Given a post that is a real-life anecdote of a complex ethical situation and an associated claim about its type, verify if the claim is true or not. The claim asks if the posts are historical or hypothetical. The posts are "HISTORICAL" when the author has already done something and they are "HYPOTHETICAL" when the author is considering doing something in the future. Say 'yes' if the claim is true otherwise say 'no'
Q: CLAIM : The following post is HYPOTHETICAL. POST : I've had pretty bad OCD my whole life so it really bugs me when people use it as a synonym for being organized, particular, anal, etc. but I usually don't say anything. I do feel like using OCD in this way takes away from how destructive and debilitating it can be, but I generally prefer to avoid conflict. However, a kid in one of my classes recently described how he had "self-diagnosed OCD" because it bugs him when pages fall out of his sketchbook. Should I just continue to silently judge him or call him out on it (respectfully) if he brings it up again?
A:

Show your work and conclude with the exact phrasing "Therefore, the final answer is [answer]." where [answer] is just the final number or expression that solves the problem.
user
yes