<documents_info>Modus Ponens Modus Tollens Hypothetical Syllogism Disjunctive Syllogism Fallacy of Affirming the Consequent Fallacy of Denying the Antecedent</documents_info>
<query>Given the statements "If P, then Q" and "Q is true", can we conclude that "P is true"? If not, which fallacy does this reasoning commit?</query>
user
Algorithm
assistant
<documents_info>Modus Ponens Modus Tollens Hypothetical Syllogism Disjunctive Syllogism Fallacy of Affirming the Consequent Fallacy of Denying the Antecedent</documents_info>
<query>Given the statements "If P, then Q" and "Q is true", can we conclude that "P is true"? If not, which fallacy does this reasoning commit?</query>
user
Chunk
assistant
<query>Given the statements "If P, then Q" and "Q is true", can we conclude that "P is true"? If not, which fallacy does this reasoning commit?</query>
<documents_info>Modus Ponens Modus Tollens Hypothetical Syllogism Disjunctive Syllogism Fallacy of Affirming the Consequent Fallacy of Denying the Antecedent</documents_info>