Given the document below, you have to determine if "Yes" or "No", the summary is factually consistent with the document.

Document:
NAME_1 spoke of his despair after his Queens Park Rangers team twice threw away a lead against NAME_2, with the Rangers chairman watching the scenes at NAME_3 Park from afar on his iPhone. NAME_4 NAME_5's hat-trick earned a draw for NAME_3, with his last goal coming just seven minutes before full-time, and within five minutes of what had looked like a winner from NAME_6. NAME_7 had earlier given QPR the lead in the first half but taking all three points wasn't to be for the relegation-threatened visitors and they had to settle for a point at NAME_3 Park. NAME_1 spoke of his despair after his Queens Park Rangers team twice threw away a lead. NAME_8, Rangers chairman, was watching the 3-3 draw at NAME_3 Park from his iPhone away from the game. Taking all three points wasn't to be for the relegation-threatened visitors and they

Summary:
1. QPR twice threw away a lead against NAME_2 on Saturday.
2. NAME_4 NAME_5's hat - trick earned NAME_3 a 3 - 3 draw at NAME_3 Park.
3. NAME_1 was watching the game from his iPhone in Malaysia.
4. The QPR chairman praised NAME_9 and NAME_10 on Twitter.

Is the summary factually consistent with the document? (Yes/No)
Start your answer explicitly with "Yes" or "No", and if you answer no, explain which sentence is inconsistent and why.
