This question is motivated by the physical description of magnetic monopoles. I will give the motivation, but you can also jump to the last section.


Let us recall Maxwell’s equations: Given a semi-riemannian 4-manifold and a 3-form $j$. We describe the field-strength differential form $F$ as a solution of the equations


$\mathrm{d}F=0$


$\mathrm{d}\star F=j$ (where $\star$ denotes the Hodge star).


If the second de-Rham-cohomology vanishes (for example in Minkowski space), $F$ is exact and we can write it as $F=\mathrm{d}A$, where $A$ denotes a 1-form.


Now let us consider monopoles: We use two 3-forms $j\_m$ (magnetic current) and $j\_e$ (electric current) and consider the equations


$\mathrm{d}F=j\_m$


$\mathrm{d}\star F=j\_e$.


Essentially, it is described in [this paper](http://arxiv.org/pdf/math-ph/0203043v1.pdf), but the author Frédéric Moulin (a physicist) uses coordinates. Now he assumes that (in Minkowski space) $F$ can be decomposed using two potentials — into an exact (in the image of the derivative) and a coexact (in the image of the coderivative) form: $F=\mathrm{d}A-\star\mathrm{d}C$. Is there a mathematical justification for this assumption (maybe it is just very pragmatic)?


### The actual question


Given a 2-form $F$ on 4-dimensional Minkowski space (more generally: semi-riemannian manifolds)—are there any known conditions such that $F$ decomposes into an exact and a coexact form: $F=\mathrm{d}A+\star\mathrm{d}C$)?


For *compact riemannian* manifolds there is the well-known Hodge decomposition: There is always a decomposition into an exact, a coexact and a harmonic form. In the non-compact case you might be able to get rid of the harmonic form by only considering “rapidly decaying” forms ([Wikipedia suggests that](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Helmholtz_decomposition#Differential_forms), but I do not have a good reference, in euclidean space there is the Helmholtz decomposition, and non-trivial (smooth) harmonic 1-forms do not vanish at infinity).


That is why I also ask: Are there “rapidly decaying” harmonic 2-forms in Minkowski space? Any references where I could see what is known about harmonic forms and Hodge theory in the semi-riemannian case are also welcome.



Hodge decomposition in Minkowski space
1. There are no "rapid decaying harmonic 2-forms" in Minkowski space. 


Consider the expression 
$$ 0 = \mathrm{d} \star \mathrm{d} F = \partial^i \partial\_{[i}F\_{jk]} = \frac13 (\Box F\_{jk} + \partial\_j \partial^i F\_{ki} + \partial\_k \partial^i F\_{ij})$$
The second and third terms in the parentheses vanish by $\mathrm{d}\star F = 0$, so we see that over Minkowski space, Maxwell's equation implies that the components of the Faraday tensor must solve a linear wave equation. 


(In the case you have source, you also see that the equations are equivalent to $\Box F\_{jk} = J\_{jk}$ where $J\_{jk}$ is built out of the magnetic and electric currents in the appropriate way.)


Now, the linear decay estimates for the wave equation (that $|F| \sim \frac{1}{1+|t|}$) is sharp. In fact, by the finite speed of propagation + strong Huygens principle, if $F$ decays too rapidly in time, conservation of energy immediately implies that $F$ must vanish identically! 


(If you don't want to go through the wave equation, you can also argue through the Maxwell equation by considering the energy integrals.)
2. Conservation of energy also implies that over Minkowski space $\mathbb{R}^{1,3}$ there cannot exist a non-vanishing "harmonic" form with finite space-time $L^2$ norm. So harmonic forms cannot exist, even in a class that is not necessary "rapidly" decaying.
3. Now, under the influence of external sources $j\_e$ and $j\_m$, you can pose the ansatz (by linearity of the equations) $F = G + H$, where 
$$ \begin{align}
\mathrm{d} G & = j\_e & \mathrm{d} H & = 0 \newline
\mathrm{d} \star G & = 0 & \mathrm{d} \star H &= j\_m
\end{align} $$
Then the cohomology result you mentioned implies that $H = \mathrm{d}A$ and $\star G = \mathrm{d}C$ for $A,C$. 
The difference of the true solution with your ansatz is $\tilde{F} - F$ a harmonic two form, which can be completely absorbed into the electric potential $A$ if you want...


So the claimed decomposition is available whenever it is possible to solve the equations (possibly nonuniquely) for $G$ and $H$. For compatible source terms (you need $\mathrm{d} j\_e =0 = \mathrm{d} j\_m$ as a necessary condition) which are $L^1$ in space-time, the existence of a solution follows from the well-posedness of the corresponding Cauchy problem, for example.
4. Much of "Hodge theory" is false for "compact semi-Riemannian manifolds" in general. For example, there is no good connection between the cohomology and the number of harmonic forms. (Simplest example: on any compact Riemannian manifold the only harmonic functions are constants. But take, for example, the torus $\mathbb{T}^2 = \mathbb{S}^1\times\mathbb{S}^1$ with the Lorentzian metric $\mathrm{d}t^2 - \mathrm{d}x^2$. Then for any $k$ the function $\sin (kx) \sin(kt)$ is "harmonic", and they are linearly independent over $L^2$. )
5. Number 4 above also implies that the Hodge decomposition is not true for general compact semi-Riemannian manifolds. Consider the exact same $\mathbb{T}^2$ as above. Let $\alpha$ be the one form $\sin(t) \cos(x) \mathrm{d}t$. We have that
$$ \mathrm{d}\alpha = \sin(t) \sin(x) \mathrm{d}t\wedge \mathrm{d}x \qquad \mathrm{d}\star \alpha = \cos(t) \cos(x) \mathrm{d}t \wedge \mathrm{d}x$$
To allow a Hodge decomposition requires that there exists $A$ and $C$, scalars, such that $$\mathrm{d}\star\mathrm{d}C = \mathrm{d}\alpha \implies \Box C = \pm \sin(t)\sin(x) $$
and
$$ \mathrm{d}\star \mathrm{d}A = \mathrm{d}\star\alpha \implies \Box A = \pm \cos(t) \cos(x) $$
where $\Box$ is the wave operator $\partial\_t^2 - \partial\_x^2$. 


Now taking Fourier transform (since we would desire $C$ and $A$ be in $L^2$ at least), we see that we have a problem. If $f\in L^2(\mathbb{T}^2)$ we have
$$ \widehat{\Box f} = -(\tau^2 - \xi^2)\widehat{f} = 0 \qquad\text{ whenever } |\tau| = |\xi| $$
But the Fourier support of $\sin(t)\sin(x)$ and $\cos(t)\cos(x)$ are precisely when $\tau = \xi = 1$. So there in fact does *not* exist a Hodge-like decomposition for the $C^\infty$ form $\alpha$.


The above just goes to say that


1. You are not going to find anything in the literature concerning Hodge decomposition for general compact semi-Riemannian manifolds, as such as theory does not exist
2. You are also unlikely to find literature that studies the Hodge decomposition in the non-compact case in general: on non-compact manifolds causality violations (closed time-like curves, for example) can, in principle, also cause problems with solving the wave equation (both homogeneous and inhomogeneous), which will prevent an analogue for Hodge decomposition to hold.
3. Your best bet, in so far as two-forms are concerned, are precisely the mathematical-physics literature concerning Maxwell equations over globally hyperbolic Lorentzian manifolds. For these manifolds, at least in principle, some version of the Hodge decomposition can be had by solving the appropriate initial value problems (something like $\Box C = j\_e, \Box A = j\_m, \mathrm{d}F\_0 = 0 = \mathrm{d}\star F\_0$ where $F\_0$ is the harmonic part, with initial data prescribed so that the data for $C$ and $A$ vanishes on the initial surface and $F\_0$ is equal to $F$ on the initial surface).


