###Instruction: Multi-class classification, answer with one of the labels:['no_consensus', 'delete', 'keep', 'comment', 'merge', 'redirect'] : ###Input:  Q98406706: Christine Weston Chandler (Q98406706) : American artist and internet personality : ( delete | history | links | entity usage | logs | discussion ) Violates her privacy Trade ( talk ) 12:39, 16 October 2020 (UTC) I'm not really sure i would consider the content here to be public information. -- Trade ( talk ) 18:48, 16 October 2020 (UTC) I know this is a discussion for a larger forum. But, WD can't have it both ways. We either participate in the "once a boy, now a girl" movement by having things like Q1052281 as an option - or we don't. Which would leave the only option for being male or female (or the extremely insulting 'other'). If being transgendered is a "privacy" issue, we shouldn't have the option to list it. And birth names, again, larger forum - we can pick and choose our "legal" name. We do not get to pick our birth name. Birth name is assigned by the parents. It should never be changed on WD. As to legal names, we allow start and stop dates for that very purpose. Chris becoming Chrissy should be no different Cassius Clay becoming Muhammad Ali. Each name has a start and stop period. The only other "privacy" issue I see would be autism, which, again, we shouldn't even have the option to use if it "my private business". Quakewoody ( talk ) 19:19, 16 October 2020 (UTC) +1. Keep therefore. Nomen ad hoc ( talk ) 22:15, 18 November 2020 (UTC) . I'm not really sure i would consider the content here to be public information. -- Trade ( talk ) 18:48, 16 October 2020 (UTC) I know this is a discussion for a larger forum. But, WD can't have it both ways. We either participate in the "once a boy, now a girl" movement by having things like Q1052281 as an option - or we don't. Which would leave the only option for being male or female (or the extremely insulting 'other'). If being transgendered is a "privacy" issue, we shouldn't have the option to list it. And birth names, again, larger forum - we can pick and choose our "legal" name. We do not get to pick our birth name. Birth name is assigned by the parents. It should never be changed on WD. As to legal names, we allow start and stop dates for that very purpose. Chris becoming Chrissy should be no different Cassius Clay becoming Muhammad Ali. Each name has a start and stop period. The only other "privacy" issue I see would be autism, which, again, we shouldn't even have the option to use if it "my private business". Quakewoody ( talk ) 19:19, 16 October 2020 (UTC) +1. Keep therefore. Nomen ad hoc ( talk ) 22:15, 18 November 2020 (UTC) . I'm not really sure i would consider the content here to be public information. -- Trade ( talk ) 18:48, 16 October 2020 (UTC) I know this is a discussion for a larger forum. But, WD can't have it both ways. We either participate in the "once a boy, now a girl" movement by having things like Q1052281 as an option - or we don't. Which would leave the only option for being male or female (or the extremely insulting 'other'). If being transgendered is a "privacy" issue, we shouldn't have the option to list it. And birth names, again, larger forum - we can pick and choose our "legal" name. We do not get to pick our birth name. Birth name is assigned by the parents. It should never be changed on WD. As to legal names, we allow start and stop dates for that very purpose. Chris becoming Chrissy should be no different Cassius Clay becoming Muhammad Ali. Each name has a start and stop period. The only other "privacy" issue I see would be autism, which, again, we shouldn't even have the option to use if it "my private business". Quakewoody ( talk ) 19:19, 16 October 2020 (UTC) +1. Keep therefore. Nomen ad hoc ( talk ) 22:15, 18 November 2020 (UTC) . Not deleted , as it has four sitelinks meanwhile; content modifications with respect to the BLP policy can nevertheless be discussed, but please do so on the item talk page — MisterSynergy ( talk ) 09:21, 25 November 2020 (UTC)