###Instruction: Multi-class classification, answer with one of the labels:['no_consensus', 'delete', 'keep', 'comment', 'merge', 'redirect'] : ###Input:  Q126487673: Q126487673 : no description : ( delete | history | links | entity usage | logs ) It was closed as deleted, but objection was raised that it was closed prematurely. Relisting to foster discussion. I am arguing for deletion for unuseful, non-educational contents consisting of an obituary notice about a highly non-notable run of the mill subject created by the obituary subject's family member .
-- Graywalls ( talk ) 23:19, 10 September 2024 (UTC)  Wikidata is only supposed to be a knowledge base for people, events, and things that have something that make them really standout and have references. Wikidata is not an obituary site. User: Masai giraffe Can you show me where the "really standout" rule is written? The only rule I know is: Wikidata:Notability: "It refers to an instance of a clearly identifiable conceptual or material entity. The entity must be notable, in the sense that it can be described using serious and publicly available references." I imagine we can index every legacy.com entry if we had the time and resources. -- RAN ( talk ) 00:04, 11 September 2024 (UTC)