Given the document below, you have to determine if "Yes" or "No", the summary is factually consistent with the document.

Document:
The Saints boss had been linked with Rangers and Aberdeen in recent months. And the Perth club's chairman, NAME_1, has spoken of his surprise that no other club has come in for NAME_2. "I think he's worried about me coming into the last two years of my contract, that he's not going to get any compensation for me and that would panic him a bit," joked NAME_2, 53. "I'm happy here. It is nice that you are linked with other jobs and so-called bigger clubs because that really means people realise the job you're doing here. "That's the most important thing for me. I'm looking forward to this season, playing in Europe and doing well for St Johnstone." As it turned out, NAME_3 took over from NAME_4 at Ibrox and NAME_5 NAME_6 has chosen to remain at Pittodrie, despite having discussions about the Sunderland vacancy, leaving NAME_2

Summary:
1. St Johnstone manager NAME_7 has played down speculation linking him with a move away from McDiarmid Park, insisting he is "happy" at the club.

Is the summary factually consistent with the document? (Yes/No)
Start your answer explicitly with "Yes" or "No", and if you answer no, explain which sentence is inconsistent and why.
