Teacher: Generate an appropriate single-sentence summary for the given text such that it includes the main topic of the text.
Teacher: Now, understand the problem? If you are still confused, see the following example:
By Marianna SpringSpecialist disinformation reporter, BBC News The adverts show the Democratic Party challenger with an earpiece, and say that he refused to have his ears checked for devices prior to the debate. The Biden campaign rejected the claims. The Trump campaign adverts ask: "Why won't Sleepy Joe commit to an ear test?" and "Who is in Joe's ear?" Accusations that presidential candidates have received debate help via hidden hearing devices are familiar, albeit unproven. Such allegations have been levelled against both Republican and Democratic candidates in the past. Prior to Tuesday's debate, the rumour about Mr Biden's supposed earpiece was circulating on several social networks, and was being promoted by the Trump campaign. At least 15 versions The advertising campaign was launched after the debate, and also promotes two other baseless but widely shared rumours about Mr Biden. One suggested he asked for breaks during the debate, and another accused him of refusing a "drug test". The photo featured in the advert is not from Tuesday's debate. It was first shared online in September 2019. In a number of the adverts, it has been doctored to show Mr Biden wearing wireless Apple headphones. This was not the case in the original image. Some versions circle the ear featuring the headphone. By Wednesday evening, there were at least 15 different versions of the advert, and according to Facebook's Ad Library, they had reached at least 10 million users. Facebook has pledged to label posts containing voting misinformation and point users towards accurate information ahead of the election. However its policy does not involve fact-checking political speech, including in advertisements. The company declined to comment about the latest Trump ad campaign. Rumour origins Hours before the debate, the claims went viral on Facebook and YouTube. Identical memes were pushed by a number of popular Facebook pages with names such as US Conservative and Unhinged Left. They claimed "Joe Biden should be inspected for a hidden earpiece as well as submit to a drug test before the debate". These memes are subject to fact-checks - and some have had warning labels applied to them on Facebook. The claims were picked up by Fox News and other conservative news outlets. They were further amplified by supporters of QAnon, an unfounded a conspiracy theory that claims President Trump is fighting a secret war against elite Satan-worshipping paedophiles. Those who believe in QAnon are known for promoting political disinformation on social media which targets opponents of the president. They shared close-up pictures of Mr Biden's ears, alleging a listening device was visible. During the debate, some also shared photos of a fold in Mr Biden's shirt, claiming it was caused by a wire, and of a supposed device on his wrist, where he wears a rosary in memory of his late son Beau. Nothing new Conspiracy theories about secret listening devices have been recycled in presidential election campaigns for the past two decades. Democratic candidate Hillary Clinton faced similar unfounded claims ahead of the 2016 presidential election. In 2004, rumours circulated among left-wing sites and blogs that President George W Bush was being aided by a secret earpiece. None of those allegations were found to be true. Even if a candidate did wear an earpiece, any advantage would be questionable. As TV and radio presenters can attest, listening to someone while simultaneously talking during the back-and-forth of a live event is a difficult skill to master.
Solution: US President Donald Trump's re-election campaign is running hundreds of Facebook advertisements pushing an unfounded conspiracy theory that Joe Biden cheated during the first US presidential debate.
Reason: This is a relevant summary for the given paragraph. It also contains explicit phrases from the given text

Now, solve this instance: European subsidies to farmers through the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) should be processed by 30 June. But European Commission sources said the government had asked for that date to be extended until 15 October. Nicola Sturgeon had earlier refused to confirm whether an extension was being sought. The subsequent confirmation from the commission led the Scottish Conservatives to accuse Ms Sturgeon of attempting to duck the issue, and claimed it was further evidence of a "culture of secrecy and denial in the SNP government". It is understood that the commission is still considering the request for an extension, with the Scottish government being encouraged to accelerate payments to farmers before next week's deadline. The deadline was also extended to October last year after problems with the Scottish government's new £178m IT system caused delays to payments which left many Scottish farmers facing a cash flow crisis, according to industry leaders. NFU Scotland President Andrew McCornick, speaking from the Highland Show, said: "We've asked for Scottish Government to have a clear and open dialogue with the industry on payments. Farmers and crofters should have been the first to know that once again there is to be a delay in payments. "This does nothing to restore trust or build confidence." 'Exceptional measure' The Scottish government had been facing fines of between £40m and £125m for failing to meet last year's deadline before the extension was agreed. At the time, the EU's commissioner for agriculture, Phil Hogan, stressed that the extension was an "exceptional measure" which reflected the difficulties some member states and devolved regions had experienced with the first year of payments under the new CAP. Ms Sturgeon, who is due to address farming leaders at the Royal Highland Show on Friday, was pressed on this year's payments by Ms Davidson at first minister's questions. The first minister said: "The government is extremely focused, led by (Rural Economy Secretary) Fergus Ewing, on making sure that payments are made, and that in the meantime there is a loan scheme available for farmers to ensure that we are taking care of their cash flow issues. "We will endeavour to make payments on time, and we will continue to discuss with the European Commission any contingency arrangements we consider are required. "Good progress has been made on making payments, both in terms of the 2015 round and also now in terms of the 2016 round." What are the CAP payments? Reforms to the CAP system saw the Single Farm Payment Scheme replaced by the new Basic Payment Scheme (BPS) in 2015. The BPS is the main EU subsidy available to farmers in Scotland, with the money being allocated by the Scottish government. The payments are designed to act as a safety net for farmers and crofters by supplementing their main business income. 19,674 different Scottish rural businesses received a total of about £650m in CAP payments last year. Ms Sturgeon said the government had been dealing with a "small number of known defects" that had been holding up some claims, but said there were now being progressed. The first minister added: "We are working to meet that deadline and we will continue to do so each and every day until that deadline." But Ms Davidson said Ms Sturgeon had refused to answer her question about whether the government was going to need an extension to the deadline this year, so it could therefore be "assumed that the answer is yes". Ms Davidson said 6,000 applications were still to be processed - about a third of the total for Scotland. She said: "At the start of the year Nicola Sturgeon spoke directly to farmers at the National Farmers Union conference, and she said 'we understand the difficulties that late payments caused to you last year, we apologise for those difficulties and we are determined not to repeat them'. "Another promise broken, why should rural Scotland ever trust you again?" 'Failed to deliver' Ms Sturgeon responded: "We continue to deliver this scheme, and we continue to seek to deliver it by the deadlines. "What we have done - which was a commitment I have directly to farmers - is put in place loan schemes so that farmers did get the cash that they depend on. "So we will continue to deliver this scheme, we will continue to work hard to rectify any problems in the IT system and we will also continue to argue for the protection of CAP payments in the longer term." After it emerged that the Scottish government had indeed sought an extension, Ms Davidson attacked the first minister and Rural Economy Secretary Fergus Ewing, saying they had "promised they would fix their broken farm payments system after last year's debacle". She said: "Instead, we now learn that the SNP has once again failed to deliver on time for Scotland's rural economy - risking another huge fine and further delays for hard-pressed farmers and crofters. "Instead of confronting this issue when I raised it with her today, the first minister tried to duck it. "This week, the SNP government has been lambasted for its lack of transparency. This sorry episode only confirms that the culture of secrecy and denial in the SNP government goes right to the top." A Scottish government spokesman replied that they had repeatedly made clear their "determination" to make the "vast majority" of CAP payments by the June deadline, and that "we are doing all we can to meet that goal". He said: "Officials have written to the European Commission to seek their agreement to extend the payment deadline - if necessary - from 30 June to 15 October for pillar one payments, on the grounds of the acutely challenging delivery and implementation issues we face in Scotland. This is simple prudence given the timescales involved."
Student:

Show your work and conclude with the exact phrasing "Therefore, the final answer is [answer]." where [answer] is just the final number or expression that solves the problem.
user
The Scottish government has again asked for an extension to the deadline for making EU farming payments, BBC Scotland understands.