Title: Not that great Review: The retractable brush is OK, but the "cleaning tip" is just a tiny disc (about the size of a paper-punch hole) of soft cloth, mounted on a rubber tip. It did clean the lens reasonably well, but I would think it would get dirty pretty quickly, and there is no way to clean it or replace it. And in my case, I won't care, since it fell off after a few uses (yes, I was treating it gently and not using any solvents).I think there are much better choices available, unless all you want is the retractable brush. Is the review positive or negative?
Negative


Title: Classy protection for leather! Review: I ordered these to protect the leather in my new Ford Flex, after returing a black Eddie Bauer set with no back piece to Target. The gray looks so much better than all the other options I considered. They worked great for both my rear-facing and front-facing car seats on the second row bucket seats. Both car seats fit very tight and secure... no slippage or wiggle room. You're supposed to use only the bottom piece for the rear-facing, but I used the whole set anyway. I will mention, however, the front-facing car seat was still a bit too tall for the seat saver. I had to add a gray, folded over hand towel to protect the headrest from the top of the car seat. I don't think there's anything the manufacturers could do to solve this problem though. Is the review positive or negative?
Positive


Q: Title: SHADA is a good example of what could have been. Review: This six-part adventure starring Tom Baker and Lalla Ward would have been a fantastic television adventure. But since workers at the BBC went on strike when they did, it is incomplete. The narration is fine. The breaking does come at some bad spots but its to be expected. I personally loved this story and I'm not as big a fan of the Tom Baker Era as I once was. Other highlights include Denis Carey as Professor Chronotis and Christopher Neame as Skagra. All in all, I think we can be glad of one thing, at least the Doctor didn't give the damn dog mouth to mouth again!!! Is the review positive or negative?
A: Positive


Question: Title: Escort Solo Radar Detector Review: I am very dissapointed with this product. I have owned and used it daily for about 10 months. It will detect K band radar only when you are within 400 feet of the gun. It is virtually useless in detecting Ka band unless you're within 50 feet of the gun. It also falsely detects Ka band very frequently especially on sunny days when it has been sitting on the dashboard for 15 minutes. The laser detector also goes off quite often. The X band detector went off so often in business areas (even with the x band sensitivity set to poor in city mode) that I disabled it.Escort advertises the following on their website:"Long-range warning for all radar signals: including "instant-on" X-band, K-band, and SuperWide Ka-band. Patented Digital SignalProcessing provides long-range warning distances, without increased false alarms."I guess their definition of "long range" is a few hundred feet.So save your money and don't waste it on this product. Is the review positive or negative?
Answer: Negative


*Question*
Title: AVOID! AVOID! AVOID! Review: This product worked great for almost five years until it developed a leak. I've learned online that this leak is common and is due to a poorly designed seal between plastic and steel pieces. Obviously, Rowenta doesn't care about those who use their products if they design something so poorly. You'd think they outsource their engineering to Kenmore, expert of the "break a day after warranty" gimmick. There's nothing duo power about this when it's sitting in a puddle of is own water.I pulled a B&D; that I'd recovered from the trash years ago. It does the job without leaking. Never again, Rowenta!I gave it two stars rather than one as it gave us five good years. I guess we're some of the lucky ones with this unit. Is the review positive or negative?
**Answer**
Negative


Title: Complete garbage Review: I don't even own this vacuum, luckly. However, I borrowed it from my friend since our own vacuum is beyond help. Obviously, this vacuum doesn't put us in a much better situation. It's complete garbage though, it will last about 3-5 minutes with a mid-way (by the "full" line) filled canister, and about 5-10 with it completely empty. I've owned a kenmore that's still kicking strong after 15 years, and this Shark vacuum still has the tags and stickers on it. Going to recommend my friend to return it while she can. Trolls need not bother saying "WELL CLEAN THE FILTER MORE LOLZ!", because while that effects how long it's short time span is, it never lasts longer than 10 minutes. It's just a horrible vacuum.Never going to buy from this brand again, and will make sure to pass it on to friends, and obviously you folks.(note: for some reason there are two links for this vacuum, the other being (...) Is the review positive or negative?

Show your work and conclude with the exact phrasing "Therefore, the final answer is [answer]." where [answer] is just the final number or expression that solves the problem.
user
Negative