Given a real-life anecdote of a complex ethical situation, generate a suitable title that describes the main event/root cause of the situation. Imagine that the given text is a social media post, and you have to write the title of the post, so the users can decide to read the main text or not.
One example is below.
Q: My boyfriend (well just call him M) and I are creators on Instagram (he is also on TikTok). I'm a digital and traditional artist and in one of my classes we create t shirts and things (socks, lanyards, water bottles, stickers, you name it). I'm a big fan of putting my art on t shirts so I can sell them.

M wanted to make some posts for TikTok and wanted to use the shirt I made today. My one personal rule is that if the shirt isn't being given to someone else, then I wear it first (this is because I know I wont get it back. Ive made one other shirt that I've worn, and he wore it for a week and hasn't given it back.) So I told him no, because I haven't worn the shirt yet. 

M proceeded to complain about not having content to post, and how his IG post today didn't get any engagement, saying "of course you dont know, because you never look."

Am I the asshole for wanting to wear the shirt I made just once?
A: wanting to wear a shirt
Rationale: The paragraph describes an argument of the author with her boyfriend regarding not wanting to give the shirt she just made before wearing herself. This desire to wear the shirt raises the ethical situation.
Q: AITA? I saw this post on Facebook and since I'm also trans I know how hard this time can be for defending a trans family, I might have jumped the gun a little bit so I'm just trying to find out if i am indeed the asshole.

&amp;#x200B;

here's a rundown on what happened, I was browsing Facebook as I normally do when I have nothing better to do, when I see a post sharing a news article saying "Britain's first Transgender family reveals son is also transitioning" so me also being tansgender I was pissed reading the text they shared with the link was as follows 

  
"Tax-payer funded child abuse"   
"the next stonen generation"  
"The parents should be put down" 

&amp;#x200B;

after reading this I wasn't very happy to say the least, so after I read the article I jumped into the comments and this is what unfolded there,  


Me: I really don't understand why this make's news, it's not uncommon for kids to understand who they really are, I identify as transgender and I've felt this way since I was 7, so there is no way people can start saying this is a bad thing or that the parents are doing anything wrong.

&amp;#x200B;

OP: it's happens more often than it used to. Maybe the parents should seek therapy for their child so he can crow to be happy and grateful in the body that god gave him. 

&amp;#x200B;

Me: or maybe god doesn't have anything to do with it.  


OP: Doesn't He? Or is that just your opinion?  


Me: I don't see why "God" would have made us able to feel this way if it isn't natural , and honestly is's disgusting that people are putting shit on them I know how fucking hard this can be to go through

&amp;#x200B;

and then they simply replied with "If you have a problem you can delete me" which I promptly blocked them, hopefully this is enough to go on, for you to judge if I was the asshole.
A:

Show your work and conclude with the exact phrasing "Therefore, the final answer is [answer]." where [answer] is just the final number or expression that solves the problem.
user
defending this family