###Instruction: Multi-class classification, answer with one of the labels:['no_consensus', 'delete', 'keep', 'comment', 'merge', 'redirect'] : ###Input:  Q40429461: Q40429461 : no description : ( delete | history | links | entity usage | logs ) There is no such subspecies, as evidence you can check the identifiers available in the parent taxon Actumnus squamosus (Q13228468) . This likely comes from a typo error in a museum database ("De" being here the begining of the author citation: Actumnus squamosus (De Haan, 1835)), and then an entry have been wrongly created here by a bot.
-- Christian Ferrer ( talk ) 19:11, 16 August 2020 (UTC) I just one with another same issue Q40529773 (also nominated for deletion) Christian Ferrer ( talk ) 15:22, 23 August 2020 (UTC)