13.  On or around September 23, 2016, Infinity AR entered into a merger agreement  whereby its wholly owned subsidiary, IAR Merger Sub, Inc., merged with and into Infinity AR.    14.  All Infinity AR shareholders, including Plaintiff, received the following or similar  message at the time of the merger:  26.  Plaintiff brings this action individually and as a class action on behalf of all  persons and entities who held Infinity AR stock at the time of the merger and were harmed  thereby (the “Class”). Excluded from the Class are defendants herein and any person, firm, trust,  corporation, or other entity related to or affiliated with any defendant.    27.  This action is properly maintainable as a class action under Rule 23 of the Federal  Rules of Civil Procedure.    28.  Numerosity: The members of the Class are so numerous and geographically  diverse that joinder of all of them is impracticable. While the exact number and identities of  members of the Class are unknown to Plaintiff at this time and can only be ascertained through  appropriate discovery, Plaintiff believes and avers that there are at least thousands of class  members.   30.  Typicality: Plaintiff’s claims are typical of the claims of other members of the  Class in that Plaintiff’s claims arise from the same course of deceptive conduct by Defendants  that affects Class Members.  Plaintiff does not have any claims adverse to the class.   31.  Adequacy: Plaintiff will fairly and adequately protect the interests of the Class.   Plaintiff’s claims are coextensive with, and not antagonistic to, the claims of other Class  Members. Plaintiff is willing and able to vigorously prosecute this action on behalf of the Class.   Plaintiff’s attorneys are competent and experienced in the area of representative and class  actions.   32.  Common questions of law and fact predominate over issues that are individual to  members of the Class. The proposed Class is sufficiently cohesive to warrant class and  representative treatment. A class action is superior to other available methods for the fair and  efficient adjudication of this action. The expense of litigating each Class Member’s claim  individually would be so cost prohibitive as to deny Class Members a viable remedy.  Plaintiff  envisions no unusual difficulty in the management of this action as a class action.  33.  Plaintiff repeats and realleges the foregoing allegations.     35.  By the acts, transactions and courses of conduct alleged herein, the Individual  Defendants, individually and acting as a part of a common plan, knowingly or recklessly and in  bad faith, have acted to unfairly deprive plaintiff and other members of the Class of the ability to  make informed and intelligent decisions regarding their investment in Infinity AR.    36.   As demonstrated by the allegations above, the Individual Defendants have  knowingly or recklessly failed to exercise the care required, and have breached their duties of  loyalty, good faith and independence owed to shareholders of Infinity AR because, among other  reasons, they failed to provide all material information about the merger to shareholders and to  act in accordance with their fundamental duties of good faith, due care and loyalty.    37.  By reason of the foregoing acts, practices and course of conduct, defendants have  violated their fiduciary obligations toward plaintiff and the other members of the Class.    38.  As a result of defendants’ unlawful actions, plaintiff and the other members of the  Class have been harmed.   39.  Plaintiff repeats and realleges the foregoing allegations.    40.  Defendant Infinity AR is sued herein as an aider and abettor of the breaches of  fiduciary duties outlined above by the Individual Defendants as members of the Board of Infinity  Aiding and Abetting the Individual Defendants’ Breach of Fiduciary Duties  Against Infinity AR   Breach of Fiduciary Duties   Against the Individual Defendants  