Excuse me if this question is trivial or trivially false, or not at this sites level. Lets work over an algebraically closed field of characteristic $p>0$, say $k$. The action of the Frobenius on $H^r\_{crys}(X/W(k))$ gives us a sequence of positive rational numbers $a\_i$ by taking the order of the eigenvalues.


Now if $X$ has a good lift to $W(k)$, $Y$, say with torsion free $H^p(Y, \Omega\_Y/W)$, I believe we can decompose the Frobenius morphism using Hodge decomposition to obtain an inequality $a\_i\le r$.


My question is whether this is true in general. This may be trivial, but I am a bit new to Crystalline cohomology so I can't figure it out.



Are the Eigenvalues of the Frobenius on Crystalline cohomology bounded by degree?
I assume that you mean $H^r\_{crys}(X/W(k))$ because $H^r\_{crys}(X/k)$ is just the de Rham cohomology over $k$.


Next, over arbitrary base field this definition of $a\_i$'s(they are called slopes of Frobenius) does not make sense because Frobenius is only $p$-linear and its eignevalues a priori depend on the choice of a linearization(see Example 8.1.3 [here](http://math.stanford.edu/%7Econrad/papers/notes.pdf)). Over a finite field one can use that some power of Frobenius is linear, so eigenvalues $\beta\_i$ of $F^n$ are well-defined and we put $a\_i=\mathrm{ord}\_p (\beta\_i)/n$. Over arbitrary $k$ one should use Dieudonne-Manin classification(Thm 8.1.4 in the linked notes).


Now, let us see what restrictions we have on these slopes. I know to proofs of the fact that on $H^r$ slopes are in the interval $[0,r]$ for $r\leq n$ and are in the interval $[r-n,n]$ for $r\geq n$.


First one works in the case $X$ is projective. In what follows, let us denote by $H^r$ the cohomology $H^r\_{crys}(X/W(k))/torsion$. First, there is a perfect pairing given by Poincare duality $$H^r\otimes H^{2n-r}\to W(k)(n)$$ where $W(k)(n)$ means $1$-dimensonal module with action of $F$ via $p^n$. This means that if $a\_1,\dots,a\_k$ are slopes of $F$ on $H^r$ then $n-a\_1,\dots,n-a\_k$ are slopes of $F$ on $H^{2n-r}$. So, we already see that slopes are in the interval $[0,n]$. For a proof of Poincare duality see, for example, Berthelot's book "Cohomologie Cristalline des Schemas de Characteristique p>0".


Next, for porjective $X$ we have Hard Lefschetz theorem(it holds only rationally):$$L^{n-r}:H^r[1/p]\cong H^{2n-r}[1/p]$$ where $L$ is multiplication by hyperplane section, the Lefschetz operator. For $x\in H^r[1/p]$ we have $F(L^{n-r} x)=F(L^{n-r})F(x)=p^{n-r}L^{n-r}F(x)$ because Frobenius on projective space multiplies hyperplane section by $p$. This means that slopes on $H^{2n-r}$ are obtained fromf slopes on $H^{r}$ by adding $n-r$, so $\{a\_1+n-r,\dots,a\_k+n-r\}=\{n-a\_1,\dots,n-a\_k\}$. In other words, for every $a\_i$ there exists $a\_j$ such that $a\_i+n-r=n-a\_j$ so $a\_i+a\_j=r$ and thus all slopes $a\_i$ are less or equal than $r$. The proof of Hard Lefschetz can be found in Katz and Messing "Some Consequences of the Riemann Hypothesis for Varieties over Finite Fields"


Another proof which works, more generally, for arbitrary proper $X$ can be obtained using de Rham-Witt complex. A great account for this theory is given in the original paper by Illusie "Complexe de de Rham-Witt et cohomologie cristalline". In short, crystalline cohomology can be computed as hypercohomology of certain complex $W\Omega^{\bullet}$ of sheaves of abelian groups on $X$. It turns out that, modulo torsion, the corresponding spectral sequence degenrates(as in Hodge theory in characteristic zero) giving, in particular, that the subspace of $H^r[1/p]$ with slopes in the interval $[i,i+i[$ is equal to $H^{r-i}(W\Omega^i\_X)[1/p]$ which gives that there are no slopes on $H^r$ less than $r-n$ which is exactly what we wanted combined with Poincare duality.


