Summarize the radiology report findings into an impression within 3 sentences.
    INPUT: The carina is not well delineated . However , the tip of the ET tube probably lies approximately 2 .7 cm above the carina . Note is made that it points toward the right - side of the tracheal wall . There are low inspiratory volumes , which likely contributes to accentuation of the cardiomediastinal silhouette . Again seen are opacities at both lung bases , consistent with bibasilar collapse and / or consolidation . Small effusions can not be excluded . There is upper zone redistribution , also likely accentuated by low lung volumes . Compared with ___ inspiratory volumes are lower , likely accounting for increased confluent confluence of the basilar opacities . Otherwise , no definite interval change . In left upper quadrant of the abdomen , a thin rim of lucency projects immediately outside what is thought to represent air within the stomach . Is there reason to suspect free air outside the stomach wall ? Otherwise , this could represent artifact due to superimposition of portions of the stomach . No obvious pneumomediastinum . No pneumothorax detected .
    OUTPUT:
    
Low inspiratory volumes , lower than on the most recent prior study . Continued bibasilar opacities , consistent with bibasilar collapse and / or consolidation . Although they appear somewhat more confluent , this is likely accentuated by lower lung volumes . The possibility of small effusions can not be excluded . There is mild vascular plethora , also not definitely increased , allowing for low lung volumes . ET tube not well delineated , but likely lying approximately 2 .7 cm above the carina . Unusual double contour appearance of the stomach , immediately inferior to the left hemidiaphragm . Clinical correlation is requested . Is there reason to suspect a small amount of air free air outside the stomach ? Otherwise , this could represent artifact due to superimposition different portions of the stomach .