###Instruction: Multi-class classification, answer with one of the labels:['no_consensus', 'delete', 'keep', 'comment', 'merge', 'redirect'] : ###Input:  Q110868086: Anders Lindgren (Q110868086) : husband of Mia Murray-Lindgren : ( delete | history | links | entity usage | logs ) Irrelevant person, only noted as a persons father Sabelöga ( talk ) 21:15, 27 August 2022 (UTC) @ Sabelöga : In Wikidata you can't just paste the parent's name as a value, so people create items to model this data. This is relevant for example for use in infoboxes. Also please do not remove links from items before applying for deletion. This is important information that influences the delete/keep decision. -- Tengwar ( talk ) 09:19, 30 August 2022 (UTC) On hold This item is linked from 2 others. -- DeltaBot ( talk ) 09:20, 30 August 2022 (UTC) @ Sabelöga @ Tengwar bare mentioning of Anders Lindgren in this svwiki article doesn't make him notable for Wikidata. If there is no serious sources about Andres Lindgren, it fails WD:Notability Estopedist1 ( talk ) 11:36, 6 September 2022 (UTC) That was kind of my reasoning too. -- Sabelöga ( talk ) 17:18, 6 September 2022 (UTC) Maybe I'm understanding it wrong, but doesn't this item fulfill the third criterion? -- Tengwar ( talk ) 23:03, 9 September 2022 (UTC) @ Sabelöga @ Tengwar bare mentioning of Anders Lindgren in this svwiki article doesn't make him notable for Wikidata. If there is no serious sources about Andres Lindgren, it fails WD:Notability Estopedist1 ( talk ) 11:36, 6 September 2022 (UTC) That was kind of my reasoning too. -- Sabelöga ( talk ) 17:18, 6 September 2022 (UTC) Maybe I'm understanding it wrong, but doesn't this item fulfill the third criterion? -- Tengwar ( talk ) 23:03, 9 September 2022 (UTC) That was kind of my reasoning too. -- Sabelöga ( talk ) 17:18, 6 September 2022 (UTC) @ Sabelöga @ Tengwar bare mentioning of Anders Lindgren in this svwiki article doesn't make him notable for Wikidata. If there is no serious sources about Andres Lindgren, it fails WD:Notability Estopedist1 ( talk ) 11:36, 6 September 2022 (UTC) That was kind of my reasoning too. -- Sabelöga ( talk ) 17:18, 6 September 2022 (UTC) Maybe I'm understanding it wrong, but doesn't this item fulfill the third criterion? -- Tengwar ( talk ) 23:03, 9 September 2022 (UTC) That was kind of my reasoning too. -- Sabelöga ( talk ) 17:18, 6 September 2022 (UTC) That was kind of my reasoning too. -- Sabelöga ( talk ) 17:18, 6 September 2022 (UTC) WD:N3 definitely needs improvement (see my previous comment), but currently yes, the item can be kept per WD:N3 Estopedist1 ( talk ) 10:43, 10 September 2022 (UTC) Not done per User:Estopedist1 -- Emu ( talk ) 14:57, 12 September 2022 (UTC)