Assume all the matrices I discuss about are $N \times N$. Consider any two hermitian matrices $A\_1$ and $A\_2$ which are indefinite. The question is, In general, for any $A\_1$ and $A\_2$ (both matrices are guaranteed to have at least one zero eigen value), does there exist any positive number $t$ such that equation
\begin{align}
(tA\_1+(1−t)A\_2)x=0
\end{align}
has a non-zero vector $x$ as a solution.


( This is my first question in mathoverflow. I am not a mathematician, but from an engineering back ground. In my application, this kind of problem arises. My level of mathematical maturity is not enough to solve it. I hope some one here can.)



Convex Combination of 2 hermitian matrices
Consider the characteristic polynomial 
$$
\lambda^N -a\_1(t)\lambda^{N-1} + \dots +(-1)^{N} a\_N(t) = 0
$$
of your Hermitian matrix $tA\_1 +(1-t)A\_2$ which has all roots real and whose coefficients are real analytic as functions of $t$. By a theorem of Rellich, the roots can be arranged as real analytic functions of $t$ also. Moreover, the eigenvectors of $tA\_1 + (1-t)A\_2$ can also be arranged real analytic in $t$. See [Dmitri Alekseevky, Andreas Kriegl, Mark Losik, Peter W. Michor: Choosing roots of polynomials smoothly, Israel J. Math 105 (1998)] [(pdf)][1](http://www.mat.univie.ac.at/~michor/roots.pdf).
(2.5 is wrong in this paper.)


By your assumptions you have at both $t=0$ and $t=1$:
At least one positive root, one negative root, and one root zero.  

From this follows nothing, and it is easy to come up with simple examples with any outcome.


But if you can ascertain that a positive eigenvector for $A\_1$ turns into a negative one for $A\_2$, then the corresponding eigenvalue must go through 0 in between. 


Maybe this can help you playing with your assumptions.


