Given the document below, you have to determine if "Yes" or "No", the summary is factually consistent with the document.

Document:
Hello, everyone. It is NAME_1 and a fell here Return of the champ. Shut the fuck up. Oh my God, he's just really pretty. We'ii. Just were we everyone everyone else gave up everyone else gave up. I kept it. He gave up Alonzo. I always kept it open for him. Everyone gave up this, you know even be I was like, you know, NAME_2 board is probably not going to be on the team not putting any faith in NAME_2 board and then all of a sudden we were like, nope screw this we're ready to get our hearts broken NAME_3's going to eat that snack every night every night NAME_4 tweets. I've been tweeting about NAME_4 been thinking about him. I was just came home. I'm literally on the road home from Tennessee Titans Patriots joint practices. I've been thinking about NAME_4 and how long would use just throw into gonna cross you see whatever his name is and that guy. Okay, no fuck contrl. Oh, no. No, he has a family he has a

Summary:
1. The document is a conversation between two persons deliberating the reentry of NAME_4 to the Patriots team.
2. They discuss his potential impact as a receiver and how he suits the team's attacking strategy.

Is the summary factually consistent with the document? (Yes/No)
Start your answer explicitly with "Yes" or "No", and if you answer no, explain which sentence is inconsistent and why.
