Let $k$ be fixed and consider the sum $$F(k,n)=\sum\_{p\_1<p\_2<\cdots<p\_k\leq n~:~p\_1 p\_2\cdots p\_k\leq n} \frac{1}{p\_1 p\_2 \cdots p\_k}.$$
Are tight upper and lower bounds on $F(k,n)$ known as $n\rightarrow \infty$? One approximation to the sum might be $$\left( \sum\_{p\leq n^{1/k}} \frac{1}{p}\right)^k\approx \left[\log \left (\frac{1}{k} \log n\right)\right]^k=\left[\log \log n -\log k\right]^k $$but I am unsure how good this approximation is.


Now, let $k$ vary very slowly with $n$, say $k=c \log \log n.$ Do the answer(s) (if known) change?



Upper and lower bounds on reciprocals of restricted prime products
Let $\pi\_k(x)$ be the number of integers $\leq x$ with exactly $k$ prime factors. In the range $k<e\log\log x$, an asymptotic formula for $\pi\_k(x)$ was given by Sathe (J. Indian Math. Soc. (N.S.) 17, (1953), 63–82). Selberg (J. Indian Math. Soc. (N.S.) 18, (1954), 83–87) gave a much simpler proof. Sifting out non-squarefree values and applying partial summation you obtain an asymptotic formula for $F(k, n)$ in the same range.


For small values of $k$, your argument actually gives an asymptotic formula. If $G(k, n)$ denotes the sum without the restriction that the $p\_i$ are different and increasing, we have
$$
\left(\sum\_{p\leq n^{1/k}}\frac{1}{p}\right)^k\leq G(k, n)\leq\left(\sum\_{p\leq n}\frac{1}{p}\right)^k,
$$
thus the known bound for $\sum\_{p\leq x}\frac{1}{p}$ give an asymptotic formula for $G(k, n)$, provided that $(\log\log n-\log k)^k\sim(\log\log n)^k$, that is, $k=o(\frac{\log\log n}{\log\log\log n})$. Passing from $G$ to $F$ takes some work, but is elementary.


