53580211
The higgsino–singlino world at the large hadron collider
We consider light higgsinos and singlinos in the next-to-minimal supersymmetric standard model at the large hadron collider. We assume that the singlino is the lightest supersymmetric particle and that the higgsino is the next-to-lightest supersymmetric particle with the remaining supersymmetric particles in the multi-TeV range. This scenario, which is motivated by the flavor and CP issues, provides a phenomenologically viable dark matter candidate and improved electroweak fit consistent with the measured Higgs mass. Here, the higgsinos decay into on (off)-shell gauge boson and the singlino. We consider the leptonic decay modes and the resulting signature is three isolated leptons and missing transverse energy which is known as the trilepton signal. We simulate the signal and the Standard Model backgrounds and present the exclusion region in the higgsino–singlino mass plane at the large hadron collider at $$\sqrt{s}=14$$s=14 TeV for an integrated luminosity of 300 fb$$^{-1}$$-1.
118704767
First LHC Constraints on Neutralinos
Abstract The ATLAS and CMS Collaborations have recently reported tantalizing hints of the existence of a 125 GeV Higgs-like particle, whose couplings appear to match well the Standard Model (SM) expectations. In this work, we study implications of this observation for the neutralino sector of supersymmetric models, assuming that the Higgs signal gets confirmed. In general, the Higgs decay into neutralinos can be one of its dominant decay channels. Since a large invisible Higgs decay branching ratio would be in conflict with the data, this possibility is now constrained. In particular, we find that most of the region μ 170 GeV , M 1 70 GeV at tan β ∼ 10 and μ 120 GeV , M 1 70 GeV at tan β ∼ 40 is disfavored.
119259465
‘Stop’ that ambulance! New physics at the LHC?
A bstractA number of LHC searches now display intriguing excesses. Most prominently, the measurement of the W+W− cross-section has been consistently ∼ 20% higher than the theoretical prediction across both ATLAS and CMS for both 7 and 8 TeV runs. More recently, supersymmetric searches for final states containing two or three leptons have also seen more events than predicted in certain signal regions. We show that a supersymmetric model containing a light stop, winos and binos can consistently match the data. We perform a fit to all measurements and searches that may be sensitive to our model and find a reduction in the log-likelihood of 15.4 compared to the Standard Model which corresponds to 3.5-σ once the extra degrees of freedom in the fit are considered.
45811522
A framework to create customised LHC analyses within CheckMATE
Checkmate  is a framework that allows the user to conveniently test simulated BSM physics events against current LHC data in order to derive exclusion limits. For this purpose, the data runs through a detector simulation and is then processed by a user chosen selection of experimental analyses. These analyses are all defined by signal regions that can be compared to the experimental data with a multitude of statistical tools. 
 
Due to the large and continuously growing number of experimental analyses available, users may quickly find themselves in the situation that the study they are particularly interested in has not (yet) been implemented officially into the Checkmate  framework. However, the code includes a rather simple framework to allow users to add new analyses on their own. This document serves as a guide to this. 
 
In addition, Checkmate  serves as a powerful tool for testing and implementing new search strategies. To aid this process, many tools are included to allow a rapid prototyping of new analyses. 
 
Website: http://checkmate.hepforge.org/ 
Program summary 
Program title: CheckMATE, AnalysisManager 
 
Catalogue identifier: AEUT_v1_1 
 
Program summary URL:http://cpc.cs.qub.ac.uk/summaries/AEUT_v1_1.html 
 
Program obtainable from: CPC Program Library, Queen’s University, Belfast, N. Ireland 
 
Licensing provisions: Standard CPC licence, http://cpc.cs.qub.ac.uk/licence/licence.html 
 
No. of lines in distributed program, including test data, etc.: 181436 
 
No. of bytes in distributed program, including test data, etc.: 2169369 
 
Distribution format: tar.gz 
 
Programming language: C++, Python. 
 
Computer: PC, Mac. 
 
Operating system: Linux, Mac OS. 
 
Catalogue identifier of previous version: AEUT_v1_0 
 
Journal reference of previous version: Comput. Phys. Comm. 187(2015)227 
 
Classification: 11.9. 
 
External routines: ROOT, Python, Delphes (included with the distribution) 
 
Does the new version supersede the previous version?: Yes 
 
Nature of problem: The LHC has delivered a wealth of new data that is now being analysed. Both ATLAS and CMS have performed many searches for new physics that theorists are eager to test their model against. However, tuning the detector simulations, understanding the particular analysis details and interpreting the results can be a tedious and repetitive task. Furthermore, new analyses are being constantly published by the experiments and might be not yet included in the official CheckMATE distribution. 
 
Solution method: The AnalysisManager within CheckMATE framework allows the user to easily include new experimental analyses as they are published by the collaborations. Furthermore, completely novel analyses can be designed and added by the user in order to test models at higher centre-of-mass energy and/or luminosity. 
 
Reasons for new version: New features, bug fixes, additional validated analyses. 
 
Summary of revisions: New kinematic variables M_CT, M_T2bl, m_T, alpha_T, razor; internal likelihood calculation; missing energy smearing; efficiency tables; validated tau-tagging; improved AnalysisManager and code structure; new analyses; bug fixes. 
 
Restrictions: Only a subset of available experimental results have been implemented. 
 
Additional comments: Checkmate is built upon the tools and hard work of many people. If Checkmate is used in your publication it is extremely important that all of the following citations are included, 
• 
Delphes 3 [1]. 
 
• 
FastJet [2,3]. 
 
• 
Anti-ktkt jet algorithm [4]. 
 
• 
CLss prescription [5]. 
 
• 
In analyses that use the MT2MT2 kinematical discriminant we use the Oxbridge Kinetics Library [6,7] and the algorithm developed by Cheng and Han [8] which also includes the MT2blMT2bl variable [9]. 
 
• 
In analyses that use the MCTMCT family of kinematical discriminants we use MctLib [10,11] which also includes the MCT⊥MCT⊥ and MCTIIMCTII variables [12]. 
 
• 
All experimental analyses that were used to set limits in the study. 
 
• 
The Monte Carlo event generator that was used. 
 
 
Running time: The running time scales about linearly with the number of input events provided by the user. The detector simulation/analysis of 20000 events needs about 50s/1s for a single core calculation on an Intel Core i5-3470 with 3.2 GHz and 8 GB RAM. 
 
References: 
[1] 
J. de Favereau, C. Delaere, P Demin, A. Giammanco, V. Lematre, et al., “DELPHES 3, A modular framework for fast simulation of a generic collider experiment”, 2013. 
 
[2] 
M. Cacciari, G. P Salam, and G. Soyez, “FastJet User Manual”, Eur. Phys. J., vol. C72, p. 1896, 2012. 
 
[3] 
M. Cacciari and G. P Salam, ”Dispelling the N3 myth for the kt jet-finder”, Phys. Lett., vol. B641, pp. 57–61, 2006. 
 
[4] 
M. Cacciari, G. P Salam, and G. Soyez, “The Anti-k(t) jet clustering algorithm”, JHEP, vol. 0804, p. 063, 2008. 
 
[5] 
A. L. Read, “Presentation of search results: the cl’s technique”, Journal of Physics G: Nuclear and Particle Physics, vol. 28, no. 10, p. 2693, 2002. 
 
[6] 
C. Lester and D. Summers, “Measuring masses of semiinvisibly decaying particles pair produced at hadron colliders”, Phys. Lett., vol. B463, pp. 99–103, 1999. 
 
[7] 
A. Barr, C. Lester, and P Stephens, “m(T2): The Truth behind the glamour”, J. Phys., vol. G29, pp. 2343–2363, 2003. 
 
[8] 
H.-C. Cheng and Z. Han, “Minimal Kinematic Constraints and m(T2)”, JHEP, vol. 0812, p. 063, 2008. 
 
[9] 
Y. Bai, H.-C. Cheng, J. Gallicchio, and J. Gu, “Stop the Top Background of the Stop Search”, JHEP, vol. 1207, p. 110, 2012. 
 
[10] 
D. R. Tovey, “On measuring the masses of pair-produced semi-invisibly decaying particles at hadron colliders”, JHEP, vol. 0804, p. 034, 2008. 
 
[11] 
G. Polesello and D. R. Tovey, “Supersymmetric particle mass measurement with the boost-corrected contransverse mass”, JHEP, vol. 1003, p. 030, 2010. 
 
[12] 
K. T. Matchev and M. Park, “A General method for determining the masses of semi-invisibly decaying particles at hadron colliders”, Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 107, p. 061801, 2011.
119291744
Neutrino masses and mixings in the baryon triality constrained minimal supersymmetric standard model
We discuss how the experimental neutrino oscillation data can be realized in the framework of the baryon triality ($B_3$) constrained supersymmetric Standard Model (cSSM). We show how to obtain phenomenologically viable solutions, which are compatible with the recent WMAP observations. We present results for the hierarchical, inverted and degenerate cases which illustrate the possible size and structure of the lepton number violating couplings. We work with a new, as yet unpublished version of SOFTSUSY, where we implemented full one--loop neutrino masses. Finally, we shortly discuss some phenomenological implications at the LHC.
51693431
Supersymmetric Jarlskog invariants: The neutrino sector
We generalize the notion of the Jarlskog invariant to supersymmetric models with right-handed neutrinos. This allows us to formulate basis-independent necessary and sufficient conditions for $CP$ conservation in such models.
119287694
Two dark matter components in dark matter extension of the minimal supersymmetric standard model and the high energy positron spectrum in PAMELA/HEAT data
We present a dark matter extension of the minimal supersymmetric standard model to give the recent trend of the high energy positron spectrum of the PAMELA/HEAT experiments. If the trend is caused indeed by dark matter, the minimal supersymmetric standard model needs to be extended. Here, we minimally extend the minimal supersymmetric standard model with one more dark matter component N together with a heavy lepton E and introduce the coupling e{sub R}E{sub R}{sup c}N{sub R}. This coupling naturally appears in the flipped SU(5) grand unification models. We also present the needed parameter ranges of these additional particles.
204934408
Gravity in the Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet Theory with the Randall-Sundrum Background
We obtain the full 5D graviton propagator in the Randall-Sundrum model with the Gauss-Bonnet interaction. From the decomposition of the graviton propagator on the brane, we show that localization of gravity arises in the presence of the Gauss-Bonnet term. We also obtain the metric perturbation for observers on the brane with considering the brane bending and compute the amplitude of one massless graviton exchange. For the positive definite amplitude or no ghost states, the sign of the Gauss-Bonnet coefficient should be negative in our convention, which is compatible with string amplitude computations. In that case, the ghost-free condition is sufficient for obtaining the Newtonian gravity. For a vanishing Gauss-Bonnet coefficient, the brane bending allows us to reproduce the correct graviton polarizations for the effective 4D Einstein gravity.
15762049
Axinos as Dark Matter Particles
The identification of dark matter in our particle physics model is still an open question. Here, we argue that axinos can be successful dark matter candidates in models with supersymmetry and the axion solution of the strong CP problem. Axinos can be the lightest supersymmetric particle (LSP) or can be heavier than the LSP. Axinos can be produced at the right abundance by thermal scattering and, if they are the LSP, also by out of equilibrium decays of the lightest superpartner of SM fields (LSPSMs). On the other hand, heavier (not LSP) axinos can generate a part of the neutralino LSP dark matter. Depending on the nature of the supersymmetric spectrum, and if R-parity is strictly conserved or slightly broken, very different signals of the LSP axino scenario can arise in colliders and in astrophysics.
119287184
Axions and the Strong CP Problem
Current upper bounds on the neutron electric dipole moment constrain the physically observable quantum chromodynamic (QCD) vacuum angle $|\overline{\ensuremath{\theta}}|\ensuremath{\lesssim}{10}^{\ensuremath{-}11}$. Since QCD explains a great deal of experimental data from the $100\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0ex}}\mathrm{MeV}$ to the TeV scale, it is desirable to explain this smallness of $|\overline{\ensuremath{\theta}}|$ in the QCD framework; this is the strong $CP$ problem. There now exist two plausible solutions to this problem, one of which leads to the existence of a very light axion. The axion decay constant window, ${10}^{9}\ensuremath{\lesssim}{F}_{a}\ensuremath{\lesssim}{10}^{12}\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0ex}}\mathrm{GeV}$ for an $O(1)$ initial misalignment angle ${\ensuremath{\theta}}_{1}$, has been obtained from astrophysical and cosmological data. For ${F}_{a}\ensuremath{\gtrsim}{10}^{12}\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0ex}}\mathrm{GeV}$ with ${\ensuremath{\theta}}_{1}lO(1)$, axions may constitute a significant fraction of the dark matter of the universe. The supersymmetrized axion solution of the strong $CP$ problem introduces its superpartner the axino, which might have affected the evolution of the Universe significantly. The very light axion (theory, supersymmetrization, and models) using recent particle, astrophysical, and cosmological data, and present prospects for its discovery is reviewed here.
56138229
Gauge CP symmetry, wormhole effects, and strong CP problem
The recent observation of four dimensional CP as a discrete gauge symmetry in 8k + 1, 8k + 2 and 8k + 3 Minkowski dimensions calls for a serious reconsid­ eration of various solutions of the strong CP problem. In these possible higher dimensions, the relevant one is a ten dimensional string theory in which a possi­ bility of light fermions exists. We point out that the model independent axion in the heterotic string theory solves the strong CP problem. We also point out that the wormhole effects to low energy global and discrete symmetries are negligible. .. " JIf',!\f':-,',f,' ,. aJ , I <\ " ; \ ,k fL .::LJ.i2" ('If"T 11 . J' ., __ ".1: 1992 11!llllnrB1i1111111 -SAlUT? -·9/ --..5~ o 11bO 0011852 5 .................. • The recent observation of four dimensional CP as a discrete gauge symmetry in 8k +1, 8k +2 and 8k +3 Minkowski dimensions [1] calls for a new understand­ ing on the weak CP violation and the strong CP invariance. Among the possible higher dimensions, the relevant one is 10 because there exists a phenomenologi­ cally viable heterotic string theory [2]. The other extra dimensions not utilized by nature are only of academic interest. In the heterotic string theory, it has been known that the four dimensional CP must be a gauge symmetry since the theory does not have any discrete symmetry except Es +-+ E~ [3]. The discrete symmetry Es +-+ E~ cannot contain the four dimensional CP of light fermions and anti-fermions since they are singlets of E~. In string theories, therefore, the required weak CP violation must arise through spontaneous breaking [4]. The Kobayashi-Maskawa weak CP phase which looks like a hard CP violation at low energy may in fact have descended down from string scale physics through spon­ taneous breaking mechanism [5]. Inflation after the spontaneous CP violation might have removed the dangerous domain walls from our observable universe. The 'calculability' solutions of the Nelson-Barr type [6] to the strong CP problem have a rationale (8QCD = 0) in higher dimensions due to CP as a discrete gauge symmetry of Lagrangian. However, there are two questions to be cleared regarding the strong CP prob­ lem. Firstly, should we consider extra dimensions? Second, what is the effect of gravity on the four dimensional low energy symmetries? In this Letter, we consider both of these questions from Planck scale physics. Regarding the first question, an extension of spatial dimensions should not be in contradiction with low energy physics. Phenomenologically, there is no reason to extend the spatial dimensions. However, one may try to include more spatial dimensions to solve theoretical problems of the standard model. So in consideration of dis'crete and global symmetries in higher dimensions, at present the ten dimensional heterotic string is the only one to be considered. Thus, let us consider the (} parameter in the heterotic string theory in ten dimension. The heterotic string has a model-independent axion aMI [7] whose decay constant is