The ethical uncertainty surrounding the US government's use of torture practices on terrorism suspects after the September 11 attacks has triggered philosophical debates, as it entails ethical quandaries that defy our sense of compassion and morality. What is your philosophical perspective on this issue?
The tenets of consequentialist morality mandate that practices such as torture be renounced since they fail to produce trustworthy confessions and instead result in misleading information that could skew investigationsAdditionally, innocent individuals could be subjected to torture.
Virtue ethics underscores that the practice of torture contradicts the development of moral values such as compassion, empathy, and benevolence, which are crucial drivers for both individuals and those in public service.
The tenets of consequentialist morality mandate that practices such as torture be renounced since they fail to produce trustworthy confessions and instead result in misleading information that could skew investigationsAdditionally, innocent individuals could be subjected to torture. By adopting a philosophical and analytical lens, one can assert that the use of torture is morally prohibited according to deontological principlesThis is due to the fact that the essential moral principle of treating all individuals with honor and respect, regardless of their social standing or actions, is violatedUtilitarian reasoning cannot justify breaking this moral law. Virtue ethics underscores that the practice of torture contradicts the development of moral values such as compassion, empathy, and benevolence, which are crucial drivers for both individuals and those in public service.