I'm interested in studying a certain generalization of determinental varieties as defined here:
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Determinantal_variety>


To be more specific, I must first lay out a few definitions.  

Consider the variety
$X=Mat\_{n\_1, n\_2}(\mathbb{C})\times Mat\_{n\_2, n\_3}(\mathbb{C})\times... Mat\_{n\_{k-1}, n\_k}(\mathbb{C}).$


There exists an action of $(g\_1, ..., g\_k)\in GL\_{n\_1}(\mathbb{C})\times... \times GL\_{n\_k}(\mathbb{C})$ on $X$ given by
$$(g\_1, ..., g\_k)\cdot(x\_1, x\_2, ..., x\_{k-1})=(g\_1x\_1g\_2^{-1}, ..., g\_{k-1}x\_{k-1}g\_k^{-1}).$$


Letting $r\_{ij}$ denote the rank of $x\_ix\_{i+1}... x\_j$, the orbits are completely determined by all valid choices for the values of $r\_{ij}$. One can see from this definition that when $k=2$, choosing any $0\leq r\_{12}\leq \min\{n\_1, n\_2\}$ precisely gives us the case of determinental varieties of rank $r\_{12}$.  

In this case, it is known that the closure is given by all of those elements of $M\_{n\_1, n\_2}(\mathbb{C})$ or rank *at most* $r\_{12}$. As indicated on the wiki page, these closures are singular, and have well known resolutions.


I believe that in the more general case I have outlined above, the closures of the orbits will also be singular, where the "=$r\_{ij}$"'s determining the orbits, will be replaced with all "$\leq r\_{ij}$" for the closures, and that these closures will, in general, be singular.


**Question:** I would like to know if these varieties have been studied in general by algebraic geometers, if so, what is their name? Are there known resolutions of the closures, and bonus points if we have a good understanding of their fibers, or rather, the cohomology of the fibers.


Note, that is this paper of Zelevinsky:
[http://www.math.utah.edu/~ptrapa/math-library/zelevinsky/zelevinski\_tworemarks.pdf](http://www.math.utah.edu/%7Eptrapa/math-library/zelevinsky/zelevinski_tworemarks.pdf)
though dressed up differently, the varieties I'm interested in studying are embedded inside Schubert varieties. I think the implication being that one might know where to go from here?


Thanks.



Searching for resolutions of generalized determinental varieties
These are "type A quiver cycles" (a name chosen so as not to collide with type A quiver varieties, which involve taking quotients; here the quotient would be a point). Your guess for the closure is correct. We compute the equivariant cohomology classes of these varieties in [Four positive formulae for type A quiver polynomials](https://arxiv.org/abs/math/0308142), and give non-small resolutions of them (also in types D,E) in [Kempf collapsing and quiver loci](https://arxiv.org/abs/math/0608327). You can find the K-classes in the latter paper, though we weren't first on that.


There are similar results available if some of the arrows in the type A quiver are flipped, in [Three combinatorial formulas for type A quiver polynomials and K-polynomials](https://arxiv.org/abs/1503.05880).


