Q: Title: Clarks Portlands - Well made comfort shoe Review: Well made comfort shoesLike- Thick soft leather. Does not require wearing in- Very comfortable. Fits like a glove on day one- rubber sole has very good grip- leather is breathable- non leather material around collar makes it very comfortable for long walks. Good design.- leather is darker than pic. makes it suitable for business casual. Looks very good with jeansDislike- rubber on the heel has a very very slight hardness to it if you tend to land hard on your heel when you walk. Suspect because of the extra thick rubber padding at the heel for added durability- front design of shoe is a little flat and old school - retro "grandpa shoes" ;-0ConclusionThis shoe runs half size big I think. Typical Clarks. I purposely bought my usual size so that I can add in an extra insole. It fits perfectly even with the insole.One of the most comfortable shoes I've ever bought. Great Clarks design and quality. Does this product review convey a negative or positive sentiment?
A: Positive


Q: Title: Horrible Review: The product is great, however, the seller filly434, does not know how to do business. I will never purchase anything from her or Merial. Does this product review convey a negative or positive sentiment?
A: Negative


Q: Title: Do you know what homeopathic means? Review: Look up homeopathy before you buy this. Basically, the active ingredients are so diluted that it probably doesnt contain a single molecule of what you think you're getting. You're simply buying a placebo solution. Does this product review convey a negative or positive sentiment?
A: Negative


Q: Title: Redford's Ambitious talk-a-thon,not compelling for the screen Review: LIONS FOR LAMBS preached and talked me out.I was exhausted looking at talking heads (albeit it really famous ones) when I would have rather "heard" this film over NPR Radio! Fortunately,its 80+ minutes was about all I really could have stood from Redford's unengaging cinematic approach to LIONS FOR LAMBS.I am not suggesting that what this film has to say is anything at all that I would personally disagree, it 's just simply I found the style of the film 100% un-cinematic and uninteresting.Frankly, a documentary such as NO END IN SIGHT was IMO far more compelling than this turkey,Streep,Cruise,Redford or no Streep,Cruise,Redford; their presence does not make this a great film to watch just like the recent remake of THE MANCHURIAN CANDIDATE.Doesn't the old saying go,"Children should be heard and not seen"?....well, if it doesn't it should!Glad I got to see this at a free screening.It was a major disappointment! Does this product review convey a negative or positive sentiment?

Show your work and conclude with the exact phrasing "Therefore, the final answer is [answer]." where [answer] is just the final number or expression that solves the problem.
user
A: Negative