Analyze the text and find the logical fallacies: Yeah jesus christ lets all put down the ai or anti ai sticks down here. NO CP trumps both.
We can fight otherwhere but hell no i don't want cp on my ai model sites nor do i want or feel a need for it existed.
"Lesser drug" or not, puritan morals or not. These people already have normal adults on sites.. Why the hell do they need kids? Much less the connotations of muddying potential kidnappings, or muddying. Fictional or not i feel VERY uncomfortable about allowing some of the fetish people to generate stuff around kids.
Some of these people buy funko pops and 2000$ skins with lack of self control by the minute. I don't try to be ill but i'm really uncomfortable with these discussions.
Call me a worried puritan if you want. But children already are a population that need 0 sexualization. Anyone defending it whether out of some modest proposal vs concealed or honest but misled ideas of safety really creeps me out.
I think there's 0 reason why citavi should voluntarily host cp models or any loli nsfw aimed models. I don't think it's radical or extreme. I think it's just common fucking sense it's what most people are comfortable and most sane people DON'T want children sexualized mutually, ai, artist, or not!! who the hell who's moral supports cp!?!?!?