CHAPTER VI: FIRKET 



June 7, 1896 

Since the end of 1895 the Dervish force in Firket had been under the command of the Emir Hammuda, and it was through the indolence and neglect of this dissipated Arab that the Egyptian army had been able to make good its position at Akasha without any fighting. Week after week the convoys had straggled unmolested through the difficult country between Sarras and the advanced base. No attack had been made upon the brigade at Akasha. No enterprise was directed against its communications. This fatal inactivity did not pass unnoticed by Wad Bishara, the Governor of Dongola; but although he was nominally in supreme command of all the Dervish forces in the province he had hardly any means of enforcing his authority. His rebukes and exhortations, however, gradually roused Hammuda, and during May two or three minor raids were planned and executed, and the Egyptian position at Akasha was several times reconnoitred. 

Bishara remained unsatisfied, and at length, despairing of infusing energy into Hammuda, he ordered his subordinate Osman Azrak to supersede him. Osman was a Dervish of very different type. He was a fanatical and devoted believer in the Mahdi and a loyal follower of the Khalifa. For many years he had served on the northern frontier of the Dervish Empire, and his name was well known to the Egyptian Government as the contriver of the most daring and the most brutal raids. His cruelty to the wretched inhabitants of the border villages had excluded him from all hope of mercy should he ever fall into the hands of the enemy. His crafty skill, however, protected him, and among the Emirs gathered at Firket there was none whose death would have given greater satisfaction to the military authorities than the man who was now to replace Hammuda. 
Who was in command?
who was neglected?
when was he in command from?
was akasha attacked?
was the inactivity go unnoticed?
how often was convoys deployed?
who was in supreme command?
what was his other occupation?
of where?
did any one have the ability to enforce his rule?
when were the raids?\
how many raids?
what position was changed?
was he satisfied?
Who superseded him?
was he a normal dervish?
what was he a follower of?
was he a kind ruler?
what protected him?
who was wanted dead?
the Emir Hammuda
the Dervish force in Firket had been under the command of the Emir Hammuda
the Dervish force
 the Dervish force in Firket had been under the command of the Emir Hammuda, and it was through the indolence and neglect of this dissipated Arab
Since the end of 1895
Since the end of 1895 the Dervish force in Firket had been under the command of the Emir Hammuda
no
the Egyptian army had been able to make good its position at Akasha without any fighting
yes
Week after week the convoys had straggled unmolested
Week after week
Week after week the convoys had straggled unmolested
Wad Bishara
This fatal inactivity did not pass unnoticed by Wad Bishara, the Governor of Dongola
Governor
Wad Bishara, the Governor of Dongola
Dongola
Governor of Dongola
no
he had hardly any means of enforcing his authority
May
during May two or three minor raids were planned and executed
two or three
 during May two or three minor raids were planned and executed
the one at Akasha
and the Egyptian position at Akasha was several times reconnoitred
no
Bishara remained unsatisfied
Osman Azrak
 he ordered his subordinate Osman Azrak to supersede him
no
Osman was a Dervish of very different type
the Khalifa
a loyal follower of the Khalifa
no
His cruelty to the wretched inhabitants of the border villages had excluded him 
His crafty skill
 His crafty skill, however, protected him
Osman
 among the Emirs gathered at Firket there was none whose death would have given greater satisfaction to the military authorities than the man who was now to replace Hammuda.