"The one thing that NAME_1 does not lack are reviews or reports. In Scotland we have had the Review by NAME_2 in 2013, followed some five years later by the NAME_3 Review.  There is also a 2021 a Scottish Parliamentary Justice Committee evidence session 2021 which focussed on the crisis within the sector. In England and Wales we have had the report of the Westminster Justice Committee (Third Report of the Justice Committee, (The Future of NAME_1 July 2021) and the Westminster Commission on NAME_1 (The Westminster Commission on NAME_1, ‘Inquiry into the sustainability and recovery of the NAME_1 sector’, October 2021). In December 2021 an independent review of NAME_1 in England and Wales was commissioned by the Westminster Government.  It was led by NAME_4. His report highlights the same general concerns as those in the above mentioned reports.

Scotland has a long and proud history of aiding those who are unable to finance the cost of legal actions. Critically analyse how NAME_1 has been  provided in Scotland over the years and how it might be improved, Your answer should  obviously focus  in the main on Scotland but there may be lessons ,(or may not), to be learned from south of the border, or any other jurisdiction with which you are familiar." Create a 800 word answer
