[QUESTION] Test for natural language inference.
Premise: "A mountain climber stops for a drink."
Hypothesis: "A man climbing a mountain needs water."
Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell
It is logical that the mountain climber would need water and stop for a drink.
The answer is yes.

Q: Given the sentence "Two men are talking a flower stand." can we conclude that "Two men punching each other."?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
A: Two men cannot be talking and punching each other at the same time.
The answer is no.

QUESTION: Given the sentence "He is skateboarding." is it true that "A skateboarder is showing off for his wife."?

Let's solve it slowly: He is skateboarding does not imply showing of for his wife.
The answer is it is not possible to tell.

[QUESTION] Given the sentence "There is a person in zebra striped pants and another person in a giraffe print pair of pants both lying down." is it true that "There are two people lying down."?
Sentence 2 is a shorter way of saying that two people are lying down as was explained in sentence one.
The answer is yes.

Q: Premise: "A man falls to his knees as he entertains the guest."
Based on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "The man is kicking a hole in his wall." is true?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
A: A man cannot falls to his knees if the man is kicking.
The answer is no.

[QUESTION] Premise: "A cat sits on top of a store sign."
Based on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "A cat laps up milk outside on the porch." is true?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Show your work and conclude with the exact phrasing "Therefore, the final answer is [answer]." where [answer] is just the final number or expression that solves the problem.
user
A cat cannot be on a store sign and on the porch.
The answer is no.