In "Reminiscences of Grothendieck and his school" Luc Illusie says:


"*I heard from Deligne that there were problems in some parts. (of Monique Hakim thesis).*


Topos annelés et schémas relatifs, Ergebnisse der Mathematik und ihrer Grenzgebiete, Band 64, Springer, Berlin, New York (1972).


My question is for a reference for these "problems". What are the problems? Where?



Problems in some parts of Monique Hakim thesis?
The [published version of the paper](http://www.ams.org/notices/201009/rtx100901106p.pdf) (it is free), yet apparently not all versions in circulation, has a footnote on that sentence: 



> 
> (13) Added in April 2010: Deligne doesn’t think there was
>  anything wrong but remembers that the objects she
>  defined over analytic spaces were not the desired ones.
> 
> 
> 


Thus, it seems there is no direct problem.


The bibliographic details are (the relevant part is on page 1110, fifth page of the pdf): 


*Luc Illusie, Alexander Beilinson, Spencer Bloch, Vladimir Drinfeld, and et al.*, [**Reminiscences of Grothendieck and his school**](http://www.ams.org/mathscinet-getitem?mr=2730367), *Notices Amer. Math. Soc.* **57** (2010), no. 9, 1106--1115. 


