Student asked: Test for natural language inference.
Premise: "A jockey rides a horse past a field of green grass and a bench overlooking water."
Hypothesis: "The jockey took up water polo instead."
Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell
Teacher's response: Let's think. One can not play water polo and rides a horse simultaneously. The answer is no.


Student asked: Given the sentence "A person with dreadlocks and a blue hooded sweatshirt speaking into a microphone." can we conclude that "He is the emcee."?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Teacher's response: Let's think. The person being referred to as emcee or master of ceremonies due to his activity with dreadlocks and a blue hooded sweatshirt speaking into a microphone. The answer is yes.


Student asked: Given the sentence "A very wet dog coming toward the camera through a mossy pond with a ball." is it true that "The dog is coming at the camera."?
Teacher's response: Let's think. A dog coming towards the camera is coming at the camera. The answer is yes.


Student asked: If "A passer by checking out what is under the covers of the cookers on the table." does that mean that "A man is looking at food cooking."?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Teacher's response:

Show your work and conclude with the exact phrasing "Therefore, the final answer is [answer]." where [answer] is just the final number or expression that solves the problem.
user
Let's think. A passer by checking out what is under the covers of the cookers on the table does not indicate that he is looking at food cooking. The answer is it is not possible to tell.