Ques:Title: Tacky lyrics with incongruous easy-listening instrumentals, sugary harmonies Product review: "Afternoon Delight" by Starland Vocal Band was the first song I thought of in response to the question "what would you think would be the WORST make-out song of all time?" as asked in a customer discussion forum, here at Amazon ("Pop Community").Moreover, that song is not merely a bad choice for make-out music, it is a bad choice for any purpose except parody. Tacky lyrics, on the same level as jokes by sniggering 6th graders, were combined with incongruous easy-listening instrumentals and overly-sugary harmonies. Embellished with instrumental sound effects of rockets shooting up.The 4-part harmony would have been OK if combined with better songs. It's possible that this band later produced better material, but after hearing "Afternoon Delight" played way too many times, I avoided anything from this band, and thus cannot comment on the other tracks of this compilation album. Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?

Ans:unflattering
-----
Ques:Title: A "must-read" for child language researchers Product review: This is a compelling account of how, and why, children acquire language the way they do. The book argues strenuously against the nativist proposals of Noam Chomsky and Steven Pinker, in particular the notion of Universal Grammar. Tomasello offers an alternative account based on an eclectic mix of "usage-based" approaches to language, including Construction Grammar and various strains of cognitive and functional linguistics.Tomasello's ideas deserve to be taken very seriously within linguistics. His background in experimental psychology and his research experience with chimpanzees inform his ideas on language acquisition and keep them grounded in psychological and biological reality. On the other hand, his nemesis Steven Pinker is very compelling in his own right (and the best writer in the field). I have to admit I can't decide who's right, Pinker or Tomasello, but I relish their battle of ideas. Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?

Ans:flattering
-----
Ques:Title: Great Peices, Completes my Nativity Product review: I received these beautifully crafted willow tree peices as a gift. I absolutely love them. I have been slowly collecting Willow Tree Figurines and I believe they are peices that not only represent real life situations, but they are so well made they will stand the test of time. As for the Nativity - I love it so much it sits out ALL year long. It is just too beautiful to put away. Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?

Ans:flattering
-----
Ques:Title: Okay, until... Product review: I threw the book away when the pastor in the book started talking about "Spiritual Israel". I realize this is a piece of fiction but I got offended at the suggestion that Christians (the Church) replaced Israel. When God was making "everlasting" promises to Israel, it was to Abraham's seed through Isaac and Jacob. Period. Not once did the O.T. say "Spiritual Israel". Why anyone would believe this nonsense is beyond me. Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?

Ans:

Show your work and conclude with the exact phrasing "Therefore, the final answer is [answer]." where [answer] is just the final number or expression that solves the problem.
user
unflattering
-----