###Instruction: Multi-class classification, answer with one of the labels:['no_consensus', 'delete', 'keep', 'comment', 'merge', 'redirect'] : ###Input:  Q116279766: St. Thomas Anglican Primary School, Badagry (Q116279766) : primary school in Nigeria : ( delete | history | links | entity usage | logs ) I believe this was only created for promo purposes only as this is the 2nd result when you search the school, Only 1 article exists on this school and its up at AFD ( simple:Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2024/St. Thomas Anglican Primary School, Badagry , not sure if NSCHOOL or GNG apply, Thanks.
-- Davey2010 ( talk ) 16:18, 10 May 2024 (UTC) https://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/St._Thomas_Anglican_Primary_School,_Badagry says it's the first primary school in Nigeria so it should be notable enough for Wikidata, see also https://www.travelwaka.com/history-of-the-first-primary-school-in-nigeria/ Piecesofuk ( talk ) 16:47, 10 May 2024 (UTC) Looks like St. Thomas Anglican Primary School, Badagry (Q116279766) and St. Thomas Anglican Primary School, Badagry (Q116687451) are duplicates, so I will be merging them shortly. – FlyingAce ✈hello 20:50, 10 May 2024 (UTC) @ Piecesofuk , @ FlyingAce - I'll be honest I'm not a WikiData editor so I don't know the rules etc regarding notability here but I don't see how an empty page is of use to anyone ?, The simple article has been deleted and there's no other article on any other project and the only cite in there is now a 404 page so what's the point in keeping it?, Many thanks, Warm Regards, Davey2010 ( talk ) 11:40, 23 May 2024 (UTC) Keep The item isn't empty. If it's the first primary school in a country then I would have thought it was historically significant and passes Wikidata's notability. I've linked it to a couple of images of it on Wikimedia Commons. It's also depicted in the Wikipedia article https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/School Piecesofuk ( talk ) 13:01, 23 May 2024 (UTC) Fair enough, I certainly understand your point regarding notability but at the same time I don't see how a couple of images, no project links and a one-bit mention on another project makes this worth keeping?, I just don't see the purpose in this but as I said understand the view re notability, Happy editing, Thanks, Davey2010 ( talk ) 13:38, 23 May 2024 (UTC) It could use more references (I've found a few and will add them once I'm on my computer), but it's not empty at this time; an "empty" item would have no statements at all :) I'd say this could meet WD:N #2 ("It refers to an instance of a clearly identifiable conceptual or material entity that can be described using serious and publicly available references."), but I would like to see more references for that, so I'll hold off on closing this for the moment. – FlyingAce ✈hello 14:17, 23 May 2024 (UTC) I've added a couple of references and linked to its founder Charles Andrew Gollmer (Q94902427) Piecesofuk ( talk ) 14:38, 23 May 2024 (UTC) Looks like St. Thomas Anglican Primary School, Badagry (Q116279766) and St. Thomas Anglican Primary School, Badagry (Q116687451) are duplicates, so I will be merging them shortly. – FlyingAce ✈hello 20:50, 10 May 2024 (UTC) @ Piecesofuk , @ FlyingAce - I'll be honest I'm not a WikiData editor so I don't know the rules etc regarding notability here but I don't see how an empty page is of use to anyone ?, The simple article has been deleted and there's no other article on any other project and the only cite in there is now a 404 page so what's the point in keeping it?, Many thanks, Warm Regards, Davey2010 ( talk ) 11:40, 23 May 2024 (UTC) Keep The item isn't empty. If it's the first primary school in a country then I would have thought it was historically significant and passes Wikidata's notability. I've linked it to a couple of images of it on Wikimedia Commons. It's also depicted in the Wikipedia article https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/School Piecesofuk ( talk ) 13:01, 23 May 2024 (UTC) Fair enough, I certainly understand your point regarding notability but at the same time I don't see how a couple of images, no project links and a one-bit mention on another project makes this worth keeping?, I just don't see the purpose in this but as I said understand the view re notability, Happy editing, Thanks, Davey2010 ( talk ) 13:38, 23 May 2024 (UTC) It could use more references (I've found a few and will add them once I'm on my computer), but it's not empty at this time; an "empty" item would have no statements at all :) I'd say this could meet WD:N #2 ("It refers to an instance of a clearly identifiable conceptual or material entity that can be described using serious and publicly available references."), but I would like to see more references for that, so I'll hold off on closing this for the moment. – FlyingAce ✈hello 14:17, 23 May 2024 (UTC) I've added a couple of references and linked to its founder Charles Andrew Gollmer (Q94902427) Piecesofuk ( talk ) 14:38, 23 May 2024 (UTC) @ Piecesofuk , @ FlyingAce - I'll be honest I'm not a WikiData editor so I don't know the rules etc regarding notability here but I don't see how an empty page is of use to anyone ?, The simple article has been deleted and there's no other article on any other project and the only cite in there is now a 404 page so what's the point in keeping it?, Many thanks, Warm Regards, Davey2010 ( talk ) 11:40, 23 May 2024 (UTC) Keep The item isn't empty. If it's the first primary school in a country then I would have thought it was historically significant and passes Wikidata's notability. I've linked it to a couple of images of it on Wikimedia Commons. It's also depicted in the Wikipedia article https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/School Piecesofuk ( talk ) 13:01, 23 May 2024 (UTC) Fair enough, I certainly understand your point regarding notability but at the same time I don't see how a couple of images, no project links and a one-bit mention on another project makes this worth keeping?, I just don't see the purpose in this but as I said understand the view re notability, Happy editing, Thanks, Davey2010 ( talk ) 13:38, 23 May 2024 (UTC) It could use more references (I've found a few and will add them once I'm on my computer), but it's not empty at this time; an "empty" item would have no statements at all :) I'd say this could meet WD:N #2 ("It refers to an instance of a clearly identifiable conceptual or material entity that can be described using serious and publicly available references."), but I would like to see more references for that, so I'll hold off on closing this for the moment. – FlyingAce ✈hello 14:17, 23 May 2024 (UTC) I've added a couple of references and linked to its founder Charles Andrew Gollmer (Q94902427) Piecesofuk ( talk ) 14:38, 23 May 2024 (UTC) Keep The item isn't empty. If it's the first primary school in a country then I would have thought it was historically significant and passes Wikidata's notability. I've linked it to a couple of images of it on Wikimedia Commons. It's also depicted in the Wikipedia article https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/School Piecesofuk ( talk ) 13:01, 23 May 2024 (UTC) Fair enough, I certainly understand your point regarding notability but at the same time I don't see how a couple of images, no project links and a one-bit mention on another project makes this worth keeping?, I just don't see the purpose in this but as I said understand the view re notability, Happy editing, Thanks, Davey2010 ( talk ) 13:38, 23 May 2024 (UTC) It could use more references (I've found a few and will add them once I'm on my computer), but it's not empty at this time; an "empty" item would have no statements at all :) I'd say this could meet WD:N #2 ("It refers to an instance of a clearly identifiable conceptual or material entity that can be described using serious and publicly available references."), but I would like to see more references for that, so I'll hold off on closing this for the moment. – FlyingAce ✈hello 14:17, 23 May 2024 (UTC) I've added a couple of references and linked to its founder Charles Andrew Gollmer (Q94902427) Piecesofuk ( talk ) 14:38, 23 May 2024 (UTC) Fair enough, I certainly understand your point regarding notability but at the same time I don't see how a couple of images, no project links and a one-bit mention on another project makes this worth keeping?, I just don't see the purpose in this but as I said understand the view re notability, Happy editing, Thanks, Davey2010 ( talk ) 13:38, 23 May 2024 (UTC) It could use more references (I've found a few and will add them once I'm on my computer), but it's not empty at this time; an "empty" item would have no statements at all :) I'd say this could meet WD:N #2 ("It refers to an instance of a clearly identifiable conceptual or material entity that can be described using serious and publicly available references."), but I would like to see more references for that, so I'll hold off on closing this for the moment. – FlyingAce ✈hello 14:17, 23 May 2024 (UTC) I've added a couple of references and linked to its founder Charles Andrew Gollmer (Q94902427) Piecesofuk ( talk ) 14:38, 23 May 2024 (UTC) It could use more references (I've found a few and will add them once I'm on my computer), but it's not empty at this time; an "empty" item would have no statements at all :) I'd say this could meet WD:N #2 ("It refers to an instance of a clearly identifiable conceptual or material entity that can be described using serious and publicly available references."), but I would like to see more references for that, so I'll hold off on closing this for the moment. – FlyingAce ✈hello 14:17, 23 May 2024 (UTC) I've added a couple of references and linked to its founder Charles Andrew Gollmer (Q94902427) Piecesofuk ( talk ) 14:38, 23 May 2024 (UTC) Looks like St. Thomas Anglican Primary School, Badagry (Q116279766) and St. Thomas Anglican Primary School, Badagry (Q116687451) are duplicates, so I will be merging them shortly. – FlyingAce ✈hello 20:50, 10 May 2024 (UTC) @ Piecesofuk , @ FlyingAce - I'll be honest I'm not a WikiData editor so I don't know the rules etc regarding notability here but I don't see how an empty page is of use to anyone ?, The simple article has been deleted and there's no other article on any other project and the only cite in there is now a 404 page so what's the point in keeping it?, Many thanks, Warm Regards, Davey2010 ( talk ) 11:40, 23 May 2024 (UTC) Keep The item isn't empty. If it's the first primary school in a country then I would have thought it was historically significant and passes Wikidata's notability. I've linked it to a couple of images of it on Wikimedia Commons. It's also depicted in the Wikipedia article https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/School Piecesofuk ( talk ) 13:01, 23 May 2024 (UTC) Fair enough, I certainly understand your point regarding notability but at the same time I don't see how a couple of images, no project links and a one-bit mention on another project makes this worth keeping?, I just don't see the purpose in this but as I said understand the view re notability, Happy editing, Thanks, Davey2010 ( talk ) 13:38, 23 May 2024 (UTC) It could use more references (I've found a few and will add them once I'm on my computer), but it's not empty at this time; an "empty" item would have no statements at all :) I'd say this could meet WD:N #2 ("It refers to an instance of a clearly identifiable conceptual or material entity that can be described using serious and publicly available references."), but I would like to see more references for that, so I'll hold off on closing this for the moment. – FlyingAce ✈hello 14:17, 23 May 2024 (UTC) I've added a couple of references and linked to its founder Charles Andrew Gollmer (Q94902427) Piecesofuk ( talk ) 14:38, 23 May 2024 (UTC) @ Piecesofuk , @ FlyingAce - I'll be honest I'm not a WikiData editor so I don't know the rules etc regarding notability here but I don't see how an empty page is of use to anyone ?, The simple article has been deleted and there's no other article on any other project and the only cite in there is now a 404 page so what's the point in keeping it?, Many thanks, Warm Regards, Davey2010 ( talk ) 11:40, 23 May 2024 (UTC) Keep The item isn't empty. If it's the first primary school in a country then I would have thought it was historically significant and passes Wikidata's notability. I've linked it to a couple of images of it on Wikimedia Commons. It's also depicted in the Wikipedia article https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/School Piecesofuk ( talk ) 13:01, 23 May 2024 (UTC) Fair enough, I certainly understand your point regarding notability but at the same time I don't see how a couple of images, no project links and a one-bit mention on another project makes this worth keeping?, I just don't see the purpose in this but as I said understand the view re notability, Happy editing, Thanks, Davey2010 ( talk ) 13:38, 23 May 2024 (UTC) It could use more references (I've found a few and will add them once I'm on my computer), but it's not empty at this time; an "empty" item would have no statements at all :) I'd say this could meet WD:N #2 ("It refers to an instance of a clearly identifiable conceptual or material entity that can be described using serious and publicly available references."), but I would like to see more references for that, so I'll hold off on closing this for the moment. – FlyingAce ✈hello 14:17, 23 May 2024 (UTC) I've added a couple of references and linked to its founder Charles Andrew Gollmer (Q94902427) Piecesofuk ( talk ) 14:38, 23 May 2024 (UTC) Keep The item isn't empty. If it's the first primary school in a country then I would have thought it was historically significant and passes Wikidata's notability. I've linked it to a couple of images of it on Wikimedia Commons. It's also depicted in the Wikipedia article https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/School Piecesofuk ( talk ) 13:01, 23 May 2024 (UTC) Fair enough, I certainly understand your point regarding notability but at the same time I don't see how a couple of images, no project links and a one-bit mention on another project makes this worth keeping?, I just don't see the purpose in this but as I said understand the view re notability, Happy editing, Thanks, Davey2010 ( talk ) 13:38, 23 May 2024 (UTC) It could use more references (I've found a few and will add them once I'm on my computer), but it's not empty at this time; an "empty" item would have no statements at all :) I'd say this could meet WD:N #2 ("It refers to an instance of a clearly identifiable conceptual or material entity that can be described using serious and publicly available references."), but I would like to see more references for that, so I'll hold off on closing this for the moment. – FlyingAce ✈hello 14:17, 23 May 2024 (UTC) I've added a couple of references and linked to its founder Charles Andrew Gollmer (Q94902427) Piecesofuk ( talk ) 14:38, 23 May 2024 (UTC) Fair enough, I certainly understand your point regarding notability but at the same time I don't see how a couple of images, no project links and a one-bit mention on another project makes this worth keeping?, I just don't see the purpose in this but as I said understand the view re notability, Happy editing, Thanks, Davey2010 ( talk ) 13:38, 23 May 2024 (UTC) It could use more references (I've found a few and will add them once I'm on my computer), but it's not empty at this time; an "empty" item would have no statements at all :) I'd say this could meet WD:N #2 ("It refers to an instance of a clearly identifiable conceptual or material entity that can be described using serious and publicly available references."), but I would like to see more references for that, so I'll hold off on closing this for the moment. – FlyingAce ✈hello 14:17, 23 May 2024 (UTC) I've added a couple of references and linked to its founder Charles Andrew Gollmer (Q94902427) Piecesofuk ( talk ) 14:38, 23 May 2024 (UTC) It could use more references (I've found a few and will add them once I'm on my computer), but it's not empty at this time; an "empty" item would have no statements at all :) I'd say this could meet WD:N #2 ("It refers to an instance of a clearly identifiable conceptual or material entity that can be described using serious and publicly available references."), but I would like to see more references for that, so I'll hold off on closing this for the moment. – FlyingAce ✈hello 14:17, 23 May 2024 (UTC) I've added a couple of references and linked to its founder Charles Andrew Gollmer (Q94902427) Piecesofuk ( talk ) 14:38, 23 May 2024 (UTC) @ Piecesofuk , @ FlyingAce - I'll be honest I'm not a WikiData editor so I don't know the rules etc regarding notability here but I don't see how an empty page is of use to anyone ?, The simple article has been deleted and there's no other article on any other project and the only cite in there is now a 404 page so what's the point in keeping it?, Many thanks, Warm Regards, Davey2010 ( talk ) 11:40, 23 May 2024 (UTC) Keep The item isn't empty. If it's the first primary school in a country then I would have thought it was historically significant and passes Wikidata's notability. I've linked it to a couple of images of it on Wikimedia Commons. It's also depicted in the Wikipedia article https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/School Piecesofuk ( talk ) 13:01, 23 May 2024 (UTC) Fair enough, I certainly understand your point regarding notability but at the same time I don't see how a couple of images, no project links and a one-bit mention on another project makes this worth keeping?, I just don't see the purpose in this but as I said understand the view re notability, Happy editing, Thanks, Davey2010 ( talk ) 13:38, 23 May 2024 (UTC) It could use more references (I've found a few and will add them once I'm on my computer), but it's not empty at this time; an "empty" item would have no statements at all :) I'd say this could meet WD:N #2 ("It refers to an instance of a clearly identifiable conceptual or material entity that can be described using serious and publicly available references."), but I would like to see more references for that, so I'll hold off on closing this for the moment. – FlyingAce ✈hello 14:17, 23 May 2024 (UTC) I've added a couple of references and linked to its founder Charles Andrew Gollmer (Q94902427) Piecesofuk ( talk ) 14:38, 23 May 2024 (UTC) Keep The item isn't empty. If it's the first primary school in a country then I would have thought it was historically significant and passes Wikidata's notability. I've linked it to a couple of images of it on Wikimedia Commons. It's also depicted in the Wikipedia article https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/School Piecesofuk ( talk ) 13:01, 23 May 2024 (UTC) Fair enough, I certainly understand your point regarding notability but at the same time I don't see how a couple of images, no project links and a one-bit mention on another project makes this worth keeping?, I just don't see the purpose in this but as I said understand the view re notability, Happy editing, Thanks, Davey2010 ( talk ) 13:38, 23 May 2024 (UTC) It could use more references (I've found a few and will add them once I'm on my computer), but it's not empty at this time; an "empty" item would have no statements at all :) I'd say this could meet WD:N #2 ("It refers to an instance of a clearly identifiable conceptual or material entity that can be described using serious and publicly available references."), but I would like to see more references for that, so I'll hold off on closing this for the moment. – FlyingAce ✈hello 14:17, 23 May 2024 (UTC) I've added a couple of references and linked to its founder Charles Andrew Gollmer (Q94902427) Piecesofuk ( talk ) 14:38, 23 May 2024 (UTC) Fair enough, I certainly understand your point regarding notability but at the same time I don't see how a couple of images, no project links and a one-bit mention on another project makes this worth keeping?, I just don't see the purpose in this but as I said understand the view re notability, Happy editing, Thanks, Davey2010 ( talk ) 13:38, 23 May 2024 (UTC) It could use more references (I've found a few and will add them once I'm on my computer), but it's not empty at this time; an "empty" item would have no statements at all :) I'd say this could meet WD:N #2 ("It refers to an instance of a clearly identifiable conceptual or material entity that can be described using serious and publicly available references."), but I would like to see more references for that, so I'll hold off on closing this for the moment. – FlyingAce ✈hello 14:17, 23 May 2024 (UTC) I've added a couple of references and linked to its founder Charles Andrew Gollmer (Q94902427) Piecesofuk ( talk ) 14:38, 23 May 2024 (UTC) It could use more references (I've found a few and will add them once I'm on my computer), but it's not empty at this time; an "empty" item would have no statements at all :) I'd say this could meet WD:N #2 ("It refers to an instance of a clearly identifiable conceptual or material entity that can be described using serious and publicly available references."), but I would like to see more references for that, so I'll hold off on closing this for the moment. – FlyingAce ✈hello 14:17, 23 May 2024 (UTC) I've added a couple of references and linked to its founder Charles Andrew Gollmer (Q94902427) Piecesofuk ( talk ) 14:38, 23 May 2024 (UTC) Keep The item isn't empty. If it's the first primary school in a country then I would have thought it was historically significant and passes Wikidata's notability. I've linked it to a couple of images of it on Wikimedia Commons. It's also depicted in the Wikipedia article https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/School Piecesofuk ( talk ) 13:01, 23 May 2024 (UTC) Fair enough, I certainly understand your point regarding notability but at the same time I don't see how a couple of images, no project links and a one-bit mention on another project makes this worth keeping?, I just don't see the purpose in this but as I said understand the view re notability, Happy editing, Thanks, Davey2010 ( talk ) 13:38, 23 May 2024 (UTC) It could use more references (I've found a few and will add them once I'm on my computer), but it's not empty at this time; an "empty" item would have no statements at all :) I'd say this could meet WD:N #2 ("It refers to an instance of a clearly identifiable conceptual or material entity that can be described using serious and publicly available references."), but I would like to see more references for that, so I'll hold off on closing this for the moment. – FlyingAce ✈hello 14:17, 23 May 2024 (UTC) I've added a couple of references and linked to its founder Charles Andrew Gollmer (Q94902427) Piecesofuk ( talk ) 14:38, 23 May 2024 (UTC) Fair enough, I certainly understand your point regarding notability but at the same time I don't see how a couple of images, no project links and a one-bit mention on another project makes this worth keeping?, I just don't see the purpose in this but as I said understand the view re notability, Happy editing, Thanks, Davey2010 ( talk ) 13:38, 23 May 2024 (UTC) It could use more references (I've found a few and will add them once I'm on my computer), but it's not empty at this time; an "empty" item would have no statements at all :) I'd say this could meet WD:N #2 ("It refers to an instance of a clearly identifiable conceptual or material entity that can be described using serious and publicly available references."), but I would like to see more references for that, so I'll hold off on closing this for the moment. – FlyingAce ✈hello 14:17, 23 May 2024 (UTC) I've added a couple of references and linked to its founder Charles Andrew Gollmer (Q94902427) Piecesofuk ( talk ) 14:38, 23 May 2024 (UTC) It could use more references (I've found a few and will add them once I'm on my computer), but it's not empty at this time; an "empty" item would have no statements at all :) I'd say this could meet WD:N #2 ("It refers to an instance of a clearly identifiable conceptual or material entity that can be described using serious and publicly available references."), but I would like to see more references for that, so I'll hold off on closing this for the moment. – FlyingAce ✈hello 14:17, 23 May 2024 (UTC) I've added a couple of references and linked to its founder Charles Andrew Gollmer (Q94902427) Piecesofuk ( talk ) 14:38, 23 May 2024 (UTC) Fair enough, I certainly understand your point regarding notability but at the same time I don't see how a couple of images, no project links and a one-bit mention on another project makes this worth keeping?, I just don't see the purpose in this but as I said understand the view re notability, Happy editing, Thanks, Davey2010 ( talk ) 13:38, 23 May 2024 (UTC) It could use more references (I've found a few and will add them once I'm on my computer), but it's not empty at this time; an "empty" item would have no statements at all :) I'd say this could meet WD:N #2 ("It refers to an instance of a clearly identifiable conceptual or material entity that can be described using serious and publicly available references."), but I would like to see more references for that, so I'll hold off on closing this for the moment. – FlyingAce ✈hello 14:17, 23 May 2024 (UTC) I've added a couple of references and linked to its founder Charles Andrew Gollmer (Q94902427) Piecesofuk ( talk ) 14:38, 23 May 2024 (UTC) It could use more references (I've found a few and will add them once I'm on my computer), but it's not empty at this time; an "empty" item would have no statements at all :) I'd say this could meet WD:N #2 ("It refers to an instance of a clearly identifiable conceptual or material entity that can be described using serious and publicly available references."), but I would like to see more references for that, so I'll hold off on closing this for the moment. – FlyingAce ✈hello 14:17, 23 May 2024 (UTC) I've added a couple of references and linked to its founder Charles Andrew Gollmer (Q94902427) Piecesofuk ( talk ) 14:38, 23 May 2024 (UTC) It could use more references (I've found a few and will add them once I'm on my computer), but it's not empty at this time; an "empty" item would have no statements at all :) I'd say this could meet WD:N #2 ("It refers to an instance of a clearly identifiable conceptual or material entity that can be described using serious and publicly available references."), but I would like to see more references for that, so I'll hold off on closing this for the moment. – FlyingAce ✈hello 14:17, 23 May 2024 (UTC) I've added a couple of references and linked to its founder Charles Andrew Gollmer (Q94902427) Piecesofuk ( talk ) 14:38, 23 May 2024 (UTC) Not deleted – adequate referencing now. – FlyingAce ✈hello 22:02, 23 May 2024 (UTC)