How adequately does the phrase "the military is under civilian control" capture the complexity of the relationship between our military and the government entities not composed of military personnel?
I maintain that upholding civilian supremacy over the military is a cornerstone of our democratic fabric, and the phrase aptly captures this singular trait of our nation's governance.
The subordination of military to non-military authorities may be true, but inherent strains and varying objectives can complicate the interdependence between the two.
I maintain that upholding civilian supremacy over the military is a cornerstone of our democratic fabric, and the phrase aptly captures this singular trait of our nation's governance. The subordination of military to non-military authorities may be true, but inherent strains and varying objectives can complicate the interdependence between the two. It is imperative to comprehend that the rudimentary precepts of civilian control are not unyielding or fixed but an ongoing metamorphosis that requires continual surveillance and refinement. My observation is that the terminology under scrutiny embodies a naïve presentation of our political structure, omitting the concrete elements that could weaken or dispute the civilian control of military establishments in specific contexts.