###Instruction: Multi-class classification, answer with one of the labels:['no_consensus', 'delete', 'keep', 'comment', 'merge', 'redirect'] : ###Input:  Q19760261: Q19760261 : no description : ( delete | history | links | entity usage | logs ) Same name exists with wikilinks Pitambar Bhattarai ⓣ ⓒ 05:29, 29 May 2017 (UTC) @ Pitambar Bhattarai : Where does the sitelink bh:भादगाउँ belong to? It is not connected to any Wikidata item right now. — MisterSynergy ( talk ) 05:35, 29 May 2017 (UTC) So Q19760261 mixed up two different cities? We don’t want to repurpose the old item, thus create a new one for the unconnected city and the mixed concept item will be deleted. — MisterSynergy ( talk ) 06:07, 29 May 2017 (UTC) @ Pitambar Bhattarai : I now looked into that case and assume now that bh:भादगाउँ belongs to Bhadgau Sinawari (Q4900524) as a sitelink. Since my assumption bases on Google translations, can you please confirm? Thanks, MisterSynergy ( talk ) 07:33, 30 May 2017 (UTC) @ MisterSynergy : you are absolutely correct. bh:भादगाउँ belongs to Bhadgau Sinawari (Q4900524) . Thank you very much. Now Deleted as ill-defined, after all sitelinks found their proper item. Thanks for your input. — MisterSynergy ( talk ) 10:48, 30 May 2017 (UTC) Now Deleted as ill-defined, after all sitelinks found their proper item. Thanks for your input. — MisterSynergy ( talk ) 10:48, 30 May 2017 (UTC) Now Deleted as ill-defined, after all sitelinks found their proper item. Thanks for your input. — MisterSynergy ( talk ) 10:48, 30 May 2017 (UTC)