referring now to the drawing , a pillow construction in accordance with my invention may be seen . the pillow , generally designated 10 , includes a main body portion 11 and a neck supporting portion 12 , joined in this embodiment at joint 13 . the main body portion 11 and the neck supporting portion 12 are each made of polyurethane foam only of different degrees of firmness ; the neck supporting portion having the greater firmness . overall the pillow 10 , of fig1 is generally t - shaped with the portion 11 corresponding to the head of the t and the neck supporting portion 12 constituting the body of the t . of course , it is obvious in the drawing that the neck portion 12 is smaller than the head portion 11 , and is shorter in the longitudinal direction , measured in the direction of the users spine . the neck portion 12 has a length in this direction of 3 to 5 inches which is sufficient to provide support for the neck . the head portion 11 is longer than the neck portion 12 measured in the same direction , e . g . 8 inches or longer . excess length of the head supporting portion 11 is optional . it is important to note that the head supporting portion 11 is wider than the neck supporting portion 12 resulting in a major feature of the invention . the head supporting portion 11 is at least 8 inches in width dictated by the possibility that sleepers lie on their sides with the side of their face against the pillow . note that the neck supporting portion 12 is slightly wider than the sleeper &# 39 ; s neck . when the sleeper turns to either side , as illustrated in fig4 his head is supported , but his chin and mouth area are not in contact with the pillow 10 , at all . for those who do not like side at pressure on their jaw or their mouth partially buried in the pillow , this new design of pillow provides comfort not heretofore available . for those who must wear orthodontic headgear , i . e . external bracing , one not only provides superior comfort for the sleeper , but it allows such persons to lie on their side on a pillow while wearing headgear for the first time . they also have the privilege of having greater neck support than head support by reason of the dual density or firmness feature described above . for those who are unaccustomed to greater neck support than head support and want the feature of no jaw and mouth obstruction , the embodiment of fig5 is particularly valuable . the embodiment of fig5 is generally cruciform in shape with a head supporting portion 11 and a neck supporting portion 12 of greater firmness than the head supporting portion 11 and an additional neck supporting portion 14 which is used by reversing the pillow 20 as shown in fig5 . the neck supporting portion 14 is of different firmness from the neck supporting portion 12 . it may be of the same firmness as the head supporting portion 11 or of greater or lesser firmness than the head supporting portion 11 . this is illustrated in fig7 by the dashed lines indicating different degrees of firmness . fig3 illustrates the differential firmness of the pillow of fig1 graphically . firmness is illustrated in the ordinate direction and distance from the front of the pillow is represented in the abscissa direction . the area 12 of the neck supporting portion is shown having a greater firmness and the head supporting portion having lesser firmness . the abrupt change in stiffness appears at joint 13 of fig1 . in fig7 a transition exists at the joint 13 where the greater stiffness neck supporting portion 12 joins the lesser stiffness of the head supporting portion 11 . the firmness of alternate neck supporting portion 14 may be greater , equal to , or less than the firmness of the head supporting portion 11 as may be desired . this is illustrated by dashed lines . a lesser firmness as illustrated by section ( 14 ) is not consistent with my basic desire but conceivably one might want graduated firmness from neck to head . this is possible using the combination of portion 12 , portion 11 and portion 14 . in carrying out the preferred embodiment of this invention shown in fig1 i employed the following material : ______________________________________neck supporting portion 12 polyurethane foam 1 . 45 #/ ft . sup . 3 firmness : soft . e . g . indentation load deflection ( ild rating ) of # 22 - 28 using astm or equivalent test method to provide a 25 % compression on a 4 &# 34 ; thick foam sample with the weight applied as 8 &# 34 ; × 8 &# 34 ; steel plate . head supporting portion 11 polyurethane foam 1 . 45 #/ ft . sup . 3 firmness : supersoft e . g . ( ild rating ) of # 15 - 21 as identified above . joint stabond ms - 230 adhesive of the stabond corp of gardena , ca 90249______________________________________ typical dimensions for a pillow made in accordance with my invention are : ______________________________________dimensions useful range______________________________________width of 11 25 &# 34 ; 12 &# 34 ; or greaterlength of 11 9 &# 34 ; 8 &# 34 ; or greaterheight of pillow 4 &# 34 ; 2 &# 34 ; to 4 &# 34 ; width of 12 and 14 11 &# 34 ; 5 &# 34 ; to 11 &# 34 ; length of 12 and 14 31 / 2 &# 34 ; 3 &# 34 ; to 5 &# 34 ; ______________________________________ i do recognize that it is possible using controlled foaming techniques to vary the density of foam in a single foam plastic body . such a technique could be applied to my invention to provide differential firmness with the neck supporting portion having greater firmness than the head supporting portion . in such case the abrupt firmness noted in fig3 & amp ; 7 will not occur , but more gradual changes will be present . in each of the embodiments , the pillows are shown with right angle corners , for ease of manufacture by cutting of the foam plastic . it must be recognized that the pillow may be shaped at their edges , if desired , without changing their functional relationship of the pillow sections . the above described embodiments of this invention are merely descriptive of its principles and are not to be considered limiting . the scope of this invention instead shall be determined from the scope of the following claims , including their equivalents .
an improved pillow having a head supporting portion and a neck supporting portion . the neck supporting portion having a firmness greater than the head supporting portion . the neck supporting portion is of lesser transverse dimension than the head supporting portion to allow freedom from interference of the pillow with the sleeper &# 39 ; s jaw and mouth . in an alternate version , the pillow includes two reversible neck supporting portions of different firmness .