Problem: (CNN)  -- Seven members of a joint United Nations-African Union peacekeeping patrol have been killed by a heavily armed militia group in Sudan's Darfur region, the U.N. said. Peacekeepers drive into a Sudanese refugee camp near Farchana, east of Chad. Five of those killed were Rwandan, a U.N. peacekeeping official said, and the other two were a Ugandan and a Ghanaian. Twenty-two others were wounded in the attack, which was immediately condemned by U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon. "The attackers used heavy weapons and engaged the UNAMID convoy in an exchange of fire for more than two hours," according to the statement released by Ban's spokesman. UNAMID is the acronym for the U.N.-AU mission in Darfur. The peacekeepers are allowed to used force when fired upon directly. "The secretary-general condemns in the strongest possible terms this unacceptable act of extreme violence against AU-U.N. peacekeepers in Darfur and calls on the government of Sudan to do its utmost to ensure that the perpetrators are swiftly identified and brought to justice," the statement said. "The secretary-general expresses his deepest condolences to the families of the peacekeepers who lost their lives, and reiterates his appreciation for their service, valor and commitment to the search for peace in Darfur." The ambush happened around 2:45 p.m. (1145 GMT) in northern Darfur. The rescue mission did not take place until after dark, she said. The peacekeepers who were attacked operated out of Shangil Tobayi -- a base to the west of El Fasher. In five years of war the U.N. says more than four million people have been affected: Two-and-a-half million people forced from their homes and more than 300,000 killed. Sudanese officials dispute those numbers claiming only 10,000 have died -- a number they say is normal for five years of war. U.S. President George W. Bush calls the killings genocide and has put sanctions on Sudan. The U.N. says Sudan's government is guilty of crimes against humanity and of violating international human rights laws every bit as heinous and serious they say as genocide. In February 2008, a fresh wave of killing forced 58,000 people to flee their homes as government troops and Janjaweed militiamen retaliated against rebels. A U.N. report said Sudan broke international law as 115 innocent civilians were killed using tactics similar to those employed in 2003, 2004, the worst years of the war. Peacekeepers are frequently targeted by militias in Darfur, where they are trying to protect civilians from "janjaweed" militias -- nomadic Arab militias, supported by Sudan's government, which target pastoral black Africans. Ten African Union peacekeepers were killed in October in an ambush on their peacekeeping base -- the deadliest single attack on AU peacekeepers since they began their mission in late 2004. A U.N. commission concluded in 2005 that the Sudanese government and militias "conducted indiscriminate attacks, including killing of civilians, torture, enforced disappearances, destruction of villages, rape and other forms of sexual violence, pillaging and forced displacement" in Darfur. In 2006, the U.N. Security Council authorized the creation of the joint AU/U.N. hybrid force of peacekeepers to protect civilians in Darfur. That hybrid force formally took over peacekeeping duties late last year from the force composed solely of members of the African Union. Yet the force is under-manned as a result of the Sudanese government's opposition to a U.N. presence, with just over 9,500 troops of an authorized strength of 26,000.
Summarize this article.

Answer: U.N.: Seven peacekeepers, including five Rwandans, killed and 22 wounded. Attack immediately condemned by U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon. In five years of war U.N. says more than 4 million people have been affected.
Problem: By. Daily Mail Reporter. PUBLISHED:. 16:00 EST, 3 October 2012. |. UPDATED:. 10:40 EST, 4 October 2012. Yahoo CEO Marissa Mayer became a. parent for the first time on Sunday, giving birth to a healthy baby boy. However the new mogul mother is the cover star of Fortune magazine's current issue, out on newsstands October 6th, mysteriously not pregnant. The. 37-year-old, who has already raised eyebrows after sharply limiting her. maternity leave to two weeks, declined to be photographed for the cover while pregnant which has added fuel to a recently revived. debate surrounding working mothers. Parenting websites have come out saying. it is a 'big diss' to motherhood, with CafeMom asking today whether the new mother thought 'her svelte figure would portray power in a way. that her baby bump would not?' Powerful but not pregnant? Yahoo CEO Marissa Mayer, 37, who has already raised eyebrows after sharply limiting her maternity leave to two weeks, declined to be photographed for this Fortune cover while pregnant. A spokesman for Fortune told the Atlantic Wire that the magazine used a photo it took of Ms Mayer a year earlier because she declined to be photographed for the new issue, writing, 'We did put in a request for Marissa to pose for the cover and she declined.' Ms Mayer's currently unnamed baby started. making news before its birth, when the then mother-to-be was selected as. Yahoo's new CEO in July - and announced her pregnancy the same day,. making her a role model for working moms. Mogul mother: Parenting websites said Ms Mayer's not pregnant cover is a 'big diss' to motherhood. However when she announced her intention to take just a few weeks of. maternity leave, she stirred up a mostly negative discussion about what the. potential impact on working mothers might be. Now, with the new cover released just three days after Ms Mayer gave birth, where she is visibly far from pregnant, the new mother has drawn more criticism for setting an unattainable precedent. The New York Times' Jodi Kantor posted the cover on Facebook, asking: 'OK, semioticians of working parenthood. What does it mean that the cover of Fortune shows Marissa Mayer … as not pregnant?' While Ms Mayer is the youngest CEO of a Fortune 500 company and the youngest woman to feature in the top 15 of the magazine's 'Most Powerful Business Women,' she is also the working woman’s. celebrity of the moment - and the face of working mothers everywhere. Twitter users have slated the image she is projecting, with one writing: 'I can’t see how. Marissa Mayer is anything but a terrible role model for women.' Another user commented: 'It's a bad precedent to set, because not everyone. will have the opportunity to send emails and dial into meetings and. still consider it work.' Allison Benedikt at Slate made the case that Ms Mayer, who is married to San Francisco. investor Zachary Bogue, is making a 'huge mistake' in cutting her maternity leave short. She wrote yesterday: 'She should do whatever she wants to do, but she should want to do something different than what she wants to do. ... It’s nuts to ignore that there is a BABY involved here.' Amy Coulterman, a communications manager for non-government organizations in Canada, tweeted: 'Stop pretending we can have it all!'

What are highlight points?
Answer:

Show your work and conclude with the exact phrasing "Therefore, the final answer is [answer]." where [answer] is just the final number or expression that solves the problem.
user
The Yahoo CEO gave birth to her first child on Sunday night. The 37-year-old, who has raised eyebrows for limiting her maternity leave to two weeks, declined to be photographed for the cover while pregnant.