Given the document below, determine if the summary is factually consistent with the document. A summary is factually consistent if no facts in the summary reflect the negation of a fact in the document.

Document: A probate judge in Alabama signed the order for the will to be sealed after a request from lawyers for NAME_1's personal representative, NAME_2. The family of NAME_1, who died last month aged 89, agreed to the request. "As the court is no doubt aware, Ms NAME_1 highly valued her privacy," the lawyers for Ms NAME_3 said. "She did not wish for her private financial affairs to be matters of public discussion. "Ms NAME_1 left a considerable legacy for the public in her published works; it is not the public's business what private legacy she left for the beneficiaries of her will." Ms NAME_3 represented the author for several years and once practised law with NAME_1's sister, NAME_4. Obituary: NAME_5 Tributes paid to NAME_6 is To Kill a Mockingbird so popular? Five Mockingbird quotes people are sharing The release of the ruling by Judge NAME_7

Summary: 1. NAME_1's second book, NAME_8 a Watchman, published 1960, was also a best-seller.

Is the summary factually consistent with the document with respect to facts?
Options: "Yes" or "No"

Answer:


