Lowe's argument against nihilism
then, as we saw, he cannot argue for premiss (1) in the way he does without assuming what premiss (1) states. And if Lowe takes the truthbearers of mathematical truths to be concrete then he cannot argue for premiss (1) in the way he does without assuming what the conclusion of This content downloaded from 207.46.13.11 on Wed, 10 Aug 2016 05:11:54 UTC All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms