Given the document below, you have to determine if "Yes" or "No", the summary is factually consistent with the document.

Document:
Project Manager: NAME_1 , but I think it will increase the price of the production of the remote control . Marketing: Specially distribution , NAME_1 . Industrial Designer: NAME_1 , NAME_1 , maybe . NAME_1 , maybe . Project Manager: If you need to have special colours for remote controls it will cost more . Marketing: Uh User Interface: NAME_1 , personalised colour . Because you know Project Manager: NAME_1 , it will cost little bit more . User Interface: NAME_1 , because maybe some people prefer a red remote control , Industrial Designer: NAME_1 , NAME_1 , NAME_1 . User Interface: some people prefer black remote control . Marketing: NAME_1 , but this is what we would ask to the users , so . Project Manager: And also f User Interface: Maybe we can have di di we can have uh several options , Marketing: NAME_1 . User Interface: so user can select which colour they prefer , so . Project Manager: NAME_1 , but as soon as you speak about options , it means that the price increases

Summary:
1. The project manager opines that possessing personalized or distinct colors for the remote control will escalate the price of production.
2. Nonetheless, the appearance of the remote control must reflect the persona of the society or brand.

Is the summary factually consistent with the document? (Yes/No)
Start your answer explicitly with "Yes" or "No", and if you answer no, explain which sentence is inconsistent and why.
