the present invention offers significant improvements in hunting aids by providing , in one embodiment , the ability to remove the bladder and rectum of the animal without piercing the bladder during field dressing . a second embodiment allows one hunter to first drag an animal and then hang the animal using the same device . the device can also accommodate dragging a large animal using two hunters . fig1 shows one embodiment of the hanging / dragging device of the invention as reference numeral 10 . the device 10 has a handle 1 made up of a handle body 2 and a pair of angled end portions 3 . each of the end portions 3 terminate in an eye 5 . preferably , the handle is about six inches in length , but other dimensions can be used . the body 2 also has a centrally positioned eye 7 . a strap 9 is shown looped in the eye 7 . the eye 7 and strap 9 can act as a grip for a hunter to drag one or more animals as described below . alternatively , a hunter could merely grab the handle 10 and drag the animal . as explained below , the eye 7 , with or without the strap 9 , can be used to support the handle 1 for hanging . in addition , while a flexible strap is shown , other flexible or rigid items could be used with the eye for dragging and / or hanging , e . g ., a metal ring large enough to accommodate a person &# 39 ; s hand , a rope or cable , or the like . further , the eye 7 could be replaced with openings in the handle body 2 or slots or grooves in the body surface , the openings or slots / grooves interfacing with a strap , hook , cable , or the like to support the handle and hooks . the body 2 and end portions 3 are preferably an integral one - piece design and made of a material capable of withstanding the forces necessary to drag and hang an animal . a preferred material would be a metal , either wrought with the eyes attached by welding , a casting , or the like . while the end portions 3 are angled with respect to a longitudinal axis of the body 1 , they could extend at right angles to the axis of the body 1 , or be aligned therewith . when the end portions 3 are aligned with the body 1 , changes in the cable length or positioning of the couplers as described below may be necessary . the end portions 3 also have a pair of cylindrical members 11 that are similar to pipe couplings , hereinafter couplers . the internal diameter of the couplers 11 is sized to slidably receive an end portion 13 of the hooks 16 . referring to fig1 and 2 , the hooks 16 are secured in the couplers 11 by cotter pins 17 . the cotter pins 17 extend through openings 19 in the couplers 11 , and openings 21 in the hooks 16 . the free ends 23 of the pins 17 are folded to prevent the pins 17 from sliding out of the openings 19 and 21 . the couplers 11 can be attached to the end portions 3 in any fashion , e . g ., welding , fasteners , etc . in the alternative , the couplers 11 could be an integral part of the end portions 3 such that each would be a part of the end portion 3 , and the eye 5 would then extend from the couplers as shown in fig3 . the hooks 16 function in concert with the eye 7 to hang one or more animals . that is , a tree or the other elevated structure supports the body 1 via the eye 7 and the rope 9 . the field dressed animal is then attached to the hook end 15 of the hook 16 to support the animal off the ground , e . g ., one hook in each hind leg of the animal , or one hook in one animal . other modes can be used to support the device using the handle body 2 as noted above . the eyes 5 of the end portions 3 cooperate with hooks 27 and cables 29 to drag the animal to a selected site . one set of hooks 27 engage the eyes 5 with the other set being used to engage the field dressed animal , e . g ., the hind legs of the animal . the cables 29 interconnect the hooks 27 for dragging . the attachment of the hooks 27 to the cables 29 can be done in any fashion , either so that the cables are easily removed from the hooks or with the cable permanently attached to the hooks . preferably the cables are about two feet in length , but other lengths can be used . alternative designs for the hooks 27 can be employed , e . g ., closed hooks having a pivoting member to allow hook attachment and release . although cables are exemplified , other items can be used , chains , wire , etc . the device 10 also facilitates a two - person drag . in this mode , the pins 17 are removed , the hooks 16 are rotated 180 ° so that the end 31 of the hook portion 15 is facing toward the eye 5 , and the pins 17 are replaced . this then allows each of a pair of hunters to grasp each hook portion 15 and drag the animal or animals . when the animal is dragged to the desired site , the pins 17 are removed , the hooks 16 are rotated back to the orientation shown in fig1 and the pins 17 are replaced for hanging . the animal ( s ) can then be hung . it should be understood that other designs than the eyes 5 could be employed to connect the hooks 27 and cables 29 . likewise , the eye 7 could be replaced with another design to allow for support of the handle 1 . other attachments can be used in place of the cotter pins to removably secure the hooks 16 the end portions 3 . in addition , while couplers are shown , other shapes could be employed , e . g ., square cross sections , to couple the hooks to the end portions 3 . referring now to fig4 a cutting device designated by the reference number 50 is shown in perspective . the device 50 is designed to remove the anal tract and the bladder from an animal as described below . the device 50 is metallic and has a cylindrical body 51 having a circular cutting edge 53 at one end thereof . extending from the edge 53 are a pair of rods 57 , each terminating in a handle 59 . the rods 57 can be attached to the body 51 and handle 59 in any fashion , but is preferred that the connections are welds . in use and as part of field dressing an animal , e . g ., a deer or hog , the cutting device is used to remove the rectum or anal tract and bladder at one time . using prior art techniques , the anus is removed by cutting around it with a small knife from the interior or exterior of the animal . once the cutting is complete , the anus is drawn into the body cavity , and it becomes free with the intestines . this technique runs the risk of piercing the bladder and ruining the animal meat . this disadvantage is overcome by the cutting tool of the invention . in use , the edge 53 is placed around the anus from the outside of the deer . with the cutting edge in contact with the deer , the handle 59 is rotated to effectively cut out the anus . unlike a knife edge being wielded by a hunter , the configuration of the circular cutting edge minimizes the chances of piercing the bladder . in fact , when rotating the cutting device and moving it through the deer , the bladder passes through the center of the cylinder 51 . thus , the edge 53 is spaced from the bladder during the rotating and cutting action , thereby minimizing bladder contact . after a number of uses , the edge 53 can be honed again to provide a sharp edge for continued cutting . fig5 shows another embodiment of the cutting device of fig4 wherein a replaceable cutting blade is used instead of the integral cutting edge 53 . in this embodiment , a portion of a cylinder 51 ′ is shown . the cylinder 51 ′ is employed in conjunction with a cylindrical cutting blade 61 having a cutting edge 63 . the blade 61 is sized to fit snugly within the cylinder 51 ′ so that the proper cutting diameter is attained . in the fig4 embodiment , the blade has a number of openings 67 ( one shown in fig5 ). the cylinder 51 ′ has one threaded opening 69 for every opening 67 in the blade 61 . a set screw 65 is provided , preferably with a lip or protrusion to wedge the blade 61 against the inner wall 71 of the cylinder 51 ′ when the set screw 65 is threaded into the opening 69 . in this embodiment , once the blade 61 is worn out , it can be easily removed and replaced with another blade by removing the set screw 65 , removing the old blade , installing a new blade , and reinserting the set screw 65 . the number of openings in the blade 61 and cylinder 51 ′ can vary from at least two up to as many as eight or more . fewer openings are desired since this makes it easier to remove and replace the blade . it should also be understood that the attachment between the blade 61 and the cylinder 51 ′ is exemplary , and other fastening techniques can be used to removably secure the blade 61 to the cylinder 51 ′. for example , a nut and bolt arrangement could be employed . although the dimensions for the device 50 can vary , preferred dimensions include a diameter of around 2 to 2 . 5 inches for the cylinder 51 , 51 ′, a length of about 12 to 15 inches for the rods with a rod diameter of about ¼ inch , and a length of about 4 to 6 inches for the handle , with a handle diameter of ¼ inch . the diameter of the cylinder should be just large enough to surround the anus and may vary depending on the animal being hunted . some devices may have to have bigger diameters than others depending on size of the animals , and the devices could be made with different diameters to suit different animals . the rod length is important to since there must be enough space between the handle 59 and edge 55 to allow the cutting edge to pass around the anus and separate it from the animal body , with the handle or rods interfering with the path of travel of the cutting device when being used . further , while the handle and rods are described with a diameter , other cross sectional shaped members can be used , square , rectangular , etc . fig6 shows another embodiment 70 wherein the handle is a - shaped , rather than the shape of fig1 . this embodiment is advantageous since the hooks 16 can be positioned as shown for a one - man drag , wherein the animal would connect to the peak of the frame at 73 . in the position designated by the reference numeral 80 , the hooks can be rotated for a two man drag wherein the animal or animals would be linked at points 75 using cables or the like . for hanging , the hooks 16 are rotated from the position designated by 80 , just as shown in fig1 . the a - frame is advantageous in that it is easier to manufacture , and is a more compact design when one person is using it for dragging . with a one man drag , only one hook or the like is needed to connect the animal to the a - frame , whereas a two man drag would employ a pair of hooks or the like . as such , an invention has been disclosed in terms of preferred embodiments thereof which fulfills each and every one of the objects of the present invention as set forth above and provides new and improved hunting aids for field dressing and dragging and hanging the field dressed animal . of course , various changes , modifications and alterations from the teachings of the present invention may be contemplated by those skilled in the art without departing from the intended spirit and scope thereof . it is intended that the present invention only be limited by the terms of the appended claims .
a combination hanging and dragging hunting aid comprises a handle having a pair of opposing free ends . the handle has means for supporting the handle such as a loop or other surface . a pair of removable hooks are attached to each free end of the handle , with the hooks being adapted to hook to an animal so that the animal can be hung via the handle . one or more flexible members are provided that can extends from one or more end of the handle . the flexible member terminates in a hook for attaching to a portion of an animal to allow the animal to be dragged using the handle . by selecting the proper position of the hooks , the animal can be first dragged to a site , and then , by repositioning the hooks , the animal can be hung up .