###Instruction: Multi-class classification, answer with one of the labels:['no_consensus', 'delete', 'keep', 'comment', 'merge', 'redirect'] : ###Input:  Q81421465: Q81421465 : no description : ( delete | history | links | entity usage | logs ) Notability Quakewoody ( talk ) 15:36, 23 March 2020 (UTC) Keep Her Instagram description suggests notability. -- Trade ( talk ) 15:40, 23 March 2020 (UTC) Deleted by MisterSynergy ( talk • contribs • logs ) -- DeltaBot ( talk ) 19:20, 23 March 2020 (UTC) Was it necessary to delete this? -- Trade ( talk ) 19:33, 23 March 2020 (UTC) Other than having a "verified" account, notability wasn't there. Miss Multi-Verse isn't quite the same caliber as Miss Universe. Quakewoody ( talk ) 19:39, 23 March 2020 (UTC) Was it necessary to delete this? -- Trade ( talk ) 19:33, 23 March 2020 (UTC) Other than having a "verified" account, notability wasn't there. Miss Multi-Verse isn't quite the same caliber as Miss Universe. Quakewoody ( talk ) 19:39, 23 March 2020 (UTC) Was it necessary to delete this? -- Trade ( talk ) 19:33, 23 March 2020 (UTC) Other than having a "verified" account, notability wasn't there. Miss Multi-Verse isn't quite the same caliber as Miss Universe. Quakewoody ( talk ) 19:39, 23 March 2020 (UTC) What counts is the information in the item, not social network descriptions that are under control of the subject herself. But as we are here: as far as I see, two out of the three beauty pageants listed on her Instagram account do not have a Wikidata item; Top Model of the World 2017 (Q33060660) has one, but according to the eswiki page, the subject of Q81421465 did not reach a top 20 position out of 39 participants. I do not see a reason not to delete the item. — MisterSynergy ( talk ) 20:14, 23 March 2020 (UTC) What counts is the information in the item, not social network descriptions that are under control of the subject herself. But as we are here: as far as I see, two out of the three beauty pageants listed on her Instagram account do not have a Wikidata item; Top Model of the World 2017 (Q33060660) has one, but according to the eswiki page, the subject of Q81421465 did not reach a top 20 position out of 39 participants. I do not see a reason not to delete the item. — MisterSynergy ( talk ) 20:14, 23 March 2020 (UTC) What counts is the information in the item, not social network descriptions that are under control of the subject herself. But as we are here: as far as I see, two out of the three beauty pageants listed on her Instagram account do not have a Wikidata item; Top Model of the World 2017 (Q33060660) has one, but according to the eswiki page, the subject of Q81421465 did not reach a top 20 position out of 39 participants. I do not see a reason not to delete the item. — MisterSynergy ( talk ) 20:14, 23 March 2020 (UTC)