the invention will now be further explained in and by the following examples . ware potatoes of the variety bintje were grown , harvested and stored in a storehouse . the material was stored at about 12 ° c . for 10 days , followed by sorting whereby in each case about 400 kg in the size 40 - 60 mm was reserved . a part of the material was intended for silver scurf variants and was stored in bins at about 10 ° c . until initial provision after 24 days . another part of the material was intended for fusaria variants . until initial provision , after 73 days , this part was stored at about 6 ° c . a further part was intended for phoma variants and was stored at about 6 ° c . until initial provision after 139 days . the separate initial provision for the various storage pathogens occurred for reasons of experimental technique . the potatoes were stored without use of sprout inhibiting agents . d4112 ec 95 - 1 , this formulation contains 500 g of d - carvone per liter ; d4108 ec 95 - 1 , this formulation contains , respectively , 500 g of d carvone + 150 g of imazalil per liter ; d4109 ec 95 - 1 , this formulation contains , respectively , 500 g of d carvone + 100 g of imazalil per liter . the potatoes of the different parts as specified hereinabove were stored in eight separate cells . per part , four repeats were provided . each repeat comprised 22 - 24 kg of potatoes and was stored in a bin . the bins were then stored in the different cells according to a lottery scheme . in them , 14 - 15 tons of potatoes could be stored in bulk . for these tests , the cells had been filled with bins of potatoes for about 5 - 10 %. to promote the fungal attacks during storage , for silver scurf , fusarium solani var . coeruleum and fusarium sulphureum a storage temperature of about 12 ° c . was aimed for , and for phoma exigua var . foveata of about 8 ° c . in addition , for the silver scurf and fusarium solani var . coeruleum a relative humidity ( rh ) of about 95 % was aimed for and for the other fungi an rh of about 90 %. in order to be able to control the various kinds of fusarium fungi and the phoma fungus , the potatoes were first infected with spores of these fungi . of fusarium sulphureum two species of fungi were available , viz . fusarium sulphureum + ( resistant to thiabendazole ) and fusarium sulphureum - ( not resistant to thiabendazole ). the required spores were cultured on dead grains of wheat . to be able to distribute the spores over the potatoes , the wheat grains were first soaked in water for half an hour . after sieving the suspensions contained , of the two fusarium species , about 50 , 000 spores per ml and of the phoma about 10 , 000 spores per ml of liquid . the infection with the different spores was carried out following the above specified storage periods . the spore suspensions were distributed over the potatoes as a fine mist by means of a disk mister ( type : mafex 87a ) mounted above a roller conveyor , at a metering position of 39 for the fusaria and of 40 for the phoma , using 1 liter of spore liquid per 1000 kg of potatoes to be treated . immediately prior to the artificial infection ( in the same pass ), the tubers to be infected were damaged all round . for this purpose , at the end of the loading belt to a roller conveyor , a variable - speed rotary shaft with pins about 15 cm in length had been arranged . from the loading belt , the potatoes dropped onto this rotary shaft with pins and then ended up on the roller conveyor where the artificial infection was carried out . for inducing silver scurf it was not considered necessary to carry out a prior artificial damaging and infection step . the attack develops spontaneously during warm and humid storage . 2 . damaged , infected and treated at initial provision with luxan fungaflor ec , dosage 75 ml / ton of potatoes , 3 . damaged , infected and treated at initial provision with luxan fungaflor ec , dosage 112 . 5 ml / ton of potatoes ; 4 . damaged , infected and treated at initial provision with formulation d4112 ec , dosage 100 ml / ton of potatoes , followed by 2 × talent , viz . after 6 and 12 weeks of storage ( cells 17 , 18 , 21 and 28 in connection with different pathogens and times of initial provision ); 5 . damaged , infected and treated at initial provision with formulation d4112 ec , dosage 300 ml / ton of potatoes , followed by 2 × talent , viz . after 6 and 12 weeks of storage ( cells 17 , 18 , 21 and 28 ); 6 . damaged , infected and treated at initial provision with formulation d4112 ec , dosage 100 ml / ton and with luxan fungaflor ec , dosage 75 ml / ton of potatoes , followed by 2 × talent , viz . after 6 and 12 weeks of storage ( cells 17 , 18 , 21 and 28 ); 7 . damaged , infected and treated at initial provision with formulation d4108 ec , dosage 100 ml / ton of potatoes , followed by 2 × talent , viz . after 6 and 12 weeks of storage ( cells 17 , 18 , 21 and 28 ); 8 . damaged , infected and treated at initial provision with formulation d4108 ec , dosage 150 ml / ton of potatoes , followed by 2 × talent , viz . after 6 and 12 weeks of storage ( cells 17 , 18 , 21 and 28 ); 9 . damaged , infected and treated at initial provision with formulation d4109 ec , dosage 150 ml / ton of potatoes , followed by 2 × talent , viz . after 6 and 12 weeks of storage ( cells 17 , 18 , 21 and 28 ); 10 . damaged , infected and treated at initial provision with luxan fungaflor ec , dosage 75 ml / ton of potatoes , followed by 3 × talent , viz . within 1 week after initial provision and after 6 and 12 weeks of storage ( cells 17 , 18 , 21 and 28 ); 11 . damaged , infected and treated at initial provision with luxan fungaflor ec , dosage 75 ml / ton of potatoes , followed by 3 × a double dosage of talent , viz . within 1 week after initial provision and after 6 and 12 weeks of storage ( cells 13 and 21 ); 12 . damaged , infected and treated with talent within 1 week after initial provision and after 6 and 12 weeks of storage ( cells 17 , 18 , 21 and 28 ). the treatments with the fungicide formulations to be tested , against the spread of silver scurf were carried out 1 day after the above - specified storage period . the treatments against fusaria and phoma were carried out in each case one day after the performance of the artificial damage and infection . in the treatments the agents to be administered were distributed over the potatoes via a disk mister ( type : mafex 87a ) mounted above a roller conveyor , using 1 liter of spraying liquid per 1000 kg of potatoes . in the treatments with the different formulations and dosages the dosing position of the mafex varied from 29 . 5 to 35 . during the treatments no problems arose with the product supply and discharge on the roller conveyor , there was always a neatly continuous potato bed , one tuber thick , on the roller conveyor and the distribution of the desired dosage on the tubers was splendid . against the spread of silver scurf , treatments with talent were carried out after : 4 days in cell 21 ( 350 ml ) objects 10 and 12 and in cell 13 ( 700 ml ) object 11 ; 49 days in cell 21 ( 350 ml ) objects 4 through 10 and 12 and in cell 13 ( 700 ml ) object 11 ; 81 days in cell 28 ( 350 ml ) objects 4 through 10 and 12 and in cell 13 ( 700 ml ) object 11 . for the control of fusarium solani var . coeruleum and fusarium sulphureum , treatments with talent were carried out after : 0 days in cell 21 ( 350 ml ) objects 10 and 12 and in cell 13 ( 700 ml ) object 11 ; 42 days in cell 18 and 28 ( 350 ml ) objects 4 through 10 and 12 and in cell 21 ( 700 ml ) for object 11 . the planned treatment after 84 days ( respectively , 2nd treatment for objects 4 through 9 and 3rd treatment for the objects 10 through 12 ) was omitted in view of sufficient differences in attack . for the control of phoma exigua var . foveata , treatments with talent were performed after : 0 days in cell 17 ( 350 ml ) objects 10 and 12 and in cell 13 ( 700 ml ) obj . 11 ; 38 days in cell 17 ( 350 ml ) objects 4 through 10 and 12 and in cell 13 ( 700 ml ) obj . 11 . the planned treatment after 90 days ( respectively , 2nd treatment for objects 4 through 9 and 3rd treatment for the objects 10 through 12 ) was omitted in view of sufficient differences in attack . the carvone content in the storage atmosphere was determined through adsorption of carvone to the adsorbent tenax , followed by thermodesorption cold trap injection on the gc ( gas chromatograph ). during the storage season , weekly air samples were taken in the storage cells . depending on the expectable carvone concentration , for 15 to 60 seconds 1 ml of air / sec was sucked in through glass tubes filled with 100 mg tenax ta ( 20 - 35 mesh ). the air samples were taken at the top in the storage cells . on the treatment dates a sample was taken both prior to and about one hour after dosage . samplings was carried out singly . prior to analysis of the loaded tenax tubes , as an internal standard , 0 . 3 μl of a 1 - methylnaphthalene solution in hexane was added ( 1 - methylnaphthalene conc . 0 . 3 mg / l ). for the purpose of determining the initial attack of silver scurf , at the start of the tests , twelve samples of 25 tubers were collected and assessed . for an intermediate assessment , after 91 days , per treatment / agent / combination of agents and repeat , 25 tubers were collected at random . after 92 days these samples were washed and the tubers were assessed on one side for the occurrence of silver scurf . the final sampling occurred after 132 days . depending on the tuber surface area covered with silver scurf , the tubers were categorized into classes . the following classes were distinguished : ______________________________________class i - 0 % tuber surface affected - aver . 0 % class ii 0 - 5 % tuber surface affected - aver . 2 . 50 % ciass iii 5 - 12 . 5 % tuber surface affected - aver . 8 . 75 % ciass iv 12 . 5 - 25 % tuber surface affected - aver . 18 . 75 % class v 25 - 50 % tuber surface affected - aver . 37 . 50 % class vi 50 - 75 % tuber surface affected - aver . 62 . 50 % class vii 75 - 100 % tuber surface affected - aver . 87 . 50 % ______________________________________ by multiplying the number of tubers in the different classes by the average percentage of affected tuber surface of the class in question , summing these products and dividing the total by the number of tubers assessed ( 25 ), per sample an average percentage of silver scurf attack was obtained . the assessment for fusarium solani var . coeruleum was carried out after 78 and 79 days . here , too , for the variants and repeats in question , the total number of tubers and the number of tubers affected by the fungus specified were determined . the assessment for these attacks was carried out after 80 and 81 days . here , too , for the variants and repeats in question , the total number of tubers and the number of tubers affected by fusarium sulphureum were determined . the assessment for phoma attack occurred after 60 days . for the variants and repeats in question , the total number of tubers and the number of tubers affected by phoma were determined . to be able to determine if the agents / combinations differed reliably from each other and from the untreated potatoes with regard to the attack by different fungal diseases , a variance analysis was carried out , which yields an l . s . d . value ( least significant difference ). the averages of the agents / formulations differ significantly per disease , at a reliability of 95 %, if their difference is greater than the l . s . d . value . the eight storage cells used were equipped with fresh air cooling . these cells were also provided with electrical heating elements . via heating and substantially internal ventilation , in all cells the desired temperature could be maintained during storage . to prevent an increase , if any , of the co 2 concentration in the cells , some fresh air was regularly admixed . temperature control proceeded via thermostats on the electrical heating elements . temperature monitoring occurred via calibrated electronic reading equipment . during storage the temperatures aimed for could be properly maintained . the air humidity in the cells varied from 85 to 95 %, viz . in the silver scurf cells from 90 to 95 % and in the other cells from 85 to 90 %. the results of the measurements are shown in fig1 - 5 . in all five cells , after the dosage with talent ( carvone ), a rapid decrease in the carvone content occurred . on average , over the storage season , the carvone contents were rather low . where a double dosage , was used , the concentration remained on average higher than with the normal dosage . table 1 summarizes the results of the intermediate measurements for silver scurf . table 1__________________________________________________________________________attack by silver scurf after 92 days . average % of tubersurface covered by objectsilver scurf no . 11 9 10 8 3 * 6 7 2 * 12 * 5 * 4 * 1 * __________________________________________________________________________2 . 9591 113 . 8870 9 * 4 . 8375 10 * * 5 . 0500 8 * * 5 . 1750 3 * * 5 . 8125 6 * * * * 6 . 0577 7 * * * * * 9 . 0188 2 * * * * * * * 9 . 2625 12 * * * * * * * 10 . 7904 5 * * * * * * * * * 14 . 0745 4 * * * * * * * * * * 21 . 8515 1 * * * * * * * * * * * __________________________________________________________________________ lsd = 0 . 6498 * = comparative example * indicate significant differences from table 1 it can be derived that after about 13 weeks of storage ( just before the 2nd talent treatment of the objects 4 through 9 and the 3rd treatment of the objects 10 through 12 ) all agents / combinations exhibit a significant controlling effect against silver scurf . mutual comparison shows that object 11 ( luxan fungaflor ec and 2 × a double dosage of talent ) exhibits the best controlling effect , immediately followed by object 9 ( d4109 ec with 1 × talent ). object 10 ( luxan fungaflor ec with 2 × talent ), object a ( higher dosage of d4108 ec with 1 × talent ), object 3 ( 1 . 5 × higher dosage with luxan fungaflor ec ), object 6 ( d4112 ec + luxan fungaflor ec and 1 × talent ) and object 7 ( lower dosage of d4108 ec and 1 × talent ) also exhibit a good controlling effect . compared to the objects already mentioned , the controlling effect of object 2 ( normal dosage of luxan fungaflor ec ), object 12 ( 2 × talent ) and object 5 ( higher dosage of d4112 ec and 1 × talent ) lags behind somewhat . the action of object 4 ( lower dosage of d4112 ec with 1 × talent ) appears to be the least effective . the results of the final assessment for silver scurf are summarized in table 2 . table 2__________________________________________________________________________attack by silver scurf after 134 days ( final assessment ). average % of tubersurface covered by objectsilver scurf no . 11 9 10 8 3 * 6 7 2 * 5 * 12 * 4 * 1 * __________________________________________________________________________3 . 7750 114 . 8894 9 * 5 . 9250 10 * * 5 . 9875 8 * * 6 . 5875 3 * * * * 7 . 0750 7 * * * * 7 . 1625 6 * * * * * 10 . 0750 2 * * * * * * * 10 . 9125 5 * * * * * * * * 11 . 1000 12 * * * * * * * * 16 . 3125 4 * * *. * * * * * * * 50 . 4530 1 * * * * * * * * * * * __________________________________________________________________________ lsd = 0 . 5171 * = comparative example * indicate significant differences in the final assessment too , all agents / combinations appear to exhibit a significant controlling effect against silver scurf . a mutual comparison of effects of the different treatments / combinations reveals that object 11 ( luxan fungaflor ec and 3 × a double dosage of talent ) gives the best controlling effect . as to effectiveness , this object is immediately followed by object 9 ( d4109 ec followed by 2 talent treatments ). the controlling effect of object 10 ( normal dosage of luxan fungaflor ec followed by 3 × talent ) and object 8 ( higher dosage of d4108 ec , followed by 2 × talent ) is comparable and good . the controlling effect of object 3 ( 1 . 5 × higher dosage of luxan fungaflor ec ) and object 7 ( lower dosage of d4108 ec , followed by 2 × talent ) is comparable and can be qualified good . further , the controlling effect of object 6 ( d4112 ec + luxan fungaflor ec , followed by 2 × talent ) and object 7 can also be qualified as comparable and good . furthermore , the controlling effect of object 2 ( normal dosage of luxan fungaflor ec ) is found to be reliably better than that of object 5 ( higher dosage of d4112 ec , followed by 2 × talent ) and object 12 ( 3 × talent ). the least effective of all agents / combinations , finally , is object 4 ( lower dosage of d4112 ec , followed by 2 × talent ). in table 3 the results of the measurements regarding attack by fusarium solani var . coeruleum are summarized . table 3 shows that with the exception of objects 2 and 3 ( 2 dosages of luxan fungaflor ec ) all other agents / combinations exhibit a significant activity against fusarium solani var . coeruleum . mutual comparison of the activity of the agents / combinations shows that object 11 ( luxan fungaflor ec , followed by 2 × a double dosage of talent ) gives by far the best controlling effect . of the other objects the controlling effect is less clear . the best results are scored here by object 6 ( d4112 ec + luxan fungaflor ec and 1 × talent ), followed , in terms of results , by the objects 8 and 7 ( 2 dosages of d4108 ec and 1 × talent ). next , the two dosages of d4112 ec , followed by 1 × talent ( obj . 5 and 4 ) are found to exhibit better activity than d4109 ec , followed by 1 × talent ( obj . 9 ). luxan fungaflor ec , followed by 2 × talent ( object 10 ) and 2 × talent alone ( object 12 ) exhibit the least activity . table 3__________________________________________________________________________attack by fusarium solani var . coeruleum after 78 and 79 days . average % of tubersaffected byfusarium objectsolani no . 11 6 8 7 5 * 4 * 9 10 12 * 3 * 2 * 1 * __________________________________________________________________________0 . 4577 1133 . 2551 6 * 36 . 8685 8 * * 38 . 9499 7 * * * 40 . 6612 5 * * * * 41 . 2594 4 * * * * 43 . 3129 9 * * * * * * 46 . 1805 10 * * * * * * * 49 . 9334 12 * * * * * * * * 78 . 1109 3 * * * * * * * * * 78 . 6097 2 * * * * * * * * * 78 . 6422 1 * * * * * * * * * __________________________________________________________________________ lsd = 1 . 2952 * = comparative example * indicate significant differences in table 4 the results of the measurements on attack by fusarium sulphureum + are summarized . table 4 shows that all agents / combinations exhibit a significant activity against fusarium sulphureum +. mutual comparison of the activity of the agents / combinations shows that the controlling effect of object 11 ( luxan fungaflor ec and 2 × a double dosage of talent ) is by far the greatest . next to be rated most effective are object 9 ( d4109 ec and 1 × talent ) and object 8 ( higher dosage of d4108 ec and 1 × talent ). then the objects 7 ( lower dosage of d4108 ec and 1 × talent ) and 10 ( luxan fungaflor ec and 2 × talent ) can still be qualified as having a fairly good activity . to be qualified clearly as least effective are object 5 ( higher dosage of d4112 ec and 1 × talent ), object 12 ( 2 × talent ) and in particular object 4 ( lower dosage of d4112 ec and 1 × talent ). table 4__________________________________________________________________________attack by fusarium sulphureum + after 80 and 81 days . average % of tubersaffected byfusarium objectsulphureum + no . 11 9 8 7 10 3 * 6 2 * 5 * 12 * 4 * 1 * __________________________________________________________________________2 . 4951 119 . 4974 9 * 10 . 1217 8 * 14 . 1231 7 * * * 16 . 1122 10 * * * * 21 . 8768 3 * * * * * 26 . 2313 6 * * * * * * 26 . 8985 2 * * * * * * 45 . 8276 5 * * * * * * * * 46 . 7307 12 * * * * * * * * 59 . 7406 4 * * * * * * * * * * 69 . 7572 1 * * * * * * * * * * * __________________________________________________________________________ lsd = 0 . 9457 * = comparative example * indicate significant differences fusarium sulphureum attack ( not resistant to thiabendazole ) in table 5 the results of the measurements on attack by fusarium sulphureum - are summarized . table 5__________________________________________________________________________attack by fusarium sulphureum - after 80 and 81 days . average % of tubersaffected byfusarium objectsulphureum - no . 9 8 11 7 6 3 * 2 * 10 12 * 5 * 4 * 1 * __________________________________________________________________________1 . 7570 91 . 8738 82 . 2962 114 . 8217 7 * * * 14 . 2680 6 * * * * 16 . 4422 3 * * * * * 19 . 5182 2 * * * * * * 22 . 0268 10 * * * * * * * 25 . 8261 12 * * * * * * * * 36 . 4681 5 * * * * * * * * * 56 . 4031 4 * * * * * * * * * * 72 . 1372 1 * * * * * * * * * * * __________________________________________________________________________ lsd = 0 . 7864 * = comparative example * indicate significant differences table 5 shows that all agents / combinations also have a significant activity against fusarium sulphureum -. mutual comparison of the activity of the agents / combinations shows that object 9 ( d4109 ec and 1 × talent ), object 8 ( higher dosage d4108 ec and 1 × talent ) and object 11 ( luxan fungaflor ec and 2 × double dosage of talent ) give the best controlling effect . object 7 too ( lower dosage of d4108 ec and 1 × talent ) exhibits a very good activity . the controlling effect of luxan fungaflor ec alone ( objects 2 and 3 ) is better than that of the combination of luxan fungaflor ec and 1 × talent ( object 10 ). finally , it can be noted that the treatments with agents that contain carvone alone ( objects 4 , 5 and 12 ) show a less effective controlling result . in table 6 the results of the measurements on phoma exigua var . foveata are summarized . table 6__________________________________________________________________________attack by phoma exigua var . foveata after 60 days . average % of tubersaffected by objectphoma no . 10 8 7 6 9 11 12 * 3 * 5 * 2 * 4 * 1 * __________________________________________________________________________15 . 7021 1028 . 5433 8 * 30 . 3914 7 * * 35 . 5336 6 * * * 38 . 4544 9 * * * * 41 . 0350 11 * * * * * 54 . 9223 12 * * * * * * 64 . 0668 3 * * * * * * * 71 . 1260 5 * * * * * * * * 75 . 6513 2 * * * * * * * * * 79 . 9465 4 * * * * * * * * * * 95 . 4509 1 * * * * * * * * * * * __________________________________________________________________________ lsd = 1 . 3279 * = comparative example * indicate significant differences table 6 shows that all agents / combinations have a significant activity against phoma exigua var . foveata . a mutual comparison of the activity of the different agents / combinations shows object 10 ( luxan fungaflor ec and 2 × talent ) to be the most effective . the next best score is that of the formulation d4108 ec with 1 × talent ( objects 8 and 7 ). next in line , in terms of controlling effect , are object 6 ( d4112 ec + luxan fungaflor ec and 1 × talent ), object 9 ( d4109 ec and 1 × talent ) and object 11 ( luxan fungaflor ec and 2 × a double dosage of talent ). the activity of treatments with carvone alone ( objects . 4 , 5 and 12 ) and imazalil alone ( objects 2 and 3 ) was clearly less effective .
in order to reduce the amount of synthetic fungicides used in the storage of potatoes , a method of repelling fungi in potatoes as effectively as possible has been looked for . what has also been looked for is an agent that is effective both for repelling fungi and for inhibiting sprouting in the storage of potatoes . it has been found that a combination of carvone and one or more fungicides leads to a synergistic effect both for repelling fungi and for inhibiting sprouting .