Chosen alongside LOCATION@1 for LOCATION@2 , LOCATION@3 scored the highest points for cost effectiveness against LOCATION@1 's points for infrastructure development , while LOCATION@3 and LOCATION@1 tied on points for the categories of human resources and quality of life .

Chosen alongside LOCATION@1 for LOCATION@2 , LOCATION@3 scored the most points for cost effectiveness against LOCATION@1 's points for infrastructure development , while LOCATION@3 and LOCATION@1 tied on points for the categories of human resources and quality of life .
