By Jennifer Abbasi
FORTUNE -- In 2007 we reported on biobutanol, a biofuel with the potential to solve many of the problems associated with ethanol. Since then, industry players like BP have been seeking ways to make a cost-efficient transition to the "advanced biofuel," and now a scientific breakthrough might finally make that possible.
Butanol trumps ethanol in several ways: Adding ethanol to gasoline reduces fuel mileage, but butanol packs almost as much energy as gas, meaning fewer fill-ups. Butanol also doesn't damage car engines like ethanol, so more of it can be blended into gas. And because butanol doesn't separate from gasoline in the presence of water, it can be blended right at the refinery, while ethanol has to be shipped separately from gas and blended closer to the filling station.
But with 200 plants already up and running in the U.S., ethanol is firmly entrenched. Modifying those plants to produce butanol from corn instead of ethanol costs roughly $15 million for each facility. Converting ethanol into butanol could be cheaper, theoretically, but the industry has been looking for a chemical catalyst capable of doing it efficiently. Until now, the conversion process produced too little butanol and too many unwanted products that had to be separated out. The process was "certainly too expensive to be competitive as a fuel molecule," says Duncan Wass, a professor of chemistry at the University of Bristol in the U.K.
At the annual American Chemical Society meeting in New Orleans, Wass presented research -- funded by BP (BP) -- on a family of new catalysts that produced 95% butanol in the lab. "They hold the prospect of being able to convert ethanol to butanol in high yield, high selectivity and at large-scale," Wass says.
It will still be some time before we'll start seeing butanol produced with Wass's catalysts at the pump -- it takes several years just to design, build, and test new fuels at scale in a pilot plant. Wass estimates it will be six years to commercialization if the next steps go off without a hitch.
But at that point, won't we just be trading one food-based fuel for another, taking corn out of the mouths of babes? Says Wass, "The beauty of these catalysts is that they can use all sources of ethanol biologically derived from any crop." Corn stalks, wood, leaves, and switch grass are all being studied as sources of non-food biofuel.
The state mounted a PR blitz to show beachgoers that Florida's surf had been spared an oily disaster. Presidential visits aside, it seems social media helped save summer tourism on the Gulf of Mexico
By Shelley DuBois, reporter
The BP (BP) Deepwater Horizon spill happened in the middle of nowhere in the Gulf of Mexico, but it also took place, as every event of global import now does, in the realm of MOREAug 27, 2010 11:12 AM ET
The CEO of Saudi Aramco, the national oil company of Saudi Arabia, lashed out at the Obama administration Thursday, lamenting the oversupply of "rhetoric" from major oil-consuming nations regarding energy independence. Without naming the U.S. president directly, Khalid Al Falih couldn't have been clearer who he was referring to. He called pervasive talk from nations that want to wean themselves from an addiction to foreign oil, a common MOREAdam Lashinsky, Sr. Editor at Large - Jan 28, 2010 8:05 AM ET
|McDonald's gives Charles Ramsey free food for a year|
|Doomsday investors betting on market crash|
|Where your donation dollars go|
|World stock markets to grind higher|
|The 'chicken poop' credit and other bad tax breaks|