Given the document below, you have to determine if "Yes" or "No", the summary is factually consistent with the document.

Document:
NAME_1 will need to hit top form to advance against five-times champions NAME_2 Munich on Tuesday despite holding a 3-1 first leg advantage in their Champions League quarter-final, coach NAME_3 said on Monday. The Spaniard warned NAME_2 remained lethal even though they were missing several big names including NAME_4 and NAME_5. 'We have to produce a great performance against one of the greatest teams in the history of NAME_2,' NAME_6, whose team are unbeaten in the competition this season, said. NAME_7, who scored twice for NAME_1 against NAME_2 Munich, smiles during training on Monday. NAME_1 manager NAME_3 believes his side will have to hit top form to progress against NAME_2 Munich. 'I am expecting a superb NAME_2 team, regardless of who they will end up playing and we are prepared for what will happen.' NAME_2 are also without NAME_8 and NAME_9, while winger

Summary:
1. NAME_1 host NAME_2 Munich in the Champions League quarter - final.
2. The Portuguese side lead 3 - 1 from the first leg at the Allianz Arena.
3. But NAME_3 says his side will have to hit top form to progress.
4. NAME_2 are missing several big names including NAME_4 and NAME_5.

Is the summary factually consistent with the document? (Yes/No)
Start your answer explicitly with "Yes" or "No", and if you answer no, explain which sentence is inconsistent and why.
