AP: Police investigating the failed car bomb left in Times Square have videotape of a possible suspect shedding clothing in an alley and putting it in a bag and found a substance that resembled fertilizer in the parked SUV, Commissioner Raymond Kelly said Sunday.
Kelly said officers were on the way to a Pennsylvania town to talk to a tourist who might have recorded the suspect on his video camera. The video shows a white man in his 40s taking off one shirt, revealing another underneath.
The commissioner said there's no evidence that a Pakistani Taliban videotaped claim to the failed car bombing is valid.
« If This Happened During Bush Administration, the Media Would Howl | Main | SCOTUS Cares not about your taxes spent or worry about your health care »
Unbelievable in my estimation. Why? Because I know exactly what it would entail to make the downfall of many buildings in New York City to fall and be destroyed. And, knowing this, and knowing what kind of "leaks" there are in American politics, why anyone would believe that the USG had anything to do with the 91101 terror attacks on American soil is certainly beyond me. Why are there NO LEAKS that the USG did this? Where are they? Is there no one that is secretly saying that the USG did this to themselves?
People that believe that the USG had anything to do with the 91101 attacks on American soil, no matter their personal takes, no matter which political party they belong to, are most assuredly brain dead idiots. And I hope they have the unfortunate experience of telling God Himself what they believe. "Depart from me because I never knew you" will be their mantra call as they make their way to Hell and Satan himself.
I've been looking for a good analogue to the willingness of Republicans to believe, or say they believe, that Obama was born abroad, and one relevant number is the share of Democrats willing to believe, as they say, that "Bush knew." There aren't a lot of great public numbers on the partisan breakdown of adherents to that conspiracy theory, but the University of Ohio yesterday shared with us the crosstabs of a 2006 poll they did with Scripps Howard that's useful in that regard. "How likely is it that people in the federal government either assisted in the 9/11 attacks or took no action to stop the attacks because they wanted the United States to go to war in the Middle East?" the poll asked. A full 22.6% of Democrats said it was "very likely." Another 28.2% called it "somewhat likely." That is: More than half of Democrats, according to a neutral survey, said they believed Bush was complicit in the 9/11 terror attacks.
Comments for this entry have been disabled. Additional comments may not be added to this entry at this time.