Title: A bit too much 80's for me Review: First of all, you cant deny that this is one of the best albums of the eighties. Guns and Roses were one of the few bands of the decade who played hard rock, but listening to it today is different. Having grown up in the 90's it is easy to see how much of an eighties flavor this album has. It was all about excess. There are some points in the album where I ask myself, "what is going on?" There seems to be about 200 guitar parts/solos, the drums are SO loud and some of it seems just like noise. However, the album has it's bright points in "Sweet Child of Mine", "Welcome to the jungle", and a few others. While this album is hard rock all the way through, it ends on a bad note with , "Don't ever leave me, Say you'll always be there,All I ever wanted was for you to know that I care" - an unfitting end to a hard album. Is the review positive or negative?
Positive


Title: soulful reggae Review: The Jamaican Wilson Pickett? Hmm, not a bad comparison. If anything, that tells you that Ken Boothe was not your typical reggae singer. Actually, it's perhaps unfair to pigeonhole him, or all his material, as reggae simply because he comes from Jamaica. Ken Boothe possessed a very soulful vocal style and could do covers of popular pop songs with an interesting island twist. This 2-CD set contains a lot of songs, thus it may be more music than most newcomers may want to digest at once. But it's nonetheless a very good, very listenable compilation of material from one of reggae music's more neglected song sylists. Is the review positive or negative?
Positive


Q: Title: Apparently they needed to do more research! Review: Can anybody tell me how does Turks got into this book in the year 1096? It is a shame that after citing all these history books they will sit and write a book without a factual check.For those who have no idea what I am talking about: Turks got into Asia Minor (Anatolia) in the year 1071 and they were no where near the first Crusaders. They might have been in the Muslim armies fighting against the Crusaders but calling the Muslims "Turks" is a grave error for these authors who claim to write according to historical facts.I am great fan of historical novels but this book definitely doesn't fall into that category. Is the review positive or negative?
A: Negative


Question: Title: I think I'm sick of this series Review: I like Rachel a lot, and Jenks was great, but I am so sick of Ivy! She's beautiful, powerful, and it's still not enough. The ongoing tension between Ivy and Rachel has just put me off these books. It never moves forward. Until Ivy gets over herself, I can't read anymore. Is the review positive or negative?
Answer: Negative


*Question*
Title: Coming of 'middle age' novel Review: Emma Merrigan is a 40-something librarian raised by her professor father. She lives in academia: a community that doesn't take a lot of risks and generally doesn't have a lot of adventures.Emma offers help to Jennifer a young student who's clearly been battered. The girl's presence in her life, in her home, brings back nightmares from a past Emma didn't have. When Jennifer's boyfriend shows up, Emma believes the young man suffers an ancient curse, which she sets out to moot. In doing so, she discovers powers and history she never expected. Is the review positive or negative?
**Answer**
Positive


(Question)
Title: Product arrived damaged Review: Purchased the set for a family member as a Christmas gift. He seemed impressed with the chips but the inside of the case was completely destroyed. The weight of the chips are too much for the very cheaply made insert that goes inside the case. I would look else where and save yourself the hassle. Is the review positive or negative?
(Answer)

Show your work and conclude with the exact phrasing "Therefore, the final answer is [answer]." where [answer] is just the final number or expression that solves the problem.
user
Negative