It seems to be well-known that the pseudoeffective cone $\overline{\text{Eff}}(X)$ of a normal variety $X$ does not contain lines through the origin. How can it be proved? Is there a reference?



The pseudoeffective cone does not contain lines
First, whether a class is pseudoeffective or not depends only on its numerical equivalence class. (The pseudoeffective cone is the closure of the cone of big classes, and $D$ is big if and only if $nD$ is numerically equivalent to $A + E$, where $A$ is an ample divisor on $X$, $E$ is an effective divisor on $X$ and $n > 0$ is an integer.)


Now suppose a class $\beta$ was such that both $\beta$ and $-\beta$ were pseudoeffective. Then $\beta \cdot a\_1 \cdots a\_k \geq 0$ and $\leq 0$ for any ample classes $a\_1, \dots, a\_k$. So $\beta \cdot a\_1 \cdots a\_k = 0$. But any divisor class can be written as a difference of ample classes, so $\beta \cdot \delta\_1 \cdots \delta\_k = 0$ for all divisor classes $\delta\_1, \dots, \delta\_k$. Thus, $\beta = 0$.


The standard reference for this material is Lazarsfeld's [Positivity in Algebraic Geometry](http://www.ams.org/journals/bull/2006-43-02/S0273-0979-06-01087-1/S0273-0979-06-01087-1.pdf). I don't have a copy handy, but I'm $> 99\%$ certain that this fact is proved somewhere in Volume I.


Edit: I should add that this assumes that $X$ is projective. I don't know of any results without this assumption.


