122679665
Hyperunification in SU(8)
An SU(8) model is suggested for a unified gauge model of the electroweak, color, and hypercolor interactions. The known quarks and leptons are either fundamental fermions or their spin-\textonehalf{} bound states. The model presented does not contain the disputed $t$ quark. Two super-multiplets in the SO(8) extended supergravity contain the renormalizable fundamental-fermion spectrum we employed.
14574575
Effective Gauss-Bonnet interaction in Randall-Sundrum compactification
The effective gravitational interaction below the Planck scale in the Randall-Sundrum world is shown to be the Gauss-Bonnet term. In this theory we find that there exists another static solution with a positive bulk cosmological constant. Also, there exist solutions for a positive visible sector cosmological constant, which is needed for a later Friedmann-Robertson-Walker universe.
18138135
Neutrino masses from discrete gauge symmetries
Abstract We investigate a model with an extra Z 2 gauge symmetry in the Standard Model. The symmetry gives a structure to the mass matrix for the neutrinos. With two extra Higgs singlets and two extra singlet right-handed neutrinos we can build a model that fits the requirements of the MSW solution of the Solar neutrino problem. With a third singlet right-handed neutrino it is also possible to have a 10 eV neutrino.
15739165
SO(10)-like Superstring Standard Model with R-parity from the Heterotic String
We construct a supersymmetric standard model in the context of the Z_{12-I} orbifold compactification of the E_8 x E_8' heterotic string theory. The gauge group is SU(3)_c x SU(2)_L x U(1)_Y x U(1)^4 x [SO(10) x U(1)^3]' with sin^2\theta_W = 3/8. We obtain three families of SO(10) spinor-like chiral matter states, and Higgs doublets. All other extra states are exactly vector-like under the standard model gauge symmetry. There are numerous standard model singlets, many of which get VEVs such that only the standard model gauge symmetry survives and desired Yukawa couplings can be generated at lower energies. In particular, all vector-like exotic states achieve superheavy masses and the R-parity can be preserved.
119316975
GMSB at a stable vacuum and MSSM without exotics from heterotic string
Abstract We show that it is possible to introduce the confining hidden sector gauge group SU ( 5 ) ′ with the chiral matter 10 0 ′ plus 5 ¯ 0 ′ , which are neutral under the standard model gauge group, toward a gauge mediated supersymmetry breaking (GMSB) in a Z 12 − I orbifold compactification of E 8 × E 8 ′ heterotic string. Three families of MSSM result without exotics. We also find a desirable matter parity P (or R-parity) assignment. We note that this model contains the spectrum of the Lee–Weinberg model which has a nice solution of the μ problem.
119883211
Conflicts between B-violating phenomena in supergravity models
Abstract We show that there is an incompatibility between matter stability and cosmological baryon production in standard N = 1 supergravity models. This discrepancy emerges from the bound on the reheating temperature T rh ⩽ 10 10 GeV which comes from the restriction on the gravitino decay after inflation. Some weird possibilities to bypass the controversy are also analyzed.
53580211
The higgsino–singlino world at the large hadron collider
We consider light higgsinos and singlinos in the next-to-minimal supersymmetric standard model at the large hadron collider. We assume that the singlino is the lightest supersymmetric particle and that the higgsino is the next-to-lightest supersymmetric particle with the remaining supersymmetric particles in the multi-TeV range. This scenario, which is motivated by the flavor and CP issues, provides a phenomenologically viable dark matter candidate and improved electroweak fit consistent with the measured Higgs mass. Here, the higgsinos decay into on (off)-shell gauge boson and the singlino. We consider the leptonic decay modes and the resulting signature is three isolated leptons and missing transverse energy which is known as the trilepton signal. We simulate the signal and the Standard Model backgrounds and present the exclusion region in the higgsino–singlino mass plane at the large hadron collider at $$\sqrt{s}=14$$s=14 TeV for an integrated luminosity of 300 fb$$^{-1}$$-1.
119259465
‘Stop’ that ambulance! New physics at the LHC?
A bstractA number of LHC searches now display intriguing excesses. Most prominently, the measurement of the W+W− cross-section has been consistently ∼ 20% higher than the theoretical prediction across both ATLAS and CMS for both 7 and 8 TeV runs. More recently, supersymmetric searches for final states containing two or three leptons have also seen more events than predicted in certain signal regions. We show that a supersymmetric model containing a light stop, winos and binos can consistently match the data. We perform a fit to all measurements and searches that may be sensitive to our model and find a reduction in the log-likelihood of 15.4 compared to the Standard Model which corresponds to 3.5-σ once the extra degrees of freedom in the fit are considered.
118473744
Limits on anisotropic inflation from the Planck data
Temperature anisotropy of the cosmic microwave background offers a test of the fundamental symmetry of spacetime during cosmic inflation. Violation of rotational symmetry yields a distinct signature in the power spectrum of primordial fluctuations as $P({\mathbf k})=P_0(k)[1+g_*(\hat{\mathbf k}\cdot\hat{\mathbf E}_{\rm cl})^2]$, where $\hat{\mathbf E}_{\rm cl}$ is a preferred direction in space and $g_*$ is an amplitude. Using the \textit{Planck} 2013 temperature maps, we find no evidence for violation of rotational symmetry, $g_*=0.002\pm 0.016$ (68% CL), once the known effects of asymmetry of the \textit{Planck} beams and Galactic foreground emission are removed.
119074604
Removing the ISW-lensing bias from the local-form primordial non-Gaussianity estimation
The Integrated Sachs-Wolfe (ISW) effect produces a secondary temperature aniso\-tropy of the cosmic microwave background (CMB), as CMB photons travel through time-varying potentials along the line-of-sight. The main contribution comes from redshifts z2, where dark energy leads to a decay of potentials. As the same photons are gravitationally lensed by these decaying potentials, there exists a high degree of correlation between the ISW effect and CMB lensing, leading to a non-zero three-point correlation (bispectrum) of the observed temperature anisotropy. This ISW-lensing bispectrum, whose shape resembles that of the so-called ``local-form'' primordial bispectrum parametrized by fNL, is known to be the largest contamination of fNL. In order to avoid a spurious detection of primordial non-Gaussianity, we need to remove the ISW-lensing bias. In this work, we investigate three debiasing methods: (I) subtraction of an expected, ensemble average of the ISW-lensing bispectrum; (II) subtraction of a measured ISW-lensing bispectrum; and (III) direct subtraction of an estimated ISW signal from an observed temperature map. One may use an estimation of the ISW map from external non-CMB data or that from the CMB data themselves. As the methods II and III are based on fewer assumptions about the nature of dark energy, they are preferred over the method I. While the methods I and II yield unbiased estimates of fNL with comparable error bars, the method III yields a biased result when the underlying primordial fNL is non-zero and the ISW map is estimated from a lensing potential reconstructed from the observed temperature map. One of the sources of the bias is a lensing reconstruction noise bias which is independent of fNL and can be calculated precisely, but other fNL-dependent terms are difficult to compute reliably. We thus conclude that the method II is the best, model-independent way to remove the ISW-lensing bias of fNL, enabling us to test the physics of inflation with smaller systematic errors.
45811522
A framework to create customised LHC analyses within CheckMATE
Checkmate  is a framework that allows the user to conveniently test simulated BSM physics events against current LHC data in order to derive exclusion limits. For this purpose, the data runs through a detector simulation and is then processed by a user chosen selection of experimental analyses. These analyses are all defined by signal regions that can be compared to the experimental data with a multitude of statistical tools. 
 
Due to the large and continuously growing number of experimental analyses available, users may quickly find themselves in the situation that the study they are particularly interested in has not (yet) been implemented officially into the Checkmate  framework. However, the code includes a rather simple framework to allow users to add new analyses on their own. This document serves as a guide to this. 
 
In addition, Checkmate  serves as a powerful tool for testing and implementing new search strategies. To aid this process, many tools are included to allow a rapid prototyping of new analyses. 
 
Website: http://checkmate.hepforge.org/ 
Program summary 
Program title: CheckMATE, AnalysisManager 
 
Catalogue identifier: AEUT_v1_1 
 
Program summary URL:http://cpc.cs.qub.ac.uk/summaries/AEUT_v1_1.html 
 
Program obtainable from: CPC Program Library, Queen’s University, Belfast, N. Ireland 
 
Licensing provisions: Standard CPC licence, http://cpc.cs.qub.ac.uk/licence/licence.html 
 
No. of lines in distributed program, including test data, etc.: 181436 
 
No. of bytes in distributed program, including test data, etc.: 2169369 
 
Distribution format: tar.gz 
 
Programming language: C++, Python. 
 
Computer: PC, Mac. 
 
Operating system: Linux, Mac OS. 
 
Catalogue identifier of previous version: AEUT_v1_0 
 
Journal reference of previous version: Comput. Phys. Comm. 187(2015)227 
 
Classification: 11.9. 
 
External routines: ROOT, Python, Delphes (included with the distribution) 
 
Does the new version supersede the previous version?: Yes 
 
Nature of problem: The LHC has delivered a wealth of new data that is now being analysed. Both ATLAS and CMS have performed many searches for new physics that theorists are eager to test their model against. However, tuning the detector simulations, understanding the particular analysis details and interpreting the results can be a tedious and repetitive task. Furthermore, new analyses are being constantly published by the experiments and might be not yet included in the official CheckMATE distribution. 
 
Solution method: The AnalysisManager within CheckMATE framework allows the user to easily include new experimental analyses as they are published by the collaborations. Furthermore, completely novel analyses can be designed and added by the user in order to test models at higher centre-of-mass energy and/or luminosity. 
 
Reasons for new version: New features, bug fixes, additional validated analyses. 
 
Summary of revisions: New kinematic variables M_CT, M_T2bl, m_T, alpha_T, razor; internal likelihood calculation; missing energy smearing; efficiency tables; validated tau-tagging; improved AnalysisManager and code structure; new analyses; bug fixes. 
 
Restrictions: Only a subset of available experimental results have been implemented. 
 
Additional comments: Checkmate is built upon the tools and hard work of many people. If Checkmate is used in your publication it is extremely important that all of the following citations are included, 
• 
Delphes 3 [1]. 
 
• 
FastJet [2,3]. 
 
• 
Anti-ktkt jet algorithm [4]. 
 
• 
CLss prescription [5]. 
 
• 
In analyses that use the MT2MT2 kinematical discriminant we use the Oxbridge Kinetics Library [6,7] and the algorithm developed by Cheng and Han [8] which also includes the MT2blMT2bl variable [9]. 
 
• 
In analyses that use the MCTMCT family of kinematical discriminants we use MctLib [10,11] which also includes the MCT⊥MCT⊥ and MCTIIMCTII variables [12]. 
 
• 
All experimental analyses that were used to set limits in the study. 
 
• 
The Monte Carlo event generator that was used. 
 
 
Running time: The running time scales about linearly with the number of input events provided by the user. The detector simulation/analysis of 20000 events needs about 50s/1s for a single core calculation on an Intel Core i5-3470 with 3.2 GHz and 8 GB RAM. 
 
References: 
[1] 
J. de Favereau, C. Delaere, P Demin, A. Giammanco, V. Lematre, et al., “DELPHES 3, A modular framework for fast simulation of a generic collider experiment”, 2013. 
 
[2] 
M. Cacciari, G. P Salam, and G. Soyez, “FastJet User Manual”, Eur. Phys. J., vol. C72, p. 1896, 2012. 
 
[3] 
M. Cacciari and G. P Salam, ”Dispelling the N3 myth for the kt jet-finder”, Phys. Lett., vol. B641, pp. 57–61, 2006. 
 
[4] 
M. Cacciari, G. P Salam, and G. Soyez, “The Anti-k(t) jet clustering algorithm”, JHEP, vol. 0804, p. 063, 2008. 
 
[5] 
A. L. Read, “Presentation of search results: the cl’s technique”, Journal of Physics G: Nuclear and Particle Physics, vol. 28, no. 10, p. 2693, 2002. 
 
[6] 
C. Lester and D. Summers, “Measuring masses of semiinvisibly decaying particles pair produced at hadron colliders”, Phys. Lett., vol. B463, pp. 99–103, 1999. 
 
[7] 
A. Barr, C. Lester, and P Stephens, “m(T2): The Truth behind the glamour”, J. Phys., vol. G29, pp. 2343–2363, 2003. 
 
[8] 
H.-C. Cheng and Z. Han, “Minimal Kinematic Constraints and m(T2)”, JHEP, vol. 0812, p. 063, 2008. 
 
[9] 
Y. Bai, H.-C. Cheng, J. Gallicchio, and J. Gu, “Stop the Top Background of the Stop Search”, JHEP, vol. 1207, p. 110, 2012. 
 
[10] 
D. R. Tovey, “On measuring the masses of pair-produced semi-invisibly decaying particles at hadron colliders”, JHEP, vol. 0804, p. 034, 2008. 
 
[11] 
G. Polesello and D. R. Tovey, “Supersymmetric particle mass measurement with the boost-corrected contransverse mass”, JHEP, vol. 1003, p. 030, 2010. 
 
[12] 
K. T. Matchev and M. Park, “A General method for determining the masses of semi-invisibly decaying particles at hadron colliders”, Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 107, p. 061801, 2011.