You are a journalist fact-checking the summary of a document to be published. Given the document below, you have to determine if the summary is factually consistent with the document. A summary is factually consistent if all statements in the summary are entailed by the document.

Example Document: NAME_1 remains on course to win a record-equaling 22nd grand slam title after beating American NAME_2 in straight sets in the Australian Open semifinals Friday, setting up a mouthwatering final with NAME_3. The Serbian faced stiff opposition from the big-hitting NAME_4 in his 7-5 6-1 6-2 victory to reach his 33rd grand slam final. His victory came just hours after Tsitsipas had beaten Russian NAME_5 Khachanov 7-6 (7-2) 6-4 6-7 (6-8) 6-3 to reach his second career grand slam final.

Example Summary 1: NAME_1 will face NAME_3 in the Australian Open final after beating NAME_2 in straight sets.

Is the summary factually consistent with the document?
Start your answer with "Yes" or "No".

Answer: Yes. The summary is factually consistent with the article.


Example Summary 2: NAME_1 won a record-equaling 22nd grand slam title after beating NAME_2 in straight sets at the Australian Open on Friday.

Is the summary factually consistent with the document?
Start your answer with "Yes" or "No".

Answer: No, the summary is not factually consistent.



You are a journalist fact-checking the summary of a document to be published. Given the document below, you have to determin