 This is the iPhone 13 Pro and Pro Max. They look exactly the same as last year's iPhone 12 Pro models, and you could argue that they have only small updates compared to those phones. But the improvements are actually really noticeable if you're the kind of person who notices phone quality. This is a phone for people who care about the details. Just like with the regular iPhone 13 and the iPhone 13 Mini, the two biggest improvements to the 13 Pro and Pro Max are with the camera and battery life. But the Pro adds a third improvement to its screen technology. Saying there are improvements to camera and battery life and screen sounds pretty standard, right? That's actually the challenge for Apple this year because the updates for the battery and camera are meaningful, and that screen change is the update that a lot of iPhone Pro users didn't even know they were missing. Now, the design is almost exactly the same as the iPhone 12. Really, the only important difference is that the 13 Pro is a little bit thicker, and so cases from the 12 aren't going to fit, especially around the camera bump. Then there is the notch. It is smaller now, but only horizontally, and Apple didn't really do anything with the extra space, like show you a battery percentage, so you're not really getting any more usable stuff out of your screen. And I would have gladly traded the old, slightly larger notch for a better selfie camera, but no, the selfie camera hardware isn't updated here, but it does get a bunch of the new camera software features. I still think this design is beautiful and a huge improvement over the curved iPhones that we've had since the 6. This is an iterative upgrade over the iPhone 12, but if you have an older iPhone, it's going to be a massive one for you. Oh, and there is a new one terabyte storage option, which is a ridiculous amount of storage for a phone, but it actually may be necessary for people who use ProRes video on these iPhones. All right, that's enough preliminaries. Let's get into battery life. Battery life is definitely better. Now look, I've only had these phones for about a week or so, and I'm trying to test all four new iPhones, so don't consider these results fully conclusive. Apple claims that the 13 Pro should get 90 minutes more of usable time and two and a half hours more on the Pro Max, which was already a battery champ. Now I mostly use the smaller Pro, just so I could get kind of a worst case scenario. And even when we were running around all day, taking photos and 4K video, and also tethering other phones to it, I went to bed with 20% left on this phone, and that was like four, four and a half hours of screen time too. The next day, I clocked nearly seven hours of use. This battery makes me feel a lot more confident leaving my external battery pack behind than I did last year. I am going to follow up with testing from both the Pro Max and the iPhone 13 mini later on on theverge.com. Now Apple says it achieved this better battery life through processor enhancements, and because the screen is more power efficient, but really I think the biggest factor is that the batteries are just plain bigger. The processor in the iPhone 13 Pro is the A15 Bionic, and it gets five GPU cores compared to the regular iPhone 13's four cores. But Apple won't really say what the extra core does beyond make things faster. And obviously it's fast. New iPhones are always fast. I think the most important new thing that the A15 does is enable a bunch of new camera features. Okay, so what should we talk about next? Cameras or screen? Camera, screen, camera. You know, I'm really into the screen and- Cameras. Okay, yeah, that's the right answer. Let's talk about cameras. ["The Last Post"] The very first thing to note is that the camera systems on both the 13 Pro and the 13 Pro Max are identical. You don't have to buy the big, expensive 6.7 inch screen to get the good camera this year. Now all three cameras on the back have gotten pretty big upgrades, and that matters because usually it's just the main wide angle sensor that gets all the attention. It gets that attention because it's the one that we use the most, and it's typically the best camera on a phone. This year, the wide angle is still 12 megapixels, but Apple has increased the sensor size and increased the pixel size to 1.9 microns, which is about as big as we've seen on a phone. And it's got an F1.5 aperture. All of that adds up to this sensor can take in a ridiculous amount of light. More light means better pictures. Now, when the scene has plenty of light to go around, say in bright outdoor situations or even average indoor light, I have to admit that you're gonna be hard pressed to find differences between the 13 Pro, the regular 13, or sometimes even last year's iPhone 12. These are all very good cameras. But when it gets dark, the differences start to be night and day. Sorry for the pun, but let's go out into the night so I can show you what this big sensor can do. This is where the iPhone 13 Pro really comes into its own, in low light. Even compared to the regular iPhone 13, this thing is much more confident. It doesn't need to switch into night mode as often, and when it does, it takes those photos much, much faster. In addition to this big sensor, Apple also made changes to how it does computational photography to use Smart HDR to process photos. I see less image noise in low light, more dynamic range in low and even medium light, and Apple claims that it is more accurate with shadow exposure, and I definitely see it. In night mode, the 13 Pro is just more willing to let dark parts stay dark. The regular 13 and the 12 just sort of over-brighten everything. Now, there are scenes where the 13 Pro also makes things too bright, but it's not that often. And in general, night mode shots are sharper on the 13 Pro. Are all these details things that everybody is going to notice? No, probably not. Even on a big phone like the Pro Max, it takes a lot of squinting to see these fine details. But if there's any place where it actually makes sense to call a phone pro, as in for professionals, it is this main camera. A new feature that Apple has added this year is photographic profiles. Apple insists that these are not filters, but rather they let you apply a creative style to every shot that you take. Basically, if you don't like the iPhone's middle-of-the-road look, you can find something that looks more like a Samsung or a Pixel photo without having to do any post-processing editing work. Profiles work on both the 13 Pro and the regular iPhone 13s. And understanding what they are exactly is a little complicated. Apple's computational photography process, Smart HDR, takes a bunch of different frames and then combines them into the end result. Part of that process involves making choices about white balance, color, contrast, and so on. Another part of that process is the iPhone semantically recognizing different things in the scene. People and grass and sky and cats. So when you set a photographic profile, the iPhone makes different choices during the Smart HDR capture process about white balance and color and contrast and so on. It also uses that semantic recognition to make better choices for specific parts of the scene, like skin tone. This is why Apple argues that it's not a filter, because it's not applied evenly across the entire image. What all this really means is that if you prefer a more opinionated camera like you get from Samsung or Google, you can do that now with the iPhone by default. You can customize any one of these profiles and as you move the sliders to customize them, the profile name automatically changes to something descriptive for your new settings, which is pretty neat. And then the profile sticks and it becomes your new default. So this is a Verge iPhone review, which means that at some point we have to talk about file formats. So here we go. You cannot shoot with photographic profiles on and have raw output on at the same time. And unlike a raw photo, where you can make all sorts of choices in the edit, photographic profiles lock your choices into the file as it's saved, as you shoot the photo. Now in theory, it might be possible for Apple to save all of that extra data for you to be able to change all of your choices later, but Apple told us that it would create such a huge file that it wouldn't be worth it. And that people who do want to edit after the fact can just choose raw. Is all that complicated? Well, yes and no. No, because you can set profiles and forget them. They just become the new default and you don't need to think too much about them. But yes, because this is yet another button on Apple's camera app, which is getting increasingly complicated and has an almost fractally expanding set of different kinds of shooting states. It is very easy to get lost in all of these settings. I'm serious, their camera app is bust. Like this little arrow here is the worst user interface element I have seen from them. And I don't know how long. It's like, what, how, what, what, what? I do like the upgrades to the telephoto lens. Apple's not playing the 100X space zoom Samsung game. It's just 3X, which is the equivalent of 77 millimeters. Now what that means is you're not gonna get really great far zoom. Anything over six or 10X digital is pretty bad, but it is very good at taking portraits. I'm not talking portrait mode, I'm talking portraits. One thing to keep in mind with the telephoto lens is that going up to 3X means that it now takes in just a little less light. So it's really not that great in low light situations, even with optical image stabilization. It's not bad, but especially when you set it next to the main camera, you will notice the drop off. You can do night mode and telephoto though, which works best for still subjects. Digital zoom is here and it's 15X, and yeah, it looks like digital zoom at 15X. Now, as for video, a lot of the footage you've been watching, the footage you're watching right now is from an iPhone 13 Pro Max, and it is very good. It's very good in bright light, it's very good in HDR conditions, and it's very good in low light. We are very impressed with the video on this camera. But where things fall down a little bit is if you use the ultra wide or the telephoto in low light, they just, they can't stand up to the quality of the regular wide angle camera. Then there's cinematic mode. It's basically portrait mode, but for video. I'm gonna talk a lot more about it in the regular iPhone 13 review video, so go watch that. But for here, what you need to know is that it doesn't work very well in low light. So did you see the background there? The cinematic mode just kept trying and missing to blur it because it was too dark. In brighter light, cinematic mode is actually fun to play with, and the results are sometimes impressive and sometimes you can just see it kind of breaking, just like it does in portrait mode photos. But since this is a pro phone, I'm just gonna say that you really shouldn't be too distracted by cinematic mode, especially since it's locked to 1080p at 30 FPS. I'm not saying that it's a gimmick, but I will say that it's gimmick adjacent. Just like with portrait mode in photos at the beginning, I think it's gonna be a few years before cinematic mode is truly useful for anything beyond casual use. And despite Apple's very fun promotions and videos, I have a hard time believing that real movies are gonna be made with this. And now it's time for more file format stuff. All of the depth information in cinematic mode gets written to the file so that you can edit it all in post, you can change the focus points throughout the video and even change the f-stop for the whole video, but only in Apple apps like Photos and Final Cut will be able to do that. Apple isn't making that file format public for Adobe or LumaFusion to adopt, and also sometimes when you airdrop the file, Apple's just gonna bake the depth choices into the file so they can't be changed later by anything. Finally, the ultra-wide camera also got improvements, so it performs a little bit better in low light, even though again, it's not as good as the main camera. But thanks to autofocus on the ultra-wide, its newest trick, which is exclusive to the pro models, is that it can do macro shots. When you bring the camera very close to a subject, it automatically switches from the wide over to the ultra-wide, but it tries to keep your framing. You can get as close as two centimeters, and from what I can see, it's a fun little feature, and the results are a lot better than the throwaway macro cameras that we've seen on a ton of Android phones lately. I dig it. In fact, I dig this whole camera system. It beats the next best smartphone camera in low light. And the next best smartphone camera just happens to be the iPhone 13 or last year's iPhone 12 Pro Max. They're the same thing, really. I have no idea if the upcoming Pixel 6 is gonna be able to compete with this, but right now, this is the best camera system on a smartphone. Now could I talk about the display? Yeah. Okay, so Apple has finally switched to a display with a variable refresh rate. The branding is Super Retina XDR Display with ProMotion. It's an LTPO OLED, which means that it's super low power, and the screen can refresh as slowly as 10 frames per second when you're looking at something static like text, and that saves battery life, or it can ramp all the way up to 120 frames per second for smooth animation and scrolling, and that is twice the 60-hertz standard that you get on other iPhones. I personally believe that Apple has gotten away with not putting a high refresh rate on an iPhone for so long because iOS itself is very smooth without very much jank in its animations. So it's hard for me to show or explain why having the screen be smoother is really important. When I scroll, the text stays readable instead of turning into a blur. Things moving around on the screen when you swipe around are just smoother, but mostly, it feels like a direct interaction with what's on the screen because the phone can literally change its refresh rate to match the movement of my finger, just like a real piece of paper in the real world accelerates faster when you move your hand faster. So many Android phones have had high refresh rate screens for so long that I really think it was overdue on pro iPhones. I don't care about the excuses, whatever they are. I think Apple should have figured this out sooner, but I'm very glad that it's here now, and the implementation is great. iOS will watch third-party apps and adjust the frame rate of the screen to match what they need for video or games or whatever. Apple tells me that many apps are gonna get ProMotion automatically, and for those that don't, because of the way that they're developed, there's gonna be an API that they can update to. One thing Apple didn't do with this screen is the thing that Android phones have had forever, which is an always-on lock screen so you can get glanceable information when the phone is just sitting on a table. I love it. Unfortunately, Apple doesn't, but I don't know. There's always next year. Now, I understand if this ProMotion refresh rate stuff sounds like fuzzy premium experience, nice-to-have things, right? But that's exactly what it is, and that's exactly what I expect out of a $1,000 phone. It's a know-it-when-you-see-it kind of feature. I definitely notice it, and I think phones without a high refresh rate screen feel juttery. ProMotion is the perfect example of what you get when you get the iPhone 13 Pro and Pro Max instead of the regular iPhones. They're nicer, but not in ways that might be immediately obvious. The two big differentiators on the Pro phones this year are the camera and the screen, and both have improvements that are really only visible when you pay a lot of attention. So does all that mean that the iPhone 13 Pro is an enthusiast phone, like the way Android has had enthusiast flagships for a while? Well, yes. This is a phone for people who love phones, and look, it is totally okay and normal to not pay this much attention to your phone, but maybe you do. I certainly do, and I gotta tell you, I like what I see. Hey, everybody, thanks so much for watching. Of course, there's a review of the regular iPhone 13 and the 13 Mini, and I barely touched on iOS 15 at all, but lucky for you, Heim Gartenberg has written a great review. That's on theverge.com.
 This is the iPhone 13 Pro and Pro Max.
 They look exactly the same as last year's
 iPhone 12 Pro models, and you could argue
 that they have only small updates compared to those phones.
 But the improvements are actually really noticeable
 if you're the kind of person who notices phone quality.
 This is a phone for people who care about the details.
 Just like with the regular iPhone 13 and the iPhone 13 Mini,
 the two biggest improvements to the 13 Pro and Pro Max
 are with the camera and battery life.
 But the Pro adds a third improvement
 to its screen technology.
 Saying there are improvements to camera and battery life
 and screen sounds pretty standard, right?
 That's actually the challenge for Apple this year
 because the updates for the battery and camera
 are meaningful, and that screen change is the update
 that a lot of iPhone Pro users
 didn't even know they were missing.
 Now, the design is almost exactly the same as the iPhone 12.
 Really, the only important difference is that the 13 Pro
 is a little bit thicker, and so cases from the 12
 aren't going to fit, especially around the camera bump.
 Then there is the notch.
 It is smaller now, but only horizontally,
 and Apple didn't really do anything with the extra space,
 like show you a battery percentage,
 so you're not really getting any more usable stuff
 out of your screen.
 And I would have gladly traded the old, slightly larger
 notch for a better selfie camera,
 but no, the selfie camera hardware isn't updated here,
 but it does get a bunch of the new camera software features.
 I still think this design is beautiful
 and a huge improvement over the curved iPhones
 that we've had since the 6.
 This is an iterative upgrade over the iPhone 12,
 but if you have an older iPhone,
 it's going to be a massive one for you.
 Oh, and there is a new one terabyte storage option,
 which is a ridiculous amount of storage for a phone,
 but it actually may be necessary for people
 who use ProRes video on these iPhones.
 All right, that's enough preliminaries.
 Let's get into battery life.
 Battery life is definitely better.
 Now look, I've only had these phones for about a week or so,
 and I'm trying to test all four new iPhones,
 so don't consider these results fully conclusive.
 Apple claims that the 13 Pro should get 90 minutes more
 of usable time and two and a half hours more on the Pro Max,
 which was already a battery champ.
 Now I mostly use the smaller Pro,
 just so I could get kind of a worst case scenario.
 And even when we were running around all day,
 taking photos and 4K video,
 and also tethering other phones to it,
 I went to bed with 20% left on this phone,
 and that was like four,
 four and a half hours of screen time too.
 The next day, I clocked nearly seven hours of use.
 This battery makes me feel a lot more confident
 leaving my external battery pack behind
 than I did last year.
 I am going to follow up with testing
 from both the Pro Max and the iPhone 13 mini
 later on on theverge.com.
 Now Apple says it achieved this better battery life
 through processor enhancements,
 and because the screen is more power efficient,
 but really I think the biggest factor
 is that the batteries are just plain bigger.
 The processor in the iPhone 13 Pro is the A15 Bionic,
 and it gets five GPU cores
 compared to the regular iPhone 13's four cores.
 But Apple won't really say what the extra core does
 beyond make things faster.
 And obviously it's fast.
 New iPhones are always fast.
 I think the most important new thing that the A15 does
 is enable a bunch of new camera features.
 Okay, so what should we talk about next?
 Cameras or screen?
 Camera, screen, camera.
 You know, I'm really into the screen and-
 Cameras.
 Okay, yeah, that's the right answer.
 Let's talk about cameras.
 ["The Last Post"]
 The very first thing to note
 is that the camera systems on both the 13 Pro
 and the 13 Pro Max are identical.
 You don't have to buy the big, expensive 6.7 inch screen
 to get the good camera this year.
 Now all three cameras on the back
 have gotten pretty big upgrades,
 and that matters because usually it's just
 the main wide angle sensor that gets all the attention.
 It gets that attention because it's the one
 that we use the most,
 and it's typically the best camera on a phone.
 This year, the wide angle is still 12 megapixels,
 but Apple has increased the sensor size
 and increased the pixel size to 1.9 microns,
 which is about as big as we've seen on a phone.
 And it's got an F1.5 aperture.
 All of that adds up to this sensor
 can take in a ridiculous amount of light.
 More light means better pictures.
 Now, when the scene has plenty of light to go around,
 say in bright outdoor situations
 or even average indoor light,
 I have to admit that you're gonna be hard pressed
 to find differences between the 13 Pro, the regular 13,
 or sometimes even last year's iPhone 12.
 These are all very good cameras.
 But when it gets dark,
 the differences start to be night and day.
 Sorry for the pun, but let's go out into the night
 so I can show you what this big sensor can do.
 This is where the iPhone 13 Pro really comes into its own,
 in low light.
 Even compared to the regular iPhone 13,
 this thing is much more confident.
 It doesn't need to switch into night mode as often,
 and when it does, it takes those photos much, much faster.
 In addition to this big sensor,
 Apple also made changes
 to how it does computational photography
 to use Smart HDR to process photos.
 I see less image noise in low light,
 more dynamic range in low and even medium light,
 and Apple claims that it is more accurate
 with shadow exposure, and I definitely see it.
 In night mode, the 13 Pro is just more willing
 to let dark parts stay dark.
 The regular 13 and the 12
 just sort of over-brighten everything.
 Now, there are scenes where the 13 Pro
 also makes things too bright, but it's not that often.
 And in general, night mode shots are sharper on the 13 Pro.
 Are all these details things
 that everybody is going to notice?
 No, probably not.
 Even on a big phone like the Pro Max,
 it takes a lot of squinting to see these fine details.
 But if there's any place where it actually makes sense
 to call a phone pro, as in for professionals,
 it is this main camera.
 A new feature that Apple has added this year
 is photographic profiles.
 Apple insists that these are not filters,
 but rather they let you apply a creative style
 to every shot that you take.
 Basically, if you don't like the iPhone's
 middle-of-the-road look, you can find something
 that looks more like a Samsung or a Pixel photo
 without having to do any post-processing editing work.
 Profiles work on both the 13 Pro
 and the regular iPhone 13s.
 And understanding what they are exactly
 is a little complicated.
 Apple's computational photography process, Smart HDR,
 takes a bunch of different frames
 and then combines them into the end result.
 Part of that process involves making choices
 about white balance, color, contrast, and so on.
 Another part of that process is the iPhone
 semantically recognizing different things in the scene.
 People and grass and sky and cats.
 So when you set a photographic profile,
 the iPhone makes different choices
 during the Smart HDR capture process
 about white balance and color and contrast and so on.
 It also uses that semantic recognition
 to make better choices for specific parts
 of the scene, like skin tone.
 This is why Apple argues that it's not a filter,
 because it's not applied evenly across the entire image.
 What all this really means is that if you prefer
 a more opinionated camera like you get
 from Samsung or Google, you can do that now
 with the iPhone by default.
 You can customize any one of these profiles
 and as you move the sliders to customize them,
 the profile name automatically changes
 to something descriptive for your new settings,
 which is pretty neat.
 And then the profile sticks
 and it becomes your new default.
 So this is a Verge iPhone review,
 which means that at some point
 we have to talk about file formats.
 So here we go.
 You cannot shoot with photographic profiles on
 and have raw output on at the same time.
 And unlike a raw photo, where you can make all sorts
 of choices in the edit, photographic profiles
 lock your choices into the file as it's saved,
 as you shoot the photo.
 Now in theory, it might be possible for Apple
 to save all of that extra data for you
 to be able to change all of your choices later,
 but Apple told us that it would create such a huge file
 that it wouldn't be worth it.
 And that people who do want to edit after the fact
 can just choose raw.
 Is all that complicated?
 Well, yes and no.
 No, because you can set profiles and forget them.
 They just become the new default
 and you don't need to think too much about them.
 But yes, because this is yet another button
 on Apple's camera app,
 which is getting increasingly complicated
 and has an almost fractally expanding set
 of different kinds of shooting states.
 It is very easy to get lost in all of these settings.
 I'm serious, their camera app is bust.
 Like this little arrow here
 is the worst user interface element I have seen from them.
 And I don't know how long.
 It's like, what, how, what, what, what?
 I do like the upgrades to the telephoto lens.
 Apple's not playing the 100X space zoom Samsung game.
 It's just 3X, which is the equivalent of 77 millimeters.
 Now what that means is you're not gonna get
 really great far zoom.
 Anything over six or 10X digital is pretty bad,
 but it is very good at taking portraits.
 I'm not talking portrait mode, I'm talking portraits.
 One thing to keep in mind with the telephoto lens
 is that going up to 3X means that it now takes in
 just a little less light.
 So it's really not that great in low light situations,
 even with optical image stabilization.
 It's not bad, but especially when you set it
 next to the main camera, you will notice the drop off.
 You can do night mode and telephoto though,
 which works best for still subjects.
 Digital zoom is here and it's 15X,
 and yeah, it looks like digital zoom at 15X.
 Now, as for video, a lot of the footage you've been watching,
 the footage you're watching right now
 is from an iPhone 13 Pro Max, and it is very good.
 It's very good in bright light,
 it's very good in HDR conditions,
 and it's very good in low light.
 We are very impressed with the video on this camera.
 But where things fall down a little bit
 is if you use the ultra wide or the telephoto
 in low light, they just, they can't stand up to the quality
 of the regular wide angle camera.
 Then there's cinematic mode.
 It's basically portrait mode, but for video.
 I'm gonna talk a lot more about it
 in the regular iPhone 13 review video, so go watch that.
 But for here, what you need to know
 is that it doesn't work very well in low light.
 So did you see the background there?
 The cinematic mode just kept trying and missing
 to blur it because it was too dark.
 In brighter light, cinematic mode is actually
 fun to play with, and the results are sometimes impressive
 and sometimes you can just see it kind of breaking,
 just like it does in portrait mode photos.
 But since this is a pro phone, I'm just gonna say
 that you really shouldn't be too distracted
 by cinematic mode, especially since it's locked
 to 1080p at 30 FPS.
 I'm not saying that it's a gimmick,
 but I will say that it's gimmick adjacent.
 Just like with portrait mode in photos at the beginning,
 I think it's gonna be a few years before cinematic mode
 is truly useful for anything beyond casual use.
 And despite Apple's very fun promotions and videos,
 I have a hard time believing that real movies
 are gonna be made with this.
 And now it's time for more file format stuff.
 All of the depth information in cinematic mode
 gets written to the file so that you can edit it
 all in post, you can change the focus points
 throughout the video and even change the f-stop
 for the whole video, but only in Apple apps
 like Photos and Final Cut will be able to do that.
 Apple isn't making that file format public
 for Adobe or LumaFusion to adopt,
 and also sometimes when you airdrop the file,
 Apple's just gonna bake the depth choices into the file
 so they can't be changed later by anything.
 Finally, the ultra-wide camera also got improvements,
 so it performs a little bit better in low light,
 even though again, it's not as good as the main camera.
 But thanks to autofocus on the ultra-wide,
 its newest trick, which is exclusive to the pro models,
 is that it can do macro shots.
 When you bring the camera very close to a subject,
 it automatically switches from the wide
 over to the ultra-wide, but it tries to keep your framing.
 You can get as close as two centimeters,
 and from what I can see, it's a fun little feature,
 and the results are a lot better
 than the throwaway macro cameras that we've seen
 on a ton of Android phones lately.
 I dig it.
 In fact, I dig this whole camera system.
 It beats the next best smartphone camera in low light.
 And the next best smartphone camera
 just happens to be the iPhone 13
 or last year's iPhone 12 Pro Max.
 They're the same thing, really.
 I have no idea if the upcoming Pixel 6
 is gonna be able to compete with this,
 but right now, this is the best camera system
 on a smartphone.
 Now could I talk about the display?
 Yeah.
 Okay, so Apple has finally switched to a display
 with a variable refresh rate.
 The branding is Super Retina XDR Display with ProMotion.
 It's an LTPO OLED, which means that it's super low power,
 and the screen can refresh as slowly as 10 frames per second
 when you're looking at something static like text,
 and that saves battery life,
 or it can ramp all the way up to 120 frames per second
 for smooth animation and scrolling,
 and that is twice the 60-hertz standard
 that you get on other iPhones.
 I personally believe that Apple has gotten away
 with not putting a high refresh rate on an iPhone
 for so long because iOS itself is very smooth
 without very much jank in its animations.
 So it's hard for me to show or explain
 why having the screen be smoother is really important.
 When I scroll, the text stays readable
 instead of turning into a blur.
 Things moving around on the screen when you swipe around
 are just smoother, but mostly,
 it feels like a direct interaction with what's on the screen
 because the phone can literally change its refresh rate
 to match the movement of my finger,
 just like a real piece of paper in the real world
 accelerates faster when you move your hand faster.
 So many Android phones have had high refresh rate screens
 for so long that I really think it was overdue
 on pro iPhones.
 I don't care about the excuses, whatever they are.
 I think Apple should have figured this out sooner,
 but I'm very glad that it's here now,
 and the implementation is great.
 iOS will watch third-party apps
 and adjust the frame rate of the screen
 to match what they need for video or games or whatever.
 Apple tells me that many apps
 are gonna get ProMotion automatically,
 and for those that don't,
 because of the way that they're developed,
 there's gonna be an API that they can update to.
 One thing Apple didn't do with this screen
 is the thing that Android phones have had forever,
 which is an always-on lock screen
 so you can get glanceable information
 when the phone is just sitting on a table.
 I love it.
 Unfortunately, Apple doesn't, but I don't know.
 There's always next year.
 Now, I understand if this ProMotion refresh rate stuff
 sounds like fuzzy premium experience,
 nice-to-have things, right?
 But that's exactly what it is,
 and that's exactly what I expect out of a $1,000 phone.
 It's a know-it-when-you-see-it kind of feature.
 I definitely notice it,
 and I think phones without a high refresh rate screen
 feel juttery.
 ProMotion is the perfect example of what you get
 when you get the iPhone 13 Pro and Pro Max
 instead of the regular iPhones.
 They're nicer, but not in ways
 that might be immediately obvious.
 The two big differentiators on the Pro phones this year
 are the camera and the screen,
 and both have improvements that are really only visible
 when you pay a lot of attention.
 So does all that mean that the iPhone 13 Pro
 is an enthusiast phone,
 like the way Android has had enthusiast flagships
 for a while?
 Well, yes.
 This is a phone for people who love phones,
 and look, it is totally okay and normal
 to not pay this much attention to your phone,
 but maybe you do.
 I certainly do, and I gotta tell you,
 I like what I see.
 Hey, everybody, thanks so much for watching.
 Of course, there's a review of the regular iPhone 13
 and the 13 Mini,
 and I barely touched on iOS 15 at all,
 but lucky for you, Heim Gartenberg has written a great review.
 That's on theverge.com.