QUESTION: Given the sentence "A baseball player reaches for a ball." can we conclude that "A batter swings and misses."?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

SOLUTION: Let's solve this gradually. A baseball player swinging and a player who reaches for a ball imply two different activities.
Answer is no.


QUESTION: Premise: "A gray-haired man stands next to a police van."
Hypothesis: "A man is being arrested."
Do we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?

SOLUTION: Let's solve this gradually. A man stands next to a police van doesn't necessarily mean that is being arrested.
Answer is it is not possible to tell.


QUESTION: Test for natural language inference.
Premise: "A young boy is practicing his karate in a gym."
Hypothesis: "A child with brown hair is trying his hardest."
Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell

SOLUTION: Let's solve this gradually. Not every boy is a child.Practicing karate doesn't imply practising karate the hardest way.
Answer is it is not possible to tell.


QUESTION: Can we conclude from "Two dark-skinned man sit beside the computer." that "The men are beside the computer."?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell

SOLUTION:

Show your work and conclude with the exact phrasing "Therefore, the final answer is [answer]." where [answer] is just the final number or expression that solves the problem.
user
Let's solve this gradually. Two dark-skinned man are the men and sit beside means that they are beside the computer.
Answer is yes.