In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: identity-attack and non-identity-attack. Identity attack refers to anything rude or disrespectful about someone's identity, including appearance, race, gender, and sexual orientation.

[Q]: Comment: It will be called another car accident soon, instead of a muslim terrorist attack.
[A]: Identity-attack


[Q]: Comment: I am a gay man, chaste & celibate, with "tendencies" rather than just an orientation or supposed "disorder", and a former priest. The dearth of celibate integrated fellow priests was largely why I left active ministry. My experience is that gay priests tend to be more sexually active than straight priests, although both (forgive the binary constructs) are at least periodically active and to a staggering extent. Solid accounts by rare seminary or chancery personnel underline this reality. Yes, concupiscence is a function of humanity, so let's start such conversations by being compassionate and, where required, forgiving. But we must also acknowledge that the sideways living of enough priests, and the bishops who manage them and who themselves live less than integrated lives, give cover to those in their ranks who engage in criminal, and not merely immoral, behavior. You're only as sick as your secrets; an elite hierarchy calling out this phenomenon as a disorder is more than ironic.
[A]: Identity-attack


[Q]: Comment: OK...let's have that conversation.

1) As I stated earlier.....blacks that kill other blacks tend to go to prison for that crime.

2) Very rarely does a cop get convicted for killing someone who happens to be unarmed.

3) While the DOJ cleared the officer in the Ferguson case (as did the primary investigation....and rightly so in my opinion), their investigation unveiled some other stinky things taking place with regards to how the Ferguson PD and City interacts with the black community there.  That also needs to be part of the conversation.

4) As another poster commented....when a child is beaten to death or nearly to death by a parent or guardian, no one comes on here and complain that no one is talking about child-on-child assaults, which happen in a greater number.  Yet, when the discussion is police treatment of blacks, some have to bring up black on black crime.  Why is that?
[A]:

Show your work and conclude with the exact phrasing "Therefore, the final answer is [answer]." where [answer] is just the final number or expression that solves the problem.
user
Identity-attack


