###Instruction: Multi-class classification, answer with one of the labels:['no_consensus', 'delete', 'keep', 'comment', 'merge', 'redirect'] : ###Input:  Q105958299: Q105958299 : no description : ( delete | history | links | entity usage | logs ) Info should be on Q35519 , use of Property:P503 violates constraints. Same for other similar items created recently --- Jura 09:29, 6 April 2021 (UTC)  Q105966521 : no description : ( delete | history | links | entity usage | logs ) Same as above --- Jura 11:35, 6 April 2021 (UTC) Q105959390 : no description : ( delete | history | links | entity usage | logs ) Same as above --- Jura 11:35, 6 April 2021 (UTC) Q105960302 : no description : ( delete | history | links | entity usage | logs ) Same as above --- Jura 11:37, 6 April 2021 (UTC) Keep . Não há nenhuma violação ao criar rótulos de códigos de idioma. Se há rótulos com o nome do idioma, também poderá haver com códigos. Leonardo José Raimundo ( talk ) 19:58, 6 April 2021 (UTC) What would be the use of such items? ISO standard (P503) can't be added there. Q37053#P220 already has "cim", so Q105960302 isn't needed. The same goes for the others above. --- Jura 08:15, 7 April 2021 (UTC) O uso de tais itens serve para preservar os códigos de idioma. Por que a norma ISO não pode ser acrescentada lá? Verifique na Wikipédia o artigo ISO 639 . Lá estão alguns códigos de idioma. Leonardo José Raimundo ( talk ) 22:40, 7 April 2021 (UTC) The code(s) is/are already saved at Q37053#P220 and similar statements. No need to make items for them. ISO 639 is already present at Q33547#P503 where it's used correctly as value. If it's somewhat meaningful, maybe one could create a lexeme for the string .  --- Jura 09:37, 8 April 2021 (UTC) What would be the use of such items? ISO standard (P503) can't be added there. Q37053#P220 already has "cim", so Q105960302 isn't needed. The same goes for the others above. --- Jura 08:15, 7 April 2021 (UTC) O uso de tais itens serve para preservar os códigos de idioma. Por que a norma ISO não pode ser acrescentada lá? Verifique na Wikipédia o artigo ISO 639 . Lá estão alguns códigos de idioma. Leonardo José Raimundo ( talk ) 22:40, 7 April 2021 (UTC) The code(s) is/are already saved at Q37053#P220 and similar statements. No need to make items for them. ISO 639 is already present at Q33547#P503 where it's used correctly as value. If it's somewhat meaningful, maybe one could create a lexeme for the string .  --- Jura 09:37, 8 April 2021 (UTC) O uso de tais itens serve para preservar os códigos de idioma. Por que a norma ISO não pode ser acrescentada lá? Verifique na Wikipédia o artigo ISO 639 . Lá estão alguns códigos de idioma. Leonardo José Raimundo ( talk ) 22:40, 7 April 2021 (UTC) The code(s) is/are already saved at Q37053#P220 and similar statements. No need to make items for them. ISO 639 is already present at Q33547#P503 where it's used correctly as value. If it's somewhat meaningful, maybe one could create a lexeme for the string .  --- Jura 09:37, 8 April 2021 (UTC) The code(s) is/are already saved at Q37053#P220 and similar statements. No need to make items for them. ISO 639 is already present at Q33547#P503 where it's used correctly as value. If it's somewhat meaningful, maybe one could create a lexeme for the string .  --- Jura 09:37, 8 April 2021 (UTC) What would be the use of such items? ISO standard (P503) can't be added there. Q37053#P220 already has "cim", so Q105960302 isn't needed. The same goes for the others above. --- Jura 08:15, 7 April 2021 (UTC) O uso de tais itens serve para preservar os códigos de idioma. Por que a norma ISO não pode ser acrescentada lá? Verifique na Wikipédia o artigo ISO 639 . Lá estão alguns códigos de idioma. Leonardo José Raimundo ( talk ) 22:40, 7 April 2021 (UTC) The code(s) is/are already saved at Q37053#P220 and similar statements. No need to make items for them. ISO 639 is already present at Q33547#P503 where it's used correctly as value. If it's somewhat meaningful, maybe one could create a lexeme for the string .  --- Jura 09:37, 8 April 2021 (UTC) O uso de tais itens serve para preservar os códigos de idioma. Por que a norma ISO não pode ser acrescentada lá? Verifique na Wikipédia o artigo ISO 639 . Lá estão alguns códigos de idioma. Leonardo José Raimundo ( talk ) 22:40, 7 April 2021 (UTC) The code(s) is/are already saved at Q37053#P220 and similar statements. No need to make items for them. ISO 639 is already present at Q33547#P503 where it's used correctly as value. If it's somewhat meaningful, maybe one could create a lexeme for the string .  --- Jura 09:37, 8 April 2021 (UTC) O uso de tais itens serve para preservar os códigos de idioma. Por que a norma ISO não pode ser acrescentada lá? Verifique na Wikipédia o artigo ISO 639 . Lá estão alguns códigos de idioma. Leonardo José Raimundo ( talk ) 22:40, 7 April 2021 (UTC) The code(s) is/are already saved at Q37053#P220 and similar statements. No need to make items for them. ISO 639 is already present at Q33547#P503 where it's used correctly as value. If it's somewhat meaningful, maybe one could create a lexeme for the string .  --- Jura 09:37, 8 April 2021 (UTC)