###Instruction: Multi-class classification, answer with one of the labels:['no_consensus', 'delete', 'keep', 'comment', 'merge', 'redirect'] : ###Input:  Q13384863: Q13384863 : no description : ( delete | history | links | entity usage | logs ) Does not meet WD:N , there is no GND type "non article". To make cleare that there is no correct value for P:P107 you can use "no value" ..
-- Sk!d ( talk ) 23:23, 25 May 2013 (UTC) Thats wrong, "name (dismabiguation)" is listed on de:Hilfe:GND#Entit.C3.A4tenliste , see the refernce to here (page 24) , there you can see there is not gnd-type "none article". The "no value" option for properties has been created exactly for this purpose, so the argurment that only with this value every item can have the property is false, too. The work with this property is not more difficult without this item, e.g. you just have to accept the snaktype "no value" in api requests for P107. We should use all possibilities of wikidata, as you already said other items will have "no value" too so, people will get used to it and should understand it. -- Sk!d ( talk ) 18:56, 26 May 2013 (UTC) "The snaktype ... in api"? For someone who runs an bot this might be the same as using the values "name (disambiguation)" or "non article", but for a "normal" user, who visit from Wikipedia, it makes things a lot more complicated. "no value" could also mean someone didn't found an authority file for this item etc. Q13384863 is self explaining. -- Kolja21 ( talk ) 21:08, 26 May 2013 (UTC) For this use there is "some value" if you are not sure about the value. -- Sk!d ( talk ) 21:51, 26 May 2013 (UTC) "The snaktype ... in api"? For someone who runs an bot this might be the same as using the values "name (disambiguation)" or "non article", but for a "normal" user, who visit from Wikipedia, it makes things a lot more complicated. "no value" could also mean someone didn't found an authority file for this item etc. Q13384863 is self explaining. -- Kolja21 ( talk ) 21:08, 26 May 2013 (UTC) For this use there is "some value" if you are not sure about the value. -- Sk!d ( talk ) 21:51, 26 May 2013 (UTC) "The snaktype ... in api"? For someone who runs an bot this might be the same as using the values "name (disambiguation)" or "non article", but for a "normal" user, who visit from Wikipedia, it makes things a lot more complicated. "no value" could also mean someone didn't found an authority file for this item etc. Q13384863 is self explaining. -- Kolja21 ( talk ) 21:08, 26 May 2013 (UTC) For this use there is "some value" if you are not sure about the value. -- Sk!d ( talk ) 21:51, 26 May 2013 (UTC) We already had a deleting discussion for P107 (Wikidata main type of item). I don't see mounting problems, only mounting usage: 3.176.860 times ( Wikidata:Database reports/Popular properties ). -- Kolja21 ( talk ) 13:17, 3 June 2013 (UTC) Because there is a singular bot adding it, not because the property has consensus. Which really, that should probably be stopped for that reason, as the discussion was closed as "no consensus" and not as "keep". -- Izno ( talk ) 21:27, 3 June 2013 (UTC) This is not done. -- Sk!d ( talk ) 02:33, 16 June 2013 (UTC) Could someone delete this Item? Becaus I don't think that the RFC will succeed there is only one pro vote and seven contra votes. -- Sk!d ( talk ) 22:41, 2 July 2013 (UTC)