Given a topological space X one can define several notion of compactness:


X is **compact** if every open cover has a finite subcover.


X is **sequentially compact** if every sequence has a convergent subsequence.


X is **limit point compact** (or Bolzano-Weierstrass) if every infinite set has an accumulation point.


X is **countably compact** if every countable open cover has a finite subcover.


X is **σ-compact** if it is the union of countably many compact subspaces.


X is **pseudocompact** if its if its image under any continuous function to $\mathbb{R}$ is 
bounded.


X is **paracompact** if every open cover admits an open locally finite refinement (i.e. every point of X has a neighborhood small enough to intersect only finitely many members of the cover).


X is **metacompact** if every open cover admits a point finite open refinement (i.e. if every point of X is in only finitely many members of the refinement). 


X is **orthocompact** if every open cover has an interior preserving open refinement (i.e. given an open cover there is a open subcover such that at any point, the intersection of all open sets in the subcover containing that point is also open).


X is **mesocompact** if every open cover has a compact-finite open refinement (i.e. given any open cover, we can find an open refinement such that every compact set is contained in finitely many members of the refinement).


So, there are quite a few notions of compactness (there are surely more than those I quoted up here). The question is: where are these definitions systematically studied? What I'm interested in particular is knowing when does one imply the other, when does it not (examples), &c.


I can fully answer the question for the first three notions:


Compact and first-countable --> Sequentially compact.


Sequentially compact and second-countable --> Compact.


Sequentially compact --> Limit-point compact.


Limit point compact, first-countable and $T\_1$ --> Sequentially compact.


but I'm absolutely ignorant about the other cases. Has this been systematically studied somewhere? If so, where?



Different forms of compactness and their relation
I don't have Munkres' book. So I don't know what is done there. You should probably consult the "Counterexamples in Topology" as mentioned above.  

My favourite book for questions of this type is "General Topology" by Ryszard Engelking.
It has a diagram in the back with interrelations between different properties of topological spaces. It has all the notions you are interested in, except the last two. Local compactness and various additional versions of paracompactness are also discussed in the book.
I assume, but haven't checked in every case, that the relations in the diagram are proved in the book.
The book also contains plenty of examples, showing that certain implications do not hold, sometimes in the form of exercises with hints.


