the principles of this invention are particularly useful when embodied in a head and neck cushion such as that illustrated in fig2 , and 4 , generally indicated by the numeral 10 . the depicted head and neck cushion 10 includes a transversely extending resilient member 12 , having an upwardly convex or arcuate upper surface 12a . as depicted in fig3 the curvature of upper surface 12a conforms to the curvature of the cervical vertebrae . the head and neck cushion 10 also has a side surface 12b extends downwardly from upper surface 12a in a direction perpendicular to the surface upon which cushion 10 is placed . a longitudinally extending central member 14 is affixed to the central portion of side surface 12b of transverse member 12 . this central member 14 includes an upper surface 14a and a side surface 14b . in its normal , uncompressed condition , upper surface 14a extends from and is the same height as the side edge of transverse member upper surface 12a . as depicted in fig3 the central member 14 is of sufficient length to accommodate the head of the user . side members 16 are positioned to each side of central member 14 and are also affixed to side surface 12b of transverse member 12 . like the other components , side members 16 include upper surfaces 16a and side surfaces 16b . as seen in fig2 side surfaces 16b are affixed directly to side surfaces . transverse member 12 , central member 14 , and side members 16 are alternatively referred to herein as first , second , third , and fourth cushion means , respectively . the various members of head and neck cushion 10 are typically affixed to each other through the use of conventional adhesives . the members 12 , 14 , and 16 are typically formed of polyurethane having different degrees of resiliency . the transverse member 12 is typically the most firm of the members in order to provide adequate support to the cervical vertebrae . it is normally in the range of from 75 - 85 ild . ild is a furniture designer &# 39 ; s designation or the resiliency of a particular material . an 80 ild cushion , for example , exhibits a one inch deflection under an 80 pound load applied over a one square foot area . the resiliency of side members 16 is normally somewhat greater than that of transverse member 12 , preferably about 15 ild . the central member 14 normally has the greatest resiliency , approximating only 10 ild , thereby providing a soft cushion for the head of the user . however , central member 14 still should have sufficient firmness that it will support the head of the user in a somewhat raised position , as depicted in fig4 . the cervical vertebrae are commonly designated c - 1 through c - 7 and are identified as such in fig3 and 5 . the atlas vertebra , as c - 1 is commonly known , contacts the occiput o positioned at the base of the skull s . the term &# 34 ; head &# 34 ; has been used and will continue to be used herein interchangeably with the term &# 34 ; skull &# 34 ;. a close study of fig3 reveals that the cervical vertebrae c - 1 through c - 7 are maintained by the head and neck cushion 10 in their normal , physiologic lordosis or curvature . the upper surface 12a of transverse member 12 is symmetrical , as is the cervical lordosis , and cooperates with the central member 14 to maintain the position of the skull in an elevated position without causing flexion of the occiput o with respect to c - 1 , or of any other of the cervical vertebrae . moreover , the height of transverse member 12 is not so great so as to cause flexion or exaggerated extension of the cervical vertebrae c - 1 through c - 7 . fig3 also shows that the skull s includes an occipital protuberance p adjacent the back or posterior of its base . the size and configuration of the occipital protuberance p varies from person to person . however , head and neck cushion 10 has been designed to accommodate a wide variety of skulls . the cooperation between transverse member 12 and central member 14 is such that central member 14 provides the sole means of support of the skull s ; that is , transverse member 12 does not contact the occipital protuberance p , or any other part of the skull s . also , transverse member 12 does not exert pressure on the substantial ligament and muscle mass m which is proximal to the atlanto - axial - occipital region . this is desirable in order that the occiput o and the upper cervical vertebrae are not forced into a position of flexion . while central member 14 is normally quite resilient , it still maintains the back of the skull s in a raised position with respect to the back b of the user . as stated previously , central member 14 is typically of substantially greater resiliency than transverse member 12 . however , it should be appreciated that it is not necessary that central member 14 be resilient at all . under certain conditions , it may be desirable to provide a relatively rigid or boardlike central member ( not shown ). however , such a member should be of appropriate height that the back of the skull s is maintained in an elevated position with respect to the back b of the user . in the depicted embodiment ( see particularly fig4 ), side members 16 are less resilient than central member 14 . therefore , they may provide a certain amount of support to the lateral aspects of the skull s to prevent inadvertent turning of the skull s . however , it should be appreciated that the central member 14 may be wide enough in certain applications that the side members 16 would not actually contact the centrally - disposed skull s . in fact , it may be desirable to delete side members 16 entirely in certain applications . it may alternatively be desirable that the two side members 16 be of different resiliency , thereby providing three different degrees of support for the skull ; that is , the central member 14 could be of a first degree of resiliency , while the side cushions could exhibit second and third degrees of resiliency . typical resiliency would be 10 ild for central member 14 , 15 ild for one of the side members 16 and 20 ild for the other side member 16 . this would increase the versatility of the cushion 10 since it would enable persons with greater or lesser than normal skull weight to use the cushion . therefore , one of these three members would have a resiliency particularly suited for every individual . the use of three different resiliencies also permits those persons with injured cervical vertebrae to use either of the side cushions during treatment before progressing to the center cushion as the injury is healing . a comparison between fig3 and 5 discloses how radically different the present invention is from the prior art . the so - called kinne prior art cushion is identified with the numeral 110 . similarly , portions of kinne &# 39 ; s cushion which correspond to those of the present invention 10 have been identified with corresponding numerals except that each numeral has been prefixed with the numeral 1 . thus , kinne &# 39 ; s transverse member is identified as 112 ; his central member is 114 ; and his side members are designated as 116 , with corresponding top and side surfaces being designated with the numerals a and b . as shown in fig1 and 5 , the transverse member 112 of head and neck cushion 110 is trapezoidal in shape , with side surface 112b inclined at approximately a 45 degree angle . a centrally disposed notch 112c is cut into transverse member 112 in order to permit the user to center his or her neck on the head and neck cushion 110 . the central member 114 more accurately comprises a depression between side members 116 positioned to each side . the sides 116b of side members 116 are inclined at approximately a 45 degree angle . as seen in fig5 the result of the afore - described configuration is that when the user positions his or her neck on the cushion 110 , the upper cervical vertebrae c - 1 through c - 4 are in flexion both with respect to each other and with respect to occiput o . this is clearly different from the physiologic position made possible by the present invention 10 and depicted in fig3 . moreover , the inclined side surface 112b of the transverse member 112 contacts the ligament and muscle mass m adjacent the occipital protuberance p , thereby pivoting the skull in a clockwise direction ( in flexion ), as shown in fig5 through the use of arrows . thus , to this extent side surface 112b of transverse member 112 provides some support to the head and skull s of the person using cushion 110 . an examination of cushion 10 of fig3 illustrates that side surface 12b and transverse cushion 12 generally do not force the skull s upwardly and into flexion ; rather , all of the support to skull s is provided by central member 14 . standard reference lines have also been included in fig3 and 5 in order to illustrate and emphasize the flexion of the cervical vertebrae c - 1 through c - 7 and of the occiput o with respect to c - 1 in cushion 110 . chamberlain &# 39 ; s line is shown in fig3 and 5 , as well as an odontoid c - 7 line . vertical plane lines p - 1 through p - 6 are also depicted , which extend downwardly from their respective vertebra . vertebral plane line p - 7 has not been depicted due to the difficulty in measuring the position of such line with the person in the depicted , supine position . as shown in fig3 the position of chamberlain &# 39 ; s line illustrates that the skull s is extended approximately 3 degrees , since chamberlain &# 39 ; s line is normally vertical , or horizontal when the person is standing erect . this has been found to be a particularly desirable position since the neck is less sensitive to slight extension than a corresponding angle in flexion because the range of motion in extension is much greater than that in flexion . an exaggerated position of extension , on the other hand , would be equally undesirable . an exaggerated position of extension may be defined as one wherein chamberlain &# 39 ; s line is extended at an angle of at least 6 degrees with respect to vertical . a position of slight extension is one in which chamberlain &# 39 ; s line extends at less than 6 degrees from vertical . described another way , it may be said that chamberlain &# 39 ; s line is slightly inclined upwardly or superiorly or is at least disposed vertically ( not inclined downwardly or inferiorly ). the odontoid c - 7 line forms an angle of approximately 89 degrees with respect to chamberlain &# 39 ; s line . vertebral plane lines p - 1 through p - 6 extend in a generally symmetrical pattern , thereby illustrating the symmetrical positioning of vertebrae c - 1 through c - 6 . as illustrated , vertebral plane lines p - 2 through p - 5 intersect at a common point x , while vertebral plane lines p - 1 and p - 6 intersect at point y which substantially corresponds to the lower surface of the cushion 10 . based upon the position of chamberlain &# 39 ; s line in fig5 kinne &# 39 ; s cushion places the skull s in flexion by approximately 4 degrees . as noted above , the neck is far more sensitive to prolonged flexion than extension ; therefore , the position depicted in fig5 is not a very desirable one . the odontoid c - 7 line forms an angle of only 85 degrees with respect to chamberlain &# 39 ; s line , thereby further illustrating the flexion promoted by cushion 110 . moreover , the position of vertebral plane lines p - 1 through p - 6 illustrate the assymmetrical positioning of vertebrae c - 1 through c - 6 . for example , vertebral plane lines p - 1 and p - 2 are almost parallel , thus demonstrating the high degree of flexion between these vertebrae . also , the points of intersection of vertebral plane lines p - 2 through p - 5 are substantially lower than the common point of intersection x shown in fig3 for cushion 10 . this further demonstrates the flexion or loss of cervical curvature resulting from use of cushion 110 . prolonged use of this prior art head and neck cushion 110 may therefore be expected to promote rather than relieve head and neck discomfort . thus , it can be seen that this prior art cushion 110 is not only dramatically different in structure , but , as a result of such differences , fails to achieve the objects and advantages of the present invention 10 . of course , it should be understood that various changes and modifications of the preferred embodiments described herein will be apparent to those skilled in the art . such changes and modifications can be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the present invention and without diminishing its attended advantages . it is , therefore , intended that such changes and modifications be covered by the following claims .
a composite head and neck cushion is provided for use by a person in a supine position . the cushion includes a first , resilient member having an upper surface which conforms to and supports the physiologic curvature of the cervical vertebrae . a second member supports the head in a raised , but unflexed position . the invention may alternatively be described as a method for cushioning the head and neck . the method comprises resiliently supporting the back of the neck of the person in an elevated position while permitting the cervical vertebrae to maintain their normal , physiologic curvature , and supporting the head of the person in an elevated position while maintaining the cervical vertebrae and the occiput in an unflexed , physiologic position .