14.  In addition to the facts pled above, at various times prior to the  filing of the instant complaint, including within one year preceding the filing of  this complaint, DEFENDANT contacted PLAINTIFF in an attempt to collect an  alleged outstanding debt.     15.  On or about March of 2016, Plaintiff began receiving numerous  calls from Defendant.     16.  Defendant called Plaintiff multiple times a day, sometimes at least  twelve calls a month.   On several occasions, Plaintiff told Defendant to stop  calling him,   Knowing and/or Willful Violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection  Act   47 U.S.C. §227 et seq.   As a result of Defendant’s willful and/or knowing violations of 47  U.S.C. §227(b)(1), Plaintiff and the Class members are entitled to   and request treble damages, as provided by statute, up to $1,500, for  each and every violation, pursuant to 47 U.S.C. §227(b)(3)(B) and 47  U.S.C. §227(b)(3)(C).    Any and all other relief that the Court deems just and proper.   Negligent Violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act  47 U.S.C. §227 et seq.   As a result of Defendant’s negligent violations of 47 U.S.C.  §227(b)(1), Plaintiff and the Class members are entitled to and  request $500 in statutory damages, for each and every violation,  pursuant to 47 U.S.C.  227(b)(3)(B).    Any and all other relief that the Court deems just and proper.   Violations of the Rosenthal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act  Cal. Civ. Code § 1788 et seq.  WHEREFORE, Plaintiff respectfully prays that judgment be entered against  Defendant for the following:  Violations of the Federal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act  15 U.S.C. § 1692 et seq.  WHEREFORE, Plaintiff respectfully prays that judgment be entered against  Defendant for the following: 