[Q] Test for natural language inference.
Premise: "A hockey player attempting to score a goal."
Hypothesis: "Hockey player aiming for a goal."
Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell
[A] Aiming for a goal is the same as attempting to score a goal.
The answer is yes.

[Q] Premise: "Snowboarders are jumping their boards off a mound of snow."
Hypothesis: "Some people are very cold."
Do we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
[A] Just because snowboarders are jumping into snow does not mean that some people are very cold.
The answer is it is not possible to tell.

[Q] Premise: "A woman is sitting on a lawn chair holding a blown up of incredible hulk."
Hypothesis: "The woman is advertising."
Do we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?

Show your work and conclude with the exact phrasing "Therefore, the final answer is [answer]." where [answer] is just the final number or expression that solves the problem.
user
[A] Because a woman is holding a sign doesn't mean she is advertising.
The answer is it is not possible to tell.