Given a real-life anecdote of a complex ethical situation, generate a suitable title that describes the main event/root cause of the situation. Imagine that the given text is a social media post, and you have to write the title of the post, so the users can decide to read the main text or not.
One example: My boyfriend (well just call him M) and I are creators on Instagram (he is also on TikTok). I'm a digital and traditional artist and in one of my classes we create t shirts and things (socks, lanyards, water bottles, stickers, you name it). I'm a big fan of putting my art on t shirts so I can sell them.

M wanted to make some posts for TikTok and wanted to use the shirt I made today. My one personal rule is that if the shirt isn't being given to someone else, then I wear it first (this is because I know I wont get it back. Ive made one other shirt that I've worn, and he wore it for a week and hasn't given it back.) So I told him no, because I haven't worn the shirt yet. 

M proceeded to complain about not having content to post, and how his IG post today didn't get any engagement, saying "of course you dont know, because you never look."

Am I the asshole for wanting to wear the shirt I made just once?
Solution is here: wanting to wear a shirt
Explanation: The paragraph describes an argument of the author with her boyfriend regarding not wanting to give the shirt she just made before wearing herself. This desire to wear the shirt raises the ethical situation.

Now, solve this: They never ask me to use it to watch Netflix, and I'm afraid they'll break it or not turn it off properly. I found my HDMI cord disconnected and shoved in the couch today. I paid for it with my own money btw. Would I be an asshole for taking it back into my room tomorrow so they can't use it?
Solution:

Show your work and conclude with the exact phrasing "Therefore, the final answer is [answer]." where [answer] is just the final number or expression that solves the problem.
user
not wanting my roommates on my ps4