###Instruction: Multi-class classification, answer with one of the labels:['no_consensus', 'delete', 'keep', 'comment', 'merge', 'redirect'] : ###Input:  Q3513207: Arabic Presentation Forms-A (Q3513207) : Unicode block (U+FB50-FDFF) : ( delete | history | links | entity usage | logs ) Was a duplicate of Q1232840 . Schnark ( talk ) 10:44, 13 March 2013 (UTC) {{ Done }} Jon Harald Søby ( talk ) 10:45, 13 March 2013 (UTC) Hmm... the French article is for "U+FB50 à U+FDCF", while the German article is for "U+FB50 bis U+FDFF". — PinkAmpers & ( Je vous invite à me parler ) 10:48, 13 March 2013 (UTC) Upon further review, I've found that Fr-WP subdivides the FB50-FDFF range into fr:Table des caractères Unicode/UFB50 and fr:Table des caractères Unicode/UFDF0 . For now, I've restored Q3513207, as I can't think of any solution other than having three separate items (one for FB50-FDFF, one for FB50-FBCF, and one for FDF0-FDFF). I welcome any better ideas. — PinkAmpers & ( Je vous invite à me parler ) 11:04, 13 March 2013 (UTC) (edit conflict) In fr.wikipedia this block is split into 3 parts, because it is contains some non-characters. There are several other articles that are split in one language or the other, I always linked in these cases the first parts together. -- Schnark ( talk ) 11:08, 13 March 2013 (UTC) If that's how you've been doing it and there are no objections, I'll re-delete it, but I'd like to here some other users' perspectives first on whether that's the best way to do it. — PinkAmpers & ( Je vous invite à me parler ) 11:09, 13 March 2013 (UTC) If there are objections, the other items are Q1389787 , Q994386 , and Q3513170 . -- Schnark ( talk ) 11:18, 13 March 2013 (UTC) {{ Tl }} 'ing JHS's {{ Done }} and placing this On hold so the bot doesn't archive it just yet. — PinkAmpers & ( Je vous invite à me parler ) 11:37, 13 March 2013 (UTC) Hmm... the French article is for "U+FB50 à U+FDCF", while the German article is for "U+FB50 bis U+FDFF". — PinkAmpers & ( Je vous invite à me parler ) 10:48, 13 March 2013 (UTC) Upon further review, I've found that Fr-WP subdivides the FB50-FDFF range into fr:Table des caractères Unicode/UFB50 and fr:Table des caractères Unicode/UFDF0 . For now, I've restored Q3513207, as I can't think of any solution other than having three separate items (one for FB50-FDFF, one for FB50-FBCF, and one for FDF0-FDFF). I welcome any better ideas. — PinkAmpers & ( Je vous invite à me parler ) 11:04, 13 March 2013 (UTC) (edit conflict) In fr.wikipedia this block is split into 3 parts, because it is contains some non-characters. There are several other articles that are split in one language or the other, I always linked in these cases the first parts together. -- Schnark ( talk ) 11:08, 13 March 2013 (UTC) If that's how you've been doing it and there are no objections, I'll re-delete it, but I'd like to here some other users' perspectives first on whether that's the best way to do it. — PinkAmpers & ( Je vous invite à me parler ) 11:09, 13 March 2013 (UTC) If there are objections, the other items are Q1389787 , Q994386 , and Q3513170 . -- Schnark ( talk ) 11:18, 13 March 2013 (UTC) {{ Tl }} 'ing JHS's {{ Done }} and placing this On hold so the bot doesn't archive it just yet. — PinkAmpers & ( Je vous invite à me parler ) 11:37, 13 March 2013 (UTC) Upon further review, I've found that Fr-WP subdivides the FB50-FDFF range into fr:Table des caractères Unicode/UFB50 and fr:Table des caractères Unicode/UFDF0 . For now, I've restored Q3513207, as I can't think of any solution other than having three separate items (one for FB50-FDFF, one for FB50-FBCF, and one for FDF0-FDFF). I welcome any better ideas. — PinkAmpers & ( Je vous invite à me parler ) 11:04, 13 March 2013 (UTC) (edit conflict) In fr.wikipedia this block is split into 3 parts, because it is contains some non-characters. There are several other articles that are split in one language or the other, I always linked in these cases the first parts together. -- Schnark ( talk ) 11:08, 13 March 2013 (UTC) If that's how you've been doing it and there are no objections, I'll re-delete it, but I'd like to here some other users' perspectives first on whether that's the best way to do it. — PinkAmpers & ( Je vous invite à me parler ) 11:09, 13 March 2013 (UTC) If there are objections, the other items are Q1389787 , Q994386 , and Q3513170 . -- Schnark ( talk ) 11:18, 13 March 2013 (UTC) {{ Tl }} 'ing JHS's {{ Done }} and placing this On hold so the bot doesn't archive it just yet. — PinkAmpers & ( Je vous invite à me parler ) 11:37, 13 March 2013 (UTC) If that's how you've been doing it and there are no objections, I'll re-delete it, but I'd like to here some other users' perspectives first on whether that's the best way to do it. — PinkAmpers & ( Je vous invite à me parler ) 11:09, 13 March 2013 (UTC) If there are objections, the other items are Q1389787 , Q994386 , and Q3513170 . -- Schnark ( talk ) 11:18, 13 March 2013 (UTC) {{ Tl }} 'ing JHS's {{ Done }} and placing this On hold so the bot doesn't archive it just yet. — PinkAmpers & ( Je vous invite à me parler ) 11:37, 13 March 2013 (UTC) If there are objections, the other items are Q1389787 , Q994386 , and Q3513170 . -- Schnark ( talk ) 11:18, 13 March 2013 (UTC) {{ Tl }} 'ing JHS's {{ Done }} and placing this On hold so the bot doesn't archive it just yet. — PinkAmpers & ( Je vous invite à me parler ) 11:37, 13 March 2013 (UTC) {{ Tl }} 'ing JHS's {{ Done }} and placing this On hold so the bot doesn't archive it just yet. — PinkAmpers & ( Je vous invite à me parler ) 11:37, 13 March 2013 (UTC) Merge as both items contain some useful links. Jakob Megaphone , Telescope 12:31, 31 March 2013 (UTC) Hmm... the French article is for "U+FB50 à U+FDCF", while the German article is for "U+FB50 bis U+FDFF". — PinkAmpers & ( Je vous invite à me parler ) 10:48, 13 March 2013 (UTC) Upon further review, I've found that Fr-WP subdivides the FB50-FDFF range into fr:Table des caractères Unicode/UFB50 and fr:Table des caractères Unicode/UFDF0 . For now, I've restored Q3513207, as I can't think of any solution other than having three separate items (one for FB50-FDFF, one for FB50-FBCF, and one for FDF0-FDFF). I welcome any better ideas. — PinkAmpers & ( Je vous invite à me parler ) 11:04, 13 March 2013 (UTC) (edit conflict) In fr.wikipedia this block is split into 3 parts, because it is contains some non-characters. There are several other articles that are split in one language or the other, I always linked in these cases the first parts together. -- Schnark ( talk ) 11:08, 13 March 2013 (UTC) If that's how you've been doing it and there are no objections, I'll re-delete it, but I'd like to here some other users' perspectives first on whether that's the best way to do it. — PinkAmpers & ( Je vous invite à me parler ) 11:09, 13 March 2013 (UTC) If there are objections, the other items are Q1389787 , Q994386 , and Q3513170 . -- Schnark ( talk ) 11:18, 13 March 2013 (UTC) {{ Tl }} 'ing JHS's {{ Done }} and placing this On hold so the bot doesn't archive it just yet. — PinkAmpers & ( Je vous invite à me parler ) 11:37, 13 March 2013 (UTC) Upon further review, I've found that Fr-WP subdivides the FB50-FDFF range into fr:Table des caractères Unicode/UFB50 and fr:Table des caractères Unicode/UFDF0 . For now, I've restored Q3513207, as I can't think of any solution other than having three separate items (one for FB50-FDFF, one for FB50-FBCF, and one for FDF0-FDFF). I welcome any better ideas. — PinkAmpers & ( Je vous invite à me parler ) 11:04, 13 March 2013 (UTC) (edit conflict) In fr.wikipedia this block is split into 3 parts, because it is contains some non-characters. There are several other articles that are split in one language or the other, I always linked in these cases the first parts together. -- Schnark ( talk ) 11:08, 13 March 2013 (UTC) If that's how you've been doing it and there are no objections, I'll re-delete it, but I'd like to here some other users' perspectives first on whether that's the best way to do it. — PinkAmpers & ( Je vous invite à me parler ) 11:09, 13 March 2013 (UTC) If there are objections, the other items are Q1389787 , Q994386 , and Q3513170 . -- Schnark ( talk ) 11:18, 13 March 2013 (UTC) {{ Tl }} 'ing JHS's {{ Done }} and placing this On hold so the bot doesn't archive it just yet. — PinkAmpers & ( Je vous invite à me parler ) 11:37, 13 March 2013 (UTC) If that's how you've been doing it and there are no objections, I'll re-delete it, but I'd like to here some other users' perspectives first on whether that's the best way to do it. — PinkAmpers & ( Je vous invite à me parler ) 11:09, 13 March 2013 (UTC) If there are objections, the other items are Q1389787 , Q994386 , and Q3513170 . -- Schnark ( talk ) 11:18, 13 March 2013 (UTC) {{ Tl }} 'ing JHS's {{ Done }} and placing this On hold so the bot doesn't archive it just yet. — PinkAmpers & ( Je vous invite à me parler ) 11:37, 13 March 2013 (UTC) If there are objections, the other items are Q1389787 , Q994386 , and Q3513170 . -- Schnark ( talk ) 11:18, 13 March 2013 (UTC) {{ Tl }} 'ing JHS's {{ Done }} and placing this On hold so the bot doesn't archive it just yet. — PinkAmpers & ( Je vous invite à me parler ) 11:37, 13 March 2013 (UTC) Upon further review, I've found that Fr-WP subdivides the FB50-FDFF range into fr:Table des caractères Unicode/UFB50 and fr:Table des caractères Unicode/UFDF0 . For now, I've restored Q3513207, as I can't think of any solution other than having three separate items (one for FB50-FDFF, one for FB50-FBCF, and one for FDF0-FDFF). I welcome any better ideas. — PinkAmpers & ( Je vous invite à me parler ) 11:04, 13 March 2013 (UTC) (edit conflict) In fr.wikipedia this block is split into 3 parts, because it is contains some non-characters. There are several other articles that are split in one language or the other, I always linked in these cases the first parts together. -- Schnark ( talk ) 11:08, 13 March 2013 (UTC) If that's how you've been doing it and there are no objections, I'll re-delete it, but I'd like to here some other users' perspectives first on whether that's the best way to do it. — PinkAmpers & ( Je vous invite à me parler ) 11:09, 13 March 2013 (UTC) If there are objections, the other items are Q1389787 , Q994386 , and Q3513170 . -- Schnark ( talk ) 11:18, 13 March 2013 (UTC) {{ Tl }} 'ing JHS's {{ Done }} and placing this On hold so the bot doesn't archive it just yet. — PinkAmpers & ( Je vous invite à me parler ) 11:37, 13 March 2013 (UTC) If that's how you've been doing it and there are no objections, I'll re-delete it, but I'd like to here some other users' perspectives first on whether that's the best way to do it. — PinkAmpers & ( Je vous invite à me parler ) 11:09, 13 March 2013 (UTC) If there are objections, the other items are Q1389787 , Q994386 , and Q3513170 . -- Schnark ( talk ) 11:18, 13 March 2013 (UTC) {{ Tl }} 'ing JHS's {{ Done }} and placing this On hold so the bot doesn't archive it just yet. — PinkAmpers & ( Je vous invite à me parler ) 11:37, 13 March 2013 (UTC) If there are objections, the other items are Q1389787 , Q994386 , and Q3513170 . -- Schnark ( talk ) 11:18, 13 March 2013 (UTC) {{ Tl }} 'ing JHS's {{ Done }} and placing this On hold so the bot doesn't archive it just yet. — PinkAmpers & ( Je vous invite à me parler ) 11:37, 13 March 2013 (UTC) If that's how you've been doing it and there are no objections, I'll re-delete it, but I'd like to here some other users' perspectives first on whether that's the best way to do it. — PinkAmpers & ( Je vous invite à me parler ) 11:09, 13 March 2013 (UTC) If there are objections, the other items are Q1389787 , Q994386 , and Q3513170 . -- Schnark ( talk ) 11:18, 13 March 2013 (UTC) {{ Tl }} 'ing JHS's {{ Done }} and placing this On hold so the bot doesn't archive it just yet. — PinkAmpers & ( Je vous invite à me parler ) 11:37, 13 March 2013 (UTC) If there are objections, the other items are Q1389787 , Q994386 , and Q3513170 . -- Schnark ( talk ) 11:18, 13 March 2013 (UTC) {{ Tl }} 'ing JHS's {{ Done }} and placing this On hold so the bot doesn't archive it just yet. — PinkAmpers & ( Je vous invite à me parler ) 11:37, 13 March 2013 (UTC) If there are objections, the other items are Q1389787 , Q994386 , and Q3513170 . -- Schnark ( talk ) 11:18, 13 March 2013 (UTC) {{ Tl }} 'ing JHS's {{ Done }} and placing this On hold so the bot doesn't archive it just yet. — PinkAmpers & ( Je vous invite à me parler ) 11:37, 13 March 2013 (UTC)