Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: marathon oil corporation notes to consolidated financial statements the changes in the carrying amount of goodwill for the years ended december 31 , 2007 , and 2008 , were as follows : ( in millions ) e&p osm rm&t total .
|( in millions )|e&p|osm|rm&t|total|
|balance as of december 31 2006|$ 519|$ 2013|$ 879|$ 1398|
|acquired|71|1437|2013|1508|
|adjusted ( a )|2013|2013|-7 ( 7 )|-7 ( 7 )|
|balance as of december 31 2007|590|1437|872|2899|
|adjusted ( a )|-17 ( 17 )|-25 ( 25 )|7|-35 ( 35 )|
|impaired|2013|-1412 ( 1412 )|2013|-1412 ( 1412 )|
|disposed ( b )|-5 ( 5 )||2013|-5 ( 5 )|
|balance as of december 31 2008|$ 568|$ 2013|$ 879|$ 1447|
( a ) adjustments related to prior period income tax and royalty adjustments . ( b ) goodwill was allocated to the norwegian outside-operated properties sold in 2008 . 17 . fair value measurements as defined in sfas no . 157 , fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date . sfas no . 157 describes three approaches to measuring the fair value of assets and liabilities : the market approach , the income approach and the cost approach , each of which includes multiple valuation techniques . the market approach uses prices and other relevant information generated by market transactions involving identical or comparable assets or liabilities . the income approach uses valuation techniques to measure fair value by converting future amounts , such as cash flows or earnings , into a single present value amount using current market expectations about those future amounts . the cost approach is based on the amount that would currently be required to replace the service capacity of an asset . this is often referred to as current replacement cost . the cost approach assumes that the fair value would not exceed what it would cost a market participant to acquire or construct a substitute asset of comparable utility , adjusted for obsolescence . sfas no . 157 does not prescribe which valuation technique should be used when measuring fair value and does not prioritize among the techniques . sfas no . 157 establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs used in applying the various valuation techniques . inputs broadly refer to the assumptions that market participants use to make pricing decisions , including assumptions about risk . level 1 inputs are given the highest priority in the fair value hierarchy while level 3 inputs are given the lowest priority . the three levels of the fair value hierarchy are as follows . 2022 level 1 2013 observable inputs that reflect unadjusted quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in active markets as of the reporting date . active markets are those in which transactions for the asset or liability occur in sufficient frequency and volume to provide pricing information on an ongoing basis . 2022 level 2 2013 observable market-based inputs or unobservable inputs that are corroborated by market data . these are inputs other than quoted prices in active markets included in level 1 , which are either directly or indirectly observable as of the reporting date . 2022 level 3 2013 unobservable inputs that are not corroborated by market data and may be used with internally developed methodologies that result in management 2019s best estimate of fair value . we use a market or income approach for recurring fair value measurements and endeavor to use the best information available . accordingly , valuation techniques that maximize the use of observable inputs are favored . financial assets and liabilities are classified in their entirety based on the lowest priority level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement . the assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement requires judgment and may affect the placement of assets and liabilities within the levels of the fair value hierarchy. .
Question: by what percentage did total goodwill decline from 2007 to 2008 year end?
Answer:
0.50086