The court accepted the argument that the 1974 constitution , under which she had been charged , was null and void .
It also said the provisions of the 1975 security law , under which she has been kept under house arrest , remained in force .
Although the court accepted the argument that the 1974 constitution , under which she had been charged , was null and void , it also said the provisions of the 1975 security law , under which she has been kept under house arrest , remained in force .