Given the document below, you have to determine if "Yes" or "No", the summary is factually consistent with the document.

Document:
Professor C: So as I understand , you know , he 's using all the machines and you 're using all the machines , PhD F: So . Professor C: is the rough division of PhD F: Yeah . Exactly . Yeah , you know , I I sort of got started using the recognizer just recently and uh , uh I fired off a training job , and then I fired off a recognition job and I get this email about midnight from NAME_1 saying , " uh , are you running two trainings simultaneously s my m my jobs are not getting run . " So I had to back off a little bit . But , soon as we get some more machines then uh then we 'll have more compute available . So , um , that 's just a quick update about what we 've got . So . NAME_2: Um , I have I have a question about the uh , parallelization ? PhD F: Mm - hmm . NAME_2: So ,

Summary:
1. During the conversation, NAME_2 mentioned that during a previous workshop, there were only 10 machines and a P-make-like system was used where all 10 people sent things to all 10 machines.

Is the summary factually consistent with the document? (Yes/No)
Start your answer explicitly with "Yes" or "No", and if you answer no, explain which sentence is inconsistent and why.
