Given the document below, you have to determine if "Yes" or "No", the summary is factually consistent with the document.

Document:
A train derailed in East Palestine, Ohio this month, leading to the release of toxic chemicals. Some of the chemicals were released on purpose in a controlled burn. Residents of the small town evacuated, and now many fear for their futures. Top editors give you the stories you want -- delivered right to your inbox each weekday. Loading Something is loading. Thanks for signing up! Access your favorite topics in a personalized feed while you're on the go. download the app Email address By clicking 'Sign up', you agree to receive marketing emails from Insider as well as other partner offers and accept our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy Residents of a small town are fearing for their futures, after toxic chemicals from a derailed train were burned in East Palestine, Ohio this month. Officials executed a "controlled burn" of vinyl chloride -- a known carcinogen -- that was being transported through Ohio after a train carrying the chemicals was derailed on Feb. 3, NPR reported. The burn occurred after some of the derailed cars already ignited due to

Summary:
1. East Palestine is grappling with the fallout after officials executed a "controlled burn" of vinyl chloride, a known carcinogen, after a train derailed.

Is the summary factually consistent with the document? (Yes/No)
Start your answer explicitly with "Yes" or "No", and if you answer no, explain which sentence is inconsisten