Network robustness assessed within a dual connectivity perspective
Network robustness assessed within a dual connectivity perspective Alejandro Tejedor 1* , Anthony Longjas 1 , Ilya Zaliapin 3, Samuel Ambroj 4 , and Efi Foufoula-Georgiou 1,2 National Center for Earth-surface Dynamics and St. Anthony Falls Laboratory, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA Department of Civil Engineering, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA Department of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Nevada, Reno, NV, USA Steinbuch Centre for Computing, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Karlsruhe, Germany Abstract Network robustness against attacks has been widely studied in fields as diverse as the Internet, power grids and human societies. Typically, in these studies, robustness is assessed only in terms of the connectivity of the nodes unaffected by the attack. Here we put forward the idea that the connectivity of the affected nodes can play a crucial role in properly evaluating the overall network robustness and its future recovery from the attack. Specifically, we propose a dual perspective approach wherein at any instant in the network evolution under attack, two distinct networks are defined: (i) the Active Network (AN) composed of the unaffected nodes and (ii) the Idle Network (IN) composed of the affected nodes. The proposed robustness metric considers both the efficiency of destroying the AN and the efficiency of building-up the IN. We show, via analysis of both prototype networks and real world data, that trade-offs between the efficiency of Active and Idle network dynamics give rise to surprising crossovers and re-ranking of different attack strategies, pointing to significant implications for decision making. *corresponding author (alej.tejedor@gmail.com)