Given the document below, you have to determine if "Yes" or "No", the summary is factually consistent with the document.

Document:
The 31-year-old NAME_1 academy graduate won three Premiership titles with Leicester in his nine years away from Kingston Park. NAME_2, who has been capped 60 times by England, said: "When the opportunity came on to the table, it didn't take long for me to make the decision. "It really feels like I'm coming home, and I've watched a fair amount of Newcastle's games in recent months." NAME_1, who have now made 10 signings for the 2017-18 season, did not disclose the length of NAME_2's contract. NAME_2, who made his Premiership debut for Newcastle in 2005, spent six season with Leicester where he went on to become club captain. He has spent the past three seasons in the French top flight with NAME_3. NAME_1 director of rugby NAME_4 said: "NAME_5 is a proven performer at the very top level, he is a local lad and it is a huge boost

Summary:
1. Newcastle NAME_1 have re-signed NAME_6 NAME_2 from leicester tigers.

Is the summary factually consistent with the document? (Yes/No)
Start your answer explicitly with "Yes" or "No", and if you answer no, explain which sentence is inconsistent and why.
