If an entire function is bounded for all $z \in \mathbb{C}$, than it's a constant by Liouville's theorem. Of course an entire function can be bounded on lines through the origin $z=r \exp(i \phi), \phi= \text{const.}, r \in \mathbb{R}$ without being constant (e.g. $\cos(z^n)$ is bounded on $n$ lines).


What is the maximum cardinality of the set of "directions" $\phi$ for which an entire function can be bounded without being constant?


From intuition I would expect only finitely many directions. Is this correct?


(Picard's second theorem says that in any open set containing $\infty$ every value with possibly a single exception is taken infinitely often by an entire non-constant function. Here I'm asking a somehow "orthogonal" question, looking for lines through $\infty$ where an entire non-constant function is bounded.)



Must the set of lines through the origin on which a nonconstant entire function is bounded be finite?
Newman gave an example in 1976 of a non-constant entire function bounded on each line through the origin in "[An entire function bounded in every direction](http://www.jstor.org/stable/2977024)". 


I like the second sentence of the article:



> 
> This is exactly what is needed to confuse students who have just struggled to comprehend the meaning of Liouville's theorem.
> 
> 
> 


Armitage gave examples in 2007 of non-constant entire functions that go to zero in every direction in "Entire functions that tend to zero on every line". For this I have only seen the [MR review](http://www.ams.org/mathscinet-getitem?mr=2290290). (If you don't have MathSciNet access, the link should still give you the publication information to find the article.)




---


**Update:** I just decided to take a look at the Armitage paper, and the introduction was enlightening:



> 
> Although every bounded entire (holomorphic) function on $\mathbb{C}$
>  is constant (Liouville’s theorem), it has been known for more than a hundred years
>  that there exist nonconstant entire functions $f$ such that $f(z) → 0$ as $z →∞$ along
>  every line through 0 (see, for example, Lindelöf’s book [10, pp. 119–122] of 1905). And it has been known for more than eighty years that such functions can tend to 0
>  along any line whatsoever (see Mittag-Leffler [11], Grandjot [8], and Bohr [4]). Further
>  references to related work are given in Burckel’s review [5] of Newman’s note [12].
>  Entire functions with radial decay are used by Beardon and Minda [3] and Ullrich [14]
>  in studies of pointwise convergent sequences of entire functions.
> 
> 
> 


Armitage goes on to mention that Mittag-Leffler and Grandjot also gave explicit constructions, but states, "The examples given in what follows may nevertheless
be of some interest because of their comparative simplicity." The examples are 
$$F(z)=\exp\left(-\int\_0^\infty t^{-t}\cosh(tz^2)dt\right) - \exp\left(-\int\_0^\infty t^{-t}\cosh(2tz^2)dt\right)$$ and
$$G(z)=\int\_0^\infty e^{i\pi t}t^{-t}\cosh(t\sqrt{z})dt\int\_0^\infty e^{i\pi t}t^{-t}\cos(t\sqrt{z})dt .$$


