the situation with regard to a patient is shown in fig1 . two adjacent vertebral bodies or vertebrae are shown at a . their spinous processes are indicated at b . the spinal canal c runs between the vertebral bodies a and the spinous processes b . e represents the exit locations of the nerve roots . the interspinal ligament d runs between two adjacent spinous processes b . a spacer 10 crosses through this ligament , and in its position is secured against transversal displacement by a first retaining element 20 on the one side , and by a second retaining element 30 on the other side . this securement is however hardly effective since the spacer 10 is designed in a waisted manner and thus centers between the two spinous processes b . implants of this type are required when signs of the so - called baastrup / kissing spine syndrome appear . the baastrup syndrome indicates the contacting of two adjacent spinous processes . in this situation , the supraspinal ligament is forwardly curved towards the spinal canal and affects the spinal canal stenosis . additionally , it may lead to an invertebral disk protrusion which further narrows the spinal canal . the spinous processes are pressed apart with the implant according to the invention , and the compressed interspinal ligament is relieved , so that the supraspinal ligament recedes and the stenosis is cured . the implant according to the invention is shown in its entirety in the assembled condition in fig2 , and is indicated at 1 . it consists of essentially four elements . the main element is a spacer 10 which is preferably designed as a roller body . this may basically be a cylindrical element . in the examples represented here , the spacer 10 is oval in cross section , whereby the spacer is seen to have two different sizes , depending on whether one represents the spacer 10 in a lateral view , as shown in fig2 and 3 , or in a plan view from above , as shown in fig4 . the spacer 10 here has a continuous inner space 11 . this may not be rotationally symmetrical , and in the example represented here , is rectangular in cross section . accordingly , in the lateral view according to fig3 , the inner space is seen to be larger , and in fig4 is seen to be smaller . the cross - sectional shape of the inner space 11 selected here is a shape which is preferred for reasons of manufacturing technology , but the inner space may in principle have practically any cross - sectional shape , as long as the cross - sectional shape is not round . the spacer or roller body 10 comprises a front side 12 and a rear side 13 . the surface which lies at the front on the introduction side is indicated as the front side , whilst the side lying opposite the introduction side is indicated as a rear side 13 . the outer peripheral surface of the spacer 10 has a waist 15 . this waist should effect a self - centering between the two adjacent spinous processes when the spacer is installed . the two end - faces 12 and 13 of the spacer 10 may be formed in a plane manner . this results in an extremely inexpensive manufacture . most preferably however , one would provide the side 12 at the front in the introduction direction with a head , as is displayed by most embodiments which are yet to be described hereinafter , and in particular as is represented in fig5 to 8 . this head 17 is divided into two parts 18 . the division is effected by a transverse cut 18 ′. the transverse cut 18 ′ serves for the rotationally secured positioning of a first retaining element 20 which is yet to be described and which comes to lie at least partly in this transverse cut . in order to ensure that the retaining element 20 , on pulling - back towards the spacer 10 , does not again get into the inner space of the spacer , the transverse cut 18 ′ is preferably provided with rounded ramps 18 ″. the spacer 10 may be designed on the rear side 13 as a simple plane surface , as shown in fig3 and 4 , but it is possible to also provide the rear side with a groove - like recess 19 which serves for positioning a second retaining element 30 with a positive fit and in a rotational secure manner . of course here too , the transverse cut 18 ′ as well as the groove - like recess 19 may have a differently designed shape when the retaining elements have been adapted accordingly . the first or front retaining element 20 may also have different shapes . the shaping of the retaining element , in particular of the first retaining element , is determined mainly by the fact that this must be designed such that it may be led through the inner space 11 of the spacer 10 . accordingly , the first retaining element 20 is designed at least approximately the same as the cross section of the inner space 11 . in the example represented here , the first retaining element 20 consists of one piece . it has essentially the shape of a flat rod and is connected to a push - and / or pull element 40 in a pivotally movable manner . the pivotally movable connection is realized by a pivot 41 . a receiver groove 21 is integrally formed roughly centrically of the longitudinal axis of the first retaining element 20 . the push - and / or pull element 40 lies in the receiver groove 21 during the introduction phase , so that no projecting element exists which prevents the passage . the head 17 of the spacer 10 may , as shown in fig9 , be asymmetrical or , as shown in the fig1 and 11 , be designed in a symmetrical manner . the first retaining element 20 comprises terminal , inclined end - faces 22 . these end - faces 22 run into cutting edges 23 . with the pushing of the first retaining element 20 through the inner space 11 , the inclined end - faces with their cutting edges 23 sever the interspinal ligament . thereby , a torque is simultaneously created by the inclined end - faces 22 , whereby the first retaining element 20 tends to come into a certain pivot movement . this pivot movement only occurs when the first retaining element 20 is completely led through the spacer 10 . thereafter , a pulling movement is applied onto the push - and / or pull element 40 , the first retaining element changes sides and comes to lie with its wide longitudinal surface onto the part surface , here shaped in a plane manner , in the transverse cut 18 ″ between the two parts 18 ′. as will be shown later , the actual spacer is previously introduced by way of a special forceps , and thereby simultaneously pushed through the interspinal ligament . the cutter 23 only simplifies the introduction when a certain back - deformation is affected by the elasticity . apart from the preferred embodiment according to the fig9 to 11 shown here , it is also possible to realize the retaining element 20 in a different shape , as shown in fig1 . here too , a single - piece , first retaining element 20 is employed . this too has roughly a rod - like shape . the cross - section of this first retaining element is however smaller than the cross section of the inner space 11 . it only reaches the full cross section in the middle region , where the rod - like part 25 is provided with a plateau 26 . the plateau 26 here serves for mounting the already mentioned pivot pin 41 . the push - and / or pull element 40 in turn is integrally formed on this pivot pin 41 . in this embodiment , a torsion spring 42 is also attached on the pivot pin 41 , and rotates the rod - like part 25 of the retaining element 20 relative to the push - and / or pull elements after completely pushing through the inner space 11 of the spacer 10 , so that the first retaining element 20 is not pulled into the inner space again on retraction . fig1 to 16 show two variants of a first retaining element 20 which is designed of two parts . here , the rod - like part 25 is divided into two part rods 24 . in the embodiments according to fig1 and 14 , the first retaining element is designed such that the two part rods 24 may be inserted with their freely movable ends at the front . the two part rods are held in a pivotally movable manner on the same pin 41 on which the push - and / or pull element 40 also engages . with this embodiment , the two part rods 24 must be spread apart by way of a relatively strong spring , which then permits a retraction only under relatively large tensile forces . the great advantage of such a solution lies in the fact that the unilateral installation is reversible , and as a result , if necessary , the complete implant may be unilaterally removed in a subsequent operation . with the embodiment according to the fig1 and 16 unilateral removal is no longer practical . otherwise however , the first retaining element 20 is designed in a very similar manner . whereas with the embodiment according to fig1 and 14 , the pivot axis 41 follows the two part rods 24 in the push - through / piercing direction , here the hinge is displaced to the front , and thus lies at the front in the push - through direction . otherwise , the element has the same parts and these are provided with the same reference numerals . the spacer 10 , although this is not represented here , may of course be provided with a somewhat rounded run - out stretch at the front side , so that a certain spreading may already be effected during the pushing - through of the folded - together , two - part retaining element 20 in the final phase of the pushing - through . the second retaining element 30 is usefully always designed as one piece . this too has a somewhat rod - like shape . the design of this second retaining element may be particularly simple since this is attached on the side which is freely accessible during the operation . in the present case , it consists of the rod - like body 31 with a plateau attachment 32 . the plateau attachment 32 is designed with regard to shape such that it may be attached with a positive - fit from the rearward side , wherein the plateau 32 is accommodated in the inner space 11 of the spacer 10 with a positive fit and secured against rotation . a central bore 33 passes through the rod - like part 31 and the plateau 32 , and the push - and / or pull element 40 may be led through this bore . this situation may be clearly seen in fig2 . as fig2 clearly shows , the plateau 26 on the first retaining element 20 may also be designed such that it engages in the inner space 11 of the spacer with a positive fit and in a rotationally secure manner . the push - and / or pull element 40 as mentioned , passes through the second retaining element 30 with its rod - like part 43 and projects outwards on the rearward side . the rod - like part 43 comprises a thread 44 at the rearward end . a retaining nut 45 is screwed onto this thread 44 . a threaded bore which passes through the retaining nut 43 up to the center serves for the insertion of a securing screw 46 . when the nut 45 is secured by way of the screw 46 , thereafter one would then cut away the rod - like part 43 of the push - and / or pull element 40 as close as possible to the nut 45 . the arrow 47 indicates this separation . a variant of the second or rear - side retaining element 30 is represented in fig1 . this again has a rod - like body 31 and likewise a plateau attachment 32 which is accommodated in the inner space of the spacer 10 . with this solution , a guide head 34 is additionally integrally formed on the rearward side opposite the plateau attachment . this guide head may guide the rod - like part 43 of the push - and / or pull element 40 . the through - bore 33 in this case may also be designed as a threaded bore . this however is not absolutely necessary . since in this embodiment a greater guidance for the securing screw 46 is provided , the securing screw 46 may be designed as a grub screw which is provided with a tip which penetrates into the rod - like part 43 with a positive fit . thereby , in practice , a cold - welding may occur . an extremely secure connection may thus be realized . the invention likewise includes a forceps preferred for placing the implant . fig1 illustrates the jaws 50 of the forceps . the forceps jaws 50 are designed such that , when lying completely on one another , they may be guided through the inner space 11 of the spacer 10 . the jaws 50 also have jaw tips 51 . these jaw tips 51 supplement the head 17 of the spacer when the forceps jaws are introduced , and are spread apart . once the spacer has been placed on the forceps jaws , one then guides the spacer with the forceps from one side between and through two adjacent spinous processes , and thereby penetrates the intraspinal ligament . for simplifying the leading - through , the operator creates the guide - through opening by way of a scalpel , at least in a slot - like manner . retaining beads 52 are furthermore formed on the jaws 50 , to prevent slipping of the spacer on the jaws 50 . the forceps jaws 50 however also hold the spacer 10 with a non - positive fit and thereby bear on the inner surface of the inner space 11 with their outer surfaces . one possible variant of the forceps is represented in fig2 and 22 . here , the two jaws of the forceps slide over one another in the manner of a scissors . the two jaws 50 again have jaw tips 51 which complement the head 17 of the spacer 10 into a tip . the jaw tips 51 thereby may be perfectly adapted to the head shape . this permits a shape which is more closed in the penetration direction , than with the previously mentioned embodiment of the forceps . although the forceps represents a preferred embodiment for application of the implant , it is of course also possible to realize differently shaped introduction means . the embodiment described here merely serves for disclosure of the complete implementation of the invention , thanks to which it is possible to only carry out an opening of two adjacent spinous processes in the region of the lumbar vertebral channel stenosis from only one side , whereupon the implant may be placed thanks to the unilateral manner of installation . a version which is modified with respect to the previously described embodiments is represented in fig2 to 26 , wherein this implant for treating lumbar spinal canal stenosis achieves the same object of the invention , specifically of providing an implant which may be applied by way of a unilateral intervention . however , whereas with all previous embodiments , the first retaining element 20 was led through the spacer 10 , here a solution is shown , with in which the first , front retaining element 20 , is designed of two parts . the two parts of the retaining element 20 are here indicated with the reference numerals 121 and 122 . the surface which lies at the front during the introduction of the spacer 10 between the two spinous processes b is represented here as a head 117 . the head 117 here has a roof - like design . the head 117 has a crossing incision 118 . this incision 118 likewise has a roof - like shape , whose tip however is ground - off . accordingly , a plane part surface 112 remains . the two parts 121 and 122 of the first , two - part retaining element 20 are held on the tensile - or compressive element 40 in a pivotally movable manner via a pivot 123 . the pivot 123 passes through the pull and / or push element 40 , and the two parts 121 and 122 engage around the tensile - or compressive element 40 designed as a rod . since in this case , the first retaining element 20 thus no longer needs to be guided through the spacer 10 , it is also not necessary for the inner space 11 to have a design which differs from the round shape . the rotational securement results from the positive - fit mounting of the two - part first retaining element , which lies integrally in the head 117 of the spacer 10 already on applying the implant , thus in the introduction position . after the implant has been correctly placed between the two adjacent spinous processes , it is then sufficient to pull on the push - and / or pull element 40 , by which means the two parts 121 and 122 automatically come out of the position as shown in fig2 , into the end position as shown in fig2 . in this position , the two parts 121 and 122 then lie on the plane part surface 112 and now remain in this position . thereafter , as a locking element , one then slides the second rearward retaining element 30 over the push - and / or pull element , until the second retaining element 30 bears on the spacer 10 . thereby , it is not at all the case that the first retaining element and the second retaining element bear laterally on the spinous processes , but these processes serve merely as a securement in order to prevent a displacement out of this position . if the two elements were to bear flush on the spinous processes , then this would in practice be equal to a partial stiffening of the backbone , and this is not necessary in most cases of lumbar spinal canal stenosis . although the push - and / or pull element 40 in the embodiment represented here is realized as a round rod , for example as a threaded rod , this is not absolutely necessary . the push - and / or pull element may indeed , as previously mentioned , have a non - round shape and accordingly the inner space 11 would in turn have a non - round shape . the embodiment represented here is relatively simple in handling and design . the spacer 10 may be introduced in the position as is shown in the fig2 and 24 , whilst simultaneously the second , rearward retaining element 30 is held secured on the push - and / or pull element 40 such that the relative positions are as shown in the fig2 and 24 . accordingly , the implants may be supplied in this preassembled condition . on introduction , pressure may be applied directly onto the push - and / or pull element 40 . once the end position is reached , one may then exert tension on the push - and / or pull element , while compression is simultaneously exerted on the second retaining element 30 . this causes elements 30 and 40 to displace relative to one another , and only the securing part , for example a locking nut then needs to be rescrewed to the new position . whilst , in the embodiment shown here , the spacer 10 essentially has the shape of an octagon rounded at the corners , this is of course not absolutely necessary . here too , the spacer 10 may in principle have the shape of a roller body . likewise , as in the previously described examples , the spacer 10 may have a waist in order to exert a self - centering effect . in principle , a roller body is to be understood as a spacer which is axially symmetrical , but not rotational symmetrical . the term roller body merely expresses the fact that the spacer in its condition of use also serves for the spinous processes to be able to roll along thereon given movement . the preferred embodiment represented in fig2 to 29 utilizes the idea of designing the complete implant , which here is indicated at 201 , such that in an introduction position , the implant 201 in the longitudinal direction is larger than in the installed condition . by way of this , one creates additional space , in order during the introduction phase to accommodate the first , front retaining element 220 in the spacer 210 in a simpler manner , by which means this may also be designed in a more optimal manner . the spacer 210 now comprises an inner space 211 which has a longitudinal slot which extends over the whole length of the roller body 210 with the exception of the end region which forms the head 217 . now the first , front retaining element 220 may be arranged in this free space which represents the inner space 211 , without any problem . the first , front retaining element 220 again is divided into two here , and the two parts 221 and 222 of the first retaining element 220 are held in a pivotable manner about a pivot 223 . thereby , the pivot 223 is attached from the middle of the spacer 210 , so that the first , front retaining element is divided into a long retaining element part 221 and a short retaining element part 222 . furthermore , the implant 201 comprises a push - and / or pull element which is indicated here at 240 . this push - and / or pull element comprises an insert part 241 . connected as one piece to this is the second , rearward retaining element 230 which consists of an upper retaining element part 231 and of a lower retaining element part 232 . both parts are integrally formed on the insert part 241 as one piece . they are diametrically opposite one another . the insert part 241 is held in an extended position in the introduction phase of the implant 201 , as is represented in fig2 . the insert part 241 at the bottom and top in each case has a saddle - like waist 242 which in shape corresponds to a same type of waist 212 on the spacer 210 . in the extended condition , these two waists are separated from one another by the push - out distance . a central elongate hole 243 is integrally formed in the insert part 241 . the shank of a crossing clamping screw 244 projects through this elongate hole 243 . the clamping screw 244 serves for the securing of the insert part 241 in a desired retraction or extension position of the insert part 241 in the spacer 210 . the spacer 210 in the end region where the clamping screw 244 is arranged , may be pressed together slightly , thanks to the inner space 211 being designed as an elongate slot . during the introduction phase , the insert part 241 is clamped in the extended position by way of the screw 244 . a longitudinal groove 245 is formed below the elongate hole 243 parallel to this . a plunger 250 is mounted in this longitudinal groove 245 . the plunger 250 has a lug 251 and a press surface 252 . by way of the lug 251 , the plunger , on collision of the insert part 241 into the spacer 210 which here are represented in a transparent manner , pushes the two retaining element parts 221 and 222 apart , whilst in the end position , the front press surface 252 lies in a flat manner on both retaining element parts 221 and 222 engaging into one another in the hinge region . the longitudinal groove 245 has a locking flute 246 which is arranged in the front region , whilst the plunger 250 comprises a bead 253 which in the position according to fig2 and 28 ( i . e . in the introduction position ) and in the intermediate position of the pushing together , is mounted in locking flute 246 . the plunger 250 furthermore at the end has a longitudinal slot 254 which extends beyond the region on which the bead 253 is attached . by way of this , the end region of the plunger 250 may be pressed together in a resilient manner , so that the bead 253 may be pressed out of the locking flute 246 when the insert part 241 is pushed into the spacer 210 . this inserted condition which corresponds to the installation position of the implant , is represented in fig2 . in this position , the plunger 250 is completely inserted in the longitudinal groove 245 . this is evident in fig2 because here too the spacer 210 is represented in a transparent manner . the bead 253 now lies in a rear position , at which a locking flute may be present . however , the flocking flute is not absolutely necessary , and is not shown in the other figures . the solution shown in fig2 to 29 for a post - operative intervention may also be unilaterally disassembled again . for this , the locking screw 244 fixed in the end position is released again , and thereafter is introduced through two insert bores 247 incorporated from the end side , by way of a tool which comprises two parallel round rods connected to one another . whilst pressing on the tool , one simultaneously pulls the insert part 241 by way of tension on the rearward , second retaining element 230 which now lies free , so that , while the insert part 241 is being pulled out , the plunger 250 remains in its rearward position whilst pressure by the tool through the upper bore 247 onto the upper part of the two - part first retaining element part 221 , permits the two parts 221 and 222 to be folded back , so that finally again the position according to fig2 is reached . in this position , one may of course remove the complete implant without any problem .
disclosed is an implant for treating lumbar spinal canal stenosis , comprising a spacer that is proved with an elongate interior space into which an insert part can be inserted . a first retaining element is fixed in the spacer in the inserted state . said first retaining part can be folded apart by inserting the insert part while a second rear retaining element that is molded onto the insert part simultaneously comes to rest on the vertebral processes , thus making it possible to insert the implant unilaterally while reducing the rist of having to undergo possible postoperative interventions .