Given the document below, you have to determine if "Yes" or "No", the summary is factually consistent with the document.

Document:
| NAME_1: hi girls! When are you flying to Japan? | NAME_2: in a week! unbelievable  | NAME_3: I can't believe either. | NAME_3: I am also increasingly scared | NAME_2: you're such an alarmist! | NAME_1: But scared of what?? | NAME_3: the long flight, earth-quakes | NAME_3: God, and tsunamis! | NAME_1: hahaha, you're really a damn alarmist | NAME_1: this is so exaggerated, are you serious? | NAME_3: NAME_1, I almost never travel, I'm afraid really | NAME_1: Listen, nothing will happen. First of all the earthquakes happen rarely, even in Japan and only in certain places | NAME_1: it's not like the whole country is shaking all the time | NAME_2: I'm telling her this all the time, but it's pointless | NAME_1: And, most of all, Japanese have amazing architecture because of their experiences with earthquakes. Their cities are super safe | NAME_3: What

Summary:
1. NAME_4 are flying to Japan in a week.
2. They are afraid of the long flight, earth-quakes and tsunamis.

Is the summary factually consistent with the document? (Yes/No)
Start your answer explicitly with "Yes" or "No", and if you answer no, explain which sentence is inconsistent and why.
