Given the document below, you have to determine if "Yes" or "No", the summary is factually consistent with the document.

Document:
tokyo ( cnn ) a bizarre and alarming discovery is raising concerns in japan about the potential for terrorism involving drones . a drone carrying traces of a radioactive material was found on the rooftop of japan 's equivalent to the white house on wednesday , police and government officials said . the discovery came on the same day a japanese court approved a government plan to restart two reactors at the sendai nuclear power plant in kagoshima prefecture , more than four years after the fukushima daiichi nuclear disaster . prime minister shinzo NAME_1 's push to restart the reactors is unpopular among many japanese , who view nuclear energy as too dangerous . a staff member spotted the drone wednesday morning on the roof of NAME_1 's residence , tokyo metropolitan police said . dozens of police investigators were dispatched to the roof to investigate the origin of

Summary:
1. a drone carrying traces of a radioactive material was found on the rooftop of japan 's equivalent to the white house .
2. the discovery came on the same day a japanese court approved a government plan to restart two reactors at the sendai nuclear power plant .
3. the drone was equipped with a small camera , smoke flares and a bottle containing small traces of cesium .

Is the summary factually consistent with the document? (Yes/No)
Start your answer explicitly with "Yes" or "No", and if you answer no, explain which sentence is inconsistent and why.
