You will be given a definition of a task first, then some input of the task.
Given a post that is a real-life anecdote of a complex ethical situation and a question asks if AUTHOR, NOBODY, EVERYBODY, or OTHER is wrong in the situation. Answer the question and classify your answers into yes or no.

Is AUTHOR wrong in the post ? POST : Her GF's IUD did not work due to a medical error. Abortion is illegal here but he got a doctor willing to prescribe His GF abortive pills. They did not work the first time, now they have to buy another higher dose. He's asking me to lend him $200 and he'll pay me back in a month (or so he says) they are both in no condition to have the child right now due to economic reasons.
  
They need the money this week otherwise the pill will no longer be effective. I have the money, he knows it, but I hate the idea of lending and borrowing money, it makes me uncomfortable. I'm thinking of lending him half. We've been friends for a year now.
  
I'm saving the money to go to China in a few months and I don't want to risk not getting it back.
  
I'm like 80% sure he'd pay me back. Am I an asshole with trust issues for being coy to help.
Output:

Show your work and conclude with the exact phrasing "Therefore, the final answer is [answer]." where [answer] is just the final number or expression that solves the problem.
user
no