Question is as in the title.


Why study orbifolds?


I study orbifolds as locally compact Hausdorff spaces $X$ having an orbifold structure, i.e., there exists an orbifold groupoid (proper foliatio. Groupoid) $\mathcal{G}$ and a homeomorphism $|\mathcal{G}|\rightarrow X$, where $|\mathcal{G}|$ is orbit space of the groupoid $\mathcal{G}$.


Let $G$ be a Lie group acting smoothly on a manifold $M$. If one further assumes the action is proper and free then, the quotient space $M/G$ has a manifold structure.


One reason why I find orbifolds interesting is, loosely, if I ignore the condition that the group $G$ (compact Lie group) freely and impose that it only acts almost freely, then there is still some interesting structure on the quotient space $M/G$, i.e., of orbifold.


I don’t know any other places where one would see Orbifolds and how it would be interesting. 


Correct me if I have a wrong understand and share your opinion of how to see an orbifold.


Edit : Wikipedia page does not say anything about groupoid way of looking at orbifolds. I did not mean to ask for references for orbifolds or groupoids. It is about how do you explain others what orbifolds are and how they occur naturally and what tools do we use to study thei geometry.



Why study orbifolds?
I can not say why one studies orbifolds (or e.g. why one studies math at all). However, I can try the approach which might convince your funding agency: There are tons of interesting examples of how orbifolds arise in "applications" (= mathematics):


1. The quotient spaces appearing in symplectic reduction are not always manifolds. If they fail to be manifolds, then one can (also not always but often enough) give them the structure of an orbifold (and then hope to do differential geometry on them), see Ana Cannas da Silvas's notes for some interesting examples: [da Silvas - Lectures on symplectic geometry](https://people.math.ethz.ch/~acannas/Papers/lsg.pdf).
2. If one is interested in shape analysis (see [Bauer, Bruveris, and Michor - Overview of the geometries of shape spaces and diffeomorphism groups](https://arxiv.org/abs/1305.1150)), one wants to study Riemannian geometry on quotients of the form $\operatorname{Imm}([0,1] , \mathbb{R}^n) / \operatorname{Diff}\_+([0,1])$ (Immersions of the interval into $\mathbb{R}^n$ mod the orientation preserving diffeomorphisms of the unit interval). Unfortunately this is not a manifold as there are immersions which may have a finite stabiliser subgroup under the reparametrisation action of $\operatorname{Diff}\_+ ([0,1])$ (this is a result of P.W. Michor and collaborators, see V. Cervera, F. Mascaro, and P. W. Michor. [The action
of the diffeomorphism group on the space of immersions](https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0926224591900152). Differential Geom. Appl., 1(4):391–401, 1991 ([MSN](https://mathscinet.ams.org/mathscinet-getitem?mr=1244452))). So in essence, these spaces are "infinite-dimensional orbifolds" (in shape analysis this is immediately disregarded as one then concentrates on the open subset of elements with trivial stabiliser).
3. Orbifolds appear naturally in questions connected to foliation theory (see, e.g., Moerdijk/Mrčun: [Introduction to Foliations and Lie Groupoids](http://ebooks.cambridge.org/ref/id/CBO9780511615450) ([MSN](https://mathscinet.ams.org/mathscinet-getitem?mr=2012261))).
4. Thurston studied them in his work on geometrisation of $3$-dimensional manifolds (see [Thurston - Geometry and topology of 3-manifolds](http://library.msri.org/books/gt3m))


Though this is by no means an exhaustive list, I hope that there is some example you find interesting enough to justify interest in orbifolds.


