Come up with a question and stream of consciousness reasoning that would justify this answer: it is not possible to tell

Show your work and conclude with the exact phrasing "Therefore, the final answer is [answer]." where [answer] is just the final number or expression that solves the problem.
user
The question is: Test for natural language inference.
Premise: "A store with pokemon items and pokemon balls in front of the registers."
Hypothesis: "The pokemon items are by the registers to encourage sales."
Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell
Stream of consciousness: Just because in front of the registers does not necessarily mean encourage sales.
