[Date Prev][Date Next]
Re: Openldap 2.2.5 production-ready?
On Thu, 4 Mar 2004 at 9:41am, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
> --On Thursday, March 04, 2004 9:22 AM -0500 Frank Swasey
> <Frank.Swasey@uvm.edu> wrote:
> > Today at 12:43pm, Tony Earnshaw wrote:
> >> List,
> >> What are peoples' views on using 2.2.6/BDB 4.2.52+2 patches, OS RedHat
> >> RHEL3/RHAS3 for production? (no backends, slurpd replication, DIT with
> >> max 500 DNs). Stability problems that I had with 2.2.5 seem to have
> >> "gone away".
> > Not for my production data.... too many errors still being reported
> > against syncrepl for my taste. With the recent fixes to get the logging
> > correct in 2.1.27, slurpd and 2.1 look like still cool for me.
> Hm... Tony said specifically, he'd be using slurpd for replication, not
> syncrepl. So I'm not clear the syncRepl bit you mention applies?
What? Now I have to read and understand the posts I reply to??? Wow!
What is this world coming too???