Question: A breeder of dogs induced a purchaser to buy a puppy by representing that it was a registered basset hound, when in fact the breeder knew it was a mixed breed. The purchaser later discovered that the representation was false. She wants to sue to disaffirm the contract and get a refund. What legal theory would be best applicable to decide this case?
A: Unconscionability.
B: Breach of warranty.
C: Fraudulent inducement.
D: Fraud in the factum.
Please eliminate two incorrect options first, then think it step by step and choose the most proper one option.