Given the document below, you have to determine if "Yes" or "No", the summary is factually consistent with the document.

Document:
NAME_1's celebrations this season have always shown him to be an animated young man when he's on the pitch - but now he is being animated off it as well. The Tottenham sensation, who has broken through into the first team, and into NAME_2 NAME_3's England side during a remarkable season, is nominated for both the PFA Player and Young Player of the Season. And now the Spurs striker features in a clever new animation, which features some of NAME_4's best goals, and celebrations from the season. NAME_1 celebrates yet another goal during what has been an incredible season for the young striker . NAME_4 scores past NAME_5 for Spurs against Newcastle, his 20th Premier League goal of the season . The video, produced by Copa90, uses still photographs of the England forward placed one on top of the other to produce an animated effect. It features

Summary:
1. NAME_1 is nominated for both the pfa player and young player of the season awards .
2. the tottenham striker has scored 20 premier league goals this season .
3. NAME_4 also made his england debut, scoring against switzerland .

Is the summary factually consistent with the document? (Yes/No)
Start your answer explicitly with "Yes" or "No", and if you answer no, explain which sentence is inconsistent and why.
