###Instruction: Multi-class classification, answer with one of the labels:['no_consensus', 'delete', 'keep', 'comment', 'merge', 'redirect'] : ###Input:  Q82960771: N¹-[2-(4-chlorophenyl)ethyl]-N²-(1,3-thiazol-2-yl)oxamide (Q82960771) : chemical compound : ( delete | history | links | entity usage | logs ) This items contains highly inconsistent data. For example, the CAS number stated belongs to a totally different chemical, i.e. to 3,3′-ethylidenebis[1-ethenyl-2-pyrrolidinone] [1] . It's best to re-start from the scratch. Leyo 08:44, 14 April 2021 (UTC) @ Leyo : No. CAS is not the defining identifier for compounds in WD, InChi/PubChem CID or CheBI ID are. Here PubChem, SMILES, sum formula, label, even DSSTOX all fit the InChi+key so the item is well defined, just the CAS is wrong. If you visit the CAS now you also see it has been deprecated, so we'll just deprecate its ID in the item. Anyway, Keep . -- SCIdude ( talk ) 09:36, 29 April 2021 (UTC) @ SCIdude : Do you have access to SciFinder to look for the correct CAS RN for this compound? -- Leyo 12:12, 29 April 2021 (UTC) No. -- SCIdude ( talk ) 14:18, 29 April 2021 (UTC) @ SCIdude : Do you have access to SciFinder to look for the correct CAS RN for this compound? -- Leyo 12:12, 29 April 2021 (UTC) No. -- SCIdude ( talk ) 14:18, 29 April 2021 (UTC) @ SCIdude : Do you have access to SciFinder to look for the correct CAS RN for this compound? -- Leyo 12:12, 29 April 2021 (UTC) No. -- SCIdude ( talk ) 14:18, 29 April 2021 (UTC) Not deleted -- Leyo 21:02, 30 April 2021 (UTC)