(29 U.S.C. § 216(b) Collective Action)  VIOLATION OF THE FAIR LABORS STANDARDS ACT  28 U.S.C. § 201, ET SEQ.   18.  Plaintiff was employed by Defendants within the statutory time frame as a  non-exempt employee in Los Angeles, California.   48.  Plaintiff realleges and incorporates all preceding paragraphs, as though  set forth in full herein.   56.  Plaintiff realleges and incorporates all preceding paragraphs, as though  set forth in full herein.   57.  By their conduct, as set forth herein, Defendants violated California  Labor Code § 510 (and the relevant orders of the Industrial Welfare Commission)  by failing to pay the California Class Members: (a) time and one-half their regular  hourly rates for hours worked in excess of eight (8) hours in a workday or in excess  of forty (40) hours in any workweek.   63.  Plaintiff realleges and incorporates all preceding paragraphs, as though  set forth in full herein.   64.  The California Class Members regularly worked shifts greater than five  (5) hours. Pursuant to Labor Code § 512 an employer may not employ someone for  a shift of more than five (5) hours without providing him or her with a meal period  of not less than thirty (30) minutes.   65.  Defendants had a common policy, practice, and/or pattern of failing to  provide the California Class Members with meal periods as required under the  Labor Code. Specifically, the California Class Members were required to work  through their meal periods, nor were they afforded the opportunity to take  uninterrupted meal periods in accordance with Cal. Labor Code § 512. Moreover,  what meal periods the California Class Members did receive were less than 30  minutes, all in violation of Labor Code and applicable Wage Orders. Moreover,  Defendants failed to compensate the California Class Members for each meal period  not provided or inadequately provided, in the form of “premium pay” as required  under Labor Code § 226.7.   66.  Therefore, pursuant to Labor Code § 226.7, the California Class  Members are entitled to damages in an amount equal to one (1) hour of wages at  their effective hourly rates of pay for each meal period not provided or deficiently  provided, a sum to be proven at trial.  72.  Plaintiff realleges and incorporates all preceding paragraphs, as though  set forth in full herein.   73.  Under Labor Code § 2802(a) an employer must indemnify its  employees for all necessary expenditures or losses incurred by the employee in  direct consequence of the discharge of his or her duties, or of his or her obedience to  the directions of the employer.    76.  Plaintiff realleges and incorporates all preceding paragraphs, as though  set forth in full herein.    77.  Numerous California Class Members are no longer employed by  Defendants; they either quit Defendants’ employ or were fired therefrom.    78.  In failing to pay the California Class Members their minimum wages,  overtime wages, premium pay for deficiently provided meal periods and rest breaks,  and unreimbursed expenses, all discussed above, Defendants willfully failed to pay  these the California Class Members all wages due and certain at the time of  termination or within seventy-two (72) hours of resignation.   79.  The wages withheld from these the California Class Members by  Defendants remained due and owing for more than thirty (30) days from the date of  separation of employment.    81.  Plaintiff realleges and incorporates all preceding paragraphs, as though  set forth in full herein.   82.  California Labor Code § 226(a) requires an employer to furnish each of  his or her employees with an accurate, itemized statement in writing showing,  among other things: (2) total hours worked by the employee . . . (9) all applicable  hourly rates in effect during the pay period and the corresponding number of hours  worked at each hourly rate by the employee. These statements must be appended to  the detachable part of the check, draft, voucher, or whatever else serves to pay the  employee’s wages; or, if wages are paid by cash or personal check, these statements  may be given to the employee separately from the payment of wages; in either case  the employer must give the employee these statements twice a month or each time  wages are paid.   87.  Plaintiff realleges and incorporates all preceding paragraphs, as though  set forth in full herein.    97.  Plaintiff realleges and incorporates all preceding paragraphs, as though  set forth in full herein.   98.  Plaintiff and the California Class Members are aggrieved employees as  defined under Labor Code § 2699(c) in that they suffered the violations alleged in  this Complaint and were employed by the alleged violators, Defendants.   FAILURE TO REIMBURSE FOR NECESSARY EXPENDITURES IN  VIOLATION OF CALIFORNIA LABOR CODE § 2802  (By Plaintiff and the California Class Members Against All Defendants)   FAILURE TO PAY MINIMUM WAGES IN VIOLATION OF CALIFORNIA  LABOR CODE §§ 1182.11-1182.13, 1194, 1194.2, AND 11197  (By Plaintiff and the California Class Members Against All Defendants)   FAILURE TO PAY WAGES AND OVERTIME IN VIOLATION OF  CALIFORNIA LABOR CODE § 510  (By Plaintiff and the California Class Members Against All Defendants)   MEAL PERIOD LIABILITY UNDER CALIFORNIA LABOR CODE § 226.7  (By Plaintiff and the California Class Members Against All Defendants)   PENALTIES PURSUANT TO   CALIFORNIA LABOR CODE § 2699, ET SEQ.  (By Plaintiff and the California Class Members Against All Defendants)   REST BREAK LIABILITY UNDER CALIFORNIA LABOR CODE § 226.7  (By Plaintiff and the California Class Members Against All Defendants)   UNFAIR COMPETITION UNDER CALIFORNIA BUSINESS AND  PROFESSIONS CODE § 17200, ET SEQ.  (By Plaintiff and the California Class Members Against All Defendants)   VIOLATION OF CALIFORNIA LABOR CODE § 226(a)  (By Plaintiff and the California Class Members Against All Defendants)   WAITING TIME PENALTIES UNDER CALIFORNIA LABOR CODE § 203  (By Plaintiff and the California Class Members Against All Defendants)  