a preferred embodiment of the invention is depicted in fig1 . a two - tank weired reservoir 10 is depicted as comprising a first tank 20 and a second tank 30 and having a communicating channel controlled by the presence of a weir 13 and in the preferred embodiment , weir 13 can be readily adjusted in height to regulate flow between the first and second tanks 20 , 30 . in alternate embodiments , the channel might be a pipe or channel , with or without a distinct adjustable weir , the water flow being regulated by the vertical height of the pep or channel relative to the surface levels of the manure present in each of the tanks 20 , 30 . as explained , it is not a necessary function of this invention that the weir 13 or any pipe or channel serving as the weir , itself be adjustable in height , though that feature is present in the preferred embodiment . no more than an aperture between the tanks is necessary to achieve the purpose of the invention ; and , in the mind of the inventor , “ weir ” as used in the claims includes , as well , a plate defining an aperture . even the plate defining the aperture , as might be present in some embodiments , could be adjustable in height relative to fluid levels anticipated in either of the first tank 20 or the second tank 30 . for purposes of this application , the term weir as used in the claims will include channels and pipes for the conduct of fluid between the first tank 20 and the second tank 30 . that liquid may pass between the two tanks 20 , 30 based upon the levels of liquid within the tanks 20 , 30 is minimally necessary to achieve the objects of this invention . as described below , in the preferred embodiment , the adjustable weir 13 allows a dairyman a simple means for regulating the volumetric flow rate within the communicating channel comprising the weir 13 . since the geometry locating the top of the weir 13 is known and all water communicating between the first tank 20 and the second tank 30 flows over the weir 13 , adjustment of the height of the weir 13 likewise adjusts the volume of fluid flowing between the tanks 20 , 30 . in the exemplary embodiment portrayed in fig1 , the first tank 20 is defined between the septum 12 and a first tank exterior wall 22 which , itself , defines a first tank inlet 23 . likewise , the second tank 30 is defined between the septum 12 and a second tank exterior wall 32 which , itself , defines a second tank inlet 33 . for purposes of this explanatory discussion , the channel is portrayed as an aperture the septum 12 defines . the weir 13 is adjustable in height in order to regulate the volume of water that will pass over the weir 13 . parenthetically , the inventor notes , in a modern dairy , manure is moved by employing high volume manure pumps selected to create a flow rate adequate to prevent settling of manure solids and bedding material as the manure is transported . while pumps are not portrayed in these fig1 - 6 , the presence of those pumps is presumed . because the movement of pumped manure into and out of a tank is well - known and as such , the pumps are not portrayed as they add nothing to portraying the character of the conjoined tanks 20 , 30 . rather , the first tank inlet 23 and the second tank inlet 33 are portrayed as open flumes in order to show , graphically , the flows into and out of the first tank 20 and the second tank 30 respectively . while such a flume system as illustrated certainly can be exploited in an embodiment of the invention , the preferred embodiment will include the high volume manure pumps that are more conventionally used for manure transport . nonetheless , in order to better portray movement of liquid into the respective tanks herein , the figures show movement of manure into tanks as issuing from pipes above the manure levels . the inventor makes this specific disclaimer that the illustrated embodiment is not the preferred embodiment because of this illustration convention omitting the display of pumps . with the exception , however , of pumps to motivate the flows issuing from the pipes into each of the first and second tanks 20 , 30 , the preferred embodiment identically embodies each of the remaining features as they are portrayed in fig1 through 6 . heavy manure 25 flows through a first tank inlet 23 the first tank exterior wall 22 defines , shown here as a flow 26 of heavy manure . the heavy manure flow 26 conveys heavy manure 25 to collect as a volume of heavy manure 21 within the first tank 20 . such is the designed purpose of the first tank 20 , i . e . to receive and hold heavy manure between the septum 12 and the first tank exterior wall 22 . when the heavy manure flow 26 stops , the organic solids within the contained heavy manure begin to settle due to gravity . just as is the practice with the second tank 30 , the contents of the first tank 20 reside there to be drawn from in order to supply the water needs of a flush or flume dairy . in normal operation , the liquid levels will fluctuate with the operation of the dairy . depending upon the needs of the dairy , either tank will receive or provide water based upon flush or flume needs in dairy operation . fig1 and 4 , for example , both demonstrate the receiving of liquid in the first tank 20 and the second tank 30 respectively . as explained above , no pump is shown in fig1 through 6 because the explanation of the working of the system is more readily illustrated without the pumps . indeed , the preferred embodiment will use pumps to move manure into and out of the first and the second tanks 20 , 30 . referring now to fig2 , when not agitated , the volume of heavy manure 21 in the first tank 20 will tend to settle , producing a film or layer of water 24 . settled particles form a sludge layer at the bottom of a column the first tank 20 defines . when the free - falling , settling particles reach the top of the sludge layer , they decelerate as the space between particles becomes smaller , and the velocity of liquid increases . the pressing of particles together squeezes liquid from between them . concentration of solids increases as the sludge layer deepens . as depicted in fig2 , particles fall from the raw heavy manure 21 . settling of particles in the volume of heavy manure 21 causes a layer of water 24 to form . the effect is well - known and is best explained from the vantage point of a single particle which floats on the more dense suspension of particles beneath it . consider generally , the first of the particles to fall out of the raw heavy manure 25 , leaving the region generally where a film of water 24 forms as the particles leave that region . as gravity draws the particle downward along with other like particles that might be present in the raw heavy manure 21 causing the density of particles locally to increase thereby slowing the particle &# 39 ; s travel downward . as more particles fall to the lower region of the first tank 20 , a film of water forms above a boundary as that boundary becomes better defined . as time passes , the film waxes to full layer of water 24 shown herein , spanning an encompassed surface area of the first tank 20 . as a short time passes , the density of particles within the water approaches very nearly that of light manure 31 , such as that stored in the second tank 30 . this natural process exploits the advantageously formed layer of water 24 , especially as this layer is formed in the most immediate neighborhood of the weir 13 . referring now to fig3 , the first tank 20 , is portrayed receiving a further flow of heavy manure 26 , which , given the heavier density of the volume of heavy manure 21 moves swiftly through the layer of water 24 and settles into the lowest region of the first tank 20 . as the received flow heavy manure 26 fills the lowest region within the first tank 20 the denser heavy manure 21 buoys up the layer of water 24 to a height exceeding the height of the weir 13 , an overflowing that weir 13 , initiates a flow of water 17 into the second tank 30 . the second tank 30 , analogous to the first tank 20 , is defined by the septum 12 and a second tank exterior wall 32 ( within includes a second tank inlet 33 that the exterior wall 32 defines ). for purposes of this application , light manure 31 resides in the second tank 30 and has been clarified by , for example , some of the processes described in text below in reference to fig7 through 10 below . the volume of light manure 31 within the second tank 30 is certainly suitable for use as flushing water . likewise , the flow of water 17 introduced into the second tank 30 are suitable for use as flushing water and this introduction of the flow of water 17 into the second tank 30 does not compromise the use of contents of the second tank 30 as flushing water . referring now to fig4 and 5 , the second tank 30 serves as the repository for light manure 31 , as light manure 31 is expelled through the second tank inlet 33 which the second tank exterior wall 32 defines to establish a flow 36 of light manure 31 . the duty cycles of the dairy separation machinery causes the volume of light manure 31 to vary throughout a cycle of operation of the dairy . the purpose of the second tank 30 is to serve as the buffering reservoir for the output of separators such as the centrifuge or , by way of a second non - limiting example , the sand lane , just as the first tank 20 serves as a buffering reservoir for the input of the same separators . again , analogous to movement of water into and out of the first tank 20 described above , from time to time , the volume of light manure 31 will exceed the capacity of the second tank 30 , generally due to the flow 36 of light manure 31 through the inlet 33 the second tank exterior wall 32 defines . naturally , as the density of light manure 31 is , by definition , far less than the density of the heavy manure 21 , the introduction of light manure 31 into the first tank 20 could not have any adverse effect upon any downstream manure handling machinery . in fact , the introduction of the liquid to the heavy manure 21 is likely to accelerate the settling of sand to form the layer of water 24 depicted herein . in many cases , the introduction of light manure 31 in a flow 16 ( as shown in fig5 ) will reduce the viscosity of the heavy manure 21 by dilution , thereby allowing particles from the water layer 24 to settle more rapidly . thus , when operations cause an excess of light manure 31 to accumulate in the second tank 30 , the flow 16 from the second tank 30 to the first tank 20 does not adversely affect operation of the dairy . as asserted , the presently preferred embodiment as depicted in fig6 , the dairyman has adjusted the height of weir 13 to be lower in height , thereby reducing the volume of each of the first tank 20 and the second tank 30 might receive , before any flow 16 or 17 between the tanks 20 , 30 might occur . such a feature might be used , either for tuning the manure handling system as a whole or to adjust to variations in volume of manure either light manure 31 or heavy manure 21 within the system . thus , in the preferred embodiments of the invention , the height of the weir 13 is adjustable to allow the dairyman to adjust that height as the “ fine tuning ” used advantageously to promote efficient operation of the dairy . naturally , the volume of the manure handling system can also be controlled by other means as well , for example , by sending excess liquid to long term storage in a lagoon . it will be readily recognized by persons skilled in the art that an adjustable weir 13 allows the dairyman to optimize timing and volumes of the flow 17 between the first tank 20 to the second tank 30 and the flow 16 from the second tank 30 to the first tank 20 . naturally , when a dairyman extends the weir 13 upward , the dairyman increases the volume of each of the first tank 20 and the second tank 30 before a flow 16 , 17 could be instituted between the first tank 20 and the second tank 30 . in doing so , the dairyman has increased the capacity of the dairy , as in some instances , to address the presence of additional cows within the herd . should the cows be sold out of the herd , the weir 13 is adjusted back downward again to optimize the volume held within the two tanks 20 , 30 , relative to the size of the herd and such other factors as the astute dairyman might consider in adjusting the weir 13 . by way of overview , the installation of the inventive reservoir 10 has a significant beneficial effect upon the design of a modern dairy 1 , such as the design depicted in a process diagram such as in fig7 and a detail of an optional embodiment additionally depicted in fig7 a . the specific design volume of the two - tank weired reservoir 10 will be dictated by the population and breed of the cattle . cows differ considerably in the amount of manure they produce . jerseys , for example , produce only 60 % as much manure as holsteins . because of the distinct variables entailed , no systematic method is published here to calculate an exact relation between volume of manure produced and the combination of breed and population . a number of different manure handling configurations are commonly used in dairy design . a flush system will fill the gutters with motivating flush water with organic solids entrained in the flush water which in the course of movement will substantially dilute the solid content of the manure . flushing dairy facilities , such as milking parlors , holding areas and free stall alleys , can replace mechanical scraping or scraping with a tractor and blade . for optimum performance , flushed surfaces are usually sloped at 2 percent to 5 percent to provide adequate flow velocity for good cleaning and transport . flush dairies are currently a preferred embodiment of the instant invention as it enjoys certain inherent advantages in operation : flushing is suited to a low - labor system incorporating a lagoon and irrigation for storage / treatment and distribution of waste . in a flume system , movement of manure once in conduits is very similar in operation , but requires mechanical movement of the manure into the conduits referred to as “ flumes ,” rather than to simply rely upon movement of flush water over the floor surface of the dairy 1 . once they receive manure , it is the flumes rather than the floor surfaces that are flushed with flush water to move the manure out of the barn . a flume system utilizes fast flowing liquid to transfer manure across the width of a barn or across several barns , generally in a round tube . a high volume pumps creates an adequate flow rate to prevent settling of manure solids and bedding material . water addition , and separation or dewatering is needed before evacuating to further processing to retain enough liquid to keep the flush flume operating . from the dairy 1 , manure is conveyed by being entrained in the water , through a channel 41 ultimately to the first tank 20 , typically a gravity pipe , i . e . a pipe placed with sufficient slope to motivate manure by gravity through the channel 41 . in the embodiment of the invention here depicted , an optional sand lane 5 is used to initially separate sand from the manure . the sand lane 5 is effectively utilized on both flush and flush flume systems . in a typical sand lane , flush or flush flume water containing heavy manure 26 is introduced into a shallow , long and narrow channel ( lane ) at a high delivery rate . an energy dissipation system is usually installed at the head end of the lane to slow the velocity of the water and distribute the flow over the width of the sand lane 5 . the bottom of the 12 - foot - wide lanes conventionally will be sloped 0 . 2 to 0 . 25 percent . the water velocity slows to 1 to 2 feet per second in the sand lane 5 which allows the sand to settle out while washing most of the organic matter from the sand to continue through the sand lane 5 into a reception pit 7 by means of a channel 42 . the reception pit 7 sits at the lowest end of the channel 42 to collect manure from the dairy 1 . the reception pit 7 in this exemplary embodiment is a fabricated manure storage tank of either concrete or coated metal with a glass lining and may be situated either above or below ground , though these are situated in this embodiment to simply allow gravity to motivate manure through the channel 42 . by using the agitator in reception pits the manure is stirred into a homogenous mix , which allows it to be easily transported , by pumping , to the further into the system . depending on the size of the storage , the agitator may be used daily or as often as necessary , to maintain the state of the manure . in the presently preferred embodiment shown , a feed pump 75 transfers the manure to further separation through a pipe 43 to a primary sand separator 8 . sand separation may be through any conventional means , for example , by slope separator , a screen such as a wedge - wire screen , or a rotary separator . naturally , the purpose is to remove as much of the sand as possible by the most economic means . sand removed , for example , by wedge - wire screening need not later to be removed by centrifuge and , thus , preliminary removal has great and positive impact on the economics of manure handling . while not specifically necessary for successful operation of the two - tank weired reservoir 10 , in a presently preferred embodiment , this screening is extremely advantageous and its use occurs at the primary separator 8 . sand so removed is generally stacked as solid 2 and in some dairy operations rinsed for use as bedding for cattle . advantageously , such sand can readily be recovered , used , and reused and where well - tolerated by the cows , it is can be used economically with far greater utility than straw or other organic bedding . screen separators 8 include stationary inclined , vibrating , rotating , and in - channel flighted conveyor screens . all separators of this type involve a screen of a specified pore size that allows only solid particles smaller in size than the openings to pass through . this type of separator generally works best with manure having a solids content of less than 5 %. in use of a stationary inclined screen , liquid manure is pumped to the top edge of the inclined screen . liquids pass through the screen while the solids accumulate on the screen and eventually move downward due to gravity forces and fluid pressure . in use of a vibrating screen , liquid manure is pumped onto the flat vibrating screen at a controlled rate . the liquid flushes through the screen while the rapid reciprocating motion employed moves the solids to the screen edge where they are collected . the vibration reduces clogging of the screen . obviously , the power requirement is higher with a vibrating screen system than with the stationary inclined screen . a continuously turning or rotating screen receives liquid manure at a controlled rate . the liquid passing through the screen is collected in a tank while the retained solids are scraped from the surface into a collection area . a refinement of the continuously turning or rotating screen is the in - channel flighted conveyor screen . this screen separator system consists of an inclined screen and a series of horizontal bars , called flighted conveyors . the separator can be placed directly in an open manure channel , which eliminates the need for a sump or a pit and a lift pump . liquid passes through the screen and drains into the channel on the downstream side of the separator , while the separated solids are deposited on a collection pad . uses are similar to those of the stationary inclined screen separators , but the in - channel flighted conveyor screen separator requires more mechanical maintenance , as its moving parts are exposed to corrosive and abrasive materials , such as sands and chemical constituents of manure . presses act as continuously - fed dewatering devices that involve the application of mechanical pressure to provide additional separation of the manure slurry . they are often used to remove additional water from the separated solids portion produced following screening or centrifugation . this physical separation process typically achieves a high level of dewatering and the pressed solid cake can be composted or used for refeeding . the three main types of mechanical filtration devices are roller , belt , and screw presses . a fourth type is the filter press . the more prevalent is the roller press , having two concave screens and a series of brushes or rollers . the manure slurry is initially deposited onto the first screen and then moved across the two screens with brushes and squeezed by the rollers . the liquids are squeezed through the holes while the solids remain on the screen . the following two separators use these principles in their operation . a further refinement is the two - stage double roller compression separator . liquid slurry is force - fed into the first set of perforated separator rollers . separated liquid is removed at this point for storage . separated solids from the first stage are conveyed to the second set of separator rollers where the fiber solids are removed by a mechanical conveyor to the storage area . the liquid fraction is drained off at this point and returned to the initial liquid slurry tank . any of the several of these might advantageously be used for primary separation 8 . having separated the major portion of sand from the manure at primary separation 8 , the sand - separated or heavy manure 21 travels through a conduit such as a channel or pipe to the second tank 30 which functions as described above with reference to fig1 - 6 , the weir 13 and septum 12 defining the weir 13 are both present as is the second tank 30 . not shown in the previously depicted embodiments is the level sensor 18 , in this case present in the second tank 30 . the level sensor 18 serves the dairyman by giving and recording the levels in the tank ( or where two are used , one level sensor 18 assigned to each tank ), and allows for predictions to readily be made as to the optimal positioning of the weir 13 in embodiments having an adjustable weir 13 . from the first tank 20 , a pump 25 that might also , at times be used for agitation , motivates a stream of manure from the first tank 20 through a conduit 26 where , in this embodiment , a flow meter 29 to an automatic valve 4 r that in some embodiments are used to admit manure into a pipe 47 to feed the centrifuge 9 . as is shown , in some embodiments , chemical additives might be used to accelerate the aggregation of particulate in the manure making it easier to remove . in operation , the automatic valve 4 r would close and both of the intake valve 4 i , and the return valve 4 b open to admit manure to an optional chemical separation plant 50 . in the presently preferred embodiment , as shown in fig7 a a circuit includes two sets of valves , an intake valve 4 i and a return valve 4 b to the conduit 57 to feed the centrifuge , and a retention valve 4 r which obstructs manure from bypassing the chemical plant 50 when closed . in the preferred embodiment the normally - closed intake valve 4 i and normally - closed return valve 4 b , both open and the normally open rerouting valve 4 r closes to add the circuit the chemical plant 50 comprises to the path of manure through the conduit 26 to the conduit 57 to feed the centrifuge 9 . each valve 4 i , 4 b , 4 r will change its state to the opposite state while at same time making the normally preferred embodiment to comprise a manifold with a single impulse that changes the state of each of the three valves 4 i , 4 b , 4 r . separation of a liquid fraction from the solid fraction of manure can be made more effective through addition of chemicals to coalesce particles of organic matter in a solid fraction . in this optional process , chemicals selected to improve the retention of the plant nutrients in the solid fraction are added prior to mechanical separation in the optional chemical plant 50 . additions of such chemicals assist with the production of a liquid fraction with a composition that is more readily separated from the solids and diminishes the energy necessary to perform the separation . flocculation , coagulation , and precipitation are methods to enhance mechanical liquid / solid separation . in most suspensions , colloidal particles do not aggregate spontaneously because such particles are negatively charged and repel each other . however , aggregation is facilitated by adding either multivalent cations that cause coagulation or polymers that promote flocculation . the addition of multivalent cations also triggers precipitation . the chemical plant 50 as depicted in fig7 a , draws manure through a conduit 56 where chemicals from a chemical tank 53 are introduced into a flow of manure through a conduit 54 . the mixed manure chemical cocktail then proceeds through the conduit 52 and at a retention tank 51 the chemicals are allowed to diffuse through the mix . naturally , to the extent manure precipitates out , it can be collected from the retention tank 51 . when appropriate in the operation of the dairy , the retained manure is drawn out of the retention tank 51 by a retention tank pump 55 though both of a conduit 58 and the return valve 4 b to be fed through the conduit 57 , to the centrifuge 9 . the centrifuge 9 is a device , which employs a high rotational speed to separate components of different densities . typically centrifuges 9 consist of a horizontal or vertical cylinder which is continuously turned at high velocities . centrifugal forces separate the liquid and solids onto the inside wall of the cylinder into two layers . an auger , which turns slightly faster than the cylinder , moves the solids to the conic part of the unit where they are discharged . the two types of centrifuge 9 separators are centrisieves and decanters . centrisieves consist of an inclined revolving drum that is lined with a filter cloth . the slurry to be separated is pumped into the drum center . the liquid leaves the drum through the filter cloth and the solids move by centrifugal force to the edge of the drum where they are removed separately . in the case of decanter centrifuges , an auger , turning at a slightly higher speed than the cylinder in which it is contained , moves the slurry to the conic part , where it is discharged . centrifuges are very effective at solids separation and can achieve relatively low moisture levels . the initial cost is high , however , and the energy requirement is also quite high in comparison to other systems . the decanter centrifuge , however , is considered as the workhorse of a wide range of liquid / solid separation activities . its application to the dewatering of waste sledges has made it a most valuable tool in animal husbandry . the dewatered solids 2 are conveyed from the centrifuge 9 and can be used for example , as compost or to be digested to produce methane . the effluent is largely pure water and traverses to the second tank 30 as sand - separated light manure 31 . it is important to understand that while it is not potable , the light manure 31 is almost entirely consisting of water 24 . as such , it contains very few organic or inorganic solids and is very suitable for use as flush water to begin the whole cycle again . the second tank 30 is used just for such storage , and to the extent that water 24 from the first tank 20 spills in a flow 17 into the second tank 30 , the presence of that water 24 will not contaminate the light manure 31 to prevent its use as flush water available through the flush water pipe 45 at the dairy . where too much water is recovered from the manure at the centrifuge 9 , two further automatic valves 4 s , 4 t work in tandem to divert the flow from the second tank 30 to long - term storage in a lagoon 3 . indeed , nothing prevents use of a ball valve to simply divert manure from the sand - separated manure conduit 35 to flow down the lagoon conduit 49 for long - term storage in the lagoon 3 . the two - tank weired reservoir 10 is not limited to embodiments wherein a centrifuge 9 is employed . by way of non - limiting example , fig8 depicts a flush dairy 1 which drains manure through a channel 41 into a sand lane 5 where sand is separated from the manure in a first separation to flow into the first tank 20 of the reservoir 10 . a feed pump 26 transfers the manure to a separator 9 . as discussed above , separation may be through any conventional means , for example , by slope , a screen such as a wedge - wire screen , or a rotary separator . naturally , the purpose is to remove as much of the sand as possible by the most economic means . solids such as sand are removed by conveyor 19 or by such means as a skid loader to where the solids are stacked as solids 2 , for such use as is economical . sedimentation tank 7 is another form of separator also called settling tank or clarifier . a sedimentation tank allows suspended particles to settle out of water or wastewater as it flows slowly through the tank , thereby providing some degree of purification . a layer of accumulated solids , called sludge , forms at the bottom of the tank and is periodically removed . manure leaving the separator 9 s travels by pipe 46 , in this embodiment , as effluent to such a sediment tank 7 for further settling of solids . at the sediment tank 7 , light manure can be sent back to the second tank 30 through a feed line 35 to fill the second tank 30 . excess light manure is suitable for flushing in its state leaving the sediment tank 7 through either a pump 75 into a pipe 41 s to serve as a dedicated flush for the sand lane 5 or into the second tank 30 as a reservoir for flush water 31 to supply , through the flush pump 36 / that feeds flush water through a pipe 45 to flush the flush dairy 1 . where an excess of flush water is present in the second tank 30 , the contents of the sediment tank 7 are shunted by pipe 49 s into the lagoon 3 for long - term storage , thereby being available to “ top up ” the system by conveyance through the feed pump 65 through a pipe 49 r to the second tank 30 when necessary . also shown is the flush flume 45 f should the dairy 1 be configured as a flume dairy rather than a flush dairy . that the two - tank wiered reservoir 10 is so readily adaptable to various configurations gives testimony to its versatility and utility in various manure management systems . hogs , generally , do not use or need either of sand or straw bedding which obviates the need for extensive trapping and separating of sand from manure . such is not to say that there are not some particles of sand to be contended with but where a decanter centrifuge 9 is in use , systems can be designed without distinct separation means to protect the centrifuge from the undue wear that sand imparts on moving parts . this simplest embodiment of an operating manure management system in a flush dairy or swine farm with flushable sties is illustrated in fig9 . while sharing many of the basic elements of the other demonstrated embodiments illustrated above , the manure management system shown is among the simplest embodiments of the invention . still relying , as it does , on the two - tank weired reservoir 10 , the flush return line 25 feeds the first tank 20 as it does either directly or indirectly after sand separation , as in a lane 5 , in every embodiment . because there is present , relatively little inorganic solid in the manure 21 held in the first tank 20 , the centrifuge 9 is fed at a nearly constant rate through the feed pump 26 . drawing from the first tank 20 and feeding the centrifuge 9 through the feed pipe 47 , the centrifuge 9 delivers separated solids for compost . a conveyor 19 delivers these to a pad for stacking solids 2 . when the solids have been removed from suspension at the centrifuge 9 , the remaining liquid is flush - quality water pumped either to the lagoon 3 ( not shown ) through a lagoon conduit 49 for long - term storage , or , to meet the more immediate needs of the dairy or swine farm 1 into the second tank 30 through a feed pipe 35 for storage as sand - separated manure 31 . when needed , the sand - separated manure 31 is drawn from the second tank 30 with a flush pump 36 and through either a flush manifold 45 or a flush flume pipe 45 f to clean and entrain manure from the dairy or swine farm 1 . and so the process continues exploiting the two - tank wiered reservoir 10 as a principal buffer in the management of manure . while the preferred embodiment of the invention has been illustrated and described , as noted above , many changes can be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention . accordingly , the scope of the invention is not limited by the disclosure of the preferred embodiment . instead , the invention should be determined entirely by reference to the claims that follow .
a method and apparatus for collecting agricultural manure in a confined animal feeding operation includes a separator which receives heavy manure removing particulate from suspension to produce light manure . heavy manure is collected to a volume of heavy manure sufficient to substantially fill the first tank . within the first tank , particulate migrates , due to the influence of gravity to form a layer containing manure comprising a lesser density of particulate than is present in the volume of heavy manure . additional heavy manure buoys the layer such that the upper surface exceeds a height of a weir . the weir is situated in a channel communicating between the first tank and a second tank configured to receive light manure from the separator .