Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.

Text: the goldman sachs group , inc . and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements long-term debt instruments the aggregate contractual principal amount of long-term other secured financings for which the fair value option was elected exceeded the related fair value by $ 361 million and $ 362 million as of december 2016 and december 2015 , respectively . the aggregate contractual principal amount of unsecured long-term borrowings for which the fair value option was elected exceeded the related fair value by $ 1.56 billion and $ 1.12 billion as of december 2016 and december 2015 , respectively . the amounts above include both principal- and non-principal-protected long-term borrowings . impact of credit spreads on loans and lending commitments the estimated net gain attributable to changes in instrument-specific credit spreads on loans and lending commitments for which the fair value option was elected was $ 281 million for 2016 , $ 751 million for 2015 and $ 1.83 billion for 2014 , respectively . the firm generally calculates the fair value of loans and lending commitments for which the fair value option is elected by discounting future cash flows at a rate which incorporates the instrument-specific credit spreads . for floating-rate loans and lending commitments , substantially all changes in fair value are attributable to changes in instrument-specific credit spreads , whereas for fixed-rate loans and lending commitments , changes in fair value are also attributable to changes in interest rates . debt valuation adjustment the firm calculates the fair value of financial liabilities for which the fair value option is elected by discounting future cash flows at a rate which incorporates the firm 2019s credit spreads . the net dva on such financial liabilities was a loss of $ 844 million ( $ 544 million , net of tax ) for 2016 and was included in 201cdebt valuation adjustment 201d in the consolidated statements of comprehensive income . the gains/ ( losses ) reclassified to earnings from accumulated other comprehensive loss upon extinguishment of such financial liabilities were not material for 2016 . note 9 . loans receivable loans receivable is comprised of loans held for investment that are accounted for at amortized cost net of allowance for loan losses . interest on loans receivable is recognized over the life of the loan and is recorded on an accrual basis . the table below presents details about loans receivable. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>$ in millions</td><td>as of december 2016</td><td>as of december 2015</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>corporate loans</td><td>$ 24837</td><td>$ 20740</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>loans to private wealth management clients</td><td>13828</td><td>13961</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>loans backed by commercial real estate</td><td>4761</td><td>5271</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>loans backed by residential real estate</td><td>3865</td><td>2316</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>other loans</td><td>2890</td><td>3533</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total loans receivable gross</td><td>50181</td><td>45821</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>allowance for loan losses</td><td>-509 ( 509 )</td><td>-414 ( 414 )</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>total loans receivable</td><td>$ 49672</td><td>$ 45407</td></tr></table> as of december 2016 and december 2015 , the fair value of loans receivable was $ 49.80 billion and $ 45.19 billion , respectively . as of december 2016 , had these loans been carried at fair value and included in the fair value hierarchy , $ 28.40 billion and $ 21.40 billion would have been classified in level 2 and level 3 , respectively . as of december 2015 , had these loans been carried at fair value and included in the fair value hierarchy , $ 23.91 billion and $ 21.28 billion would have been classified in level 2 and level 3 , respectively . the firm also extends lending commitments that are held for investment and accounted for on an accrual basis . as of december 2016 and december 2015 , such lending commitments were $ 98.05 billion and $ 93.92 billion , respectively . substantially all of these commitments were extended to corporate borrowers and were primarily related to the firm 2019s relationship lending activities . the carrying value and the estimated fair value of such lending commitments were liabilities of $ 327 million and $ 2.55 billion , respectively , as of december 2016 , and $ 291 million and $ 3.32 billion , respectively , as of december 2015 . as of december 2016 , had these lending commitments been carried at fair value and included in the fair value hierarchy , $ 1.10 billion and $ 1.45 billion would have been classified in level 2 and level 3 , respectively . as of december 2015 , had these lending commitments been carried at fair value and included in the fair value hierarchy , $ 1.35 billion and $ 1.97 billion would have been classified in level 2 and level 3 , respectively . goldman sachs 2016 form 10-k 147 .
Question: as of 2016, what was the amount from the total loans receivable gross that was backed by commercial real estate?
Answer: 4761.0
Question: and what was this total of loans receivable gross?
Answer: 50181.0
Question: what percentage, then, of this total did that amount represent?
Answer: 0.09488
Question: and what was this same percentage representation for those values in 2015?

user
0.11503
assistant