We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.

Example Input: We know that Bloomberg is convinced that guns are the reason his city is such a mess.
Example Output: Valid

Example Input: 32 years of gun control in Washington DC, crime has not been reduced.
Example Output: Valid

Example Input: As it is pretty much a democracy, then it is the right of the people to waive their own rights.
Example Output:

Show your work and conclude with the exact phrasing "Therefore, the final answer is [answer]." where [answer] is just the final number or expression that solves the problem.
user
Valid

