Let $k$ be a finite field, say with $q=p^a$ elements. Honda-Tate theory states that there is a bijection between isogeny classes of *simple* abelian varieties over $k$ and $\mathrm{Gal}(\overline{\mathbb{Q}}/\mathbb{Q})$-conjugacy classes of algebraic integers in $\mathbb{C}$ all of whose conjugate have absolute value $p^{a/2}$ (these are the so-called "Weil numbers"). For a beautiful survey, see Tate's  [Bourbaki seminar](http://archive.numdam.org/article/SB_1968-1969__11__95_0.pdf) .


Given a simple abelian variety $A/k$, the associated Weil number $\pi\_A$ (or rather its conjugacy class) corresponds to the Frobenius endomorphism, view as an element of $\mathrm{End}\_k(A)$. Let now $C$ be a smooth, projective, irreducible curve over $k$ and let $\mathcal{A}/C$ be an abelian scheme, therefore a family of abelian varieties parametrized by points of $C$. There is a Frobenius operator acting on $\mathcal{A}$ giving the Frobenius operator on each fiber $A\_v$ for all $v\in C$, and these fibers are abelian varieties over finite fields for all closed $v$. My question is how Honda-Tate behaves in families, so if we can find a **bijection** between isogeny types of $\mathcal{A}/C$ and "polynomials" in $\mathcal{O}\_C[T]$ (or may be in $\Gamma(C,\mathcal{O}\_C)[T]$?) whose specialization at every closed point has roots that are Weil numbers.


EDIT: As Piotr Achinger observes, it seems reasonable that the coefficients be in characteristic $0$. I do not know if hoping the coefficients to live in the Witt vectors of $\mathcal{O}\_C$ is enough for giving some sense to "a family parametrized by $C$.


I am tempted to think the answer should be "yes", being so fiber-wise. On the other hand, if we pick a "random" collection of Weil polynomials building an element of $\mathcal{O}\_C[T]$, I would be surprised if we can build an abelian scheme over $C$ having the "right" fibers (because, for instance, abelian schemes must have good reduction everywhere, and it seems too strong a condition to be simply controlled by a "nice" collection, if what I write ever makes any sense).


If the answer to my question is "yes" (or if it can be made to be "yes" after some modification of my question...), is this "polynomial" in two variables related to the Hasse-Weil function of the abelian scheme? After all, they are both constructed by looking at Frobenius acting on Tate modules, so I would expect a connection. 



Honda-Tate in families
I think your intuition that Weil numbers generalize to functions is wrong, or rather only partially correct. A Weil "number" is in fact a sheaf on $\operatorname{Spec}\mathbb F\_p$: The sheaf corresponding to the Galois representation that sends $Frob\_p$ to a matrix whose characteristic polynomial is the minimal polynomial of $\pi\_A$. 


Lisse and constructible sheaves, or rather their derived categories / Grothendieck groups, are often the appropriate scheme-theoretic notion of function. One has addition and multiplication of functions, and even integration in the form of higher pushforward maps. Thus scheme-theoretic analogues of convolution, Fourier analysis, etc. often exist.


I will thus discuss the sheaf version of the problem. I would guess that the Witt vector version of the problem can be solved by thinking of the sheaf of Tate modules using crystalline cohomology, but as I don't know anything about crystalline cohomology you should take this with a grain of salt.


One can split the sheaf version of the problem into two parts. First, what are necessary and sufficient conditions on a constructible $l$-adic sheaf on $C$ for it to be the sheaf of Tate modules of an abelian scheme over $C$? Second, if two abelian varieties $A\_1$ and $A\_2$ have the same sheaf of Tate modules, are they isogenous?


I don't have much to say about the first part, but the second part is a special case of the Tate conjecture. An isomorphism between $R^1 \pi\_{1\*} \mathbb Q\_l$ and $R^1 \pi\_{2\*} \mathbb Q\_l$ produces a Galois-invariant cohomology class in $H^0(C,R^1 \pi\_{1\*} \mathbb Q\_l ^\vee \otimes R^1 \pi\_{2\*} \mathbb Q\_l)$, which is a quotient of $H^2( A\_1^\vee \times \_C A\_2, \mathbb Q\_l)$. If the Tate conjecture is true, then that cohomology class is a $\mathbb Q\_l$-linear combination of classes induced by algebraic cycles. At least one of those cycles must correspond to a line bundle on $A\_1^{\vee} \times\_C A\_2$ that induces a nontrivial morphism $A\_2 \to A\_1$. For $A\_1$ and $A\_2$ simple abelian schemes this must be an isogeny. It is not too hard to see that this means we can also get an isogeny for products of simple abelian schemes.


I have no idea whether this special case of the Tate conjecture has a solution. A similar problem that naively seems about as hard, the Tate conjecture for $H^1 (R^1 \pi\_\* \mathbb Q\_l)$ of an elliptic surface, is the function field BSD conjecture.


