In this task, you are given a text of many news articles seperated by special token "|||||". Your task is to summarize them.

[Q]: Kylie Jenner Your Eye Kit Stinks, Gives Us Headaches ... Customers Complain 
  
 Customers Complain Kylie Jenner's Eyeshadow's Giving Us Headaches 
  
 EXCLUSIVE 
  
 One of Kylie Jenner's eye kits has become a real pain for customers who've filed complaints about chemical-induced headaches. 
  
 At least 15 people filed complaints within the past 2 weeks with the Better Business Bureau, claiming they smelled "chemicals and glue" when opening Kylie's Royal Peach Eyeshadow Palette. 
  
 Customers described the odor as "spray paint" or "paint thinner," and one said it stunk so bad she put the whole package outside her house. There's also at least one complaint of the makeup causing "a horrible headache." 
  
 The BBB tells us Kylie Cosmetics launched an investigation immediately and found an adhesive in the packaging was causing the smell. Kylie's company insists it's safe to use ... according to the BBB. 
  
 No word if the packaging has been changed, but the BBB says it got fewer complaints this week. We reached out to Kylie Cosmetics ... but no word back. ||||| A photo posted by Kylie (@kyliejenner) on Jan 7, 2017 at 4:40pm PST 
  
 The 19-year-old 'Keeping Up With the Kardashians' star who built up her beauty empire Kylie Cosmetics over two years before launching it last year launched a new eye make-up kit, which features 12 shades of eye powder and an eyeshadow brush, to her ever expanding cosmetics line on Thursday (12.01.17), and the star has revealed the product was snapped up in under 10 minutes.The teen entrepreneur announced the news of her instant sell-out on the brand's Instagram account with a picture of the latest item. 
  
  
  
  
  
 The post read: "#TheRoyalPeachPalette sold out in 9 MINUTES!!! Congrats to everyone who got theirs! You're going to fall in love with this palette and I'm excited to see the looks you all create!."And the television personality has teased she will continue to develop her collection and will be adding more items to her line "very soon".The upload continued: "So much more to come very soon. X."The beauty mogul announced she was planning to expand her range earlier this month to include the new eye make-up, and she shared an image of the exterior packaging, which features Kylie's brunette eyes beaming out under golden brown and royal blue eyeshadow, as well as a sneak preview of the colours in the product to social media.Alongside the upload Kylie included all of the product details, including the price and additional features in the kit, such as a mirror and a brush. ||||| One of Kylie Jenner’s eyeshadow palettes has come under fire for giving customers headaches. According to TMZ, at least 15 people have complained about the Kylie Royal Peach Eyeshadow Palette to the Better Business Bureau within the last two weeks, saying they could smell “chemicals and glue” when they opened it. 
  
 Some customers compared the smell to “spray paint” or “paint thinner”, with one saying she had to take the whole package outside because the odour was so strong. The worst account has a customer saying the palette gave her a “horrible headache.” Kylie Cosmetics was apparently quick to take action, and investigated the strange smells. They discovered it was coming from an adhesive in the packaging, so not the actual product, and told the BBB the product is safe to use. |||||
[A]: It's not every day that a new packet of makeup smells so bad it needs to be taken outside to air out. Such is the conundrum facing teen beauty mogul Kylie Jenner after her much-anticipated Royal Peach Eyeshadow Palette, which IOL reports sold out in nine minutes last month, is being slammed for smelling like "spray paint" and "paint thinner." TMZ reports that more than 15 complaints have been filed with the Better Business Bureau, with one user complaining of a "horrible headache." Jenner, who's known for turning to social media to warn her fans about fake products, has yet to respond to complaints, but Kylie Cosmetics has announced that it's a packaging adhesive and not the makeup itself that's causing the smell, reports Cosmopolitan. It's unclear whether the packaging has been changed, but the BBB notes fewer reports this week than last. (The massive Kardashian brand encompasses hundreds of trademark applications alone.)


[Q]: Libya unrest: Evacuation of Tripoli migrants planned 
  
 Rebels have almost completely surrounded Tripoli 
  
 The International Organisation for Migration (IOM) says it is organising an evacuation of thousands of foreign workers from Libya's capital, Tripoli. 
  
 An IOM spokeswoman said thousands of people wanted to leave as fighting approaches the city. 
  
 Rebels have said that at least 30 fighters have died and 120 have been injured as they attempt to take control of Zlitan, east of the capital. 
  
 They have sought to take control of the strategic coastal town since August. 
  
 "Battles began in the early hours of today and the rebels have liberated most of Zlitan," rebel spokesman Gemal Salem told Reuters. 
  
 Major obstacle 
  
 It is not possible for the BBC to independently verify these claims however government troops have been fighting rebels in the area for months. 
  
 The town, some 93 miles (150km) east of the capital, represents a major obstacle in the path from the nearby city of Misrata to Tripoli. 
  
 Meanwhile, there have also been clashes to the west, south and east of Tripoli as rebels push back government forces. 
  
 Nato, enforcing a UN-mandated no-fly zone to protect civilians since March, controls sea access to Tripoli. 
  
 An IOM spokeswoman said an operation to rescue stranded foreign workers - many of them Egyptians - would begin in the coming days. 
  
 "We have a very limited window of opportunity to carry out this operation because of the fighting," said Jemini Pandya. 
  
 "We are looking at all options available, but it will probably have to be by sea," she added during a news conference in Geneva. 
  
 Such a move would almost certainly require the co-operation of all sides in the fighting to ensure evacuees made it safely onto boats, says the BBC's Geneva correspondent, Imogen Foulkes. 
  
 Land route closed 
  
 Since the conflict in Libya began in February, an estimated 600,000 migrant workers have fled the country, many with the help of the IOM, says our correspondent. 
  
 But many foreign workers still remain in Tripoli. 
  
 The last land escape route - the road west from Tripoli to Tunisia - has now been closed by fighting after rebel forces moved into the town of Zawiya, just 50km (30 miles) from the capital. 
  
 On Thursday, rebel forces captured an oil refinery outside the town. 
  
 Although much of the fuel used by the Libyan army is smuggled across the border from Tunisia and Algeria, the refinery provides supplies for the capital, Tripoli, the BBC's Matthew Price reports from Tripoli. 
  
 Rebel forces have also recently advanced to the south of Tripoli, capturing the town of Gharyan. 
  
 Libya's conflict broke out in February, inspired by uprisings in Tunisia and Egypt which toppled the presidents of those countries. 
  
 Rebels quickly consolidated gains in the east of the country, but until recently Col Gaddafi's forces held much of the west. ||||| ZAWIYAH, Libya Libyan rebels fought fierce battles in two coastal cities on either side of the capital Tripoli on Friday in a drive to topple Muammar Gaddafi, but met stiff resistance from forces loyal to the long-time leader. 
  
 Sustained blasts from rocket-propelled grenades, mortars and anti-aircraft guns rang out in the center of Zawiyah, a city on the coastal highway 50 km (30 miles) west of Tripoli that the rebels entered this week, in a clash that killed at least two. 
  
 As they pushed to consolidate control of the city and its strategic oil refinery, rebels in Zawiyah's central square exchanged heavy fire with Gaddafi forces holed up inside a nearby hospital before driving them out, Reuters witnesses said. 
  
 East of Tripoli, opposition forces fought bloody street battles in the city of Zlitan but suffered heavy casualties, a Reuters reporter there said. A rebel spokesman said 32 rebel fighters were killed, with 150 wounded. 
  
 Rebel advances have cut off Tripoli from its main supply routes, putting Gaddafi's four-decade rule under heavy pressure. 
  
 But Gaddafi's information minister, Moussa Ibrahim, said late on Friday the government's military retained the upper hand and scorned what he described as 'bands of insurgents'. 
  
 With rebels pushing on the ground, NATO has pressed on with its campaign from the air and its warplanes pounded targets in the capital overnight. 
  
 Gaddafi's government has blamed NATO bombings for scores of civilian deaths and said 27 people were killed in the most recent raids on Tripoli. NATO accuses Gaddafi forces of housing military assets near civilians. 
  
 MIGRANT WORKERS 
  
 In another sign the fighting is hitting closer to Gaddafi's inner circle, the brother of the spokesman who has served as the Tripoli government's public face was reported killed in a front line city. The government blamed NATO attack helicopters. 
  
 Libyan officials separately brought journalists to a residential district where a compound of several large buildings was blasted to pieces. Neighbors said it belonged to Abdullah al-Senussi, Gaddafi's brother-in-law and head of intelligence. 
  
 NBC News reported Gaddafi was making preparations to leave Libya with his family for possible exile in Tunisia, but that it was unclear if he would follow through. NBC said the information came from U.S. officials who cited intelligence reports. 
  
 A spokeswoman for the International Organization for Migration (IOM), Jemini Pandya, said the operation to rescue thousands of Egyptians and other foreigners trapped in Tripoli by the latest fighting would begin within days. 
  
 "We are looking at all options available, but it will probably have to be by sea," she told a Geneva news conference. 
  
 More than 600,000 of up to 2.5 million foreigners, mostly Asian and African migrant workers, have fled Libya in six months of fighting. But thousands remained in Tripoli, which until this week was calm and a safe two-hour drive from Tunisia. 
  
 The route has been cut since the rebels entered Zawiyah, which lies on the coastal highway, six days ago. In Zawiyah, medics at another local hospital said two dead and three wounded had been taken there from the recent fighting. 
  
 On Thursday they took the neighboring town of Sabratha, and on Friday they seized the nearby town of Surman. 
  
 Several hundred rebels and their supporters gathered on the streets of Surman, just off the highway, to celebrate the victory, flying the rebel green, red and black flag. 
  
 "SENUSSI HOUSE" HIT 
  
 In Tripoli, Omar Masood, an oil engineer who lives across the street from the compound that was destroyed, said it had been struck before dawn and belonged to Senussi, one of the most senior figures in Gaddafi's leadership. 
  
 A large building had been reduced to rubble. The grounds appeared to be grand, with a fountain and children's swing set and a garden with a live gazelle standing amid the ruins. Officials could not say if it was Senussi's house or whether he was present at the time. 
  
 Senussi, who is married to Gaddafi's sister, is one of three figures along with Gaddafi and his son Saif al-Islam wanted by the International Criminal Court for war crimes. The court's prosecutor blames him for killing civilians. 
  
 A government official said the brother of Moussa Ibrahim -- the spokesman whose briefings have been broadcast worldwide throughout the six-month-old uprising -- was killed by a NATO helicopter gunship in the central square of Zawiyah. 
  
 A Reuters reporter at the front east of Tripoli said rebels had launched an assault on Gaddafi's forces in Zlitan, the closest front line east of the capital. Many wounded were being brought to the rebels' field hospital. 
  
 "Battles began in the early hours of today and the rebels have liberated most of Zlitan," rebel spokesman Gemal Salem said by telephone. "Now the fighting is in the west of Zlitan." 
  
 (Additional reporting by Missy Ryan in Tripoli; Robert Birsel in Benghazi, Libya; Stephanie Nebehay in Geneva; Ulf Laessing in Garyan, Libya; Mariam Karouny in Beirut; William Maclean in London; and Souhail Karam in Rabat; Tarek Amara in Tunis; Writing by Richard Valdmanis and Peter Graff; Editing by Maria Golovnina) |||||
[A]: Another sign that rebels are tightening their grip on Moammar Gadhafi: An international agency says it plans to evacuate thousands of foreign workers from Tripoli, reports Reuters. The foreigners are mostly Egyptians who have no easy way out now that rebels have closed in on the capital and shut highways. The International Organization for Migration is trying to organize a rescue effort in the next few days, probably by sea. "We have a very limited window of opportunity to carry out this operation because of the fighting," says a spokeswoman. The tricky part, notes the BBC, is that such an evacuation would probably require the cooperation of the rebels, NATO, and the Libyan government. Rumors are swirling, meanwhile, that Gadhafi himself is planning to flee the country.


[Q]: Skip in Skip x Embed x Share CLOSE The justices will hear the case of a transgender teen who filed a lawsuit against his Virginia school district so he could use the boys' bathroom. Newslook 
  
 Gavin Grimm poses on his front porch in Gloucester, Virginia, in August. His lawsuit over a school district's refusal to let him use the boys' bathroom has reached the Supreme Court. (Photo: Steve Helber, AP) 
  
 WASHINGTON -- The Supreme Court agreed Friday to take up the controversial issue of transgender rights, instantly transforming what had loomed as a holding-pattern term with only eight justices into one featuring another major social policy issue. 
  
 The justices will consider a Virginia school district's challenge to Obama administration guidelines requiring that schools allow transgender students to use restrooms matching their chosen gender, rather than birth gender. 
  
 A federal appeals court ruled in April for high school student Gavin Grimm in one of several lawsuits challenging the Department of Education rule. The justices could have sidestepped the issue pending action by other appellate courts but decided to wade in now. The case is likely to be heard by April and decided by late June. 
  
 While the focus of the case is on discrimination in education, the court's ruling could have a major impact on other forms of bias against transgender men and women, such as in employment, said Shannon Minter, legal director of the National Center for Lesbian Rights. 
  
 "For transgender people, the stakes of this case are incredibly high," Minter, a transgender man, said. "Whatever the court rules in Grimm may ensure that transgender people are accepted and included as equal members of our society, or it may relegate them to outsiders for decades to come." 
  
 Grimm, a 17-year-old high school senior in Gloucester County, Virginia, identified as a boy several years ago and eventually sought to use the boys' bathroom in school. He is represented by the American Civil Liberties Union, whose legal director, Steven Shapiro, had said, “We want to get it resolved for his benefit as fast as we can.” 
  
 Ironically, though, Grimm's opportunity to set a nationwide standard for transgender students will work against his own wishes during his senior year. That's because the Supreme Court in August blocked his victory at the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 4th Circuit from taking effect while it considered the school board's petition. Had the high court turned down the case, Grimm would have won boys' bathroom rights immediately. 
  
 “I was disappointed but not discouraged,” Grimm said in a conference call Friday evening. “I’m looking forward to using my platform ... so that hopefully in the future, no other kids are going to have to go through this.” 
  
 In a statement issued by the American Civil Liberties Union earlier, Grimm said, “I never thought that my restroom use would ever turn into any kind of national debate. The only thing I ever asked for was the right to be treated like everyone else." 
  
 Twenty-three states, including North Carolina and Texas, have challenged the administration's right to interpret its own regulations without legislative action or judicial review. And several conservative justices have argued in the past that agencies have no such power. The court refused Friday to take up that broader issue as part of Grimm's case. 
  
 By agreeing to hear the case now, the justices likely are hoping that a ninth colleague will be confirmed by the time the case is heard. But with Senate Republicans blocking President Obama's nomination of federal appeals court Judge Merrick Garland, that is far from guaranteed. 
  
 If the court goes forward with only eight justices, it could produce a tie vote that leaves the lower court's decision intact. That would be a victory for Grimm and the ACLU, but without national precedent. 
  
 The battle over so-called bathroom bills has played out in many states as conservative lawmakers seek to force students to use facilities that correspond to their gender at birth, and transgender students fight for the right to follow their gender identity. 
  
 The Supreme Court was urged to weigh in on the issue of transgender bathrooms. (Photo: Elaine Thompson, AP) 
  
 Grimm's case is based on the Constitution’s guarantee of equal protection as well as Title IX, a federal law that bars sex discrimination in education. The Education Department invoked that law when issuing its guidelines in May, threatening federal enforcement -- including the loss of federal education funds. 
  
 Kyle Duncan, the lawyer for the Gloucester County School Board, argued in court papers that under Title IX, "our nation’s schools have structured their facilities and programs around the idea that in certain intimate settings, men and women may be separated 'to afford members of each sex privacy from the other sex.'" The appeals court's ruling "turns that longstanding expectation upside down," he said. 
  
 The Virginia lawsuit had been decided by two federal courts by the time the administration weighed in. Since then, about two dozen states have filed suit against the guidelines. 
  
 In August, a federal judge in Texas sided with school districts opposed to the directive, preventing the Education Department from implementing its guidance nationwide. Judge Reed O'Connor said federal agencies exceeded their authority under the 1972 law banning sex discrimination in schools. That case is now pending before another federal appeals court. 
  
 Without Supreme Court intervention, school districts in the 4th Circuit -- which includes Virginia, Maryland, North Carolina, South Carolina and West Virginia -- would be bound by the appeals court ruling in Grimm's favor, while all other school districts would be bound by the Texas judge's decision blocking the administration policy. 
  
 The Gloucester County School Board's appeal has garnered broad support from conservatives, including 20 states, 114 members of Congress, and former Education Secretary William Bennett, who argued that under Title IX the term "sex" refers to an "immutable physiological characteristic, not an individual's self-reported 'internal sense of gender.'" 
  
 But Sarah Warbelow, legal director at the Human Rights Campaign, the nation's largest gay rights organization, said 18 states already allow transgender people to use facilities consistent with their gender identity without problems. 
  
 “The Supreme Court’s ultimate decision in this case will have a profound impact on transgender youth across the country,” Warbelow said. 
  
 Read or Share this story: http://usat.ly/2eVMtH7 ||||| WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court will take up the case of a Virginia school board that wants to prevent a transgender teenager from using the boys' bathroom at his high school. 
  
 The justices said Friday they will hear the appeal from the Gloucester County school board sometime next year. The high court's order means that student Gavin Grimm will not be able to use the boys' bathroom in the meantime. 
  
 A lower court had ordered the school board to accommodate Grimm, but the justices in August put that order on hold while they considered whether to hear the appeal. 
  
 Grimm is a 17-year-old high school senior. ||||| 17-year-old student Gavin Grimm, a transgender male, was banned from using the men's restroom by the Gloucester County School Board. A Supreme Court stay now prevents Grimm from using the facility while justices decide whether to hear the case. (McKenna Ewen,Adriana Usero/The Washington Post) 
  
 17-year-old student Gavin Grimm, a transgender male, was banned from using the men's restroom by the Gloucester County School Board. A Supreme Court stay now prevents Grimm from using the facility while justices decide whether to hear the case. (McKenna Ewen,Adriana Usero/The Washington Post) 
  
 Gavin Grimm is a senior at Gloucester High School in Virginia. 
  
 This op-ed has been updated to reflect the news that the Supreme Court will take up Grimm’s case. 
  
 If you told me two years ago that the Supreme Court was going to have to approve whether I could use the school restroom, I would have thought you were joking. 
  
 In the fall of 2014, I began my sophomore year at Gloucester High School in Virginia. At the end of the previous school year, after years of stress and anxiety, I had finally come out to my family as transgender. Over the summer, with the guidance of medical professionals and the support of my family, I legally changed my name and was finally able to live authentically as a boy in all aspects of my daily life. 
  
 I was excited about starting the new school year. Before school started, my mother and I met with the high school principal and guidance counselor, and they were understanding and supportive. I was a little nervous about how other kids would react, but I was more concerned about turning in my homework assignments, which tended to magically disappear as a result of my sometimes poor organizational skills. 
  
 At first, I used the nurse’s office restroom, but after a couple of weeks the long trips back and forth felt stigmatizing and unnecessary. I was using men’s restrooms in restaurants and shopping malls, so I told the principal I would like to use the boys’ restrooms at school, too. I thought then, perhaps naively, that this common-sense “issue” would be resolved quietly and privately, as it should have been. 
  
 If only. Even though I used the restrooms for almost two months without any disturbance, a group of parents and community members heard that “a girl” was using the boys’ restroom and began complaining. Instead of supporting me and the decision of the school administrators, the school board convened two public meetings, inviting the community to discuss my genitals and restroom usage in front of reporters and television cameras. 
  
 I continue to suffer daily because of the school board’s decision to make my bathroom use a matter of public debate. 
  
 After the public discussion, the school board passed a new policy to stop me from using the same bathrooms as other kids. The policy says students with “gender identity issues” can’t use the restrooms that match the gender they live every day. Instead, the school board said I should go back to using the nurse’s office or use a new “unisex” single-stall restroom so that no one else would have their privacy invaded by using the same restroom as me. It was humiliating and painful. 
  
 I feel the humiliation every time I need to use the restroom and every minute I try to “hold it” in the hopes of avoiding the long walk to the nurse’s office. And the humiliation can come when I least expect it. 
  
 Just a few weeks ago I was sitting with my friends at the high school football game and having fun — until I needed to take a restroom break. The stadium did not have the option of a single-stall restroom, and the main school building was locked. Suddenly a night out with my friends was marred by the realization that someone was going to have to take me to a gas station if I needed to use the restroom. Every day brings that little bit of extra planning and that nagging feeling that someone is going to find a new way to single me out. 
  
 What keeps me going is the knowledge that I am not the only transgender student out there, and I have the chance to make things better so other transgender kids do not have to go through what I am going through. With each step, my potential for positive impact has increased. First within my school district. Then within the federal courts, where a U.S. District Court ruling in my favor was stayed by the Supreme Court. And now, with the Supreme Court deciding Friday to take on the case itself, that impact could now potentially resonate across the nation. 
  
 I did not choose to announce to the news media that I am transgender. My school board made that decision for me. But now that I am visible, I want to use my position to help the country see transgender people like me as real people just living our lives. We are not perverse. We are not broken. We are not sick. We are not freaks. We cannot change who we are. Our gender identities are as innate as anyone else’s. 
  
 I hope the justices of the Supreme Court can see me and the rest of the transgender community for who we are — just people — and rule accordingly. |||||
[A]:

Show your work and conclude with the exact phrasing "Therefore, the final answer is [answer]." where [answer] is just the final number or expression that solves the problem.
user
Eight justices or no, the Supreme Court will tackle another major social issue after it announced Friday it will hear the case of a transgender teen who wants to use the men's restroom at his Virginia high school, the AP reports. In the Washington Post, 17-year-old Gavin Grimm says he used the men's room at his school for months after coming out as transgender until the school board got wind of it and held two "humiliating and painful" public meetings "to discuss my genitals and restroom usage." After the Gloucester County school board banned Grimm from using the men's room, Grimm won a court case to allow him to use the restroom that matches his gender identity, USA Today reports. But the Supreme Court put the lower court's decision on hold last summer and will hear the case next year, likely reaching a decision by June. The justices' decision to hear the case means Grimm won't be able to use the men's room during his senior year of high school, but he says he's willing to sacrifice if it means helping transgender students around the country. "I hope the justices of the Supreme Court can see me and the rest of the transgender community for who we are—just people—and rule accordingly," he says in the Post. “The Supreme Court’s ultimate decision in this case will have a profound impact on transgender youth across the country,” the Human Rights Campaign's legal director tells USA Today.


