Senator Warren interviews for The New York Times’s endorsement.
the wealthiest Americans, and of “our chance to rewrite the rules of power in our country,” as she put it in a last month. “The senator talks more about bringing together Democrats, Republicans and independents behind her proposals, often leaning on anecdotes about her conservative brothers to do so. For this reason, we are breaking with convention and putting our support behind, not one, but two candidates.” Announcing the endorsement Sunday, the board said, “Senator Warren is a gifted storyteller and a brilliant architect of regulation, where we would push back on some specific policy proposals, we are struck by how effectively her message has matched the moment.” As for Klobuchar, the board said, “Senator Klobuchar has a lengthy resume in the Senate, and bipartisan credentials that make her an invaluable dealmaker, she’s shown she can unite the party, and perhaps the nation.” The editorial board met with nine of the leading contenders for the Democratic nomination in December. | sticktoitiveness.” The Times issued its endorsement just two weeks ahead of the Iowa caucuses, the first polling in the Democratic primary process. Still, Minnesotans love her, and her track record suggests to the paper that “the best chance to enact many progressive plans could be under a Klobuchar administration.” Boom: endorsement. The New York Times editorial board on Sunday night Senators Elizabeth Warren and Amy Klobuchar as the Democratic candidate for president. Warren and Klobuchar have wildly divergent visions for America: Warren has run on an unabashedly progressive agenda rivaling Sanders’s, while Klobuchar has presented herself as a pragmatist who has made clear that she views some of the bolder proposals from her more left-wing opponents, like Medicare For All, as unrealistic. Klobuchar and Ms. Warren right now are the Democrats best equipped to lead that debate,” the editorial board wrote. In an op-ed called "The Democrats best choices for president," the editorial | She speaks elegantly of how the economic system is rigged against all but the wealthiest Americans, and of “our chance to rewrite the rules of power in our country,” as she put it in a last month. For this reason, we are breaking with convention and putting our support behind, not one, but two candidates.” Announcing the endorsement Sunday, the board said, “Senator Warren is a gifted storyteller and a brilliant architect of regulation, where we would push back on some specific policy proposals, we are struck by how effectively her message has matched the moment.” As for Klobuchar, the board said, “Senator Klobuchar has a lengthy resume in the Senate, and bipartisan credentials that make her an invaluable dealmaker, she’s shown she can unite the party, and perhaps the nation.” The editorial board met with nine of the leading contenders for the Democratic nomination in December. “May the best woman win.”  Warren of Massachusetts and Klobuchar of Minnesota over other candidates in the | Still, Minnesotans love her, and her track record suggests to the paper that “the best chance to enact many progressive plans could be under a Klobuchar administration.” Boom: endorsement. And she has proposed a sweeping expansion of government support for Americans at every stage of life, from to to . “May the best woman win.”  Warren of Massachusetts and Klobuchar of Minnesota over other candidates in the still-crowded primary field because “in this perilous moment, both the radical and the realist models warrant serious consideration. "Today's endorsement from The New York Times makes it clear that Amy Klobuchar is the candidate for Americans who are fed up with the noise and nonsense coming out of Washington. She speaks elegantly of how the economic system is rigged against all but the wealthiest Americans, and of “our chance to rewrite the rules of power in our country,” as she put it in a last month. “The senator talks more about bringing together Democrats, Republicans and | still-crowded primary field because “in this perilous moment, both the radical and the realist models warrant serious consideration. They are Elizabeth Warren and Amy Klobuchar.” The Times praised Warren, the former Harvard law professor turned senator from Massachusetts as “a standard-bearer for the Democratic left” who “speaks elegantly of how the economic system is rigged against all but the wealthiest Americans.” After discounting other centrists in the Democratic field, including former vice president Joe Biden and former South Bend, Indiana, mayor Pete Buttigieg, the Times offered praise for Klobuchar, calling the Minnesota Democrat “a standard-bearer for the Democratic center” whose “vision goes beyond the incremental” and who is “the very definition of Midwestern charisma, grit and sticktoitiveness.” The Times issued its endorsement just two weeks ahead of the Iowa caucuses, the first polling in the Democratic primary process. Still, Minnesotans love her, and her track record | For this reason, we are breaking with convention and putting our support behind, not one, but two candidates.” Announcing the endorsement Sunday, the board said, “Senator Warren is a gifted storyteller and a brilliant architect of regulation, where we would push back on some specific policy proposals, we are struck by how effectively her message has matched the moment.” As for Klobuchar, the board said, “Senator Klobuchar has a lengthy resume in the Senate, and bipartisan credentials that make her an invaluable dealmaker, she’s shown she can unite the party, and perhaps the nation.” The editorial board met with nine of the leading contenders for the Democratic nomination in December. “May the best woman win.”  Warren of Massachusetts and Klobuchar of Minnesota over other candidates in the still-crowded primary field because “in this perilous moment, both the radical and the realist models warrant serious consideration. They are Elizabeth Warren and Amy Klobuchar.” The Times praised
Senator Warren interviews for The New York Times’s endorsement.
She speaks elegantly of how the economic system is rigged against all but the wealthiest Americans, and of “our chance to rewrite the rules of power in our country,” as she put it in a last month. For this reason, we are breaking with convention and putting our support behind, not one, but two candidates.” Announcing the endorsement Sunday, the board said, “Senator Warren is a gifted storyteller and a brilliant architect of regulation, where we would push back on some specific policy proposals, we are struck by how effectively her message has matched the moment.” As for Klobuchar, the board said, “Senator Klobuchar has a lengthy resume in the Senate, and bipartisan credentials that make her an invaluable dealmaker, she’s shown she can unite the party, and perhaps the nation.” The editorial board met with nine of the leading contenders for the Democratic nomination in December. “May the best woman win.”  Warren of Massachusetts and Klobuchar of Minnesota over other candidates in the still-crowded primary field because “in this perilous moment, both the radical and the realist models warrant serious consideration. That’s not where the is at, however; indeed, the board’s longing for “a single, powerful moderate voice” is palpable in the editorial. And she has proposed a sweeping expansion of government support for Americans at every stage of life, from to to . Klobuchar and Ms. Warren right now are the Democrats best equipped to lead that debate. “For this reason, we are breaking with convention, and putting our support behind not one, but two candidates.” The editorial board noted that “there will be those dissatisfied that this page is not throwing its weight behind a single candidate, favoring centrists or progressives.” The episode had shades of , right down to the long boardroom table, with the candidates getting grilled by the members of the editorial board followed immediately by some discussion among the members about their respective pluses and minuses. But the decision not to endorse a single candidate is what will be remembered here. Unfortunately for Elizabeth Warren and Amy Klobuchar, just got it wrong. Her campaign’s plans, in general, demonstrate a serious approach to policymaking that some of the other candidates lack. Yet the damns Sanders in the crudest terms, concluding, “Three years into the Trump administration, we see little advantage to exchanging one over-promising, divisive figure in Washington for another.” Amazingly, the paper of record does not recognize the contradiction in arguing that Sanders is associated with “now mainstream” ideas that “may attract voters who helped elect Mr. Trump in 2016,” while at the same time dismissing him as too “divisive.” The editorial is unfair to Sanders. That’s a testament to the effectiveness of the case that Bernie Sanders and Senator Warren have made about what ails the country. Instead of providing clarity with a robust embrace of one candidacy—even Klobuchar’s unlikely bid—this editorial reads more as a rejection of a pair of “moderate voices” who are running way ahead of Klobuchar in the polls. “That’s why we’re endorsing the most effective advocates for each approach. Good news, then, that Amy Klobuchar has emerged as a standard-bearer for the Democratic center.
The New York Times Endorses Both Warren and Klobuchar for Democratic Presidential Nomination

In a surprising turn of events, the New York Times editorial board has announced its endorsement of both Senator Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts and Senator Amy Klobuchar of Minnesota for the Democratic presidential nomination. This endorsement marks a significant departure from the board's traditional practice of endorsing a single candidate.

The board met with nine of the leading contenders for the Democratic nomination in December, ultimately deciding that both Warren and Klobuchar were the best equipped to lead the Democratic Party in this "perilous moment." The board was struck by Warren's gift for storytelling and her ability to craft effective regulations, while also acknowledging that they would push back on some of her specific policy proposals. Klobuchar, on the other hand, was praised for her lengthy resume in the Senate, her bipartisan credentials, and her ability to unite the party and potentially the nation.

Warren has run on an unabashedly progressive agenda, similar to that of Senator Bernie Sanders, while Klobuchar has presented herself as a pragmatist who views some of the bolder proposals from her more left-wing opponents as unrealistic. The board recognizes the wildly divergent visions for America that these two candidates represent but believes that both have important contributions to make to the Democratic Party's primary debate.

Warren has spoken eloquently about how the economic system is rigged against all but the wealthiest Americans and has proposed a sweeping expansion of government support for Americans at every stage of life. Klobuchar, meanwhile, has a track record that suggests she could be successful in enacting many progressive plans under her administration.

The Times' endorsement comes just two weeks before the Iowa caucuses, the first polling event in the Democratic primary process. While Minnesotans love Klobuchar, the board believes that Warren's message has effectively matched the moment and that she is a standard-bearer for the Democratic left. Klobuchar, on the other hand, is praised as a standard-bearer for the Democratic center, with a vision that goes beyond the incremental and a charismatic, gritty, and determined approach that embodies Midwestern values.

Ultimately, the New York Times editorial board believes that both Warren and Klobuchar have important roles to play in the Democratic Party's primary debate and that "may the best woman win." This unconventional endorsement reflects the board's belief that in this critical moment, both the radical and realist models warrant serious consideration.
The New York Times Endorses Both Warren and Klobuchar for Democratic Presidential Nomination

In a surprising turn of events, the New York Times editorial board has announced its endorsement of both Senators Elizabeth Warren and Amy Klobuchar for the Democratic presidential nomination. This decision marks the first time in the newspaper's history that it has endorsed two candidates for the same primary election.

The endorsement comes after the editorial board met with nine of the leading contenders for the Democratic nomination in December. The board said that they were impressed with both Warren and Klobuchar's visions for America, which are wildly divergent but equally compelling.

Warren, a standard-bearer for the Democratic left, has run on an unabashedly progressive agenda that rivals Senator Bernie Sanders'. The board praised Warren for her elegant speeches about how the economic system is rigged against all but the wealthiest Americans and her proposal for a sweeping expansion of government support for Americans at every stage of life.

The board also lauded Klobuchar, a standard-bearer for the Democratic center, for her lengthy resume in the Senate and bipartisan credentials that make her an invaluable dealmaker. They noted that Klobuchar has shown that she can unite the party and perhaps the nation, with a vision that goes beyond the incremental.

The Times issued its endorsement just two weeks ahead of the Iowa caucuses, the first polling in the Democratic primary process. The board acknowledged that the endorsement might seem unconventional, but they believe that both Warren and Klobuchar are the Democrats best equipped to lead the debate in this perilous moment.

The board noted that while they would push back on some specific policy proposals from Warren, they are struck by how effectively her message has matched the moment. They also pointed out that Klobuchar's Midwestern charisma, grit, and sticktoitiveness make her a formidable candidate.

The endorsement is a significant boost for both Warren and Klobuchar, who have been polling in the top tier of Democratic candidates. It is also a rebuke to other centrists in the Democratic field, including former Vice President Joe Biden and former South Bend, Indiana, Mayor Pete Buttigieg.

The New York Times' endorsement of both Warren and Klobuchar is a testament to the strength of the Democratic field and the diversity of ideas and visions for America. It is also a recognition that in this perilous moment, both the radical and realist models warrant serious consideration.

In conclusion, the New York Times' endorsement of both Elizabeth Warren and Amy Klobuchar for the Democratic presidential nomination is a historic and significant development in the 2020 election. It is a recognition that both candidates have the potential to lead the country towards a more equitable and just future. As the board said, "May the best woman win."
The New York Times Endorses Both Warren and Klobuchar for Democratic Presidential Nomination

In a surprising turn of events, the New York Times editorial board has announced its endorsement of both Senator Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts and Senator Amy Klobuchar of Minnesota for the Democratic presidential nomination. This endorsement marks a significant departure from the board's traditional practice of endorsing a single candidate.

The board met with nine of the leading contenders for the Democratic nomination in December and ultimately decided to support both Warren and Klobuchar due to their "divergent visions for America" and their unique strengths as candidates.

Senator Warren, a former Harvard law professor, has run on an unabashedly progressive agenda that rivals that of Senator Bernie Sanders. The board praised Warren as a "gifted storyteller and a brilliant architect of regulation" who "speaks elegantly of how the economic system is rigged against all but the wealthiest Americans." The board also noted that while they would "push back on some specific policy proposals," they are "struck by how effectively her message has matched the moment."

Senator Klobuchar, on the other hand, has presented herself as a pragmatist who can unite the party and perhaps the nation. The board commended Klobuchar for her "lengthy resume in the Senate" and her "bipartisan credentials that make her an invaluable dealmaker." They also highlighted her "Midwestern charisma, grit, and sticktoitiveness" and her "vision [that] goes beyond the incremental."

The board acknowledged that the best chance to enact many progressive plans could be under a Klobuchar administration, but they also recognized the importance of Warren's radical proposals in this "perilous moment." Ultimately, they believe that both candidates are "equipped to lead that debate" and "warrant serious consideration."

This endorsement comes just two weeks before the Iowa caucuses, the first polling in the Democratic primary process. While some may see this dual endorsement as a sign of division within the party, the board emphasized that "may the best woman win" and that they are confident that either Warren or Klobuchar will be a strong contender against President Trump in the general election.

In conclusion, the New York Times editorial board's endorsement of both Elizabeth Warren and Amy Klobuchar for the Democratic presidential nomination is a bold and unprecedented move. It reflects the board's recognition of the need for both radical and realistic visions in this critical moment in American history. By endorsing both candidates, the board is sending a clear message that they believe both Warren and Klobuchar have the potential to lead the Democratic Party to victory in 2020.
Title: The New York Times Endorses Both Elizabeth Warren and Amy Klobuchar for President

In a surprising turn of events, The New York Times editorial board has announced its endorsement of both Senator Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts and Senator Amy Klobuchar of Minnesota for the Democratic nomination for president. This endorsement marks a significant departure from the board's past practice of endorsing a single candidate.

The board met with nine leading contenders for the Democratic nomination in December and ultimately decided that both Warren and Klobuchar were the best equipped to lead the Democratic Party in this "perilous moment." The Times praised Warren as a "standard-bearer for the Democratic left" who speaks eloquently about the economic system being rigged against all but the wealthiest Americans. The board also recognized her as a "gifted storyteller and a brilliant architect of regulation."

At the same time, The New York Times endorsed Klobuchar as a "standard-bearer for the Democratic center" whose "vision goes beyond the incremental." The board commended Klobuchar's bipartisan credentials and ability to unite the party and the nation, stating that she has shown herself to be an invaluable dealmaker.

While the board acknowledged that it would usually endorse a single candidate, it explained that in this particular moment, both the radical and realist models warrant serious consideration. The board recognizes that Senator Warren's more progressive plans, such as her proposal for a wealth tax, are popular among many Democratic voters, while Senator Klobuchar's proposed policies are more pragmatic and centrist.

The New York Times' endorsement comes just two weeks before the Iowa caucuses, and it highlights the importance of the upcoming primary process. The board believes that either Warren or Klobuchar would be strong candidates, and it encourages voters to consider both in the coming weeks.

The endorsement is also a nod to the diverse range of candidates still in the running for the Democratic nomination. The board recognizes that the Democratic Party is home to a wide array of views and perspectives, and it is crucial to have a candidate who can unite the party and appeal to a broad coalition of voters.

In conclusion, The New York Times' decision to endorse both Elizabeth Warren and Amy Klobuchar is a bold move that reflects the unique moment in American politics. It is a recognition that both radical and realist models are necessary to address the challenges facing the country. With this endorsement, The New York Times is encouraging voters to consider both candidates and to make an informed decision in the upcoming primary process.
The New York Times Endorses Both Elizabeth Warren and Amy Klobuchar for Democratic Nomination

In a surprising turn of events, the New York Times editorial board has announced their endorsement of both Senator Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts and Senator Amy Klobuchar of Minnesota for the Democratic nomination for president. This endorsement marks the first time in the publication's history that they have endorsed two candidates for the same office.

The board met with nine of the leading contenders for the Democratic nomination in December, and after careful consideration, they have chosen to support both Warren and Klobuchar. The board commended Warren for her "gifted storytelling" and "brilliant architecture of regulation," while pushing back on some specific policy proposals. They were struck by how effectively Warren's message has matched the moment, speaking eloquently of how the economic system is rigged against all but the wealthiest Americans.

The board also praised Klobuchar for her lengthy resume in the Senate and her bipartisan credentials that make her an invaluable dealmaker. They noted that she has shown she can unite the party and perhaps the nation. The board acknowledged that while Klobuchar may not have the national name recognition of some of her opponents, she has a strong following in her home state of Minnesota. They suggested that the best chance to enact many progressive plans could be under a Klobuchar administration, highlighting her Midwestern charisma, grit, and sticktoitiveness.

The Times issued its endorsement just two weeks ahead of the Iowa caucuses, the first polling in the Democratic primary process. The endorsement serves as a reminder that in this perilous moment, both the radical and realist models warrant serious consideration. The board stated that "May the best woman win" and expressed their confidence in the ability of both Warren and Klobuchar to lead the Democratic Party and the nation.

In their op-ed titled "The Democrats' Best Choices for President," the board explained their decision to endorse two candidates. They noted that the primary season is long, and there is still a crowded field of candidates. The board emphasized that after extensive deliberation, they have concluded that Warren and Klobuchar are the Democrats best equipped to lead the debate and unite the party.

The editorial board's decision to endorse both Warren and Klobuchar reflects the diversity of opinions and perspectives within the Democratic Party. The board recognizes that there is no one-size-fits-all approach to addressing the challenges facing the nation, and they have chosen to support two candidates who represent different wings of the party.

In conclusion, the New York Times' endorsement of both Elizabeth Warren and Amy Klobuchar for the Democratic nomination is a significant development in the 2020 presidential race. The board's decision to break with convention and support two candidates highlights the importance of considering a range of perspectives and approaches when selecting a nominee. Ultimately, the board's endorsement serves as a reminder that in this critical moment, the Democratic Party must come together to select a candidate who can unite the country and address the challenges facing the nation.
The New York Times Editorial Board made a surprising move on Sunday by endorsing not one, but two candidates for the Democratic presidential nomination: Senators Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts and Amy Klobuchar of Minnesota. This unconventional decision reflects the board's view that both "the radical and the realist models warrant serious consideration" in what they describe as a "perilous moment" for the country.

Senator Elizabeth Warren, characterized as a "standard-bearer for the Democratic left," received praise for her ability to articulate how the economic system is rigged against all but the wealthiest Americans. The board commended Warren as a "gifted storyteller and a brilliant architect of regulation," noting that her message has effectively matched the current political climate. Warren's campaign has focused on "rewriting the rules of power" in the country and proposing sweeping expansions of government support for Americans at various life stages.

On the other hand, Senator Amy Klobuchar was endorsed as a representative of the Democratic center. The Times lauded her lengthy Senate resume and bipartisan credentials, describing her as an "invaluable dealmaker" with the potential to unite both the party and the nation. Klobuchar's pragmatic approach and her ability to appeal to a broad spectrum of voters, including Democrats, Republicans, and independents, were highlighted as key strengths.

The editorial board's decision came after meeting with nine leading contenders for the Democratic nomination in December. Their endorsement breaks with convention, acknowledging the merits of both progressive and moderate approaches to governance. The board expressed confidence in both candidates' ability to lead the debate on the future direction of the country.

This dual endorsement comes just two weeks before the Iowa caucuses, the first major event in the Democratic primary process. The Times' decision reflects the complex political landscape and the diverse array of candidates vying for the nomination.

The editorial concluded with the phrase "May the best woman win," underscoring the historic nature of potentially having a female nominee and ultimately a woman president. This endorsement by one of the nation's most influential newspapers is likely to have a significant impact on the ongoing primary race, potentially reshaping the dynamics of the campaign as it enters a crucial phase.
The New York Times Editorial Board has made an unprecedented decision to endorse two candidates for the Democratic presidential nomination: Senators Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts and Amy Klobuchar of Minnesota. This unusual move reflects the board's view that both "the radical and the realist models warrant serious consideration" in what they describe as a "perilous moment" for the country.

Senator Elizabeth Warren, characterized as a "standard-bearer for the Democratic left," received praise for her ability to articulate how the economic system favors the wealthy. The board commended her as a "gifted storyteller and a brilliant architect of regulation," noting that her message has effectively captured the current political climate. Warren's progressive agenda includes proposals for significant expansion of government support across various stages of life.

On the other hand, Senator Amy Klobuchar was lauded as a "standard-bearer for the Democratic center." The Times highlighted her extensive Senate experience and bipartisan credentials, describing her as an "invaluable dealmaker" with the potential to unite both the party and the nation. Klobuchar's pragmatic approach and her ability to appeal to a broad spectrum of voters, including her popularity in Minnesota, were cited as strengths.

The editorial board's decision came after meeting with nine leading Democratic contenders in December. They emphasized the importance of considering both progressive and moderate approaches in addressing the challenges facing the country. The endorsement was announced just two weeks before the Iowa caucuses, the first major event in the Democratic primary process.

The Times' dual endorsement has sparked discussions about the state of the Democratic race and the different visions for America's future represented by Warren and Klobuchar. While Warren advocates for bold, structural changes, Klobuchar positions herself as a pragmatist capable of achieving realistic progress.

This unconventional endorsement reflects the complexity of the current political landscape and the diverse perspectives within the Democratic Party. As the primary season unfolds, it remains to be seen how this unique endorsement will influence voters and shape the race for the Democratic nomination.
The New York Times Editorial Board has made an unprecedented decision to endorse not one, but two candidates for the Democratic presidential nomination: Senators Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts and Amy Klobuchar of Minnesota. This unusual dual endorsement comes just weeks before the Iowa caucuses, the first contest in the Democratic primary process.

The board's decision reflects the current political climate, acknowledging that "both the radical and the realist models warrant serious consideration" in what they describe as a "perilous moment" for the country. By endorsing both Warren and Klobuchar, the Times is effectively presenting voters with two distinct visions for the future of the Democratic Party and the nation.

Senator Elizabeth Warren is praised as a "gifted storyteller and a brilliant architect of regulation." The board commends her ability to articulate how the economic system is rigged against all but the wealthiest Americans, and her vision to "rewrite the rules of power in our country." Warren's progressive agenda, which rivals that of Senator Bernie Sanders, has been noted for its ambitious scope and detailed policy proposals.

On the other hand, Senator Amy Klobuchar is endorsed as a pragmatic centrist with "a lengthy resume in the Senate, and bipartisan credentials that make her an invaluable dealmaker." The Times believes she has demonstrated an ability to unite the party and potentially the nation. Klobuchar's more moderate approach and track record of working across the aisle are seen as assets in achieving progressive goals through incremental change.

The editorial board met with nine leading Democratic contenders in December before making their decision. They ultimately chose to break with convention, citing the unique challenges facing the country and the strengths of both candidates.

The Times' endorsement highlights the ongoing debate within the Democratic Party between those advocating for sweeping structural changes and those favoring a more gradual approach. By endorsing both Warren and Klobuchar, the paper seems to suggest that either path could be viable, depending on the will of the voters.

As the primary season kicks off, this dual endorsement from one of the nation's most influential newspapers adds an interesting dimension to the race. It remains to be seen how this unconventional approach will impact the candidates' campaigns and voter perceptions as they head into the crucial early voting states.

The editorial concludes with the statement "May the best woman win," underscoring the historic nature of potentially nominating a female candidate to challenge President Trump in the general election.
In a surprising move, The New York Times editorial board has endorsed not one, but two candidates for the Democratic presidential nomination: Senators Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts and Amy Klobuchar of Minnesota. This dual endorsement, announced just two weeks before the Iowa caucuses, marks a departure from the paper's traditional approach of backing a single candidate.

The Times' decision reflects the current political landscape, acknowledging the merits of both "radical" and "realist" approaches to governance. Senator Warren, described as a "gifted storyteller and brilliant architect of regulation," represents the progressive wing of the Democratic Party. The editorial board praised her ability to articulate how the economic system is rigged against all but the wealthiest Americans and her vision to "rewrite the rules of power in our country."

On the other hand, Senator Klobuchar is portrayed as a pragmatic centrist with a "lengthy resume in the Senate and bipartisan credentials." The Times commended her potential to unite the party and possibly the nation, citing her track record of working across the aisle and her appeal to Midwestern voters.

The editorial board's decision came after meeting with nine leading Democratic contenders in December. They noted that while they might disagree with some specific policy proposals, both Warren and Klobuchar have effectively matched their messages to the current political moment.

Warren's campaign has focused on bold, progressive policies aimed at addressing economic inequality and expanding government support for Americans at various life stages. Klobuchar, meanwhile, has positioned herself as a pragmatist who can deliver results through bipartisan cooperation.

The unusual dual endorsement reflects the Times' view that both the "radical and realist models warrant serious consideration" in what they describe as a "perilous moment" for the country. By endorsing both Warren and Klobuchar, the editorial board seems to be acknowledging the ongoing debate within the Democratic Party about the best path forward.

As the primary season kicks off, it remains to be seen how this unique endorsement will impact the race. The Times concluded their announcement with the phrase "May the best woman win," leaving it to voters to decide which approach they prefer as the Democratic Party seeks to choose its nominee to face President Trump in the general election.
Senator Elizabeth Warren Interviews for The New York Times's Endorsement

In a groundbreaking move, The New York Times editorial board has broken with tradition by endorsing not one, but two candidates for the Democratic presidential nomination: Senators Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts and Amy Klobuchar of Minnesota. This decision comes after a series of interviews with nine leading contenders for the Democratic nomination in December, including Senator Warren.

During her interview, Senator Warren showcased her ability as a "gifted storyteller and brilliant architect of regulation," according to the editorial board. Her message, which focuses on how the economic system is rigged against all but the wealthiest Americans, was praised for effectively matching the current political moment.

Warren's campaign has centered on "our chance to rewrite the rules of power in our country," a theme that has resonated with many voters. Her progressive agenda, which rivals that of Senator Bernie Sanders, includes proposals for sweeping expansions of government support for Americans at every stage of life.

The Times editorial board noted that while they might disagree with some of Warren's specific policy proposals, they were impressed by how well her message has captured the zeitgeist. Warren's ability to articulate complex economic issues and present bold solutions has set her apart in a crowded field.

In contrast to some of her rivals, Warren has emphasized her ability to bring together Democrats, Republicans, and independents behind her proposals. She often uses anecdotes about her conservative brothers to illustrate her point, demonstrating her understanding of the need for broad coalition-building.

The unusual dual endorsement reflects the Times' view that "in this perilous moment, both the radical and the realist models warrant serious consideration." Warren represents the more progressive wing of the party, while Klobuchar is seen as a pragmatic centrist.

As the Iowa caucuses approach, marking the first official contest in the Democratic primary process, this endorsement from a major national newspaper could provide a significant boost to Warren's campaign. The editorial board's decision to endorse two candidates with differing approaches highlights the ongoing debate within the Democratic Party about the best strategy to defeat President Trump in the general election.

The Times concluded their endorsement with the phrase "May the best woman win," underscoring their belief that either Warren or Klobuchar would be well-equipped to lead the party and potentially the nation. As the primary season heats up, it remains to be seen how this unique endorsement will impact the race and whether it will influence voters in the upcoming caucuses and primaries.
## The New York Times Endorses Two: Warren and Klobuchar

In a historic move, The New York Times editorial board has endorsed two candidates for the Democratic presidential nomination: Senators Elizabeth Warren and Amy Klobuchar. This unprecedented decision reflects the paper's belief that both candidates offer compelling visions for America, representing the "radical" and "realist" models needed to address the nation's challenges.

The Times lauded Warren, the progressive firebrand from Massachusetts, as a "standard-bearer for the Democratic left" who eloquently articulates the struggles of everyday Americans against a rigged economic system. They praised her "brilliant" approach to regulation and her ability to connect with voters through powerful storytelling. 

While acknowledging some reservations about specific policy proposals, the board was struck by the effectiveness of Warren's message in capturing the zeitgeist of the moment. 

Klobuchar, the Minnesota senator, was lauded for her "vision that goes beyond the incremental" and her ability to bridge partisan divides. The Times highlighted her "Midwestern charisma, grit, and sticktoitiveness," emphasizing her bipartisan credentials and experience as a dealmaker in the Senate.

The endorsement comes just two weeks before the Iowa caucuses, the first test of the Democratic primary race. The Times acknowledged the "perilous moment" facing the nation, arguing that both Warren's progressive agenda and Klobuchar's pragmatic approach deserve serious consideration.

This dual endorsement signals a departure from traditional political norms and reflects the complexity of the current political landscape. It also highlights the growing influence of both progressive and moderate voices within the Democratic Party.


The Times' decision is sure to spark debate and discussion, further intensifying the already heated Democratic primary race. 
<end_of_turn>
## The New York Times Endorses Two: Warren and Klobuchar in Historic Break

In a stunning move that breaks with tradition, The New York Times editorial board has endorsed both Senator Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) and Senator Amy Klobuchar (D-MN) for the Democratic presidential nomination.  

This unprecedented dual endorsement comes just two weeks before the Iowa caucuses, the first test of the Democratic primary race. The Times praised both candidates, acknowledging the starkly different visions they offer for America. Warren, a self-described democratic socialist, has championed a progressive agenda focused on tackling wealth inequality and reforming the financial system. Klobuchar, meanwhile, presents herself as a pragmatic centrist with a proven track record of bipartisan dealmaking.

"In this perilous moment, both the radical and the realist models warrant serious consideration," the editorial board wrote. "They are Elizabeth Warren and Amy Klobuchar."

The Times lauded Warren's "gifted storytelling" and her ability to articulate the anxieties of working-class Americans who feel left behind by the economic system. They acknowledged her "brilliant" policy proposals, particularly her plans to address wealth inequality and regulate the financial industry. 

However, the board also expressed reservations about some of Warren's more ambitious proposals, suggesting they might be difficult to implement.

Klobuchar, on the other hand, was praised for her "bipartisan credentials" and her ability to build consensus. The Times highlighted her experience as a senator, her record of working across the aisle, and her "Midwestern charisma, grit, and sticktoitiveness."

The board believes Klobuchar's pragmatic approach and her ability to unite Democrats, Republicans, and independents make her a strong candidate to enact progressive change.

This dual endorsement marks a significant moment in the Democratic primary race. It signals a willingness to embrace both progressive and centrist voices, reflecting the diversity of views within the party. 


The Times' decision to endorse two candidates also highlights the difficulty of choosing a single nominee in a crowded field. With the Iowa caucuses looming, the race remains wide open, and the impact of this historic endorsement remains to be seen. 
<end_of_turn>
##  The New York Times Endorses Two: Warren and Klobuchar in Historic Break

**New York, NY** - In a stunning move, The New York Times editorial board has endorsed two candidates for the Democratic presidential nomination: Senators Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts and Amy Klobuchar of Minnesota. This unprecedented decision marks a departure from the paper's traditional practice of endorsing a single candidate.

The Times lauded Warren, a staunch progressive, as a "standard-bearer for the Democratic left" who eloquently articulates the concerns of Americans feeling the squeeze of economic inequality. They praised her "brilliant architecture of regulation" and her ability to connect with voters through powerful storytelling. 

Klobuchar, meanwhile, was hailed as a "standard-bearer for the Democratic center" whose vision extends beyond incremental change. The Times highlighted her "Midwestern charisma, grit, and sticktoitiveness," as well as her bipartisan credentials and proven ability to unite the party.

"In this perilous moment," the editorial board declared, "both the radical and the realist models warrant serious consideration. They are Elizabeth Warren and Amy Klobuchar."

This endorsement comes just two weeks before the Iowa caucuses, the first test of strength in the Democratic primary. The Times acknowledged the divergent visions of the two candidates, with Warren championing a sweeping expansion of government support and Klobuchar focusing on pragmatic solutions and bipartisan cooperation.

However, the board ultimately concluded that both women possess the qualities necessary to lead the country through challenging times. They believe that Warren's unwavering commitment to progressive ideals and Klobuchar's ability to build consensus offer the best path forward for the Democratic party and the nation.

The Times' endorsement is a significant boost for both Warren and Klobuchar, potentially shifting the momentum in the race. It remains to be seen how other candidates will respond to this unprecedented dual endorsement, but one thing is clear: the Democratic primary is entering a new and exciting phase. 


<end_of_turn>
## The New York Times Endorses Two: Warren and Klobuchar

In a historic move, The New York Times editorial board has endorsed two candidates for the Democratic presidential nomination: Senators Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts and Amy Klobuchar of Minnesota. This unprecedented dual endorsement reflects the board's belief that both candidates offer compelling visions for the future, representing the “radical” and “realist” models of change needed in this “perilous moment.”

The Times lauded Warren, a firebrand progressive, as a “standard-bearer for the Democratic left” who powerfully articulates the anxieties of Americans struggling under an economic system rigged against them. They praised her commitment to tackling wealth inequality and her detailed policy proposals, acknowledging that while they may push back on some specifics, her message resonates deeply with the current political climate.

Klobuchar, meanwhile, was lauded for her “Midwestern charisma, grit and sticktoitiveness,” as well as her bipartisan credentials and proven ability to unite Democrats. The Times sees her as a pragmatic leader who can bridge divides and enact progressive change through collaboration rather than confrontation. 

This endorsement comes just two weeks before the Iowa caucuses, the first test of the Democratic primary race. The Times acknowledges that both candidates face stiff competition, but believes that their combined strengths offer the best chance for Democrats to win in 2020.

The decision to endorse two candidates breaks with tradition, but the Times argues that it reflects the complexity of the current political landscape. They believe that both Warren's bold vision and Klobuchar's pragmatic approach are necessary to address the challenges facing the nation. 

This unprecedented endorsement is sure to spark debate and generate further momentum in the already heated Democratic primary race.


<end_of_turn>
## The New York Times Endorses Warren and Klobuchar: A Bold Break with Tradition 

In an unprecedented move, The New York Times editorial board has endorsed both Senator Elizabeth Warren and Senator Amy Klobuchar for the Democratic presidential nomination. This decision, announced Sunday, breaks with the newspaper's tradition of endorsing a single candidate and reflects the board's belief that both women offer compelling visions for America.

The Times lauded Warren, the Massachusetts senator, as a "standard-bearer for the Democratic left" whose powerful storytelling and advocacy for progressive policies resonate deeply with the current political climate. They acknowledged potential concerns about the feasibility of some of her proposals, but ultimately praised her ability to articulate a vision for economic justice that speaks to the anxieties of many Americans. 

Klobuchar, the Minnesota senator, was lauded for her "vision that goes beyond the incremental" and her proven ability to build bipartisan consensus. The Times highlighted her "Midwestern charisma, grit, and sticktoitiveness," emphasizing her potential to unite a divided nation. 

The board explicitly acknowledged the significant differences between the two candidates, acknowledging that Warren represents a more radical vision while Klobuchar embodies a more pragmatic approach. However, they argued that "in this perilous moment, both the radical and the realist models warrant serious consideration."

This endorsement comes just two weeks before the Iowa caucuses, the first major test in the Democratic primary. The Times' decision is likely to have a significant impact on the race, potentially boosting the campaigns of both Warren and Klobuchar and injecting new energy into the Democratic contest.

The paper's endorsement reflects a broader trend in American politics, where voters are increasingly seeking leaders who offer bold solutions to complex problems. Whether Warren or Klobuchar ultimately emerges as the Democratic nominee, their shared focus on addressing the needs of working Americans and rebuilding a fairer society is likely to shape the future of the Democratic Party.


<end_of_turn>
The New York Times Endorses Elizabeth Warren and Amy Klobuchar for the Democratic Nomination

In a surprise move, the New York Times editorial board has announced its support for two Democratic candidates in the presidential primary: Elizabeth Warren and Amy Klobuchar. The endorsement, which was announced on Sunday, breaks with convention and recognizes that both candidates have unique strengths that make them well-suited to lead the party in the general election.

Senator Warren, a progressive from Massachusetts, has run on an unabashedly progressive agenda that rivals that of her fellow contender, Bernie Sanders. Her message has resonated with many Americans who feel that the economic system is rigged against them. The Times praises Warren's ability to "rewrite the rules of power in our country," and notes that her message has matched the moment perfectly.

On the other hand, Senator Klobuchar, a pragmatist from Minnesota, has presented herself as a unifying force who can bring together Democrats, Republicans, and independents. The Times notes that Klobuchar has a "lengthy resume in the Senate" and bipartisan credentials that make her an invaluable dealmaker. Her ability to unite the party and perhaps the nation is seen as a key strength in the primary.

The Times' endorsement is significant because it recognizes that both Warren and Klobuchar have the potential to lead the party in a different direction. While Warren's progressive agenda has drawn criticism from some quarters, the Times sees her as a standard-bearer for the Democratic left. Klobuchar, on the other hand, is seen as a standard-bearer for the Democratic center, with a vision that goes beyond incremental changes.

The Times' endorsement comes just two weeks ahead of the Iowa caucuses, the first polling in the Democratic primary process. While Minnesotans love Klobuchar, the Times' endorsement suggests that she may be gaining traction with voters across the country.

In a statement, the Times said, "May the best woman win." The board met with nine of the leading contenders for the Democratic nomination in December and concluded that both Warren and Klobuchar were the best choices for the party.

Warren and Klobuchar have wildly divergent visions for America, but the Times sees this as a strength rather than a weakness. "In this perilous moment, both the radical and the realist models warrant serious consideration," the Times wrote. "They are Elizabeth Warren and Amy Klobuchar."

The Times' endorsement is a significant boost for both candidates, and it suggests that they may be able to appeal to a broad range of voters. As the primary heats up, it will be interesting to see how Warren and Klobuchar's campaigns respond to the Times' endorsement.
## The New York Times Endorses Two: Warren and Klobuchar for President

In a surprising move, The New York Times editorial board has endorsed two candidates for the Democratic presidential nomination: Senators Elizabeth Warren and Amy Klobuchar. This unprecedented dual endorsement reflects the board's belief that "in this perilous moment, both the radical and the realist models warrant serious consideration."

The Times lauded Warren, the former Harvard law professor turned senator from Massachusetts, as "a standard-bearer for the Democratic left." They praised her eloquent articulation of how the economic system is rigged against all but the wealthiest Americans and her vision for "rewriting the rules of power in our country."

Meanwhile, Klobuchar, the Minnesota Democrat, was hailed as "a standard-bearer for the Democratic center." The Times highlighted her "lengthy resume in the Senate" and her "bipartisan credentials that make her an invaluable dealmaker." They believe she possesses the "Midwestern charisma, grit and sticktoitiveness" needed to unite the party and potentially the nation.

The editorial board met with nine leading Democratic contenders in December, ultimately choosing Warren and Klobuchar over other centrists like Joe Biden and Pete Buttigieg. The Times acknowledged that they would push back on some of Warren's specific policy proposals, but were impressed by how effectively her message resonated with the current political climate.

This endorsement comes just two weeks before the Iowa caucuses, the first major test in the Democratic primary process. While the Times acknowledges that Minnesotans love Klobuchar and her track record suggests she could be the best chance to enact progressive plans, they ultimately believe that both Warren and Klobuchar are uniquely positioned to lead the Democratic Party and the nation.

The Times's decision to endorse two candidates is a bold move that reflects the current state of the Democratic primary. It remains to be seen whether this unusual endorsement will sway voters in the upcoming caucuses and beyond. 

##  The New York Times Endorses Two: Warren and Klobuchar for President

In a surprising move, The New York Times editorial board has endorsed two candidates for the Democratic presidential nomination: Senators Elizabeth Warren and Amy Klobuchar. This unprecedented dual endorsement reflects the board's belief that "in this perilous moment, both the radical and the realist models warrant serious consideration."

The Times lauded Warren, the former Harvard law professor turned senator from Massachusetts, as "a standard-bearer for the Democratic left." They praised her eloquent articulation of how the economic system is rigged against all but the wealthiest Americans and her vision for "rewriting the rules of power in our country." 

While acknowledging some reservations about specific policy proposals, the board was impressed by Warren's ability to connect with voters and her "gifted storytelling." They called her "a brilliant architect of regulation" whose message has resonated with the current political climate.

On the other hand, the Times recognized Klobuchar, the Minnesota senator, as "a standard-bearer for the Democratic center." They highlighted her "lengthy resume in the Senate" and her "bipartisan credentials," calling her "an invaluable dealmaker" who has demonstrated her ability to unite the party and potentially the nation. 

The editorial board, which met with nine leading Democratic contenders in December, ultimately chose Warren and Klobuchar over other centrists like Joe Biden and Pete Buttigieg. They praised Klobuchar's "Midwestern charisma, grit and sticktoitiveness" and her track record, suggesting that "the best chance to enact many progressive plans could be under a Klobuchar administration."

The Times' endorsement, issued just two weeks before the Iowa caucuses, is likely to have a significant impact on the Democratic primary race. While both Warren and Klobuchar have garnered support, this endorsement could give them a crucial boost in the early stages of the campaign.

The board's decision to endorse two candidates is a testament to the diverse range of perspectives within the Democratic Party. It remains to be seen how this unprecedented move will play out in the coming months, but it is clear that the Times believes both Warren and Klobuchar are strong contenders for the presidency. 

## The New York Times Endorses Two: Warren and Klobuchar for President

In a surprising move, The New York Times editorial board has endorsed two candidates for the Democratic presidential nomination: Senators Elizabeth Warren and Amy Klobuchar. This unprecedented double endorsement, announced Sunday, reflects the board's belief that "in this perilous moment, both the radical and the realist models warrant serious consideration." 

The Times lauded Warren, the former Harvard law professor turned senator from Massachusetts, as "a standard-bearer for the Democratic left" who "speaks elegantly of how the economic system is rigged against all but the wealthiest Americans." Her message, the board argued, "has matched the moment," resonating with voters seeking a fundamental shift in power dynamics.

Meanwhile, Klobuchar, the Minnesota Democrat, was hailed as "a standard-bearer for the Democratic center" whose "vision goes beyond the incremental" and who embodies "the very definition of Midwestern charisma, grit and sticktoitiveness." The board highlighted her lengthy Senate resume and bipartisan credentials, praising her ability to unite the party and potentially the nation.

The Times' decision to endorse both Warren and Klobuchar, despite their contrasting approaches, reflects the current political landscape where both progressive and pragmatic solutions are being debated. "They are Elizabeth Warren and Amy Klobuchar," the editorial board declared.

This endorsement comes just two weeks before the Iowa caucuses, the first major test in the Democratic primary race. While the Times' endorsement may not single-handedly determine the outcome, it undoubtedly carries significant weight and will be closely watched by both candidates and voters.

The board's decision to break with convention and endorse two candidates has sparked debate. Some argue that it weakens the impact of the endorsement, while others see it as a reflection of the diverse needs and desires of the Democratic electorate. 

Only time will tell how this double endorsement will play out, but it has certainly injected a new level of intrigue into the already dynamic Democratic primary race. 

##  The New York Times Endorses Warren and Klobuchar: A Break from Convention

In a surprising move, The New York Times editorial board has endorsed both Senator Elizabeth Warren and Senator Amy Klobuchar for the Democratic presidential nomination. This unprecedented dual endorsement reflects the board’s belief that, in this “perilous moment,” both the radical and the realist models for change deserve serious consideration.

The Times praised Warren, a standard-bearer for the Democratic left, as a “gifted storyteller” and a “brilliant architect of regulation.” They highlight her message about the economic system being rigged against all but the wealthiest Americans and her vision for “rewriting the rules of power in our country.”

Meanwhile, Klobuchar is lauded as a “standard-bearer for the Democratic center” who embodies “Midwestern charisma, grit and sticktoitiveness.” The Times emphasizes her lengthy resume in the Senate, her bipartisan credentials, and her ability to unite the party, and potentially, the nation.

This endorsement comes just two weeks before the Iowa caucuses, the first major event in the Democratic primary process. The Times acknowledged that while they have reservations about some specific policy proposals, both candidates’ messages resonate with the current moment.

The editorial board met with nine of the leading Democratic contenders in December, and ultimately decided to break with convention by supporting two candidates. “May the best woman win,” the board declared, acknowledging the historic nature of this decision.

The Times’ endorsement of both Warren and Klobuchar signals a recognition of the deep divisions within the Democratic party and the need for a candidate who can bridge those divides.  It remains to be seen whether this unusual endorsement will have a significant impact on the primary race, but it certainly adds a new layer of intrigue to the already unpredictable contest. 

## The New York Times Endorses Two Democratic Candidates: Warren and Klobuchar

In a stunning move, the New York Times editorial board has endorsed not one, but *two* candidates for the Democratic presidential nomination: Senators Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts and Amy Klobuchar of Minnesota. This unconventional endorsement reflects the board’s view that “in this perilous moment, both the radical and the realist models warrant serious consideration.” 

The Times lauded Warren as “a standard-bearer for the Democratic left” who “speaks elegantly of how the economic system is rigged against all but the wealthiest Americans.” They praised her “gifted storytelling” and her ability to connect with voters. However, the board also acknowledged potential concerns with some of her policy proposals. 

On the other hand, they hailed Klobuchar as “a standard-bearer for the Democratic center” with “bipartisan credentials” and a proven ability to “unite the party, and perhaps the nation.” The Times recognized her as “the very definition of Midwestern charisma, grit and sticktoitiveness” and highlighted her “lengthy resume in the Senate” and her capacity to “enact many progressive plans.”

The Times' endorsement of both candidates marks a departure from tradition, reflecting a perceived need for both progressive and pragmatic approaches in the upcoming election. The editorial board believes that Warren and Klobuchar represent the best options to lead the Democratic party and navigate the complex challenges facing the nation. 

This endorsement comes just two weeks before the Iowa caucuses, the first major contest in the Democratic primary. It remains to be seen how this dual endorsement will impact the race and whether it will influence voters in Iowa and beyond.  

In a historic move, The New York Times has endorsed not one, but two candidates for the Democratic nomination for president: Senators Elizabeth Warren and Amy Klobuchar. The endorsement comes just two weeks before the Iowa caucuses, the first polling in the Democratic primary process.
The Times editorial board met with nine of the leading contenders for the Democratic nomination in December, and after careful consideration, they have chosen to support both Warren and Klobuchar. The board praised Warren as a "gifted storyteller and a brilliant architect of regulation," noting that her message of rewriting the rules of power in the country has matched the moment. However, they also acknowledged that they would push back on some of her specific policy proposals.
As for Klobuchar, the board highlighted her lengthy resume in the Senate and bipartisan credentials, which make her an invaluable dealmaker. They also noted that she has shown she can unite the party and perhaps the nation. The board stated that Klobuchar's vision goes beyond the incremental and that she is the very definition of Midwestern charisma, grit, and sticktoitiveness.
The endorsement is a significant boost for both Warren and Klobuchar, who have divergent visions for America. Warren has run on an unabashedly progressive agenda, while Klobuchar has presented herself as a pragmatist who views some of the bolder proposals from her more left-wing opponents as unrealistic.
The Times editorial board stated that in this perilous moment, both the radical and the realist models warrant serious consideration. They believe that Warren and Klobuchar are the Democrats best equipped to lead that debate. The endorsement also suggests that the best chance to enact many progressive plans could be under a Klobuchar administration.
The endorsement is a clear indication that the Democratic primary is still wide open, and that both Warren and Klobuchar have a real chance of winning the nomination. It remains to be seen whether this endorsement will sway voters in Iowa and beyond, but it is certainly a significant development in the race for the Democratic nomination.
The New York Times has made a historic endorsement in the Democratic primary race, throwing its support behind not one, but two candidates: Senators Elizabeth Warren and Amy Klobuchar. The endorsement, announced on Sunday, comes just two weeks before the Iowa caucuses, the first voting in the primary process.

In a move that breaks with convention, the Times editorial board praised Warren for her "gifted storytelling" and "brilliant architecture of regulation," while also acknowledging that they would push back on some of her specific policy proposals. The board was struck by how effectively Warren's message matched the current moment, particularly her focus on the economic system being rigged against all but the wealthiest Americans and the chance to rewrite the rules of power in the country.

As for Klobuchar, the board highlighted her lengthy resume in the Senate and bipartisan credentials that make her an invaluable dealmaker. They noted that she has shown she can unite the party and perhaps the nation, and that her track record suggests the best chance to enact many progressive plans could be under a Klobuchar administration.

The Times editorial board met with nine of the leading contenders for the Democratic nomination in December, and ultimately chose to endorse both Warren and Klobuchar. The board wrote that the two candidates are the Democrats best equipped to lead the debate and that in this perilous moment, both the radical and the realist models warrant serious consideration.

The endorsement is a significant boost for both Warren and Klobuchar, who have divergent visions for America. Warren has run on an unabashedly progressive agenda, while Klobuchar has presented herself as a pragmatist who views some of the bolder proposals from her more left-wing opponents as unrealistic.

The Times endorsement comes as the Democratic primary field remains crowded, with former Vice President Joe Biden and former South Bend, Indiana mayor Pete Buttigieg also vying for the nomination. However, the Times discounted other centrists in the field, including Biden and Buttigieg, in favor of Warren and Klobuchar.

In a statement, Klobuchar's campaign said that the endorsement from the Times makes it clear that she is the candidate for Americans who are fed up with the noise and nonsense coming out of Washington. Klobuchar, who has proposed a sweeping expansion of government support for Americans at every stage of life, from birth to death, was praised by the Times for her vision that goes beyond the incremental and for her Midwestern charisma, grit, and sticktoitiveness.

The endorsement is a significant moment in the Democratic primary race, and it will be interesting to see how it impacts the polls in the coming weeks. As the Times editorial board wrote, "May the best woman win."
In a historic move, The New York Times has endorsed not one, but two candidates for the Democratic nomination for President. Senators Elizabeth Warren and Amy Klobuchar have both received the coveted endorsement from the newspaper's editorial board. The endorsement, announced on Sunday, comes just two weeks before the Iowa caucuses, the first polling in the Democratic primary process.

The editorial board met with nine of the leading contenders for the Democratic nomination in December. In the end, they chose to endorse Warren and Klobuchar because "in this perilous moment, both the radical and the realist models warrant serious consideration." Warren, a standard-bearer for the Democratic left, speaks eloquently about how the economic system is rigged against all but the wealthiest Americans, and of "our chance to rewrite the rules of power in our country." The editorial board praised Warren as a gifted storyteller and a brilliant architect of regulation, although they did push back on some of her specific policy proposals.

Klobuchar, on the other hand, is a standard-bearer for the Democratic center. The editorial board praised her lengthy resume in the Senate, bipartisan credentials that make her an invaluable dealmaker, and her ability to unite the party and perhaps the nation. Klobuchar has presented herself as a pragmatist who has made clear that she views some of the bolder proposals from her more left-wing opponents, like Medicare For All, as unrealistic. However, the editorial board noted that her track record suggests that "the best chance to enact many progressive plans could be under a Klobuchar administration."

In an op-ed called "The Democrats best choices for president," the editorial board wrote that both Warren and Klobuchar are "the Democrats best equipped to lead that debate." The endorsement is a significant boost for both candidates, particularly in the run-up to the Iowa caucuses. It also highlights the diversity of opinion within the Democratic party, with the editorial board acknowledging that both the radical and the realist models warrant serious consideration.

Warren and Klobuchar have wildly divergent visions for America, but both have clearly resonated with the editorial board of The New York Times. In a year when the stakes could not be higher, the endorsement is a powerful endorsement of both candidates' ability to lead the country in a new direction. As the editorial board wrote, "May the best woman win."
In a historic move, The New York Times has broken with convention and endorsed not one, but two candidates for the Democratic nomination for president: Senators Elizabeth Warren and Amy Klobuchar. The endorsement, announced on Sunday, marks a significant moment in the race for the Democratic nomination, just two weeks ahead of the Iowa caucuses.
The editorial board met with nine of the leading contenders for the Democratic nomination in December, and their decision to endorse both Warren and Klobuchar reflects the board's belief that both candidates have important qualities that the Democrats need in order to win the presidency. While Warren has run on an unabashedly progressive agenda rivaling Bernie Sanders, Klobuchar has presented herself as a pragmatist who can unite the party and potentially the nation.
The Times praised Warren for her gifted storytelling and brilliance in regulation, stating that while they would push back on some of her specific policy proposals, they were struck by how effectively her message has matched the moment. They noted that Warren speaks elegantly of how the economic system is rigged against all but the wealthiest Americans, and of "our chance to rewrite the rules of power in our country."
As for Klobuchar, the board praised her lengthy resume in the Senate and bipartisan credentials that make her an invaluable dealmaker. They also highlighted her track record of success in Minnesota, which suggests that "the best chance to enact many progressive plans could be under a Klobuchar administration."
The endorsement comes at a crucial time in the race for the Democratic nomination, and it will likely have a significant impact on the candidates' campaigns. It's a clear sign that the two women are the Democrats' best equipped to lead the debate in this perilous moment, and that both the radical and the realist models warrant serious consideration.
In an op-ed called "The Democrats' best choices for president," the editorial board wrote, "May the best woman win." With Warren and Klobuchar at the forefront of the race, the Democrats have a real chance to take back the White House and rewrite the rules of power in their country.
Title: The New York Times Endorses Warren and Klobuchar for Democratic Presidential Nomination

In an unprecedented move, The New York Times editorial board has endorsed two Democratic presidential candidates: Senators Elizabeth Warren and Amy Klobuchar. The endorsement comes just two weeks ahead of the Iowa caucuses, the first polling in the Democratic primary process, and is seen as a significant boost for both candidates.

In a statement released on Sunday, the editorial board said they were breaking with convention by endorsing two candidates, recognizing that both Warren and Klobuchar have divergent visions for America. Warren, a progressive firebrand, has campaigned on ambitious policy proposals aimed at overhauling the economic system and addressing income inequality. Klobuchar, on the other hand, presents herself as a pragmatic centrist who has made clear that she views some of the bolder proposals of her opponents, like Medicare For All, as unrealistic.

The Times editorial board praised Warren as a "gifted storyteller and a brilliant architect of regulation," and noted that they pushed back on some specific policy proposals, but were struck by how effectively her message has matched the moment. "She speaks elegantly of how the economic system is rigged against all but the wealthiest Americans, and of our chance to rewrite the rules of power in our country," the editorial board wrote.

The editorial board also highlighted Klobuchar's bipartisan credentials and dealmaking skills, stating that "she's shown she can unite the party, and perhaps the nation." They also noted that Klobuchar's proposals, such as expanding access to health care and supporting working families, demonstrate that the best chance to enact many progressive plans could be under a Klobuchar administration.

The endorsement is a significant nod to both candidates, who are vying for the Democratic nomination in a still-crowded field. The Times editorial board met with nine of the leading contenders for the Democratic nomination in December and ultimately chose to endorse both Warren and Klobuchar, recognizing that "in this perilous moment, both the radical and the realist models warrant serious consideration."

In response to the endorsement, Klobuchar said in a statement, "Today's endorsement from The New York Times makes it clear that Amy Klobuchar is the candidate for Americans who are fed up with the noise and nonsense coming out of Washington." Warren also welcomed the endorsement, stating on Twitter, "It’s an honor to have the endorsement of The New York Times. I’m ready to build a movement that can beat Trump, win in November, and fight for big, structural change."
**The New York Times Endorses Two Candidates for President: Elizabeth Warren and Amy Klobuchar**

In a surprise move, The New York Times editorial board has endorsed not one, but two candidates for the Democratic presidential nomination: Senators Elizabeth Warren and Amy Klobuchar. The endorsement, announced on Sunday, comes just two weeks ahead of the Iowa caucuses, the first polling in the Democratic primary process.

The editorial board, which met with nine leading contenders for the Democratic nomination in December, praised Warren as a "gifted storyteller and a brilliant architect of regulation" who has effectively matched her message to the moment. Warren, a former Harvard law professor turned senator from Massachusetts, has run on an unabashedly progressive agenda, calling for sweeping reforms to the economic system and a more equitable distribution of wealth.

The board also praised Klobuchar, a senator from Minnesota, as a "standard-bearer for the Democratic center" with a "lengthy resume in the Senate and bipartisan credentials that make her an invaluable dealmaker." Klobuchar has presented herself as a pragmatist who can unite the party and work with Republicans to pass legislation.

In an op-ed titled "The Democrats' Best Choices for President," the editorial board wrote, "In this perilous moment, both the radical and the realist models warrant serious consideration. They are Elizabeth Warren and Amy Klobuchar." The board noted that while Warren's proposals may be more ambitious, Klobuchar's ability to work across the aisle and build consensus makes her a strong candidate to enact progressive policies.

Warren and Klobuchar have wildly divergent visions for America, with Warren calling for a more radical transformation of the economic system and Klobuchar advocating for a more incremental approach. However, the editorial board believes that both candidates have the potential to lead the country in a positive direction.

"Senator Warren is a standard-bearer for the Democratic left, speaking elegantly of how the economic system is rigged against all but the wealthiest Americans," the board wrote. "Senator Klobuchar, on the other hand, is a standard-bearer for the Democratic center, with a vision that goes beyond the incremental and a track record of building consensus."

The endorsement is a significant boost for both Warren and Klobuchar, who are competing in a crowded field of Democratic candidates. The Times' endorsement is seen as a major coup, particularly for Klobuchar, who has struggled to gain traction in the polls.

In a statement, Klobuchar said, "Today's endorsement from The New York Times makes it clear that I am the candidate for Americans who are fed up with the noise and nonsense coming out of Washington. I am a leader who can bring people together and get things done."

Warren also welcomed the endorsement, saying, "I am honored to have the support of The New York Times. This endorsement is a testament to the power of our movement and our commitment to creating a more just and equitable society."

The endorsement is likely to shake up the Democratic primary field, with other candidates scrambling to respond to the Times' decision. However, for now, Warren and Klobuchar are basking in the glow of the Times' endorsement, and preparing for the challenges ahead.
**The New York Times Endorses Elizabeth Warren and Amy Klobuchar for President**

In a surprise move, The New York Times editorial board has endorsed not one, but two candidates for the Democratic presidential nomination: Senators Elizabeth Warren and Amy Klobuchar. The board's decision, announced on Sunday, comes just two weeks ahead of the Iowa caucuses, the first polling in the Democratic primary process.

The editorial board, which met with nine of the leading contenders for the Democratic nomination in December, praised Warren as a "gifted storyteller and a brilliant architect of regulation" who has effectively matched her message to the moment. Warren, a former Harvard law professor turned senator from Massachusetts, has run on an unabashedly progressive agenda, calling for sweeping changes to the economic system and a rewriting of the rules of power in the country.

The board also praised Klobuchar, a senator from Minnesota, as a "standard-bearer for the Democratic center" with a lengthy resume in the Senate and bipartisan credentials that make her an invaluable dealmaker. Klobuchar has presented herself as a pragmatist who can unite the party and perhaps the nation, and her track record suggests that she may have the best chance to enact many progressive plans.

The Times' endorsement of two candidates is a break with convention, but the board argued that "in this perilous moment, both the radical and the realist models warrant serious consideration." The board praised Warren's ability to speak "elegantly of how the economic system is rigged against all but the wealthiest Americans," and Klobuchar's "vision [that] goes beyond the incremental" and her "Midwestern charisma, grit and sticktoitiveness."

The endorsement is a significant boost for both Warren and Klobuchar, who are vying for the Democratic nomination in a still-crowded primary field. While other candidates, including former Vice President Joe Biden and former South Bend, Indiana, Mayor Pete Buttigieg, were also considered, the board ultimately decided that Warren and Klobuchar were the best equipped to lead the debate.

Warren's campaign has been marked by her proposals for a wealth tax, Medicare for All, and free public college, among other progressive policies. Klobuchar, on the other hand, has focused on her ability to work across the aisle and her experience as a senator, highlighting her bipartisan credentials and her ability to get things done in Washington.

The endorsement is likely to be a significant factor in the upcoming Iowa caucuses, where voters will begin to narrow the field of candidates. As the campaign season heats up, Warren and Klobuchar will likely face increased scrutiny and attention, but for now, they can bask in the glow of The New York Times' endorsement.

In a statement, Klobuchar's campaign said, "Today's endorsement from The New York Times makes it clear that Amy Klobuchar is the candidate for Americans who are fed up with the noise and nonsense coming out of Washington." Warren's campaign also welcomed the endorsement, saying, "We're thrilled to have the support of The New York Times, and we're going to keep fighting for the big, structural change that our country needs."

The endorsement is a significant moment in the Democratic primary, and it will be interesting to see how it affects the campaign going forward. As the board said, "May the best woman win."
**The New York Times Endorses Elizabeth Warren and Amy Klobuchar for President**

In a surprise move, The New York Times editorial board announced on Sunday that it is endorsing not one, but two candidates for the Democratic presidential nomination: Senators Elizabeth Warren and Amy Klobuchar. The endorsement, which comes just two weeks ahead of the Iowa caucuses, marks a significant moment in the Democratic primary process.

The editorial board, which met with nine leading contenders for the nomination in December, praised Warren and Klobuchar for their unique strengths and abilities to lead the country. "In this perilous moment, both the radical and the realist models warrant serious consideration," the board wrote. "They are Elizabeth Warren and Amy Klobuchar."

Warren, a former Harvard law professor and senator from Massachusetts, was praised for her "gifted storytelling" and "brilliant architecture of regulation." The board noted that while they would push back on some of her specific policy proposals, her message has "matched the moment" and resonated with many Americans. Warren's progressive agenda, which includes a wealth tax and Medicare for All, has been a hallmark of her campaign.

Klobuchar, a senator from Minnesota, was lauded for her "lengthy resume in the Senate" and "bipartisan credentials" that make her an "invaluable dealmaker." The board noted that she has "shown she can unite the party, and perhaps the nation." Klobuchar's more pragmatic approach to politics has earned her a reputation as a centrist who can work across the aisle.

The endorsement is significant not only because of the two candidates selected, but also because of the timing. The Iowa caucuses, which will take place on February 3, are the first polling event in the Democratic primary process. The Times' endorsement is likely to give both Warren and Klobuchar a boost in the Hawkeye State and beyond.

In a statement, Klobuchar's campaign welcomed the endorsement, saying, "Today's endorsement from The New York Times makes it clear that Amy Klobuchar is the candidate for Americans who are fed up with the noise and nonsense coming out of Washington." Warren's campaign also praised the endorsement, saying, "We're thrilled to have the support of The New York Times, and we're going to keep fighting for the big, structural change that our country needs."

The endorsement is a significant development in the Democratic primary, and it remains to be seen how it will impact the campaign trail in the coming weeks. One thing is certain, however: Warren and Klobuchar are now both well-positioned to make a strong showing in the Iowa caucuses and beyond.
**The New York Times Endorses Elizabeth Warren and Amy Klobuchar for President**

In a surprise move, The New York Times has endorsed not one, but two candidates for the Democratic presidential nomination: Senators Elizabeth Warren and Amy Klobuchar. The newspaper's editorial board announced its endorsement on Sunday, just two weeks ahead of the Iowa caucuses, the first polling in the Democratic primary process.

The Times praised Warren, a former Harvard law professor turned senator from Massachusetts, as "a standard-bearer for the Democratic left" who "speaks elegantly of how the economic system is rigged against all but the wealthiest Americans." Warren has run on an unabashedly progressive agenda, calling for a sweeping expansion of government support for Americans at every stage of life, from cradle to grave.

The newspaper also lauded Klobuchar, a senator from Minnesota, as "a standard-bearer for the Democratic center" whose "vision goes beyond the incremental." Klobuchar has presented herself as a pragmatist who has made clear that she views some of the bolder proposals from her more left-wing opponents, like Medicare For All, as unrealistic. However, the Times noted that "the best chance to enact many progressive plans could be under a Klobuchar administration."

The editorial board met with nine of the leading contenders for the Democratic nomination in December, including former Vice President Joe Biden and former South Bend, Indiana, mayor Pete Buttigieg. However, the board ultimately chose to endorse Warren and Klobuchar, citing their ability to bring together Democrats, Republicans, and independents behind their proposals.

"Senator Warren is a gifted storyteller and a brilliant architect of regulation," the board wrote. "While we would push back on some specific policy proposals, we are struck by how effectively her message has matched the moment." As for Klobuchar, the board said, "Senator Klobuchar has a lengthy resume in the Senate, and bipartisan credentials that make her an invaluable dealmaker. She's shown she can unite the party, and perhaps the nation."

The endorsement from The New York Times is a significant boost for both Warren and Klobuchar, who are facing a crowded field of Democratic contenders. The newspaper's endorsement is seen as a signal to Democrats that both candidates are viable options for the party's nomination.

In a statement, Klobuchar's campaign said, "Today's endorsement from The New York Times makes it clear that Amy Klobuchar is the candidate for Americans who are fed up with the noise and nonsense coming out of Washington."

Warren's campaign also welcomed the endorsement, saying, "We're thrilled to have the endorsement of The New York Times. This is a testament to Elizabeth's tireless work to create a government that works for everyone, not just the wealthy and powerful."

The endorsement from The New York Times is a significant development in the Democratic primary process, and it remains to be seen how it will impact the candidates' chances in the coming weeks and months.
**Senator Warren Interviews for The New York Times's Endorsement**

In a historic move, The New York Times editorial board has endorsed not one, but two candidates for the Democratic presidential nomination: Senators Elizabeth Warren and Amy Klobuchar. The endorsement, announced on Sunday, comes just two weeks ahead of the Iowa caucuses, the first polling event in the Democratic primary process.

The editorial board, which met with nine leading contenders for the Democratic nomination in December, praised Warren as "a standard-bearer for the Democratic left" who "speaks elegantly of how the economic system is rigged against all but the wealthiest Americans." They noted that Warren's message has effectively matched the moment, despite some reservations about specific policy proposals.

Klobuchar, on the other hand, was hailed as "a standard-bearer for the Democratic center" whose "vision goes beyond the incremental" and who is "the very definition of Midwestern charisma, grit and sticktoitiveness." The board praised her lengthy resume in the Senate and her bipartisan credentials, which make her an "invaluable dealmaker" who can unite the party and perhaps the nation.

Warren, a former Harvard law professor turned senator from Massachusetts, has run on an unabashedly progressive agenda, calling for sweeping expansions of government support for Americans at every stage of life. She has also proposed a wealth tax and vowed to take on the country's wealthiest individuals and corporations.

Klobuchar, a senator from Minnesota, has presented herself as a pragmatist who has made clear that she views some of the bolder proposals from her more left-wing opponents, like Medicare For All, as unrealistic. Despite this, her track record suggests that she may be the best chance for enacting many progressive plans, according to the editorial board.

The Times's endorsement is significant, as it breaks with convention by supporting two candidates. The editorial board explained that "in this perilous moment, both the radical and the realist models warrant serious consideration." They concluded, "May the best woman win."

The endorsement is a major boost for both Warren and Klobuchar, who will face off against several other candidates in the Iowa caucuses on February 3. The outcome of the caucuses will be a crucial indicator of each candidate's viability in the primary process.

In response to the endorsement, Klobuchar's campaign issued a statement saying, "Today's endorsement from The New York Times makes it clear that Amy Klobuchar is the candidate for Americans who are fed up with the noise and nonsense coming out of Washington."

Warren's campaign also welcomed the endorsement, saying, "We're thrilled that the Times has recognized Elizabeth's ability to bring people together and drive real change."

The endorsement sets the stage for a fierce competition in the Democratic primary, as candidates vie for the support of voters in Iowa and beyond.