###Instruction: Multi-class classification, answer with one of the labels:['no_consensus', 'delete', 'keep', 'comment', 'merge', 'redirect'] : ###Input:  Q4272145: Q4272145 : no description : ( delete | history | links | entity usage | logs ) Old item that was previously linked to two articles. Both were deleted as non-notable so I think we can safely say this item is out of scope now. Hiàn ( talk ) 00:26, 2 October 2018 (UTC) On hold This item is linked from 1 other. -- DeltaBot ( talk ) 00:30, 2 October 2018 (UTC) @ Hiàn : I think this meets notability because of structural need for Q7073063 . -- Pasleim ( talk ) 17:19, 4 October 2018 (UTC) @ Pasleim : I suppose that's good enough of a reason for keeping the entry. I do plan on requesting deletion of the OS 0.3 article at en.wiki soon however. Hiàn ( talk ) 21:29, 4 October 2018 (UTC) @ Pasleim : I suppose that's good enough of a reason for keeping the entry. I do plan on requesting deletion of the OS 0.3 article at en.wiki soon however. Hiàn ( talk ) 21:29, 4 October 2018 (UTC)