23.  The members of the Class are so numerous that joinder of all members is  impracticable.  Throughout the Class Period, AgFeed common stock was actively traded on the  NASDAQ.  While the exact number of Class members is unknown to Plaintiffs at this time and can  only be ascertained through appropriate discovery, Plaintiffs believe that there are hundreds or  thousands of members in the proposed Class.  Record owners and other members of the Class may  be identified from records maintained by AgFeed or its transfer agent and may be notified of the  pendency of this action by mail, using the form of notice similar to that customarily used in  securities class actions.   24.   Plaintiffs' claims are typical of the claims of the members of the Class as all members  of the Class are similarly affected by Defendants' wrongful conduct in violation of federal law that is  complained of herein.   25.  Plaintiffs will fairly and adequately protect the interests of the members of the Class  and have retained counsel competent and experienced in class and securities litigation.   27.  A class action is superior to all other available methods for the fair and efficient  adjudication of this controversy since joinder of all members is impracticable.  Furthermore, as the  damages suffered by individual Class members may be relatively small, the expense and burden of  individual litigation make it impossible for members of the Class to individually redress the wrongs  done to them.  There will be no difficulty in the management of this action as a class action.  62.   Plaintiffs repeat and reallege each allegation contained above as if fully set forth  herein.  This claim is asserted against all Defendants.   63.  During the Class Period, Defendants disseminated or approved the false statements  specified above, which they knew or deliberately disregarded were misleading in that they contained  misrepresentations and failed to disclose material facts necessary in order to make the statements  made, in light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading.   64.  Defendants violated §10(b) of the Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5 in that they: (a)  employed devices, schemes and artifices to defraud; (b) made untrue statements of material facts or  omitted to state material facts necessary in order to make the statements made, in light of the  circumstances under which they were made, not misleading; or (c) engaged in acts, practices and a  course of business that operated as a fraud or deceit upon Plaintiffs and others similarly situated in  connection with their purchases of AgFeed common stock during the Class Period.   66.   Plaintiffs repeat and reallege each allegation contained above as if fully set forth  herein.  This claim is asserted against the Individual Defendants.   67.  The Individual Defendants acted as controlling persons of AgFeed within the  meaning of §20(a) of the Exchange Act.  By reason of their positions with the Company, the  Individual Defendants had the power and authority to cause AgFeed to engage in the wrongful  conduct complained of herein.   By reason of such conduct, these defendants are liable pursuant to  §20(a) of the Exchange Act.  For Violation of §10(b) of the Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5  Against All Defendants   For Violation of §20(a) of the Exchange Act  Against the Individual Defendants  