 (UTC) The discussion is about a list of awards. The illustration doesn't represent that. The image would more appropriately be on the item for the artist. No need to duplicate. If there are other malformed lists about Basshunter, please fix them, but we don't need to discuss them here. --- Jura 10:59, 6 February 2022 (UTC) I finished the split: Q110825249 . --- Jura 11:21, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : First explain Falco discography (Q10087) , Miranda Cosgrove discography (Q13118) , Texas discography (Q125194) and thousands of other. This is image for infobox. What is the problem? This split was totally non-sense. Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:31, 6 February 2022 (UTC) You split off most statements to the item for the artist, not me. I thought you understood that you have be conflating items. --- Jura 12:34, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : This is not any "conflation" in anyway. How even you got that idea? There is no any logic in this. How? You are trying to do something weird. This is single item for list of awards and nominations received by Basshunter. What is the problem again. Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:37, 6 February 2022 (UTC) Please explain why you moved these statements from the item we are discussing here after it was listed for deletion. --- Jura 12:40, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : Maybe I miss understood you but you told that somehow award received (P166) and nominated for (P1411) are missleading so I thought you mean that they are dedicated for human (Q5) than Wikimedia list article (Q13406463) so I have moved them. Should I restore them? Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:45, 6 February 2022 (UTC) No. They are clearly statements that go on items for humans (or other awardees) and not on items for a link to a Wikipedia list. This is why I consider that the item conflats two concepts. --- Jura 12:50, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : So yes it was a issue which was fixed now and this is the same item for list just it is fixed now and due to it isn't any conflation (this is not archive - and we don't need information about edit history in main space - we could say that). Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:11, 6 February 2022 (UTC) As it was added as a sample item to has list (P2354) , we should do full cleanup for conflation: i.e. split the content into clean items. Otherwise people may be using the incorrect item for the concept they thought they had been using. If it wasn't a model item, we might have done differently. --- Jura 13:16, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : What do you mean? It was and it still is has list (P2354) so? There is some lists and they are has list (P2354) to each other. Isn't it how has list (P2354) works? Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:29, 6 February 2022 (UTC) A sample list should be of high quality, otherwise people who use it as a model end up doing not so high quality things. --- Jura 13:32, 6 February 2022 (UTC) I finished the split: Q110825249 . --- Jura 11:21, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : First explain Falco discography (Q10087) , Miranda Cosgrove discography (Q13118) , Texas discography (Q125194) and thousands of other. This is image for infobox. What is the problem? This split was totally non-sense. Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:31, 6 February 2022 (UTC) You split off most statements to the item for the artist, not me. I thought you understood that you have be conflating items. --- Jura 12:34, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : This is not any "conflation" in anyway. How even you got that idea? There is no any logic in this. How? You are trying to do something weird. This is single item for list of awards and nominations received by Basshunter. What is the problem again. Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:37, 6 February 2022 (UTC) Please explain why you moved these statements from the item we are discussing here after it was listed for deletion. --- Jura 12:40, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : Maybe I miss understood you but you told that somehow award received (P166) and nominated for (P1411) are missleading so I thought you mean that they are dedicated for human (Q5) than Wikimedia list article (Q13406463) so I have moved them. Should I restore them? Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:45, 6 February 2022 (UTC) No. They are clearly statements that go on items for humans (or other awardees) and not on items for a link to a Wikipedia list. This is why I consider that the item conflats two concepts. --- Jura 12:50, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : So yes it was a issue which was fixed now and this is the same item for list just it is fixed now and due to it isn't any conflation (this is not archive - and we don't need information about edit history in main space - we could say that). Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:11, 6 February 2022 (UTC) As it was added as a sample item to has list (P2354) , we should do full cleanup for conflation: i.e. split the content into clean items. Otherwise people may be using the incorrect item for the concept they thought they had been using. If it wasn't a model item, we might have done differently. --- Jura 13:16, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : What do you mean? It was and it still is has list (P2354) so? There is some lists and they are has list (P2354) to each other. Isn't it how has list (P2354) works? Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:29, 6 February 2022 (UTC) A sample list should be of high quality, otherwise people who use it as a model end up doing not so high quality things. --- Jura 13:32, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : First explain Falco discography (Q10087) , Miranda Cosgrove discography (Q13118) , Texas discography (Q125194) and thousands of other. This is image for infobox. What is the problem? This split was totally non-sense. Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:31, 6 February 2022 (UTC) You split off most statements to the item for the artist, not me. I thought you understood that you have be conflating items. --- Jura 12:34, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : This is not any "conflation" in anyway. How even you got that idea? There is no any logic in this. How? You are trying to do something weird. This is single item for list of awards and nominations received by Basshunter. What is the problem again. Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:37, 6 February 2022 (UTC) Please explain why you moved these statements from the item we are discussing here after it was listed for deletion. --- Jura 12:40, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : Maybe I miss understood you but you told that somehow award received (P166) and nominated for (P1411) are missleading so I thought you mean that they are dedicated for human (Q5) than Wikimedia list article (Q13406463) so I have moved them. Should I restore them? Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:45, 6 February 2022 (UTC) No. They are clearly statements that go on items for humans (or other awardees) and not on items for a link to a Wikipedia list. This is why I consider that the item conflats two concepts. --- Jura 12:50, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : So yes it was a issue which was fixed now and this is the same item for list just it is fixed now and due to it isn't any conflation (this is not archive - and we don't need information about edit history in main space - we could say that). Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:11, 6 February 2022 (UTC) As it was added as a sample item to has list (P2354) , we should do full cleanup for conflation: i.e. split the content into clean items. Otherwise people may be using the incorrect item for the concept they thought they had been using. If it wasn't a model item, we might have done differently. --- Jura 13:16, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : What do you mean? It was and it still is has list (P2354) so? There is some lists and they are has list (P2354) to each other. Isn't it how has list (P2354) works? Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:29, 6 February 2022 (UTC) A sample list should be of high quality, otherwise people who use it as a model end up doing not so high quality things. --- Jura 13:32, 6 February 2022 (UTC) You split off most statements to the item for the artist, not me. I thought you understood that you have be conflating items. --- Jura 12:34, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : This is not any "conflation" in anyway. How even you got that idea? There is no any logic in this. How? You are trying to do something weird. This is single item for list of awards and nominations received by Basshunter. What is the problem again. Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:37, 6 February 2022 (UTC) Please explain why you moved these statements from the item we are discussing here after it was listed for deletion. --- Jura 12:40, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : Maybe I miss understood you but you told that somehow award received (P166) and nominated for (P1411) are missleading so I thought you mean that they are dedicated for human (Q5) than Wikimedia list article (Q13406463) so I have moved them. Should I restore them? Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:45, 6 February 2022 (UTC) No. They are clearly statements that go on items for humans (or other awardees) and not on items for a link to a Wikipedia list. This is why I consider that the item conflats two concepts. --- Jura 12:50, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : So yes it was a issue which was fixed now and this is the same item for list just it is fixed now and due to it isn't any conflation (this is not archive - and we don't need information about edit history in main space - we could say that). Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:11, 6 February 2022 (UTC) As it was added as a sample item to has list (P2354) , we should do full cleanup for conflation: i.e. split the content into clean items. Otherwise people may be using the incorrect item for the concept they thought they had been using. If it wasn't a model item, we might have done differently. --- Jura 13:16, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : What do you mean? It was and it still is has list (P2354) so? There is some lists and they are has list (P2354) to each other. Isn't it how has list (P2354) works? Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:29, 6 February 2022 (UTC) A sample list should be of high quality, otherwise people who use it as a model end up doing not so high quality things. --- Jura 13:32, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : This is not any "conflation" in anyway. How even you got that idea? There is no any logic in this. How? You are trying to do something weird. This is single item for list of awards and nominations received by Basshunter. What is the problem again. Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:37, 6 February 2022 (UTC) Please explain why you moved these statements from the item we are discussing here after it was listed for deletion. --- Jura 12:40, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : Maybe I miss understood you but you told that somehow award received (P166) and nominated for (P1411) are missleading so I thought you mean that they are dedicated for human (Q5) than Wikimedia list article (Q13406463) so I have moved them. Should I restore them? Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:45, 6 February 2022 (UTC) No. They are clearly statements that go on items for humans (or other awardees) and not on items for a link to a Wikipedia list. This is why I consider that the item conflats two concepts. --- Jura 12:50, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : So yes it was a issue which was fixed now and this is the same item for list just it is fixed now and due to it isn't any conflation (this is not archive - and we don't need information about edit history in main space - we could say that). Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:11, 6 February 2022 (UTC) As it was added as a sample item to has list (P2354) , we should do full cleanup for conflation: i.e. split the content into clean items. Otherwise people may be using the incorrect item for the concept they thought they had been using. If it wasn't a model item, we might have done differently. --- Jura 13:16, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : What do you mean? It was and it still is has list (P2354) so? There is some lists and they are has list (P2354) to each other. Isn't it how has list (P2354) works? Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:29, 6 February 2022 (UTC) A sample list should be of high quality, otherwise people who use it as a model end up doing not so high quality things. --- Jura 13:32, 6 February 2022 (UTC) Please explain why you moved these statements from the item we are discussing here after it was listed for deletion. --- Jura 12:40, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : Maybe I miss understood you but you told that somehow award received (P166) and nominated for (P1411) are missleading so I thought you mean that they are dedicated for human (Q5) than Wikimedia list article (Q13406463) so I have moved them. Should I restore them? Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:45, 6 February 2022 (UTC) No. They are clearly statements that go on items for humans (or other awardees) and not on items for a link to a Wikipedia list. This is why I consider that the item conflats two concepts. --- Jura 12:50, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : So yes it was a issue which was fixed now and this is the same item for list just it is fixed now and due to it isn't any conflation (this is not archive - and we don't need information about edit history in main space - we could say that). Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:11, 6 February 2022 (UTC) As it was added as a sample item to has list (P2354) , we should do full cleanup for conflation: i.e. split the content into clean items. Otherwise people may be using the incorrect item for the concept they thought they had been using. If it wasn't a model item, we might have done differently. --- Jura 13:16, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : What do you mean? It was and it still is has list (P2354) so? There is some lists and they are has list (P2354) to each other. Isn't it how has list (P2354) works? Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:29, 6 February 2022 (UTC) A sample list should be of high quality, otherwise people who use it as a model end up doing not so high quality things. --- Jura 13:32, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : Maybe I miss understood you but you told that somehow award received (P166) and nominated for (P1411) are missleading so I thought you mean that they are dedicated for human (Q5) than Wikimedia list article (Q13406463) so I have moved them. Should I restore them? Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:45, 6 February 2022 (UTC) No. They are clearly statements that go on items for humans (or other awardees) and not on items for a link to a Wikipedia list. This is why I consider that the item conflats two concepts. --- Jura 12:50, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : So yes it was a issue which was fixed now and this is the same item for list just it is fixed now and due to it isn't any conflation (this is not archive - and we don't need information about edit history in main space - we could say that). Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:11, 6 February 2022 (UTC) As it was added as a sample item to has list (P2354) , we should do full cleanup for conflation: i.e. split the content into clean items. Otherwise people may be using the incorrect item for the concept they thought they had been using. If it wasn't a model item, we might have done differently. --- Jura 13:16, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : What do you mean? It was and it still is has list (P2354) so? There is some lists and they are has list (P2354) to each other. Isn't it how has list (P2354) works? Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:29, 6 February 2022 (UTC) A sample list should be of high quality, otherwise people who use it as a model end up doing not so high quality things. --- Jura 13:32, 6 February 2022 (UTC) No. They are clearly statements that go on items for humans (or other awardees) and not on items for a link to a Wikipedia list. This is why I consider that the item conflats two concepts. --- Jura 12:50, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : So yes it was a issue which was fixed now and this is the same item for list just it is fixed now and due to it isn't any conflation (this is not archive - and we don't need information about edit history in main space - we could say that). Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:11, 6 February 2022 (UTC) As it was added as a sample item to has list (P2354) , we should do full cleanup for conflation: i.e. split the content into clean items. Otherwise people may be using the incorrect item for the concept they thought they had been using. If it wasn't a model item, we might have done differently. --- Jura 13:16, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : What do you mean? It was and it still is has list (P2354) so? There is some lists and they are has list (P2354) to each other. Isn't it how has list (P2354) works? Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:29, 6 February 2022 (UTC) A sample list should be of high quality, otherwise people who use it as a model end up doing not so high quality things. --- Jura 13:32, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : So yes it was a issue which was fixed now and this is the same item for list just it is fixed now and due to it isn't any conflation (this is not archive - and we don't need information about edit history in main space - we could say that). Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:11, 6 February 2022 (UTC) As it was added as a sample item to has list (P2354) , we should do full cleanup for conflation: i.e. split the content into clean items. Otherwise people may be using the incorrect item for the concept they thought they had been using. If it wasn't a model item, we might have done differently. --- Jura 13:16, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : What do you mean? It was and it still is has list (P2354) so? There is some lists and they are has list (P2354) to each other. Isn't it how has list (P2354) works? Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:29, 6 February 2022 (UTC) A sample list should be of high quality, otherwise people who use it as a model end up doing not so high quality things. --- Jura 13:32, 6 February 2022 (UTC) As it was added as a sample item to has list (P2354) , we should do full cleanup for conflation: i.e. split the content into clean items. Otherwise people may be using the incorrect item for the concept they thought they had been using. If it wasn't a model item, we might have done differently. --- Jura 13:16, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : What do you mean? It was and it still is has list (P2354) so? There is some lists and they are has list (P2354) to each other. Isn't it how has list (P2354) works? Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:29, 6 February 2022 (UTC) A sample list should be of high quality, otherwise people who use it as a model end up doing not so high quality things. --- Jura 13:32, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : What do you mean? It was and it still is has list (P2354) so? There is some lists and they are has list (P2354) to each other. Isn't it how has list (P2354) works? Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:29, 6 February 2022 (UTC) A sample list should be of high quality, otherwise people who use it as a model end up doing not so high quality things. --- Jura 13:32, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : But for this reason list of awards and nominations received by Basshunter (Q63384701) can't be deleted in any way - there is no point. If you want to move properties then use moveClaim.js. I have moved award received (P166) and nominated for (P1411) to Basshunter (Q383541) so it is Fixed . Eurohunter ( talk ) 14:22, 3 February 2022 (UTC) You forgot P18. It's still a conflation potentially misleading users, oddly listed as sample on Property:P2354 . Once the split complete, it can be deleted. --- Jura 14:53, 3 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : What do you mean about image (P18) ? This is main image used for this item, ilustration of this list so what is wrong? See first random discographies I found for example Falco discography (Q10087) , Miranda Cosgrove discography (Q13118) , Texas discography (Q125194) . What about has list (P2354) ? President of the French Republic (Q191954) Wikimedia list related to this subject: list of presidents of France (Q29580) same as Basshunter (Q383541) Wikimedia list related to this subject: list of awards and nominations received by Basshunter (Q63384701) , list of songs recorded by Basshunter (Q11761784) , list of Basshunter live performances (Q6352124) . " list related to this subject " right? What is wrong? Eurohunter ( talk ) 10:49, 6 February 2022 (UTC) The discussion is about a list of awards. The illustration doesn't represent that. The image would more appropriately be on the item for the artist. No need to duplicate. If there are other malformed lists about Basshunter, please fix them, but we don't need to discuss them here. --- Jura 10:59, 6 February 2022 (UTC) I finished the split: Q110825249 . --- Jura 11:21, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : First explain Falco discography (Q10087) , Miranda Cosgrove discography (Q13118) , Texas discography (Q125194) and thousands of other. This is image for infobox. What is the problem? This split was totally non-sense. Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:31, 6 February 2022 (UTC) You split off most statements to the item for the artist, not me. I thought you understood that you have be conflating items. --- Jura 12:34, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : This is not any "conflation" in anyway. How even you got that idea? There is no any logic in this. How? You are trying to do something weird. This is single item for list of awards and nominations received by Basshunter. What is the problem again. Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:37, 6 February 2022 (UTC) Please explain why you moved these statements from the item we are discussing here after it was listed for deletion. --- Jura 12:40, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : Maybe I miss understood you but you told that somehow award received (P166) and nominated for (P1411) are missleading so I thought you mean that they are dedicated for human (Q5) than Wikimedia list article (Q13406463) so I have moved them. Should I restore them? Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:45, 6 February 2022 (UTC) No. They are clearly statements that go on items for humans (or other awardees) and not on items for a link to a Wikipedia list. This is why I consider that the item conflats two concepts. --- Jura 12:50, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : So yes it was a issue which was fixed now and this is the same item for list just it is fixed now and due to it isn't any conflation (this is not archive - and we don't need information about edit history in main space - we could say that). Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:11, 6 February 2022 (UTC) As it was added as a sample item to has list (P2354) , we should do full cleanup for conflation: i.e. split the content into clean items. Otherwise people may be using the incorrect item for the concept they thought they had been using. If it wasn't a model item, we might have done differently. --- Jura 13:16, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : What do you mean? It was and it still is has list (P2354) so? There is some lists and they are has list (P2354) to each other. Isn't it how has list (P2354) works? Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:29, 6 February 2022 (UTC) A sample list should be of high quality, otherwise people who use it as a model end up doing not so high quality things. --- Jura 13:32, 6 February 2022 (UTC) You forgot P18. It's still a conflation potentially misleading users, oddly listed as sample on Property:P2354 . Once the split complete, it can be deleted. --- Jura 14:53, 3 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : What do you mean about image (P18) ? This is main image used for this item, ilustration of this list so what is wrong? See first random discographies I found for example Falco discography (Q10087) , Miranda Cosgrove discography (Q13118) , Texas discography (Q125194) . What about has list (P2354) ? President of the French Republic (Q191954) Wikimedia list related to this subject: list of presidents of France (Q29580) same as Basshunter (Q383541) Wikimedia list related to this subject: list of awards and nominations received by Basshunter (Q63384701) , list of songs recorded by Basshunter (Q11761784) , list of Basshunter live performances (Q6352124) . " list related to this subject " right? What is wrong? Eurohunter ( talk ) 10:49, 6 February 2022 (UTC) The discussion is about a list of awards. The illustration doesn't represent that. The image would more appropriately be on the item for the artist. No need to duplicate. If there are other malformed lists about Basshunter, please fix them, but we don't need to discuss them here. --- Jura 10:59, 6 February 2022 (UTC) I finished the split: Q110825249 . --- Jura 11:21, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : First explain Falco discography (Q10087) , Miranda Cosgrove discography (Q13118) , Texas discography (Q125194) and thousands of other. This is image for infobox. What is the problem? This split was totally non-sense. Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:31, 6 February 2022 (UTC) You split off most statements to the item for the artist, not me. I thought you understood that you have be conflating items. --- Jura 12:34, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : This is not any "conflation" in anyway. How even you got that idea? There is no any logic in this. How? You are trying to do something weird. This is single item for list of awards and nominations received by Basshunter. What is the problem again. Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:37, 6 February 2022 (UTC) Please explain why you moved these statements from the item we are discussing here after it was listed for deletion. --- Jura 12:40, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : Maybe I miss understood you but you told that somehow award received (P166) and nominated for (P1411) are missleading so I thought you mean that they are dedicated for human (Q5) than Wikimedia list article (Q13406463) so I have moved them. Should I restore them? Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:45, 6 February 2022 (UTC) No. They are clearly statements that go on items for humans (or other awardees) and not on items for a link to a Wikipedia list. This is why I consider that the item conflats two concepts. --- Jura 12:50, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : So yes it was a issue which was fixed now and this is the same item for list just it is fixed now and due to it isn't any conflation (this is not archive - and we don't need information about edit history in main space - we could say that). Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:11, 6 February 2022 (UTC) As it was added as a sample item to has list (P2354) , we should do full cleanup for conflation: i.e. split the content into clean items. Otherwise people may be using the incorrect item for the concept they thought they had been using. If it wasn't a model item, we might have done differently. --- Jura 13:16, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : What do you mean? It was and it still is has list (P2354) so? There is some lists and they are has list (P2354) to each other. Isn't it how has list (P2354) works? Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:29, 6 February 2022 (UTC) A sample list should be of high quality, otherwise people who use it as a model end up doing not so high quality things. --- Jura 13:32, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : What do you mean about image (P18) ? This is main image used for this item, ilustration of this list so what is wrong? See first random discographies I found for example Falco discography (Q10087) , Miranda Cosgrove discography (Q13118) , Texas discography (Q125194) . What about has list (P2354) ? President of the French Republic (Q191954) Wikimedia list related to this subject: list of presidents of France (Q29580) same as Basshunter (Q383541) Wikimedia list related to this subject: list of awards and nominations received by Basshunter (Q63384701) , list of songs recorded by Basshunter (Q11761784) , list of Basshunter live performances (Q6352124) . " list related to this subject " right? What is wrong? Eurohunter ( talk ) 10:49, 6 February 2022 (UTC) The discussion is about a list of awards. The illustration doesn't represent that. The image would more appropriately be on the item for the artist. No need to duplicate. If there are other malformed lists about Basshunter, please fix them, but we don't need to discuss them here. --- Jura 10:59, 6 February 2022 (UTC) I finished the split: Q110825249 . --- Jura 11:21, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : First explain Falco discography (Q10087) , Miranda Cosgrove discography (Q13118) , Texas discography (Q125194) and thousands of other. This is image for infobox. What is the problem? This split was totally non-sense. Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:31, 6 February 2022 (UTC) You split off most statements to the item for the artist, not me. I thought you understood that you have be conflating items. --- Jura 12:34, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : This is not any "conflation" in anyway. How even you got that idea? There is no any logic in this. How? You are trying to do something weird. This is single item for list of awards and nominations received by Basshunter. What is the problem again. Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:37, 6 February 2022 (UTC) Please explain why you moved these statements from the item we are discussing here after it was listed for deletion. --- Jura 12:40, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : Maybe I miss understood you but you told that somehow award received (P166) and nominated for (P1411) are missleading so I thought you mean that they are dedicated for human (Q5) than Wikimedia list article (Q13406463) so I have moved them. Should I restore them? Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:45, 6 February 2022 (UTC) No. They are clearly statements that go on items for humans (or other awardees) and not on items for a link to a Wikipedia list. This is why I consider that the item conflats two concepts. --- Jura 12:50, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : So yes it was a issue which was fixed now and this is the same item for list just it is fixed now and due to it isn't any conflation (this is not archive - and we don't need information about edit history in main space - we could say that). Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:11, 6 February 2022 (UTC) As it was added as a sample item to has list (P2354) , we should do full cleanup for conflation: i.e. split the content into clean items. Otherwise people may be using the incorrect item for the concept they thought they had been using. If it wasn't a model item, we might have done differently. --- Jura 13:16, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : What do you mean? It was and it still is has list (P2354) so? There is some lists and they are has list (P2354) to each other. Isn't it how has list (P2354) works? Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:29, 6 February 2022 (UTC) A sample list should be of high quality, otherwise people who use it as a model end up doing not so high quality things. --- Jura 13:32, 6 February 2022 (UTC) The discussion is about a list of awards. The illustration doesn't represent that. The image would more appropriately be on the item for the artist. No need to duplicate. If there are other malformed lists about Basshunter, please fix them, but we don't need to discuss them here. --- Jura 10:59, 6 February 2022 (UTC) I finished the split: Q110825249 . --- Jura 11:21, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : First explain Falco discography (Q10087) , Miranda Cosgrove discography (Q13118) , Texas discography (Q125194) and thousands of other. This is image for infobox. What is the problem? This split was totally non-sense. Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:31, 6 February 2022 (UTC) You split off most statements to the item for the artist, not me. I thought you understood that you have be conflating items. --- Jura 12:34, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : This is not any "conflation" in anyway. How even you got that idea? There is no any logic in this. How? You are trying to do something weird. This is single item for list of awards and nominations received by Basshunter. What is the problem again. Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:37, 6 February 2022 (UTC) Please explain why you moved these statements from the item we are discussing here after it was listed for deletion. --- Jura 12:40, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : Maybe I miss understood you but you told that somehow award received (P166) and nominated for (P1411) are missleading so I thought you mean that they are dedicated for human (Q5) than Wikimedia list article (Q13406463) so I have moved them. Should I restore them? Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:45, 6 February 2022 (UTC) No. They are clearly statements that go on items for humans (or other awardees) and not on items for a link to a Wikipedia list. This is why I consider that the item conflats two concepts. --- Jura 12:50, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : So yes it was a issue which was fixed now and this is the same item for list just it is fixed now and due to it isn't any conflation (this is not archive - and we don't need information about edit history in main space - we could say that). Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:11, 6 February 2022 (UTC) As it was added as a sample item to has list (P2354) , we should do full cleanup for conflation: i.e. split the content into clean items. Otherwise people may be using the incorrect item for the concept they thought they had been using. If it wasn't a model item, we might have done differently. --- Jura 13:16, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : What do you mean? It was and it still is has list (P2354) so? There is some lists and they are has list (P2354) to each other. Isn't it how has list (P2354) works? Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:29, 6 February 2022 (UTC) A sample list should be of high quality, otherwise people who use it as a model end up doing not so high quality things. --- Jura 13:32, 6 February 2022 (UTC) I finished the split: Q110825249 . --- Jura 11:21, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : First explain Falco discography (Q10087) , Miranda Cosgrove discography (Q13118) , Texas discography (Q125194) and thousands of other. This is image for infobox. What is the problem? This split was totally non-sense. Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:31, 6 February 2022 (UTC) You split off most statements to the item for the artist, not me. I thought you understood that you have be conflating items. --- Jura 12:34, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : This is not any "conflation" in anyway. How even you got that idea? There is no any logic in this. How? You are trying to do something weird. This is single item for list of awards and nominations received by Basshunter. What is the problem again. Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:37, 6 February 2022 (UTC) Please explain why you moved these statements from the item we are discussing here after it was listed for deletion. --- Jura 12:40, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : Maybe I miss understood you but you told that somehow award received (P166) and nominated for (P1411) are missleading so I thought you mean that they are dedicated for human (Q5) than Wikimedia list article (Q13406463) so I have moved them. Should I restore them? Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:45, 6 February 2022 (UTC) No. They are clearly statements that go on items for humans (or other awardees) and not on items for a link to a Wikipedia list. This is why I consider that the item conflats two concepts. --- Jura 12:50, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : So yes it was a issue which was fixed now and this is the same item for list just it is fixed now and due to it isn't any conflation (this is not archive - and we don't need information about edit history in main space - we could say that). Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:11, 6 February 2022 (UTC) As it was added as a sample item to has list (P2354) , we should do full cleanup for conflation: i.e. split the content into clean items. Otherwise people may be using the incorrect item for the concept they thought they had been using. If it wasn't a model item, we might have done differently. --- Jura 13:16, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : What do you mean? It was and it still is has list (P2354) so? There is some lists and they are has list (P2354) to each other. Isn't it how has list (P2354) works? Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:29, 6 February 2022 (UTC) A sample list should be of high quality, otherwise people who use it as a model end up doing not so high quality things. --- Jura 13:32, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : First explain Falco discography (Q10087) , Miranda Cosgrove discography (Q13118) , Texas discography (Q125194) and thousands of other. This is image for infobox. What is the problem? This split was totally non-sense. Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:31, 6 February 2022 (UTC) You split off most statements to the item for the artist, not me. I thought you understood that you have be conflating items. --- Jura 12:34, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : This is not any "conflation" in anyway. How even you got that idea? There is no any logic in this. How? You are trying to do something weird. This is single item for list of awards and nominations received by Basshunter. What is the problem again. Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:37, 6 February 2022 (UTC) Please explain why you moved these statements from the item we are discussing here after it was listed for deletion. --- Jura 12:40, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : Maybe I miss understood you but you told that somehow award received (P166) and nominated for (P1411) are missleading so I thought you mean that they are dedicated for human (Q5) than Wikimedia list article (Q13406463) so I have moved them. Should I restore them? Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:45, 6 February 2022 (UTC) No. They are clearly statements that go on items for humans (or other awardees) and not on items for a link to a Wikipedia list. This is why I consider that the item conflats two concepts. --- Jura 12:50, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : So yes it was a issue which was fixed now and this is the same item for list just it is fixed now and due to it isn't any conflation (this is not archive - and we don't need information about edit history in main space - we could say that). Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:11, 6 February 2022 (UTC) As it was added as a sample item to has list (P2354) , we should do full cleanup for conflation: i.e. split the content into clean items. Otherwise people may be using the incorrect item for the concept they thought they had been using. If it wasn't a model item, we might have done differently. --- Jura 13:16, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : What do you mean? It was and it still is has list (P2354) so? There is some lists and they are has list (P2354) to each other. Isn't it how has list (P2354) works? Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:29, 6 February 2022 (UTC) A sample list should be of high quality, otherwise people who use it as a model end up doing not so high quality things. --- Jura 13:32, 6 February 2022 (UTC) You split off most statements to the item for the artist, not me. I thought you understood that you have be conflating items. --- Jura 12:34, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : This is not any "conflation" in anyway. How even you got that idea? There is no any logic in this. How? You are trying to do something weird. This is single item for list of awards and nominations received by Basshunter. What is the problem again. Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:37, 6 February 2022 (UTC) Please explain why you moved these statements from the item we are discussing here after it was listed for deletion. --- Jura 12:40, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : Maybe I miss understood you but you told that somehow award received (P166) and nominated for (P1411) are missleading so I thought you mean that they are dedicated for human (Q5) than Wikimedia list article (Q13406463) so I have moved them. Should I restore them? Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:45, 6 February 2022 (UTC) No. They are clearly statements that go on items for humans (or other awardees) and not on items for a link to a Wikipedia list. This is why I consider that the item conflats two concepts. --- Jura 12:50, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : So yes it was a issue which was fixed now and this is the same item for list just it is fixed now and due to it isn't any conflation (this is not archive - and we don't need information about edit history in main space - we could say that). Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:11, 6 February 2022 (UTC) As it was added as a sample item to has list (P2354) , we should do full cleanup for conflation: i.e. split the content into clean items. Otherwise people may be using the incorrect item for the concept they thought they had been using. If it wasn't a model item, we might have done differently. --- Jura 13:16, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : What do you mean? It was and it still is has list (P2354) so? There is some lists and they are has list (P2354) to each other. Isn't it how has list (P2354) works? Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:29, 6 February 2022 (UTC) A sample list should be of high quality, otherwise people who use it as a model end up doing not so high quality things. --- Jura 13:32, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : This is not any "conflation" in anyway. How even you got that idea? There is no any logic in this. How? You are trying to do something weird. This is single item for list of awards and nominations received by Basshunter. What is the problem again. Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:37, 6 February 2022 (UTC) Please explain why you moved these statements from the item we are discussing here after it was listed for deletion. --- Jura 12:40, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : Maybe I miss understood you but you told that somehow award received (P166) and nominated for (P1411) are missleading so I thought you mean that they are dedicated for human (Q5) than Wikimedia list article (Q13406463) so I have moved them. Should I restore them? Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:45, 6 February 2022 (UTC) No. They are clearly statements that go on items for humans (or other awardees) and not on items for a link to a Wikipedia list. This is why I consider that the item conflats two concepts. --- Jura 12:50, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : So yes it was a issue which was fixed now and this is the same item for list just it is fixed now and due to it isn't any conflation (this is not archive - and we don't need information about edit history in main space - we could say that). Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:11, 6 February 2022 (UTC) As it was added as a sample item to has list (P2354) , we should do full cleanup for conflation: i.e. split the content into clean items. Otherwise people may be using the incorrect item for the concept they thought they had been using. If it wasn't a model item, we might have done differently. --- Jura 13:16, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : What do you mean? It was and it still is has list (P2354) so? There is some lists and they are has list (P2354) to each other. Isn't it how has list (P2354) works? Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:29, 6 February 2022 (UTC) A sample list should be of high quality, otherwise people who use it as a model end up doing not so high quality things. --- Jura 13:32, 6 February 2022 (UTC) Please explain why you moved these statements from the item we are discussing here after it was listed for deletion. --- Jura 12:40, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : Maybe I miss understood you but you told that somehow award received (P166) and nominated for (P1411) are missleading so I thought you mean that they are dedicated for human (Q5) than Wikimedia list article (Q13406463) so I have moved them. Should I restore them? Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:45, 6 February 2022 (UTC) No. They are clearly statements that go on items for humans (or other awardees) and not on items for a link to a Wikipedia list. This is why I consider that the item conflats two concepts. --- Jura 12:50, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : So yes it was a issue which was fixed now and this is the same item for list just it is fixed now and due to it isn't any conflation (this is not archive - and we don't need information about edit history in main space - we could say that). Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:11, 6 February 2022 (UTC) As it was added as a sample item to has list (P2354) , we should do full cleanup for conflation: i.e. split the content into clean items. Otherwise people may be using the incorrect item for the concept they thought they had been using. If it wasn't a model item, we might have done differently. --- Jura 13:16, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : What do you mean? It was and it still is has list (P2354) so? There is some lists and they are has list (P2354) to each other. Isn't it how has list (P2354) works? Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:29, 6 February 2022 (UTC) A sample list should be of high quality, otherwise people who use it as a model end up doing not so high quality things. --- Jura 13:32, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : Maybe I miss understood you but you told that somehow award received (P166) and nominated for (P1411) are missleading so I thought you mean that they are dedicated for human (Q5) than Wikimedia list article (Q13406463) so I have moved them. Should I restore them? Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:45, 6 February 2022 (UTC) No. They are clearly statements that go on items for humans (or other awardees) and not on items for a link to a Wikipedia list. This is why I consider that the item conflats two concepts. --- Jura 12:50, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : So yes it was a issue which was fixed now and this is the same item for list just it is fixed now and due to it isn't any conflation (this is not archive - and we don't need information about edit history in main space - we could say that). Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:11, 6 February 2022 (UTC) As it was added as a sample item to has list (P2354) , we should do full cleanup for conflation: i.e. split the content into clean items. Otherwise people may be using the incorrect item for the concept they thought they had been using. If it wasn't a model item, we might have done differently. --- Jura 13:16, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : What do you mean? It was and it still is has list (P2354) so? There is some lists and they are has list (P2354) to each other. Isn't it how has list (P2354) works? Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:29, 6 February 2022 (UTC) A sample list should be of high quality, otherwise people who use it as a model end up doing not so high quality things. --- Jura 13:32, 6 February 2022 (UTC) No. They are clearly statements that go on items for humans (or other awardees) and not on items for a link to a Wikipedia list. This is why I consider that the item conflats two concepts. --- Jura 12:50, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : So yes it was a issue which was fixed now and this is the same item for list just it is fixed now and due to it isn't any conflation (this is not archive - and we don't need information about edit history in main space - we could say that). Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:11, 6 February 2022 (UTC) As it was added as a sample item to has list (P2354) , we should do full cleanup for conflation: i.e. split the content into clean items. Otherwise people may be using the incorrect item for the concept they thought they had been using. If it wasn't a model item, we might have done differently. --- Jura 13:16, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : What do you mean? It was and it still is has list (P2354) so? There is some lists and they are has list (P2354) to each other. Isn't it how has list (P2354) works? Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:29, 6 February 2022 (UTC) A sample list should be of high quality, otherwise people who use it as a model end up doing not so high quality things. --- Jura 13:32, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : So yes it was a issue which was fixed now and this is the same item for list just it is fixed now and due to it isn't any conflation (this is not archive - and we don't need information about edit history in main space - we could say that). Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:11, 6 February 2022 (UTC) As it was added as a sample item to has list (P2354) , we should do full cleanup for conflation: i.e. split the content into clean items. Otherwise people may be using the incorrect item for the concept they thought they had been using. If it wasn't a model item, we might have done differently. --- Jura 13:16, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : What do you mean? It was and it still is has list (P2354) so? There is some lists and they are has list (P2354) to each other. Isn't it how has list (P2354) works? Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:29, 6 February 2022 (UTC) A sample list should be of high quality, otherwise people who use it as a model end up doing not so high quality things. --- Jura 13:32, 6 February 2022 (UTC) As it was added as a sample item to has list (P2354) , we should do full cleanup for conflation: i.e. split the content into clean items. Otherwise people may be using the incorrect item for the concept they thought they had been using. If it wasn't a model item, we might have done differently. --- Jura 13:16, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : What do you mean? It was and it still is has list (P2354) so? There is some lists and they are has list (P2354) to each other. Isn't it how has list (P2354) works? Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:29, 6 February 2022 (UTC) A sample list should be of high quality, otherwise people who use it as a model end up doing not so high quality things. --- Jura 13:32, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : What do you mean? It was and it still is has list (P2354) so? There is some lists and they are has list (P2354) to each other. Isn't it how has list (P2354) works? Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:29, 6 February 2022 (UTC) A sample list should be of high quality, otherwise people who use it as a model end up doing not so high quality things. --- Jura 13:32, 6 February 2022 (UTC) You forgot P18. It's still a conflation potentially misleading users, oddly listed as sample on Property:P2354 . Once the split complete, it can be deleted. --- Jura 14:53, 3 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : What do you mean about image (P18) ? This is main image used for this item, ilustration of this list so what is wrong? See first random discographies I found for example Falco discography (Q10087) , Miranda Cosgrove discography (Q13118) , Texas discography (Q125194) . What about has list (P2354) ? President of the French Republic (Q191954) Wikimedia list related to this subject: list of presidents of France (Q29580) same as Basshunter (Q383541) Wikimedia list related to this subject: list of awards and nominations received by Basshunter (Q63384701) , list of songs recorded by Basshunter (Q11761784) , list of Basshunter live performances (Q6352124) . " list related to this subject " right? What is wrong? Eurohunter ( talk ) 10:49, 6 February 2022 (UTC) The discussion is about a list of awards. The illustration doesn't represent that. The image would more appropriately be on the item for the artist. No need to duplicate. If there are other malformed lists about Basshunter, please fix them, but we don't need to discuss them here. --- Jura 10:59, 6 February 2022 (UTC) I finished the split: Q110825249 . --- Jura 11:21, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : First explain Falco discography (Q10087) , Miranda Cosgrove discography (Q13118) , Texas discography (Q125194) and thousands of other. This is image for infobox. What is the problem? This split was totally non-sense. Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:31, 6 February 2022 (UTC) You split off most statements to the item for the artist, not me. I thought you understood that you have be conflating items. --- Jura 12:34, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : This is not any "conflation" in anyway. How even you got that idea? There is no any logic in this. How? You are trying to do something weird. This is single item for list of awards and nominations received by Basshunter. What is the problem again. Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:37, 6 February 2022 (UTC) Please explain why you moved these statements from the item we are discussing here after it was listed for deletion. --- Jura 12:40, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : Maybe I miss understood you but you told that somehow award received (P166) and nominated for (P1411) are missleading so I thought you mean that they are dedicated for human (Q5) than Wikimedia list article (Q13406463) so I have moved them. Should I restore them? Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:45, 6 February 2022 (UTC) No. They are clearly statements that go on items for humans (or other awardees) and not on items for a link to a Wikipedia list. This is why I consider that the item conflats two concepts. --- Jura 12:50, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : So yes it was a issue which was fixed now and this is the same item for list just it is fixed now and due to it isn't any conflation (this is not archive - and we don't need information about edit history in main space - we could say that). Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:11, 6 February 2022 (UTC) As it was added as a sample item to has list (P2354) , we should do full cleanup for conflation: i.e. split the content into clean items. Otherwise people may be using the incorrect item for the concept they thought they had been using. If it wasn't a model item, we might have done differently. --- Jura 13:16, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : What do you mean? It was and it still is has list (P2354) so? There is some lists and they are has list (P2354) to each other. Isn't it how has list (P2354) works? Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:29, 6 February 2022 (UTC) A sample list should be of high quality, otherwise people who use it as a model end up doing not so high quality things. --- Jura 13:32, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : What do you mean about image (P18) ? This is main image used for this item, ilustration of this list so what is wrong? See first random discographies I found for example Falco discography (Q10087) , Miranda Cosgrove discography (Q13118) , Texas discography (Q125194) . What about has list (P2354) ? President of the French Republic (Q191954) Wikimedia list related to this subject: list of presidents of France (Q29580) same as Basshunter (Q383541) Wikimedia list related to this subject: list of awards and nominations received by Basshunter (Q63384701) , list of songs recorded by Basshunter (Q11761784) , list of Basshunter live performances (Q6352124) . " list related to this subject " right? What is wrong? Eurohunter ( talk ) 10:49, 6 February 2022 (UTC) The discussion is about a list of awards. The illustration doesn't represent that. The image would more appropriately be on the item for the artist. No need to duplicate. If there are other malformed lists about Basshunter, please fix them, but we don't need to discuss them here. --- Jura 10:59, 6 February 2022 (UTC) I finished the split: Q110825249 . --- Jura 11:21, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : First explain Falco discography (Q10087) , Miranda Cosgrove discography (Q13118) , Texas discography (Q125194) and thousands of other. This is image for infobox. What is the problem? This split was totally non-sense. Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:31, 6 February 2022 (UTC) You split off most statements to the item for the artist, not me. I thought you understood that you have be conflating items. --- Jura 12:34, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : This is not any "conflation" in anyway. How even you got that idea? There is no any logic in this. How? You are trying to do something weird. This is single item for list of awards and nominations received by Basshunter. What is the problem again. Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:37, 6 February 2022 (UTC) Please explain why you moved these statements from the item we are discussing here after it was listed for deletion. --- Jura 12:40, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : Maybe I miss understood you but you told that somehow award received (P166) and nominated for (P1411) are missleading so I thought you mean that they are dedicated for human (Q5) than Wikimedia list article (Q13406463) so I have moved them. Should I restore them? Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:45, 6 February 2022 (UTC) No. They are clearly statements that go on items for humans (or other awardees) and not on items for a link to a Wikipedia list. This is why I consider that the item conflats two concepts. --- Jura 12:50, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : So yes it was a issue which was fixed now and this is the same item for list just it is fixed now and due to it isn't any conflation (this is not archive - and we don't need information about edit history in main space - we could say that). Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:11, 6 February 2022 (UTC) As it was added as a sample item to has list (P2354) , we should do full cleanup for conflation: i.e. split the content into clean items. Otherwise people may be using the incorrect item for the concept they thought they had been using. If it wasn't a model item, we might have done differently. --- Jura 13:16, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : What do you mean? It was and it still is has list (P2354) so? There is some lists and they are has list (P2354) to each other. Isn't it how has list (P2354) works? Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:29, 6 February 2022 (UTC) A sample list should be of high quality, otherwise people who use it as a model end up doing not so high quality things. --- Jura 13:32, 6 February 2022 (UTC) The discussion is about a list of awards. The illustration doesn't represent that. The image would more appropriately be on the item for the artist. No need to duplicate. If there are other malformed lists about Basshunter, please fix them, but we don't need to discuss them here. --- Jura 10:59, 6 February 2022 (UTC) I finished the split: Q110825249 . --- Jura 11:21, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : First explain Falco discography (Q10087) , Miranda Cosgrove discography (Q13118) , Texas discography (Q125194) and thousands of other. This is image for infobox. What is the problem? This split was totally non-sense. Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:31, 6 February 2022 (UTC) You split off most statements to the item for the artist, not me. I thought you understood that you have be conflating items. --- Jura 12:34, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : This is not any "conflation" in anyway. How even you got that idea? There is no any logic in this. How? You are trying to do something weird. This is single item for list of awards and nominations received by Basshunter. What is the problem again. Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:37, 6 February 2022 (UTC) Please explain why you moved these statements from the item we are discussing here after it was listed for deletion. --- Jura 12:40, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : Maybe I miss understood you but you told that somehow award received (P166) and nominated for (P1411) are missleading so I thought you mean that they are dedicated for human (Q5) than Wikimedia list article (Q13406463) so I have moved them. Should I restore them? Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:45, 6 February 2022 (UTC) No. They are clearly statements that go on items for humans (or other awardees) and not on items for a link to a Wikipedia list. This is why I consider that the item conflats two concepts. --- Jura 12:50, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : So yes it was a issue which was fixed now and this is the same item for list just it is fixed now and due to it isn't any conflation (this is not archive - and we don't need information about edit history in main space - we could say that). Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:11, 6 February 2022 (UTC) As it was added as a sample item to has list (P2354) , we should do full cleanup for conflation: i.e. split the content into clean items. Otherwise people may be using the incorrect item for the concept they thought they had been using. If it wasn't a model item, we might have done differently. --- Jura 13:16, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : What do you mean? It was and it still is has list (P2354) so? There is some lists and they are has list (P2354) to each other. Isn't it how has list (P2354) works? Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:29, 6 February 2022 (UTC) A sample list should be of high quality, otherwise people who use it as a model end up doing not so high quality things. --- Jura 13:32, 6 February 2022 (UTC) I finished the split: Q110825249 . --- Jura 11:21, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : First explain Falco discography (Q10087) , Miranda Cosgrove discography (Q13118) , Texas discography (Q125194) and thousands of other. This is image for infobox. What is the problem? This split was totally non-sense. Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:31, 6 February 2022 (UTC) You split off most statements to the item for the artist, not me. I thought you understood that you have be conflating items. --- Jura 12:34, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : This is not any "conflation" in anyway. How even you got that idea? There is no any logic in this. How? You are trying to do something weird. This is single item for list of awards and nominations received by Basshunter. What is the problem again. Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:37, 6 February 2022 (UTC) Please explain why you moved these statements from the item we are discussing here after it was listed for deletion. --- Jura 12:40, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : Maybe I miss understood you but you told that somehow award received (P166) and nominated for (P1411) are missleading so I thought you mean that they are dedicated for human (Q5) than Wikimedia list article (Q13406463) so I have moved them. Should I restore them? Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:45, 6 February 2022 (UTC) No. They are clearly statements that go on items for humans (or other awardees) and not on items for a link to a Wikipedia list. This is why I consider that the item conflats two concepts. --- Jura 12:50, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : So yes it was a issue which was fixed now and this is the same item for list just it is fixed now and due to it isn't any conflation (this is not archive - and we don't need information about edit history in main space - we could say that). Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:11, 6 February 2022 (UTC) As it was added as a sample item to has list (P2354) , we should do full cleanup for conflation: i.e. split the content into clean items. Otherwise people may be using the incorrect item for the concept they thought they had been using. If it wasn't a model item, we might have done differently. --- Jura 13:16, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : What do you mean? It was and it still is has list (P2354) so? There is some lists and they are has list (P2354) to each other. Isn't it how has list (P2354) works? Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:29, 6 February 2022 (UTC) A sample list should be of high quality, otherwise people who use it as a model end up doing not so high quality things. --- Jura 13:32, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : First explain Falco discography (Q10087) , Miranda Cosgrove discography (Q13118) , Texas discography (Q125194) and thousands of other. This is image for infobox. What is the problem? This split was totally non-sense. Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:31, 6 February 2022 (UTC) You split off most statements to the item for the artist, not me. I thought you understood that you have be conflating items. --- Jura 12:34, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : This is not any "conflation" in anyway. How even you got that idea? There is no any logic in this. How? You are trying to do something weird. This is single item for list of awards and nominations received by Basshunter. What is the problem again. Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:37, 6 February 2022 (UTC) Please explain why you moved these statements from the item we are discussing here after it was listed for deletion. --- Jura 12:40, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : Maybe I miss understood you but you told that somehow award received (P166) and nominated for (P1411) are missleading so I thought you mean that they are dedicated for human (Q5) than Wikimedia list article (Q13406463) so I have moved them. Should I restore them? Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:45, 6 February 2022 (UTC) No. They are clearly statements that go on items for humans (or other awardees) and not on items for a link to a Wikipedia list. This is why I consider that the item conflats two concepts. --- Jura 12:50, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : So yes it was a issue which was fixed now and this is the same item for list just it is fixed now and due to it isn't any conflation (this is not archive - and we don't need information about edit history in main space - we could say that). Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:11, 6 February 2022 (UTC) As it was added as a sample item to has list (P2354) , we should do full cleanup for conflation: i.e. split the content into clean items. Otherwise people may be using the incorrect item for the concept they thought they had been using. If it wasn't a model item, we might have done differently. --- Jura 13:16, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : What do you mean? It was and it still is has list (P2354) so? There is some lists and they are has list (P2354) to each other. Isn't it how has list (P2354) works? Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:29, 6 February 2022 (UTC) A sample list should be of high quality, otherwise people who use it as a model end up doing not so high quality things. --- Jura 13:32, 6 February 2022 (UTC) You split off most statements to the item for the artist, not me. I thought you understood that you have be conflating items. --- Jura 12:34, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : This is not any "conflation" in anyway. How even you got that idea? There is no any logic in this. How? You are trying to do something weird. This is single item for list of awards and nominations received by Basshunter. What is the problem again. Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:37, 6 February 2022 (UTC) Please explain why you moved these statements from the item we are discussing here after it was listed for deletion. --- Jura 12:40, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : Maybe I miss understood you but you told that somehow award received (P166) and nominated for (P1411) are missleading so I thought you mean that they are dedicated for human (Q5) than Wikimedia list article (Q13406463) so I have moved them. Should I restore them? Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:45, 6 February 2022 (UTC) No. They are clearly statements that go on items for humans (or other awardees) and not on items for a link to a Wikipedia list. This is why I consider that the item conflats two concepts. --- Jura 12:50, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : So yes it was a issue which was fixed now and this is the same item for list just it is fixed now and due to it isn't any conflation (this is not archive - and we don't need information about edit history in main space - we could say that). Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:11, 6 February 2022 (UTC) As it was added as a sample item to has list (P2354) , we should do full cleanup for conflation: i.e. split the content into clean items. Otherwise people may be using the incorrect item for the concept they thought they had been using. If it wasn't a model item, we might have done differently. --- Jura 13:16, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : What do you mean? It was and it still is has list (P2354) so? There is some lists and they are has list (P2354) to each other. Isn't it how has list (P2354) works? Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:29, 6 February 2022 (UTC) A sample list should be of high quality, otherwise people who use it as a model end up doing not so high quality things. --- Jura 13:32, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : This is not any "conflation" in anyway. How even you got that idea? There is no any logic in this. How? You are trying to do something weird. This is single item for list of awards and nominations received by Basshunter. What is the problem again. Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:37, 6 February 2022 (UTC) Please explain why you moved these statements from the item we are discussing here after it was listed for deletion. --- Jura 12:40, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : Maybe I miss understood you but you told that somehow award received (P166) and nominated for (P1411) are missleading so I thought you mean that they are dedicated for human (Q5) than Wikimedia list article (Q13406463) so I have moved them. Should I restore them? Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:45, 6 February 2022 (UTC) No. They are clearly statements that go on items for humans (or other awardees) and not on items for a link to a Wikipedia list. This is why I consider that the item conflats two concepts. --- Jura 12:50, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : So yes it was a issue which was fixed now and this is the same item for list just it is fixed now and due to it isn't any conflation (this is not archive - and we don't need information about edit history in main space - we could say that). Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:11, 6 February 2022 (UTC) As it was added as a sample item to has list (P2354) , we should do full cleanup for conflation: i.e. split the content into clean items. Otherwise people may be using the incorrect item for the concept they thought they had been using. If it wasn't a model item, we might have done differently. --- Jura 13:16, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : What do you mean? It was and it still is has list (P2354) so? There is some lists and they are has list (P2354) to each other. Isn't it how has list (P2354) works? Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:29, 6 February 2022 (UTC) A sample list should be of high quality, otherwise people who use it as a model end up doing not so high quality things. --- Jura 13:32, 6 February 2022 (UTC) Please explain why you moved these statements from the item we are discussing here after it was listed for deletion. --- Jura 12:40, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : Maybe I miss understood you but you told that somehow award received (P166) and nominated for (P1411) are missleading so I thought you mean that they are dedicated for human (Q5) than Wikimedia list article (Q13406463) so I have moved them. Should I restore them? Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:45, 6 February 2022 (UTC) No. They are clearly statements that go on items for humans (or other awardees) and not on items for a link to a Wikipedia list. This is why I consider that the item conflats two concepts. --- Jura 12:50, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : So yes it was a issue which was fixed now and this is the same item for list just it is fixed now and due to it isn't any conflation (this is not archive - and we don't need information about edit history in main space - we could say that). Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:11, 6 February 2022 (UTC) As it was added as a sample item to has list (P2354) , we should do full cleanup for conflation: i.e. split the content into clean items. Otherwise people may be using the incorrect item for the concept they thought they had been using. If it wasn't a model item, we might have done differently. --- Jura 13:16, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : What do you mean? It was and it still is has list (P2354) so? There is some lists and they are has list (P2354) to each other. Isn't it how has list (P2354) works? Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:29, 6 February 2022 (UTC) A sample list should be of high quality, otherwise people who use it as a model end up doing not so high quality things. --- Jura 13:32, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : Maybe I miss understood you but you told that somehow award received (P166) and nominated for (P1411) are missleading so I thought you mean that they are dedicated for human (Q5) than Wikimedia list article (Q13406463) so I have moved them. Should I restore them? Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:45, 6 February 2022 (UTC) No. They are clearly statements that go on items for humans (or other awardees) and not on items for a link to a Wikipedia list. This is why I consider that the item conflats two concepts. --- Jura 12:50, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : So yes it was a issue which was fixed now and this is the same item for list just it is fixed now and due to it isn't any conflation (this is not archive - and we don't need information about edit history in main space - we could say that). Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:11, 6 February 2022 (UTC) As it was added as a sample item to has list (P2354) , we should do full cleanup for conflation: i.e. split the content into clean items. Otherwise people may be using the incorrect item for the concept they thought they had been using. If it wasn't a model item, we might have done differently. --- Jura 13:16, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : What do you mean? It was and it still is has list (P2354) so? There is some lists and they are has list (P2354) to each other. Isn't it how has list (P2354) works? Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:29, 6 February 2022 (UTC) A sample list should be of high quality, otherwise people who use it as a model end up doing not so high quality things. --- Jura 13:32, 6 February 2022 (UTC) No. They are clearly statements that go on items for humans (or other awardees) and not on items for a link to a Wikipedia list. This is why I consider that the item conflats two concepts. --- Jura 12:50, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : So yes it was a issue which was fixed now and this is the same item for list just it is fixed now and due to it isn't any conflation (this is not archive - and we don't need information about edit history in main space - we could say that). Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:11, 6 February 2022 (UTC) As it was added as a sample item to has list (P2354) , we should do full cleanup for conflation: i.e. split the content into clean items. Otherwise people may be using the incorrect item for the concept they thought they had been using. If it wasn't a model item, we might have done differently. --- Jura 13:16, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : What do you mean? It was and it still is has list (P2354) so? There is some lists and they are has list (P2354) to each other. Isn't it how has list (P2354) works? Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:29, 6 February 2022 (UTC) A sample list should be of high quality, otherwise people who use it as a model end up doing not so high quality things. --- Jura 13:32, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : So yes it was a issue which was fixed now and this is the same item for list just it is fixed now and due to it isn't any conflation (this is not archive - and we don't need information about edit history in main space - we could say that). Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:11, 6 February 2022 (UTC) As it was added as a sample item to has list (P2354) , we should do full cleanup for conflation: i.e. split the content into clean items. Otherwise people may be using the incorrect item for the concept they thought they had been using. If it wasn't a model item, we might have done differently. --- Jura 13:16, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : What do you mean? It was and it still is has list (P2354) so? There is some lists and they are has list (P2354) to each other. Isn't it how has list (P2354) works? Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:29, 6 February 2022 (UTC) A sample list should be of high quality, otherwise people who use it as a model end up doing not so high quality things. --- Jura 13:32, 6 February 2022 (UTC) As it was added as a sample item to has list (P2354) , we should do full cleanup for conflation: i.e. split the content into clean items. Otherwise people may be using the incorrect item for the concept they thought they had been using. If it wasn't a model item, we might have done differently. --- Jura 13:16, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : What do you mean? It was and it still is has list (P2354) so? There is some lists and they are has list (P2354) to each other. Isn't it how has list (P2354) works? Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:29, 6 February 2022 (UTC) A sample list should be of high quality, otherwise people who use it as a model end up doing not so high quality things. --- Jura 13:32, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : What do you mean? It was and it still is has list (P2354) so? There is some lists and they are has list (P2354) to each other. Isn't it how has list (P2354) works? Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:29, 6 February 2022 (UTC) A sample list should be of high quality, otherwise people who use it as a model end up doing not so high quality things. --- Jura 13:32, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : What do you mean about image (P18) ? This is main image used for this item, ilustration of this list so what is wrong? See first random discographies I found for example Falco discography (Q10087) , Miranda Cosgrove discography (Q13118) , Texas discography (Q125194) . What about has list (P2354) ? President of the French Republic (Q191954) Wikimedia list related to this subject: list of presidents of France (Q29580) same as Basshunter (Q383541) Wikimedia list related to this subject: list of awards and nominations received by Basshunter (Q63384701) , list of songs recorded by Basshunter (Q11761784) , list of Basshunter live performances (Q6352124) . " list related to this subject " right? What is wrong? Eurohunter ( talk ) 10:49, 6 February 2022 (UTC) The discussion is about a list of awards. The illustration doesn't represent that. The image would more appropriately be on the item for the artist. No need to duplicate. If there are other malformed lists about Basshunter, please fix them, but we don't need to discuss them here. --- Jura 10:59, 6 February 2022 (UTC) I finished the split: Q110825249 . --- Jura 11:21, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : First explain Falco discography (Q10087) , Miranda Cosgrove discography (Q13118) , Texas discography (Q125194) and thousands of other. This is image for infobox. What is the problem? This split was totally non-sense. Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:31, 6 February 2022 (UTC) You split off most statements to the item for the artist, not me. I thought you understood that you have be conflating items. --- Jura 12:34, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : This is not any "conflation" in anyway. How even you got that idea? There is no any logic in this. How? You are trying to do something weird. This is single item for list of awards and nominations received by Basshunter. What is the problem again. Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:37, 6 February 2022 (UTC) Please explain why you moved these statements from the item we are discussing here after it was listed for deletion. --- Jura 12:40, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : Maybe I miss understood you but you told that somehow award received (P166) and nominated for (P1411) are missleading so I thought you mean that they are dedicated for human (Q5) than Wikimedia list article (Q13406463) so I have moved them. Should I restore them? Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:45, 6 February 2022 (UTC) No. They are clearly statements that go on items for humans (or other awardees) and not on items for a link to a Wikipedia list. This is why I consider that the item conflats two concepts. --- Jura 12:50, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : So yes it was a issue which was fixed now and this is the same item for list just it is fixed now and due to it isn't any conflation (this is not archive - and we don't need information about edit history in main space - we could say that). Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:11, 6 February 2022 (UTC) As it was added as a sample item to has list (P2354) , we should do full cleanup for conflation: i.e. split the content into clean items. Otherwise people may be using the incorrect item for the concept they thought they had been using. If it wasn't a model item, we might have done differently. --- Jura 13:16, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : What do you mean? It was and it still is has list (P2354) so? There is some lists and they are has list (P2354) to each other. Isn't it how has list (P2354) works? Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:29, 6 February 2022 (UTC) A sample list should be of high quality, otherwise people who use it as a model end up doing not so high quality things. --- Jura 13:32, 6 February 2022 (UTC) The discussion is about a list of awards. The illustration doesn't represent that. The image would more appropriately be on the item for the artist. No need to duplicate. If there are other malformed lists about Basshunter, please fix them, but we don't need to discuss them here. --- Jura 10:59, 6 February 2022 (UTC) I finished the split: Q110825249 . --- Jura 11:21, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : First explain Falco discography (Q10087) , Miranda Cosgrove discography (Q13118) , Texas discography (Q125194) and thousands of other. This is image for infobox. What is the problem? This split was totally non-sense. Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:31, 6 February 2022 (UTC) You split off most statements to the item for the artist, not me. I thought you understood that you have be conflating items. --- Jura 12:34, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : This is not any "conflation" in anyway. How even you got that idea? There is no any logic in this. How? You are trying to do something weird. This is single item for list of awards and nominations received by Basshunter. What is the problem again. Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:37, 6 February 2022 (UTC) Please explain why you moved these statements from the item we are discussing here after it was listed for deletion. --- Jura 12:40, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : Maybe I miss understood you but you told that somehow award received (P166) and nominated for (P1411) are missleading so I thought you mean that they are dedicated for human (Q5) than Wikimedia list article (Q13406463) so I have moved them. Should I restore them? Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:45, 6 February 2022 (UTC) No. They are clearly statements that go on items for humans (or other awardees) and not on items for a link to a Wikipedia list. This is why I consider that the item conflats two concepts. --- Jura 12:50, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : So yes it was a issue which was fixed now and this is the same item for list just it is fixed now and due to it isn't any conflation (this is not archive - and we don't need information about edit history in main space - we could say that). Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:11, 6 February 2022 (UTC) As it was added as a sample item to has list (P2354) , we should do full cleanup for conflation: i.e. split the content into clean items. Otherwise people may be using the incorrect item for the concept they thought they had been using. If it wasn't a model item, we might have done differently. --- Jura 13:16, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : What do you mean? It was and it still is has list (P2354) so? There is some lists and they are has list (P2354) to each other. Isn't it how has list (P2354) works? Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:29, 6 February 2022 (UTC) A sample list should be of high quality, otherwise people who use it as a model end up doing not so high quality things. --- Jura 13:32, 6 February 2022 (UTC) I finished the split: Q110825249 . --- Jura 11:21, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : First explain Falco discography (Q10087) , Miranda Cosgrove discography (Q13118) , Texas discography (Q125194) and thousands of other. This is image for infobox. What is the problem? This split was totally non-sense. Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:31, 6 February 2022 (UTC) You split off most statements to the item for the artist, not me. I thought you understood that you have be conflating items. --- Jura 12:34, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : This is not any "conflation" in anyway. How even you got that idea? There is no any logic in this. How? You are trying to do something weird. This is single item for list of awards and nominations received by Basshunter. What is the problem again. Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:37, 6 February 2022 (UTC) Please explain why you moved these statements from the item we are discussing here after it was listed for deletion. --- Jura 12:40, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : Maybe I miss understood you but you told that somehow award received (P166) and nominated for (P1411) are missleading so I thought you mean that they are dedicated for human (Q5) than Wikimedia list article (Q13406463) so I have moved them. Should I restore them? Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:45, 6 February 2022 (UTC) No. They are clearly statements that go on items for humans (or other awardees) and not on items for a link to a Wikipedia list. This is why I consider that the item conflats two concepts. --- Jura 12:50, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : So yes it was a issue which was fixed now and this is the same item for list just it is fixed now and due to it isn't any conflation (this is not archive - and we don't need information about edit history in main space - we could say that). Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:11, 6 February 2022 (UTC) As it was added as a sample item to has list (P2354) , we should do full cleanup for conflation: i.e. split the content into clean items. Otherwise people may be using the incorrect item for the concept they thought they had been using. If it wasn't a model item, we might have done differently. --- Jura 13:16, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : What do you mean? It was and it still is has list (P2354) so? There is some lists and they are has list (P2354) to each other. Isn't it how has list (P2354) works? Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:29, 6 February 2022 (UTC) A sample list should be of high quality, otherwise people who use it as a model end up doing not so high quality things. --- Jura 13:32, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : First explain Falco discography (Q10087) , Miranda Cosgrove discography (Q13118) , Texas discography (Q125194) and thousands of other. This is image for infobox. What is the problem? This split was totally non-sense. Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:31, 6 February 2022 (UTC) You split off most statements to the item for the artist, not me. I thought you understood that you have be conflating items. --- Jura 12:34, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : This is not any "conflation" in anyway. How even you got that idea? There is no any logic in this. How? You are trying to do something weird. This is single item for list of awards and nominations received by Basshunter. What is the problem again. Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:37, 6 February 2022 (UTC) Please explain why you moved these statements from the item we are discussing here after it was listed for deletion. --- Jura 12:40, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : Maybe I miss understood you but you told that somehow award received (P166) and nominated for (P1411) are missleading so I thought you mean that they are dedicated for human (Q5) than Wikimedia list article (Q13406463) so I have moved them. Should I restore them? Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:45, 6 February 2022 (UTC) No. They are clearly statements that go on items for humans (or other awardees) and not on items for a link to a Wikipedia list. This is why I consider that the item conflats two concepts. --- Jura 12:50, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : So yes it was a issue which was fixed now and this is the same item for list just it is fixed now and due to it isn't any conflation (this is not archive - and we don't need information about edit history in main space - we could say that). Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:11, 6 February 2022 (UTC) As it was added as a sample item to has list (P2354) , we should do full cleanup for conflation: i.e. split the content into clean items. Otherwise people may be using the incorrect item for the concept they thought they had been using. If it wasn't a model item, we might have done differently. --- Jura 13:16, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : What do you mean? It was and it still is has list (P2354) so? There is some lists and they are has list (P2354) to each other. Isn't it how has list (P2354) works? Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:29, 6 February 2022 (UTC) A sample list should be of high quality, otherwise people who use it as a model end up doing not so high quality things. --- Jura 13:32, 6 February 2022 (UTC) You split off most statements to the item for the artist, not me. I thought you understood that you have be conflating items. --- Jura 12:34, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : This is not any "conflation" in anyway. How even you got that idea? There is no any logic in this. How? You are trying to do something weird. This is single item for list of awards and nominations received by Basshunter. What is the problem again. Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:37, 6 February 2022 (UTC) Please explain why you moved these statements from the item we are discussing here after it was listed for deletion. --- Jura 12:40, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : Maybe I miss understood you but you told that somehow award received (P166) and nominated for (P1411) are missleading so I thought you mean that they are dedicated for human (Q5) than Wikimedia list article (Q13406463) so I have moved them. Should I restore them? Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:45, 6 February 2022 (UTC) No. They are clearly statements that go on items for humans (or other awardees) and not on items for a link to a Wikipedia list. This is why I consider that the item conflats two concepts. --- Jura 12:50, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : So yes it was a issue which was fixed now and this is the same item for list just it is fixed now and due to it isn't any conflation (this is not archive - and we don't need information about edit history in main space - we could say that). Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:11, 6 February 2022 (UTC) As it was added as a sample item to has list (P2354) , we should do full cleanup for conflation: i.e. split the content into clean items. Otherwise people may be using the incorrect item for the concept they thought they had been using. If it wasn't a model item, we might have done differently. --- Jura 13:16, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : What do you mean? It was and it still is has list (P2354) so? There is some lists and they are has list (P2354) to each other. Isn't it how has list (P2354) works? Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:29, 6 February 2022 (UTC) A sample list should be of high quality, otherwise people who use it as a model end up doing not so high quality things. --- Jura 13:32, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : This is not any "conflation" in anyway. How even you got that idea? There is no any logic in this. How? You are trying to do something weird. This is single item for list of awards and nominations received by Basshunter. What is the problem again. Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:37, 6 February 2022 (UTC) Please explain why you moved these statements from the item we are discussing here after it was listed for deletion. --- Jura 12:40, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : Maybe I miss understood you but you told that somehow award received (P166) and nominated for (P1411) are missleading so I thought you mean that they are dedicated for human (Q5) than Wikimedia list article (Q13406463) so I have moved them. Should I restore them? Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:45, 6 February 2022 (UTC) No. They are clearly statements that go on items for humans (or other awardees) and not on items for a link to a Wikipedia list. This is why I consider that the item conflats two concepts. --- Jura 12:50, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : So yes it was a issue which was fixed now and this is the same item for list just it is fixed now and due to it isn't any conflation (this is not archive - and we don't need information about edit history in main space - we could say that). Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:11, 6 February 2022 (UTC) As it was added as a sample item to has list (P2354) , we should do full cleanup for conflation: i.e. split the content into clean items. Otherwise people may be using the incorrect item for the concept they thought they had been using. If it wasn't a model item, we might have done differently. --- Jura 13:16, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : What do you mean? It was and it still is has list (P2354) so? There is some lists and they are has list (P2354) to each other. Isn't it how has list (P2354) works? Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:29, 6 February 2022 (UTC) A sample list should be of high quality, otherwise people who use it as a model end up doing not so high quality things. --- Jura 13:32, 6 February 2022 (UTC) Please explain why you moved these statements from the item we are discussing here after it was listed for deletion. --- Jura 12:40, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : Maybe I miss understood you but you told that somehow award received (P166) and nominated for (P1411) are missleading so I thought you mean that they are dedicated for human (Q5) than Wikimedia list article (Q13406463) so I have moved them. Should I restore them? Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:45, 6 February 2022 (UTC) No. They are clearly statements that go on items for humans (or other awardees) and not on items for a link to a Wikipedia list. This is why I consider that the item conflats two concepts. --- Jura 12:50, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : So yes it was a issue which was fixed now and this is the same item for list just it is fixed now and due to it isn't any conflation (this is not archive - and we don't need information about edit history in main space - we could say that). Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:11, 6 February 2022 (UTC) As it was added as a sample item to has list (P2354) , we should do full cleanup for conflation: i.e. split the content into clean items. Otherwise people may be using the incorrect item for the concept they thought they had been using. If it wasn't a model item, we might have done differently. --- Jura 13:16, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : What do you mean? It was and it still is has list (P2354) so? There is some lists and they are has list (P2354) to each other. Isn't it how has list (P2354) works? Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:29, 6 February 2022 (UTC) A sample list should be of high quality, otherwise people who use it as a model end up doing not so high quality things. --- Jura 13:32, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : Maybe I miss understood you but you told that somehow award received (P166) and nominated for (P1411) are missleading so I thought you mean that they are dedicated for human (Q5) than Wikimedia list article (Q13406463) so I have moved them. Should I restore them? Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:45, 6 February 2022 (UTC) No. They are clearly statements that go on items for humans (or other awardees) and not on items for a link to a Wikipedia list. This is why I consider that the item conflats two concepts. --- Jura 12:50, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : So yes it was a issue which was fixed now and this is the same item for list just it is fixed now and due to it isn't any conflation (this is not archive - and we don't need information about edit history in main space - we could say that). Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:11, 6 February 2022 (UTC) As it was added as a sample item to has list (P2354) , we should do full cleanup for conflation: i.e. split the content into clean items. Otherwise people may be using the incorrect item for the concept they thought they had been using. If it wasn't a model item, we might have done differently. --- Jura 13:16, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : What do you mean? It was and it still is has list (P2354) so? There is some lists and they are has list (P2354) to each other. Isn't it how has list (P2354) works? Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:29, 6 February 2022 (UTC) A sample list should be of high quality, otherwise people who use it as a model end up doing not so high quality things. --- Jura 13:32, 6 February 2022 (UTC) No. They are clearly statements that go on items for humans (or other awardees) and not on items for a link to a Wikipedia list. This is why I consider that the item conflats two concepts. --- Jura 12:50, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : So yes it was a issue which was fixed now and this is the same item for list just it is fixed now and due to it isn't any conflation (this is not archive - and we don't need information about edit history in main space - we could say that). Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:11, 6 February 2022 (UTC) As it was added as a sample item to has list (P2354) , we should do full cleanup for conflation: i.e. split the content into clean items. Otherwise people may be using the incorrect item for the concept they thought they had been using. If it wasn't a model item, we might have done differently. --- Jura 13:16, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : What do you mean? It was and it still is has list (P2354) so? There is some lists and they are has list (P2354) to each other. Isn't it how has list (P2354) works? Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:29, 6 February 2022 (UTC) A sample list should be of high quality, otherwise people who use it as a model end up doing not so high quality things. --- Jura 13:32, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : So yes it was a issue which was fixed now and this is the same item for list just it is fixed now and due to it isn't any conflation (this is not archive - and we don't need information about edit history in main space - we could say that). Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:11, 6 February 2022 (UTC) As it was added as a sample item to has list (P2354) , we should do full cleanup for conflation: i.e. split the content into clean items. Otherwise people may be using the incorrect item for the concept they thought they had been using. If it wasn't a model item, we might have done differently. --- Jura 13:16, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : What do you mean? It was and it still is has list (P2354) so? There is some lists and they are has list (P2354) to each other. Isn't it how has list (P2354) works? Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:29, 6 February 2022 (UTC) A sample list should be of high quality, otherwise people who use it as a model end up doing not so high quality things. --- Jura 13:32, 6 February 2022 (UTC) As it was added as a sample item to has list (P2354) , we should do full cleanup for conflation: i.e. split the content into clean items. Otherwise people may be using the incorrect item for the concept they thought they had been using. If it wasn't a model item, we might have done differently. --- Jura 13:16, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : What do you mean? It was and it still is has list (P2354) so? There is some lists and they are has list (P2354) to each other. Isn't it how has list (P2354) works? Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:29, 6 February 2022 (UTC) A sample list should be of high quality, otherwise people who use it as a model end up doing not so high quality things. --- Jura 13:32, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : What do you mean? It was and it still is has list (P2354) so? There is some lists and they are has list (P2354) to each other. Isn't it how has list (P2354) works? Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:29, 6 February 2022 (UTC) A sample list should be of high quality, otherwise people who use it as a model end up doing not so high quality things. --- Jura 13:32, 6 February 2022 (UTC) The discussion is about a list of awards. The illustration doesn't represent that. The image would more appropriately be on the item for the artist. No need to duplicate. If there are other malformed lists about Basshunter, please fix them, but we don't need to discuss them here. --- Jura 10:59, 6 February 2022 (UTC) I finished the split: Q110825249 . --- Jura 11:21, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : First explain Falco discography (Q10087) , Miranda Cosgrove discography (Q13118) , Texas discography (Q125194) and thousands of other. This is image for infobox. What is the problem? This split was totally non-sense. Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:31, 6 February 2022 (UTC) You split off most statements to the item for the artist, not me. I thought you understood that you have be conflating items. --- Jura 12:34, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : This is not any "conflation" in anyway. How even you got that idea? There is no any logic in this. How? You are trying to do something weird. This is single item for list of awards and nominations received by Basshunter. What is the problem again. Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:37, 6 February 2022 (UTC) Please explain why you moved these statements from the item we are discussing here after it was listed for deletion. --- Jura 12:40, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : Maybe I miss understood you but you told that somehow award received (P166) and nominated for (P1411) are missleading so I thought you mean that they are dedicated for human (Q5) than Wikimedia list article (Q13406463) so I have moved them. Should I restore them? Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:45, 6 February 2022 (UTC) No. They are clearly statements that go on items for humans (or other awardees) and not on items for a link to a Wikipedia list. This is why I consider that the item conflats two concepts. --- Jura 12:50, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : So yes it was a issue which was fixed now and this is the same item for list just it is fixed now and due to it isn't any conflation (this is not archive - and we don't need information about edit history in main space - we could say that). Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:11, 6 February 2022 (UTC) As it was added as a sample item to has list (P2354) , we should do full cleanup for conflation: i.e. split the content into clean items. Otherwise people may be using the incorrect item for the concept they thought they had been using. If it wasn't a model item, we might have done differently. --- Jura 13:16, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : What do you mean? It was and it still is has list (P2354) so? There is some lists and they are has list (P2354) to each other. Isn't it how has list (P2354) works? Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:29, 6 February 2022 (UTC) A sample list should be of high quality, otherwise people who use it as a model end up doing not so high quality things. --- Jura 13:32, 6 February 2022 (UTC) I finished the split: Q110825249 . --- Jura 11:21, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : First explain Falco discography (Q10087) , Miranda Cosgrove discography (Q13118) , Texas discography (Q125194) and thousands of other. This is image for infobox. What is the problem? This split was totally non-sense. Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:31, 6 February 2022 (UTC) You split off most statements to the item for the artist, not me. I thought you understood that you have be conflating items. --- Jura 12:34, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : This is not any "conflation" in anyway. How even you got that idea? There is no any logic in this. How? You are trying to do something weird. This is single item for list of awards and nominations received by Basshunter. What is the problem again. Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:37, 6 February 2022 (UTC) Please explain why you moved these statements from the item we are discussing here after it was listed for deletion. --- Jura 12:40, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : Maybe I miss understood you but you told that somehow award received (P166) and nominated for (P1411) are missleading so I thought you mean that they are dedicated for human (Q5) than Wikimedia list article (Q13406463) so I have moved them. Should I restore them? Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:45, 6 February 2022 (UTC) No. They are clearly statements that go on items for humans (or other awardees) and not on items for a link to a Wikipedia list. This is why I consider that the item conflats two concepts. --- Jura 12:50, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : So yes it was a issue which was fixed now and this is the same item for list just it is fixed now and due to it isn't any conflation (this is not archive - and we don't need information about edit history in main space - we could say that). Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:11, 6 February 2022 (UTC) As it was added as a sample item to has list (P2354) , we should do full cleanup for conflation: i.e. split the content into clean items. Otherwise people may be using the incorrect item for the concept they thought they had been using. If it wasn't a model item, we might have done differently. --- Jura 13:16, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : What do you mean? It was and it still is has list (P2354) so? There is some lists and they are has list (P2354) to each other. Isn't it how has list (P2354) works? Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:29, 6 February 2022 (UTC) A sample list should be of high quality, otherwise people who use it as a model end up doing not so high quality things. --- Jura 13:32, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : First explain Falco discography (Q10087) , Miranda Cosgrove discography (Q13118) , Texas discography (Q125194) and thousands of other. This is image for infobox. What is the problem? This split was totally non-sense. Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:31, 6 February 2022 (UTC) You split off most statements to the item for the artist, not me. I thought you understood that you have be conflating items. --- Jura 12:34, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : This is not any "conflation" in anyway. How even you got that idea? There is no any logic in this. How? You are trying to do something weird. This is single item for list of awards and nominations received by Basshunter. What is the problem again. Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:37, 6 February 2022 (UTC) Please explain why you moved these statements from the item we are discussing here after it was listed for deletion. --- Jura 12:40, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : Maybe I miss understood you but you told that somehow award received (P166) and nominated for (P1411) are missleading so I thought you mean that they are dedicated for human (Q5) than Wikimedia list article (Q13406463) so I have moved them. Should I restore them? Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:45, 6 February 2022 (UTC) No. They are clearly statements that go on items for humans (or other awardees) and not on items for a link to a Wikipedia list. This is why I consider that the item conflats two concepts. --- Jura 12:50, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : So yes it was a issue which was fixed now and this is the same item for list just it is fixed now and due to it isn't any conflation (this is not archive - and we don't need information about edit history in main space - we could say that). Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:11, 6 February 2022 (UTC) As it was added as a sample item to has list (P2354) , we should do full cleanup for conflation: i.e. split the content into clean items. Otherwise people may be using the incorrect item for the concept they thought they had been using. If it wasn't a model item, we might have done differently. --- Jura 13:16, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : What do you mean? It was and it still is has list (P2354) so? There is some lists and they are has list (P2354) to each other. Isn't it how has list (P2354) works? Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:29, 6 February 2022 (UTC) A sample list should be of high quality, otherwise people who use it as a model end up doing not so high quality things. --- Jura 13:32, 6 February 2022 (UTC) You split off most statements to the item for the artist, not me. I thought you understood that you have be conflating items. --- Jura 12:34, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : This is not any "conflation" in anyway. How even you got that idea? There is no any logic in this. How? You are trying to do something weird. This is single item for list of awards and nominations received by Basshunter. What is the problem again. Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:37, 6 February 2022 (UTC) Please explain why you moved these statements from the item we are discussing here after it was listed for deletion. --- Jura 12:40, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : Maybe I miss understood you but you told that somehow award received (P166) and nominated for (P1411) are missleading so I thought you mean that they are dedicated for human (Q5) than Wikimedia list article (Q13406463) so I have moved them. Should I restore them? Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:45, 6 February 2022 (UTC) No. They are clearly statements that go on items for humans (or other awardees) and not on items for a link to a Wikipedia list. This is why I consider that the item conflats two concepts. --- Jura 12:50, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : So yes it was a issue which was fixed now and this is the same item for list just it is fixed now and due to it isn't any conflation (this is not archive - and we don't need information about edit history in main space - we could say that). Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:11, 6 February 2022 (UTC) As it was added as a sample item to has list (P2354) , we should do full cleanup for conflation: i.e. split the content into clean items. Otherwise people may be using the incorrect item for the concept they thought they had been using. If it wasn't a model item, we might have done differently. --- Jura 13:16, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : What do you mean? It was and it still is has list (P2354) so? There is some lists and they are has list (P2354) to each other. Isn't it how has list (P2354) works? Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:29, 6 February 2022 (UTC) A sample list should be of high quality, otherwise people who use it as a model end up doing not so high quality things. --- Jura 13:32, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : This is not any "conflation" in anyway. How even you got that idea? There is no any logic in this. How? You are trying to do something weird. This is single item for list of awards and nominations received by Basshunter. What is the problem again. Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:37, 6 February 2022 (UTC) Please explain why you moved these statements from the item we are discussing here after it was listed for deletion. --- Jura 12:40, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : Maybe I miss understood you but you told that somehow award received (P166) and nominated for (P1411) are missleading so I thought you mean that they are dedicated for human (Q5) than Wikimedia list article (Q13406463) so I have moved them. Should I restore them? Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:45, 6 February 2022 (UTC) No. They are clearly statements that go on items for humans (or other awardees) and not on items for a link to a Wikipedia list. This is why I consider that the item conflats two concepts. --- Jura 12:50, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : So yes it was a issue which was fixed now and this is the same item for list just it is fixed now and due to it isn't any conflation (this is not archive - and we don't need information about edit history in main space - we could say that). Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:11, 6 February 2022 (UTC) As it was added as a sample item to has list (P2354) , we should do full cleanup for conflation: i.e. split the content into clean items. Otherwise people may be using the incorrect item for the concept they thought they had been using. If it wasn't a model item, we might have done differently. --- Jura 13:16, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : What do you mean? It was and it still is has list (P2354) so? There is some lists and they are has list (P2354) to each other. Isn't it how has list (P2354) works? Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:29, 6 February 2022 (UTC) A sample list should be of high quality, otherwise people who use it as a model end up doing not so high quality things. --- Jura 13:32, 6 February 2022 (UTC) Please explain why you moved these statements from the item we are discussing here after it was listed for deletion. --- Jura 12:40, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : Maybe I miss understood you but you told that somehow award received (P166) and nominated for (P1411) are missleading so I thought you mean that they are dedicated for human (Q5) than Wikimedia list article (Q13406463) so I have moved them. Should I restore them? Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:45, 6 February 2022 (UTC) No. They are clearly statements that go on items for humans (or other awardees) and not on items for a link to a Wikipedia list. This is why I consider that the item conflats two concepts. --- Jura 12:50, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : So yes it was a issue which was fixed now and this is the same item for list just it is fixed now and due to it isn't any conflation (this is not archive - and we don't need information about edit history in main space - we could say that). Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:11, 6 February 2022 (UTC) As it was added as a sample item to has list (P2354) , we should do full cleanup for conflation: i.e. split the content into clean items. Otherwise people may be using the incorrect item for the concept they thought they had been using. If it wasn't a model item, we might have done differently. --- Jura 13:16, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : What do you mean? It was and it still is has list (P2354) so? There is some lists and they are has list (P2354) to each other. Isn't it how has list (P2354) works? Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:29, 6 February 2022 (UTC) A sample list should be of high quality, otherwise people who use it as a model end up doing not so high quality things. --- Jura 13:32, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : Maybe I miss understood you but you told that somehow award received (P166) and nominated for (P1411) are missleading so I thought you mean that they are dedicated for human (Q5) than Wikimedia list article (Q13406463) so I have moved them. Should I restore them? Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:45, 6 February 2022 (UTC) No. They are clearly statements that go on items for humans (or other awardees) and not on items for a link to a Wikipedia list. This is why I consider that the item conflats two concepts. --- Jura 12:50, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : So yes it was a issue which was fixed now and this is the same item for list just it is fixed now and due to it isn't any conflation (this is not archive - and we don't need information about edit history in main space - we could say that). Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:11, 6 February 2022 (UTC) As it was added as a sample item to has list (P2354) , we should do full cleanup for conflation: i.e. split the content into clean items. Otherwise people may be using the incorrect item for the concept they thought they had been using. If it wasn't a model item, we might have done differently. --- Jura 13:16, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : What do you mean? It was and it still is has list (P2354) so? There is some lists and they are has list (P2354) to each other. Isn't it how has list (P2354) works? Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:29, 6 February 2022 (UTC) A sample list should be of high quality, otherwise people who use it as a model end up doing not so high quality things. --- Jura 13:32, 6 February 2022 (UTC) No. They are clearly statements that go on items for humans (or other awardees) and not on items for a link to a Wikipedia list. This is why I consider that the item conflats two concepts. --- Jura 12:50, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : So yes it was a issue which was fixed now and this is the same item for list just it is fixed now and due to it isn't any conflation (this is not archive - and we don't need information about edit history in main space - we could say that). Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:11, 6 February 2022 (UTC) As it was added as a sample item to has list (P2354) , we should do full cleanup for conflation: i.e. split the content into clean items. Otherwise people may be using the incorrect item for the concept they thought they had been using. If it wasn't a model item, we might have done differently. --- Jura 13:16, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : What do you mean? It was and it still is has list (P2354) so? There is some lists and they are has list (P2354) to each other. Isn't it how has list (P2354) works? Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:29, 6 February 2022 (UTC) A sample list should be of high quality, otherwise people who use it as a model end up doing not so high quality things. --- Jura 13:32, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : So yes it was a issue which was fixed now and this is the same item for list just it is fixed now and due to it isn't any conflation (this is not archive - and we don't need information about edit history in main space - we could say that). Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:11, 6 February 2022 (UTC) As it was added as a sample item to has list (P2354) , we should do full cleanup for conflation: i.e. split the content into clean items. Otherwise people may be using the incorrect item for the concept they thought they had been using. If it wasn't a model item, we might have done differently. --- Jura 13:16, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : What do you mean? It was and it still is has list (P2354) so? There is some lists and they are has list (P2354) to each other. Isn't it how has list (P2354) works? Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:29, 6 February 2022 (UTC) A sample list should be of high quality, otherwise people who use it as a model end up doing not so high quality things. --- Jura 13:32, 6 February 2022 (UTC) As it was added as a sample item to has list (P2354) , we should do full cleanup for conflation: i.e. split the content into clean items. Otherwise people may be using the incorrect item for the concept they thought they had been using. If it wasn't a model item, we might have done differently. --- Jura 13:16, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : What do you mean? It was and it still is has list (P2354) so? There is some lists and they are has list (P2354) to each other. Isn't it how has list (P2354) works? Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:29, 6 February 2022 (UTC) A sample list should be of high quality, otherwise people who use it as a model end up doing not so high quality things. --- Jura 13:32, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : What do you mean? It was and it still is has list (P2354) so? There is some lists and they are has list (P2354) to each other. Isn't it how has list (P2354) works? Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:29, 6 February 2022 (UTC) A sample list should be of high quality, otherwise people who use it as a model end up doing not so high quality things. --- Jura 13:32, 6 February 2022 (UTC) I finished the split: Q110825249 . --- Jura 11:21, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : First explain Falco discography (Q10087) , Miranda Cosgrove discography (Q13118) , Texas discography (Q125194) and thousands of other. This is image for infobox. What is the problem? This split was totally non-sense. Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:31, 6 February 2022 (UTC) You split off most statements to the item for the artist, not me. I thought you understood that you have be conflating items. --- Jura 12:34, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : This is not any "conflation" in anyway. How even you got that idea? There is no any logic in this. How? You are trying to do something weird. This is single item for list of awards and nominations received by Basshunter. What is the problem again. Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:37, 6 February 2022 (UTC) Please explain why you moved these statements from the item we are discussing here after it was listed for deletion. --- Jura 12:40, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : Maybe I miss understood you but you told that somehow award received (P166) and nominated for (P1411) are missleading so I thought you mean that they are dedicated for human (Q5) than Wikimedia list article (Q13406463) so I have moved them. Should I restore them? Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:45, 6 February 2022 (UTC) No. They are clearly statements that go on items for humans (or other awardees) and not on items for a link to a Wikipedia list. This is why I consider that the item conflats two concepts. --- Jura 12:50, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : So yes it was a issue which was fixed now and this is the same item for list just it is fixed now and due to it isn't any conflation (this is not archive - and we don't need information about edit history in main space - we could say that). Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:11, 6 February 2022 (UTC) As it was added as a sample item to has list (P2354) , we should do full cleanup for conflation: i.e. split the content into clean items. Otherwise people may be using the incorrect item for the concept they thought they had been using. If it wasn't a model item, we might have done differently. --- Jura 13:16, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : What do you mean? It was and it still is has list (P2354) so? There is some lists and they are has list (P2354) to each other. Isn't it how has list (P2354) works? Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:29, 6 February 2022 (UTC) A sample list should be of high quality, otherwise people who use it as a model end up doing not so high quality things. --- Jura 13:32, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : First explain Falco discography (Q10087) , Miranda Cosgrove discography (Q13118) , Texas discography (Q125194) and thousands of other. This is image for infobox. What is the problem? This split was totally non-sense. Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:31, 6 February 2022 (UTC) You split off most statements to the item for the artist, not me. I thought you understood that you have be conflating items. --- Jura 12:34, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : This is not any "conflation" in anyway. How even you got that idea? There is no any logic in this. How? You are trying to do something weird. This is single item for list of awards and nominations received by Basshunter. What is the problem again. Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:37, 6 February 2022 (UTC) Please explain why you moved these statements from the item we are discussing here after it was listed for deletion. --- Jura 12:40, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : Maybe I miss understood you but you told that somehow award received (P166) and nominated for (P1411) are missleading so I thought you mean that they are dedicated for human (Q5) than Wikimedia list article (Q13406463) so I have moved them. Should I restore them? Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:45, 6 February 2022 (UTC) No. They are clearly statements that go on items for humans (or other awardees) and not on items for a link to a Wikipedia list. This is why I consider that the item conflats two concepts. --- Jura 12:50, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : So yes it was a issue which was fixed now and this is the same item for list just it is fixed now and due to it isn't any conflation (this is not archive - and we don't need information about edit history in main space - we could say that). Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:11, 6 February 2022 (UTC) As it was added as a sample item to has list (P2354) , we should do full cleanup for conflation: i.e. split the content into clean items. Otherwise people may be using the incorrect item for the concept they thought they had been using. If it wasn't a model item, we might have done differently. --- Jura 13:16, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : What do you mean? It was and it still is has list (P2354) so? There is some lists and they are has list (P2354) to each other. Isn't it how has list (P2354) works? Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:29, 6 February 2022 (UTC) A sample list should be of high quality, otherwise people who use it as a model end up doing not so high quality things. --- Jura 13:32, 6 February 2022 (UTC) You split off most statements to the item for the artist, not me. I thought you understood that you have be conflating items. --- Jura 12:34, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : This is not any "conflation" in anyway. How even you got that idea? There is no any logic in this. How? You are trying to do something weird. This is single item for list of awards and nominations received by Basshunter. What is the problem again. Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:37, 6 February 2022 (UTC) Please explain why you moved these statements from the item we are discussing here after it was listed for deletion. --- Jura 12:40, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : Maybe I miss understood you but you told that somehow award received (P166) and nominated for (P1411) are missleading so I thought you mean that they are dedicated for human (Q5) than Wikimedia list article (Q13406463) so I have moved them. Should I restore them? Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:45, 6 February 2022 (UTC) No. They are clearly statements that go on items for humans (or other awardees) and not on items for a link to a Wikipedia list. This is why I consider that the item conflats two concepts. --- Jura 12:50, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : So yes it was a issue which was fixed now and this is the same item for list just it is fixed now and due to it isn't any conflation (this is not archive - and we don't need information about edit history in main space - we could say that). Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:11, 6 February 2022 (UTC) As it was added as a sample item to has list (P2354) , we should do full cleanup for conflation: i.e. split the content into clean items. Otherwise people may be using the incorrect item for the concept they thought they had been using. If it wasn't a model item, we might have done differently. --- Jura 13:16, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : What do you mean? It was and it still is has list (P2354) so? There is some lists and they are has list (P2354) to each other. Isn't it how has list (P2354) works? Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:29, 6 February 2022 (UTC) A sample list should be of high quality, otherwise people who use it as a model end up doing not so high quality things. --- Jura 13:32, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : This is not any "conflation" in anyway. How even you got that idea? There is no any logic in this. How? You are trying to do something weird. This is single item for list of awards and nominations received by Basshunter. What is the problem again. Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:37, 6 February 2022 (UTC) Please explain why you moved these statements from the item we are discussing here after it was listed for deletion. --- Jura 12:40, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : Maybe I miss understood you but you told that somehow award received (P166) and nominated for (P1411) are missleading so I thought you mean that they are dedicated for human (Q5) than Wikimedia list article (Q13406463) so I have moved them. Should I restore them? Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:45, 6 February 2022 (UTC) No. They are clearly statements that go on items for humans (or other awardees) and not on items for a link to a Wikipedia list. This is why I consider that the item conflats two concepts. --- Jura 12:50, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : So yes it was a issue which was fixed now and this is the same item for list just it is fixed now and due to it isn't any conflation (this is not archive - and we don't need information about edit history in main space - we could say that). Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:11, 6 February 2022 (UTC) As it was added as a sample item to has list (P2354) , we should do full cleanup for conflation: i.e. split the content into clean items. Otherwise people may be using the incorrect item for the concept they thought they had been using. If it wasn't a model item, we might have done differently. --- Jura 13:16, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : What do you mean? It was and it still is has list (P2354) so? There is some lists and they are has list (P2354) to each other. Isn't it how has list (P2354) works? Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:29, 6 February 2022 (UTC) A sample list should be of high quality, otherwise people who use it as a model end up doing not so high quality things. --- Jura 13:32, 6 February 2022 (UTC) Please explain why you moved these statements from the item we are discussing here after it was listed for deletion. --- Jura 12:40, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : Maybe I miss understood you but you told that somehow award received (P166) and nominated for (P1411) are missleading so I thought you mean that they are dedicated for human (Q5) than Wikimedia list article (Q13406463) so I have moved them. Should I restore them? Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:45, 6 February 2022 (UTC) No. They are clearly statements that go on items for humans (or other awardees) and not on items for a link to a Wikipedia list. This is why I consider that the item conflats two concepts. --- Jura 12:50, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : So yes it was a issue which was fixed now and this is the same item for list just it is fixed now and due to it isn't any conflation (this is not archive - and we don't need information about edit history in main space - we could say that). Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:11, 6 February 2022 (UTC) As it was added as a sample item to has list (P2354) , we should do full cleanup for conflation: i.e. split the content into clean items. Otherwise people may be using the incorrect item for the concept they thought they had been using. If it wasn't a model item, we might have done differently. --- Jura 13:16, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : What do you mean? It was and it still is has list (P2354) so? There is some lists and they are has list (P2354) to each other. Isn't it how has list (P2354) works? Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:29, 6 February 2022 (UTC) A sample list should be of high quality, otherwise people who use it as a model end up doing not so high quality things. --- Jura 13:32, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : Maybe I miss understood you but you told that somehow award received (P166) and nominated for (P1411) are missleading so I thought you mean that they are dedicated for human (Q5) than Wikimedia list article (Q13406463) so I have moved them. Should I restore them? Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:45, 6 February 2022 (UTC) No. They are clearly statements that go on items for humans (or other awardees) and not on items for a link to a Wikipedia list. This is why I consider that the item conflats two concepts. --- Jura 12:50, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : So yes it was a issue which was fixed now and this is the same item for list just it is fixed now and due to it isn't any conflation (this is not archive - and we don't need information about edit history in main space - we could say that). Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:11, 6 February 2022 (UTC) As it was added as a sample item to has list (P2354) , we should do full cleanup for conflation: i.e. split the content into clean items. Otherwise people may be using the incorrect item for the concept they thought they had been using. If it wasn't a model item, we might have done differently. --- Jura 13:16, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : What do you mean? It was and it still is has list (P2354) so? There is some lists and they are has list (P2354) to each other. Isn't it how has list (P2354) works? Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:29, 6 February 2022 (UTC) A sample list should be of high quality, otherwise people who use it as a model end up doing not so high quality things. --- Jura 13:32, 6 February 2022 (UTC) No. They are clearly statements that go on items for humans (or other awardees) and not on items for a link to a Wikipedia list. This is why I consider that the item conflats two concepts. --- Jura 12:50, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : So yes it was a issue which was fixed now and this is the same item for list just it is fixed now and due to it isn't any conflation (this is not archive - and we don't need information about edit history in main space - we could say that). Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:11, 6 February 2022 (UTC) As it was added as a sample item to has list (P2354) , we should do full cleanup for conflation: i.e. split the content into clean items. Otherwise people may be using the incorrect item for the concept they thought they had been using. If it wasn't a model item, we might have done differently. --- Jura 13:16, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : What do you mean? It was and it still is has list (P2354) so? There is some lists and they are has list (P2354) to each other. Isn't it how has list (P2354) works? Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:29, 6 February 2022 (UTC) A sample list should be of high quality, otherwise people who use it as a model end up doing not so high quality things. --- Jura 13:32, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : So yes it was a issue which was fixed now and this is the same item for list just it is fixed now and due to it isn't any conflation (this is not archive - and we don't need information about edit history in main space - we could say that). Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:11, 6 February 2022 (UTC) As it was added as a sample item to has list (P2354) , we should do full cleanup for conflation: i.e. split the content into clean items. Otherwise people may be using the incorrect item for the concept they thought they had been using. If it wasn't a model item, we might have done differently. --- Jura 13:16, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : What do you mean? It was and it still is has list (P2354) so? There is some lists and they are has list (P2354) to each other. Isn't it how has list (P2354) works? Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:29, 6 February 2022 (UTC) A sample list should be of high quality, otherwise people who use it as a model end up doing not so high quality things. --- Jura 13:32, 6 February 2022 (UTC) As it was added as a sample item to has list (P2354) , we should do full cleanup for conflation: i.e. split the content into clean items. Otherwise people may be using the incorrect item for the concept they thought they had been using. If it wasn't a model item, we might have done differently. --- Jura 13:16, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : What do you mean? It was and it still is has list (P2354) so? There is some lists and they are has list (P2354) to each other. Isn't it how has list (P2354) works? Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:29, 6 February 2022 (UTC) A sample list should be of high quality, otherwise people who use it as a model end up doing not so high quality things. --- Jura 13:32, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : What do you mean? It was and it still is has list (P2354) so? There is some lists and they are has list (P2354) to each other. Isn't it how has list (P2354) works? Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:29, 6 February 2022 (UTC) A sample list should be of high quality, otherwise people who use it as a model end up doing not so high quality things. --- Jura 13:32, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : First explain Falco discography (Q10087) , Miranda Cosgrove discography (Q13118) , Texas discography (Q125194) and thousands of other. This is image for infobox. What is the problem? This split was totally non-sense. Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:31, 6 February 2022 (UTC) You split off most statements to the item for the artist, not me. I thought you understood that you have be conflating items. --- Jura 12:34, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : This is not any "conflation" in anyway. How even you got that idea? There is no any logic in this. How? You are trying to do something weird. This is single item for list of awards and nominations received by Basshunter. What is the problem again. Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:37, 6 February 2022 (UTC) Please explain why you moved these statements from the item we are discussing here after it was listed for deletion. --- Jura 12:40, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : Maybe I miss understood you but you told that somehow award received (P166) and nominated for (P1411) are missleading so I thought you mean that they are dedicated for human (Q5) than Wikimedia list article (Q13406463) so I have moved them. Should I restore them? Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:45, 6 February 2022 (UTC) No. They are clearly statements that go on items for humans (or other awardees) and not on items for a link to a Wikipedia list. This is why I consider that the item conflats two concepts. --- Jura 12:50, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : So yes it was a issue which was fixed now and this is the same item for list just it is fixed now and due to it isn't any conflation (this is not archive - and we don't need information about edit history in main space - we could say that). Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:11, 6 February 2022 (UTC) As it was added as a sample item to has list (P2354) , we should do full cleanup for conflation: i.e. split the content into clean items. Otherwise people may be using the incorrect item for the concept they thought they had been using. If it wasn't a model item, we might have done differently. --- Jura 13:16, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : What do you mean? It was and it still is has list (P2354) so? There is some lists and they are has list (P2354) to each other. Isn't it how has list (P2354) works? Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:29, 6 February 2022 (UTC) A sample list should be of high quality, otherwise people who use it as a model end up doing not so high quality things. --- Jura 13:32, 6 February 2022 (UTC) You split off most statements to the item for the artist, not me. I thought you understood that you have be conflating items. --- Jura 12:34, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : This is not any "conflation" in anyway. How even you got that idea? There is no any logic in this. How? You are trying to do something weird. This is single item for list of awards and nominations received by Basshunter. What is the problem again. Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:37, 6 February 2022 (UTC) Please explain why you moved these statements from the item we are discussing here after it was listed for deletion. --- Jura 12:40, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : Maybe I miss understood you but you told that somehow award received (P166) and nominated for (P1411) are missleading so I thought you mean that they are dedicated for human (Q5) than Wikimedia list article (Q13406463) so I have moved them. Should I restore them? Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:45, 6 February 2022 (UTC) No. They are clearly statements that go on items for humans (or other awardees) and not on items for a link to a Wikipedia list. This is why I consider that the item conflats two concepts. --- Jura 12:50, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : So yes it was a issue which was fixed now and this is the same item for list just it is fixed now and due to it isn't any conflation (this is not archive - and we don't need information about edit history in main space - we could say that). Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:11, 6 February 2022 (UTC) As it was added as a sample item to has list (P2354) , we should do full cleanup for conflation: i.e. split the content into clean items. Otherwise people may be using the incorrect item for the concept they thought they had been using. If it wasn't a model item, we might have done differently. --- Jura 13:16, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : What do you mean? It was and it still is has list (P2354) so? There is some lists and they are has list (P2354) to each other. Isn't it how has list (P2354) works? Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:29, 6 February 2022 (UTC) A sample list should be of high quality, otherwise people who use it as a model end up doing not so high quality things. --- Jura 13:32, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : This is not any "conflation" in anyway. How even you got that idea? There is no any logic in this. How? You are trying to do something weird. This is single item for list of awards and nominations received by Basshunter. What is the problem again. Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:37, 6 February 2022 (UTC) Please explain why you moved these statements from the item we are discussing here after it was listed for deletion. --- Jura 12:40, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : Maybe I miss understood you but you told that somehow award received (P166) and nominated for (P1411) are missleading so I thought you mean that they are dedicated for human (Q5) than Wikimedia list article (Q13406463) so I have moved them. Should I restore them? Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:45, 6 February 2022 (UTC) No. They are clearly statements that go on items for humans (or other awardees) and not on items for a link to a Wikipedia list. This is why I consider that the item conflats two concepts. --- Jura 12:50, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : So yes it was a issue which was fixed now and this is the same item for list just it is fixed now and due to it isn't any conflation (this is not archive - and we don't need information about edit history in main space - we could say that). Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:11, 6 February 2022 (UTC) As it was added as a sample item to has list (P2354) , we should do full cleanup for conflation: i.e. split the content into clean items. Otherwise people may be using the incorrect item for the concept they thought they had been using. If it wasn't a model item, we might have done differently. --- Jura 13:16, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : What do you mean? It was and it still is has list (P2354) so? There is some lists and they are has list (P2354) to each other. Isn't it how has list (P2354) works? Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:29, 6 February 2022 (UTC) A sample list should be of high quality, otherwise people who use it as a model end up doing not so high quality things. --- Jura 13:32, 6 February 2022 (UTC) Please explain why you moved these statements from the item we are discussing here after it was listed for deletion. --- Jura 12:40, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : Maybe I miss understood you but you told that somehow award received (P166) and nominated for (P1411) are missleading so I thought you mean that they are dedicated for human (Q5) than Wikimedia list article (Q13406463) so I have moved them. Should I restore them? Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:45, 6 February 2022 (UTC) No. They are clearly statements that go on items for humans (or other awardees) and not on items for a link to a Wikipedia list. This is why I consider that the item conflats two concepts. --- Jura 12:50, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : So yes it was a issue which was fixed now and this is the same item for list just it is fixed now and due to it isn't any conflation (this is not archive - and we don't need information about edit history in main space - we could say that). Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:11, 6 February 2022 (UTC) As it was added as a sample item to has list (P2354) , we should do full cleanup for conflation: i.e. split the content into clean items. Otherwise people may be using the incorrect item for the concept they thought they had been using. If it wasn't a model item, we might have done differently. --- Jura 13:16, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : What do you mean? It was and it still is has list (P2354) so? There is some lists and they are has list (P2354) to each other. Isn't it how has list (P2354) works? Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:29, 6 February 2022 (UTC) A sample list should be of high quality, otherwise people who use it as a model end up doing not so high quality things. --- Jura 13:32, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : Maybe I miss understood you but you told that somehow award received (P166) and nominated for (P1411) are missleading so I thought you mean that they are dedicated for human (Q5) than Wikimedia list article (Q13406463) so I have moved them. Should I restore them? Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:45, 6 February 2022 (UTC) No. They are clearly statements that go on items for humans (or other awardees) and not on items for a link to a Wikipedia list. This is why I consider that the item conflats two concepts. --- Jura 12:50, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : So yes it was a issue which was fixed now and this is the same item for list just it is fixed now and due to it isn't any conflation (this is not archive - and we don't need information about edit history in main space - we could say that). Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:11, 6 February 2022 (UTC) As it was added as a sample item to has list (P2354) , we should do full cleanup for conflation: i.e. split the content into clean items. Otherwise people may be using the incorrect item for the concept they thought they had been using. If it wasn't a model item, we might have done differently. --- Jura 13:16, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : What do you mean? It was and it still is has list (P2354) so? There is some lists and they are has list (P2354) to each other. Isn't it how has list (P2354) works? Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:29, 6 February 2022 (UTC) A sample list should be of high quality, otherwise people who use it as a model end up doing not so high quality things. --- Jura 13:32, 6 February 2022 (UTC) No. They are clearly statements that go on items for humans (or other awardees) and not on items for a link to a Wikipedia list. This is why I consider that the item conflats two concepts. --- Jura 12:50, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : So yes it was a issue which was fixed now and this is the same item for list just it is fixed now and due to it isn't any conflation (this is not archive - and we don't need information about edit history in main space - we could say that). Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:11, 6 February 2022 (UTC) As it was added as a sample item to has list (P2354) , we should do full cleanup for conflation: i.e. split the content into clean items. Otherwise people may be using the incorrect item for the concept they thought they had been using. If it wasn't a model item, we might have done differently. --- Jura 13:16, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : What do you mean? It was and it still is has list (P2354) so? There is some lists and they are has list (P2354) to each other. Isn't it how has list (P2354) works? Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:29, 6 February 2022 (UTC) A sample list should be of high quality, otherwise people who use it as a model end up doing not so high quality things. --- Jura 13:32, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : So yes it was a issue which was fixed now and this is the same item for list just it is fixed now and due to it isn't any conflation (this is not archive - and we don't need information about edit history in main space - we could say that). Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:11, 6 February 2022 (UTC) As it was added as a sample item to has list (P2354) , we should do full cleanup for conflation: i.e. split the content into clean items. Otherwise people may be using the incorrect item for the concept they thought they had been using. If it wasn't a model item, we might have done differently. --- Jura 13:16, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : What do you mean? It was and it still is has list (P2354) so? There is some lists and they are has list (P2354) to each other. Isn't it how has list (P2354) works? Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:29, 6 February 2022 (UTC) A sample list should be of high quality, otherwise people who use it as a model end up doing not so high quality things. --- Jura 13:32, 6 February 2022 (UTC) As it was added as a sample item to has list (P2354) , we should do full cleanup for conflation: i.e. split the content into clean items. Otherwise people may be using the incorrect item for the concept they thought they had been using. If it wasn't a model item, we might have done differently. --- Jura 13:16, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : What do you mean? It was and it still is has list (P2354) so? There is some lists and they are has list (P2354) to each other. Isn't it how has list (P2354) works? Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:29, 6 February 2022 (UTC) A sample list should be of high quality, otherwise people who use it as a model end up doing not so high quality things. --- Jura 13:32, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : What do you mean? It was and it still is has list (P2354) so? There is some lists and they are has list (P2354) to each other. Isn't it how has list (P2354) works? Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:29, 6 February 2022 (UTC) A sample list should be of high quality, otherwise people who use it as a model end up doing not so high quality things. --- Jura 13:32, 6 February 2022 (UTC) You split off most statements to the item for the artist, not me. I thought you understood that you have be conflating items. --- Jura 12:34, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : This is not any "conflation" in anyway. How even you got that idea? There is no any logic in this. How? You are trying to do something weird. This is single item for list of awards and nominations received by Basshunter. What is the problem again. Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:37, 6 February 2022 (UTC) Please explain why you moved these statements from the item we are discussing here after it was listed for deletion. --- Jura 12:40, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : Maybe I miss understood you but you told that somehow award received (P166) and nominated for (P1411) are missleading so I thought you mean that they are dedicated for human (Q5) than Wikimedia list article (Q13406463) so I have moved them. Should I restore them? Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:45, 6 February 2022 (UTC) No. They are clearly statements that go on items for humans (or other awardees) and not on items for a link to a Wikipedia list. This is why I consider that the item conflats two concepts. --- Jura 12:50, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : So yes it was a issue which was fixed now and this is the same item for list just it is fixed now and due to it isn't any conflation (this is not archive - and we don't need information about edit history in main space - we could say that). Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:11, 6 February 2022 (UTC) As it was added as a sample item to has list (P2354) , we should do full cleanup for conflation: i.e. split the content into clean items. Otherwise people may be using the incorrect item for the concept they thought they had been using. If it wasn't a model item, we might have done differently. --- Jura 13:16, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : What do you mean? It was and it still is has list (P2354) so? There is some lists and they are has list (P2354) to each other. Isn't it how has list (P2354) works? Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:29, 6 February 2022 (UTC) A sample list should be of high quality, otherwise people who use it as a model end up doing not so high quality things. --- Jura 13:32, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : This is not any "conflation" in anyway. How even you got that idea? There is no any logic in this. How? You are trying to do something weird. This is single item for list of awards and nominations received by Basshunter. What is the problem again. Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:37, 6 February 2022 (UTC) Please explain why you moved these statements from the item we are discussing here after it was listed for deletion. --- Jura 12:40, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : Maybe I miss understood you but you told that somehow award received (P166) and nominated for (P1411) are missleading so I thought you mean that they are dedicated for human (Q5) than Wikimedia list article (Q13406463) so I have moved them. Should I restore them? Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:45, 6 February 2022 (UTC) No. They are clearly statements that go on items for humans (or other awardees) and not on items for a link to a Wikipedia list. This is why I consider that the item conflats two concepts. --- Jura 12:50, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : So yes it was a issue which was fixed now and this is the same item for list just it is fixed now and due to it isn't any conflation (this is not archive - and we don't need information about edit history in main space - we could say that). Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:11, 6 February 2022 (UTC) As it was added as a sample item to has list (P2354) , we should do full cleanup for conflation: i.e. split the content into clean items. Otherwise people may be using the incorrect item for the concept they thought they had been using. If it wasn't a model item, we might have done differently. --- Jura 13:16, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : What do you mean? It was and it still is has list (P2354) so? There is some lists and they are has list (P2354) to each other. Isn't it how has list (P2354) works? Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:29, 6 February 2022 (UTC) A sample list should be of high quality, otherwise people who use it as a model end up doing not so high quality things. --- Jura 13:32, 6 February 2022 (UTC) Please explain why you moved these statements from the item we are discussing here after it was listed for deletion. --- Jura 12:40, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : Maybe I miss understood you but you told that somehow award received (P166) and nominated for (P1411) are missleading so I thought you mean that they are dedicated for human (Q5) than Wikimedia list article (Q13406463) so I have moved them. Should I restore them? Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:45, 6 February 2022 (UTC) No. They are clearly statements that go on items for humans (or other awardees) and not on items for a link to a Wikipedia list. This is why I consider that the item conflats two concepts. --- Jura 12:50, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : So yes it was a issue which was fixed now and this is the same item for list just it is fixed now and due to it isn't any conflation (this is not archive - and we don't need information about edit history in main space - we could say that). Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:11, 6 February 2022 (UTC) As it was added as a sample item to has list (P2354) , we should do full cleanup for conflation: i.e. split the content into clean items. Otherwise people may be using the incorrect item for the concept they thought they had been using. If it wasn't a model item, we might have done differently. --- Jura 13:16, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : What do you mean? It was and it still is has list (P2354) so? There is some lists and they are has list (P2354) to each other. Isn't it how has list (P2354) works? Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:29, 6 February 2022 (UTC) A sample list should be of high quality, otherwise people who use it as a model end up doing not so high quality things. --- Jura 13:32, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : Maybe I miss understood you but you told that somehow award received (P166) and nominated for (P1411) are missleading so I thought you mean that they are dedicated for human (Q5) than Wikimedia list article (Q13406463) so I have moved them. Should I restore them? Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:45, 6 February 2022 (UTC) No. They are clearly statements that go on items for humans (or other awardees) and not on items for a link to a Wikipedia list. This is why I consider that the item conflats two concepts. --- Jura 12:50, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : So yes it was a issue which was fixed now and this is the same item for list just it is fixed now and due to it isn't any conflation (this is not archive - and we don't need information about edit history in main space - we could say that). Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:11, 6 February 2022 (UTC) As it was added as a sample item to has list (P2354) , we should do full cleanup for conflation: i.e. split the content into clean items. Otherwise people may be using the incorrect item for the concept they thought they had been using. If it wasn't a model item, we might have done differently. --- Jura 13:16, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : What do you mean? It was and it still is has list (P2354) so? There is some lists and they are has list (P2354) to each other. Isn't it how has list (P2354) works? Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:29, 6 February 2022 (UTC) A sample list should be of high quality, otherwise people who use it as a model end up doing not so high quality things. --- Jura 13:32, 6 February 2022 (UTC) No. They are clearly statements that go on items for humans (or other awardees) and not on items for a link to a Wikipedia list. This is why I consider that the item conflats two concepts. --- Jura 12:50, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : So yes it was a issue which was fixed now and this is the same item for list just it is fixed now and due to it isn't any conflation (this is not archive - and we don't need information about edit history in main space - we could say that). Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:11, 6 February 2022 (UTC) As it was added as a sample item to has list (P2354) , we should do full cleanup for conflation: i.e. split the content into clean items. Otherwise people may be using the incorrect item for the concept they thought they had been using. If it wasn't a model item, we might have done differently. --- Jura 13:16, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : What do you mean? It was and it still is has list (P2354) so? There is some lists and they are has list (P2354) to each other. Isn't it how has list (P2354) works? Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:29, 6 February 2022 (UTC) A sample list should be of high quality, otherwise people who use it as a model end up doing not so high quality things. --- Jura 13:32, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : So yes it was a issue which was fixed now and this is the same item for list just it is fixed now and due to it isn't any conflation (this is not archive - and we don't need information about edit history in main space - we could say that). Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:11, 6 February 2022 (UTC) As it was added as a sample item to has list (P2354) , we should do full cleanup for conflation: i.e. split the content into clean items. Otherwise people may be using the incorrect item for the concept they thought they had been using. If it wasn't a model item, we might have done differently. --- Jura 13:16, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : What do you mean? It was and it still is has list (P2354) so? There is some lists and they are has list (P2354) to each other. Isn't it how has list (P2354) works? Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:29, 6 February 2022 (UTC) A sample list should be of high quality, otherwise people who use it as a model end up doing not so high quality things. --- Jura 13:32, 6 February 2022 (UTC) As it was added as a sample item to has list (P2354) , we should do full cleanup for conflation: i.e. split the content into clean items. Otherwise people may be using the incorrect item for the concept they thought they had been using. If it wasn't a model item, we might have done differently. --- Jura 13:16, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : What do you mean? It was and it still is has list (P2354) so? There is some lists and they are has list (P2354) to each other. Isn't it how has list (P2354) works? Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:29, 6 February 2022 (UTC) A sample list should be of high quality, otherwise people who use it as a model end up doing not so high quality things. --- Jura 13:32, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : What do you mean? It was and it still is has list (P2354) so? There is some lists and they are has list (P2354) to each other. Isn't it how has list (P2354) works? Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:29, 6 February 2022 (UTC) A sample list should be of high quality, otherwise people who use it as a model end up doing not so high quality things. --- Jura 13:32, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : This is not any "conflation" in anyway. How even you got that idea? There is no any logic in this. How? You are trying to do something weird. This is single item for list of awards and nominations received by Basshunter. What is the problem again. Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:37, 6 February 2022 (UTC) Please explain why you moved these statements from the item we are discussing here after it was listed for deletion. --- Jura 12:40, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : Maybe I miss understood you but you told that somehow award received (P166) and nominated for (P1411) are missleading so I thought you mean that they are dedicated for human (Q5) than Wikimedia list article (Q13406463) so I have moved them. Should I restore them? Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:45, 6 February 2022 (UTC) No. They are clearly statements that go on items for humans (or other awardees) and not on items for a link to a Wikipedia list. This is why I consider that the item conflats two concepts. --- Jura 12:50, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : So yes it was a issue which was fixed now and this is the same item for list just it is fixed now and due to it isn't any conflation (this is not archive - and we don't need information about edit history in main space - we could say that). Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:11, 6 February 2022 (UTC) As it was added as a sample item to has list (P2354) , we should do full cleanup for conflation: i.e. split the content into clean items. Otherwise people may be using the incorrect item for the concept they thought they had been using. If it wasn't a model item, we might have done differently. --- Jura 13:16, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : What do you mean? It was and it still is has list (P2354) so? There is some lists and they are has list (P2354) to each other. Isn't it how has list (P2354) works? Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:29, 6 February 2022 (UTC) A sample list should be of high quality, otherwise people who use it as a model end up doing not so high quality things. --- Jura 13:32, 6 February 2022 (UTC) Please explain why you moved these statements from the item we are discussing here after it was listed for deletion. --- Jura 12:40, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : Maybe I miss understood you but you told that somehow award received (P166) and nominated for (P1411) are missleading so I thought you mean that they are dedicated for human (Q5) than Wikimedia list article (Q13406463) so I have moved them. Should I restore them? Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:45, 6 February 2022 (UTC) No. They are clearly statements that go on items for humans (or other awardees) and not on items for a link to a Wikipedia list. This is why I consider that the item conflats two concepts. --- Jura 12:50, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : So yes it was a issue which was fixed now and this is the same item for list just it is fixed now and due to it isn't any conflation (this is not archive - and we don't need information about edit history in main space - we could say that). Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:11, 6 February 2022 (UTC) As it was added as a sample item to has list (P2354) , we should do full cleanup for conflation: i.e. split the content into clean items. Otherwise people may be using the incorrect item for the concept they thought they had been using. If it wasn't a model item, we might have done differently. --- Jura 13:16, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : What do you mean? It was and it still is has list (P2354) so? There is some lists and they are has list (P2354) to each other. Isn't it how has list (P2354) works? Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:29, 6 February 2022 (UTC) A sample list should be of high quality, otherwise people who use it as a model end up doing not so high quality things. --- Jura 13:32, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : Maybe I miss understood you but you told that somehow award received (P166) and nominated for (P1411) are missleading so I thought you mean that they are dedicated for human (Q5) than Wikimedia list article (Q13406463) so I have moved them. Should I restore them? Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:45, 6 February 2022 (UTC) No. They are clearly statements that go on items for humans (or other awardees) and not on items for a link to a Wikipedia list. This is why I consider that the item conflats two concepts. --- Jura 12:50, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : So yes it was a issue which was fixed now and this is the same item for list just it is fixed now and due to it isn't any conflation (this is not archive - and we don't need information about edit history in main space - we could say that). Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:11, 6 February 2022 (UTC) As it was added as a sample item to has list (P2354) , we should do full cleanup for conflation: i.e. split the content into clean items. Otherwise people may be using the incorrect item for the concept they thought they had been using. If it wasn't a model item, we might have done differently. --- Jura 13:16, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : What do you mean? It was and it still is has list (P2354) so? There is some lists and they are has list (P2354) to each other. Isn't it how has list (P2354) works? Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:29, 6 February 2022 (UTC) A sample list should be of high quality, otherwise people who use it as a model end up doing not so high quality things. --- Jura 13:32, 6 February 2022 (UTC) No. They are clearly statements that go on items for humans (or other awardees) and not on items for a link to a Wikipedia list. This is why I consider that the item conflats two concepts. --- Jura 12:50, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : So yes it was a issue which was fixed now and this is the same item for list just it is fixed now and due to it isn't any conflation (this is not archive - and we don't need information about edit history in main space - we could say that). Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:11, 6 February 2022 (UTC) As it was added as a sample item to has list (P2354) , we should do full cleanup for conflation: i.e. split the content into clean items. Otherwise people may be using the incorrect item for the concept they thought they had been using. If it wasn't a model item, we might have done differently. --- Jura 13:16, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : What do you mean? It was and it still is has list (P2354) so? There is some lists and they are has list (P2354) to each other. Isn't it how has list (P2354) works? Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:29, 6 February 2022 (UTC) A sample list should be of high quality, otherwise people who use it as a model end up doing not so high quality things. --- Jura 13:32, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : So yes it was a issue which was fixed now and this is the same item for list just it is fixed now and due to it isn't any conflation (this is not archive - and we don't need information about edit history in main space - we could say that). Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:11, 6 February 2022 (UTC) As it was added as a sample item to has list (P2354) , we should do full cleanup for conflation: i.e. split the content into clean items. Otherwise people may be using the incorrect item for the concept they thought they had been using. If it wasn't a model item, we might have done differently. --- Jura 13:16, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : What do you mean? It was and it still is has list (P2354) so? There is some lists and they are has list (P2354) to each other. Isn't it how has list (P2354) works? Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:29, 6 February 2022 (UTC) A sample list should be of high quality, otherwise people who use it as a model end up doing not so high quality things. --- Jura 13:32, 6 February 2022 (UTC) As it was added as a sample item to has list (P2354) , we should do full cleanup for conflation: i.e. split the content into clean items. Otherwise people may be using the incorrect item for the concept they thought they had been using. If it wasn't a model item, we might have done differently. --- Jura 13:16, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : What do you mean? It was and it still is has list (P2354) so? There is some lists and they are has list (P2354) to each other. Isn't it how has list (P2354) works? Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:29, 6 February 2022 (UTC) A sample list should be of high quality, otherwise people who use it as a model end up doing not so high quality things. --- Jura 13:32, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : What do you mean? It was and it still is has list (P2354) so? There is some lists and they are has list (P2354) to each other. Isn't it how has list (P2354) works? Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:29, 6 February 2022 (UTC) A sample list should be of high quality, otherwise people who use it as a model end up doing not so high quality things. --- Jura 13:32, 6 February 2022 (UTC) Please explain why you moved these statements from the item we are discussing here after it was listed for deletion. --- Jura 12:40, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : Maybe I miss understood you but you told that somehow award received (P166) and nominated for (P1411) are missleading so I thought you mean that they are dedicated for human (Q5) than Wikimedia list article (Q13406463) so I have moved them. Should I restore them? Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:45, 6 February 2022 (UTC) No. They are clearly statements that go on items for humans (or other awardees) and not on items for a link to a Wikipedia list. This is why I consider that the item conflats two concepts. --- Jura 12:50, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : So yes it was a issue which was fixed now and this is the same item for list just it is fixed now and due to it isn't any conflation (this is not archive - and we don't need information about edit history in main space - we could say that). Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:11, 6 February 2022 (UTC) As it was added as a sample item to has list (P2354) , we should do full cleanup for conflation: i.e. split the content into clean items. Otherwise people may be using the incorrect item for the concept they thought they had been using. If it wasn't a model item, we might have done differently. --- Jura 13:16, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : What do you mean? It was and it still is has list (P2354) so? There is some lists and they are has list (P2354) to each other. Isn't it how has list (P2354) works? Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:29, 6 February 2022 (UTC) A sample list should be of high quality, otherwise people who use it as a model end up doing not so high quality things. --- Jura 13:32, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : Maybe I miss understood you but you told that somehow award received (P166) and nominated for (P1411) are missleading so I thought you mean that they are dedicated for human (Q5) than Wikimedia list article (Q13406463) so I have moved them. Should I restore them? Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:45, 6 February 2022 (UTC) No. They are clearly statements that go on items for humans (or other awardees) and not on items for a link to a Wikipedia list. This is why I consider that the item conflats two concepts. --- Jura 12:50, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : So yes it was a issue which was fixed now and this is the same item for list just it is fixed now and due to it isn't any conflation (this is not archive - and we don't need information about edit history in main space - we could say that). Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:11, 6 February 2022 (UTC) As it was added as a sample item to has list (P2354) , we should do full cleanup for conflation: i.e. split the content into clean items. Otherwise people may be using the incorrect item for the concept they thought they had been using. If it wasn't a model item, we might have done differently. --- Jura 13:16, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : What do you mean? It was and it still is has list (P2354) so? There is some lists and they are has list (P2354) to each other. Isn't it how has list (P2354) works? Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:29, 6 February 2022 (UTC) A sample list should be of high quality, otherwise people who use it as a model end up doing not so high quality things. --- Jura 13:32, 6 February 2022 (UTC) No. They are clearly statements that go on items for humans (or other awardees) and not on items for a link to a Wikipedia list. This is why I consider that the item conflats two concepts. --- Jura 12:50, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : So yes it was a issue which was fixed now and this is the same item for list just it is fixed now and due to it isn't any conflation (this is not archive - and we don't need information about edit history in main space - we could say that). Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:11, 6 February 2022 (UTC) As it was added as a sample item to has list (P2354) , we should do full cleanup for conflation: i.e. split the content into clean items. Otherwise people may be using the incorrect item for the concept they thought they had been using. If it wasn't a model item, we might have done differently. --- Jura 13:16, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : What do you mean? It was and it still is has list (P2354) so? There is some lists and they are has list (P2354) to each other. Isn't it how has list (P2354) works? Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:29, 6 February 2022 (UTC) A sample list should be of high quality, otherwise people who use it as a model end up doing not so high quality things. --- Jura 13:32, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : So yes it was a issue which was fixed now and this is the same item for list just it is fixed now and due to it isn't any conflation (this is not archive - and we don't need information about edit history in main space - we could say that). Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:11, 6 February 2022 (UTC) As it was added as a sample item to has list (P2354) , we should do full cleanup for conflation: i.e. split the content into clean items. Otherwise people may be using the incorrect item for the concept they thought they had been using. If it wasn't a model item, we might have done differently. --- Jura 13:16, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : What do you mean? It was and it still is has list (P2354) so? There is some lists and they are has list (P2354) to each other. Isn't it how has list (P2354) works? Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:29, 6 February 2022 (UTC) A sample list should be of high quality, otherwise people who use it as a model end up doing not so high quality things. --- Jura 13:32, 6 February 2022 (UTC) As it was added as a sample item to has list (P2354) , we should do full cleanup for conflation: i.e. split the content into clean items. Otherwise people may be using the incorrect item for the concept they thought they had been using. If it wasn't a model item, we might have done differently. --- Jura 13:16, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : What do you mean? It was and it still is has list (P2354) so? There is some lists and they are has list (P2354) to each other. Isn't it how has list (P2354) works? Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:29, 6 February 2022 (UTC) A sample list should be of high quality, otherwise people who use it as a model end up doing not so high quality things. --- Jura 13:32, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : What do you mean? It was and it still is has list (P2354) so? There is some lists and they are has list (P2354) to each other. Isn't it how has list (P2354) works? Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:29, 6 February 2022 (UTC) A sample list should be of high quality, otherwise people who use it as a model end up doing not so high quality things. --- Jura 13:32, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : Maybe I miss understood you but you told that somehow award received (P166) and nominated for (P1411) are missleading so I thought you mean that they are dedicated for human (Q5) than Wikimedia list article (Q13406463) so I have moved them. Should I restore them? Eurohunter ( talk ) 12:45, 6 February 2022 (UTC) No. They are clearly statements that go on items for humans (or other awardees) and not on items for a link to a Wikipedia list. This is why I consider that the item conflats two concepts. --- Jura 12:50, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : So yes it was a issue which was fixed now and this is the same item for list just it is fixed now and due to it isn't any conflation (this is not archive - and we don't need information about edit history in main space - we could say that). Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:11, 6 February 2022 (UTC) As it was added as a sample item to has list (P2354) , we should do full cleanup for conflation: i.e. split the content into clean items. Otherwise people may be using the incorrect item for the concept they thought they had been using. If it wasn't a model item, we might have done differently. --- Jura 13:16, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : What do you mean? It was and it still is has list (P2354) so? There is some lists and they are has list (P2354) to each other. Isn't it how has list (P2354) works? Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:29, 6 February 2022 (UTC) A sample list should be of high quality, otherwise people who use it as a model end up doing not so high quality things. --- Jura 13:32, 6 February 2022 (UTC) No. They are clearly statements that go on items for humans (or other awardees) and not on items for a link to a Wikipedia list. This is why I consider that the item conflats two concepts. --- Jura 12:50, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : So yes it was a issue which was fixed now and this is the same item for list just it is fixed now and due to it isn't any conflation (this is not archive - and we don't need information about edit history in main space - we could say that). Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:11, 6 February 2022 (UTC) As it was added as a sample item to has list (P2354) , we should do full cleanup for conflation: i.e. split the content into clean items. Otherwise people may be using the incorrect item for the concept they thought they had been using. If it wasn't a model item, we might have done differently. --- Jura 13:16, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : What do you mean? It was and it still is has list (P2354) so? There is some lists and they are has list (P2354) to each other. Isn't it how has list (P2354) works? Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:29, 6 February 2022 (UTC) A sample list should be of high quality, otherwise people who use it as a model end up doing not so high quality things. --- Jura 13:32, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : So yes it was a issue which was fixed now and this is the same item for list just it is fixed now and due to it isn't any conflation (this is not archive - and we don't need information about edit history in main space - we could say that). Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:11, 6 February 2022 (UTC) As it was added as a sample item to has list (P2354) , we should do full cleanup for conflation: i.e. split the content into clean items. Otherwise people may be using the incorrect item for the concept they thought they had been using. If it wasn't a model item, we might have done differently. --- Jura 13:16, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : What do you mean? It was and it still is has list (P2354) so? There is some lists and they are has list (P2354) to each other. Isn't it how has list (P2354) works? Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:29, 6 February 2022 (UTC) A sample list should be of high quality, otherwise people who use it as a model end up doing not so high quality things. --- Jura 13:32, 6 February 2022 (UTC) As it was added as a sample item to has list (P2354) , we should do full cleanup for conflation: i.e. split the content into clean items. Otherwise people may be using the incorrect item for the concept they thought they had been using. If it wasn't a model item, we might have done differently. --- Jura 13:16, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : What do you mean? It was and it still is has list (P2354) so? There is some lists and they are has list (P2354) to each other. Isn't it how has list (P2354) works? Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:29, 6 February 2022 (UTC) A sample list should be of high quality, otherwise people who use it as a model end up doing not so high quality things. --- Jura 13:32, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : What do you mean? It was and it still is has list (P2354) so? There is some lists and they are has list (P2354) to each other. Isn't it how has list (P2354) works? Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:29, 6 February 2022 (UTC) A sample list should be of high quality, otherwise people who use it as a model end up doing not so high quality things. --- Jura 13:32, 6 February 2022 (UTC) No. They are clearly statements that go on items for humans (or other awardees) and not on items for a link to a Wikipedia list. This is why I consider that the item conflats two concepts. --- Jura 12:50, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : So yes it was a issue which was fixed now and this is the same item for list just it is fixed now and due to it isn't any conflation (this is not archive - and we don't need information about edit history in main space - we could say that). Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:11, 6 February 2022 (UTC) As it was added as a sample item to has list (P2354) , we should do full cleanup for conflation: i.e. split the content into clean items. Otherwise people may be using the incorrect item for the concept they thought they had been using. If it wasn't a model item, we might have done differently. --- Jura 13:16, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : What do you mean? It was and it still is has list (P2354) so? There is some lists and they are has list (P2354) to each other. Isn't it how has list (P2354) works? Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:29, 6 February 2022 (UTC) A sample list should be of high quality, otherwise people who use it as a model end up doing not so high quality things. --- Jura 13:32, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : So yes it was a issue which was fixed now and this is the same item for list just it is fixed now and due to it isn't any conflation (this is not archive - and we don't need information about edit history in main space - we could say that). Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:11, 6 February 2022 (UTC) As it was added as a sample item to has list (P2354) , we should do full cleanup for conflation: i.e. split the content into clean items. Otherwise people may be using the incorrect item for the concept they thought they had been using. If it wasn't a model item, we might have done differently. --- Jura 13:16, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : What do you mean? It was and it still is has list (P2354) so? There is some lists and they are has list (P2354) to each other. Isn't it how has list (P2354) works? Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:29, 6 February 2022 (UTC) A sample list should be of high quality, otherwise people who use it as a model end up doing not so high quality things. --- Jura 13:32, 6 February 2022 (UTC) As it was added as a sample item to has list (P2354) , we should do full cleanup for conflation: i.e. split the content into clean items. Otherwise people may be using the incorrect item for the concept they thought they had been using. If it wasn't a model item, we might have done differently. --- Jura 13:16, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : What do you mean? It was and it still is has list (P2354) so? There is some lists and they are has list (P2354) to each other. Isn't it how has list (P2354) works? Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:29, 6 February 2022 (UTC) A sample list should be of high quality, otherwise people who use it as a model end up doing not so high quality things. --- Jura 13:32, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : What do you mean? It was and it still is has list (P2354) so? There is some lists and they are has list (P2354) to each other. Isn't it how has list (P2354) works? Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:29, 6 February 2022 (UTC) A sample list should be of high quality, otherwise people who use it as a model end up doing not so high quality things. --- Jura 13:32, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : So yes it was a issue which was fixed now and this is the same item for list just it is fixed now and due to it isn't any conflation (this is not archive - and we don't need information about edit history in main space - we could say that). Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:11, 6 February 2022 (UTC) As it was added as a sample item to has list (P2354) , we should do full cleanup for conflation: i.e. split the content into clean items. Otherwise people may be using the incorrect item for the concept they thought they had been using. If it wasn't a model item, we might have done differently. --- Jura 13:16, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : What do you mean? It was and it still is has list (P2354) so? There is some lists and they are has list (P2354) to each other. Isn't it how has list (P2354) works? Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:29, 6 February 2022 (UTC) A sample list should be of high quality, otherwise people who use it as a model end up doing not so high quality things. --- Jura 13:32, 6 February 2022 (UTC) As it was added as a sample item to has list (P2354) , we should do full cleanup for conflation: i.e. split the content into clean items. Otherwise people may be using the incorrect item for the concept they thought they had been using. If it wasn't a model item, we might have done differently. --- Jura 13:16, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : What do you mean? It was and it still is has list (P2354) so? There is some lists and they are has list (P2354) to each other. Isn't it how has list (P2354) works? Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:29, 6 February 2022 (UTC) A sample list should be of high quality, otherwise people who use it as a model end up doing not so high quality things. --- Jura 13:32, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : What do you mean? It was and it still is has list (P2354) so? There is some lists and they are has list (P2354) to each other. Isn't it how has list (P2354) works? Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:29, 6 February 2022 (UTC) A sample list should be of high quality, otherwise people who use it as a model end up doing not so high quality things. --- Jura 13:32, 6 February 2022 (UTC) As it was added as a sample item to has list (P2354) , we should do full cleanup for conflation: i.e. split the content into clean items. Otherwise people may be using the incorrect item for the concept they thought they had been using. If it wasn't a model item, we might have done differently. --- Jura 13:16, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : What do you mean? It was and it still is has list (P2354) so? There is some lists and they are has list (P2354) to each other. Isn't it how has list (P2354) works? Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:29, 6 February 2022 (UTC) A sample list should be of high quality, otherwise people who use it as a model end up doing not so high quality things. --- Jura 13:32, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : What do you mean? It was and it still is has list (P2354) so? There is some lists and they are has list (P2354) to each other. Isn't it how has list (P2354) works? Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:29, 6 February 2022 (UTC) A sample list should be of high quality, otherwise people who use it as a model end up doing not so high quality things. --- Jura 13:32, 6 February 2022 (UTC) @ Jura1 : What do you mean? It was and it still is has list (P2354) so? There is some lists and they are has list (P2354) to each other. Isn't it how has list (P2354) works? Eurohunter ( talk ) 13:29, 6 February 2022 (UTC) A sample list should be of high quality, otherwise people who use it as a model end up doing not so high quality things. --- Jura 13:32, 6 February 2022 (UTC) Old discussion. @ Eurohunter , Jura1 : if we merge list of awards and nominations received by Basshunter (Q110825249) and list of awards and nominations received by Basshunter (Q63384701) , the problem should be solved. Any loose ends?-- Estopedist1 ( talk ) 13:26, 24 August 2022 (UTC) Done Q63384701 and Q110825249 are merged-- Estopedist1 ( talk ) 05:59, 31 August 2022 (UTC)