How to compare a reflector telescope to a refractor one? I already have a small 60mm Tasco refractor (with 300mm focal lenght) and a homemade 40mm refractor (with 1300mm focal lenght) and I want to buy a new telescope to have a better experience (I don't have an EQ mount yet)

I face the current choice: for the same price, I can have a 70mm refractor (900mm fl) with a great EQ mount, or a 114mm reflector (900mm fl) with a less great EQ mount...

How can I compare those 2 two? They are not the same type, and I feel like comparing oranges with apples. 

I know the technical difference between them, and I know the details about collimation. I just don't know how to rate them and chose one.

In short: Is it better a big reflector or a small refractor?
(If I want to extend the information to other choices I might encounter)
Small and effective refractors are easier to make than small and effective reflectors, but reflectors are cheaper in general. Unless you have some special reason to want to avoid a larger aperture (eg because you are engaged in solar observation) or a special reason why you want the optical qualities of a refractor, you almost certainly want a bigger aperture and so for a fixed price you are likely to be better off with the reflector.

Not having a EQ mount may be a bit of an issue though.