Given the document below, you have to determine if "Yes" or "No", the summary is factually consistent with the document.

Document:
And net income on a non-GAAP basis in the second quarter was $94.8 million or $0.91 per diluted share, that compares to $106.6 million or $1.04 per diluted share in Q2 of last year. Net income on a GAAP basis in the second quarter was $76.2 million or $0.73 per diluted share, and that compares to $88.5 million or $0.86 per diluted share in last year's Q2. Based on a combination of the factors I just covered, we estimate that Q3 diluted earnings per share could range from $0.15 to $0.30 on a GAAP basis and from $0.37 to $0.52 on a non-GAAP basis. And if I focus more specifically on Q3, we anticipate that third quarter total revenue could range from $260 million to $290 million.

Summary:
1. The company underwent a downturn in net income on both a non-GAAP and GAAP basis in Q2 compared to the preceding year.
2. They estimate Q3 earnings per share and overall revenue to be lower than Q2.

Is the summary factually consistent with the document? (Yes/No)
Start your answer explicitly with "Yes" or "No", and if you answer no, explain which sentence is inconsistent and why.
