In this question, we will follow the notations and definitions from the book "Automorphic Representations and L-Functions for the General Linear Group" by Goldfeld and Hundley. For simplicity, let's focus of $GL\_2$. The definition of an (cuspidal) automorphic representation with central character $\omega$ is given in Definition 5.1.12, (5.1.14), where $\omega$ is a unitary Hecke character 
$$\omega: \mathbb{Q}^{\times} \backslash \mathbb{A}\_{\mathbb{Q}}^{\times} \rightarrow \mathbb{C}^{\times}$$


i.e. it is a smooth $(\mathfrak{g},K\_{\infty}) \times GL(2,\mathbb{A}\_{\text{finite}})$-module which is also isomorphic to a subquotient of the complex vector space of adelic (cusp) automorphic forms. As I literally know nothing about the theory of automorphic representations, I have two questions to bother the community.


1. Suppose we have two cuspidal automorphic representations with the same central character $\omega$, and if they are isomorphic as $(\mathfrak{g},K\_{\infty}) $ modules, are they isomorphic as automorphic representations? If not, do the two automorphic representations have any relations?
2. Given a $(\mathfrak{g},K\_{\infty}) $ module, how to check whether there exists a cuspidal automorphic representation whose local representation at $\infty$ is just this module? E.g. in order for this to be true, are there restrictions on this module? On the other hand, if there exists such a cuspidal automorphic representation, is it unique?


Any references are welcomed!



To what extent does the $(\mathfrak{g},K_{\infty})$ module determines the automorphic representation?
1) No, two distinct cuspidal automorphic representations can have the same underlying $(\mathfrak{g},K)$-module. In particular, if the $(\mathfrak{g},K)$-module is a weight $k$ discrete series, then the cuspidal automorphic representations corresponds to a holomorphic newform of weight $k$, and there are plenty of these. On the other hand, if the $(\mathfrak{g},K)$-module is a principal series representation, then there conjecturally are very few cuspidal automorphic representations that share the same $(\mathfrak{g},K)$-module, though they do exist: the known ones are quadratic twists. See [my recent paper](https://doi.org/10.1093/imrn/rnx283) for further discussion on this problem.


2) For weight $k$ discrete series, there are formulae for the dimensions of spaces of holomorphic cusp forms of weight $k$, so this is easily done. For principal series, this is a very hard question. These correspond to Maass cusp forms, so you are asking whether given a positive real number $\lambda$, there exists a Maass cusp form with Laplacian eigenvalue $\lambda$. We only *explicitly* know a very thin sequence of such Laplacian eigenvalues, namely those corresponding to Hecke Größencharaktere, whose Laplacian eigenvalues are related to logarithms of fundamental units of real quadratic fields.


