Decide if the following premise is consistent with the corresponding hypothesis. Note that consistency means all information in the hypothesis is supported by the premise.

Here are some examples:
Premise: Linguistics is the scientific study of language, and involves an analysis of language form, language meaning, and language in context. The earliest activities in the documentation and description of language have been attributed to the 4th century BCE Indian grammarian NAME_1, who wrote a formal description of the Sanskrit language in his "Aṣṭādhyāyī. Hypothesis: Form and meaning are the only aspects of language linguistics is concerned with.
Label: No
Reason: Linguistics involves an analysis of language form, language meaning, and language in context, so context is also a crucial aspect. The algorithm missed this point, perhaps.

premise: NAME_2, KBE Grande Ufficiale OMRI (] ; born 12 February 1923) is an Italian director and producer of operas, films and television. He is also a former senator (1994%E2%80%932001) for the Italian centre-right "Forza Italia" party. Recently, Italian researchers have found that he is one of the few distant relatives of NAME_3. Hypothesis: NAME_2 had a political career Label: Yes Reason: NAME_2 was a senator so he had a political career. The system likely was fooled because I used words not used in the context.

Premise: Testimony: The Story of NAME_4 is a 1988 British musical drama film directed by NAME_5 and starring NAME_6, NAME_7 and NAME_8. The film is based on the memoirs of NAME_9 (1906–1975) as dictated in the book "Testimony" (edited by NAME_10, ISBN ) and filmed in Panavision. Some consider the book to be a fabrication.
Hypothesis: NAME_9 may have been lying about his life in this book.

Explain your reasoning step by step then answer (yes or no):