Write a six-paragraph essay following an argumentative format using this outline: Write a 1,500 word essay using this outline with hard language and precision with MLA9 in-text citations with the same outline as given below. The introduction should have these: Introduction Paragraph with a Grabber/Hook meant to capture the reader's attention, background information with multiple sentences giving a general overview of the essay's topic, and a thesis statement with the same given below in the outline. It should be rather long with complex language. Then, there should be the first body paragraph, which should use the first Claim/Reason 1. There should be three supporting ideas used, that is the evidence and supports and add more using the same sources and introducing more. Afterward, there should be the second body paragraph, which should use the second Claim/Reason 2. There should be three supporting ideas used, that is the evidence and supports and add more using the same sources and introducing more. Furthermore, there should be the third body paragraph, which should use the third Claim/Reason 3. There should be three supporting ideas used, that is the evidence and supports and add more using the same sources and introducing more. Then there should be a strong counterargument against a rebuttal using a clear-cut claim reason and three supporting ideas used, that is the evidence and supports and adding more using the same sources and introducing more. Then there should be a conclusion paragraph, which will use the same conclusion phrase below in the outline, then restate the specfiic arguments by rephrasing them in different ways with a catchy clincher. EACH PARAGRAPH MUST BE VERY, VERY LONG. YOU MUST FOLLOW ALL RULES; AND HERE IS THE OUTLINE BELOW:

 Capital Punishment: an Egregious Epitome; an Unjust Methodology
Introduction:
Thesis (Statement; viz.,): The death penalty should be abolished in the United States due to its ineffectiveness, potential for executing innocent individuals, and the more humane alternatives available.
I. Claim/Reason 1: The death penalty is an ineffective deterrent of crime
Evidence: Studies show no significant correlation between the death penalty and crime rates
Support: In their study, Donohue and Wolfers (2006) analyze empirical evidence surrounding the death penalty and crime deterrence and find no significant correlation between the two. (Donohue & Wolfers, 791-846)

II. Claim/Reason 2: Death penalty states have consistently higher murder rates than non-death penalty states
A. Evidence; Support: According to data from the FBI Uniform Crime Reports, states with the death penalty generally have higher murder rates compared to states without it. (FBI Uniform Crime Reports)

III. Claim/Reason 3: The risk of executing innocent people is too high. 
Evidence 1: A significant number of death row inmates have been exonerated
Support 1: The National Registry of Exonerations reveals that there have been numerous cases of wrongfully convicted death row inmates being exonerated after reconsideration of their cases. (National Registry of Exonerations)
       B. Evidence 2: The judicial system is not infallible, leading to potential wrongful convictions 
Support 2: The Innocence Project highlights several cases where the judicial system has failed by convicting innocent individuals due to factors such as flawed evidence or witness misidentification. (Innocence Project)

IV. Claim/Reason 4L Existence of more humane alternatives to the death penalty 
Evidence 1: Life imprisonment without parole is a more ethical and effective punishment 1. Support 1: In their book “Courting Death,” Steiker and Steiker (2016) argue that life imprisonment without parole is not only a more ethical alternative to the death penalty but also a more effective method of punishment. (Steiker & Steiker)
Evidence 2: Rehabilitation programs can help reduce crime rates and improve society
Support 2: The National Institute of Justice supports the implementation of rehabilitation programs to reduce crime and recidivism rates, thus showing a more humane and beneficial alternative to the death penalty. (National Institute of Justice)
V. Conclusion
A. The death’s penalties’ lack of association with crime rate reduction, risks with malpractice and ethical concerns – with more humane alternatives (e.g., rehabilitation; lifetime incarceration) implicate the socioeconomic illegality of the death penalty; of – which induces more harm than a proper net benefit.



















Works Cited
A. Donohue, John J., and Justin Wolfers. “Uses and Abuses of Empirical Evidence in the Death Penalty Debate.” Stanford Law Review, vol. 58, no. 3, 2006, pp. 791-846.
B. Death Penalty Information Center. “Deterrence: States Without the Death Penalty Have Had Consistently Lower Murder Rates.” deathpenaltyinfo.org, www.deathpenaltyinfo.org/deterrence-states-without-death-penalty-have-had-consistently-lower-murder-rates.
C. FBI Uniform Crime Reports. “Crime in the United States.” ucr.fbi.gov, www.ucr.fbi.gov/crime-in-the-u.s.
D. National Registry of Exonerations. “Exonerations in the United States.” law.umich.edu, www.law.umich.edu/special/exoneration/Pages/Exonerations-in-the-United-States-Map.aspx.
E. Innocence Project. “Wrongful Convictions.” innocenceproject.org, www.innocenceproject.org/causes/wrongful-convictions/.
F. Steiker, Carol S., and Jordan M. Steiker. Courting Death: The Supreme Court and Capital Punishment. Belknap Press, 2016.
G. National Institute of Justice. “Rehabilitation Programs.” njj.gov, www.nij.gov/topics/corrections/rehabilitation/Pages/welcome.aspx.

END OUTLINE;

THE ESSAY FORMAT SHOULD BE LIKE THIS, EXCEPT ADD IN-TEXT CITATIONS WITH MLA9 FORMAT CITATIONS AS PER OUTLINE:

"Is there really a god?" Philosophers (and the common folk) sought the presence of a pre-eminent, almighty creator of the macrocosm; others acknowledge that the topic is "imponderable," or unanswerable and illusionary and that there are more practical questions to weigh. The quintessential Greek philosopher Socrates was no exception; Socrates spoke philosophically. Socrates goes around Athens, informing about an immaculate god, an immaculate almighty creator, and an immaculate person with high morals. Irrespective of Socrates's achievements, he urged an intelligently moral and ethical power to the people of Athens as his fame grew throughout modern-day Greece, simultaneously undermining the Athenian code despite his intentions. His tacit denial of plethoras of deities per Athenian religion led to his execution; he publicly (during trial) refused to denounce his viewpoints for "corrupting the youth," emphasizing he was (righteously) conversing his thoughts and the truth, nor did he criticize Athens. Analogous to Buddhism and the Abrahamic faiths, the potent philosopher was thoroughly aware of external and internal suffering; an ethical God ameliorates people's conscience. Socrates argued he would never denounce belief in a god(s), as per the "divine voice" speaking to him. He understood the righteousness behind freedom of religion; Socrates reveals his dedication to believing in a god through speech, actions, and erudite, objective, and scientific contemplations.

Socrates's talking points and actions in the trial for his crimes in Athens symbolize his passion for learning and preaching about an omnipotent, omniscient creator. In court, his alleged attacks and brutal criticism against the Athenian people incited the people's call to court; this means Socrates was not reluctant to preach morals and ethics present for an almighty creator. Additionally, Socrates justifies his research and virtue in acknowledging an omnipotent God, undermining Athenian rule through religion by repeatedly saying to the jurors, "[if my teaching about the nature of virtue] corrupts the youth, I am a mischievous person." Peacefully, Socrates would be subject to death instead of lying to his insatiable concupiscence against Athenian religious principles. Socrates understands that he would lie against his philosophy, the jury is wholly against him, and he fails his defense. Accordingly, Socrates is not oblivious to obliviously favoring the jury; the jury would unwillingly imprison themselves if they voted for his innocence. Socrates declares, "Men of Athens, I honor and love you; but I shall obey God rather than you, and while I have life and strength, I shall never cease from the practice and teaching of philosophy;" every time he says this, he characterizes the safety and determination present in his eyes. Socrates is henceforth rescuing the jury from committing a non-ethically wrong crime. Socrates withdraws these intolerable, unpretentious burdens: guilt, prejudice, and anger. Socrates establishes; he would bear his words (and thoughts). Socrates proceeded; Socrates sacrificed himself for all; on behalf of God and (his intent) to better conscience---congealing his stance as a sacrificial martyr (i.e., role model) by carrying out his execution by voluntarily gulping a deadly potion of hemlock (a poisonous plant). Socrates manipulates his death as a final lesson for the jury and his pupils'; defending oneself is better than fleeing; he assumes that people are inherently kind to God himself; societal standards diminish kindness. Death to Socrates (and the jury) symbolizes death to philosophy and thinking. Creed and intelligence, he acknowledges, are what an all-good and omniscient God would deliver. Intellect is the foundation of good, analogous to incognizance. Courage and intent to perform his agonizing death mean teaching for the betterment of society on behalf of a morally, ethical, and logical God. Socrates's martyrdom and talking points on behalf of the people and God exemplify his passion for learning more about an omnipotent, omniscient God and orders to the people. Such discloses Socrates's dedication to putting his faith towards omnipotence and omniscience towards monotheism; this symbolizes his impenetrable belief(s).

Furthermore, Socrates's preaching about the existence of a God to his disciples reflects his ideas and philosophies on his faith in a monotheistic creator. Consider; this when one of his pupils, Plato, asked about the existence of a God. He proclaims that if a god were to exist, he would lack evil as a perfectly omnipotent creator and would lack evil as a perfectly omniscient creator. Socrates implies that omnipotence is unsharable upon multiple gods. Such would be contradictory. Socrates believes clashes in power between two omnipotent and omniscient beings would cause destruction, causing the universe to cease. Henceforward, Socrates establishes that a creator supports, loves, and forgives. Socrates refrains from saying "God" plurally when lecturing or philosophizing religion; he does not believe in polytheistic viewpoints; Socrates believes that eternal oblivion, an afterlife, and a singular god would be sound; he maintains that a monotheistic god can seamlessly establish order and power without error (unlike the Athenian religion). Such established order would make sense for the harboring of life on Earth. Socrates's hints, implications, and preachings reflecting his rejection of polytheistic attributes, fundamentals, and philosophies reflect his belief in a monotheistic creator.

Nevertheless, there may be affirmations; Socrates may have never addressed the belief of multiple Gods according to Athenian historical records and followers of the predominantly polytheistic religion through his public presence. For instance, Socrates states, "The word of God, I thought, ought to be considered first." Although this is true, Socrates believed in a single, robust, and all-understanding creator. Irrespective of whether Socrates' said such information and preached to his disciples publicly, he believed in the importance and logical viewpoint of believing in monotheism rather than polytheism. To Socrates, omnipotence and omniscience are contradictory; if multiple gods and goddesses share omnipotent and omniscient abilities. Conflicts and clashes between omnipotent beings would be inevitable; this produces a logical fallacy. The universe would cease to exist. Socrates implicitly says that the existence of multiple gods is contradictory unless one being is omnipotent, i.e., monotheism. Socrates's criticism of polytheistic attributes in Athenic religion led to his trial and execution. One of the principal indictments against Socrates was "plaguing the youth" (i.e., criticizing religion), Leading to his execution. Although Socrates never explicitly addressed the Athenian religion, he implicitly denied the religion to his pupils and the Athenian populace while ensuring he would not discriminate against religious followers. Socrates did not explicitly mention or address the Athenian religion; he understood his fate and consequences surmising with a formal criticism of the religion. Socrates's judgment to refrain from scrutinizing the Athenian religion made him avoid legal reprimands and consequences from the Athenian trials unfathomably longer for those who took the peril.

Socrates was very momentous and is a famous Greek scholar eminent for his philosophic theses, notions, and scientific and mathematical discoveries. Although Socrates made phenomenal advancements and strides in the sciences and technologies, the philosophies led to his spiraling (and inevitable death). His continuous reassurances to his pupils and the jury that he would follow God rather than Athens highlights that Socrates would rather martyr himself on behalf of God and the betterment and safety of the people rather than go against his philosophical thinking. Socrates goes as far as to perform the execution as a conclusive lesson to his pupils that believing in an omnipotent, omniscient god is justifiable. He also does it to symbolize that one should pursue greater in the fundamentals and existence of God, and the same forward for philosophical conceptualizations and ideas for the betterment of the people. Socrates describes God as a perfect, omnipotent, omniscient, and all-good creator. His rejection of polytheistic grammar apprises Socrates's allegiance to putting his faith towards omnipotence and omniscience towards monotheism, which exemplifies Socrates's sentiment toward an all-mighty, all-conscious, and aware God, simultaneously allowing him to pursue his teachings longer. Whether observing first or secondary sources, consider whether; Socrates was right for committing suicide to dwell on his word, or should he have deceitfully anathematized his philosophic intentions and studied further discreetly? FOLLOW THE SIX PARAGRAPH ARGUMENTATIVE ESSAY MODEL WITH 3 PIECES OF SUPPORTING EVIDENCE AND ELABORATIONS!