22.  Plaintiff has never been on a cruise nor has Plaintiff provided Defendant with her email  address.   23.  Notwithstanding, on or about September 24, 2019, Defendant sent an e-mail to Plaintiff  with the following subject line: “1-Day Exclusive Royal Sale! Up to $1,100 to Spend on Board +  Hundreds in Discounts.”    25.  Thus, Defendant’s claim of a Up to $1,100 to Spend on Board is false or misleading.   26.  Defendant’s e-mail constitutes an unsolicited commercial electronic mail message  under FEMCA because (1) it was sent to promote the sale or lease of, or investment in, property, goods,  or services related to any trade or commerce; and (2) it was sent without Plaintiff’s affirmative or  implied consent.   27.  Plaintiff is the sole user of the e-mail address to which Defendant transmitted the  violative e-mail.   28.  Defendant’s unsolicited e-mail caused Plaintiff actual harm including lost productivity  and resources, annoyance, and consumption of valuable digital storage space.   29.  Plaintiff was induced by the misleading subject line in Defendant’s e-mail to click on  and view Defendant’s e-mail.   30.  Plaintiff estimates that she has wasted approximately 30 seconds reviewing Defendant’s  misleading e-mail.   32.  Plaintiff brings this case as a class action pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 23, on behalf of  herself and all others similarly situated.   33.  Plaintiff brings this case on behalf of following Class:  All persons within Florida who, within the four years prior to the  filing of this Complaint, were sent the same unsolicited commercial  electronic mail message sent to Plaintiff, as alleged herein, from  Defendant or anyone on Defendant’s behalf.   34.  Defendant and its employees or agents are excluded from the Class.   35.  Plaintiff does not know the exact number of members in the Class but believes the Class  members number in the several thousands, if not more.  39.  The common questions in this case are capable of having common answers. If Plaintiff’s  claim that Defendant routinely transmits unsolicited commercial electronic mail messages containing  misleading subject lines is accurate, Plaintiff and the Class members will have identical claims capable  of being efficiently adjudicated and administered in this case.  44.  Plaintiff re-alleges and incorporates the foregoing allegations as if fully set forth herein.   45.  Defendant initiated the transmission of an unsolicited commercial electronic mail  message to electronic mail addresses held by residents of this state that contained false or misleading  information in the subject line.   46.  Defendant failed to secure affirmative or implied consent to transmit the subject e-mails  to Plaintiff and members of the Class.   47.  Defendant caused harm to Plaintiff and members of the Class, including lost  productivity and resources, annoyance, consumption of valuable digital storage space and/or financial  costs.   48.  Defendant’s conduct undermined the integrity of electronic commerce in this state.   PROPOSED CLASS   Violation of Florida’s Electronic Mail Communications Act  (On Behalf of Plaintiff and the Class)  