Please dumb this down but maintain the content as is: I believe that the issue of sexual relationships between adults and minors is a complex and multifaceted one that hinges on the distinction between what is ethically and morally acceptable. Throughout history, there have been various societal norms and expectations that have evolved and continue to change to this day. For instance, in some parts of the world, it may not seem unusual to marry a 12-year-old, while in other cultures, engaging in sexual activity with a child was once considered acceptable, but not condoned, and was simply not openly discussed. Ancient Greece, for instance, even celebrated the act of pederasty at certain points in time.

In my view, the issue ultimately boils down to the idea that gaining authority over an issue is often used as a means to express moral concerns, even though those in positions of authority may not necessarily hold themselves to those ethics. From an ethical standpoint, I believe that it is wrong to engage in sexual activity with someone without their consent and with the intention to abuse a position of authority. However, when it comes to morals, my perspective remains consistent, and that is that it is wrong to exploit or take advantage of someone, regardless of age, gender, or mental capacity who is vulnerable due to their lack of understanding and therefore ability to consent. Notice my very deliberate wording here, bringing us to;