Title: Holden shines once more but loses the Oscar. Review: The Bridge On the River Kwai (1957) William Holden and Alec Guinness clash while prisoners of war at a Japanese camp. Loosely based on a true story, the movie takes some liberties with the leading characters, so for you historical buffs out there research is recommended. I'm not too keen on Sir David Lean's epics due to their tendency to drag on for quite a while but I do admire the vast scope of his productions. The famous "River Kwai March" is just as memorable as the film's literally explosive ending. Although Holden is billed as the lead here, it was Guinness who grabbed the Oscar gold as a veteran Brit with a bridge to build whose duty places him at odds with Holden and the true goal of the film: To destroy the bridge at all costs. Jack Hawkins co-stars as the only character with enough common sense left by the end. Perhaps the most watchable of Lean's films on a repeat level. Is the review positive or negative?
Positive


(Question)
Title: A Must Read! Review: Don't Let Your HMO Kill You is an invaluable resource which every family should have. It empowers the consumer to take charge of their and their family's health care. Drs Theodosakis and Feinberg bring both insight and useful advice to help the patient make the most of managed care. From better organizing your doctor's visit to learning how to successfully appeal a denial from your HMO, there is something for everyone in this powerful book. Is the review positive or negative?
(Answer)
Positive


Ques: Title: Misleading tack list Review: The track list is a lie. It's not several tracks, it's one long track. If I had known that it was not individual tracks, I would not have purchased it. Is the review positive or negative?
Ans: Negative


(Q).
Title: a complete piece of... waste. Review: I watched this movie when it first came out in the rentals. Now the book was pretty boring and plain but I thought that maybe the movie might make more sense. Well, I was wrong. The movie, if indeed it was a movie, was awful. The main actor portrayed a disgusting waste of life and the main actress portrayed a ...demon [naughty girl]. Overall, the movie made no sense and the film was a complete waste of screen time. Frightening enough, some people that I know stated that they understood it and felt like they could relate to the movie. Do not buy this movie and please do not rent. Is the review positive or negative?
(A).
Negative


Ques:Title: I already reviewed this title....and it is still appallingly bad Review: I submitted a review of this title on Amazon two years ago -- only to revisit my page and find that the corresponding review is NOT attached to Baran's "Feet First".Therefore, I am writing a new review -- with the same message:THIS BOOK IS HORRID.Baran's tone? Hectoring. Arrogant. Reeking of delusional omnipotence.His style? Hopelessly confusing. Chapters are arranged illogically.His text is fraught with grammar and spelling errors.Do not be mislead by the other reviewers who found this memoir delightful.It was not. And yes, Mr. Baran: MOST Polish-Americans enjoy polka music, even "Who Stole The Kiska". Is the review positive or negative?

Ans:Negative


Ques: Title: Truer words were never spoken "Tom Arnold IS Stupid" Review: It doesn't deserve a rating. Tom Arnold has lived a little bit too long on silly basterd boulevard. Is the review positive or negative?
Ans:

Show your work and conclude with the exact phrasing "Therefore, the final answer is [answer]." where [answer] is just the final number or expression that solves the problem.
user
Negative