Does anyone have a clue where the "h" came from? 



History question - why h in the definition of derivative?
I think that use of $h$ in the definition of derivative is linked to the relationship between Calculus of Finite Difference and Differential Calculus. 


In the book *Leçons sur le Calcul des Fonctions*, Councier, **1806**, [Lagrange](http://archive.org/stream/leonssurlecalcu01lagrgoog#page/n12/mode/2up):


1. Assigns to Maclaurin and d'Alembert the origin of differentiation as the limit of finite differences, (pp. 1);
2. Writes "Considerons un fonction $fx$ d'une variable quelconque $x$. Si la place de $x$ on substitue $x + i$, $i$ étant une quantité quelconque indetermineé, elle divendra $f(x + i)$ ...", (pp. 8);
3. Develops $f(x + i)$ in series: 
$$f(x+ i) = fx + i f'x + \frac{i^2}{2} f''x + \frac{i^3}{2 . 3}f'''x + \frac{i^4}{2.3.4}f^{iv}+ \mbox{etc}$$ as we can see at (pp. 15), and
4. Writes "Nous appelerons la fonction $fx$ fonction primitive... Nous nommerous de plus la fontion dérivée $f'x$, primière fonction dérivée ou fonction derivée du primier ordre...", (pp. 15).


Notes B of [Lacroix's](http://archive.org/stream/anelementarytre00babbgoog#page/n609/mode/2up) book *An Elementary Treatise on the Differential and Integral Calculus*, Cambridge, **1816**, pp. 599, , using $h$ instead $i$, is based on Lagrange's work. 


In **1829**, Dr. Martin Ohm, in *Versuch eines vollkommen consequenten Systems der Mathematik*, Vol. III, pp.53, Berlin, available [here](http://books.google.com/books/about/Versuch_eines_vollkommen_consequenten_sy.html?id=eQI4AAAAMAAJ&redir_esc=y), uses $h$. He writes:


$$f(x+h)=f(x) + \partial f(x).h+\partial^2 f(x) .\frac{h^2}{2!} + \partial^3 f(x) .\frac{h^3}{3!} +.\ldots$$


Also, as we can see, Dr. Martin Ohm uses factorials!! (Martin and Georg Ohm were brothers. Georg discovered the Ohm's Law).


In G. Boole, *Treatise on the Calculus of Finite Differences*, MacMillan, London, **1880**, pp.1, we can read: " The Calculus of Finite Differences may be strictly defined as the science which is occupied about the ratios of the simultaneous increments of quantities mutually dependent. The Differential Calculus is occupied about the limits to which such ratios approach as the increments are definitely diminished" [Boole1](http:////archive.org/stream/treatiseoncalcul00booluoft#page/n15/mode/2up).


At pages 2 and 3 , we can see the definition of derivative using $h$. All arguments are based on Finite Differences [Boole2](http:////archive.org/stream/treatiseoncalcul00booluoft#page/2/mode/2up).


The differentiation was developed based on trigonometric assumptions (method of tangents). A very good history can be found in H.Sloman, *The Claim of Leibnitz to the Invention of the Differential Calculus*, MacMillan, **1860** [Sloman1](http://archive.org/details/claimleibnitzto00slomgoog).


A possible explanation for the use of h in the definition of derivative (**and the link between Differential Calculus and Calculus of Finite Differences**) can be found in this book at page 127, second paragraph [Sloman2](http://archive.org/stream/claimleibnitzto00slomgoog#page/n139/mode/2up).


PS: Although $h$ has been used in the books mentioned above (1816, 1829, 1860 and 1880), Milne-Thomson, in his *recent* book (**1933**), uses $\omega$ instead [Milne-Thomson](http://archive.org/stream/calculusoffinite032017mbp#page/n25/mode/2up). 


Milne-Thomson's book can be considered an example of Euler's notation use.
In *Institutiones calculi differentialis cum eius usu in analysi finitorum ac doctrina serierum*, Chapter 1, *De differentiis finitis*, pp.1, **1787**, [Euler](http://eulerarchive.maa.org/pages/E212.html) writes "variabilis x capiat incrementum $\omega$" ! 


