45.  Plaintiffs incorporate by reference the foregoing allegations as if fully set forth herein.    46.  Plaintiffs and Class members used Alexa Devices in their residences or otherwise had  their private conversations overheard, recorded, intercepted, or monitored by an Alexa Device.    47.  When Plaintiffs and Class members used Alexa Devices or otherwise had their  communications recorded, stored, intercepted, or monitored by an Alexa Device, Amazon recorded  their communications, transmitted the communications to cloud servers, and retained copies of the  communications, in violation of WA Rev. Code § 9.73.030, which prohibits the willful interception  of any oral communication and the willful use of any device to intercept any oral communication.   48.  Amazon did not adequately disclose to Plaintiffs and Class members that it would  record and store their communications that occurred in the vicinity of Alexa Devices.   49.  Plaintiffs and Class members did not believe that Amazon would record and store their  interactions with Alexa Devices.   50.  Plaintiffs and Class members reasonably expected that their Alexa interactions would  remain private.    51.  Plaintiffs and Class members did not consent to have their communications recorded,  stored, intercepted, or monitored by Amazon through Alexa Devices.   52.  Amazon intentionally recorded and stored interactions Plaintiffs and Class members  had with Alexa.   53.  Amazon’s conduct violated the statute complained of herein.    60.  Plaintiff incorporates by reference the foregoing allegations as if fully set forth herein.    61.  Plaintiff and Class members used Alexa Devices in their residences or otherwise had  their private conversations overheard, recorded, intercepted, or monitored by an Alexa Device.    75.  Plaintiffs incorporate by reference the foregoing allegations as if fully set forth herein.    76.  Plaintiffs and Class members used Alexa Devices in their residences or otherwise had  their private conversations overheard, recorded, intercepted, or monitored by an Alexa Device.    77.  When Plaintiffs and Class members used Alexa Devices or otherwise had their  communications recorded, stored, intercepted, or monitored by an Alexa Device, Amazon recorded  their communications, transmitted the communications to cloud servers, retained copies of the  communications, in violation of 18 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 5703, which prohibits the willful interception of  any oral communication.    78.  Amazon did not adequately disclose to Plaintiffs and Class members that it would  record and store their communications that occurred in the vicinity of Alexa Devices.   79.  Plaintiffs and Class members did not believe that Amazon would record and store their  interactions with Alexa Devices.   80.  Plaintiffs and Class members reasonably expected that their Alexa interactions would  remain private.    81.  Plaintiffs and Class members did not consent to have their communications recorded,  stored, intercepted, or monitored by Amazon through Alexa Devices.   82.  Amazon intentionally recorded and stored interactions Plaintiffs and Class members  had with Alexa.   83.  Amazon’s conduct violated the statute complained of herein.    SEATTLE, WASHINGTON  98104  (206) 622-2000  By: /s/ Bradley S. Keller  Bradley S. Keller  Violation of the Pennsylvania Wiretapping Statute,   18 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 5703  (On Behalf of Plaintiffs Pamela Zager, Maureen Urbach, James Urbach,   and the Pennsylvania Subclass)   Violation of the Maryland Wiretapping Statute,   Md. Cts. & Jud. Pro. § 10-402  (On Behalf of Plaintiff Caron Watkins and the Maryland Subclass)   Violation of the Washington Wiretapping Statute,   WA Rev. Code § 9.73.030  (On Behalf of Plaintiffs Jeffrey Hoyt, Lorlie Tesoriero,   and the Washington Subclass)  