7301880
Using the intraoperative hand held probe without lymphoscintigraphy or using only dye correlates with higher sensory morbidity following sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer: A review of the literature
BackgroundThere are no studies that have directly investigated the incremental reduction in sensory morbidity that lymphoscintigraphy images (LS) and triangulated body marking or other skin marking techniques provide during sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) compared to using only the probe without LS and skin marking or using only dye. However, an indirect assessment of this potential for additional sensory morbidity reduction is possible by extracting morbidity data from studies comparing the morbidity of SLNB to that of axillary lymph node dissection.MethodsA literature search yielded 13 articles that had data on sensory morbidity at specific time points on pain, numbness or paresthesia from SLNB that used radiotracer and probe or used only dye as a primary method of finding the sentinel node (SN). Of these, 10 utilized LS, while 3 did not utilize LS. By matching the data in studies not employing LS to the studies that did, comparisons regarding the percentage of patients experiencing pain, numbness/paresthesia after SLNB could be reasonably attempted at a cutoff of 9 months.ResultsIn the 7 studies reporting on pain after 9 months (> 9 months) that used LS (1347 patients), 13.8% of patients reported these symptoms, while in the one study that did not use LS (143 patients), 28.7% of patients reported these symptoms at > 9 months (P < 0.0001). In the 6 studies reporting on numbness and/or paresthesia at > 9 months that used LS (601 patients), 12.5% of patients reported these symptoms, while in the 3 studies that did not use LS (229 patients), 23.1% of patients reported these symptoms at > 9 months (P = 0.0002). Similar trends were also noted for all these symptoms at ≤ 9 months.ConclusionBecause of variations in techniques and time of assessing morbidity, direct comparisons between studies are difficult. Nevertheless at a minimum, a clear trend is present: having the LS images and skin markings to assist during SLNB appears to yield more favorable morbidity outcomes for the patients compared to performing SLNB with only the probe or performing SLNB with dye alone. These results are extremely pertinent, as the main reason for performing SLNB itself in the first place is to achieve reduced morbidity.
23386772
Morbidity following sentinel lymph node biopsy versus axillary lymph node dissection for patients with breast carcinoma
Axillary lymph node dissection for staging the axilla in breast carcinoma patients is associated with considerable morbidity, such as edema of the arm, pain, sensory disturbances, impairment of arm mobility, and shoulder stiffness. Sentinel lymph node biopsy electively removes the first lymph node, which gets the drainage from the tumor and should therefore be associated with nearly zero morbidity.
38764772
Treatment of 100 patients with sentinel node‐negative breast cancer without further axillary dissection
The sentinel node biopsy technique for breast cancer has been validated extensively in phase I and II studies. However, no data from phase III randomized clinical studies are available. It remains controversial whether a histologically negative sentinel node biopsy without further axillary dissection can be considered to be good clinical practice.
30637229
Sentinel lymph node biopsy results in less postoperative morbidity compared with axillary lymph node dissection for breast cancer.
BACKGROUND
This study was designed to compare the postoperative morbidity and socioeconomic impact of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) with axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) in patients with early stage breast cancer.


METHODS
A prospective, nonrandomized, controlled study was designed to include patients who underwent breast conservation surgery and SLNB +/- ALND. Group A consisted of patients who had a negative SLNB and did not go on to completion ALND. Group B consisted of patients who underwent a SLNB followed by a completion ALND because either (1) their sentinel node contained cancer or (2) they were within the validation phase of our institution's sentinel lymph node protocol. Patients were evaluated with a questionnaire and underwent a standardized physical examination to determine arm circumference.


RESULTS
Data were obtained from 96 patients with a mean follow-up period of 15 months (range 8 to 29). Significant differences were seen in subjective measurements of arm complaints and arm numbness (P <0.001), with fewer complaints reported in group A. The difference in mid-bicep and antecubital fossa circumferences was significant when comparing the ratio of the procedure arm with the nonprocedure arm and when subtracting the nonprocedure arm from the procedure arm (P <0.003 and P <0.016, respectively) in favor of group A. Axillary surgery was performed as an outpatient procedure in 88% of group A patients, compared with 15% in group B (P <0.001). Furthermore, 71% of group A patients returned to "normal activity" in less than 4 days, in comparison with 7% of group B (P <0.001).


CONCLUSIONS
SLNB results in less postoperative morbidity in terms of subjective arm complaints and mid-arm swelling. Expeditious return to work or normal activity after SLNB has potentially significant socioeconomic consequences.
24538402
Morbidity of Breast Cancer Patients Following Complete Axillary Dissection or Sentinel Node Biopsy Only: A Comparative Evaluation
AbstractIntroduction The usefulness of routine axillary dissection (AD) at levels I–II in breast cancer patients has been questioned for years because of the high postoperative morbidity in the shoulder and arm region, and the increasing number of patients with negative nodes. Sentinel node biopsy (SNB) was hoped both to reduce morbidity and to improve the reliability of staging. This study was designed to provide more evidence in this matter by comparing the follow-up data of patients with AD and those with SNB only.
Method One hundred forty patients who had undergone AD between 1993 and 1996 were questioned for their subjective and objective symptoms using a questionnaire and subsequently subjected to a clinical examination. Their data were compared with those of 57 patients who had undergone SNB only between 1998 and 2000.
Results Local recurrences have not been seen to date. The difference between the two groups in terms of a loss of quality of life was negligible. The differences in overall complaints, number of symptoms, pain, limited range of motion of the operated upper extremity, numbness, paresthesias, and arm swelling as well as perceived disability in activities of daily living were significantly in favor of SNB. The length of hospital stay was significantly shorter for SNB patients.
Conclusion SNB appears to be an accurate procedure for axillary nodal staging in breast cancer patients and is associated with reduced postoperative morbidity and length of hospital stay. But it is still investigational and should not be implemented as therapeutical standard before results of randomized trials are published.
19588431
Sensory morbidity after sentinel lymph node biopsy and axillary dissection: A prospective study of 233 women
BackgroundWe prospectively compared the sensory morbidity and lymphedema experienced after sentinel node biopsy (SLNB) and axillary dissection (ALND) over a 12-month period by using a validated instrument.MethodsPatients undergoing breast-conserving therapy completed the Breast Sensation Assessment Scale (BSAS) at baseline and 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery. Repeated-measures analysis of variance was used to compare ALND and SLNB over the 12-month period. Upper- and lower-arm circumference measurements at baseline and 12 months were used to assess lymphedema.ResultsSLNB was associated with substantial sensory morbidity, although significantly less than ALND, over time on all four subscales and the summary score. A statistically significant improvement in sensory morbidity occurred for both groups in the first 3 months, with no further change thereafter. For both types of axillary surgery, younger patients had significantly higher BSAS scores than older patients. There was no significant difference in arm circumference between patients with SLNB and ALND at 12 months.ConclusionsAmong women undergoing breast-conserving therapy, SLNB has significant sensory morbidity, although approximately half that of ALND. Sensory morbidity improves in the first 3 months after surgery, but patients continue to report sensory morbidity at 1 year. Longitudinal follow-up is required to further assess lymphedema.
20773382
Comparison of side effects between sentinel lymph node and axillary lymph node dissection for breast cancer
BackgroundAxillary lymph node dissection (ALND) is often associated with permanent arm side effects. Side effects after sentinel lymph node dissection (SLND) should be less common, because the surgery is less extensive.MethodsThe study compared side effects and interference with daily life between 169 women who underwent an SLND and 78 who underwent an ALND for breast cancer. Patients rated symptom severity and interference with daily life caused by pain, numbness, limitation of arm range of motion (ROM), and arm swelling at 1, 6, and 12 months after surgery by using the Measure of Arm Symptom Survery. Repeated-measures and regression analyses for each time period were used to determine associations between symptoms and dissection type.ResultsAt 1 month, SLND patients reported less pain, numbness, limitation in ROM, and seromas than ALND patients. At 6 months, SLND patients had less pain, numbness, and arm swelling, and at 12 months, SLND patients had less numbness, arm swelling, and limitation in ROM than ALND patients. At 1 month, pain, numbness, and limitation in ROM interfered significantly more with daily life for ALND patients. At 6 and 12 months, only numbness interfered more with daily life for ALND patients.ConclusionsSLND was associated with fewer side effects than ALND at all time points.
25112405
Shoulder-arm morbidity following axillary dissection and sentinel node only biopsy for breast cancer.
AIMS
The purpose of this study was to examine the outcome of shoulder-arm morbidity in patients with breast cancer after various axillary staging procedures. We used a new specific summation score to compare conventional axillary node dissection (AD) and sentinel node only biopsy for postoperative shoulder-arm morbidity.


METHODS
Eighty-five patients undergoing conventional AD and 66 patients undergoing sentinel node biopsy were evaluated both subjectively (questionnaire) and objectively (clinical examination) for reduced muscle strength, limited range of motion, lymphedema and pain, dysesthesias and loss of sensitivity. The symptoms elicited were rated by their severity with a single summation score describing all symptoms reported.


RESULTS
Subjective evaluation of patients undergoing breast conserving surgery showed a highly significant difference in favor of SNB only (P< or =0.002). On clinical examination the outcome of patients with SNB only was also significantly or highly significantly better (difference in arm volume:P =0.007; difference in arm muscle strength: P=0.016; loss of sensitivity: P<0.001). Of a total score of 100 (=no symptoms), the mean for AD patients was 80.2 vs 92.8 for SNB patients (P=0.001). In patients undergoing total mastectomy the difference was only significant for pain sensations and total scores.


CONCLUSIONS
SNB appears to reduce morbidity. Summation scores are a suitable and practicable tool for describing the symptoms associated with axillary surgery.
39633995
Motion restriction and axillary web syndrome after sentinel node biopsy and axillary clearance in breast cancer.
BACKGROUND
We evaluated the prevalence of motion restriction and axillary web syndrome (AWS) after sentinel node biopsy (SNB) and axillary clearance (AC) in a prospective study. AWS is a self-limiting cause of early postoperative morbidity after axillary surgery. Limited range of motion associated with palpable cords of tissue in the axilla are typical for AWS.


METHODS
Altogether 85 breast cancer patients who underwent SNB only (49 patients) or SNB and AC (36 patients) were examined before and after surgery. The range of shoulder flexion and abduction and the presence of AWS were registered.


RESULTS
The range of shoulder movements was restricted in 24 (45%) patients after SNB only and in 31 (86%) patients who also underwent AC (P = 0.002). AWS was encountered in 10 (20%) patients with SNB and in 26 (72%) with AC (P <0.00005).


CONCLUSIONS
In the SNB group, significantly less early postoperative morbidity was observed.
32810246
Comparison of morbidity between axillary lymph node dissection and sentinel node biopsy.
AIMS
The use of axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) in women with breast cancer is associated with considerable morbidity. Sentinel node biopsy (SNB) removes the lymph node in the axillary basin indicative for receiving first lymphatic drainage from the breast. This study compares the nature and severity of physical morbidity among breast cancer patients who underwent primary surgery for breast cancer combined with either ALND or SNB. Also, it assesses influence of subsequent radiotherapy on morbidity.


METHOD
Two hundred and thirteen ALND patients were compared with 180 SNB patients retrospectively. Morbidity was measured using a disease-specific quality-of-life questionnaire.


RESULTS
Patients' demographic characteristics were alike. The axillary procedure is the strongest and most consistent factor in explaining differences in a variety of self-reported complaints. Patients having had SNB have a 3.2-fold lower risk of experiencing pain, a 5-fold lower risk of lymph oedema, a 7.7-fold lower risk of numbness, a 3.7-fold lower risk of tingling sensations, a 7.1-fold lower risk of loss of strength in arm/hand, a 3.6-fold lower risk of loss of active motion range of the arm and a 2.9-fold lower risk of impaired use of the arm. Axillary radiation therapy adds to complaints next to the axillary surgical procedure by increasing the risk of lymph oedema 2.4-fold and enhancing the risk of impaired use of the arm by 2.6-fold. Axillary radiation therapy does not explain lymph oedema by itself.


CONCLUSION
SNB is associated with less morbidity compared to ALND in patients with primary breast cancer.
8044080
Relapse and morbidity in patients undergoing sentinel lymph node biopsy alone or with axillary dissection for breast cancer.
HYPOTHESIS
Axillary relapse in node-negative patients staged with sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy alone is no more frequent than in patients treated with standard axillary dissection. Morbidity is less for patients who had SLN biopsy.


DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS
Between October 14, 1997, and August 31, 2001, 1253 consecutive women with primary invasive breast cancer were prospectively entered into an SLN biopsy database. Completion axillary dissection was performed in 164 patients after SLN biopsy as part of a training protocol.


INTERVENTIONS
Patients were contacted by questionnaire or telephone to determine breast cancer relapse; presence of arm lymphedema, arm pain, axillary infection, or seroma formation; and tumor recurrence or death.


MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES
chi2 or Fisher exact tests and Wilcoxon rank sum tests were used to analyze categorical and continuous variables. Logistic regression was used to analyze morbidity.


RESULTS
Of 1253 women, 894 (71%) were node negative by SLN biopsy alone (n = 730 [82%]) or SLN biopsy and completion axillary dissection (n = 164 [18%]). Questionnaires were completed by 776 patients (87%). Mean +/- SD follow-up was 2.4 +/- 0.9 years. Patients with axillary dissections reported a significantly higher occurrence of arm lymphedema (34%), arm pain (38%), seroma formation (24%), and infection (9%) vs SLN biopsy-only patients (6%, 14%, 7%, and 3%, respectively). One axillary relapse (0.1%) occurred during follow-up of 685 women who underwent SLN biopsy only.


CONCLUSIONS
With intermediate-term follow-up, there was 1 axillary recurrence in 685 SLN node-negative women, supporting use of SLN biopsy as an accurate method for staging breast cancer. Biopsy of the SLN was associated with significantly less morbidity than completion axillary dissection.
27482229
A randomized comparison of sentinel-node biopsy with routine axillary dissection in breast cancer.
BACKGROUND
Although numerous studies have shown that the status of the sentinel node is an accurate predictor of the status of the axillary nodes in breast cancer, the efficacy and safety of sentinel-node biopsy require validation.


METHODS
From March 1998 to December 1999, we randomly assigned 516 patients with primary breast cancer in whom the tumor was less than or equal to 2 cm in diameter either to sentinel-node biopsy and total axillary dissection (the axillary-dissection group) or to sentinel-node biopsy followed by axillary dissection only if the sentinel node contained metastases (the sentinel-node group).


RESULTS
The number of sentinel nodes found was the same in the two groups. A sentinel node was positive in 83 of the 257 patients in the axillary-dissection group (32.3 percent), and in 92 of the 259 patients in the sentinel-node group (35.5 percent). In the axillary-dissection group, the overall accuracy of the sentinel-node status was 96.9 percent, the sensitivity 91.2 percent, and the specificity 100 percent. There was less pain and better arm mobility in the patients who underwent sentinel-node biopsy only than in those who also underwent axillary dissection. There were 15 events associated with breast cancer in the axillary-dissection group and 10 such events in the sentinel-node group. Among the 167 patients who did not undergo axillary dissection, there were no cases of overt axillary metastasis during follow-up.


CONCLUSIONS
Sentinel-node biopsy is a safe and accurate method of screening the axillary nodes for metastasis in women with a small breast cancer.
16486905
Short‐term morbidity of the upper limb after sentinel lymph node biopsy or axillary lymph node dissection for Stage I or II breast carcinoma
The goals of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) are to improve axillary staging and reduce unnecessary axillary lymph node dissections (ALND), thereby reducing treatment‐related upper‐limb morbidity. In the current prospective study, short‐term upper‐limb morbidity was assessed after SLNB and/or ALND.
2460830
Comparison of quality of life and arm complaints after axillary lymph node dissection vs sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer patients
The sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) represents a minimal invasive surgical method for axillary staging in patients with primary breast cancer. In a prospective study, evaluation of quality of life (QOL) and arm morbidity was performed before surgery on a total of 56 breast cancer patients. The EORTC QLQ-C30 and EORTC QLQ-BR23 questionnaires were used for QOL assessment. Assessment of pain was additionally observed using the McGill Pain Questionnaire. Arm mobility was observed by goniometric measurement of arm movement. Data were collected before surgery (t1), 1 week after discharge (t2) and 9–12 months after surgery (t3).The type of axillary surgery does not seem to affect global QOL at a short-time follow-up, but patients recover sooner after SLNB. Body image and sexual functioning remain stable in both types of axillary surgery. Arm/shoulder pain was reported in 36% of patients after SLNB in comparison to 68% receiving axillary lymph node dissection (ALND), and ‘numbness’ was reported only in 4% of patients in the SLNB group vs 19.3% after ALND. Abduction, flexion and horizontal adduction of the affected arm show significant impairment after ALND. Breast cancer patients should be counselled about the benefits of SLNB over ALND concerning QOL and postsurgery side effects in a short-term follow-up.
171347
Eighteen sensations after breast cancer surgery: a two-year comparison of sentinel lymph node biopsy and axillary lymph node dissection.
PURPOSE/OBJECTIVES
To evaluate the prevalence, severity, and level of distress of 18 sensations at baseline (3-15 days) and 24 months after breast cancer surgery and to compare sensations after sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) with those after SLNB plus immediate or delayed axillary lymph node dissection (ALND).


DESIGN
Prospective, descriptive.


SETTING
Evelyn H. Lauder Ambulatory Breast Center at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center in New York, NY.


SAMPLE
294 women with breast cancer; 214 had undergone breast conserving therapy, and 80 had undergone total mastectomy; 197 had had SLNB, and 97 had had SLNB and ALND.


METHODS
Patients completed the Breast Sensation Assessment Scale (BSAS) at baseline and 3, 6, 12, and 24 months after surgery.


MAIN RESEARCH VARIABLES
Prevalence, severity, and level of distress of sensations in patients who had undergone breast cancer surgery.


FINDINGS
Sensations were less prevalent, severe, and distressing in patients undergoing SLNB than those undergoing ALND. This difference appeared to be limited to those undergoing breast conserving therapy. Most sensations after SLNB and ALND, even if prevalent, were not very severe or distressing. Some sensations persisted as long as two years. These included tenderness after SLNB and numbness after ALND. Patients often reported phantom sensations after total mastectomy.


CONCLUSIONS
Overall, prevalence, severity, and level of distress were lower after SLNB compared to ALND, but some morbidity existed after SLNB. Certain sensations remained prevalent in both groups for as long as 24 months.


IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING
Nurses can use information from this study to provide more accurate education and support to patients.
1961270
Lymphedema following breast cancer treatment, including sentinel lymph node biopsy.
To compare the occurrence, signs, and symptoms of lymphedema (LE) the arms of women after axillary lymph node dissection (ALND), sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB), combined SLNB and ALND (Both), or neither as part of breast cancer diagnosis and treatment, a concurrent descriptive-comparative cross-sectional four-group design with retrospective chart review was carried out. In a convenience sample of 102 women treated for breast cancer and receiving follow-up care at a midwestern United States cancer center, sequential circumferential measurements at five selected anatomical sites along both arms and hands were used to determine the presence of LE (> or = 2 cm differences between sites). Participants self-reported LE-related signs and symptoms by interview and completion of the Lymphedema and Breast Cancer Questionnaire (LBCQ). Retrospective chart review was carried out to verify lymph node-related diagnostic and treatment procedures. Based on node group, LE occurred as follows: 43.3% (29 of 67) of women who underwent ALND alone; 22.2% (2 of 9) of those who underwent SLNB alone; 25.0% (3 of 12) of those with combined SLNB and ALND; and 22.2% (2 of 9) with neither SLNB nor ALND. LE-related symptoms were reported by women who underwent ALND alone, SLND alone, combined SLNB and ALND, and neither. Among the node groups, three symptoms were more common: larger arm size, firmness/tightness in past year, and numbness in past year. We conclude that circumferential measurements of the upper arm and forearm may be critical for distinguishing LE from no LE. Overall, the proportion of women who experienced LE-related signs and symptoms was higher among women who underwent ALND versus SLNB. However, numbness and tenderness frequently were reported by those undergoing ALND, SLNB or both; and by women without LE. It is possible that some frequently occurring symptoms, such as numbness and tenderness, may be related to breast cancer surgery and not LE. Findings from this study can assist health professionals in educating women with breast cancer about LE risk factors, as well as early detection and management of LE by using the LBCQ and sequential circumferential arm measurements to evaluate limb changes subjectively and objectively concurrent with each breast cancer survivor's follow-up care.
40372430
Breast lymphedema after breast conserving treatment
The authors aimed to evaluate breast lymphedema after breast conserving therapy (BCT) and sentinel node biopsy (SNB) or axillary clearance (AC). Fifty-seven breast cancer patients with BCT underwent SNB only and 103 underwent AC (57 with tumor negative and 46 with positive axillary nodes). Clinical examination and breast ultrasonography (US) were performed one year after surgery. Clinical examination revealed breast edema in 48% of patients in the AC node positive group, in 35% in the AC node negative group, and in 23% in the SNB group (p<0.05 between SNB and AC node positive). US revealed subcutaneous edema in the operated breast in 69–70% of the patients in the AC groups and in 28% in the SNB group (p=0.001–0.0001 between the SNB and the AC groups). Breast lymphedema was less common one year after BCT in patients with SNB only than in those with more extensive axillary treatment.
8881850
Treatment-Related Upper Limb Morbidity 1 Year after Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy or Axillary Lymph Node Dissection for Stage I or II Breast Cancer
Background: In a prospective study, upper limb morbidity and perceived disability/activities of daily life (ADLs) were assessed before and 1 year after sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) or axillary lymph node dissection (ALND).Methods: A total of 204 patients with stage I/II breast cancer (mean age, 55.6 years; SD, 11.6 years) entered the study, and 189 patients (93%) could be evaluated after 1 year. Fifty-eight patients (31%) underwent only SLNB, and 131 (69%) underwent ALND. Assessments performed before surgery (t0) and 1 year after surgery (t1), included pain, shoulder range of motion, muscle strength, upper arm/forearm circumference, and perceived shoulder disability/ADL.Results: Considerable treatment-related upper limb morbidity was observed. Significant (P < .05) changes between t0 and t1 were found in all assessments except strength of elbow flexors. Patients in the ALND group showed significantly more changes in the range of motion in forward flexion, abduction, and abduction/external rotation; grip strength and strength of shoulder abductors; circumference of upper arm and forearm; and perceived shoulder disability in ADLs compared with the SLNB group. Multivariate linear regression analysis showed that ALND could predict a decrease of range of motion in forward flexion, abduction, strength of shoulder abductors, grip strength, and shoulder-related ADLs and an increase in the circumference of the upper arm. Radiation of the axilla (19 patients) predicts an additional decrease in shoulder range of motion.Conclusions: One year after treatment of breast cancer, there is significantly less upper limb morbidity after SLNB compared with ALND. ALND is a predictor for upper limb morbidity.
30111228
Lymphatic mapping improves staging and reduces morbidity in women undergoing total mastectomy for breast carcinoma.
Lymphatic mapping (LM) and sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) have become widely accepted in the setting of breast conservation surgery. We hypothesized that LM can be extended to women undergoing total mastectomy, being technically feasible, yielding highly accurate and sensitive results, improving axillary staging, and reducing postoperative morbidity. Between 1995 and 2003, 99 women (mean age 59 years, range 34-87) underwent 100 mastectomies with LM using blue dye alone. Fifty-nine operations (60%) were followed by a completion axillary lymph node dissection (ALND). Ninety per cent of patients had invasive carcinoma; 10 per cent had in situ carcinoma. Mean tumor size was 2.5 cm (range 0.3-8 cm). One hundred fifty-nine sentinel nodes (SNs) (mean 1.65, range 1-5) were successfully identified in 96 (96%) axillae. Twenty-five (25%) sentinel nodes revealed nodal metastases. Five of 25 (20%) SNs had micrometasteses. Three patients had a false-negative SN, yielding a sensitivity of 91 per cent. The accuracy of LM was 97 per cent. No patient who underwent SLNB alone developed lymphedema, axillary seroma formation, infection, or restricted arm movement. This was contrasted with patients undergoing ALND, where 10 (16%) developed lymphedema and 2 (3%) developed an infection. Ten (25%) patients developed axillary paresthesias after SNB compared with 47 (78%) patients after ALND (P < 0.0001). LM in the setting of mastectomy is accurate and sensitive. This technique improves axillary staging and decreases morbidity. Patients who are not candidates for breast conservation should be offered LM and SLNB at the time of mastectomy.
24604801
The sentinel lymph node biopsy under local anesthesia in breast carcinoma: experience of the European Institute of Oncology and impact on quality of life
AbstractBackground: Sentinel lymph node biopsy performed under local anesthesia currently represents one of the main fields of investigation in breast cancer surgery because of its positive impact on the management and organisation of treatment. We previously published our preliminary experience with 115 patients; here we present an update of our experience with particular attention devoted to quality of life.Patients and methods: From September 2000 to April 2003 we treated 244 patients with this technique. We developed a ‘questionnaire of impact on quality of life – LA’ to be administered to these patients, to assess their reactions to the procedure: we administered the questionnaire to 243 patients. Our aim was to verify whether the advantages in terms of treatment planning are accompanied by an improvement in quality of life and a good degree of acceptance by the patients.Results: The questionnaire was administered to the patients during follow-up and we obtained positive results; the impact of the procedure under local anesthesia was positive for 81% of patients, while the remaining 19% reported that it had ‘no impact at all’. We can conclude that axillary sentinel node biopsy, when performed under local anesthesia, meets with a very high degree of acceptance by the patients and exerts an optimal impact on quality of life.

30258029
One-year morbidity after sentinel node biopsy and breast surgery.
Posttreatment morbidity within 1 year after sentinel node biopsy was evaluated objectively by physical examination and also by evaluating patients self-reports of symptoms in a questionnaire. These patients were compared with patients who underwent axillary clearance. At 2 weeks after surgery patients who had undergone sole sentinel node biopsy had made significantly better recoveries than those who had undergone axillary clearance. Although every fourth patient complained of at least mild arm symptoms 1 year after sole SNB, the risk of severe long-term morbidity is minimal. In particular, the risk of disabling lymphoedema seems to be negligible after SNB only.
8036743
Surgeons "vote with their feet" for sentinel node biopsy for breast cancer staging.
has tested are the H3N2/Fujian drift strain. But animal studies suggest that the inclusion of H3N2/Panama in the current vaccine will provide crossprotection against H3N2/Fujian. “We don’t always have exactly the same strain [in the vaccine] that is circulating in the community, and our experience, historically, has been . . . that the vaccine will still provide some cross-protection,” the CDC director explained. The CDC is strongly encouraging health care workers to get vaccinated this year. “We know from previous experience that immunization rates in health care workers are not optimal,” she said. “Less than 50% of the health care workers who should be vaccinated actually receive their vaccine.” Weekly influenza activity updates and information about influenza and who shouldbe immunizedareavailableon the CDC Web site at http://www.cdc.gov /ncidod/diseases/flu/fluvirus.htm.
34917334
Lymphoscintigraphic and intraoperative detection of the sentinel lymph node in breast cancer patients: The nuclear medicine perspective
The concept of sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer surgery relates to the fact that the tumor drains in a logical way via the lymphatic system, from the first to upper levels. Therefore, (1) the first lymph node met (the sentinel node) will most likely be the first one affected by metastasis, and (2) a negative sentinel node makes it highly unlikely that other nodes are affected. Sentinel lymph node biopsy would represent a significant advantage as a mini‐invasive procedure, considering that, after operation, about 70% of patients are found to be free from metastatic disease, yet axillary node dissection can lead to significant morbidity. Although the pattern of lymphatic drainage from a breast cancer can be very variable, the mammary gland and the overlying skin can be considered as a biologic unit in which lymphatics tend to follow the vasculature. Considering that tumor lymphatics are disorganized and relatively ineffective, subdermal, and peritumoral injection of small aliquots of radiotracer is preferred to intratumoral administration. 99mTc‐labeled colloids with most of the particles in the 100–200 nm size range would be ideal for radioguided sentinel node biopsy in breast cancer. Lymphoscintigraphy is an essential part of radioguided sentinel lymph node biopsy, as images are used to direct the surgeon to the site of the node. The sentinel lymph node should have a significantly higher count than background. After removal of the sentinel node, the axilla must be re‐examined to ensure all radioactive sites are identified and removed for analysis. The success rate of radioguidance in localizing the sentinel lymph node in breast cancer surgery is about 94–97% in Institutions where a high number of procedures are performed, approaching 99% when combined with the vital blue dye technique. At present, there is no definite evidence that a negative sentinel lymph node biopsy is invariably correlated with a negative axillary status, except perhaps for T1a‐b breast cancers, with size ≤1 cm. Randomized clinical trials should elucidate the impact of avoiding axillary node dissection in patients with a negative sentinel lymph node on the long‐term clinical outcome of patients. J. Surg. Oncol. 2004;85:112–122. © 2004 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
25859790
Update on detection of sentinel lymph nodes in patients with breast cancer.
Sentinel lymph node biopsy is now the practice of choice for the management of many patients with breast cancer. This was not true in the early 1990s, when the first such procedures were performed and protocols for such were refined often. This was also not true in the first years of the 21st century, when a decade of collective experience and information acquired from numerous clinical investigations dictated additional subtle and not-so-subtle refinements of the procedures. However, it is true today; reports of the latest round of clinical investigations indicate that there are several breast cancer sentinel node procedures that result in successful identification of potential sentinel nodes in nearly all patients who are eligible for such procedures. A significant component of many of these successful sentinel node procedures is a detection and localization protocol that involves radiotracer methodologies, including radiopharmaceutical administration, preoperative nuclear medicine imaging, and intraoperative gamma counting. The present state and roles of nuclear medicine protocols used in breast cancer sentinel lymph node biopsy procedures is reviewed with emphasis on discussion of recent results, unresolved issues, and future considerations. Included are brief reviews of present radiotracer and blue-dye techniques for node localization, including remarks about injection strategies, counting probe technology, and radiation safety. Included also are discussions of on-going investigations of the implications of the presence of micrometastases; of the management value of detection, localization, and excision of extra-axillary nodes such as internal mammary nodes; and of the broad range of recurrence rates presently being reported. Remarks on the present and possible near- and long-term roles for nuclear medicine in the staging of breast cancer patients including comments on positron emission tomography and intraoperative imaging conclude the article.
19807867
Lymphatic mapping and sentinel node biopsy: a surgical perspective.
Lymphatic mapping and sentinel node biopsy has been rapidly and widely adopted by the surgical community as an oncologic equivalent elective lymphadenectomy for regional node staging in both melanoma and breast cancer. Despite being the de facto standard of care, it remains a highly unstandardized procedure surrounded by many unresolved controversies for surgeons who perform the procedure. The controversies are as basic as the definition of the real sentinel node and as specific as the appropriate localization pharmaceutical(s), site of injection, timing of the injection, and utility of external scintigraphy (dynamic versus. static). Furthermore, questions regarding surgical training, indications, and contraindications remain unanswered. Because there are few long-term studies stratified by technique and indication, the resolution of these surgical controversies are unlikely in the near future.
6476603
Routine preoperative lymphoscintigraphy is not necessary prior to sentinel node biopsy for breast cancer.
BACKGROUND
This prospective study was performed to ascertain the added benefit of lymphoscintigraphy to a standard method of intraoperative lymphatic mapping and sentinel node biopsy for breast cancer.


METHODS
Patients with invasive breast cancer were injected with 99mTc sulfur colloid prior to sentinel node biopsy; preoperative lymphoscintigraphy was then performed in half of the patient population.


RESULTS
Sentinel node identification was possible in 45 of 50 patients (90%). All 14 patients (31%) with axillary nodal metastases had at least one histologically positive sentinel node (0% false negative rate). Lymphoscintigraphy revealed sentinel nodes in 17 of the 24 patients (70.8%) imaged. All 17 of these patients had one or more axillary sentinel nodes identified using intraoperative lymphatic mapping. In addition, 5 of 7 patients with a negative preoperative lymphoscintogram had an axillary sentinel lymph node(s) identified intraoperatively. None of the tumors showed drainage to the internal mammary lymph node chain by lymphoscintigraphy despite the fact that there were 5 patients with inner quadrant tumors. There was no significant advantage with respect to sentinel lymph node localization (91.7% versus 88.5%, P = not significant) or false negative rate (0%, both groups, P = not significant) in the group undergoing preoperative lymphoscintigraphy when compared with the patients in whom lymphoscintigraphy was not performed.


CONCLUSIONS
Preoperative lymphoscintigraphy adds little additional information to intraoperative lymphatic mapping, and its routine use is not justified.
22159712
Preoperative lymphoscintigraphy for breast cancer does not improve the ability to identify axillary sentinel lymph nodes.
OBJECTIVE
To evaluate the role of preoperative lymphoscintigraphy in sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy for breast cancer.


SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA
Numerous studies have demonstrated that SLN biopsy can be used to stage axillary lymph nodes for breast cancer. SLN biopsy is performed using injection of radioactive colloid, blue dye, or both. When radioactive colloid is used, a preoperative lymphoscintigram (nuclear medicine scan) is often obtained to ease SLN identification. Whether a preoperative lymphoscintigram adds diagnostic accuracy to offset the additional time and cost required is not clear.


METHODS
After informed consent was obtained, 805 patients were enrolled in the University of Louisville Breast Cancer Sentinel Lymph Node Study, a multiinstitutional study involving 99 surgeons. Patients with clinical stage T1-2, N0 breast cancer were eligible for the study. All patients underwent SLN biopsy, followed by level I/II axillary dissection. Preoperative lymphoscintigraphy was performed at the discretion of the individual surgeon. Biopsy of nonaxillary SLNs was not required in the protocol. Chi-square analysis and analysis of variance were used for statistical comparison.


RESULTS
Radioactive colloid injection was performed in 588 patients. In 560, peritumoral injection of isosulfan blue dye was also performed. A preoperative lymphoscintigram was obtained in 348 of the 588 patients (59%). The SLN was identified in 221 of 240 patients (92.1%) who did not undergo a preoperative lymphoscintigram, with a false-negative rate of 1.6%. In the 348 patients who underwent a preoperative lymphoscintigram, the SLN was identified in 310 (89.1%), with a false-negative rate of 8.7%. A mean of 2.2 and 2. 0 SLNs per patient were removed in the groups without and with a preoperative lymphoscintigram, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference in the SLN identification rate, false-negative rate, or number of SLNs removed when a preoperative lymphoscintigram was obtained.


CONCLUSIONS
Preoperative lymphoscintigraphy does not improve the ability to identify axillary SLN during surgery, nor does it decrease the false-negative rate. Routine preoperative lymphoscintigraphy is not necessary for the identification of axillary SLNs in breast cancer.
6663877
Technical advances in sentinel lymph node biopsy for breast cancer.
Technical advances in the past several years have simplified and improved sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy for breast cancer. The use of alternative injection sites (skin or subareolar) yields high SLN identification rates and may shorten the learning curve associated with standard peri-tumoral injection. The dual-agent (radiocolloid plus blue dye) technique is now recommended to decrease false-negative rates, especially when surgeons are just learning how to perform SLN biopsy. Methylene blue may be an acceptable substitute for isosulfan blue dye and is associated with fewer hypersensitivity reactions. Hand-held gamma probes are now smaller and more maneuverable, with better shielding for directional detection of gamma rays. Routine preoperative lymphoscintigraphy can be avoided, thus facilitating operating room scheduling. Surgeons can use minimally invasive techniques to identify and remove internal mammary SLNs.
16486905
Short‐term morbidity of the upper limb after sentinel lymph node biopsy or axillary lymph node dissection for Stage I or II breast carcinoma
The goals of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) are to improve axillary staging and reduce unnecessary axillary lymph node dissections (ALND), thereby reducing treatment‐related upper‐limb morbidity. In the current prospective study, short‐term upper‐limb morbidity was assessed after SLNB and/or ALND.
9013255
Technical Aspects of Performing Lymphoscintigraphy: Optimization of Methods Used to Obtain Images
Sentinel node detection is an important part of the clinical management of newly diagnosed melanoma. Now there is a similar or even greater enthusiasm for sentinel node evaluation in patients with breast carcinoma. However, controversies exist regarding the dose, volume, and route of administration. Even the role of lymphoscintigraphy itself, in contrast to using only a hand-held gamma probe during surgery for sentinel node detection, is being debated. Nevertheless, many centers and surgeons find that lymphoscintigraphy images are valuable in the treatment of patients and they use lymphoscintigraphy as a guide during surgery and to confirm the results obtained with the hand-held probe. Centers just beginning to use lymphoscintigraphy may find the images especially useful. Given this fact, the authors wanted to define the practical and technical aspects of performing lymphoscintigraphy in patients with breast cancer and examined various methods for the optimization of the technique of image acquisition. The suggested technique is generally free of the controversies noted above and applies to most patients. It includes various maneuvers that aim to improve the rate of sentinel node visualization using the gamma camera and the accuracy of node detection. The recommendations presented here should prove useful for both those experienced and for those centers just beginning to use the technique of lymphoscintigraphy.
12592590
Areolar-Cutaneous “Junction” Injections to Augment Sentinel Node Count Activity
Purpose The authors report on a modified lymphoscintigraphy protocol for increasing activity in the sentinel node (SN) through a specific technique (LymphoBoost). It consists of an areolar–cutaneous “junction” injection, using a very shallow, high-volume, high-specific-activity injection of 100% filtered Tc-99m sulfur colloid, as an adjunct to their standard protocol. Materials and Methods Results from a previously optimized protocol (group 1, n = 28) were compared with those from their new protocol (group 2, n = 85), which consisted of two sets of consecutively applied (within 12 to 20 minutes) injections: group 2A composed of perilesional and intradermal injections (similar to the previous group 1) followed by group 2B LymphoBoost injections within 12 to 20 minutes in the same patients. Regions of interest were drawn around the SN and the injection sites (IS) at the end of the studies to calculate the end-of-study SN:IS ratio for both group 1 and group 2 studies. The SN:IS ratio is generally independent of dose and is a measurement of the “efficiency” of getting activity from the IS to the SN. Results The mean SN:IS ratio in group 2 was 3.34 times greater than that in group 1 studies (P < 0.0005). The median SN:IS ratio was 3.53 times greater in the group 2 studies. Many cases showed a dramatic increase in SN counts before the LymphoBoost injection was even completed, with more than 5% of injected activity reaching nodes at the end of the study in some patients. Multiple different lymphatic pathways were noted, but all led to the same node(s). No significant disagreement between group 2A and group 2B results was noted. Conclusions Areolar–cutaneous junction injections, performed under these conditions, augment SN activity dramatically in most patients. Hotter nodes provide several benefits, especially when next-day surgery is contemplated, and should also reduce the extent of dissection needed to remove the sentinel node.
20722200
Clinical breast lymphoscintigraphy: optimal techniques for performing studies, image atlas, and analysis of images.
Breast lymphoscintigraphy is increasingly performed before surgery to delineate the drainage to the sentinel node (SN) in the axilla. On the basis of the histologic status of harvested SNs, the disease status of the entire axilla can be predicted. This prediction allows a more limited dissection to be performed while maintaining staging accuracy comparable with that of classic axillary lymph node dissection. Lymphoscintigraphy assists surgeons in harvesting the SN during gamma probe-assisted axillary biopsy or dissection and provides a wide field of view survey, among other benefits. When certain injection protocols are used, lymphoscintigraphy can be performed in the afternoon before surgery the next morning, thus minimizing disruptions of tight surgical schedules. Image acquisition can be optimized and SN activity can be maximized by means of such factors as parameters for preparation of the radiotracer, injection techniques, energy settings for the gamma camera, breast displacement maneuvers, and techniques for marking and outlining the patient's body. The ultimate goals are to delineate the true SN, maximize activity in the node for facilitated removal (even at next-day surgery), and deliver the information to the surgeon without delaying the surgical schedule.
22134661
Reducing exposure from 57Co sources during breast lymphoscintigraphy by optimizing energy windows and other suggested enhancements of acquisition and the display of images.
UNLABELLED
We set out to measure the reduction in exposure attained by using a weak 57Co sheet source with optimal energy windows.


METHODS
Two groups of 10 lymphoscintigraphy studies were analyzed. Group 1 consisted of 10 studies obtained with a stronger source of 57Co, 59 MBq (1.6 mCi) at the time of data acquisition, with transmission images acquired at 3 energy windows of 115-129, 130-134, and 135-150 keV. Group 2 consisted of 10 studies with a weaker sheet source of 57Co, 11 MBq (0.3 mCi). Transmission images were acquired at 3 energy windows of 112-132, 130-134, and 135-150 keV. Same-sized regions of interest (ROIs) were drawn on the patient's torso (PT) and on the nonattenuated image of the transmission source itself (TS), all 1-min images. The counts in each ROI obtained over 1 min and the ratios between the TS ROI and the PT ROI were calculated for all of the energies. Dosimetry calculations based on measured exposure rates and the activity of the sheet sources were used to calculate the patient equivalent dose at 30 cm.


RESULTS
For the 57Co energy window, group 1 had an average ROI count of 1,955 in the TS region and 135 counts in the PT region. The average ratio of TS/PT was 15.4. Similarly, group 2 had an average ROI count of 646.4 in the TS region and 91.2 counts in the PT region. The average ratio of TS/PT was 8.6. The relative "outlining performance," when comparing the 57Co and 99mTc windows, showed an average improvement when using the 57Co window of 4.4 and 5.8 times for group 1 and group 2, respectively (TS/PT at 57Co window)/(TS/PT at 99mTc window). Estimates of the patient equivalent dose per study were 2.30 microSv for the stronger 57Co flood source and 0.46 microSv for the weaker 57Co flood source, a 5-fold reduction in equivalent dose. Technologists received less than half of the above doses.


CONCLUSION
Use of expanded, separate energy windows optimized for the primary 122-keV photon of 57Co greatly improves transmission scan image quality compared with the standard 140-keV 99mTc windows used for the delineation of the sentinel node. This markedly reduces exposure for all, by allowing the use of a weaker source, and can save time.
23566655
A training simulator for sentinel node biopsy in breast cancer: a new standard.
BACKGROUND
Sentinel node biopsy is becoming the staging investigation of choice for early breast cancer. Optimal identification of the sentinel node requires the utilization of a radionuclide in combination with blue dye. Gamma probe guided surgery is a skill that is currently unfamiliar to many surgeons. Appropriate training within the surgical skills laboratory could play a major role in the widespread implementation of this technique, but no suitable model currently exists for this purpose.


AIM
To develop a realistic phantom for the teaching and practice of the core new skills required of a surgeon to perform gamma probe guided sentinel node biopsy in breast cancer.


METHODS
We describe the development of our sentinel node biopsy simulator which consists of a torso with its arm extended in an operating position. The replaceable breast and axilla are constructed from a thermoplastic elastomer gel, which has similar physical and radiation attenuation properties to that of human tissue. Radionuclide injection sites and radioactive sentinel nodes are simulated by hollow blue coloured PVC beads filled with Technetium-99m. The model allows demonstration and practice of injection techniques, imaging techniques and gamma probe guided removal of sentinel nodes.


CONCLUSION
We believe that training for sentinel node biopsy should begin in the surgical skills laboratory. The model we have developed is able to provide an accurate simulation of all new practical skills required for accurate sentinel node identification. It is an important aid to training in the sentinel lymph node biopsy procedure for breast carcinoma.
22514119
Breast Sentinel Lymph Node Navigation With Three-Dimensional Interstitial Multidetector-Row Computed Tomographic Lymphography
Objective:Three-dimensional multidetector-row computed tomographic lymphography (3D MDCT-LG) with interstitial injection of a widely available nonionic monometric contrast medium iopamidol was used for navigation of breast sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy. Methods:3D MDCT-LG was obtained after massage of the interstitially injection sites of a total of 4–5 mL undiluted iopamidol at periareolar and peritumoral areas in 68 consecutive patients with early-stage breast cancer, using a 4 detector-row CT scanner. Drainage lymphatic patterns and SLN anatomy were assessed on 3D MDCT-LG images. 3D MDCT-LG-navigated SLN biopsy with combined use of blue dye was followed by backup axillary lymph node dissection to evaluate accuracy of SLN biopsy. Results:The 3D MDCT-LG images clearly localized primary SLNs by visualizing the direct connection between these nodes and their afferent lymphatic vessels on detailed anatomy of the surrounding structures in all patients. Drainage lymphatic pathways on these images were classified into 4 patterns: single route/single SLN (39 cases, 57%), multiple routes/multiple SLNs (10 cases, 15%), single route/multiple SLNs (9 cases, 13%), and multiple routes/single SLN (10 cases, 15%). Under 3D MDCT-LG navigation, SLNs was found at the accurate location in all patients. With backup axillary lymph node dissection, metastasis was found in 14 (20%) patients, and 8 of these patients had metastasis only in the preoperatively identified SLNs. In other 5 positive patients, metastasis was found both in the SLN and non-SLNs. However, micrometastasis eventually was found only in non-SLN in an elderly patient. Overall, the sensitivity, false-negative rate, and accuracy of 3D CT-L-navigated SLN biopsy were 92% (13/14 patients), 7% (1/14 patients), and 98% (67/68 patients), respectively. Conclusions:Topographic 3D interstitial MDCT-LG can be a widely available and reliable navigator for breast SLN biopsy.
5850406
Preoperative lymphoscintigraphy and triangulated patient body marking are important parts of the sentinel node process in breast cancer
Breast CancerSentinel Lymph NodeMorbidityLymphoscintigraphy Introdu tio Failure to visualize or correctly visualize sentinel nodes (SN) during preoperative lymphoscintigraphy (LS) is a frustrating problem. Most of these instances occur due to inexperience in performing the studies, and can be realized and corrected with the use of proper technique, even in centers that do not have state of art equipment. This is now becoming a major issue, as more and more sentinel node biopsies are being performed, and will increasingly gain more importance once sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) becomes the standard of care in patients with breast cancer world wide.
19475021
Intraoperative Subareolar Injection of 99mTc-Labeled Sulfur Colloid Results in Consistent Sentinel Lymph Node Identification
BackgroundPreoperative parenchymal or peritumoral (PT) injection of 99mTc-labeled sulfur colloid (TcSC) is the standard method for sentinel lymph node (SLN) identification in patients with breast cancer. Limitations of this method include variable identification rates, slow transit times, and painful injections. We hypothesize that TcSC will travel to the SLN within minutes after injection into the subareolar (SA) lymphatics, thus making an intraoperative injection technique feasible.MethodsOne hundred twenty-two women with invasive breast cancer were enrolled onto this prospective study. Immediately after the induction of general anesthesia, patients were injected with 1 to 2 mCi of filtered TcSC in the SA location. Then, 5 mL of 1% isosulfan blue dye was injected into the PT location. The SLN or SLNs were identified as radioactive, blue, or both and removed for pathologic evaluation.ResultsThe mean patient age was 56 years. The mean tumor size was 1.5 cm. In 86.1% of patients, a transcutaneous axillary “hot spot” was identified by handheld gamma probe. The mean time from TcSC injection to axillary incision was 17.6 minutes. At least one SLN was identified in 99.2% of patients. The mean number of SLNs identified per patient was 1.83. The mean count of radioactive SLNs was 2715 cps. In 97.2% of patients, blue SLNs were also radioactive.ConclusionsTcSC injected into the SA lymphatics rapidly drains to the SLN. The radioactive SLN is easily and quickly identified after an intraoperative SA TcSC injection. The simplicity of this method eliminates the inherent problems associated with standard PT injection.