[Diagnostic yield and safety of bronchoscopic cryotechnique in routine diagnostics for suspected lung cancer].
BACKGROUND
Cryoprobes with flexible catheters are an additional important tool for endobronchial interventional therapy and histologic diagnosis. Different studies compared the diagnostic effectiveness and complications to the forceps as a standard. However, routine endoscopic procedures require a combined use of different methods in order to achieve the highest diagnostic yield. We investigated the impact of cryotechnique in comparison with combined diagnostic tools during routine diagnostics of malignant tumors.


PATIENTS AND METHODS
A consecutive series of patients undergoing routine diagnostic for lung cancer was included over a 30 months period (n = 469). The use of the cryotechnique, the complication rates and diagnostic value were prospectively documented. Cryotechnique was used on top of conventional technologies.


RESULTS
A histologic proof of tumor by cryotechnique in centrally located tumors was delivered more frequently compared to forceps biopsies alone (81.4 versus 59.9% and 66.2 versus 37.7% in peripheral lesions). However, when the other non-cryotechniques were taken into account, the value was reduced in central probes (7.4%; p = 0.02), but remained high for peripheral findings (19.3%; p < 0.002). The frequency of complications seemed unchanged, however severe bleeding occurred.


CONCLUSION
The cryotechnique bears high diagnostic potential beside its therapeutic value, also in routine investigations. The changed complication profile of this technology needs to be addressed in the informed consent and secured airway management may be helpful.