118696062
Anomalous parity asymmetry of WMAP 7-year power spectrum data at low multipoles: Is it cosmological or systematics?
It is natural to assume a parity-neutral Universe and accordingly no particular parity preference in the cosmic microwave background sky. However, our investigation based on the WMAP 7-year power spectrum shows there exists a large-scale odd-parity preference with high statistical significance. We also find that the odd-parity preference in WMAP7 data is slightly higher than earlier releases. We have investigated possible origins, and ruled out various noncosmological origins. We also find that the primordial origin requires |Re[{Phi}(k)]|<<|Im[{Phi}(k)]| for k < or approx. 22/{eta}{sub 0}, where {eta}{sub 0} is the present conformal time. In other words, it requires translational invariance in the primordial Universe to be violated on scales larger than 4 Gpc. The Planck surveyor, which possesses wide frequency coverage and systematics distinct from the WMAP, may allow us to resolve the mystery of the anomalous odd-parity preference. Furthermore, polarization maps of large-sky coverage will reduce degeneracy in cosmological origins.
17325286
THE GAUSS–LEGENDRE SKY PIXELIZATION FOR THE CMB POLARIZATION (GLESP-POL) ERRORS DUE TO PIXELIZATION OF THE CMB SKY
We present the development of the method for numerical analysis of polarization in the Gauss–Legendre sky pixelization (GLESP) scheme for CMB maps. This incorporation of the polarization transforms in the pixelization scheme GLESP completes the creation of our new method for numerical analysis of CMB maps. A comparison of GLESP and HEALPix calculations is done.
118530966
How accurately can we measure the hydrogen 2S->1S transition rate from the cosmological data?
Recent progress in observational cosmology, and especially the forthcoming PLANCK mission data, open new directions in so-called precision cosmology. In this paper we illustrate this statement considering the accuracy of cosmological determination of the two-quanta decay rate of 2s hydrogen atom state. We show that the PLANCK data will allow us to measure this decay rate significantly better than in the laboratory experiments.
118997460
Alfv\'en turbulence in the WMAP 5 year data and a forecast for the PLANCK
118455901
CMB data constraint on self-annihilation of dark matter particles
Recently, self‐annihilation of dark matter particles is proposed to explain the “WMAP Haze” and excess of energetic positrons and electrons in ATIC and PAMELA results. If self‐annihilation of dark matter occurs around the recombination of cosmic plasma, energy release from self‐annihilation of dark matter delays the recombination, and hence affects CMB anisotropy. By using the recent CMB data, we have investigated the self‐annihilation of dark matter particles. In this investigation, we do not find statistically significant evidence, and impose an upper bound on 〈σν〉/mϰ.The upcoming data from Planck surveyor and the Fermi Gamma‐ray telescope will allow us to break some of parameter degeneracy and improve constraints on self‐annihilation of dark matter particles.
118613110
How to make a clean separation between CMB E and B modes with proper foreground masking
We investigate the E/B decomposition of CMB polarization on a masked sky. In real space, operators of E and B mode decomposition involve only differentials of CMB polarization. We may, therefore in principle, perform a clean E/B decomposition from incomplete sky data. Since it is impractical to apply second derivatives to observation data, we usually rely on spherical harmonic transformation and inverse transformation, instead of using real-space operators. In spherical harmonic representation, jump discontinuities in a cut sky produces Gibbs phenomenon, unless a spherical harmonic expansion is made up to an infinitely high multipole. By smoothing a foreground mask, we may suppress the Gibbs phenomenon effectively in a similar manner to apodization of a foreground mask discussed in other works. However, we incur foreground contamination by smoothing a foreground mask, because zero-value pixels in the original mask may be rendered non-zero by the smoothing process. In this work, we investigate an optimal foreground mask, which ensures proper foreground masking and suppresses Gibbs phenomenon. We apply our method to a simulated map of the pixel resolution comparable to the Planck satellite. The simulation shows that the leakage power is lower than unlensed CMB B mode power spectrum of tensor-to-scalar ratio r ∼ 1 × 10 −7 . We compare the result with that of the original mask. We find that the leakage power is reduced by a factor of 10 6 ∼ 10 9 at the cost of a sky fraction 0.07, and that that the enhancement is highest at lowest multipoles. We confirm that all the zero-value pixels in the original mask remain zero in our mask. The application of this method to the Planck data will improve the detectability of primordial tensor perturbation.
45811522
A framework to create customised LHC analyses within CheckMATE
Checkmate  is a framework that allows the user to conveniently test simulated BSM physics events against current LHC data in order to derive exclusion limits. For this purpose, the data runs through a detector simulation and is then processed by a user chosen selection of experimental analyses. These analyses are all defined by signal regions that can be compared to the experimental data with a multitude of statistical tools. 
 
Due to the large and continuously growing number of experimental analyses available, users may quickly find themselves in the situation that the study they are particularly interested in has not (yet) been implemented officially into the Checkmate  framework. However, the code includes a rather simple framework to allow users to add new analyses on their own. This document serves as a guide to this. 
 
In addition, Checkmate  serves as a powerful tool for testing and implementing new search strategies. To aid this process, many tools are included to allow a rapid prototyping of new analyses. 
 
Website: http://checkmate.hepforge.org/ 
Program summary 
Program title: CheckMATE, AnalysisManager 
 
Catalogue identifier: AEUT_v1_1 
 
Program summary URL:http://cpc.cs.qub.ac.uk/summaries/AEUT_v1_1.html 
 
Program obtainable from: CPC Program Library, Queen’s University, Belfast, N. Ireland 
 
Licensing provisions: Standard CPC licence, http://cpc.cs.qub.ac.uk/licence/licence.html 
 
No. of lines in distributed program, including test data, etc.: 181436 
 
No. of bytes in distributed program, including test data, etc.: 2169369 
 
Distribution format: tar.gz 
 
Programming language: C++, Python. 
 
Computer: PC, Mac. 
 
Operating system: Linux, Mac OS. 
 
Catalogue identifier of previous version: AEUT_v1_0 
 
Journal reference of previous version: Comput. Phys. Comm. 187(2015)227 
 
Classification: 11.9. 
 
External routines: ROOT, Python, Delphes (included with the distribution) 
 
Does the new version supersede the previous version?: Yes 
 
Nature of problem: The LHC has delivered a wealth of new data that is now being analysed. Both ATLAS and CMS have performed many searches for new physics that theorists are eager to test their model against. However, tuning the detector simulations, understanding the particular analysis details and interpreting the results can be a tedious and repetitive task. Furthermore, new analyses are being constantly published by the experiments and might be not yet included in the official CheckMATE distribution. 
 
Solution method: The AnalysisManager within CheckMATE framework allows the user to easily include new experimental analyses as they are published by the collaborations. Furthermore, completely novel analyses can be designed and added by the user in order to test models at higher centre-of-mass energy and/or luminosity. 
 
Reasons for new version: New features, bug fixes, additional validated analyses. 
 
Summary of revisions: New kinematic variables M_CT, M_T2bl, m_T, alpha_T, razor; internal likelihood calculation; missing energy smearing; efficiency tables; validated tau-tagging; improved AnalysisManager and code structure; new analyses; bug fixes. 
 
Restrictions: Only a subset of available experimental results have been implemented. 
 
Additional comments: Checkmate is built upon the tools and hard work of many people. If Checkmate is used in your publication it is extremely important that all of the following citations are included, 
• 
Delphes 3 [1]. 
 
• 
FastJet [2,3]. 
 
• 
Anti-ktkt jet algorithm [4]. 
 
• 
CLss prescription [5]. 
 
• 
In analyses that use the MT2MT2 kinematical discriminant we use the Oxbridge Kinetics Library [6,7] and the algorithm developed by Cheng and Han [8] which also includes the MT2blMT2bl variable [9]. 
 
• 
In analyses that use the MCTMCT family of kinematical discriminants we use MctLib [10,11] which also includes the MCT⊥MCT⊥ and MCTIIMCTII variables [12]. 
 
• 
All experimental analyses that were used to set limits in the study. 
 
• 
The Monte Carlo event generator that was used. 
 
 
Running time: The running time scales about linearly with the number of input events provided by the user. The detector simulation/analysis of 20000 events needs about 50s/1s for a single core calculation on an Intel Core i5-3470 with 3.2 GHz and 8 GB RAM. 
 
References: 
[1] 
J. de Favereau, C. Delaere, P Demin, A. Giammanco, V. Lematre, et al., “DELPHES 3, A modular framework for fast simulation of a generic collider experiment”, 2013. 
 
[2] 
M. Cacciari, G. P Salam, and G. Soyez, “FastJet User Manual”, Eur. Phys. J., vol. C72, p. 1896, 2012. 
 
[3] 
M. Cacciari and G. P Salam, ”Dispelling the N3 myth for the kt jet-finder”, Phys. Lett., vol. B641, pp. 57–61, 2006. 
 
[4] 
M. Cacciari, G. P Salam, and G. Soyez, “The Anti-k(t) jet clustering algorithm”, JHEP, vol. 0804, p. 063, 2008. 
 
[5] 
A. L. Read, “Presentation of search results: the cl’s technique”, Journal of Physics G: Nuclear and Particle Physics, vol. 28, no. 10, p. 2693, 2002. 
 
[6] 
C. Lester and D. Summers, “Measuring masses of semiinvisibly decaying particles pair produced at hadron colliders”, Phys. Lett., vol. B463, pp. 99–103, 1999. 
 
[7] 
A. Barr, C. Lester, and P Stephens, “m(T2): The Truth behind the glamour”, J. Phys., vol. G29, pp. 2343–2363, 2003. 
 
[8] 
H.-C. Cheng and Z. Han, “Minimal Kinematic Constraints and m(T2)”, JHEP, vol. 0812, p. 063, 2008. 
 
[9] 
Y. Bai, H.-C. Cheng, J. Gallicchio, and J. Gu, “Stop the Top Background of the Stop Search”, JHEP, vol. 1207, p. 110, 2012. 
 
[10] 
D. R. Tovey, “On measuring the masses of pair-produced semi-invisibly decaying particles at hadron colliders”, JHEP, vol. 0804, p. 034, 2008. 
 
[11] 
G. Polesello and D. R. Tovey, “Supersymmetric particle mass measurement with the boost-corrected contransverse mass”, JHEP, vol. 1003, p. 030, 2010. 
 
[12] 
K. T. Matchev and M. Park, “A General method for determining the masses of semi-invisibly decaying particles at hadron colliders”, Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 107, p. 061801, 2011.
8320350
RF parity and almost massless up quark
Abstract We introduce a parity R F to introduce naturally small masses for the first family members and in particular an almost massless u-quark toward the strong CP solution. We also discuss the phenomenological implications of this model on the proton decay and the neutrino mass. Furthermore, it is possible to embed this R F parity into the local U (1) R gauge symmetry.
118627114
White dwarf axions, PAMELA data, and flipped-SU(5)
Abstract Recently, there are two hints arising from physics beyond the standard model. One is a possible energy loss mechanism due to emission of very weakly interacting light particles from white dwarf stars, with a coupling strength ∼ 0.7 × 10 − 13 , and another is the high energy positrons observed by the PAMELA satellite experiment. We construct a supersymmetric flipped-SU(5) model, SU ( 5 ) × U ( 1 ) X with appropriate additional symmetries, [ U ( 1 ) H ] gauge × [ U ( 1 ) R × U ( 1 ) Γ ] global × Z 2 , such that these are explained by a very light electrophilic axion of mass 0.5 meV from the spontaneously broken U ( 1 ) Γ and two component cold dark matters from Z 2 parity. We show that in the flipped-SU(5) there exists a basic mechanism for allowing excess positrons through the charged SU(5) singlet leptons, but not allowing antiproton excess due to the absence of the SU(5) singlet quarks. We show the discovery potential of the charged SU(5) singlet E at the LHC experiments by observing the electron and positron spectrum. With these symmetries, we also comment on the mass hierarchy between the top and bottom quarks.
2256167
Completing natural inflation
If the inflaton is a pseudo-scalar axion, the axion shift symmetry can protect the flatness of its potential from too large radiative corrections. This possibility, known as natural inflation, requires an axion scale which is greater than the (reduced) Planck scale. It is unclear whether such a high value is compatible with an effective field theoretical description, and whether the global axionic symmetry survives quantum gravity effects. We propose a mechanism which provides an effective large axion scale, although the original one is sub-Planckian. The mechanism is based on the presence of two axions, with a potential provided by two anomalous gauge groups. The effective large axion scale is due to an almost exact symmetry between the couplings of the axions to the anomalous groups. We also comment on a possible implementation in heterotic string theory.
16961389
Cosmic Axion
+ θ̄ 16π2 TrFμνF̃ μν (2) Since this θ̄ term violates CP invariance, the upper bound of the neutron electric dipole moment puts a strong constraint on the magnitude of θ̄, |θ̄| < 10. The smallness of θ̄ has led to the strong CP problem, “Why is θ̄ so small?” [1] We know that many small parameters in physics have led to new ideas, in most cases leading to new symmetries. For example, MW/MP ≪ 1 has led to supersymmetry, mu,d ≪ 1 GeV has led to SU(2)L × SU(2)R chiral symmetry, etc. For the strong CP problem, the nicest solution is the very light axion resulting from the Peccei-Quinn symmetry [2].