Q: Premise: "Mike holmgren on the field with his team the seattle seahawkss talking over practice details with an assistant coach."
Based on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "Mike holmgren is talking about the offensive strategies." is true?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
A: it is not possible to tell
Chain-of-thought: Just because Mike Holmgren is talking over practice details with an assistant coach doesn't mean those details are about offensive strategies.

Q: Premise: "A coppery dog leaps to catch a ball."
Based on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "There is person throwing the ball." is true?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
A: it is not possible to tell
Chain-of-thought: There are ball machines to throw balls. It does not have to be a person.

Q: Premise: "A man sits under an umbrella beside a pond while he works."
Hypothesis: "A woman is swimming in a pool."
Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
A: no
Chain-of-thought: A pond is made from fresh water whereas a pool is chlorinated.

Q: Premise: "This team of south african athletes have disabilities."
Hypothesis: "The team has athletes without legs."
Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
A: it is not possible to tell
Chain-of-thought:

Show your work and conclude with the exact phrasing "Therefore, the final answer is [answer]." where [answer] is just the final number or expression that solves the problem.
user
The team of athletes with disabilities does not imply that they are without legs.