10.  During  Plaintiff’s  employment  with  Defendant,  Defendant  employed two or more employees which handled goods, materials and supplies  which had travelled in interstate commerce.   11.  Included in such goods, materials and supplies were computers,  telephones, office equipment and furniture, as well as numerous other goods,  materials and supplies which had been carried in interstate commerce.       12.  Therefore, Defendant is considered an enterprise covered by the  FLSA, and as defined by 29 U.S.C. §203(r) and 203(s).     13.  Additionally, Plaintiff and other special investigators are  individually covered by the FLSA as a result of routine e-mails and telephone  calls which transact business in interstate commerce.  2.  Plaintiff has worked for Defendant since 2005.     26.  During their employment with Defendant, special investigators,  including Plaintiff, worked numerous overtime hours for Defendant.   27.  During their employment with Defendant, special investigators  were all paid a salary.   28.  Even though Plaintiff and these similarly situated employees  worked overtime hours, they were not paid any additional compensation in  addition to their weekly salary by Defendant.   3.  Plaintiff worked for Defendant based out of Land O’ Lakes, Florida.     30.  Based on information and belief, Defendant classifies Plaintiff and  other special investigators as exempt under the administrative exemption.   31.  Defendant does nor rely on any other exemption as a basis not to pay  Plaintiff and other special investigators overtime pay.     32.  Plaintiff and other special investigators are not exempt because  their primary job duties did not entail the exercise of discretion and independent  judgment with respect to matters of significance.   33.  Typically, investigative employees do not meet the duties section of  the administrative exemption.  See 29 C.F.R. § 541.203(j).     34.  As such, Defendant cannot meet its burden to prove that these  employees are exempt from overtime compensation under the FLSA.    35.  The additional persons who may become plaintiffs in this action are  employees who held positions similarly to Plaintiff and who worked in excess of  forty (40) hours during one or more work weeks during the relevant time periods  but who did not receive pay at one and one-half times their regular rate for their  hours worked in excess of forty (40) hours.    37.  Upon information and belief, the records, to the extent any exist and  are accurate, concerning the number of hours worked and amounts paid to  Plaintiff and other similarly situated employees are in the possession and  custody of Defendant.  4.  Defendant is a Florida Corporation that operates under the  Assurant umbrella.    5.  Assurant is a global provider of risk management procedures and  services.   6.  As part of the insurance offerings provided by Assurant and its  subsidiaries, Defendant employs special investigators throughout the company  whose primary duties include conducting investigations of suspected claims.   7.  This action is brought under the FLSA to recover from Defendant  overtime compensation, liquidated damages, and reasonable attorneys’ fees and  costs.  This action is intended to include each and every special investigator who  was classified as exempt and who worked for Defendant at any time within the  past three (3) years.   8.  This Court has jurisdiction over Plaintiff’s claims pursuant to 28  U.S.C. §1331 and the FLSA and the authority to grant declaratory relief under  the FLSA pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §2201 et seq.  