Given the document below, determine if the summary is factually consistent with the document. A summary is factually consistent if no facts in the summary reflect the negation of a fact in the document.

Document: A blogger is alleged to have ignored a reporting ban during the trial of the Dutch engineer for murdering NAME_1. The suspect was arrested last week over the tweet, sent out before the jury delivered its verdict. On Friday NAME_2, 33, was jailed at Bristol Crown Court for a minimum of 20 years for strangling NAME_3. NAME_2 killed the 25-year-old landscape architect, his next door neighbour, at her flat in Canynge Road, Bristol, on 17 December and dumped her body about three miles away in NAME_4, Failand. The office of NAME_5 confirmed that it had received papers from Bristol Crown Court about the tweet by the suspect, who is understood not to be a journalist. Reporting restrictions made under the Contempt of Court Act banning publication of NAME_2's use of violent porn were lifted following his conviction. On the morning of NAME_3's murder he

Summary: 1. On the morning of NAME_3's murder he reportedly watched violent sex films online.

Is the summary factually consistent with the document with respect to facts?
Options: "Yes" or "No"

Answer:


