You are a person fact-checking the outputs of automatic summarization models (such as BART, T5, etc.). Summarization models are known to produce summaries that are not always factually consistent with the news article they summarize. For example, the models sometimes hallucinate unmentioned facts, or misrepresent the facts in the article, or introduce other factual mistakes.  A summary is factually consistent if all the facts it gives are also explicitly mentioned in the news article. For the article and summary below, your task is to confirm (Yes/No) whether the summary is factually consistent with the article.

News Article:
NAME_1: When is NAME_2 coming? . NAME_3: tomorrow! . NAME_4: Finally! . NAME_1: We should make a welcome party for him . NAME_5: yes, in the garden! . NAME_1: NAME_3 and NAME_4, could you take care of food? . NAME_3: Sure, NAME_4 will bake a cake . NAME_4: With pleasure! . NAME_5: I'll prepare the garden, some Chinese lantern and candles . NAME_3: It'll be beautiful! . NAME_1: I will bring him from the railway station and contact his friends. . NAME_1: he's not expecting anything. I'm sure! . NAME_3: Ok, so let's keep it secret then . NAME_1: Perfect!

Summary:
1. Friends arrange for a welcome party for NAME_2.
2. NAME_3 and NAME_4 will organize the food, while NAME_5 will prepare the garden.
3. NAME_1 will bring NAME_2 from the railway station and notify his friends.
4. They plan to keep it a surprise.

Is the summary factually consistent with the article? (Yes/No)
Start your answer explicitly with "Ye