Please summarize the following article in 3 sentences:

When Judge NAME_1 was a young father, his wife captured much of their daily life on a parenting blog that highlighted the family’s strong antiabortion beliefs.

One photo showed one of their children, a toddler, in a T-shirt that read “I survived Roe v. Wade.”

“As you might guess, NAME_2 LOVES this shirt,” NAME_3’s wife wrote in January 2009, referring to her husband. “I put it on her today not even realizing that today is the anniversary of Roe v. Wade.”

Now, 14 years later, as a 45-year-old federal judge in Amarillo, Tex., NAME_3 lives in the same antiabortion world he has inhabited his entire adult life, surrounded by friends and family who abhor the procedure, while holding the same views himself, as The Washington Post reported in February. Those perspectives, rooted in deeply held Christian beliefs, have swirled around him over the past five months as he deliberated whether to revoke government approval of a key abortion drug — a decision with nationwide implications that some close to him felt he was destined to make.

As his sister, NAME_4, said in the weeks leading up to the ruling: “I feel like he was made for this.”

On Good Friday — the Christian holiday marking NAME_5’ crucifixion — NAME_3 delivered the ruling they had hoped for.

Read The Post's profile of Judge NAME_1

In a 67-page decision, he put a hold on the U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s approval of mifepristone, used in over half of all abo