Why is ancient astronomy right?

• B
Let's be honest...Why were planets visible to the ancient people and not to us humans any longer? Is it because the planets distanced? How can some planets distance themselves while others don't? It's said that light pollution has affected the visibility of planets in the sky, whereas there still reports of people seeing at least one planet in the sky. So how come ancient astrology was on right before the telescopes?

Related Astronomy and Astrophysics News on Phys.org
Orodruin
Staff Emeritus
Homework Helper
Gold Member
Why were planets visible to the ancient people and not to us humans any longer?
This is an incorrect supposition. Many planets are visible to the naked eye - brighter than the stars. Most notably Venus and Mars, but I regularly see Mercury, Jupiter, and Saturn too.

Is it because the planets distanced? How can some planets distance themselves while others don't?
It is unclear what you mean by this. The planets all have different orbits, resulting in different periods and therefore varying distances.

So how come ancient astrology was on right before the telescopes?
You have to separate astrology from astronomy. The latter is an empirical science, the former is hokum.

Ancient astronomers could easily measure the movement of the planets. Saturn and closer planets are visible to the eye without problem. Uranus was not discovered until the 18th century and Neptune 19th.

QuantumQuest
This is an incorrect supposition. Many planets are visible to the naked eye - brighter than the stars. Most notably Venus and Mars, but I regularly see Mercury, Jupiter, and Saturn too.

It is unclear what you mean by this. The planets all have different orbits, resulting in different periods and therefore varying distances.

You have to separate astrology from astronomy. The latter is an empirical science, the former is hokum.

Ancient astronomers could easily measure the movement of the planets. Saturn and closer planets are visible to the eye without problem. Uranus was not discovered until the 18th century and Neptune 19th.
How come i haven't been capable of pointing out any planets on my own? and the only one planet that i was pointed to looked allot like a normal star in the same white seeming color. What colors do you see the planets you pointed out in?

phinds
Gold Member
2019 Award
How come i haven't been capable of pointing out any planets on my own?
I don't see how you can expect us to know why you fail to do what most of the rest of us do easily.

CalcNerd
mfb
Mentor
To the naked eye, planets look very similar to bright stars. The most notable difference is their position in the sky which varies a bit from day to day. They also tend to flicker a bit less in turbulent air.

I don't see how you can expect us to know why you fail to do what most of the rest of us do easily.
Im being honest i don't see any planet and the only one shown to me didn't look like a planet it looked more like a star I don't need your insult at all....how long does one have to look in the sky without a telescope until they notice the orbit of a planet?

fresh_42
Mentor
Light pollution plays a crucial role. Especially if you live in an urban area. And other than phinds, I doubt that I could find or see Mercury. Venus isn't difficult. She is a little brighter than stars and changes position within hours. Sometimes Mars is easy, too, if it can be seen at all, because it really appears to be a little orange and as Venus, is slowly moving. I haven't seen Jupiter or Saturn either, although I tried. But I guess my main problem (beside light pollution) was, that I didn't knew very well where to search for. And this might be another essential point. You have to know where and also when to look at. If you have plenty of time, as your ancient astronomers probably had, you could watch and see which points are slowly moving (differences between half an hour or so). In addition you have to rule out high flying aircrafts, ISS, and some other man made satellites.

Vedward
Astronuc
Staff Emeritus
As Orodruin mentioned, the planets, notably Venus and Mars, as well as Mercury, Jupiter, and Saturn are readily visible. It helps when they are on our side of the sun. Mercury might be a challenge given it's proximity to the sun, but Venus and Mars are readily visible.

how long does one have to look in the sky without a telescope until they notice the orbit of a planet?
If Venus is visible, it's readily apparent. Venus has been incorrectly called the 'Evening Star' or 'Morning Star'. It is very bright, and as mfb indicated, the planets do not flicker like the stars do.

https://stardate.org/astro-guide/ssguide/venus

There are numerous astronomical resources, which provide information on the planets, their positions and when they are visible.

For example,
You can see all five bright planets in the evening this month! But you’ll have to look hard for two of them. First, the easy ones … Jupiter, Mars and Saturn pop out as darkness falls in July 2016. Jupiter, brightest of the bunch, is found in the western half of the sky until late evening. Mars is still a bright beacon, although fainter than Jupiter at nightfall and early evening, still in a noticeable triangle with Saturn and the bright star Antares. Jupiter, Mars and Saturn are visible throughout July. Now the more difficult planets … Mercury and Venus. In July 2016, they’re low in the glare of evening twilight, quickly following the sun below the horizon before nightfall. But, as the days pass, both Mercury and Venus get higher in the sky. By mid-July, you can start searching for them with the eye, in the west after sunset. By late July, you might be able to see all five bright planets at once, briefly, after sunset. Follow the links below to learn more about July planets in 2016.
http://earthsky.org/astronomy-essentials/visible-planets-tonight-mars-jupiter-venus-saturn-mercury
http://earthsky.org/astronomy-essen...onight-mars-jupiter-venus-saturn-mercury#mars

QuantumQuest
Combine this info http://www.space.com/5743-storied-history-word-planet.html with the fact that the "Ancients" compiled generations of observations, let me know your thoughts.
before i do that answer my question...how long does it take for anyone to measure the orbit of a planet without telescope?

Astronuc
Staff Emeritus
how long does it take for anyone to measure the orbit of a planet without telescope?
One would have to take several measurements over days for Venus, and perhaps weeks for Mars to months for Jupiter and Saturn, keeping careful note of date and time, and positions with respect to the coordinate system.

There are plenty of astronomical resources that map the planets' orbits. Why would one bother to repeat such measurements?

One should study some basic astronomy, including understanding about the ecliptic.
http://earthsky.org/space/what-is-the-ecliptic

fresh_42
Mentor
how long does it take for anyone to measure the orbit of a planet without telescope?
I would say it took Copernicus half a lifetime. There have been column after column of notes on positions, entire fully written books.
I don't know whether it would be easier today as we know Kepler's laws.

One would have to take several measurements over days for Venus, and perhaps weeks for Mars to months for Jupiter and Saturn, keeping careful note of date and time, and positions with respect to the coordinate system.

There are plenty of astronomical resources that map the planets' orbits. Why would one bother to repeat such measurements?
Yep...Yet it seems very tiresome to me to do all that work. Do you possess any links to the first and all records left behind by ancient people about jupiter, venus, saturn...etc?

Yet it seems very tiresome to me to do all that work.

CalcNerd, DrSteve, davenn and 3 others
Astronuc
Staff Emeritus
Yep...Yet it seems very tiresome to me to do all that work. Do you possess any links to the first and all records left behind by ancient people about jupiter, venus, saturn...etc?
I don't know about ancient data sources, but current sources are available from various national observatories. In the US, the US Naval Observatory publishes data on the moon and planets.

Depending on where one lives, one could probably contact a local (regional or national, that is) and see if they offer a publication (either hard copy or pdf) or software to determine the position or orbits of the planets.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_astronomical_observatories

Last edited:
lucivaldo
russ_watters
Mentor
how long does it take for anyone to measure the orbit of a planet without telescope?
For the brightest planet, Venus, you really can't miss it since it is the brightest object in the night sky that isn't the moon. And if you are paying attention, you should be able to notice its movement over a period of a few weeks (or even a few days if you are really paying attention). So the problem is, quite simply, that you are spending very little time looking at the sky.

About every other year, Jupiter and Venus are very close to each other in the sky. For an ancient with nothing else to look at at night that isn't lit by a campfire, they'd pretty much have to be blind not to notice them changing position from one day to the next:

Jupiter, Mars, Venus and Mercury are so bright and therefore so noticeable that the ancients simply couldn't help but realize they weren't stars, what with Pokemon Go and Must See TV not being available yet to occupy their time at night.

CalcNerd, anorlunda, Merlin3189 and 3 others
what with Pokemon Go and Must See TV not being available yet to occupy their time at night.
Those were the days.

fresh_42
Mentor
So the problem is, quite simply, that you are spending very little time looking at the sky.
I have also the problem, that I don't have a horizon nearby and it's difficult to see objects that don't rise very far in the sky. Plus light pollution is bigger the closer it comes to human housing. So sometimes it is not as easy as simply look out of the window.

fresh_42
Mentor
1oldman2
davenn
Gold Member
2019 Award
Sometimes Mars is easy, too, if it can be seen at all, because it really appears to be a little orange
Mars ranges from easy to that flaming bright you cant miss it, as it has been for the recent months
has also been very easy to see its motion relative to the background stars. It has just finished doing a big loop into the constellation of Scorpio and back out

Dave

I think Jupiter is the most easy planet to spot since it's very bright when near to Earth, not so much as Venus, but Venus is only visible in the sky just after the Sun sets, or soon before Sun Rises - because it's nearer to the Sun than we are.
Jupiter is often the only bright object that can be seen in the sky at any time of night other than the Moon, if there is a thin cloud cover.
The thin clouds are enough to block almost all stars, but Jupiter still can be seen.

1oldman2
Chronos
Gold Member
All planets out to saturn are easily visible to the naked eye most of the time.

sophiecentaur
Gold Member
How come i haven't been capable of pointing out any planets on my own?
Partly for the same reason that you may not be able to point out a rare summer visiting bird in your local park or an unusual version of a well known saloon car. You need to get at least partially immersed in any topic before you start to get any success.
There is a small matter of Dark Adaption, which can help you, even in urban conditions. You need to spend several minutes / best part of an hour and you start to see stuff up there that was not there when you stepped outside your door.
It's along these lines:-
Q: "Can you play the piano?"
A: "Dunno, I've never tried."

As for the Ancients, people tend to confuse technology with intelligence and ingenuity. These old guys were just as smart as us and have only been proved 'wrong' in the light of some serious help from later technology. The lack of light pollution was a significant advantage that they had. Plus enough money to employ servants (or slaves) to allow them to devote their lives (24/7) to their study.

Last edited:
1oldman2
Astronuc
Staff Emeritus
To determine how long it would take to calculate or plot the orbit of a planet, one would need to determine how accurate one wishes the calculation to be. Consider the following:
Code:
Planet         Distance from     Mass
Sun (millions km)  10^22 kg         Solar orbital period
Jupiter             778         190,000          4332 days (10.87 years)
Saturn             1429          56,900         10760 days (29.48 years)
So for the orbit of Jupiter, it would take nearly 11 years to find Jupiter in the same region of sky (against the stellar background) and nearly 30 years for Saturn. One would need a very good surveying instrument. One could make yearly measurements against the stars, then gradually construct an orbit based on the geometry between the earth and the star field.

http://www.telescope.org/nuffield/pas/solar/solar7.html

1oldman2
The thin clouds are enough to block almost all stars, but Jupiter still can be seen.
Here is a good example.

anorlunda