in fig1 and 2 there is illustrated a downrigger system 10 of the invention comprising a generally v - shaped body member having an upwardly extending arm member 12 and a downwardly and rearwardly extending leg member 14 . a weight member 16 is secured to the leg member . the upper end of the leg is attached to the lower end of the arm member . preferably the arm and leg members are integral and are joined by a coiled section 13 . the coil provides an attachment point for the cable 20 which is used to tow the downrigger behind a boat while fishing . also , the coil provides for spring action of the arm and leg members . the coil also provides more bounce when it strikes the bottom of the lake , for example , which in turn gives the fishing lure more action . at the upper end of the arm member 12 there is attachment means for detachably securing the fishing line 22 to the arm . many conventional line clips are suitable for use in securing the fishing line in this manner . the clip 30 shown in the drawings includes opposing fingers or jaws 31 between which the line 22 is frictionally retained . the jaws are urged toward each other by spring means . the clip is able to retain the line in the position shown until a fish takes the lure 40 at the end of the line . then the force on the line is sufficient to overcome the frictional force exerted by the clip , and the line is pulled free of the clip . this enables the fisherman to control the fish without interference by the downrigger system . the leg member 14 extends downwardly below the weight 16 . because the leg is thin and of uniform thickness , it is not subject to snagging rocks or submerged obstructions . rather , the leg tends to ride along the bottom and lifts over rocks and obstructions as the downrigger is towed . the weight 16 typically weighs about 5 to 12 pounds , with a weight 6 - 7 pounds being preferred . the shape of the weight may also vary . preferably the weight has a generally triangular shape , with the apex facing forwardly , as illustrated . other shapes , of course , could also be used . the triangular shape shown for the weight is preferred because it exhibits less resistance than previous shapes when it is towed through the water . as a result , it is more directly under the boat during use and the depth meter on the downrigger is more accurate . the shape shown is designed to glide over obstructions such as moss beds . another advantage of the downrigger system of this invention is that the weight can be adjustably mounted on the leg 14 , if desired . for example , the weight can be secured to the leg by means of a removable pin which engages the leg and extends through the weight . providing more than one location on the leg for engaging the pin enables the weight to be located at different positions on the leg . another possibility is the use of a set screw in the weight for engaging the leg at any desired position . by providing for adjustable mounting of the weight on the leg , it is possible to rotate the weight axially on the leg . this enables one to obtain a planing effect so that the weight tends to travel to the left or to the right , as desired , of the direction of travel of the boat which is towing the downrigger . for this purpose , it is preferred that the weight be shaped such that it is capable of gliding smoothly through the water and , depending upon the orientation of the weight , it may be pushed either to the left or the right by the force of the water . the leg member is preferably at least about 8 inches long and may be much longer , e . g ., 30 inches or more , if desired . the arm member may have a length as short as about 6 inches or as long as 25 inches or more . for practical reasons the length of the arm is less than about 20 inches . preferably the length of the leg member below the lower end of the weight is about 15 to 20 inches . the length of the leg member between the upper end of the weight and the coil is about 4 to 6 inches . the angle between the arm 12 and leg 14 is preferably in the range of about 40 ° to 65 °. the arm and leg members may both be composed of the same material . a preferred diameter is about 5 / 32 to 1 / 4 inch ( e . g . 3 / 16 inch ). other diameter rods may also be used , desired , such as 0 . 1 - 0 . 5 inch . although the presence of a coil connecting the arm and leg members is preferred , it is not required . the coil provides for enhanced spring action between the arm and leg members . the arm and leg members are preferably composed of stainless steel which is corrosion - resistant and has very good tensile strength . other materials could also be used , if desired . other variants are possible without departing from the scope of this invention . for example , other shapes for the weight may also be used .
a downrigger fishing system is described which significantly decreases the incidence of bottom snags . the downrigger system includes a downwardly and rearwardly extending leg which resists snagging or catching on rocks and other submerged items in the water . the downrigger system is useful for fishing at a desired depth by holding the line and lure under the water at any designated depth . the line is released from the downrigger when a fish takes the lure .