Q: Premise: "A young man is leaning on a tree in the grass and reading a book."
Hypothesis: "A young man leaning on tree."
Do we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
A: it is not possible to tell
CoT: Someone leaning on a tree in the grass and reading a book is not just leaning on a tree.
****
Q: Test for natural language inference.
Premise: "A woman reaches into a box of candy while a man stands nearby."
Hypothesis: "The woman wants a piece of candy."
Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell
A: yes
CoT: The woman wants a piece of candy is the same as a woman reaches into a box of candy.
****
Q: Can we conclude from "A large column of bicyclists is cycling down a road." that "People are riding their bikes down the road."?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell
A: it is not possible to tell
CoT: It can be inferred unless not all cyclists are people (monkeys?).
****
Q: Given the sentence "A bike rider with a blue backpack peddling across a bridge." can we conclude that "An empty-handed equestrian striding down a dirt trail."?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
A: no
CoT:

Show your work and conclude with the exact phrasing "Therefore, the final answer is [answer]." where [answer] is just the final number or expression that solves the problem.
user
A equestrian rides a horse and is different to a bike rider. The bike rider carries a backpack and the equestrian is empty handed. Peddling across a bridge is a different activity to striding down a trail.
****