Perhaps under the influence of a recent question
on *[perverse sheaves](https://mathoverflow.net/q/198656/6094)*,
in conjunction with the impending $\pi$-day (3/14/15 at 9:26:53),
I recalled a long-ago parody of abstruse mathematical language
that I can no longer remember in detail nor find by searching.


I am not seeking merely 
"[examples of colorful language](https://mathoverflow.net/q/22299/6094),"
as in that earlier MO question, but rather parodies
almost in the Alan Sokal *[Fashionable Nonsense](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fashionable_Nonsense)* sense
(although I don't think he parodied abstract mathematics directly).


I am partly motivated by the possible educational advantage
of self-mockery (or self-awareness),
tangentially related to
an MESE question, "[Wonder as Motivation](https://matheducators.stackexchange.com/q/7563/511)."
But I ask here to tap into the likely greater density 
of mathematicians working in abstract fields ripe for parody.



> 
> ***Q***. Can you provide examples of (or pointers to) intentionally comic *parodies* of abstruse
>  mathematical language, written by knowledgeable mathematicians so that they
>  could (in another universe) make mathematical sense.
> 
> 
> 



Parodies of abstruse mathematical writing
Is this what you're looking for?


<http://thatsmathematics.com/mathgen/>


Mathgen is an random math paper generator, based on [SCIgen](http://pdos.csail.mit.edu/scigen/) which does the same for computer science papers. It will provide you with an unlimited supply of abstruse nonsense: definitions, theorems, proofs, references, and all.


Here is a sample title and abstract.



> 
> "Some Reducibility Results for Ultra-Universally Nonnegative Arrows"
> 
> 
> Assume we are given a contra-intrinsic subring $\mathscr{{W}}$. Recently, there has been much interest in the description of manifolds. We show that $\| t' \| > \mathbf{{b}}$. So is it possible to describe compactly ultra-prime systems? Hence recent interest in finitely Huygens--Hilbert, closed, meager groups has centered on describing canonical homomorphisms.
> 
> 
> 


(Disclosure: edited by Nate Eldredge, author of Mathgen, to include additional details.)


