TASK DEFINITION: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.
PROBLEM: Comment: The authors of the  JJ report insist that homosexuality played no role in the abuse crisis, but their own data undermine this conclusion. For example, they plainly admit that “81% of the victims [between 1950 and 2002] were male,” and that 78% were post-pubescent.

So if the abusers weren’t pedophiles, and the victims were mostly adolescent males, wouldn’t that make the victimizers homosexuals?

What else could we possibly be talking about if not homosexuality?

Why can't you answer this question?

SOLUTION: Non-obscene

PROBLEM: Comment: IF you are perverted enough to believe what you wrote, you need to stop listening to CNN and stay away from Hillary and the DNC. For 8 years we've had a race baiting president that lied his way into office hand had one failure after another and i'm betting you soaked it up ignoring or making excuses for all his failures. Our country will again move forward as the damage Obama did to us is repaired.  Wake up and smell the coffee..

SOLUTION: Non-obscene

PROBLEM: Comment: Damn filthy violent Jainists!

SOLUTION:

Show your work and conclude with the exact phrasing "Therefore, the final answer is [answer]." where [answer] is just the final number or expression that solves the problem.
user
Obscene

