###Instruction: Multi-class classification, answer with one of the labels:['no_consensus', 'delete', 'keep', 'comment', 'merge', 'redirect'] : ###Input:  Q20649854: Lovely Joshi (Q20649854) : Indian actress : ( delete | history | links | entity usage | logs ) No valid sitelink to a page on Wikipedia or it's sister projects. GSS ( talk | c | en ) 13:15, 11 March 2018 (UTC) On hold This item is linked from 1 other. -- DeltaBot ( talk ) 23:40, 11 March 2018 (UTC) Keep cast of a film with an item. @ GSS-1987 : Deletion is merely based on the absence of sitelinks. I doubt most listing below qualify. I wonder whether enwiki has a Bollywood gap. --- Jura 23:55, 11 March 2018 (UTC) @ Jura1 , GSS-1987 : enwiki does have a large gap with respect to actors and actresses, though less so to the best of my understanding with respect to films. I recall undeleting an item about a Bhojpuri film and then expanding on it because it was an actual film and some of its cast already had items. Mahir256 ( talk ) 00:47, 12 March 2018 (UTC) @ Jura1 : That item also has no sitelinks too and do we need to keep all those items which fails our notability standard but exists outside Wikipedia? Thank you – GSS ( talk | c | en ) 06:24, 12 March 2018 (UTC) @ GSS-1987 : Bear in mind that An item is acceptable if and only if it fulfills at least one of these two goals, that is if it meets at least one of the criteria below: , not just that it has to have a sitelink. Note of course that any failures of WD:N criteria are not the only rationales for deleting items (although the linked page has been a proposal since its creation, it is a good general guideline to follow, and you are welcome to open a discussion on Wikidata:Project chat about revisions to this guideline or adopting it as official policy). Mahir256 ( talk ) 15:11, 12 March 2018 (UTC) @ Jura1 , GSS-1987 : enwiki does have a large gap with respect to actors and actresses, though less so to the best of my understanding with respect to films. I recall undeleting an item about a Bhojpuri film and then expanding on it because it was an actual film and some of its cast already had items. Mahir256 ( talk ) 00:47, 12 March 2018 (UTC) @ Jura1 : That item also has no sitelinks too and do we need to keep all those items which fails our notability standard but exists outside Wikipedia? Thank you – GSS ( talk | c | en ) 06:24, 12 March 2018 (UTC) @ GSS-1987 : Bear in mind that An item is acceptable if and only if it fulfills at least one of these two goals, that is if it meets at least one of the criteria below: , not just that it has to have a sitelink. Note of course that any failures of WD:N criteria are not the only rationales for deleting items (although the linked page has been a proposal since its creation, it is a good general guideline to follow, and you are welcome to open a discussion on Wikidata:Project chat about revisions to this guideline or adopting it as official policy). Mahir256 ( talk ) 15:11, 12 March 2018 (UTC) @ Jura1 : That item also has no sitelinks too and do we need to keep all those items which fails our notability standard but exists outside Wikipedia? Thank you – GSS ( talk | c | en ) 06:24, 12 March 2018 (UTC) @ GSS-1987 : Bear in mind that An item is acceptable if and only if it fulfills at least one of these two goals, that is if it meets at least one of the criteria below: , not just that it has to have a sitelink. Note of course that any failures of WD:N criteria are not the only rationales for deleting items (although the linked page has been a proposal since its creation, it is a good general guideline to follow, and you are welcome to open a discussion on Wikidata:Project chat about revisions to this guideline or adopting it as official policy). Mahir256 ( talk ) 15:11, 12 March 2018 (UTC) @ GSS-1987 : Bear in mind that An item is acceptable if and only if it fulfills at least one of these two goals, that is if it meets at least one of the criteria below: , not just that it has to have a sitelink. Note of course that any failures of WD:N criteria are not the only rationales for deleting items (although the linked page has been a proposal since its creation, it is a good general guideline to follow, and you are welcome to open a discussion on Wikidata:Project chat about revisions to this guideline or adopting it as official policy). Mahir256 ( talk ) 15:11, 12 March 2018 (UTC) Keep , notable per Wikidata standard. VIGNERON ( talk ) 13:10, 13 March 2018 (UTC) @ Jura1 , GSS-1987 : enwiki does have a large gap with respect to actors and actresses, though less so to the best of my understanding with respect to films. I recall undeleting an item about a Bhojpuri film and then expanding on it because it was an actual film and some of its cast already had items. Mahir256 ( talk ) 00:47, 12 March 2018 (UTC) @ Jura1 : That item also has no sitelinks too and do we need to keep all those items which fails our notability standard but exists outside Wikipedia? Thank you – GSS ( talk | c | en ) 06:24, 12 March 2018 (UTC) @ GSS-1987 : Bear in mind that An item is acceptable if and only if it fulfills at least one of these two goals, that is if it meets at least one of the criteria below: , not just that it has to have a sitelink. Note of course that any failures of WD:N criteria are not the only rationales for deleting items (although the linked page has been a proposal since its creation, it is a good general guideline to follow, and you are welcome to open a discussion on Wikidata:Project chat about revisions to this guideline or adopting it as official policy). Mahir256 ( talk ) 15:11, 12 March 2018 (UTC) @ Jura1 : That item also has no sitelinks too and do we need to keep all those items which fails our notability standard but exists outside Wikipedia? Thank you – GSS ( talk | c | en ) 06:24, 12 March 2018 (UTC) @ GSS-1987 : Bear in mind that An item is acceptable if and only if it fulfills at least one of these two goals, that is if it meets at least one of the criteria below: , not just that it has to have a sitelink. Note of course that any failures of WD:N criteria are not the only rationales for deleting items (although the linked page has been a proposal since its creation, it is a good general guideline to follow, and you are welcome to open a discussion on Wikidata:Project chat about revisions to this guideline or adopting it as official policy). Mahir256 ( talk ) 15:11, 12 March 2018 (UTC) @ Jura1 : That item also has no sitelinks too and do we need to keep all those items which fails our notability standard but exists outside Wikipedia? Thank you – GSS ( talk | c | en ) 06:24, 12 March 2018 (UTC) @ GSS-1987 : Bear in mind that An item is acceptable if and only if it fulfills at least one of these two goals, that is if it meets at least one of the criteria below: , not just that it has to have a sitelink. Note of course that any failures of WD:N criteria are not the only rationales for deleting items (although the linked page has been a proposal since its creation, it is a good general guideline to follow, and you are welcome to open a discussion on Wikidata:Project chat about revisions to this guideline or adopting it as official policy). Mahir256 ( talk ) 15:11, 12 March 2018 (UTC)