12.  In or around December 2013, Plaintiff Thrasher received a number of  unsolicited phone calls to her wireless phone, for which Plaintiff provided no  consent to call, in attempt to collect an alleged debt owed.     13.  Such calls were often made by prerecorded voice message.   14.  Specifically, on December 13, 2013, Plaintiff Thrasher received two  unsolicited phone calls form CMRE, both which featured a prerecorded voice.   21.  Plaintiff brings this action on behalf of herself and on behalf of and all  others similarly situated (“the Class”).   22.  Plaintiff represents, and is a member of the Class, consisting of all  persons within the United States who received any unsolicited telephone calls from  Defendant or its agents on their paging service, cellular phone service, mobile  radio service, radio common carrier service, or other service, through the use of  any automatic telephone dialing system or artificial or pre-recorded voice system  as set forth in 47 U.S.C. § 227(b)(1)(A)(3), which telephone calls by Defendant or  its agents were not made for emergency purposes or with the recipients’ prior  express consent, within four years prior to the filing of this Complaint.   33.  Plaintiff incorporates by reference all of the above paragraphs of this  Complaint as though fully stated herein.   34.  Each such telephone call was made using equipment that, upon  information and belief, had the capacity to store or produce telephone numbers to  be called, using a random or sequential number generator, and to dial such  numbers.  By using such equipment, Defendant was able to effectively make  thousands of phone calls simultaneously to lists of thousands of wireless phone  numbers of consumers without human intervention.  These telephone calls were  made without the prior express consent of the Plaintiff and other members of the  Class to receive such telephone calls.    35.  Defendant also made telephone calls featuring a prerecorded or  artificial voice without the prior express consent of the Plaintiff and other members  of the Class to receive such telephone calls.    39.  Plaintiff incorporates by reference the above paragraphs 1 through 32  inclusive, of this Complaint as though fully stated herein.   40.  Each such telephone call was made using equipment that, upon  information and belief, had the capacity to store or produce telephone numbers to  be called, using a random or sequential number generator, and to dial such  numbers.  By using such equipment, Defendant was able to effectively make  thousands of phone calls simultaneously to lists of thousands of wireless phone  numbers of consumers without human intervention.  These telephone calls were  made without the prior express consent of the Plaintiff and other members of the  Class to receive such telephone calls.    41.  Defendant also made telephone calls featuring a prerecorded or  artificial voice without the prior express consent of the Plaintiff and other members  of the Class to receive such telephone calls.    45.  As a result of Defendant’s, and Defendant’s agents’, negligent  violations of 47 U.S.C. § 227(b)(1), Plaintiff seeks for herself and each Class  member $500.00 in statutory damages, for each and every violation, pursuant to 47  U.S.C. § 227(b)(3)(B).   46.  Pursuant to 47 U.S.C. § 227(b)(3)(A), Plaintiff seeks injunctive relief  prohibiting such conduct in the future.   47.  Any other relief the Court may deem just and proper.  KNOWING AND/OR WILLFUL VIOLATIONS OF THE   TELEPHONE CONSUMER PROTECTION ACT   47 U.S.C. §§ 227 ET SEQ.   NEGLIGENT VIOLATIONS OF THE TELEPHONE CONSUMER PROTECTION ACT  47 U.S.C. §§ 227 ET SEQ.   THE TCPA, 47 U.S.C. §§ 227 ET SEQ.   VIOLATION OF THE TCPA, 47 U.S.C. §§ 227 ET SEQ.  