Given the article below, you have to determine if "Yes" or "No", the summary is factually consistent with news article.

Is the summary factually consistent with the article? (Yes/No)
Start with Yes or No. If you say No, explain which sentence is inconsistent and why.

Summary:
1. The speakers are involved in a game where they have to guess the occupation connected with given titles.
2. They correctly guess "shop assistant" and "colour distribution technician", but wrongly guess "pimp" and "therapist".

News Article:
NAME_1: Okay, round two. Retail Jedi! . NAME_2: Marketing. . NAME_3: Shop assistant! . NAME_1: You're right! It's a shop assistant! . NAME_2: NAME_4. 1:1. . NAME_1: Don't worry, NAME_5, you'll get your chance! Round three: Wet Leisure Attendant! . NAME_3: This has to be a pimp! I'm sure of it! . NAME_2: A masseuse! . NAME_1: Sorry, guys. No points this time! It's a lifeguard. . NAME_3: You've got to be kidding me! . NAME_2: Lol . NAME_1: Okay, round four: Colour Distribution Technician! . NAME_3: Easy! Painter. . NAME_2: Not so fast! Decorator! . NAME_1: I see ur getting the hang of it! Both answers correct! Point each.
