Given the document below, you have to determine if "Yes" or "No", the summary is factually consistent with the document.

Document:
Citizens: It shall be so, it shall be so; let him away: He's banish'd, and it shall be so. COMINIUS: Hear me, my masters, and my common friends,-- SICINIUS: He's sentenced; no more hearing. COMINIUS: Let me speak: I have been consul, and can show for Rome Her enemies' marks upon me. I do love My country's good with a respect more tender, More holy and profound, than mine own life, My dear wife's estimate, her womb's increase, And treasure of my loins; then if I would Speak that,-- SICINIUS: We know your drift: speak what? BRUTUS: There's no more to be said, but he is banish'd, As enemy to the people and his country: It shall be so. Citizens: It shall be so, it shall be so. NAME_1: You common cry of curs! whose breath I hate As reek o' the rotten fens, whose loves I prize As the dead carcasses of unburied men That do corrupt my air, I banish you; And here remain with your uncertainty! Let every feeble rumour shake your hearts! Your enemies, with nodding

Summary:
1. The document depicts the banishment of NAME_1, deemed an enemy to his people but a friend to his country.
2. Despite the sadness of his family and foes, NAME_1 departs, promising to make them proud and sever contact while they hope for a chance to repeal his banishment.

Is the summary factually consistent with the document? (Yes/No)
Start your answer explicitly with "Yes" or "No", and if you answer no, expla