Let us consider the equation:
$$
\dot{x}\_i = F\_i(x)
$$
with $x\in \mathbb{R}^n$ and $i=1\dots n$, and the equation for small displacements:
$$
\dot{\delta x} = \sum\_j \frac{\partial}{\partial x\_j} F\_i(x) \delta x\_j
$$
I often read (and checked in practice) the following: starting from a random initial $\delta x$, for increasing time it approaches a given "regime", such that its growth is given by the largest Lyapunov exponent $\lambda\_1$.


However, in principle, it should be possible to find a particular $\delta x$ such that it will evolve with a different (lower) Lyapunov exponent $\lambda\_2<\lambda\_1$. Such initial vector $\delta x(t=0)$ could depend on the initial $x(t=0)$.


My first question is the following: is such a vector really dependent on $x(t=0)$, or it is constant for every $x$?


The question could appear strange, but it is related to the definition of "Lyapunov vector" that I saw often. This definition is based on the following procedure. First, a matrix $Y\_{i,j}(t)$ is considered, with equation:
$$ 
\dot{Y\_{i,j}}= \sum\_k \frac{\partial}{\partial x\_k} F\_i Y\_{k,j}
$$
Then a matrix $M$ is defined as:
$$
M = \lim\_{t\to +\infty} \frac{\log Y Y^T}{t}
$$
According to this definition, the Lyapunov exponents and vectors are the eigenvalues and eigenvectors of $M$. For this reason, I would say that the Lyapunov vector is a single vector for the whole trajectory, not depending on $x$. Hence my question about its relation with the above-mentioned vector field $\delta x(x)$.


Since I think that the vector field $\delta x(x)$ is not the Lyapunov exponent, I'm asking about literature about it, where the properties of such a field are studied and discussed.



Starting vector in Lyapunov exponents evaluation
To begin with, there is no reason whatsoever for the dynamical system determined by an **arbitrary** vector field on $\mathbb R^n$ to be Lyapunov regular.


If the system is Lyapunov regular, then the associated filtrations of the tangent space start from the bottom of the Lyapunov spectrum. If you are interested just in the top Lyapunov exponents (assuming for simplicity that they are simple - I use plural because they may very well depend on the starting point), then you will have an $(n-1)$-dimensional distribution in the tangent bundle (generated by the directions with the lower exponents), and you are asking about (the existence of?) a vector field consisting of tangent vectors outside of this distribution. Probably, you would also want this field to be invariant with respect to the dynamics.


If you think about your questions in the coordinate-free form, then you will see that there is no reason for the answer to question (1) to be positive. Indeed, the very notion of a "constant" (or parallel, in a more rigorous terminology) vector field depends on the linear structure on $\mathbb R^n$ (how do you identify tangent vectors at different points? what happens if one changes coordinates by applying a diffeomorphism of $\mathbb R^n$?).


(2) What do you mean by "the Lyapunov vector"?


(3) The distributions determined by the Lyapunov filtration have been considered in numerous publications - see, for instance [Smooth ergodic theory and nonuniformly hyperbolic dynamics by Barreira & Pesin](http://www.personal.psu.edu/ybp1/papers_www/BP-survey.pdf) and the references therein.


EDIT (after OP's clarifications). The vector field you are talking about is then the field orthogonal to the distribution I mentioned (the difference is that you are implicitly using the standard Euclidean structure; it seems to be a very natural thing until you think about what happens if one changes coordinates). The argument I had outlined shows that there is no reason for this vector field to be constant (in your terminology).


By the way, your definition of Lyapunov regularity in terms of the matrix $M$ is incomplete. The missing condition is that the increments $Y\_t^{-1}Y\_{t+1}$ have to be subexponential (although it is usually satisfied automatically - for instance, in your situation it would follow from the boundedness of $F\_i$ - it does not have to hold in general). The simplest example is
$$
Y\_t=\begin{pmatrix}1 & 0 \\ e^t & 1\end{pmatrix} \;.
$$
Here the limit $M$ exists, but this family is **not** Lyapunov regular.


