Title: Exceeded My Expectations Review: I must admit that my sole interest in seeing this film was one of sheer curiosity, it having been written and produced by my mother's cousin, Michael Petroni. I really didn't know what to expect and purposely didn't read any reviews or opinions beforehand in order to form as unbiased an opinion as possible and had no intention of sharing my opinion with the public, once made. That changed, however, before the final credits rolled.This film was so beautifully executed in every way, so deeply intense and so profoundly thought provoking that I was spell-bound throughout its entirety. It was everything I look for in a good, quality motion picture. I completely concur with all of the opinions expressed here. While this film may not be for everyone, it is definitely for anyone who has good taste in fine art. Does this product review convey a negative or positive sentiment?
Positive

Title: Waste of money Review: At first, this item worked great. After about 4 months the battery would no longer take a charge. The second battery worked a few months longer and now only lasts about 5-10 minutes before giving out. Living in the north, our summers don't even last 3 months and I certainly expected this item to last longer than two summers. Boy was I wrong. I wouldn't recommend this product to anyone. Does this product review convey a negative or positive sentiment?
Negative

Q: Title: The ugly duckling in Karajan's Sibelius output Review: EMI must be embarrassed by Karajan's 1980 recording of the Sibelius Second. In their latest Karajan Edition reissues they picked his much earlier version with the Philharmonia. The 1980 Berlin version has been sporadically in and out of print, but it languishes as the ugly duckling in an output of Sibelius symphonies for EMI and DG that has won wide acclaim.The performance itself is powerful, often massive, and played with consummate skill. EMI's sonics are fine; the conductor is in good form. I'm baffled, frankly. British critics love Barbirolli's measured, highly personal account of the Second on Chesky with the Royal Phil., part of a Reader's Digest project from the Sixties. In some ways Karajan is the anti-Barbirolli, favoring high orchestral polish and an objective stance. Maybe that's the problem. In any case, I'm very impressed by Karajan's heroic approach, so let me lift a lone voice above the general neglect of a very fine reading. Does this product review convey a negative or positive sentiment?
A: Positive

Question: Title: Not as good as High Maintenance Review: I think Belle could have done better. I read High Maintenance first and loved it. I was disappointed with Going Down. It was a real stretch to believe that prostitution was the only way Benny was able to make any money, and all of her attempts at earning money by working elsewhere were sabotaged so her only way to save herself was by going back to prostitution.I did, however, enjoy the situations with Benny's dysfunctional family. I also enjoyed Benny's sense of humor about men. I was happy she found someone new in the end. I thought Adam was a jerk.I would still read a third book by Belle, when and if that happens. Does this product review convey a negative or positive sentiment?
Answer: Negative

*Question*
Title: History's Truths Revealed Review: Kotkin is a first rate historian who dispenses with the slogans, cliches, and jingoism that often cloud Soviet studies. Armageddon Averted is superbly titled and succinctly written. The author takes less than 200 pages of text to explain the ending collapse of the U.S.S.R. - the "death agony of an entire world comprising non-market economies and anti-liberal institutions." It's a pleasure to read history that so elegantly summarizes complex and world changing events without mischaracterizing them. Many "experts" not only failed to anticipate the changes that occurred, but subsequently gave the wrong reasons for them. Kotkin's breadth and depth of knowledge allow him to avoid such blunders. Most highly recommended. Additional plusses are the Notes and Further Reading sections. The naysayers below seem to have axes to grind that cloud their "reviews." Does this product review convey a negative or positive sentiment?
**Answer**
Positive

(Q).
Title: Godzilla Smashes Tokyo! Review: Godzilla Returns is about a gigantic atomic monter that destroys Tokyo. In 1956,an atomic monster rises out of Tokyo Bay. It levels the metropolis and returns towards the water. The buildings are left crushed beneath the flames, and many are dead. Now,back in 1996,a 13 year old boy watch in disbelief,as the so called myth destroys the city! If you want to know the ending,please purchase this book for yourself. I would rate this book,on a 1 to 10 scale,a 9. It was very neat, and full of suspense. It is a very interesting book. Does this product review convey a negative or positive sentiment?
(A).

Show your work and conclude with the exact phrasing "Therefore, the final answer is [answer]." where [answer] is just the final number or expression that solves the problem.
user
Positive