202111272
Measurement of the hadronic photon structure function F-2(gamma)(x,Q(2)) in two-photon collisions at LEP
The hadronic photon structure function F-2(gamma)(x,Q(2)) is measured from data taken with the ALEPH detector at LEP. At centre-of-mass energies between roots=189 GeV and 207 GeV an integrated luminosity of 548.4 pb(-1) is analyzed in two ranges of Q(2) with [Q(2)] =17.3 GeV2 and 67.2 GeV2. Detector effects and acceptance are corrected for with a Tikhonov unfolding procedure. The results are compared to theoretical predictions and measurements from other experiments.
122002257
Production of D**s mesons in hadronic Z decays
The production rates of the orbitally excited Ds** mesons, Ds1 and Ds2*, are measured with the 4.1 million hadronic Z decays recorded by the ALEPH detector during 1991--1995. The Ds** mesons are reconstructed in the decay modes Ds1+ -> D*+ K0, Ds1+ -> D*0 K+ and Ds2*+ -> D0 K+. The production rate of the Ds1 is measured to be n(Z->Ds1+-)=(0.52+-0.09+-0.06)%, under the assumption that the two considered decay modes of the Ds1 saturate the branching ratio. The production rate of the Ds2* is determined to be n(Z->Ds2*+-)=(0.83+-0.29+0.07-0.13)%, assuming that the branching fraction of the decay Ds2*+ -> D0 K+ is 45%. The production rates in Z->cc and Z->bbar decays are measured separately.
91183149
Measurement of the tau lepton lifetime
The mean lifetime of the lepton is measured in a sample of 25700 pairs collected in 1992 with the ALEPH detector at LEP. A new analysis of the 1-1 topology events is introduced. In this analysis, the dependence of the impact parameter sum distribution on the daughter track momenta is taken into account, yielding improved precision compared to other impact parameter sum methods. Three other analyses of the oneand three-prong decays are updated with increased statistics. The measured lifetime is 293:5 3:1 1:7 fs. Including previous (1989{1991) ALEPH measurements, the combined lifetime is 293:7 2:7 1:6 fs. (Submitted to Physics Letters B) See the following pages for the list of authors. The ALEPH Collaboration D. Buskulic, D. Casper, I. De Bonis, D. Decamp, P. Ghez, C. Goy, J.-P. Lees, A. Lucotte, M.-N. Minard, P. Odier, B. Pietrzyk Laboratoire de Physique des Particules (LAPP), INP-CNRS, 74019 Annecy-le-Vieux Cedex, France F. Ariztizabal, M. Chmeissani, J.M. Crespo, I. Efthymiopoulos, E. Fernandez, M. Fernandez-Bosman, V. Gaitan, Ll. Garrido, M. Martinez, S. Orteu, A. Pacheco, C. Padilla, F. Palla, A. Pascual, J.A. Perlas, F. Sanchez, F. Teubert Institut de Fisica d'Altes Energies, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, 08193 Bellaterra (Barcelona), Spain A. Colaleo, D. Creanza, M. de Palma, A. Farilla, G. Gelao, M. Girone, G. Iaselli, G. Maggi, M. Maggi, N. Marinelli, S. Natali, S. Nuzzo, A. Ranieri, G. Raso, F. Romano, F. Ruggieri, G. Selvaggi, L. Silvestris, P. Tempesta, G. Zito Dipartimento di Fisica, INFN Sezione di Bari, 70126 Bari, Italy X. Huang, J. Lin, Q. Ouyang, T. Wang, Y. Xie, R. Xu, S. Xue, J. Zhang, L. Zhang, W. Zhao Institute of High-Energy Physics, Academia Sinica, Beijing, The People's Republic of China G. Bonvicini, M. Cattaneo, P. Comas, P. Coyle, H. Drevermann, A. Engelhardt, R.W. Forty, M. Frank, R. Hagelberg, J. Harvey, R. Jacobsen, P. Janot, B. Jost, E. Kneringer, J. Knobloch, I. Lehraus, C. Markou, E.B. Martin, P. Mato, A. Minten, R. Miquel, T. Oest, P. Palazzi, J.R. Pater, J.F. Pusztaszeri, F. Ranjard, P. Rensing, L. Rolandi, D. Schlatter, M. Schmelling, O. Schneider, W. Tejessy, I.R. Tomalin, A. Venturi, H. Wachsmuth, W. Wiedenmann, T. Wildish, W. Witzeling, J. Wotschack European Laboratory for Particle Physics (CERN), 1211 Geneva 23, Switzerland Z. Ajaltouni, M. Bardadin-Otwinowska, A. Barres, C. Boyer, A. Falvard, P. Gay, C. Guicheney, P. Henrard, J. Jousset, B. Michel, S. Monteil, J-C. Montret, D. Pallin, P. Perret, F. Podlyski, J. Proriol, J.-M. Rossignol, F. Saadi Laboratoire de Physique Corpusculaire, Universit e Blaise Pascal, INP-CNRS, Clermont-Ferrand, 63177 Aubi ere, France T. Fearnley, J.B. Hansen, J.D. Hansen, J.R. Hansen, P.H. Hansen, B.S. Nilsson Niels Bohr Institute, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark A. Kyriakis, E. Simopoulou, I. Siotis, A. Vayaki, K. Zachariadou Nuclear Research Center Demokritos (NRCD), Athens, Greece A. Blondel, G. Bonneaud, J.C. Brient, P. Bourdon, L. Passalacqua, A. Roug e, M. Rumpf, R. Tanaka, A. Valassi, M. Verderi, H. Videau Laboratoire de Physique Nucl eaire et des Hautes Energies, Ecole Polytechnique, INP-CNRS, 91128 Palaiseau Cedex, France D.J. Candlin, M.I. Parsons Department of Physics, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH9 3JZ, United Kingdom E. Focardi, G. Parrini Dipartimento di Fisica, Universit a di Firenze, INFN Sezione di Firenze, 50125 Firenze, Italy M. Corden, M. Del no, C. Georgiopoulos, D.E. Ja e Supercomputer Computations Research Institute, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL 323064052, USA 13;14 A. Antonelli, G. Bencivenni, G. Bologna, F. Bossi, P. Campana, G. Capon, V. Chiarella, G. Felici, P. Laurelli, G. Mannocchi, F. Murtas, G.P. Murtas, M. Pepe-Altarelli Laboratori Nazionali dell'INFN (LNF-INFN), 00044 Frascati, Italy S.J. Dorris, A.W. Halley, I. ten Have, I.G. Knowles, J.G. Lynch, W.T. Morton, V. O'Shea, C. Raine, P. Reeves, J.M. Scarr, K. Smith, M.G. Smith, A.S. Thompson, F. Thomson, S. Thorn, R.M. Turnbull Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QQ,United Kingdom U. Becker, O. Braun, C. Geweniger, G. Graefe, P. Hanke, V. Hepp, E.E. Kluge, A. Putzer, B. Rensch, M. Schmidt, J. Sommer, H. Stenzel, K. Tittel, S. Werner, M. Wunsch Institut f ur Hochenergiephysik, Universitat Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Fed. Rep. of Germany R. Beuselinck, D.M. Binnie, W. Cameron, D.J. Colling, P.J. Dornan, N. Konstantinidis, L. Moneta, A. Moutoussi, J. Nash, G. San Martin, J.K. Sedgbeer, A.M. Stacey Department of Physics, Imperial College, London SW7 2BZ, United Kingdom G. Dissertori, P. Girtler, D. Kuhn, G. Rudolph Institut f ur Experimentalphysik, Universitat Innsbruck, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria C.K. Bowdery, T.J. Brodbeck, P. Colrain, G. Crawford, A.J. Finch, F. Foster, G. Hughes, T. Sloan, E.P. Whelan, M.I. Williams Department of Physics, University of Lancaster, Lancaster LA1 4YB, United Kingdom A. Galla, A.M. Greene, K. Kleinknecht, G. Quast, J. Raab, B. Renk, H.-G. Sander, R. Wanke, P. van Gemmeren C. Zeitnitz Institut f ur Physik, Universitat Mainz, 55099 Mainz, Fed. Rep. of Germany J.J. Aubert, A.M. Bencheikh, C. Benchouk, A. Bonissent, G. Bujosa, D. Calvet, J. Carr, C. Diaconu, F. Etienne, M. Thulasidas, D. Nicod, P. Payre, D. Rousseau, M. Talby Centre de Physique des Particules, Facult e des Sciences de Luminy, INP-CNRS, 13288 Marseille, France I. Abt, R. Assmann, C. Bauer, W. Blum, D. Brown, H. Dietl, F. Dydak, G. Ganis, C. Gotzhein, K. Jakobs, H. Kroha, G. L utjens, G. Lutz, W. M anner, H.-G. Moser, R. Richter, A. Rosado-Schlosser, S. Schael, R. Settles, H. Seywerd, R. St. Denis, G. Wolf Max-Planck-Institut f ur Physik, Werner-Heisenberg-Institut, 80805 M unchen, Fed. Rep. of Germany R. Alemany, J. Boucrot, O. Callot, A. Cordier, F. Courault, M. Davier, L. Du ot, J.-F. Grivaz, Ph. Heusse, M. Jacquet, D.W. Kim, F. Le Diberder, J. Lefran cois, A.-M. Lutz, G. Musolino, I. Nikolic, H.J. Park, I.C. Park, M.-H. Schune, S. Simion, J.-J. Veillet, I. Videau Laboratoire de l'Acc el erateur Lin eaire, Universit e de Paris-Sud, INP-CNRS, 91405 Orsay Cedex, France D. Abbaneo, P. Azzurri, G. Bagliesi, G. Batignani, S. Bettarini, C. Bozzi, G. Calderini, M. Carpinelli, M.A. Ciocci, V. Ciulli, R. Dell'Orso, R. Fantechi, I. Ferrante, F. Fidecaro, L. Fo a, F. Forti, A. Giassi, M.A. Giorgi, A. Gregorio, F. Ligabue, A. Lusiani, P.S. Marrocchesi, A. Messineo, G. Rizzo, G. Sanguinetti, A. Sciab a, P. Spagnolo, J. Steinberger, R. Tenchini, G. Tonelli, G. Triggiani, C. Vannini, P.G. Verdini, J. Walsh Dipartimento di Fisica dell'Universit a, INFN Sezione di Pisa, e Scuola Normale Superiore, 56010 Pisa, Italy A.P. Betteridge, G.A. Blair, L.M. Bryant, F. Cerutti, Y. Gao, M.G. Green, D.L. Johnson, T. Medcalf, Ll.M. Mir, P. Perrodo, J.A. Strong Department of Physics, Royal Holloway & Bedford New College, University of London, Surrey TW20 OEX, United Kingdom V. Bertin, D.R. Botterill, R.W. Cli t, T.R. Edgecock, S. Haywood, M. Edwards, P. Maley, P.R. Norton, J.C. Thompson Particle Physics Dept., Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, Chilton, Didcot, Oxon OX11 OQX, United Kingdom B. Bloch-Devaux, P. Colas, S. Emery, W. Kozanecki, E. Lan con, M.C. Lemaire, E. Locci, B. Marx, P. Perez, J. Rander, J.-F. Renardy, A. Roussarie, J.-P. Schuller, J. Schwindling, A. Trabelsi, B. Vallage CEA, DAPNIA/Service de Physique des Particules, CE-Saclay, 91191 Gif-sur-Yvette Cedex, France R.P. Johnson, H.Y. Kim, A.M. Litke, M.A. McNeil, G. Taylor Institute for Particle Physics, University of California at Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA 95064, USA A. Beddall, C.N. Booth, R. Boswell, S. Cartwright, F. Combley, I. Dawson, A. Koksal, M. Letho, W.M. Newton, C. Rankin, L.F. Thompson Department of Physics, University of She eld, She eld S3 7RH, United Kingdom A. Bohrer, S. Brandt, G. Cowan, E. Feigl, C. Grupen, G. Lutters, J. Minguet-Rodriguez, F. Rivera, P. Saraiva, L. Smolik, F. Stephan, Fachbereich Physik, Universitat Siegen, 57068 Siegen, Fed. Rep. of Germany M. Apollonio, L. Bosisio, R. Della Marina, G. Giannini, B. Gobbo, F. Ragusa Dipartimento di Fisica, Universit a di Trieste e INFN Sezione di Trieste, 34127 Trieste, Italy J. Rothberg, S. Wasserbaech Experimental Elementary Particle Physics, University of Washington, WA 98195 Seattle, U.S.A. S.R. Armstrong, L. Bellantoni, P. Elmer, Z. Feng, D.P.S. Ferguson, Y.S. Gao, S. Gonz alez, J. Grahl, J.L. Harton, O.J. Hayes, H. Hu, P.A. McNamara III, J.M. Nachtman, W. Orejudos, Y.B. Pan, Y. Saadi, M. Schmitt, I.J. Scott, V. Sharma, J.D. Turk, A.M. Walsh, Sau Lan Wu, X. Wu, J.M. Yamartino, M. Zheng, G. Zobernig Department of Physics, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706, USA Now at CERN, 1211 Geneva 23, Switzerland. Deceased. Now at Dipartimento di Fisica, Universit a di Lecce, 73100 Lecce, Italy. Also Istituto di Fisica Generale, Universit a di Torino, Torino, Italy. Also Istituto di Cosmo-Geo sica del C.N.R., Torino, Italy. Supported by the Commission of the European Communities, contract ERBCHBICT941234. Supported by CICYT, Spain. Supported by the National Science Foundation of China. Supported by the Danish Natural Science Research Council. Supported by the UK Particle Physics and Astronomy Research Council. Supported by the US Department of Energy, grant DE-FG0295-ER40896. On leave from Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain. Supported by the US Department of Energy, contract DE-FG05-92ER40742. Supported by the US Department of Energy, contract DE-FC05-85ER250000. Permanent address: Universitat de Barcelona, 08208 Barcelona, Spain. Supported by the Bundesministerium f ur Forschung und Technologie, Fed. Rep. of Germany. Supported by the Direction des Sciences de la Mati ere, C.E.A. Supported by Fonds zur F orderung der wissenschaftlichen Forschung, Austria. Permanent address: Kangnung National University, Kangnung, Korea. Now at Dipartimento di Fisica, Universit a di Milano, Milano, Italy. Also at CERN, 1211 Geneva 23, Switzerland. Supported by the US Department of Energy, grant DE-FG0
123148086
Charm counting in b decays
The inclusive production of charmed particles in decays has been measured from the yield of D0, D+, Ds+ and Λc+ decays in a sample of events with high b purity collected with the ALEPH detector from 1992 to 1995. From these measurements, adding the charmonia production rate and an estimate of the charmed strange baryon contribution, the average number of charm quarks per b decay is determined to be nc = 1.230 ± 0.036 ± 0.038 ± 0.053, where the uncertainties are due to statistics, systematic effects and branching ratios, respectively.
144007210
A precise determination of the number of families with light neutrinos and of the Z boson partial widths
More extensive and precise results are reported on the parameters of Z decay. On the basis of 20 000 Z decays collected with the ALEPH detector at LEP we find Mz=91.182±0.026 (exp.) ±0.030 (beam) GeV, Γz=2.541±0.056 GeV and σhad0=41.4±0.8 nb. The partial widths for the hadronic and leptonic channels are Γhad=1804±44 MeV, Γe+e−=82.1±3.4 MeV, Γμ+μ−=87.9±6.0 MeV and Γτ+τ−=86.1±5.6 MeV, in good agreement with the standard model. On the basis of the average leptonic width Γl+l−=83.9±2.2 MeV, the effective weak mixing angle is found to be sin2θw(Mz)=0.231±0.008. Usin g the partial widths calculated in the standard model, the number of light neutrino families is Nν=3.01±0.15 (exp.)±0.05 (theor.).
15227858
Measurement of W pair production in e+ e- collisions at 183-GeV
Abstract The production of W + W − pairs is analysed in a data sample collected by ALEPH at a mean centre-of-mass energy of 182.7 GeV, corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 57 pb −1 . Cross sections are given for different topologies of W decays into leptons or hadrons. Under Standard Model assumptions for the W-pair production and decay, the W-pair cross section is measured to be 15.57±0.62 (stat.) ±0.29 (syst.) pb . Using also the W-pair data samples collected by ALEPH at lower centre-of-mass energies, the decay branching ratio of the W boson into hadrons is measured to be B(W→hadrons) =68.93±1.21 (stat.) ±0.51 (syst.) % , allowing a determination of the CKM matrix element |V cs |=1.043±0.058 (stat.) ±0.026 (syst.) . The agreement of the cross sections with the Standard Model prediction allows a limit to be set on the W decay rate to undetectable final states.
119255605
MAGNETARS: FACT OR FICTION?
Anomalous X-ray pulsars (AXPs) and soft gamma-ray repeaters (SGRs) are enigmatic pulsar-like objects. The energy budget is the fundamental problem in their studies. In the magnetar model, they are supposed to be powered by the extremely strong magnetic fields (≳ 1014G) of neutron stars. Observations for and against the magnetar model are both summarized. Considering the difficulties encountered by the magnetar model to comfortably understand more and more observations, one may doubt that AXPs and SGRs are really magnetars. If they are not magnetar candidates (including magnetar-based models), then they must be "quark star/fallback disk" systems.
119273711
Can eccentric binary millisecond pulsars form by accretion-induced collapse of white dwarfs?
Binary radio pulsars are generally believed to have been spun up to millisecond periods (i.e. recycling) via mass accretion from their donor stars, and they are the descendants of neutron star low-mass X-ray binaries. However, some studies indicate that the formation of pulsars from the accretion-induced collapse (AIC) of accreting white dwarfs (WDs) cannot be excluded. In this work, we use a population-synthesis code to examine if the AIC channel can produce eccentric binary millisecond pulsars (BMSPs) in the Galaxy. Our simulated results indicate that only when the natal MSPs receive a relatively strong kick (100 km s −1 ), can the AIC channel produce ∼10–180 eccentric (e > 0.1) BMSPs in the Galaxy, most of which are accompanied by a helium star. Such a kick seems to be highly unlikely in the conventional AIC process, hence the probability of forming eccentric BMSPs via the AIC channel can be ruled out. Even if a high kick is allowed, the AIC channel cannot produce eccentric BMSPs with an orbital period of 20 d. Therefore, we propose that the peculiar BMSP PSR J1903+0327 cannot be formed by the AIC channel. However, the AIC evolutionary channel may produce some fraction of isolated MSPs, and even submillisecond pulsars if they really exist.
119200466
Too massive neutron stars: The role of dark matter?
The maximum mass of a neutron star is generally determined by the equation of state of the star material. In this study, we take into account dark matter particles, assumed to behave like fermions with a free parameter to account for the interaction strength among the particles, as a possible constituent of neutron stars. We find dark matter inside the star would soften the equation of state more strongly than that of hyperons, and reduce largely the maximum mass of the star. However, the neutron star maximum mass is sensitive to the particle mass of dark matter, and a very high neutron star mass larger than 2 M⊙ could be achieved when the particle mass is small enough, being M⊙ the mass of the sun. Such kind of dark-matteradmixed neutron stars could explain the recent measurement of the Shapiro delay in the radio pulsar PSR J1614-2230, which yielded a neutron star mass of 1.97 ± 0.04 M⊙ that may be hardly reached when hyperons are considered only, as in the case of the microscopic Brueckner theory. Furthermore, in this particular case, we point out that the dark matter around a neutron star should also contribute to the mass measurement due to its pure gravitational effect. However, our numerically calculation illustrates that such contribution could be safely ignored because of the usual diluted dark matter environment assumed. We conclude that a very high mass measurement of about 2 M⊙ requires a really stiff equation of state in neutron stars, and find a strong upper limit (6 0.64 GeV) for the particle mass of non-selfannihilating dark matter based on the present model.
14562576
A strange star model for GRO J1744-28
A model is suggested for the bursting x-ray pulsar, GRO J1744-28, where the compact object of the pulsar is proposed to be a strange matter star with crusts. It is suggested that two envelope crusts shield the two polar caps of an accreting strange stars owing to strong polar-cap magnetic fields. GRO J1744-28 might not have a unified crust, but two polar crusts. Bursts are the result of phase transition of polar crusts if one accreting crust is heavier than that the Coulomb force can support. It is shown that there should be phase-lags when bursting crust is expanded about one hundred meters. Many calculated properties of this model, such as the phase-lags, the bursting luminosity and the characteristic photon energy, are in agreement with observations.
119181380
QUARK-CLUSTER STARS: THE STRUCTURE
The nature of pulsar-like compact stars is still in controversy although the first pulsar was found more than 40 years ago. Generally speaking, conventional neutron stars and non-mainstream quark stars are two types of models to describe the inner structure of pulsars, with the former composed mainly of hadrons and the latter of a peculiar kind of matter whose state equation should be understood in the level of quarks rather than hadrons. To construct a more realistic model from both theoretical and observational points of view, we conjecture that pulsars could be "quark-cluster stars" which are composed of quark-clusters with almost equal numbers of up, down and strange quarks. Clustering quark matter could be the result of strong coupling between quarks inside realistic compact stars. The lightest quark clusters could be of H-dibaryons, while quark clusters could also be heavier with more quarks. Being essentially related to the non-perturbative quantum-chromo dynamics (QCD), the state of supra-nuclear condensed matter is really difficult to obtain strictly by only theoretical QCD-calculations, and we expect, nevertheless, that astrophysical observations could help us to have a final solution.