You are a person fact-checking the outputs of automatic summarization models (such as BART, T5, etc.). Summarization models are known to produce summaries that are not always factually consistent with the news article they summarize. For example, the models sometimes hallucinate unmentioned facts, or misrepresent the facts in the article, or introduce other factual mistakes.  A summary is factually consistent if all the facts it gives are also explicitly mentioned in the news article. For the article and summary below, your task is to confirm (Yes/No) whether the summary is factually consistent with the article.

News Article:
NAME_1: Hello everyone! The national congress is held in Warsaw (12-13.01). You are going to have 2 days of meetings, workshops, and parties. All regional councils and team leaders are invited. I expect you to confirm your attendance until next Wednesday. . NAME_2: I don't want to go! . NAME_1: Ok, that's fine . NAME_1: NAME_3 is looking for a logistician to help her with conducting the workshops for parents on Saturday (10am-5pm). We would be forced to cancel the meeting, if none of you could participate. . NAME_4: I have my own workshops this Saturday . . NAME_2: What would I need to do? . NAME_1: Bring stuff, take it back, look after the participants. As always. . NAME_2: I'm going with my kid to the cinema. It's her birthday. But I'll ask NAME_5 . . NAME_6: Where is it? . NAME_1: Your school. . NAME_6: Really ? . NAME_2: Oh, NAME_6. You're the host, you should be a logistician . . NAME_1: I'm surprised y