See full results and maps from the New York election.
contours of where several candidates received strong support, especially & , as well as . These maps show the vote patterns for recent primary elections and related trends in New York City to help provide context for the 2016 presidential primary. We allocated the results from elections from 2001 to 2012 (with the exception of the few years when there were no citywide elections of significance). This provides an apples-to-apples spatial comparison of the local voting patterns from one year to the next, and also allows for easy analysis of voting patterns with Census data. | in each overlapping area, we geocoded each year's active registered voters from registration files provided by the NYC Board of Elections. This provides an apples-to-apples spatial comparison of the local voting patterns from one year to the next, and also allows for easy analysis of voting patterns with Census data. For comparison and contrast, it also includes maps of recent gubernatorial and presidential elections. — by Census block, instead of election districts. The map of inactive ballots in the comptroller's race appears to follow the contours of where several candidates received strong support, especially & , as well as . It particular, it visualizes election results for all the Democratic mayoral candidates who have previously run for citywide office. These maps show the vote patterns for recent primary elections and related trends in New York City to help provide context for the 2016 presidential primary.   Powered by This Election Atlas provides background for understanding | in each overlapping area, we geocoded each year's active registered voters from registration files provided by the NYC Board of Elections. — by Census block, instead of election districts. The Board of Elections provides election results by Election District (ED), and all registered voters citywide. The map
See full results and maps from the New York election.
Visit Our2024 Super TuesdayCoverage
New York Election Results: 19th Congressional District
State Results
Disabling auto-updates may improve reliability when using a screen reader or keyboard to navigate.
New York Election Results: 19th Congressional District

* Incumbent
Vote reporting is effectively complete in New York.
Results by county
Vote share
Leader
Delgado
Van De Water
Note: Absentee vote data may not be available in some places.
Absentee votes by candidate
Some states and counties will report candidate vote totals for mail-in ballots, but some places may not report comprehensive vote type data.
9% of counties (1 of 11) have reported absentee votes. Data for absentee votes may not be available in some places.
Latest updates
Maggie AstorJan. 7, 2021
Vice President Mike Pence affirms Joseph R. Biden Jr. and Kamala Harris as the next president and vice president.
Read our analysis of the vote
Latest updates
Nicholas Fandos, in Washington
Congress confirmed Joe Biden’s victory, defying a mob that stormed the Capitol after being egged on by President Trump.Read more ›
Maggie AstorJan. 7, 2021
Vice President Mike Pence affirms Joseph R. Biden Jr. and Kamala Harris as the next president and vice president.
Astead Herndon, in AtlantaJan. 6, 2021
Today encapsulated the politics of progress and grievance that have defined the Trump years: Senate wins for Warnock and Ossoff, and a mob at the Capitol.Read more ›
Jonathan Martin, in AtlantaJan. 6, 2021
Democrats have now captured control of the Senate as Jon Ossoff has defeated David Perdue, following the Rev. Raphael Warnock’s victory over Senator Kelly Loeffler.See live results ›
The New York TimesJan. 6, 2021
A mob of people loyal to President Trump stormed the Capitol, halting Congress’s counting of the electoral votes to confirm President-elect Joseph R. Biden Jr.’s victory.Read more ›
Trip GabrielDec. 14, 2020
Joseph R. Biden Jr. has received a majority of votes from the Electoral College, formally securing the presidency in the manner set out in the Constitution.Read more ›
Isabella Grullón PazDec. 14, 2020
The 538 members of the Electoral College are meeting to cast ballots for president based on the election results in their states, formalizing Joseph R. Biden Jr.’s victory.Track the Electoral College results ›
The New York TimesDec. 5, 2020
California has certified its electors for the 2020 election, officially giving Joseph R. Biden Jr. more than the 270 pledged electors needed to become president.Read more ›
Reid Epstein, in WashingtonNov. 30, 2020
The chairwoman of the Wisconsin Elections Commission has certified Biden as the winner in Wisconsin, formalizing his narrow victory in a state Trump carried four years ago.Read more ›
Glenn Thrush, in WashingtonNov. 30, 2020
Arizona has officially certified Biden’s narrow victory in the state, further undermining Trump’s efforts to portray his decisive national loss as a matter still under dispute.Read more ›
Michael D. Shear, in WashingtonNov. 23, 2020
President Trump authorized his government to begin the transition to President-elect Joseph R. Biden Jr.’s administration.Read more ›
2020 Election Results
Past Election Results
Source: Election results from National Election Pool/Edison Research
By Michael Andre, Aliza Aufrichtig, Gray Beltran, Matthew Bloch, Larry Buchanan, Andrew Chavez, Nate Cohn, Matthew Conlen, Annie Daniel, Asmaa Elkeurti, Andrew Fischer, Josh Holder, Will Houp, Jonathan Huang, Josh Katz, Aaron Krolik, Jasmine C. Lee, Rebecca Lieberman, Ilana Marcus, Jaymin Patel, Charlie Smart, Ben Smithgall, Umi Syam, Rumsey Taylor, Miles Watkins and Isaac WhiteAdditional data collection by Alice Park, Rachel Shorey, Thu Trinh and Quoctrung BuiCandidate photo research and production by Earl Wilson, Alana Celii, Lalena Fisher, Yuriria Avila, Amanda Cordero, Laura Kaltman, Andrew Rodriguez, Alex Garces, Chris Kahley, Andy Chen, Chris O'Brien, Jim DeMaria, Dave Braun and Jessica WhiteReporting contributed by Alicia Parlapiano
Displaying the information at this level reveals voting patterns literally city block by block in some areas, whereas election districts (EDs) often cover much larger areas. ( ) These maps show the vote patterns in District 11 in 2014 (and the 2015 special election) compared with earlier years. In each map, the dot in election districts indicates which candidate received the most overall votes in that ED. The schematic outline below summarizes the allocation process using EDs and tracts: To determine the exact count of voters in each overlapping area, we geocoded each year's active registered voters from registration files provided by the NYC Board of Elections. In order to visualize the patterns of voting results from 2001 to 2012 at the local level across the city, we used the smallest geographic area possible. — by Census block, instead of election districts. The Board of Elections provides election results by Election District (ED), and all registered voters citywide.   Powered by This Election Atlas provides background for understanding the 2013 mayoral election in New York City. These maps show the latest Democratic enrollment and recent primary voting trends to gauge the strength and voting tendencies of New York City's current electorate for the Democratic presidential primary. These maps show the vote patterns for recent primary elections and related trends in New York City to help provide context for the 2016 presidential primary. This provides an apples-to-apples spatial comparison of the local voting patterns from one year to the next, and also allows for easy analysis of voting patterns with Census data. The map of inactive ballots in the comptroller's race appears to follow the contours of where several candidates received strong support, especially & , as well as . This map shows the certified vote results from the November 2021 general election for Mayor. These voting patterns provide a quantifiable, visual record against which to gauge the 2013 campaigns. It particular, it visualizes election results for all the Democratic mayoral candidates who have previously run for citywide office.
## See Full Results and Maps from the New York Election

New York City's political landscape is a complex tapestry woven from diverse neighborhoods, each with its own unique voting patterns and allegiances. Understanding these patterns is crucial for interpreting election results and predicting future trends. This Election Atlas provides a comprehensive look at recent New York City elections, offering detailed maps and data to illuminate the city's political geography.

**Mapping the Vote: A Decade of Data**

This atlas presents a decade's worth of election data, spanning from 2001 to 2012. By focusing on citywide elections and excluding years without significant contests, we offer a consistent and comparable view of voting patterns over time.

**Beyond Election Districts: The Power of Census Blocks**

Unlike traditional election maps that rely on Election Districts (EDs), this atlas utilizes Census blocks as its geographic unit. This granular approach allows for a more precise understanding of voting behavior within neighborhoods and communities.

**Visualizing Trends: From Mayoral Races to Presidential Elections**

The atlas features interactive maps showcasing the results of various elections, including:

* **Mayoral Races:** Explore the vote distribution for all Democratic mayoral candidates who have previously run for citywide office. See how support for specific candidates has shifted across different neighborhoods over time.
* **Comptroller's Race:** Analyze the geographic distribution of inactive ballots in the comptroller's race. This map reveals intriguing patterns that may correlate with the support for specific candidates.
* **Gubernatorial and Presidential Elections:** Compare and contrast voting patterns in citywide and national elections. Identify areas where local trends align with or diverge from broader political currents.

**Understanding the Data: A Deeper Dive**

For each overlapping area, we geocoded each year's active registered voters from registration files provided by the NYC Board of Elections. This meticulous process ensures an accurate representation of the electorate and allows for meaningful analysis of voting patterns in relation to demographic data from the Census.

**The 2016 Context:**

This Election Atlas serves as a valuable resource for understanding the context of the 2016 presidential primary in New York City. By examining past voting trends and identifying areas of strong support for various candidates, we can gain insights into the factors that may influence voter behavior in the upcoming election.

**Explore the Atlas:**

Dive into the interactive maps and data visualizations to uncover the fascinating story of New York City's political landscape.

[Link to interactive atlas]

This Election Atlas is a powerful tool for journalists, researchers, political analysts, and anyone interested in understanding the dynamics of New York City politics.
## See Full Results and Maps from the New York Election

New York City's political landscape is a tapestry woven from diverse neighborhoods, each with its own unique voting patterns and political leanings. Understanding these nuances is crucial for comprehending the city's political climate and predicting future election outcomes. This Election Atlas provides a comprehensive view of recent primary elections in New York City, offering valuable context for the upcoming 2016 presidential primary.

**Mapping the Vote: A Historical Perspective**

This interactive atlas goes beyond simply presenting the results of the latest election. It delves into historical voting data, mapping the outcomes of elections from 2001 to 2012 (excluding years without significant citywide elections). This longitudinal perspective allows for a fascinating analysis of evolving voting patterns across different neighborhoods.

**Census Block Level Analysis**

Instead of relying on traditional Election Districts, this atlas utilizes Census block data for a more granular understanding of voting behavior. By geocoding each year's active registered voters from registration files provided by the NYC Board of Elections, we achieve a finer-grained picture of where support lies for different candidates.

**Visualizing Trends and Patterns**

The atlas features interactive maps that vividly illustrate the distribution of votes for various candidates.  

* **Mayoral Races:** The maps highlight the performance of Democratic mayoral candidates who have previously run for citywide office, revealing areas of strength and weakness for each contender.

* **Inactive Ballots:** Intriguingly, the map of inactive ballots in the comptroller's race appears to mirror the support base of certain candidates, particularly [mention specific candidates here]. This suggests a potential correlation between voter apathy and support for particular political figures.

* **Comparison with Gubernatorial and Presidential Elections:** For broader context, the atlas also includes maps of recent gubernatorial and presidential elections, allowing users to compare and contrast voting patterns across different races.

**Understanding the 2016 Presidential Primary**

By providing a historical and geographically detailed view of New York City's voting patterns, this Election Atlas serves as a valuable tool for understanding the political landscape heading into the 2016 presidential primary. It allows analysts, journalists, and the general public to identify key voting blocs, predict potential outcomes, and gain a deeper understanding of the factors influencing voter behavior in the city.

**Explore the Atlas:**

[Link to the interactive Election Atlas]

This Election Atlas is a powerful resource for anyone interested in the intricacies of New York City politics. Explore the interactive maps, delve into the historical data, and gain a deeper understanding of the city's vibrant and ever-evolving political landscape.



## See Full Results and Maps from the New York Election 

New York City's political landscape is a tapestry woven from diverse neighborhoods, each with its own unique voting patterns and preferences. Understanding these intricate patterns is crucial for comprehending the city's political dynamics, especially in the lead-up to major elections like the 2016 presidential primary.

This Election Atlas provides a powerful tool for deciphering these patterns. Utilizing data from citywide elections between 2001 and 2012, we present interactive maps that showcase the geographic distribution of votes for various candidates and races. By geocoding active registered voters at the Census block level, rather than the traditional Election District level, we offer a more granular and precise view of voting behavior. 

These maps expose fascinating trends. For instance, the distribution of inactive ballots in the comptroller's race appears to mirror the support base of certain candidates, particularly [Candidate Name 1] and [Candidate Name 2], highlighting potential areas of concentrated support.

Furthermore, by visualizing election results for past Democratic mayoral candidates who have sought citywide office, we can trace the evolution of voting patterns over time. This historical perspective allows us to identify enduring strongholds for specific candidates or political ideologies, as well as emerging trends that may shape future elections.

For a broader context, we also include maps of recent gubernatorial and presidential elections. Comparing these results with local races provides valuable insights into how national political currents intersect with the unique dynamics of New York City politics.

This Election Atlas is a valuable resource for journalists, political analysts, academics, and anyone interested in understanding the complex political landscape of New York City. By providing a clear and accessible visual representation of voting patterns, we aim to empower informed civic engagement and contribute to a more nuanced understanding of the city's political life.


**Explore the interactive maps and delve into the rich tapestry of New York's electoral history.**

**[Link to Interactive Maps]**
## See Full Results and Maps from the New York Election

New York City's political landscape has been reshaped after a dynamic election cycle. To understand the intricate voting patterns that emerged, this interactive Election Atlas delves into the results, offering a visual journey through the city's diverse political allegiances.

Powered by detailed data, these maps provide a granular look at voting trends in recent primaries, shedding light on the geographic strongholds of various candidates. 

**Exploring the Contours of Support:**

The maps reveal fascinating insights into the distribution of support. For instance, the map of inactive ballots in the comptroller's race mirrors the areas where specific candidates garnered strong support, highlighting the influence of  [**Insert names of candidates here**] in particular.

**A Historical Perspective:**

This Election Atlas goes beyond the recent election, offering a historical lens by analyzing data from 2001 to 2012 (excluding years without significant citywide elections). This longitudinal view allows for a nuanced understanding of how voting patterns have evolved over time, providing valuable context for the 2016 presidential primary.

**Mapping the Data:**

To ensure accuracy and comparability, the maps are constructed using Census blocks instead of electoral districts. This meticulous approach enables precise spatial analysis and facilitates the integration of Census data, offering a richer understanding of the demographic factors influencing voting behavior.

**Beyond the Citywide Races:**

The Atlas doesn't limit its scope to just mayoral races. It also includes maps of recent gubernatorial and presidential elections, allowing for a broader comparison of voting patterns across different electoral contests.

**Visualizing Past Mayoral Candidates:**

The Atlas specifically visualizes the results for all Democratic mayoral candidates who have previously sought citywide office. This historical perspective sheds light on the enduring legacies of these candidates and their impact on the city's political landscape.

**Understanding the NYC Electorate:**

For each overlapping area, the Atlas geocodes each year's active registered voters, utilizing data provided by the NYC Board of Elections. This comprehensive approach ensures an apples-to-apples comparison of local voting patterns from year to year, providing a deeper understanding of the city's electorate.

**A Valuable Resource:**

This Election Atlas serves as an invaluable resource for anyone seeking to understand the complexities of New York City politics. Whether you're a political analyst, a researcher, or simply a curious citizen, these maps offer a powerful tool for exploring the city's diverse political landscape.



## See Full Results and Maps from the New York Election  

New York City's political landscape is a complex tapestry woven from diverse neighborhoods, demographics, and voting patterns. Understanding these patterns is crucial for interpreting election results and predicting future trends. This article provides a deep dive into the recent New York elections, using interactive maps and data analysis to illuminate the city's voting dynamics.

**Unearthing Voting Trends:**

We've compiled comprehensive data from New York City elections spanning from 2001 to 2012, excluding years without significant citywide elections. This extensive dataset allows for a detailed examination of how voting patterns have evolved over time. 

**Mapping the Vote:**

Our analysis utilizes Census blocks instead of traditional Election Districts, offering a granular view of voter preferences within specific neighborhoods. This approach enables us to identify hyperlocal trends and pinpoint areas of strong support for particular candidates.

**Key Insights:**

- **Contours of Support:**

The maps reveal fascinating insights into the geographical distribution of support for different candidates.  For instance, the map highlighting inactive ballots in the comptroller's race paints a particularly interesting picture.  It mirrors the areas where specific candidates, such as [Candidate A] and [Candidate B], enjoyed strong support, suggesting potential areas of overlap in their voter bases.  

- **Historical Analysis:**

By comparing election results from year to year, we can trace the evolution of voter preferences. This historical perspective helps us understand how demographic shifts, political events, and changing candidate profiles have impacted voting patterns across the city.

- **Past Mayoral Races:**

Our analysis includes maps visualizing the results for Democratic mayoral candidates who have previously vied for citywide office. This comparison sheds light on the enduring strengths and weaknesses of different political figures and their appeal across various neighborhoods.

 **Context for the 2016 Presidential Primary:**

These maps and data provide invaluable context for understanding the political climate in New York City leading up to the 2016 presidential primary. By analyzing past trends and identifying key voting blocs, we can gain insights into the potential outcomes of this crucial election.


**Explore the Data:**


We encourage you to explore the interactive maps and dive deeper into the data yourself. By uncovering the nuances of New York City's voting patterns, we can foster a deeper understanding of our political landscape and the forces shaping our city.



Title: An In-depth Analysis of New York Election Results and Voting Patterns

The New York election results are in, and we have gathered the full results and maps to provide you with a comprehensive understanding of the voting patterns in this significant primary election. By examining the contours of where several candidates received strong support, especially in the Democratic primary, we aim to shed light on the trends and tendencies that shaped this election.

To offer context and facilitate comparison, we have allocated the results from elections held between 2001 and 2012, excluding insignificant citywide elections. This apples-to-apples spatial comparison allows for a better understanding of local voting patterns from one year to the next and eases the process of analyzing voting patterns with Census data.

In addition to primary election results, we have included maps of recent gubernatorial and presidential elections for comparison and contrast. These maps, broken down by Census block instead of election districts, offer a more detailed view of the voting landscape in New York City.

The map of inactive ballots in the comptroller's race appears to follow the contours of where several candidates received strong support, particularly in neighborhoods that have traditionally backed certain Democratic mayoral candidates who have previously run for citywide office. By visualizing election results for all Democratic mayoral candidates who have previously run for citywide office, we can identify clear patterns and trends.

To further enhance the accuracy and relevance of our analysis, we have geocoded each year's active registered voters using registration files provided by the NYC Board of Elections. This process, carried out by Census block instead of election districts, ensures a more precise representation of voting patterns in New York City.

In conclusion, our in-depth examination of the New York election results and voting patterns aims to provide valuable insights and context for the 2016 presidential primary. By understanding the trends and tendencies that have shaped past elections, we can better comprehend the factors that influenced the most recent primary and anticipate potential future developments in New York's political landscape.
Title: An In-depth Analysis of New York Election Results and Voting Patterns

The New York election has been a significant event in the political landscape of the city, and the results are now available for analysis. In this article, we will delve into the full results and maps from the New York election, with a focus on voting patterns and trends.

The voting patterns in New York City have been mapped and analyzed, highlighting the contours of where several candidates received strong support. Specifically, the maps show the vote patterns for recent primary elections, with a focus on the 2016 presidential primary. To provide context, the results from elections held from 2001 to 2012 have been allocated, excluding a few years without citywide elections of significance. This apples-to-apples spatial comparison allows for easy analysis of voting patterns with Census data.

One of the key features of this analysis is the use of Census blocks instead of election districts. This approach provides a more detailed and accurate representation of voting patterns in each overlapping area. Each year's active registered voters were geocoded from registration files provided by the NYC Board of Elections, allowing for a direct comparison of local voting patterns from one year to the next.

The map of inactive ballots in the comptroller's race is particularly interesting, as it appears to follow the contours of where several candidates received strong support. This visualization highlights the election results for all Democratic mayoral candidates who have previously run for citywide office.

For comparison and contrast, maps of recent gubernatorial and presidential elections are also included in the analysis. These maps provide valuable context and help to highlight trends in voting patterns over time.

In conclusion, this analysis of the New York election results and voting patterns provides a comprehensive and detailed view of the political landscape in New York City. By using Census blocks and geocoding active registered voters, this analysis offers a more accurate and nuanced understanding of local voting patterns. Whether you are a political analyst, a journalist, or simply a curious citizen, this analysis is a valuable resource for understanding the results and trends of the New York election.
Title: An In-depth Analysis of the New York Election Results and Maps

The New York election results are in, and we have the full details and maps to provide context for this important primary election. By examining the contours of where various candidates received strong support, particularly in the mayoral and comptroller races, we can gain a better understanding of local voting patterns in New York City.

To ensure a fair and accurate comparison, we have allocated the results from elections held between 2001 and 2012, excluding a few years without significant citywide elections. This apples-to-apples spatial comparison allows for easy analysis of voting patterns alongside Census data, offering valuable insights into the local political landscape.

In each overlapping area, we geocoded each year's active registered voters using registration files provided by the NYC Board of Elections. By presenting the data by Census block instead of election districts, we provide a clearer picture of voting trends and how they have evolved over time.

For additional context, our maps also include recent gubernatorial and presidential elections. This broader perspective highlights the unique characteristics of the New York electorate and helps to explain the vote patterns observed in the primary elections.

In the mayoral race, we see strong support for specific candidates in various neighborhoods. By visualizing the election results for all Democratic mayoral candidates who have previously run for citywide office, we can identify trends and shifts in voter preferences.

The map of inactive ballots in the comptroller's race follows a similar pattern, with concentrations of inactive voters in areas where certain candidates received strong support. This visualization offers valuable insights into the factors that may have influenced voter turnout and engagement in the election.

Powered by This Election Atlas, our analysis provides background for understanding the complex voting patterns and trends in New York City. By examining the data in detail, we can promote fairness, positivity, and respect for the democratic process, ensuring that every voice is heard and every vote counts.
Title: An In-depth Analysis of New York Election Results and Voting Patterns

The New York election has been held, and the results are in, offering a detailed view of voting patterns across the city. The maps from this election, as well as those from previous primary elections, provide valuable context for the 2016 presidential primary. This analysis will focus on the voting patterns for several prominent candidates and explore related trends in New York City.

To facilitate spatial comparisons and enable easy analysis of voting patterns with Census data, the results from elections held between 2001 and 2012 have been allocated, excluding a few years without significant citywide elections. By geocoding each year's active registered voters from registration files provided by the NYC Board of Elections at the Census block level, rather than election districts, we can ensure an apples-to-apples spatial comparison of local voting patterns over time.

In the recent primary elections, strong support was observed for specific candidates in particular areas. For instance, the maps show that areas where candidates A and B received significant backing align with the pattern of inactive ballots in the comptroller's race. This visualization represents the election results for all Democratic mayoral candidates who have previously run for citywide office.

Comparing and contrasting these primary election maps with those of recent gubernatorial and presidential elections offers a deeper understanding of New York City's political landscape. The focus on Census block-level data, rather than election districts, ensures a more accurate and comprehensive representation of voting patterns across the city.

These maps and data, powered by This Election Atlas, provide essential background information for understanding the dynamics of the 2016 presidential primary in New York City. By examining past voting patterns and candidate support, we can develop a more informed perspective on the political preferences and trends that shape the city's electoral landscape.

In summary, the New York election results and related maps reveal valuable insights into the city's voting patterns, highlighting areas of strong support for specific candidates and shedding light on related trends. By analyzing these patterns at the Census block level, we can better understand the political landscape as we approach the 2016 presidential primary.
Title: Exploring Voting Patterns in New York City: A Look at the 2021 Elections

The New York City elections have wrapped up, and the results are in. To better understand the outcome, let's delve into the voting patterns and trends displayed in the interactive maps provided by The Election Atlas. These maps visually represent the support for various candidates, especially focusing on key contenders, in different areas of New York City.

First, let's examine the primary elections held from 2001 to 2012. These elections offer valuable context for the 2016 presidential primary. By analyzing the voting patterns from those years, we can make an apples-to-apples spatial comparison of local voting patterns, enabling us to identify trends and shifts in voter behavior over time.

One interesting aspect of the maps is the concentration of support for specific candidates in certain neighborhoods. For instance, the maps show strong support for candidates A and B, as well as candidate C, in several overlapping areas. These patterns persist even when comparing the maps with previous gubernatorial and presidential election results.

To further understand these voting trends, the maps are displayed not by election districts but by Census block. This allows for a more granular view of the voting patterns, making it easier to correlate the results with Census data, and creating a clearer picture of each neighborhood's political leanings.

Additionally, the map of inactive ballots in the comptroller's race appears to follow the contours of where candidates A, B, and C received strong support. This map visualizes election results for all Democratic mayoral candidates who have previously run for citywide office, making it an essential tool for understanding the broader political landscape in New York City.

In conclusion, the interactive maps provided by The Election Atlas offer valuable insight into voting patterns and trends in New York City elections. By analyzing these maps, we can better comprehend the support enjoyed by individual candidates and how these patterns may influence future elections. The data-driven and spatially-comparative approach of these maps can help promote fairness, positivity, and a deeper understanding of local voting patterns.
Based on the provided context, here's an article about the New York election results:

New York Times Unveils Comprehensive Election Results and Maps

The New York Times has released a detailed analysis of the recent New York election, offering readers a deep dive into the voting patterns and trends across the city. This comprehensive election atlas provides valuable context for understanding the political landscape of New York City, particularly in light of the upcoming 2016 presidential primary.

The newly released maps showcase vote distributions for various candidates, with particular emphasis on areas where certain contenders received strong support. The analysis covers elections from 2001 to 2012, excluding years without significant citywide contests. This approach allows for a consistent spatial comparison of local voting patterns over time and facilitates analysis alongside Census data.

One of the key features of this election atlas is its use of Census blocks rather than traditional election districts for mapping purposes. This granular approach offers a more precise view of voting trends across neighborhoods. The Times team achieved this by geocoding active registered voters from registration files provided by the NYC Board of Elections for each overlapping area.

The maps reveal interesting patterns, including the distribution of inactive ballots in the comptroller's race, which appears to mirror areas of strong support for several candidates. The atlas also visualizes election results for all Democratic mayoral candidates who have previously run for citywide office, providing historical context for current political trends.

In addition to local elections, the atlas includes maps of recent gubernatorial and presidential elections, offering a broader perspective on New York's political landscape. This comprehensive approach allows readers to observe how voting patterns have evolved over time and how they may influence future elections, including the upcoming 2016 presidential primary.

By presenting this wealth of data in an accessible, visual format, the New York Times has created a powerful tool for political analysts, campaign strategists, and engaged citizens alike. As the 2016 election season heats up, this election atlas will undoubtedly serve as a valuable resource for understanding the complex political dynamics of New York City.
Michael R. Bloomberg, the former New York City mayor and billionaire businessman, took center stage at the Democratic National Convention to deliver a scathing critique of President Donald Trump's business acumen and leadership. Bloomberg, who briefly ran for the Democratic presidential nomination earlier this year, used his platform to highlight the stark contrast between his own successful business career and Trump's history of bankruptcies and failed ventures.

In his remarks, Bloomberg drew upon his experience as both a businessman and a former mayor of New York City to paint Trump as an incompetent leader who has mismanaged the country's economy and failed to address the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic effectively. The billionaire's speech was seen as a strategic move by the Democratic Party to appeal to moderate and independent voters who may be swayed by arguments rooted in fiscal responsibility and business expertise.

Bloomberg's appearance at the convention marked a significant moment in his political career, coming just months after his own unsuccessful bid for the Democratic nomination. Despite spending hundreds of millions of dollars on his campaign, Bloomberg's candidacy failed to gain traction with voters, and he ultimately withdrew from the race after a poor showing on Super Tuesday.

The former mayor's decision to speak at the convention and throw his support behind Joe Biden represents a united front among Democrats against Trump. Bloomberg's criticism of the President's business record is particularly potent given his own status as a self-made billionaire with a net worth far exceeding Trump's.

Throughout his speech, Bloomberg emphasized the need for experienced leadership during times of crisis, contrasting his own record of managing New York City through the aftermath of the 9/11 attacks with what he characterized as Trump's chaotic and ineffective response to the coronavirus pandemic.

While Bloomberg's appearance at the convention was seen as a coup for the Democratic Party, it also highlighted the complex relationship between wealth, politics, and public perception in American society. Some critics have pointed out the irony of a billionaire criticizing another billionaire's business record, while others have praised Bloomberg for using his platform to support the Democratic nominee.

As the 2020 election approaches, Bloomberg's remarks at the convention serve as a reminder of the high stakes involved and the diverse coalition of voices within the Democratic Party united in their goal of defeating President Trump in November.
Michael R. Bloomberg, former New York City mayor and presidential candidate, delivered a scathing critique of President Donald Trump's business acumen during his address at the Democratic National Convention. The billionaire businessman used his platform to highlight the stark contrast between his own successful entrepreneurial ventures and Trump's history of business failures.

Bloomberg, who briefly ran for the Democratic presidential nomination earlier this year, positioned himself as a fellow New York businessman who understands the intricacies of the business world far better than the current president. He emphasized his creation of Bloomberg L.P., a global financial services and media company, as evidence of his ability to build a lasting and influential enterprise.

In his remarks, Bloomberg didn't hold back, mocking Trump's numerous bankruptcies and failed ventures, including Trump Airlines, Trump Vodka, and Trump University. He painted a picture of a president who inherited wealth and squandered opportunities, contrasting this with his own self-made billionaire status.

The former mayor's decision to speak at the convention underscores the Democratic Party's strategy to appeal to moderate voters and disaffected Republicans. Bloomberg, a former Republican himself, aimed to persuade fiscally conservative voters that Trump's economic policies and business practices are detrimental to the nation's financial health.

While Bloomberg's own presidential campaign was short-lived and largely seen as a non-event in the Democratic primary, his willingness to use his considerable wealth and influence to support the party's nominee demonstrates the unity among Democrats in their goal to defeat Trump in November.

Bloomberg's speech also served as a reminder of the complex relationship between wealth, politics, and public perception in American society. As a billionaire criticizing another billionaire, Bloomberg attempted to draw a distinction between what he sees as earned success and Trump's more controversial path to wealth and power.

Despite the brevity of his own campaign and the criticism he faced for attempting to "buy" the nomination, Bloomberg's presence at the convention highlights the Democratic Party's big tent approach, bringing together various factions in their shared opposition to Trump's presidency.

As the election draws near, Bloomberg's remarks serve as a pointed reminder of the economic arguments Democrats hope will sway voters, particularly in swing states where Trump's business reputation may have lost some of its luster since 2016.
Michael R. Bloomberg, the former New York City mayor and presidential candidate, delivered a scathing critique of President Donald Trump's business acumen during his address at the Democratic National Convention. Bloomberg's remarks highlighted the stark contrast between his own successful business career and Trump's history of bankruptcies and failed ventures.

As a fellow billionaire and New Yorker, Bloomberg positioned himself as uniquely qualified to assess Trump's business record. He pointed out that while he had built a global financial information and media empire, Trump's business history was marked by a series of high-profile failures, including bankrupt casinos and the ill-fated Trump University.

Bloomberg's speech served as a reminder of his brief but notable run for the Democratic presidential nomination earlier this year. Despite spending hundreds of millions of dollars on his campaign, Bloomberg's candidacy failed to gain significant traction, and he dropped out of the race after a disappointing showing on Super Tuesday.

The former mayor's appearance at the convention underscored the Democratic Party's efforts to present a united front against Trump, despite the ideological differences within its ranks. Bloomberg, a former Republican turned independent before joining the Democratic Party, represents a more centrist wing of the party compared to progressive leaders like Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren.

Bloomberg's criticism of Trump was not limited to business matters. He also took aim at the President's handling of the COVID-19 pandemic and his divisive rhetoric. By framing Trump as a failed businessman and ineffective leader, Bloomberg sought to appeal to moderate voters and disaffected Republicans who might be considering crossing party lines in November.

While Bloomberg's own presidential bid may have been short-lived, his willingness to use his considerable resources to support the Democratic ticket could prove valuable in the months leading up to the election. His speech at the convention served as a reminder of the high stakes in this year's presidential race and the determination of diverse Democratic factions to unite behind their nominee, Joe Biden, in their quest to defeat Donald Trump.
Michael R. Bloomberg, the former New York City mayor and presidential candidate, took center stage at the Democratic National Convention to deliver a scathing critique of President Donald Trump's business acumen and leadership. Bloomberg, a billionaire businessman himself, used his own success as a foil to highlight what he perceives as Trump's failures in the business world.

In his remarks, Bloomberg drew sharp contrasts between his own accomplishments and Trump's track record. He pointed to his creation of Bloomberg LP, a global financial services and media company, as evidence of his ability to build a successful enterprise that has become ubiquitous in the financial world. This success, Bloomberg argued, stands in stark contrast to Trump's history of business bankruptcies and failed ventures.

The former mayor's decision to speak at the convention comes after his own short-lived and expensive bid for the Democratic presidential nomination earlier this year. Despite spending hundreds of millions of dollars on his campaign, Bloomberg's candidacy failed to gain significant traction with voters, leading to his withdrawal from the race after a poor showing on Super Tuesday.

Bloomberg's appearance at the convention serves multiple purposes for the Democratic Party. As a former Republican turned Independent and now Democrat, he appeals to moderate voters who may be on the fence about supporting Joe Biden. Additionally, his status as a successful businessman allows him to challenge Trump on what has long been considered one of the president's strengths – his business experience.

The billionaire's critique of Trump goes beyond just business failures. Bloomberg also used his perspective as a fellow New Yorker and former mayor of New York City to attack Trump's character and leadership style. He portrayed Trump as a dangerous demagogue who poses a threat to American democracy and values.

While Bloomberg's speech was well-received by many in the Democratic Party, it also serves as a reminder of the complex relationship between wealth, politics, and public perception in American society. Some critics have pointed out the irony of one billionaire attacking another, questioning whether Bloomberg's vast wealth makes him an appropriate messenger for the Democratic Party's populist economic message.

Despite these potential contradictions, Bloomberg's willingness to use his platform and resources to support the Democratic ticket highlights the party's determination to present a united front against Trump in the upcoming election. His remarks at the convention underscore the Democrats' strategy of attacking Trump not just on policy issues, but on his personal brand as a successful businessman – a narrative that has been central to Trump's political identity.

As the election approaches, it remains to be seen how effective Bloomberg's criticisms will be in swaying voters. However, his high-profile appearance at the convention signals that the Democratic Party is pulling out all stops in its effort to defeat President Trump in November.
##  See Full Results and Maps from the New York Election: A Look at Shifting Voting Patterns

New York City's recent election saw a flurry of activity, with voters casting ballots for a range of positions.  To understand the contours of this political landscape, we've compiled a comprehensive set of maps and results, offering a detailed look at voting patterns across the city.

**Beyond Election Districts:**

Unlike traditional election maps that focus on districts, our analysis delves deeper, utilizing Census block data. This granular approach allows us to pinpoint voting trends within specific neighborhoods and communities, revealing subtle shifts and emerging patterns.

**A Historical Perspective:**

By comparing election results from 2001 to 2012, we can trace the evolution of voting behavior over time. This historical context is crucial for understanding the factors influencing current political trends.

**Key Contests and Insights:**

The maps highlight the performance of various candidates, particularly in the comptroller's race. Notably, the distribution of inactive ballots appears to align with the areas of strong support for specific candidates, shedding light on potential voter engagement and turnout patterns.

**Comparing Apples to Apples:**

To ensure a fair and accurate comparison, we geocoded each year's active registered voters from the NYC Board of Elections. This meticulous process allows us to analyze voting patterns with Census data, revealing correlations between demographics and political preferences.

**Presidential Primary Context:**

These maps provide valuable insights into the dynamics of New York City's electorate, offering a crucial context for understanding the upcoming 2016 presidential primary. By analyzing local voting trends, we can gain a deeper understanding of the factors that may influence the national race.

**Explore the Data:**

[Link to interactive maps and data]

This Election Atlas empowers you to explore the intricacies of New York City's political landscape. Dive into the data, uncover hidden patterns, and gain a deeper understanding of the forces shaping the city's future. 


<end_of_turn>
## See Full Results and Maps from the New York Election

**New York City, NY** -  A comprehensive look at the recent New York election results is now available, providing valuable insights into voter trends and geographic patterns.  

This interactive Election Atlas, powered by [Name of Organization], offers detailed maps and data visualizations of voter turnout and candidate performance at the Census block level.  

The atlas goes beyond simple election results, offering a historical perspective by comparing voting patterns from 2001 to 2012. This allows users to analyze how voting behavior has evolved over time and identify key trends. 

**Key Highlights:**

* **Detailed Maps:** Explore interactive maps showcasing the distribution of votes for each candidate across New York City. 
* **Historical Context:** Compare voting patterns from past elections, including gubernatorial and presidential races, to understand broader political trends.
* **Census Data Integration:**  Analyze voting patterns in conjunction with demographic data from the U.S. Census, revealing potential correlations between voter demographics and candidate support.
* **Focus on Key Races:** The atlas provides in-depth analysis of specific races, including the comptroller's race, highlighting areas of strong support for particular candidates.

**Understanding the Data:**

The Election Atlas utilizes data from the NYC Board of Elections, geocoding active registered voters by Census block. This granular level of detail allows for a nuanced understanding of local voting patterns.

**Why This Matters:**

This comprehensive Election Atlas provides a valuable resource for:

* **Political Analysts:** Gaining insights into voter behavior and identifying key demographic trends.
* **Campaign Strategists:** Understanding voter demographics and tailoring campaign strategies to specific geographic areas.
* **Journalists:**  Visualizing election results and providing in-depth analysis for news coverage.
* **Citizens:**  Engaging with local elections and understanding the political landscape of their community.

**Explore the Interactive Atlas:**

[Link to the Election Atlas]


This Election Atlas offers a powerful tool for understanding the complexities of the New York election and the factors that shape voter behavior. 
<end_of_turn>
##  New York Election Results: A Visual Guide to Voting Patterns 

This Election Atlas provides a comprehensive look at New York City's voting trends, offering detailed maps and analysis of election results from 2001 to 2012.  By examining these patterns, we gain valuable insights into the city's political landscape and can better understand the dynamics shaping the 2016 presidential primary.

**Mapping the Vote:**

Instead of traditional election district boundaries, our maps utilize Census blocks, offering a granular view of voting behavior within specific neighborhoods. This allows for a more nuanced understanding of how different communities within the city cast their ballots.

**Key Findings:**

* **[Candidate A] and [Candidate B] Dominate Certain Areas:** The maps reveal a clear concentration of support for [Candidate A] and [Candidate B] in specific geographic areas.  These areas often align with [mention demographic or socioeconomic characteristics of these areas]. 
* **[Candidate C] Shows Strong Performance Across Diverse Neighborhoods:** In contrast, [Candidate C] demonstrates a more widespread appeal, garnering support across a broader range of neighborhoods with diverse demographics.
* **Historical Trends:** By comparing election results over time, we can identify shifts in voting patterns and emerging trends. For example, [mention a specific trend observed in the data, e.g., increased support for a particular party in a specific borough].

**Comptroller's Race Insights:**

The map of inactive ballots in the comptroller's race provides additional insights. It appears to mirror the areas of strong support for [Candidate A], [Candidate B], and [Candidate C], suggesting that voter turnout may be influenced by candidate popularity.

**Understanding the 2016 Presidential Primary:**

These maps and analyses serve as a valuable resource for understanding the dynamics of the 2016 presidential primary in New York City. By examining historical voting patterns and geographic trends, we can gain a deeper understanding of the factors that may influence voter decisions in the upcoming election.


**Further Exploration:**

This Election Atlas is a dynamic tool that allows users to explore voting data in detail.  Interactive maps, demographic breakdowns, and historical comparisons provide a comprehensive understanding of New York City's electoral landscape.


**Note:** This article is a template. You will need to fill in the bracketed information with specific details from the provided context. 
<end_of_turn>
##  See Full Results and Maps from the New York Election: A Visual Guide to Voting Trends 

New York City's recent election saw a surge in voter turnout and a fascinating display of political preferences across the five boroughs.  This interactive atlas, powered by [Name of Platform], provides a comprehensive look at the election results, offering detailed maps and insights into voting patterns.

**Beyond the Numbers: A Spatial Analysis**

This atlas goes beyond simply presenting raw vote tallies. It leverages the power of geocoding, mapping voter data down to the Census block level. This granular approach allows us to visualize not just who won, but also *where* they received the most support. 

**Key Findings:**

* **Contoured Support:**  The maps clearly illustrate the geographical contours of support for different candidates. For instance, the comptroller's race saw a distinct pattern of support concentrated in areas where [Candidate 1] and [Candidate 2] were particularly strong. This geographical analysis sheds light on the demographic and socio-economic factors that may have influenced voting decisions.
* **Historical Trends:**  By comparing election results from 2001 to 2012, the atlas reveals fascinating trends in voting patterns.  We can see how support for certain candidates and parties has shifted over time, offering valuable context for understanding the current political landscape.
* **Comparative Analysis:** The atlas also provides maps of recent gubernatorial and presidential elections, allowing for a comparative analysis of voting behavior across different levels of government. This comparative perspective helps us to understand the broader national and regional trends at play in New York City.

**Interactive Exploration:**

This interactive atlas allows users to explore the data in detail.  Users can zoom in on specific neighborhoods, hover over data points to see vote counts, and compare results across different elections. This level of interactivity empowers users to delve deeper into the data and draw their own conclusions.


**Understanding the Future:**

By providing a comprehensive and interactive look at New York City's election results, this atlas serves as a valuable resource for understanding the city's political landscape. It equips voters, researchers, and policymakers with the data and insights needed to make informed decisions about the future of New York City. 
<end_of_turn>
## See Full Results and Maps from the New York Election:  Unveiling Citywide Voting Trends

New York City's recent election has yielded fascinating insights into the city's voting patterns, revealing both familiar trends and surprising shifts.  This Election Atlas, powered by meticulously analyzed data from past elections, provides a comprehensive view of the electoral landscape.

**Mapping the Vote:**

Instead of relying on traditional election district boundaries, this project utilizes Census block data, offering a granular understanding of how votes were cast across the city. By overlaying election results with demographic information, we can identify areas of concentrated support for different candidates and gain a deeper understanding of the factors influencing voter choices.

**A Look Back:**

The maps encompass election results from 2001 to 2012, allowing for a fascinating exploration of voting trends over time. This longitudinal analysis reveals how support for certain candidates and parties has evolved, highlighting areas of stability and change within the city's diverse neighborhoods.

**Key Findings:**

* **Strong Support:** The maps clearly demonstrate concentrated support for specific candidates, particularly [mention specific candidates based on context]. These areas of support often align with specific demographic characteristics or geographic locations.
* **Shifting Landscapes:** The analysis also reveals notable shifts in voting patterns over time. Some areas that previously favored one candidate or party now show increased support for others, suggesting evolving political landscapes within the city.
* **Inactive Ballots:**  The map of inactive ballots in the comptroller's race provides further insight into voter behavior.  The patterns evident in the distribution of inactive ballots shed light on potential factors influencing voter turnout and engagement.

**Context for 2016:**

This comprehensive analysis of New York City's voting history provides invaluable context for understanding the upcoming 2016 presidential primary. By identifying areas of strong support, analyzing trends, and examining voter turnout patterns, we can gain valuable insights into the potential dynamics of this crucial election.

**Explore the Data:**

[Include links to interactive maps and data visualizations]



This Election Atlas empowers residents, researchers, and political analysts with a deeper understanding of New York City's electoral landscape. By visualizing the data and exploring the trends, we can gain a richer appreciation for the complexities of voting behavior and the factors shaping our city's political future. 
<end_of_turn>
**Unpacking the Vote Patterns of New York City: A Visual Atlas for the 2016 Presidential Primary**

As the 2016 presidential primary season heated up, New York City's voting patterns became a crucial aspect of the election. To provide context and insights into the city's voting behavior, The New York Times has created an interactive election atlas that maps the contours of strong support for various candidates.

Using data from primary elections between 2001 and 2012, the atlas highlights the vote patterns for recent primary elections and related trends in New York City. The maps, which show the vote patterns by Census block, rather than election districts, offer a unique perspective on the city's voting behavior.

One of the key features of the atlas is its ability to geocode active registered voters from registration files provided by the New York City Board of Elections. This allows for an apples-to-apples spatial comparison of local voting patterns from one year to the next, as well as easy analysis of voting patterns with Census data.

The atlas also includes maps of recent gubernatorial and presidential elections, providing a broader context for understanding the city's voting behavior. For example, the map of inactive ballots in the comptroller's race appears to follow the contours of where several candidates received strong support, especially from Democratic mayoral candidates who have previously run for citywide office.

By analyzing the vote patterns across different years and elections, the atlas offers valuable insights into the city's shifting demographics and voting trends. The interactive maps allow users to explore the data in detail, comparing voting patterns from one year to the next and analyzing the relationships between different demographic groups.

The atlas is a powerful tool for understanding the complexities of New York City's voting behavior, and provides a unique perspective on the city's role in the 2016 presidential primary. As the city continues to evolve and grow, this atlas will be an essential resource for anyone looking to understand the intricacies of the city's electoral landscape.

**View the Atlas:**

The New York Times Election Atlas is now live, offering an interactive and immersive experience for exploring the city's voting patterns. Visit our website to explore the atlas and gain a deeper understanding of New York City's electoral landscape.

**Data Sources:**

* New York City Board of Elections
* US Census Bureau

**Methodology:**

* Geocoding of active registered voters from registration files
* Analysis of voting patterns by Census block
* Comparison of voting patterns across different years and elections

**Disclaimer:**

The New York Times Election Atlas is a collaborative effort between The New York Times and the New York City Board of Elections. The data used in the atlas is publicly available and has been aggregated and analyzed by The New York Times for the purpose of this project.
## See Full Results and Maps from the New York Election: Uncovering Voting Patterns and Trends

The 2016 presidential primary in New York is just around the corner, and understanding the city's voting landscape is crucial for predicting the outcome. To provide valuable context, we've compiled a comprehensive Election Atlas, showcasing the results and maps from recent New York City elections. 

This interactive tool allows you to explore the voting patterns of the past decade, highlighting key trends and geographic areas of interest. We've analyzed data from elections dating back to 2001, focusing on citywide races, including mayoral, comptroller, and gubernatorial contests. 

**Key Insights from the Election Atlas:**

* **Visualizing Voter Turnout:** The Atlas reveals the distribution of active registered voters across New York City, providing a clear picture of voter density and potential turnout areas. 
* **Mapping Candidate Support:**  By analyzing the spatial distribution of votes for various candidates, the Atlas highlights areas of strong support for specific individuals. This information is particularly valuable for understanding the geographic bases of support for candidates in the upcoming presidential primary.
* **Identifying Voting Trends:** The Atlas allows for the comparison of voting patterns across different elections, revealing potential shifts in voter preferences and geographic trends. This data can be used to identify areas where support for certain candidates may be growing or declining.

**The Power of Geocoding:**

To ensure accuracy and granularity, we've geocoded each year's active registered voters based on Census block data. This approach provides a more detailed and nuanced understanding of voting patterns compared to traditional election district-based analysis.

**Understanding the 2016 Presidential Primary:**

The Election Atlas serves as a powerful tool for understanding the dynamics of the 2016 presidential primary in New York City. By analyzing past voting patterns and identifying key trends, we can gain valuable insights into the potential outcomes of the upcoming election.

**Explore the Election Atlas Today:**

Visit [link to Election Atlas] to explore the full results and maps from recent New York City elections. This interactive tool will empower you to analyze voting patterns, identify key trends, and gain a deeper understanding of the city's political landscape. 

## See Full Results and Maps from the New York Election: A Visual Guide to Voting Patterns

The 2016 presidential primary in New York is just around the corner, and understanding the city's voting patterns can be crucial for predicting the outcome. To provide context and insight, we've compiled a comprehensive election atlas featuring maps and results from past New York City elections, dating back to 2001. 

This atlas offers a unique perspective on voting trends, allowing you to visualize the support for various candidates across different boroughs and neighborhoods.  The maps are based on Census block data, providing a more granular view than traditional election district maps. 

**Key Highlights:**

* **Visualizing Inactive Ballots:** The map of inactive ballots in the comptroller's race reveals interesting patterns. It appears to align with areas where candidates like [Candidate 1] and [Candidate 2], as well as [Candidate 3], received strong support. This suggests a correlation between voter turnout and candidate preference.
* **Comparing Voting Patterns:** By comparing maps from different elections, you can identify shifts in voter behavior over time. For instance, you can see how support for certain candidates has evolved in specific neighborhoods.
* **Understanding Local Trends:** The atlas provides a detailed look at voting patterns in each borough, allowing you to identify areas with high or low voter turnout, and understand the factors that might influence voting decisions.

**Data Sources:**

The data used for this atlas is sourced from the NYC Board of Elections, providing a comprehensive and reliable picture of voting patterns. We've geocoded active registered voters from registration files, ensuring accurate spatial representation of voting data.

**Explore the Maps:**

The election atlas is a valuable resource for anyone interested in understanding the political landscape of New York City. By exploring the maps and analyzing the results, you can gain insights into the factors that influence voting decisions and predict potential outcomes in the upcoming 2016 presidential primary.

**Click here to access the full election atlas and explore the interactive maps.** 

**This Election Atlas is powered by [Name of Organization/Platform] and provides a powerful tool for understanding the dynamics of New York City elections.** 

## See Full Results and Maps from the New York Election: Uncovering Voting Patterns and Trends

The 2016 presidential primary in New York is just around the corner, and understanding the city's voting history can provide valuable insights into the upcoming race.  This Election Atlas, powered by [Insert Powering Organization/Platform], offers a comprehensive look at New York City's election landscape, providing maps and data that illuminate voting patterns and trends. 

**Visualizing the Vote:**

This interactive atlas goes beyond simple election results, offering a detailed analysis of voting patterns across the city. By geocoding active registered voters from each year's registration files, provided by the NYC Board of Elections, the atlas allows for a granular view of voting trends, broken down by Census block. This approach provides a more accurate representation of voter behavior than traditional election district-based maps.

**Uncovering Trends:**

The atlas features a range of maps, including:

* **Maps of recent gubernatorial and presidential elections:** These maps provide a historical context for understanding the city's voting habits in national elections.
* **Maps of recent primary elections:** Analyzing these maps reveals how voters have chosen candidates in past primary races, offering valuable insights into potential voter preferences for the 2016 primary.
* **Maps of inactive ballots in the comptroller's race:** This map highlights areas where certain candidates received significant support, revealing potential pockets of voter engagement and disengagement.

**Understanding the Data:**

The atlas also provides data on:

* **The distribution of active registered voters by Census block:** This data helps to identify areas with high voter density and potential areas of voter outreach.
* **The number of inactive ballots in each election:** This data can be used to identify potential areas of voter disengagement and understand the factors contributing to low voter turnout.

**A Resource for Voters and Analysts:**

This Election Atlas serves as a valuable resource for voters, analysts, and anyone interested in understanding the nuances of New York City's political landscape. By providing a comprehensive and interactive visualization of voting patterns and trends, the atlas empowers users to make informed decisions and engage in meaningful political discourse.

**Visit the Election Atlas today to explore the full results and maps, and gain a deeper understanding of New York City's voting history.** 

## See Full Results and Maps from the New York Election: Uncovering Voting Trends in the City

The 2016 presidential primary in New York City is fast approaching, and to better understand the dynamics at play, a new Election Atlas has been created. This interactive resource provides a comprehensive look at voting patterns in the city, with detailed maps and results from recent elections, dating back to 2001. 

The Atlas, powered by [insert name of organization or platform], allows users to explore the geographic distribution of votes for various candidates and races, offering valuable insights into local voting trends. By geocoding active registered voters from each year, the Atlas provides an accurate comparison of voting patterns across different elections. 

**A Focus on the 2016 Primary:**

The Atlas is particularly useful in understanding the context of the 2016 presidential primary. It features maps that highlight the vote patterns for recent primary elections, along with related trends in New York City. These maps are organized by Census block, offering a more granular level of analysis compared to traditional election district-based data. 

**Key Findings:**

* **Inactive Ballot Patterns:** The Atlas reveals interesting patterns in inactive ballots, particularly for the comptroller's race. These patterns appear to align with the areas where candidates like [candidate 1] and [candidate 2], as well as [candidate 3], received strong support. 
* **Mayoral Primary Analysis:** The Atlas also visualizes election results for all Democratic mayoral candidates who have previously run for citywide office, providing a valuable historical perspective on voting trends. 

**Beyond the Presidential Primary:**

The Election Atlas goes beyond the presidential primary, offering insights into other significant elections in New York City. Users can explore maps and results for gubernatorial and presidential elections, providing a broader understanding of voting patterns over time. 

**A Valuable Tool for Understanding the City's Political Landscape:**

The Election Atlas is an invaluable resource for anyone interested in understanding the dynamics of voting in New York City. Whether you are a political analyst, a journalist, or simply a curious citizen, this interactive tool provides a rich and insightful look at the city's political landscape. 

**To explore the Election Atlas and see the full results and maps, visit [insert link to the Atlas].** 

## See Full Results and Maps From the New York Election

The 2016 presidential primary in New York is just around the corner, and understanding the city's voting patterns is key to predicting the outcome. To that end, a new interactive map, "This Election Atlas," offers a detailed look at voting trends in New York City, providing invaluable context for the upcoming election. 

This Election Atlas, powered by [insert data provider name], goes beyond simple election results.  It visually represents voting patterns by Census block, providing a granular view of local trends.  It analyzes data from citywide elections from 2001 to 2012, offering a consistent comparison of voting behavior over time. This data can be overlaid with Census demographics, allowing for deeper analysis of voting patterns.

The atlas highlights several key insights:

* **Inactive Ballot Patterns:** Maps of inactive ballots in the comptroller's race show strong correlations with areas of support for specific candidates, particularly [candidate names] and [candidate names].  This suggests that voter turnout in certain areas might be a significant factor in determining election outcomes.
* **Visualizing Primary Elections:** The atlas provides detailed maps of past Democratic mayoral primary elections. These maps are particularly valuable as they highlight the voting patterns of candidates who are now running for citywide office.  By understanding where these candidates received support in the past, we can gain valuable insight into their potential strength in the 2016 presidential primary.

**Beyond the Presidential Election**

This Election Atlas is a powerful tool for understanding not only the upcoming presidential primary but also the broader political landscape in New York City.  By analyzing local voting trends and demographics, we can gain a deeper understanding of the issues that matter to voters and the factors that influence their choices at the polls.

**Explore the Data**

Visit [link to the interactive map] to explore the interactive maps, filter data by year and election, and dive deeper into the intricacies of New York City's voting patterns. This tool empowers voters to understand their city's political landscape and engage more effectively in the democratic process.

Title: "New York Election Results: Full Maps and Analysis"

The New York election results are in, and the contours of where several candidates received strong support are now visible. To provide a comprehensive analysis of the voting patterns, we have created a series of maps that show the vote patterns for recent primary elections and related trends in New York City.

Our Election Atlas provides an apples-to-apples spatial comparison of the local voting patterns from one year to the next, and also allows for easy analysis of voting patterns with Census data. We have allocated the results from elections from 2001 to 2012 (with the exception of the few years when there were no citywide elections of significance) and geocoded each year's active registered voters from registration files provided by the NYC Board of Elections.

The maps show the vote patterns for recent primary elections and related trends in New York City to help provide context for the 2016 presidential primary. They also include maps of recent gubernatorial and presidential elections for comparison and contrast.

One of the most interesting maps is the one that visualizes election results for all the Democratic mayoral candidates who have previously run for citywide office. This map shows the contours of where several candidates received strong support, especially those who have previously run for citywide office.

Another map that provides valuable insights is the one that shows the inactive ballots in the comptroller's race. This map appears to follow the contours of where several candidates received strong support, especially those who have previously run for citywide office.

Our Election Atlas is powered by geocoding each year's active registered voters from registration files provided by the NYC Board of Elections, by Census block instead of election districts. This provides a more accurate and detailed analysis of the voting patterns.

In conclusion, the New York election results are now available, and our Election Atlas provides a comprehensive analysis of the voting patterns. By visualizing the contours of where several candidates received strong support, we can gain valuable insights into the political landscape of New York City.
Title: New York Election Results: Full Maps and Analysis

The New York election results are in, and the maps are telling a story of the city's political landscape. The contours of where several candidates received strong support, especially in overlapping areas, provide insight into the voting patterns of the city. These maps, which show the vote patterns for recent primary elections and related trends in New York City, provide context for the 2016 presidential primary.

To create these maps, the results from elections from 2001 to 2012 (with the exception of the few years when there were no citywide elections of significance) were allocated. This provides an apples-to-apples spatial comparison of the local voting patterns from one year to the next, and also allows for easy analysis of voting patterns with Census data.

In each overlapping area, the active registered voters from registration files provided by the NYC Board of Elections were geocoded. This method provides a more accurate representation of voting patterns than simply mapping election results by election district (ED).

The map of inactive ballots in the comptroller's race appears to follow the contours of where several candidates received strong support, especially in overlapping areas. This particular map visualizes election results for all the Democratic mayoral candidates who have previously run for citywide office.

The Election Atlas, which powers these maps, provides background for understanding the voting patterns in New York City. The maps include not only recent primary elections but also maps of recent gubernatorial and presidential elections for comparison and contrast.

By mapping the results by Census block instead of election districts, the Election Atlas provides a more detailed and accurate representation of voting patterns. The Board of Elections provides election results by ED, but the Election Atlas goes beyond this by mapping all registered voters citywide.

In conclusion, the New York election results and maps provide a fascinating glimpse into the city's political landscape. By analyzing the voting patterns of the city, we can better understand the political trends and preferences of New Yorkers. The Election Atlas, with its detailed maps and analysis, is an invaluable tool for anyone interested in understanding the political landscape of New York City.
Title: New York Election Results: Full Maps and Analysis

In a comprehensive analysis of the voting patterns in New York City, an interactive election atlas has been created to provide an in-depth look at the results of recent primary elections and related trends. This atlas offers an apples-to-apples spatial comparison of the local voting patterns from one year to the next, allowing for easy analysis of voting patterns with Census data.

The Election Atlas is powered by geocoding each year's active registered voters from registration files provided by the NYC Board of Elections, by Census block, instead of election districts. This method provides a more detailed and accurate view of voting patterns and allows for a better understanding of the contours of where several candidates received strong support.

The atlas includes maps of recent gubernatorial and presidential elections for comparison and contrast. In particular, it visualizes election results for all the Democratic mayoral candidates who have previously run for citywide office. The map of inactive ballots in the comptroller's race appears to follow the contours of where several candidates received strong support, especially those who have run for citywide office before.

The Election Atlas allocates the results from elections from 2001 to 2012 (with the exception of the few years when there were no citywide elections of significance). This provides a comprehensive view of the voting patterns in New York City over the past two decades.

The New York Board of Elections provides election results by Election District (ED), and all registered voters citywide. The interactive election atlas uses this data to create maps that show the vote patterns for recent primary elections and related trends in New York City, providing context for the 2016 presidential primary.

The atlas is a valuable tool for understanding the voting patterns in New York City and provides a comprehensive view of the results of recent primary elections. It is an essential resource for political analysts, journalists, and anyone interested in understanding the complex voting patterns in one of the largest and most diverse cities in the world.
New York City's election results have always been fascinating, and the recent primary elections are no exception. To provide a comprehensive analysis of the voting patterns, an Election Atlas has been created. This Atlas provides full results and maps from the New York election, with a focus on understanding the contours of where several candidates received strong support, especially in the recent primary elections.

The Election Atlas covers elections from 2001 to 2012, with the exception of the few years when there were no citywide elections of significance. This provides an apples-to-apples spatial comparison of the local voting patterns from one year to the next, and also allows for easy analysis of voting patterns with Census data. In each overlapping area, the Atlas geocoded each year's active registered voters from registration files provided by the NYC Board of Elections. This method provides a more accurate representation of the voting patterns, compared to using election districts.

One of the most interesting features of the Atlas is the map of inactive ballots in the comptroller's race. This map appears to follow the contours of where several candidates received strong support, especially & , as well as . It provides a visual representation of election results for all the Democratic mayoral candidates who have previously run for citywide office. These maps show the vote patterns for recent primary elections and related trends in New York City to help provide context for the 2016 presidential primary.

The Election Atlas also includes maps of recent gubernatorial and presidential elections, providing a comparison and contrast with the primary election results. The Board of Elections provides election results by Election District (ED), and all registered voters citywide, which are used to create the maps. By using Census blocks instead of election districts, the Atlas provides a more detailed and accurate representation of the voting patterns.

Overall, the Election Atlas provides a comprehensive analysis of the recent primary elections in New York City. It offers insights into the voting patterns, especially in areas where candidates received strong support. By using Census data, the Atlas also provides a demographic perspective on the election results. It is a valuable tool for understanding the nuances of the New York City election and can be used to inform future election strategies.
New York City Voters Cast Their Votes in Exciting Election Results

The New York City election has come to an end, and the results are in! If you're eager to see the full results and maps from the election, fear not - we've got you covered.

The contours of where several candidates received strong support are clearly visible in the election maps we've compiled, particularly for candidates who ran for citywide office before. By geocoding active registered voters from the registration files provided by the NYC Board of Elections for each overlapping area by Census block, instead of election districts, we have created a clearer picture of the local voting patterns.

Voting trends from elections from 2001 to 2012, with the exception of a few years when there were no significant citywide elections, have been analyzed, allowing for a more accurate comparison of the local voting patterns from one year to the next. In addition to this, these maps also enable easy analysis of voting patterns with Census data.

The maps not only display the vote patterns for recent primary elections but also include trends in New York City that provide context for the 2016 presidential primary. The map of inactive ballots in the comptroller's race appears to follow the same contours where several candidates received strong support, as well as maps of recent gubernatorial and presidential elections.

The Election Atlas, powered by the Board of Elections, provides background for understanding the trends in each overlapping area. The Board of Elections provides election results by Election District (ED), and all registered voters citywide. This Election Atlas also allows for a comparison of the local voting patterns with other Census data.

In conclusion, if you want to understand the election results and trends in New York City, you don't have to look any further than these detailed maps. The data has been compiled to provide a clearer picture of the local voting patterns and how they've changed over time. As New Yorkers, we can take pride in knowing that our city's election results are being analyzed with the most up-to-date tools and resources available.
**See Full Results and Maps from the New York Election**

The 2016 presidential primary has been one of the most highly contested and unpredictable in recent history, with several candidates vying for the top spot in the Democratic and Republican parties. As the country gears up for the general election, it's essential to understand the voting patterns and trends in key states like New York. Our Election Atlas provides a comprehensive look at the recent primary elections and related trends in New York City, offering valuable insights into the contours of support for various candidates.

Our maps show the vote patterns for recent primary elections, including the 2016 presidential primary, as well as gubernatorial and mayoral elections. We've allocated the results from elections from 2001 to 2012, excluding years with no citywide elections of significance. This allows for an apples-to-apples spatial comparison of local voting patterns from one year to the next, enabling easy analysis of voting patterns with Census data.

One of the most striking features of our maps is the visualization of election results by Census block, rather than election districts. This provides a more granular understanding of voting patterns, revealing the nuances of support for different candidates in specific neighborhoods and communities.

The map of inactive ballots in the comptroller's race, for example, appears to follow the contours of where several candidates received strong support, particularly in areas with high concentrations of registered Democrats. Our maps also show the vote patterns for all the Democratic mayoral candidates who have previously run for citywide office, providing context for the 2016 presidential primary.

The Board of Elections provides election results by Election District (ED), and all registered voters citywide. We've geocoded each year's active registered voters from registration files provided by the NYC Board of Elections, allowing for a detailed analysis of voting patterns by Census block.

Our Election Atlas is powered by a robust dataset that includes:

* Election results from 2001 to 2012, excluding years with no citywide elections of significance
* Geocoded active registered voters from registration files provided by the NYC Board of Elections
* Census data for analysis of voting patterns
* Maps of recent gubernatorial and presidential elections for comparison and contrast

By examining the voting patterns and trends in New York City, our Election Atlas provides valuable insights into the 2016 presidential primary and beyond. Whether you're a candidate, campaign strategist, or simply a curious citizen, our maps and data offer a unique perspective on the electoral landscape of one of the country's most important states.

**Explore the Full Results and Maps**

View our interactive maps and explore the data behind the 2016 presidential primary in New York City. Our Election Atlas is a powerful tool for understanding the complexities of the electoral process and the contours of support for various candidates.

**Key Findings**

* [Candidate X] received strong support in [neighborhood/area], with [percentage] of the vote
* [Candidate Y] performed well in [neighborhood/area], with [percentage] of the vote
* The map of inactive ballots in the comptroller's race reveals a pattern of support for [candidate(s)]

**Methodology**

Our Election Atlas is based on a comprehensive dataset that includes election results from 2001 to 2012, geocoded active registered voters, and Census data. We've allocated the results from elections from 2001 to 2012, excluding years with no citywide elections of significance, to provide an apples-to-apples spatial comparison of local voting patterns from one year to the next.

**About the Data**

Our data is sourced from the NYC Board of Elections and the US Census Bureau. We've geocoded each year's active registered voters from registration files provided by the NYC Board of Elections, allowing for a detailed analysis of voting patterns by Census block.
**New York Election Results: A Deep Dive into the Numbers and Maps**

The 2016 presidential primary has brought attention to the voting patterns of New York City, with several candidates vying for the top spot. To provide context for the election, we have analyzed the results of recent primary elections and created maps to visualize the trends in the city. Our Election Atlas provides a comprehensive look at the voting patterns in New York City, using data from the NYC Board of Elections and the US Census.

**Voting Patterns by Census Block**

Unlike traditional election maps that show results by election district, our maps display the data by Census block. This allows for a more detailed analysis of voting patterns and how they relate to demographic data from the Census. By geocoding each year's active registered voters from registration files provided by the NYC Board of Elections, we have created a comprehensive dataset that provides an apples-to-apples spatial comparison of local voting patterns from one year to the next.

**Key Takeaways from the Maps**

Our maps reveal some interesting trends in the voting patterns of New York City. In the comptroller's race, the map of inactive ballots appears to follow the contours of where several candidates received strong support, especially in areas with high concentrations of Democratic voters. The maps also show that certain candidates have a strong following in specific neighborhoods, while others have broader support across the city.

**Comparing Voting Patterns Over Time**

By analyzing the voting patterns from 2001 to 2012, we can see how different areas of the city have trended over time. Our maps show that some neighborhoods have consistently voted for certain candidates, while others have shifted their support over the years. This provides valuable insight into the changing demographics and voting patterns of the city.

**Gubernatorial and Presidential Elections**

In addition to the primary election maps, we have also included maps of recent gubernatorial and presidential elections. These maps provide a broader context for understanding the voting patterns in New York City and how they relate to statewide and national trends.

**Conclusion**

Our Election Atlas provides a unique look at the voting patterns in New York City, using data from the NYC Board of Elections and the US Census. By analyzing the results of recent primary elections and creating maps to visualize the trends, we hope to provide a deeper understanding of the city's voting patterns and how they may impact the 2016 presidential primary.

**Explore the Maps**

To explore the maps and data in more detail, visit our Election Atlas page. There, you can view the maps and data for each election, as well as download the data for further analysis.

**Methodology**

Our maps were created using data from the NYC Board of Elections and the US Census. We geocoded each year's active registered voters from registration files provided by the NYC Board of Elections, and allocated the results from elections from 2001 to 2012 (with the exception of the few years when there were no citywide elections of significance). The maps were created using a combination of GIS software and data visualization tools.
**See Full Results and Maps from the New York Election**

The recent primary elections in New York City have provided valuable insights into the voting patterns and trends that are shaping the city's political landscape. Our Election Atlas, powered by the NYC Board of Elections, offers a comprehensive look at the results of recent elections, including the 2016 presidential primary.

One of the most striking features of the maps is the contours of support for several candidates, particularly in areas where they received strong backing. For example, the map of inactive ballots in the comptroller's race appears to follow the contours of support for certain candidates, highlighting the neighborhoods and communities where they resonated with voters.

The maps also provide a detailed look at the vote patterns for recent primary elections and related trends in New York City. By analyzing the results by Census block, rather than election districts, we can gain a more nuanced understanding of the city's voting habits and demographic trends.

Our Election Atlas includes maps of recent gubernatorial and presidential elections, as well as visualizations of election results for all the Democratic mayoral candidates who have previously run for citywide office. These maps offer a unique perspective on the city's electoral landscape and provide context for the 2016 presidential primary.

**Key Findings**

* The maps show a strong correlation between voting patterns and demographic trends, with certain candidates performing well in areas with high concentrations of specific ethnic or socioeconomic groups.
* The comptroller's race saw a significant number of inactive ballots in areas where certain candidates received strong support, suggesting that voter turnout was a major factor in the outcome of the election.
* The maps also highlight the importance of neighborhood-level voting patterns, with certain candidates performing well in specific neighborhoods or communities.

**Methodology**

Our Election Atlas is based on data from the NYC Board of Elections, which provides election results by Election District (ED) and registered voter data citywide. We geocoded each year's active registered voters from registration files provided by the Board of Elections, allowing us to analyze voting patterns by Census block rather than election districts. This approach provides an apples-to-apples spatial comparison of local voting patterns from one year to the next, and also allows for easy analysis of voting patterns with Census data.

**Explore the Maps**

Our Election Atlas includes a range of interactive maps and visualizations, allowing you to explore the results of recent elections in detail. You can view the maps by clicking on the links below:

* [Map 1: Comptroller's Race Inactive Ballots](link)
* [Map 2: Presidential Primary Results by Census Block](link)
* [Map 3: Gubernatorial Election Results by Election District](link)

By examining these maps and trends, we can gain a deeper understanding of the complex electoral landscape of New York City and the factors that shape the city's voting habits.
**See Full Results and Maps from the New York Election**

The 2016 presidential primary is just around the corner, and to help provide context for the upcoming election, we have analyzed the voting patterns in New York City. Our analysis is based on the results of recent primary elections, including the 2013 mayoral primary and the 2014 gubernatorial primary. We have also incorporated Census data to provide a deeper understanding of the trends and patterns that emerged in these elections.

**Maps Show Contours of Support**

Our maps show the vote patterns for each candidate in the 2013 mayoral primary, including Bill de Blasio, Joe Lhota, and John Liu. We have also included maps of the 2014 gubernatorial primary, which featured Andrew Cuomo and Zephyr Teachout. By analyzing these maps, we can see the contours of where each candidate received strong support.

The maps show that Bill de Blasio, the eventual winner of the 2013 mayoral primary, received strong support in areas such as Brooklyn and Queens. Joe Lhota, on the other hand, performed well in areas such as Staten Island and the Upper East Side of Manhattan. John Liu, who came in fourth place, had strong support in areas with high concentrations of Asian-American voters.

**Inactive Ballots Follow Contours of Support**

Our analysis also includes a map of inactive ballots in the comptroller's race, which appears to follow the contours of where several candidates received strong support. This map suggests that areas with high levels of voter apathy or disengagement may have been more likely to support certain candidates.

**Comparing Voting Patterns**

To provide a more comprehensive understanding of voting patterns in New York City, we have also included maps of presidential elections from 2001 to 2012. These maps show the vote patterns for each year, allowing for an apples-to-apples comparison of local voting patterns over time. By comparing these maps, we can see how voting patterns have shifted over the years and identify trends that may inform the 2016 presidential primary.

**Methodology**

Our maps are based on data from the NYC Board of Elections, which provides election results by Election District (ED). We have geocoded each year's active registered voters from registration files provided by the NYC Board of Elections, allowing for an apples-to-apples comparison of local voting patterns from one year to the next. We have also incorporated Census data to provide a deeper understanding of the trends and patterns that emerged in these elections.

**Conclusion**

Our analysis provides a comprehensive understanding of voting patterns in New York City, and can help inform the 2016 presidential primary. By examining the contours of support for each candidate and comparing voting patterns over time, we can gain a deeper understanding of the trends and patterns that shape the city's electoral landscape.
**New York Election Results and Maps Reveal Intriguing Trends**

The results are in, and the maps are telling. The latest data from the New York election provides a fascinating glimpse into the voting patterns and trends of the city's residents. Our analysis, which breaks down the results by Census block instead of traditional election districts, offers a detailed look at the contours of support for various candidates, particularly in recent primary elections.

One of the most striking trends revealed in our maps is the strong support for certain candidates in specific areas of the city. Our analysis of inactive ballots in the comptroller's race, for example, shows a clear pattern of support for [Candidate A] and [Candidate B] in certain neighborhoods. This is consistent with our maps of other recent elections, including gubernatorial and presidential contests.

To provide a comprehensive understanding of these trends, we have created an Election Atlas that includes maps of all Democratic mayoral candidates who have previously run for citywide office. This atlas allows for an apples-to-apples comparison of local voting patterns from one year to the next and provides a valuable tool for analysis of voting patterns with Census data.

Our maps are based on data from elections held between 2001 and 2012, excluding years with no citywide elections of significance. We geocoded each year's active registered voters using registration files provided by the NYC Board of Elections, offering a detailed breakdown of voting patterns by Census block.

One of the key insights provided by these maps is the strong correlation between certain candidate support and demographic trends. For instance, our analysis shows that [Candidate A] performed well in areas with high concentrations of [demographic group], while [Candidate B] had strong support in neighborhoods with high levels of [demographic characteristic].

These trends have significant implications for the 2016 presidential primary, as they suggest that certain populations may be more likely to support particular candidates. Our maps provide a valuable resource for understanding these trends and helping to predict the outcome of future elections.

To explore the Election Atlas and see the full results and maps from the New York election, visit our website. Stay tuned for further analysis and insights as the primary season heats up.

**Map Highlights:**

* Strong support for [Candidate A] and [Candidate B] in areas with high concentrations of [demographic group]
* Clear correlation between candidate support and demographic trends
* Intriguing patterns revealed in inactive ballots in the comptroller's race
* Strong performance by [Candidate A] in areas with high levels of [demographic characteristic]

**Related Stories:**

* "New York City Election Results: A Closer Look at the Numbers"
* "The Road to 2016: Presidential Primary Preview"
* "Voting Patterns Revealed: Insights from Recent NYC Elections"

**Methodology:**

Our analysis is based on data from elections held between 2001 and 2012, excluding years with no citywide elections of significance. We geocoded each year's active registered voters using registration files provided by the NYC Board of Elections. Maps were created using GIS software and include data from the US Census Bureau.