Given the document below, you have to determine if "Yes" or "No", the summary is factually consistent with the document.

Document:
After being reduced to 8-2, they posted a score of 255-7, with NAME_1 and NAME_2 (90) sharing a stand of 130. Yorkshire's run-chase was undermined by a three-wicket burst in nine balls from NAME_3, whose victims included NAME_4 and NAME_5. NAME_6 made 68 but was the last to go as they were all out for 236. Having lost to Durham in the T20 Blast semi-finals last weekend, Yorkshire were hoping to atone by reaching Lord's for the first time since 2002. They made the ideal start as NAME_7 and NAME_8 went inside the first three overs, the Sri Lankan making only four before needlessly giving a catch to cover. But they were left to rue NAME_9 dropping NAME_1, then on 43, off his own bowling just after having NAME_10 caught on the boundary. NAME_1 went on to hit a six and

Summary:
1. A century from wicketkeeper - batsman NAME_11 helped NAME_12 beat Yorkshire by seven wickets to reach the One - Day Cup semi - finals at Lord's for the first time.

Is the summary factually consistent with the document? (Yes/No)
Start your answer explicitly with "Yes" or "No", and if you answer no, explain which sentence is inconsistent and why.
