<documents_info>Modus Ponens Modus Tollens Hypothetical Syllogism Disjunctive Syllogism Fallacy of Affirming the Consequent Fallacy of Denying the Antecedent</documents_info>
<query>Given the statements "If P, then Q" and "Q is true", can we conclude that "P is true"? If not, which fallacy does this reasoning commit?</query>
user
Algorithm
assistant
<documents_info>Modus Ponens Modus Tollens Hypothetical Syllogism Disjunctive Syllogism Fallacy of Affirming the Consequent Fallacy of Denying the Antecedent</documents_info>
<query>Given the statements "If P, then Q" and "Q is true", can we conclude that "P is true"? If not, which fallacy does this reasoning commit?</query>
user
Chunk
assistant
Given the statements "If P, then Q" and "Q is true", can we conclude that "P is true"? If not, which fallacy does this reasoning commit?
Modus Ponens Modus Tollens Hypothetical Syllogism Disjunctive Syllogism Fallacy of Affirming the Consequent Fallacy of Denying the Antecedent