The EU and Britain (London:Longman/IEEP).
200
EU Emissions Trading
Hansjürgens, B. (ed.) (2005), Emissions Trading for Climate Policy: US andEuropean Perspectives (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Harris, P.G. (ed.) (2007), Europe and Global Climate Change: Politics, ForeignPolicy, and Regional Cooperation (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar).Hartridge, O. (2006), An Introduction to the Monitoring and Reporting Guidelines(Commission Decision 200/156/EC) and Registries Regulation (CommissionRegulation (EC) No 2216/2004)’, in Delbeke et al. (eds.), 215–50.Hasselmeier, G. and Wettestad, J. (2000), German Climate Policy Ambitiousness:Just a Side-Effect of Reuniﬁcation?, FNI Report 2/2000 (Lysaker, Norway: TheFridtjof Nansen Institute).Hix, S. (1999), The Political System of the European Union (London: MacmillanPress).Hoffman, S. (1966), ‘Obstinate or Obsolete? The Fate of the Nation State and theCase of Western Europe’, Daedalus 95:3, 862–915.Homeyer, I. (2001), ‘Enlarging EU Environmental Policy’. Paper prepared forpresentation at the Environmental Studies Workshop ‘Environmental Challengesof EU Eastern Enlargement’ organised by the Robert-Scuman-Centre at theEuropean University Institute, Florence, Italy, May 25-26, 2001.— (2004), ‘Differential Effects of Enlargement on EU Environmental Governance’,Environmental Politics 13:1 Spring, 52–76.Hønneland, G. and Blakkisrud, H. (eds.) (forthcoming 2007), Implementing Russia’sInternational Obligations: The Environment and Human Rights.Hooghe, L. and Marks, G. (2001), Multi-Level Governance and EuropeanIntergration (Oxford: Rowman & Littleﬁeld Publishers, Inc.).International Energy Agency (2002), International Emission Trading: From Conceptto Reality (Paris: International Energy Agency).— (2005), Energy Policies of IEA Countries – Spain (Paris: International EnergyAgency).Jänicke, M. and Jacob, K. (eds.) (2006), Environmental Governance in GlobalPerspective. New Approaches to Ecological Modernisation (Berlin: FreieUniversität).Jehlicka, P. and Tickle, A. (2002), ‘Environmental Policy and EU Enlargement: AState-Centered Approach’ in Crisen and Carmin (eds.).— (2004), ‘Environmental Implications of Eastern Enlargement: The End ofprogressive EU Environmental Policy?’ in Special Issue: EU Enlargement andthe Environment: Institutional Change and Environmental Policy in Central andEastern Europe, Environmental Politics 13:1, 77–95.Jordan, A.J. (1999), ‘The Implementation of EC Environmental Policy: A PolicyProblem without a Political Solution?’, Environment and Planning C: Governmentand Policy 17:1, 69–90.Jordan, A., Wurzel, R., Zito, A., and Brückner, L. (2003a), ‘Policy Innovation or“Muddling Through”? “New” Environmental Policy Instruments in the UnitedKingdom’, Environmental Politics 12:1 Spring. 179–98.Jordan, A., Wurzel, R.K.V., and Zito, A.R. (guest eds.) (2003b), EnvironmentalPolitics 12:1, Spring.
References
201
Kerr, S. (June 1999), ‘Allocation of Greenhouse Gas Reduction ResponsibilitiesAmong and Within the Countries of the European Union’, Scoping Paper No.5to the European Commission DG Environment, Contract B4-3040/98/000795/MAR/B1 (Washington DC: Center for Clean Air Policy).Klaassen, G. (1999), Emissions Trading in the European Union: Practice andProspects, Ch.5 in Sorrell and Skea (eds.), 83–101.Knill, C. and Lenschow, A. (eds.) (2000), Implementing EU Environmental Policy:New Directions and Old Problems (Manchester: Manchester University Press).Kramer, J.M. (2002), Enlargement and the Environment: Future Challenges, inCrisen and Carmin (eds.).Krasner, S.D. (1983), ‘Structural Causes and Regime Consequences: Regimes asIntervening Variables’, in Krasner (ed.).— (ed.) (1983), International Regimes (Ithaca, NY and London: Cornell UniversityPress).Kruger, J. and Pizer, W.A. (2004), The EU Emissions Trading Directive: Opportunitiesand Potential Pitfalls, report (Washington DC: Resources for the Future).Larsson, T. (2003), Precooking in the European Union - the World of Expert Groups,report for the Swedish Treasury. Available from <http://www.regeringen.se/sb/d/4997/a/36305> accessed 22 May 2007.Lefevere, J. (2005), ‘The EU Greenhouse Gas Emission Allowance Trading Scheme’,in Yamin (ed.) (2005a), 75-148.— (2006), ‘The EU ETS “Linking Directive” Explained’, in Delbeke, J. (ed.), 117–51.Levy, M. et al. (1995), ‘The Study of International Regimes’, European Journal ofInternational Relations 1:3, 267–330.Malnes, R. (1995), ‘“Leader” and “Entrepreneur” in International Negotiations: AConceptual Analysis’, European Journal of International Relations 1:1, 87–112.March, J.G. and Olsen, J.P. (1996), ‘Institutional Perspectives on Political Institutions’,Governance: An International Journal of Policy and Administration 9:3, 247–64.Marshall, Lord (1998), Economic Instruments and the Business Use of Energy: AReport by Lord Marshall (London: Task Force Secretariat).Matthes, F.C. and Schafhausen, F. (forthcoming 2007), ‘Germany’, in Ellerman, D. etal. (eds.)Meadows, D. (2006), ‘The Emissons Allowance Trading Directive 2003/87/ECExplained’, in Delbeke, J. (ed.)Michaelowa, A. (2004), ‘CDM Incentives in the Industrialized Countries – TheLong and Winding Road’, International Review for Environmental Strategies 5:1.Available online at <http://www.hm-treasury.gov.uk/media/072/35/Michaelowa_(2004j)_CDM_incentives.pdf> accessed 23 May 2007.Michaelowa, A. et al. (2005), ‘Governmental and Industrial Responses to ClimateChange: The Case of Germany’, in Begg et al. (eds.).Miles, E.L. et al. (2002), Environmental Regime Effectiveness: Confronting Theorywith Evidence (Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press).Moe, A. (forthcoming 2007), ‘Implementation of Russian Climate Commitments– Drivers and Barriers’, in Hønneland and Blakkisrud (eds.).Moravcsik, A. (1998), The Choice for Europe. Social Purpose & State Power fromMessina to Maastricht (London: Routledge).
202
EU Emissions Trading
— (1999a), ‘Theory and Method in the Study of International Negotiation: ARejoinder to Oran Young’, International Organisation 53:4 Autumn, 811–14.— (1999b). ‘A new Statecraft? Supranational Entrepreneurs and InternationalCooperation’, International Organization 53:2, 267–396.Morgheim, J. (2000), Statement of Jeff Morgheim, Climate Change Manager, BP, toSenate Committee on Commerce, Science and Transportation, 21 September.Mullins, F. (2005), ‘Implementation Challenges: Insights from the European UnionEmission Allowance Trading Scheme’, in Yamin (ed.) (2005a), 183–200.NAO (2004), The UK Emissions Trading Scheme: A New Way to Combat ClimateChange (London: National Audit Ofﬁce).Neuhoff, K. et al. (2006), ‘Emission Projections 2008-2012 versus NAPs II, ClimateStrategies’, updated version November 22 2006, Climate Policy 6, 395–410. Availableonline (homepage) <www.climate-strategies.org> accessed 23 May 2007.Newell. P.N. (2000), Climate for Change: Non-state Actors and the Global Politicsof the Greenhouse (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Newell, P. and Paterson, M. (1998), A Climate for Business: Global Warming, theState and Capital, Review of International Political Economy 5:4, 679–703.Nugent, N. (1999), The Government and Politics of the European Union (London:Macmillan Press).Oberthür, S. and Gehring, T. (2006), Institutional Interaction in Global EnvironmentalGovernance: Synergy and Conﬂict among International and EU Policies(Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press).Oberthür, S. and Tänzler, D. (2007), ‘Climate Policies in the European Union: TheInﬂuence of International Regimes in Policy Diffusion’, in Paul G. Harris (ed.).OECD (2004), Environmental Performance Reviews: Spain (Paris: OECD).Ofﬁcial Journal (13 October 1986), ‘Resolution on Measures to Counteract theRising Concentration of Carbon Dioxide in the Atmosphere (The “Greenhouse”Effect)’, Ofﬁcial Journal C 255, 0272Ott, H. and Sachs, W. (2000), ‘Ethical Aspects of Emissions Trading. Contributionto the World Council of Churches Consultation on ‘Equity and Emissions Trading– Ethical and Theological Dimentions’, Saskatoon, Canada, 9-14 May, WuppertalPapers 110, September.PCA (2007), ‘Tildelingssystem for kvoter i EU’. Internal note, Norwegian PollutionControl Authority.Pedersen, S.L. (2000), ‘The Danish CO2 Emissions Trading System’, Review of EuropeanCommunity and International Environmental Law – RECIEL 9:3, 223–31.Pew Center (2005), The European Union Emissions Trading Scheme (EU-ETS)– Insights and Opportunities, (Arlington, VA: Pew Center on Global ClimateChange).Porter, G. (1999), ‘Trade Competition and Pollution Standards: “Race to the Bottom”or “Stuck at the Bottom”?’ The Journal of Environment & Development 8:2 June,133–51.Ringius, L. (1999), Differentiation, Leaders, and Fairness: Negotiating ClimateCommitments in the European Community, International Negotiation 4, 133–66.
References
203
Risse-Kappen, T. (1995), Bringing Transnational Relations Back In: Non-StateActors, Domestic Structures and International Institutions (Cambridge: CambridgeUniversity Press).Roeser, F. and Jackson, T. (2005), ‘Early Experiences with Emissions Trading in theUK’, in Begg et al.(eds.).Rogge, K. et al. (2006), An Early Assessment of National Allocation Plans for Phase2 of EU Emission Trading (Karlsruhe: Fraunhofer ISI).Rogers, EM. (1995), Diffusion of Innovations, 4th Edition (New York: Free Press).Santarius, T. and Ott, H.E. (2002), ‘Attitudes of German Companies Regarding theImplementation of an Emissions Trading Scheme: A Quantitative and QualitativeAnalysis’, Wuppertal Papers 122e, August.Sbragia, A.M. (2000), ‘Environmental Policy – Economic Constraints and ExternalPressures’, in Wallace and Wallace (eds.), 293–316.Schjølseth, S. (1999), Explaining EU Climate Unity: Actors, Interests and Institutions.FNI Report 7/99 (Lysaker, Norway: The Fridtjof Nansen Institute).Schreurs, M.A. (2004), ‘The Climate Change Divide: The European Union, theUnited States and the Future of the Kyoto Protocol’, in Vig and Faure (eds.).Skjærseth, J.B. (1994), ‘The Climate Policy of the EC: Too Hot to Handle?’ Journalof Common Market Studies 32:1, March, 25–45.— (1999), The Making and Implementation of North Sea Pollution Commitments:Institutions, Rationality and Norms (Oslo: University of Oslo and AkademikaAS).— (2000), North Sea Cooperation: Linking Domestic and International PollutionControl (Manchester: Manchester University Press).— (ed.) (2004), International Regimes and Norway’s Environmental Policy: Crossﬁreand Coherence (Aldershot, UK: Ashgate).— (2006), ‘Protecting the North-East Atlantic: Enhancing Synergies by InstitutionalInterplay’, Marine Policy 30: 157-166.Skjærseth, J.B. and Skodvin, T. (2003), Climate Change and the Oil Industry: CommonProblem, Varying Strategies (Manchester: Manchester University Press).Skjærseth, J. B. and Wettestad, J. (2002), ‘Understanding the Effectiveness of EUEnvironmental Policy: How can Regime Analysis Contribute?’, EnvironmentalPolitics 11:3, 99–120.Skjærseth, J.B. and Wettestad, J. (2007), Is EU Enlargement Bad for EnvironmentalPolicy?, Confronting Gloomy Expectations with Evidence, InternationalEnvironmentalAgreements, Online edition (March 2, 2007) <http://www.springerlink.com/content/?k=Is+Eu+Enlargement+Bad+for+Environmental+Policy> accessed23 May 2007.Skodvin, T. and Andresen, S. (2006), ‘Leadership Revisited’, Global EnvironmentalPolitics 6:3, August, 13–27.Slingenberg, Y. (2006), ‘The International Climate Policy Developments of the1990’s: The UNFCCC; the Kyoto Protocol; the Marrakech Accords and the EURatiﬁcation Decision’, in Delbeke et al. (eds.).Sorrell, S. (2003a), Back to the Drawing Board? Implications of the EU EmissionsTrading Directive for UK Climate Policy, SPRU report for the project ‘Interaction
204
EU Emissions Trading
in EU climate policy’, January 2003. (Brighton, UK: SPRU, The University ofSussex).— (2003b), ‘Carbon Trading in the Policy Mix’, Oxford Review of Economic Policy19:3, 420–37.Sorrell, S. and Skea, J. (eds.) (1999), Pollution for Sale – Emissions Trading andJoint Implementation (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar).Steger, U. (1993), ‘The Greening of the Board Room: How German Companies areDealing with Environmental Issues’, in Fischer and Schot (eds.).Sterk, W. et al. (2005), ‘Joint Emissions Trading as a Socio-Ecological Transformation.Implications of Design Differences for Linking Domestic Emissions TradingSchemes’, Working Paper CSP4. (Wuppertal, Germany: JET-SET, WuppertalInstitute for Climate, Environment and Energy).Stokke, O.S. (2000), ‘Managing Straddling Stocks: The Interplay of Global andRegional Regimes’, Ocean and Coastal Management 43:2-3, 205–34.— (2001), The Interplay of International Regimes: Putting Effectiveness Theory toWork. FNI-Report 14/2001. (Lysaker, Norway: The Fridtjof Nansen Institute).Szarka, J. (2003), ‘The Politics of Bounded Innovation: “New” EnvironmentalPolicy Instruments in France’. Environmental Politics 12:1, Spring, 93–115.Tabara, J.D. (2003), ‘Spain: Words that Succeed and Climate Policies that Fail,Climate Policy 3:1, 19–31.Tangen, K. (1998), Dagbok fra Kyoto: Oppsummering av Forhandlingene som Ledetfram til Kyoto-protokollen i FNs Klimakonvensjon. FNI-Report 7/1998. (Lysaker,Norway: The Fridtjof Nansen Institute).Tews, K. (2006), ‘The Diffusion of Environmental Policy Innovations: Cornerstonesof an Analytical Framework’, in Jänicke and Jacob (eds.).Tietenberg, T. et al. (1999), International Rules for Greenhouse Gas EmissionsTrading: Deﬁning the Principles, Modalities, Rules and Guidelines for Veriﬁcation,Reporting and Accountability. UNCTAD/GDS/GFSB/Misc.6 (New York NY:UNCTAD Secretariat).Torvanger, A. et al. (1996), Exploring Distribution of Commitments – A Follow-upof the Berlin Mandate. CICERO Report 1996:3. (Oslo: Centre for InternationalClimate and Environmental Research).Underdal, A. (1991), Solving Collective Problems: Notes on Three Modes ofLeadership, in Fridtjof Nansen Institute (1991), 139-153.— (1994), ‘Leadership Theory – Rediscovering the Arts of Management’, in Zartman(ed.), 178–97.— (1998), ‘Explaining Compliance and Defection: Three Models’, EuropeanJournal of International Relations 4:1, 5–30.— (2002), ‘One Question, Two Answers’, in Miles et al.Underdal, A. and Hanf, K. (eds.) (2000), International Environmental Agreementsand Domestic Politics: The Case of Acid Rain (Aldershot, UK: Ashgate).Vainio, M. and Zapfel, P. (2006), ‘Economic Analysis of Emission Trading in CO2Emissions in the European Union’, in Delbeke et al. (eds.).Victor, D.G. et al. (1998), The Implementation and Effectiveness of InternationalEnvironmental Commitments: Theory and Practice (Cambridge MA: MIT Press).
References
205
Victor, D.G. and House, J.C. (2006), ‘BP’s Emissions Trading System’, EnergyPolicy 34:15, October, 2100–112.Vig, N.J. and Faure, M.G. (eds.) (2004), Green Giants? Environmental Policies ofthe United States and the European Union (Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press).Vis, P. (2006a). ‘Basic Design Options for Emissions Trading, in Delbeke et al. (eds.).— (2006b), ‘The First Allocation Round: A Brief History, in Delbeke et al. (eds.),187–212.Wallace, H. and Wallace, W. (eds.) (2000), Policy-Making in the European Union(Oxford: Oxford University Press).Walz, R. and Betz, R. (2003), Interaction in EU Climate Policy: Interaction ofthe EU ETS with German Climate Policy Instruments, Policy Brief (Karlsruhe:Fraunhofer-ISI).Watanabe, R. (2005), Germany’s Experience with the Introduction of the EUEmissions Trading Scheme: Lessons for Japan. IGES-CP Working Paper 2004-006.(Kamiyamaguchi, Hayama Kanagawa: IGES – Institute for Global EnvironmentalStrategies). Available online <http://enviroscope.iges.or.jp/modules/envirolib/view.php?docid=160> accessed 23 May 2007.Watanabe, R. and Metz, L. (2004), ‘The Development of Climate Change Policy inGermany’, International Review for Environmental Strategies 5:1, 109–26.Weale, A. et al. (2000), Environmental Governance in Europe (Oxford: OxfordUniversity Press).Weiler, J.H.H. (1991), ‘The Transformation of Europe’, The Yale Law Journal 100,2401–83.Wettestad, J. (2000), ‘The Complicated Development of EU Climate Policy, Ch.3 inGrubb and Gupta (eds.), 25–47.— (2001), ‘The Ambiguous Prospects for EU Climate Policy – A Summary ofOptions’, Energy and Environment 12:2&3, 139–67.— (2002), Clearing the Air – European Advances in Tackling Acid Rain andAtmospheric Pollution (Aldershot, UK: Ashgate).— (2004), ‘The Rapid EU Process: Causes and Consequences’, Environment 46:9,November, 43–4.— (2005), ‘The Making of the 2003 EU Emissions Trading Directive: Ultra-QuickProcess Due To Entrepreneurial Proﬁciency?’, Global Environmental Politics5:1, February, 1–24.Wettestad, J. and Hals Butenschøn, S. (2000), The Increasing British ClimateAmbitiousness: A Mere Reﬂection of ‘The Dash for Gas’?, FNI Report 3/2000.(Lysaker, Norway: The Fridtjof Nansen Institute).Wettestad, J. and Sæverud, I.A. (2005), Implementing EU Emissions Trading:Institutional Misﬁt? FNI Report 10/2005. (Lysaker, Norway: The Fridtjof NansenInstitute).Wurzel, R.K.W. (2002), Environmental Policy-making in Britain, Germany and theEuropean Union (Manchester: Manchester University Press).Wurzel, R.K.W. et al. (2003), ‘From High Regulatory State to Social and EcologicalMarket Economy? “New” Environmental Policy Instruments in Germany’ inJordan et al. (guest eds.), 115–36.
206
EU Emissions Trading
Yamin, F. (ed.) (2005a), Climate Change and Carbon Markets: A Handbook ofEmissions Reduction Mechanisms (London: Earthscan).— (2005b), ‘The International Rules on the Kyoto Mechanisms, in Yamin (ed.)(2005a).Yamin, F. and Lefevre, J. (2000), Final Report to the European Commission DGEnvironment: Design Options for Implementing an Emissions Trading Regime forGreenhouse Gases in the EC (London: FIELD).Yin, R.K. (1989), Case Study Research: Design and Methods (London: Sage).Young, O.R. (1989), International Cooperation: Building Regimes for NaturalResources and the Environment (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press).— (1991), ‘Political Leadership and Regime Formation: On the Development ofInstitutions in International Society’, International Organization 45:Summer,281–308.— (1999), ‘Comment on Andrew Morawscik, “A New Statecraft? SupranationalEntrepreneurs and International Cooperation”’, International Organisation 53:4,Autumn, 805–9.Young, O.R. and Zürn, M. (2006), ‘The International Regimes Satabase: Designingand Using a Sophisticated Tool for Institutional Analysis’, Global EnvironmentalPolitics 6:3, August, 121–43.Zapfel, P. (2005), ‘Greenhouse Gas Emissions Trading in the EU: Building theWorld’s Largest Cap-and-trade Scheme’, in Hansjürgens (ed.).Zapfel, P. and Vainio, M. (2002), ‘Pathways to European Greenhouse Gas EmissionsTrading History and Misconceptions’, a paper presented at the 1st Workshop ofthe Concerted Action on Tradable Emission Permits (CATEP) in Venice, Italy,December 3-4, 2001.Zartman, I.W. (ed.) (1994), International Multilateral Negotiation (San Fransisco:Jossey-Bass).Zetterberg, L. et al. (2004), Analysis of National Allocation Plans for the EU ETS(Stockholm, Sweden: IVL – Swedish Environmenal Research Institute Ltd.).Zito, A.R et al. (2003), ‘Instrument Innovation in an Environmental Lead State:“New” Environmental Policy Instruments in the Netherlands, EnvironmentalPolitics 12:1, Spring, 157–79.
Annex I
List of InterviewsJorge Moreira Da Silva, ETS Rapporteur, European Parliament, 11 February 2002.Rob Bradley, Climate Action Network (CNE), 11 February 2002 and 26 May 2004.Christian Egenhofer, Centre for European Policy Studies (CEPS), 12 February 2002and 13 January 2006.Henning Arp, European Commission, DG Environment, 12 February 2002.Peter Zapfel, European Commission, DG Environment, 13 February 2002.Frazer Goodwin, Transport & Environment, 18 June 2003.Per Stiansen, Ministry of Environment, Norway, 16 January 2004 and 26 October2006.Trygve Hallingstad, Ministry of Environment, Norway, Brussels representative, 26May 2004 and 12 January 2006.Ulf Bjornholm-Ottosen, Swedish Delegation to the EU, 26 May 2004.Terhi Lehtonen, European Parliament, 27 May 2004.Sabina Magnano, European Parliament, 27 May 2004.Michael Wriglesworth, International Emissions Trading Association ( IETA)/CEPS,27 May 2004 and 16 May 2006.Frank Brannvoll/Jenny Schulz, Storaenso/Alliance of Power Consuming Industries,27 May 2004.John Scowcroft, Eurelectric, 28 May 2004 and 11 January 2006.Håvard Vaggen Malvik/Kåre Rudsar, European Commission, DG for Energy andTransport, 28 May 2004.Chris Dodwell, Department of Environment, Transport and the Regions (DEFRA),UK, 16 February 2005.Adrian Gault, Department of Trade and Industry (DTI), UK, 16 February 2005.Teresa Ribera, Ministry of Environment, Spain, 9 May 2005.Larry Philps, CO2 Spain, 9 May 2005.Lucia Martin Bermejo, Confederation of Industry, Spain, 10 May 2005.Pedro Mora, Cement Industry, Spain, 10 May 2005.Javier Rodriguez Morales, Paper Industry, Spain, 10 May 2005.Jose Luis Ortega, Greenpeace Spain, 10 May 2005.Eduardo Loma-Osorio Riano/Felix de las Fuentes, Iberdrola, Spain, 10 May 2005.Klaus Werner, E.ON AG, Germany, 28 September 2005.Felix Christian Matthes, Öko-Institut e.V, Germany, 28 September 2005.Stefan Besser, Ministry of Environment, Germany, 28 September 2005.Joachim Löchte, RWE AG, Germany, 29 September 2005.Jürgen Landgrebe/Thomas Langrock, Federal Environmental Agency, Germany, 29September 2005.
208
EU Emissions Trading
Peter Vis, European Commission, DG Environment, 12 January 2006 and 15 May2006.Damien Meadows, European Commission, DG Environment, 12 January 2006.Paal Frisvold, Bellona Norway, Brussels ofﬁce, 12 January 2006.Ulf Sviden, Ministry of Environment, Sweden, 1 March 2006.Mark Hayden, European Commission, DG for Economic and Financial Affairs, 15May 2006.Harald Francke-Lund, Pollution Control Authority, Norway, 8 November 2006.
IndexACCF, see American Council for CapitalFormationAd Hoc Group on the Berlin Mandate(AGBM) 5, 66, 67, 89AGBM, see Ad Hoc Group on the BerlinMandateallowance allocation 13, 14–15, 39–40,154–8 passim, 194and EU institutions 78, 79, 120–25passim, 125–38 passim, 142, 156,171–4, 179and industry 120–25 passim, 175–6and international climate regime 32, 48,174–8, 179–80and member states 21–2, 41–3, 44, 45, 48,49–63, 96, 104–5,