The council was designated as the LOCATION@1 's worst performing authority in both NUMBER@1 and NUMBER@2 , but in NUMBER@3 was rated as a two star ` improving adequate ' council and in NUMBER@4 it retained its two stars with an ` improving well ' status .

The council was the LOCATION@1 's worst council in both NUMBER@1 and NUMBER@2 , but is now rated as a two star improving adequate council after its recent corporate performance assessment .
