[QUESTION] Given the sentence "Three dogs run across the track." can we conclude that "The dogs are at school track meet."?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Dogs running does not mean they are participating in a school track meet.
The answer is it is not possible to tell.

Q: Given the sentence "Two adults and a small child washing hands." can we conclude that "Two adults and a small child are washing their hands after dinner."?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
A: Just because adults and a small child are washing hands doesn't imply after dinner.
The answer is it is not possible to tell.

QUESTION: Given the sentence "Group of people gathered in meeting like setting with food sitting in front of them." can we conclude that "There is a meeting."?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Let's solve it slowly: A group of people gathered in a meeting implies there is a meeting.
The answer is yes.

[QUESTION] Premise: "Three young boys walking down the street."
Hypothesis: "Two wearing hats."
Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
The boys were reading books in the living room before dinner time.
The answer is no.

Q: If "A woman in a green top and black pants is walking past some boats in the water." does that mean that "A woman is sleeping by some boats."?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
A: If a woman is walking past boats she is not sleeping by them.
The answer is no.

[QUESTION] Test for natural language inference.
Premise: "A wakeboarder is in midair doing a trick."
Hypothesis: "A person is outdoors."
Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell

Show your work and conclude with the exact phrasing "Therefore, the final answer is [answer]." where [answer] is just the final number or expression that solves the problem.
user
A wakeboarder is a person. A wakeboarder in midair is outdoors.
The answer is yes.