Given the document below, you have to determine if "Yes" or "No", the summary is factually consistent with the document.

Document:
| NAME_1: Fuck you, you pimp | NAME_2: What? | NAME_1: Fuck you man, I want my money back | NAME_2: Was your account hacked by some prankster? | NAME_1: No, I'm the prankster, just having a laugh at your expense | NAME_2: Well, fuck you too then XD

Summary:
1. NAME_1 is trying to play a prank on NAME_2 .

Is the summary factually consistent with the document? (Yes/No)
Start your answer explicitly with "Yes" or "No", and if you answer no, explain which sentence is inconsistent and why.
