Question:
<citphrase id="cp0.0">cited from="[2006] FCA 1254">corporations</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp0.1">cited from="[2006] FCA 1254">winding up</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp0.2">cited from="[2006] FCA 1254">application by asic to wind up a publicly listed company (and its subsidiary) on the ground of insolvency, the just and equitable ground and contended conduct by directors in the affairs of the company in their own interests rather than members as a whole (ss 461(1)(e) and (k), s 459p, s 459a, and s 462(2) of the corporations act 2001 (cth)).</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp1.0">cited from="[2004] FCA 394">corporations</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp1.1">cited from="[2004] FCA 394">winding up</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp1.2">cited from="[2004] FCA 394">just and equitable</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp1.3">cited from="[2004] FCA 394">two-man company</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp1.4">cited from="[2004] FCA 394">deadlocked board</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp2.0">cited from="[1995] FCA 1663">corporations</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp2.1">cited from="[1995] FCA 1663">winding-up</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp2.2">cited from="[1995] FCA 1663">just and equitable ground</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp2.3">cited from="[1995] FCA 1663">australian securities commission as applicant</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp2.4">cited from="[1995] FCA 1663">petition based on public interest</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp2.5">cited from="[1995] FCA 1663">trust and management companies</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp2.6">cited from="[1995] FCA 1663">maintaining appropriate standards of conduct in the superannuation industry</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp2.7">cited from="[1995] FCA 1663">investor protection</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp2.8">cited from="[1995] FCA 1663">persistent breaches of trust, of fiduciary duty and of the corporations law</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp2.9">cited from="[1995] FCA 1663">companies not insolvent.   corporations</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp2.10">cited from="[1995] FCA 1663">receivers and managers</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp2.11">cited from="[1995] FCA 1663">corporations law s1323</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp2.12">cited from="[1995] FCA 1663">asc investigation completed</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp2.13">cited from="[1995] FCA 1663">no necessity for fraud</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp2.14">cited from="[1995] FCA 1663">serious and persistent breaches of trust, of fiduciary duty and of the corporations law</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp2.15">cited from="[1995] FCA 1663">investor protection</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp2.16">cited from="[1995] FCA 1663">undertakings by respondent companies in lieu of an order inappropriate.   corporations</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp2.17">cited from="[1995] FCA 1663">management and administration</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp2.18">cited from="[1995] FCA 1663">trust companies</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp2.19">cited from="[1995] FCA 1663">director's duty of care in such companies</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp2.20">cited from="[1995] FCA 1663">effect on of trustee's duty of caution.   corporations</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp2.21">cited from="[1995] FCA 1663">management and administration</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp2.22">cited from="[1995] FCA 1663">corporations law s60</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp2.23">cited from="[1995] FCA 1663">deemed director</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp2.24">cited from="[1995] FCA 1663">person according to whose direction or instruction the directors are accustomed to act</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp2.25">cited from="[1995] FCA 1663">directions or instructions need not be formal or all-encompassing.   corporations</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp2.26">cited from="[1995] FCA 1663">trust companies</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp2.27">cited from="[1995] FCA 1663">whether directors owe a duty of care to trust beneficiaries</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp2.28">cited from="[1995] FCA 1663">whether directors as such are in a fiduciary relationship with trust beneficiaries.   corporations</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp2.29">cited from="[1995] FCA 1663">management and administration</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp2.30">cited from="[1995] FCA 1663">duty to keep both minutes of board meetings and correct accounting records</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp2.31">cited from="[1995] FCA 1663">corporations law ss258 and 289</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp2.32">cited from="[1995] FCA 1663">trust companies</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp2.33">cited from="[1995] FCA 1663">significant trust decisions and investments not recorded.   trusts and trustees</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp2.34">cited from="[1995] FCA 1663">powers, duties, rights and liabilities</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp2.35">cited from="[1995] FCA 1663">duty of care and caution</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp2.36">cited from="[1995] FCA 1663">prudent business person test</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp2.37">cited from="[1995] FCA 1663">trust companies</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp2.38">cited from="[1995] FCA 1663">higher standard for professional, corporate trustee.   trusts and trustees</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp2.39">cited from="[1995] FCA 1663">powers, duties, rights and liabilities</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp2.40">cited from="[1995] FCA 1663">related trusts</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp2.41">cited from="[1995] FCA 1663">duty to consider the separate interests of each trust</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp2.42">cited from="[1995] FCA 1663">inter</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp2.43">cited from="[1995] FCA 1663">trust dealings.   trusts and trustees</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp2.44">cited from="[1995] FCA 1663">powers, duties, rights and liabilities</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp2.45">cited from="[1995] FCA 1663">trust funds of separate trusts</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp2.46">cited from="[1995] FCA 1663">duty to bank separately</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp2.47">cited from="[1995] FCA 1663">common bank account</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp2.48">cited from="[1995] FCA 1663">use of trust funds for non-trust purposes.   trusts and trustees</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp2.49">cited from="[1995] FCA 1663">superannuation trusts</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp2.50">cited from="[1995] FCA 1663">investments</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp2.51">cited from="[1995] FCA 1663">negative gearing</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp2.52">cited from="[1995] FCA 1663">non-performing loans</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp2.53">cited from="[1995] FCA 1663">loans without any or adequate or timely security</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp2.54">cited from="[1995] FCA 1663">borrowing at up to twice reserve bank lending rates</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp2.55">cited from="[1995] FCA 1663">imprudent investments.   trusts and trustees</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp2.56">cited from="[1995] FCA 1663">breach of trust</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp2.57">cited from="[1995] FCA 1663">partial decision making</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp2.58">cited from="[1995] FCA 1663">acting in interests of a third party.   trusts and trustees</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp2.59">cited from="[1995] FCA 1663">trust company</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp2.60">cited from="[1995] FCA 1663">keeping of records</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp2.61">cited from="[1995] FCA 1663">no</citphrase>
</citphrases>
<citances>
</citances>
<legistitles>
<title id="l0">CORPORATIONS ACT 2001 </title>
<title id="l1">CORPORATIONS ACT 2001 - SECT 461 General grounds on which company may be wound up by Court</title>
<title id="l2">CORPORATIONS ACT 2001 - SECT 462 Standing to apply for winding up</title>
<title id="l3">CORPORATIONS ACT 2001 - SECT 464 Application for winding up in connection with investigation under ASIC Act</title>
<title id="l4">CORPORATIONS ACT 2001 - SECT 912A General obligations</title>
<title id="l5">CORPORATIONS ACT 2001 - SECT 912C Direction to provide a statement</title>
<title id="l6">CORPORATIONS ACT 2001 - SECT 989B Financial services licensee to prepare and lodge annual profit and loss statement and balance sheet</title>
<title id="l7">CORPORATIONS ACT 2001 - SECT 989D Time of lodgment</title>
<title id="l8">CORPORATIONS ACT 2001 - SECT 1311 General penalty provisions</title>
<title id="l9">FEDERAL COURT RULES </title>
</legistitles>
</case>


Question:
<citphrase id="cp0.0">cited from="[2006] FCAFC 48">appeals</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp0.1">cited from="[2006] FCAFC 48">security for costs</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp0.2">cited from="[2006] FCAFC 48">application to have order for security set aside or amount reduced</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp0.3">cited from="[2006] FCAFC 48">impecunious appellant</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp0.4">cited from="[2006] FCAFC 48">reduction in grounds of appeal</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp0.5">cited from="[2006] FCAFC 48">detailed factual challenges on appeal</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp0.6">cited from="[2006] FCAFC 48">costs unlikely to be recovered in the event the appeal is unsuccessful</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp0.7">cited from="[2006] FCAFC 48">appellant seeking to run arguments not run at trial</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp1.0">cited from="[2006] FCAFC 2">practice and procedure</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp1.1">cited from="[2006] FCAFC 2">circumstances in which a later full court can depart from an earlier full court decision</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp1.2">cited from="[2006] FCAFC 2">stare decisis</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp1.3">cited from="[2006] FCAFC 2">determining ratio decidendi</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp1.4">cited from="[2006] FCAFC 2">application of minister for immigration and multicultural affairs v al shamry (2001) 110 fcr 27  migration</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp1.5">cited from="[2006] FCAFC 2">the application of s 424a(1) of the migration act 1958 (cth)</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp1.6">cited from="[2006] FCAFC 2">meaning of 'application', 'information', and 'reason, or part of the reason' in s 424a</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp2.0">cited from="[2005] HCA 24">saap  anor v minister for immigration and multicultural and indigenous affairs  immigration</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp2.1">cited from="[2005] HCA 24">refugees</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp2.2">cited from="[2005] HCA 24">decision of refugee review tribunal ("tribunal")</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp2.3">cited from="[2005] HCA 24">tribunal invited the first appellant to appear to give evidence and present arguments under migration act 1958 (cth), s 425</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp2.4">cited from="[2005] HCA 24">evidence was later taken from first appellant's daughter in absence of first appellant</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp2.5">cited from="[2005] HCA 24">tribunal affirmed decision under review by relying on information obtained from first appellant's daughter</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp2.6">cited from="[2005] HCA 24">tribunal failed to give the first appellant particulars in writing of information</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp2.7">cited from="[2005] HCA 24">tribunal failed to invite the first appellant in writing to comment on information</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp2.8">cited from="[2005] HCA 24">whether tribunal breached migration act , s 424a.  immigration</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp2.9">cited from="[2005] HCA 24">construction of migration act , s 424a</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp2.10">cited from="[2005] HCA 24">whether the provisions of pt 7 div 4 have sequential or ambulatory operation</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp2.11">cited from="[2005] HCA 24">relevance of refugee convention in case of ambiguity.  immigration</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp2.12">cited from="[2005] HCA 24">jurisdictional error</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp2.13">cited from="[2005] HCA 24">whether a breach of migration act , s 424a amounts to jurisdictional error that invalidates the decision.  immigration</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp2.14">cited from="[2005] HCA 24">procedural fairness</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp2.15">cited from="[2005] HCA 24">general law</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp2.16">cited from="[2005] HCA 24">whether tribunal breached rules of procedural fairness.  administrative law (cth)</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp2.17">cited from="[2005] HCA 24">certiorari</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp2.18">cited from="[2005] HCA 24">mandamus</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp2.19">cited from="[2005] HCA 24">jurisdictional error</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp2.20">cited from="[2005] HCA 24">whether grant of relief should be withheld on discretionary grounds</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp2.21">cited from="[2005] HCA 24">relevant factors</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp2.22">cited from="[2005] HCA 24">judiciary act 1903 (cth), s 39b.  practice</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp2.23">cited from="[2005] HCA 24">joinder of party</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp2.24">cited from="[2005] HCA 24">tribunal was not named as a party for the relief sought under judiciary act , s 39b</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp2.25">cited from="[2005] HCA 24">whether the tribunal was a necessary party to the proceedings</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp2.26">cited from="[2005] HCA 24">"officer or officers of the commonwealth"</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp2.27">cited from="[2005] HCA 24">judiciary act , s 39b.</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp3.0">cited from="[2004] HCA 25">applicant s v minister for immigration and multicultural affairs  immigration</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp3.1">cited from="[2004] HCA 25">refugees</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp3.2">cited from="[2004] HCA 25">application for protection visa</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp3.3">cited from="[2004] HCA 25">well-founded fear of persecution for reason of membership of particular social group</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp3.4">cited from="[2004] HCA 25">particular social group identified as able-bodied young men from afghanistan</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp3.5">cited from="[2004] HCA 25">whether member of a particular social group</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp3.6">cited from="[2004] HCA 25">whether afghan society must perceive the particular social group</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp3.7">cited from="[2004] HCA 25">whether well-founded fear of persecution</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp3.8">cited from="[2004] HCA 25">whether enmity or malignity necessary to establish persecution</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp3.9">cited from="[2004] HCA 25">whether facts reveal law of general application</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp3.10">cited from="[2004] HCA 25">whether implementation of law of general application can amount to persecution</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp3.11">cited from="[2004] HCA 25">whether implementation of ad hoc policy can amount to persecution.</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp4.0">cited from="[2004] FCAFC 123">migration</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp4.1">cited from="[2004] FCAFC 123">application for protection visa refused</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp4.2">cited from="[2004] FCAFC 123">tribunal's understanding of the word 'persecution'</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp4.3">cited from="[2004] FCAFC 123">s 424a of migration act 1958</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp4.4">cited from="[2004] FCAFC 123">whether information was 'the reason or part of the reason' for affirming the decision under review</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp4.5">cited from="[2004] FCAFC 123">meaning of 'information'</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp4.6">cited from="[2004] FCAFC 123">identification of the 'reason' for decision</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp4.7">cited from="[2004] FCAFC 123">an interpretative task</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp4.8">cited from="[2004] FCAFC 123">discretionary ground to refuse relief</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp5.0">cited from="[1992] FCA 44">administrative law</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp5.1">cited from="[1992] FCA 44">judicial review</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp5.2">cited from="[1992] FCA 44">whether there was evidence before the decision-maker to support decision</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp5.3">cited from="[1992] FCA 44">`no evidence'</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp5.4">cited from="[1992] FCA 44">administrative decisions (judicial review) act 1977 (cth) ss 5(1)(h) , 5 (3)(b)</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp5.5">cited from="[1992] FCA 44">non-existence of a fact relied upon</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp5.6">cited from="[1992] FCA 44">exercise of discretion to refuse determination.  customs law</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp5.7">cited from="[1992] FCA 44">tariff concessions</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp5.8">cited from="[1992] FCA 44">importation of gearcases</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp5.9">cited from="[1992] FCA 44">determinsation under customs act 1901 (cth) s.273 customs tariff act 1982 (cth) item 19 part 1 sch. 4</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp5.10">cited from="[1992] FCA 44">decision that australian made substitutes were `reasonably available'.</citphrase>
</citphrases>
<citances>
</citances>
<legistitles>
<title id="l0">MIGRATION ACT 1958 </title>
<title id="l1">MIGRATION ACT 1958 - SECT 36 Protection visas</title>
<title id="l2">MIGRATION ACT 1958 - SECT 91R Persecution</title>
<title id="l3">MIGRATION ACT 1958 - SECT 414 Refugee Review Tribunal must review decisions</title>
<title id="l4">MIGRATION ACT 1958 - SECT 415 Powers of Refugee Review Tribunal</title>
<title id="l5">MIGRATION ACT 1958 - SECT 420 Refugee Review Tribunal's way of operating</title>
<title id="l6">MIGRATION ACT 1958 - SECT 424A Information and invitation given in writing by Tribunal</title>
<title id="l7">FEDERAL COURT RULES </title>
<title id="l8">DISASTERS ACT </title>
</legistitles>
</case>


Question:
<citphrase id="cp1.0">cited from="[1990] FCA 364">administrative law</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp1.1">cited from="[1990] FCA 364">judicial review</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp1.2">cited from="[1990] FCA 364">decision to refuse application for resident status</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp1.3">cited from="[1990] FCA 364">whether decision unreasonable</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp1.4">cited from="[1990] FCA 364">when and on what grounds factual errors may be reviewed</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp1.5">cited from="[1990] FCA 364">natural justice</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp1.6">cited from="[1990] FCA 364">what material decision-maker must consider in application for entry permit.  immigration</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp1.7">cited from="[1990] FCA 364">de facto marraige alleged</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp1.8">cited from="[1990] FCA 364">whether "some basis" to reject permanence of relationship.</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp2.0">cited from="[1981] HCA 45">estoppel</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp2.1">cited from="[1981] HCA 45">res judicata</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp2.2">cited from="[1981] HCA 45">issue estoppel</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp2.3">cited from="[1981] HCA 45">hire of plant</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp2.4">cited from="[1981] HCA 45">contractual indemnity by hirer against loss caused to owner from use of plant</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp2.5">cited from="[1981] HCA 45">action for damages against hirer and owner arising out of use of plant</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp2.6">cited from="[1981] HCA 45">notices of contribution between hirer and owner</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp2.7">cited from="[1981] HCA 45">claim of contribution by owner</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp2.8">cited from="[1981] HCA 45">apportionment of liability between defendants</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp2.9">cited from="[1981] HCA 45">subsequent action by owner for indemnity</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp2.10">cited from="[1981] HCA 45">whether estopped by failure in original action to plead indemnity in defence to the claim for contribution</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp2.11">cited from="[1981] HCA 45">wrongs act 1958 (vict.) s. 24 (1) (c).</citphrase>
</citphrases>
<citances>
</citances>
<legistitles>
</legistitles>
</case>


Question:
<citphrase id="cp0.0">cited from="[2009] FCA 789">native title</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp0.1">cited from="[2009] FCA 789">consideration of an application for orders supported by an agreement for a consent determination of native title rights and interests in the land and waters of the determination area</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp0.2">cited from="[2009] FCA 789">consideration of s 87 of the native title act 1993 (cth)</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp0.3">cited from="[2009] FCA 789">consideration of whether proposed orders appear "appropriate" to the court and whether orders ought to be made as sought determining native title rights and interests in the wik and wik way peoples in land and waters broadly described as the land and waters on the western side of cape york peninsula landward of the high water mark at mean spring tide of the sea of the gulf of carpentaria, bounded to the north by the embley river and to the south by the edward river and extending in the east to the upper reaches of the watercourses that drain into the gulf of carpentaria</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp1.0">cited from="[2002] HCA 58">members of the yorta yorta aboriginal community v victoria  aboriginals</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp1.1">cited from="[2002] HCA 58">native title to land</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp1.2">cited from="[2002] HCA 58">determination of native title</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp1.3">cited from="[2002] HCA 58">native title rights and interests in s 223(1) native title act 1993 (cth)</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp1.4">cited from="[2002] HCA 58">possessed under traditional laws acknowledged and traditional customs observed in s 223(1)(a).  aboriginals</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp1.5">cited from="[2002] HCA 58">native title to land</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp1.6">cited from="[2002] HCA 58">determination of native title</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp1.7">cited from="[2002] HCA 58">consequences of sovereignty</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp1.8">cited from="[2002] HCA 58">whether traditional laws and customs observed must originate in pre-sovereignty laws and customs</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp1.9">cited from="[2002] HCA 58">effect of development of, or changes in, traditional laws and customs since sovereignty</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp1.10">cited from="[2002] HCA 58">whether proof of continuous acknowledgment and observance of traditional laws and customs required</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp1.11">cited from="[2002] HCA 58">effect of interruption to continuous acknowledgment and observance of traditional laws and customs</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp1.12">cited from="[2002] HCA 58">whether substantially uninterrupted acknowledgment and observance is sufficient</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp1.13">cited from="[2002] HCA 58">whether traditional law and customs need only be presently acknowledged and observed</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp1.14">cited from="[2002] HCA 58">whether continuous existence of claimant society required</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp1.15">cited from="[2002] HCA 58">effect of cessation of claimant society on acknowledgment and observance of traditional laws and customs.  aboriginals</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp1.16">cited from="[2002] HCA 58">native title to land</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp1.17">cited from="[2002] HCA 58">native title rights and interests</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp1.18">cited from="[2002] HCA 58">section 223(1)(c) native title act 1993 (cth)</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp1.19">cited from="[2002] HCA 58">meaning of rights and interests recognised by the common law of australia</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp1.20">cited from="[2002] HCA 58">whether there are common law requirements of native title.  aboriginals</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp1.21">cited from="[2002] HCA 58">native title to land</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp1.22">cited from="[2002] HCA 58">extinguishment of native title</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp1.23">cited from="[2002] HCA 58">whether s 223 native title act 1993 (cth) incorporates notions of extinguishment of native title</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp1.24">cited from="[2002] HCA 58">whether concepts of "abandonment" or "expiration" of native title can be applied.  aboriginals</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp1.25">cited from="[2002] HCA 58">native title to land</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp1.26">cited from="[2002] HCA 58">evidence</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp1.27">cited from="[2002] HCA 58">proof</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp1.28">cited from="[2002] HCA 58">oral and written testimony.</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp2.0">citing from="[2010] FCA 646">native title</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp2.1">citing from="[2010] FCA 646">determination of native title by consent</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp2.2">citing from="[2010] FCA 646">partial claim</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp2.3">citing from="[2010] FCA 646">whether it is within the power of the court and appropriate to make an order under section 87a of the native title act</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp2.4">citing from="[2010] FCA 646">whether section 225 of the native title act satisfied</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp2.5">citing from="[2010] FCA 646">determination of native title made</citphrase>
</citphrases>
<citances>
<sentence from="[2010] FCA 646" id="cs0">12 Part 4, Division 1C of the Act provides that some or all of the parties involved in a Native Title proceeding may negotiate an agreed outcome for that application or part of that application. The Court is empowered to make orders by consent in native title matters where agreement is reached between parties on the terms of the orders. Section 87A of the Act provides, among other things, that if at any stage of the proceedings after the close of notification, agreement is reached on a proposed determination of native title in relation to an area included in the area covered by the application, the Court may make an order in, or consistent with, the proposed determination of native title without holding a hearing if the Court is satisfied that the proposed determination for that area is within power and that it would be appropriate to make the order. (see Glenette Greenwool and Ors on behalf of the Kowanyama People v State of Queensland  Ors [2009] FCA 1192 at [14] ).</sentence>
</citances>
<legistitles>
<title id="l0">CORPORATIONS (ABORIGINAL AND TORRES STRAIT ISLANDER) ACT 2006 </title>
<title id="l1">FISHERIES MANAGEMENT ACT 1991 </title>
<title id="l2">NATIVE TITLE ACT 1993 </title>
<title id="l3">NATIVE TITLE ACT 1993 - SECT 13 Approved determinations of native title</title>
<title id="l4">NATIVE TITLE ACT 1993 - SECT 47A Reserves etc. covered by claimant applications</title>
<title id="l5">NATIVE TITLE ACT 1993 - SECT 55 Determinations by Federal Court</title>
<title id="l6">NATIVE TITLE ACT 1993 - SECT 57 Determination of prescribed body corporate etc.</title>
<title id="l7">NATIVE TITLE ACT 1993 - SECT 61 Native title and compensation applications</title>
<title id="l8">NATIVE TITLE ACT 1993 - SECT 66 Notice of application</title>
<title id="l9">NATIVE TITLE ACT 1993 - SECT 87 Power of Federal Court if parties reach agreement</title>
<title id="l10">NATIVE TITLE ACT 1993 - SECT 87A Power of Federal Court to make determination for part of an area</title>
<title id="l11">NATIVE TITLE ACT 1993 - SECT 94A Order containing determination of native title</title>
<title id="l12">NATIVE TITLE ACT 1993 - SECT 190A Registrar to consider claims</title>
<title id="l13">NATIVE TITLE ACT 1993 - SECT 212 Confirmation of ownership of natural resources, access to beaches etc.</title>
<title id="l14">NATIVE TITLE ACT 1993 - SECT 223 Native title</title>
<title id="l15">NATIVE TITLE ACT 1993 - SECT 225 Determination of native title</title>
<title id="l16">TELECOMMUNICATIONS ACT 1997 </title>
<title id="l17">FEDERAL COURT RULES </title>
<title id="l18">NATIVE TITLE (PRESCRIBED BODIES CORPORATE) REGULATIONS 1999 </title>
<title id="l19">NATIVE TITLE (PRESCRIBED BODIES CORPORATE) REGULATIONS 1999 - REG 4 Prescribed bodies corporate (Act s 59)</title>
<title id="l20">AUSTRALIAN TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION ACT 1989 </title>
<title id="l21">TELECOMMUNICATIONS ACT 1975 </title>
<title id="l22">TELECOMMUNICATIONS ACT 1991 </title>
<title id="l23">REGISTRATION ACT </title>
<title id="l24">COMMUNITY SERVICES (ABORIGINES) ACT 1984 </title>
<title id="l25">FISHERIES ACT 1994 </title>
<title id="l26">LAND ACT 1994 </title>
<title id="l27">MINERAL RESOURCES ACT 1989 </title>
<title id="l28">NATIVE TITLE (QUEENSLAND) ACT 1993 </title>
<title id="l29">NATIVE TITLE (QUEENSLAND) ACT 1993 - SECT 18 18 Confirmation of access to beaches etc.</title>
<title id="l30">PETROLEUM ACT 1923 </title>
<title id="l31">PETROLEUM AND GAS (PRODUCTION AND SAFETY) ACT 2004 </title>
<title id="l32">WATER ACT 2000 </title>
<title id="l33">LOCAL GOVERNMENT (AREAS) REGULATION 2008 </title>
</legistitles>
</case>


Question:
<citphrase id="cp0.0">cited from="[2008] AATA 533">health and community services</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp0.1">cited from="[2008] AATA 533">pharmaceutical benefits</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp0.2">cited from="[2008] AATA 533">application for approval to supply pharmaceutical benefits at proposed premises</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp0.3">cited from="[2008] AATA 533">application involved cancellation of existing approval and relocation of pharmacy to large medical centre</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp0.4">cited from="[2008] AATA 533">australian community pharmacy authority rules</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp0.5">cited from="[2008] AATA 533">proposed premises in large medical centre</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp0.6">cited from="[2008] AATA 533">less than equivalent of at least 8 full-time medical practitioners practising at medical centre</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp0.7">cited from="[2008] AATA 533">proposed premises could not be used for purpose of operating pharmacy under local government legislation</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp0.8">cited from="[2008] AATA 533">requirements in rules not met</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp0.9">cited from="[2008] AATA 533">recommendation that application not be approved must be made</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp0.10">cited from="[2008] AATA 533">decision under review affirmed</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp1.0">cited from="[2007] HCA 8">forsyth v deputy commissioner of taxation  courts and judges</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp1.1">cited from="[2007] HCA 8">federal jurisdiction in state courts</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp1.2">cited from="[2007] HCA 8">whether s 39(2) of the judiciary act 1903 (cth) conferred jurisdiction on the district court of new south wales to hear and determine an action to recover a penalty under the income tax assessment act 1936 (cth).  federal jurisdiction in state courts</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp1.3">cited from="[2007] HCA 8">limitations on the jurisdiction of state courts</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp1.4">cited from="[2007] HCA 8">whether s 44(1)(a) of the district court act 1973 (nsw) was a limit on the jurisdiction of the district court of new south wales within the meaning of the judiciary act 1903 (cth).  federal jurisdiction in state courts</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp1.5">cited from="[2007] HCA 8">statutory interpretation</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp1.6">cited from="[2007] HCA 8">s 44(1)(a) of the district court act 1973 (nsw) gave the district court of new south wales jurisdiction to hear and dispose of certain classes of actions</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp1.7">cited from="[2007] HCA 8">whether s 44(1)(a) should be given an ambulatory or fixed time construction.  statutory interpretation</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp1.8">cited from="[2007] HCA 8">subsequent regulatory change</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp1.9">cited from="[2007] HCA 8">s 44(1)(a) of the district court act 1973 (nsw) defined the jurisdiction of the district court of new south wales by reference to the allocation of work between the divisions of the supreme court of new south wales</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp1.10">cited from="[2007] HCA 8">whether a subsequent reallocation of work between the divisions of the supreme court of new south wales alters the jurisdiction of the district court of new south wales.</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp2.0">cited from="[2001] HCA 37">marshall v director-general, department of transport  real property</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp2.1">cited from="[2001] HCA 37">resumption of land by public body</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp2.2">cited from="[2001] HCA 37">compensation</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp2.3">cited from="[2001] HCA 37">whether compensation for injurious affection is payable in respect of land taken for the statutory purpose but not, or not yet, physically used for that purpose.</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp3.0">cited from="[1999] HCA 16">thompson v his honour judge byrne  ors  criminal law</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp3.1">cited from="[1999] HCA 16">motor traffic offence</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp3.2">cited from="[1999] HCA 16">prescribed concentration of alcohol</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp3.3">cited from="[1999] HCA 16">breath samples furnished within 3 hours after driving exceeded prescribed limit</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp3.4">cited from="[1999] HCA 16">later blood sample showing concentration of alcohol within prescribed limit</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp3.5">cited from="[1999] HCA 16">whether offence committed</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp3.6">cited from="[1999] HCA 16">proper interpretation of s 49(1)(f) of the road safety act 1986 (vic).  precedent</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp3.7">cited from="[1999] HCA 16">stare decisis</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp3.8">cited from="[1999] HCA 16">high court</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp3.9">cited from="[1999] HCA 16">whether mills v meeking [1990] hca 6 ; (1990) 169 clr 214 should be reconsidered.</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp4.0">cited from="[1998] HCA 28">project blue sky inc  ors v australian broadcasting authority  statutes</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp4.1">cited from="[1998] HCA 28">construction</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp4.2">cited from="[1998] HCA 28">reconciliation of conflicting provisions</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp4.3">cited from="[1998] HCA 28">intention of legislature</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp4.4">cited from="[1998] HCA 28">presumption that provisions intended to achieve consistent goals</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp4.5">cited from="[1998] HCA 28">leading and subordinate provisions</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp4.6">cited from="[1998] HCA 28">grammatical meaning and legal meaning.  statutes</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp4.7">cited from="[1998] HCA 28">construction</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp4.8">cited from="[1998] HCA 28">acts done in breach of a condition regulating a statutory power</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp4.9">cited from="[1998] HCA 28">whether invalid</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp4.10">cited from="[1998] HCA 28">mandatory and directory provisions</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp4.11">cited from="[1998] HCA 28">purpose-based test.  media law</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp4.12">cited from="[1998] HCA 28">television</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp4.13">cited from="[1998] HCA 28">regulation of programming</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp4.14">cited from="[1998] HCA 28">australian broadcasting authority</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp4.15">cited from="[1998] HCA 28">standard prescribing australian content requirements</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp4.16">cited from="[1998] HCA 28">whether inconsistent with legislative requirement that functions be performed consistently with australia's international obligations.  media law</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp4.17">cited from="[1998] HCA 28">television</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp4.18">cited from="[1998] HCA 28">regulation of programming</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp4.19">cited from="[1998] HCA 28">australian broadcasting authority</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp4.20">cited from="[1998] HCA 28">power to make standards that "relate to ... the australian content of programs"</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp4.21">cited from="[1998] HCA 28">whether restricted to standards conferring preferential treatment.  trade law</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp4.22">cited from="[1998] HCA 28">australia new zealand closer economic relations trade agreement.  broadcasting services act 1992 (cth), ss 3 , 122 , 158, 160.  broadcasting services (transitional provisions and consequential amendments) act 1992 (cth), s 21.  tasker v fullwood [1978] 1 nswlr 20 at 23-24 applied.</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp6.0">cited from="[1996] AATA 367">pharmacy restructuring</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp6.1">cited from="[1996] AATA 367">whether 1993 guidelines or 1995 rules applied. application to tribunal lodged when 1993 guidelines in force. those guidelines applicable. consideration of 1995 rules. 1995 rules considered.  national health act 1953 national health amendment act 1955 pharmaceutical benefits determination no pb 9 of 1993 pharmaceutical benefits determination no pb 6 of 1995  esber v the commonwealth of australia [1992] hca 20 ; 174 clr 430 patti-mae lee v secretary department of social security (unreported federal court judgment full court no 960677) smoker v pharmacy restructuring authority and ors [1994] fca 1487 ; 53 fcr 287 re hargreaves and australian community pharmacy authority 38 ald 679 re khan and australian community pharmacy authority and anor (unreported tribunal decision no 10871) re teys and ors and australian community pharmacy authority and anor 41 ald 689 pharmacy restructuring authority and anor v chatfield [1993] fca 348 ; 18 aar 34 re hargreaves and australian community pharmacy authority (no 2) [1995] aata 326 ; 41 ald 147 secretary, department of health, housing, local government and community services and anor v kaderbhai and anor [1994] fca 1197 ; 122 alr 577  hearing  sydney, 19-21 august 1996 18:10:1996  counsel for the applicant: mr j.a. trebeck  solicitor for applicant: herbert weller  counsel for the respondent: mr r. beech-jones  solicitor for the respondent: australian government solicitor  order  1. the decisions under review in matter no n95/154 are set aside and this matter remitted to the respondent with the following directions, namely:</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp6.2">cited from="[1996] AATA 367">(a) the australian community pharmacy authority is to recommend to the secretary, department of health and family services that the applicants' application for the establishment of a pharmacy at glossodia shopping village, golden valley road, glossadia be approved; and (b) the secretary, department of health and family services is to reconsider the said application in the light of the above substituted recommendation.</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp7.0">cited from="[1991] HCA 21">criminal law</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp7.1">cited from="[1991] HCA 21">sexual offence</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp7.2">cited from="[1991] HCA 21">time limit for prosecution of certain offences</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp7.3">cited from="[1991] HCA 21">prosecution for indecent assault and carnal knowledge to be commenced within twelve months</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp7.4">cited from="[1991] HCA 21">no time limit on prosecution for committing act of indecency</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp7.5">cited from="[1991] HCA 21">whether charge of committing act of indecency may be brought after twelve months when conduct relied on constitutes indecent assault or carnal knowledge</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp7.6">cited from="[1991] HCA 21">crimes act 1900 (n.s.w.),ss. 61e, 71, 78.  statutes</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp7.7">cited from="[1991] HCA 21">construction and interpretation</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp7.8">cited from="[1991] HCA 21">specific provision subject to condition or limitation</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp7.9">cited from="[1991] HCA 21">general provision in same statute not available to avoid condition or limitation</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp7.10">cited from="[1991] HCA 21">crimes act 1900 (n.s.w.),ss. 61e, 71, 78</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp7.11">cited from="[1991] HCA 21">interpretation act 1987 (n.s.w.),ss. 33, 34.</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp8.0">cited from="[1990] HCA 33">administrative law (cth)</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp8.1">cited from="[1990] HCA 33">judicial review</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp8.2">cited from="[1990] HCA 33">decision of administrative character made under enactment</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp8.3">cited from="[1990] HCA 33">conduct engaged in for purpose of making decision</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp8.4">cited from="[1990] HCA 33">review of decisions and conduct</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp8.5">cited from="[1990] HCA 33">ambit</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp8.6">cited from="[1990] HCA 33">grounds</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp8.7">cited from="[1990] HCA 33">administrative decisions (judicial review) act 1977 (cth), ss. 3 , 5 , 6 .  broadcasting and television</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp8.8">cited from="[1990] HCA 33">commercial broadcasting licences</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp8.9">cited from="[1990] HCA 33">australian broadcasting tribunal</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp8.10">cited from="[1990] HCA 33">power to suspend or revoke licence if satisfied that licensee no longer fit and proper person to hold licence</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp8.11">cited from="[1990] HCA 33">controller of licensee not fit and proper person</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp8.12">cited from="[1990] HCA 33">whether licensee fit and proper</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp8.13">cited from="[1990] HCA 33">conduct before commencement of licence period</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp8.14">cited from="[1990] HCA 33">broadcasting act 1942 (cth), s. 88.</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp9.0">cited from="[1990] HCA 6">criminal law</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp9.1">cited from="[1990] HCA 6">driving offence</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp9.2">cited from="[1990] HCA 6">prescribed concentration of alcohol</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp9.3">cited from="[1990] HCA 6">sample of breath</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp9.4">cited from="[1990] HCA 6">analysis of sample furnished within three hours after driving vehicle indicating presence in blood of more than prescribed concentration of alcohol</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp9.5">cited from="[1990] HCA 6">whether offence committed only when vehicle involved in accident</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp9.6">cited from="[1990] HCA 6">road safety act 1986 (vict.), s.49(1)(f).</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp10.0">cited from="[1989] FCA 200">social services</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp10.1">cited from="[1989] FCA 200">unemployment benefit</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp10.2">cited from="[1989] FCA 200">student</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp10.3">cited from="[1989] FCA 200">enrolled in full-time law course</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp10.4">cited from="[1989] FCA 200">undertaking full-time temporary employment as high school teacher</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp10.5">cited from="[1989] FCA 200">whether eligible for unemployment benefit at expiry of teaching contract</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp10.6">cited from="[1989] FCA 200">whether "engaged in a course of education on a full-time basis"</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp10.7">cited from="[1989] FCA 200">whether statutory test refers to nature of enrolment or nature of participation in course of study.  statutory interpretation</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp10.8">cited from="[1989] FCA 200">social security act 1947</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp10.9">cited from="[1989] FCA 200">unemployment benefit</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp10.10">cited from="[1989] FCA 200">criteria of eligibility</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp10.11">cited from="[1989] FCA 200">"engaged in a course of education on a full-time basis"</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp10.12">cited from="[1989] FCA 200">"full-time basis"</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp10.13">cited from="[1989] FCA 200">ss.116 and 136</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp10.14">cited from="[1989] FCA 200">legislative histories.</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp11.0">cited from="[1985] HCA 48">contract</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp11.1">cited from="[1985] HCA 48">carriage of goods</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp11.2">cited from="[1985] HCA 48">duties and liabilities</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp11.3">cited from="[1985] HCA 48">special contracts</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp11.4">cited from="[1985] HCA 48">exemption clauses</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp11.5">cited from="[1985] HCA 48">contracts by which persons contract out of remedies for negligence of other persons driving motor vehicle declared void by statute</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp11.6">cited from="[1985] HCA 48">third party claim for property damage</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp11.7">cited from="[1985] HCA 48">"person"</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp11.8">cited from="[1985] HCA 48">motor vehicles act 1959(s.a.), s. 133.  statutes</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp11.9">cited from="[1985] HCA 48">construction</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp11.10">cited from="[1985] HCA 48">divisions and headings</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp11.11">cited from="[1985] HCA 48">section operating independently of other sections in part</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp11.12">cited from="[1985] HCA 48">heading of part.</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp12.0">cited from="[1981] HCA 26">statutes</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp12.1">cited from="[1981] HCA 26">interpretation</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp12.2">cited from="[1981] HCA 26">literal meaning unambiguous</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp12.3">cited from="[1981] HCA 26">draftsman's mistake</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp12.4">cited from="[1981] HCA 26">parliament's intention clear from context and legislative history</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp12.5">cited from="[1981] HCA 26">income tax assessment act 1936 (cth), ss. 80b (5), 80c (3).  income tax (cth)</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp12.6">cited from="[1981] HCA 26">deductions</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp12.7">cited from="[1981] HCA 26">losses of previous years</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp12.8">cited from="[1981] HCA 26">company</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp12.9">cited from="[1981] HCA 26">holding company and subsidiary</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp12.10">cited from="[1981] HCA 26">arrangement by continuing shareholder for purpose of enabling company to take previous year's losses into account for deduction</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp12.11">cited from="[1981] HCA 26">interpretation</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp12.12">cited from="[1981] HCA 26">income tax assessment act 1936 (cth), ss. 80, 80b, 80c (3).</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp13.0">cited from="[1978] HCA 30">vendor and purchaser (q.)</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp13.1">cited from="[1978] HCA 30">sale of land</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp13.2">cited from="[1978] HCA 30">instalment contract</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp13.3">cited from="[1978] HCA 30">contract of sale</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp13.4">cited from="[1978] HCA 30">price payable by deposit and balance at later date</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp13.5">cited from="[1978] HCA 30">interest payable periodically on unpaid balance</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp13.6">cited from="[1978] HCA 30">whether "instalment contract"</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp13.7">cited from="[1978] HCA 30">property law act 1974 (q.),ss. 71 (2) (b), 72 (1), sch. form 2.</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp14.0">cited from="[1976] HCA 36">administrative bodies</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp14.1">cited from="[1976] HCA 36">public service board</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp14.2">cited from="[1976] HCA 36">charges of breach of discipline and misconduct</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp14.3">cited from="[1976] HCA 36">inquiry or investigation</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp14.4">cited from="[1976] HCA 36">power to delegate functions</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp14.5">cited from="[1976] HCA 36">requirement that decision of case be determined by board</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp14.6">cited from="[1976] HCA 36">validity of delegation</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp14.7">cited from="[1976] HCA 36">whether board may adopt delegate's findings and recommendations without independent investigation</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp14.8">cited from="[1976] HCA 36">public service act, 1902 (n.s.w.), as amended, ss. 11 (1), 56, 60.</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp15.0">cited from="[1955] HCA 27">workers' compensation</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp15.1">cited from="[1955] HCA 27">adult worker</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp15.2">cited from="[1955] HCA 27">partial incapacity</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp15.3">cited from="[1955] HCA 27">average weekly earnings</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp15.4">cited from="[1955] HCA 27">pre-injury earnings</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp15.5">cited from="[1955] HCA 27">post-injury earnings</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp15.6">cited from="[1955] HCA 27">comparison</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp15.7">cited from="[1955] HCA 27">rising wage structure</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp15.8">cited from="[1955] HCA 27">weekly payments</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp15.9">cited from="[1955] HCA 27">attempt to maintain values</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp15.10">cited from="[1955] HCA 27">basic wage formula</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp15.11">cited from="[1955] HCA 27">workers' compensation act 1926-1951 (n.s.w.), s. 11 (1) (a), (b).</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp20.0">citing from="[2009] AATA 811">health and ageing</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp20.1">citing from="[2009] AATA 811">pharmacists</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp20.2">citing from="[2009] AATA 811">application for approval to supply pharmaceutical benefits at particular premises</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp20.3">citing from="[2009] AATA 811">recommendation by authority not to approve application</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp20.4">citing from="[2009] AATA 811">whether tribunal limited to material available to decision-maker</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp20.5">citing from="[2009] AATA 811">whether tribunal entitled to consider facts at time of review</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp20.6">citing from="[2009] AATA 811">decision under review set aside and remitted.</citphrase>
</citphrases>
<citances>
<sentence from="[2009] AATA 811" id="cs0">Section 10 of the Rules is mandatory. It says that unless the prescribed requirements have been satisfied, "the Authority must recommend that an Applicant not be approved". The Rule gives the Authority no discretion to recommend that an Applicant be approved if the prescribed requirements have not been met. [1] Relevantly for this decision, the applicable criteria are those prescribed under subsection 9(b) and Item 114 of Part 2 of Schedule 1. Pursuant to Item 114 of the Rules, the proposed premises must be in a rural locality and at least 10km, by the shortest lawful access route, from the nearest approved premises.
  In essence, the High Court in Shi held that there is nothing in the Tribunal's enabling legislation that confines it to the facts and circumstances before the primary-decision maker. The exception to this general principle is that, if the statute under which the decision under review was made limits the review to the particular time in the past, then the Tribunal will similarly be limited to the state of affairs existing at that relevant time. [2] Kiefel J stated in Shi at [142]:

 In considering what is the right decision, the tribunal must address the same question as the original decision-maker was required to address. Identifying the question raised by the statute for decision will usually determine the facts which may be taken into account in connection with the decision. The issue is then one of relevance, determined by reference to the elements in the question, or questions, necessary to be addressed in reaching a decision.</sentence>
</citances>
<legistitles>
<title id="l0">ADMINISTRATIVE APPEALS TRIBUNAL ACT 1975 </title>
<title id="l1">ADMINISTRATIVE DECISIONS (JUDICIAL REVIEW) ACT 1977 </title>
<title id="l2">ADMINISTRATIVE DECISIONS (JUDICIAL REVIEW) ACT 1977 - SECT 5 Applications for review of decisions</title>
<title id="l3">ACTS INTERPRETATION ACT 1901 </title>
<title id="l4">ACTS INTERPRETATION ACT 1901 - SECT 15AA Regard to be had to purpose or object of Act</title>
<title id="l5">NATIONAL HEALTH ACT 1953 </title>
<title id="l6">NATIONAL HEALTH ACT 1953 - SECT 90 Approved pharmacists [see Note 1]</title>
<title id="l7">NATIONAL HEALTH ACT 1953 - SECT 99K Functions</title>
<title id="l8">NATIONAL HEALTH ACT 1953 - SECT 99L Determination of rules by Minister</title>
<title id="l9">FEDERAL COURT RULES </title>
<title id="l10">INTERPRETATION ACT 1987 </title>
<title id="l11">INTERPRETATION ACT 1987 - SECT 33 Regard to be had to purposes or objects of Acts and statutory rules</title>
<title id="l12">CROWN LANDS ACT </title>
</legistitles>
</case>


Question:
<citphrase id="cp0.0">cited from="[2005] HCA 72">applicant veal of 2002 v minister for immigration and multicultural and indigenous affairs  immigration</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp0.1">cited from="[2005] HCA 72">application for protection visa</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp0.2">cited from="[2005] HCA 72">decision of refugee review tribunal</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp0.3">cited from="[2005] HCA 72">procedural fairness</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp0.4">cited from="[2005] HCA 72">where tribunal reviewed an unsolicited letter received by the department of immigration and multicultural and indigenous affairs, which made allegations against the appellant</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp0.5">cited from="[2005] HCA 72">where tribunal did not inform the appellant of the existence of the letter or its contents</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp0.6">cited from="[2005] HCA 72">where tribunal affirmed decision under review and said that in reaching its decision it gave no weight to the letter</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp0.7">cited from="[2005] HCA 72">whether procedural fairness required the tribunal to inform the appellant of the existence of the letter or its contents.</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp3.0">cited from="[1992] AATA 84">freedom of information</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp3.1">cited from="[1992] AATA 84">disclosure of referees' reports</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp3.2">cited from="[1992] AATA 84">whether confidential referees' reports are exempt documents under foi act</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp3.3">cited from="[1992] AATA 84">whether disclosure contrary to public interest</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp3.4">cited from="[1992] AATA 84">whether disclosure would have a substantial adverse effect on the management or assessment of personnel by the commonwealth or an agency</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp3.5">cited from="[1992] AATA 84">whether disclosure would have a substantial adverse effect on efficient conduct of operations of an agency</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp3.6">cited from="[1992] AATA 84">whether disclosure would found an action for breach of confidence</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp3.7">cited from="[1992] AATA 84">decision affirmed.</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp5.0">cited from="[1987] FCA 266">administrative law</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp5.1">cited from="[1987] FCA 266">whether documents sought under the freedom of information act 1982 , to obtain evidence of an alleged infringement of patent, were exempt documents within the meaning of s.45(1).</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp6.0">citing from="[2008] AATA 477">and he was seeking to follow that up because in his view, not only should that document</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp6.1">citing from="[2008] AATA 477">i think he's saying to me</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp6.2">citing from="[2008] AATA 477">not only should that document have been available to him at the time of his family law proceedings, but the contents of that document led him to believe that certain aspects of citizenship or permanent residence, or both, were matters that might have been taken into account at the time, and might have affected him.  so that's the context in which his application is made. it certainly helps me, as i said, to know the context, even though it wasn't strictly essential to do so. now, all the documents have been held</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp6.3">citing from="[2008] AATA 477">all the relevant documents have been held exempt under the one section of the freedom of information act which is section 41 subsection (1). and that relates to personal privacy:</citphrase>
</citphrases>
<citances>
<sentence from="[2008] AATA 477" id="cs0">

And then in the case of applicant ABCD v Refugee Review Tribunal (2006) FCA 908 in the Federal Court Allsop J referred to some of the previous judgment and he listed four factors to be taken into account: (1) is whether the author could be identified; (2) whether the documents contain information personal about the third person; (3) whether it was clear from the documents that release of the document would cause stress on a third party and no public purpose would be achieved by the release of the documents.</sentence>
</citances>
<legistitles>
<title id="l0">ADMINISTRATIVE APPEALS TRIBUNAL ACT 1975 </title>
<title id="l1">ADMINISTRATIVE APPEALS TRIBUNAL ACT 1975 - SECT 44 Appeals to Federal Court of Australia from decisions of the Tribunal</title>
<title id="l2">FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT 1982 </title>
<title id="l3">FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT 1982 - SECT 4 Interpretation</title>
<title id="l4">FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT 1982 - SECT 45 Documents containing material obtained in confidence</title>
<title id="l5">MIGRATION ACT 1958 </title>
<title id="l6">FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT 1982 No. 3 of 1982 - SECT 41 Documents affecting personal privacy</title>
<title id="l7">FEDERAL COURT RULES 1979 </title>
</legistitles>
</case>


Question:
<citphrase id="cp0.0">cited from="[1995] FCA 1663">corporations</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp0.1">cited from="[1995] FCA 1663">winding-up</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp0.2">cited from="[1995] FCA 1663">just and equitable ground</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp0.3">cited from="[1995] FCA 1663">australian securities commission as applicant</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp0.4">cited from="[1995] FCA 1663">petition based on public interest</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp0.5">cited from="[1995] FCA 1663">trust and management companies</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp0.6">cited from="[1995] FCA 1663">maintaining appropriate standards of conduct in the superannuation industry</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp0.7">cited from="[1995] FCA 1663">investor protection</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp0.8">cited from="[1995] FCA 1663">persistent breaches of trust, of fiduciary duty and of the corporations law</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp0.9">cited from="[1995] FCA 1663">companies not insolvent.   corporations</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp0.10">cited from="[1995] FCA 1663">receivers and managers</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp0.11">cited from="[1995] FCA 1663">corporations law s1323</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp0.12">cited from="[1995] FCA 1663">asc investigation completed</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp0.13">cited from="[1995] FCA 1663">no necessity for fraud</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp0.14">cited from="[1995] FCA 1663">serious and persistent breaches of trust, of fiduciary duty and of the corporations law</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp0.15">cited from="[1995] FCA 1663">investor protection</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp0.16">cited from="[1995] FCA 1663">undertakings by respondent companies in lieu of an order inappropriate.   corporations</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp0.17">cited from="[1995] FCA 1663">management and administration</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp0.18">cited from="[1995] FCA 1663">trust companies</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp0.19">cited from="[1995] FCA 1663">director's duty of care in such companies</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp0.20">cited from="[1995] FCA 1663">effect on of trustee's duty of caution.   corporations</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp0.21">cited from="[1995] FCA 1663">management and administration</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp0.22">cited from="[1995] FCA 1663">corporations law s60</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp0.23">cited from="[1995] FCA 1663">deemed director</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp0.24">cited from="[1995] FCA 1663">person according to whose direction or instruction the directors are accustomed to act</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp0.25">cited from="[1995] FCA 1663">directions or instructions need not be formal or all-encompassing.   corporations</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp0.26">cited from="[1995] FCA 1663">trust companies</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp0.27">cited from="[1995] FCA 1663">whether directors owe a duty of care to trust beneficiaries</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp0.28">cited from="[1995] FCA 1663">whether directors as such are in a fiduciary relationship with trust beneficiaries.   corporations</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp0.29">cited from="[1995] FCA 1663">management and administration</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp0.30">cited from="[1995] FCA 1663">duty to keep both minutes of board meetings and correct accounting records</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp0.31">cited from="[1995] FCA 1663">corporations law ss258 and 289</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp0.32">cited from="[1995] FCA 1663">trust companies</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp0.33">cited from="[1995] FCA 1663">significant trust decisions and investments not recorded.   trusts and trustees</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp0.34">cited from="[1995] FCA 1663">powers, duties, rights and liabilities</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp0.35">cited from="[1995] FCA 1663">duty of care and caution</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp0.36">cited from="[1995] FCA 1663">prudent business person test</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp0.37">cited from="[1995] FCA 1663">trust companies</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp0.38">cited from="[1995] FCA 1663">higher standard for professional, corporate trustee.   trusts and trustees</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp0.39">cited from="[1995] FCA 1663">powers, duties, rights and liabilities</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp0.40">cited from="[1995] FCA 1663">related trusts</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp0.41">cited from="[1995] FCA 1663">duty to consider the separate interests of each trust</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp0.42">cited from="[1995] FCA 1663">inter</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp0.43">cited from="[1995] FCA 1663">trust dealings.   trusts and trustees</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp0.44">cited from="[1995] FCA 1663">powers, duties, rights and liabilities</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp0.45">cited from="[1995] FCA 1663">trust funds of separate trusts</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp0.46">cited from="[1995] FCA 1663">duty to bank separately</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp0.47">cited from="[1995] FCA 1663">common bank account</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp0.48">cited from="[1995] FCA 1663">use of trust funds for non-trust purposes.   trusts and trustees</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp0.49">cited from="[1995] FCA 1663">superannuation trusts</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp0.50">cited from="[1995] FCA 1663">investments</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp0.51">cited from="[1995] FCA 1663">negative gearing</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp0.52">cited from="[1995] FCA 1663">non-performing loans</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp0.53">cited from="[1995] FCA 1663">loans without any or adequate or timely security</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp0.54">cited from="[1995] FCA 1663">borrowing at up to twice reserve bank lending rates</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp0.55">cited from="[1995] FCA 1663">imprudent investments.   trusts and trustees</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp0.56">cited from="[1995] FCA 1663">breach of trust</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp0.57">cited from="[1995] FCA 1663">partial decision making</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp0.58">cited from="[1995] FCA 1663">acting in interests of a third party.   trusts and trustees</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp0.59">cited from="[1995] FCA 1663">trust company</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp0.60">cited from="[1995] FCA 1663">keeping of records</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp0.61">cited from="[1995] FCA 1663">no</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp1.0">citing from="[2010] QSC 435">(third respondent) file no/s: bs9846/09 division: trial division proceeding: application originating court: supreme court at brisbane delivered on: 19 november 2010 delivered at: brisbane hearing date: 20 august 2010 judge: martin j order: the applicant is to bring in minutes of order  corporations</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp1.1">citing from="[2010] QSC 435">winding up</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp1.2">citing from="[2010] QSC 435">generally</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp1.3">citing from="[2010] QSC 435">other matters</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp1.4">citing from="[2010] QSC 435">where the director of a company was ordered to surrender his passport pending investigation</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp1.5">citing from="[2010] QSC 435">where the commonwealth director of public prosecutions subsequently determined there was no reasonable prospect of conviction on material briefed</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp1.6">citing from="[2010] QSC 435">whether the passport should be returned</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp3.0">citing from="[2007] FCA 918">corporations</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp3.1">citing from="[2007] FCA 918">asic investigation</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp3.2">citing from="[2007] FCA 918">fraudulent trading scheme</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp3.3">citing from="[2007] FCA 918">stolen money deposited in defendant's account</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp3.4">citing from="[2007] FCA 918">defendant refuses to provide explanation</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp3.5">citing from="[2007] FCA 918">account frozen</citphrase>
</citphrases>
<citances>
<sentence from="[2010] QSC 435" id="cs0"/>
<sentence from="[2008] FCA 1423" id="cs1">19 The power to restrain Mr Hawley in the way for which ASIC contends, therefore, is enlivened. In the exercise of that power there are a number of relevant discretionary matters. First, I take into account the extent of the desirability of protecting the relevant interests. Although I have concluded that their protection is desirable, I do not think that the interests are strong ones. Secondly, ASIC's investigation is essentially at an end. It is appropriate, therefore, that I be satisfied that ASIC has something approaching a prima facie case against Mr Hawley: Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Lee [2007] FCA 508 at [12] per Finkelstein J. That is an illustration of the commonsense proposition that with ASIC's investigation basically at an end, it would be inappropriate to restrain Mr Hawley from leaving the country if I were of the view that its case had little merit.</sentence>
<sentence from="[2007] FCA 918" id="cs2">1 ASIC is continuing its investigation into the fraudulent trading scheme that is described in ASIC v Lee [2007] FCA 508. To recapitulate, Australian investors were induced into purchasing non-existent commodity options on non-existent foreign commodities exchanges and lost more than $8 million. Some of the stolen money (approximately $139,000) was transferred into bank accounts maintained by Mr Lee with the Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Limited and Westpac Banking Corporation Limited. Mr Lee has over $2 million in those accounts. On 11 April 2007 I made an order under s 1323(3) of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) that, pending trial, the money in those accounts be frozen. Now, following the trial, ASIC seeks a continuation of that order.</sentence>
</citances>
<legistitles>
<title id="l0">AUSTRALIAN SECURITIES AND INVESTMENTS COMMISSION ACT 2001 </title>
<title id="l1">CORPORATIONS ACT 2001 </title>
<title id="l2">CORPORATIONS ACT 2001 - SECT 1323 Power of Court to prohibit payment or transfer of money, financial products or other property</title>
</legistitles>
</case>


Question:
<citphrase id="cp0.0">cited from="[2004] NSWSC 632">corporations</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp0.1">cited from="[2004] NSWSC 632">reinstatement of registration</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp0.2">cited from="[2004] NSWSC 632">where deregistration followed completion of creditors voluntary winding up</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp0.3">cited from="[2004] NSWSC 632">where plaintiff creditor willing to fund liquidator to investigate potential recoveries</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp0.4">cited from="[2004] NSWSC 632">question whether all creditors given notice of final meeting</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp0.5">cited from="[2004] NSWSC 632">whether liquidator under previous voluntary winding up will again be in office upon reinstatement of registration</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp0.6">cited from="[2004] NSWSC 632">whether order for winding up and order for appointment of new liquidator should be made</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp1.0">cited from="[2003] NSWSC 1250">corporations</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp1.1">cited from="[2003] NSWSC 1250">winding up</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp1.2">cited from="[2003] NSWSC 1250">company deregistered</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp1.3">cited from="[2003] NSWSC 1250">company in liquidation at time of deregistration</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp1.4">cited from="[2003] NSWSC 1250">whether reinstatement to register causes liquidator to be again in office</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp2.0">cited from="[2001] NSWSC 253">corporations [134]</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp2.1">cited from="[2001] NSWSC 253">proxies</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp2.2">cited from="[2001] NSWSC 253">joint debt</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp2.3">cited from="[2001] NSWSC 253">whether each creditor can nominate separate proxy. corporations [238][259]</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp2.4">cited from="[2001] NSWSC 253">creditors voluntary winding up</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp2.5">cited from="[2001] NSWSC 253">appointment of chairman</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp2.6">cited from="[2001] NSWSC 253">how determined. corporations [337]</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp2.7">cited from="[2001] NSWSC 253">validation</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp2.8">cited from="[2001] NSWSC 253">substantial injustice</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp2.9">cited from="[2001] NSWSC 253">factors involved. meetings [7]</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp2.10">cited from="[2001] NSWSC 253">chairman</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp2.11">cited from="[2001] NSWSC 253">how appointed. words  phrases</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp2.12">cited from="[2001] NSWSC 253">"convene".</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp3.0">cited from="[2000] NSWSC 316">corporations</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp3.1">cited from="[2000] NSWSC 316">reinstatement</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp3.2">cited from="[2000] NSWSC 316">whether court satisfied that it is just that the company's registration be reinstated</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp3.3">cited from="[2000] NSWSC 316">reinstatement sought for purposes of proceedings alleging contraventions of part iv of trade practices act</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp3.4">cited from="[2000] NSWSC 316">relevance of public interest</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp3.5">cited from="[2000] NSWSC 316">effect of reinstatement</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp3.6">cited from="[2000] NSWSC 316">order conditional on payment of liquidator's costs</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp4.0">citing from="[2008] NSWSC 1058">corporations</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp4.1">citing from="[2008] NSWSC 1058">deregistered company</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp4.2">citing from="[2008] NSWSC 1058">application for order that asic reinstate registration</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp4.3">citing from="[2008] NSWSC 1058">applicant wishes to pursue proceedings against company in dust diseases tribunal</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp4.4">citing from="[2008] NSWSC 1058">whether plaintiff may proceed direct against insured without reinstatement of company's registration</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp4.5">citing from="[2008] NSWSC 1058">not shown that he can</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp4.6">citing from="[2008] NSWSC 1058">various factors relevant to whether reinstatement "just"</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp4.7">citing from="[2008] NSWSC 1058">company in liquidation immediately before deregistration</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp4.8">citing from="[2008] NSWSC 1058">need to re-install liquidator</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp4.9">citing from="[2008] NSWSC 1058">former liquidator should be appointed unless unable or unwilling to act</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp5.0">citing from="[2008] FCA 1181">jhfbv, the earlier immediate parent company of jhaf, was itself deregistered and ceased to exist on 31 october 2004. accordingly, the commissioner is not in a position to recover from it any part of the two payments totalling $1,051,500,227 that jhaf paid to jhfbv in early november 2001. although the later parent company, jhifbv, continues to exist, the amount that was paid to it by way of return of capital was only $7,608,773</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp5.1">citing from="[2008] FCA 1181">a small fraction of the estimated tax liability exceeding $150,000,000.</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp6.0">citing from="[2008] FCA 962">corporations</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp6.1">citing from="[2008] FCA 962">application for reinstatement of company</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp6.2">citing from="[2008] FCA 962">whether the former liquidators of the company remain as liquidators upon company's reinstatement</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp6.3">citing from="[2008] FCA 962">practical approach needed due to evidence of former liquidators having no further interest in the matter</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp6.4">citing from="[2008] FCA 962">company reinstated</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp6.5">citing from="[2008] FCA 962">new liquidators appointed</citphrase>
</citphrases>
<citances>
<sentence from="[2008] NSWSC 1058" id="cs0">24 Immediately before deregistration, however, Rigby Jones was subject to members voluntary winding up. A liquidator was in office. If and when reinstated, the company will again be a company in liquidation. However, the person who was the liquidator at the time of deregistration will not resume office as liquidator upon reinstatement: see J P Morgan Portfolio Services Ltd v Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu [2008] FCA 433 ; (2008) 65 ACSR 636 and cases there discussed. It will be necessary, therefore, that a liquidator be appointed. This is another aspect of stewardship.</sentence>
<sentence from="[2008] FCA 1181" id="cs1">6 Section 509(5) of the Corporations Act provided that ASIC must deregister a company at the end of a period three months after the liquidator lodges with ASIC a return of the holding of the final meeting. Mr Green filed that return on 23 May 2005. ASIC deregistered JHAF on 23 August 2005. As noted earlier, upon deregistration JHAF ceased to exist. Clearly, Mr Green is no longer in office as its liquidator. It is therefore not quite appropriate to speak of his being "replaced". Although I reached this view before becoming aware of Stone J's decision in JP Morgan Portfolio Services Ltd v Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu [2008] FCA 433 ; (2008) 167 FCR 212 , I note that it is totally in conformity with her Honour's.</sentence>
<sentence from="[2008] FCA 962" id="cs2">5 Mr Fernon SC, who appears this morning for the plaintiffs, has referred me to a line of authorities which reveals the dispute. I do not intend to record what was said in those authorities, but the cases and relevant paragraphs are: Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Australian Securities and Investments Commission [2000] NSWSC 316 ; (2000) 174 ALR 688 at [50] ; Ramantanis v G and M Excavations; v I and M Excavations [2003] NSWSC 1250 at [7] to [8]; Murray Halstead v CTS Quality Building Products Pty Ltd (in liq) [2006] NSWSC 1022 at [12] ; JP Morgan Portfolio Services Limited v Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu [2008] FCA 433 ; (2008) 65 ACSR 636 at [7] -[8], and [10]. With the exception of the decision of Austin J in ACCC v ASIC , these authorities support the proposition that on registration of a company, the liquidator who was in office at the time of deregistration is not automatically reinstated. </sentence>
</citances>
<legistitles>
<title id="l0">CORPORATIONS ACT 2001 </title>
<title id="l1">CORPORATIONS ACT 2001 - SECT 532 Disqualification of liquidator</title>
<title id="l2">CORPORATIONS ACT 2001 - SECT 601AH Reinstatement</title>
<title id="l3">FEDERAL COURT RULES </title>
</legistitles>
</case>


Question:
<citphrase id="cp0.0">cited from="[2004] FCAFC 73">administrative law</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp0.1">cited from="[2004] FCAFC 73">appeal by commissioner against orders setting aside a decision not to extend time in which to transfer losses under s 80g</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp0.2">cited from="[2004] FCAFC 73">after deductions claimed by transferor company upon which losses were founded were disallowed. income tax</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp0.3">cited from="[2004] FCAFC 73">validity of ruling tr 98/12</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp4.0">cited from="[1994] FCA 1052">administrative law</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp4.1">cited from="[1994] FCA 1052">statutory discretion</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp4.2">cited from="[1994] FCA 1052">ministerial policy</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp4.3">cited from="[1994] FCA 1052">role of policy in exercise of discretion</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp4.4">cited from="[1994] FCA 1052">on merits review by administrative appeals tribunal</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp4.5">cited from="[1994] FCA 1052">relevant factors</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp4.6">cited from="[1994] FCA 1052">misapplication or misconstruction</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp4.7">cited from="[1994] FCA 1052">failure to take into account relevant factors</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp4.8">cited from="[1994] FCA 1052">error of law.   immigration</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp4.9">cited from="[1994] FCA 1052">deportation</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp4.10">cited from="[1994] FCA 1052">criminal deportation policy</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp4.11">cited from="[1994] FCA 1052">merits review by administrative appeals tribunal</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp4.12">cited from="[1994] FCA 1052">misapplication of policy</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp4.13">cited from="[1994] FCA 1052">whether reviewable error</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp4.14">cited from="[1994] FCA 1052">prior warnings</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp4.15">cited from="[1994] FCA 1052">effect and relevance</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp4.16">cited from="[1994] FCA 1052">community benefit</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp4.17">cited from="[1994] FCA 1052">how assessed</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp4.18">cited from="[1994] FCA 1052">relationship to personal hardship to deportee and others.</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp5.0">cited from="[1993] HCA 29">income tax (cth)</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp5.1">cited from="[1993] HCA 29">allowable deductions</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp5.2">cited from="[1993] HCA 29">finance company raising funds for lending by drawing and selling bills of exchange and promissory notes</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp5.3">cited from="[1993] HCA 29">sale at discount</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp5.4">cited from="[1993] HCA 29">amounts of discount outgoings incurred in securing working capital</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp5.5">cited from="[1993] HCA 29">when incurred</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp5.6">cited from="[1993] HCA 29">apportionment between year of outgoings and year in which instruments paid out</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp5.7">cited from="[1993] HCA 29">income tax assessment act 1936 (cth), s. 51(1).  bills of exchange</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp5.8">cited from="[1993] HCA 29">accommodation bills</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp5.9">cited from="[1993] HCA 29">acceptance</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp5.10">cited from="[1993] HCA 29">whether drawer then presently liable to pay acceptor</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp5.11">cited from="[1993] HCA 29">promissory notes</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp5.12">cited from="[1993] HCA 29">sale</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp5.13">cited from="[1993] HCA 29">whether maker then presently liable to pay face value.</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp6.0">cited from="[1988] FCA 433">broadcasting</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp6.1">cited from="[1988] FCA 433">broadcasting act 1942</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp6.2">cited from="[1988] FCA 433">broadcasting (ownership and control) act 1987</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp6.3">cited from="[1988] FCA 433">limitations on "cross media interests"</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp6.4">cited from="[1988] FCA 433">grant of extension of the period referred to in sub-s. 92fab (9) of the broadcasting act 1942 to remedy contravention of the act</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp6.5">cited from="[1988] FCA 433">whether the australian broadcasting tribunal has power to grant a further extension.  judicial review</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp6.6">cited from="[1988] FCA 433">administrative decisions (judicial review) act 1977</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp6.7">cited from="[1988] FCA 433">whether there was an error of law in the construction of the broadcasting act 1942 by the tribunal</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp6.8">cited from="[1988] FCA 433">whether there was a failure to take account of a relevant consideration, viz. the effect upon the interests of the applicants seeking extension of time of the refusal of that application.  statutory interpretation</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp6.9">cited from="[1988] FCA 433">s. 33 (1) of the acts interpretation act 1901</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp6.10">cited from="[1988] FCA 433">statutory powers exercisable from time to time</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp6.11">cited from="[1988] FCA 433">contrary intention.</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp7.0">cited from="[1986] HCA 40">administrative law</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp7.1">cited from="[1986] HCA 40">commissioner to inquire into land claims and report to minister</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp7.2">cited from="[1986] HCA 40">report to contain recommendation if certain facts found</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp7.3">cited from="[1986] HCA 40">requirement to comment on detriment to others of acting on recommendation</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp7.4">cited from="[1986] HCA 40">report made in ignorance of certain material facts</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp7.5">cited from="[1986] HCA 40">submissions by persons who would be detrimentally affected by recommended action</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp7.6">cited from="[1986] HCA 40">reference to material facts not known to commissioner</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp7.7">cited from="[1986] HCA 40">submissions not drawn to minister's attention</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp7.8">cited from="[1986] HCA 40">whether failure to take relevant consideration into account</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp7.9">cited from="[1986] HCA 40">administrative decision (judicial review) act 1977 (cth), s. 5(2)(b)</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp7.10">cited from="[1986] HCA 40">aboriginal land rights (northern territory) act 1976,ss. 11(1), 50(3).  courts</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp7.11">cited from="[1986] HCA 40">practice and procedure</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp7.12">cited from="[1986] HCA 40">discretionary judgments</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp7.13">cited from="[1986] HCA 40">appellate court</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp7.14">cited from="[1986] HCA 40">functions</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp7.15">cited from="[1986] HCA 40">allegation of improper exercise of power by minister</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp7.16">cited from="[1986] HCA 40">discretion to refuse relief</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp7.17">cited from="[1986] HCA 40">finding of trial judge that exercise not improper</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp7.18">cited from="[1986] HCA 40">reversed on appeal</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp7.19">cited from="[1986] HCA 40">exercise of discretion by appellate court</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp7.20">cited from="[1986] HCA 40">further appeal</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp7.21">cited from="[1986] HCA 40">grounds on which further appellate court will interfere with intermediate court's exercise of discretion.</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp8.0">cited from="[1983] FCA 91">administrative law</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp8.1">cited from="[1983] FCA 91">judicial review</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp8.2">cited from="[1983] FCA 91">application for extension of time to lodge application under administrative decisions (judicial review) act 1977</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp8.3">cited from="[1983] FCA 91">decision to "stand-down" employees following declarations under s.43a of the telecommunications act 1975</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp8.4">cited from="[1983] FCA 91">principles relevant to granting extension of time</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp8.5">cited from="[1983] FCA 91">undue delay.  administrative decisions (judicial review) act 1977 , s.11  telecommunications act 1975 , s.43a  administrative law</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp8.6">cited from="[1983] FCA 91">judicial review</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp8.7">cited from="[1983] FCA 91">application for extension of time to lodge application under administrative decisions (judicial review) act 1977 (cth)</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp8.8">cited from="[1983] FCA 91">decision to "stand down" employees following declarations under s. 43a of the telecommunications act 1975 (cth)</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp8.9">cited from="[1983] FCA 91">principles relevant to granting extension of time</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp8.10">cited from="[1983] FCA 91">undue delay</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp8.11">cited from="[1983] FCA 91">relevance of public interest and prejudice</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp8.12">cited from="[1983] FCA 91">administrative decisions (judicial review) act 1977 (cth), s. 11</citphrase>
<citphrase id="cp8.13">cited from="[1983] FCA 91">telecommunications act 1975 (cth), s. 43a. during a period of industrial dispute the respondent "stood down" certain employees and made directions under s. 43a of the telecommunications act 1975 (cth) that those employees should not be paid their salary for the relevant period. following the end of the dispute the applicants' union commenced inquiries and sought legal advice as to the validity of the order to "stand down". the applicants gave no notice to the respondent of any intention to bring proceedings. the applications for extension of time (within which to lodge applications for orders to review) were lodged about eighteen months after the "stand down" orders.</citphrase>
</citphrases>
<citances>
<sentence from="[2009] NSWSC 347" id="cs0">

64 Ms Katzmann SC submitted that the Tribunal's conclusion at paragraph [17] was open on the evidence, and could not be considered irrational or so unreasonable that no reasonable or rational decision maker could have made it. She submitted that there is nothing irrational in a conclusion that, during a period of nearly an hour, when both the Plaintiff and Miss Burn were at the same place and when there was no impediment to verbal or written communication, it was practicable for the Plaintiff to provide Miss Burn with the additional information about his fees, that he would have known but she did not. Ms Katzmann SC submitted that the question of Wednesbury unreasonableness usually applies to cases of judicial review of abuse of discretionary powers: Minister for Urban Affairs and Planning v Rosemount Estates Pty Limited (1996) 91 LGERA 31 at 42-44; Minister for Immigration v Eshetu [1999] 197 CLR 611 at [122]- [126]. It is a finding to be made "in extremis" : BHP Billiton Direct Reduced Iron Pty Limited v Deputy Commissioner of Taxation [2007] FCA 1528 at [148] . </sentence>
</citances>
<legistitles>
<title id="l0">ADMINISTRATIVE APPEALS TRIBUNAL ACT 1975 </title>
<title id="l1">ADMINISTRATIVE APPEALS TRIBUNAL ACT 1975 - SECT 42D Power to remit matters to decision-maker for further consideration</title>
<title id="l2">ADMINISTRATIVE DECISIONS (JUDICIAL REVIEW) ACT 1977 </title>
<title id="l3">INDUSTRY RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT ACT 1986 </title>
<title id="l4">INCOME TAX ASSESSMENT ACT 1936 </title>
<title id="l5">INCOME TAX ASSESSMENT ACT 1997 </title>
<title id="l6">JUDICIARY ACT 1903 </title>
<title id="l7">JUDICIARY ACT 1903 - SECT 1 Short title [see Note 1]</title>
<title id="l8">JUDICIARY ACT 1903 - SECT 15 Exercise of jurisdiction</title>
<title id="l9">JUDICIARY ACT 1903 - SECT 25 Powers of court to extend to whole Commonwealth</title>
<title id="l10">JUDICIARY ACT 1903 - SECT 35 Appeal from courts of States</title>
<title id="l11">JUDICIARY ACT 1903 - SECT 36 New Trials</title>
<title id="l12">JUDICIARY ACT 1903 - SECT 39B Original jurisdiction of Federal Court of Australia</title>
<title id="l13">JUDICIARY ACT 1903 - SECT 45 Defence in causes removed to High Court</title>
<title id="l14">JUDICIARY ACT 1903 - SECT 50 Reports</title>
<title id="l15">TAXATION ADMINISTRATION ACT 1953 </title>
<title id="l16">TAXATION LAWS AMENDMENT (RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT) ACT 2001 </title>
<title id="l17">FEDERAL COURT RULES </title>
<title id="l18">TAXATION LAWS AMENDMENT (SELF ASSESSMENT) ACT 1992 </title>
</legistitles>
</case>