[QUESTION] Can we conclude from "Group of people illuminated by soft oil lantern light." that "People are next to a light."?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell
When people are next to a light they will be illuminated by it.
The answer is yes.

Q: If "A man selling hand-drawn portraits by the street." does that mean that "A man is drinking tea in a cafe."?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
A: Selling portraits by the street cannot occur with drinking tea in a cafe.
The answer is no.

QUESTION: Premise: "Two white dogs outside on a sunny day."
Hypothesis: "Two dogs running outside."
Do we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?

Let's solve it slowly: The dogs may be outside but they are not necessarily running.
The answer is it is not possible to tell.

[QUESTION] Test for natural language inference.
Premise: "A dog and cat laying down together."
Hypothesis: "A cat laying on top of a dog."
Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell
Not all dogs and cats laying together are on top of one another.
The answer is it is not possible to tell.

Q: Premise: "A group poses for a picture in front of a frozen waterfall."
Based on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "A group posing for a picture." is true?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
A: A group that poses for a picture is a group posing for a picture.
The answer is yes.

[QUESTION] Premise: "A man and a woman exercising in a park."
Hypothesis: "A couple sit on the couch."
Do we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?

Show your work and conclude with the exact phrasing "Therefore, the final answer is [answer]." where [answer] is just the final number or expression that solves the problem.
user
People exercising in a park cannot simultaneously sit on a couch.
The answer is no.