The Effect of the 1994 Assault Rifle Ban

Gun control has been a contentious issue in the United States for decades. The Second Amendment of the Constitution guarantees the right of citizens to bear arms, but the interpretation of this amendment has been a subject of debate among legal scholars, policymakers, and the general public. In response to a series of high-profile mass shootings in the 1990s, the federal government enacted a ban on assault rifles in 1994. The ban restricted the manufacture, sale, and possession of certain types of firearms, including semi-automatic rifles and high-capacity magazines. The ban was set to expire in 2004, and despite efforts to renew it, it was ultimately allowed to lapse. The lifting of the ban was a significant moment in the history of gun control policy in the United States, and its effects have been the subject of much debate and analysis.

The lifting of the ban on assault rifles in 2004 had a limited effect on crime rates. Studies have shown that there was no significant increase in crime during the ban. It is also worth noting that the ban had a limited impact on crime rates even after the ban was lifted. This is probably due to the ban only covering a small percentage of firearms in circulation. There was also no noticeable impact on the number of mass shootings during the ban. But it is worth noting that the number of mass shootings drastically rose after the ban was lifted. The argument against the ban was that assault weapons are only used in a small percentage of crimes and that most crimes are committed with handguns. Therefore, lifting the ban did not significantly impact the overall crime rate significantly. However, The Conversation points out that “The data shows an almost immediate – and steep – rise in mass shooting deaths in the years after the assault weapons ban expired in 2004” (Klein).

The lifting of the ban on assault rifles in 2004 has had mixed effects on public safety. While the ban was in effect, it may have prevented some shootings and made it more difficult for criminals to obtain certain types of firearms. According to ABC News, “Most reviews of the 1994 version of the assault weapons ban point to loopholes in the text of the bill that, some argue, made it less effective than some would have wanted” (Keneally). One of the criticisms was that the ban only applied to certain firearms, so manufacturers were able to make minor modifications to get around the ban. For example, manufacturers could reduce the size of the magazine to get around the ban. Also, guns bought before the ban were grandfathered and legal to continue to own. Additionally, the lifting of the ban has made it easier for civilians to purchase certain types of firearms, which could potentially increase the risk of mass shootings and other types of gun violence. This can be seen in some of the recent mass shootings where assault rifles were used, including the 2017 Las Vegas shooting, the 2019 El Paso shooting, and many of the school shootings that have happened recently. However, proponents of the ban argue that the ban did have some impact on reducing gun violence, particularly in mass shootings.

The lifting of the ban on assault rifles in 2004 has also led to an increase in public support for stricter gun control measures. In the wake of mass shootings involving these weapons, many have called for their ban once more, as well as stricter background checks, greater restrictions on high-capacity magazines, and the closing of loopholes in existing gun laws. A study conducted by Pew Research Center in 2019 found that “Overall, the share of Americans who say gun laws in the U.S. should be made stricter has increased from 52% in 2017 to 60% this year… The share of those saying gun laws should be less strict has dropped from 18% in 2017 to 11% today” (Schaeffer). This indicates that people are becoming more aware of the dangers of assault rifles and are expressing greater support for measures that might prevent gun violence. Some states have even taken independent actions to impose their own restrictions on assault weapons, despite the absence of a federal ban.
write another body paragraph about the future of gun laws and write a conclusion