Rewrite this text in a polite and logically sound manner: The way I see it, it’s not just people being mad about changes they didn’t agree to; it’s people acting as if their principles were personally insulted by these changes. Do you know the phrase “it’s the principle of the thing?” It seems that many of the people who are mad about this are using this line of thinking as a justification (the other one is doing the good old fashioned “slippery slope” argument unironically). In a way, it kinda makes sense: they removing/replacing things for a product you purchased, and you never agreed to it, and that is wrong. However, once you get a look at what was actually removed/replaced, you can’t help but feel that people are overreacting to some changes that are, in the grand scheme of things, irrelevant to the overall product. Yet people complain as if its very essence is tarnished beyond recognition. It may be because I’m not as invested in this product as others, but the backlash seems to me very blown out of proportion. My solution? Just like any other time a backlash of this magnitude occurs, the right thing to do is wait and see. If the game does indeed suffer from these changes, then the complaints were right and valid, if a bit exaggerated However, if things stay pretty much the same (or if the game actually gets more popular from this), then the whole situation was a bunch of nothing. Only time will tell.