35743828
Transitive Compaction in Parallel via Branchings
Abstract We study the following problem: given a strongly connected digraph, find a minimal strongly connected spanning subgraph of it. Our main result is a parallel algorithm for this problem, which runs in polylog parallel time and uses O ( n 3 ) processors on a PRAM. Our algorithm is simple and the major tool it uses is computing a minimum-weight branching with zero-one weights. We also present sequential algorithms for the problem that run in time O ( m + n · log n ).
204987180
Decomposition by clique separators
Abstract We consider the problem of decomposing a graph by means of clique separators, by which we mean finding cliques (complete graphs) whose removal disconnects the graph. We give an O( nm )-time algorithm for finding a decomposition of an n -vertex, m -edge graph. We describe how such a decomposition can be used in divide-and-conquer algorithms for various graph problems, such as graph coloring and finding maximum independent sets. We survey classes of graphs for which such divide-and-conquer algorithms are especially useful.
39925472
Unique Maximum Matching Algorithms
We consider the problem of testing the uniqueness of maximum matchings, both in the unweighted and in the weighted case. For the unweighted case, we have two results. First, given a graph with n vertices and m edges, we can test whether the graph has a unique perfect matching, and find it if it exists, in O(mlog4n) time. This algorithm uses a recent dynamic connectivity algorithm and an old result of Kotzig characterizing unique perfect matchings in terms of bridges. For the special case of planar graphs, we improve the algorithm to run in O(nlogn) time. Second, given one perfect matching, we can test for the existence of another in linear time. This algorithm is a modification of Edmonds' blossom-shrinking algorithm implemented using depth-first search. A generalization of Kotzig's theorem proved by Jackson and Whitty allows us to give a modification of the first algorithm that tests whether a given graph has a unique f-factor, and find it if it exists. We also show how to modify the second algorithm to check whether a given f-factor is unique. Both extensions have the same time bounds as their perfect matching counterparts. For the weighted case, we can test in linear time whether a maximum-weight matching is unique, given the output from Edmonds' algorithm for computing such a matching. The method is an extension of our algorithm for the unweighted case.
31445898
Enumeration of the Elementary Circuits of a Directed Graph
An algorithm to enumerate all the elementary circuits of a directed graph is presented. The algorithm uses back-tracking with lookahead to avoid unnecessary work, and it has a time bound of $O ((V+E)(C+1))$ when applied to a graph with $V$ vertices, $E$ edges, and $C$ elementary circuits. Keywords: Algorithm, circuit, cycle, graph
19021187
Unique maximum matching algorithms
We consider the problem of testing the uniqueness of maximum matchings, both in the unweighted and in the weighted case. For the unweighted case, we have two results. Given a graph with n vertices and m edges, we can test whether the graph has a unique perfect matching, and find it if it exists, in O(mlog’n) time. This algorithm uses a recent dynamic connectivity algorithm and an old result of K&zig characterizing unique perfect matchings in terms of bridges. Also, given one perfect matching, we can test for the existence of another in linear time. This algorithm is a modification of Edmonds’ blossom-shrinldng algorithm implemented using depthfirst search. We prove a generalization of K&zig’s the+ rem characterizing unique f-factors in terms of bridges. This theorem allows us to give a modification of the frst algorithm that tests whether a given graph has a unique f-factor, and lind it if it exists. We also show how to modify the second algorithm to check whether a given f-factor is unique. Both extensions have the same time bounds as their perfect matching counterparts. For the weighted case, we can test in linear time whether a maximum-weight matching is unique, given the output from Edmonds’ algorithm for computing such a mntcting. The method is an extension of OUT algorithm for the unweighted case.
206562722
Dominating Sets in Planar Graphs
Motivated by an application to unstructured multigrid calculations, we consider the problem of asymptotically minimizing the size of dominating sets in triangulated planar graphs. Specifically, we wish to find the smallestesuch that, fornsufficiently large, everyn-vertex planar graph contains a dominating set of size at mosten.We prove that 1/4<e<1/3, and we conjecture thate=1/4.For triangulated discs we obtain a tight bound ofe=1/3.The upper bound proof yields a linear-time algorithm for finding an(n/3)-size dominating set.
10887766
Fully persistent lists with catenation
This paper considers the problem of representing stacks with catenation so that any stack, old or new, is available for access or update operations. This problem arises in the implementation of list-based and functional programming languages. A solution is proposed requiring constant time and space for each stack operation except catenation, which requires O(log log k) time and space. Here k is the number of stack operations done before the catenation. All the resource bounds are amortized over the sequence of operations.
37146522
Making Data Structures Persistent
7483054
A Linear-Time Algorithm for a Special Case of Disjoint Set Union
This paper presents a linear-time algorithm for the special case of the disjoint set union problem in which the structure of the unions (defined by a “union tree”) is known in advance. The algorithm executes an intermixed sequence of m union and find operations on n elements in O(m+n) time and O(n) space. This is a slight but theoretically significant improvement over the fastest known algorithm for the general problem, which runs in O(mα(m+n, n)+n) time and O(n) space, where a is a functional inverse of Ackermann's function. Used as a subroutine, the algorithm gives similar improvements in the efficiency of algorithms for solving several other problems, including two-processor scheduling, matching on convex graphs, finding nearest common ancestors off-line, testing a flow graph for reducibility, and finding two disjoint directed spanning trees. The algorithm obtains its efficiency by combining the fast algorithm for the general problem with table look-up on small sets, and requires a random access machine for its implementation. The algorithm extends to the case in which single-node additions to the union tree are allowed. The extended algorithm is useful in finding maximum cardinality matchings in nonbipartite graphs.
52152408
A new approach to the maximum-flow problem
All previously known efficient maximum-flow algorithms work by finding augmenting paths, either one path at a time (as in the original Ford and Fulkerson algorithm) or all shortest-length augmenting paths at once (using the layered network approach of Dinic). An alternative method based on the <italic>preflow</italic> concept of Karzanov is introduced. A preflow is like a flow, except that the total amount flowing into a vertex is allowed to exceed the total amount flowing out. The method maintains a preflow in the original network and pushes local flow excess toward the sink along what are estimated to be shortest paths. The algorithm and its analysis are simple and intuitive, yet the algorithm runs as fast as any other known method on dense graphs, achieving an <italic>O</italic>(<italic>n</italic><supscrpt>3</supscrpt>) time bound on an <italic>n</italic>-vertex graph. By incorporating the dynamic tree data structure of Sleator and Tarjan, we obtain a version of the algorithm running in <italic>O</italic>(<italic>nm</italic> log(<italic>n</italic><supscrpt>2</supscrpt>/<italic>m</italic>)) time on an <italic>n</italic>-vertex, <italic>m</italic>-edge graph. This is as fast as any known method for any graph density and faster on graphs of moderate density. The algorithm also admits efficient distributed and parallel implementations. A parallel implementation running in <italic>O</italic>(<italic>n</italic><supscrpt>2</supscrpt>log <italic>n</italic>) time using <italic>n</italic> processors and <italic>O</italic>(<italic>m</italic>) space is obtained. This time bound matches that of the Shiloach-Vishkin algorithm, which also uses <italic>n</italic> processors but requires <italic>O</italic>(<italic>n</italic><supscrpt>2</supscrpt>) space.
18699794
Almost-optimum speed-ups of algorithms for bipartite matching and related problems
We present algorithms for matching and related problems that run on an EREW PRAM with <italic>p</italic> processors. Given is a bipartite graph <italic>G</italic> with <italic>n</italic> vertices, <italic>m</italic> edges, and integral edge costs at most <italic>N</italic> in magnitude. We give an algorithm for the assignment problem (minimum cost perfect bipartite matching) that runs in <italic>&Ogr;</italic>(√<italic>nm</italic> log (<italic>nN</italic>)(log(2<italic>p</italic>))/<italic>p</italic>) time and <italic>&Ogr;</italic>(<italic>m</italic>) space, for <italic>p</italic> ≤ <italic>m</italic>/(√<italic>n</italic>log<supscrpt>2</supscrpt><italic>n</italic>). For <italic>p</italic> = 1 this improves the best known sequential algorithm, and is within a factor of log (<italic>nN</italic>) of the best known bound for the problem without costs (maximum cardinality matching). For <italic>p</italic> > 1 the time is within a factor of log <italic>p</italic> of optimum speed-up. Extensions include an algorithm for maximum cardinality bipartite matching with slightly better processor bounds, and similar results for bipartite degree-constrained subgraph problems (with and without costs). Our ideas also extend to general graph matching problems.