8.  Beginning in or around August 2018, Defendant contacted Plaintiff  on Plaintiff’s cellular telephone numbers ending in -6147 in an attempt to solicit  Plaintiff to purchase Defendant’s services.     9.  Defendant used an “automatic telephone dialing system” as defined  by 47 U.S.C. § 227(a)(1) to place its calls to Plaintiff seeking to solicit its  services.    Knowing and/or Willful Violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection  Act   47 U.S.C. §227(c)  • As a result of Defendant’s willful and/or knowing violations of 47  U.S.C. §227(c)(5), Plaintiff and the DNC Class and DNC  Revocation Class members are entitled to and request treble  damages, as provided by statute, up to $1,500, for each and every  violation, pursuant to 47 U.S.C. §227(c)(5).   • Any and all other relief that the Court deems just and proper.   Knowing and/or Willful Violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection  Act   47 U.S.C. §227(b)  • As a result of Defendant’s willful and/or knowing violations of 47  U.S.C. §227(b)(1), Plaintiff and the ATDS Class and ATDS  Revocation Class members are entitled to and request treble  damages, as provided by statute, up to $1,500, for each and every  violation, pursuant to 47 U.S.C. §227(b)(3)(B) and 47 U.S.C.  §227(b)(3)(C).   • Any and all other relief that the Court deems just and proper.   Negligent Violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act  47 U.S.C. §227(b)  • As a result of Defendant’s negligent violations of 47 U.S.C.  §227(b)(1), Plaintiff and the ATDS Class and ATDS Revocation  Class members are entitled to and request $500 in statutory  damages, for each and every violation, pursuant to 47 U.S.C.   227(b)(3)(B).   • Any and all other relief that the Court deems just and proper. 