Given the document below, determine if the summary is factually consistent with the document. A summary is factually consistent if no facts in the summary reflect the negation of a fact in the document.

Document: The NAME_1 is already Scotland's top paid-for tourist attraction, with 755,001 visitors between April and July - an increase of 8% on last year. Historic Scotland said it also recorded 1.96 million visits to their 77 attractions across Scotland during the same period, 9% more than last year. Several other paid-for heritage sites also broke their records. NAME_2 was second most popular attraction between April and July, with 215,461 visitors, while NAME_3 on the banks of Loch Ness was third with a 9% visitor increase to 192,191. The Neolithic settlement of Skara Brae in Orkney took fourth spot, recording 56,386 visitors. Doune NAME_1's jump to fifth place was credited to its TV role as the fictional NAME_1 Leoch in the Outlander series which helped attract 40,751 visitors, a 23% increase. Other attractions in the top ten are Linlithgow Palace, NAME_4, St Andrews NAME_1, NAME_5 in Inverness

Summary: 1. The NAME_1 is already Scotland's top paid-for tourist attraction, with 8% visitors between April and July - an increase of 8% on last year.

Is the summary factually consistent with the document with respect to facts?
Options: "Yes" or "No"

Answer:


