30.  Plaintiff re-states, re-alleges, and incorporates herein by reference, paragraphs one (1)  through twenty nine (29) as if set forth fully in this cause of action.   31.  This cause of action is brought on behalf of Plaintiff and the members of a class.   32.  Class C consists of all persons whom Defendant's records reflect resided in the New  York State and who received telephone messages from the Defendant's collection  representatives within one year prior to the date of the within complaint up to the date of  the filing of the complaint; (a) which stated that the messages were from “The Law Firm  of Richard J. Boudreau & Associates LLC but which failed to qualify that the debt had  not been reviewed by an attorney and / or that the telephone messages did not qualify  that the persons leaving the messages were non-attorneys at the firm; (b) the messages  were left concerning the seeking payment of an alleged debt; and (c) that Plaintiff asserts  that the messages contained violations of 15 U.S.C. §§ 1692e, 1692e(3) and 1692e(10).   33.  Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23, a class action is appropriate and  preferable in this case because:  -8-  (a) Based on the fact that form telephonic messages and form collection letters are at  the heart of this litigation, the class is so numerous that joinder of all members is  impracticable.   (b) There are questions of law and fact common to the class and these questions  predominate over any question(s) affecting only individual class members.  The  principal question presented by this claim is whether the Defendant violated the  Violations of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act brought by Plaintiff on behalf of herself and the  members of a class, as against the Defendant.  