Given the document below, you have to determine if "Yes" or "No", the summary is factually consistent with the document.

Document:
First Soldier: Will not you go? AUFIDIUS: I am attended at the cypress grove: I pray you-- 'Tis south the city mills--bring me word thither How the world goes, that to the pace of it I may spur on my journey. First Soldier: I shall, sir. MENENIUS: The augurer tells me we shall have news to-night. NAME_1: Good or bad? MENENIUS: Not according to the prayer of the people, for they love not Marcius. SICINIUS: Nature teaches beasts to know their friends. MENENIUS: Pray you, who does the NAME_2 love? SICINIUS: The lamb. MENENIUS: Ay, to devour him; as the hungry plebeians would the noble Marcius. NAME_1: He's a lamb indeed, that baes like a bear. MENENIUS: He's a bear indeed, that lives like a lamb. You two are old men: tell me one thing that I shall ask you. Both: Well, sir. MENENIUS: In what enormity is Marcius poor in, that you two have not in abundance? NAME_1: He's poor in no one fault, but stored with all. SICINIUS: Especially in pride. NAME_1: And topping all others in boasting.

Summary:
1. In this excerpt from a play, Menenius challenges NAME_1 and Sicinius' condemnation of Marcius for being arrogant.
2. Menenius implies that the two magistrates are hypocritical, incompetent, and no better than Marcius in their own pride and conduct.

Is the summary factually consistent with the document? (Yes/No)
Start your answer explicitly with "Yes" or "No", and if you answer no, explain which