39.  Valley Forge’s common stock was publicly traded on the OTCBB  market at all relevant times.  Defendants’ material misrepresentations, omissions  and manipulative contrivances had the effect of artificially inflating the price of  Valley Forge’s common stock and warrants.   43.  Defendants made each misrepresentation and/or omission of material  fact alleged herein with reckless disregard for, or knowledge of its false and  misleading nature.     49.  At all relevant times, the market for Valley Forge’s common stock  was an efficient market for the following reasons, among others:  a.  During the Class Period, Valley Forge’s common stock was  actively traded on the over-the-counter market, a highly efficient national securities  market.  During the Class Period, Valley Forge had tens of millions of shares  outstanding.  In or about March 30, 2012, it had roughly 62.4 million shares  outstanding.  b.  As a registered and regulated issuer of securities, Valley Forge  filed periodic reports with the Securities and Exchange Commission described in  this complaint;   50.  As a result of the above, the market for Valley Forge securities  promptly digested current information with respect to Valley Forge from all  publicly available sources and reflected such information in Valley Forge’s stock  prices.  Under these circumstances, all purchasers of Valley Forge stock during the  Class Period suffered similar injury through their purchase of securities at prices,  which were artificially inflated by Defendants’ manipulative activities.  Thus, a  presumption of reliance applies.    VI.  56.  Plaintiffs hereby incorporate by reference each of the preceding  allegations as though fully set forth herein.     57.  Defendants Brothers and Wilhide are jointly and severally liable for  Valley Forge’s material misrepresentations and omissions complained of herein  under §20(a) of the Exchange Act in that they each functioned as a control person  of Valley Forge by virtue of their respective executive and directorial positions  with the company, as well as their knowledge of and involvement in the business  of Valley Forge, their daily access to confidential information regarding the  operations and finances of Valley Forge, and their power and ability to make  public statements on behalf of Valley Forge to shareholders, potential shareholders  and the SEC during the Class Period.  As such, they had the power and ability to  control Valley Forge’s actions.  Violations of § 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934  and Rule 10b-5 Promulgated thereunder  (Against All Defendants and DOES 1-100)   Violations of § 20(a) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934   (Against Defendants Brothers, Wilhide and DOES 1-100)  