Ballpoint pen is not best to write on paper and ink pen not suits to write on paper plate.. So what could be the question?
Question followed by answer: Premise: "A woman is using an ink well and pen to write on paper."
Based on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "A man is using a cheap ballpoint pen to write on a paper plate." is true?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
no

Looking into a hole does not mean the person is going to cave-dive.
The question and answer are below.
Premise: "A man looks into a barred hole in a hill."
Based on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "The man is getting ready to cave-dive." is true?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
it is not possible to tell

A man welding with a shield does not infer that the man bought a new mask.
The question and answer are below.
Test for natural language inference.
Premise: "A man welding with a shield covering his face and protective clothing."
Hypothesis: "The man bought a new mask for his welding job."
Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell
it is not possible to tell

Mud is not food. The boys cannot be simultaneously drinking and eating.. So what could be the question?
Question followed by answer: Given the sentence "The two young boy are eating food." can we conclude that "Two boys are drinking mud."?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
no

A man would not smoke a pipe while a toddler is playing near him.
The question and answer are below.
Premise: "A toddler is playing with model trains on carpet."
Based on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "A man smokes a pipe on the sofa." is true?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
no

Dogs can not be running side by side and playing poker.
The question and answer are below.

Show your work and conclude with the exact phrasing "Therefore, the final answer is [answer]." where [answer] is just the final number or expression that solves the problem.
user
Test for natural language inference.
Premise: "Three dogs are running side by side on the grass."
Hypothesis: "Three dogs are playing poker."
Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell
no