119259465
‘Stop’ that ambulance! New physics at the LHC?
A bstractA number of LHC searches now display intriguing excesses. Most prominently, the measurement of the W+W− cross-section has been consistently ∼ 20% higher than the theoretical prediction across both ATLAS and CMS for both 7 and 8 TeV runs. More recently, supersymmetric searches for final states containing two or three leptons have also seen more events than predicted in certain signal regions. We show that a supersymmetric model containing a light stop, winos and binos can consistently match the data. We perform a fit to all measurements and searches that may be sensitive to our model and find a reduction in the log-likelihood of 15.4 compared to the Standard Model which corresponds to 3.5-σ once the extra degrees of freedom in the fit are considered.
118704767
First LHC Constraints on Neutralinos
Abstract The ATLAS and CMS Collaborations have recently reported tantalizing hints of the existence of a 125 GeV Higgs-like particle, whose couplings appear to match well the Standard Model (SM) expectations. In this work, we study implications of this observation for the neutralino sector of supersymmetric models, assuming that the Higgs signal gets confirmed. In general, the Higgs decay into neutralinos can be one of its dominant decay channels. Since a large invisible Higgs decay branching ratio would be in conflict with the data, this possibility is now constrained. In particular, we find that most of the region μ 170 GeV , M 1 70 GeV at tan β ∼ 10 and μ 120 GeV , M 1 70 GeV at tan β ∼ 40 is disfavored.
45811522
A framework to create customised LHC analyses within CheckMATE
Checkmate  is a framework that allows the user to conveniently test simulated BSM physics events against current LHC data in order to derive exclusion limits. For this purpose, the data runs through a detector simulation and is then processed by a user chosen selection of experimental analyses. These analyses are all defined by signal regions that can be compared to the experimental data with a multitude of statistical tools. 
 
Due to the large and continuously growing number of experimental analyses available, users may quickly find themselves in the situation that the study they are particularly interested in has not (yet) been implemented officially into the Checkmate  framework. However, the code includes a rather simple framework to allow users to add new analyses on their own. This document serves as a guide to this. 
 
In addition, Checkmate  serves as a powerful tool for testing and implementing new search strategies. To aid this process, many tools are included to allow a rapid prototyping of new analyses. 
 
Website: http://checkmate.hepforge.org/ 
Program summary 
Program title: CheckMATE, AnalysisManager 
 
Catalogue identifier: AEUT_v1_1 
 
Program summary URL:http://cpc.cs.qub.ac.uk/summaries/AEUT_v1_1.html 
 
Program obtainable from: CPC Program Library, Queen’s University, Belfast, N. Ireland 
 
Licensing provisions: Standard CPC licence, http://cpc.cs.qub.ac.uk/licence/licence.html 
 
No. of lines in distributed program, including test data, etc.: 181436 
 
No. of bytes in distributed program, including test data, etc.: 2169369 
 
Distribution format: tar.gz 
 
Programming language: C++, Python. 
 
Computer: PC, Mac. 
 
Operating system: Linux, Mac OS. 
 
Catalogue identifier of previous version: AEUT_v1_0 
 
Journal reference of previous version: Comput. Phys. Comm. 187(2015)227 
 
Classification: 11.9. 
 
External routines: ROOT, Python, Delphes (included with the distribution) 
 
Does the new version supersede the previous version?: Yes 
 
Nature of problem: The LHC has delivered a wealth of new data that is now being analysed. Both ATLAS and CMS have performed many searches for new physics that theorists are eager to test their model against. However, tuning the detector simulations, understanding the particular analysis details and interpreting the results can be a tedious and repetitive task. Furthermore, new analyses are being constantly published by the experiments and might be not yet included in the official CheckMATE distribution. 
 
Solution method: The AnalysisManager within CheckMATE framework allows the user to easily include new experimental analyses as they are published by the collaborations. Furthermore, completely novel analyses can be designed and added by the user in order to test models at higher centre-of-mass energy and/or luminosity. 
 
Reasons for new version: New features, bug fixes, additional validated analyses. 
 
Summary of revisions: New kinematic variables M_CT, M_T2bl, m_T, alpha_T, razor; internal likelihood calculation; missing energy smearing; efficiency tables; validated tau-tagging; improved AnalysisManager and code structure; new analyses; bug fixes. 
 
Restrictions: Only a subset of available experimental results have been implemented. 
 
Additional comments: Checkmate is built upon the tools and hard work of many people. If Checkmate is used in your publication it is extremely important that all of the following citations are included, 
• 
Delphes 3 [1]. 
 
• 
FastJet [2,3]. 
 
• 
Anti-ktkt jet algorithm [4]. 
 
• 
CLss prescription [5]. 
 
• 
In analyses that use the MT2MT2 kinematical discriminant we use the Oxbridge Kinetics Library [6,7] and the algorithm developed by Cheng and Han [8] which also includes the MT2blMT2bl variable [9]. 
 
• 
In analyses that use the MCTMCT family of kinematical discriminants we use MctLib [10,11] which also includes the MCT⊥MCT⊥ and MCTIIMCTII variables [12]. 
 
• 
All experimental analyses that were used to set limits in the study. 
 
• 
The Monte Carlo event generator that was used. 
 
 
Running time: The running time scales about linearly with the number of input events provided by the user. The detector simulation/analysis of 20000 events needs about 50s/1s for a single core calculation on an Intel Core i5-3470 with 3.2 GHz and 8 GB RAM. 
 
References: 
[1] 
J. de Favereau, C. Delaere, P Demin, A. Giammanco, V. Lematre, et al., “DELPHES 3, A modular framework for fast simulation of a generic collider experiment”, 2013. 
 
[2] 
M. Cacciari, G. P Salam, and G. Soyez, “FastJet User Manual”, Eur. Phys. J., vol. C72, p. 1896, 2012. 
 
[3] 
M. Cacciari and G. P Salam, ”Dispelling the N3 myth for the kt jet-finder”, Phys. Lett., vol. B641, pp. 57–61, 2006. 
 
[4] 
M. Cacciari, G. P Salam, and G. Soyez, “The Anti-k(t) jet clustering algorithm”, JHEP, vol. 0804, p. 063, 2008. 
 
[5] 
A. L. Read, “Presentation of search results: the cl’s technique”, Journal of Physics G: Nuclear and Particle Physics, vol. 28, no. 10, p. 2693, 2002. 
 
[6] 
C. Lester and D. Summers, “Measuring masses of semiinvisibly decaying particles pair produced at hadron colliders”, Phys. Lett., vol. B463, pp. 99–103, 1999. 
 
[7] 
A. Barr, C. Lester, and P Stephens, “m(T2): The Truth behind the glamour”, J. Phys., vol. G29, pp. 2343–2363, 2003. 
 
[8] 
H.-C. Cheng and Z. Han, “Minimal Kinematic Constraints and m(T2)”, JHEP, vol. 0812, p. 063, 2008. 
 
[9] 
Y. Bai, H.-C. Cheng, J. Gallicchio, and J. Gu, “Stop the Top Background of the Stop Search”, JHEP, vol. 1207, p. 110, 2012. 
 
[10] 
D. R. Tovey, “On measuring the masses of pair-produced semi-invisibly decaying particles at hadron colliders”, JHEP, vol. 0804, p. 034, 2008. 
 
[11] 
G. Polesello and D. R. Tovey, “Supersymmetric particle mass measurement with the boost-corrected contransverse mass”, JHEP, vol. 1003, p. 030, 2010. 
 
[12] 
K. T. Matchev and M. Park, “A General method for determining the masses of semi-invisibly decaying particles at hadron colliders”, Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 107, p. 061801, 2011.
119291744
Neutrino masses and mixings in the baryon triality constrained minimal supersymmetric standard model
We discuss how the experimental neutrino oscillation data can be realized in the framework of the baryon triality ($B_3$) constrained supersymmetric Standard Model (cSSM). We show how to obtain phenomenologically viable solutions, which are compatible with the recent WMAP observations. We present results for the hierarchical, inverted and degenerate cases which illustrate the possible size and structure of the lepton number violating couplings. We work with a new, as yet unpublished version of SOFTSUSY, where we implemented full one--loop neutrino masses. Finally, we shortly discuss some phenomenological implications at the LHC.
118182564
A Simple Baryon Triality Model for Neutrino Masses
We make a simple ansatz for the supersymmetric lepton-number violating Yukawa couplings, by relating them to the corresponding Higgs Yukawa couplings. This reduces the free B$_3$ parameters from 36 to 6. We fit these parameters to solve the solar and atmospheric neutrino anomalies in terms of neutrino oscillations. The resulting couplings are consistent with the stringent low-energy bounds. We investigate the resulting LHC collider signals for a stau LSP scenario.
16726847
Testing neutrino masses in the R-parity violating minimal supersymmetric standard model with LHC results
Within the R–parity violating minimal supersymmetric standard model (MSSM), we use a hierarchical ansatz for the lepton–number violating trilinear Yukawa couplings by relating them to the corresponding Higgs–Yukawa couplings. This ansatz reduces the number of free parameters in the lepton–number violating sector from 36 to 6. Baryon–number violating terms are forbidden by imposing the discrete gauge symmetry Baryon Triality. We fit the lepton–number violating parameters to the most recent neutrino oscillation data, including the mixing angle θ13 found by Daya Bay. We find that we obtain phenomenologically viable neutrino masses and mixings only in the case of normal ordered neutrino masses and that the lepton–number violating sector is unambiguously determined by neutrino oscillation data. We discuss the resulting collider signals for the case of a neutralino as well as a scalar tau lightest supersymmetric particle. We use the ATLAS searches for multi–jet events and large transverse missing momentum in the 0, 1 and 2 lepton channel with 7 TeV center–of–mass energy in order to derive exclusion limits on the parameter space of this R–parity violating supersymmetric model.
119316975
GMSB at a stable vacuum and MSSM without exotics from heterotic string
Abstract We show that it is possible to introduce the confining hidden sector gauge group SU ( 5 ) ′ with the chiral matter 10 0 ′ plus 5 ¯ 0 ′ , which are neutral under the standard model gauge group, toward a gauge mediated supersymmetry breaking (GMSB) in a Z 12 − I orbifold compactification of E 8 × E 8 ′ heterotic string. Three families of MSSM result without exotics. We also find a desirable matter parity P (or R-parity) assignment. We note that this model contains the spectrum of the Lee–Weinberg model which has a nice solution of the μ problem.
14387976
Fast simulation of the whole-sky CMB map in the presence of primordial magnetic field
We present a novel method for generation of sets of the Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) anisotropy maps, which reproduces the $\Delta \l=2$ correlations associated with Alfv\'en turbulence. The method is based on the non-linear transformation of the CMB maps, which is obtained from the Monte Carlo simulation of the statistically isotropic Gaussian signal. Our method is computationally fast and efficient. 
We have applied two estimators (the cross-correlation estimator in multipole domain for $\l+1,m$ and $\l-1,m$ modes and circular phase moments) to test the statistical properties of derived maps. Both of these statistics confirm the effectiveness of our generation method. We believe that our method can be useful for fast generation of the non-Gaussian maps in the presence of the primordial magnetic field, and be a valuable tool for the non-Gaussianity investigation of the CMB in the framework of the future PLANCK data analysis.
123039434
A natural solution of the μ problem with a composite axion in the hidden sector
Abstract Some superstring models with an intermediate scale hidden sector for supersymmetry breaking can provide a global symmetry which induces the needed μ-term of the supersymmetric standard model in terms of the hidden sector scale. We discuss the μ problem and its solution within the low-energy supersymmetric standard model with an intermediate scale (10 10 – 10 13 GeV) hidden sector. We also present this realization in an orbifold model with a gauge group SU(3) c ⊗ SU(2) L ⊗ U(1) ⊗ SU(5) h with possible extra U(1)'s.
119046581
Dynkin diagram strategy for orbifolding with Wilson lines
Abstract A simple method for breaking gauge groups by orbifolding is presented. We extend the method of Kac and Peterson to include Wilson lines. The complete classification of the gauge group breaking, e.g., from heterotic string, is now possible. From this Dynkin diagram technique, one can easily visualize the origin and the symmetry pattern of the surviving gauge group.
119104757
Mixing of axino and goldstino, and axino mass
Abstract Axino, related to the SUSY transformation of axion, can mix with goldstino in principle. This case is realized when some superfields carrying nonvanishing Peccei–Quinn charges develop both scalar VEVs and F-terms. In this case, we present a proper definition of axion and axino. With this definition, we present the QCD axino mass in the most general framework, including nonminimal Kahler potential. The axino mass is known to have a hierarchical mass structure depending on accidental symmetries. With only one axino, if G A = 0 where G = K + ln | W | 2 , we obtain m a ˜ = m 3 / 2 . For G A ≠ 0 , the axino mass depends on the details of the Kahler potential. In the gauge mediation scenario, the gaugino mass is the dominant axino mass parameter. Therefore, we can take the theoretical QCD axino mass as a free parameter in the study of its cosmological effects, ranging from eV to multi-TeV scales, without a present knowledge on its ultraviolet completion.