Given a real-life anecdote of a complex ethical situation, identify who is wrong here. Classify each post into the following categories : AUTHOR (if the author of the post is wrong in the situation), OTHER (if any of the others mentioned in the paragraph is wrong), EVERYBODY (if everyone mentioned is wrong) and NOBODY (if no one is wrong in the situation).
One example is below.
Q: Pretty much was hanging out with two friends. I was watching the Lakers game. They won at the very last minute and I immediately hopped up and celebrated. Before I could even finish celebrating one friend started going on about how the Lakers suck. It just pissed me off so much I screamed at her to get out my room until she left. 


She knows I'm a huge fan and she likes them too. She was only saying it to antagonize me. Am I the dick here?
A: AUTHOR
Rationale: It is very rude to shout at someone and ask her to leave the room even if her comments may have antagonized the author. Hence author is at fault here.
Q: I just started doing stand up comedy. People keep telling me what I should write about! 'You should do a bit about this, you should do a bit about that' I hate it. Don't tell me what to write! If you want to write a joke, go write that joke!!! Also I didn't like an idea I heard so I told my friend to 'work on it a bit' and he was like 'thats not my job, thats your job'. Get fucked! This is my hobby not my job! Fuck off!

Am I the asshole?
A:

Show your work and conclude with the exact phrasing "Therefore, the final answer is [answer]." where [answer] is just the final number or expression that solves the problem.
user
EVERYBODY