Given the document below, you have to determine if "Yes" or "No", the summary is factually consistent with the document.

Document:
the hosts had taken an early lead when NAME_1 drove in a low shot. but NAME_2's defensive frailties resurfaced within seconds when NAME_3 equalised for the cherries. NAME_4 struck from the left of the box to seal a first league win in nine matches for the toffees but some home fans protested against NAME_5. relive NAME_2's win here follow all the reaction to saturday's football here the winless streak in the league, coupled with last weekend's fa cup semi - final defeat by manchester united, had stirred significant discontent amongst NAME_2 fans about their spanish boss. the ex - wigan manager had said he was ` ` ready to fight more than ever'' in the build - up to the match, a week after a last - minute loss at wembley that itself followed a 4 - 0 humbling by liverpool. a banner saying ` ` time to

Summary:
1. NAME_2 ended their winless run in the premier league with victory over bournemouth at goodison park as NAME_6' goal ended a run of five games without a win under new boss NAME_7.

Is the summary factually consistent with the document? (Yes/No)
Start your answer explicitly with "Yes" or "No", and if you answer no, explain which sentence is inconsistent and why.
