###Instruction: Multi-class classification, answer with one of the labels:['no_consensus', 'delete', 'keep', 'comment', 'merge', 'redirect'] : ###Input:  Q67195300: Bahtiyar Kadın (Q67195300) : no description : ( delete | history | links | entity usage | logs ) A draft in EN:WP was deleted. Notable? E4024 ( talk ) 15:54, 21 June 2021 (UTC) Comment She seem to be one of the consorts of Mustafa II (Q199659) . There is maybe a structural need. Fralambert ( talk ) 16:06, 25 June 2021 (UTC) Did you see it in En:WP? Not a reliable source. Show me a history book and I will withdraw the DR. -- E4024 ( talk ) 23:27, 26 June 2021 (UTC) Keep The source is: Majer, Hans Georg (1992). Osmanlı Araştırmaları XII (The Journal of Ottoman Studies XII) : The harem of Mustafa II (1695–1703). pp. 435–7, 438. So it mentions that she is "one of his personal women" to Mustafa. She seems to be one of his consorts, one of his wives, or one of his slaves IDK about the details but I agree she deserves a data structure here and other women too, which is mentioned in the source. I think that all these women deserve much more than being only an unknown in history as "a personal woman to another ottoman guy." -- Palaangelino ( talk ) 01:31, 17 September 2021 (UTC) Thanks. Of course it will be kept after this reliable source. I thank you especially for this text in English, which sheds some light into the reality of Harem, which is not an Orientalist "heaven" for horny men but a family home where there are males, although young in age, other than the Sultan as well as female members of his family, and of course the haremağaları or akoğlanlar (sic, Turkish humour). Thanks a lot Pala ! -- E4024 ( talk ) 02:43, 17 September 2021 (UTC) Great to know more about ottoman harems for all of us. Glad to illuminate some eyes here. -- Palaangelino ( talk ) 03:17, 17 September 2021 (UTC) Did you see it in En:WP? Not a reliable source. Show me a history book and I will withdraw the DR. -- E4024 ( talk ) 23:27, 26 June 2021 (UTC) Keep The source is: Majer, Hans Georg (1992). Osmanlı Araştırmaları XII (The Journal of Ottoman Studies XII) : The harem of Mustafa II (1695–1703). pp. 435–7, 438. So it mentions that she is "one of his personal women" to Mustafa. She seems to be one of his consorts, one of his wives, or one of his slaves IDK about the details but I agree she deserves a data structure here and other women too, which is mentioned in the source. I think that all these women deserve much more than being only an unknown in history as "a personal woman to another ottoman guy." -- Palaangelino ( talk ) 01:31, 17 September 2021 (UTC) Thanks. Of course it will be kept after this reliable source. I thank you especially for this text in English, which sheds some light into the reality of Harem, which is not an Orientalist "heaven" for horny men but a family home where there are males, although young in age, other than the Sultan as well as female members of his family, and of course the haremağaları or akoğlanlar (sic, Turkish humour). Thanks a lot Pala ! -- E4024 ( talk ) 02:43, 17 September 2021 (UTC) Great to know more about ottoman harems for all of us. Glad to illuminate some eyes here. -- Palaangelino ( talk ) 03:17, 17 September 2021 (UTC) Keep The source is: Majer, Hans Georg (1992). Osmanlı Araştırmaları XII (The Journal of Ottoman Studies XII) : The harem of Mustafa II (1695–1703). pp. 435–7, 438. So it mentions that she is "one of his personal women" to Mustafa. She seems to be one of his consorts, one of his wives, or one of his slaves IDK about the details but I agree she deserves a data structure here and other women too, which is mentioned in the source. I think that all these women deserve much more than being only an unknown in history as "a personal woman to another ottoman guy." -- Palaangelino ( talk ) 01:31, 17 September 2021 (UTC) Thanks. Of course it will be kept after this reliable source. I thank you especially for this text in English, which sheds some light into the reality of Harem, which is not an Orientalist "heaven" for horny men but a family home where there are males, although young in age, other than the Sultan as well as female members of his family, and of course the haremağaları or akoğlanlar (sic, Turkish humour). Thanks a lot Pala ! -- E4024 ( talk ) 02:43, 17 September 2021 (UTC) Great to know more about ottoman harems for all of us. Glad to illuminate some eyes here. -- Palaangelino ( talk ) 03:17, 17 September 2021 (UTC) Thanks. Of course it will be kept after this reliable source. I thank you especially for this text in English, which sheds some light into the reality of Harem, which is not an Orientalist "heaven" for horny men but a family home where there are males, although young in age, other than the Sultan as well as female members of his family, and of course the haremağaları or akoğlanlar (sic, Turkish humour). Thanks a lot Pala ! -- E4024 ( talk ) 02:43, 17 September 2021 (UTC) Great to know more about ottoman harems for all of us. Glad to illuminate some eyes here. -- Palaangelino ( talk ) 03:17, 17 September 2021 (UTC) Did you see it in En:WP? Not a reliable source. Show me a history book and I will withdraw the DR. -- E4024 ( talk ) 23:27, 26 June 2021 (UTC) Keep The source is: Majer, Hans Georg (1992). Osmanlı Araştırmaları XII (The Journal of Ottoman Studies XII) : The harem of Mustafa II (1695–1703). pp. 435–7, 438. So it mentions that she is "one of his personal women" to Mustafa. She seems to be one of his consorts, one of his wives, or one of his slaves IDK about the details but I agree she deserves a data structure here and other women too, which is mentioned in the source. I think that all these women deserve much more than being only an unknown in history as "a personal woman to another ottoman guy." -- Palaangelino ( talk ) 01:31, 17 September 2021 (UTC) Thanks. Of course it will be kept after this reliable source. I thank you especially for this text in English, which sheds some light into the reality of Harem, which is not an Orientalist "heaven" for horny men but a family home where there are males, although young in age, other than the Sultan as well as female members of his family, and of course the haremağaları or akoğlanlar (sic, Turkish humour). Thanks a lot Pala ! -- E4024 ( talk ) 02:43, 17 September 2021 (UTC) Great to know more about ottoman harems for all of us. Glad to illuminate some eyes here. -- Palaangelino ( talk ) 03:17, 17 September 2021 (UTC) Keep The source is: Majer, Hans Georg (1992). Osmanlı Araştırmaları XII (The Journal of Ottoman Studies XII) : The harem of Mustafa II (1695–1703). pp. 435–7, 438. So it mentions that she is "one of his personal women" to Mustafa. She seems to be one of his consorts, one of his wives, or one of his slaves IDK about the details but I agree she deserves a data structure here and other women too, which is mentioned in the source. I think that all these women deserve much more than being only an unknown in history as "a personal woman to another ottoman guy." -- Palaangelino ( talk ) 01:31, 17 September 2021 (UTC) Thanks. Of course it will be kept after this reliable source. I thank you especially for this text in English, which sheds some light into the reality of Harem, which is not an Orientalist "heaven" for horny men but a family home where there are males, although young in age, other than the Sultan as well as female members of his family, and of course the haremağaları or akoğlanlar (sic, Turkish humour). Thanks a lot Pala ! -- E4024 ( talk ) 02:43, 17 September 2021 (UTC) Great to know more about ottoman harems for all of us. Glad to illuminate some eyes here. -- Palaangelino ( talk ) 03:17, 17 September 2021 (UTC) Thanks. Of course it will be kept after this reliable source. I thank you especially for this text in English, which sheds some light into the reality of Harem, which is not an Orientalist "heaven" for horny men but a family home where there are males, although young in age, other than the Sultan as well as female members of his family, and of course the haremağaları or akoğlanlar (sic, Turkish humour). Thanks a lot Pala ! -- E4024 ( talk ) 02:43, 17 September 2021 (UTC) Great to know more about ottoman harems for all of us. Glad to illuminate some eyes here. -- Palaangelino ( talk ) 03:17, 17 September 2021 (UTC) Keep The source is: Majer, Hans Georg (1992). Osmanlı Araştırmaları XII (The Journal of Ottoman Studies XII) : The harem of Mustafa II (1695–1703). pp. 435–7, 438. So it mentions that she is "one of his personal women" to Mustafa. She seems to be one of his consorts, one of his wives, or one of his slaves IDK about the details but I agree she deserves a data structure here and other women too, which is mentioned in the source. I think that all these women deserve much more than being only an unknown in history as "a personal woman to another ottoman guy." -- Palaangelino ( talk ) 01:31, 17 September 2021 (UTC) Thanks. Of course it will be kept after this reliable source. I thank you especially for this text in English, which sheds some light into the reality of Harem, which is not an Orientalist "heaven" for horny men but a family home where there are males, although young in age, other than the Sultan as well as female members of his family, and of course the haremağaları or akoğlanlar (sic, Turkish humour). Thanks a lot Pala ! -- E4024 ( talk ) 02:43, 17 September 2021 (UTC) Great to know more about ottoman harems for all of us. Glad to illuminate some eyes here. -- Palaangelino ( talk ) 03:17, 17 September 2021 (UTC) Thanks. Of course it will be kept after this reliable source. I thank you especially for this text in English, which sheds some light into the reality of Harem, which is not an Orientalist "heaven" for horny men but a family home where there are males, although young in age, other than the Sultan as well as female members of his family, and of course the haremağaları or akoğlanlar (sic, Turkish humour). Thanks a lot Pala ! -- E4024 ( talk ) 02:43, 17 September 2021 (UTC) Great to know more about ottoman harems for all of us. Glad to illuminate some eyes here. -- Palaangelino ( talk ) 03:17, 17 September 2021 (UTC) Thanks. Of course it will be kept after this reliable source. I thank you especially for this text in English, which sheds some light into the reality of Harem, which is not an Orientalist "heaven" for horny men but a family home where there are males, although young in age, other than the Sultan as well as female members of his family, and of course the haremağaları or akoğlanlar (sic, Turkish humour). Thanks a lot Pala ! -- E4024 ( talk ) 02:43, 17 September 2021 (UTC) Great to know more about ottoman harems for all of us. Glad to illuminate some eyes here. -- Palaangelino ( talk ) 03:17, 17 September 2021 (UTC) Not deleted BrokenSegue ( talk ) 15:27, 1 October 2021 (UTC)