There were also propositions of separating from LOCATION@1 to rejoin LOCATION@2 , LOCATION@3 , p. NUMBER@1 but after LOCATION@2 's dissolution into the LOCATION@4 and LOCATION@5 on NUMBER@2 January NUMBER@3 , these ideas have been rendered largely moot .

There were also propositions of separating from LOCATION@1 to rejoin LOCATION@2 , LOCATION@3 , p. NUMBER@1 but after LOCATION@2 's dissolution into the LOCATION@4 and LOCATION@5 on January NUMBER@2 , NUMBER@3 , these ideas have been rendered largely moot .
