The Jacobi theta function $\theta(z) = 1 + 2 \sum\_{n = 1}^\infty q^{n^2}$, with $q = e^{\pi i z}$ is a (twisted) modular form with weight $1/2$. It has an associated $L$-function $L(\theta, s) = \sum\_{m =1}^\infty \frac{1}{(m^2)^s} = \sum\_{m=1}^\infty \frac{1}{m^{2s}} = \zeta(2s)$, which stands roughly in the same relation to $\theta(z)$ as the $L$-function of a modular form $f$ stands to $f$. (They are both essentially Mellin transforms). 


(Of course, there are a few issues here - $\theta$ is only a twisted modular form, the Fourier expansion for $\theta$ is in terms of $e^{\pi i z}$ instead of $e^{2\pi i z}$, there is the factor of $2$ appearing in the argument, etc.)


In the case of a weight $2k$ modular form $f$ (at least in the case that $f$ is a Hecke eigenform), there is an associated Galois representation with the same $L$-function by the Eichler-Shimura construction, and the Langlands conjectures for $GL\_2(\mathbb{Q})$ predict that every Galois representation of a certain type arises this way.


Is there a similar explanation for the case of $\theta$? Of course, the $\zeta$ function is the $L$-function for the trivial one-dimensional Galois representation, but modular forms should be related to $2$-dimensional Galois representations...


(I've only thought much about the Langlands philosophy quite recently, so I'm probably missing some very basic point!)


EDIT: Thanks to GH from MO for pointing out that the trivial one-dimensional representation corresponds via (a trivial case of) class field theory to the $GL(1)$-automorphic representation defined by the trivial Hecke character.



Is there a "Langlands philosophy" reason for the fact that the L-function of the Jacobi theta function is (almost) the Riemann zeta function?
Good question. I don't understand fully what's happening, but here is an idea.


Let $f=\sum a\_n q^n$ be a modular form of weight $k+1/2$, nebentypus $\chi$. Assuming $k \geq 1$, the Shimura correspondence attaches to $f$ a
modular form of integral weight $2k$, $g = \sum b\_n q^n$ such that
$$L(g,s) = L(\chi',s-k+1) \sum \frac{a\_{n^2}}{n^s},$$  

where $\chi'(n)=\chi(n) \left(\frac{-1}{n} \right)^{k}$.
The Shimura correspondence is well understood in terms of the Langlands program, thanks to famous work of Waldspurger, namely functoriality from the metaplectic group. [I took this statement of the Shimura correspondence from Ono's book, *the web of modularity*]


Now for some reason (convergence, I suppose) the Shimura correspondence does not work as stated in weight $1/2$ (that is $k=0$) but let suppose it does and apply it boldly to $\Theta$ (neglecting the $q^{1/24}$-missing factor), which has trivial nebentypus. The character $\chi'$ would be trivial in this case. The function $g$ would be a weight $0$ modular form, that is a constant. The Galois representation attached to the constant modular form $g=1$ is the sum of the trivial character and the cyclotomic character inverted, and its $L$-function is thus $\zeta(s) \zeta(s+1)$.
So the displayed formula becomes
$$\zeta(s)\zeta(s+1) = \zeta(s+1) \sum a\_{n^2}/n^{s}$$
where $f=\theta(z)=\sum\_{n \in \mathbb Z} q^{n^2} = \sum\_{n \geq 0} a\_n q^n$. Hence we get that $\sum \frac{a\_{n^2}}{n^s}$ is the $\zeta(s)$,or that the Mellin transform of $\Theta$ is $\zeta(2s)$. This in some sense "explains" why it is so in terms of the Langlands program.


