QUESTION: Premise: "Black and white dog chewing on a canon camera setting in the grass the camera is black and white."
Based on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "The dog was playing in the water." is true?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

SOLUTION: Let's solve this gradually. A dog chewing on a camera in grass can not be playing in water.
Answer is no.


QUESTION: Test for natural language inference.
Premise: "Runners 14474 and 12188 run side by side in the new york city marathon."
Hypothesis: "Two friends keep each other company at the new york city marathon."
Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell

SOLUTION: Let's solve this gradually. Just because Runners 14474 and 12188 run side by side doesn't imply they are friends.
Answer is it is not possible to tell.


QUESTION: Given the sentence "The man is riding a motorcycle over jagged rocks." can we conclude that "A motorcyclist is riding down an unpaved road."?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

SOLUTION: Let's solve this gradually. A motorcyclist riding unpaved road is a rephrasing of a man riding a motorcycle over jagged rocks.
Answer is yes.


QUESTION: Can we conclude from "A man wearing a suit scratches the back of his head at a meeting." that "A man is with a group of people."?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell

SOLUTION:

Show your work and conclude with the exact phrasing "Therefore, the final answer is [answer]." where [answer] is just the final number or expression that solves the problem.
user
Let's solve this gradually. A MEETING IS USUALLY MORE THEN ONE PERSON WHICH IS A GROUP.
Answer is yes.