as summarized above , this invention involves knotless suture anchors , which contain an internal mechanism that exerts a ratcheting effect and activity on one or more suture strands that pass through the anchoring device . this type of knotless suture anchor 100 is depicted in fig1 and 2 . to more clearly depict the various non - planar surfaces that will interact with each other , both the cutaway elevation ( side ) view shown in fig1 , and the plan ( top ) view shown in fig2 , should be regarded as semi - schematic or semi - exploded views , in which the separation shown between the components is exaggerated . anchor 100 comprises an outer barrel 102 , which can also be referred to as a sleeve , enclosure , jacket , outer wall , or similar terms . it can have a cylindrical , square , rectangular , elliptical , or other suitable cross - section . the outer barrel has a tip or end 104 , which is suited to be driven into a bone , presumably into a pre - drilled pilot hole . alternately , for anchors that are designed to be affixed to soft tissues , any other suitable attachment type of attachment means ( such as a flap or collar of soft flexible material which can be penetrated by surgical needles or staples ) can be provided . if desired , the outer barrel 102 and / or tip 104 can have external threads , which would allow the anchor to be screwed into a pilot hole in a hard bone . if this type of screw - emplacement design is used , then the anchor will also require : ( 1 ) a recessed socket or comparable accommodation , on the upper surface 108 of anchor 100 , to engage the tip of a hex wrench or comparable driving tool ; and , ( 2 ) a suitable means for threading one or more suture strands through the anchor device 100 , after the anchor device has been screwed into a bone or otherwise emplaced in a targeted tissue . this can be accomplished by emplacing a small segment of a very thin flexible wire , with a loop at one end and a gripping component at the other end , within the ratcheting mechanism of the anchor device and occupying the same looped position that will later be occupied by a suture strand , during manufacture of the device . after the anchor device has been screwed into a bone surface or otherwise emplaced in soft tissue by a surgeon , the surgeon can insert the end of an anchoring or reinforcing suture strand , coupled to an implant device , through the small loop of wire that emerges from one side of the ratcheting anchor device . the opposite end of the wire segment is then gently pulled , by the surgeon , in a manner which will pull the end of the suture strand through the anchor , so that the suture strand will replace the wire segment , which will be discarded after it has been used to pull or “ tow ” the suture strand into position , within the ratcheting mechanism of the anchor device . if the outer surface does not have external threads , and is designed to be driven into a bone surface ( presumably into a pre - drilled pilot hole ) by a tapping or similar operation , then the shaft of the anchoring device preferably should have a plurality of barbs or comparable protrusions 106 , to help secure the anchor 100 and prevent it from being pulled out of the bone surface or other tissue . a generally upper region of anchoring device 100 contains the mechanism or subassembly that will provide the type of ratcheting action and effect that is desired and useful , for handling a suture strand as described herein . the main components of this ratcheting mechanism or subassembly include : ( i ) a seating component 120 ( also called seat 120 , for convenience ), which will be affixed to a first side of outer barrel 102 anchor 100 ; ( ii ) a retainer device 128 , which also can be called a washer , grommet , or similar terms , and which will be affixed to a second side or surface of outer barrel 102 ; and , ( iii ) a movable component , which is and trapped between the seat 120 and the retainer 128 , and which is referred to herein as brake 130 ( it can also be called a bead , ball , or similar terms ). as shown more clearly in fig2 , the ratcheting subassembly provides : ( i ) an entry orifice 123 , which passes through seat 122 , and which allows suture strand 190 ( which will have an implant end 192 , coupled to a cartilage - replacing or other implant device , and a free end 194 , which can be gripped and pulled by a surgeon &# 39 ; s tool ) to enter one side surface of anchoring device 100 ; and , ( ii ) an exit orifice 129 , which passes through retainer component 128 , and which allows the free end 194 of suture strand 190 to exit the anchoring device 100 . within the ratchet subassembly ( i . e ., between entry orifice 123 , and exit orifice 129 ), the suture strand 190 will be wrapped in a single loop , around brake component 130 , in a manner as illustrated in fig1 and 2 . this configuration , and the forces exerted on the movable brake or bead 130 by suture strand 190 ( which generally will be much more taut and tight than the loose and relaxed configuration shown in fig1 and 2 ) will trap the brake or bead 130 in a pathway that allows it to move somewhat , but only in a limited and constrained manner , back and forth between the seat 122 and the retainer 128 . the retainer device 128 , which surrounds the strand exit orifice 129 , normally will be positioned so that it is diametrically opposed to the seat component 120 , which surrounds the strand inlet orifice 123 . alternately , the inlet and exit orifices can be positioned at other angles , if desired , for specialty uses . for example , if an anchoring device of this type will be positioned at the most distant accessible location within an operating field , it may be more convenient for a surgeon to use an anchoring device which has an angle , between the inlet and outlet pathways , somewhere within a range of about 110 degrees up to about 150 degrees . preferably , if that type of angle is provided , it generally should be an obtuse rather than acute angle , to prevent an acute directional change from interfering with the ratcheting activity and effect of the anchoring device . the seating surface 124 , in seating component 120 , is sized and shaped in a manner that accommodates and conforms to the size and shape of the brake or bead 130 . accordingly , brake 130 will settle into , and press firmly against , said seating surface 124 , when tension is applied to the implant end 192 of suture strand 190 . the seating and pinching action that will arise , when a tensile force tries to pull suture strand 190 toward the implant device , will effectively pinch , trap , grip , and hold the suture strand 129 between the brake or bead 130 , and the seating surface 124 , in a manner which will block and prevent suture strand 190 from being pulled toward the implant device . to help ensure an optimal seating interface between movable brake or bead 130 , and seating surface 124 of seat component 122 , conforming and accommodating surfaces should be provided on : ( i ) the seating surface 124 ; and , ( ii ) the side or surface of the brake or bead 130 that will directly contact and rest against the seating surface 124 . if desired , rounded surfaces can be used , with a generally spherical brake or bead , and a generally hemispherical or “ rounded saucer ” seat . however , round shapes tend to pose a greater risk that a brake or bead of this type might become stuck ( or jammed , wedged , lodged , or similar terms ) in the seating surface , compared to accommodating conical shapes . accordingly , unless and until testing indicates otherwise , accommodating conical shapes for the seating surface , and the brake component , are deemed to be somewhat preferable , to spherical and hemispherical shapes . in addition , it also should be noted that the suture strand , passing through the entry and exit orifices and through the bead as well , will help ensure that the brake component will remain properly aligned with the seating component . the brake or bead component 130 surrounds , encloses , and provides a pathway 132 , which also can be called a hole , tunnel , orifice , etc . that pathway can be formed by molding , drilling , or other suitable means , and its edges preferably should be rounded , to prevent abrasion and possible breakage of the suture strand . its shape and placement will allow suture strand 190 to be : ( 1 ) inserted all the way through the brake , in a left - to - right direction when illustrated as in fig1 and 2 ; ( 2 ) looped halfway around the brake , as illustrated in fig1 and 2 ; and , ( 3 ) inserted through the brake hole 132 a second time , in the same direction as the first insertion . this will create a single continuous loop of suture strand material , which will encircle half of the brake or bead 130 . in this manner , the suture strand is provided with an ability to directly pull and move the brake in either direction , i . e ., either : ( 1 ) toward either the seating component 122 , shown on the left sides of fig1 and 2 ; or , ( 2 ) toward the retainer 128 , shown on the right sides of fig1 and 2 . however , as soon as brake 130 “ bumps into ” and presses against either the seating component 122 ( if being pulled back toward the implant device ), or the retainer 128 ( if being pulled away from the implant , by a surgeon using a tool ), no further travel of the brake is possible ; accordingly , the suture strand can continue to travel , only if the entire segment of strand material ( including the loop ) is able to slide along any and all surfaces it contacts , including : ( 1 ) the internal surface of seating component orifice 123 ; ( 2 ) the internal surface of brake hole 132 ; ( 3 ) the outer surface of brake 130 ; ( 4 ) the internal surface , once again , of brake hole 132 ; and ; the internal surface of the orifice 129 , which passes through retainer 128 . in direct contrast to the “ snug and conforming ” seating interface between brake 130 and seating component 122 , one or more small bump - or nodule - type protrusions 129 , located on the “ retainer side ” of brake 130 , or on the brake - contacting interior surface of retainer 128 , will have the opposite effect , and will prevent brake 130 from pressing against retainer 128 in a snug and / or conforming manner . therefore , even when brake 130 is being pulled directly into and against retainer 128 , by a tensile force exerted on the free end 194 of suture strand 190 , the suture strand 190 will not become caught , pinched , or otherwise gripped and held by the very small contact points that will be created between brake 130 , and the interior surface of retainer 128 , if small bumps , nodules , or other protrusions are provided , either on the “ retainer side ” of the brake component , or on the retainer surface , to prevent the brake from nestling into and resting securely against the retainer . as a result , the surgeon will be able to pull the suture strand through the anchoring device 100 in one direction , as indicated in fig2 , but tension from the implant will not be able to pull the suture strand back through the anchoring device in the opposite direction , toward the implant device . accordingly , this will generate and provide the type of ratcheting mechanism effect that is desired , in this type of ratcheting knotless suture anchor . a “ rough prototype ” of this type of mechanism has been assembled and tested by the applicant herein , an orthopedic surgeon , using a combination of : ( i ) braided suture materials made of ultra - high - molecular - weight polyethylene ( uhmwpe ), which were available to him in his practice as a surgeon ; and , ( ii ) small conical beads and pre - drilled cones ( the beads had diameters of about 4 mm , and both the beads and cones were made of unidentified non - rusting metal alloys ) that he found at a crafts store . upon using those components to assemble and test the types of devices shown in fig1 and 2 , and based on having performed hundreds of rotator cuff repairs over a span of decades as a practicing orthopedic surgeon , he discovered that those bead - and - cone assemblies were able to generate gripping forces that were more than strong enough , with an adequate margin of safety , to serve as fully functional and suitable suture - ratcheting devices for use during procedures such as rotator cuff repairs , even when the beads were made of hard and unyielding metal alloys . furthermore , even higher and stronger gripping and trapping force will be generated , if somewhat soft and pliable materials ( which can be created having any desired level of softness , flexibility , and pliability , using well - known polymer technology ) are used to make the movable brake component , and / or the seating surface , in a ratcheting anchor with a design as disclosed herein . accordingly , even at that earliest stage of testing , it became clear to the applicant herein that this approach to designing miniaturized ratcheting suture anchors is entirely feasible and practical . it also should be noted that different types of strand materials will provide varying levels of “ gripping strength ”. in general , suture strands made from multiple smaller fibers , either in twisted form ( comparable to conventional jute ropes ) or braided form ( comparable to braided nylon ropes ) will provide textured and non - smooth surfaces that can generate higher levels of “ gripping strength ” ( i . e ., the ability to resist tensile forces that otherwise would pull a strand in a non - allowed direction ), compared to “ monofilament ” strands ( i . e ., single - stranded fibers with smooth surfaces , comparable to most types of conventional fishing lines , usually created by forcibly extruding a hot liquefied polymer out of a single extrusion orifice ). accordingly , twisted or braided ( rather than monofilament ) suture strands are likely to be preferred for most uses described herein . however , any surgeon who has tested and tried out these new types of suture anchors , using various types of candidate suture materials , can develop his / her own preferences for certain types and thicknesses of suture strands , for use in various different types of surgical procedures as described herein . in addition to pointing out that different types and thicknesses of suture strand materials can be used with these types of racheting anchors ( with braided suture materials , which are available in a range of thicknesses , providing a presumptively preferred choice for such uses , subject to the surgeon &# 39 ; s personal preferences for any specific patient ), it should also be noted that any surface of a movable brake component or a seating component in the types of ratcheting anchors described herein can be provided with a textured , patterned , or other non - smooth surface , or with additional types of barbed , sawtoothed , hooked , “ biased bristle ”, or other components , positioned at one or more suitable locations within the ratcheting mechanism . for example , the internal tunnel which passes through a movable brake component , and / or one or more edges of such brake component , can be provided with a series of edges shaped in a sawtoothed , gnarled , or other pattern , or with a set of “ directionally biased ” miniaturized teeth or other protrusions , of the type that are found on the surfaces of various types of rasps that as used to work with wood , metal , or other solid materials . accordingly , when such additional textures , barbs , hooks , and similar non - smooth surfaces or components are taken into account , it is more accurate to say that at least one seating surface must “ engage ” at least one surface of a movable brake component , rather than requiring that such “ mated ” surfaces must “ conform ” to each other . to be covered by the claims , such “ engagement ” requires the creation of a racheting effect or activity , when applied to a suture strand ( i . e ., the strand must be able to travel in a first allowed direction without major impedance , while travel in the opposite direction must be effectively blocked and prevented ). another design which falls within the class of ratcheting anchor devices covered by the claims is shown in fig3 , which includes panels 3 a and 3 b . in this drawing , ratcheting suture anchor 200 comprises a suture entry orifice 202 and a suture exit orifice 204 , and a movable brake component 210 which is slidably coupled to a braided suture strand 290 . that coupling involves a side - mounted ( rather than centered ) eyelet component 212 , which has a tunnel passing through it with a diameter that is small enough to exert a steady but yieldable gripping force on a relatively large - diameter suture strand 290 . braided suture strands are well - suited for this type of use , since they have sufficient thickness , and sufficient compressibility ( or “ yieldability ”, or similar terms ), to enable a braided strand to engage a small - diameter tunnel in a “ gripping but yielding ” manner , which will : ( 1 ) allow the suture strand 290 to be pulled through the eyelet 212 of brake component 210 in the “ allowed ” direction , as indicated in fig3 a , without requiring undue force ; and , ( 2 ) enable the suture strand to pull the brake component 210 into engagement with the seating component 230 , as indicated in fig3 b , in a manner which will create a pinching ( or gripping , crimping , or similar terms ) zone 234 , which will grip and trap the braided suture strand 290 between the brake component 210 , and the seating surface 232 . fig3 also indicates a retainer structure 220 , near the suture exit orifice 204 . that retainer structure can have any of various shapes or surfaces , such as a loose mesh , a grid of parallel bars , a molded waffle - type surface , or any other type of surface which will not create the type of enlarged pinching and gripping zone that will be created when the movable brake 210 is pulled against the seating component 230 . accordingly , when the types of ratcheting mechanisms shown in fig1 - 3 are considered , it becomes clear that one of the advantages of these types of racheting mechanisms , compared to the “ ring cinch ” mechanism shown and described in u . s . application ser . no . 13 / 073 , 342 ( fanton et al ; published as 20110238113 ), is that the ratcheting mechanisms disclosed herein have only a single moving part ( this disregards and does not count the suture strand itself , which will simply slide through the mechanism , in a tightly constrained pathway , while being pulled by an external force ). by contrast , each of the “ cinch ” mechanisms described in u . s . application ser . no . 13 / 073 , 342 requires at least two distinct internal moving parts , which can change their positions relative to each other and to their housing assembly . reducing the number of moving parts by half , within these types of miniaturized devices , leads to three advantages , which can be summarized as follows : ( 1 ) simpler , less expensive , and more reliable manufacture of these types of miniaturized devices ; ( 2 ) reduced risk of jamming or malfunction , due to interactions between the internal parts and the housing assembly ; and , ( 3 ) reduced risk of jamming or malfunction when used in surgical fields that may contain bone chips or other unwanted particulates , which is of particular concern during various types of orthopedic operations ( such as when repairing damaged cartilage , as one example ). the methods required for manufacturing these types of anchors is well within the skill of the art . in general , it is likely to be preferable to “ trap ” the movable brake ( or bead ) component , inside the anchoring device , by molding the outer shell ( or sleeve , barrel , etc .) in the form of bottom and top components which can be snapped , glued , or otherwise affixed to each other . for example , the bottom component can contain point 104 , and the lower surfaces of suture inlet 120 and suture outlet 128 . a brake / bead 130 , which already has had a suture strand ( or a thin placement wire , or comparable emplacement tool ) passed through its tunnel 132 a first time , wrapped around the brake , and then passed through the tunnel a second time , as shown in fig2 , is then suspended over the bottom component , with both ends of the suture strand resting upon the u - shaped lower portions of the entry and exit holes 123 and 129 . a top component can then be lowered down onto the bottom component , while the suture strand and bead remain in place . alternately , if desired , the entry and exit holes can both be manufactured as part of a single component , such as either : ( i ) a semi - circular bracket which will hold the entry and exit holes at the far ends of the c - shaped bracket ; or , ( ii ) as part of a top ( or cap , or similar terms ) component . in either situation , the two ends of a suture strand ( or emplacement tool ) which has been affixed to a brake component can be inserted through the entry and exit holes ( in an in - to - out direction for both holes ), in a manner which will effectively suspend and trap the brake component between the entry and exit holes . the top component , with the suture strand and brake component coupled to it , can then be press - fit into ( or glued to , or otherwise affixed to ) the bottom component . it also should be noted that the anchoring devices disclosed herein can be manufactured in two components , in a manner which will allow the bottom component to be anchored to a bone or soft tissue , within a joint or other surgical site , by itself , before the top component is inserted . subsequently , the top component , which will carry a movable - brake type of ratchet mechanism with a suture strand affixed to it , can be inserted into the joint or other operating field , and attached to the bottom component . this can render it easier and more convenient for a surgeon to affix a bottom component to a bone surface or soft tissue , without being encumbered by the top component or by a suture strand , and without creating any risk that a miniaturized ratchet mechanism might be damaged by an installation step . this type of two - component anchoring system 300 is illustrated in fig4 , which shows : ( 1 ) a lower component 310 , with a flexible apron 312 that is designed to be affixed to soft tissue by means of staples , sutures , etc ., coupled to a center component 314 that will receive and hold the base of upper component 320 ; and , ( 2 ) an upper component 320 , with a suture strand 322 passing through it ( entry orifice 324 is shown ; the exit orifice , on the other side , is not shown ). upper component 320 contains a “ movable brake ” ratchet mechanism as described herein , within the housing component shown in fig4 . the upper and lower components can be made of any suitable materials that will enable the upper component 320 to be securely affixed to an already - anchored lower component 310 , by any suitable means , such as a snap - ring component , a drop of glue , or a “ tab - and - slot ” configuration that allows the upper component 320 to be inserted into the lower component 310 and then rotated a fraction of a turn to lock it in place . it also should be noted that this type of ratcheting knotless anchoring device can be adapted for assembling various types of “ implant assemblies ”, in an in situ manner ( i . e ., inside a patient &# 39 ; s body , which includes the patients limbs , joints , etc .). as one example , in a shoulder joint , if a rotator cuff has suffered severe damage , or if it became damaged years earlier , and was never repaired in a timely manner , an optimal approach to repairing the damage may involve a sequence of steps in which : ( i ) a segment of reinforcing mesh is affixed to an extended edge or area of the torn rotator cuff ; ( ii ) an accommodating securing device is affixed to the enlarged end of the humerus ( i . e ., the long bone in the upper arm ; and , ( iii ) a set of suture strands with ratcheting anchors , as described herein , is used to pull the reinforcing mesh ( and the tissue of the torn rotator cuff , in a manner that will pose less risk of tearing , distortion , or other damage of that tissue ) to the securing device that has been attached to the bone . in that type of approach , strands or segments of the reinforcing mesh ( rather than the suture strands that were used to pull the mesh ) can be affixed directly to the securing device that has been anchored to the bone that type of procedure which can be regarded as in situ assembly of an implant device , wherein : ( 1 ) the assembly of that type of implant device will be completed , inside the patient &# 39 ; s body , when the reinforcing mesh component has been attached to the securing device ; and , ( 2 ) the complete implant , once it has been assembled in situ , has an improved ability to benefit the patient , compared to any other type of implant device that could have been inserted into the patient &# 39 ; s body as a sole and single component . as will be recognized by anyone who is familiar with how medical devices and surgical implants are manufactured , stored , and shipped , the types of racheting suture anchors disclosed herein can be manufactured , packaged , stored , and shipped in the form of pre - assembled parts and / or subassemblies , commonly known as “ kits . to maintain sterility , these types of kits are stored within sealed air - tight and water - tight enclosure ( such as relatively thick and durable types of plastic shrink - wrapping ), which are designed to be opened only in a sterile operating room or similar environment , immediately prior to use by a surgeon . accordingly , an example of such a kit 400 is provided in fig5 , which shows a sealed plastic envelope 410 , having a bottom layer 412 and a top layer 414 ( shown peeled up at one corner , to illustrate the two distinct layers ). envelope 410 contains , in this example , a cartilage - replacing implant 420 , which is sized and shaped for use in replacing the hyaline cartilage on a femoral runner , in a knee joint . this example shows six suture strands 422 , each one emerging from the peripheral edge of the femoral implant 420 ( for example , each implant can be wrapped around a flexible anchoring cable that is embedded within a molded polymeric component , around the entire periphery of the implant ). each suture strand 422 has a racheting mechanism 424 coupled to it . each such racheting mechanism is designed to be coupled to an anchoring component 430 , after the anchoring component has been driven into a bone surface . the ratcheting mechanisms 424 , and the anchoring components 430 , are illustrated with exaggerated sizes , to simplify the illustration . 1 . one or more fixation devices , which can include either or both types of devices shown in fig1 and 4 , for attaching an anchor to either hard bone and / or soft tissue , and which can be inserted into a joint , body cavity , or other operating site , prior to insertion of a racheting mechanism into the targeted site ; 2 . one or more brake components , which are designed to be threaded onto suture strands and then inserted into a ratcheting suture anchor as described herein ; and , 3 . one or more ratcheting mechanisms , which are designed to be inserted into an operating site and then securely affixed to an already - anchored fixation device . if desired , these types of kits can also include other components and / or devices , such as , for example , cartilage - replacing implants , segments of mesh or other materials that will be used to reinforce a segment of damage tissue that is being repaired , etc . if desired , additional design features can be used to facilitate in situ assembly of a racheting suture anchor . for example , the lower component ( i . e ., with fixation / anchoring means that will allow the lower component to be driven into a bone surface , or stapled or sutured to soft tissue ) can be provided with suture entry and exit components with crimped access slots on their top edges . after a surgeon has threaded a brake component onto a suture strand , the surgeon can use conventional arthroscopic or laparoscopic tools to : ( 1 ) press the suture strand into the entry orifice , in a manner which will use the crimped orifice to secure the suture strand in that location ; ( 2 ) adjust the positioning of the suture strand , until the brake component ( which can slide along the length of the suture strand , but only with resistance ) is positioned between the entry and exit orifices ; ( 3 ) press the suture strand down into the crimped exit orifice , to ensure that the suture strand and the brake component will not move out of position as the ratchet mechanism is being inserted into the operating area and then affixed to the anchoring component . all of the ratchet mechanisms disclosed herein will allow a suture strand to pass entirely through an anchor device , in a manner which will provide a “ free end ” of the suture strand . this can provide two potentially important benefits , compared to the type of rotating ratchet mechanism disclosed in the published applications by van der burg et al . first , the “ direct pass - through ” nature of the ratchet mechanisms disclosed herein will allow substantially longer suture strands to be used , for initial anchoring and preliminary reinforcing of a cartilage - replacing implant device , compared to a rotating ratchet system which would need to stuff long suture strands inside miniaturized cylinders that are kept as small as possible . the types of flexible cartilage - replacing implant devices being developed by the applicant herein will pose substantial challenges , especially to surgeons must learn how to use them effectively . a set of relatively long and easily - reachable suture strands , positioned at key locations around the periphery of an implant , will effectively provide a set of “ handles ” that can be used by a surgeon to help the surgeon manipulate and position an implant , inside a joint which is being manipulated with only limited arthroscopic access . it should also be noted that the suture strands which are coupled to an implant can be color - coded , to provide a surgeon with an additional set of visual cues , to help the surgeon complete the surgical procedure quickly and effectively . secondly , since all of the ratchet mechanisms disclosed herein will allow the “ free end ” of a suture strand to be grasped and pulled by the surgeon , these designs can preserve a normal and natural “ feel ”, which most arthroscopic surgeons would prefer to have , during a tightening procedure . by contrast , a rotating ratchet mechanism , as disclosed in published application 2010 / 0063542 ( van der burg et al ) will need to be driven by some type of wrench or similar powered tool . furthermore , in a rotating ratchet system which must be driven by a powered wrench , there is some level of risk that the accumulation of a significant length of suture strand , in a narrow and tightly constrained gap between an internal rotating device and a surrounding sleeve , might cause the rotation and responsiveness of the mechanism to be altered , and distorted , in ways that cannot be fully predicted or controlled if a substantial length of suture strand is involved . finally , it should be noted that the relatively simple “ direct pass - through ” nature of the ratchet mechanisms disclosed herein can enable various designs and methods for momentarily releasing the grip of a ratchet mechanism on a suture strand , in a way that will allow the tension in the strand to be reduced , if necessary . as just one example , a small sleeve made of smooth - surfaced plastic , with a slit passing through it lengthwise , can be fitted onto the surface of a suture strand , immediately “ above ” a ratchet mechanism . if the smooth sleeve is pushed into the ratchet mechanism , it can create enough separation , between two gears or similar devices , to enable a suture strand to be pulled backward through the ratchet mechanism . thus , there has been shown and described ( i ) a new and useful class of knotless suture anchors with ratcheting capability , and ( ii ) a new and useful class of surgical implant devices which incorporate such ratcheting suture anchors . although this invention has been exemplified for purposes of illustration and description by reference to certain specific embodiments , it will be apparent to those skilled in the art that various modifications , alterations , and equivalents of the illustrated examples are possible . any such changes which derive directly from the teachings herein , and which do not depart from the spirit and scope of the invention , are deemed to be covered by this invention .
a device for knotless securing of surgical sutures has a component such as a tissue embeddable anchor , carrying a mechanism that permits a suture to be pulled through the device in one direction but prevents travel in the opposite direction . the suture passes through the device between an entry and exit . a movable brake in the anchor or other component interacts with the suture . tension on the suture in one direction pinches the suture by pulling the brake against the suture at a seating surface , preventing movement of the suture in that direction . tension in the other direction lifts the brake and frees the suture .