Detailed Instructions: Given a text, write a compressed version of it in a single sentence.
Q: Some medical ethicists and constitutional scholars say that the Supreme Court was wrong to create the pre-viability / post-viability distinction in the first place. Why, they ask, does the fact that a fetus can survive outside the womb with the help of vast medical technology change either of the interests at war in the abortion debate: the fetus's own claim to " human-ness " and a woman's right to control her body?
A:

Show your work and conclude with the exact phrasing "Therefore, the final answer is [answer]." where [answer] is just the final number or expression that solves the problem.
user
Ethicists and scholars say the Supreme Court was wrong to create viability distinction.  Why does the fact that a fetus can survive without med tech change the interests in the abortion debate.