Thumb carpometacarpal joint arthroplasty for osteoarthritis may hold advantages over trapeziectomy by preserving range of motion, whilst providing stability and preventing thumb shortening.
We compare functional and satisfaction outcomes scores, radiological shortening and complication rates between patients treated with trapeziectomy and those receiving the ARPE thumb CMCJ arthroplasty.
Seventy-five trapeziectomies and one hundred and ten ARPE arthroplasties were performed over the study period. Both treatments resulted in significant improvements in functional scores. When matching patients according to pre-operative function, patients receiving the ARPE arthroplasty had better post-operative function (Quick DASH: trapeziectomy = 25.1, ARPE = 16.8). More patients receiving the ARPE arthroplasty were satisfied with their treatment (trapeziectomy = 7.8/10, ARPE = 8.7/10) and would have the same treatment again (trapeziectomy = 76%, ARPE = 89%). The ARPE also resulted in less thumb shortening. However the ARPE arthroplasty is associated with a higher complication rate, with 14% of patients requiring further surgery at a mean of 2 years follow up (95% implant survival).
Both trapeziectomy and the ARPE CMCJ arthroplasty are effective treatment options for thumb CMCJ osteoarthritis. Arthroplasty may offer potential advantages in terms of post-operative function and patient satisfaction. However the risk of complications and requirement for further surgery is greater and must be carefully considered during patient selection and pre-operative counselling.