25.  Defendant Zendesk is a customer service software company founded in Copenhagen,  Denmark in 2007 and now headquartered in San Francisco, California.  The Company has been  reporting to the SEC and listed on the NYSE since conducting its initial public stock offering 2014.   26.  According to the Company, the Zendesk product family and platform is purpose-built  to help companies deliver the best customer experiences and adapt to changing customer  expectations.  Zendesk products unify customer communication and customer data across disparate  channels and departments and simplify the process of providing great omnichannel customer service  and engagement across self-service, phone calls, live chat, messaging, and email.   53.  Plaintiff incorporates ¶¶1-52 by reference.   54.  During the Class Period, defendants disseminated or approved the false statements  specified above, which they knew or deliberately disregarded were misleading in that they contained  misrepresentations and failed to disclose material facts necessary in order to make the statements  made, in light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading.   55.  Defendants violated §10(b) of the Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5 in that they:  (a) employed devices, schemes, and artifices to defraud; (b) made untrue statements of material fact  or omitted to state material facts necessary in order to make the statements made, in light of the  circumstances under which they were made, not misleading; or (c) engaged in acts, practices, and a  course of business that operated as a fraud or deceit upon plaintiff and others similarly situated in  connection with their purchases of Zendesk common stock during the Class Period.   56.  Plaintiff and the Class have suffered damages in that, in reliance on the integrity of  the market, they paid artificially inflated prices for Zendesk common stock.  Plaintiff and the Class  would not have purchased Zendesk common stock at the prices they paid, or at all, if they had been  aware that the market prices had been artificially and falsely inflated by defendants’ misleading  statements.  57.  Plaintiff incorporates ¶¶1-56 by reference.   For Violation of §10(b) of the Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5  Against All Defendants   For Violation of §20(a) of the Exchange Act  Against All Defendants  