the preferred embodiment of the crab trap 10 of the present invention is shown in the isometric view of fig1 and comprises a main containing portion 12 where the crabs are held until they can be retrieved , a plurality of gates 14 that allow the crab to enter the main containing portion 12 but not to leave , and a plurality of diversion sections 16 which will be described more fully later herein , that guide the crabs toward the gates 14 . for convenience of description , the crab trap 10 shall be considered as having a center location 18 and a perimeter 20 . the gates 14 are positioned along the perimeter 20 of the crab trap 10 at equally spaced intervals . each diversion section 16 comprises a pair of diversion wall portions 22 that are substantially vertically aligned . each pair of diversion wall portions 22 are connected to each other at a juncture location 25 from which they extend radially inwardly and divergently . each gate 14 and its two adjacent diversion wall portions 22a and 22b form a diversion and collecting region 28 . ( see fig1 ). referring to fig2 b , the crab trap 10 has a main frame 32 that comprises an upper frame member 34 and a lower frame member 36 that are joined together by a plurality of interconnecting vertical frame members 38 . the upper frame member 34 comprises a plurality of radially extending v - shaped frame projections 40 that are attached to a generally circular frame member 42 . the v - shaped frame projections each comprise two straight frame members 41 that are joined together at an outer end 44 ( the vertex of the v - shape ) and the inner ends 46 ( the distal ends of the v - shape ) are joined to the circular frame member 42 . as can be seen in fig2 the addition of these v - shaped frame projections 40 to the circular frame member 42 create an upper frame member 34 that has a configuration resembling a star shape . the lower frame member 36 is shown in fig4 and comprises a plurality of inwardly curved frame members 48 that are joined end 50a to end 50b with their concave side 52 facing outwardly relative to the center 18 of the crab trap 10 . assembled in this manner , the lower frame member 36 has a general star - shaped configuration that approximates the general star shape of the upper frame member 34 but is not identical to it . the star shapes of the upper frame member 34 and the lower frame member 36 are the same in that the apex 44 of the v - shaped frame portions 40 are positioned directly above the apex 54 of the points of the star - shaped lower frame member 36 when the main frame portion 32 is assembled . each curved frame member 50 has two generally straight portions 56a and 56b and a curved portion 58 . these straight portions 56a and 56b of the arcuate frame members 50 lie directly below a corresponding member 41a an 41b of the v - shaped projection 40 . the curved frame sections 48 are preferably made from a tubular metal that is filled with a relatively heavy and inexpensive anchor metal such as lead . the additional of the anchor metal to the curved frame sections 48 produces a heavy base for the crab trap 10 which assists the crab trap 10 to sink the ocean bottom in the proper upright orientation and to keep the crab trap 10 in that location until it is retrieved . the addition of the anchor metal also protects the trap 10 against the effects of electrolysis . as shown in fig2 c , a semi - circular access door 60 is hinge mounted to the circular frame member 42 by means of a diametrically aligned spindle member 62 that is mounted for rotational movement in holes 64 formed in the interior circumference 66 of the circular frame member 42 . an arcuate door frame member 68 is joined at either end 69 to the spindle member 62 to form the frame 71 of a semi - circular shaped access door 60 . the mesh section 70 that contains the access door 60 and the circular frame member 42 is preferably made from a resilient wire mesh 72 . as shown in fig2 the wire mesh 72 extends over the portion 73 of the circular frame member 42 that is behind the spindle member 62 of the access door 60 . the portion 70 of the wire mesh 72 that covers the access door 60 is connected under directly to the arcuate door frame member 68 . preferably , the wire mesh 72 is attached so that it is under some tension when the access door 60 is in its closed position 75 ( fig3 ). this resilient nature of the wire mesh 72 and this tension will tend to pull the access door 60 upwardly about the spindle member 62 to an open position 77 that is shown from the side in fig3 . the tension from the resilient wire mesh 72 holds open the access door 60 while the crab trap 10 is filled with bait or the crabs are removed . of course , the access door 60 can also be folded back to rest on the wire mesh covering the rear portion 74 of the circular frame member 42 . returning to fig2 c , while in use catching crabs , the access door 60 is held closed by a latch assembly 76 that is preferably mounted on the circular frame member 42 opposite the spindle member 62 , or approximately half way along the circumference 76 of the arcuate door frame member 68 . the latch assembly 76 comprises a housing 80 that is attached to the circular frame member 42 opposite the access door 60 . this fixed housing 80 contains a spring that is attached to a slidably mounted lock rod 84 . the locking end 88 of the lock rod 84 extends through a pair of holes 86 defined in the circular frame member 42 and extends over the arcuate door frame member 68 . attached to the opposite end 89 of the lock rod 84 is a handle 90 . while the access door 60 is in its closed position 75 , the resilient wire mesh 72 is urging the access door 60 upwardly , but the locking end 88 of the latch assembly 76 restrains this upward movement . to release the access door 60 into its open position 77 , the handle 90 of the latch assembly 76 is pulled in the direction opposite the latch access door 60 which causes the lock rod 84 to slide against the tension of the spring until the locking end 88 of the latch assembly 76 no longer restrains the arcuate frame member 68 of the access door 60 . an escape ring 92 is mounted in the generally triangular region 93 between the two v frame members 41 and the circular frame member 42 . the triangular region 93 is not covered with the wire mesh 72 . the escape ring 92 has a diameter 94 that corresponds to the minimum size crab that local regulations legally allow the crab harvester to keep . crabs that are smaller than this minimum size can easily escape the crab trap 10 by crawling through the open area 95 in the escape ring 92 . this is advantageous because the undersize crabs will just take up space in the main containing portion 12 and because it avoids the effort involved in segregating the undersize crabs and throwing them back into the water . larger crabs will not fit through the escape rings 92 and will be retained in the trap . the escape rings 92 are tied to points 100 on the v frame members 41 and to a point 102 on the circular frame member 42 using a cord 96 that is designed to rot while in the water . if the crab trap 10 is lost or otherwise not retrieved , the cord 96 will rot over the course of a few months which will release the escape ring 92 from the main frame 32 of the crab trap 10 and permit the mature crabs to escape through the triangular region 93 . this is environmentally desirable because the crabs in a lost crab trap 10 can escape to either be caught again in another trap 10 or to breed more crabs to be caught at a later time . another advantage of using rot cord 96 to attach the escape rings 92 to the main frame portion 32 is that different size escape rings 92 can easily be substituted for those already in place . different jurisdictions have different regulations for the minimum size crabs that the fisher can keep . by changing the size of the escape rings 92 , the crab trap 10 can be used in all of these jurisdictions by making this easy substitution . the escape ring 92 is tied to the frame at preferable three points 100 , 102 , as is described above . the triangular region can support a wide variety of different size escape rings 92 by tying the escape ring 92 to the three points 100 , 102 , discussed above . referring to fig4 a heavier gauge wire mesh 104 or metal mesh plate 104 can be attached to the lower frame member 36 instead of the wire mesh 72 used on the rest ofthe crab trap 10 . this heavier metal mesh 104 has the advantages that it adds additional torsional stability to the lower frame member 36 , it adds additional weight to the lower frame member 36 , and because of it adds durability to the portion 105 of the crab trap 10 that will take the most abuse over its useful life . the lower frame member 36 also has a cross member 106 that is connected between two of its arcuate frame sections 48 that adds torsional stability . the primary purpose of this cross member 106 , however , is to serve as a container 107 for a filling of metal 108 that is sacrificed to protect the main frame 32 from the effects of electrolysis and corrosion . the cross member 106 is made of tubular metal having a longitudinal channel 110 that exposes the sacrificial metal 108 to the water . the cross member 106 is hermetically welded to the trap 10 . examples of the type of sacrificial metal 108 that may be used include zinc or lead . the resilient wire mesh 72 extends from the upper frame member to the lower frame member following the star shaped contour of the crab trap 10 . there is no wire mesh 72 in the triangular region 93 containing the escape ring because the intent is to allow the crabs to escape if the crab trap 10 is left in the water long enough for the escape ring 92 to detach from the upper frame member 34 . as detailed in fig5 the gate 14 comprises an entry tunnel 116 , an opening 118 , and one - way obstruction means 120 . between each pair of diversion walls 22a and 22b is an entry tunnel 116 that has a funnel - like shape . the funnel shape of entry tunnel 116 is defined by the wire mesh 72 that is stretched over and attached to a hoop 122 that defines the shape of the entry tunnel 116 and the opening 118 to the main containing portion 12 . the hoop 122 is attached at its upper end 124 to the upper frame member 34 and at its lower end 126 to the lower frame member 36 . the hoop 122 comprises a right and a left support member 128 and 130 that are joined near their top ends 129 by a horizontal upper support bar 132 and near their lower ends 131 by a horizontal lower stop bar 134 . the upper support bar 132 and the lower stop bar 134 are not in the same vertical plane . the lower stop bar 134 actually resides in a vertical plane 136 that is behind the position of the upper support bar 132 and more toward the center of the crab trap 10 . this is accomplished by bending the right and left vertical supports 128 and 130 into approximately the shape of an &# 34 ; l &# 34 ; with the top 124 of the &# 34 ; l &# 34 ; attached to the upper frame member 34 , the upper support bar 132 attached in an upper portion 140 of the &# 34 ; l &# 34 ;, the lower stop bar 134 attached near the vertex 141 of the &# 34 ; l &# 34 ; and lower end 137 attached to the lower frame member 36 . however , this system is not obligatory for the crab trap . the wire mesh 72 is stretched over the exterior surface of the hoop 122 and secured to it , leaving an opening 118 between the vertical support members 128 and 130 and the horizontal bars 132 and 134 . each opening 118 to the main containing portion 12 is blocked by a plurality of obstruction members 120 that are hinge mounted to the upper support bar 132 and which depend downwardly and across the opening 118 . the lower portion 144 of the each obstruction member 120 rests against the lower stop bar 134 so that the obstruction member 120 is actually positioned downwardly and rearwardly toward the center 18 of the crab trap 10 when it is closed . in this closed position 145 , the force of gravity keeps the obstruction members 120 in contact with the lower stop bar 134 and external forces such as gravity or currents are less likely to cause the obstruction members 120 to swing open , especially if the crab trap 10 is not resting in a level position on the ocean floor . when a crab enters the crab trap 10 it pushes these obstruction members 120 inwardly and upwardly to an open position 145 . after the crab falls into the trap , the obstruction members 120 swing downwardly to rest on the stop bar 134 which does not permit the obstruction members 120 to be push forwardly by the crab so that it can escape . obviously , the specific arrangement of the doors could be modified , and other arrangements could be used . in the preferred embodiment , the obstruction members are comprised of a single piece of wire that is formed into a first downwardly extending tine 146 , a first 360 ° degree loop 148 , a first 90 degree bend 150 a slight distance ( x ) away from the loop 148 , a central portion 152 , a second 90 degree bend 154 , a second 360 degree loop 156 at a distance ( x ) from the second bend 154 , and then a second downwardly depending tine 158 . the first 148 and second 156 loops form a hinge with the upper support bar 132 resident inside them . the first 146 and second 158 tines depend downwardly and rearwardly until the distal end 144 of each tine lies in a retaining cup 160 that has been attached to the stop bar 134 . the obstruction member 120 is maintained in position on the upper support bar 132 by a pair of stop members 162 that are mounted on the upper support bar 132 on either side of the first 148 and second 156 loop of the obstruction member 120 . the stop members 160 and 162 help prevent the crab from pushing the obstruction member 120 to the side so that it can escape the crab trap 10 . the crab trap 10 is preferably made from marine grade aluminum , although a rubber coated iron would also suffice . aluminum has the advantages of corrosion resistance , light weight , fabrication ease , and cost . it also makes the upper part lighter than the bottom for stability in lowing the trap . most of the weight is in the bottom 1 inch . the theory of operation of the crab trap 10 will now be discussed with reference to fig7 - 9 . it is believed that crabs travel in and out with the tide following the direction of the current in a more or less straight line . when the crab encounters food it will stop for a meal and then continue to swim with the current . further , it is believed that crabs are reluctant to swim against the current , so that it is unlikely that they will fight the current even to reach a meal that it has passed . the same is believed to be true when the crab encounters the traps currently being used in the art . in fig7 a crab trap 163 ( as is known in the art ) is shown schematically . the large arrow 164 indicates the direction of the current and the small arrows indicate the approximate travel path of the crab . if the crab happens to encounter the gate 170 of the trap 163 while it is swimming with the current 164 , the crab will probably enter the trap 163 to partake of the bait 172 ( arrow 165 ). if the crab encounters the trap 163 near the gate 170 it may even move a bit against the current 164 to enter the trap 163 ( arrows 166 ). it is believed , however , that there is a limit to the amount of effort the crab will make to find the gate 170 , and that the further the crab is from the gate 170 when it encounters the trap 163 , the more likely it is to simply deflected off the trap 163 as it continues to move with the current 164 ( arrows 168 ). if the crab encounters the gate 174 of a rectangular style trap 12 ( as is shown schematically in fig8 ), the crab will likely enter the trap 172 . if the crab finds one of the walls 176 of the trap 172 it is theorized that it will move sideways to avoid that obstruction and it will either find a gate 174 and enter it , as shown with arrow 178 , or it will move away from the trap 172 or climb over the trap 172 where it can continue swimming with the tide 180 ( arrows 182 ). which path the crab chooses is mostly a matter of chance . since most rectangular crab trap 10s have gates 174 only on two sides 184 , if the crab encounters the rectangular trap at a side 186 that does not have a gate it will move to either end of the wall 186 and then continue on with the current 188 as shown with arrow 190 ( the current heads in a different direction for this last example ). the present invention is based on the premise that the crab trap should be designed so that instead of being handicapped by the natural tendency of the crab to travel with the current , the present invention 10 takes advantage of it . the star shape of the crab trap 10 greatly increases the area of the crab trap 10 where the crab is likely to enter a gate 14 by following the path of least resistance against the current 192 . as an example , the direction of the current is shown by the large arrow 192 in fig9 . like traps currently in use , if the tide 192 brings the crab directly to a gate 14a it will probably enter ( arrow 193 ). unlike these traps , however , if the crab encounters either of the diversion walls 22a or 22b in the diversion and collecting region 28 , it will move along the path of the least resistance to the current 192 which is inwardly along the diversion walls 22a or 22b toward the gate 14 and into the trap 10 ( arrows 194 ). in this example , the primary diversion and collecting zone 14a is within the area defined by the diversion walls 22a and 22b leading to the gate 14a on the crab trap 10 that is roughly perpendicular to the direction of the current 192 . however , the capture zone 195 for the crabs also includes a large portion of the diversion and collection regions 28b and 28e of the two gates 14b and 14e that are adjacent to the primary gate 14a . as shown by arrows 196 , if the crab passes the primary diversion and collecting zone 28a it may reach one of the secondary gates 14b or 14e and enter through it . the crab may actually move down the diversion wall 197 in the secondary diversion and collecting region 28b or 28e if the bait 198 catches its interest . however , like the traps shown in fig7 and 8 , at some point the crab will be unwilling to move against the current 192 and will instead move toward the apex 54 of the v - shaped projection 40 and continue on its way ( arrows 199 ). it should be noted that because of the symmetrical nature of the trap 10 , the crabs will be caught during both the incoming and outgoing tide regardless of the way the trap 10 falls when lowered to the ocean floor . reference will now be made to fig1 - 13 to discuss further various features of the present invention . as indicated previously , these drawings are to a reduced scale , and the various dimensions for purposes of comparison are given in the following discussion in millimeters , and relate directly to the design as shown in fig1 through 13 . with regard to the angular orientation of the diversion wall portions 22 , reference is made to fig1 where the crab trap 10 is shown in plane view somewhat semi - schematically . the vertical planes occupied by the two diversion walls 22a and 22b meet when projected further radially inwardly make an angle , indicated at 200 . this angle 200 should be less than 180 °, so that the diversion walls 22a and 22b converge radially inwardly so as to properly direct the crabs into the gate 14 . in the present embodiment , the preferred angle 200 is set about 140 °, however , this angle 200 could be decreased to angles less than 140 °. the angle 202 which is made by either or both of the diversion wall portions 22a and 22b mate with a line 204 drawn between the two juncture locations 25 of the two diverting section 16 must be greater than zero to provide the radial inward slant to lead the crabs toward the gate 14 . in the preferred embodiment shown herein , this angle 202 is about 20 °. however , this could be increased moderately , or possibly increased to a steeper angle . with regard to optimizing the configuration in relative dimensions of the components of the crab trap , a number of factors have to be considered . first , the overall lateral dimensions and height dimensions ofthe crab trap have to be kept within reasonable limits so that these could be stored on the boat , and also handled by the fishermen with relative convenient . yet , it is desirable that the containing portion 12 of the crab trap 10 have as large a volume as possible to maximize the amount of crabs which could be caught in any one fishing cycle . further , there is the consideration of costs , in that the design cannot be such that it would substantially increase the costs of materials and labor in constructing the crab trap . also , the structure must be sturdy , durable , and able to withstand substantial impacts on loads placed thereon . in fig1 , there is shown a set of arrows 206 , 208 , and 210 . these arrows 206 - 210 show the same direction travel of the crab traps as in fig9 where the direction of travel of the crab trap is straight toward a gate 14 , so that the path of travel is perpendicular to the gate 14 . ( this is the same as shown in fig1 ). there is indicated at &# 34 ; b &# 34 ; the lateral dimension of the diversion and collecting region 28 . the diameter of the circular main frame member 42 is indicated at &# 34 ; d &# 34 ; ( the region inside this circular frame member 42 comprising the major part of the containing portion 12 ). as shown in fig1 , the diameter &# 34 ; d &# 34 ; is about 77 millimeters , and the dimension at &# 34 ; b &# 34 ; is about 60 millimeters . thus , the diversion and collecting region 28 has a lateral dimension which is about 80 % of the total diameter of the circular main frame 42 . in addition , as indicated earlier in this text , there are the two regions &# 34 ; c &# 34 ;, which represent a path of travel where the crabs might be present in following the arrows indicated at 208 and 210 in fig1 . it is also quite possible that the crabs following the arrows 208 and 210 will pass just outside the adjacent juncture location 25 and enter into one of the gates 14 . also shown in fig1 are the three arrows 212 , 214 , and 216 showing possible paths of travel of the crabs when these paths of travel are parallel to a radial line extending from the center location 18 to a forward located juncture location 25 . in this instance , the crab traveling in the middle location indicated by the arrow 212 will pass by the centrally location juncture location 25 and then enter into one or the other of the gates on opposite sides of the forward juncture location 25 . those crabs which are traveling in the paths of the arrows indicated at 214 or 216 will more likely pass around the two laterally projecting diversion section 16 and not enter into the crab trap 10 . again , as with the situation shown at the arrows 206 - 210 , there is a central diverting and collecting region which has a lateral dimension which is about 80 % of the total diameter of the main frame member 42 . now reference is made to fig1 to analyze the situation where the path of travel of the crabs are along the arrows indicated at 218 , 220 and 222 , these being parallel paths which are half way between the two paths of travel indicated in fig1 . there is shown a lateral dimension &# 34 ; e &# 34 ; which extends from the most forward juncture location 25 to the far edge 224 of the more forward gate 14 . this lateral dimension &# 34 ; e &# 34 ; represents a collecting zone where there is a higher likelihood of having the crabs enter the more forward gate 14 . in addition , there is the region indicated by the lateral dimension &# 34 ; f &# 34 ; in fig1 , where the gate aligned with the path defined by the arrow 220 is at a sharper angle , but yet in a position where crabs could enter . then , there is the diverting wall 22 , the planar orientation thereof ( shown at 226 ) being perpendicular to the path as shown by the arrow 222 . the crabs could be diverted possibly to the right or the left and it could be presumed that a certain percentage of these crabs would pass through the more forward gate 14 . the lateral dimension of the collecting region &# 34 ; e &# 34 ; is 38 millimeters ( about half of the dimension &# 34 ; d &# 34 ;), the lateral dimension &# 34 ; f &# 34 ;, where there is still a reasonable likelihood of catching the crabs is 20 millimeters , while the dimension at &# 34 ; g &# 34 ; is 19 millimeters . from the above discussion , it is apparent that with the configuration of this preferred embodiment of the crab trap 10 , no matter how the crab trap is oriented with respect to the floor of the ocean current ( and hence the path of travel of the crabs ), there is a relatively large effective collecting area or areas where the crab would have a high likelihood or a reasonable likelihood of entering the adjacent gate 14 . to discuss another design feature of the preferred embodiment of this invention , reference is now made to fig1 . it was indicated previously that one of the design criteria is that the overall size of the crab trap should not be so great as to make it too bulky to be conveniently carried on the ship or too large or unwielding to handle . the crab trap 10 of the present invention has a main frame 32 , and the region defined by the circular frame member represents the main containing area . the volume within the diverting section 16 provides additional volume to the containing area , however . as indicated previously the dimension &# 34 ; d &# 34 ; is 79 millimeters in this drawing of fig1 which is to scale . the maximum crosswise dimension of the crab trap 10 as shown in fig1 is the dimension &# 34 ; h &# 34 ; which is across two juncture locations 25 , and in this drawing of figure measures 100 millimeters . the next largest dimension is indicated at &# 34 ; k &# 34 ;, and this measures 95 millimeters . thus , in terms of maximum lateral dimension , in the present invention these two dimensions are 100 and 95 millimeters compared to 77 millimeters which is the diameter . however , it should be noted that the overall dimension of the crab trap 12 has substantial indentations around the perimeter , so that these can be grouped more closely together as these are being positioned side by side . in addition , as indicated above , the volume contained with the diversion sections 16 adds to the overall containing capacity of the crab trap 10 . to carry this analysis further , references is now made to fig1 . one possible design change is to bring the two diversion wall end portions 26 closer together . within the broader scope of the present invention , it may be possible to move the two wall sections 22 of any one diverting section 16 closer together so that these would in effect simply comprise a single wall extending radially from the center line 18 . if this were done , it would not be practical to increase the lateral dimensions of the gates 14 so that these would reach to the inner ends of the wall section 16 , since the gates 14 would interfere with each other as they swing inwardly . in some situations , substituting the single wall for the diverting section 16 instead of the two diverging slanting wall portions 22 , the angular orientation of the single wall portion may be such so that it would provide advantages in certain situations where the flow of the current is in a particular direction . on the other hand , there would be several disadvantages . for example , the two wall sections 22 structurally form a triangular configuration which make these particularly sturdy , as opposed to cantilevering a single wall from the main frame members 42 and 36 . further , the volume provided by the present configuration of the diversion sections 16 also serves as part of the containing area , thus increasing the overall of the containing area of the trap 10 . further , these diverting sections 16 have the added advantage of providing a convenient place for the escape rings 92 to be placed . another possible design option is to extend the radial dimension of each of the diverting sections 16 further away from the center location 18 . as shown in fig1 , the diverting wall portions 22 have been lengthened to move the juncture location 25 further outwardly . these are shown at 22 &# 39 ; and 25 &# 39 ;. let us examine the effect of this on the operation , configuration and size of the crab trap 10 . first , we look at the overall increase in the dimensions . the maximum lateral dimension of the expanded crab trap as shown in fig1 is indicated at &# 34 ; m &# 34 ;, and this is 133 millimeters , as opposed to 77 millimeters for the diameter of the main frame member 42 which defines the main collecting area . the other dimension is indicated at &# 34 ; n &# 34 ;, and this dimension is 126 millimeters . thus , the rectangle which would be defined by these dimensions would be 133 millimeters by 126 millimeters for a total area of 16 , 800 , as opposed to the corresponding rectangular area ( more precisely square area ) occupied by a circular configuration having the diameter of the main frame 42 , this rectangular area ( more precisely a square area ) being about 5 , 900 millimeters . ( it should be kept in mind that these millimeter dimensions are simply given in this instance to give relative values , so that these correspond exactly to the scale shown in the drawings of fig0 through 13 . obviously , the dimension of the full crab trap would be much larger .) thus , the maximum rectangular area defined by the larger scale crab trap in fig1 ( 16 , 800 ) is 285 % of the rectangular area that would be occupied by a circular crab trap having a diameter of 77 millimeters which would be the same as the size of the main frame member 42 . next we examine the lateral areas of the diversion and collecting areas . with further reference to fig1 , when the path is directly toward the diverting section 16 &# 39 ;, as indicated by the arrow 230 in fig1 , the lateral dimension of the effective diverting area is indicated at &# 34 ; p &# 34 ;, and is equal to 60 millimeters , which is substantially the same as lateral dimension &# 34 ; b &# 34 ; as shown in fig1 for a comparable operation of the crab trap configuration shown in fig1 . however , there may be some advantage for the large configuration in fig1 , in that the surfaces 232 of the laterally extending sections 16 &# 39 ; may divert a portion of the crabs into the gates 16 that are adjacent to the diverting section 16 closest toward the direction of the current indicated at 230 . let us now consider the situation where the current is in the direction indicated at 234 in fig1 . the lateral dimension of the diverting and collection area in this instance is indicated at &# 34 ; s &# 34 ;, which is a value of 79 millimeters , in comparison to a comparable value of the lateral dimension &# 34 ; b &# 34 ; shown in fig1 , which is 60 millimeters . thus , there is an increase of about 31 %. thus , the lateral dimensions of the diversion and collecting areas can be increased by moving the juncture points 25 further radially outwardly . however , there is no increase in the volume of the main collecting area within the main frame member 42 , except for the small additional volume which is given by extending the diversion sections 16 out to the location of 16 &# 39 ;. the radius from the center location 18 to the outer edge of the main frame member 42 indicated at &# 34 ; r &# 34 ; in fig1 is about 39 millimeters . the radial distance of the juncture location of 25 &# 39 ; of the extended diverting section 16 &# 39 ; indicated at &# 34 ; u &# 34 ; is 68 millimeters . present analysis would indicate that the overall radial length of each diverting section 16 should be no greater than about equal of the radius of the main containing section of the crab trap ( indicated at &# 34 ; r &# 34 ; in fig1 . the angle formed by the planes occupied by two adjacent wall portions 28a and 28b that form a single diversion and collecting area 28 ( this angle being indicated at 200 in fig1 ) should be less than 180 °, and not less than about 90 °. the angle 200 could be made less than 90 °, and within the scope of the present invention , this is possible , even to lower this angled was much as 45 °. however , present design analysis indicates that the offsetting design compromises that would be made would dictate against this . also , the angle 202 ( shown in fig1 ) ( the angle made by the line 204 between adjacent juncture locations 50 ) and the plane either of the diverting wall portion 22a or 22b should be greater than zero , and desirably not greater than 45 °. again , these could be increased beyond that , but the overall design compromises that would be required do not , at the present , indicate that this would be desirable . it is obvious that various modification could be made to the present invention without departing from the basic teachings thereof . for example , while present analysis indicates that the preferred embodiment shown herein , where there are five gates 14 and five diversion sections 16 , these could be increased in number , or possibly decreased . further , the angular position of the diversion wall portions 22 could be modified . also , the diversion sections 16 could have their radial dimensions increased or decreased ( the radial dimension being the distance from the center location 18 of the crab trap to the juncture location 25 . while this invention has been described in terms of a preferred embodiment , it is contemplated that persons reading the preceding description and studying the drawing will realize various alterations , permutations and modifications thereof . it is therefore intended that the following appended claims are interpreted as including all such alterations and modifications as fall within the true spirit and scope of the present invention .
a crab trap shaped like a star formed from generally curved segments apexes of the star . these curved segments define the shape of the side walls of the trap which gently converge to a entrance tunnel and opening that leads to the interior of the trap . each opening has a one - way gate so that the crustacean can enter but cannot escape from the trap . with the exception of the apexes , if the crustacean contacts any part of the side wall of the trap , the gentle curve of that segment of the side wall will urge the crustacean toward the entrance tunnel for that portion of the trap . an access door is provided in the top of the trap that is held closed by a spring - loaded lock finger . to open the access door , the spring - loaded lock finger is retracted and the access door is pulled open by hand or by the resilient nature of the netting that surrounds the frame of the trap . the crab trap also includes a number of escape rings that are sized according to local fishing regulations to permit immature crabs to escape the trap while retaining the mature crustaceans . these escape rings can easily be changed for using the traps in different jurisdictions with different size restrictions .