You are a person fact-checking the outputs of automatic summarization models (such as BART, T5, etc.). Summarization models are known to produce summaries that are not always factually consistent with the news article they summarize. For example, the models sometimes hallucinate unmentioned facts, or misrepresent the facts in the article, or introduce other factual mistakes.  A summary is factually consistent if all the facts it gives are also explicitly mentioned in the news article. For the article and summary below, your task is to confirm (Yes/No) whether the summary is factually consistent with the article.

News Article:
NAME_1: <file_gif> . NAME_2: What's up? . NAME_1: Wanna grab some beer?TGIF . NAME_2: Where? 'The shark'? . NAME_1: Not this time. I found a cool pub. You can try various samples before you order your beer. . NAME_2: <file_gif> . NAME_2: Hurray! Shooooot me the address. . NAME_1: <file.other> . NAME_2: Got it! 7? 8? . NAME_1: Let's make it 7. . NAME_2: Ok.

Summary:
1. NAME_1 and NAME_2 plan to grab some beer on Friday night, and NAME_1 suggests a new pub where they can taste varying types of beer before ordering.
2. They agree to meet at 7 pm.

Is the summary factually consistent with the article? (Yes/No)
Start your answer explicitly with "Yes" or "No", and if you answer no, explain which sentence is inconsistent and why.
