10.  When Plaintiff answered Defendant’s call, Plaintiff heard nothing  until he repeatedly asked who was calling, then heard a click before a live person  began talking in order to gather Plaintiff’s information and try to solicit Plaintiff to  purchase Defendant’s services.   8.  Beginning in or around September 2017, Defendant contacted  Plaintiff on Plaintiff’s cellular telephone number ending in -0810, in an attempt to  solicit Plaintiff to purchase Defendant’s services.     9.  Defendant used an “automatic telephone dialing system” as defined  by 47 U.S.C. § 227(a)(1) to place its call to Plaintiff seeking to solicit its services.    Knowing and/or Willful Violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection  Act   47 U.S.C. §227(b)   As a result of Defendant’s willful and/or knowing violations of 47  U.S.C. §227(b)(1), Plaintiff and the ATDS Class members are  entitled to and request treble damages, as provided by statute, up to  $1,500, for each and every violation, pursuant to 47 U.S.C.  §227(b)(3)(B) and 47 U.S.C. §227(b)(3)(C).    Any and all other relief that the Court deems just and proper.   Negligent Violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act  47 U.S.C. §227(c)   As a result of Defendant’s negligent violations of 47 U.S.C.  §227(c)(5), Plaintiff and the DNC Class members are entitled to and  request $500 in statutory damages, for each and every violation,  pursuant to 47 U.S.C.  227(c)(5).    Any and all other relief that the Court deems just and proper. 