Given the document below, you have to determine if "Yes" or "No", the summary is factually consistent with the document.

Document:
NAME_1: The fitter for the King of heaven, that hath him. NAME_2: He is in heaven, where NAME_3 shalt never come. NAME_1: Let him thank me, that holp to send him thither; For he was fitter for that place than earth. NAME_2: And NAME_3 unfit for any place but hell. NAME_1: Yes, one place else, if you will hear me name it. NAME_2: Some dungeon. NAME_1: Your bed-chamber. NAME_2: I'll rest betide the chamber where NAME_3 liest! NAME_1: So will it, madam till I lie with you. NAME_2: I hope so. NAME_1: I know so. But, gentle NAME_2, To leave this keen encounter of our wits, And fall somewhat into a slower method, Is not the causer of the timeless deaths Of these Plantagenets, NAME_4 and NAME_5, As blameful as the executioner? NAME_2: NAME_3 art the cause, and most accursed effect. NAME_1: Your beauty was the cause of that effect; Your beauty: which did haunt me in my sleep To undertake the death of all the world, So I might live one hour

Summary:
1. In this dialogue, NAME_1 and NAME_2 engage in a heated exchange, with NAME_2 blaming NAME_1 for the death of NAME_6.
2. As their conversation unfolds, NAME_1 admits to being provoked by NAME_2's words, and eventually convinces her to make peace, leaving him with hope for the future.

Is the summary factually consistent with the document? (Yes/No)
Start your answer explicitly wi