119635932
On Distance-Transitive Graphs
On suppose que Γ est un graphe non oriente connexe de genre fini g et G est un sous-groupe de aut(Γ) tel que pour chaque sommet x, G(x) est fini et agit transitivement sur l'ensemble des s-chemins (x 0 ,…,x s ) avec x 0 =x. Soit M un entier positif avec M≡3 (mod 8) et soit m=(M+9)/4 et n=max(2m+4,14). Si s≥2(m−1) et s≥(g−M)/2 alors Gm(x 0 ,…,x n )=1 pour chaque n-chemin (x 0 ,…,x n )
122390175
An application of p -factorization methods to symmetric graphs
124466085
On a theorem of Goldschmidt
122623073
Symmetrische graphen mit auflösbaren stabilisatoren
120137397
The nonexistence of certain Moufang polygons
Let F=(V, E) be an arbitrary undirected graph, finite or infinite, V the vertex set of F, E the edge set, and let G be an arbitrary subgroup of aut(F). For each x e V we denote by F(x) the set of vertices adjacent to x, by G(x) the stabilizer of x in G and, for each ieN, by Gi(x ) the subgroup {asG(x)l aeG(y) for all y e V with O(x,y)<i} where O(x,y) denotes the distance between x and y. An s-path (for seN) is an (s+ 1)-tuple (x 0 . . . . . x~) of vertices such that xi~F(x i_ 1) if 1 < i N s and xi+xi_ 2 if 2=<i<s. Let
46019521
The nonexistence of 8-transitive graphs
We prove that the inequalitys≦7 holds for finites-transitive graphs assuming that the list of known 2-transitive permutation groups is complete.
53988483
Permutation groups with projective unitary subconstituents
AssTRAcT. Let r be a finite directed graph with vertex set V(I) and edge set EQ7) and let G be a subgroup of aut(I) which we assume to act transitively on both V(r) and E(r). Suppose that for some prime power q, the stabilizer G(x) of a vertex x induces on both {yI(x,y) E E(r)) and {wl(w, x) E E)} a group lying between PSU(3, q2) and Pr1U(3, q2). It is shown that if G acts primitively on V(I), then for each edge (x, y), the subgroup of G(x) fixing every vertex in {wI(x, w) or (y, w) E E(r)) is trivial.
19510229
Bifurcation in difference approximations to two-point boundary value problems
Numerical methods for bifurcation problems of the form (*) LyAXf(y), By =0, where f(0) = 0 and f'(0) * 0, are considered. Here y is a scalar function, X is a real scalar, L is a linear differential operator and By = 0 represents some linear homogeneous two-point boundary conditions. Under certain assumptions, it is shown that if (*) is replaced by an appropriate difference scheme, then there exists a unique branch of nontrivial solutions of the discrete problem in a neighborhood of a branch of nontrivial solutions of (*) bifurcating from the trivial solution and that the discrete branch converges to the continuous one. Error estimates are derived and an illustrative numerical example is included.
119855015
The application of implicit Runge-Kutta and collection methods to boundary-value problems
The solution of a nonlinear system of first order differential equations with nonlinear boundary conditions by implicit Runge-Kutta methods based on interpolatory quadrature formulae is examined. An equivalence between implicit Runge-Kutta and collocation schemes is established. It is shown that the difference equations obtained have a unique solution in a neighbourhood of an isolated solution of the continuous problem, that this solution can be computed by Newton iteration and that it converges to the isolated solution. The order of convergence is equal to the degree of precision of the related quadra- ture formula plus one. The efficient implementation of the methods is discussed and numerical examples are given. 1. Introduction. We investigate the application of certain implicit Runge- Kutta methods (cf. Butcher (2)) to the numerical solution of nonlinear boundary- value problems of the form
120998826
Symmetric graphs with projective subconstituents
Let P be an undirected graph and G a subgroup of aut(r) acting transitively on the vertex set of P. Let x be an arbitrary vertex of P. We denote by P(x) the set of vertices adjacent to x and by G(x)F(x) the permutation group induced by the stabilizer G (x) of x in G on P(x); G (x)r(X) is called the subconstituent of the pair (P, G). For each i E N let Gi(x) = {a E G(x)Ia E G(y) if a (x, y) 1 then s 3. In [8], it was shown that s 3. We prove the following partial result:
6860028
SOLVEBLOK: A Package for Solving Almost Block Diagonal Linear Systems
Abstract : In spline approximation and in the numerical solution of (systems of) ordinary differential equations, one is eventually faced with linear systems of a rather characteristic, almost block diagonal, form which reflects the underlying geometry of the problems. While these systems could be treated as banded systems, it is more efficient, both in the generation of the systems and in their numerical solution, to work explicitly with their block structure. The report describes a package of FORTRAN routines for the solution of an almost block diagonal system by Gauss elimination with scaled row pivoting. Two examples are given. The first involves the solution of an m-th order ordinary differential equation by collocation. The second example offers a package of routines for the solution of a system of first order ODEs by collection at Lobatto points which is then used on a somewhat tricky reentry problem.