In this task, you are given a text of many news articles seperated by special token "|||||". Your task is to summarize them.

[EX Q]: "The president is thinking about pardoning nobody," Anthony Scaramucci said. 
  
 | Pablo Martinez Monsivais/AP Photo Scaramucci: 'The president is thinking about pardoning nobody' 
  
 New White House Communications Director Anthony Scaramucci insisted that President Donald Trump isn't considering any pardons for family members or staffers targeted by special counsel Robert Mueller, and also dismissed Donald Trump Jr.'s meeting with a lawyer linked to Russian intelligence as a "non-event." 
  
 "The president is thinking about pardoning nobody," Scaramucci said in a combative interview Sunday on CNN's "State of the Union." 
  
 Story Continued Below 
  
 After host Jake Tapper pressed him on why Trump would tweet about his pardon powers, Scaramucci responded: "It has been coming up a lot, because there's an undercurrent of nonsensical stuff." 
  
 Morning Score newsletter Your guide to the permanent campaign — weekday mornings, in your inbox. Email Sign Up By signing up you agree to receive email newsletters or alerts from POLITICO. You can unsubscribe at any time. 
  
 Tapper interjected: "Because he has asked advisers about it." 
  
 "Oh, come on, Jake," responded Scaramucci, founder of the investment firm SkyBridge Capital. "This is the problem with the whole system. He's the president of the United States. If I turn to one of my staff members at SkyBridge and ask them a question and they run out to the news media and tell everyone what I'm thinking about, is that fair to the president?" 
  
 "The truth of the matter is that the president isn't going to have to pardon anybody, because the Russia thing is a nonsensical thing," Scaramucci continued. 
  
 Scaramucci, who said the White House needed to be better about its messaging, also alleged the investigations into a meeting among Trump Jr., Paul Manafort and Jared Kushner and a lawyer with ties to Russian intelligence agencies were much ado about nothing. 
  
 "Once they realized there was no legitimacy to it, people were walking out or they were on their iPhones," he said. "It was a non-event, and if we want to turn it into a two-week, four-week news cycle, that's fine. But it was a non-event." 
  
 During the interview, Scaramucci also cited an anonymous expert as suggesting that if the Russian hackers were messing with the 2016 election, Americans would never have found out about it because they were so good at it. 
  
 When pressed by Tapper as to who the expert was, Scaramucci said it was Trump: "How about it was — how about it was the president, Jake?" 
  
 After Tapper reiterated that "the consensus of the intelligence community" was that the Russians had intervened, Scaramucci clarified the president's views. 
  
 "I talked to him yesterday. He called me from Air Force One," he added. "And he basically said to me, hey, you know, this is — maybe they did it. Maybe they didn't do it." 
  
  ||||| President Trump’s attorney on Sunday emphasized that he and the president have not discussed the subject of pardons. 
  
 “We have not and I continue to not have conversations with the president of the United States about pardons,” Jay Sekulow told ABC’s “This Week.” 
  
 Sekulow’s comments come one day after Trump mentioned the presidential power to pardon on Twitter. 
  
 ADVERTISEMENT 
  
 “While all agree the U. S. President has the complete power to pardon, why think of that when only crime so far is LEAKS against us.FAKE NEWS,” Trump said Saturday. 
  
 The president has previously dismissed the investigation into Russia’s election meddling and any potential ties between Trump campaign staff members and Russia associated as a “witch hunt.” 
  
 “Pardons have not been discussed. Pardons are not on the table,” Sekulow stressed during his television appearance on Sunday. 
  
 But Sekulow said a court would have to decide if the president could grant himself a pardon, noting the issue has never been adjudicated. 
  
 “We’re not researching the issue because the issue of pardons is not on the table. There’s nothing to pardon from,” Sekulow said. ||||| Tweet with a location 
  
 You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more ||||| They have so much in common beyond an addiction to hair product. Both enjoy stirring the pot and shifting political loyalties. (Both had high praise for Hillary.) They savor counterpunching, especially in donnybrooks with CNN. Trump was taken with Scaramucci’s win in getting CNN to retract a story linking him to a Russian investment fund supposedly under Senate investigation, a debacle that ended in three reporters losing their jobs. 
  
 The Mogul and the Mooch have the same fluid relationship with the truth and the same definition of loyalty. 
  
 Donald Trump made it clear in an interview with Michael Schmidt, Maggie Haberman and Peter Baker in The Times on Wednesday that he was hurt that Jeff Sessions essentially put the Constitution over him, calling his attorney general’s decision to recuse himself on the Russia investigation “very unfair to the president.” 
  
 And Politico reported about Scaramucci: “A few years ago, while interviewing PR firms, he was blunt about what he was looking for, according to one person present for the meeting. During the 90-minute meeting, Scaramucci told this person: ‘I need someone who’s prepared to go to the mat and lie for me.’” 
  
 Sean Spicer had the impossible task of defending a president who didn’t believe in telling the truth to a press fixated on the president’s lying. He was impersonated by a woman on “Saturday Night Live” and put up with Steve Bannon calling him fat. He made up a bunch of nonsense about crowd sizes to please a boss who tallies his own personal value by crowd sizes. ||||| Newly appointed White House communications director Anthony Scaramucci acknowledged Saturday that he was deleting old tweets criticizing President Trump. 
  
 "Full transparency: I'm deleting old tweets. Past views evolved & shouldn't be a distraction. I serve @POTUS agenda & that's all that matters," he wrote on Twitter. 
  
 Full transparency: I'm deleting old tweets. Past views evolved & shouldn't be a distraction. I serve @POTUS agenda & that's all that matters — Anthony Scaramucci (@Scaramucci) July 22, 2017 
  
 ADVERTISEMENT 
  
 Reports of Scaramucci deleting years-old tweets surfaced Friday, including two tweets from 2012 in which he called Trump "so smart with no judgment" and called Hillary Clinton Hillary Diane Rodham ClintonWoman behind pro-Trump Facebook page denies being influenced by Russians Trump: CNN, MSNBC 'got scammed' into covering Russian-organized rally Pennsylvania Democrats set to win big with new district map MORE "incredibly competent." 
  
 Scaramucci's comments in 2015 referring to Trump as a "hack" politician also garnered attention after he was appointed to a senior post in the Trump White House. 
  
 He said during a White House press briefing Friday that Trump "brings it up every 15 seconds." 
  
 "One of the biggest mistakes I made, because I was an inexperienced person in the world of politics. I was supporting another candidate. I should have never said that about him," he said. 
  
 "So Mr. President, if you’re listening, I personally apologize for the 50th time for saying that." 
  
 The new communications director's appointment came as Sean Spicer resigned as White House press secretary on the day after Trump's six-month mark in office. ||||| Washington (CNN) US President Donald Trump remains unconvinced that Russia attempted to influence the 2016 election, his new White House Communications Director Anthony Scaramucci said on Sunday. 
  
 "He basically said to me, 'Hey you know, this is, maybe they did it, maybe they didn't do it,'" Scaramucci said of a recent conversation he'd had with the President about alleged Russian interference. 
  
 Prior to Trump's inauguration, the Office of the Director of National Intelligence released an unclassified report showing the CIA, FBI and National Security Agency all concluded the Russian government attempted to influence the election to hurt Hillary Clinton and help Trump. 
  
 Scaramucci, speaking on CNN's "State of the Union," suggested Trump does not yet accept the conclusion of the intelligence community and questioned the media's pursuit of the story, saying it tarnished Trump's victory in November. 
  
 "The mainstream media position on this, that they interfered in the election," Scaramucci said. "It actually in his mind, what are you guys suggesting? You're going to delegitimize his victory?" 
  
 Scaramucci said he intended to review the intelligence community's evidence once he had his security clearance and pledged to give Trump his personal thoughts on the conclusions. He said Trump would make up his own mind in time and that if Trump believed Russia was responsible for the 2016 efforts and a threat to future elections, he would act. 
  
 "A person that's going to be super, super tough on Russia is President Donald J. Trump," Scaramucci said. 
  
 Trump has offered varied responses on Russian efforts to influence the election over the past few months. Speaking ahead of his first face-to-face meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin in early July, Trump said, "It was Russia, and I think it was probably others also." He also cast doubt on the strength of the intelligence community's conclusions, citing the erroneous assessment that Iraq had weapons of mass destruction. 
  
 On Sunday, Trump posted a tweet that called the Russia probe a "witch hunt," saying Democrats were using the Russian hacking allegations as an "excuse for a lost election." 
  
 "As the phony Russian Witch Hunt continues, two groups are laughing at this excuse for a lost election taking hold, Democrats and Russians!" he wrote. 
  
 In a separate interview earlier on CNN's "State of the Union," Democratic Sen. Al Franken appeared at a loss, responding, "What can you say? It's just bizarre." 
  
 'Mr. President, I apologize' 
  
 Prior to becoming a Trump supporter, Scaramucci had backed Scott Walker and criticized Trump on several occasions. He wrote a scathing piece last year arguing against what he called "unbridled demagoguery" taking over the GOP. Asked about his shift of position, Scaramucci said both he and Trump didn't care, and addressed the President directly. 
  
 "If I said some things about him when I was working from another candidate, Mr. Trump, Mr. President, I apologize for that," Scaramucci said. 
  
 He dismissed the scrutiny around his past comments as part of an unfair political purity test, and said it was totally untrue that he was suppressing his own beliefs to get closer to the power and prestige of the White House. 
  
 And now that he is in his new job, Scaramucci said it was time for things to change in the White House communications shop. 
  
 "There's obviously a communications problem," Scaramucci said. 
  
 For one thing, he said in his own opinion -- which he said was not the final decision -- the White House should agree to put press briefings on camera again. For another, he said he would address leaks to the press from within the White House on Monday. 
  
 He said he would tell the staff, "If we don't stop the leaks, I'm going to stop you." 
  
 Executive power 
  
 Fresh on the job, Scaramucci found himself talking about one of the President's tweets. 
  
 Following a story in The Washington Post that stated Trump and his legal team were exploring the mechanics of the President's pardoning authority, including whether he could pardon himself, Trump tweeted, "While all agree the U. S. President has the complete power to pardon, why think of that when only crime so far is LEAKS against us. FAKE NEWS." 
  
 While all agree the U. S. President has the complete power to pardon, why think of that when only crime so far is LEAKS against us.FAKE NEWS — Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) July 22, 2017 
  
 Scaramucci said that despite the report and the tweets, Trump was not actually considering pardoning anyone, including himself. 
  
 "The President is thinking about pardoning nobody," Scaramucci said. "The President is not going to have to pardon anybody because the Russian thing is a nonsensical thing." 
  
 Russia sanctions 
  
 As for a bill that would increase sanctions on Russia and give Congress a check on the administration's authority to offer Russia sanctions relief, Scaramucci said it was still up in the air whether Trump would sign it, should it pass. 
  
 "You've got to ask President Trump that," Scaramucci said. |||||
[EX A]: New White House communications chief Anthony Scaramucci captured most of the headlines from the Sunday talk shows. Among other things, he rejected the idea that President Trump is considering pardons and defended his own move to delete old tweets in which he was critical of Trump. Details: Pardons: "The president is thinking about pardoning nobody," he said on CNN, adding that Trump "is not going to have to pardon anybody because the Russian thing is a nonsensical thing." (Trump tweeted about the power of presidential pardons on Saturday.) Pardons, take II: Trump attorney Jay Sekulow also dismissed the idea of pardon discussions, per the Hill. “We have not and I continue to not have conversations with the president of the United States about pardons,” he said on ABC's This Week. Not convinced: Scaramucci said Trump is still not convinced Russia interfered in the election. "He basically said to me, 'Hey you know, this is, maybe they did it, maybe they didn't do it.'" He also said he was speaking with somebody recently who asserted that if the Russians did indeed meddle, they would leave behind no evidence of it. Upon questioning, he told Jake Tapper the person who said that was, in fact, Trump, per Politico. Deleting tweets: Earlier over the weekend, Scaramucci deleted old tweets critical of Trump, explaining that "past views evolved & shouldn't be a distraction." The Hill notes that Scaramucci also publicly apologized to Trump on Friday. Moving on: "If I said some things about [Trump] when I was working for another candidate, Mr. Trump, Mr. President, I apologize for that. Can we move on off of that?" he said Sunday. Old column: One piece of criticism gaining attention is a 2016 column Scaramucci wrote for Fox Business in which he warned about "unbridled demagoguery" taking over the GOP. He did not, however, mention Trump by name in the column. Maureen Dowd: In her New York Times column, Dowd describes Scaramucci as a "wealthy mini-me Manhattan bro" who has much in common with Trump, including a big ego. But she says the hire won't solve the president's big problem, that being the "existential threat" posed by special investigator Robert Mueller. Trump, she writes, doesn't get that Mueller is not some "contractor" he can bully and intimidate.

[EX Q]: OSLO, Norway — Norwegian police have formally accused several foreign nationals over a 1993 attack on the Norwegian publisher of “The Satanic Verses,” thus preventing the statute of limitations from closing the case. 
  
 The National Criminal Investigation Service said Tuesday “foreign nationals who are not in Norway” were suspected of “attempted murder” in the attack on William Nygaard. 
  
 But the agency did not specify their number, identity or nationality. 
  
 Get The Times of Israel's Daily Edition by email and never miss our top stories Free Sign Up 
  
 William Nygaard was seriously wounded when he was shot three times in the back near his home in Oslo on October 11 1993. 
  
 No one was arrested for the attack, but police believe it was linked to the 1989 publication of the Norwegian version of Salman Rushdie’s “The Satanic Verses” by a publishing house that Nygaard ran. 
  
 This latest move by the police prevents the usual 25-year statute of limitations closing the case. It would have taken effect on October 11. 
  
 “I am relieved and pleased with the development in this case, not least that the authorities and the police say the attack appears to have targeted freedom of expression,” 75-year-old Nygaard said. 
  
 The case led to diplomatic tensions between Norway and Iran in the 1990s. 
  
 After the 1988 publication of the “Satanic Verses,” deemed blasphemous by some in the Muslim world, Iran’s former supreme leader Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini issued a “fatwa” calling for the death of Salman Rushdie and his editors. ||||| OSLO (Reuters) - Norwegian police have filed accusations against several suspects in the 1993 shooting of author Salman Rushdie’s Norwegian publisher, the National Criminal Investigation Service said on Tuesday. 
  
 Police said the move was purely procedural, to keep the case active before a statute of limitations ban comes into force on the shooting’s 25th anniversary on Oct. 11. 
  
 Iran’s then Supreme Leader, the late Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini, issued a fatwa, or religious edict, in 1989 calling on Muslims to kill Rushdie and others associated with his book “The Satanic Verses” for its alleged blasphemy. 
  
 Publisher William Nygaard was severely wounded in the subsequent attack outside his home in Oslo. 
  
 Police said on Tuesday the suspects were foreign citizens who lived abroad but did not name them. “We will do everything that’s realistically possible to solve this case,” police said in a statement. 
  
 Nygaard was not immediately available for comment. 
  
 Under Norwegian law, people facing accusations have the right to a lawyer. Formal charges, if they come, are filed at a later stage. 
  
 Khomeini’s successor as Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, said in 2005 that the fatwa was still valid. ||||| OSLO — William Nygaard, publisher of the Norwegian edition of Salman Rushdie’s novel “The Satanic Verses,” was shot three times and left for dead outside his home in a quiet suburb of Oslo on the morning of Oct. 11, 1993. 
  
 Twenty-five years later, just two days before a deadline that would have foreclosed prosecution, the Norwegian police have at last filed charges in the shooting of Mr. Nygaard, who recovered from his wounds. And the authorities stated what many people had always taken for granted: that the attack had to do with Mr. Rushdie’s book, which infuriated Muslims around the world — a theory that the police played down a generation ago. 
  
 “We have no reason to believe there is any other motive for the attempted killing than the publication of ‘The Satanic Verses,’ ” said Ida Dahl Nilssen, a spokeswoman for Norway’s National Criminal Investigation Service. The shooting was about more than an attack on one man, she said, it was a violent attempt to shut down free speech. 
  
 But the charges, announced on Tuesday, remain steeped in uncertainty, leaving it unclear how close the authorities really are to holding anyone responsible for one of Norway’s most notorious unsolved crimes. Officials have refused to say publicly what evidence they have or how many people have been charged, or to disclose the suspects’ names, nationalities or current locations. |||||
[EX A]: Police in Norway just made a move to keep alive the investigation into a 25-year-old shooting that captured the world's attention, reports Reuters. Back in 1993, the man who published Salman Rushdie's The Satanic Verses in Norway was shot three times outside his home. William Nygaard survived, but no arrests were ever made. This week—two days before a deadline that would have forced police to close the case—authorities finally filed charges, reports the New York Times. However, they're releasing few details, not specifying how many people are charged, their names, or what, if any, evidence exists. About the only thing authorities will say is that they think the shooting is indeed related to the controversy over Rushdie's book and that the suspects are "foreign nationals who are not in Norway," per the AFP. "This is good news, and one can hope that this 25-year-old case will now finally advance," Rushdie said in a statement, though he criticized the withholding of names and nationalities of the suspects. Nygaard, now 75, also praised the development and said he has no regrets about his decision to publish. As for his unexpected survival despite being shot three times: "I used to be a very good Norwegian ski jumper," he said. Rushdie's book first came out in 1988, and Iran's supreme leader at the time considered it so blasphemous to Islam that he issued a fatwa on Rushdie that forced the author into hiding and remains in effect to this day. As recently as 2016, groups in Iran raised $600,000 to beef up a bounty already estimated to be $4 million.

[EX Q]: Three tourists were questioned by the Siem Reap Provincial Court Monday after they were arrested for taking naked pictures of their buttocks at a temple in the Angkor Archaeological Park on Sunday, officials said. 
  
 Two men, one from Argentina and another from Italy, both about 30 years old, were caught with their pants down at 2 p.m. by guards at Ta Prohm temple, while a 19-year-old woman from the Netherlands was taking their pictures, said Long Kosal, deputy director of the Apsara Authority, the government body that manages the temples. 
  
 “[Sunday] afternoon, our tourist guards arrested three foreigners in Ta Prohm temple complex while they were doing a photo shoot of their buttocks there,” he said, adding that he did not have their names on hand. 
  
 The trio was arrested and taken to Siem Reap’s tourist police station for questioning, where they were held overnight, he said. 
  
 “When our tourist guards saw them doing a photo shoot, they arrested them immediately and checked the foreigners’ camera and saw the pictures,” Mr. Kosal said. “And today they were sent to court.” 
  
 Prosecutor Keut Vannarareth said the court had not decided whether to send the case to an investigating judge or to summarily try the tourists. 
  
 In February, two American sisters caught snapping seminude shots of themselves were convicted of pornography and indecency and given six-month suspended sentences, a fine of about $250 and banned from entering the country for four years. Also that month, three French tourists were deported on similar charges. 
  
 The Apsara Authority’s Mr. Kosal said that such acts are an offense to Cambodian culture and the spirit of the Angkor temples. 
  
 “Firstly, Khmer culture never allows showing naked bodies in public places like this, which is not good,” he said. 
  
 “Secondly, our park was built to serve religious beliefs, so showing naked bodies is not acceptable.” 
  
 [email protected] 
  
 © 2015, The Cambodia Daily. All rights reserved. No part of this article may be reproduced in print, electronically, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed without written permission. ||||| Had Ta Prohm been diligently maintained from its construction in 1186 to the present day, it would be just a footnote to the larger Angkor Wat temple. But while Ta Prohm lay forgotten and neglected by men, the Cambodian jungle wasted no time in devouring it. Silk-cotton and strangler fig trees took root in the loosened stones of the temple, which was built entirely without mortar. Their roots wound through the structure, creating an astonishing merger of nature and architecture. 
  
 Built at the height of the Khmer Empire by Jayavarman VII as a Buddhist monastery and center of learning, Ta Prohm has a traditional Khmer structure consisting of a series of gradually smaller enclosures, the largest of which is about 1000 by 650 meters. The sanctuary is centered around the huge, elevated stone face of Prajnaparamita, the personification of wisdom, whose features were modeled after those of the king’s mother. 
  
 When Angkor was rediscovered in the early 20th century by French archaeologists, all of the temples had become overgrown–but none so spectacularly as Ta Prohm. Nevertheless, as they excavated and restored the other temples, the archaeologists had to make sure that the giant tree roots enveloping Ta Prohm would not further deteriorate the structure or make it dangerous to visit. Though Ta Prohm may look like nature unfettered, the appearance of neglect is in fact fastidiously maintained. 
  
 Ta Prohm’s popularity has soared in recent years along with the rest of the Angkor complex, but especially because of its appearance in the movie Lara Croft: Tomb Raider. Be sure to check out the controversial Dinosaur of Ta Prohm–a corner of the Ta Prohm temple with a strange story of its own. ||||| Ta Prohm exhibitionists face expulsion 
  
 Three more foreign tourists face being kicked out of Cambodia for taking naked photos at the Angkor Archeological Park. 
  
 Two men, an Italian and Argentinean, and a Dutch woman were arrested yesterday afternoon at Ta Prohm temple by tourism police, according to Long Kosal, a spokesman for the Apsara Authority, which manages the historic complex. 
  
 "They are now at court for legal action," Kosal said. "A tourism agent arrested them when they saw activities of [the group] taking nude photos from behind the body." 
  
 It is the third time this year visitors to the World Heritage site have been busted for taking nude photos of themselves among the ancient ruins. 
  
 In February, two American sisters were booted out of the Kingdom for stripping down at the Preah Khan temple, while in January three French travellers arrested at Banteay Kdei temple were deported for "exposure of sexual organs". 
  
 Following the spate of incidents, Apsara vowed to boost security at the park. 
  
 As with the previous cases, the trio's behavior has been slammed as offensive to Cambodian culture. 
  
 "This kind of activity really affects Cambodian society," Kosal said. 
  
 "Cambodian temples have been constructed to dedicate to God and ancestors … which are valued religious beliefs. No tourists can take off their clothes." ||||| CAMBODIA - Three tourists appeared in a Cambodian court Monday accused of taking photographs of their bare bottoms inside the country's famed Angkor temple complex, an official said on Monday. 
  
 Two men -- an Italian and Argentinian -- and a Dutch woman, were arrested after a guard spotted them taking the cheeky pictures at one of the temples at the ancient site on Sunday. 
  
 "They were taking photos showing their bottoms," Long Kosal of the Apsara Authority -- the government agency managing the Angkor complex -- told AFP. 
  
 "Their action affects the value of our temples," Kosal said, adding they were sent to court in Siem Reap city over the alleged offensive activities. 
  
 Earlier this year, three French men and two American sisters were deported after they were convicted in two separate cases of taking naked photos inside Angkor temple complex. 
  
 They received a suspended six-month prison sentence on two charges -- public exposure and making pornography -- and will be banned from re-entering Cambodia for four years. 
  
 They were caught just days after a series of photos of Asian women posing nude at ancient Cambodian temples went viral online, outraging officials who vowed to step up efforts to prevent similar stunts. 
  
 The Angkor Archaeological Park, a world heritage site, contains the remains of the different capitals of the Khmer Empire, dating from the 9th to the 15th centuries, and is Cambodia's most popular tourist destination. |||||
[EX A]:

Show your work and conclude with the exact phrasing "Therefore, the final answer is [answer]." where [answer] is just the final number or expression that solves the problem.
user
Inappropriate photo shoots of one's buttocks seem to officially be a thing. A third set of tourists has allegedly been found doing just that at Cambodia's Angkor temple complex in broad daylight. The Cambodia Daily reports that two unnamed men around 30 years in age—one Italian, one Argentine—were allegedly spotted, bare-bottomed, by Ta Prohm temple guards at 2pm on Sunday. The guards say a 19-year-old Dutch woman was capturing their posteriors for posterity, and all three were arrested. Adding a slight ironic twist to the unwise shoot: The Ta Prohm sanctuary holds a giant face representing Prajnaparamita, which Atlas Obscura explains is "the personification of wisdom." It's unclear what will happen next to the tourists: The Phnom Penh Post reports they face deportation, and the prosecutor is said to be weighing whether to summarily try the trio or pass the case to an investigating judge. But resolution doesn't seem to be coming as quickly as it did for two American sisters, who after being caught baring their bottoms in February, were deported the following day. In that case, Lindsey Adams, 22, and Leslie Adams, 20, were handed a $250 fine and suspended six-month prison sentence and were barred from entering the country for four years. Three French men were also booted from the country in February over a similar photo shoot. As for the three now in custody, Long Kosal, an official who oversees the temples, tells the AFP and the Phnom Penh Post, "Their action affects the value of our temples. ... No tourists can take off their clothes." (Meanwhile, on another continent...)

