[QUESTION] Can we conclude from "Four people are rowing in a canoe on a calm peaceful lake." that "People row a canoe over large ocean waves."?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell
A calm peaceful lake is definitely does not produce ocean waves.
The answer is no.

Q: If "A child sits staring on a hill side." does that mean that "A child sits on a hill side."?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
A: The child must be looking at something while sitting on the hill side.
The answer is yes.

QUESTION: Test for natural language inference.
Premise: "A group of people in a blurry photo are standing in concentric circles and clapping."
Hypothesis: "A photo of a smiling man sits on the desk."
Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell

Let's solve it slowly: A smiling man can't be simultaneously be a group of people.
The answer is no.

[QUESTION] If "The woman and little girl are sitting in the brown leather chair." does that mean that "Two females stand outside."?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
The woman means one adult female which is very different than two females. The sct of sitting is contradictory to the act of stand.
The answer is no.

Q: Given the sentence "A man carting a little girl around in a trash barrel." is it true that "The man is carting the girl around."?
A: The man is carting the girl around because he has her in a trash barrel.
The answer is yes.

[QUESTION] Premise: "A man on a phone and a woman are in front of a wall."
Based on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "A man on a phone and a woman are near a wall." is true?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Show your work and conclude with the exact phrasing "Therefore, the final answer is [answer]." where [answer] is just the final number or expression that solves the problem.
user
Being in front of a wall and near a wall could be two totally different things.
The answer is it is not possible to tell.