The paper I'm referring to can be found [here](https://arxiv.org/abs/math/0206094), and is absolutely seminal work in area of homotopy theory for operads. It came out in 2003. I remember someone once told me there was a mistake somewhere in this paper, but I can't remember where.



> 
> Is there some error in this paper? Is it a big deal?
> 
> 
> 


An error in a different paper of the authors (but related to this paper) was pointed out and corrected [here](https://mathoverflow.net/questions/44166/how-does-berger-moerdijks-relative-boardman-vogt-work). Is this the only known error in the paper?



Are there any errors in Axiomatic Homotopy Theory for Operads?
The only errors that I am aware of in this paper are the following:


* A $G$ missing in the statement of Lemma 5.10 (pointed out by the authors after Lemma 2.5.3 in [1])
* A small mistake in the proof of Proposition 5.1 (also pointed out by the authors and fixed in the Appendix of [2])


[1] I. Moerdijk and C. Berger, The Boardman-Vogt resolution of operads in monoidal model categories, *Topology* **45** (2006), 807-849.


[2] I. Moerdijk and C. Berger, On the derived category of an algebra over an operad, *Georgian Math. J.* **16** (2009), 13-28.


