118704767
First LHC Constraints on Neutralinos
Abstract The ATLAS and CMS Collaborations have recently reported tantalizing hints of the existence of a 125 GeV Higgs-like particle, whose couplings appear to match well the Standard Model (SM) expectations. In this work, we study implications of this observation for the neutralino sector of supersymmetric models, assuming that the Higgs signal gets confirmed. In general, the Higgs decay into neutralinos can be one of its dominant decay channels. Since a large invisible Higgs decay branching ratio would be in conflict with the data, this possibility is now constrained. In particular, we find that most of the region μ 170 GeV , M 1 70 GeV at tan β ∼ 10 and μ 120 GeV , M 1 70 GeV at tan β ∼ 40 is disfavored.
54573705
Constraints on the $R$-parity violating minimal supersymmetric standard model with neutrino masses from multilepton studies at the LHC
In a recent paper, we proposed a hierarchical ansatz for the lepton-number-violating trilinear Yukawa couplings of the R-parity violating minimal supersymmetric standard model. As a result, the number of free parameters in the lepton-number-violating sector was reduced from 36 to 6. Neutrino oscillation data fixes these six parameters, which also uniquely determines the decay modes of the lightest supersymmetric particle and thus governs the collider signature at the LHC. A typical signature of our model consists of multiple leptons in the final state and significantly reduced missing transverse momentum compared to models with R-parity conservation. In this work, we present exclusion limits on our model based on multilepton searches performed at the Large Hadron Collider with 7 TeV center-of-mass energy in 2011 while accommodating a 125 GeV Higgs.
13595363
CheckMATE: Confronting your favourite new physics model with LHC data
Abstract In the first three years of running, the LHC has delivered a wealth of new data that is now being analysed. With over 20 fb−1 of integrated luminosity, both ATLAS and CMS have performed many searches for new physics that theorists are eager to test their model against. However, tuning the detector simulations, understanding the particular analysis details and interpreting the results can be a tedious task. Check mate (Check Models At Terascale Energies) is a program package which accepts simulated event files in many formats for any model. The program then determines whether the model is excluded or not at 95% C.L. by comparing to many recent experimental analyses. Furthermore the program can calculate confidence limits and provide detailed information about signal regions of interest. It is simple to use and the program structure allows for easy extensions to upcoming LHC results in the future. Program summary Program title: CheckMATE Catalogue identifier: AEUT_v1_0 Program summary URL: http://cpc.cs.qub.ac.uk/summaries/AEUT_v1_0.html Program obtainable from: CPC Program Library, Queen’s University, Belfast, N. Ireland Licensing provisions: Standard CPC licence, http://cpc.cs.qub.ac.uk/licence/licence.html No. of lines in distributed program, including test data, etc.: 179960 No. of bytes in distributed program, including test data, etc.: 6089336 Distribution format: tar.gz Programming language: C++, Python. Computer: PC, Mac. Operating system: Linux, Mac OS. RAM: Bytes Classification: 11.9. External routines: ROOT, Python, Delphes (included with the distribution) Nature of problem: The LHC has delivered a wealth of new data that is now being analysed. Both ATLAS and CMS have performed many searches for new physics that theorists are eager to test their model against. However, tuning the detector simulations, understanding the particular analysis details and interpreting the results can be a tedious and repetitive task. Solution method: CheckMATE is a program package which accepts simulated event files in many formats for any model. The program then determines whether the model is excluded or not at 95% C.L. by comparing to many recent experimental analyses. Furthermore the program can calculate confidence limits and provide detailed information about signal regions of interest. It is simple to use and the program structure allows for easy extensions to upcoming LHC results in the future. Restrictions: Only a subset of available experimental results have been implemented. Additional comments: Checkmate is built upon the tools and hard work of many people. If Checkmate is used in your publication it is extremely important that all of the following citations are included, • Delphes 3 [1]. • FastJet [2, 3]. • Anti-kt jet algorithm [4]. • C L s prescription [5]. • In analyses that use the MT2 kinematical discriminant we use the Oxbridge Kinetics Library [6, 7] and the algorithm developed by Cheng and Han [8]. • All experimental analyses that were used to set limits in the study. • The Monte Carlo event generator that was used. Running time: The running time scales about linearly with the number of input events provided by the user. The detector simulation/analysis of 20000 events needs about 50 s/1 s for a single core calculation on an Intel Core i5-3470 with 3.2 GHz and 8 GB RAM. References: [1] J. de Favereau, C. Delaere, P. Demin, A. Giammanco, V. Lematre, et al., DELPHES 3, A modular framework for fast simulation of a generic collider experiment arXiv:1307.6346 . [2] M. Cacciari, G.P. Salam, G. Soyez, FastJet User Manual, Eur. Phys. J. C72 (2012) 1896. arXiv:1111.6097 , http://dx.doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-012-1896-2 . [3] M. Cacciari, G.P. Salam, Dispelling the N3 myth for the k t jet-finder, Phys. Lett. B641 (2006) 57–61. arXiv:hep-ph/0512210 , http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2006.08.037 . [4] M. Cacciari, G.P. Salam, G. Soyez, The Anti-k(t) jet clustering algorithm, JHEP 0804 (2008) 063. arXiv:0802.1189 , http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1126-6708/2008/04/063 . [5] A.L. Read, Presentation of search results: the cl’s technique, Journal of Physics G: Nuclear and Particle Physics 28 (10) (2002) 2693. URL http://stacks.iop.org/0954-3899/28/i=10/a=313 [6] C. Lester, D. Summers, Measuring masses of semiinvisibly decaying particles pair produced at hadron colliders, Phys. Lett. B463 (1999) 99–103. arXiv:hep-ph/9906349 , http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0370-2693(99)00945-4 . [7] A. Barr, C. Lester, P. Stephens, m(T2): The Truth behind the glamour, J. Phys. G29 (2003) 2343–2363. arXiv:hep-ph/0304226 , http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0954-3899/29/10/304 . [8] H.-C. Cheng, Z. Han, Minimal Kinematic Constraints and m(T2), JHEP 0812 (2008) 063. arXiv:0810.5178 , http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1126-6708/2008/12/063 .
119291744
Neutrino masses and mixings in the baryon triality constrained minimal supersymmetric standard model
We discuss how the experimental neutrino oscillation data can be realized in the framework of the baryon triality ($B_3$) constrained supersymmetric Standard Model (cSSM). We show how to obtain phenomenologically viable solutions, which are compatible with the recent WMAP observations. We present results for the hierarchical, inverted and degenerate cases which illustrate the possible size and structure of the lepton number violating couplings. We work with a new, as yet unpublished version of SOFTSUSY, where we implemented full one--loop neutrino masses. Finally, we shortly discuss some phenomenological implications at the LHC.
45811522
A framework to create customised LHC analyses within CheckMATE
Checkmate  is a framework that allows the user to conveniently test simulated BSM physics events against current LHC data in order to derive exclusion limits. For this purpose, the data runs through a detector simulation and is then processed by a user chosen selection of experimental analyses. These analyses are all defined by signal regions that can be compared to the experimental data with a multitude of statistical tools. 
 
Due to the large and continuously growing number of experimental analyses available, users may quickly find themselves in the situation that the study they are particularly interested in has not (yet) been implemented officially into the Checkmate  framework. However, the code includes a rather simple framework to allow users to add new analyses on their own. This document serves as a guide to this. 
 
In addition, Checkmate  serves as a powerful tool for testing and implementing new search strategies. To aid this process, many tools are included to allow a rapid prototyping of new analyses. 
 
Website: http://checkmate.hepforge.org/ 
Program summary 
Program title: CheckMATE, AnalysisManager 
 
Catalogue identifier: AEUT_v1_1 
 
Program summary URL:http://cpc.cs.qub.ac.uk/summaries/AEUT_v1_1.html 
 
Program obtainable from: CPC Program Library, Queen’s University, Belfast, N. Ireland 
 
Licensing provisions: Standard CPC licence, http://cpc.cs.qub.ac.uk/licence/licence.html 
 
No. of lines in distributed program, including test data, etc.: 181436 
 
No. of bytes in distributed program, including test data, etc.: 2169369 
 
Distribution format: tar.gz 
 
Programming language: C++, Python. 
 
Computer: PC, Mac. 
 
Operating system: Linux, Mac OS. 
 
Catalogue identifier of previous version: AEUT_v1_0 
 
Journal reference of previous version: Comput. Phys. Comm. 187(2015)227 
 
Classification: 11.9. 
 
External routines: ROOT, Python, Delphes (included with the distribution) 
 
Does the new version supersede the previous version?: Yes 
 
Nature of problem: The LHC has delivered a wealth of new data that is now being analysed. Both ATLAS and CMS have performed many searches for new physics that theorists are eager to test their model against. However, tuning the detector simulations, understanding the particular analysis details and interpreting the results can be a tedious and repetitive task. Furthermore, new analyses are being constantly published by the experiments and might be not yet included in the official CheckMATE distribution. 
 
Solution method: The AnalysisManager within CheckMATE framework allows the user to easily include new experimental analyses as they are published by the collaborations. Furthermore, completely novel analyses can be designed and added by the user in order to test models at higher centre-of-mass energy and/or luminosity. 
 
Reasons for new version: New features, bug fixes, additional validated analyses. 
 
Summary of revisions: New kinematic variables M_CT, M_T2bl, m_T, alpha_T, razor; internal likelihood calculation; missing energy smearing; efficiency tables; validated tau-tagging; improved AnalysisManager and code structure; new analyses; bug fixes. 
 
Restrictions: Only a subset of available experimental results have been implemented. 
 
Additional comments: Checkmate is built upon the tools and hard work of many people. If Checkmate is used in your publication it is extremely important that all of the following citations are included, 
• 
Delphes 3 [1]. 
 
• 
FastJet [2,3]. 
 
• 
Anti-ktkt jet algorithm [4]. 
 
• 
CLss prescription [5]. 
 
• 
In analyses that use the MT2MT2 kinematical discriminant we use the Oxbridge Kinetics Library [6,7] and the algorithm developed by Cheng and Han [8] which also includes the MT2blMT2bl variable [9]. 
 
• 
In analyses that use the MCTMCT family of kinematical discriminants we use MctLib [10,11] which also includes the MCT⊥MCT⊥ and MCTIIMCTII variables [12]. 
 
• 
All experimental analyses that were used to set limits in the study. 
 
• 
The Monte Carlo event generator that was used. 
 
 
Running time: The running time scales about linearly with the number of input events provided by the user. The detector simulation/analysis of 20000 events needs about 50s/1s for a single core calculation on an Intel Core i5-3470 with 3.2 GHz and 8 GB RAM. 
 
References: 
[1] 
J. de Favereau, C. Delaere, P Demin, A. Giammanco, V. Lematre, et al., “DELPHES 3, A modular framework for fast simulation of a generic collider experiment”, 2013. 
 
[2] 
M. Cacciari, G. P Salam, and G. Soyez, “FastJet User Manual”, Eur. Phys. J., vol. C72, p. 1896, 2012. 
 
[3] 
M. Cacciari and G. P Salam, ”Dispelling the N3 myth for the kt jet-finder”, Phys. Lett., vol. B641, pp. 57–61, 2006. 
 
[4] 
M. Cacciari, G. P Salam, and G. Soyez, “The Anti-k(t) jet clustering algorithm”, JHEP, vol. 0804, p. 063, 2008. 
 
[5] 
A. L. Read, “Presentation of search results: the cl’s technique”, Journal of Physics G: Nuclear and Particle Physics, vol. 28, no. 10, p. 2693, 2002. 
 
[6] 
C. Lester and D. Summers, “Measuring masses of semiinvisibly decaying particles pair produced at hadron colliders”, Phys. Lett., vol. B463, pp. 99–103, 1999. 
 
[7] 
A. Barr, C. Lester, and P Stephens, “m(T2): The Truth behind the glamour”, J. Phys., vol. G29, pp. 2343–2363, 2003. 
 
[8] 
H.-C. Cheng and Z. Han, “Minimal Kinematic Constraints and m(T2)”, JHEP, vol. 0812, p. 063, 2008. 
 
[9] 
Y. Bai, H.-C. Cheng, J. Gallicchio, and J. Gu, “Stop the Top Background of the Stop Search”, JHEP, vol. 1207, p. 110, 2012. 
 
[10] 
D. R. Tovey, “On measuring the masses of pair-produced semi-invisibly decaying particles at hadron colliders”, JHEP, vol. 0804, p. 034, 2008. 
 
[11] 
G. Polesello and D. R. Tovey, “Supersymmetric particle mass measurement with the boost-corrected contransverse mass”, JHEP, vol. 1003, p. 030, 2010. 
 
[12] 
K. T. Matchev and M. Park, “A General method for determining the masses of semi-invisibly decaying particles at hadron colliders”, Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 107, p. 061801, 2011.
54918406
Light stop searches at the LHC with monojet events
We consider light top squarks (stops) in the minimal supersymmetric Standard Model at the Large Hadron Collider. Here, we assume that the lightest neutralino is the lightest supersymmetric particle (LSP) and the lighter stop is the next-to-LSP. Stop pair production is difficult to probe at the Large Hadron Collider for small stop-LSP mass splitting. It has been shown previously that even in this case stop detection is possible if one considers stop pair production in association with one hard jet. We reconsider this supersymmetric monojet signature and go beyond previous works by including the full Standard Model background and optimizing the cuts, working at the hadron level and including detector effects. As a result, a larger portion of the stop-LSP mass plane becomes accessible to monojet searches.
120800011
A common scale for the invisible axion, local SUSY GUTs and Saxino decay
Abstract We identify the scale 10 11–12 GeV as that of the invisible axion and the SUSY breaking scale of local SUSY GUTs. The saxino ( a SUSY partner of the axino; the other partner is the invisble axion) decay is also commented on.
56138229
Gauge CP symmetry, wormhole effects, and strong CP problem
The recent observation of four dimensional CP as a discrete gauge symmetry in 8k + 1, 8k + 2 and 8k + 3 Minkowski dimensions calls for a serious reconsid­ eration of various solutions of the strong CP problem. In these possible higher dimensions, the relevant one is a ten dimensional string theory in which a possi­ bility of light fermions exists. We point out that the model independent axion in the heterotic string theory solves the strong CP problem. We also point out that the wormhole effects to low energy global and discrete symmetries are negligible. .. " JIf',!\f':-,',f,' ,. aJ , I <\ " ; \ ,k fL .::LJ.i2" ('If"T 11 . J' ., __ ".1: 1992 11!llllnrB1i1111111 -SAlUT? -·9/ --..5~ o 11bO 0011852 5 .................. • The recent observation of four dimensional CP as a discrete gauge symmetry in 8k +1, 8k +2 and 8k +3 Minkowski dimensions [1] calls for a new understand­ ing on the weak CP violation and the strong CP invariance. Among the possible higher dimensions, the relevant one is 10 because there exists a phenomenologi­ cally viable heterotic string theory [2]. The other extra dimensions not utilized by nature are only of academic interest. In the heterotic string theory, it has been known that the four dimensional CP must be a gauge symmetry since the theory does not have any discrete symmetry except Es +-+ E~ [3]. The discrete symmetry Es +-+ E~ cannot contain the four dimensional CP of light fermions and anti-fermions since they are singlets of E~. In string theories, therefore, the required weak CP violation must arise through spontaneous breaking [4]. The Kobayashi-Maskawa weak CP phase which looks like a hard CP violation at low energy may in fact have descended down from string scale physics through spon­ taneous breaking mechanism [5]. Inflation after the spontaneous CP violation might have removed the dangerous domain walls from our observable universe. The 'calculability' solutions of the Nelson-Barr type [6] to the strong CP problem have a rationale (8QCD = 0) in higher dimensions due to CP as a discrete gauge symmetry of Lagrangian. However, there are two questions to be cleared regarding the strong CP prob­ lem. Firstly, should we consider extra dimensions? Second, what is the effect of gravity on the four dimensional low energy symmetries? In this Letter, we consider both of these questions from Planck scale physics. Regarding the first question, an extension of spatial dimensions should not be in contradiction with low energy physics. Phenomenologically, there is no reason to extend the spatial dimensions. However, one may try to include more spatial dimensions to solve theoretical problems of the standard model. So in consideration of dis'crete and global symmetries in higher dimensions, at present the ten dimensional heterotic string is the only one to be considered. Thus, let us consider the (} parameter in the heterotic string theory in ten dimension. The heterotic string has a model-independent axion aMI [7] whose decay constant is
121311744
Polarization of recoil-electron beam in high-energy Moller and Bhabha scattering
Longitudinal and transverse polarizations of the final electron beam in Moller and Bhabha scattering are analyzed in electroweak gauge models involving more than one neutral vector boson. In pure QED, for given initial polarizations of incoming particles, the polarization of the outgoing electron beam is the same for Moller and Bhabha scattering and is energy independent. However, in various electroweak gauge models, we find that the energy dependence and final-state polarizations are in general different for the two scattering processes; thus, observing polarization effects in such scattering processes may be useful to test various gauge models at high energy.
119209905
Inverted effective supersymmetry with combined Z ′ and gravity mediation, and muon anomalous magnetic moment
Effective supersymmetry(SUSY) where stop is the lightest squark may run into a two-loop tachyonic problem in some Z' mediation models. In addition, a large A term or/and a large stop mass are needed to have about a 126 GeV Higgs boson with three families of quarks and leptons. Thus, we suggest an inverted effective SUSY(IeffSUSY) where stop mass is larger compared to those of the first two families. In this case, it is possible to have a significant correction to the anomalous magnetic moment of muon. A three family IeffSUSY in a Z' mediation scenario is explicitly studied with the Z' quantum number related to B-L. Here, we adopt both the Z' mediation and gravity mediation where the Z' mediation is the dominant one for stop, while the gravity mediation is the dominant one for the muonic leptons and Higgs multiplets. We present a numerical study based on a specific anomaly free model, and show the existence of the parameter region where all the phenomenological conditions are satisfied.
78815401
Effective SUSY and NPQMSSM after LHC run
Some supersymmetric models after the recent LHC reports are reviewed. This includes the strong CP solution with axions, an extra Z′ from GUTs, and the scalar and pseudoscalar Higgs bosons in supersymmetric extension of the standard model. We also comment on the maximal weak CP violation.