Synovial fluid (SF) analysis was a mandatory investigation in rheumatological practice. In recent time, synovial fluid analysis lost importance predominantly due to unclear defined guidelines for the practical use.
To evaluate the clinical value of the determination of the complement components C'3c and C'4 and immunoglobulines IgG, IgA and IgM synovial fluid concentrations with regard to pathophysiology and currently used RA and SpA classification criteria.
Synovial fluid samples were obtained from 22 patients fulfilling ACR criteria for rheumatoid arthritis (RA), and 18 patients suffering from seronegative spondyloarthropathy (SpA) according to the ESSG criteria. Sixteen osteoarthritis (OA) SF samples were used as controls. IgG, IgA, IgM, C'3c and C'4 in SF and sera were determined by nephelometry. Comparison of the diseases, and linear as well as stepwise logistic regression analyses were performed in order to determine the interrelation of the determined parameters and a ranking of their diagnostic value for the identification of RA or SpA synovial fluids.
SF-IgA, SF-IgG and SF-IgM concentrations were closely correlated with their corresponding serum levels (p < 0.01), while SF-C'3c and SF-C'4 depended on articular factors (p < 0.01). Determination of SF-C'3c (accuracy = 80.4%, improved chi 2 = 22.02, p < 0.001) and SF-C'4 (accuracy = 75.0%, improved chi 2 = 21.81, p < 0.001) both provided a good predictive value for the diagnosis of SpA when exceeding the cut off level of about 40 mg/dl (C'3c) or 15 mg/dl (C'4), respectively. Calculation of the C'-SF/S ratios did not provide an additional diagnostic benefit. SF-IgG, IgA and IgM as well as the calculated SF/S ratios were within the same range in RA and SpA fluids.
SF concentration of complement components primarily depends on local articular factors. Significant differences of SF complement concentrations in established RA and SpA give reason for prospective analysis of these parameters in early undifferentiated oligoarthritis and evaluation in large studies, e.g. when re-evaluating the preliminary criteria for spondyloarthropathy.