Given the document below, you have to determine if "Yes" or "No", the summary is factually consistent with the document.

Document:
Marketing: Is it easy to use ? Project Manager: I'm not sure . I'm not sure . User Interface: Yeah . User Interface: Well yeah , the voice recognition of course is hard to learn , I think . Well , hard it's not for the for the e for the elderly . They won't use it . Industrial Designer: Well , but there are two parts in this remote control . What you see here is is the basic part . Everybody can use it , so that's easy to use . Project Manager: Yeah . Industrial Designer: That's for a novice user . When you have a more advanced , elaborate user , well , such a user really would like to explore all these additional functions . So in that in that way it is advanced , Project Manager: Yeah . Industrial Designer: and I think it's easy to use for for both uh types of users . User Interface: I think I think a three . Industrial Designer: So uh It's maybe it's not very uh

Summary:
1. The group had a varied opinion on whether the remote control was user-friendly, with some members believing that it was easy for both novice and advanced users, while others believed that the advanced functions may be difficult.
2. There was also a mention of voice recognition being hard to learn, but not for the elderly.

Is the summary factually consistent with the document? (Yes/No)
Start your answer explicitly with "Yes" or "No", and if you answer no, explain which sentence is inconsistent and why.
