###Instruction: Multi-class classification, answer with one of the labels:['no_consensus', 'delete', 'keep', 'comment', 'merge', 'redirect'] : ###Input:  Q111961239: Q111961239 : no description : ( delete | history | links | entity usage | logs ) Not a valid reason for deprecation Swpb ( talk ) 14:14, 11 May 2022 (UTC) On hold This item is linked from 1 other. -- DeltaBot ( talk ) 14:20, 11 May 2022 (UTC) Why not? It it is just a more specific version of the reasons it is derived from, like identifier not suited for this item. The use case for it here was also based on widely known public reference material. In order for an identifier to be used for an item, it needs to be considered valid by reputable secondary sources. The example I first used this reason on is not considered valid by sources on the topic. (The SIL, who came up with the "jnj" code for the Yem language, is a Christian missionary organization, not a legitimate scholarly body.) -- Middle river exports ( talk ) 16:22, 11 May 2022 (UTC) @ Middle river exports : Can you please give us the precise example where you used this? Vojtěch Dostál ( talk ) 06:31, 20 May 2022 (UTC) Why not? It it is just a more specific version of the reasons it is derived from, like identifier not suited for this item. The use case for it here was also based on widely known public reference material. In order for an identifier to be used for an item, it needs to be considered valid by reputable secondary sources. The example I first used this reason on is not considered valid by sources on the topic. (The SIL, who came up with the "jnj" code for the Yem language, is a Christian missionary organization, not a legitimate scholarly body.) -- Middle river exports ( talk ) 16:22, 11 May 2022 (UTC) @ Middle river exports : Can you please give us the precise example where you used this? Vojtěch Dostál ( talk ) 06:31, 20 May 2022 (UTC) @ Middle river exports : Can you please give us the precise example where you used this? Vojtěch Dostál ( talk ) 06:31, 20 May 2022 (UTC) Why not? It it is just a more specific version of the reasons it is derived from, like identifier not suited for this item. The use case for it here was also based on widely known public reference material. In order for an identifier to be used for an item, it needs to be considered valid by reputable secondary sources. The example I first used this reason on is not considered valid by sources on the topic. (The SIL, who came up with the "jnj" code for the Yem language, is a Christian missionary organization, not a legitimate scholarly body.) -- Middle river exports ( talk ) 16:22, 11 May 2022 (UTC) @ Middle river exports : Can you please give us the precise example where you used this? Vojtěch Dostál ( talk ) 06:31, 20 May 2022 (UTC)