Let $A$ be a non-zero abelian variety defined over a number field $F$. Let $v$ be a finite place of $F$, and let $f\_v(A)$ be the usual conductor exponent of $A$ at $v$ (defined e.g. on p.500 of the article of Serre and Tate on good reduction of abelian varieties).


Questions (a): Let $B$ be a non-zero abelian variety over $F$. Is it true that $$f\_v(A\times\_F B)=f\_v(A)+f\_v(B)?$$ If not, what is the relation of $f\_v(A\times\_F B)$ to $f\_v(A)$ and $f\_v(B)$? 


Suppose $A=E$ has dimension one (i.e. $A$ is an elliptic curve). Then $f\_v(E)=1$ if and only if $E$ has semi-stable bad reduction at $v$.


Question (b): For arbitrary $A$ as above, can one say something similar (probably involving $dim(A)$) about $f\_v$ in the case when $A$ has semi-stable reduction at $v$?



Conductor of abelian varieties
The answer to (a) is yes. The conductor is given by the representation of an inertia group $I\_v$ in the Tate module. As $T\_\ell(A\times B)=T\_\ell(A)\times T\_\ell(B)$, the additivity is easy to see from definition (Serre: Facteurs locaux des fonctions zêta des variétés algébriques, §2. The definition you cite is the same, but only when there is potentially good reduction). 


For (b): let $t$ (resp. $u$) be the toric (resp. unipotent) rank of $A$ at $v$ (this means that the fiber at $v$ of the identity component of the Néron model of $A$ is extension an abelian variety by the product of a torus of dimension $t$ and a unipotent group of dimension $u$), then 
$$f\_v(A)=t+2u+\delta\_v$$ 
where $\delta\_v$ is the Swan conductor. If $f\_v=0$, then $A$ has good reduction. If $f\_v=1$, then $u=0$ and by definition $A$ has semi-stable bad reduction at $v$ (equal to the extension of an abelian variety of dimension $\dim A -1$ by a torus of dimension $1$). 


If $f\_v(A)\ge 2$, this doesn't imply semi-stable reduction in general. You can have $u=1$, $t=\delta\_v=0$ and $f\_v(A)=2=\dim A$: e.g. if $A$ is the Jacobian of the curve $y^2=(x^3+1)(x^3+p)$, $p>3$, over $\mathbb Q$. 


