###Instruction: Multi-class classification, answer with one of the labels:['no_consensus', 'delete', 'keep', 'comment', 'merge', 'redirect'] : ###Input:  Q110446270: Jan Purkert (Q110446270) : Czech Wikimedian : ( delete | history | links | entity usage | logs ) Does not meet notability criteria Gymnicus ( talk ) 09:24, 25 January 2022 (UTC) On hold This item is linked from 1 other. -- DeltaBot ( talk ) 11:00, 25 January 2022 (UTC) The linking data object První český wikidatista-rezident: Institut umění – Divadelní ústav vykročil k otevřeným propojeným datům (Q110678796) was only created after I had already submitted the deletion proposal. I personally see it as questionable whether such a blog post is relevant. In addition, this is purely intended to make Jan Purkert relevant. -- Gymnicus ( talk ) 19:35, 25 January 2022 (UTC) Not done Linked from other items (so it fulfills structural needs; you wouldn't be able to describe the subject of První český wikidatista-rezident: Institut umění – Divadelní ústav vykročil k otevřeným propojeným datům (Q110678796) w/o this item). In addition to that, Jan Purkert is a "clearly identifiable conceptual or material entity" which "can be described using serious and publicly available references". There are no requirements that the references need to be non-trivial or independent. I'm convinced that blog posts published by a Wikimedia chapter are enough to satisfy the criteria applied to "serious and publicly available". -- Martin Urbanec ( talk ) 21:38, 28 January 2022 (UTC)