Given the document below, you have to determine if "Yes" or "No", the summary is factually consistent with the document.

Document:
Lance Corporal Trimaan "NAME_1" NAME_2 stalked NAME_3 before fatally attacking her last October. Her parents NAME_4 and NAME_5 NAME_6 described the moment two Northumbria Police officers knocked on their door. NAME_7 said: "And then they said to us NAME_8 has been killed. And we looked at each other and said 'It's NAME_1'. We knew, we knew even then." The trial at Newcastle Crown Court heard NAME_2 had become obsessed with the 24-year-old and had stalked her. NAME_9 told of her guilt about trying to reassure her daughter on the phone two days before. She said: "And I sort of reassured her that was ok, the police knew what was going on and that it would be all right and if she just ignored him he would ignore her. "And I only put the phone down for 10 minutes and NAME_10 (daughter) NAME_11 and said 'You cannot

Summary:
1. The parents of a woman murdered by a soldier have told of the moment police knocked on their door.

Is the summary factually consistent with the document? (Yes/No)
Start your answer explicitly with "Yes" or "No", and if you answer no, explain which sentence is inconsistent and why.
