the following detailed description , given by way of example and not intended to limit the present invention solely thereto , will best be appreciated in conjunction with the accompanying drawings fig1 - 5 . “ patient tolerance ”: refers to how significant are the post - treatment side effects following rim ; as used herein , this term does not refer to immunologic tolerance ; “ conformal radiation therapy ”: is a three dimensional therapy designed to conform the field of radiation to the exact volume of the tissue treated ; “ modulation ”: refers to immune modulation representing a change in the direction of an immune reaction towards cancer ; “ human leukocyte antigens ( hla )”: are an important factor in transplantation , while “ major histocompatibility antigens ( mhc )”, are the equivalent of the hla in animals ; “ chimerism ”: refers to a mixture of patient and donor t cells ; “ abscopal effect ”: refers to an immunologic effect of radiation outside of the irradiated zone ; “ performance status ”: refers to the daily amount of time a patient is confined to his bed . a performance status of 2 refers to a patient confined to his bed less than 50 % of the daytime , and is not considered bedridden ; “ non - cytolytic radiation dose ”: refers to a radiation dose insufficient to kill a significant number of tumor cells fig1 shows the response of a low dose irradiated tumor . as indicated above , it is known from pre - clinical models , that the danger signals produced after low , or non - cytolytic doses of radiation , up - regulate major histocompatibility complex ( mhc ) molecules presenting taa on the surface of the tumor cells , # 1 in fig1 . this is accompanied by a local secretion of chemokines which enhance the immune cell traffic through the vascular endothelium . the stromal cells situated within the irradiated field contribute to the secretion of inflammatory cytokines , step # 2 , that in turn activate the antigen presenting cells ( apc ), shown at # 3 in fig1 . the latter present taa , step # 4 , and stimulate the generation of cytotoxic t cells targeted towards these taa . these cells migrate to the irradiated tumor , step # 5 in fig1 . fig2 illustrates an increase in the survival time for stage iii - b lung cancer patients receiving anti - tumor vaccination according to butts et al . j clin oncol 2005 ; 23 : 6674 ). as indicated above , in this study , the authors treated patients with advanced non - small cell lung cancer in a randomized manner with either a mucin - 1 targeted vaccine or with placebo . out of the 65 patients with stage iii - b , most of whom had received prior radiotherapy , those who received the vaccine reached a 50 % survival probability at 31 months , compared to only 13 months for the patients who received the placebo . the rim method is now described in conjunction with fig3 - 5 . a comprehensive physical examination of both the donor and the patient should be initially performed before commencing the treatment . the patient evaluation is shown in fig5 . patients that are more likely to benefit from this method are selected based on inclusion and exclusion criteria . patients with advanced lung cancer documented by a histo - pathological analysis ; patients who received at least one line of chemotherapy ; patients with least one measurable tumor mass (≧ 1 cm ) not previously irradiated and situated in the lymph nodes , soft tissue , lung , or skeleton ; patients presenting a performance status less or equal to 2 and a life expectancy greater than 3 months ; availability of a family donor with 50 % or more hla compatibility is also necessary . patients for whom the treatment is not recommendable are excluded based on the following exclusion criteria : presence of a second active cancer requiring treatment ; corticosteroid dependency ; presence of vertebral metastases as the only tumors that could be irradiated ; decreased diffusion capacity below 40 % if a lung tumor was the only metastasis that could be irradiated ; patients needing urgent radiotherapy . donor evaluation and selection are described next . the donor should be a first degree genetic relative of the patient , in relatively good health . the donor selection process starts preferably one month prior to the planned treatment , and includes evaluation of the donor health and compatibility . donor evaluation includes medical history , physical exam , hla typing , complete blood count ( cbc ), electrolytes , glycemia , uric acid , ca , p , albumin , lactate dehydrogenase ( ldh ), liver enzymes , renal , coagulation , blood group , electro cardiogram ( ekg ) and chest x - ray . donor evaluation also includes serology for human immunodeficiency virus ( hiv ), hepatitis a , b and c , herpes simplex virus ( hsv ), varicella - zoster virus ( vzv ), epstein - barr virus ( ebv ) and cyto megalo virus ( cmv ). every active medical condition shall be evaluated and stabilised before the pbmc collection , i . e ., diabetes , hypertension , chest pain , weight loss , fever , etc . aspirin is stopped for one week before and one week after collection , if it is safe to do so . for donors on aspirin or plavix needing a central catheter , we favour a femoral line . donors on anticoagulation medication ( coumadin ) who require a central line for collection are switched to low molecular weight heparin . donors are considered based on the following donor inclusion criteria : they should be a first degree relative with the patient ( parent , sibling or child ); have a hla compatibility of ≧ 50 %; and a performance status of 0 or 1 . donors are excluded based on the following donor exclusion criteria : a hla incompatibility in the graft versus host direction ( donor homozygous and patient heterozygous for the shared haplotype ); a positive serology for hiv , hepatitis b or c ; and an active medical condition that cannot be improved within a month . the day of pbmc infusion is referred to as ‘ day 0 ’ and the n th day before that is referred to as ‘ day − n ’ ( see fig3 ) normally , the patients do not need to receive any pre - medication , unless they have already reacted to previous blood transfusions , necessitating a specific medication . in this case , the same pre - medication is administered prior to pbmc , with the exception of corticosteroids , which should be avoided wherever possible . donors receive five doses of granulocyte colony stimulating factor ( gcsf ), each dose calculated as 10 μg / kg , by subcutaneous injection . the gcsf injections are administered from day − 4 to day 0 . pbmc collection is preferably performed through a standard leukapheresis procedure , 2 to 3 hours after the last gcsf injection on day 0 . aliquots from the collection product are stained for flow cytometry with cd34 and cd3 antibodies to measure their respective concentrations . in the first stage , the patient receives a dose of external radiation of preferably 15 gy . this dose is divided in three equal fractions of 5 gy , on days − 3 , − 2 and − 1 . optionally , cyclophosphamide , 250 mg / m 2 may be administered on day − 2 . in the second stage , the pbmc are administered intravenously , fresh and unmodified . donor pbmc should be infused within 24 hours after collection . preferably , this is performed within 1 hour , in which case the collection bag is kept at room temperature ( 20 - 24 ° c .). if the infusion cannot be performed within 1 hour , the bag is kept in the refrigerator at 4 ° c . until the infusion . the post - treatment refers to a methodology of monitoring the cellular immune response at the tumor site and the patients &# 39 ; adverse events . recipients are evaluated preferably during 6 months post - treatment . the patient post - treatment evaluations are shown in fig5 . each patient is evaluated regarding the post - treatment immune condition , the phenotype of the neoplastic cell , and the degree of t cell infiltration . paired t tests will be used to compare hla mfi on tumor cells and t cell density between pre and post treatment samples . tumor response is evaluated using the immune - related response criteria ( ircr ) as illustrated in fig4 . the survival period without progression is calculated starting from day 0 until cancer progression , if any . a chimerism analysis is performed for determining the presence of donor cells in the recipient . adverse events are collected according to the common terminology criteria for adverse events ( ctcae ) from the national cancer institute , version 3 . 0 , and a grade , i . e . mild , moderate , or severe , is attributed to each toxicity . ( http :// ctep . cancer . gov / protocoldevelopment / electronic_applications / docs / ctcaev3 . pdf ). treatment tolerance is evaluated by follow - up clinic visits scheduled twice a week for the first 2 weeks , then once a week for the following 2 weeks , then every 2 weeks for 2 months , and every month for the following 3 months , for a total of 6 months , as shown in fig5 . the visits will end either after the 6 months follow - up period , or at the time of disease progression , or whenever the consent of the patient has been waved , if that occurred earlier . beyond 6 months , standard care will be offered to the patient , according to established clinical guidelines . the immune response is assessed using tumor biopsies done before and after the treatment for immunological comparisons . the tumor block slides could be stained with cd4 and cd8 antibodies in order to assess the t cell density under the microscope . this will be expressed as t cell numbers on a 400 × power field ( 0 . 292 mm 2 ), relative to the number of tumoral cells and related to the weight of tumoral tissue . flow cytometry analysis may be used to determine the presence of immunologic markers like hla , fas ( cd95 ) and icam - 1 ( cd54 ) ( tumor cells ), cd3 , cd4 , cd8 , cd25 and foxp3 ( t cells ). the percentage of the positive cells in these markers as well as their fluorescence intensity will be determined . the tumor infiltrating t cells are preferably sorted and isolated by fluorescence - activated cell sorting ( facs ), from the post treatment biopsy specimen . blood granulocytes and mononuclear cells are isolated every 2 weeks by density gradient centrifugation . the origins of all these cell populations are determined with polymerase chain reaction ( pcr ) techniques , quantifying patient and donor specific variable number of tandem repeats ( vntr ) bands . tumor responses can be assessed through radiologic imaging after 6 , 12 and 18 weeks . this is done by ct - scanning and the immune related response criteria are applied , as seen in fig4 . symptoms attributable to lung cancer are collected monthly according to the fact / nccn lung symptom index ( flsi )- 12 . in this example the radiation is administered to the primary tumor of the recipient . the dose of external radiation is 15 gy and divided in 3 fractions , on days − 3 , − 2 and − 1 . cyclophosphamide , 250 mg / m 2 is administered on day − 2 . donors receive 5 doses of gcsf , each dose of 10 μg / kg from day − 4 to day 0 . pbmc collection is performed through a standard leukapheresis procedure on day 0 . the pbmc are administered intravenously , fresh and unmodified , starting at a rate of 40 cc / hour for 15 minutes and increasing with 20 cc / hour every 15 minutes as tolerated , up to a maximum 100 of cc / hour . at the same time , the body temperature , vital signs , and oxygen saturation are monitored every 15 minutes , until a stable flow of perfusion is reached . thereafter , monitoring is performed every 30 minutes . the immune responses are assessed using tumor biopsies done before and after the treatment . flow cytometry is used to assess the following cell surface markers : hla , fas , icam - 1 on tumor cells , and cd3 , cd4 , cd8 , cd25 and foxp3 on tumor infiltrating t cells . the tumor block slides are stained with cd4 and cd8 antibodies in order to assess the t cell density on a 400 × magnitude power field . the tumor infiltrating t cells are isolated by facs from the post treatment biopsy specimen . blood granulocytes and mononuclear cells are isolated every 2 weeks with a density gradient centrifugation . the origin of all these cell populations are determined with pcr techniques , quantifying patient and donor specific vntr bands . tumor responses are assessed through radiologic imaging after 6 , 12 and 18 weeks . this is done by ct - scanning and the immune related response criteria ircr are applied ( see fig4 ). the dose of external radiation is 15 gy and divided in 3 fractions , on days − 3 , − 2 and − 1 . donors receive 5 doses of gcsf , each dose of 10 μg / kg from day − 4 to day 0 . pbmc collection is performed through a standard leukapheresis procedure on day 0 . the pbmc are administered intravenously , fresh and unmodified . the immune responses are assessed using tumor biopsies done before and after the treatment . flow cytometry is used to assess the following cell surface markers : hla , fas , icam - 1 on tumor cells , and cd3 , cd4 , cd8 , cd25 and foxp3 on tumor infiltrating t cells . the tumor block slides are stained with cd4 and cd8 antibodies in order to assess the t cell density on a 400 × magnitude power field . the tumor infiltrating t cells are isolated by facs from the post treatment biopsy specimen . blood granulocytes and mononuclear cells are isolated every 2 weeks with a density gradient centrifugation . the origin of all these cell populations are determined with pcr techniques , quantifying patient and donor specific vntr bands . tumor responses are assessed through radiologic imaging after 6 , 12 and 18 weeks . this is done by ct - scanning and the immune related response criteria ircr are applied ( see fig4 ). this is an example where the radiation is administered to the primary tumor of the recipient . the dose of external radiation is 15 gy and divided in 3 fractions , on days − 3 , − 2 and − 1 . donors receive 5 doses of gcsf , each dose of 10 μg / kg from day − 4 to day 0 . pbmc collection is performed through a standard leukapheresis procedure on day 0 . the pbmc are administered intravenously , fresh and unmodified . the immune responses are assessed using tumor biopsies done before and after the treatment . flow cytometry is used to assess the following cell surface markers : hla , fas , icam - 1 on tumor cells , and cd3 , cd4 , cd8 , cd25 and foxp3 on tumor infiltrating t cells . the tumor block slides are stained with cd4 and cd8 antibodies in order to assess the t cell density on a 400 × magnitude power field . the tumor infiltrating t cells are isolated by facs from the post treatment biopsy specimen . blood granulocytes and mononuclear cells are isolated every 2 weeks with a density gradient centrifugation . the origin of all these cell populations is determined with pcr techniques , quantifying patient and donor specific vntr bands . tumor responses are assessed through radiologic imaging after 6 , 12 and 18 weeks . this is done by ct - scanning and the immune related response criteria ircr are applied ( see fig4 ). this example provides for a method where the radiation is administered to the largest metastatic site . the dose of external radiation is 15 gy and divided in 3 equal fractions , on days − 3 , − 2 and − 1 . donors will receive 5 doses of gcsf , each dose of 10 μg / kg from day − 4 to day 0 . pbmc collection is performed through a standard leukapheresis procedure on day 0 . the pbmc are administered intravenously , fresh and unmodified . the immune responses are assessed using tumor biopsies done before and after the treatment . flow cytometry is used to assess the following cell surface markers : hla , fas , icam - 1 on tumor cells , and cd3 , cd4 , cd8 , cd25 and foxp3 on tumor infiltrating t cells . the tumor block slides are stained with cd4 and cd8 antibodies in order to assess the t cell density on a 400 × magnitude power field . the tumor infiltrating t cells are isolated by facs from the post treatment biopsy specimen . blood granulocytes and mononuclear cells are isolated every 2 weeks with a density gradient centrifugation . the origin of all these cell populations is determined with pcr techniques , quantifying patient and donor specific vntr bands . tumor responses are assessed through radiologic imaging after 6 , 12 and 18 weeks . this is done by ct - scanning and the immune related response criteria ircr are applied ( see fig4 ).
a combination therapy for treating advanced cancer , comprises , first , performing targeted low dose radiation therapy on a recipient tumoral site to generate an inflammation zone and an immuno - stimulant effect , including release of cytokines and chemokines . secondly , pmbc collected from a suitable donor are administered intravenously in order to initiate an allogeneic reaction . the post - radiotherapy inflammation zone will attract the newly injected pbmc to the tumor bed , triggering an immunological cancer cell rejection . the cellular response in the recipient is monitored and post - treatment evaluation for recipients &# 39 ; side effects is also provided .