###Instruction: Multi-class classification, answer with one of the labels:['no_consensus', 'delete', 'keep', 'comment', 'merge', 'redirect'] : ###Input:  Q16979650: sibling group (Q16979650) : group of humans, they are siblings; e.g. Grimm brothers, Brontë sisters : ( delete | history | links | entity usage | logs ) Merged with Q31184 , imported from User:Ricordisamoa/StreamDelete . -- Lymantria ( talk ) 05:18, 28 August 2014 (UTC) Isn't this item still in use? m -- BeneBot* ( talk ) 05:20, 28 August 2014 (UTC) On hold similar, but are these really the same. One item seems to be about one brother and one sister combinations only, the other about all combinations of them, so with more than two members. - cycŋ - ( talk ) 06:54, 28 August 2014 (UTC) Doesn't seem the same to me. Lymantria ( talk ) 17:04, 28 August 2014 (UTC) Not done - Items shouldn't be merged. I don't see anything that needs to be reverted, but I may be wrong in this. - cycŋ - ( talk ) 09:36, 29 August 2014 (UTC) On hold similar, but are these really the same. One item seems to be about one brother and one sister combinations only, the other about all combinations of them, so with more than two members. - cycŋ - ( talk ) 06:54, 28 August 2014 (UTC) Doesn't seem the same to me. Lymantria ( talk ) 17:04, 28 August 2014 (UTC) Not done - Items shouldn't be merged. I don't see anything that needs to be reverted, but I may be wrong in this. - cycŋ - ( talk ) 09:36, 29 August 2014 (UTC) On hold similar, but are these really the same. One item seems to be about one brother and one sister combinations only, the other about all combinations of them, so with more than two members. - cycŋ - ( talk ) 06:54, 28 August 2014 (UTC) Doesn't seem the same to me. Lymantria ( talk ) 17:04, 28 August 2014 (UTC) Not done - Items shouldn't be merged. I don't see anything that needs to be reverted, but I may be wrong in this. - cycŋ - ( talk ) 09:36, 29 August 2014 (UTC)