the present invention will now be described below with reference to the following working examples which are not to be deemed limitative of the present invention in any manner thereof . ozonated water was prepared by using an apparatus illustrated in fig1 . the raw material ozonated water produced by an ozonated water production device 6 was supplied through a teflon ® ( registered trademark ) pipe 3 , { fraction ( 1 / 2 )} inch in inner diameter to a use point 10 . a diluting point 1 was disposed at a position of 0 . 5 m from the outlet port of the ozonated water production device 6 . at this dilution point 1 , the raw material ozonated water and the ultra pure water 7 for dilution were mixed inside the closed pipe without being exposed to the ambient air . a dissolved ozone concentration meter 2 was disposed at a position 0 . 5 m farther from the dilution point 1 and a dissolved ozone concentration meter 4 was disposed at a position 10 m farther from the dissolved ozone concentration meter 2 . between the dissolved ozone concentration meter 2 and the dissolved ozone concentration meter 4 , a teflon ® ( registered trademark ) pipe 3 of { fraction ( 1 / 2 )} inch in diameter was used for forwarding the ozonated water . as the raw material ozonated water to be supplied , the solution of ozone in ultra pure water containing not more than 1 ppb of toc was used . the flow rate of the raw material ozonated water was fixed at 2 l / min . three flow rates , 2 l / min . ( dilution to twice the original volume ), 4 l / min . ( dilution to three times the original volume ), and 6 l / min . ( dilution to four times the original volume ) were used for the diluting ultra pure water . the raw material ozonated water and the diluting ultra pure water were both used at a fixed temperature of 25 ° c . the dissolved ozone concentrations were measured with the dissolved ozone concentration meter 2 ( former stage ozone concentration ) and the dissolved ozone concentration meter 4 ( latter stage ozone concentration ). the results are shown in table 2 . ozonated water was prepared by using an apparatus illustrated in fig2 . the raw material ozonated water produced by an ozonated water production device 6 was supplied through a teflon ® pipe 3 , { fraction ( 1 / 2 )} inch in inside diameter to a use point 10 . a dilution point 5 was disposed at a position 10 . 5 m from the outlet port of the ozonated water production device 6 . at the dilution point 5 , the raw material ozone water and the ultra pure water 7 for dilution were mixed in the closed pipe without being exposed to the ambient air . a dissolved ozone concentration meter 2 was disposed at a position of 1 m from the outlet port of the ozonated water production device 6 and a dissolved ozone concentration meter 4 was disposed 0 . 5 m farther from the dilution point 5 mentioned above . the dissolved ozone concentrations were measured with the dissolved ozone concentration meter 2 and the dissolved ozone concentration meter 4 by following the procedure of example 1 while mixing the raw material ozonated water at the dilution point 5 with the ultra pure water for dilution . the results are shown in table 2 . comparison of example 1 and comparative example 1 reveals that in the absence of dilution , while the concentrations of the raw material ozonated water ( former - stage ozone concentrations ) were 46 ppm , those at the use point ( later - stage ozone concentrations ) both fell to 23 ppm . in contrast , in the dilutions to 2 - 4 times the original volume , the ozone concentrations at the use points varied with the positions of dilution . the ozone concentrations obtained in example 1 in which the dilution was made in the neighborhood of the ozonated water production device were higher than the ozone concentrations obtained in comparative example 1 in which the dilution was made in the neighborhood of the use point . the supply of the ozonated water was carried out by following the procedure of example 1 while using ozonated water prepared by dissolving carbon dioxide as an ozone decomposition inhibiting agent to ph 4 . 7 in ultra pure water having toc lowered to 1 ppb by irradiation of the ultraviolet light . the results are shown in table 3 . the supply of the ozonated water was carried out by following the procedure of comparative example 1 while using ozonated water prepared by dissolving carbon dioxide as an ozone decomposition inhibiting agent to ph 4 . 7 in ultra pure water having toc lowered to 1 ppb by irradiation of the ultraviolet light . the results are shown in table 3 . comparison of example 2 and comparative example 2 reveals that in the absence of dilution , while the concentrations of the raw material ozonated water ( former - stage ozone concentrations ) were 127 ppm , those at the use point ( later - stage ozone concentrations ) both fell to 116 ppm . in contrast , in the dilutions to 2 - 4 times the original volume , the ozone concentrations at the use points varied with the positions of dilution . the ozone concentrations obtained in example 2 in which the dilution was made in the neighborhood of the ozonated water production device were higher than the ozone concentrations obtained in comparative example 2 in which the dilution was made in the neighborhood of the use point . the supply of the ozonated water was carried out by following the procedure of example 1 while using ozonated water prepared by dissolving isopropyl alcohol as an ozone decomposition inhibiting agent in a concentration of 1 . 5 ppm in ultra pure water having toc lowered to 1 ppb by irradiation of the ultraviolet light . the results are shown in table 4 . the supply of the ozonated water was carried out by following the procedure of comparative example 1 while using ozonated water prepared by dissolving isopropyl alcohol as an ozone decomposition inhibiting agent in a concentration of 1 . 5 ppm in ultra pure water having toc lowered to 1 ppb by irradiation of the ultraviolet light . the results are shown in table 4 . comparison of example 3 and comparative example 3 reveals that in the absence of dilution , while the concentrations of the raw material ozonated water ( former - stage ozone concentrations ) were 141 ppm , those at the use point ( later - stage ozone concentrations ) both fell to 126 ppm . in contrast , in the dilutions to 2 - 4 times the original volume , the ozone concentrations at the use points varied with the positions of dilution . the ozone concentrations obtained in example 3 in which the dilution was made in the neighborhood of the ozonated water production device were higher than the ozone concentrations obtained in comparative example 3 in which the dilution was made in the neighborhood of the use point . according to the method of the present invention for forwarding an ozonated water , in the case of forwarding the ozonated water over a long distance and enabling the use point to be supplied with the ozonated water having an adjusted concentration , a simple operation of adding the diluting water to the ozonated water immediately after production , guiding the resultant ozonated water through a pipe to the use point , and adjusting the amount of the diluting water to be added so as to enable the ozonated water to acquire a target concentration at the use point results in suppressing the decomposition of ozone , permitting the supply of the ozonated water over the long distance , lowering the loss of the ozonated water by decomposition , and allowing effective use of the ozonated water . thus , the method of the present invention contributes to the reduction of the cost of production of the ozonated water . the method of the present invention for forwarding the ozonated water , therefore , is applied advantageously to the plants for producing semiconductor substrates and liquid crystal panels by consuming ozonated water of adjusted concentration in large amounts , particularly to the cleaning operations . further , for the sake of increasing the convenience of the use of the ozonated water in the future , the realization of the central supply of the ozonated water has been gaining in importance . this realization necessitates the supply over a long distance . even in this case , the method of this invention is capable of effectively forwarding the ozonated water . the method of the present invention for forwarding the ozonated water can be utilized not merely in the field of semiconductors mentioned above by way of an example but in all the fields which are in need of using the ozonated water . these fields include detergent grade ozonated water for sterilizing and disinfecting foodstuffs and furnishings for medical practices and wash basin grade ozonated water for sterilizing and disinfecting various articles in numerous fields , for example . 3 . teflon ® ( registered trademark ) pipe { fraction ( 1 / 2 )} inch in diameter accordingly , while only a few embodiments of the present invention have been shown and described , it is obvious that many changes and modifications may be made thereunto without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention .
a method is provided forwarding ozonated water efficiently with the loss of ozone lowered . the method for forwarding ozonated water is from an ozonated water producing device to a use point separated from the device . this enables the use point to be supplied with ozonated water having a concentration adjusted as aimed at , by adding a diluting water to a raw material ozonated water in the neighborhood of the ozonated water producing device under a condition inhibiting exposure to an ambient air , adjusting the amount of the diluting water to be added thereby giving the ozonated water a target concentration at the use point , and subsequently guiding the ozonated water through a pipe to the use point .