###Instruction: Multi-class classification, answer with one of the labels:['no_consensus', 'delete', 'keep', 'comment', 'merge', 'redirect'] : ###Input:  Q61740369: Q61740369 : no description : ( delete | history | links | entity usage | logs ) Fails notability Quakewoody ( talk ) 14:17, 13 November 2020 (UTC) Normally, a merge is correct. But since they were created a year apart by different/sock accounts, and both should be deleted, we can skip that step so admin can clearly see what is going on. Also, for whatever reason, the fact that they were the same person didn't hit me until after I nominated the two of them, which is why I added the comment separately. I think worth noting, is that there is a 3rd item for someone of this name, but it seems legitimate. Yet, it was nominated for deletion by the sock of the other two. Odd. Quakewoody ( talk ) 15:01, 13 November 2020 (UTC) Normally, a merge is correct. But since they were created a year apart by different/sock accounts, and both should be deleted, we can skip that step so admin can clearly see what is going on. Also, for whatever reason, the fact that they were the same person didn't hit me until after I nominated the two of them, which is why I added the comment separately. I think worth noting, is that there is a 3rd item for someone of this name, but it seems legitimate. Yet, it was nominated for deletion by the sock of the other two. Odd. Quakewoody ( talk ) 15:01, 13 November 2020 (UTC) I think worth noting, is that there is a 3rd item for someone of this name, but it seems legitimate. Yet, it was nominated for deletion by the sock of the other two. Odd. Quakewoody ( talk ) 15:01, 13 November 2020 (UTC) Normally, a merge is correct. But since they were created a year apart by different/sock accounts, and both should be deleted, we can skip that step so admin can clearly see what is going on. Also, for whatever reason, the fact that they were the same person didn't hit me until after I nominated the two of them, which is why I added the comment separately. I think worth noting, is that there is a 3rd item for someone of this name, but it seems legitimate. Yet, it was nominated for deletion by the sock of the other two. Odd. Quakewoody ( talk ) 15:01, 13 November 2020 (UTC)