Okay, bad news. I wanted to use the mailing list that Launchpad provides for the quam-plures-security group to post bugmail related to security vulnerabilites there, but it turns out that this list public -- not good for sensitive messages. I'll try to set up a mailing list on the QP server (that's the good thing: it makes such tasks very easy).
When you're done tinkering please post here. Tween now and then I'm figuring everything is practice and thus not worthy of immediate attention.
I think I figured something out just now. I sorta know there are currently 3 bugs, but I only find one of them when I click "Search existing bug reports" then the "search" button. Bugs 13 and 14 have a status of "resolved", which is only findable if you search for "closed" bugs. The whole truth is there is a branch in merge that addresses those bugs, but if someone else searches they won't find them. Those bugs are still very active in every available version of QP known to man.
The problem therefore is that the statuses one might set a bug to do not align with the statuses available when searching for bugs. That is why a branch a little while ago I didn't close the bug report on: it didn't show up as an open bug report!
The solution? Observe that there is no functional difference between resolved and closed, and don't close a bug report if it isn't actually closed. Oh wait maybe "resolved" is for something like "it wasn't really a bug due to user not aware of something"?
Dunno. All I know is if I click for open bug reports I get a list of one bug even though there are three.
Well, I figured "resolved" would mean something like "fixed in a branch that is proposed for merge, but not actually merged into trunk yet". "Closed"
Except they have tried everywhere else in the UK jools, They can't even get it going in Rugby mad Wales, It's dying on it's feet even along the M62's much vaunted heartlands, while Union grows ever bigger. Sad to say something needs to change, and as i have already said one team over there is a nonsense, but if after 150 years we can only boast Half a dozen stable teams, who themselves are completely reliant on Sky for survival, there is not much hope long term.
The most sensible way forward would be for mergers ( as far as survival goes ) but we all know the thinking on that " I'll give up watching the game first ". (Maybe sooner than we think). Anyway lets see what S league have in mind when they take over.
Again i see your point jools, So i take it you are in favour of ESL " the breadwinners " including the Giants coughing up more of their earnings to fund the Grass roots of the sport as well as the championship and below that.
The SL owners have reputedly voted the opposite way to that claiming that they need more money to keep the level of SL up ,so that the value of the TV deal has a chance of at least staying as high as it is now.
The argument being that without SL there is no TV deal, without the TV deal there is no Rugby league at any kind of pro level. The challenge cup has diminished in importance and value alarmingly, So the only thing making any money to talk of is SL. So what do you reckon, share the money out more ,or every man for himself, I'll be really interested to hear what people think.
In my opinion there are too many clubs who cannot generate the cash flow needed to survive without handouts from the RL.Ask yourself this without these hand outs these clubs would fold so what do we want several clubs to go to the wall or carry on throwing good money after bad? The thought of losing clubs, unpalatable as it may be, in my opinion it is the only way forward. It is only an opinion but I would expand the academy system starting at U15 level using top grade coaches up to u21 with a rule to play up to 5-6 players that could maybe be used to give players from the first teams game time.The present system does not allow clubs at season end to blood young players for fear of being relegated so,go back to no promotion or relegation.I would then expand SL to 17-18 clubs ie take the top 4-5 clubs into SL(this is the number that are capable of sustaining a place in SL) .I would then limit overseas players to 2 strictly enforced.This may stop the number of young players leaving for RU.The game of Rugby League is fraught with problems created by a management and the clubs themselves ie making rules and then overlooking them as suits, this has to stop.I realise this in part will upset some people but as I say it is only an opinion people may have other ideas and may have things too add to this or disagree with it is just how I see RL now. I emailed a similar letter to the RL quite a few years ago which was returned without them even bothering to read it ,I suppose they think that very long term supporters only watch games and do not see what is happening to the game we have loved for a huge part of their lives.There are a lot of things in the pipe line that no doubt we shall hear about when it's signed sealed and delivered I believe they do not give a damn what their spectators want!!
Not much there not to agree with Bilko but it doesn't really answer my question , Yes you accept that some clubs need to go, but what you don't say about all this grass roots stuff is , Who is to pay for it ? S League clubs are saying it's not going to be them , they need every penny, The RFL are skint and i don't think they even cover their running costs.( Nobody makes any money except SL)
That's what i have been saying, There is more money in Darts and tiddlywinks than Rugby league and yet you are saying we don't want any truck with your Aussie Billionaires, whatever you call your Canadian team full of English and foreign players, All that said i don't see them being in SL long term unless some of that dosh finds it's way to ESL.
Think there are interesting times ahead in the next few years, going to be big changes, at least on a par with when Sky took over, and Sky themselves seem to be in a battle with Amazon , Netflix , Disney etc. maybe League will come out of that better with better deals.
If we are good enough we stay up as we are in a competition with 8 other teams 4 of whom will definitely stay in SL.
Well said...to the others quickly shake that head 20 times one way and then 20 times the other way...thats right get those cobwebs right out of there...its 2018 by the way. Toronto isn't going anywhere except straight to the top and no one can stop it...its like a tsunami!
Young lads after 15 years (sometimes younger) have conflicting interests that most certainly interferes with RL.Usually it is only the keen ones that seem to be able to unite the interests.I both played and coached for a long number of years so I do have first hand knowledge of this and I do keep in touch with a lot of my old teamates both here and abroad who cannot understand why we do not improve a great deal at any level all we seem to do is continually keep shooting ourselves in the foot.Some posters on here seem to think that gate money does not matter a 2000 gate nowadays generate circa £50,000 enough to pay 5 academy players wages for a season if each side brought in a couple of thousand spectators it would go a fair way to alleviate a lot of clubs cash flow.(yes it is pie in the sky).this is my own personal gripe against Catalans Toronto or Toulouse the league will bend over backwards for these clubs who do not/will not bring anything to the ESL table.I do no not pretend to know all the answers just a few and even they are scoffed at by some of the ruling body.Change must come but we may not like it when it does.Once again just an opinion.
Well said. The sooner we move away from heartland clubs who contribute nothing to the bigger picture the better
Surely it can only be a player from Catalans. Probably the best RL side I have ever witnessed in this season's comp.
Our chairman at Hull KR, Neil Hudgell has made it clear that Toronto are still the subject of due diligence. They are in the competition courtesy of the RFL but Neil Hudgell says the RFL failed to conduct due diligence, the RFL are not in charge of Super League any longer and the Super League clubs have a number of reservations.
The biggest being the inability of Toronto to host home matches during the first 2/3 months of the competition due to the harsh Canadian winter. Neil Hudgell has made it clear that the Super League clubs will not allow Toronto to have a skewed fixture list, during the frozen Canadian months of February & March they will not be allowed to play all games away...they can join the competition but only with the same conditions as every other club.
In answer to your question jo- in my eyes the governing body should help to fund the game at grassroots level- it’s they who need to figure out how to facilitate that-as far as I’m concerned that’s their job. It will be partly funded by SL clubs in some respects anyway. There are ways that clubs could be involved for minimal cost such as running training sessions/coaching etc- which they could VOLUNTEER TO DO. Just like the regular coaches/first Aiders/touchline managers etc do!
I know some of this goes on-but more could be done. So many young kids move on to Union, not because it’s a better game, but because the coaching and facilities are better.
All views expressed are those of the author and not necessarily those of the RLFANS.COM or it's subsites.
Whilst every effort is made to ensure that news stories, articles and images are correct, we cannot be held responsible for errors. However, if you feel any material on this website is copyrighted or incorrect in any way please contact us using the link at the top of the page so we can remove it or negotiate copyright permission.
RLFANS.COM, the owners of this website, is not responsible for the content of its sub-sites or posts, please email the author of this sub-site or post if you feel you find an article offensive or of a choice nature that you disagree with.
You must be 18+ to gamble, for more information and for help with gambling issues see https://www.begambleaware.org/.
The website is very limited in details and I was wondering if it would be worth it to take down my 1500pts eldar army?
Also, the event starts at 10am, so what time would you reckon you need to get down there for to have first-ish access to the hobby zone... etc.
It would not. The chance of playing a pickup game at Games Day is slim-to-none. The gaming side is more about themed participation games run by the various gaming clubs and GWHQ.
Remember, Games Day is NOT a tournament. It is a convention. Standard pickup games are not what to expect there, it&#39;s a showcase of arguably everything else.
Crikey! This crazy clown causes commotion like the coming of Christ. Contained in a circle corrupted by crackheads and carnal cravings, he creates no concession to callous cheaters concentrating on nought but cock. Certainly, still a curious and cordial cavalier in the countenance of crazed cads, curs and creeps who condemn courtesy as something corny. No cloud could collapse his crushing crescendo of comical crowing and crimson coiffure. This conjecture on culture comes circumlocutive, consequently...
If GD Baltimore is anything to go by, don&#39;t bother bringing an army, they have plenty there, and next to no one will be playing games with their armies, but the themed battles.
Also, getting there much more than 10 minutes early is pointless. You will still get your ticket before doors open, and being at the front of the pack is pointless. As long as you&#39;re not heading for the forgeworld table (which being in the uk, why would you?) you won&#39;t be in a massive line even if you are near the back of the pack, so even on time or a few minutes late is fine.
This&#39;ll be my first games day this year, I&#39;m looking really forward to it, I was going to ask the same thing, but also I was going to ask is there anything like a sellers/trade area there? I plan to sell my 4000pt fully painted Tau army and rather than all the hassle of ebay, hoped I could off them there?
Snap. This is my first games day and i&#39;m from the UK as well. I don&#39;t believe there is anywhere where you can sell/trade models as I don&#39;t believe that GW would be running an area where their customers get money rather than themselves, but don&#39;t hold me to it.
I went down last year and i got a game with my 1500pts of space wolves and had a good game. The only thing though is to get to the tables early to book a game.
I guessed there wouldn&#39;t be since GW don&#39;t like us making money rather than giving it to them, but if you think about it if I sold them there, the money would go straight back into GW&#39;s pocket as soon as I got back to the stalls
If anyone is going to GDUK this year and wants to meet up I&#39;d be more than happy to, looking forward to it.
Awesome, I did wonder as I couldn&#39;t spot anything on the site for it, although maybe I just didn&#39;t look hard enough
Where is the thread for meet-ups as I&#39;ve used the search but can&#39;t find it, possible link anyone or topic name?
Is this board for computer games too? Or just board/card/ tabletop games? Restayvien Other Games 28 07 Aug 2004 12:53
knottiedd7229185196f4dc, knottie816602e85b86c21c, knottie4d7e7cf0d0dcfd0c, knottiedcd1946b970146dd, cam_green and 130 others were promoted to member.