15.  Plaintiff Montford was an “employee”, as defined by FLSA §3(e)(1),  21USC §203(e)(1) of Defendant Forestry Management from November, 2015  through December, 2017 as a truck driver driving intrastate routes within the State  of Georgia from the forest where trees are cut and loaded onto his truck to be  delivered to the mills located in and around Barnesville, Georgia where the trees  are transformed into other products..   16.  At all times material, Defendant Spiller exercised operational control and  supervising authority over the work activities of Plaintiff Montford and Defendant  Spiller scheduled Plaintiff’s working hours and supervised scheduling as well as  exercised authority and supervision over Plaintiff Montford’s compensation.   18.  Plaintiff Montford and other similarly situated truck drivers are not exempt  under the Motor Carrier Exemption of the Fair Labors Standards Act as defined  in  13(b)(1) because Plaintiff Montford and similarly situated truck drivers are not  involved in interstate travel across state lines or connected to an interstate terminal  to continuum an interstate journey of goods. Plaintiff Montford and similarly  situated truck drivers are involved solely in intrastate trucking between the forest  and mills located in and around Barnesville Georgia within the State of Georgia.    19.  Plaintiff and similarly situated truck drivers, loaders and tree cutters are not  exempt from overtime pay by Forestry Management for forestry and lumbering  operations because the Defendant Forestry Management regularly employs more  than eight employees.    21.  The allegations in all previous paragraphs are incorporated by reference as if  fully set out in this paragraph.   22.  At all times material Plaintiff Montford has been an “employee” covered by  the FLSA and is entitled to overtime pay for all hours worked in excess of 40 hours  at one and a half rate of his regular rate of pay.   23.  At all times relevant Plaintiff Montford and similarly situated truck drivers,  loaders and tree cutters were not exempt from the overtime wage requirements of  the FLSA by reason of any exemption.   25.   Plaintiff and similarly situated truck drivers, loaders and tree cutters have  been at all times relevant required to work without the overtime compensation  required by 29 U.S.C. §207 (a)(1) for those hours worked in excess of forty (40) in  the work week.   26.   As evidenced by Plaintiff Montford’s own paycheck stubs, the Plaintiff  alleges that Defendants Forestry Management and Brand Spiller have a policy,  practice and scheme of paying truck drivers, loaders and tree cutters only straight  time for all hours worked in a workweek, no matter if the truck drivers, loaders and  tree cutters worked in excess of forty (40) hours in a workweek.   27.   From November, 2015 through, December 2017, Defendants failed to  compensate Plaintiff Montford for overtime pay in accordance with the FLSA.   29.  Defendants’ pattern and practice of violating 29 U.S.C. §207 is unlawful  under 29 U.S.C §215 (a)(2) which provides: “It shall be unlawful for any person-  (2) to violate any of the provisions of …section 207 of this title, or any of the  provisions of any regulation or order of the Secretary issued under section 214 of  this title.”    30.  Defendants Forestry Management and Spiller violations of the overtime  provisions of the FLSA are willful and intentional. 