###Instruction: Multi-class classification, answer with one of the labels:['no_consensus', 'delete', 'keep', 'comment', 'merge', 'redirect'] : ###Input:  Q125125596: Q125125596 : no description : ( delete | history | links | entity usage | logs ) This entry has already been removed. The individual appears to be attempting self-promotion, and their primary account on Arabic Wikipedia has been banned. They seem to be trying to create additional accounts to circumvent this ban and promote the entry. — Osama Eid ( talk ) 23:36, 9 April 2024 (UTC) This is Wikidata, not Wikipedia, the item was created for data collection about this person, not for self-promotion, as Mr. Osama Eid suggested, and I'll use the same, and we'll use the same argument he made when he was trying to prove other person's notability on Arabic Wikipedia: 1- GND (P227): https://d-nb.info/gnd/1262564190 2- LCNAF (P244): https://id.loc.gov/authorities/no2022130005 Those are Wikidata properties for an identifier that suggests notability, alongside other respectful and can't be self-created such as VIAF (P214), ISNI (P213), NLA (P409), NTA (P1006), IdRef (P269), ULAN (P245), NLA Trove (P1315), if all those libraries trusted who is he, and Mr. Osama thinks that he is trying to promote himself, then something is wrong. By the way, I added the item not him and he has nothing to do with it. ~~ Mohammed Al-Sanaani ( talk ) 05:58, 10 April 2024 (UTC) This particular item has been removed multiple times in the past. Its previous owner, who used to be an administrator on Arabic Wikipedia, was banned for misusing Wikidata and Wikipedia to promote individuals who did not meet the required standards in return for financial gain and recognition. Interestingly, you hail from the same country as him and are connected with him on Facebook! — Osama Eid ( talk ) 19:51, 10 April 2024 (UTC) It seems like Mr. Osama fully misunderstands the meaning of (Wikidata properties for an identifier that suggests notability) if an item was deleted for not meeting the notability in the past (which is not true because it did) or for other mysterious reasons!, that doesn't mean it shouldn't be created if it does gain the notability as the Identifiers says! Again, this is Wikidata, you shouldn't use those incorrect claims about (financial gain and recognition) and other strange reasons everywhere you can to fulfill your desires to punish him, could you make room for admins to check the identifiers of the Item, or even his website which contains more IDs and accomplishments, to make their final decisions? and me being from the same country as him or even know him as a public figure and has a big followers base on social media, doesn't prevent me from adding Item as I know, otherwise you, yourself, should stop adding Wikipedia pages about people you know and work for Wikipedia, right? this is gone so far by you, and I'll stop here and let the decisions to the admins. Mohammed Al-Sanaani ( talk ) 22:31, 10 April 2024 (UTC) Your intentions are clear! When I requested the deletion of his previous item and it became evident that he was misusing Wikidata for fame and profit, he offered the same justification with the same tone and arguments. Wikidata is not a platform for seeking attention or recognition; it has strict policies that must be followed. — Osama Eid ( talk ) 21:49, 11 April 2024 (UTC) This particular item has been removed multiple times in the past. Its previous owner, who used to be an administrator on Arabic Wikipedia, was banned for misusing Wikidata and Wikipedia to promote individuals who did not meet the required standards in return for financial gain and recognition. Interestingly, you hail from the same country as him and are connected with him on Facebook! — Osama Eid ( talk ) 19:51, 10 April 2024 (UTC) It seems like Mr. Osama fully misunderstands the meaning of (Wikidata properties for an identifier that suggests notability) if an item was deleted for not meeting the notability in the past (which is not true because it did) or for other mysterious reasons!, that doesn't mean it shouldn't be created if it does gain the notability as the Identifiers says! Again, this is Wikidata, you shouldn't use those incorrect claims about (financial gain and recognition) and other strange reasons everywhere you can to fulfill your desires to punish him, could you make room for admins to check the identifiers of the Item, or even his website which contains more IDs and accomplishments, to make their final decisions? and me being from the same country as him or even know him as a public figure and has a big followers base on social media, doesn't prevent me from adding Item as I know, otherwise you, yourself, should stop adding Wikipedia pages about people you know and work for Wikipedia, right? this is gone so far by you, and I'll stop here and let the decisions to the admins. Mohammed Al-Sanaani ( talk ) 22:31, 10 April 2024 (UTC) Your intentions are clear! When I requested the deletion of his previous item and it became evident that he was misusing Wikidata for fame and profit, he offered the same justification with the same tone and arguments. Wikidata is not a platform for seeking attention or recognition; it has strict policies that must be followed. — Osama Eid ( talk ) 21:49, 11 April 2024 (UTC) It seems like Mr. Osama fully misunderstands the meaning of (Wikidata properties for an identifier that suggests notability) if an item was deleted for not meeting the notability in the past (which is not true because it did) or for other mysterious reasons!, that doesn't mean it shouldn't be created if it does gain the notability as the Identifiers says! Again, this is Wikidata, you shouldn't use those incorrect claims about (financial gain and recognition) and other strange reasons everywhere you can to fulfill your desires to punish him, could you make room for admins to check the identifiers of the Item, or even his website which contains more IDs and accomplishments, to make their final decisions? and me being from the same country as him or even know him as a public figure and has a big followers base on social media, doesn't prevent me from adding Item as I know, otherwise you, yourself, should stop adding Wikipedia pages about people you know and work for Wikipedia, right? this is gone so far by you, and I'll stop here and let the decisions to the admins. Mohammed Al-Sanaani ( talk ) 22:31, 10 April 2024 (UTC) Your intentions are clear! When I requested the deletion of his previous item and it became evident that he was misusing Wikidata for fame and profit, he offered the same justification with the same tone and arguments. Wikidata is not a platform for seeking attention or recognition; it has strict policies that must be followed. — Osama Eid ( talk ) 21:49, 11 April 2024 (UTC) Your intentions are clear! When I requested the deletion of his previous item and it became evident that he was misusing Wikidata for fame and profit, he offered the same justification with the same tone and arguments. Wikidata is not a platform for seeking attention or recognition; it has strict policies that must be followed. — Osama Eid ( talk ) 21:49, 11 April 2024 (UTC) Deleted as recreation of Q116216369 .  Creator indeffed for block evasion. Bovlb ( talk ) 22:03, 7 May 2024 (UTC) This particular item has been removed multiple times in the past. Its previous owner, who used to be an administrator on Arabic Wikipedia, was banned for misusing Wikidata and Wikipedia to promote individuals who did not meet the required standards in return for financial gain and recognition. Interestingly, you hail from the same country as him and are connected with him on Facebook! — Osama Eid ( talk ) 19:51, 10 April 2024 (UTC) It seems like Mr. Osama fully misunderstands the meaning of (Wikidata properties for an identifier that suggests notability) if an item was deleted for not meeting the notability in the past (which is not true because it did) or for other mysterious reasons!, that doesn't mean it shouldn't be created if it does gain the notability as the Identifiers says! Again, this is Wikidata, you shouldn't use those incorrect claims about (financial gain and recognition) and other strange reasons everywhere you can to fulfill your desires to punish him, could you make room for admins to check the identifiers of the Item, or even his website which contains more IDs and accomplishments, to make their final decisions? and me being from the same country as him or even know him as a public figure and has a big followers base on social media, doesn't prevent me from adding Item as I know, otherwise you, yourself, should stop adding Wikipedia pages about people you know and work for Wikipedia, right? this is gone so far by you, and I'll stop here and let the decisions to the admins. Mohammed Al-Sanaani ( talk ) 22:31, 10 April 2024 (UTC) Your intentions are clear! When I requested the deletion of his previous item and it became evident that he was misusing Wikidata for fame and profit, he offered the same justification with the same tone and arguments. Wikidata is not a platform for seeking attention or recognition; it has strict policies that must be followed. — Osama Eid ( talk ) 21:49, 11 April 2024 (UTC) It seems like Mr. Osama fully misunderstands the meaning of (Wikidata properties for an identifier that suggests notability) if an item was deleted for not meeting the notability in the past (which is not true because it did) or for other mysterious reasons!, that doesn't mean it shouldn't be created if it does gain the notability as the Identifiers says! Again, this is Wikidata, you shouldn't use those incorrect claims about (financial gain and recognition) and other strange reasons everywhere you can to fulfill your desires to punish him, could you make room for admins to check the identifiers of the Item, or even his website which contains more IDs and accomplishments, to make their final decisions? and me being from the same country as him or even know him as a public figure and has a big followers base on social media, doesn't prevent me from adding Item as I know, otherwise you, yourself, should stop adding Wikipedia pages about people you know and work for Wikipedia, right? this is gone so far by you, and I'll stop here and let the decisions to the admins. Mohammed Al-Sanaani ( talk ) 22:31, 10 April 2024 (UTC) Your intentions are clear! When I requested the deletion of his previous item and it became evident that he was misusing Wikidata for fame and profit, he offered the same justification with the same tone and arguments. Wikidata is not a platform for seeking attention or recognition; it has strict policies that must be followed. — Osama Eid ( talk ) 21:49, 11 April 2024 (UTC) It seems like Mr. Osama fully misunderstands the meaning of (Wikidata properties for an identifier that suggests notability) if an item was deleted for not meeting the notability in the past (which is not true because it did) or for other mysterious reasons!, that doesn't mean it shouldn't be created if it does gain the notability as the Identifiers says! Again, this is Wikidata, you shouldn't use those incorrect claims about (financial gain and recognition) and other strange reasons everywhere you can to fulfill your desires to punish him, could you make room for admins to check the identifiers of the Item, or even his website which contains more IDs and accomplishments, to make their final decisions? and me being from the same country as him or even know him as a public figure and has a big followers base on social media, doesn't prevent me from adding Item as I know, otherwise you, yourself, should stop adding Wikipedia pages about people you know and work for Wikipedia, right? this is gone so far by you, and I'll stop here and let the decisions to the admins. Mohammed Al-Sanaani ( talk ) 22:31, 10 April 2024 (UTC) Your intentions are clear! When I requested the deletion of his previous item and it became evident that he was misusing Wikidata for fame and profit, he offered the same justification with the same tone and arguments. Wikidata is not a platform for seeking attention or recognition; it has strict policies that must be followed. — Osama Eid ( talk ) 21:49, 11 April 2024 (UTC)