the invention disclosed herein is best understood by reference to the drawings , wherein like numerals will be used to describe like parts throughout . in fig1 a frontal perspective view of one embodiment of an oral weight control device 10 is shown as it would appear outside of the mouth . this embodiment comprises two basic elements : an upper support brace 12 , and a guard 14 . the guard includes openings 16 therein that allow liquids and finely ground foods to freely pass therethrough . the size of these openings 16 may be adjusted depending on the needs of a particular user . in fig1 for example , the guard 14 is realized from relatively stiff wires or tubes 18 that are bonded or otherwise secured to each other in a lattice - type framework . thus , with the openings 16 present within the guard 14 , the guard functions similar to a sieve -- allowing liquids and finely ground materials to freely pass therethrough , yet blocking or preventing solid foods having a size larger than the meshed openings 16 from passing therethrough . this blocking action impedes ingestion of large food particles , allowing more thorough mastication thereof by the rear teeth . the guard 14 is pivotally mounted to the upper support brace 12 at pivot points 20 . this pivot mount is preferably adapted to allow the guard 14 to freely pivot with respect to the support brace 12 . thus , when the apparatus 10 is worn inside of the mouth , the guard 14 freely pivots to its lower or closed position , as shown best in fig4 and 5a , under the influence of gravity . if desired , a suitable spring 22 could be employed to bias the guard 14 in its closed or lower position . the use of such a spring 22 would maintain the guard 14 in its closed position when the mouth is open and the tongue down regardless of the orientation the user might assume with respect to the gravitational force field . ( that is , the spring would prevent the user from circumventing the function of the guard 14 by engaging in such unorthodox practices as eating with his head in an upside down position .) the spring constant associated with the spring 22 would , of course , be selectively chosen such that should food matter be pushed against the back side of the guard 14 , as would occur during regurgitation , the spring constant would allow the guard to readily assume its open position . the upper support brace 12 is configured to fit against the roof of the user &# 39 ; s mouth . typically , this brace 12 will be secured inside the mouth by looping the ends thereof around upper rear reeth 24 and 26 as shown in fig3 . to this end , the upper support brace 12 has loops 28 at respective ends thereof which are adapted to securely fit around teeth 24 and 26 . while the upper support brace 12 is shown in the figures as being secured to rear teeth 24 and 26 , it is understood that the invention contemplates securing the brace 12 inside of the mouth in whatever fashion may be appropriate for a particular user . in lieu of the upper support brace 12 , it may be desirable to use an embodiment of the invention as shown in fig6 a and 6b . in this embodiment , the guard 14 is pivotally mounted to stirrups 15 at pivot points 20 . these stirrups , in turn , may be cemented , or otherwise fastened , directly to the user &# 39 ; s teeth . the particular embodiment used ( fig1 or fig6 a ) will depend to a large extent on the size of the user &# 39 ; s mouth the presence of various dental work already performed ( such as caps , crowns , bridges , etc . ), and the potential difficulty of inserting bands 28 between the user &# 39 ; s teeth . however , either embodiment serves the same function . the discussion which follows is directed to both the embodiment of fig1 as well as to the embodiment of fig6 a and 6b . in fig4 a side profile view of the oral weight control device 10 is shown as it might be worn inside of the mouth of a user . the guard 14 assumes its lower or closed position at all times , causing the tip of the guard , shown at 30 , to rest upon the top of the tongue 32 . while this configuration may present some mild discomfort to a user for the first few hours of installation , experience has indicated that the user quickly adapts to having the device in his or her mouth and is quickly ( within a day or so ) able to compensate for the presence of the guard so as to freely talk , move the jaws , tongue , and the like . in this regard , it should be noted that orthodontists have placed a wide variety of appliances and other devices inside of the mouth of their patients for many years . many of these appliances are very cumbersome and uncomfortable , yet the wearer thereof quickly adapts to their presence and is soon able to function in a nearly normal fashion . as best seen in fig4 and 5a , any solid food entering the mouth opening is blocked by the guard 14 . any regurgitated material that is thrown up from the stomach would cause the guard 14 until it is thoroughly chewed to assume its upper or raised position , as shown in fig5 b , thereby allowing the regurgitated matter to freely exit the mouth , as represented by the arrow a -- a in fig5 b . thus , it is seen that the guard 14 functions similar to a one - way trap door , trapping entry of solid foods passing into the mouth , as shown in fig5 a , yet freely allowing the exit of food material from inside of the mouth , as shown at fig5 b . as can be appreciated from the above description , the oral weight control device 10 disclosed herein is a custom made device that is fitted for a specific individual . as such , an oral surgeon , or other qualified dentist , should be consulted and used for the initial installation of the device . typically , the loops 28 of the upper support brace or band 12 ( fig1 ), or the stirrups 15 ( fig6 a ), will be securely fitted to or around the teeth 24 and 26 so as to prevent removal of the device by the user once it has been installed . however , it is conceivable that the upper band 12 , ( fig1 ), or the stirrup 15 ( fig6 a ) while being tightly fitted within the mouth , could nonetheless be detachably fitted therein so as to allow even the user to remove the device should the need arise to do so . a wide variety of materials could be used to realize the device . for example , chromed steel has been successfully used to realize both the upper support brace 12 and the pivotally mounted guard 14 . however , other materials , such as a monofilament ( water resistant ) nylon material , could be used for the guard 14 . also , there are numerous polymers ( plastics ) and similar compounds that are commercially available which could provide the needed rigidity for the brace 12 ( fig1 ), guard 14 , and stirrups 15 ( fig6 a ). in this connection , it is noted that the brace 12 ( fig1 ) or stirrups 15 ( fig6 a ) and guard 14 could have a certain degree of resiliency associated therewith and still function so as to realize the present invention . in fact , a certain degree of resiliency may be desired . thus , the guard 14 could be made from a stiff plastic or rubber , or combination of the two ; or alternatively , it could be made from a relatively stiff wire that is coated with a suitable rubber or plastic coating . for example , a rubber or latex tubing has successfully been used to cover various wires on guard 14 . such a rubber or latex tubing is shown in fig6 a and 6b as item 17 . the primary function served by including tubing 17 in the locations shown ( low spots and high spots ) is to make the device more comfortable to wear . that is , the tubing 17 acts as a cushion or pad at those spots where the device regularly contacts the mouth . it should also be noted that the guard 14 could assume a wide variety of shapes which can block passage of large food particles or otherwise retain them at the molars for thorough mastication . the actual shape used would be very dependent upon the needs of the particular user as well as the size and shape of the user &# 39 ; s mouth . for example , where a mesh is used the openings 16 could be made very small , in which case a large number of cross braces and supports would be included or added to the lattice structure 18 . alternatively , the openings 16 could be made larger , in which case fewer support members would be used . further , a slit structure , as shown in the embodiment of fig6 a , could be employed , thereby creating long narrow openings through which the food must pass . if a particular patient determines that too much food material is passing by the sides of the guard 14 , then appropriate side guards could be fastened to the guard 14 to block such passageways . in fig7 a still further alternative embodiment of the invention is shown . this alternative embodiment contemplates the use of an upper support brace 40 secured against the roof of the mouth , and a lower support brace 42 secured across the bottom of the mouth and across the top of the tongue . appropriate bands or loops 44 could be fastened around appropriate teeth so as to secure the braces 40 and 42 in their desired position . a flexible netting material 46 may then be appropriately secured to the upper and lower support braces 40 and 42 . this flexible netting material could be realized from monofilament nylon , meshed metal , or other suitable materials . the material could even be stretchable to a certain extent if desired . typically , however , it will be fitted loosely between the upper and lower support braces 40 and 42 so as to allow free movement of the jaw muscles and tongue . as with the previous embodiment , the meshed openings within the netting material 46 could be selectively adjusted in order to suit the needs of a particular user . the method used to bond the netting material 46 to the support braces 40 and 42 , as well as the method used to bond the fibers of the net material one to another , could be selectively performed so as to allow such bonds to become disengaged if sufficient back pressure is present , as might occur , for example , if a rearward flow of food matter is pushed backwards against the net during regurgitation . the method of weight control associated with the present invention includes having a device as disclosed herein installed in the user &# 39 ; s mouth to force the user to slow the rate of food consumption and to follow an appropriate liquid / ground food diet thereafter it is apparent that this will allow more time for the body to naturally register the sensation of being full or satisfied prior to completion of a meal . as mentioned , it is highly recommended that a user consult with a physician and / or oral surgeon or dentist prior to embarking on a weight control method of this type . the physician , of course , can give proper counsel as to the amount of nutrients and calories which the user should include in his or her diet . the oral surgeon or dentist is needed , of course , to insure that the device is made properly by those trained to make such a device , ( i . e ., dental lab technicians ), and to properly fit and install the oral weight control device 10 within the user &# 39 ; s mouth . obviously , a comfortable fit is essential because the subject weight loss method requires sufficient wearing time to allow natural weight loss to occur . it should also be appreciated that the present invention can be easily used by those who wear dentures . in such a situation , the guard 14 may be simply pivotally mounted to the denture at an appropriate location . when the denture is removed from the mouth , as is commonly done when sleeping , the guard would also be removed from the mouth . while the invention herein disclosed has been described by means of specific embodiments and applications thereof , numerous modifications and variations could be made thereto by those skilled in the art without departing from the spirit and scope of the appended claims , the invention may be practiced otherwise than as specifically described herein .
an oral weight control apparatus and method adapted to block solid foods from entering the stomach of a user thereof , while at the same time allowing the user to freely move his tongue and jaws , to talk , to breathe , to drink fluids , and to participate in other desirable activities without the presence of the apparatus being visible or otherwise made known to anyone other than the user . the apparatus includes a guard , net , or other sieve - like blocking means that is secured inside the mouth of the user . liquids and finely ground foods may freely pass through the guard or sieve but solid foods may not . in the preferred embodiment , the blocking means functions as a one - way valve , blocking solid foods from entering the stomach through the mouth but allowing food within the stomach to pass back out through the mouth . the method includes mounting such an apparatus within the mouth in order to constrain the user to follow a suitable diet comprised of liquids and finely ground foods having a desired nutrient level .