Are there some references about the center of quantum affine algebras? I searched on google and only find [the paper](http://arxiv.org/pdf/q-alg/9412007v1.pdf). In particular, what is the center of $U\_q(\widehat{\mathfrak{sl}\_2})$. Thank you very much.



Center of quantum affine algebras
For affine (quantum or not) algebras the center appears only for special value of element "c" - the so-called "critical level".
The second order central element related to "Sugavara construction" is well-known for a long time. 
Somewhat nice explicit formulas for the center of affine (not quantum) algebras for type A\_n first appeared in [our paper](http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0604128), sorry for self-advertisement.
For the generalization to quantum case see [paper](http://arxiv.org/abs/1505.03667).
It is somewhat surprising that in quantum case there is an alternative approach to describe the center - it is presented in the paper you cited,
which appeared before cited above developments.


Let me briefly sketch the ideas behind these works.
Let us start with gl\_n. Basic linear algebra tells that characteristic polynomial of a matrix det(L-t) gives invariant polynomials.
The algebra U(gl\_n) is somehow a quantization/deformation of commutative Poisson algebra S(gl), so we may hope that "det(L-t)" can be somehow deformed to give generators of the center of U(gl\_n), that indeed can be done - there exists [Capelli determinat](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Capelli%27s_identity) which does the job. We need to deal with the matrix with non-commuting elements, but nevertheless it works.
It appears that in affine case somewhat similar formula "det(d/dz - L(z))"
does the job. 


Going further to quantum case, it is well-known that quantum algebras can be described in the so-called RLL = LLR formalism, it is actually not one line to describe U\_q(gl\_n) (or affine) version since one has L^+, L^- operators,
however this is standard. Roughly speaking the formula $det(1-q^{d/dz} L(z) )$ will do the job for U\_q(gl\_n) both affine or not. For non-affine case one should take only the first term of L(z) in "z" expansion.
Sorry for being too sketchy. 


