You are given two sentences. You have to find if there is entailment or agreement of the Hypothesis by the Premise. From the given pair of sentences, you should identify if there is enough information in the Premise to support the claim made in the Hypothesis. The Premise may not exactly be the same as Hypothesis. Your task is to return 'entails' if the premise supports hypothesis else return 'neutral'.

[Q]: Premise: We say the solution is saturated . 
 Hypothesis: If a solution contains so much solute that its solubility limit is reached, the solution is said to be saturated.
[A]: neutral


[Q]: Premise: Present-day plate motion constraint on mantle rheology and convection. 
 Hypothesis: Earthquakes mark the motions of colliding plates and the locations where plates plunge into the mantle.
[A]: neutral


[Q]: Premise: SECONDARY CARTILAGES Any abnormal growth of cartilage is a formation after the development of the primary cartilaginous skeleton, and hence is in one way a secondary cartilage. 
 Hypothesis: Early in the development of a human fetus, the skeleton is made entirely of cartilage.
[A]:

Show your work and conclude with the exact phrasing "Therefore, the final answer is [answer]." where [answer] is just the final number or expression that solves the problem.
user
neutral


