###Instruction: Multi-class classification, answer with one of the labels:['no_consensus', 'delete', 'keep', 'comment', 'merge', 'redirect'] : ###Input:  Q17595517: Equestrian statue of William III (Q17595517) : statue in Breda, Netherlands : ( delete | history | links | entity usage | logs ) This is not a statue of King William III of the Netherlands (19th century), but of King William III of England (17th century) who was also stadholder of Holland and several other provinces of the Netherlands. Q2183129 is the correct Wikidata item for this statue.
-- JopkeB ( talk ) 03:50, 6 November 2022 (UTC) @ Emu , The text of Rijksmonumentnummer 519013 says: "RUITERSTANDBEELD van koning-stadhouder Willem III (1650-1702) op sokkel uit 1921." In English: "Equestrian STATUE of King-Stadtholder Willem III (1650-1702) on a pedestal from 1921." King-Stadtholder Willem III (1650-1702) is the same as King William III of England , who is not the same as King William III of the Netherlands . So in my opinion this statue is for King William III of England, not for King William III of the Netherlands. What do you think it suggests? -- JopkeB ( talk ) 15:45, 6 November 2022 (UTC) @ JopkeB I suggest that there is a monument for “Koning Willem III”. Where on Equestrian statue of William III (Q17595517) does it say which William III is depicted on this statue and why would it matter anyway? But I guess this isn’t productive, so another question: Do you suggest that Equestrian statue of William III (Q17595517) and Equestrian statue of William III (Q2183129) refer to the same object? It seems so to me, but I’m not an expert on statues in the Netherlands, I just looked at the pictures and the coordinate location. If so, the two items should be merged, not one of them deleted. -- Emu ( talk ) 16:00, 6 November 2022 (UTC) @ Emu There are only several busts of “Koning Willem III” of the Netherlands (none of them has a Commons category, nor a Wikipedia article), I cannot find any statue or other grand monument for him. He was not a popular person and I guess that is the reason he did not get one. Yes, both items refer to the same object, the photos are from the same statue and the adresses are the same, but their descriptions differ. The description of Equestrian statue of William III (Q17595517) is wrong. Equestrian statue of William III (Q2183129) is the correct one and has the correct links to Wikipedia and Commons, I would like to keep this one. In my opinion Equestrian statue of William III (Q17595517) is redundant and can be deleted. But I am not familiar with the proper action in such cases on Wikidata, so I leave it up to you to merge or delete. -- JopkeB ( talk ) 03:50, 7 November 2022 (UTC) @ JopkeB Okay, I see. We generally don’t delete duplicates so I merged the two items. Please check if the item is in order now! -- Emu ( talk ) 19:26, 7 November 2022 (UTC) Yes, thanks @ Emu , the item is in order now! JopkeB ( talk ) 04:25, 8 November 2022 (UTC) @ Emu , The text of Rijksmonumentnummer 519013 says: "RUITERSTANDBEELD van koning-stadhouder Willem III (1650-1702) op sokkel uit 1921." In English: "Equestrian STATUE of King-Stadtholder Willem III (1650-1702) on a pedestal from 1921." King-Stadtholder Willem III (1650-1702) is the same as King William III of England , who is not the same as King William III of the Netherlands . So in my opinion this statue is for King William III of England, not for King William III of the Netherlands. What do you think it suggests? -- JopkeB ( talk ) 15:45, 6 November 2022 (UTC) @ JopkeB I suggest that there is a monument for “Koning Willem III”. Where on Equestrian statue of William III (Q17595517) does it say which William III is depicted on this statue and why would it matter anyway? But I guess this isn’t productive, so another question: Do you suggest that Equestrian statue of William III (Q17595517) and Equestrian statue of William III (Q2183129) refer to the same object? It seems so to me, but I’m not an expert on statues in the Netherlands, I just looked at the pictures and the coordinate location. If so, the two items should be merged, not one of them deleted. -- Emu ( talk ) 16:00, 6 November 2022 (UTC) @ Emu There are only several busts of “Koning Willem III” of the Netherlands (none of them has a Commons category, nor a Wikipedia article), I cannot find any statue or other grand monument for him. He was not a popular person and I guess that is the reason he did not get one. Yes, both items refer to the same object, the photos are from the same statue and the adresses are the same, but their descriptions differ. The description of Equestrian statue of William III (Q17595517) is wrong. Equestrian statue of William III (Q2183129) is the correct one and has the correct links to Wikipedia and Commons, I would like to keep this one. In my opinion Equestrian statue of William III (Q17595517) is redundant and can be deleted. But I am not familiar with the proper action in such cases on Wikidata, so I leave it up to you to merge or delete. -- JopkeB ( talk ) 03:50, 7 November 2022 (UTC) @ JopkeB Okay, I see. We generally don’t delete duplicates so I merged the two items. Please check if the item is in order now! -- Emu ( talk ) 19:26, 7 November 2022 (UTC) Yes, thanks @ Emu , the item is in order now! JopkeB ( talk ) 04:25, 8 November 2022 (UTC) @ JopkeB I suggest that there is a monument for “Koning Willem III”. Where on Equestrian statue of William III (Q17595517) does it say which William III is depicted on this statue and why would it matter anyway? But I guess this isn’t productive, so another question: Do you suggest that Equestrian statue of William III (Q17595517) and Equestrian statue of William III (Q2183129) refer to the same object? It seems so to me, but I’m not an expert on statues in the Netherlands, I just looked at the pictures and the coordinate location. If so, the two items should be merged, not one of them deleted. -- Emu ( talk ) 16:00, 6 November 2022 (UTC) @ Emu There are only several busts of “Koning Willem III” of the Netherlands (none of them has a Commons category, nor a Wikipedia article), I cannot find any statue or other grand monument for him. He was not a popular person and I guess that is the reason he did not get one. Yes, both items refer to the same object, the photos are from the same statue and the adresses are the same, but their descriptions differ. The description of Equestrian statue of William III (Q17595517) is wrong. Equestrian statue of William III (Q2183129) is the correct one and has the correct links to Wikipedia and Commons, I would like to keep this one. In my opinion Equestrian statue of William III (Q17595517) is redundant and can be deleted. But I am not familiar with the proper action in such cases on Wikidata, so I leave it up to you to merge or delete. -- JopkeB ( talk ) 03:50, 7 November 2022 (UTC) @ JopkeB Okay, I see. We generally don’t delete duplicates so I merged the two items. Please check if the item is in order now! -- Emu ( talk ) 19:26, 7 November 2022 (UTC) Yes, thanks @ Emu , the item is in order now! JopkeB ( talk ) 04:25, 8 November 2022 (UTC) @ Emu There are only several busts of “Koning Willem III” of the Netherlands (none of them has a Commons category, nor a Wikipedia article), I cannot find any statue or other grand monument for him. He was not a popular person and I guess that is the reason he did not get one. Yes, both items refer to the same object, the photos are from the same statue and the adresses are the same, but their descriptions differ. The description of Equestrian statue of William III (Q17595517) is wrong. Equestrian statue of William III (Q2183129) is the correct one and has the correct links to Wikipedia and Commons, I would like to keep this one. In my opinion Equestrian statue of William III (Q17595517) is redundant and can be deleted. But I am not familiar with the proper action in such cases on Wikidata, so I leave it up to you to merge or delete. -- JopkeB ( talk ) 03:50, 7 November 2022 (UTC) @ JopkeB Okay, I see. We generally don’t delete duplicates so I merged the two items. Please check if the item is in order now! -- Emu ( talk ) 19:26, 7 November 2022 (UTC) Yes, thanks @ Emu , the item is in order now! JopkeB ( talk ) 04:25, 8 November 2022 (UTC) @ JopkeB Okay, I see. We generally don’t delete duplicates so I merged the two items. Please check if the item is in order now! -- Emu ( talk ) 19:26, 7 November 2022 (UTC) Yes, thanks @ Emu , the item is in order now! JopkeB ( talk ) 04:25, 8 November 2022 (UTC) Yes, thanks @ Emu , the item is in order now! JopkeB ( talk ) 04:25, 8 November 2022 (UTC) @ Emu , The text of Rijksmonumentnummer 519013 says: "RUITERSTANDBEELD van koning-stadhouder Willem III (1650-1702) op sokkel uit 1921." In English: "Equestrian STATUE of King-Stadtholder Willem III (1650-1702) on a pedestal from 1921." King-Stadtholder Willem III (1650-1702) is the same as King William III of England , who is not the same as King William III of the Netherlands . So in my opinion this statue is for King William III of England, not for King William III of the Netherlands. What do you think it suggests? -- JopkeB ( talk ) 15:45, 6 November 2022 (UTC) @ JopkeB I suggest that there is a monument for “Koning Willem III”. Where on Equestrian statue of William III (Q17595517) does it say which William III is depicted on this statue and why would it matter anyway? But I guess this isn’t productive, so another question: Do you suggest that Equestrian statue of William III (Q17595517) and Equestrian statue of William III (Q2183129) refer to the same object? It seems so to me, but I’m not an expert on statues in the Netherlands, I just looked at the pictures and the coordinate location. If so, the two items should be merged, not one of them deleted. -- Emu ( talk ) 16:00, 6 November 2022 (UTC) @ Emu There are only several busts of “Koning Willem III” of the Netherlands (none of them has a Commons category, nor a Wikipedia article), I cannot find any statue or other grand monument for him. He was not a popular person and I guess that is the reason he did not get one. Yes, both items refer to the same object, the photos are from the same statue and the adresses are the same, but their descriptions differ. The description of Equestrian statue of William III (Q17595517) is wrong. Equestrian statue of William III (Q2183129) is the correct one and has the correct links to Wikipedia and Commons, I would like to keep this one. In my opinion Equestrian statue of William III (Q17595517) is redundant and can be deleted. But I am not familiar with the proper action in such cases on Wikidata, so I leave it up to you to merge or delete. -- JopkeB ( talk ) 03:50, 7 November 2022 (UTC) @ JopkeB Okay, I see. We generally don’t delete duplicates so I merged the two items. Please check if the item is in order now! -- Emu ( talk ) 19:26, 7 November 2022 (UTC) Yes, thanks @ Emu , the item is in order now! JopkeB ( talk ) 04:25, 8 November 2022 (UTC) @ JopkeB I suggest that there is a monument for “Koning Willem III”. Where on Equestrian statue of William III (Q17595517) does it say which William III is depicted on this statue and why would it matter anyway? But I guess this isn’t productive, so another question: Do you suggest that Equestrian statue of William III (Q17595517) and Equestrian statue of William III (Q2183129) refer to the same object? It seems so to me, but I’m not an expert on statues in the Netherlands, I just looked at the pictures and the coordinate location. If so, the two items should be merged, not one of them deleted. -- Emu ( talk ) 16:00, 6 November 2022 (UTC) @ Emu There are only several busts of “Koning Willem III” of the Netherlands (none of them has a Commons category, nor a Wikipedia article), I cannot find any statue or other grand monument for him. He was not a popular person and I guess that is the reason he did not get one. Yes, both items refer to the same object, the photos are from the same statue and the adresses are the same, but their descriptions differ. The description of Equestrian statue of William III (Q17595517) is wrong. Equestrian statue of William III (Q2183129) is the correct one and has the correct links to Wikipedia and Commons, I would like to keep this one. In my opinion Equestrian statue of William III (Q17595517) is redundant and can be deleted. But I am not familiar with the proper action in such cases on Wikidata, so I leave it up to you to merge or delete. -- JopkeB ( talk ) 03:50, 7 November 2022 (UTC) @ JopkeB Okay, I see. We generally don’t delete duplicates so I merged the two items. Please check if the item is in order now! -- Emu ( talk ) 19:26, 7 November 2022 (UTC) Yes, thanks @ Emu , the item is in order now! JopkeB ( talk ) 04:25, 8 November 2022 (UTC) @ Emu There are only several busts of “Koning Willem III” of the Netherlands (none of them has a Commons category, nor a Wikipedia article), I cannot find any statue or other grand monument for him. He was not a popular person and I guess that is the reason he did not get one. Yes, both items refer to the same object, the photos are from the same statue and the adresses are the same, but their descriptions differ. The description of Equestrian statue of William III (Q17595517) is wrong. Equestrian statue of William III (Q2183129) is the correct one and has the correct links to Wikipedia and Commons, I would like to keep this one. In my opinion Equestrian statue of William III (Q17595517) is redundant and can be deleted. But I am not familiar with the proper action in such cases on Wikidata, so I leave it up to you to merge or delete. -- JopkeB ( talk ) 03:50, 7 November 2022 (UTC) @ JopkeB Okay, I see. We generally don’t delete duplicates so I merged the two items. Please check if the item is in order now! -- Emu ( talk ) 19:26, 7 November 2022 (UTC) Yes, thanks @ Emu , the item is in order now! JopkeB ( talk ) 04:25, 8 November 2022 (UTC) @ JopkeB Okay, I see. We generally don’t delete duplicates so I merged the two items. Please check if the item is in order now! -- Emu ( talk ) 19:26, 7 November 2022 (UTC) Yes, thanks @ Emu , the item is in order now! JopkeB ( talk ) 04:25, 8 November 2022 (UTC) @ JopkeB I suggest that there is a monument for “Koning Willem III”. Where on Equestrian statue of William III (Q17595517) does it say which William III is depicted on this statue and why would it matter anyway? But I guess this isn’t productive, so another question: Do you suggest that Equestrian statue of William III (Q17595517) and Equestrian statue of William III (Q2183129) refer to the same object? It seems so to me, but I’m not an expert on statues in the Netherlands, I just looked at the pictures and the coordinate location. If so, the two items should be merged, not one of them deleted. -- Emu ( talk ) 16:00, 6 November 2022 (UTC) @ Emu There are only several busts of “Koning Willem III” of the Netherlands (none of them has a Commons category, nor a Wikipedia article), I cannot find any statue or other grand monument for him. He was not a popular person and I guess that is the reason he did not get one. Yes, both items refer to the same object, the photos are from the same statue and the adresses are the same, but their descriptions differ. The description of Equestrian statue of William III (Q17595517) is wrong. Equestrian statue of William III (Q2183129) is the correct one and has the correct links to Wikipedia and Commons, I would like to keep this one. In my opinion Equestrian statue of William III (Q17595517) is redundant and can be deleted. But I am not familiar with the proper action in such cases on Wikidata, so I leave it up to you to merge or delete. -- JopkeB ( talk ) 03:50, 7 November 2022 (UTC) @ JopkeB Okay, I see. We generally don’t delete duplicates so I merged the two items. Please check if the item is in order now! -- Emu ( talk ) 19:26, 7 November 2022 (UTC) Yes, thanks @ Emu , the item is in order now! JopkeB ( talk ) 04:25, 8 November 2022 (UTC) @ Emu There are only several busts of “Koning Willem III” of the Netherlands (none of them has a Commons category, nor a Wikipedia article), I cannot find any statue or other grand monument for him. He was not a popular person and I guess that is the reason he did not get one. Yes, both items refer to the same object, the photos are from the same statue and the adresses are the same, but their descriptions differ. The description of Equestrian statue of William III (Q17595517) is wrong. Equestrian statue of William III (Q2183129) is the correct one and has the correct links to Wikipedia and Commons, I would like to keep this one. In my opinion Equestrian statue of William III (Q17595517) is redundant and can be deleted. But I am not familiar with the proper action in such cases on Wikidata, so I leave it up to you to merge or delete. -- JopkeB ( talk ) 03:50, 7 November 2022 (UTC) @ JopkeB Okay, I see. We generally don’t delete duplicates so I merged the two items. Please check if the item is in order now! -- Emu ( talk ) 19:26, 7 November 2022 (UTC) Yes, thanks @ Emu , the item is in order now! JopkeB ( talk ) 04:25, 8 November 2022 (UTC) @ JopkeB Okay, I see. We generally don’t delete duplicates so I merged the two items. Please check if the item is in order now! -- Emu ( talk ) 19:26, 7 November 2022 (UTC) Yes, thanks @ Emu , the item is in order now! JopkeB ( talk ) 04:25, 8 November 2022 (UTC) @ Emu There are only several busts of “Koning Willem III” of the Netherlands (none of them has a Commons category, nor a Wikipedia article), I cannot find any statue or other grand monument for him. He was not a popular person and I guess that is the reason he did not get one. Yes, both items refer to the same object, the photos are from the same statue and the adresses are the same, but their descriptions differ. The description of Equestrian statue of William III (Q17595517) is wrong. Equestrian statue of William III (Q2183129) is the correct one and has the correct links to Wikipedia and Commons, I would like to keep this one. In my opinion Equestrian statue of William III (Q17595517) is redundant and can be deleted. But I am not familiar with the proper action in such cases on Wikidata, so I leave it up to you to merge or delete. -- JopkeB ( talk ) 03:50, 7 November 2022 (UTC) @ JopkeB Okay, I see. We generally don’t delete duplicates so I merged the two items. Please check if the item is in order now! -- Emu ( talk ) 19:26, 7 November 2022 (UTC) Yes, thanks @ Emu , the item is in order now! JopkeB ( talk ) 04:25, 8 November 2022 (UTC) @ JopkeB Okay, I see. We generally don’t delete duplicates so I merged the two items. Please check if the item is in order now! -- Emu ( talk ) 19:26, 7 November 2022 (UTC) Yes, thanks @ Emu , the item is in order now! JopkeB ( talk ) 04:25, 8 November 2022 (UTC) @ JopkeB Okay, I see. We generally don’t delete duplicates so I merged the two items. Please check if the item is in order now! -- Emu ( talk ) 19:26, 7 November 2022 (UTC) Yes, thanks @ Emu , the item is in order now! JopkeB ( talk ) 04:25, 8 November 2022 (UTC)