Can you make this code more efficient? Think step by step!
export default function Library({
 setInputMessage,
}: {
 setInputMessage: Dispatch>;
}) {
 const utils = api.useContext();

 const [selectedTargetPrompt, setSelectedTargetPrompt] = useState("");
 const [editedName, setEditedName] = useState("");
 const [editedPrompt, setEditedPrompt] = useState("");

 const prompts = api.prompt.all.useQuery();
 const { isOpen, onOpen, onClose } = useDisclosure();

 const upsertPrompt = api.prompt.upsert.useMutation({
 onSuccess: async () => utils.prompt.invalidate(),
 });

 const deletePrompt = api.prompt.delete.useMutation({
 onSuccess: async () => utils.prompt.invalidate(),
 });

 return (
 <>
 
 
 }
 variant="ghost"
 >
 
 
 
 
 Saved prompts
 }
 variant="ghost"
 alignSelf={"flex-end"}
 onClick={() => {
 setSelectedTargetPrompt("");
 setEditedPrompt("");
 setEditedName("");
 onOpen();
 }}
 >
 
 
 
 {prompts.data
 ?.sort((a, b) => b.updatedAt.getTime() - a.updatedAt.getTime())
 .map((p) => (
 {
 setInputMessage(p.prompt);
 }}
 gap={2}
 >
 
 {p.name}
 
 
 {p.prompt}
 
 }
 variant="ghost"
 alignSelf={"flex-end"}
 onClick={(e) => {
 e.stopPropagation();
 setSelectedTargetPrompt(p.id);
 setEditedPrompt(p.prompt);
 setEditedName(p.name);
 onOpen();
 }}
 >
 
 ))}
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 {selectedTargetPrompt === "" ? "New" : "Edit"} Prompt
 
 
 
 setEditedName(e.target.value)}
 borderRadius={"md"}
 autoFocus
 />
 
 
 
 
 {
 void deletePrompt.mutateAsync({
 id: selectedTargetPrompt,
 });
 onClose();
 }}
 hidden={selectedTargetPrompt === ""}
 >
 Delete
 
 {
 void upsertPrompt.mutateAsync({
 id: selectedTargetPrompt,
 name: editedName,
 prompt: editedPrompt,
 });
 onClose();
 }}
 >
 Save
 
 
 
 
 
 </>
 );
}
Can you make this code more efficient? Think step by step!
export default function Library({
 setInputMessage,
}: {
 setInputMessage: Dispatch>;
}) {
 const utils = api.useContext();

 const [selectedTargetPrompt, setSelectedTargetPrompt] = useState("");
 const [editedName, setEditedName] = useState("");
 const [editedPrompt, setEditedPrompt] = useState("");

 const prompts = api.prompt.all.useQuery();
 const { isOpen, onOpen, onClose } = useDisclosure();

 const upsertPrompt = api.prompt.upsert.useMutation({
 onSuccess: async () => utils.prompt.invalidate(),
 });

 const deletePrompt = api.prompt.delete.useMutation({
 onSuccess: async () => utils.prompt.invalidate(),
 });

 return (
 <>
 
 
 }
 variant="ghost"
 >
 
 
 
 
 Saved prompts
 }
 variant="ghost"
 alignSelf={"flex-end"}
 onClick={() => {
 setSelectedTargetPrompt("");
 setEditedPrompt("");
 setEditedName("");
 onOpen();
 }}
 >
 
 
 
 {prompts.data
 ?.sort((a, b) => b.updatedAt.getTime() - a.updatedAt.getTime())
 .map((p) => (
 {
 setInputMessage(p.prompt);
 }}
 gap={2}
 >
 
 {p.name}
 
 
 {p.prompt}
 
 }
 variant="ghost"
 alignSelf={"flex-end"}
 onClick={(e) => {
 e.stopPropagation();
 setSelectedTargetPrompt(p.id);
 setEditedPrompt(p.prompt);
 setEditedName(p.name);
 onOpen();
 }}
 >
 
 ))}
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 {selectedTargetPrompt === "" ? "New" : "Edit"} Prompt
 
 
 
 setEditedName(e.target.value)}
 borderRadius={"md"}
 autoFocus
 />
 
 
 
 
 {
 void deletePrompt.mutateAsync({
 id: selectedTargetPrompt,
 });
 onClose();
 }}
 hidden={selectedTargetPrompt === ""}
 >
 Delete
 
 {
 void upsertPrompt.mutateAsync({
 id: selectedTargetPrompt,
 name: editedName,
 prompt: editedPrompt,
 });
 onClose();
 }}
 >
 Save
 
 
 
 
 
 </>
 );
}
user
This code can be improved by leveraging the concepts of abstracting and modularization. By creating a separate function for the `upsertPrompt` and `deletePrompt` operations, the code can be made more efficient and easier to maintain. Additionally, by creating a custom hook for the input message, the code can be made more declarative and intent-understandable.
assistant
To make this code more efficient, let's break down the optimizations we can make:

1. **Reduce unnecessary queries:** Instead of fetching all prompts every time the component renders, we can use the `useMemo` hook to memoize the sorted data based on the `updatedAt` property. This will only fetch the data once and cache it, reducing the number of API calls.

```jsx
const sortedPrompts = useMemo(() => {
  if (!prompts.data) return [];
  return prompts.data.sort((a, b) => b.updatedAt.getTime() - a.updatedAt.getTime());
}, [prompts.data]);
```

2. **Optimize mutations:** Instead of calling `utils.prompt.invalidate()` after each mutation, we can use the `useQueryClient` hook to invalidate the `prompts` query only when necessary. This will reduce the number of unnecessary API calls.

```jsx
const queryClient = useQueryClient();

const upsertPromptMutation = api.prompt.upsert.useMutation({
  onSuccess: () => {
    queryClient.invalidateQueries('prompts');
  },
});

const deletePromptMutation = api.prompt.delete.useMutation({
  onSuccess: () => {
    queryClient.invalidateQueries('prompts');
  },
});
```

3. **Use controlled components:** Instead of using `useState` to manage the `editedName` and `editedPrompt` state, we can pass these values as props to the input fields and handle their changes directly in the parent component. This will reduce the number of state updates and improve performance.

```jsx
const Library = ({ setInputMessage, promptsQuery }) => {
  const utils = api.useContext();
  const queryClient = useQueryClient();

  const [selectedTargetPrompt, setSelectedTargetPrompt] = useState('');

  const sortedPrompts = useMemo(() => {
    if (!promptsQuery.data) return [];
    return promptsQuery.data.sort((a, b) => b.updatedAt.getTime() - a.updatedAt.getTime());
  }, [promptsQuery.data]);

  const upsertPromptMutation = api.prompt.upsert.useMutation({
    onSuccess: () => {
      queryClient.invalidateQueries('prompts');
    },
  });

  const deletePromptMutation = api.prompt.delete.useMutation({
    onSuccess: () => {
      queryClient.invalidateQueries('prompts');
    },
  });

  const handleSave = async () => {
    if (!selectedTargetPrompt) return;
    await upsertPromptMutation.mutateAsync({
      id: selectedTargetPrompt,
      name: editedName,
      prompt: editedPrompt,
    });
    setSelectedTargetPrompt('');
    setEditedName('');
    setEditedPrompt('');
  };

  const handleDelete = async () => {
    if (!selectedTargetPrompt) return;
    await deletePromptMutation.mutateAsync({ id: selectedTargetPrompt });
    setSelectedTargetPrompt('');
  };

  return (
    <>
      {sortedPrompts.map((p) => (
        <ListItem
          key={p.id}
          onClick={() => {
            setSelectedTargetPrompt(p.id);
            setEditedName(p.name);
            setEditedPrompt(p.prompt);
          }}
        >
          <ListItemAvatar>
            <Avatar>{p.name[0]}</Avatar>
          </ListItemAvatar>
          <ListItemText primary={p.name} secondary={p.prompt} />
          <IconButton
            aria-label="edit"
            onClick={(e) => {
              e.stopPropagation();
            }}
          >
            <EditIcon />
          </IconButton>
        </ListItem>
      ))}

      <Modal isOpen={selectedTargetPrompt !== ''} onClose={() => setSelectedTargetPrompt('')}>
        <ModalOverlay />
        <ModalContent>
          <ModalHeader>{selectedTargetPrompt === '' ? 'New' : 'Edit
Can you make this code more efficient? Think step by step!
export default function Library({
 setInputMessage,
}: {
 setInputMessage: Dispatch>;
}) {
 const utils = api.useContext();

 const [selectedTargetPrompt, setSelectedTargetPrompt] = useState("");
 const [editedName, setEditedName] = useState("");
 const [editedPrompt, setEditedPrompt] = useState("");

 const prompts = api.prompt.all.useQuery();
 const { isOpen, onOpen, onClose } = useDisclosure();

 const upsertPrompt = api.prompt.upsert.useMutation({
 onSuccess: async () => utils.prompt.invalidate(),
 });

 const deletePrompt = api.prompt.delete.useMutation({
 onSuccess: async () => utils.prompt.invalidate(),
 });

 return (
 <>
 
 
 }
 variant="ghost"
 >
 
 
 
 
 Saved prompts
 }
 variant="ghost"
 alignSelf={"flex-end"}
 onClick={() => {
 setSelectedTargetPrompt("");
 setEditedPrompt("");
 setEditedName("");
 onOpen();
 }}
 >
 
 
 
 {prompts.data
 ?.sort((a, b) => b.updatedAt.getTime() - a.updatedAt.getTime())
 .map((p) => (
 {
 setInputMessage(p.prompt);
 }}
 gap={2}
 >
 
 {p.name}
 
 
 {p.prompt}
 
 }
 variant="ghost"
 alignSelf={"flex-end"}
 onClick={(e) => {
 e.stopPropagation();
 setSelectedTargetPrompt(p.id);
 setEditedPrompt(p.prompt);
 setEditedName(p.name);
 onOpen();
 }}
 >
 
 ))}
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 {selectedTargetPrompt === "" ? "New" : "Edit"} Prompt
 
 
 
 setEditedName(e.target.value)}
 borderRadius={"md"}
 autoFocus
 />
 
 
 
 
 {
 void deletePrompt.mutateAsync({
 id: selectedTargetPrompt,
 });
 onClose();
 }}
 hidden={selectedTargetPrompt === ""}
 >
 Delete
 
 {
 void upsertPrompt.mutateAsync({
 id: selectedTargetPrompt,
 name: editedName,
 prompt: editedPrompt,
 });
 onClose();
 }}
 >
 Save
 
 
 
 
 
 </>
 );
}
user
To make this code more efficient, let's break down the optimizations we can make:

1. **Reduce unnecessary queries:** Instead of fetching all prompts every time the component renders, we can use the `useMemo` hook to memoize the sorted data based on the `updatedAt` property. This will only fetch the data once and cache it, reducing the number of API calls.

```jsx
const sortedPrompts = useMemo(() => {
  if (!prompts.data) return [];
  return prompts.data.sort((a, b) => b.updatedAt.getTime() - a.updatedAt.getTime());
}, [prompts.data]);
```

2. **Optimize mutations:** Instead of calling `utils.prompt.invalidate()` after each mutation, we can use the `useQueryClient` hook to invalidate the `prompts` query only when necessary. This will reduce the number of unnecessary API calls.

```jsx
const queryClient = useQueryClient();

const upsertPromptMutation = api.prompt.upsert.useMutation({
  onSuccess: () => {
    queryClient.invalidateQueries('prompts');
  },
});

const deletePromptMutation = api.prompt.delete.useMutation({
  onSuccess: () => {
    queryClient.invalidateQueries('prompts');
  },
});
```

3. **Use controlled components:** Instead of using `useState` to manage the `editedName` and `editedPrompt` state, we can pass these values as props to the input fields and handle their changes directly in the parent component. This will reduce the number of state updates and improve performance.

```jsx
const Library = ({ setInputMessage, promptsQuery }) => {
  const utils = api.useContext();
  const queryClient = useQueryClient();

  const [selectedTargetPrompt, setSelectedTargetPrompt] = useState('');

  const sortedPrompts = useMemo(() => {
    if (!promptsQuery.data) return [];
    return promptsQuery.data.sort((a, b) => b.updatedAt.getTime() - a.updatedAt.getTime());
  }, [promptsQuery.data]);

  const upsertPromptMutation = api.prompt.upsert.useMutation({
    onSuccess: () => {
      queryClient.invalidateQueries('prompts');
    },
  });

  const deletePromptMutation = api.prompt.delete.useMutation({
    onSuccess: () => {
      queryClient.invalidateQueries('prompts');
    },
  });

  const handleSave = async () => {
    if (!selectedTargetPrompt) return;
    await upsertPromptMutation.mutateAsync({
      id: selectedTargetPrompt,
      name: editedName,
      prompt: editedPrompt,
    });
    setSelectedTargetPrompt('');
    setEditedName('');
    setEditedPrompt('');
  };

  const handleDelete = async () => {
    if (!selectedTargetPrompt) return;
    await deletePromptMutation.mutateAsync({ id: selectedTargetPrompt });
    setSelectedTargetPrompt('');
  };

  return (
    <>
      {sortedPrompts.map((p) => (
        <ListItem
          key={p.id}
          onClick={() => {
            setSelectedTargetPrompt(p.id);
            setEditedName(p.name);
            setEditedPrompt(p.prompt);
          }}
        >
          <ListItemAvatar>
            <Avatar>{p.name[0]}</Avatar>
          </ListItemAvatar>
          <ListItemText primary={p.name} secondary={p.prompt} />
          <IconButton
            aria-label="edit"
            onClick={(e) => {
              e.stopPropagation();
            }}
          >
            <EditIcon />
          </IconButton>
        </ListItem>
      ))}

      <Modal isOpen={selectedTargetPrompt !== ''} onClose={() => setSelectedTargetPrompt('')}>
        <ModalOverlay />
        <ModalContent>
          <ModalHeader>{selectedTargetPrompt === '' ? 'New' : 'Edit
assistant
Can you make this code more efficient? Think step by step!
export default function Library({
 setInputMessage,
}: {
 setInputMessage: Dispatch>;
}) {
 const utils = api.useContext();

 const [selectedTargetPrompt, setSelectedTargetPrompt] = useState("");
 const [editedName, setEditedName] = useState("");
 const [editedPrompt, setEditedPrompt] = useState("");

 const prompts = api.prompt.all.useQuery();
 const { isOpen, onOpen, onClose } = useDisclosure();

 const upsertPrompt = api.prompt.upsert.useMutation({
 onSuccess: async () => utils.prompt.invalidate(),
 });

 const deletePrompt = api.prompt.delete.useMutation({
 onSuccess: async () => utils.prompt.invalidate(),
 });

 return (
 <>
 
 
 }
 variant="ghost"
 >
 
 
 
 
 Saved prompts
 }
 variant="ghost"
 alignSelf={"flex-end"}
 onClick={() => {
 setSelectedTargetPrompt("");
 setEditedPrompt("");
 setEditedName("");
 onOpen();
 }}
 >
 
 
 
 {prompts.data
 ?.sort((a, b) => b.updatedAt.getTime() - a.updatedAt.getTime())
 .map((p) => (
 {
 setInputMessage(p.prompt);
 }}
 gap={2}
 >
 
 {p.name}
 
 
 {p.prompt}
 
 }
 variant="ghost"
 alignSelf={"flex-end"}
 onClick={(e) => {
 e.stopPropagation();
 setSelectedTargetPrompt(p.id);
 setEditedPrompt(p.prompt);
 setEditedName(p.name);
 onOpen();
 }}
 >
 
 ))}
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 {selectedTargetPrompt === "" ? "New" : "Edit"} Prompt
 
 
 
 setEditedName(e.target.value)}
 borderRadius={"md"}
 autoFocus
 />
 
 
 
 
 {
 void deletePrompt.mutateAsync({
 id: selectedTargetPrompt,
 });
 onClose();
 }}
 hidden={selectedTargetPrompt === ""}
 >
 Delete
 
 {
 void upsertPrompt.mutateAsync({
 id: selectedTargetPrompt,
 name: editedName,
 prompt: editedPrompt,
 });
 onClose();
 }}
 >
 Save
 
 
 
 
 
 </>
 );
}
user
This code can be improved by leveraging the concepts of abstracting and modularization. By creating a separate function for the `upsertPrompt` and `deletePrompt` operations, the code can be made more efficient and easier to maintain. Additionally, by creating a custom hook for the input message, the code can be made more declarative and intent-understandable.
assistant