$\DeclareMathOperator\Spec{Spec}$Let $L \rightarrow X$ be an ample line bundle over $X$ which is a compact complex manifold. Suppose that I have a ***first-order*** deformation of the pair $(X,L)$. When does this first-order deformation gives rise to a **complex** deformation of the pair $(X,L)$ in the sense of Kodaira and Spencer?
If one considers the extension
$$ 0 \rightarrow \mathcal{O}\_X \rightarrow \mathcal{E}\_L \rightarrow T\_X \rightarrow 0$$
defined by the first Chern class of $L$,
then $H^2(X, \mathcal{E}\_L)$ is an obstruction space for the functor of **infinitesimal deformations** of $(X,L)$. Is $H^2(X, \mathcal{E}\_L)=0$ sufficient to ensure the existence of an associated **complex** deformation?


I took the definitions from Sernesi's book. I call a deformation of $X$ a flat surjective morphism $$\mathcal{X} \rightarrow \Delta$$ with $X \rightarrow \Spec(\mathbb{C})$ the central fiber. Then the deformation is:


* "**first-order**" if $\Delta=\Spec(\mathbb{C}[\epsilon])$
* "**infinitesimal**" if $\Delta=\Spec(A)$ with $A$ a local artinian $\mathbb{C}$-algebra.
* "**complex**" if $\Delta$ is a complex manifold.


In that case the definition of the morphism $$\mathcal{X} \rightarrow \Delta$$ is to be a proper submersion.


The point that I do not understand is how do I go from infinitesimal to complex?



From first-order deformation to complex deformation of a pair $(X,L)$
What you are typically looking for is a "true" deformation over an algebraic or analytic pointed curve $(T, 0)$ such that the tangent vector to $T$ at $0$ corresponds to the infinitesimal deformation you have.


The functor of infinitesimal deformations of a pair $(X, L)$ admits a semiuniversal formal deformation (see e.g. Sernesi's book page 146). Assuming $(X, L)$ is unobstructed (which is equivalent to saying that the base of the semiuniversal formal deformation is the Spec of a power series ring) then $H^1(X, \mathcal E\_L)$ is the tangent space to the base of this deformation.


Now in order to construct $(T, 0)$:


1. you can sometimes make an ad-hoc argument using some suitable Hilbert space, or
2. you can use the extremely powerful Artin's approximation and algebraization theorems (see Sernesi's book pages 87, 88).
Artin's theorems ensures the existence of a "true" algebraic (I think there are also analytic versions of Artin's theorems) deformation provided the semiuniversal formal deformation is effective (see Sernesi's book page 82, for a Grothendieck's criterion for effectiveness).
This way you get an algebraic deformation over a smooth base, whose tangent space at a point $0$ is $H^1(X, \mathcal E\_L)$, so you can get a path through $0$ pointing at your infinitesimal deformation.


