When it comes to numbering results in a mathematical publication, I'm aware of two methods: 


1. Joint numbering: *Thm. 1, Prop. 2, Thm. 3, Lem. 4, etc.*
2. Separate numbering: *Thm. 1, Prop. 1, Thm. 2, Lem. 1, etc.*


Every piece of writting advice I have encountered advocates the use of 1. over 2., the rationale being that it makes it easier to find the result based on the number. It seems that 1. is more popular than 2., although 2. still exists, especially in books. I can only imagine that people using 2. must have a reason, but I have not yet to encounter one. I hope it is not too opinion-based to ask:


*What is the rationale for separately numbering theorems, propositions and lemmas, like in 2.?"*



Why would one number theorems, propositions and lemmas separately?
This is a slight elaboration of François Dorais's comment. If you have a small number of theorems/lemmas/propositions—let's say, small enough that readers can reasonably be expected to hold all the theorems in their head at once—then the second method of numbering can help readers grasp the flow of the paper and can even serve as a mnemonic aid.


A secondary consideration, similar to what Fedor Petrov said, is that the reader may want to skim through and just look at the main theorems. If you adopt the first method of numbering, then readers might accidentally skip from (say) Theorem 8 to Theorem 17 without realizing that they missed Theorem 14.


One famous book that uses the second method of numbering is Serre's *Course in Arithmetic*. Serre uses the "Theorem" designation very sparsely in that book, and the numbering system helps make the Theorems stand out.


