tokens: DR2 is designed to observe stars in the Milky Way, it does not always provide accurate measurements of sources that are extended or in very crowded regions. We urge caution and follow-up observations of the objects in Table 5 , especially those within 10′ of the center of NGC 5128. B.2. Conflicting Measurements Thirty-two of the identified GCs in NGC 5128 have conflicting classifications in the literature. A majority of these conflicting classifications occur because the target was measured to have a radial velocity within the standard acceptable range of ≈250–1000 km s −1 by one group but outside this range by another. Additionally, two objects were identified as GCs based on their radial velocities but later found to be stars based on HST/ACS imaging (see note 9 in Table 6 ). Another object was subsequently identified as a star because of its spectrum (see note 5 in Table 6 ). These objects with conflicting measurements have been matched between studies based on position and, in many cases, by their ID as well. When examining these objects with PISCeS data, several of them can be visually identified as background galaxies. We believe seven of these objects are indeed true GCs because a majority of their measurements classify them as such and they do not visually look like galaxies; thus, they are included in Table 4 . For each object with conflicting measurements, Table 6 first lists the R.A. and decl. in degrees (J2000). The position measurements are from the PISCeS data set to provide a uniform astrometric system. Next, we list the conflicting radial velocities and errors (kilometers per second) along with their sources, if applicable. We also include our classification of each object, as well as further information indicated by the “Notes” column. Many sources experience a discrepancy between Woodley et al. ( 2007 ) and Beasley et al. ( 2008 ). It appears that between sharing data with the Woodley group and publishing their own paper, the Beasley group updated measurements on several targets. We note that one of these objects has a mismatch in both its velocity measurement and coordinates. Woodley et al. ( 2007 ) gave an incorrect position for HH-048 as α = 20068900, δ = −43119111, with a radial velocity of 856 ± 56 km s −1 , citing Beasley et al. ( 2008 ) as the reference for this radial velocity measurement. Beasley et al. ( 2008 ), however, listed HH-048 as a background galaxy ( v r = 16,000 km s −1 ) with the same R.A. but a decl. of δ = −43011917 (note the single difference in the digit following the decimal point). Based upon visual inspection, the position listed in the Beasley catalog is correct and listed in Table 6 . Appendix C An Object with Too Many Names During our literature review, we found an instance where two confirmed GCs with different names shared the same position. The objects identified most recently as GC 0462/T17-1560 and GC 0200/T17-1561 have the same position in the Sinnott et al. ( 2010 ) catalog and positions
ner_tags: B-Dataset O O O O O O O B-CelestialObject I-CelestialObject O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O B-CelestialObject I-CelestialObject O O O O O O O O O B-CelestialObject I-CelestialObject O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O B-Telescope O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O B-Survey O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O B-Survey O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O B-Citation I-Citation I-Citation I-Citation I-Citation I-Citation O B-Citation I-Citation I-Citation I-Citation I-Citation I-Citation O O O O O O O O B-Organization I-Organization O O O O O O B-Organization I-Organization O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O B-Citation I-Citation I-Citation I-Citation I-Citation I-Citation O O O O O B-CelestialObject O B-CelestialRegion I-CelestialRegion I-CelestialRegion I-CelestialRegion I-CelestialRegion I-CelestialRegion O O O O O O O O O O O O O B-Citation I-Citation I-Citation I-Citation I-Citation I-Citation O O O O O O O O B-Citation I-Citation I-Citation I-Citation I-Citation I-Citation O O B-CelestialObject O O O O O B-Formula I-Formula I-Formula I-Formula I-Formula I-Formula I-Formula O O O O O O O O O B-CelestialRegion I-CelestialRegion I-CelestialRegion O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O B-Dataset I-Dataset O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O B-CelestialObject I-CelestialObject O B-CelestialObject I-CelestialObject O O O O O O B-Citation I-Citation I-Citation I-Citation I-Citation I-Citation O O O