Given the document below, you have to determine if "Yes" or "No", the summary is factually consistent with the document.

Document:
The raids came a day after it emerged a Frenchman was being held by police investigating the murder of three people at the Brussels Jewish Museum. NAME_1, 29, was arrested at a station in Marseille on Friday. Prosecutors say he has claimed responsibility for the attack and spent more than a year in Syria. Interior Minister NAME_2 told Europe 1 radio on Monday: "There are people who recruit jihadists. There are as I'm speaking arrests being made." "We are acting everywhere. There will be no respite in the fight against terrorists." There is no suggestion of a link between the four arrests on Monday and the detention of NAME_3 during a random check on a coach arriving from Amsterdam in southern France on Friday. But NAME_3 is said to have had links with radical Islamists and served five years in jail in France for robbery before

Summary:
1. French police have arrested four people suspected of being involved in the recruitment of jihadists, the interior minister has said, as raids were carried out in Paris and Marseille.

Is the summary factually consistent with the document? (Yes/No)
Start your answer explicitly with "Yes" or "No", and if you answer no, explain which sentence is inconsistent and why.
