Information Paradox with Hawking's Radiation A theory about Blackholes storing the information from the universe.

Being said that Blackholes are condensed mass sufficient enough to break every particle into different elementary particles, broken particles will eventually reach the center(or they break down the time they reach there).

Some say that the information is stored on the surface instead, which can be carried by the Hawking's Radiation.

Questions:


How exactly can Hawking's Radiation carry the information?
How is it possible for information to exist at the event horizon? 


(If the mass was swallowed by the blackholes then every single particle should be inside the event horizon as they brought towards the black hole at very high velocity and it's becoming difficult to imagine that some particles were left at the horizon itself).

Maybe: If the information is on the event Horizon then it might not have broken to elementary particles!
How exactly can Hawking's Radiation carry the information?


It does not, if you mean information about the interior of the black hole.

The relevant theorem is the No Hair Theorem.  Basically you can only get gross statistical properties of black holes, nothing else and no information about the interior structure (meaning any info inside stored in any way, stays there or is lost as randomized radiation).

If you accept the No Hair Theorem then Hawking radiation would be essentially random in character, giving you no more information about the black hole than the No Hair Theorem allows you to know.  This would mean "information" being lost as a black hole evaporates.


  How is it possible for information to exist at the event horizon?


I don't think it's possible for anything to exist at the event horizon for any time.  It's a surface of zero thickness (as I understand it) and no actual substance.  Nothing can stop there and no real thing could be said to be "on" the horizon, just passing through it.

One of the complication of discussing black holes in relation to things like quantum-scale elementary particles is that while we can't say exactly where a particle is (the uncertainty principle) "classical" general relativity (i.e. without quantum theory) doesn't incorporate this at all and so the idea of a particle having a precise position is perfectly reasonable in classical general relativity.  But that's unlikely to be the case in whatever theory we end up with that links general relativity and quantum field theories.

I suspect you are hearing things related to the Holographic principle.  This is pretty much beyond my real understanding in any depth, but note that it is intimately linked with trying to connect String Theory, gravity (and hence a kind of quantum gravity), Thermodynamics and a notion of "information" within those multiple contexts.  I personally don't intend to try and read too much into this as it's beyond cutting edge theory for me (beyond my "event horizon" I suppose :-) ).  However I'd suggest being wary of reading too much into this idea given the present state of the theories involved.