Differences between best response, dominant strategy and Nash equilibrium I can't seem to get the differences of these terms.
I watched this video that has the differences of best response and Nash equilibrium:

But then I heard about dominant strategies from another video and searched for differences to land at this quiz question:

Is a​ player's best response in a game the same as his dominant​ strategy?
Not necessarily. If a player has a dominant​ strategy, then it is his best​ response; however, every best response is not always a dominant strategy.

Is there a table form that shows the differences of these 3 based on a specific player and what other players would do?
Consider the following game between P1 (row player) and P2 (column player):
\begin{array}{|c|c|c|}\hline
&amp; L &amp; R \\\hline
T&amp; 1,1 &amp; 2,0 \\\hline
B&amp; 0,0 &amp; 1,1 \\\hline
\end{array}

$T$ is P1's dominant strategy
$T$ is P1's best response to both of P2's strategies $L$ and $R$
$L$ is P2's best response to P1's strategy $T$
$R$ is P2's best response to P1's strategy $B$
$(T,L)$ is the only Nash equilibrium

Generalizing from the above observations:

A strategy is dominant if and only if it is a best response to each of the other player's strategies, e.g. P1's $T$.
A strategy that is a best response to some but not all of the other player's strategies cannot be a dominant strategy, e.g. P2's $L$ and $R$.
A Nash equilibrium is a pair of mutually best responding strategies, e.g. $(T,L)$.