$\def\Cl{\mathcal C\ell}
\def\CL{\boldsymbol{\mathscr{C\kern-.1eml}}(\mathbb R)}$
I'm not an expert in neither of the fields I'm touching, so don't be too rude with me :-) here's my question.


A well known definition of Clifford algebras is the following: 



> 
> Fix a quadratic form $q$ on a vector space $V$[¹] and consider the quotient of the tensor algebra $T(V)$ under the ideal $\mathfrak i\_q = \langle v\otimes v - q(v){\bf 1}\mid v\in V\rangle$; 
> 
> 
> *Remark*: as such quotient enjoys a suitable universal property, it is easy to see that $(V,q)\mapsto \Cl(V,q)$ determines a functor from the category of quadratic spaces to the category of algebras.
> 
> 
> *Remark:* It's easy to see that if $q=0$ the Clifford algebra $\Cl(V,0)$ coincides with the exterior algebra $\bigwedge^\*\! V$ (this is clear, $\mathfrak i\_0=\langle v\otimes v\mid v\in V\rangle$!).
> 
> 
> 


Now.


I would like to know to which extent it is possible to regard Clifford algebras as "deformations of exterior algebras": I believe that fixing a suitable real number $0<\epsilon \ll 1$, and a map $t\mapsto q\_t$ defined for $t\in]-\epsilon,\epsilon[$ with codomain the space of quadratic forms, a useful interpretation of this construction regards $\Cl(V,q\_\epsilon)$ as a suitably small deformation of $\bigwedge^\*\! V$.[²] 


I can try to be more precise, but this pushes my moderate knowledge of differential geometry to its limit. I'm pretty sure there is a topology on the *don't say moduli, don't say moduli*--"space" of Clifford algebras $\CL$ so that I can differentiate those curves $\gamma : I \to \CL$ for which $\gamma(0)=\bigwedge^\*\!V$. 



> 
> * If this is true, what is the linear term of a "series expansion"
>  $$\textstyle
> \gamma(t) \approx \bigwedge^\*\!V + t(\text{higher order terms})?
> $$
> * Is there any hope to prove that the functor $\Cl$ is "analytic" in the sense that there are suitable vector-space valued coefficients $a\_n(V,q)$ for which
>  $$\textstyle
> \Cl(V,q) \cong \bigoplus\_{n\ge 0} a\_n(V,q)\otimes V^{\otimes n}
> $$
>  or even less prudently: $\Cl(V,q) \cong \bigoplus\_{n\ge 0} a\_n(V,q)\otimes (\bigwedge^\*V)^{\otimes n}$ (I'd call these "semi-analytic", or something)?
> * Regarding quadratic forms as symmetric matrices, one can wonder what are the properties of Clifford algebras induced by the fact that $\|q\|\ll 1$. For example, an exterior algebra $\Cl(V,0)$ decomposes as a direct sum of homogeneous components
>  $$\textstyle
> \Cl(V,0) \cong \bigoplus\_{p=0}^{\dim V} \bigwedge^p\!V
> $$
>  is there a similar decomposition of $\Cl(V,q\_\epsilon)$ for a sufficiently small $\epsilon$[³]?
> 
> 
> 


I can't help but admit I wasn't able to come up with a good idea for this question. :-) especially because well, I'm not a geometer.




---


[¹] I will assume that vector spaces are finite dimensional, over a field of characteristic zero, sorry if you like arithmetic geometry! Even better, if you want, vector spaces are real.


[²] I guess it is possible to say simply that I'm given a "Clifford bundle" $p : E \to \mathbb R$, and the preimage of a small neighbourhood of zero is a neighbourhood of $(V, 0)$ -the zero quadratic space over the typical fiber of $p$.


[³] I must admit this might be a trivial question: I remember that $\Cl(V,q)$ has an even-odd decomposition in a natural way, but I can't find a reference for a complete decomposition in irreducibles. And, well, I don't have a book on this topic :-)



Clifford algebras as deformations of exterior algebras
As Igor mentions in the comments, this is really a question about deformations of the multiplication map of the exterior algebra in the space of associative multiplications. Since this is a pretty general story, let me try to sketch how it works in this case.


Let's fix some field $k$ and a $k$-algebra $(A,\mu)$. We want to understand deformations of $(A,\mu)$, and to start only *infinitesimal* deformations. For this we fix an Artinian augmented $k$-algebra $R\to k$ and build a groupoid $\operatorname{Def}\_R$: objects are flat $R$-algebras $B$ with an isomorphism $\rho: B\otimes\_R k\cong A$, and morphisms from $(B,\rho)$ to $(B',\rho')$ are isomorphisms of $R$-algebras over $k$.


$R$ being Artinian just means that $R \cong k\oplus\mathfrak m$, with $\mathfrak m$ being nilpotent and finite-dimensional. In fact, one does not lose all that much by restricting to $R\_n = k[\hbar]/(\hbar^{n+1})$. By flatness, any $R\_n$-deformation is of the form $B\cong R\_n\otimes\_k A\cong A[\hbar]/(\hbar^{n+1})$, but with an interesting multiplication $\mu\_{B}$. It is determined by $\mu\_B(a,a') = \sum\_{i=0}^n\hbar^i\mu\_i(a,a')$ for some maps $\mu\_i:A\otimes\_k A\to A$. Similarly, any automorphism $\lambda$ of $B$ is determined by $\lambda(a) = \sum\_{i=0}^n\hbar^n\lambda\_i(a)$ for some maps $\lambda\_i:A\to A$. Then the condition that $\mu\_B$ is associative leads to the following constraints:


* $\mu\_0 = \mu$ by checking compatibility with $\rho$. From now on, I'll write $\cdot = \mu$. Similarly, $\lambda\_0 = \operatorname{id}$.
* $\mu\_1(f,g)h + \mu\_1(fg,h) = f\mu\_1(g,h) + \mu\_1(f,gh)$, and $\lambda$ is a morphism from $\mu\_1$ to $\mu\_2$ iff $\mu\_1(f,g) - \mu\_2(f,g) = \lambda\_1(fg) - f\lambda\_1(g) - \lambda\_1(f)g$. The first condition is that $\mu\_1$ is a closed $1$-cocycle in the Hochschild chain complex $C^n(A) = \operatorname{Hom}(A^{\otimes(n+1)},A)$ with differential
$$
\mathrm d\mu(a\_0,\dots,a\_{n+1}) = a\_0\mu(a\_1,\dots,a\_n) + \sum\_{i=0}^{n-1} (-1)^{i+1}\mu(a\_0,\dots,a\_ia\_{i+1},\dots,a\_n) + (-1)^{n+1}\mu(a\_0,\dots,a\_{n-1})a\_n\ .
$$
The multiplications of two such cocycles are isomorphic iff the cocycles are cohomologous. In this case the isomorphisms are a torsor over the set of closed $0$-cycles. All in all, the category $\operatorname{Def}\_{k[x]/x^2}$ has objects in bijection with $HH^1(A)$, and each object has automorphism group $HH^0(A)$, where $HH^i(A) = H^i(C^\*(A))$.
	+ $f\mu\_2(g,h) - \mu\_2(fg,h) + \mu\_2(f,gh) - \mu\_2(f,g)h = \mu\_1(f,\mu\_1(g,h)) - \mu\_1(\mu\_1(f,g),h)$. Thus given a first-order deformation $\mu\_1$, one may form the element $\mu\_1(-,\mu\_1(-,-)) - \mu\_1(\mu\_1(-,-),-)$, which one can check to be a closed $2$-cocycle. The existence of $\mu\_2$ is equivalent to the corresponding cohomology class vanishing. Thus for every first-order deformation there is an obstruction lying in $HH^2(A)$ which vanishes iff this first-order deformation extends to a second-order deformation. In this case the extensions are a torsor over $HH^1(A)$, and similarly for the automorphisms.
	+ This story continues: If we have found $\mu\_1,\dots,\mu\_n$, the existence of $\mu\_{n+1}$ is equivalent to some obstruction class in $HH^2(A)$ vanishing, in which case the posible extensions are a torsor over $HH^1(A)$. Note however that the obstruction depends on all previous choices.


In fact, essentially all of these formal deformation problems arise in the following way (at least if $k$ is characteristic $0$): One has a dgla $(\mathfrak g,[-,-])$ and a natural isomorphism $\operatorname{Def}\_{k\oplus\mathfrak m} \cong \{x\in \mathfrak m\otimes \mathfrak g^1\mid \mathrm dx + \frac{1}{2}[x,x] = 0\}//\mathfrak m\otimes \mathfrak g^0$, where the nilpotent Lie algebra $\mathfrak m\otimes \mathfrak g^0$ acts on this set of "Maurer-Cartan elements" by the Lie bracket and one takes the action groupoid of the action of the corresponding nilpotent Lie group. In our case the dgla is $C^\*(A)$ equipped with the Gerstenhaber bracket which takes two cocycles and takes the sum over all ways to plug one into the other (with some signs).


In general, the deformation functor only depends on the dgla up to quasiisomorphism. This has one important consequence: If $\mathfrak g$ is formal, i.e. quasiisomorphic to its cohomology, then a Maurer-Cartan element of $\mathfrak g$ is "the same" as an element $x\in H^1(\mathfrak g)$ satisfying $[x,x] = 0$, i.e. a first-order deformation which extends to a second-order deformation. This then gives rise to a Maurer-Cartan element for *any* $R$, i.e. a lift to arbitrarily high order in $\hbar$, without having to check whether any more obstructions vanish! One can then put all of these lifts together to obtain an associative multiplication $\mu\_\hbar = \mu + \cdots$ on $A[[\hbar]]$.


For a differential geometer, the most interesting case is that $A = C^\infty(M)$. In this case one should restrict to the subcomplex of the Hochschild complex of maps $C^\infty(M)^{\otimes(n+1)}\to C^\infty(M)$ which are differential operators in each variable. The Hochschild-Kostant-Rosenberg theorem computes the homology of this complex as polyvector fields $\oplus\_{i\ge 1} \Gamma(M,\Lambda^i TM)$. The bracket on the homology groups is the Schouten bracket (extension of the Lie bracket as a biderivation). Amazingly, as proven by Kontsevich this dgla is actually formal! By the previous discussion this means that a first-order deformation, i.e. a biderivation $\pi\in\Gamma(M,\Lambda^2 TM)$, extends to all orders iff it extends to a second-order deformation, i.e. iff $[\pi,\pi] = 0$, iff $f\otimes g\mapsto \{f,g\} = \pi(\mathrm df,\mathrm dg)$ is a Poisson structure on $M$. This is called deformation quantization since quantization should associate to each function $f$ on $M$ an operator $\widehat f$ on some Hilbert space such that $[\widehat f,\widehat g] = \hbar \widehat{\{f,g\}} + O(\hbar^2)$. Deformation quantization does away with the Hilbert space and formally expands $\widehat f \cdot \widehat g = \widehat{f\cdot g} + \sum\_{i\ge 1}\hbar^i\widehat{\mu\_i(f,g)}$.


What does any of this have to do with your question about Clifford algebras? One can think of the graded commutative algebra $\Lambda^\*V$ as functions on the supermanifold $\Pi V^\vee$ ("$V$ dual in odd degree"). The metric is a graded *anti*symmetric bilinear form on $V^\vee$ and hence induces a symplectic, and by extension Poisson, structure on this supermanifold, which by the previous discussion has an essentially unique deformation quantization. In fact, one can give an explicit formula for it by putting the right "fermion signs" into the [Moyal product](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moyal_product). This is a very special deformation quantization since only finitely many $\mu\_i$ are nonzero. Thus for any value of $\hbar$ the series $\sum\_{i\ge 0}\hbar^i \mu\_i$ converges, and one may set $\hbar = 1$ to recover the Clifford algebra.


