This is a followup to a previous question


[What is the right definition of the Picard group of a commutative ring?](https://mathoverflow.net/questions/13768/what-is-the-right-definition-of-the-picard-group-of-a-commutative-ring) 


where I was worried about the distinction between invertible modules and rank one projective modules over an arbitrary commutative ring. I was worrying too much, because of the following theorem [Bourbaki, Commutative Algebra, Section II.5.2, Theorem 1]:


Let $R$ be a commutative ring and $M$ a finitely generated $R$-module. The following are equivalent:  

(i) $M$ is projective.  

(ii) $M$ is finitely presented and locally free in the weaker sense: $\forall \mathfrak{p} \in \operatorname{Spec}(R), \ M\_{\mathfrak{p}} \cong R\_{\mathfrak{p}}^{r(\mathfrak{p})}$.  

(iii) $M$ is locally free in the weaker sense and its rank function $\mathfrak{p} \mapsto r(\mathfrak{p})$ is locally constant on $\operatorname{Spec}(R)$.  

(iv) $M$ is locally free in the stronger sense: there exist $f\_1,\ldots,f\_n \in R$, generating the unit ideal, such that for each $i$, $M\_{f\_i}$ is a free $R\_{f\_i}$-module.  

(v) For every maximal ideal $\mathfrak{m}$ of $R$, there exists $f \in R \setminus \mathfrak{m}$ such that $M\_f$ is a free $R\_f$-module. 


This answers my previous question, because the rank function of an invertible module is identically one.


In order to really feel like I understand what's going on here, I would like to see an example of a finitely generated locally free [in the weaker sense of (ii) above] module which is *not* projective. Thus $R$ must be non-Noetherian. The wikipedia article on [projective modules](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Projective_module) contains some nice information, in particular sketching an example of such a module over a Boolean ring. For a Boolean ring though the localization at every prime ideal is simply $\mathbb{Z}/2\mathbb{Z}$, so it is not too surprising that there are more locally free modules than projectives.


I would like to see an example with $R$ an integral domain, if possible. It would be especially nice if you can give a reference to one of the standard texts on commutative algebra which contains such an example or at least a citation of such an example.



A finitely generated, locally free module over a domain which is not projective?
It is impossible to produce an example of a finitely generated flat $R$-module that is not projective when $R$ is an integral domain. See: Cartier, "Questions de rationalité des diviseurs en géométrie algébrique," [here](http://www.numdam.org/numdam-bin/item?id=BSMF_1958__86__177_0), Appendice, Lemme 5, p. 249. Also see Bourbaki Algèbre Chapitre X (Algèbre Homologique, "AH") X.169 Exercise Sect. 1, No. 13. I also sketch an alternate proof that there are no such examples for $R$ an integral domain below.


Observe that, for finitely generated $R$-modules $M$, being locally free in the weaker sense is equivalent to being flat [Bourbaki, AC II.3.4 Pr. 15, combined with AH X.169 Exercise Sect. 1, No. 14(c).]. ($R$ doesn't have to be noetherian for this, though many books seem to assume it.)


There's a concrete way to interpret projectivity for finitely generated flat modules. We begin by translating Bourbaki's criterion into the language of invariant factors. For any finitely generated flat $R$-module $M$ and any nonnegative integer $n$, the $n$-th *invariant factor* $I\_n(M)$ is the annihilator of the $n$-th exterior power of $M$.


**Lemma.** (Bourbaki's criterion) A finitely generated flat $R$-module $M$ is projective if and only if, for any nonnegative integer $n$, the set $V(I\_n(M))$ is open in $\mathrm{Spec}(R)$.


This openness translates to finite generation.


**Proposition.** If $M$ is a finitely generated flat $R$-module, then $M$ is projective iff its invariant factors are finitely generated.


**Corollary.** The following conditions are equivalent for a ring $R$: (1) Every flat cyclic $R$-module is projective. (2) Every finitely generated flat $R$-module is projective.


**Corollary.** Over an integral domain $R$, every finitely generated flat $R$-module is projective.


**Corollary.** A flat ideal $I$ of $R$ is projective iff its annihilator is finitely generated.


**Example.** Let me try to give an example of a principal ideal of a ring $R$ that is locally free in the weak sense but not projective. Of course my point is not the nature of this counterexample itself, but rather the way in which one uses the criteria above to produce it.


Let $S:=\bigoplus\_{n=1}^{\infty}\mathbf{F}\_2$, and let $R=\mathbf{Z}[S]$. (The elements of $R$ are thus expressions $\ell+s$, where $\ell\in\mathbf{Z}$ and $s=(s\_1,s\_2,\dots)$ of elements of $\mathbf{F}\_2$ that eventually stabilize at $0$.) Consider the ideal $I=(2+0)$.


I first claim that for any prime ideal $\mathfrak{p}\in\mathrm{Spec}(R)$, the $R\_{\mathfrak{p}}$-module $I\_{\mathfrak{p}}$ is free of rank $0$ or $1$. There are three cases: (1) If $x\notin\mathfrak{p}$, then $I\_{\mathfrak{p}}=R\_{\mathfrak{p}}$. (2) If $x\in\mathfrak{p}$ and $\mathfrak{p}$ does not contain $S$, then $I\_{\mathfrak{p}}=0$. (3) Finally, if both $x\in\mathfrak{p}$ and $S\subset\mathfrak{p}$, then $I\_{\mathfrak{p}}$ is a principal ideal of $R\_{\mathfrak{p}}$ with trivial annihilator.


It remains to show that $I$ is not projective as an $R$-module. But its annihilator is $S$, which is not finitely generated over $R$.


[This answer was reorganized on the recommendation of Pete Clark.]


