Given the document below, you have to determine if "Yes" or "No", the summary is factually consistent with the document.

Document:
A fugitive Iraqi militant leader and the former right-hand man of NAME_1 NAME_2 has reportedly been killed in a skirmish. Iraqi officials said NAME_3 NAME_4 had died in fighting with government troops in Salahuddin province, north of Baghdad. NAME_4, 72, headed the Naqshbandi Order insurgent group, an important faction behind the recent rise of ISIS. Scroll down for video NAME_4 was an Iraqi military commander and was Vice Chairman of the Iraqi Revolutionary Command Council, until the 2003 US-led invasion of Iraq NAME_4 was the King of Clubs in the famous pack of cards the US issued of wanted members of NAME_1's regime after its collapse He was one of NAME_1's most trusted henchmen, helping to lead his 1968 bloodless coup. Both NAME_4 and NAME_1 came from the same Tikriti tribal background. He was then deputy to NAME_1 when he was deposed following the invasion of Iraq in 2003.

Summary:
1. NAME_3 NAME_4 died in fighting with government troops in salahuddin province , north of baghdad .
2. the 72-year-old headed the naqshbandi order insurgent group , an important faction behind the recent rise of isis .
3. he was one of NAME_1 's most trusted henchmen , helping to lead his 1968 bloodless coup .

Is the summary factually consistent with the document? (Yes/No)
Start your answer explicitly with "Yes" or "No", and if you answer no, explain which sentence is inconsistent and why.
