(Claim for Declaratory Relief that the Church Plan Exemption  Violates the  Establishment Clause of the First Amendment  to the U.S. Constitution, and is Therefore Void and  Ineffective Against Defendant Providence) ............................................ 64  (Claim for Failure to Establish a Trust Meeting the Requirements of ERISA Section 403  Against Defendant Providence)  228.  Plaintiffs incorporate and re-allege by reference the foregoing paragraphs as if  fully set forth herein.  229.  ERISA section 403, 29 U.S.C. § 1103, provides, subject to certain exceptions not  applicable here, that all assets of an employee benefit plan shall be held in trust by one or more  trustees, that the trustees shall be either named in the trust instrument or in the plan instrument  described in ERISA section 402(a), 29 U.S.C. § 1102(a), or appointed by a person who is a  named fiduciary.  230.  Although the Plan’s assets have been held in trust, the trust does not meet the  requirements of ERISA section 403, 29 U.S.C. § 1103.  231.  Defendant Providence violated section 403 by failing to put the Plan’s assets in  trust in compliance with ERISA section 403.  See 29 U.S.C. § 1103.  (Claim for Failure to Establish the Plan Pursuant to a Written  Instrument Meeting the Requirements of ERISA Section  402 Against Defendant Providence) ....................................................... 52  (Claim for Failure to Provide Minimum Funding, Including by  Failing to Comply with ERISA Funding Rules, Against  Defendant Providence)............................................................................ 50  (Claim for Failure to Establish a Trust Meeting the Requirements  of ERISA Section 403 Against Defendant Providence) ......................... 53  COUNT VI...................................................................................................................... 53  (Claim for Civil Money Penalty Pursuant to ERISA Section  502(a)(1)(A) Against Providence and the Plan  Administrator Defendants)...................................................................... 53  (Claim for Breach of Fiduciary Duty to Monitor Performance of  Other Fiduciaries Against the Monitoring Defendants) .......................... 58  COUNT IX...................................................................................................................... 60  (Claim for Co-Fiduciary Liability Against All Defendants)............................... 60  A.  Numerosity. ......................................................................................................... 43  B.  Commonality....................................................................................................... 43  C.  Typicality. ........................................................................................................... 44  D.  Adequacy. ........................................................................................................... 44  E.  Rule 23(b)(1) Requirements. .............................................................................. 45  F.  Rule 23(b)(2) Requirements. .............................................................................. 45  G.  Rule 23(b)(3) Requirements. .............................................................................. 45  VI.  SEATTLE, WASHINGTON  98101-3052  T E L E P H O N E :  ( 2 0 6 )  6 2 3 - 1 9 0 0   F A C S I MI L E :  ( 2 0 6 )  6 2 3 - 3 3 8 4  