###Instruction: Multi-class classification, answer with one of the labels:['no_consensus', 'delete', 'keep', 'comment', 'merge', 'redirect'] : ###Input:  Q65029855: John Trevena (Q65029855) : lawyer : ( delete | history | links | entity usage | logs ) This guy isn't notable for anything except that he was charged with battery once. There's zero reason to have an entry for him based on that alone though. Really if anything it's all the more reason not to have one. Adamant1 ( talk ) 11:50, 23 May 2022 (UTC) Well, he have a siteling to bnwiki. He have to be deleted their first. Fralambert ( talk ) 12:46, 23 May 2022 (UTC) Because of this - keep , the bnWP article looks very detailed and is full of sources, I guess it will be hard to prove that the person isn't notable for the bnWP, respectively for us too. -- Wolverène ( talk ) 13:03, 23 May 2022 (UTC) Not done per above, WD:N #1 -- Ameisenigel ( talk ) 09:32, 25 May 2022 (UTC) Because of this - keep , the bnWP article looks very detailed and is full of sources, I guess it will be hard to prove that the person isn't notable for the bnWP, respectively for us too. -- Wolverène ( talk ) 13:03, 23 May 2022 (UTC) Not done per above, WD:N #1 -- Ameisenigel ( talk ) 09:32, 25 May 2022 (UTC) Because of this - keep , the bnWP article looks very detailed and is full of sources, I guess it will be hard to prove that the person isn't notable for the bnWP, respectively for us too. -- Wolverène ( talk ) 13:03, 23 May 2022 (UTC) Not done per above, WD:N #1 -- Ameisenigel ( talk ) 09:32, 25 May 2022 (UTC)