###Instruction: Multi-class classification, answer with one of the labels:['no_consensus', 'delete', 'keep', 'comment', 'merge', 'redirect'] : ###Input:  Q3926647: Q3926647 : no description : ( delete | history | links | entity usage | logs ) merged with Q415000 — PinkAmpers & ( Je vous invite à me parler ) 07:11, 1 February 2013 (UTC) Pugo, Quail and Quaglia are really the same thing? -- Stryn ( talk ) 07:13, 1 February 2013 (UTC) In the sense that all three are disambiguation pages that include links to articles on species of quail, yes. As with all disambiguation pages, there are of course differences (e.g. the English page doesn't take into account people with the last name "Quaglia", for obvious reasons), but the bird species are the unifying trend. If there are any interwiki conflicts due to the other things the pages may contain, we can handle them as they come up. — PinkAmpers & ( Je vous invite à me parler ) 07:18, 1 February 2013 (UTC) Actually we do have something of a problem in en:Quaglia ... should I take this to Wikidata:Interwiki conflicts ? — PinkAmpers & ( Je vous invite à me parler ) 07:20, 1 February 2013 (UTC) Mmh... yeah, I restored it. Better to check if we can do something else for this than just delete. Well, here is also Q1364662 . -- Stryn ( talk ) 07:26, 1 February 2013 (UTC) Hmm. Well, in the spirit of starting with the easiest parts, we can definitely merge Q1364662 and Q3926647 , right? The de-wiki and en-wiki pages are both solely about "Quaglia" as a proper noun, so it seems appropriate that they be the same item. The more difficult question is where the Italian article, which considers both the proper noun and the species of bird, should be put. — PinkAmpers & ( Je vous invite à me parler ) 07:31, 1 February 2013 (UTC) Yes, this is Done now (duplicate of Q1364662 ). We can continue this discussion maybe on the interwiki conflict page. Btw I found also co:Quaglia . -- Stryn ( talk ) 07:36, 1 February 2013 (UTC) Thanks. :) I added the Corsican one to Q415000 (for now, at least), since it didn't mention anything about Quaglia as a common name. I'll go bring it up at WD:IC . — PinkAmpers & ( Je vous invite à me parler ) 07:38, 1 February 2013 (UTC) In the sense that all three are disambiguation pages that include links to articles on species of quail, yes. As with all disambiguation pages, there are of course differences (e.g. the English page doesn't take into account people with the last name "Quaglia", for obvious reasons), but the bird species are the unifying trend. If there are any interwiki conflicts due to the other things the pages may contain, we can handle them as they come up. — PinkAmpers & ( Je vous invite à me parler ) 07:18, 1 February 2013 (UTC) Actually we do have something of a problem in en:Quaglia ... should I take this to Wikidata:Interwiki conflicts ? — PinkAmpers & ( Je vous invite à me parler ) 07:20, 1 February 2013 (UTC) Mmh... yeah, I restored it. Better to check if we can do something else for this than just delete. Well, here is also Q1364662 . -- Stryn ( talk ) 07:26, 1 February 2013 (UTC) Hmm. Well, in the spirit of starting with the easiest parts, we can definitely merge Q1364662 and Q3926647 , right? The de-wiki and en-wiki pages are both solely about "Quaglia" as a proper noun, so it seems appropriate that they be the same item. The more difficult question is where the Italian article, which considers both the proper noun and the species of bird, should be put. — PinkAmpers & ( Je vous invite à me parler ) 07:31, 1 February 2013 (UTC) Yes, this is Done now (duplicate of Q1364662 ). We can continue this discussion maybe on the interwiki conflict page. Btw I found also co:Quaglia . -- Stryn ( talk ) 07:36, 1 February 2013 (UTC) Thanks. :) I added the Corsican one to Q415000 (for now, at least), since it didn't mention anything about Quaglia as a common name. I'll go bring it up at WD:IC . — PinkAmpers & ( Je vous invite à me parler ) 07:38, 1 February 2013 (UTC) Actually we do have something of a problem in en:Quaglia ... should I take this to Wikidata:Interwiki conflicts ? — PinkAmpers & ( Je vous invite à me parler ) 07:20, 1 February 2013 (UTC) Mmh... yeah, I restored it. Better to check if we can do something else for this than just delete. Well, here is also Q1364662 . -- Stryn ( talk ) 07:26, 1 February 2013 (UTC) Hmm. Well, in the spirit of starting with the easiest parts, we can definitely merge Q1364662 and Q3926647 , right? The de-wiki and en-wiki pages are both solely about "Quaglia" as a proper noun, so it seems appropriate that they be the same item. The more difficult question is where the Italian article, which considers both the proper noun and the species of bird, should be put. — PinkAmpers & ( Je vous invite à me parler ) 07:31, 1 February 2013 (UTC) Yes, this is Done now (duplicate of Q1364662 ). We can continue this discussion maybe on the interwiki conflict page. Btw I found also co:Quaglia . -- Stryn ( talk ) 07:36, 1 February 2013 (UTC) Thanks. :) I added the Corsican one to Q415000 (for now, at least), since it didn't mention anything about Quaglia as a common name. I'll go bring it up at WD:IC . — PinkAmpers & ( Je vous invite à me parler ) 07:38, 1 February 2013 (UTC) Mmh... yeah, I restored it. Better to check if we can do something else for this than just delete. Well, here is also Q1364662 . -- Stryn ( talk ) 07:26, 1 February 2013 (UTC) Hmm. Well, in the spirit of starting with the easiest parts, we can definitely merge Q1364662 and Q3926647 , right? The de-wiki and en-wiki pages are both solely about "Quaglia" as a proper noun, so it seems appropriate that they be the same item. The more difficult question is where the Italian article, which considers both the proper noun and the species of bird, should be put. — PinkAmpers & ( Je vous invite à me parler ) 07:31, 1 February 2013 (UTC) Yes, this is Done now (duplicate of Q1364662 ). We can continue this discussion maybe on the interwiki conflict page. Btw I found also co:Quaglia . -- Stryn ( talk ) 07:36, 1 February 2013 (UTC) Thanks. :) I added the Corsican one to Q415000 (for now, at least), since it didn't mention anything about Quaglia as a common name. I'll go bring it up at WD:IC . — PinkAmpers & ( Je vous invite à me parler ) 07:38, 1 February 2013 (UTC) Hmm. Well, in the spirit of starting with the easiest parts, we can definitely merge Q1364662 and Q3926647 , right? The de-wiki and en-wiki pages are both solely about "Quaglia" as a proper noun, so it seems appropriate that they be the same item. The more difficult question is where the Italian article, which considers both the proper noun and the species of bird, should be put. — PinkAmpers & ( Je vous invite à me parler ) 07:31, 1 February 2013 (UTC) Yes, this is Done now (duplicate of Q1364662 ). We can continue this discussion maybe on the interwiki conflict page. Btw I found also co:Quaglia . -- Stryn ( talk ) 07:36, 1 February 2013 (UTC) Thanks. :) I added the Corsican one to Q415000 (for now, at least), since it didn't mention anything about Quaglia as a common name. I'll go bring it up at WD:IC . — PinkAmpers & ( Je vous invite à me parler ) 07:38, 1 February 2013 (UTC) Yes, this is Done now (duplicate of Q1364662 ). We can continue this discussion maybe on the interwiki conflict page. Btw I found also co:Quaglia . -- Stryn ( talk ) 07:36, 1 February 2013 (UTC) Thanks. :) I added the Corsican one to Q415000 (for now, at least), since it didn't mention anything about Quaglia as a common name. I'll go bring it up at WD:IC . — PinkAmpers & ( Je vous invite à me parler ) 07:38, 1 February 2013 (UTC) In the sense that all three are disambiguation pages that include links to articles on species of quail, yes. As with all disambiguation pages, there are of course differences (e.g. the English page doesn't take into account people with the last name "Quaglia", for obvious reasons), but the bird species are the unifying trend. If there are any interwiki conflicts due to the other things the pages may contain, we can handle them as they come up. — PinkAmpers & ( Je vous invite à me parler ) 07:18, 1 February 2013 (UTC) Actually we do have something of a problem in en:Quaglia ... should I take this to Wikidata:Interwiki conflicts ? — PinkAmpers & ( Je vous invite à me parler ) 07:20, 1 February 2013 (UTC) Mmh... yeah, I restored it. Better to check if we can do something else for this than just delete. Well, here is also Q1364662 . -- Stryn ( talk ) 07:26, 1 February 2013 (UTC) Hmm. Well, in the spirit of starting with the easiest parts, we can definitely merge Q1364662 and Q3926647 , right? The de-wiki and en-wiki pages are both solely about "Quaglia" as a proper noun, so it seems appropriate that they be the same item. The more difficult question is where the Italian article, which considers both the proper noun and the species of bird, should be put. — PinkAmpers & ( Je vous invite à me parler ) 07:31, 1 February 2013 (UTC) Yes, this is Done now (duplicate of Q1364662 ). We can continue this discussion maybe on the interwiki conflict page. Btw I found also co:Quaglia . -- Stryn ( talk ) 07:36, 1 February 2013 (UTC) Thanks. :) I added the Corsican one to Q415000 (for now, at least), since it didn't mention anything about Quaglia as a common name. I'll go bring it up at WD:IC . — PinkAmpers & ( Je vous invite à me parler ) 07:38, 1 February 2013 (UTC) Actually we do have something of a problem in en:Quaglia ... should I take this to Wikidata:Interwiki conflicts ? — PinkAmpers & ( Je vous invite à me parler ) 07:20, 1 February 2013 (UTC) Mmh... yeah, I restored it. Better to check if we can do something else for this than just delete. Well, here is also Q1364662 . -- Stryn ( talk ) 07:26, 1 February 2013 (UTC) Hmm. Well, in the spirit of starting with the easiest parts, we can definitely merge Q1364662 and Q3926647 , right? The de-wiki and en-wiki pages are both solely about "Quaglia" as a proper noun, so it seems appropriate that they be the same item. The more difficult question is where the Italian article, which considers both the proper noun and the species of bird, should be put. — PinkAmpers & ( Je vous invite à me parler ) 07:31, 1 February 2013 (UTC) Yes, this is Done now (duplicate of Q1364662 ). We can continue this discussion maybe on the interwiki conflict page. Btw I found also co:Quaglia . -- Stryn ( talk ) 07:36, 1 February 2013 (UTC) Thanks. :) I added the Corsican one to Q415000 (for now, at least), since it didn't mention anything about Quaglia as a common name. I'll go bring it up at WD:IC . — PinkAmpers & ( Je vous invite à me parler ) 07:38, 1 February 2013 (UTC) Mmh... yeah, I restored it. Better to check if we can do something else for this than just delete. Well, here is also Q1364662 . -- Stryn ( talk ) 07:26, 1 February 2013 (UTC) Hmm. Well, in the spirit of starting with the easiest parts, we can definitely merge Q1364662 and Q3926647 , right? The de-wiki and en-wiki pages are both solely about "Quaglia" as a proper noun, so it seems appropriate that they be the same item. The more difficult question is where the Italian article, which considers both the proper noun and the species of bird, should be put. — PinkAmpers & ( Je vous invite à me parler ) 07:31, 1 February 2013 (UTC) Yes, this is Done now (duplicate of Q1364662 ). We can continue this discussion maybe on the interwiki conflict page. Btw I found also co:Quaglia . -- Stryn ( talk ) 07:36, 1 February 2013 (UTC) Thanks. :) I added the Corsican one to Q415000 (for now, at least), since it didn't mention anything about Quaglia as a common name. I'll go bring it up at WD:IC . — PinkAmpers & ( Je vous invite à me parler ) 07:38, 1 February 2013 (UTC) Hmm. Well, in the spirit of starting with the easiest parts, we can definitely merge Q1364662 and Q3926647 , right? The de-wiki and en-wiki pages are both solely about "Quaglia" as a proper noun, so it seems appropriate that they be the same item. The more difficult question is where the Italian article, which considers both the proper noun and the species of bird, should be put. — PinkAmpers & ( Je vous invite à me parler ) 07:31, 1 February 2013 (UTC) Yes, this is Done now (duplicate of Q1364662 ). We can continue this discussion maybe on the interwiki conflict page. Btw I found also co:Quaglia . -- Stryn ( talk ) 07:36, 1 February 2013 (UTC) Thanks. :) I added the Corsican one to Q415000 (for now, at least), since it didn't mention anything about Quaglia as a common name. I'll go bring it up at WD:IC . — PinkAmpers & ( Je vous invite à me parler ) 07:38, 1 February 2013 (UTC) Yes, this is Done now (duplicate of Q1364662 ). We can continue this discussion maybe on the interwiki conflict page. Btw I found also co:Quaglia . -- Stryn ( talk ) 07:36, 1 February 2013 (UTC) Thanks. :) I added the Corsican one to Q415000 (for now, at least), since it didn't mention anything about Quaglia as a common name. I'll go bring it up at WD:IC . — PinkAmpers & ( Je vous invite à me parler ) 07:38, 1 February 2013 (UTC) Actually we do have something of a problem in en:Quaglia ... should I take this to Wikidata:Interwiki conflicts ? — PinkAmpers & ( Je vous invite à me parler ) 07:20, 1 February 2013 (UTC) Mmh... yeah, I restored it. Better to check if we can do something else for this than just delete. Well, here is also Q1364662 . -- Stryn ( talk ) 07:26, 1 February 2013 (UTC) Hmm. Well, in the spirit of starting with the easiest parts, we can definitely merge Q1364662 and Q3926647 , right? The de-wiki and en-wiki pages are both solely about "Quaglia" as a proper noun, so it seems appropriate that they be the same item. The more difficult question is where the Italian article, which considers both the proper noun and the species of bird, should be put. — PinkAmpers & ( Je vous invite à me parler ) 07:31, 1 February 2013 (UTC) Yes, this is Done now (duplicate of Q1364662 ). We can continue this discussion maybe on the interwiki conflict page. Btw I found also co:Quaglia . -- Stryn ( talk ) 07:36, 1 February 2013 (UTC) Thanks. :) I added the Corsican one to Q415000 (for now, at least), since it didn't mention anything about Quaglia as a common name. I'll go bring it up at WD:IC . — PinkAmpers & ( Je vous invite à me parler ) 07:38, 1 February 2013 (UTC) Mmh... yeah, I restored it. Better to check if we can do something else for this than just delete. Well, here is also Q1364662 . -- Stryn ( talk ) 07:26, 1 February 2013 (UTC) Hmm. Well, in the spirit of starting with the easiest parts, we can definitely merge Q1364662 and Q3926647 , right? The de-wiki and en-wiki pages are both solely about "Quaglia" as a proper noun, so it seems appropriate that they be the same item. The more difficult question is where the Italian article, which considers both the proper noun and the species of bird, should be put. — PinkAmpers & ( Je vous invite à me parler ) 07:31, 1 February 2013 (UTC) Yes, this is Done now (duplicate of Q1364662 ). We can continue this discussion maybe on the interwiki conflict page. Btw I found also co:Quaglia . -- Stryn ( talk ) 07:36, 1 February 2013 (UTC) Thanks. :) I added the Corsican one to Q415000 (for now, at least), since it didn't mention anything about Quaglia as a common name. I'll go bring it up at WD:IC . — PinkAmpers & ( Je vous invite à me parler ) 07:38, 1 February 2013 (UTC) Hmm. Well, in the spirit of starting with the easiest parts, we can definitely merge Q1364662 and Q3926647 , right? The de-wiki and en-wiki pages are both solely about "Quaglia" as a proper noun, so it seems appropriate that they be the same item. The more difficult question is where the Italian article, which considers both the proper noun and the species of bird, should be put. — PinkAmpers & ( Je vous invite à me parler ) 07:31, 1 February 2013 (UTC) Yes, this is Done now (duplicate of Q1364662 ). We can continue this discussion maybe on the interwiki conflict page. Btw I found also co:Quaglia . -- Stryn ( talk ) 07:36, 1 February 2013 (UTC) Thanks. :) I added the Corsican one to Q415000 (for now, at least), since it didn't mention anything about Quaglia as a common name. I'll go bring it up at WD:IC . — PinkAmpers & ( Je vous invite à me parler ) 07:38, 1 February 2013 (UTC) Yes, this is Done now (duplicate of Q1364662 ). We can continue this discussion maybe on the interwiki conflict page. Btw I found also co:Quaglia . -- Stryn ( talk ) 07:36, 1 February 2013 (UTC) Thanks. :) I added the Corsican one to Q415000 (for now, at least), since it didn't mention anything about Quaglia as a common name. I'll go bring it up at WD:IC . — PinkAmpers & ( Je vous invite à me parler ) 07:38, 1 February 2013 (UTC) Mmh... yeah, I restored it. Better to check if we can do something else for this than just delete. Well, here is also Q1364662 . -- Stryn ( talk ) 07:26, 1 February 2013 (UTC) Hmm. Well, in the spirit of starting with the easiest parts, we can definitely merge Q1364662 and Q3926647 , right? The de-wiki and en-wiki pages are both solely about "Quaglia" as a proper noun, so it seems appropriate that they be the same item. The more difficult question is where the Italian article, which considers both the proper noun and the species of bird, should be put. — PinkAmpers & ( Je vous invite à me parler ) 07:31, 1 February 2013 (UTC) Yes, this is Done now (duplicate of Q1364662 ). We can continue this discussion maybe on the interwiki conflict page. Btw I found also co:Quaglia . -- Stryn ( talk ) 07:36, 1 February 2013 (UTC) Thanks. :) I added the Corsican one to Q415000 (for now, at least), since it didn't mention anything about Quaglia as a common name. I'll go bring it up at WD:IC . — PinkAmpers & ( Je vous invite à me parler ) 07:38, 1 February 2013 (UTC) Hmm. Well, in the spirit of starting with the easiest parts, we can definitely merge Q1364662 and Q3926647 , right? The de-wiki and en-wiki pages are both solely about "Quaglia" as a proper noun, so it seems appropriate that they be the same item. The more difficult question is where the Italian article, which considers both the proper noun and the species of bird, should be put. — PinkAmpers & ( Je vous invite à me parler ) 07:31, 1 February 2013 (UTC) Yes, this is Done now (duplicate of Q1364662 ). We can continue this discussion maybe on the interwiki conflict page. Btw I found also co:Quaglia . -- Stryn ( talk ) 07:36, 1 February 2013 (UTC) Thanks. :) I added the Corsican one to Q415000 (for now, at least), since it didn't mention anything about Quaglia as a common name. I'll go bring it up at WD:IC . — PinkAmpers & ( Je vous invite à me parler ) 07:38, 1 February 2013 (UTC) Yes, this is Done now (duplicate of Q1364662 ). We can continue this discussion maybe on the interwiki conflict page. Btw I found also co:Quaglia . -- Stryn ( talk ) 07:36, 1 February 2013 (UTC) Thanks. :) I added the Corsican one to Q415000 (for now, at least), since it didn't mention anything about Quaglia as a common name. I'll go bring it up at WD:IC . — PinkAmpers & ( Je vous invite à me parler ) 07:38, 1 February 2013 (UTC) Hmm. Well, in the spirit of starting with the easiest parts, we can definitely merge Q1364662 and Q3926647 , right? The de-wiki and en-wiki pages are both solely about "Quaglia" as a proper noun, so it seems appropriate that they be the same item. The more difficult question is where the Italian article, which considers both the proper noun and the species of bird, should be put. — PinkAmpers & ( Je vous invite à me parler ) 07:31, 1 February 2013 (UTC) Yes, this is Done now (duplicate of Q1364662 ). We can continue this discussion maybe on the interwiki conflict page. Btw I found also co:Quaglia . -- Stryn ( talk ) 07:36, 1 February 2013 (UTC) Thanks. :) I added the Corsican one to Q415000 (for now, at least), since it didn't mention anything about Quaglia as a common name. I'll go bring it up at WD:IC . — PinkAmpers & ( Je vous invite à me parler ) 07:38, 1 February 2013 (UTC) Yes, this is Done now (duplicate of Q1364662 ). We can continue this discussion maybe on the interwiki conflict page. Btw I found also co:Quaglia . -- Stryn ( talk ) 07:36, 1 February 2013 (UTC) Thanks. :) I added the Corsican one to Q415000 (for now, at least), since it didn't mention anything about Quaglia as a common name. I'll go bring it up at WD:IC . — PinkAmpers & ( Je vous invite à me parler ) 07:38, 1 February 2013 (UTC) Yes, this is Done now (duplicate of Q1364662 ). We can continue this discussion maybe on the interwiki conflict page. Btw I found also co:Quaglia . -- Stryn ( talk ) 07:36, 1 February 2013 (UTC) Thanks. :) I added the Corsican one to Q415000 (for now, at least), since it didn't mention anything about Quaglia as a common name. I'll go bring it up at WD:IC . — PinkAmpers & ( Je vous invite à me parler ) 07:38, 1 February 2013 (UTC)