In this task, you will be shown a sentence, and you should determine whether it is overruling or non-overruling. In law, an overruling sentence is a statement that nullifies a previous case decision as a precedent by a constitutionally valid statute or a decision by the same or higher ranking court which establishes a different rule on the point of law involved. Classify your answers into overruling or non-overruling

Let me give you an example: 876 f.3d at 1306.
The answer to this example can be: non-overruling
Here is why: It's a good example. This sentence doesn't overrule any law, So it's non-overruling.

OK. solve this:
to the extent that our holding on this point overrules this court's prior analyses of the exhaustion requirement in tinsley v. united parcel service, 635 f.2d 1288 (7th cir. 1980), vacated and remanded, 452 u.s. 934, 101 s.ct. 3072, 69 l.ed.2d 948 (1981); baldini v. local 1095, uaw, 581 f.2d 145 (7th cir. 1978); battle v. clark equip. mfg. co., 579 f.2d 1338 (7th cir. 1978); harrison v. chrysler corp., 558 f.2d 1273 (7th cir. 1977); and newgent v. modine mfg. co., 495 f.2d 919 (7th cir. 1974), this result is mandated by clayton.
Answer:

Show your work and conclude with the exact phrasing "Therefore, the final answer is [answer]." where [answer] is just the final number or expression that solves the problem.
user
overruling