###Instruction: Multi-class classification, answer with one of the labels:['no_consensus', 'delete', 'keep', 'comment', 'merge', 'redirect'] : ###Input:  Q95974446: Balsamic Roasted Turkey Salad (Q95974446) : salad : ( delete | history | links | entity usage | logs ) Just a salad with two specific ingredients; seems to lack any notability.
-- Yaron Koren ( talk ) 19:01, 5 July 2024 (UTC) There is also a Commons sitelink (WD:N #1). – Morneo06 ( talk ) 21:40, 5 July 2024 (UTC) Comment @ Morneo06 : Not voting, just wanted to bring it to your attention that bullet 4 under criterion 1 calls out Commons categories as not establishing criterion 1. William Graham ( talk ) 22:33, 5 July 2024 (UTC) Maybe I am interpreting this one differently than you do as from my understanding this applies to Category items only, not regular items that have a Commons category sitelink. Morneo06 ( talk ) 10:13, 6 July 2024 (UTC) It's clunkily worded. My interpretation of 1.4 is that P31=mediawiki category with only a commons link is not notable. And if it's a main item with only a commons sitelink it should be to an album page and not to a category. Infrastruktur ( talk ) 19:01, 6 July 2024 (UTC) I agree, poorly worded. I always interpreted it as do not create a Wikidata entry called Category:Foo, just add Category:Foo to the Wikidata item Foo using Multilingual_sites. -- RAN ( talk ) 21:39, 6 July 2024 (UTC) The last part is not right. Commons category links go on the main item unless a separate category item is necessary, either because the same category exists on another wiki, or because there is a Commons gallery for the same topic. The only sitelink on a main item can be a link to a Commons category (and over a quarter of all the Commons sitelinks are on items with no other sitelinks). The idea was to prevent people from creating lots of items for intersection categories like commons:Category:Men facing left and looking at viewer in Los Angeles which are not useful for us and are unlikely to ever have any other sitelinks. - Nikki ( talk ) 07:33, 19 July 2024 (UTC) Comment @ Morneo06 : Not voting, just wanted to bring it to your attention that bullet 4 under criterion 1 calls out Commons categories as not establishing criterion 1. William Graham ( talk ) 22:33, 5 July 2024 (UTC) Maybe I am interpreting this one differently than you do as from my understanding this applies to Category items only, not regular items that have a Commons category sitelink. Morneo06 ( talk ) 10:13, 6 July 2024 (UTC) It's clunkily worded. My interpretation of 1.4 is that P31=mediawiki category with only a commons link is not notable. And if it's a main item with only a commons sitelink it should be to an album page and not to a category. Infrastruktur ( talk ) 19:01, 6 July 2024 (UTC) I agree, poorly worded. I always interpreted it as do not create a Wikidata entry called Category:Foo, just add Category:Foo to the Wikidata item Foo using Multilingual_sites. -- RAN ( talk ) 21:39, 6 July 2024 (UTC) The last part is not right. Commons category links go on the main item unless a separate category item is necessary, either because the same category exists on another wiki, or because there is a Commons gallery for the same topic. The only sitelink on a main item can be a link to a Commons category (and over a quarter of all the Commons sitelinks are on items with no other sitelinks). The idea was to prevent people from creating lots of items for intersection categories like commons:Category:Men facing left and looking at viewer in Los Angeles which are not useful for us and are unlikely to ever have any other sitelinks. - Nikki ( talk ) 07:33, 19 July 2024 (UTC) Maybe I am interpreting this one differently than you do as from my understanding this applies to Category items only, not regular items that have a Commons category sitelink. Morneo06 ( talk ) 10:13, 6 July 2024 (UTC) It's clunkily worded. My interpretation of 1.4 is that P31=mediawiki category with only a commons link is not notable. And if it's a main item with only a commons sitelink it should be to an album page and not to a category. Infrastruktur ( talk ) 19:01, 6 July 2024 (UTC) I agree, poorly worded. I always interpreted it as do not create a Wikidata entry called Category:Foo, just add Category:Foo to the Wikidata item Foo using Multilingual_sites. -- RAN ( talk ) 21:39, 6 July 2024 (UTC) The last part is not right. Commons category links go on the main item unless a separate category item is necessary, either because the same category exists on another wiki, or because there is a Commons gallery for the same topic. The only sitelink on a main item can be a link to a Commons category (and over a quarter of all the Commons sitelinks are on items with no other sitelinks). The idea was to prevent people from creating lots of items for intersection categories like commons:Category:Men facing left and looking at viewer in Los Angeles which are not useful for us and are unlikely to ever have any other sitelinks. - Nikki ( talk ) 07:33, 19 July 2024 (UTC) It's clunkily worded. My interpretation of 1.4 is that P31=mediawiki category with only a commons link is not notable. And if it's a main item with only a commons sitelink it should be to an album page and not to a category. Infrastruktur ( talk ) 19:01, 6 July 2024 (UTC) I agree, poorly worded. I always interpreted it as do not create a Wikidata entry called Category:Foo, just add Category:Foo to the Wikidata item Foo using Multilingual_sites. -- RAN ( talk ) 21:39, 6 July 2024 (UTC) The last part is not right. Commons category links go on the main item unless a separate category item is necessary, either because the same category exists on another wiki, or because there is a Commons gallery for the same topic. The only sitelink on a main item can be a link to a Commons category (and over a quarter of all the Commons sitelinks are on items with no other sitelinks). The idea was to prevent people from creating lots of items for intersection categories like commons:Category:Men facing left and looking at viewer in Los Angeles which are not useful for us and are unlikely to ever have any other sitelinks. - Nikki ( talk ) 07:33, 19 July 2024 (UTC) I agree, poorly worded. I always interpreted it as do not create a Wikidata entry called Category:Foo, just add Category:Foo to the Wikidata item Foo using Multilingual_sites. -- RAN ( talk ) 21:39, 6 July 2024 (UTC) The last part is not right. Commons category links go on the main item unless a separate category item is necessary, either because the same category exists on another wiki, or because there is a Commons gallery for the same topic. The only sitelink on a main item can be a link to a Commons category (and over a quarter of all the Commons sitelinks are on items with no other sitelinks). The idea was to prevent people from creating lots of items for intersection categories like commons:Category:Men facing left and looking at viewer in Los Angeles which are not useful for us and are unlikely to ever have any other sitelinks. - Nikki ( talk ) 07:33, 19 July 2024 (UTC) Comment @ Morneo06 : Not voting, just wanted to bring it to your attention that bullet 4 under criterion 1 calls out Commons categories as not establishing criterion 1. William Graham ( talk ) 22:33, 5 July 2024 (UTC) Maybe I am interpreting this one differently than you do as from my understanding this applies to Category items only, not regular items that have a Commons category sitelink. Morneo06 ( talk ) 10:13, 6 July 2024 (UTC) It's clunkily worded. My interpretation of 1.4 is that P31=mediawiki category with only a commons link is not notable. And if it's a main item with only a commons sitelink it should be to an album page and not to a category. Infrastruktur ( talk ) 19:01, 6 July 2024 (UTC) I agree, poorly worded. I always interpreted it as do not create a Wikidata entry called Category:Foo, just add Category:Foo to the Wikidata item Foo using Multilingual_sites. -- RAN ( talk ) 21:39, 6 July 2024 (UTC) The last part is not right. Commons category links go on the main item unless a separate category item is necessary, either because the same category exists on another wiki, or because there is a Commons gallery for the same topic. The only sitelink on a main item can be a link to a Commons category (and over a quarter of all the Commons sitelinks are on items with no other sitelinks). The idea was to prevent people from creating lots of items for intersection categories like commons:Category:Men facing left and looking at viewer in Los Angeles which are not useful for us and are unlikely to ever have any other sitelinks. - Nikki ( talk ) 07:33, 19 July 2024 (UTC) Maybe I am interpreting this one differently than you do as from my understanding this applies to Category items only, not regular items that have a Commons category sitelink. Morneo06 ( talk ) 10:13, 6 July 2024 (UTC) It's clunkily worded. My interpretation of 1.4 is that P31=mediawiki category with only a commons link is not notable. And if it's a main item with only a commons sitelink it should be to an album page and not to a category. Infrastruktur ( talk ) 19:01, 6 July 2024 (UTC) I agree, poorly worded. I always interpreted it as do not create a Wikidata entry called Category:Foo, just add Category:Foo to the Wikidata item Foo using Multilingual_sites. -- RAN ( talk ) 21:39, 6 July 2024 (UTC) The last part is not right. Commons category links go on the main item unless a separate category item is necessary, either because the same category exists on another wiki, or because there is a Commons gallery for the same topic. The only sitelink on a main item can be a link to a Commons category (and over a quarter of all the Commons sitelinks are on items with no other sitelinks). The idea was to prevent people from creating lots of items for intersection categories like commons:Category:Men facing left and looking at viewer in Los Angeles which are not useful for us and are unlikely to ever have any other sitelinks. - Nikki ( talk ) 07:33, 19 July 2024 (UTC) It's clunkily worded. My interpretation of 1.4 is that P31=mediawiki category with only a commons link is not notable. And if it's a main item with only a commons sitelink it should be to an album page and not to a category. Infrastruktur ( talk ) 19:01, 6 July 2024 (UTC) I agree, poorly worded. I always interpreted it as do not create a Wikidata entry called Category:Foo, just add Category:Foo to the Wikidata item Foo using Multilingual_sites. -- RAN ( talk ) 21:39, 6 July 2024 (UTC) The last part is not right. Commons category links go on the main item unless a separate category item is necessary, either because the same category exists on another wiki, or because there is a Commons gallery for the same topic. The only sitelink on a main item can be a link to a Commons category (and over a quarter of all the Commons sitelinks are on items with no other sitelinks). The idea was to prevent people from creating lots of items for intersection categories like commons:Category:Men facing left and looking at viewer in Los Angeles which are not useful for us and are unlikely to ever have any other sitelinks. - Nikki ( talk ) 07:33, 19 July 2024 (UTC) I agree, poorly worded. I always interpreted it as do not create a Wikidata entry called Category:Foo, just add Category:Foo to the Wikidata item Foo using Multilingual_sites. -- RAN ( talk ) 21:39, 6 July 2024 (UTC) The last part is not right. Commons category links go on the main item unless a separate category item is necessary, either because the same category exists on another wiki, or because there is a Commons gallery for the same topic. The only sitelink on a main item can be a link to a Commons category (and over a quarter of all the Commons sitelinks are on items with no other sitelinks). The idea was to prevent people from creating lots of items for intersection categories like commons:Category:Men facing left and looking at viewer in Los Angeles which are not useful for us and are unlikely to ever have any other sitelinks. Maybe I am interpreting this one differently than you do as from my understanding this applies to Category items only, not regular items that have a Commons category sitelink. Morneo06 ( talk ) 10:13, 6 July 2024 (UTC) It's clunkily worded. My interpretation of 1.4 is that P31=mediawiki category with only a commons link is not notable. And if it's a main item with only a commons sitelink it should be to an album page and not to a category. Infrastruktur ( talk ) 19:01, 6 July 2024 (UTC) I agree, poorly worded. I always interpreted it as do not create a Wikidata entry called Category:Foo, just add Category:Foo to the Wikidata item Foo using Multilingual_sites. -- RAN ( talk ) 21:39, 6 July 2024 (UTC) The last part is not right. Commons category links go on the main item unless a separate category item is necessary, either because the same category exists on another wiki, or because there is a Commons gallery for the same topic. The only sitelink on a main item can be a link to a Commons category (and over a quarter of all the Commons sitelinks are on items with no other sitelinks). The idea was to prevent people from creating lots of items for intersection categories like commons:Category:Men facing left and looking at viewer in Los Angeles which are not useful for us and are unlikely to ever have any other sitelinks. - Nikki ( talk ) 07:33, 19 July 2024 (UTC) It's clunkily worded. My interpretation of 1.4 is that P31=mediawiki category with only a commons link is not notable. And if it's a main item with only a commons sitelink it should be to an album page and not to a category. Infrastruktur ( talk ) 19:01, 6 July 2024 (UTC) I agree, poorly worded. I always interpreted it as do not create a Wikidata entry called Category:Foo, just add Category:Foo to the Wikidata item Foo using Multilingual_sites. -- RAN ( talk ) 21:39, 6 July 2024 (UTC) The last part is not right. Commons category links go on the main item unless a separate category item is necessary, either because the same category exists on another wiki, or because there is a Commons gallery for the same topic. The only sitelink on a main item can be a link to a Commons category (and over a quarter of all the Commons sitelinks are on items with no other sitelinks). The idea was to prevent people from creating lots of items for intersection categories like commons:Category:Men facing left and looking at viewer in Los Angeles which are not useful for us and are unlikely to ever have any other sitelinks. - Nikki ( talk ) 07:33, 19 July 2024 (UTC) I agree, poorly worded. I always interpreted it as do not create a Wikidata entry called Category:Foo, just add Category:Foo to the Wikidata item Foo using Multilingual_sites. -- RAN ( talk ) 21:39, 6 July 2024 (UTC) The last part is not right. Commons category links go on the main item unless a separate category item is necessary, either because the same category exists on another wiki, or because there is a Commons gallery for the same topic. The only sitelink on a main item can be a link to a Commons category (and over a quarter of all the Commons sitelinks are on items with no other sitelinks). The idea was to prevent people from creating lots of items for intersection categories like commons:Category:Men facing left and looking at viewer in Los Angeles which are not useful for us and are unlikely to ever have any other sitelinks. It's clunkily worded. My interpretation of 1.4 is that P31=mediawiki category with only a commons link is not notable. And if it's a main item with only a commons sitelink it should be to an album page and not to a category. Infrastruktur ( talk ) 19:01, 6 July 2024 (UTC) I agree, poorly worded. I always interpreted it as do not create a Wikidata entry called Category:Foo, just add Category:Foo to the Wikidata item Foo using Multilingual_sites. -- RAN ( talk ) 21:39, 6 July 2024 (UTC) The last part is not right. Commons category links go on the main item unless a separate category item is necessary, either because the same category exists on another wiki, or because there is a Commons gallery for the same topic. The only sitelink on a main item can be a link to a Commons category (and over a quarter of all the Commons sitelinks are on items with no other sitelinks). The idea was to prevent people from creating lots of items for intersection categories like commons:Category:Men facing left and looking at viewer in Los Angeles which are not useful for us and are unlikely to ever have any other sitelinks. - Nikki ( talk ) 07:33, 19 July 2024 (UTC) I agree, poorly worded. I always interpreted it as do not create a Wikidata entry called Category:Foo, just add Category:Foo to the Wikidata item Foo using Multilingual_sites. -- RAN ( talk ) 21:39, 6 July 2024 (UTC) The last part is not right. Commons category links go on the main item unless a separate category item is necessary, either because the same category exists on another wiki, or because there is a Commons gallery for the same topic. The only sitelink on a main item can be a link to a Commons category (and over a quarter of all the Commons sitelinks are on items with no other sitelinks). The idea was to prevent people from creating lots of items for intersection categories like commons:Category:Men facing left and looking at viewer in Los Angeles which are not useful for us and are unlikely to ever have any other sitelinks. I agree, poorly worded. I always interpreted it as do not create a Wikidata entry called Category:Foo, just add Category:Foo to the Wikidata item Foo using Multilingual_sites. -- RAN ( talk ) 21:39, 6 July 2024 (UTC) The last part is not right. Commons category links go on the main item unless a separate category item is necessary, either because the same category exists on another wiki, or because there is a Commons gallery for the same topic. The only sitelink on a main item can be a link to a Commons category (and over a quarter of all the Commons sitelinks are on items with no other sitelinks). The idea was to prevent people from creating lots of items for intersection categories like commons:Category:Men facing left and looking at viewer in Los Angeles which are not useful for us and are unlikely to ever have any other sitelinks.