Let $A$ be an abelian variety defined over a number field $K$. Fix a prime $v \subset \mathcal{O}\_K$, with underlying rational prime $p$. What relationship, known or conjectural (if any), should there be between the local Tamagawa number $c\_v(A) = [A(K\_v): A\_0(K\_v)]$ and the cardinality of the $p$-primary subgroup $A(K\_v)(p)$ of $A(K\_v)$? 


I am aware of the recent work of Lorenzini, which 
considers possible cancellations of the ratio \begin{align\*}
\frac{\prod\_{v \subset \mathcal{O}\_K} c\_v(A)}{\vert A(K)\_{\operatorname{tors}}\vert},
\end{align\*} and shows for instance this ratio for $A$ an elliptic curve defined 
over $K ={\bf{Q}}$ is always greater than or equal to $\frac{1}{5}$. 


The question comes up naturally in a certain Euler characteristic computations (e.g. for the 
$p^{\infty}$-Selmer group of $A$ defined over some profinite Galois extension $K\_{\infty}$ of $K$, where certain primes of $K$ are known to split completely, and hence where the torsion subgroup $A(K\_{\infty})\_{\operatorname{tors}}$ is known to be finite). In particular, granted the refined conjecture of Birch and Swinnerton-Dyer, it is apparent from these computations that $c\_v(A)$ for a prime of bad (multiplicative) reduction $v$ is given essentially by the quotient `\begin{align*}\frac{\vert H^1(G_w, A(K_{\infty, w}))(p)\vert }{\vert H^2(G_w, A(K_{\infty, w}))(p)\vert }. \end{align*}` Here, $K\_{\infty, w}$ is the union of all completions at primes above $v$ in $K\_{\infty}$, and $G\_w$ denotes the Galois group $\operatorname{Gal}(K\_{\infty, w}/K\_v)$. 
If $A$ has good ordinary reduction at all primes above $p$ in $K$, then it is possible to use the Coates-Greenberg theory of deeply ramified extensions to characterize the local factor at $v$ in the Euler characteristic formula coming from this quotient as $\vert \widetilde{A}(\kappa\_v)(p)\vert^2$, where $\widetilde{A}$ is the reduction of $A$ mod $v$, and $\kappa\_v$ the residue field at $v$ (which is consistent with B+S-D). But, this characterization seems to break down when $A$ does not have good ordinary reduction at $v$, and I have not found any calculations in the literature for this case of bad reduction. Hence why I ask about any possible known relation to torsion. Sorry if the question is silly!



Tamagawa numbers of abelian varieties and torsion.
There is no general relation between the local $p$-primary torsion and the Tamagawa numbers. I believe one can have $p$-torsion points that map to non-trivial or to the trivial element in the group of components of the Neron model.


This should indicate you that, in your Euler characteristic formula, you can not hope to replace the square of the local $p$-primary part with just the Tamagawa numbers when the reduction is not good ordinary. 


If I understand correctly what you want to do is to compute the cokernel of the universal norms on the local points at a place above $p$. I would start by looking at papers about the case of a $\mathbb{Z}\_p$-extension. If the reduction is multiplicative, then the computations were carried out by John W. Jones in Compositio 73 (1990). He has also a paper about the additive case. If your reduction is good but not ordinary, then it is a completely different story since the cokernel is not finite. I am sure there are many other references


