###Instruction: Multi-class classification, answer with one of the labels:['no_consensus', 'delete', 'keep', 'comment', 'merge', 'redirect'] : ###Input:  Q16060417: Q16060417 : no description : ( delete | history | links | entity usage | logs ) Non-notable item: sandbox subpage of Wikipedia:Tutorial (historical)/Formatting (Q6439890) . — TintoMeches , 10:01, 7 April 2014 (UTC) Thanks GZWDer for pinging me. I know, nevertheless it's still another sandbox subpage which —in my mind— has exactly the same purpose as project:Sandbox (Q3938) , and one item is enough for me. I believe this is the case when Wikipedia has two items for the same concept, but IMO in this circumstance interlinks are quite unnecessary, as looking for the same page in a different Wikimedia project would add nothing. How many sandboxes do we need? — TintoMeches , 11:33, 7 April 2014 (UTC) But then it seems to meet the first requirement of the notability policy . It would seem to me that policy would have to be adjusted in order to fulfil your request here. I think that is the wrong way around. Lymantria ( talk ) 16:13, 7 April 2014 (UTC) Deleted by Cycn ( talk • contribs • logs ) -- BeneBot* ( talk ) 06:45, 8 April 2014 (UTC) Not a sandbox of a template, but performs the same function as a one. The tutorials should be linked, clearly, but the sandbox of the tutorial has the same level of notability as one of a template. Sandbox content is not related, as it's used for testing purposes, only project:Sandbox (Q3938) is different as it has no parrent by which it can be found over the different wikis. - - ( Cycn / talk ) 06:57, 8 April 2014 (UTC)