Given the document below, you have to determine if "Yes" or "No", the summary is factually consistent with the document.

Document:
These are external links and will open in a new window. His meetings will focus on the relationship between the UK and Russia, as well as issues involving Syria and Ukraine "where we continue to have significant differences", it said. The Foreign Office said the UK "will engage with Russia where it is in our national interest to do so". The timings and details of the visit will be released "in due course". A spokeswoman said: "The foreign secretary has accepted an invitation from Russian foreign minister NAME_1 to visit Moscow in the coming weeks. "The prime minister and the foreign secretary have made clear that our policy towards Russia is to 'engage but beware' and the visit is entirely consistent with this approach. "This is not a return to business as usual and the foreign secretary will continue to be robust on those issues where we differ." A

Summary:
1. Foreign Secretary NAME_2 is to travel to Moscow in the coming weeks, the Foreign Office has confirmed, following an invitation from Russia's foreign minister.

Is the summary factually consistent with the document? (Yes/No)
Start your answer explicitly with "Yes" or "No", and if you answer no, explain which sentence is inconsistent and why.
