I have two questions on complex geometry.


First one is that why the existence of almost complex structure on tangent bundle on real 2n-dimensional manifold is a topological question?


Wikipedia describes it as a topological question. I think that mean there is some homology or cohomology group associated to topological property whose vanishing or nonvanishing pertains to the existence.


Would you explain why it should be a topological question intuitively and may I suggest exact topological invariant which captures the existence property?


Second, in Huybrechts's book 'Complex Geometry',
when it comes to Euler exact sequence on $P^n$, he mentioned that there is natural inclusion map such that $O(-1)\rightarrow\oplus\_{j=0}^{n}O$.
I can hardly come up with any idea on what this inclusion map is.


If possible, would you let me know the exact expression for this map?
(here, $O(-1)$ is the tautological line bundle sheaf on $P^n$ and $O$ is the holomorphic sheaf of the trivial line bundle) 


Hoping to get some shedding light in your reply.



Two questions on complex geometry
(1) Why is the existence of an almost-complex structure a topological question? Suppose $M$ is a $2n$-manifold. The tangent bundle is classified by some map $M\to BGL\_{2n}(\mathbb{R})$; $M$ admits an almost-complex structure if and only if this map admits a lift to $BGL\_{n}(\mathbb{C})$ (that is, an almost-complex structure is the same as endowing the tangent bundle with the structure of a complex vector bundle). The existence of such a lift depends only on the homotopy type of the map $M\to BGL\_{2n}(\mathbb{R})$, and is thus a topological question. As such, it can be analyzed via standard methods in obstruction theory, which I will leave for you to google.


(2) Suppose we have a projective space $\mathbb{P}V$, where $V$ is some vector space of dimension $n+1$. Then a map $X\to\mathbb{P}V$ is the same as a line bundle $\mathcal{L}$ on $X$ and a surjective map $V\otimes \mathcal{O}\_X\to \mathcal{L}$. The identity map on $\mathbb{P}V$ classifies such data---namely, a map $V\otimes \mathcal{O}\_{\mathcal{P}V}\to \mathcal{O}(1)$. Explicitly, this map is given by identifying the global sections of $\mathcal{O}(1)$ with $V$, via the standard computation of the cohomology of line bundles on projective space.


Now your map is dual of this map. (Picking a basis $(x\_i)$ of $V=\Gamma(\mathbb{P}V, \mathcal{O}(1))$, this map is given by multiplication by $(x\_i)$.) 


By the way, the Euler exact sequence admits a very geometric interpretation. Namely, there is a sequence of maps $\mathbb{A}^{n+1}\setminus\{0\}\to \mathbb{P}^n\to \operatorname{pt}$, where the first map is the usual quotient by $\mathbb{C}^\*$. This induces a short exact sequence of cotangent bundles $$0\to \pi^\*\Omega^1\_{\mathbb{P}^n}\to \Omega^1\_{\mathbb{A}^{n+1}\setminus\{0\}}\to \Omega^1\_{(\mathbb{A}^{n+1}\setminus\{0\})/\mathbb{P}^n}\to 0.$$


Each of these sheaves admits an (equivariant) action of $\mathbb{C}^\*$, and so descend to sheaves on $\mathbb{P}^n$, giving exactly the Euler exact sequence.


