THE first full post-mortems of people who died after smoking cannabis suggest that the drug can kill unaided.
Cannabis has been known to cause death when laced with other substances, by triggering a heart condition or by causing respiratory cancers. But whether it can be directly lethal has remained unclear. A 2011 report from the UK Department of Health says no cases of fatal overdose have been associated with cannabis.
But earlier this month, a UK coroner's report found that a 31-year-old woman died from a marijuana overdose. So can it be fatal?
Benno Hartung of University Hospital Düsseldorf in Germany and his colleagues conducted post-mortems on 15 people whose deaths were linked to cannabis use. To rule out other factors that might have contributed to death, they performed numerous tests, including an autopsy, a toxicology exam, genetic tests and histological analysis of all organs.
Two of the deaths could not be attributed to anything but cannabis intoxication. Both were men who died of cardiac arrhythmia – when the heart beats too quickly or slowly. The team surmises that this was triggered by smoking cannabis. Both men had enough THC – an active chemical in cannabis – in their blood to suggest they had taken cannabis within hours of death. Neither had a history of cardiovascular problems or channelopathies – diseases that increase the risk of heart problems by affecting ion channels (Forensic Science International, doi.org/rh4).
It is not clear how cannabis could trigger arrhythmias. There might be unknown channelopathies that increase the risk of cardiac conditions triggered by the drug, says Hartung.
Even so, says David Raynes at the UK National Drug Prevention Alliance, "these deaths are rare and will remain rare. The real risks are from long-term effects on the young brain."
This article appeared in print under the headline "Cannabis kills without other drugs... or guns"
If you would like to reuse any content from New Scientist, either in print or online, please contact the syndication department first for permission. New Scientist does not own rights to photos, but there are a variety of licensing options available for use of articles and graphics we own the copyright to.