10, AND EACH OF THEM,  Defendant (s).  )  )  )  )  )  )  )  )  )  )  )  )  )  )  )  )  )  )  Case No.  10.   In the letter, Defendant attempted to induce Plaintiff to make  payments on a debt allegedly owed to Cach, LLC, originally from JP Morgan  Chase/Washington Mutual/Providian Bank, and in the amount of $17,779.31.   11.  Defendant stated in the letter: “THE LAW LIMITS HOW LONG  39.  Plaintiff repeats and reincorporates by reference into this cause of  action allegations set forth above at paragraphs 1-38.    40.   To the extent that Defendant’s actions, counted above, violated the  FDCPA, those actions were done knowingly and willfully.   41.  Pursuant to 15 U.S.C. § 1692k, Plaintiff seeks up to $1,000 for  himself and each Member of the Class for each violation of the federal Fair Debt  Collection Practices Act.    42.  Plaintiff repeats and reincorporates by reference into this cause of  action allegations set forth above at paragraphs 1-38.    43.   To the extent that Defendant’s actions, counted above, violated the  RFDCPA, those actions were done knowingly and willfully.   44.  Pursuant to Cal. Civ. Code §1788.30, Plaintiff seeks $1,000 in  statutory damages for himself and each Member of the Sub-Class for each  violation of the RFDCPA.  9.   On or around May 26, 2016, Defendant sent Plaintiff a debt collection  letter in an effort to collect an alleged debt owed from Plaintiff.  Attached as Exhibit  A is a redacted true and correct copy of this letter (“the Letter”).   CACH, LLC WILL NOT SUE YOU FOR IT, AND CACH, LLC WILL NOT  REPORT IT TO ANY CREDIT REPORTING AGENCY. WE ARE NOT A LAW  FIRM AND WE CANNOT GIVE YOU LEGAL ADVICE. SHOULD YOU  Violations of the Federal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act  15 U.S.C. § 1692 et seq.  (Plaintiff and the Class)   Violations of the Rosenthal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act  Cal. Civ. Code § 1788 et seq.  (Plaintiff and the Sub-Class)  