Les Conditions D'une Lecture Argumentative du Morphème-(i)na
Our research on the particle -(i)na is for the purpose of thinking about necessary conditions in order to think again the problem which is linked to this morpheme. Our main interest consists in installing the argumentative function in the centre of the analytic dispositive. To do this, we used the theories of argumentation and topoi defended by Oswald Ducrot and Jean-Claude Anscombre. In addition to these theories, we used stereotype theory. First of all, we limited our observation only to the utterances which seem to be suitable for the argumentative reading without causing major difficulties. According to the empiric observations, there are two types of utterances constructed on -(i)na, to say and . We considered that all these utterances translate a discursive strategy of which the objective is install negative discourative space in which opened positive property cannot be inserted. All have to be suitable for the expression of defavorable option and -(i)na element constrains discourse continuaty in the negative sense.