Induced technical change vs. directed technical change I am trying to get a better grip on the literature on directed technical change and induced technical change. In other words, I am trying to understand if these concepts are the same and used interchangibly in the literature to refer to endogenous technical change.

Also, can anyone please point to a good review of the literature on this topic(s)?
Directed technical change is the relatively recent name for what it was was previously called Induced technical change. 

Informal discussion about the endogenous direction of technical change was first discussed (but not "microfounded") by Hicks (1932) and Fellner (1961). Yet, it was Kennedy (1964) who first proposed a formal model about endogenous technical change (previous examples like Solow (1957) assumed exogenous technical change).

The more recent denomination of directed technical change was proposed by Acemoglu (2002). This author has plenty of material about the topic:


these very comprehensive slides (also here, and why not, see all the material he shares here).
The 2002 paper on the subject
Chapter 15 of his book on economic growth


You can also see more about the historical literature on induced technological change here and here.