 Let's get this out of the way. The Mavic 3 Cine is the best consumer drone you can buy right now, if you can afford to buy it. At $4,999 it is an expensive option, but the combination of image quality and size, it'll be hard to find anything better. But that doesn't mean it's a drone for everyone. This is the Mavic 3 Cine. The Mavic 3 is essentially the same size as the Mavic 2 Pro. If you look closely, you'll notice it's a little bit longer, about the same height, and just slightly heavier. Basically it is the same footprint as before, and you won't notice much of a difference carrying it in your bag. The wingspan and therefore the arms are a little bit longer, which adds more room for these slightly longer propellers too. The new camera module is big, and it houses the main camera, the 24mm lens, and also this 28x hybrid zoom lens, which I'll talk about later. The whole camera sticks out a little bit, which is both good and bad. It's bad because it leaves the camera exposed, so any potential crashes might be catastrophic. Luckily I didn't find myself in that situation yet. But it's good because this camera can also tilt upwards by quite a bit, almost 30 degrees. Oh, also one neat little new feature is that the gimbal locks itself after flight, meaning it will not dangle in transport, and it makes it easier to put this muzzle on. And I'm gonna call it a muzzle because, I don't know, it just feels like a muzzle. Anyways, DJI released two Mavic 3s. The biggest difference between the regular Mavic 3 and the Cine is that the Cine has 1TB SSD and it can shoot 5.1K ProRes 422 HQ video up to 50 frames per second. Other than that, everything else is identical. We'll dive into the camera quality real soon, but out of all those improvements over the Mavic 2 Pro, the one I noticed the most was the battery life. It's rated for 46 minutes and you don't always get, you know, 46 minutes of flight time. But compared to 31 minutes that the Mavic 2 Pro had, it is very noticeable once you start flying around. I'm very used to trying to maximize battery life with each flight, but every time I'd glance over, I'd be surprised I still have around 70-75% battery life. If you buy the $5,000 bundle, which by the way is the only way you can buy the Cine version, it's not sold by itself, you get three batteries and plenty of flight time. Also this might be minor to most, but it's kind of a big deal for me. The charging hub is now USB-C, meaning you can charge it basically on anything that supports USB-C charging. Just know that each one of those batteries takes a while to charge on a 65-watt charger, so plan accordingly. It took me about an hour and 45 minutes to charge from 11% all the way up to 100%. Alright, camera time. So we showed you all the specs before, but the most important one is the sensor size. This sensor is 4 thirds inch of a sensor, which is to say it is a third of an inch larger than the Mavic 2 Pro. It is also a 4 by 3 sensor, which means your photos are no longer in 3 by 2 aspect ratio. So with increasing sensor size, you get better noise handling, richer detail, greater dynamic range, reduced diffraction, better depth of field, which you don't really notice on drones, effectively better image quality all around. So let's look at some of the clips. All these clips you're looking at right now are shot anywhere from ISO 800 to 6400, and they look extremely good. To be fair, this whole scene has a good amount of light coming from the buildings, and there's some real life ray tracing happening with the reflections on the ground, but if you're really looking for noise, then you should look at the dark blue sky here. This is at 200%. It's definitely noisy, but it's really not that bad. Overall, everything from that night looks extremely good. Now let's take a look at the locked off shot for more direct ISO comparison. Traditionally, drone cameras have a really steep decline in quality as you keep adding more ISO, and that's the case here, but the downgrade isn't as steep as before. 3200 is pushing it, 6400 is really pushing it, and in all seriousness, you really won't need to shoot at 6400 as often. I tried doing it here, and it doesn't look that good. All the shots were shot in ProRes, but you are watching this on YouTube's player after it was exported to an H.264 format and then compressed again by YouTube, so you're not really going to be able to see every little detail here. I am including links in the description where you can download those files yourself and take a look. The built-in 1TB SSD on the CineModel has enough room for about 2 hours of 5.1K 24 frames per second ProRes footage. Unfortunately, the SSD is not user replaceable, but there is a microSD slot here too, which you can use to store your H.264 and H.265 clips, but not ProRes. But the differences between the two codecs are really not that noticeable. So looking at the clips in the Premiere timeline, it's actually really hard to notice much of a difference in just overall clarity and sharpness. So for the sake of this demo, we're going to start manipulating clips by lifting up the shadows all the way up, overall exposure, we're going to add some saturation. I know this looks ugly, but looking back and forth between these two clips, I don't really see much of a difference. So I've duplicated these clips and started adding more color to it, especially in the sky, adding some blue, and you can sort of tell that the H.264 isn't holding up as well as the ProRes in the top right corner, but those differences are so minor. If I were to do a blind test and try to guess which is which, I really wouldn't know. The bottom line is you don't really notice any difference between the two codecs. But some of you who do drone work professionally and work for production houses or on big productions, you often need to shoot and deliver files in ProRes, so now you have that option. I also think it's just remarkable with living in the age where you're able to shoot ProRes videos on our phones and now the drones of this size. But most who aren't using drones professionally will still reap the benefits just from this larger sensor, higher bitrate, and more frames in the standard Mavic 3 for far less money. This new camera can also shoot 4K up to 120 frames per second. I'm over the moon that we can now shoot 120 frames per second in 4K, but there is a little bit of cropping. And don't get me wrong, the footage still looks really good. Just know that you're not using the entire sensor when you're in this mode. And honestly, I can't get enough of these silky smooth waves. If 60 frames per second is enough for you, then there won't be any cropping there. When it comes to photos, the differences between the two drones are not as obvious at first. You might find it surprising that the Mavic 3 dynamic range is rated for 12.8 stops compared to Mavic 2 Pro's 14 stops of dynamic range. But that doesn't tell the whole story. First let's take a look at that dynamic range that you get out of a single image with some very quick lightroom adjustments. So here's a more challenging sunset photo shooting straight into the sun. We can start by adjusting exposure, lifting shadows, dragging down the highlights, and you can get a really nice photo out of it. Lifting those shadows does reveal a lot of noise, but it's really not that bad. You can clean that up manually. So yeah, you can still get a good photo without it looking too artificial. So looking at the side by side photos taken with the Mavic 3 and the Mavic 2 Pro, you will start noticing the differences, but only if you look really closely. First the Mavic 3 is a little bit wider because of that 24mm lens. And the colors straight out of the camera are wildly different here, so I'm just gonna match the white balance values first. Both of these photos are shot at relatively high ISO, at 1600 ISO, and if we zoom in at like 300%, you'll see how much clearer the sky is in the background. And also how much smaller the noise grains are too. I'll give you one more example here. Both of these photos again were shot at 1600 ISO, and it just looks so much cleaner. Upon hearing the photo specs for this camera, I was a little bit worried that we're not getting much of an improvement between the Mavic 3, Mavic 2 Pro, or even the Air 2S. It was still just 20 megapixels, and it was rated for less dynamic range than before. But there's a lot more detail available, even if you have to go hunting to find it. Okay, lastly, this brings me to the final thing I want to talk about, and that is the hybrid lens. So okay, I don't love it. I understand why it exists, but I'm not convinced it's entirely necessary. It's fun, sure, and sometimes you can find some cool things or just look around, but don't expect miracles in terms of just pure image quality. It's a separate lens with a separate half an inch CMOS sensor sitting above the main camera. It is capable of 28x zoom or 162mm in focal length. You can't shoot in ProRes with it, which is understandable, and you cannot shoot in D-Log, which is a little bit less understandable. And you're locked in at 4K or 1080p at 30 frames per second. So when you enter the explore mode by tapping on these binoculars here, you enable digital zoom. Okay, at first that digital zoom is happening on the main lens, and I think that the 2x zoom looks really decent. Once you get to 7x zoom, that's when the switch happens and the hybrid lens takes over. And the 7x looks pretty good too. See how much clearer the Wells Fargo sign is over here? But once you start going to 14x or 28x, it's really not something you'd just proudly post on your portfolio. Oh, also, you cannot take raw photos while in the explore mode, just 12 megapixel JPEGs, and some of them look pretty good. Okay, few last quick things regarding photos. The minimal shutter speed is two seconds. Long exposure drone photos are often hard to pull off, but I do wish that shutter speed was a little bit longer. And lastly, aperture is adjustable from f2.8 all the way to f11, which works for both photos and video, of course. All right, I threw a lot of information at you, so what I want to do next is go through my notes app and just read some of the key takeaways that I've written down as I was reviewing this drone. So video quality is incredible. 5.1K is a decent resolution bump. ProRes is really not for everyone. 4K 60 without cropping is fantastic. 4K 120 even with cropping is incredible. Photos on paper didn't get much of a spec update, but that sensor does make for a big quality bump. Battery life is noticeably better. Vertical descent is much faster than before. APAS is also better, and thus the return to home is improved, but 99% of the time I just fly back manually because it's just faster. So DJI's light speed USB-C cable is actually amazing and sort of necessary when transferring these big files. The provided ND filters are okay. I did notice some green color casts, especially with longer exposure photos, but also the Mavic 3 feels a little bit unfinished. A lot of the features weren't available. Active truck wasn't available. Master shots were not available. Panoramic photos, which I use all the time, they were not available during my testing. Hyperlapse is also not available. The wide angle lens attachment apparently is coming down the line. I'm very curious to see how that works. Also not available. So all the core features that were available during my testing worked exceptionally well, but the list of things that is not ready is quite long. There's the new remote controller in the Cinebundle. It is the DJI RC Pro, which is very similar to the smart controller that came out a couple of years ago. It has a great screen, operating system built on top of OS, has decent but not exceptional battery life. I can get anywhere from three to six hours, depending mostly on the screen brightness. So there are new obstacle avoidance sensor on this drone. They're still omnidirectional and they're finally not as sensitive or as obnoxiously loud in the software as before. Also controller numerically tells you how close you are to objects. So that really helps when you're flying near trees or buildings and stuff like that. Okay, OcuSync 3 Plus is fantastic. I didn't anticipate a big change here, but I really did notice a difference. Not in range, but overall steadiness of the connection, especially when going behind buildings or trees. It wasn't as big of a problem as before and I would not lose signal whatsoever. Okay, last two things, A-Pass 5 and ActiveTrack. I didn't actually have time to test these because these features were not available during my testing period. A-Pass got enabled a few days ago, but ActiveTrack is still not ready and it's probably going to be ready in January from what DJI tells me. I still fly with sensors off, but when I did turn them on, they were far less aggressive and annoying than before. I'm expecting some major improvement from DJI in this category. Everyone is waiting for them to catch up with Skydio and that is a very high bar. So we're just going to have to wait and see. So there are things I was hoping to see with this drone after years of rumors. One which was built in NDs. It's done here and that's fine I guess. Part of me was hoping for interchangeable lenses and I still think those would be far more useful than the hybrid lens. But I do agree with a lot of the choices that DJI made here. Increasing the sensor size instead of simply increasing resolution for one, enabling 4K up to 120 frames per second and adding ProRes video is going to be tempting for a lot of people. This drone is now very close to being an Inspire 2 and it's just this big. So do I recommend this drone? Yes, I set it on top. It is the best drone you can find and if you can afford it and know what you'll use it for, just go for it. $5,000 is a lot of money and if you add warranty on top of that and if you live in a place where you gotta pay high sales taxes, that price can go up really quickly. If you're a hobbyist or a prosumer mostly posting on your social feeds, you can probably get away with an Air 2, a 2S or even a Mini 2. If you're a bit more sensitive about image quality, do this professionally, want the best of the best in a relatively small package and have enough computing power to edit these massive files and storage, you really can't go wrong with the Mavic 3 or the Mavic 3 Cine. But I still strongly recommend that you be honest with yourself and see if you're actually going to benefit from this ProRes files or built-in storage and you'll likely save yourself a lot of money. Okay everyone, thank you so much for watching. A lot of you sent in questions and I hope I answered most of them, but if you still have more questions, just drop them below and we'll have a chat. Cool.
 Let's get this out of the way.
 The Mavic 3 Cine is the best consumer drone you can buy right now, if you can afford to
 buy it.
 At $4,999 it is an expensive option, but the combination of image quality and size, it'll
 be hard to find anything better.
 But that doesn't mean it's a drone for everyone.
 This is the Mavic 3 Cine.
 The Mavic 3 is essentially the same size as the Mavic 2 Pro.
 If you look closely, you'll notice it's a little bit longer, about the same height,
 and just slightly heavier.
 Basically it is the same footprint as before, and you won't notice much of a difference
 carrying it in your bag.
 The wingspan and therefore the arms are a little bit longer, which adds more room for
 these slightly longer propellers too.
 The new camera module is big, and it houses the main camera, the 24mm lens, and also this
 28x hybrid zoom lens, which I'll talk about later.
 The whole camera sticks out a little bit, which is both good and bad.
 It's bad because it leaves the camera exposed, so any potential crashes might be catastrophic.
 Luckily I didn't find myself in that situation yet.
 But it's good because this camera can also tilt upwards by quite a bit, almost 30 degrees.
 Oh, also one neat little new feature is that the gimbal locks itself after flight, meaning
 it will not dangle in transport, and it makes it easier to put this muzzle on.
 And I'm gonna call it a muzzle because, I don't know, it just feels like a muzzle.
 Anyways, DJI released two Mavic 3s.
 The biggest difference between the regular Mavic 3 and the Cine is that the Cine has
 1TB SSD and it can shoot 5.1K ProRes 422 HQ video up to 50 frames per second.
 Other than that, everything else is identical.
 We'll dive into the camera quality real soon, but out of all those improvements over the
 Mavic 2 Pro, the one I noticed the most was the battery life.
 It's rated for 46 minutes and you don't always get, you know, 46 minutes of flight time.
 But compared to 31 minutes that the Mavic 2 Pro had, it is very noticeable once you
 start flying around.
 I'm very used to trying to maximize battery life with each flight, but every time I'd
 glance over, I'd be surprised I still have around 70-75% battery life.
 If you buy the $5,000 bundle, which by the way is the only way you can buy the Cine version,
 it's not sold by itself, you get three batteries and plenty of flight time.
 Also this might be minor to most, but it's kind of a big deal for me.
 The charging hub is now USB-C, meaning you can charge it basically on anything that supports
 USB-C charging.
 Just know that each one of those batteries takes a while to charge on a 65-watt charger,
 so plan accordingly.
 It took me about an hour and 45 minutes to charge from 11% all the way up to 100%.
 Alright, camera time.
 So we showed you all the specs before, but the most important one is the sensor size.
 This sensor is 4 thirds inch of a sensor, which is to say it is a third of an inch larger
 than the Mavic 2 Pro.
 It is also a 4 by 3 sensor, which means your photos are no longer in 3 by 2 aspect ratio.
 So with increasing sensor size, you get better noise handling, richer detail, greater dynamic
 range, reduced diffraction, better depth of field, which you don't really notice on
 drones, effectively better image quality all around.
 So let's look at some of the clips.
 All these clips you're looking at right now are shot anywhere from ISO 800 to 6400,
 and they look extremely good.
 To be fair, this whole scene has a good amount of light coming from the buildings, and there's
 some real life ray tracing happening with the reflections on the ground, but if you're
 really looking for noise, then you should look at the dark blue sky here.
 This is at 200%.
 It's definitely noisy, but it's really not that bad.
 Overall, everything from that night looks extremely good.
 Now let's take a look at the locked off shot for more direct ISO comparison.
 Traditionally, drone cameras have a really steep decline in quality as you keep adding
 more ISO, and that's the case here, but the downgrade isn't as steep as before.
 3200 is pushing it, 6400 is really pushing it, and in all seriousness, you really won't
 need to shoot at 6400 as often.
 I tried doing it here, and it doesn't look that good.
 All the shots were shot in ProRes, but you are watching this on YouTube's player after
 it was exported to an H.264 format and then compressed again by YouTube, so you're not
 really going to be able to see every little detail here.
 I am including links in the description where you can download those files yourself and
 take a look.
 The built-in 1TB SSD on the CineModel has enough room for about 2 hours of 5.1K 24 frames
 per second ProRes footage.
 Unfortunately, the SSD is not user replaceable, but there is a microSD slot here too, which
 you can use to store your H.264 and H.265 clips, but not ProRes.
 But the differences between the two codecs are really not that noticeable.
 So looking at the clips in the Premiere timeline, it's actually really hard to notice much of
 a difference in just overall clarity and sharpness.
 So for the sake of this demo, we're going to start manipulating clips by lifting up
 the shadows all the way up, overall exposure, we're going to add some saturation.
 I know this looks ugly, but looking back and forth between these two clips, I don't really
 see much of a difference.
 So I've duplicated these clips and started adding more color to it, especially in the
 sky, adding some blue, and you can sort of tell that the H.264 isn't holding up as well
 as the ProRes in the top right corner, but those differences are so minor.
 If I were to do a blind test and try to guess which is which, I really wouldn't know.
 The bottom line is you don't really notice any difference between the two codecs.
 But some of you who do drone work professionally and work for production houses or on big productions,
 you often need to shoot and deliver files in ProRes, so now you have that option.
 I also think it's just remarkable with living in the age where you're able to shoot ProRes
 videos on our phones and now the drones of this size.
 But most who aren't using drones professionally will still reap the benefits just from this
 larger sensor, higher bitrate, and more frames in the standard Mavic 3 for far less money.
 This new camera can also shoot 4K up to 120 frames per second.
 I'm over the moon that we can now shoot 120 frames per second in 4K, but there is a little
 bit of cropping.
 And don't get me wrong, the footage still looks really good.
 Just know that you're not using the entire sensor when you're in this mode.
 And honestly, I can't get enough of these silky smooth waves.
 If 60 frames per second is enough for you, then there won't be any cropping there.
 When it comes to photos, the differences between the two drones are not as obvious at first.
 You might find it surprising that the Mavic 3 dynamic range is rated for 12.8 stops compared
 to Mavic 2 Pro's 14 stops of dynamic range.
 But that doesn't tell the whole story.
 First let's take a look at that dynamic range that you get out of a single image with some
 very quick lightroom adjustments.
 So here's a more challenging sunset photo shooting straight into the sun.
 We can start by adjusting exposure, lifting shadows, dragging down the highlights, and
 you can get a really nice photo out of it.
 Lifting those shadows does reveal a lot of noise, but it's really not that bad.
 You can clean that up manually.
 So yeah, you can still get a good photo without it looking too artificial.
 So looking at the side by side photos taken with the Mavic 3 and the Mavic 2 Pro, you
 will start noticing the differences, but only if you look really closely.
 First the Mavic 3 is a little bit wider because of that 24mm lens.
 And the colors straight out of the camera are wildly different here, so I'm just gonna
 match the white balance values first.
 Both of these photos are shot at relatively high ISO, at 1600 ISO, and if we zoom in at
 like 300%, you'll see how much clearer the sky is in the background.
 And also how much smaller the noise grains are too.
 I'll give you one more example here.
 Both of these photos again were shot at 1600 ISO, and it just looks so much cleaner.
 Upon hearing the photo specs for this camera, I was a little bit worried that we're not
 getting much of an improvement between the Mavic 3, Mavic 2 Pro, or even the Air 2S.
 It was still just 20 megapixels, and it was rated for less dynamic range than before.
 But there's a lot more detail available, even if you have to go hunting to find it.
 Okay, lastly, this brings me to the final thing I want to talk about, and that is the
 hybrid lens.
 So okay, I don't love it.
 I understand why it exists, but I'm not convinced it's entirely necessary.
 It's fun, sure, and sometimes you can find some cool things or just look around, but
 don't expect miracles in terms of just pure image quality.
 It's a separate lens with a separate half an inch CMOS sensor sitting above the main
 camera.
 It is capable of 28x zoom or 162mm in focal length.
 You can't shoot in ProRes with it, which is understandable, and you cannot shoot in D-Log,
 which is a little bit less understandable.
 And you're locked in at 4K or 1080p at 30 frames per second.
 So when you enter the explore mode by tapping on these binoculars here, you enable digital
 zoom.
 Okay, at first that digital zoom is happening on the main lens, and I think that the 2x
 zoom looks really decent.
 Once you get to 7x zoom, that's when the switch happens and the hybrid lens takes over.
 And the 7x looks pretty good too.
 See how much clearer the Wells Fargo sign is over here?
 But once you start going to 14x or 28x, it's really not something you'd just proudly post
 on your portfolio.
 Oh, also, you cannot take raw photos while in the explore mode, just 12 megapixel JPEGs,
 and some of them look pretty good.
 Okay, few last quick things regarding photos.
 The minimal shutter speed is two seconds.
 Long exposure drone photos are often hard to pull off, but I do wish that shutter speed
 was a little bit longer.
 And lastly, aperture is adjustable from f2.8 all the way to f11, which works for both photos
 and video, of course.
 All right, I threw a lot of information at you, so what I want to do next is go through
 my notes app and just read some of the key takeaways that I've written down as I was
 reviewing this drone.
 So video quality is incredible.
 5.1K is a decent resolution bump.
 ProRes is really not for everyone.
 4K 60 without cropping is fantastic.
 4K 120 even with cropping is incredible.
 Photos on paper didn't get much of a spec update, but that sensor does make for a big
 quality bump.
 Battery life is noticeably better.
 Vertical descent is much faster than before.
 APAS is also better, and thus the return to home is improved, but 99% of the time I just
 fly back manually because it's just faster.
 So DJI's light speed USB-C cable is actually amazing and sort of necessary when transferring
 these big files.
 The provided ND filters are okay.
 I did notice some green color casts, especially with longer exposure photos, but also the
 Mavic 3 feels a little bit unfinished.
 A lot of the features weren't available.
 Active truck wasn't available.
 Master shots were not available.
 Panoramic photos, which I use all the time, they were not available during my testing.
 Hyperlapse is also not available.
 The wide angle lens attachment apparently is coming down the line.
 I'm very curious to see how that works.
 Also not available.
 So all the core features that were available during my testing worked exceptionally well,
 but the list of things that is not ready is quite long.
 There's the new remote controller in the Cinebundle.
 It is the DJI RC Pro, which is very similar to the smart controller that came out a couple
 of years ago.
 It has a great screen, operating system built on top of OS, has decent but not exceptional
 battery life.
 I can get anywhere from three to six hours, depending mostly on the screen brightness.
 So there are new obstacle avoidance sensor on this drone.
 They're still omnidirectional and they're finally not as sensitive or as obnoxiously
 loud in the software as before.
 Also controller numerically tells you how close you are to objects.
 So that really helps when you're flying near trees or buildings and stuff like that.
 Okay, OcuSync 3 Plus is fantastic.
 I didn't anticipate a big change here, but I really did notice a difference.
 Not in range, but overall steadiness of the connection, especially when going behind buildings
 or trees.
 It wasn't as big of a problem as before and I would not lose signal whatsoever.
 Okay, last two things, A-Pass 5 and ActiveTrack.
 I didn't actually have time to test these because these features were not available
 during my testing period.
 A-Pass got enabled a few days ago, but ActiveTrack is still not ready and it's probably going
 to be ready in January from what DJI tells me.
 I still fly with sensors off, but when I did turn them on, they were far less aggressive
 and annoying than before.
 I'm expecting some major improvement from DJI in this category.
 Everyone is waiting for them to catch up with Skydio and that is a very high bar.
 So we're just going to have to wait and see.
 So there are things I was hoping to see with this drone after years of rumors.
 One which was built in NDs.
 It's done here and that's fine I guess.
 Part of me was hoping for interchangeable lenses and I still think those would be far
 more useful than the hybrid lens.
 But I do agree with a lot of the choices that DJI made here.
 Increasing the sensor size instead of simply increasing resolution for one, enabling 4K
 up to 120 frames per second and adding ProRes video is going to be tempting for a lot of
 people.
 This drone is now very close to being an Inspire 2 and it's just this big.
 So do I recommend this drone?
 Yes, I set it on top.
 It is the best drone you can find and if you can afford it and know what you'll use it
 for, just go for it.
 $5,000 is a lot of money and if you add warranty on top of that and if you live in a place
 where you gotta pay high sales taxes, that price can go up really quickly.
 If you're a hobbyist or a prosumer mostly posting on your social feeds, you can probably
 get away with an Air 2, a 2S or even a Mini 2.
 If you're a bit more sensitive about image quality, do this professionally, want the
 best of the best in a relatively small package and have enough computing power to edit these
 massive files and storage, you really can't go wrong with the Mavic 3 or the Mavic 3 Cine.
 But I still strongly recommend that you be honest with yourself and see if you're actually
 going to benefit from this ProRes files or built-in storage and you'll likely save yourself
 a lot of money.
 Okay everyone, thank you so much for watching.
 A lot of you sent in questions and I hope I answered most of them, but if you still
 have more questions, just drop them below and we'll have a chat.
 Cool.