in the following description of embodiments of the present invention , reference is made to the accompanying drawings that form a part hereof and in which is shown by way of illustration a number of specific embodiments in which the present invention can be practiced . it is to be understood that other embodiments can be utilized and structural changes can be made without departing from the scope of the present invention . this specification discloses one or more embodiments that incorporate features of the present invention . the embodiment ( s ) described , and references in the specification to “ one embodiment ”, “ an embodiment ”, “ an example embodiment ”, etc ., indicate that the embodiment ( s ) described may include a particular feature , structure , or characteristic , but every embodiment may not necessarily include the particular feature , structure , or characteristic . moreover , such phrases are not necessarily referring to the same embodiment . further , when a particular feature , structure , or characteristic is described in connection with an embodiment , it is submitted that it is within the knowledge of one skilled in the relevant art ( s ) to effect such feature , structure , or characteristic in connection with other embodiments whether or not explicitly described . a device and method are described herein for removing coffee grinds and other particles from the bottom of a french press thoroughly and with a minimal amount of effort . fig1 and fig2 illustrate an embodiment of a press cleaning device 100 that can be operatively positioned inside of a french press , such as french press 210 , to remove coffee grinds and other particles from the inside bottom of the french press . the press cleaning device 100 includes a cylindrical stem 110 having a handle 120 disposed at a first end and a flat circular disk - shaped ramp 130 disposed at a second end . the stem 110 provides a central axis for manipulating the device 100 , as described herein . the stem 110 is a relatively thin tube having a vertical height that is slightly and comfortably greater than the height of the french press 210 . although the stem 110 is illustrated in fig1 as having a tubular shape , various other configurations can be utilized . for example , a cross - sectional view of the various configurations for the stem 110 can be circular , oval , triangular , square , poly - sided , star - shaped , or the like . the handle 120 is coupled to the stem 110 to enable a user to rotate or twist the stem 110 . in fig1 , the handle 120 is illustrated as being perpendicular to the top of stem 110 , but the handle 120 can be positioned at other angles or possess other configurations , for example a spherical shape , as long the handle 120 permits the user to easily grip and rotate the stem 110 on a central axis . in an embodiment , the handle 120 is coupled in the middle to the top of the stem 110 and enables the user to rotate the stem 110 in a clockwise motion . in other embodiments , the handle 120 is coupled to enable the user to rotate the stem 110 in a counter - clockwise motion . in another embodiment , a knob is included and adapted to be pushed at the handle end of the stem and results in the ramp 130 below rotating . the center of the disk - shaped ramp 130 is perpendicularly coupled on its central axis to the stem 110 , and forms a gradually descending curving plane or ramp beneath the stem 110 . the ramp 130 is also positioned onto the stem 110 such that the leading lower edge 150 of the ramp 130 is parallel to the handle 120 ( which parallels the floor of the french press 210 ). the circumference of the ramp 130 is substantially the same as the circumference of the inside of the french press 210 . in another embodiment the outside edges of the ramp 130 can be made of a malleable or pliable material , such as soft rubber or plastic , which allows for a minimally wider diameter ( than the inside diameter of the french press 210 ) thus affecting a thorough scraping of the walls of the french press 210 . in the illustrated depictions , the ramp 130 is a rigid , solid floored or non - porous device ; however in other embodiments , the ramp 130 could be a rigid porous screen - like material that allows the liquid to strain through but not the larger , coarse coffee grinds . since french presses may vary in size or volume , the circumference of ramp 130 can also vary to match the inner circumference of the french press 210 that the device 100 is being used to clean . therefore in an embodiment , the ramp 130 could be detachable from stem 110 so that differently sized ramps 130 can be attached and removed from device 100 and therefore used with differently sized french presses . in another embodiment , the device 100 is a single unit , with no detachable parts therefore requiring different devices at different circumferences for different sized presses . the ramp 130 is formed or threaded around the stem 110 in a corkscrew manner . as such , the ramp 130 essentially begins as a circle that has been cut from the outside circumference of the ramp 130 along half the diameter of the ramp 130 toward the center where the ramp 130 is coupled on its central axis to the stem 110 , this cut is equal to the radius of the inner circumference of the french press 210 and produces two edges . one edge of this cut is then engineered or manipulated from the inside ( stem side ) or center of the circle and along its entire length to become lower than the other cut ( the upper or ending edge 140 ) and becomes the leading edge 150 — whose entire edge parallels the floor of the french press 210 and the handle 120 . as aforementioned , this cut also produces another edge known as the upper or ending edge 140 . the leading edge 150 is also slightly less in length or radius than the final edge 140 to accommodate for the lesser circumference on the bottom of the french press 210 due to the curve where the side meets the bottom or floor of the cafetière , discussed in greater detail below with reference to fig3 and fig4 . the leading edge 150 is lower than the ending edge 140 and behind it the plane of the ramp 130 revolves gradually upward so that the circular disc - shape of the ramp 130 follows like an inclined ramp to the ending edge 140 . in an embodiment , the ending edge 140 is positioned directly above the leading edge 150 with a small height difference between the two ( as described in greater detail below with reference to fig3 and fig4 ). in another embodiment , the ramp 130 continues to thread around the stem 110 beyond the point where the leading edge 150 and the ending edge 140 are vertically aligned . for example , the ramp 130 can continue a full circle and a quarter or a full circle and a half . in either case , grinds or other particles that are pushed over ending edge 140 fall and remain on the ramp 130 positioned below . when the device 100 is rotated clockwise , the leading edge 150 screws around and downward toward the bottom or floor of the french press 210 . accordingly , the leading edge 150 is configured to penetrate or slice through any coffee grinds and other particles settled at the bottom of the french press 210 . as the leading edge 150 continues to penetrate , the grinds are transferred up the ramp 130 and neatly compacted and stacked on the ramp 130 . during the stacking process , the sides of the french press 210 function as retaining walls and the ramp 130 functions as a supporting floor for the grinds as they are stacked . the grinds readily adhere to each other and form the shape of the inside surface of the french press 210 . the user can continue to turn the handle 120 of the device 100 until there is no resistance . it should be understood that a difference in pressure would be readily apparent when the ramp 130 scrapes or “ shovels ” the last of the grinds from the bottom of the inside of the french press 210 . upon reaching the bottom , the user can lift the handle 120 vertically or upward , and as the device 100 is pulled upward and out of the french press 210 , any remaining liquid flows down and out of the grinds and remains in the french press 210 . as discussed , the minimal moisture remaining within the grinds causes them to cement together forming a solid or rigid form . this adhesive property enables the molded grains to remain perfectly formed and stacked onto the ramp 130 as the device 100 is lifted out of the french press 210 and readily remain formed and stacked on the device outside the cafetière when transferring them to a rubbish container . in addition , as discussed , the ramp 130 being substantially the same circumference as the french press 210 , scrapes clean the walls of the french press 210 leaving no grind residue along the sides of the cafetière . the circular motion caused by rotating the handle 120 , and concomitantly the ramp 130 , contributes to the grinds piling compacted and formed onto the ramp 130 and quickly produces a neat and rigid , stack . thus , the device 100 overcomes the drawbacks of conventional techniques for removing coffee grinds that are time consuming and results in significant residue and dregs . the device 100 with the grinds stacked and compacted can be tapped on the side of a garbage pail , and all the grinds readily slide off the ramp 130 and fall inside the pail with only a trace of moisture . an advantage of this device 100 is that it cleans all the grinds from a french press 210 easily and quickly with a minimal amount of effort , and permits the french press 210 , itself , to be easily rinsed clean of the remaining coffee liquid without harm to the plumbing . to remove all of the grinds from the inside of the french press 210 , it is important for the leading edge 150 to reach and scrape the bottom of the french press 210 . therefore , the height difference between the leading edge 150 and the ending edge 140 should be set to enable the leading edge 150 which parallels the bottom surface or floor of the french press 210 to reach the bottom of the french press 210 ; coffee presses generally have a slightly rounded bottom edge where the inner wall of the french press meets the bottom as they are commonly molded glass ( as shown in fig2 ; which represents a difference in circumferences : the lesser circumference of the bottom or floor and the greater circumference of the majority upper and parallel sides of the french press container ). the difference in height between the leading edge 150 and the ending edge 140 should , at a minimum , be equivalent to the height of the curving on the rounded bottom edge within the french press 210 commonly three - eighths to three - fourths of an inch , depending on the size of the french press 210 . in another embodiment , the height can be greater , has long as it is more than the difference between these two circumferences . this can be further explained with reference to fig3 and 4 . fig3 illustrates an expanded view of the lower portion of the french press 210 to emphasize the curvature 340 a - 340 b of the inside bottom surface . the vertical sides of the french press 210 are molded so that the region where the vertical sides meet the horizontal bottom or floor of the french press 210 is an inward curve ( i . e ., curvature 340 a - 340 b ). upper indicators 310 a - 310 b specify an area immediately above the curvature 340 a - 340 b , lower indicators 320 a - 320 b specify area where the curvature 340 a - 340 b meets the bottom of the french press 210 , and the vertical height 330 of the curvature 340 a - 340 b is measured from the bottom to the upper indicators 310 a - 310 b . the horizontal distance between upper indicators 310 a - 310 b defines a first diameter at a point immediately above the curvature 340 a - 340 b . the horizontal distance between lower indicators 320 a - 320 b defines a second diameter of the bottom of french press 210 , which coincidentally is the area immediately below the curvature 340 a - 340 b . since the second diameter is smaller than the first diameter , the circumference for the bottom of the french press 210 is less than the circumference for the remainder of the coffee press . thus , the curvature 340 a - 340 b of the inner bottom of the french press 210 also causes the bottom circumference ( measured from lower indicators 320 a - 320 b ) to be slightly smaller than the inner circumference ( measured from upper indicators 310 a - 310 b ) of the french press 210 immediately above the curvature 340 a - 340 b . as such in an embodiment , the length of leading edge 150 has a bit cut off ; therefore , its radius is less than the radius of the ending edge 140 and equivalent or less than the circumference of the bottom - most part of the french press 210 , which as mentioned above is a lesser circumference than the remainder of the french press 210 due to the molded inward slanted curve ( curvature 340 a - 340 ) where the sides meet the floor . the outside corner of the length of leading edge 150 has the most cut - off . the amount cut - off reduces gradually as it continues up the ascending slant of the ramp 130 until it equals the larger circumference that is above the rounded bottom of the inside of the french press 210 ; which is the same circumference as the majority of the inside of the french press 210 , or all of the area above the rounded bottom where the sides parallel one another — above this curve , the circumference of the coffee press remains equal . without this cut to the length of the leading edge 150 and the graduated cut along the lowermost outside edge of the ramp , or the circumference of the ramp 130 , the lower portion of the ramp 130 would be too wide to reach and scrape the bottom plane or floor of the french press 210 where the bottommost coffee grinds reside . the aforementioned graduated cut to the length of the leading edge 150 and the longer ending edge 140 can be explained with reference to fig4 , which illustrates an expanded view of the lower portion of device 100 . the leading edge 150 is coupled along the central axis of the ramp 130 to stem 110 at lower position 420 . similarly , the ending edge 140 is coupled along the central axis of the ramp 130 to stem 110 at upper position 410 . the vertical distance 430 between lower position 420 and higher position 410 is substantially the same or somewhat greater as the vertical height 330 of the curvature 340 a - 340 b of the bottom inner surface of the french press 210 . hence , as discussed above , the graduated radial cut between the length of the shorter leading edge 150 and the length of the longer ending edge 140 allows the lower leading edge 150 to reach and scrape the bottom of the french press 210 . for french presses that do not have cylindrical glass volumes with rounded edges , the graduated cutting and rounding of the corner of the leading edge 150 would not be necessary . otherwise , the graduated cutting and rounding allows the leading edge 150 to scrape along the entire surface of the bottom thereby leaving no grinds or other particles inside of the french press 210 . in an embodiment , the shape of the ramp 130 is flat and circular as discussed . however in other embodiments , the outside edges of the ramp 130 can be convex , concave , or a mixture of both in shape as long as the ramp 130 is capable of removing substantially all of the grinds from the bottom of the french press 210 . in an embodiment , the outside edges of the ramp 130 can have a railing ( e . g ., walls perpendicular to the floor of the ramp 130 ) akin to the walls of the french press 210 , as side support for the coffee grinds . in another embodiment , the outside edges of ramp 130 may be made of a malleable or pliable material , such as soft rubber or plastic which allows for a minimally wider diameter ( than the inside diameter of the french press 210 ) thus affecting a thorough scraping of the walls of the french press 210 . the stem 110 , the handle 120 , and ramp 130 can be made of a plastic , metal , alloy , ceramic , or other sturdy materials . if the selected material is a metal or an alloy , a metal , such as copper or aluminum , should be selected to minimize oxidation or rusting of the components . they can also be painted with rust - proof paint and easily labeled for advertising . all three components can be made of the same materials , or different materials can be used to fabricate the components . the handle 120 , the ramp 130 , or both can be integrally formed into the stem 110 or removably attached to the stem 110 , particularly as aforementioned in the case of the stem 110 and the ramp 130 in order for the ramp 130 to be interchangeable to the various sizes of french presses 210 , according to the manufacturers &# 39 ; wishes . if the manufacturer chooses a screw - like device , then the clockwise motion of the handle would perfectly fit and corroborate the counter - clockwise screw attachment of the ramp 130 . it should be understood that the device 100 , as described herein , is an exemplary device for implementing various aspects of the present invention . notably , the figures and examples above are not meant to limit the scope of the present invention to a single embodiment , but other embodiments are possible by way of interchange of some or all of the described or illustrated elements . moreover , where certain elements of the present invention can be partially or fully implemented using known components , only those portions of such known components that are necessary for an understanding of the present invention are described , and detailed descriptions of other portions of such known components are omitted so as not to obscure the present invention . in the present specification , an embodiment showing a singular component should not necessarily be limited to other embodiments including a plurality of the same component , and vice - versa , unless explicitly stated otherwise herein . it is to be understood that the phraseology or terminology herein is for the purpose of description and not of limitation , such that the terminology or phraseology of the present specification is to be interpreted by the skilled artisan in light of the teachings and guidance presented herein , in combination with the knowledge of one skilled in the relevant art ( s ). moreover , it is not intended for any term in the specification or claims to be ascribed an uncommon or special meaning unless explicitly set forth as such . further , the present invention encompasses present and future known equivalents to the known components referred to herein by way of illustration . while various embodiments of the present invention have been described above , it should be understood that they have been presented by way of example , and not limitation . it would be apparent to one skilled in the relevant art ( s ) that various changes in form and detail could be made therein without departing from the spirit and scope of the present invention . thus , the present invention should not be limited by any of the above - described exemplary embodiments , but should be defined only in accordance with the following claims and their equivalents .
a press cleaning device and method are described for removing coffee grinds from a french or coffee press . the device includes a stem having a handle and a circular disk - shaped declining plane ramp disposed at different ends . the circumference of the ramp is substantially the same as the inner circumference of the press . the ramp includes a radial cut running diametrically from the center of the ramp toward the outer circumference . the cut is fabricated to provide a lower or leading edge paralleling the horizontal floor of the press and trailing the leading edge an upward slanted ramp that follows like a circular inclined plane to an upper or ending edge . when rotated , the lower edge , which parallels the floor of the coffee press while slicing and shoveling , transfers the grinds from the bottom of the press up the ramp whereupon the grinds are stacked and can be removed .