13.  On or about July 4, 2014, Enerson mailed a debt collection letter to Plaintiff  regarding an alleged debt owed to “CAPITAL ONE, N.A.” A copy of this letter is attached as  Exhibit A.   14.  Upon information and belief, Enerson first became involved in the collection of  the alleged debt identified in Exhibit A after the alleged debt was in default.   15.  Upon information and belief, Exhibit A was the first letter Enerson sent Plaintiff  regarding the alleged debt to which the letter refers.   16.  Upon information and belief, Exhibit A is a form letter, generated by computer,  and with the information specific to Plaintiff inserted by computer.   18.  Plaintiff did not receive any other written communications from Enerson  containing the 15 U.S.C. § 1692g(a) notice, either before or after Exhibit A.  19.  Plaintiff incorporates by reference as if fully set forth herein the allegations  contained in the preceding paragraphs of this Complaint.   20.  Enerson failed to provide to Plaintiff the required notice pursuant to 15 U.S.C. §  1692g(a).   21.  Enerson has thus failed to comply with the debt validation notice requirements  pursuant to 15 U.S.C. § 1692g(a).   22.  Failure to provide the 15 U.S.C. § 1692g(a) notice is also a false representation or  deceptive means to collect a debt, in violation of 15 U.S.C. § 1692e(10).   23.  Defendants violated 15 U.S.C. §§ 1692g(a) and 1692e(10).  24.  Plaintiff brings this action on behalf of a Class, consisting of (a) all natural  persons in the State of Wisconsin (b) who were sent an initial collection letter in the form  represented by Exhibit A, (c) seeking to collect a debt for personal, family or household  purposes, (d) on or after September 3, 2013, (e) that was not returned by the postal service.   25.  The Class is so numerous that joinder is impracticable.  Upon information and  belief, there are more than 50 members of the Class.   27.  Plaintiff’s claims are typical of the claims of the Class members.  All are based on  the same factual and legal theories.   28.  Plaintiff will fairly and adequately represent the interests of the Class members.  Plaintiff has retained counsel experienced in consumer credit and debt collection abuse cases.   29.  A class action is superior to other alternative methods of adjudicating this dispute.    Individual cases are not economically feasible. 