Given the document below, you have to determine if "Yes" or "No", the summary is factually consistent with the document.

Document:
A Saudi Arabian man has been arrested at the Mexican border after attempting to flee the country to avoid facing rape charges in Utah. NAME_1, 27, is in the U.S. on a Saudi government student sponsorship and has ties to the country's royal family, according to court documents. He was picked up by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement on Friday and a judge in Provo signed an arrest warrant on Monday to extradite him back to Utah. NAME_1, 27, was arrested on Friday at the border near San Diego. He is set to be extradited back to Utah where he faces charges related to the rape of a student in February NAME_2 had been charged on April 3 with rape, a first-degree felony, and obstructing justice, a second-degree felony. He has not yet entered a plea to those charges. Prosecutors believe NAME_2 was attempting to flee the country

Summary:
1. NAME_1 , 27 , is in the u.s. on a saudi government student sponsorship and has ties to the country 's royal family , according to court documents .
2. he was arrested on friday at the mexican border and is set to be extradited back to utah where he faces charges related to the rape of a student in february .

Is the summary factually consistent with the document? (Yes/No)
Start your answer explicitly with "Yes" or "No", and if you answer no, explain which sentence is inconsistent and why.
