Rangel repeatedly insisted , as he had all along , that nothing he had done was with the aim of enriching himself .
Supporters of Rangel argued that by comparison with previous cases , a reprimand would be a more fitting punishment for Rangel 's trangressions than censure .
Rangel repeatedly insisted , as Rangel had all along , that nothing Rangel had done was with the aim of enriching himself .
Supporters of Rangel argued that by comparison with previous cases , a reprimand would be a more fitting punishment for Rangel 's trangressions than censure .