Given the document below, you have to determine if "Yes" or "No", the summary is factually consistent with the document.

Document:
Derby County season ticket holders from the 2010-11 campaign might struggle to believe it but NAME_1 prepares to face his former club Real Madrid on Wednesday as the highest-scoring Spanish-national in La Liga with a big money move to NAME_2 waiting for him at the end of the season. NAME_3 played for Derby on loan five years ago, but with just five goals in 29 games he looked anything like Champions League material. After returning to NAME_4 he moved to Rayo Vallecano and at the club with one of the lowest budgets in Spanish football he has had the season of his life. Now Champions League quarter-finalists NAME_2, coached by NAME_5, are ready to poach him. NAME_1 (left) in action for Derby against Norwich during his unsuccessful spell with the club. NAME_3 celebrates scoring for Real Madrid against Real Union in November 2008. NAME_3 has scored

Summary:
1. NAME_1 has scored 17 goals for Rayo Vallecano this season.
2. The 27 - year - old could move to NAME_2 at the end of the season.
3. NAME_3 spent a season on loan at Derby County in 2010 - 11.

Is the summary factually consistent with the document? (Yes/No)
Start your answer explicitly with "Yes" or "No", and if you answer no, explain which sentence is inconsistent and why.
