Given the document below, you have to determine if "Yes" or "No", the summary is factually consistent with the document.

Document:
Hello guys, welcome to the goons. Very first episode on the podcast. This podcast is basically going to be about a couple of goons childhood friends. There's gonna be other other friends joining us on this. But today I have one of my good friends NAME_1 childhood friend known him since we were little tell me about a little bit on my cheer yourself up about it. I can't speak English right now, but NAME_2 what up guys? My name is NAME_2. As you said my nickname ought to be called Harem king or daddy, you know, Daddy I know about that. I mean whoa animation, that's not Boku. No pico. Okay, uh, first of all child to a monster mushrooming, I mean, I'm gone. Just kidding. A Demon Slayer, that's just lit to do me sooner those who don't watch anime to tell me a little bit about Demon Slayer Demon Slayer is about this fucking red haired kid. Okay. Okay. I mean, yeah red and black his family gets fucking marked by a demon. Yeah, you solved

Summary:
1. The podcast episode is about a group of childhood friends discussing their favorite drinks and snacks, as well as what they plan to do in the future, including one friend who wants to major in education.
2. The group also briefly talks about the anime show Demon Slayer and the possibility of Arizona not making gummies.

Is the summary factually consistent with the document? (Yes/No)
Start your answer explicitly with "Yes" or "No", and if 