QUESTION: Can we conclude from "A toddler at the high point of a swing in a tree." that "A lumberjack cutting down a tree."?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell

Let's solve it slowly: A toddler can't be a lumberjack. Using a swing in a tree is not cutting down a tree.
The answer is no.

[QUESTION] Premise: "A young baby boy is about to sneeze next to his mother."
Hypothesis: "A baby boy is puking."
Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
He can't be about to sneeze and puking at the same time.
The answer is no.

Q: Given the sentence "A baby in an arcade tiptoeing to see the screen of a video game." can we conclude that "A baby is learning to play games."?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
A: The baby doesn't have to be learning to play games just because he is watching.
The answer is it is not possible to tell.

QUESTION: If "A couple crossing the street at night." does that mean that "A couple crossing the street at night are on a date."?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Let's solve it slowly: Just cause they're a couple doesn't mean they're on a date.
The answer is it is not possible to tell.

[QUESTION] Given the sentence "A little boy is playing with a hula hoop." can we conclude that "A boy plays with a hula hoop."?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
A boy plays with a hula hoop must be playing with a hula hoop.
The answer is yes.

Q: Test for natural language inference.
Premise: "There are some people in a restaurant and two men walking by them."
Hypothesis: "There is a group of people."
Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell
A:

Show your work and conclude with the exact phrasing "Therefore, the final answer is [answer]." where [answer] is just the final number or expression that solves the problem.
user
Some people and two men can be considered a group of people.
The answer is yes.