###Instruction: Multi-class classification, answer with one of the labels:['no_consensus', 'delete', 'keep', 'comment', 'merge', 'redirect'] : ###Input:  Q66424186: Ambivalent and nevertheless recommendable book on the Saxon parties with partly alarming findings (Q66424186) : German blog post in: https://saxorum.hypotheses.org , 2019 : ( delete | history | links | entity usage | logs ) Not notable Gymnicus ( talk ) 22:16, 7 June 2023 (UTC) On hold This item is linked from 1 other. -- DeltaBot ( talk ) 22:20, 7 June 2023 (UTC) The link is from Q61483181#P527 , one of many similar items there. Peter James ( talk ) 22:25, 7 June 2023 (UTC) Notable. Q66424186 discribes 'hand made' one blog post as part of an institutional webblog - (Q61483181) - of state library SLUB Dresden . Jeb ( talk ) 09:09, 8 June 2023 (UTC) saxorum.hypotheses.org (Q61483181) is the research blog of Saxon State and University Library, Dresden (Q323270) . Most or certainly all of the blog posts are also catalogued in the K10plus and therefore the wikidata items know a K10plus PPN ID (P6721) . These are all well formed bibliographic wikidata items. Furthermore every blog post on hypotheses shows its own Wikidata-QID on the bottom of the post. SLUB Dresden do a lot of work in encouraging librarians and other GLAM-related people to bring in their stuff and knowledge into Wikidata. They know what they are doing. So the publisher of the blog and most of the blog post authors are notable on their own. Mfchris84 ( talk ) 10:52, 8 June 2023 (UTC) Not deleted per discussion -- Emu ( talk ) 20:19, 9 June 2023 (UTC) Should K10plus PPN ID (P6721) be considered a Wikidata property for an identifier that suggests notability (Q62589316) ? Bovlb ( talk ) 21:43, 9 June 2023 (UTC) Not deleted per discussion -- Emu ( talk ) 20:19, 9 June 2023 (UTC) Not deleted per discussion -- Emu ( talk ) 20:19, 9 June 2023 (UTC)