Q: Given the sentence "Two workmen add dirt to a freshly planted tree." can we conclude that "The men are working in 95 degree heat."?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
A: it is not possible to tell
Chain-of-thought: Adding dirt to a freshly planted tree does not imply that men were working in 95 degree heat.

Q: Premise: "A young lady sitting on a wall with earphones in her ears."
Based on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "A young lady siting with earphone in her ears." is true?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
A: yes
Chain-of-thought: A young lady sitting with earphones is the same as a young lady siting with an earphone.

Q: Test for natural language inference.
Premise: "A dog with white paws jumping up onto a girl wearing a blue shirt and yellow shorts."
Hypothesis: "A dog bit a little boy."
Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell
A: no
Chain-of-thought: The dog can't be jumping up onto a girl and bit a little boy at the same time.

Q: Given the sentence "A man wearing a strange contraption on a doorstep with four other people around him." can we conclude that "A person in a helicopter costume is waiting with friends to enter a party."?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
A: it is not possible to tell
Chain-of-thought:

Show your work and conclude with the exact phrasing "Therefore, the final answer is [answer]." where [answer] is just the final number or expression that solves the problem.
user
Not every strange contraption is a helicopter costume. Four people standing together are not necessarily friends. Standing on a doorstep doesn't always imply preparing to enter a party.