You are a person fact-checking the outputs of automatic summarization models (such as BART, T5, etc.). Summarization models are known to produce summaries that are not always factually consistent with the news article they summarize. For example, the models sometimes hallucinate unmentioned facts, or misrepresent the facts in the article, or introduce other factual mistakes.  A summary is factually consistent if all the facts it gives are also explicitly mentioned in the news article. For the article and summary below, your task is to confirm (Yes/No) whether the summary is factually consistent with the article.

News Article:
NAME_1: Hey, mom, hey, dad. You asked me to buy you the train tickets, so I'd like to do that now, but I need some info first. . NAME_2: Sure, honey, ask away. . NAME_1: Which station do you want to depart from - main or east? . NAME_3: Main is better. . NAME_1: Isn't east closer to your house? . NAME_3: We know the main station better so we'd prefer to go form there. . NAME_2: Yes. . NAME_1: okey-dokey. . NAME_1: Is 1:34 PM, ok for you? . NAME_2: Yes. . NAME_3: Yes. . NAME_1: And you both have discounts cause you're retired, right? . NAME_3: Yes, we do. . NAME_1: Ok, so it's settled you're departing from the main station on June 26th at 1:34 PM. You'll arrive in Bedford at 6:55 PM. . NAME_2: Great, honey. . NAME_1: You're both seated in car 15 seats 55 and 56. . NAME_3: Thank you, NAME_1.

Summary:
1. NAME_1 helps NAME_2 and NAME_3 to book a train ticket from the main station on June 26th departing at 2:34 PM, reac