Given the document below, you have to determine if "Yes" or "No", the summary is factually consistent with the document.

Document:
NAME_1 and his Davis Cup colleagues have got their preferred venue by securing London's Queen's Club as the place where they will take on France in their quarter final. The venerable club in Baron's Court will host Britain's biggest home tie in three decades from July 17-19, after agreement was reached between its management and the Lawn Tennis Association today. British Captain NAME_2 and his lead player had made it clear that they wanted to take on the strong French team on grass, as it would appear to give them fewer selection options from their rich resources. NAME_1 in action last year at the Queen's Club, which will host the Davis Cup quarter final against France. NAME_3 celebrates winning at Queen's in 2013 - one of three triumphs he has had at the tournament. Tickets go on sale on May 27 and the match is sure to

Summary:
1. The venerable club in Baron's Court will host Britain 's biggest home tie in three decades from July 17 - 19.
2. British Captain NAME_2 and his lead player had made it clear that they wanted to take on the strong French team on grass.
3. Tickets go on sale on May 27 and the match is sure to sell out quickly.

Is the summary factually consistent with the document? (Yes/No)
Start your answer explicitly with "Yes" or "No", and if you answer no, explain which sentence is inconsistent and why.
