Given the document below, you have to determine if "Yes" or "No", the summary is factually consistent with the document.

Document:
A dress worn by NAME_1 when she played NAME_2 NAME_3 in the classic 1939 film Gone With the Wind has fetched $137,000 at auction. Heritage Auctions offered the gray jacket and skirt, featuring a black zigzag applique, plus more than 150 other items from the Academy Award-winning film at auction on Saturday in Beverly Hills, California. The dress - a jacket and full skirt ensemble - was worn in several key scenes in the 1939 movie, including when NAME_2 NAME_3 encounters NAME_4, played by NAME_5, and when she gets attacked in the shanty town. Scroll down for video . An outfit worn in several scenes of the 1939 film Gone With The Wind by NAME_1 as she played NAME_2 NAME_3 sold for $137,000 at auction on Saturday . The dress - a jacket and full skirt ensemble - was worn in several key scenes in the

Summary:
1. heritage auctions offered the gray jacket and skirt, featuring a black zigzag applique, plus more than 150 other items from the academy award-winning film .
2. the dress was worn in several key scenes in the 1939 movie, including when NAME_2 NAME_3 encounters NAME_4, played by NAME_5 .
3. it was one of more than 150 items that were part of the private collection of NAME_6, formerly in charge of the hair and makeup department at universal studios .

Is the summary factually consistent with the document? (Yes/No)
Start your answer explicitly with "Yes" or "No", and if you answer no, explain which sentence is inconsistent and why.
