Q: Premise: "Bmx biker in shallow stream with current performing a wheelie."
Hypothesis: "A biker is in a forest stream racing in a competition."
Do we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
A: it is not possible to tell
Chain-of-thought: The stream might not be in a forest or racing in a competition.

Q: Premise: "A toddler looking behind him while standing on a red tricycle."
Hypothesis: "The toddler is riding a bicycle."
Do we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
A: no
Chain-of-thought: Standing is not riding. A tricycle has more wheels than a bicycle.

Q: Given the sentence "A group of people watch a vintage steam locomotive (with coal car) on a track." can we conclude that "Separated by a chain link fence."?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
A: it is not possible to tell
Chain-of-thought: The locomotive was built in the 1800s and can still run.

Q: Premise: "The child in the stroller has it's mouth open."
Based on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "A child in a stroller with a pacifier in its mouth." is true?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
A: no
Chain-of-thought:

Show your work and conclude with the exact phrasing "Therefore, the final answer is [answer]." where [answer] is just the final number or expression that solves the problem.
user
A child with a pacifier in its mouth does not have its mouth open.