Given the article below, you have to determine if "Yes" or "No", the summary is factually consistent with news article.

Is the summary factually consistent with the article? (Yes/No)
Start with Yes or No. If you say No, explain which sentence is inconsistent and why.

Summary:
1. NAME_1 invites his friends to see the movie "Metropolis" but ends up being accused of just using them for their big screen TVs.
2. Eventually, NAME_2 and NAME_3 both agree to watch the movie with NAME_1.

News Article:
NAME_1: Would any of you like to watch the 1920s classic "Metropolis" with me? I recently downloaded it - the remastered version, high quality, and I just have my computer sooo anyone up for it? . NAME_2: so you just want to use us for our big screen TVs :( . NAME_3: Don't we mean anything to you anymore???? ;(((((( . NAME_3: But yeah, sure. . NAME_2: I've seen it once a long time ago, could watch it again. . NAME_3: Obviously NAME_1's gonna choose whoever has the bigger tv :P . NAME_2: and who will that be? :O . NAME_3: you . NAME_2: YASS! My dreams have come true :NAME_4: I didn't think my question would lead to such a dramatic exchange, but thanks :NAME_5: Apparently you don't really know us that well
