following are examples of formulations to be used in fogging applications : a solvent system was prepared by mixing 60 parts diethyleneglycol 10 parts methanol and 30 parts methylene dichloride to form a solvent system specifically suitable for fogging applications . a &# 34 ; dynafog dh90 &# 34 ; fogging apparatus was used to spread a fog into a 90 cubic meter room . 50 ml of fogging composition was thus applied . the density of the fog was visually estimated 10 seconds after application . a scale of from 0 to 100 % was used to measure fog density , zero signifying no fog and 100 % meaning total fog , or no visibility into the room . partial densities were estimated respectively . a comparison of commercial solvents for fogging formulations with the solvent composition of the invention as shown in table 1 , shows the advantage of the fog obtained with the composition of this invention table 1______________________________________solvent fog density______________________________________nevolin ( 1 ) 60 % vk - 2 ( 2 ) 40 % example 1 95 % ______________________________________ ( 1 ) a product of chemische pharmaceutische div . &# 34 ; luxan &# 34 ; elst ( gid ) holland ( 2 ) a product of timmer ltd . england , containing ethoxyethanol , methanol and water . pesticide concentrates were blended with the solvent system of example 1 as follows : in all cases these formulations gave excellent fogs and were equal or superior to formulations of these pesticides prepared with commercial fogging solvents such as nevolin , pulsfog vk1 and pulsfog vk2 . wettable powder fogging compositions were prepared as follows giving excellent fogs . 75 parts of the solvent system of example 1 , 10 parts of water and 15 parts of pesticide concentrate were mixed using the following pesticides : these fogging solutions were compared with formulations made with commercial solvents recommended for wettable powders such as pulsfog vk2 and the inventive compositions were found to be much superior to the commercial products . to demonstrate the versatility and universal applicability of the inventive solvent system for fogging applications a comparative study was made of four pesticides formulated with commercially recommended solvents for this technique and the inventive solvent system as well as with single and two solvent combinations of ingredients comprising the inventive three component solvent system . the formulations were made up by blending 10 parts of pesticide concentrate with 90 parts of solvent . the blended fogging formulations were measured for ( 1 ) flash point ( 2 ) viscosity ( 3 ) fogging ability and in the case of the liquid concentrates ( 4 ) solubility , and for solid concentrates ( 5 ) wetting and ( 6 ) suspensibility . the results are tabulated in tables 2a ( formulations with liquid concentrates ) and 2b ( formulations with solid concentrates ). from tables 2a and 2b it is evident that only the inventive combination of solvents is satisfactory for formulating a variety of pesticides , both liquid and solid concentrates possessing the necessary desirable properties for successful fogging compositions . table 2a__________________________________________________________________________solventcomposition (%) pesticide a ( liquid conc . ) __________________________________________________________________________diethylene glycol 100 40 40 40methylenedichloride 100 60 50methanol 100 60 50petroleum dist . 100 60pulsfog vk 1 100pulsfog vk 2 100nevolin 100example 1 100solubility 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1flash point 1 1 3 1 -- -- -- 1 1 1 1 1viscosity 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1fogging 1 3 3 2 1 2 1 1 1 2 2 3__________________________________________________________________________solventcomposition (%) pesticide b ( liquid conc . ) __________________________________________________________________________diethylene glycol 100 40 40 40methylenedichloride 100 60 50methanol 100 60 50petroleum dist . 100 60pulsfog vk 1 100pulsfog vk 2 100nevolin 100example 1 100solubility 2 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 3 1 1 1flash point 1 1 3 1 -- -- -- 1 1 1 2 1viscosity 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1fogging 1 3 3 1 1 2 1 1 1 2 2 3__________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________solventcomposition (%) pesticide c ( wp ) __________________________________________________________________________diethylene glycol 100 40 40 40methylenedichloride 100 60 50methanol 100 60 50petroleum dist . 100 60pulsfog vk 1 100pulsfog vk 2 100nevolin 100example 1 100flash point 1 1 3 2 -- -- -- 1 1 1 3 1viscosity 3 1 1 2 2 1 1 1 2 1 1 1fogging 1 3 3 2 2 2 2 1 1 2 2 3wetting 2 2 1 2 2 1 1 1 2 2 1 1suspensibility 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 2 2 1 1__________________________________________________________________________solventcomposition (%) pesticide d ( wp ) __________________________________________________________________________diethylene glycol 100 40 40 40methylenedichloride 100 60 50methanol 100 60 50petroleum dist . 100 60pulsfog vk 1 100pulsfog vk 2 100nevolin 100example 1 100flash point 1 1 3 2 -- -- -- 1 1 1 3 1viscosity 3 1 1 2 2 1 2 1 2 1 1 1fogging 1 3 3 2 2 2 2 1 1 2 2 3wetting 2 1 1 2 2 1 2 1 2 1 1 2suspensibility 2 2 1 1 2 1 2 1 3 1 1 2__________________________________________________________________________
there is provided a solvent system for application of pesticides by fogging , said solvent system being of use with both liquid and solid pesticides , said solvent system comprising in combination 38 to 80 parts by weight of a glycol or a glycol ether , from 2 to 20 parts by weight of an alcohol of 1 to 3 carbon atoms and 18 to 60 parts by weight of methylene chloride .