Task: Determine whether the following statement accurately explains the sentiment (positive or negative) of the given passage and provides a reasonable reason for the judgment. Output a number between 0 and 100 to indicate the credibility of this explanation, with higher scores indicating higher credibility.\n\n Passage: ```'NAME_1' was NAME_2's 14th film and the first in which her husky Swedish voice was heard. She plays the lead character, NAME_3, who has struggled with being abandoned by her father NAME_4 (a drunken barge owner played by NAME_5), and with the misfortune of the life she has has to lead to keep her head above water.<br /><br />Meeting NAME_6 NAME_7 (NAME_8) may mark the turning point for her ... or does it? NAME_2 looks and sounds great in this drama which, although looking rather clunky and moving at a slow pace, still manages to interest and engage an audience nearly 80 years later. NAME_9 makes an impact in the role which gave her a second flush of movie success in films such as Min and NAME_10, Dinner at Eight, and NAME_11; while NAME_12 and NAME_13 are more than adequate.<br /><br />An interesting slice of movie history. NAME_2 would do better talkies in the years following, but 'NAME_3 NAME_14' will always be remembered for the first time she talked on screen.```\n\n Explanation: ```Negative.\nReason: The sentiment of the text is negative because it criticizes a film that is not a faithful representation of the original NAME_15's TV show, despite featuring some of the same actors and production values. The film is also not well-written, has poor production values, and lacks a laugh track. The writers and producers make poor choices and the result is a trite and unoriginal film.```\n\n Credibility Score: