A woman crossing a bridge is not necessarily to get to her car.. So what could be the question?
Question followed by answer: Test for natural language inference.
Premise: "Woman in a dress walking across a bridge."
Hypothesis: "The woman is crossing the bridge to get to her car."
Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell
it is not possible to tell


Men cannot be taking a break at the back of a business and be greeting customers at the same time.. So what could be the question?
Question followed by answer: Given the sentence "Two men taking a break at the back of a business." can we conclude that "Men greeting customers."?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
no


Man in a suit is a direct contradiction to a woman in a suit.. So what could be the question?
Question followed by answer: Can we conclude from "A man in a suit and a woman in a black skirt and boots are waiting at a ticket counter." that "A woman in a suit and a woman in a black skirt and boots are waiting at a ticket counter."?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell
no


They could not be flying if they were standing on risers both cannot be done at the same time.. So what could be the question?
Question followed by answer:

Show your work and conclude with the exact phrasing "Therefore, the final answer is [answer]." where [answer] is just the final number or expression that solves the problem.
user
If "Rear view of a choir group standing on risers with a chair filling a space between the risers." does that mean that "A choir group is flying in the sky."?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
no