11.   13.   This action can be maintained as a class action under FRCP 23(a)  and (b) because there are questions of law and fact common to the class  members, which predominate over any questions relating to individual  class members, including but not limited to:  a) Whether Walgreen made false or misleading representations of  fact about the true cost of consumer goods,  b) Whether Walgreen advertised consumer goods as having a  certain cost, with the intent not to provide its consumer goods for  that advertised cost,  c) Whether Walgreen’s behavior as alleged in this complaint  violated Oregon’s Unlawful Trade Practices Act,  d) Whether Walgreen behaved willfully, intentionally, recklessly or  maliciously, and   e) Whether under Oregon law, Walgreen should be able to retain the  overcharges it wrongfully collected from its customers.   15.   A class action is superior to other available methods for the fair  and efficient adjudication of this controversy. Absent class-wide  adjudication, members of the class are without effective recourse. Few,  if any, class members can afford to prosecute individual actions against  Walgreen, especially in light of the amounts of overcharges at issue.  Absent class treatment, Walgreen’s alleged wrongdoing would go  unabated, and no class member would be afforded the opportunity to  seek judicial relief, whether for themselves or for the public good  generally.   18.       9.   Oregon’s Unit Pricing Law provides that “no person shall sell or  offer for retail sale at a grocery store or food market any packaged  consumer commodity unless there is clearly displayed upon the  commodity package or at a place in reasonable proximity to where the  commodity is offered for sale a statement of the unit retail price of the  commodity pursuant to ORS 616.870 (prescribed pricing by units of  measurement) and the total retail price of the commodity.” ORS  616.860(1) (emphasis added).   On August 2, 2020 at approximately 8:20am, plaintiff stopped  into a Walgreen store at 2829 N Lombard Street in Portland, Oregon to  purchase consumer goods for his personal consumption. Plaintiff  selected an eight-pack of Wyler’s Light Pink Lemonade drink mix off the  shelf. Walgreen advertised that plaintiff’s cost for the eight-pack of  Wyler’s Light Pink Lemonade drink mix was $1.00. Plaintiff took the  eight-pack of Wyler’s Light Pink Lemonade drink mix to the register  along with other consumer goods and handed his debit card to the clerk.  Walgreen charged plaintiff’s debit card, then gave plaintiff a receipt.   Under FRCP 23, plaintiff brings this action on behalf of himself  and all other similarly situated Oregon Walgreen customers. The class  is initially defined as:  a) Oregon Walgreen customers, who, after August 11, 2019,  b) Were charged more by Walgreen for a multipack consumer good  subject to Oregon’s Unit Pricing Law than the price advertised by  Walgreen on the shelf for the multipack consumer good.  