Endo-laparoscopic approach versus conventional open surgery in the treatment of obstructing left-sided colon cancer: long-term follow-up of a randomized trial.
INTRODUCTION
We previously conducted a randomized trial comparing the endo-laparoscopic approach (i.e. placing self-expanding metallic stents followed by laparoscopic resection) and conventional open surgery in the treatment of obstructing left-sided colon cancer. This study is a follow-up of the previous randomized trial and aims to report the long-term outcomes of the two groups.


METHODS
Forty-eight patients from the randomized trial were followed up in an outpatient clinic with regular monitoring. Patients were compared for clinicopathological variables, disease recurrence and survival rates.


RESULTS
Clinicopathological details were comparable between the two groups. During the median follow-up periods of 32 months for the open group and 65 months endo-laparoscopic group, no statistically significant difference was observed between the groups in disease recurrence rate, 5-year overall survival (27% vs 48%, P = 0.076) and 5-year disease-free survival rates (48% vs 52%, P = 0.63).


CONCLUSION
Besides being a safe bridge to subsequent elective laparoscopic surgery, preoperative self-expanding metallic stents insertion does not adversely affect oncological outcomes and patient survival. Based on our data, the endo-laparoscopic approach is the treatment of choice for patients presenting with malignant left-sided colonic obstruction.