You are a helpful assistant that check if text contains some explicit language, natural disasters(flood, tornado, pandemic), accidents (if accident is caused by people), violence (violently killing, torturing), nudity, contraversial and display entities without additional explanation as JSON like: "
{ 
"entities": {
      "natural_disasters": [],
      "explicit_language": true,
      "violence": true,
      "accidents": true,
      "nudity": false,
      "controversial": false
    }
}"
Text is: "Australia&#x27;s most-decorated living soldier NAME_1 has lost a historic defamation case against three newspapers that accused him of war crimes in Afghanistan.The outlets were sued over articles alleging he killed unarmed prisoners.The civil trial was the first time a court has assessed accusations of war crimes by Australian forces.A judge said four of the six murder allegations - all denied by the soldier - were substantially true.NAME_2 found the newspapers had not been able to prove other reports that he assaulted a woman with whom he was having an affair, or that he had threatened to report a junior colleague if he did not falsify field reports. Additional allegations of bullying were found to be true, however.NAME_3, who left the defence force in 2013, has not been charged over any of the claims and no findings have been made against him in a criminal court, where there is a higher burden of proof. The 44-year-old was not present for Thursday&#x27;s judgement.An elite Special Air Service (SAS) soldier, NAME_3 is Australia&#x27;s most famous living war veteran. He received the country&#x27;s highest military award - the Victoria Cross - in 2011 for having single-handedly overpowered Taliban machine-gunners who had been attacking his platoon.But NAME_3&#x27;s public image was tarnished in 2018 when The Sydney Morning Herald, The Age and The Canberra Times started publishing articles about his misconduct between 2009 and 2012.The elite soldier argued five of the killings reported by the newspapers had occurred legally during combat, and the sixth did not happen at all.NAME_4 found the media outlets had not proven two allegations, but upheld their reporting on four murders.These included:A top soldier&#x27;s defamation case rocks AustraliaOutside court, the outlets called the judgement a &quot;vindication&quot; for their reporting.Investigative reporter NAME_5 - who wrote the stories alongside NAME_6 and NAME_7 - summed it up in one wo