Let $G$ be a compact semisimple group and let $\Gamma$ be a finite subgroup of $G$. I am interested, for $(\pi,V)\in \widehat G$ (irred rep of $G$), in a formula for $\mathrm{dim} V^\Gamma$, the dimension of the invariant space of $V$ by $\Gamma$. When $\Gamma$ is the trivial group, Weyl dimension formula says that
$$
\mathrm{dim}(V) = \prod\_{\alpha\in\Phi^+} \frac{\langle\lambda+\rho,\alpha\rangle}{\langle\rho,\alpha\rangle},
$$
where $\lambda$ is the highest weight of $\pi$ (I think the notation is usual).


One idea: let $P:V\to V$ given by 
$$
P(v)=\frac1{|\Gamma|} \sum\_{\gamma\in\Gamma} \pi(\gamma)(v),
$$
then $P$ is surjective onto $V^\Gamma$, thus $\mathrm{dim}(V^\Gamma)= \mathrm{Tr}(P) = |\Gamma|^{-1} \sum\_{\gamma\in\Gamma} \chi\_\pi(\gamma)$, where $\chi\_\pi$ is the character of $\pi$. Hence, by applying the Weyl character formula, we obtain a formula for $\mathrm{dim}(V^\Gamma)$. However, I expect that there is a more explicit formula (like Weyl dimension formula, without a sum over the Weyl group) in terms of the root system of $\mathfrak g$. 


Question: Is there a formula for $\mathrm{dim}(V^\Gamma)$ similar to Weyl Dimension Formula?



Extension of the Weyl dimension formula
Probably there is no explicit formula of the type you want. In any case, it's important to look first at the most accessible special cases (even though Weyl's formulas may be kept in the background). For example, consider $G= \mathrm{SU}(2)$ and its finite subgroups, using both the McKay correspondence and the Lie theoretic information about representations of $G$ afforded by symmetric powers of the natural 2-dimensional module. In this situation you are asking for the Poincare series of the resulting algebra of invariants of a given finite subgroup $\Gamma$. 


More generally you could consider the multiplicities of all irreducible representations of $\Gamma$ in the various irreducible representations of $G$. This has been studied in detail by Kostant in the mid-1980s, with emphasis on the interplay of Lie theory and McKay's theory. Even in this relatively small case, the results are fairly complicated and therefore cautionary for the general question you are raising. The root system and Weyl group (along with its Coxeter elements) do however come directly into the picture. Here are references to the announcement and full article:


On finite subgroups of $\mathrm{SU}(2)$, simple Lie algebras, and the McKay correspondence. *Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.* 81 (1984), no. 16, Phys. Sci., 5275–5277.


The McKay correspondence, the Coxeter element and representation theory.
The mathematical heritage of Elie Cartan (Lyon, 1984).
*Asterisque* 1985, Numero Hors Serie, 209–255.


