fig1 represents the production of a single - unit wax model 1 from a negative mandibular impression 3 that has been executed beforehand by a dental surgeon after preparation of the tooth to receive a prosthesis . the impression 3 comprises a working cavity 2 reproducing in negative form the shape of the prepared tooth . to produce the single - unit wax model , a dental wax is cast in the working cavity 2 of the negative mandibular impression 3 . there is also formed in wax a root part 4 projecting above the working cavity 2 . the dental wax used to produce the single - unit wax model 1 must not be a wax that is too hard and of high shrinkage , in order for it to espouse as closely as possible the shape of the working cavity 2 . the root part 4 projects above the working cavity 2 with a substantially conical shape . a sprue 5 that can be burned out is fixed to the summit of the root part 4 of the single - unit wax model 1 . the sprue 5 that can be burned out is fixed simply by pressing it 1 to 2 mm into the root part 4 . fig2 represents the coating of the single - unit wax model 1 in a conventional coating device 6 . the coating device 6 includes a base 7 that obstructs in sealed manner the lower face 8 a of a mold 8 generally called a cylinder . the free end 9 of the sprue 5 that can be burned out of the single - unit wax model 1 is stuck to the base 7 by means of a droplet of wax 10 . the single - unit wax model 1 and the sprue 5 that can be burned out are then coated by casting a coating 11 in the cylinder 8 via the open top face 8 b of the coating device 6 . the coating 11 can be a standard coating used by dental prosthetists . during coating , it is standard practice to pressurize the coating 11 so that , once solidified , the coating 11 is bubble - free and has a good surface state all around the single - unit wax model 1 . once the coating 11 has solidified in the cylinder 8 all around the single - unit wax model 1 and the sprue 5 that can be burned out , the coating device 6 is placed in an kiln at a temperature chosen according to the instructions of the coating fabricator , in order to burn out the sprue 5 that can be burned out and evacuate the wax . the coating device 6 is then turned over and put down on the top face 8 b of the cylinder 8 . the base 7 is then directed upward and serves as a cone for casting the metal alloy . on casting metal alloy in the base 7 , the molten metal alloy takes the place of the sprue 5 that can be burned out and the wax in the solidified coating 11 , taking on the exact shape of the single - unit wax model 1 . this is the lost - wax process well known to dental prosthetists . fig3 represents the single - unit metal model 16 obtained by this method . it has an extrados surface 12 , a root surface 13 and a root sprue 14 . the extrados surface 12 of the single - unit metal model 16 corresponds in positive form to the intrados of the tooth prosthesis to be produced . fig3 also shows application of a stripping product 17 for preventing the ceramic adhering to the single - unit metal model 16 after firing the ceramic on the single - unit metal model 16 to the extrados surface 12 of the single - unit metal model 16 by means of a brush . the stripping product 17 is applied to the single - unit metal model 16 so that it extends a short distance beyond the extrados surface 12 of the single - unit metal model 16 . an upper periphery 18 of low height h of the root surface 13 is therefore very lightly coated with stripping product 17 . then , this enables the dental prosthetist to use a brush to build up the ceramic on the single - unit metal model 16 coated with the stripping product 17 , extending a very short distance beyond the extrados surface 12 onto the root surface 13 in order to be certain that the extrados surface 12 is covered with ceramic . despite the ceramic extending onto a very small part of the root surface 13 , no bonding area between the ceramic and the single - unit metal model 16 is created after firing the ceramic because the stripping product 17 was also applied so as to extend onto the root surface 13 in the upper periphery 18 of low height h . the stripping product 17 can be a mixture based on quartz powder . the quartz powder can have a particle size from about 40 to 50 microns . however , the stripping product 17 can also advantageously be a mixture marketed under the trade name toothpcs by the french company jbc logidis . fig4 represents the production of a working model 21 . the extrados surface 12 of the single - unit metal model 16 is inserted in the working cavity 2 of the mandibular impression 3 . a first layer 19 of class iv plaster and a second layer 20 of class iii plaster are then cast , as is standard practice for dental prosthetists . after drying , the working model 21 can be stripped from the mandibular impression 3 . there is then obtained a working model 21 similar to that represented in fig5 , into which the single - unit metal model 16 can be inserted . it is then possible to separate the single - unit metal model 16 from the working model 21 , which then incorporates a cavity 15 into which the dental prosthetist can conveniently re - insert the single - unit metal model 16 . to facilitate such re - insertion , the metal alloy used to produce the single - unit metal model 16 can include nickel and chromium . the presence of nickel prevents excessive oxidation of the single - unit metal model 16 that could compromise its re - insertion in the working model 21 . when producing the working model 21 with the single - unit metal model 16 inserted in the mandibular impression 3 ( fig4 ), wax 22 is advantageously applied around the base of the root surface 13 , extending a short distance onto the mandibular impression 3 at the periphery of the working cavity 2 . this wax 22 holds the single - unit metal model 16 in the mandibular impression 3 while casting the plaster , and prevents the class iv plaster 19 penetrating into the working cavity 2 under the single - unit metal model . furthermore , to make it easier for the dental prosthetist to locate the root sprue 14 of the single - unit metal model 16 , a dab of wax 23 is applied to the free end 24 of the root sprue 14 . once the working model 21 has been stripped from the impression , the dental prosthetist removes the wax 23 to uncover the end 24 of the root sprue 14 . removal of the single - unit metal model 16 from the working model 21 can be assisted by applying slight pressure to the end 24 of the root sprue 14 and slight traction to the extrados surface 12 of the single - unit metal model 16 . fig5 shows a working model 21 , once produced , into which the single - unit metal model 16 can be freely inserted or from which it can be freely withdrawn . the working model 21 can thereafter be used by the dental prosthetist to hold the single - unit metal model 16 while he coats it with stripping product 17 and then while he builds up the ceramic on the single - unit metal model 16 to give it the exterior shape required for the prosthesis to be produced . the dental prosthetist can then remove the single - unit metal model 16 on which he has built up the ceramic from the working model 21 and complete the building up of the ceramic so that it overflows very slightly onto the root surface 13 of the single - unit metal model 16 as previously mentioned . fig6 represents a final presentation model 35 produced in the conventional way using the mandibular impression 3 . the final presentation model 35 is the exact replica in plaster of the dentition of the patient after preparation by the dental surgeon . it comprises in particular a cut tooth replica 36 and a replica of the adjacent teeth 37 and 38 . the final presentation module 35 is used to check the points of contact of the ceramic prosthesis that caps the cut tooth replica 36 . it is important to be able to check the points of contact of the ceramic prosthesis disposed on the cut tooth replica 36 with the replicas of the adjacent teeth 37 and 38 . furthermore , to ensure that the gum of the patient will not be injured by any projection from the ceramic prosthesis , the contact between the ceramic prosthesis and the gum replica 39 of the final presentation module 35 is checked . this ensures a perfect fit of the ceramic prosthesis onto the cut tooth replica 36 . finally , the final presentation model 35 can serve as a support for the ceramic dental prosthesis when sending it to the dental surgeon . fig7 illustrates rectification of shrinkage 25 at the periphery 26 of the ceramic prosthesis 27 in contact with the single - unit metal model 16 . this is an intermediary step between two successive steps of firing the ceramic prosthesis 27 . this rectification of the shrinkage 25 is effected by using a brush 29 to add neck mass 28 at the level of the shrinkage 25 . fig8 illustrates finishing the shape of the ceramic prosthesis 27 by grinding using a rubber grinder wheel 30 . the masses 31 and 32 are removed from the ceramic prosthesis 27 in order to be able , on the one hand , to separate the ceramic prosthesis 27 easily from the single - unit metal model 16 and , on the other hand , to impart to the ceramic prosthesis 27 the shape necessary for perfect nesting over the tooth in the mouth of the patient as prepared by the dental surgeon . fig9 illustrates the production of a ceramic prosthesis 27 for a dental prosthesis in place on its single - unit metal model 16 . the ceramic prosthesis 27 represented here is of a different type from that represented in the preceding figures : here it is an inlay - onlay type dental prosthesis . in this figure , it is seen that during the step f ) in which the dental prosthetist uses a brush to build up the ceramic 27 on the single - unit metal model 16 , he adds an excrescence 33 to the top of the ceramic 27 . this excrescence 33 enables the dental prosthetist to hold the ceramic 27 to separate the ceramic 27 from the single - unit metal model 16 . this excrescence 33 is ground off afterwards along the dashed line 34 in order to impart to the ceramic prosthesis 27 the final shape that it must have in the mouth of the patient . the method according to the invention is therefore usable for all the various types of dental prosthesis that exist . in all cases , the prosthesis obtained consists entirely of a mass of ceramic in which there can where appropriate be distinguished thin layers of different tint or appearance . in fact , to achieve the esthetic appearance of a natural tooth , the prosthetist may be required , when building up of the ceramic , to use the brush to superpose successive layers of different ceramics having different characteristics in terms of tint and translucency . the thickness of the layers corresponds to the usual thickness of a layer of ceramic deposited using a brush . the present invention is not limited to the embodiments that have been described explicitly and encompasses diverse variants and generalizations thereof within the scope of the following claims .
a ceramo - ceramic dental prosthesis is made from a patient &# 39 ; s negative mandibular impression , including at least one working cavity having an inner surface matching the lower surface of the prosthesis to be produced and left at least by one tooth primed by the dental surgeon to be prosthetized . the method of making the prosthesis includes a step of providing a single - unit wax model used for producing by precision casting a single - unit metal model on which is mounted , by the dental technician , a ceramic , the single - unit model having previously been coated with a stripping product to avoid the adherence of the ceramic on the metal single - unit model after the ceramic is cured on the single - unit metal model .