[QUESTION] Test for natural language inference.
Premise: "A woman with a newspaper is looking at a man with a side pack on a street sidewalk."
Hypothesis: "A woman searching for her car."
Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell
A woman cannot search for her car and look at a man at the same time.
The answer is no.

[QUESTION] Premise: "A man in a white jacket sits behind a large machine with the logo dbs."
Hypothesis: "A man is sitting behind a giant poster."
Do we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
A giant poster is not the same thing as a large machine so both could not be in the same location.
The answer is no.

[QUESTION] Premise: "A baseball team celebrating victory after a winning game."
Hypothesis: "The team forgot to show up for the game."
Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
They would not be celebrating victory if they forgot to show up because they would have to be at the game to win.
The answer is no.

[QUESTION] Premise: "A mexican man unfolds a large piece of paper at a birthday celebration."
Based on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "A man is unfording paper at a birthday party." is true?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Show your work and conclude with the exact phrasing "Therefore, the final answer is [answer]." where [answer] is just the final number or expression that solves the problem.
user
A mexican man is a man. Unfolds a large piece of paper is a rephrasing of unfolding paper. And a party implies a celebration.
The answer is yes.