Given the document below, you have to determine if "Yes" or "No", the summary is factually consistent with the document.

Document:
| NAME_1: how do you feel about minimalism? | NAME_2: I used to think it's total bullshit | NAME_2: NAME_3, it's still about spending | NAME_2: but it's about shifting the paradigm from buying cheap to buying expensive stuff | NAME_1: if expensive lives longer, ofc | NAME_2: right | NAME_1: I'm asking because I just saw this documentary about minimalism gurus | NAME_1: and I felt mixed about it | NAME_2: I think it's a good idea to buy things that will serve you longer | NAME_2: but it's so difficult to be mindful about everything you buy | NAME_1: I feel there are so many conflicting priorities when it comes to shopping | NAME_1: if you want to buy durable stuff you usually pick brands you know, big brands | NAME_1: and then it might not be fair trade product | NAME_2: take leather for example | NAME_2:

Summary:
1. NAME_1 saw a documentary about minimalism .

Is the summary factually consistent with the document? (Yes/No)
Start your answer explicitly with "Yes" or "No", and if you answer no, explain which sentence is inconsistent and why.
