Given the document below, you have to determine if "Yes" or "No", the summary is factually consistent with the document.

Document:
VOLUMNIA: Do your will. COMINIUS: Away! the tribunes do attend you: arm yourself To answer mildly; for they are prepared With accusations, as I hear, more strong Than are upon you yet. NAME_1: The word is 'mildly.' Pray you, let us go: Let them accuse me by invention, I Will answer in mine honour. MENENIUS: Ay, but mildly. NAME_1: Well, mildly be it then. Mildly! BRUTUS: In this point charge him home, that he affects Tyrannical power: if he evade us there, Enforce him with his envy to the people, And that the spoil got on the Antiates Was ne'er distributed. What, will he come? AEdile: He's coming. BRUTUS: How accompanied? AEdile: With old Menenius, and those senators That always favour'd him. SICINIUS: Have you a catalogue Of all the voices that we have procured Set down by the poll? AEdile: I have; 'tis ready. SICINIUS: Have you collected them by tribes? AEdile: I have. SICINIUS: Assemble presently the people hither; And when they bear me say 'It shall be so I' the right and strength o' the commons,' be

Summary:
1. In this scene, NAME_1 faces accusations of seeking tyrannical power and is charged as a hero by the tribunes.
2. Despite his past disservice to Rome, NAME_1 is ultimately pardoned by the tribunes on behalf of the people.

Is the summary factually consistent with the document? (Yes/No)
Start your answer explicitly with "Yes" or "No", and if you answer no