###Instruction: Multi-class classification, answer with one of the labels:['no_consensus', 'delete', 'keep', 'comment', 'merge', 'redirect'] : ###Input:  Q22302097: number of entities (Q22302097) : discrete quantity; number of entities of a given kind in a system : ( delete | history | links | entity usage | logs ) Duplicate of dimensionless quantity (Q126818) Bigbossfarin ( talk ) 14:15, 22 January 2017 (UTC) I don't think that's correct. I marked number of entities (Q22302097) as subclass of (P279) of dimensionless quantity (Q126818) . Lymantria ( talk ) 16:48, 22 January 2017 (UTC) But percent (Q11229) (which uses this as statement) is not a natural number (Q21199) . Isn't it the same if 1 (Q199) uses natural number (Q21199) and dimensionless quantity (Q126818) for instance of (P31) ?-- Bigbossfarin ( talk ) 17:42, 22 January 2017 (UTC) You were right of course about percent (Q11229) . The item seems to be misused here and there. And indeed this item "unifies" natural number (Q21199) and dimensionless quantity (Q126818) . It is a sublclass consisting of finite cardinality (Q4049983) . Lymantria ( talk ) 07:00, 23 January 2017 (UTC) But percent (Q11229) (which uses this as statement) is not a natural number (Q21199) . Isn't it the same if 1 (Q199) uses natural number (Q21199) and dimensionless quantity (Q126818) for instance of (P31) ?-- Bigbossfarin ( talk ) 17:42, 22 January 2017 (UTC) You were right of course about percent (Q11229) . The item seems to be misused here and there. And indeed this item "unifies" natural number (Q21199) and dimensionless quantity (Q126818) . It is a sublclass consisting of finite cardinality (Q4049983) . Lymantria ( talk ) 07:00, 23 January 2017 (UTC) You were right of course about percent (Q11229) . The item seems to be misused here and there. And indeed this item "unifies" natural number (Q21199) and dimensionless quantity (Q126818) . It is a sublclass consisting of finite cardinality (Q4049983) . Lymantria ( talk ) 07:00, 23 January 2017 (UTC) But percent (Q11229) (which uses this as statement) is not a natural number (Q21199) . Isn't it the same if 1 (Q199) uses natural number (Q21199) and dimensionless quantity (Q126818) for instance of (P31) ?-- Bigbossfarin ( talk ) 17:42, 22 January 2017 (UTC) You were right of course about percent (Q11229) . The item seems to be misused here and there. And indeed this item "unifies" natural number (Q21199) and dimensionless quantity (Q126818) . It is a sublclass consisting of finite cardinality (Q4049983) . Lymantria ( talk ) 07:00, 23 January 2017 (UTC)