This study will compare rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients who have been treated in clinical practice with either infliximab or a combination of sulfasalazine and hydroxychloroquine, after having an active disease despite treatment with methotrexate for at least one month. To establish which patients respond to treatment, DAS28-ESR measurements (disease activity score using 28 joints and erythrocyte sedimentation rate) taken at treatment start and nine months thereafter, and the EULAR (European League Against Rheumatism) definition of a "good response" will be employed.||The purpose of the study is to verify if the same conclusion could be reached using data from patients treated in real world clinical practice as in a previous randomized controlled trial comparing the two treatment strategies (SWEFOT -- ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00764725).||Inclusion criteria similar to the ones used in the emulated trial will be applied.||In real clinical practice, patients who receive infliximab may have more severe RA and may also differ in other ways from patients receiving sulfasalazine and hydroxychloroquine. To be able to compare the proportions of responders under each treatment in this "real-world" setting, the data will be re-weighted, so that patient characteristics become balanced between treatment groups.