Q: Premise: "A person on a bmx bike."
Based on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "A person is using the bmx bike as a vehicle." is true?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
A: yes
CoT: A person on a bmx bike shows that person is using the bike as a vehicle.
****
Q: Test for natural language inference.
Premise: "Two bicyclists pass one another on a pathway."
Hypothesis: "Two men talk about politics."
Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell
A: no
CoT: You cannot pass a person and talk at the same time.
****
Q: Premise: "A person in a blue shirt and hat working on a roof of a structure that is behind a fence."
Based on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "A person in a blue shirt and hat working on a roof of a structure that is behind a fence." is true?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
A: yes
CoT: Working on a roof of a structure is where one would be working on a roof.
****
Q: Can we conclude from "Two little boys sit on the ground and play with a bicycle on the ground." that "The boys are little."?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell
A: yes
CoT:

Show your work and conclude with the exact phrasing "Therefore, the final answer is [answer]." where [answer] is just the final number or expression that solves the problem.
user
Two boys are little on the ground and play with a bicycle.
****