[QUESTION] Test for natural language inference.
Premise: "A skier doing a trick by a snow mound while a man films it with a camera."
Hypothesis: "Two people are riding a tandem bike."
Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell
They would not be riding a bike if they are doing a trick by a snow mound as you do not ride a bike in the snow.
The answer is no.

Q: Premise: "A baby exploring his house with the dog."
Hypothesis: "Baby plays with dog."
Do we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
A: Exploring with the dog means the baby plays with the dog.
The answer is yes.

QUESTION: Premise: "A man with a large feather in his hat rides a horse."
Hypothesis: "The man is in a kitchen."
Do we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?

Let's solve it slowly: The man rides a horse so can't be in a kitchen.
The answer is no.

[QUESTION] Given the sentence "A man reads his paper on the bench." can we conclude that "The man is outside catching up on the latest headlines."?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
A man reads his paper on the bench outside catching up on the latest headlines. .
The answer is yes.

Q: Given the sentence "The large goose is flapping his wings near the water." can we conclude that "The goose swims in the water."?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
A: One can not swims in and flapping near the water simultaneously.
The answer is no.

[QUESTION] Premise: "Four people are in water talking with mountains in the background."
Based on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "The people are dry." is true?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Show your work and conclude with the exact phrasing "Therefore, the final answer is [answer]." where [answer] is just the final number or expression that solves the problem.
user
People cannot be dry and in the water at the same time.
The answer is no.