Endogenous Growth: Balanced Growth Path with CRRA Utility I've got a model of endogenous growth due to spillovers.

$\textbf{Model:}$
$$K_t=\frac{1}{n}\sum_{t=1}^nk_t$$
In this model, $k_t$ is chosen by agents, and $K_t=\bar{k}_t$ (the average of all $k_t$).

Now, agents want to dynamically maximize utility (under certain constraints) and they have CRRA (constant relative risk aversion) utility, so the maximization looks like:
$$\sum_{t=0}^\infty\beta^t\bigg(\frac{c_t^{1-\gamma}}{1-\gamma}\bigg)$$
$$s.t.\;Y_t=k_t^\alpha(E_tL)^{1-\alpha}$$
$$c_t+i_t=Y_t$$
$$k_{t+1}=(1-\delta)k_t+i_t$$
$$c_t,i_t\geq0$$

$E_tL$ is effective labor and the rest of the variables are typical  (I can give their definitions if requested).

One last addition to the model is that there are two equilibrium constraints:
$$E_t=\frac{K_t}{L}$$
$$k_t=K_t$$
$\textbf{Solution:}$

Using an Euler equation approach, two terms in the objective:
$$...\frac{\beta^t[k_t^\alpha K_t^{1-\alpha}+(1-\delta)k_t-k_{t+1}]^{1-\gamma}}{1-\gamma}+\frac{\beta^{t+1}[k_{t+1}^\alpha K_{t+1}^{1-\alpha}+(1-\delta)k_{t+1}-k_{t+2}]^{1-\gamma}}{1-\gamma}...$$
FOC:

w.r.t  $k_{t+1}$ and substituting in consumption:

$$\beta^tc_t^{-\gamma}=\beta^{t+1}c_{t+1}^{-\gamma}[\alpha k_{t+1}^{\alpha-1}K_{t+1}^{1-\alpha}+1-\delta]$$ 
Substituting in the equilibrium constraints:
$$c_t^{-\gamma}=\beta c_{t+1}^{-\gamma}[\alpha+1-\delta]$$
$$\implies \frac{c_{t+1}}{c_t}=[\beta(\alpha+1-\delta)]^{\frac{1}{\gamma}}$$
This implies that consumption grows at a constant rate which depends on preference parameters.

The next thing I want to prove that we have a balanced growth path. By this I mean that all variables grow at the same constant rate. $$\frac{k_{t+1}}{k_t}=\frac{c_{t+1}}{c_t}?$$
I have started to answer the question, but I have gotten stuck. Here is what I have so far:
$$k_{t+1}=k_t^\alpha K_t^{1-\alpha}+(1-\delta)k_t-c_t$$
In equilibrium $K_t=k_t$:
$$k_{t+1}=k_t+(1-\delta)k_t-c_t$$
$$\implies \frac{k_{t+1}}{k_t}=1+(1-\delta)-\frac{c_t}{k_t}$$
If we have a constant rate of capital growth, suppose:
$$\frac{k_{t+1}}{k_t}&lt;\frac{c_{t+1}}{c_t}$$
If this is true:
$$\underset{t\rightarrow \infty}{lim}\;\frac{k_{t+1}}{k_t}=\underset{t\rightarrow \infty}{lim}\;1+(1-\delta)-\frac{c_t}{k_t}=-\infty$$
This means that the growth rate will continue decreasing. Now there are two ways this can happen. The first way is if $\underset{t\rightarrow \infty}{lim}\;k_t=-\infty$, which would clearly show that it couldn't be the case because capital cannot be negative. The second way which this could happen is if $\underset{t\rightarrow \infty}{lim}\;k_t=D$ where $D$ is some positive horizontal asymptote. If it did approach some asymptote, there is no reason why it could not be the case that consumption grows at a faster rate than capital. This is where I am stuck. How can I show that it cannot converge to some asymptote, and that $\underset{t\rightarrow \infty}{lim}\;k_t=-\infty$? Also, if there is an easier way to show that this model exhibits balanced growth paths, what is it? Any help would be greatly appreciated!
You have obtained

$$ \frac{c_{t+1}}{c_t}=[\beta(\alpha+1-\delta)]^{\frac{1}{\gamma}} \equiv 1+g$$

and

$$\frac{k_{t+1}}{k_t}=1+(1-\delta)-\frac{c_t}{k_t}$$

By equating you can show that there is a unique rule that maintains a balanced growth path

$$\frac{k_{t+1}}{k_t}=\frac{c_{t+1}}{c_t} \implies c_t =( 1-\delta-g)k_t$$ 

(too much consumption, by the way). This shows that the model has a unique balanced growth path. 

If you want further to argue that the economy will indeed choose this path, you have to invoke the Transversality condition (which constraints the consequences that a chosen path should have  on capital accumulation), and maybe the Inada condition that your chosen utility function satisfies.