referring to the figures , fig1 illustrates a first embodiment of applicants &# 39 ; insect control sprayer system ( 8 ). the figure shows the container tank ( 10 ), the control panel ( 12 ), and the canned pump ( 14 ). insecticide may be poured into the container tank ( 10 ) via the fill tube ( 11 ). the level of insecticide within the container tank ( 10 ) may be visually determined by inspection of the sight glass ( 16 ). the control panel ( 12 ) may be programmed for a minimum of 0 to a maximum of 288 spraying intervals in any given 24 hour period . each spray interval may have a duration ranging from 1 second to 99 seconds . the pressure gauge ( 18 ) displays the pressure of the insecticide being pumped by a pump ( 14 ) to the distribution system ( 20 ). the pump ( 14 ) may be a canned pump or may be a standard rotary vane pump coupled with an electric motor adapted for pumping water and moderate aggressive liquids with low flow at high pressure . the pump ( 14 ) may be integrated into the insect control spray system ( 8 ), for example , mounted upon container lid ( 15 ) as shown in fig1 a , or the pump ( 14 ) may be positioned within the container tank ( 10 ), or the pump ( 14 ) may be external and apart from the container tank ( 10 ) and the container lid ( 15 ), drawing insecticide from the container tank ( 10 ) via an attached hose . in one such embodiment , examples of pumps that are suitable for use with the instant insect control sprayer system ( 8 ) are the procon series 4 or 5 brass rotary vane pump or a fluid - o - tech po / pa brass rotary vane pump powered by a ⅓ - 1 horsepower , or larger , electric motor . although fig1 shows the distribution system ( 20 ) as being attached to the exterior of a home , it should be noted that the distribution system may be mounted within the walls during the construction of a building with only the nozzles ( 22 ) being visible . the pump ( 14 ) pumps insecticide through the distribution system ( 20 ) where the insecticide is expelled in appropriate locations by spray nozzles ( 22 ). check valves ( 21 ) ensure that insecticide does not flow back into the pump ( 14 ) or the container tank ( 10 ). the entire system draws power from an ac power source ( 24 ). however , a battery backup for the control panel ( 12 ) is provided ( element 38 on fig2 ). a user may remotely commence and terminate the spraying of insecticide via a wireless remote control ( 26 ). a hardwired remote operation panel ( 13 ) is also provided to remotely commence and terminate the spraying of insecticide . the wireless remote control ( 26 ) and the hardwired remote operation panel ( 13 ) may operate in one of two modes . in the first mode , depressing a button on either remote ( 13 or 26 ) will cause the pump ( 14 ) to be energized and commence the spray of insecticide . the pump ( 14 ) will remain energized only so long as the button on the remote ( 13 or 26 ) is depressed . once the button is released , the pump ( 14 ) is de - energized and the spray of insecticide terminates . in the second mode , depressing a button on either remote ( 13 or 26 ) will cause the pump ( 14 ) to be energized and commence the spray of insecticide . in this mode , releasing the button does not de - energize the pump . rather , the button on the remote ( 13 or 26 ) must be depressed a second time to terminate the spraying of insecticide . in either mode , the signal generated by either remote ( 13 or 26 ) is received by the control panel via the control panel antenna ( 27 ) in the case of the wireless remote control ( 26 ) or directly in the case of the hardwired remote operation panel ( 13 ). to commence the spraying of insecticide , whether in response to a signal from the remote control ( 13 or 26 ) or due to user scheduling , the control panel ( 12 ) closes a normally open circuit to energize the pump ( 14 ). referring now to fig1 a wherein it is seen a partial perspective view of the upper portion of the container tank ( 10 ) of the insect control sprayer system ( 8 ). in this view it is seen that container lid ( 15 ) is securely mounted in place atop the container tank ( 10 ) by a fastening strap ( 17 ). the fastening strap ( 17 ) comprises a latching mechanism ( 19 ) at the proximal and distal ends thereof . when the fastening strap ( 17 ) is in place about the container lid ( 15 ) and the latching mechanism ( 19 ) is engaged , the container lid ( 15 ) may not be removed from the container tank ( 10 ). the latching mechanism ( 19 ) may be locked in its engaged position by a tamper proof seal ( 31 ) such as with vms products &# 39 ; sentry cable seal to prevent removal of the container lid ( 15 ) by unauthorized persons . it is further seen in fig1 a that a fill tube cap ( 33 ) engages with and covers the distal end of the fill tube ( 11 ). the fill tube ( 11 ) and the fill tube cap ( 33 ) may further comprise eyelets ( 35 a , 35 b ) adapted to receive tamper proof seal ( 37 ) to prevent removal of the fill tube cap ( 33 ) by unauthorized persons . fig2 is an equipment diagram of applicants &# 39 ; insect control sprayer system ( 8 ). backup power is supplied to the control panel via a battery backup ( 38 ) to preserve user settings in the event that ac power ( 24 ) fails . a low level sensor ( 28 ) within container tank ( 10 ) detects when the insecticide reaches a first low level . upon reaching the first low level , the low level sensor ( 28 ) sends a signal to the control panel ( 12 ) which causes the low level sensor light ( 30 ) to illuminate . when the insecticide level reaches a second low level , the low level sensor ( 28 ) sends a signal to the control panel ( 12 ) which then prevents further operation of the pump ( 14 ) until the low level sensor ( 28 ) terminates its signal . a filter ( 32 ) prevents contaminants from entering the distribution system ( 20 ). referring to the control panel ( 12 ), a user accesses the features of the control panel ( 12 ) via the control panel keypad ( 34 ) and information is displayed to the user on the control panel display ( 36 ). referring to fig3 and 4 , a computer system controls applicants &# 39 ; insect control spray system . if the computer system does not detect user input , box 40 , it compares the current time to the stored start intervals to determine whether spraying of insecticide should commence , box 42 . if an interval start time has been reached , box 42 , the system checks for a signal from the low level sensor ( 28 ), the wind speed as measured by the anemometer ( 120 ), and the total rain fall as measured by the rain gauge ( 122 ), box 44 . if the low level sensor ( 28 ) is not set , the wind speed does not exceed the maximum programmed by the user , and the programmed maximum amount of rainfall has not been exceeded , the pump ( 14 ) is energized causing insecticide to flow through the distribution system ( 20 ) and spray from the nozzles ( 22 ). if the low level sensor ( 28 ) is set , the wind speed does exceed the maximum programmed by the user , or the programmed maximum amount of rainfall has been exceeded , the system does nothing . if an interval end time has been reached , box 48 , the system determines whether the user has manually overridden the system to cause the system to spray insecticide . if the user has manually overridden the system , box 50 , the system is allowed to continue spraying . otherwise , the pump is de - energized , box 52 . if the system detects that the low level sensor ( 28 ) is set , box 54 , the system determines whether the insecticide level has reached the first low level or the second low level , box 56 . if the insecticide has reached the first low level , the system sets the low level indicator , box 60 , and causes the low level sensor light ( 30 ) to illuminate . if the insecticide has reached the second low level , the system first stops all pumping activity , box 58 , and then sets the low level indicator , box 60 , and causes the low level sensor light ( 30 ) to illuminate . if the system detects that the low level sensor ( 28 ) is not set , it clears the low level indicator is and darkens the low level sensor light , box 62 . finally , the system retrieves and records wind speed information from the anemometer ( 120 ) and rainfall information from the rain gauge ( 122 ), box 64 . referring back to box 40 , if the system detects user input , the system determines whether the input was from the remote control ( 26 ) or from the control panel keypad ( 34 ). if the input is from the remote control , box 70 , the system determines whether the user desires to commence or terminate spraying insecticide , box 72 . if the user desires to terminate spraying , the system stops the pump ( 14 ) and clears the manual override indicator , box 78 . if the user desires to commence spraying , the system determines whether the low level sensor ( 28 ) is set , box 74 . if the low level sensor ( 28 ) is not set , the system energizes the pump ( 14 ) and sets the manual override indicator , box 76 . if the user input is from the control panel keypad ( 34 ) and the user desires to set the current time , box 80 , the system prompts the user for the current time and date and accepts the time and date from the user , box 82 . if the user input is from the control panel keypad ( 34 ) and the user desires to set or clear spray intervals , box 84 , the system prompts the user for the interval to set or clear , boxes 86 and 88 , and prompts the user for the spray duration if the user is setting a spray interval , box 90 . the user may program up to a maximum of 288 spraying intervals for any given 24 hour period and each spraying interval may have a duration of 1 second to 99 seconds . in some embodiments of the present invention , the control panel ( 12 ) may verify that newly programmed spraying intervals do not overlap a subsequent or prior spraying interval . if the user input is from the control panel keypad ( 34 ) and the user desires to set the maximum wind speed below which the insect control spray system ( 8 ) will operate , box 92 , the system prompts the user for the maximum wind speed , box 94 . if the user input is from the control panel keypad ( 34 ) and the user desires to set the maximum amount of rainfall below which the insect control spray system ( 8 ) will operate , box 92 , the system prompts the user for the maximum amount of rainfall within a defined period of time , box 98 . the rainfall amount may be set in one - hundredth &# 39 ; s of an inch increments and may range from 0 . 01 inch through a maximum of 99 . 99 inches . the period of time during which the rainfall is measured may range from a minimum of 30 minutes to a maximum of one week . fig5 illustrates an alternate embodiment of applicants &# 39 ; insect control sprayer system ( 8 ). in this embodiment , a programmable computer ( 29 ) communicates with the control panel ( 12 ) to offer enhanced control over the operation of the insect control sprayer system ( 8 ). the programmable computer ( 29 ) may be a stand - alone personal computer or may be part of a “ smart house ” or automated home system . the programmable computer ( 29 ) may be programmed to commence and terminate the spraying of insecticide at any time . additionally , the programmable computer ( 29 ) may report to the user the current insecticide level and whether a low level of insecticide condition exists . fig6 is an equipment diagram of an alternate embodiment of applicants &# 39 ; insect control sprayer system ( 8 ). in this embodiment , a pair of floats ( 100 and 102 ) are substituted for the low level sensor ( 28 ) of the first embodiment . the low level sensor light float ( 100 ) is connected to a normally open low level sensor light circuit ( 104 ). the low level pump cutoff float ( 100 ) is connected to a normally closed pump cutoff circuit ( 104 ). when the insecticide level within the container tank ( 10 ) reaches a first low level , the low level sensor light float ( 100 ) closes the low level sensor light circuit ( 104 ) causing the low level sensor light ( 30 ) to illuminate . if the insecticide within the container tank ( 10 ) is further depleted and reaches a second low level , the low level pump cutoff float ( 102 ) opens the pump cutoff circuit ( 106 ) preventing power from being provided to the pump ( 14 ) until insecticide is added to the container tank ( 10 ). when the insecticide in the container tank ( 10 ) is replenished , the sensor light float ( 100 ) opens the low level sensor light circuit ( 104 ) and the pump cutoff float ( 102 ) closes the pump cutoff circuit ( 106 ). a manual override circuit ( 108 ) is also provided . a user may open the normally closed manual override circuit ( 108 ) to prevent operation of the pump ( 14 ) notwithstanding the programming schedule of the control panel ( 12 ). fig7 illustrates an alternative embodiment of applicants &# 39 ; insect control sprayer system ( 8 ). in this embodiment , the distribution system ( 20 ) is partially embedded ( 20 a ) within the structure of a building . this embodiment is more aesthetically pleasing to the user of the system as the only visible indicia of the system are the spray nozzles ( 22 ). fig8 illustrates section view of a spray nozzle . the nozzles ( 22 ) are atomizing nozzles comprised of a stainless steel housing ( 110 ); a non - corrosive , bronze fine - mesh filter ( 112 ); and a check valve ( 114 ) to reduce or prevent dripping at the termination of a spray interval . a representative manufacturer of the nozzles is hago . referring now to fig9 , it is seen another embodiment of the insect control sprayer system ( 8 ). in this embodiment it is seen that an anemometer ( 120 ) in communicative contact with the control panel ( 12 ) is provided . it is also seen that a rain gauge ( 122 ) in communicative contact with the control panel ( 12 ) may also be provided . in this embodiment , the insect control sprayer system ( 8 ) may be configured to prevent the dispensing of insecticide when conditions are such that it would be inappropriate or ineffective to spray insecticide . the anemometer ( 120 ) captures wind speed and , upon reaching a predetermined velocity , opens a normally closed circuit ( element 132 on fig1 ) to de - energize the pump ( 14 ). when the wind speed drops below the predetermined velocity , the now - open circuit ( 132 ) is closed to allow the pump ( 14 ) to be energized . the maximum wind velocity at which the sprayer system ( 8 ) will be permitted to spray insecticide may either be set on the anemometer ( 120 ) itself via a selectable switch on the anemometer or by a setting available through the control panel ( 12 ). interrupting or preventing a dispensing cycle during windy conditions saves insecticide , avoids property damage , and improves insecticide distribution uniformity . an example of an anemometer ( 120 ) that is suitable for use with the instant insect control sprayer system ( 8 ) is the hunter ® wind - clik ® wind sensor . the rain gauge ( 122 ) monitors rainfall levels and , upon reaching a determined amount of rain per a determined period of time , opens a normally closed circuit ( element 132 on fig1 ) to de - energize the pump . the maximum amount of permitted rainfall per period of time may be set either on the rain gauge ( 122 ) itself via a selectable switch on the rain gauge or by a setting available through the control panel ( 12 ). an example of a rain gauge ( 122 ) that is suitable for use with the instant insect control sprayer system ( 8 ) is the hunter ® rain - clik ® rain sensor . although both the anemometer ( 120 ) and the rain gauge ( 122 ) are shown in wired communicative contact with the control panel ( 12 ), it is to be understood that each may also be in wireless communicative contact with the control panel ( 12 ), as is well known in the art , and therefore be more easily positionable at any appropriate location . also seen in fig9 is an external control panel ( 124 ). all of the programming and display features of the control panel ( 12 ) are available in the external control panel ( 124 ). the external control panel ( 124 ) may be in wired or wireless communicative contact with the control panel ( 12 ). in some embodiments of the insect sprayer system ( 8 ) of the instant invention , the external control panel ( 124 ) will comprise a means to allow the sprayer system ( 8 ) to communicate with remote entities such as those that will maintain the spray system ( 8 ) or replenish supplies when a low - level condition is detected and exchange status information with those remote entities . status information may include error or fault conditions such as low levels of insecticide or a failure of a component of the sprayer system ( 8 ) such as the pump ( 14 ). status information may also include statistical information such as consumption rate and run times . in some embodiments , especially those embodiments without an external control panel ( 124 ), communications means may be located within control panel ( 12 ). one means of communication is an integrated telephone automated dialer ( 126 ). the automated dialer ( 126 ) is connected to the telephone system of a home or business via a telephone jack ( 128 ). in some embodiments , the automated dialer ( 126 ) may be comprised of a cellular , mobile , or other wireless telephone so as to eliminate the need for a telephone jack ( 128 ). the external control panel ( 124 ) or control panel ( 12 ) may be programmed with the telephone numbers for individuals or entities which will maintain the insect control spray system ( 8 ) or replenish supplies therefore as needed . when a fault condition is detected or a low level condition is detected , the external control panel ( 124 ) may be programmed to automatically call an appropriate party , such as a service technician , with a pre - recorded message . an example of an automated dialer ( 126 ) that is suitable for use with the instant insect control sprayer system ( 8 ) is the visonic ®, ltd . speech dialer , model dl - 125c . in another embodiment , the means of communications comprises a radio transmitter or transmitter / receiver ( 127 ). the radio transmitter / receiver ( 127 ) utilizes antenna ( 129 ) to communicate with a remote location ( not shown ) to report the detection of fault conditions or low level conditions . it is contemplated that the radio transmitter / receiver ( 127 ) may be used in place of or in conjunction with the automated dialer ( 126 ). upon detection of a fault condition , low - level condition , or other condition requiring service , the radio transmitter / receiver ( 127 ) will transmit an analog or digital signal , which may or may not be encoded , on a determined frequency to a receiving station notifying the station of the identity of the sprayer system ( 8 ) requiring attention and the condition which prompted the transmission . the receiving station may transmit a response to the radio transmitter / receiver ( 127 ) of the sprayer system ( 8 ) indicating that the message has been received and / or that a service technician will be dispatched . a weatherproof case ( item 130 of fig1 ) may be provided to protect the external control panel from inclement weather . although the invention has been described with reference to specific embodiments , this description is not meant to be construed in a limited sense . various modifications of the disclosed embodiments , as well as alternative embodiments of the inventions will become apparent to persons skilled in the art upon the reference to the description of the invention . it is , therefore , contemplated that the appended claims will cover such modifications that fall within the scope of the invention .
the present invention provides an automated insect control system . the system utilizes a container tank , a canned pump , distribution system , and a programmable digital timer to allow a user to control the times per day and the duration in which to apply insecticide to an area . a remote control is provided which permits a user to commence and terminate spraying of insecticide as the need arises without resorting to reprogramming of the spraying schedule .