10.  Defendants contacted or attempted to contact Plaintiff from telephone  numbers belonging to Defendants, including without limitation (619) 889 – 8448.   11.  Defendants’ calls constituted calls that were not for emergency  purposes as defined by 47 U.S.C. § 227(b)(1)(A).   8.  Beginning in or around August of 2018, Defendant contacted Plaintiff  on Plaintiff’s cellular telephone numbers ending in -1038 in an attempt to solicit  Plaintiff to purchase Defendants’ services.     9.  Defendants used an “automatic telephone dialing system” as defined  by 47 U.S.C. § 227(a)(1) to place its calls to Plaintiff seeking to solicit its services.    Knowing and/or Willful Violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection  Act   47 U.S.C. §227(b)  � As a result of Defendants’ willful and/or knowing violations of 47  U.S.C. §227(b)(1), Plaintiff and the ATDS Class members are  entitled to and request treble damages, as provided by statute, up to  $1,500, for each and every violation, pursuant to 47 U.S.C.  §227(b)(3)(B) and 47 U.S.C. §227(b)(3)(C).   � Any and all other relief that the Court deems just and proper.   Negligent Violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act  47 U.S.C. §227(c)  � As a result of Defendants’ negligent violations of 47 U.S.C.  §227(c)(5), Plaintiff and the DNC Class members are entitled to and  request $500 in statutory damages, for each and every violation,  pursuant to 47 U.S.C.  227(c)(5).   � Any and all other relief that the Court deems just and proper. 