Given the document below, you have to determine if "Yes" or "No", the summary is factually consistent with the document.

Document:
First Soldier: Will not you go? AUFIDIUS: I am attended at the cypress grove: I pray you-- 'Tis south the city mills--bring me word thither How the world goes, that to the pace of it I may spur on my journey. First Soldier: I shall, sir. NAME_1: The augurer tells me we shall have news to-night. NAME_2: Good or bad? NAME_1: Not according to the prayer of the people, for they love not Marcius. SICINIUS: Nature teaches beasts to know their friends. NAME_1: Pray you, who does the NAME_3 love? SICINIUS: The lamb. NAME_1: Ay, to devour him; as the hungry plebeians would the noble Marcius. NAME_2: He's a lamb indeed, that baes like a bear. NAME_1: He's a bear indeed, that lives like a lamb. You two are old men: tell me one thing that I shall ask you. Both: Well, sir. NAME_1: In what enormity is Marcius poor in, that you two have not in abundance? NAME_2: He's poor in no one fault, but stored with all. SICINIUS: Especially in pride. NAME_2: And topping all others in boasting.

Summary:
1. In this excerpt from a play, NAME_1 argues with NAME_2 and Sicinius, challenging their objection of Marcius for being boastful.
2. NAME_1 insinuates that the two magistrates are hypocritical, incompetent, and no better than Marcius in their own pride and behavior.

Is the summary factually consistent with the document? (Yes/No)
Start your answer explicitly with "Yes" or "No", and if you answ