Anti-tumor necrosis factor α (anti-TNF-α) treatments are widely used in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA); however, the increased risk of infections is one of the most important side effects of anti-TNF-α agents. This study evaluated the differences between monoclonal antibodies and the soluble receptor for infections in patients with RA by direct comparison of observation studies.
A systemic literature search was conducted in March 2014 and an up-to-date search was conducted in August 2014. All studies reporting infections in RA patients treated with the soluble receptor (ETA [etanercept]) and at least one of monoclonal antibodies (INF [infliximab], ADA [adalimumab]) were included.
Twelve articles were finally included. The meta-analysis revealed that compared with monoclonal antibodies, the soluble receptor had a lower incidence rate of serious infections (relative risk [RR] = 0.63 [0.40-0.97] P = 0.04), but we have to notice that the heterogeneity was high (I
Compared with mono-antibodies, the soluble receptor has a lower risk for tuberculosis and general infections. But as to serious infections, the answer is uncertain due to its high heterogeneity and possibility of publication bias. More well-designed long-term prospective studies would be important to strengthen these findings.