Given the document below, you have to determine if "Yes" or "No", the summary is factually consistent with the document.

Document:
The result was further embarrassment for NAME_1's side after their 3-2 defeat by Luxembourg last month. NAME_2 was among Northern Ireland players to miss great chances before the hosts scored two second-half goals. "If you watched that game you're probably scratching your head wondering how have we lost 2-0. We are," he said. Media playback is not supported on this device "People might see the result and say 'Northern Ireland lost 2-0, what a poor result that is' but they don't see how we've played. "Saying that, we've only got ourselves to blame. We dominated the game for 45 minutes but didn't take our chances and their goalkeeper played very well. "Then we just switched off for a couple of minutes, conceded, and the game changes. "In the second half I hit the bar - it's a game of inches - and their second goal was just frustration." Another

Summary:
1. Northern ireland striker NAME_3 said his side were to blame for their 2-0 defeat by NAME_4 in their final world cup qualifier.

Is the summary factually consistent with the document? (Yes/No)
Start your answer explicitly with "Yes" or "No", and if you answer no, explain which sentence is inconsistent and why.
