###Instruction: Multi-class classification, answer with one of the labels:['no_consensus', 'delete', 'keep', 'comment', 'merge', 'redirect'] : ###Input:  Q67174802: Q67174802 : no description : ( delete | history | links | entity usage | logs ) Not-notable book, deleted from en.wiki ( see here ) Clearly promotional, created by an editor who appears to have gone all out, both here and on Commons, to ensure visibility of their newly published work.
-- Nick Moyes ( talk ) 21:55, 12 October 2019 (UTC) I support deletion. And I am glad you added the author for deletion as well. The book exists. The author exists. But I find nothing to show notability. Admittedly, I don't know all of the various author/book identifier websites, so it is possible that there is data I haven't found. But, in general, I see no reason to keep either of them. Quakewoody ( talk ) 03:57, 13 October 2019 (UTC)