Q: Premise: "A dog tamer creates human jumping ring."
Based on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "The person owns the dog." is true?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
A: it is not possible to tell
Chain-of-thought: The dog tamer is not imply to have owns the dog.

Q: Given the sentence "Railroad crew working on train car with orange safety vest and yellow hard hats." can we conclude that "People ride a train through a city."?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
A: no
Chain-of-thought: People cannot be working on the train while riding the train.

Q: Given the sentence "A little girl in a white sweater with polka dots is playing with a wooden tracked train set." can we conclude that "A little girl is on an airplane flying to california."?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
A: no
Chain-of-thought: The little girl will not be playing with the tracked train set because she is flying to California.

Q: Given the sentence "A smiling bearded man wearing safety goggles and a brown checked shirt is holding a brown toy lemur which has a white face." can we conclude that "A man has a white rubber ball."?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
A: no
Chain-of-thought:

Show your work and conclude with the exact phrasing "Therefore, the final answer is [answer]." where [answer] is just the final number or expression that solves the problem.
user
One can be having either a toy lemur or a rubber ball.