###Instruction: Multi-class classification, answer with one of the labels:['no_consensus', 'delete', 'keep', 'comment', 'merge', 'redirect'] : ###Input:  Q66542603: Q66542603 : no description : ( delete | history | links | entity usage | logs ) Is this really needed, also seems to be a duplicate of Q151 Sabelöga ( talk ) 23:52, 4 October 2020 (UTC) @ TomT0m : what is this item meant to be for? I see no purpose… — MisterSynergy ( talk ) 07:52, 5 October 2020 (UTC) @ MisterSynergy , Sabelöga : if « wiktionary » is primarily a website, then yes, but to me it’s a dictionary project. The website is the primary mean by which the project is constructed and built, and by which contributors interracts. But isn’t primarily also … a dictionary, or a dataset ? If we go to the enwiktionary main page we can read « Welcome to the English-language Wiktionary, a collaborative project to produce a free-content multilingual dictionary. », which tends to demonstrate it’s primarily a dictionary project. Not especially a website … the website is indeed un important part of the project. It’s not the whole by itself … author TomT0m / talk page 09:15, 5 October 2020 (UTC) Thank you. I meanwhile also found Wikidata:Project chat/Archive/2019/08#Modelling the wiktionary … which is apparently the starting point for this item. Also I think I get the point that you are making here, but I cannot see spontaneously where this creates problems, e.g. by weird P31/P279 inferences or so. What is meant to be improved here? Unfortunately, there is currently only one use of this item at Q151#Q151$76279b2a-48a0-c493-329d-60b885308f74 , and this is not yet helpful at all. Do you plan to finish this approach, or should we delete the item for now as it seems to be a stalled project? — MisterSynergy ( talk ) 09:28, 5 October 2020 (UTC) @ TomT0m : please provide an answer . Nomen ad hoc ( talk ) 13:56, 18 November 2020 (UTC) . @ MisterSynergy , Sabelöga : if « wiktionary » is primarily a website, then yes, but to me it’s a dictionary project. The website is the primary mean by which the project is constructed and built, and by which contributors interracts. But isn’t primarily also … a dictionary, or a dataset ? If we go to the enwiktionary main page we can read « Welcome to the English-language Wiktionary, a collaborative project to produce a free-content multilingual dictionary. », which tends to demonstrate it’s primarily a dictionary project. Not especially a website … the website is indeed un important part of the project. It’s not the whole by itself … author TomT0m / talk page 09:15, 5 October 2020 (UTC) Thank you. I meanwhile also found Wikidata:Project chat/Archive/2019/08#Modelling the wiktionary … which is apparently the starting point for this item. Also I think I get the point that you are making here, but I cannot see spontaneously where this creates problems, e.g. by weird P31/P279 inferences or so. What is meant to be improved here? Unfortunately, there is currently only one use of this item at Q151#Q151$76279b2a-48a0-c493-329d-60b885308f74 , and this is not yet helpful at all. Do you plan to finish this approach, or should we delete the item for now as it seems to be a stalled project? — MisterSynergy ( talk ) 09:28, 5 October 2020 (UTC) @ TomT0m : please provide an answer . Nomen ad hoc ( talk ) 13:56, 18 November 2020 (UTC) . Thank you. I meanwhile also found Wikidata:Project chat/Archive/2019/08#Modelling the wiktionary … which is apparently the starting point for this item. Also I think I get the point that you are making here, but I cannot see spontaneously where this creates problems, e.g. by weird P31/P279 inferences or so. What is meant to be improved here? Unfortunately, there is currently only one use of this item at Q151#Q151$76279b2a-48a0-c493-329d-60b885308f74 , and this is not yet helpful at all. Do you plan to finish this approach, or should we delete the item for now as it seems to be a stalled project? — MisterSynergy ( talk ) 09:28, 5 October 2020 (UTC) @ TomT0m : please provide an answer . Nomen ad hoc ( talk ) 13:56, 18 November 2020 (UTC) . @ TomT0m : please provide an answer . Nomen ad hoc ( talk ) 13:56, 18 November 2020 (UTC) . @ MisterSynergy , Sabelöga : if « wiktionary » is primarily a website, then yes, but to me it’s a dictionary project. The website is the primary mean by which the project is constructed and built, and by which contributors interracts. But isn’t primarily also … a dictionary, or a dataset ? If we go to the enwiktionary main page we can read « Welcome to the English-language Wiktionary, a collaborative project to produce a free-content multilingual dictionary. », which tends to demonstrate it’s primarily a dictionary project. Not especially a website … the website is indeed un important part of the project. It’s not the whole by itself … author TomT0m / talk page 09:15, 5 October 2020 (UTC) Thank you. I meanwhile also found Wikidata:Project chat/Archive/2019/08#Modelling the wiktionary … which is apparently the starting point for this item. Also I think I get the point that you are making here, but I cannot see spontaneously where this creates problems, e.g. by weird P31/P279 inferences or so. What is meant to be improved here? Unfortunately, there is currently only one use of this item at Q151#Q151$76279b2a-48a0-c493-329d-60b885308f74 , and this is not yet helpful at all. Do you plan to finish this approach, or should we delete the item for now as it seems to be a stalled project? — MisterSynergy ( talk ) 09:28, 5 October 2020 (UTC) @ TomT0m : please provide an answer . Nomen ad hoc ( talk ) 13:56, 18 November 2020 (UTC) . Thank you. I meanwhile also found Wikidata:Project chat/Archive/2019/08#Modelling the wiktionary … which is apparently the starting point for this item. Also I think I get the point that you are making here, but I cannot see spontaneously where this creates problems, e.g. by weird P31/P279 inferences or so. What is meant to be improved here? Unfortunately, there is currently only one use of this item at Q151#Q151$76279b2a-48a0-c493-329d-60b885308f74 , and this is not yet helpful at all. Do you plan to finish this approach, or should we delete the item for now as it seems to be a stalled project? — MisterSynergy ( talk ) 09:28, 5 October 2020 (UTC) @ TomT0m : please provide an answer . Nomen ad hoc ( talk ) 13:56, 18 November 2020 (UTC) . Thank you. I meanwhile also found Wikidata:Project chat/Archive/2019/08#Modelling the wiktionary … which is apparently the starting point for this item. Also I think I get the point that you are making here, but I cannot see spontaneously where this creates problems, e.g. by weird P31/P279 inferences or so. What is meant to be improved here? Unfortunately, there is currently only one use of this item at Q151#Q151$76279b2a-48a0-c493-329d-60b885308f74 , and this is not yet helpful at all. Do you plan to finish this approach, or should we delete the item for now as it seems to be a stalled project? — MisterSynergy ( talk ) 09:28, 5 October 2020 (UTC) @ TomT0m : please provide an answer . Nomen ad hoc ( talk ) 13:56, 18 November 2020 (UTC) .