Given the document below, determine if the summary is factually consistent with the document.
A summary is factually consistent if all statements in the summary are entailed by the document.

Document: The statue was gifted to NAME_1 in Derbyshire in 2001 by its twin town of Pawtucket in the US. NAME_1 was divided over the statue, described by some as "hideous", and it was quickly vandalised and taken down. Now it is being refurbished by a local youth group, town council leader NAME_2 wants it to take pride of place in the centre of town once again. It will stand on a concrete sill in front of the station facing the A6, he said. However Mr NAME_3 is yet to approach NAME_4 which owns the building and until he has permission, Mr Potato Head will be based over the road at a charity's headquarters from 18 June. "It's just a bit light-hearted fun. He's a bit Marmite - some people like it, some don't. It's a bit of fun for the kids and everybody," he said. Some residents argued

Summary: 1. US was divided over the statue, described by some as "hideous", and it was quickly vandalised and taken down.

Is the summary factually consistent with the document?
Start your answer with "Yes" or "No".

Answer:


