Given the document below, you have to determine if "Yes" or "No", the summary is factually consistent with the document.

Document:
NAME_1 won a first clean sweep in his maiden Six Nations as coach in 2008 after Wales' disappointing 2007 World Cup display. He guided Wales to a second Grand Slam in 2012 after narrowly missing out on the 2011 World Cup final. "We were disappointed not getting to the final in 2011," he said. "We feel a little bit the same this time around. "There's a little bit of frustration as we felt we could have gone a bit further in the World Cup, although we were proud of what we achieved given the number of injuries we had." Wales qualified alongside Australia from their World Cup pool despite a host of injuries to key players such as NAME_2, NAME_3 and NAME_4. Wales were knocked out of the World Cup by two-time champions South Africa in the quarter-final despite leading with 10 minutes remaining. NAME_5 and NAME_6

Summary:
1. NAME_7 says Wales will be " frustrated " if they fail to win a third Six Nations Grand Slam in four years.

Is the summary factually consistent with the document? (Yes/No)
Start your answer explicitly with "Yes" or "No", and if you answer no, explain which sentence is inconsistent and why.
