Need help identifying this cognitive bias or fallacy pointed out by Kahneman in Thinking Fast and Slow This was in Thinking Fast and Slow by Kahneman.
He described a situation where someone might prefer A to B, and B to C, but then might prefer C to A (when A and C are directly compared to each other).
I can't seem to remember the name of this bias or fallacy, and I looked in the book but wasn't able to find the passage.
Anybody remember what it was?
(The last time I posted a behavioral economics question on here, some people protested that it didn't belong here. For your information, Kahneman has a Nobel in Economics, so please take your objections to the Nobel Committee. Thank you and good day.)

Update: the term is: &quot;Preference Reversal&quot;
When this event occurs it is known as a failure of "transitivity" of preferences.

Transitive preferences are such that for every  X,Y,Z, if X is preferred to Y and Y is preferred to Z then X must be preferred to Z. 

Economists define rational preferences as binary relations that are complete and transitive, meaning that we can compare everything and the comparisons are consistent.