I have a problem I have been stuck with since several weeks now, and yet I believe it should be easy to specialists.


Let $k$ be an algebraically closed field, $m$ and $n$ two integers. Let $H\_1,\dots,H\_m$ be $m$ (smooth if that helps) hypersurfaces of degrees $d\_1, \dots,d\_m$ in the projective space $\mathbb P^n$ over $k$. Let $X$ be the intersection $H\_1 \cap \dots \cap H\_n$, and for $\ell$ any fixed auxiliary prime different from the characteristic of $k$, let $b\_i$ be the Betti numbers of $X$ (rank of 
$H^i\_\text{ét}(X,\mathbb Z\_\ell)$). The question is:



> 
> Is there a constant $c(m,d\_1,\dots,d\_n)$ depending on the number of hypersurfaces $m$ and their degrees $d\_i$ but not on the dimension $n$ of the ambient projective space such that all the Betti numbers $b\_i$ are less than $c(m,d\_1,\dots,d\_n)$?
> 
> 
> 


I am actually interested in the case where $b\_1=\dots=b\_m=2$, that is $X$ is an intersection of $m$ quadrics. For example, when $m=1$ and $d\_1=2$, $X$ is a smooth quadrics, the cohomology of $X$ is well-known (see e.g. Miles Reid's thesis) and the Betti numbers are always $0$, $1$ or $2$, independently of the dimension $n-1$ of $X$. Still when $m=1$ but with $d\_1$ arbitrary, I know that by Lefschetz's theorem $b\_i=0$ or $1$ except for $i=n-1$, and I presume there is a formula for $b\_{n-1}$ in terms of the degree $d\_1$, but independent of the dimension $n$ -- Yet i couldn't find this formula in my memory nor on the web.


Though I am primarily interested in a general answer (in the case of quadrics), please feel free to assume anything that can help you ($X$ smooth, complete intersection, $m=1$, $m=2$ etc.) or replace the étale cohomology by your preferred one. 


PS: after some hesitation, I have added the number theory tag because when the $H\_i$ are defined over a finite field $\mathbb F\_q$ (and $k$ is the algebraic closure of $\mathbb F\_q$) the question is closely related (by Grothendieck's Lefschetz fixed points formula) to bounds on the number of points on $X(\mathbb F)$. For example, a positive answer would imply that for $n$ large enough with respects to $m$ and the $d\_i$, $X(\mathbb F\_q)$ is not-empty.


EDIT: Quochuan's reply has shown that the answer to the question is "no" for an hyper surface of degree $d>2$. He also pointed out that it was easy to compute the cohomology for a complete intersection. Following his suggestion, and this related [question](https://mathoverflow.net/questions/79740/cohomology-of-complete-intersections), one sees that the answer is also no for the complete intersection of two or more quadrics. In this case, if I'm not mistaken, the cohomology in middle degree grows polynomially in $n$. Anyway, the bottom line is that the case of quadrics is unique in his genre. 



Upper bound on Betti numbers of an intersection of hypersurfaces (or quadrics)
No. When $m = 1$ and $d \ge 3$ the Betti numbers grow exponentially in $n$; see, for example, [this blog post](https://qchu.wordpress.com/2014/06/16/hypersurfaces-4-manifolds-and-characteristic-classes/) for the computation for smooth hypersurfaces (which is over $\mathbb{C}$, but then we can appeal to the Weil conjectures). As you say, you only need the middle Betti number, or equivalently the Euler characteristic, and you can compute this by computing the Chern classes. This is very classical and I think it even appears in Weil's paper introducing the Weil conjectures, maybe for the special case of Fermat hypersurfaces. The computation for smooth complete intersections is very similar, and beyond that I don't know. 


As far as guaranteeing that there are points on a variety over a finite field, you can appeal to the [Chevalley-Warning theorem](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chevalley%E2%80%93Warning_theorem), which makes the guarantee you describe. 


