Teacher:In this task, you must classify if a given review is positive/negative, indicating your answer as P or N.
Teacher: Now, understand the problem? Solve this instance: let 's face it : the $ 100 million - plus smash that was " goldeneye " was not a good film by any means , and as a bond movie was only marginally better than , say , " a view to a kill " or either of the timothy dalton pictures , by virtue of nice pacing .
but it did revive the series , and granted the producers some new directions in which to take the it ( ie .
the new " m " is a woman ) .
"
tomorrow never dies " is the picture " goldeneye " should have been ; it 's also the most entertaining bond outing since " the spy who loved me " .
the new picture opens with china considering war with britain after a standard military operation is misconstrued as a hostile threat from an english submarine .
as an attack occurs , the front - page headline is already being prepared , courtesy of carver media .
carver ( pryce )
the man is a deluded magnate , a sort of hybrid of ted turner , bill gates , and peter sellars ' german scientist from " dr .
strangelove " ( physically , pryce even recalls sellars in his kubrick days ) .
it 's up to james bond to take him down , with assistance , of course , from a wealth of gadgets ( including a multi - purpose cell phone ) , and beautiful women .
enter michelle yeoh , fresh from " supercop " , as a chinese secret agent with her own agenda ; with effortless grace , she cat burgles , dispatches baddies seemingly with the ease of preparing pasta , and refuses the advances of our philandering hero .
they make a great team .
" tomorrow never dies " is a surprisingly entertaining and efficient film , given that at the helm is none other than the director of " turner & hooch " .
spottiswoode has crafted some breathtaking set pieces ,
each much more intricate and impressive than , for instance , the tank scene in " goldeneye " .
moreover , brosnan has at last settled into the role some feel he was born to play ; last time out , the fate of the franchise rested on his shoulders , and there was noticeable discomfort in his body language .
returned in brosnan 's eyes has some of the playfulness he demonstrated for so many years on tv 's " remington steele " , as has his deadpan wit .
and though carver 's motives are muddy ( when carver explains that " genius is insanity with some success " , screenwriter fierstein is taking a lazy shortcut ) , pryce makes an agreeable , memorable villain .
in the future , they should pursue actors as talented and experienced as pryce to breathe life into these cardboard figures .
there a few too many explosions in " tomorrow never dies " , perhaps so many they qualify as dialogue .
and it could have used a sharper script , though
i was amused by the double entendres , none of which i will reveal here .
as it stands , the plot suffers many holes ( i 'm not taking about implausibilities ) , and the dialogue tends towards the hackneyed .
now that the elements are in place : modern special effects and stunt work , cool pierce brosnan , kickass female allies .
. .
it 's time to put them to use in something truly special .
there 's no mistaking , however , that " tomorrow never dies " is ideal holiday escapism , and for the first time in perhaps years ,
you 'll walk out wanting more bond movies .
-reviewed december 17 , 1997
Student:

Show your work and conclude with the exact phrasing "Therefore, the final answer is [answer]." where [answer] is just the final number or expression that solves the problem.
user
P