INDUCEMENT, AND CONSPIRACY TO DEFRAUD  (AGAINST ALL  DEFENDANTS) ................................................................................................................47  COUNT III  UNJUST ENRICHMENT  (AGAINST AIG PARENT ONLY) ..............................48  ORGANIZATIONS ACT, 18 U.S.C. § 1962(C) AND 18 U.S.C. § 1962(D)    (AGAINST ALL DEFENDANTS) ...................................................................................37  A.  The Racketeering Enterprise ..................................................................................37  B.  Racketeering Activity and Predicate Acts .............................................................38  C.  Causation................................................................................................................45  D.  Violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1962(d) ...........................................................................46  UNJUST ENRICHMENT  (AGAINST AIG PARENT ONLY)  113.  Plaintiffs incorporate by reference the allegations set forth above as if fully set  forth herein.  114.  Plaintiffs bring this claim against defendant AIG Parent only.  115.  AIG Parent was benefited by its uniform policy, pattern, and practice of deception  and unjustly failed to pay the Plaintiffs or the members of the proposed class for those benefits.  116.  AIG Parent’s failure to pay Plaintiffs or the members of the proposed class for  those benefits was to the detriment of the Plaintiffs and the members of the proposed class.  117.  Plaintiffs and the members of the proposed class have no contractual remedy for  AIG Parent’s unjust enrichment, and the return of the benefits to the Plaintiffs and members of  the class would not be inconsistent with any contracts between them and Defendants.  VIOLATION OF RACKETEER INFLUENCED AND  CORRUPT ORGANIZATIONS ACT,  18 U.S.C. § 1962(c) AND 18 U.S.C. § 1962(d)  