Given the document below, you have to determine if "Yes" or "No", the summary is factually consistent with the document.

Document:
NAME_1, from Measham in Leicestershire, was found dead last November. NAME_2, 29, of George Avenue, Ibstock, admitted raping and murdering the teenager at a hearing in April. He and NAME_3, 27, also of George Avenue, are on trial at Nottingham Crown Court after both denied a charge of false imprisonment. NAME_4 had also previously pleaded guilty to sexual grooming and two counts of sexual activity with a child. NAME_5 QC, prosecuting, told the jury that NAME_6 went willingly to NAME_4's flat in Ibstock, Leicestershire on 13 November. She believed they were in a "secret relationship" after chatting on Facebook for about a fortnight, the court heard, and had told her family she was staying with her best friend. NAME_4 - who called himself "NAME_7 NAME_4" online - told the teenager she was his "princess" who he would "love and treasure forever". "On that night

Summary:
1. A 15-year-old girl who was raped and murdered by a man she met on Facebook was chased and pinned to the ground by another man after she tried to escape from his flat, a court has heard.

Is the summary factually consistent with the document? (Yes/No)
Start your answer explicitly with "Yes" or "No", and if you answer no, explain which sentence is inconsistent and why.
