How can he deny the very logical and valid assertion that compiling millions of data points and finding meaningful patterns could divulge important information about is and is n't conducive to winning basketball games .
So why is Charles Barkley incapable of recognizing the validity of analytics ?
How can Charles Barkley deny the very logical and valid assertion that compiling millions of data points and finding meaningful patterns could divulge important information about is and is n't conducive to winning basketball games .
So why is Charles Barkley incapable of recognizing the validity of analytics ?