QUESTION: Test for natural language inference.
Premise: "The large green fish is jumping out of the water."
Hypothesis: "The green fish is getting grilled for dinner."
Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell

Let's solve it slowly: An alive fish can jump out of the water. A dead fish can get grilled for dinner.
The answer is no.

[QUESTION] Premise: "Construction workers having a discussion by the tracks."
Hypothesis: "A discussion is underway about tracks."
Do we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
The discussion by the tracks infers it is about the tracks.
The answer is yes.

Q: Given the sentence "A man in a striped shirt looking at the ocean." can we conclude that "A man looking at the ocean to try and spot a shark."?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
A: Looking at the ocean does not imply looking for a shark.
The answer is it is not possible to tell.

QUESTION: Given the sentence "A wakeboarder is performing a trick on a rail." is it true that "Nobody is performing."?

Let's solve it slowly: A wake boarder cannot be performing when it is said that nobody is performing.
The answer is no.

[QUESTION] Premise: "A child in a red shirt is running around in water."
Hypothesis: "A child is running at the water park."
Do we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Running around in water does not imply being at a water park.
The answer is it is not possible to tell.

Q: Premise: "Girl paints a picture of the images she is looking at."
Based on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "A girl uses watercolor to paint a picture of a flower." is true?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
A:

Show your work and conclude with the exact phrasing "Therefore, the final answer is [answer]." where [answer] is just the final number or expression that solves the problem.
user
The medium by which she is painting may not be watercolor and not all images are those of a flower.
The answer is it is not possible to tell.