 What you are looking at here is the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra, and there is a lot going on. It is big. It has 5G, 108 megapixel camera for other cameras, a massive screen, a high refresh rate, a $1,399 starting price. It's just a lot. If there is a spec that you can think of for a phone, this phone is trying to beat that spec. The S20 Ultra goes big. I mean, you know, literally big. Look at the phone. And looking at it, I think one thing is blindingly obvious. Samsung feels like it has something to prove. Let's see if it can. The best word that I can come up with to describe the S20 Ultra is imposing. It has this giant, giant camera bump on the back, which sometimes can be a little bit annoying. Sometimes can be a problem on a table, but look, the thing looks like a Galaxy phone overall, just kind of taken to the limit. It is as large and nearly as heavy as pretty much any phone that I've ever used. It's a monolith. It sees your puny attempts at using a phone one-handed and it laughs at you. Now, the main reason this phone is as big as it is is that you can have this screen, which is 6.9 inches diagonally. And because this screen doesn't have a face unlock sensor on it, it can cover nearly the entire front of the phone. Now, I figured that I'd be annoyed at having to go back to an in-screen fingerprint sensor instead of face unlock, but I really wasn't. The sensor is fast and accurate enough for me, so I've got no complaints. But the real reason I think that this screen shows that Samsung has something to prove with the S20 Ultra is they finally added the option to switch it to 120 hertz refresh rate. Now, it comes out of the box at 60 hertz to save battery, but I hopped into settings and turned it on right away and never looked back because I think it has enough battery life to handle it. And 120 hertz really does make scrolling and screen animations look better and smoother. Samsung even says that it's not bothering with any variable refresh rate based on the content of the screen nonsense, it's just locked to 120. Oh, by the way, you can't have both 120 hertz and the phone's maximum 3200 by 1440 resolution, but I think the trade for 1080 by 2300 to get 120 hertz is totally worth it. And of course, the screen looks great. Looks great indoors, outdoors, at different angles with HDR content. Samsung knows how to do this by now, and it's very good at it. And again, because it's nearly seven inches diagonally, it looks good because it's just huge. But look, Samsung has already done the make the phone bigger than everybody else thing. That's not actually what the S20 Ultra is about. It's about being bigger in every way, not just size. And there is no better place to start talking about what that means than to just jump right into the biggest number of all, the 108 megapixel camera. So let's just get into it. If you count the depth sensor, there are five cameras on this phone, and three of them have just silly megapixel counts. The selfie camera is 40 megapixels. The telephoto is 48. The regular wide angle is 108 megapixels. The only camera that isn't out of bounds megapixel-wise is the ultra wide, which is 12 megapixels. But the S20 goes further than that. So similar to what Huawei did on its phones, the telephoto lens here actually hits a prism and a mirror and redirects the light across the body of the phone into the sensor, like a periscope. It means that the phone can get real optical zoom all the way up to 4x and something really good up to 10x. Then there's this thing that Samsung calls space zoom, which pushes the zoom all the way out to 100x. That's one of the reasons that Samsung went with a 48 megapixel camera on the telephoto, so that it has more pixels to choose from when it starts cropping in. It also does this thing where it takes multiple photos to help get data from all the sensors to help. So how does all that tech work? Well, I tested this zoom against the iPhone 11 Pro and the Pixel 4 XL, both of which have telephoto lenses. And for fun, I threw in the Sony RX100 Mark VII. The Pixel 4 XL maxes at 8x zoom, so I just compared it at that level. And I used a tripod for all of these photos that you're looking at. I think the RX100 wins, but you know, it's a standalone camera, so of course it's gonna. When you just look at the phones, the S20 Ultra embarrasses the iPhone, and I think it edges out the Pixel 4 too. So far so good, but what about this space zoom thing? Well, you can impress your friends with little whoa moments by zooming all the way into 100x, but truthfully, I think they look like splotchy messes at that zoom level. I was able to get some fairly nice stuff at 30x, usually by propping the phone on something stable, but it still looks like a phone photo to me. Okay, but what about just regular, plain old non-zoom photos? Well, Samsung is doing some weird tech stuff here too. So by default, the 108 megapixel sensor makes 12 megapixel images, because the hardware automatically combines nine pixels into one big pixel. It's a process called binning. And combined, those binned pixels are about as big as what they would have been on a lower megapixel sensor, which does help this camera avoid some of the usual problems that you get with high megapixel sensors, like bad low light and noise. It mostly works. See, in order to make all of this pixel binning stuff happen, Samsung still has to do a lot in the software. Now, generally, I think the S20 wants to smooth out lighting, especially on faces, it wants to keep things bright, and it wants to shift towards less red tones. And those are often really good instincts for photos. So for example, I think the shot of Alex looks great, and this purple plant, plant thing, it's intense in just the right way. But then Samsung sometimes steers the S20's tuning just a little too far. So compared to the iPhone or the Pixel, this photo of me is just plain over smoothed and over brightened. It is actually super weird. As soon as the S20 camera sees a face, it brings up the shadows too much, it smooths skin too much, and it tries way too hard to adjust the white balance and often gets it wrong. Turn your head 45 degrees where it doesn't see a face, and it's fine. Turn on Pro Mode, and it's fine again. Turn on Bixby Seed Optimizer, and well, okay, Bixby makes it worse, but still. In a lot of lighting conditions, I got good photos of faces, but in challenging conditions, it got rough. Samsung tells me that it's looking into it, but that there's no setting that you can change to change the default behavior of what this thing does with faces. The weirdest part though, none of this applies to the selfie camera, which is great. Now Samsung also lets you take full on 108 megapixel photos, and there's yet more camera tech involved in this, like re-mosaic-ing, but the bottom line is you need a lot of light to get a decent photo at that resolution, and even then, my 108 megapixel photos were noisy enough in the fine details when I cropped in that I never really saw the point. Now when it comes to low light photos, Samsung is doing better than it ever has, partly because the sensors are so big here, but it still has a lot of work to do to catch up to the Pixel 4. And on portrait, again, better than it ever has, but it still has a lot of work to do to catch up to the iPhone. The selfie camera though, which is 40 megapixels, is my favorite camera on this entire phone. It doesn't do the same bad over-smoothing on faces. I just really like it. Finally, I hate to tell you this, but as usual with every phone that we try, the ultra-wide camera is the worst of the three cameras in terms of quality. Things kind of just get over-sharpened as a result of a meh sensor. I guess the iPhone kind of beats the S20 here, but nothing is really good. Now as for video, the headline feature is that you can shoot and edit in 8K, and I don't know, I think that's kind of gimmicky, but I do like that you can pull a still photo out. More important to me is the slightly improved video stabilization because I have pretty shaky hands, but you should know that that still doesn't work in 4K and definitely not in 8K. Last, and you know what, definitely not least, is I saw this thing hunting for focus a lot, especially when I was shooting video. I also really like this new feature called Single Take, which does as many of Samsung's weirdo camera modes as possible in one long shot. It's fun, but I wouldn't depend on it for anything important because the quality's like not that good. So that's a lot. It's a lot of camera, which makes sense because this camera bump is so huge, right? I mean, okay, where do I think it all lands? Well, I think Samsung has a little bit more work to do on its photo algorithms. I think it's gonna take a minute for them to learn how to take all of these huge megapixel counts and turn them into something that really works in every single context, especially with faces. Now the S20 phones are the very first mainstream 5G phones. There have been a few before, but they've never been the default, and with the S20 line, they are. Now you should know that only the S20 Ultra and the S20 Plus support the super high-speed millimeter wave 5G that you can really only get at like a few street corners, but all of them support the slightly slower but much more widespread mid-band 5G. So, okay, here's the state of 5G in New York City. On T-Mobile's mid-band, I was able to pull anywhere from like 45 down, which is not much faster than LTE, up to 120 megs per second in a pretty good spot. That's real fast, but it's not as fast as what I could get on Verizon's millimeter wave, where I saw download speeds hit over 1300 Mbps, which is incredible. I got that on one street corner if I held my phone right, I didn't turn my body around, I didn't walk half a block away, and if I was lucky, because sometimes it would drop down to LTE anyway in that spot. Yeah, that's 5G for you. It's just not fully ready yet. Don't buy this phone just because it's a 5G phone. In fact, don't buy any phone just because it's a 5G phone. Samsung always boasts the best possible specs for an Android phone on the Galaxy S line, and this year is no different. But what is different this year is that I think a couple of those specs could actually matter for people. I'm not talking about the Snapdragon 865 processor, which obviously is fast, but it's not in a way that I think people are really gonna notice over the 855. What I mean are things like the battery. It's 5000 milliamps here, which is huge, and has let me run a full day with very heavy use. I've done it several times now. 5G might bring that battery life down a tick, but I was clearing six hours of screen time with the 120 hertz refresh rate turned on. The RAM matters too. You get 12 or 16 gigs of RAM, depending on which model you buy, and that means that apps close less often in the background, and you can even pin apps to memory, which means that Android won't be able to close them in the background. This might seem like a weird power user feature, but let's be honest, this is a weird power user phone. Samsung is also sticking to its guns by offering expandable storage, and it's not keeping the headphone jack. And it is okay to be sad about that. Don't let anybody tell you different. The other side of performance is software, and for the most part, Samsung is doing a solid job with one UI on top of Android 10. I still like it, but Samsung is starting to Samsung it up a little bit with feature creep. Everything that it's ever made is still here, and too much of it is sitting in the settings tray, and it's ready to confuse you. There's Quick Share, which is like AirDrop, but only for Galaxy phones. There's Link Share, which lets you throw stuff online for a private link for people to download for a day or two. There's Music Share, which lets other people with Galaxy phones play their music on the Bluetooth device that's paired to your Galaxy phone. But it's not as weird as Samsung Daily, which sits next to the home screen and just doesn't really offer useful cards for anything, or as weird as Bixby, which sits under a long press of the power button, and is still just Bixby. Overall, the experience on the S20 Ultra is quite good, but it takes a day or two of dismissing prompts and turning off stuff that you don't want, which is super annoying. So, Galaxy S20 Ultra. Did Samsung prove that it could make the best screen on a smartphone? Yes, it did. Did Samsung prove that it could make 5G a mainstream feature for phones? Well, yes, it did, but that doesn't mean that your city or your carrier has it. Did Samsung prove that it could throw every single performance spec possible into a single phone? I mean, obviously it did. This is Samsung. It also proved, though, that it's starting to lose its restraint a little bit on software. But the biggest thing that Samsung had to prove is that it could stay in the camera fight and do so with big megapixel sensors and zoom. And I think on zoom, Samsung has proved that its hardware can beat Google and Apple at around 8X, but it's not magic enough to get something great beyond that. I'm more worried about how the camera treats faces, though, because I think Samsung is still Samsung-ing it up a little bit too much there. Mostly, though, Samsung proved that when it wants to, it can still go all out with the phone. I mean, they did call this the Ultra, which is another way of saying a lot. And yeah, this phone is a lot. Ah, ah, ah, that was dumb. A lot of phone. Lots of phone. So many phone. Phones on phones. Megaphone. Megaphone. It's loud, right, huh? Thanks for watching. Like and subscribe.
 What you are looking at here is the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra,
 and there is a lot going on.
 It is big.
 It has 5G, 108 megapixel camera for other cameras,
 a massive screen, a high refresh rate,
 a $1,399 starting price.
 It's just a lot.
 If there is a spec that you can think of for a phone,
 this phone is trying to beat that spec.
 The S20 Ultra goes big.
 I mean, you know, literally big.
 Look at the phone.
 And looking at it, I think one thing is blindingly obvious.
 Samsung feels like it has something to prove.
 Let's see if it can.
 The best word that I can come up with
 to describe the S20 Ultra is imposing.
 It has this giant, giant camera bump on the back,
 which sometimes can be a little bit annoying.
 Sometimes can be a problem on a table,
 but look, the thing looks like a Galaxy phone overall,
 just kind of taken to the limit.
 It is as large and nearly as heavy
 as pretty much any phone that I've ever used.
 It's a monolith.
 It sees your puny attempts at using a phone one-handed
 and it laughs at you.
 Now, the main reason this phone is as big as it is
 is that you can have this screen,
 which is 6.9 inches diagonally.
 And because this screen doesn't have
 a face unlock sensor on it,
 it can cover nearly the entire front of the phone.
 Now, I figured that I'd be annoyed
 at having to go back to an in-screen fingerprint sensor
 instead of face unlock, but I really wasn't.
 The sensor is fast and accurate enough for me,
 so I've got no complaints.
 But the real reason I think that this screen shows
 that Samsung has something to prove with the S20 Ultra
 is they finally added the option
 to switch it to 120 hertz refresh rate.
 Now, it comes out of the box at 60 hertz to save battery,
 but I hopped into settings and turned it on right away
 and never looked back because I think it has enough
 battery life to handle it.
 And 120 hertz really does make scrolling
 and screen animations look better and smoother.
 Samsung even says that it's not bothering
 with any variable refresh rate
 based on the content of the screen nonsense,
 it's just locked to 120.
 Oh, by the way, you can't have both 120 hertz
 and the phone's maximum 3200 by 1440 resolution,
 but I think the trade for 1080 by 2300
 to get 120 hertz is totally worth it.
 And of course, the screen looks great.
 Looks great indoors, outdoors,
 at different angles with HDR content.
 Samsung knows how to do this by now,
 and it's very good at it.
 And again, because it's nearly seven inches diagonally,
 it looks good because it's just huge.
 But look, Samsung has already done
 the make the phone bigger than everybody else thing.
 That's not actually what the S20 Ultra is about.
 It's about being bigger in every way, not just size.
 And there is no better place to start talking
 about what that means than to just jump right
 into the biggest number of all,
 the 108 megapixel camera.
 So let's just get into it.
 If you count the depth sensor,
 there are five cameras on this phone,
 and three of them have just silly megapixel counts.
 The selfie camera is 40 megapixels.
 The telephoto is 48.
 The regular wide angle is 108 megapixels.
 The only camera that isn't out of bounds megapixel-wise
 is the ultra wide, which is 12 megapixels.
 But the S20 goes further than that.
 So similar to what Huawei did on its phones,
 the telephoto lens here actually hits a prism and a mirror
 and redirects the light across the body of the phone
 into the sensor, like a periscope.
 It means that the phone can get real optical zoom
 all the way up to 4x and something really good up to 10x.
 Then there's this thing that Samsung calls space zoom,
 which pushes the zoom all the way out to 100x.
 That's one of the reasons that Samsung went
 with a 48 megapixel camera on the telephoto,
 so that it has more pixels to choose from
 when it starts cropping in.
 It also does this thing where it takes multiple photos
 to help get data from all the sensors to help.
 So how does all that tech work?
 Well, I tested this zoom against the iPhone 11 Pro
 and the Pixel 4 XL, both of which have telephoto lenses.
 And for fun, I threw in the Sony RX100 Mark VII.
 The Pixel 4 XL maxes at 8x zoom,
 so I just compared it at that level.
 And I used a tripod for all of these photos
 that you're looking at.
 I think the RX100 wins, but you know,
 it's a standalone camera, so of course it's gonna.
 When you just look at the phones,
 the S20 Ultra embarrasses the iPhone,
 and I think it edges out the Pixel 4 too.
 So far so good, but what about this space zoom thing?
 Well, you can impress your friends with little whoa moments
 by zooming all the way into 100x,
 but truthfully, I think they look like splotchy messes
 at that zoom level.
 I was able to get some fairly nice stuff at 30x,
 usually by propping the phone on something stable,
 but it still looks like a phone photo to me.
 Okay, but what about just regular,
 plain old non-zoom photos?
 Well, Samsung is doing some weird tech stuff here too.
 So by default, the 108 megapixel sensor
 makes 12 megapixel images,
 because the hardware automatically combines nine pixels
 into one big pixel.
 It's a process called binning.
 And combined, those binned pixels are about as big
 as what they would have been on a lower megapixel sensor,
 which does help this camera avoid
 some of the usual problems that you get
 with high megapixel sensors,
 like bad low light and noise.
 It mostly works.
 See, in order to make all of this pixel binning stuff
 happen, Samsung still has to do a lot in the software.
 Now, generally, I think the S20 wants to smooth out lighting,
 especially on faces, it wants to keep things bright,
 and it wants to shift towards less red tones.
 And those are often really good instincts for photos.
 So for example, I think the shot of Alex looks great,
 and this purple plant, plant thing,
 it's intense in just the right way.
 But then Samsung sometimes steers the S20's tuning
 just a little too far.
 So compared to the iPhone or the Pixel,
 this photo of me is just plain over smoothed
 and over brightened.
 It is actually super weird.
 As soon as the S20 camera sees a face,
 it brings up the shadows too much,
 it smooths skin too much,
 and it tries way too hard to adjust the white balance
 and often gets it wrong.
 Turn your head 45 degrees where it doesn't see a face,
 and it's fine.
 Turn on Pro Mode, and it's fine again.
 Turn on Bixby Seed Optimizer, and well, okay,
 Bixby makes it worse, but still.
 In a lot of lighting conditions,
 I got good photos of faces,
 but in challenging conditions, it got rough.
 Samsung tells me that it's looking into it,
 but that there's no setting that you can change
 to change the default behavior
 of what this thing does with faces.
 The weirdest part though,
 none of this applies to the selfie camera, which is great.
 Now Samsung also lets you take full on
 108 megapixel photos,
 and there's yet more camera tech involved in this,
 like re-mosaic-ing, but the bottom line is
 you need a lot of light to get a decent photo
 at that resolution, and even then,
 my 108 megapixel photos were noisy enough
 in the fine details when I cropped in
 that I never really saw the point.
 Now when it comes to low light photos,
 Samsung is doing better than it ever has,
 partly because the sensors are so big here,
 but it still has a lot of work to do
 to catch up to the Pixel 4.
 And on portrait, again, better than it ever has,
 but it still has a lot of work to do
 to catch up to the iPhone.
 The selfie camera though, which is 40 megapixels,
 is my favorite camera on this entire phone.
 It doesn't do the same bad over-smoothing on faces.
 I just really like it.
 Finally, I hate to tell you this,
 but as usual with every phone that we try,
 the ultra-wide camera is the worst of the three cameras
 in terms of quality.
 Things kind of just get over-sharpened
 as a result of a meh sensor.
 I guess the iPhone kind of beats the S20 here,
 but nothing is really good.
 Now as for video, the headline feature
 is that you can shoot and edit in 8K,
 and I don't know, I think that's kind of gimmicky,
 but I do like that you can pull a still photo out.
 More important to me
 is the slightly improved video stabilization
 because I have pretty shaky hands,
 but you should know that that still doesn't work in 4K
 and definitely not in 8K.
 Last, and you know what, definitely not least,
 is I saw this thing hunting for focus a lot,
 especially when I was shooting video.
 I also really like this new feature called Single Take,
 which does as many of Samsung's weirdo camera modes
 as possible in one long shot.
 It's fun, but I wouldn't depend on it
 for anything important
 because the quality's like not that good.
 So that's a lot.
 It's a lot of camera,
 which makes sense because this camera bump is so huge, right?
 I mean, okay, where do I think it all lands?
 Well, I think Samsung has a little bit more work to do
 on its photo algorithms.
 I think it's gonna take a minute for them to learn
 how to take all of these huge megapixel counts
 and turn them into something that really works
 in every single context, especially with faces.
 Now the S20 phones are the very first mainstream 5G phones.
 There have been a few before,
 but they've never been the default,
 and with the S20 line, they are.
 Now you should know that only the S20 Ultra
 and the S20 Plus support
 the super high-speed millimeter wave 5G
 that you can really only get at like a few street corners,
 but all of them support the slightly slower
 but much more widespread mid-band 5G.
 So, okay, here's the state of 5G in New York City.
 On T-Mobile's mid-band, I was able to pull anywhere
 from like 45 down, which is not much faster than LTE,
 up to 120 megs per second in a pretty good spot.
 That's real fast, but it's not as fast
 as what I could get on Verizon's millimeter wave,
 where I saw download speeds hit over 1300 Mbps,
 which is incredible.
 I got that on one street corner if I held my phone right,
 I didn't turn my body around,
 I didn't walk half a block away,
 and if I was lucky, because sometimes it would drop down
 to LTE anyway in that spot.
 Yeah, that's 5G for you.
 It's just not fully ready yet.
 Don't buy this phone just because it's a 5G phone.
 In fact, don't buy any phone
 just because it's a 5G phone.
 Samsung always boasts the best possible specs
 for an Android phone on the Galaxy S line,
 and this year is no different.
 But what is different this year
 is that I think a couple of those specs
 could actually matter for people.
 I'm not talking about the Snapdragon 865 processor,
 which obviously is fast, but it's not in a way
 that I think people are really gonna notice over the 855.
 What I mean are things like the battery.
 It's 5000 milliamps here, which is huge,
 and has let me run a full day with very heavy use.
 I've done it several times now.
 5G might bring that battery life down a tick,
 but I was clearing six hours of screen time
 with the 120 hertz refresh rate turned on.
 The RAM matters too.
 You get 12 or 16 gigs of RAM,
 depending on which model you buy,
 and that means that apps close less often in the background,
 and you can even pin apps to memory,
 which means that Android won't be able
 to close them in the background.
 This might seem like a weird power user feature,
 but let's be honest, this is a weird power user phone.
 Samsung is also sticking to its guns
 by offering expandable storage,
 and it's not keeping the headphone jack.
 And it is okay to be sad about that.
 Don't let anybody tell you different.
 The other side of performance is software,
 and for the most part, Samsung is doing a solid job
 with one UI on top of Android 10.
 I still like it, but Samsung is starting
 to Samsung it up a little bit with feature creep.
 Everything that it's ever made is still here,
 and too much of it is sitting in the settings tray,
 and it's ready to confuse you.
 There's Quick Share, which is like AirDrop,
 but only for Galaxy phones.
 There's Link Share, which lets you throw stuff online
 for a private link for people to download for a day or two.
 There's Music Share, which lets other people
 with Galaxy phones play their music
 on the Bluetooth device that's paired to your Galaxy phone.
 But it's not as weird as Samsung Daily,
 which sits next to the home screen
 and just doesn't really offer useful cards for anything,
 or as weird as Bixby, which sits under a long press
 of the power button, and is still just Bixby.
 Overall, the experience on the S20 Ultra is quite good,
 but it takes a day or two of dismissing prompts
 and turning off stuff that you don't want,
 which is super annoying.
 So, Galaxy S20 Ultra.
 Did Samsung prove that it could make the best screen
 on a smartphone?
 Yes, it did.
 Did Samsung prove that it could make 5G
 a mainstream feature for phones?
 Well, yes, it did, but that doesn't mean
 that your city or your carrier has it.
 Did Samsung prove that it could throw
 every single performance spec possible into a single phone?
 I mean, obviously it did.
 This is Samsung.
 It also proved, though, that it's starting to lose
 its restraint a little bit on software.
 But the biggest thing that Samsung had to prove
 is that it could stay in the camera fight
 and do so with big megapixel sensors and zoom.
 And I think on zoom, Samsung has proved
 that its hardware can beat Google and Apple at around 8X,
 but it's not magic enough to get something great
 beyond that.
 I'm more worried about how the camera treats faces, though,
 because I think Samsung is still Samsung-ing it up
 a little bit too much there.
 Mostly, though, Samsung proved that when it wants to,
 it can still go all out with the phone.
 I mean, they did call this the Ultra,
 which is another way of saying a lot.
 And yeah, this phone is a lot.
 Ah, ah, ah, that was dumb.
 A lot of phone.
 Lots of phone.
 So many phone.
 Phones on phones.
 Megaphone.
 Megaphone.
 It's loud, right, huh?
 Thanks for watching.
 Like and subscribe.