###Instruction: Multi-class classification, answer with one of the labels:['no_consensus', 'delete', 'keep', 'comment', 'merge', 'redirect'] : ###Input:  Q65095514: Alex Maclean (Q65095514) : no description : ( delete | history | links | entity usage | logs ) Not notable Baby come ( talk ) 19:11, 22 August 2020 (UTC) This is the actor in a movie. It is totally notable. Added the present in work (P1441) statement to make it explicit. Regards, -- Antoine2711bot ( talk ) 13:50, 23 August 2020 (UTC) But is this film or any of its participants notable? Quakewoody ( talk ) 14:28, 23 August 2020 (UTC) @ Quakewoody : What are the criterias for movies in WD? I think #2 of the Notability states it simply: It refers to an instance of a clearly identifiable conceptual or material entity. The entity must be notable, in the sense that it can be described using serious and publicly available references . For actors in movies, they get it automatically with #3 : It fulfills a structural need, for example: it is needed to make statements made in other items more useful . Regards, Antoine Antoine2711 ( talk ) 04:54, 24 August 2020 (UTC) For starters, Q65055300 has no cast list anywhere except WD. And one of those cast members died 6 years before this film was shot. Quakewoody ( talk ) 15:30, 24 August 2020 (UTC) @ Quakewoody : Well, I think we can be happy that WD has more data than elsewhere. Since I put that data there, and I got the data from a movie distributor of that film, I know my data is pretty accurate, though not 100 %, of course. Thanks for pointing out the mistake of the cast member. I will fix it. But, overall, your request to delete Alex is way too agressive. You should know the rules of notability, and in this case, nothing is questionnable, even remotely. Regards, Antoine2711 ( talk ) 21:29, 25 August 2020 (UTC) Should WD have more data than elsewhere? I mean, we aren't content originators. Nothing found here isn't already found elsewhere. Quakewoody ( talk ) 22:10, 25 August 2020 (UTC) @ Quakewoody : You are wrong. Of course we are not content originators. But all that exists cannot be found on the internet. It doesn't mean it doesn't exists. Antoine2711 ( talk ) 21:37, 15 September 2020 (UTC) But the non-internet cast list that they gave to you (and apparently only you) included a dead man. Can we trust it? Besides, is the movie even notable. Quakewoody ( talk ) 21:48, 15 September 2020 (UTC) @ Quakewoody : What are the criterias for movies in WD? I think #2 of the Notability states it simply: It refers to an instance of a clearly identifiable conceptual or material entity. The entity must be notable, in the sense that it can be described using serious and publicly available references . For actors in movies, they get it automatically with #3 : It fulfills a structural need, for example: it is needed to make statements made in other items more useful . Regards, Antoine Antoine2711 ( talk ) 04:54, 24 August 2020 (UTC) For starters, Q65055300 has no cast list anywhere except WD. And one of those cast members died 6 years before this film was shot. Quakewoody ( talk ) 15:30, 24 August 2020 (UTC) @ Quakewoody : Well, I think we can be happy that WD has more data than elsewhere. Since I put that data there, and I got the data from a movie distributor of that film, I know my data is pretty accurate, though not 100 %, of course. Thanks for pointing out the mistake of the cast member. I will fix it. But, overall, your request to delete Alex is way too agressive. You should know the rules of notability, and in this case, nothing is questionnable, even remotely. Regards, Antoine2711 ( talk ) 21:29, 25 August 2020 (UTC) Should WD have more data than elsewhere? I mean, we aren't content originators. Nothing found here isn't already found elsewhere. Quakewoody ( talk ) 22:10, 25 August 2020 (UTC) @ Quakewoody : You are wrong. Of course we are not content originators. But all that exists cannot be found on the internet. It doesn't mean it doesn't exists. Antoine2711 ( talk ) 21:37, 15 September 2020 (UTC) But the non-internet cast list that they gave to you (and apparently only you) included a dead man. Can we trust it? Besides, is the movie even notable. Quakewoody ( talk ) 21:48, 15 September 2020 (UTC) @ Quakewoody : What are the criterias for movies in WD? I think #2 of the Notability states it simply: It refers to an instance of a clearly identifiable conceptual or material entity. The entity must be notable, in the sense that it can be described using serious and publicly available references . For actors in movies, they get it automatically with #3 : It fulfills a structural need, for example: it is needed to make statements made in other items more useful . Regards, Antoine Antoine2711 ( talk ) 04:54, 24 August 2020 (UTC) For starters, Q65055300 has no cast list anywhere except WD. And one of those cast members died 6 years before this film was shot. Quakewoody ( talk ) 15:30, 24 August 2020 (UTC) @ Quakewoody : Well, I think we can be happy that WD has more data than elsewhere. Since I put that data there, and I got the data from a movie distributor of that film, I know my data is pretty accurate, though not 100 %, of course. Thanks for pointing out the mistake of the cast member. I will fix it. But, overall, your request to delete Alex is way too agressive. You should know the rules of notability, and in this case, nothing is questionnable, even remotely. Regards, Antoine2711 ( talk ) 21:29, 25 August 2020 (UTC) Should WD have more data than elsewhere? I mean, we aren't content originators. Nothing found here isn't already found elsewhere. Quakewoody ( talk ) 22:10, 25 August 2020 (UTC) @ Quakewoody : You are wrong. Of course we are not content originators. But all that exists cannot be found on the internet. It doesn't mean it doesn't exists. Antoine2711 ( talk ) 21:37, 15 September 2020 (UTC) But the non-internet cast list that they gave to you (and apparently only you) included a dead man. Can we trust it? Besides, is the movie even notable. Quakewoody ( talk ) 21:48, 15 September 2020 (UTC) @ Quakewoody : Well, I think we can be happy that WD has more data than elsewhere. Since I put that data there, and I got the data from a movie distributor of that film, I know my data is pretty accurate, though not 100 %, of course. Thanks for pointing out the mistake of the cast member. I will fix it. But, overall, your request to delete Alex is way too agressive. You should know the rules of notability, and in this case, nothing is questionnable, even remotely. Regards, Antoine2711 ( talk ) 21:29, 25 August 2020 (UTC) Should WD have more data than elsewhere? I mean, we aren't content originators. Nothing found here isn't already found elsewhere. Quakewoody ( talk ) 22:10, 25 August 2020 (UTC) @ Quakewoody : You are wrong. Of course we are not content originators. But all that exists cannot be found on the internet. It doesn't mean it doesn't exists. Antoine2711 ( talk ) 21:37, 15 September 2020 (UTC) But the non-internet cast list that they gave to you (and apparently only you) included a dead man. Can we trust it? Besides, is the movie even notable. Quakewoody ( talk ) 21:48, 15 September 2020 (UTC) @ Quakewoody : Well, I think we can be happy that WD has more data than elsewhere. Since I put that data there, and I got the data from a movie distributor of that film, I know my data is pretty accurate, though not 100 %, of course. Thanks for pointing out the mistake of the cast member. I will fix it. But, overall, your request to delete Alex is way too agressive. You should know the rules of notability, and in this case, nothing is questionnable, even remotely. Regards, Antoine2711 ( talk ) 21:29, 25 August 2020 (UTC) Should WD have more data than elsewhere? I mean, we aren't content originators. Nothing found here isn't already found elsewhere. Quakewoody ( talk ) 22:10, 25 August 2020 (UTC) @ Quakewoody : You are wrong. Of course we are not content originators. But all that exists cannot be found on the internet. It doesn't mean it doesn't exists. Antoine2711 ( talk ) 21:37, 15 September 2020 (UTC) But the non-internet cast list that they gave to you (and apparently only you) included a dead man. Can we trust it? Besides, is the movie even notable. Quakewoody ( talk ) 21:48, 15 September 2020 (UTC) Should WD have more data than elsewhere? I mean, we aren't content originators. Nothing found here isn't already found elsewhere. Quakewoody ( talk ) 22:10, 25 August 2020 (UTC) @ Quakewoody : What are the criterias for movies in WD? I think #2 of the Notability states it simply: It refers to an instance of a clearly identifiable conceptual or material entity. The entity must be notable, in the sense that it can be described using serious and publicly available references . For actors in movies, they get it automatically with #3 : It fulfills a structural need, for example: it is needed to make statements made in other items more useful . Regards, Antoine Antoine2711 ( talk ) 04:54, 24 August 2020 (UTC) For starters, Q65055300 has no cast list anywhere except WD. And one of those cast members died 6 years before this film was shot. Quakewoody ( talk ) 15:30, 24 August 2020 (UTC) @ Quakewoody : Well, I think we can be happy that WD has more data than elsewhere. Since I put that data there, and I got the data from a movie distributor of that film, I know my data is pretty accurate, though not 100 %, of course. Thanks for pointing out the mistake of the cast member. I will fix it. But, overall, your request to delete Alex is way too agressive. You should know the rules of notability, and in this case, nothing is questionnable, even remotely. Regards, Antoine2711 ( talk ) 21:29, 25 August 2020 (UTC) Should WD have more data than elsewhere? I mean, we aren't content originators. Nothing found here isn't already found elsewhere. Quakewoody ( talk ) 22:10, 25 August 2020 (UTC) @ Quakewoody : You are wrong. Of course we are not content originators. But all that exists cannot be found on the internet. It doesn't mean it doesn't exists. Antoine2711 ( talk ) 21:37, 15 September 2020 (UTC) But the non-internet cast list that they gave to you (and apparently only you) included a dead man. Can we trust it? Besides, is the movie even notable. Quakewoody ( talk ) 21:48, 15 September 2020 (UTC) @ Quakewoody : What are the criterias for movies in WD? I think #2 of the Notability states it simply: It refers to an instance of a clearly identifiable conceptual or material entity. The entity must be notable, in the sense that it can be described using serious and publicly available references . For actors in movies, they get it automatically with #3 : It fulfills a structural need, for example: it is needed to make statements made in other items more useful . Regards, Antoine Antoine2711 ( talk ) 04:54, 24 August 2020 (UTC) For starters, Q65055300 has no cast list anywhere except WD. And one of those cast members died 6 years before this film was shot. Quakewoody ( talk ) 15:30, 24 August 2020 (UTC) @ Quakewoody : Well, I think we can be happy that WD has more data than elsewhere. Since I put that data there, and I got the data from a movie distributor of that film, I know my data is pretty accurate, though not 100 %, of course. Thanks for pointing out the mistake of the cast member. I will fix it. But, overall, your request to delete Alex is way too agressive. You should know the rules of notability, and in this case, nothing is questionnable, even remotely. Regards, Antoine2711 ( talk ) 21:29, 25 August 2020 (UTC) Should WD have more data than elsewhere? I mean, we aren't content originators. Nothing found here isn't already found elsewhere. Quakewoody ( talk ) 22:10, 25 August 2020 (UTC) @ Quakewoody : You are wrong. Of course we are not content originators. But all that exists cannot be found on the internet. It doesn't mean it doesn't exists. Antoine2711 ( talk ) 21:37, 15 September 2020 (UTC) But the non-internet cast list that they gave to you (and apparently only you) included a dead man. Can we trust it? Besides, is the movie even notable. Quakewoody ( talk ) 21:48, 15 September 2020 (UTC) @ Quakewoody : Well, I think we can be happy that WD has more data than elsewhere. Since I put that data there, and I got the data from a movie distributor of that film, I know my data is pretty accurate, though not 100 %, of course. Thanks for pointing out the mistake of the cast member. I will fix it. But, overall, your request to delete Alex is way too agressive. You should know the rules of notability, and in this case, nothing is questionnable, even remotely. Regards, Antoine2711 ( talk ) 21:29, 25 August 2020 (UTC) Should WD have more data than elsewhere? I mean, we aren't content originators. Nothing found here isn't already found elsewhere. Quakewoody ( talk ) 22:10, 25 August 2020 (UTC) @ Quakewoody : You are wrong. Of course we are not content originators. But all that exists cannot be found on the internet. It doesn't mean it doesn't exists. Antoine2711 ( talk ) 21:37, 15 September 2020 (UTC) But the non-internet cast list that they gave to you (and apparently only you) included a dead man. Can we trust it? Besides, is the movie even notable. Quakewoody ( talk ) 21:48, 15 September 2020 (UTC) @ Quakewoody : Well, I think we can be happy that WD has more data than elsewhere. Since I put that data there, and I got the data from a movie distributor of that film, I know my data is pretty accurate, though not 100 %, of course. Thanks for pointing out the mistake of the cast member. I will fix it. But, overall, your request to delete Alex is way too agressive. You should know the rules of notability, and in this case, nothing is questionnable, even remotely. Regards, Antoine2711 ( talk ) 21:29, 25 August 2020 (UTC) Should WD have more data than elsewhere? I mean, we aren't content originators. Nothing found here isn't already found elsewhere. Quakewoody ( talk ) 22:10, 25 August 2020 (UTC) @ Quakewoody : You are wrong. Of course we are not content originators. But all that exists cannot be found on the internet. It doesn't mean it doesn't exists. Antoine2711 ( talk ) 21:37, 15 September 2020 (UTC) But the non-internet cast list that they gave to you (and apparently only you) included a dead man. Can we trust it? Besides, is the movie even notable. Quakewoody ( talk ) 21:48, 15 September 2020 (UTC) Should WD have more data than elsewhere? I mean, we aren't content originators. Nothing found here isn't already found elsewhere. Quakewoody ( talk ) 22:10, 25 August 2020 (UTC) @ Quakewoody : What are the criterias for movies in WD? I think #2 of the Notability states it simply: It refers to an instance of a clearly identifiable conceptual or material entity. The entity must be notable, in the sense that it can be described using serious and publicly available references . For actors in movies, they get it automatically with #3 : It fulfills a structural need, for example: it is needed to make statements made in other items more useful . Regards, Antoine Antoine2711 ( talk ) 04:54, 24 August 2020 (UTC) For starters, Q65055300 has no cast list anywhere except WD. And one of those cast members died 6 years before this film was shot. Quakewoody ( talk ) 15:30, 24 August 2020 (UTC) @ Quakewoody : Well, I think we can be happy that WD has more data than elsewhere. Since I put that data there, and I got the data from a movie distributor of that film, I know my data is pretty accurate, though not 100 %, of course. Thanks for pointing out the mistake of the cast member. I will fix it. But, overall, your request to delete Alex is way too agressive. You should know the rules of notability, and in this case, nothing is questionnable, even remotely. Regards, Antoine2711 ( talk ) 21:29, 25 August 2020 (UTC) Should WD have more data than elsewhere? I mean, we aren't content originators. Nothing found here isn't already found elsewhere. Quakewoody ( talk ) 22:10, 25 August 2020 (UTC) @ Quakewoody : You are wrong. Of course we are not content originators. But all that exists cannot be found on the internet. It doesn't mean it doesn't exists. Antoine2711 ( talk ) 21:37, 15 September 2020 (UTC) But the non-internet cast list that they gave to you (and apparently only you) included a dead man. Can we trust it? Besides, is the movie even notable. Quakewoody ( talk ) 21:48, 15 September 2020 (UTC) @ Quakewoody : Well, I think we can be happy that WD has more data than elsewhere. Since I put that data there, and I got the data from a movie distributor of that film, I know my data is pretty accurate, though not 100 %, of course. Thanks for pointing out the mistake of the cast member. I will fix it. But, overall, your request to delete Alex is way too agressive. You should know the rules of notability, and in this case, nothing is questionnable, even remotely. Regards, Antoine2711 ( talk ) 21:29, 25 August 2020 (UTC) Should WD have more data than elsewhere? I mean, we aren't content originators. Nothing found here isn't already found elsewhere. Quakewoody ( talk ) 22:10, 25 August 2020 (UTC) @ Quakewoody : You are wrong. Of course we are not content originators. But all that exists cannot be found on the internet. It doesn't mean it doesn't exists. Antoine2711 ( talk ) 21:37, 15 September 2020 (UTC) But the non-internet cast list that they gave to you (and apparently only you) included a dead man. Can we trust it? Besides, is the movie even notable. Quakewoody ( talk ) 21:48, 15 September 2020 (UTC) @ Quakewoody : Well, I think we can be happy that WD has more data than elsewhere. Since I put that data there, and I got the data from a movie distributor of that film, I know my data is pretty accurate, though not 100 %, of course. Thanks for pointing out the mistake of the cast member. I will fix it. But, overall, your request to delete Alex is way too agressive. You should know the rules of notability, and in this case, nothing is questionnable, even remotely. Regards, Antoine2711 ( talk ) 21:29, 25 August 2020 (UTC) Should WD have more data than elsewhere? I mean, we aren't content originators. Nothing found here isn't already found elsewhere. Quakewoody ( talk ) 22:10, 25 August 2020 (UTC) @ Quakewoody : You are wrong. Of course we are not content originators. But all that exists cannot be found on the internet. It doesn't mean it doesn't exists. Antoine2711 ( talk ) 21:37, 15 September 2020 (UTC) But the non-internet cast list that they gave to you (and apparently only you) included a dead man. Can we trust it? Besides, is the movie even notable. Quakewoody ( talk ) 21:48, 15 September 2020 (UTC) Should WD have more data than elsewhere? I mean, we aren't content originators. Nothing found here isn't already found elsewhere. Quakewoody ( talk ) 22:10, 25 August 2020 (UTC) @ Quakewoody : Well, I think we can be happy that WD has more data than elsewhere. Since I put that data there, and I got the data from a movie distributor of that film, I know my data is pretty accurate, though not 100 %, of course. Thanks for pointing out the mistake of the cast member. I will fix it. But, overall, your request to delete Alex is way too agressive. You should know the rules of notability, and in this case, nothing is questionnable, even remotely. Regards, Antoine2711 ( talk ) 21:29, 25 August 2020 (UTC) Should WD have more data than elsewhere? I mean, we aren't content originators. Nothing found here isn't already found elsewhere. Quakewoody ( talk ) 22:10, 25 August 2020 (UTC) @ Quakewoody : You are wrong. Of course we are not content originators. But all that exists cannot be found on the internet. It doesn't mean it doesn't exists. Antoine2711 ( talk ) 21:37, 15 September 2020 (UTC) But the non-internet cast list that they gave to you (and apparently only you) included a dead man. Can we trust it? Besides, is the movie even notable. Quakewoody ( talk ) 21:48, 15 September 2020 (UTC) @ Quakewoody : Well, I think we can be happy that WD has more data than elsewhere. Since I put that data there, and I got the data from a movie distributor of that film, I know my data is pretty accurate, though not 100 %, of course. Thanks for pointing out the mistake of the cast member. I will fix it. But, overall, your request to delete Alex is way too agressive. You should know the rules of notability, and in this case, nothing is questionnable, even remotely. Regards, Antoine2711 ( talk ) 21:29, 25 August 2020 (UTC) Should WD have more data than elsewhere? I mean, we aren't content originators. Nothing found here isn't already found elsewhere. Quakewoody ( talk ) 22:10, 25 August 2020 (UTC) @ Quakewoody : You are wrong. Of course we are not content originators. But all that exists cannot be found on the internet. It doesn't mean it doesn't exists. Antoine2711 ( talk ) 21:37, 15 September 2020 (UTC) But the non-internet cast list that they gave to you (and apparently only you) included a dead man. Can we trust it? Besides, is the movie even notable. Quakewoody ( talk ) 21:48, 15 September 2020 (UTC) Should WD have more data than elsewhere? I mean, we aren't content originators. Nothing found here isn't already found elsewhere. Quakewoody ( talk ) 22:10, 25 August 2020 (UTC) @ Quakewoody : Well, I think we can be happy that WD has more data than elsewhere. Since I put that data there, and I got the data from a movie distributor of that film, I know my data is pretty accurate, though not 100 %, of course. Thanks for pointing out the mistake of the cast member. I will fix it. But, overall, your request to delete Alex is way too agressive. You should know the rules of notability, and in this case, nothing is questionnable, even remotely. Regards, Antoine2711 ( talk ) 21:29, 25 August 2020 (UTC) Should WD have more data than elsewhere? I mean, we aren't content originators. Nothing found here isn't already found elsewhere. Quakewoody ( talk ) 22:10, 25 August 2020 (UTC) @ Quakewoody : You are wrong. Of course we are not content originators. But all that exists cannot be found on the internet. It doesn't mean it doesn't exists. Antoine2711 ( talk ) 21:37, 15 September 2020 (UTC) But the non-internet cast list that they gave to you (and apparently only you) included a dead man. Can we trust it? Besides, is the movie even notable. Quakewoody ( talk ) 21:48, 15 September 2020 (UTC) Should WD have more data than elsewhere? I mean, we aren't content originators. Nothing found here isn't already found elsewhere. Quakewoody ( talk ) 22:10, 25 August 2020 (UTC) Should WD have more data than elsewhere? I mean, we aren't content originators. Nothing found here isn't already found elsewhere. Quakewoody ( talk ) 22:10, 25 August 2020 (UTC) Not deleted ; weak structural need; sources given in the items are problematic and should be more accessible, not just a plain P248 value — MisterSynergy ( talk ) 09:37, 27 September 2020 (UTC)