Given the document below, you have to determine if "Yes" or "No", the summary is factually consistent with the document.

Document:
NAME_1 forward and assistant coach NAME_2 has made a winning start in World Cup qualifying as coach of NAME_3. The Caribbean island team advanced to the second qualifying round in CONCACAF for the 2018 tournament late Tuesday. NAME_3 drew 2-2 in a second-leg match at NAME_4 to win 4-3 on aggregate. NAME_5's team won 2-1 on Saturday in Willemstad. NAME_2 has helped NAME_3 progress to the next stage of 2018 World Cup qualification . NAME_1 assistant NAME_5 (far right) worked with NAME_6 (centre) at the 2014 World Cup . The first-round encounter was headed to extra time on Tuesday until NAME_1 Under 21 international NAME_7 NAME_8 scored in the 87th minute, five minutes after coming on as a substitute. NAME_3 face NAME_9 in the next round, on June 8 and 16. NAME_5, whose mother is from NAME_3, was a World Cup losing semi-finalist

Summary:
1. NAME_3 beat NAME_4 4-3 on aggregate to progress to the second qualifying round in CONCACAF for the 2018 World Cup .
2. NAME_2 's team won 2-1 on Saturday in Willemstad .
3. The NAME_1 forward worked with NAME_6 last year .

Is the summary factually consistent with the document? (Yes/No)
Start your answer explicitly with "Yes" or "No", and if you answer no, explain which sentence is inconsistent and why.
