First, read this:
My name is <PRESIDIO_ANONYMIZED_PERSON> and I am currently starting my senior year here at Mason! I am studying to become a secondary education teacher with a concentration in social sciences. My ideal subject to teach would be ancient civilizations at the high school level. I have wanted to be a teacher ever since I was five; however, being introduced to ancient civilizations in the fifth grade solidified this dream of mine. Choosing to teach this topic in high school would allow me to go more in depth on the topic. I think my discipline would fall closer to paradigmatic/pre-paradigmatic due to teaching relying on a few different aspects. Formative and summative assessments are utilized to evaluate a student's understanding and learning. The valuable and relevant intel collected from assessments aid in analyzing their performance and progress. This is done on a personal level with the student, but may also be reported to other faculty and their parents. 
Interaction between students, teachers, and parents are also crucial in ensuring success. Learning about human behavior and experiences are an important factor in teaching. Open communication would allow students to express themselves and their needs freely in the classroom. This would not only allow them to be heard amongst their peers, but would also allow teachers to support them effectively. I think the goal I have for this class is to just learn as much as I can. I haven't taken an English class since before the pandemic, so I really want to solidfy my writing and research skills. This is especially important due to my career choice and the fact that I officially start my BAM program in the fall


Then, do the following assignment:
Comment on one of your peer's posts: how is your discipline similar or different? If you are in the same discipline, do you agree with your peer's assessment? Is there anything they left out?

