A person on fire doesn't have to be in a house.. So what could be the question?
Question followed by answer: Premise: "A person on fire runs to the left and two other people face him."
Hypothesis: "The person caught on fire in the house."
Do we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
it is not possible to tell


The man is holding himself up so he cannot be falling off.. So what could be the question?
Question followed by answer: Premise: "A man wearing an unfastened helmet holds himself up on the side of a wall as people look on."
Based on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "A man is falling off of a wall." is true?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
no


The hat the child is wearing is not necessarily a baseball hat. The ball the child is holding is not necessarily a basketball.. So what could be the question?
Question followed by answer: Given the sentence "A small child wearing a hat and coat holding a large ball." can we conclude that "A kid in a baseball cap is holding a basketball."?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
it is not possible to tell


Jumping into a body of water does not imply jumping into a big yellow inner tube.. So what could be the question?
Question followed by answer:

Show your work and conclude with the exact phrasing "Therefore, the final answer is [answer]." where [answer] is just the final number or expression that solves the problem.
user
Given the sentence "A guy jumping off a dock into a body of water." is it true that "A man is jumping of a dock into a big yellow inner tube."?
it is not possible to tell