I have a nonlinear, two point boundary value problem of the form 
$F(x, y(x), y'(x); \Omega ) = y''$ along with some boundary conditions of the form $y\_\Omega(0) = a\_\Omega, y\_{\Omega}(1) = b\_\Omega$. The set $\Omega$ is a set of parameters which both alters the dynamics and changes the locations of the boundary points. 


Now, suppose to I have a solution to this BVP (call it $y\_\Omega(x))$, and I change the parameters in $\Omega$ a small bit (resulting in new boundary points) - am I guaranteed to again have a solution $Y\_{\Omega'}$ that is "close" to the original function in some sense? 


Really, I am asking if there is an implicit function theorem for boundary value problems. 


Alternatively, since my BVP is derived via the Euler-Lagrange equations, I would be fine if there was an implicit function theorem for the minimum of an integral, as well. 



Implicit function theorem for boundary value problems
There is an implicit function theorem for smooth nonlinear maps between Banach spaces. You can apply this to your problem by considering the mapping 
$$(y,\Omega)\mapsto (y''-F,y(0),y(1))$$
from $C^2[0,1]\times (your\ parameter\ set)$ to $C[0,1]\times R^2$. 


