Given a quadratic differential $q$ on a surface of genus $g$, we say that $q\in \mathcal Q(k\_1,\ldots,k\_n)$ if $q$ has $n$ distinct zeroes of order $k\_1,\ldots,k\_n$ respectively. The set $\mathcal Q(k\_1,\ldots,k\_n)$ is called the stratum of $q$.


A polygon $P$ with angles equal to rational multiples of $\pi$ gives rise to a compact Riemann surface by reflecting $P$ in the complex plane across each side repeatedly, and identifying $z$ with $z+b$ if the map $w\mapsto w+b$ preserves the edges of the polygons. This has an induced abelian differential $dz$, and squaring this gives rise to a quadratic differential $q$.


I'm interested in determining what stratum $q$ lies in from the the angles of $P$. In the case of isosceles or right triangles, the following classification holds:


* If $P$ is isosceles with
angles $2\pi\frac{a}{b},2\pi r,2\pi r$,
$\gcd(a,b)=1$


	+ and $b=3,4,6$ then $q$ is constant.
	+ and $b\neq 3,4,6$ and $b\equiv 0\mod 4$ then $q\in\mathcal Q(2a-2,4br-2)$.
	+ and $b\neq 3,4,6$ and $b\equiv 2\mod 4$ then $q\in\mathcal Q(2a-2,2br-2,2br-2)$.
	+ and $b\neq 3,4,6$ and $b\equiv 1,3\mod 4$ then $q\in\mathcal Q(2a-2,2a-2,8br-2)$.
* If $P$ is right with an angle $\pi\frac{a}{b}\neq \frac{\pi}{2}$, $\gcd(a,b)=1$ then the classification is the same as for $P$ isoceles with angles $2\pi\frac{a}{b},2\pi\left(\frac{1}{4}-\frac{a}{2b}\right),2\pi\left(\frac{1}{4}-\frac{a}{2b}\right)$. It can be verified that choosing the other angle does not change the result.


As pointed out Matheus' answer, each vertex of the polygon corresponding to an angle of $\pi\frac{a}{b}$ in the unfolding is associated with a zero of order $2a-2$. However, identifications of these vertices mean that it is not possible in general to determine the stratum from this alone, as can be seen in the case of isosceles triangles with $b\equiv 0$. Because the number of zeros of $q$ counting multiplicity is $4g-4$ where $g$ is the genus, we know that for a $k$-gon with angles $\pi m\_i/n\_i$
$$\text{# of zeros of }q=2\gcd(n\_1,\ldots,n\_k)\left(k-2-\sum\_{i=1}^k\frac{1}{n\_i}\right)$$
thanks to a result of Masur in the work cited by Matheus. Unfortunately, similar calculations do not seem to give the number of distinct zeros or their orders.


My question is whether there is a generalization of this classification to all triangles, or even all polygons $P$. I would also appreciate a reference to any such classification in literature, so that I can check the correctness of my own work and do not need to reproduce a proof.


**Edits:** The construction of the Riemann surface and quadratic differential from a polygon has been clarified. The classification of strata of quadratic differentials for non-right, non-isosceles triangles has been deleted due to a major error. Discussion relevant to Matheus' answer has been added.



Strata of quadratic differentials from rational billiards
Dear Alex Becker, 


You can find the answer to your question in the excellent survey "Rational billiards and flat structures" of H. Masur and S. Tabachnikov: for a free online version see here (<http://math.uchicago.edu/~masur/handbook.dvi>). 


As you can check in this survey, it is not very hard to deduce the singularity pattern of q from the angles of a rational $k$-gon $P$. Indeed, for each $j=1,\dots,k$, let $v\_j$ be the $j$th vertex of $P$, let $\pi m\_j/n\_j$ be the angle around $v\_j$ (where $m\_j$ and $n\_j$ are coprime), and let $N$ be the least common multiple of $n\_j$'s. From the arguments on the survey (see Lemma 1.2 of the .dvi online version), after the unfolding procedure (of reflecting sides), $v\_j$ gives rise to $N/n\_j$ points with total angle $2\pi m\_j$. Thus, the Abelian differential $\omega$ induced by $dz$ on $P$ has a zero of order $m\_i-1$ on each of these points, that is, its stratum is 
$$\mathcal{H}(\underbrace{m\_1-1,\dots,m\_1-1}\_{N/n\_1},\dots,\underbrace{m\_k-1,\dots,m\_k-1}\_{N/n\_k})$$ In particular, the quadratic differential $q=\omega^2$ belongs to the stratum 
$$\mathcal{Q}(\underbrace{2(m\_1-1),\dots,2(m\_1-1)}\_{N/n\_1},\dots,\underbrace{2(m\_k-1),\dots,2(m\_k-1)}\_{N/n\_k})$$
because every time $\omega$ has a zero $x$ of order $a$, it is written locally near $x$ as $\omega=z^a dz$, so that $q:=\omega^2=z^{2a}dz^2$ locally near $x$.


Just for "double check", the genus is given by the formula 
$$2g-2=\sum \textrm{ orders of zeroes of }\omega$$
or equivalently, 
$$4g-4=\sum \textrm{ orders of zeroes of }q$$
for $q=\omega^2$. By applying this formula to the unfolding of $P$, we get that the genus satisfies 
$$2g-2=\sum(m\_j-1)N/n\_j$$
Since the sum of the inner angles of $P$ is $\pi(k-2)$, we have that $\sum m\_j/n\_j=k-2$ and thus the previous equation becomes
$$2g-2=N(k-2-\sum(1/n\_j))$$
that is exactly the same formula for the genus as in the survey. Of course, by multiplying everything in this equation we get the correct corresponding statement for the quadratic differential $q$.


Finally, concerning the triangle associated to the octagon, I think you wish to unfold the triangle with angles $\pi/8, \pi/2, 3\pi/8$ and not $\pi/4,3\pi/8,3\pi/8$: indeed, by unfolding the first you get a nice octagon but by unfolding the second you get two copy of the octagon (that is, a Riemann surface that is not connected) and this explains why your comment doesn't contradict the facts claimed in the survey. 


Best regards,


Matheus


