What does observational evidence say about the number of protoplanets believed to exist in the early solar system? Currently, the solar system has 8 major planets, a handful of dwarf planets and a plethora of asteroids, comets and natural debris, and of course, a rather locally dominant star (the Sun).  There are many references that describe the early solar system as a chaotic environment with many more protoplanets.

Based on observational evidence, how many protoplanets are believed to have existed in the early solar system?
Earth and moon are thought to be formed by the collision of two planets. So we have at least these two protoplants. The cores probably ended mainly in the core of Earth; that's inferred by the much higher mean density of Earth in relation to Moon.

Iron-nickel meteorites strongly indicate at least one pre-existing planet large enough to form an iron-nickel core.

Comets of the Kuiper belt are hypothized to be a collision product.

As you go further back in time the building blocks of planets get ever smaller and more numerous till the interstellar dust and supernova remnants our solar system is formed of.

Some of the early material will most likely have been ejected from the solar system; this may include protoplanets.

By the chaotic nature of multi-body systems like our solar system it's getting more and more difficult to track single bodies back into the past.

The NICE models try to describe the early solar system.