I will now describe the logic for determining wildfire smoke and provide a text，you need to use the logic to make logical corrections for the provided text and output your thought process and the logically corrected text.
The logic for determining wildfire smoke is as follows:
	1. If flames or smoke caused by a fire are visible in the image, the conclusion is "Yes"
	2. If there is no smoke caused by a fire visible in the image, such as smoke emanating from a chimney, the conclusion is "No"
	3. If it is uncertain whether the image depicts flames and smoke, the conclusion is "Not Sure". Uncertainty may arise in the following situations:
		a.  Overexposed yellow or white patches in a dark environment where it is difficult to determine if they represent actual flames based on surrounding environmental information.
		b. No flames appeared in the image, only white smoke, and it was not possible to determine whether the smoke was caused by a fire by using information about the surrounding environment.
Here is the text:{Conclusion: Yes}{Description: There is no flame, there is smoke. Smoke appears above the transmission tower in the middle of the image. The smoke is white. Since the smoke is obscured by trees below and surrounded by transmission towers, it is uncertain whether the smoke was caused by a fire. Power transmission facilities are present in the diagram. In the middle of the image, several transmission towers appear connected to overhead lines. The overhead line is longitudinally through. There is a certain distance between the smoke and the camera, and the smoke is close to the transmission tower and the overhead line.}{Impact: It has a impact. Although there is a certain distance between the smoke and the camera, the smoke is close to the transmission tower and the overhead line, so it will have a impact on the transmission line.}
