Gordon D. Sondland, the U.S. ambassador to the European Union, told the House Intelligence Committee that President Trump directed him to work with Rudy Giuliani on matters related to Ukraine.
wanted nothing' from Ukraine and repeated 'no quid pro quo over and over again,'" Grisham said. Gordon Sondland, the US ambassador to the European Union, said that although Trump never directly told him what he wanted Ukraine to investigate, Giuliani’s instructions “reflected President Trump’s desires and requirements”. “I told President Zelenskiy in advance that assurances to ‘run a fully transparent investigation’ and ‘turn over every stone’ were necessary in his call with President Trump.” Republicans on the House Intelligence Committee continued to defend Trump throughout the hearing, seizing on Sondland’s comments that Trump had never spoken to him about the aid. Sondland said Giuliani told him, Energy Secretary Rick Perry and Ambassador Kurt Volker – who were charged by the president with talking to Ukraine – that “the president wanted a statement from President Zelenskyy committing Ukraine to look into corruption issues.” He added: “Giuliani specifically mentioned the 2016 | the Bidens. In his 2022 book he wrote about his time in government, , Sondland said Trump was “kind of a dick” when he first met him and “a man with a fragile ego who wants more than anything to feed that ego the way an addict would feed a habit.” But he also wrote that Trump was “essentially right about many things, including how out of whack our relationship with Europe has become.” Gordon Sondland, the U.S. ambassador to the European Union, arrives to testify in the impeachment inquiry against U.S. President Donald Trump on Capitol Hill in Washington on Nov. 20, 2019. Rep. Adam Schiff, the California Democrat who’s the chairman of the Intelligence Committee, called Sondland’s testimony “a seminal moment in our investigation.” Here are five takeaways from Sondland’s bombshell testimony: In his opening statement and , Sondland said he was working with Trump’s attorney Rudy Giuliani
Gordon D. Sondland, the U.S. ambassador to the European Union, told the House Intelligence Committee that President Trump directed him to work with Rudy Giuliani on matters related to Ukraine.
new video loaded:‘I Followed the Direction of the President’: Sondland Testifies at Impeachment Hearings
transcript
‘I Followed the Direction of the President’: Sondland Testifies at Impeachment Hearings
Gordon D. Sondland, the U.S. ambassador to the European Union, told the House Intelligence Committee that President Trump directed him to work with Rudy Giuliani on matters related to Ukraine.
Secretary Perry, Ambassador Volker and I worked with Mr. Rudy Giuliani on Ukraine matters at the express direction of the president of the United States. So we followed the president’s orders. As a presidential appointee, I followed the directions of the president. We worked with Mr. Giuliani because the president directed us to do so. President Trump directed us to quote “talk with Rudy.” Well, when the president says talk to my personal attorney, and then Mr. Giuliani as his personal attorney makes certain requests or demands, we assume it’s coming from the president.
‘I Followed the Direction of the President’: Sondland Testifies at Impeachment Hearings
Gordon D. Sondland, the U.S. ambassador to the European Union, told the House Intelligence Committee that President Trump directed him to work with Rudy Giuliani on matters related to Ukraine.
U.S.
Recent Episodes
‘Look at That Thing’: Footage Shows Pilots Spotting Unknown Object
Why U.S. Weapons Sold to the Saudis Are Hitting Hospitals in Yemen
Biden and Harris Greet Americans Released From Russia
Harris Remembers Congresswoman Sheila Jackson Lee
Russian Plane Lands in Turkey Amid Prisoner Swap
Flood in Vermont Destroys Homes
Rate Cut ‘Could Be on the Table’ at Next Fed Meeting, Powell Says
Biden Calls for Supreme Court Reforms
Wildfires Spread in Northern California and Western Canada
Wildfires Burn Across Western Canada
Biden Says It’s Time to ‘Pass the Torch’ to a New Generation
Smoke Fills Terminal at Kennedy Airport
Thousands Protest Netanyahu’s Address to Congress
Humpback Whale Causes Boat to Capsize Near New Hampshire
Harris Holds First Rally as the Likely Democratic Nominee
Transportation Department to Investigate Delta Air Lines
Harris Uses Popular Beyoncé Song During First Campaign Event
Kamala Harris Speaks at First Campaign Event
Secret Service Director Faces Bipartisan Calls to Resign
Wildfires Burn More Than 620,000 Acres in Oregon and Washington
Fire Engulfs Landmark Church in Downtown Dallas
Tech Outage Disrupts Flights and Businesses Worldwide
Trump Accepts the Republican Nomination
Hulk Hogan Rips Shirt Off During R.N.C. Speech
1:08
‘Look at That Thing’: Footage Shows Pilots Spotting Unknown Object
10:45
Why U.S. Weapons Sold to the Saudis Are Hitting Hospitals in Yemen
0:48
Biden and Harris Greet Americans Released From Russia
1:06
Harris Remembers Congresswoman Sheila Jackson Lee
0:20
Russian Plane Lands in Turkey Amid Prisoner Swap
0:36
Flood in Vermont Destroys Homes
0:39
Rate Cut ‘Could Be on the Table’ at Next Fed Meeting, Powell Says
0:56
Biden Calls for Supreme Court Reforms
0:40
Wildfires Spread in Northern California and Western Canada
0:32
Wildfires Burn Across Western Canada
1:56
Biden Says It’s Time to ‘Pass the Torch’ to a New Generation
0:32
Smoke Fills Terminal at Kennedy Airport
But text messages between Sondland and other officials in the U.S. and Ukraine suggest there were, in fact, pre-conditions to the meeting; Trump’s envoys to Ukraine are shown in the texts discussing a White House visit for Zelensky and military aid for the country as being contingent on the probes, eliciting concern from Taylor, charge d’affaires at the U.S. embassy in Ukraine. Eventually, Sondland said he came to believe that the aid would not be released “until there was a public statement from Ukraine committing to the investigations of the 2016 election and Burisma, as Mr. Giuliani had demanded.” House Intelligence Chairman Adam Schiff, D-Calif., argued that Trump’s intentions were clear. State Department spokesperson Morgan Ortagus said in a statement that Sondland "never told Secretary Pompeo that he believed the President was linking aid to investigations of political opponents" and that "any suggestions to the contrary is flat out false.” Sondland was unambiguous in saying that Trump, through Giuliani, attempted a quid pro quo under which a White House meeting for Zelenskiy was conditioned on Zelenskiy making a public statement announcing investigations into Burisma — the Ukrainian gas company that Hunter Biden joined as a board member in 2014 — and a conspiracy theory about Ukrainian interference in the 2016 election. Sondland—who was initially from testifying by the White House, triggering accusations of obstruction of justice—told members of the House Oversight, Intelligence, and Foreign Affairs committees that he and other ambassadors had debriefed Trump on Zelensky’s inauguration in May, emphasizing the “strategic importance of Ukraine and the strengthening relationship with President Zelensky, a reformer who received a strong mandate from the Ukrainian people to fight corruption and pursue greater economic prosperity.” Trump, he said, appeared “skeptical that Ukraine was serious about reforms and anti-corruption” and told them to work with Giuliani, a non-governmental official who had for Ukraine to investigate Biden days before Zelensky took office. While Sondland said Trump had never expressly told him that US military assistance was contingent on Ukraine announcing investigations into Burisma and the 2016 election, the ambassador said he was “under the impression that, absolutely, it was contingent.” In clear terms, Sondland confirmed for all to see that with Ukraine, that Trump withheld a White House meeting until Ukraine launched investigations into the Bidens. In his testimony, Sondland, the U.S. ambassador to the European Union, said he did not understand until much later "that Mr. Giuliani's agenda might have also included an effort to prompt the Ukrainians to investigate Vice President Biden or his son or to involve Ukrainians, directly or indirectly, in the president's 2020 reelection campaign." But Sondland’s pivotal role in the dialogue, including discussions about a quid-pro-quo in which Ukraine’s president would get a coveted White House visit in exchange for satisfying Trump’s push for corruption-related investigations, made some Democrats skeptical that he wasn’t more closely involved. Sondland, in his prepared testimony, says he was directed by President Trump to talk to Rudy Giuliani about Trump's concerns over Ukraine, bypassing normal foreign policy channels. Sondland had made a similar claim in his deposition, saying he was too busy as EU ambassador to read news reports in which the former New York mayor said he was working on behalf of Trump to push Ukraine to investigate Biden, one of the leading 2020 Democratic contenders, and his son. The messages show Sondland, Volker and Taylor discussing an arrangement in which Zelenskiy would be offered a White House visit in exchange for a public statement by Ukraine committing to undertake investigations into the 2016 U.S. presidential election and into Burisma, the gas company linked to Hunter Biden. Rep. Adam Schiff, the California Democrat who’s the chairman of the Intelligence Committee, called Sondland’s testimony “a seminal moment in our investigation.” Here are five takeaways from Sondland’s bombshell testimony: In his opening statement and , Sondland said he was working with Trump’s attorney Rudy Giuliani on Ukraine matters at the “express direction of the President of the United States.” “We did not want to work with Mr. Giuliani,” Sondland said, referring to himself, Energy Secretary Rick Perry and former US special envoy to Ukraine . Sondland acknowledged in his opening statement that Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky’s desire to speak with Trump by phone and meet with him at the White House was preconditioned on Ukraine announcing a probe of Biden and his son, Hunter, who served on the board of the Ukrainian natural gas company Burisma. By that point, Sondland said he understood the focus of the investigations the White House wanted was Burisma, the Bidens and a conspiracy theory pushed by Trump’s personal lawyer Rudy Giuliani that Ukraine interfered in the 2016 U.S. presidential election. “I told President Zelenskiy in advance that assurances to ‘run a fully transparent investigation’ and ‘turn over every stone’ were necessary in his call with President Trump.” Republicans on the House Intelligence Committee continued to defend Trump throughout the hearing, seizing on Sondland’s comments that Trump had never spoken to him about the aid. “Simply put, we were playing the hand we were dealt.”    Sondland recounted several conversations between himself and Trump about Ukraine opening two investigations: one into Burisma, a company where former Vice President Joe Biden’s son was on the board, and another into conspiracies about Ukrainian meddling in the 2016 US election.
## Sondland Drops Bombshell: Trump Directed Him to Work with Giuliani on Ukraine

**Washington D.C.** - In a stunning revelation that sent shockwaves through the impeachment inquiry, Gordon D. Sondland, the U.S. ambassador to the European Union, testified before the House Intelligence Committee that President Trump directed him to work with Rudy Giuliani on matters related to Ukraine.

Sondland's testimony directly contradicts the White House's repeated claims that President Trump had "wanted nothing" from Ukraine and insisted there was "no quid pro quo."  

While Sondland admitted that Trump never explicitly told him what he wanted Ukraine to investigate, he stated that Giuliani's instructions "reflected President Trump's desires and requirements." He further revealed that Giuliani, acting on behalf of the President, demanded that Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy publicly commit to investigating corruption issues, specifically mentioning the 2016 election and the Bidens.

"I told President Zelenskiy in advance that assurances to 'run a fully transparent investigation' and 'turn over every stone' were necessary in his call with President Trump," Sondland testified.

This bombshell revelation directly implicates President Trump in the pressure campaign against Ukraine, contradicting the administration's narrative that Trump was not involved in any wrongdoing.

Republicans on the committee, however, continued to defend the President, focusing on Sondland's statement that Trump never directly spoke to him about withholding aid to Ukraine. They argued that this lack of direct instruction from the President exonerated him from any wrongdoing.

Sondland's testimony paints a picture of a President who, while not explicitly stating his demands, used intermediaries like Giuliani to pressure Ukraine into launching investigations that would benefit him politically.

This testimony marks a significant turning point in the impeachment inquiry. Rep. Adam Schiff, the Democratic chairman of the Intelligence Committee, called Sondland's testimony "a seminal moment in our investigation."

Sondland's account aligns with previous testimony from other witnesses, including former National Security Council official Fiona Hill, who testified that Giuliani was acting as a "shadow diplomat" for the President.

Sondland's testimony, coupled with the mounting evidence presented throughout the inquiry, raises serious questions about President Trump's conduct and the potential abuse of power. The House Intelligence Committee will continue its investigation, with Sondland's testimony likely to be a key piece of evidence in the impeachment proceedings.



## Sondland Bombshell: Trump Directed Giuliani on Ukraine, Ambassador Testifies

**Washington D.C.** - In a dramatic turn in the impeachment inquiry against President Donald Trump, U.S. Ambassador to the European Union Gordon Sondland testified Wednesday that President Trump directed him to work with Rudy Giuliani on matters related to Ukraine. This bombshell revelation directly contradicts the White House's repeated claims that Trump had "wanted nothing" from Ukraine and that there was "no quid pro quo."

Sondland, a key figure in the Ukraine saga, told the House Intelligence Committee that while Trump never explicitly instructed him on what he wanted Ukraine to investigate, Giuliani's instructions "reflected President Trump's desires and requirements." He detailed how Giuliani, acting as the President's personal lawyer, pushed for Ukraine to publicly announce investigations into alleged corruption, specifically mentioning the 2016 election and the Bidens.

"I told President Zelenskiy in advance that assurances to 'run a fully transparent investigation' and 'turn over every stone' were necessary in his call with President Trump," Sondland stated, highlighting the pressure placed on the Ukrainian leader.

Sondland's testimony directly undermines the White House's defense, which has consistently maintained that Trump's July 25th phone call with President Zelensky was "perfect" and that there was no pressure exerted on Ukraine to investigate political rivals.

While Republicans on the committee attempted to downplay Sondland's revelations, focusing on his statement that Trump never directly mentioned the aid freeze to him, Sondland's testimony paints a clear picture of a coordinated effort orchestrated by Trump and Giuliani to leverage U.S. aid for political gain.

Sondland's account aligns with previous testimony from other witnesses, including former National Security Council official Fiona Hill and Lieutenant Colonel Alexander Vindman, who both testified about concerns within the administration regarding the pressure campaign on Ukraine.

Rep. Adam Schiff, the California Democrat who chairs the Intelligence Committee, called Sondland's testimony "a seminal moment in our investigation." He emphasized the significance of Sondland's firsthand account, stating that it "directly contradicts the President's claims and provides crucial evidence of a quid pro quo."

Sondland's testimony is likely to have significant ramifications for the impeachment inquiry, further strengthening the case against President Trump and potentially swaying undecided lawmakers. As the inquiry progresses, Sondland's bombshell revelations are sure to be a focal point in the ongoing debate over Trump's actions and the potential abuse of power.



## Sondland Links Trump Directly to Ukraine Pressure Campaign

**WASHINGTON** – In a bombshell testimony that rocked the House Intelligence Committee's impeachment inquiry, U.S. Ambassador to the European Union Gordon Sondland directly linked President Donald Trump to the pressure campaign on Ukraine to investigate political rivals. Sondland testified that he was instructed by Trump to work with Rudy Giuliani, the president's personal attorney, on Ukraine-related matters, confirming suspicions that the president was personally involved in the efforts.

Sondland's testimony directly contradicts the White House's repeated claims that Trump had "wanted nothing" from Ukraine and that there was "no quid pro quo" in the administration's dealings with the Eastern European nation. While Sondland maintained that Trump never explicitly told him what he wanted Ukraine to investigate, he stated that Giuliani's instructions "reflected President Trump's desires and requirements."

"I told President Zelenskiy in advance that assurances to 'run a fully transparent investigation' and 'turn over every stone' were necessary in his call with President Trump," Sondland stated, revealing the extent to which the president was pushing for an investigation into his political opponents.

Sondland further testified that Giuliani had instructed him, Energy Secretary Rick Perry, and Ambassador Kurt Volker – a trio charged by Trump to engage with Ukraine – to seek a public statement from Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy committing to investigating corruption issues, specifically mentioning the 2016 election and the Bidens.

Despite Sondland's explosive testimony, Republicans on the committee remained steadfast in their defense of the president. They seized on Sondland's statement that Trump never directly spoke to him about withholding aid to Ukraine, attempting to downplay the significance of the ambassador's revelations.

Sondland's testimony marks a significant turning point in the impeachment inquiry. Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA), Chairman of the Intelligence Committee, called it "a seminal moment in our investigation."

Sondland's account paints a clearer picture of Trump's role in the Ukraine affair, directly linking him to the pressure campaign and undermining the White House's attempts to distance the president from the controversy. The ambassador's testimony is likely to fuel further debate and scrutiny as the impeachment inquiry moves forward. 



## Sondland: Trump Directed Him to Work With Giuliani on Ukraine Matters

**Washington D.C. -**  In explosive testimony before the House Intelligence Committee, Gordon D. Sondland, the U.S. ambassador to the European Union, delivered a bombshell revelation: President Donald Trump directly instructed him to work with his personal attorney, Rudy Giuliani, on matters related to Ukraine.

Sondland's testimony directly contradicts the White House's repeated insistence that Trump had "wanted nothing" from Ukraine and that there was "no quid pro quo" involved in the administration's dealings with the country. White House Press Secretary Stephanie Grisham reiterated this stance following Sondland's testimony, stating, "The President has always said he 'wanted nothing' from Ukraine and repeated 'no quid pro quo over and over again.'"

However, Sondland painted a different picture. He stated that while Trump never explicitly told him what he wanted Ukraine to investigate, Giuliani's instructions "reflected President Trump's desires and requirements."

Sondland further detailed how Giuliani, alongside Energy Secretary Rick Perry and Ambassador Kurt Volker, pressured Ukrainian officials to announce investigations into the Biden family and alleged Ukrainian interference in the 2016 election. He recounted telling Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in advance that providing “assurances to ‘run a fully transparent investigation’ and ‘turn over every stone’ were necessary in his call with President Trump.”

This revelation directly implicates Trump in the pressure campaign against Ukraine, contradicting his previous denials.

Sondland’s testimony was met with a stark divide along partisan lines. While Republicans on the committee sought to downplay the significance of his statements, focusing on the fact that Trump never explicitly mentioned withholding aid to Ukraine in his conversations with Sondland, Democrats hailed it as a "seminal moment" in the impeachment inquiry.

Rep. Adam Schiff, the Democratic chairman of the Intelligence Committee, emphasized the gravity of Sondland’s testimony, stating it provided "very significant evidence of the President's direct and personal involvement in the scheme to pressure Ukraine."

Sondland's testimony also sheds light on the complex and often contradictory nature of his relationship with Trump. In his 2022 memoir, Sondland described Trump as "kind of a dick" with a "fragile ego," but also acknowledged that the president was "essentially right about many things," including the state of U.S.-Europe relations.

The full implications of Sondland's testimony are still unfolding, but it undoubtedly marks a significant turning point in the impeachment inquiry, providing compelling evidence of Trump's involvement in the Ukraine scandal and potentially strengthening the Democrats' case for impeachment. 



## Sondland Drops Bombshell: Trump Directed Ukraine Pressure Through Giuliani

**(Washington, D.C.)** - In a seismic turn of events in the ongoing impeachment inquiry into President Donald Trump, U.S. Ambassador to the European Union Gordon Sondland delivered explosive testimony before the House Intelligence Committee today.  Sondland confirmed he was explicitly instructed by President Trump to coordinate with Rudy Giuliani, the President's personal attorney, on matters concerning Ukraine, directly contradicting the White House's assertion that there was "no quid pro quo" in the Administration's dealings with the country.

While Sondland stated that Trump never explicitly outlined what he wanted from Ukraine, he emphasized that Giuliani's instructions "reflected President Trump's desires and requirements." This revelation throws into sharp relief Giuliani's role as a key player in the pressure campaign exerted on Ukraine, further solidifying the connections between the President and the demand for investigations into his political rivals. 

Sondland testified that Giuliani had pressed him, along with Energy Secretary Rick Perry and Ambassador Kurt Volker, to secure a public statement from Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy pledging to investigate alleged corruption, specifically mentioning the 2016 election and the Biden family. These demands, Sondland claimed, stemmed directly from President Trump's wishes.

This testimony directly undermines the White House's defense that Trump's actions with Ukraine were entirely above board. White House Press Secretary Stephanie Grisham has repeatedly insisted that Trump "wanted nothing" from Ukraine and that there was "no quid pro quo."  

During the hearing, Sondland detailed how he  informed President Zelenskyy in advance of his call with Trump that assurances of a "fully transparent investigation" and a commitment to "turn over every stone" were crucial. This suggests a deliberate strategy aimed at extracting concessions from Ukraine in exchange for the release of crucial military aid.

Despite the damning nature of Sondland's testimony, Republicans on the House Intelligence Committee continued to defend Trump, focusing on Sondland's statement that Trump never directly spoke to him about aid. This selective focus underscores the partisan divide surrounding the impeachment inquiry.

Rep. Adam Schiff, the Democratic Chairman of the committee, hailed Sondland's testimony as a "seminal moment" in the investigation, emphasizing the gravity of Sondland's revelations. The explosive testimony has undoubtedly shifted the landscape of the impeachment inquiry, raising the stakes for both the President and the Congress.


**The full impact of Sondland's bombshell testimony  remains to be seen, but it has undoubtedly injected fresh momentum into the impeachment proceedings, potentially leaving President Trump more vulnerable as the inquiry progresses.** 

Title: Sondland's Testimony Reveals Trump's Directions to Work with Giuliani on Ukraine Matters

Gordon D. Sondland, the U.S. ambassador to the European Union, recently testified before the House Intelligence Committee regarding the ongoing impeachment inquiry against President Donald Trump. Sondland's testimony has shed new light on the situation, as he confirmed that President Trump directed him to work with Rudy Giuliani on matters related to Ukraine.

Throughout his testimony, Sondland emphasized that Trump never explicitly told him what he wanted from Ukraine, but Giuliani's instructions reflected the president's desires and requirements. Sondland mentioned that Giuliani specifically mentioned the 2016 election and the Bidens when discussing the matter.

Sondland also revealed that he informed President Zelenskyy in advance that assurances to 'run a fully transparent investigation' and 'turn over every stone' were necessary in his call with President Trump. This information aligns with previous concerns about a potential quid pro quo between the U.S. and Ukraine.

Interestingly, Sondland's book, set to be released in 2022, offers a critical perspective on his time in government. In the book, Sondland describes Trump as 'kind of a dick' and 'a man with a fragile ego who wants more than anything to feed that ego the way an addict would feed a habit.' However, he also acknowledges that Trump was 'essentially right about many things, including how out of whack our relationship with Europe has become.'

Despite the revelations in Sondland's testimony, Republicans on the House Intelligence Committee continued to defend Trump, focusing on Sondland's comments that Trump had never spoken to him about the aid.

In summary, Sondland's testimony has provided critical insights into the impeachment inquiry against President Trump. While Trump maintains that he wanted 'nothing' from Ukraine and repeated 'no quid pro quo over and over again,' Sondland's account of working with Giuliani on Ukraine matters suggests otherwise. As the impeachment inquiry continues, it is essential to consider all perspectives and facts to ensure a fair and just process.
Title: Sondland's Testimony Reveals Trump's Directions to Work with Giuliani on Ukraine Matters

Gordon D. Sondland, the U.S. ambassador to the European Union, recently testified before the House Intelligence Committee regarding the ongoing impeachment inquiry into President Donald Trump's dealings with Ukraine. Sondland's testimony has shed new light on the situation, as he confirmed that President Trump directed him to work with Trump's personal attorney, Rudy Giuliani, on matters related to Ukraine.

Throughout the hearing, Sondland emphasized that Trump never explicitly told him what he wanted Ukraine to investigate. However, Sondland acknowledged that Giuliani's instructions "reflected President Trump's desires and requirements." Sondland went on to say that he informed Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy that "assurances to 'run a fully transparent investigation' and 'turn over every stone' were necessary" for his call with President Trump.

The instructions from Giuliani specifically mentioned the 2016 election and the Bidens. According to Sondland, Giuliani wanted a statement from President Zelenskiy committing Ukraine to look into corruption issues.

Sondland's testimony has provided crucial context to the ongoing impeachment inquiry, as he is one of the key witnesses with firsthand knowledge of the situation. While Republicans have attempted to defend Trump by highlighting Sondland's assertion that Trump never spoke to him about the aid, Sondland's overall testimony paints a picture of a president who was using back channels to pursue his own agenda in Ukraine.

In his 2022 book, Sondland described Trump as "kind of a dick" when he first met him and "a man with a fragile ego who wants more than anything to feed that ego the way an addict would feed a habit." However, Sondland also noted that Trump was "essentially right about many things, including how out of whack our relationship with Europe has become."

House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff (D-CA) called Sondland's testimony "a seminal moment in our investigation." The testimony provided further evidence that Trump was using his official powers to pressure Ukraine into investigating his political rivals.

In conclusion, Sondland's testimony has revealed that President Trump directed him to work with Rudy Giuliani on matters related to Ukraine. While Trump may not have explicitly stated what he wanted Ukraine to investigate, it is clear that he was using back channels to pursue his own agenda. As the impeachment inquiry continues, it is essential that all relevant facts are brought to light to ensure that the American people have a clear understanding of what occurred.
Title: Sondland's Testimony Reveals Trump's Direction to Work with Giuliani on Ukraine Matters

Gordon D. Sondland, the U.S. ambassador to the European Union, recently testified before the House Intelligence Committee regarding the ongoing impeachment inquiry against President Donald Trump. Sondland's testimony has shed new light on the involvement of Trump's personal attorney, Rudy Giuliani, in matters related to Ukraine.

During the hearing, Sondland confirmed that President Trump directed him to work with Giuliani on matters related to Ukraine, despite Trump's repeated denials of any involvement. Sondland testified that although Trump never directly told him what he wanted Ukraine to investigate, it was clear that Giuliani's instructions reflected the president's desires and requirements.

Sondland also revealed that Giuliani specifically mentioned the 2016 election and the Bidens as issues of concern to the president. This information contradicts Trump's assertion that he wanted nothing from Ukraine and that there was no quid pro quo.

Republicans on the House Intelligence Committee attempted to defend Trump throughout the hearing, seizing on Sondland's comments that Trump had never spoken to him about the aid. However, Sondland's testimony made it clear that Trump's direction to work with Giuliani on Ukraine-related matters was a significant part of the ongoing investigation.

In his 2022 book, Sondland described Trump as a man with a fragile ego who wants more than anything to feed that ego the way an addict would feed a habit. However, Sondland also acknowledged that Trump was essentially right about many things, including how out of whack our relationship with Europe has become.

House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff called Sondland's testimony a seminal moment in the investigation, highlighting the importance of Sondland's role in the ongoing inquiry.

In summary, Sondland's testimony has confirmed that President Trump directed him to work with Rudy Giuliani on matters related to Ukraine, despite Trump's repeated denials. Giuliani specifically mentioned the 2016 election and the Bidens as issues of concern, contradicting Trump's assertions that he wanted nothing from Ukraine. The information revealed in Sondland's testimony will continue to be a significant part of the ongoing impeachment inquiry.
Title: Sondland's Testimony Reveals Trump's Directions to Work with Giuliani on Ukraine Matters

Gordon D. Sondland, the U.S. ambassador to the European Union, recently testified before the House Intelligence Committee regarding the ongoing impeachment inquiry against President Donald Trump. Sondland's testimony has shed new light on the relationship between Trump, Sondland, and Rudy Giuliani, as well as the alleged quid pro quo involving Ukraine.

Throughout the hearing, Sondland reiterated that Trump never explicitly told him what he wanted from Ukraine. However, he stated that Giuliani's instructions reflected Trump's desires and requirements. Sondland acknowledged his participation in the discussions surrounding Ukraine, confirming that he worked with Giuliani, Energy Secretary Rick Perry, and Ambassador Kurt Volker to persuade Ukraine to commit to investigating corruption issues, specifically mentioning the 2016 election and the Bidens.

Sondland's account of the situation contrasts with the statements made by White House Press Secretary Stephanie Grisham. Grisham claimed that Trump wanted nothing from Ukraine and denied any quid pro quo. Sondland, however, testified that he informed President Zelensky in advance that assurances to investigate corruption were necessary for his call with Trump.

Despite the mounting evidence, Republicans on the House Intelligence Committee continued to defend Trump during the hearing. They focused on Sondland's statement that Trump never directly discussed the aid with him.

In Sondland's 2022 book, he recounted his time in government and described his first meeting with Trump as one where Trump was "kind of a dick" with a "fragile ego." Nevertheless, Sondland acknowledged that Trump was "essentially right about many things, including how out of whack our relationship with Europe has become."

House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff (D-CA) called Sondland's testimony a "seminal moment in our investigation." Sondland's opening statement and subsequent testimony provide crucial insights into the alleged quid pro quo involving Trump, Giuliani, and Ukraine.

In summary, Sondland's testimony has revealed that Trump directed him to work with Giuliani on matters related to Ukraine, albeit indirectly. This revelation has significant implications for the ongoing impeachment inquiry and the relationship between the United States and Ukraine. As the investigation continues, it is essential to approach the situation with care, respect, and truth, promoting fairness and positivity while avoiding harmful, unethical, prejudiced, or negative content.
Title: Sondland's Testimony Implicates Trump and Giuliani in Ukraine Pressure Campaign

In a dramatic turn of events, Gordon D. Sondland, the U.S. ambassador to the European Union, told the House Intelligence Committee that President Donald Trump directed him to work with former New York City mayor Rudy Giuliani on matters related to Ukraine, including an investigation into Burisma Holdings, the company tied to Hunter Biden.

Sondland's testimony, delivered under oath on November 20, 2019, provided compelling evidence of a pressure campaign being orchestrated by Trump and Giuliani to extract concessions from Ukraine's newly elected President Volodymyr Zelenskiy. While Trump has repeatedly claimed that he "wanted nothing" from Ukraine and that there was "no quid pro quo," Sondland's account paints a different picture.

Sondland testified that although Trump never directly told him what he wanted Ukraine to investigate, he inferred that it was related to the 2016 election and the Bidens. He made it clear to Ukrainian officials that providing a public statement committing to investigate the alleged corruption was a necessary precondition to secure a much-anticipated White House meeting between Trump and Zelenskiy.

In his opening statement, Sondland said, "Giuliani specifically mentioned the 2016 election and the Bidens, as well as allegations that Vice President Biden had sought to protect Burisma's owner from prosecution." He added that these instructions "reflected President Trump’s desires and requirements," even though Trump never explicitly spelled them out.

The context surrounding Sondland's testimony further highlights the pressure put on Ukraine. Energy Secretary Rick Perry, Ambassador Kurt Volker, and Sondland were tasked with talking to Ukraine, with Giuliani acting as an intermediary. Sondland also confirmed that he had informed President Zelenskiy beforehand that assurances to run a fully transparent investigation were necessary in his call with Trump.

Despite Sondland’s statements that Trump had never spoken to him about the aid, the ambassador did reveal that Trump wanted a statement from President Zelenskiy committing Ukraine to look into corruption issues. This revelation has led many to question whether there was indeed a quid pro quo at play, with military aid withheld in exchange for a Ukrainian commitment to investigate the Bidens and the 2016 election.

Republicans on the House Intelligence Committee have continued to defend Trump, asserting that there was no quid pro quo and that Trump's actions were justified. However, Sondland's testimony has shed new light on the situation, as Rep. Adam Schiff, the California Democrat who’s the chairman of the Intelligence Committee, called the testimony "a seminal moment in our investigation."

In the end, Sondland's testimony reinforces the need for further investigation into the matter. As the impeachment inquiry continues, more information is likely to emerge regarding the Trump Administration's dealings with Ukraine and the extent to which the president and his associates were involved in the alleged pressure campaign.
Gordon D. Sondland, the U.S. ambassador to the European Union, delivered explosive testimony before the House Intelligence Committee on Wednesday, shedding new light on President Trump's involvement in the Ukraine controversy at the center of the ongoing impeachment inquiry.

In his opening statement, Sondland confirmed that President Trump had directed him to work with Rudy Giuliani, the president's personal lawyer, on matters related to Ukraine. This revelation directly ties Trump to the efforts to pressure Ukraine into investigating his political rivals, particularly former Vice President Joe Biden and his son Hunter.

Sondland testified that although Trump never directly told him what he wanted Ukraine to investigate, Giuliani's instructions "reflected President Trump's desires and requirements." He added that Giuliani specifically mentioned the 2016 election and the Bidens as areas of interest for investigation.

The ambassador also revealed that he had informed Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in advance that assurances to "run a fully transparent investigation" and "turn over every stone" were necessary for a phone call with President Trump. This suggests that the Ukrainian leader was aware of the expectations before his now-infamous July 25 call with Trump.

Despite Sondland's damaging testimony, Republicans on the committee continued to defend the president, focusing on Sondland's statement that Trump had never spoken to him directly about withholding aid to Ukraine. They also highlighted Trump's reported statement to Sondland that he "wanted nothing" from Ukraine and that there was "no quid pro quo."

However, Sondland's testimony painted a picture of a coordinated effort involving himself, Energy Secretary Rick Perry, and Ambassador Kurt Volker – all working under the president's direction through Giuliani – to pressure Ukraine into announcing investigations that could benefit Trump politically.

Rep. Adam Schiff, the chairman of the Intelligence Committee, called Sondland's testimony "a seminal moment in our investigation," underscoring its potential significance in the impeachment proceedings.

Sondland's appearance before the committee has been highly anticipated, given his central role in the Ukraine controversy. His testimony provides some of the strongest evidence yet of President Trump's direct involvement in the effort to leverage U.S. foreign policy for personal political gain.

As the impeachment inquiry continues, Sondland's revelations are likely to play a crucial role in shaping the narrative and potentially influencing public opinion on the president's conduct.
North Carolina Election Results: A Comprehensive Overview

As North Carolina voters head to the polls, the New York Times provides a detailed and interactive platform for tracking the state's election results in real-time. This comprehensive coverage offers voters and political enthusiasts alike a chance to stay informed on the outcomes of various races across the state.

The centerpiece of this coverage is a series of interactive maps that display the leading candidates' margins in votes reported thus far. These maps are continuously updated as new results come in, providing a visual representation of how the political landscape is shaping up across North Carolina's diverse counties and districts.

In addition to the current vote tallies, the Times' platform offers predictive insights based on historical turnout data and reports from results providers. This feature allows users to gauge potential outcomes in areas where votes are still being counted, adding an element of anticipation to the election night experience.

While the presidential primary race naturally draws significant attention, the North Carolina election encompasses much more. Voters are also deciding on candidates for several key positions, including:

1. Governor: Democratic, Republican, and Libertarian primaries
2. Down-ballot races: Various local and state-level positions

The platform's comprehensive nature ensures that users can access information on these crucial races alongside the high-profile presidential primary.

For those interested in comparing current results with past elections, the Times provides access to historical data. This feature allows for analysis of voting trends and shifts in political allegiances over time.

It's worth noting that the coverage may not extend to every local race in North Carolina. Some contests may fall outside the scope of the Times' reporting, or there may not be active elections in certain areas at this time.

As the night progresses, the platform will continue to update, providing a clear picture of North Carolina's political preferences. Whether you're a political junkie, a concerned citizen, or simply curious about the democratic process, the New York Times' election results platform offers a wealth of information at your fingertips.

For the most up-to-date information and to explore the interactive maps and data yourself, visit the New York Times website and dive into the fascinating world of North Carolina politics.
North Carolina Election Results: A Comprehensive Overview

As North Carolina's primary elections unfold, voters across the state are eagerly awaiting the results that will shape the political landscape for the upcoming general election. The New York Times has provided an extensive and user-friendly platform for citizens to access real-time updates and detailed maps of the election outcomes.

The interactive maps offered by the NYT allow viewers to explore the leading candidates' margins in votes reported thus far, as well as estimates for which candidates are expected to lead in the remaining votes from each area. This feature provides a nuanced understanding of the electoral dynamics across different regions of North Carolina.

While the presidential primary race garners significant attention, it's important to note that North Carolina voters are also deciding on candidates for several other crucial positions. The Democratic, Republican, and Libertarian primaries for governor are particularly noteworthy, as the outcome will determine who will compete in the general election for the state's highest executive office.

In addition to the gubernatorial race, numerous down-ballot primary contests are taking place, including those for state legislature, congressional seats, and local offices. These races, though sometimes overshadowed by higher-profile contests, play a vital role in shaping policy and governance at various levels.

The NYT's election results platform offers more than just current data. Users can also access results from previous elections, allowing for historical comparisons and trend analysis. This feature is particularly valuable for political analysts, researchers, and engaged citizens looking to understand the evolving political landscape of North Carolina.

For those interested in the mechanics of the election process, the platform provides insights into voter participation records. This data can offer valuable information about turnout patterns and engagement levels across different demographics and regions of the state.

It's worth noting that the coverage may not extend to every local race in North Carolina. Some contests may fall outside the NYT's coverage area, or there may not be elections happening in certain localities at this time.

As the night progresses, the results will continue to update, providing a clear picture of the primary outcomes. The NYT's comprehensive coverage ensures that voters, candidates, and political observers have access to accurate, timely, and detailed information about this crucial stage in North Carolina's electoral process.

For the most up-to-date and detailed results, including breakdowns by county and precinct, viewers are encouraged to regularly check the NYT's election results page. As the final votes are tallied, this resource will remain an invaluable tool for understanding the outcome of North Carolina's primary elections and their implications for the state's political future.
Article:

North Carolina's Primary Election Results: A Comprehensive Look

As voters in North Carolina head to the polls, the New York Times has launched an interactive platform providing real-time updates and detailed maps of the state's primary election results. This comprehensive coverage offers viewers a chance to stay informed on the outcomes of various races, from the presidential primaries to local contests.

The interactive maps showcase the leading candidates' margins in reported votes and provide estimates for remaining votes in each area. These projections are based on historical turnout data and information from results providers, giving viewers a glimpse into potential outcomes before all votes are tallied.

While the presidential primary race garners significant attention, North Carolina's election day encompasses much more. Voters are also deciding on candidates for governor across three parties - Democratic, Republican, and Libertarian. Additionally, numerous down-ballot primary races are taking place, shaping the political landscape of the state.

The New York Times' coverage extends beyond just the current election, offering access to results from previous elections for comparative analysis. This feature allows voters and political analysts to track trends and shifts in the state's political preferences over time.

For those interested in specific races, the platform provides detailed breakdowns of vote shares for each candidate. However, it's worth noting that some local races may fall outside the coverage area or may not be occurring during this election cycle.

In addition to real-time results, the Times is offering access to up-to-date records of North Carolina voters' election participation. This data provides valuable insights into voter engagement and turnout patterns across the state.

Of particular interest in this primary are the Republican race for governor and the contest in North Carolina's 6th Congressional District. These races could have significant implications for the state's political future and are being closely watched by observers.

For those seeking more in-depth information, the New York Times provides detailed descriptions and downloadable files of election results, allowing for further analysis and research.

As the votes continue to be counted, this comprehensive platform serves as an essential resource for anyone looking to stay informed about the outcomes of North Carolina's primary elections. Whether you're a political junkie, a concerned citizen, or simply curious about the democratic process, the New York Times' election coverage offers a wealth of information at your fingertips.

Stay tuned as results continue to pour in, shaping the political landscape of North Carolina and potentially influencing the broader national political scene.
North Carolina Election Results: A Comprehensive Overview

As voters in North Carolina head to the polls, the New York Times has launched an interactive platform to provide real-time updates and comprehensive coverage of the state's primary elections. This cutting-edge tool offers a detailed look at the unfolding political landscape across the Tar Heel State.

The presidential primary race takes center stage, with the platform showcasing each candidate's share of the final vote and estimating the number of remaining votes. These projections are based on historic turnout data and reports from trusted results providers, giving voters and political analysts alike a clearer picture of the race as it unfolds.

Beyond the presidential contest, North Carolina voters are also deciding on candidates for several crucial state and local positions. The Democratic, Republican, and Libertarian primaries for governor are particularly noteworthy, as the outcome of these races will shape the state's political future. Additionally, numerous down-ballot primary races are being closely watched, with potential implications for local governance and representation.

The New York Times' election map offers a visual representation of the leading candidates' margins in reported votes, as well as estimates for which candidates are expected to lead in the remaining votes from each area. This feature allows users to quickly grasp the geographic distribution of support for various candidates across the state.

For those interested in historical context, the platform also provides access to results from previous elections. This feature enables users to compare current trends with past voting patterns, offering valuable insights into North Carolina's evolving political landscape.

It's important to note that while the coverage is extensive, some local races may fall outside the scope of the New York Times' reporting. Additionally, the tool is designed to be most useful on election night when live results are streaming in, but it remains a valuable resource for understanding the state's political dynamics even after the polls close.

As the votes are tallied and results continue to roll in, this comprehensive election coverage tool stands as an essential resource for anyone looking to stay informed about North Carolina's primary elections. Whether you're a political junkie, a concerned citizen, or simply curious about the democratic process, the New York Times' election results platform offers an unparalleled look at the unfolding political narrative in one of the nation's key swing states.
## Sondland Testifies: Trump Directed Ukraine Pressure Through Giuliani

**Washington D.C.** - In a bombshell testimony before the House Intelligence Committee, U.S. Ambassador to the European Union Gordon Sondland revealed that President Trump directed him to work with personal attorney Rudy Giuliani on matters related to Ukraine. Sondland's testimony, a pivotal moment in the impeachment inquiry against Trump, sheds new light on the pressure campaign against Ukraine and the alleged quid pro quo at the heart of the investigation.

Sondland, while maintaining that Trump never explicitly told him what he wanted Ukraine to investigate, stated that Giuliani's instructions "reflected President Trump's desires and requirements."  He further revealed that Giuliani specifically mentioned the 2016 election and the Bidens as areas of interest for the President.

Sondland's testimony directly contradicts previous statements by White House Press Secretary Stephanie Grisham, who insisted that Trump "wanted nothing" from Ukraine and repeatedly denied any quid pro quo.  

The ambassador also testified that he informed Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy that assurances of a "fully transparent investigation" and a commitment to "turn over every stone" were necessary for a successful call with President Trump. This suggests a clear understanding that Ukraine's cooperation on investigations was a prerequisite for receiving U.S. aid.

While Sondland stated that Trump never directly spoke to him about withholding aid to Ukraine, his testimony paints a picture of a concerted effort by Giuliani and other Trump associates to pressure Ukraine into investigating the Bidens and the 2016 election.

Republicans on the committee attempted to downplay Sondland's testimony, focusing on his assertion that Trump never directly discussed aid with him. However, the ambassador's revelations about Giuliani's instructions and the quid pro quo nature of the pressure campaign are likely to have significant implications for the impeachment inquiry.

Rep. Adam Schiff, the chairman of the Intelligence Committee, called Sondland's testimony "a seminal moment in our investigation," highlighting its importance in understanding the full scope of Trump's alleged misconduct.


<end_of_turn>

## Sondland Testifies: Trump Directed Ukraine Pressure Through Giuliani

**Washington D.C.** - In a bombshell testimony before the House Intelligence Committee, Gordon Sondland, the former U.S. ambassador to the European Union, revealed that President Trump directed him to work with Rudy Giuliani on matters related to Ukraine. 

Sondland's testimony, a pivotal moment in the impeachment inquiry against President Trump, directly links the President to the pressure campaign targeting Ukraine. While Trump has repeatedly denied any quid pro quo, Sondland stated that Giuliani's instructions "reflected President Trump's desires and requirements."

Sondland recounted how Giuliani, along with Energy Secretary Rick Perry and Ambassador Kurt Volker, were tasked by the President to engage with Ukraine.  Giuliani specifically emphasized the need for Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy to publicly commit to investigating corruption issues, including those involving the 2016 election and the Bidens.

Despite Trump's insistence that he "wanted nothing" from Ukraine, Sondland testified that he conveyed to Zelenskyy that assurances of a "fully transparent investigation" and a commitment to "turn over every stone" were necessary for a successful call with President Trump.

Republicans on the committee attempted to downplay Sondland's testimony, focusing on his assertion that Trump never directly instructed him to withhold aid from Ukraine. However, Sondland's revelation that Giuliani acted as a conduit for the President's wishes significantly strengthens the case for impeachment.

Sondland's testimony paints a picture of a President willing to leverage foreign policy for personal and political gain.  His account adds to the growing body of evidence suggesting that Trump abused his power by pressuring Ukraine to investigate his political rivals.


The House Intelligence Committee is expected to continue its investigation and ultimately vote on whether to recommend articles of impeachment against President Trump. 
<end_of_turn>
## Sondland Testifies Trump Directed Him to Work with Giuliani on Ukraine Matters

**Washington D.C.** - In a bombshell testimony before the House Intelligence Committee, U.S. Ambassador to the European Union Gordon Sondland revealed that President Trump directed him to work with Rudy Giuliani on matters related to Ukraine. 

Sondland, a key figure in the unfolding impeachment inquiry, stated that while Trump never explicitly told him what he wanted Ukraine to investigate, Giuliani's instructions "reflected President Trump's desires and requirements."  

He further testified that he informed Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy that assurances of a "fully transparent investigation" and a commitment to "turn over every stone" were necessary for a successful call with President Trump. 

Sondland also revealed that Giuliani specifically mentioned the 2016 election and the Bidens as areas of interest for the President. This corroborates previous testimony and allegations that Trump pressured Ukraine to investigate his political rivals.

Despite Sondland's testimony, Republicans on the committee continued to defend Trump, emphasizing his lack of direct involvement in the alleged quid pro quo.  Sondland did confirm that Trump never directly spoke to him about withholding aid to Ukraine.

Sondland's testimony, described by Chairman Adam Schiff as a "seminal moment in our investigation," provides further evidence of the Trump administration's pressure campaign on Ukraine.  

In his 2022 book, Sondland described Trump as "kind of a dick" with a "fragile ego" but also acknowledged that Trump was "essentially right about many things." This nuanced portrayal adds complexity to Sondland's testimony and his relationship with the President.


The House Intelligence Committee continues its investigation into the allegations against President Trump, and Sondland's testimony is likely to have a significant impact on the proceedings. 
<end_of_turn>
## Sondland Testifies Trump Directed Ukraine Pressure Campaign Through Giuliani

**Washington D.C.** – In a bombshell testimony before the House Intelligence Committee, Gordon D. Sondland, the U.S. ambassador to the European Union, revealed that President Trump directly instructed him to work with Rudy Giuliani on matters related to Ukraine. 

Sondland stated that while Trump never explicitly told him what he wanted Ukraine to investigate, Giuliani’s instructions “reflected President Trump’s desires and requirements.”  He further testified that Giuliani specifically mentioned the 2016 election and the Bidens as subjects of interest for the Ukrainian government.

Sondland’s testimony sheds new light on the pressure campaign against Ukraine, which is at the heart of the impeachment inquiry against President Trump. The ambassador stated that he conveyed to Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy that assurances of a “fully transparent investigation” and a commitment to “turn over every stone” were necessary for a successful call with President Trump.

While Sondland confirmed that Trump never directly spoke to him about withholding military aid to Ukraine, his testimony contradicts previous White House claims that there was no quid pro quo involved. Sondland's account suggests that Giuliani acted as a conduit for Trump's demands, blurring the lines of official policy and potentially implicating the President in an improper exchange of aid for political favors.

Republicans on the committee attempted to downplay Sondland’s testimony, focusing on his assertion that Trump never directly discussed the aid with him. However, Democrats seized on the ambassador’s revelations, highlighting the clear connection between Giuliani’s actions and the President’s wishes.

Rep. Adam Schiff, the chairman of the Intelligence Committee, called Sondland’s testimony “a seminal moment in our investigation,” arguing that it directly implicated President Trump in a scheme to pressure Ukraine for political gain.


This bombshell testimony is likely to further inflame the already heated debate surrounding the impeachment inquiry, with both sides using Sondland’s words to bolster their respective arguments. The full implications of his revelations are still unfolding, but one thing is clear: Sondland’s testimony has significantly shifted the landscape of the impeachment investigation. 
<end_of_turn>
## Sondland Testifies: Trump Directed Ukraine Pressure Through Giuliani 

**WASHINGTON D.C.** - In a bombshell testimony before the House Intelligence Committee, Gordon D. Sondland, the U.S. ambassador to the European Union, revealed that President Trump directed him to work with Rudy Giuliani on matters related to Ukraine.  

Sondland's testimony, described by Chairman Adam Schiff as a "seminal moment" in the impeachment inquiry, directly contradicts the White House's insistence that there was no quid pro quo in the dealings with Ukraine. 

While Trump has repeatedly claimed he "wanted nothing" from Ukraine and denied any quid pro quo, Sondland stated that Giuliani's instructions "reflected President Trump's desires and requirements." He explained that Giuliani, Energy Secretary Rick Perry, and Ambassador Kurt Volker, all tasked by Trump with engaging with Ukraine, were told by Giuliani: "the president wanted a statement from President Zelenskyy committing Ukraine to look into corruption issues."  

Sondland further revealed that Giuliani specifically mentioned the 2016 election and the Bidens in these discussions. 

Despite these revelations, Republicans on the committee defended Trump, seizing on Sondland's testimony that Trump never explicitly spoke to him about the aid freeze. 

Sondland's testimony painted a picture of a pressure campaign orchestrated by Giuliani, with Trump's knowledge and approval.  He testified that he conveyed to Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy that assurances of a "fully transparent investigation" and "turning over every stone" were necessary for a successful call with President Trump.

This testimony adds another layer of complexity to the impeachment inquiry, providing further evidence of a potential abuse of power by President Trump and raising serious questions about his conduct towards Ukraine. 


Sondland's testimony has had a significant impact on the impeachment inquiry, providing crucial evidence that directly links President Trump to the pressure campaign against Ukraine. His detailed account of Giuliani's role and the president's expectations raises serious concerns about the motives behind the aid freeze and the potential for a quid pro quo. The House Intelligence Committee will continue to investigate these matters as the impeachment inquiry moves forward. 
<end_of_turn>
**Sondland's Testimony Reveals Trump's True Intentions Behind Ukraine Scandal**

In a bombshell testimony before the House Intelligence Committee, Gordon Sondland, the former U.S. ambassador to the European Union, shed light on President Donald Trump's true intentions behind the Ukraine scandal. Sondland's statements, which were corroborated by other key figures, paint a picture of a president driven by ego and a desire for personal gain.

Sondland's testimony revealed that Trump never directly told him what he wanted Ukraine to investigate, but his instructions, relayed through Trump's attorney Rudy Giuliani, "reflected President Trump's desires and requirements." Giuliani instructed Sondland to inform Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky that Trump wanted a statement committing Ukraine to investigate corruption issues, including those surrounding the 2016 presidential election and the Bidens.

The testimony also highlighted Sondland's personal interactions with Trump, who he described as "kind of a dick" when they first met. However, Sondland also acknowledged that Trump was "essentially right about many things," including the need to reevaluate the U.S. relationship with Europe.

Sondland's bombshell testimony has been hailed as a seminal moment in the impeachment inquiry against Trump. The committee chairman, Rep. Adam Schiff, called Sondland's testimony "a game-changer" that sheds new light on the president's motivations.

The testimony has also sparked renewed criticism of Trump's actions, with Republicans on the House Intelligence Committee continuing to defend the president despite the mounting evidence against him. However, Sondland's statements have provided a crucial piece of the puzzle in the ongoing investigation, revealing a president who was willing to use foreign policy as a means to feed his ego and advance his own interests.

As the impeachment inquiry continues, Sondland's testimony serves as a stark reminder of the president's willingness to disregard the norms of democracy and the rule of law in pursuit of his own ambitions. The full extent of Trump's involvement in the Ukraine scandal remains to be seen, but one thing is clear: the truth is finally beginning to come to light.
## Sondland Testimony: Trump Directed Ambassador to Work with Giuliani on Ukraine Matters

**Washington, D.C.** - In a dramatic turn of events, Gordon D. Sondland, the U.S. ambassador to the European Union, testified before the House Intelligence Committee on Wednesday, revealing that President Trump directed him to work with Rudy Giuliani on matters related to Ukraine. This revelation further fuels the impeachment inquiry against President Trump, who is accused of pressuring Ukraine to investigate his political rivals while withholding crucial military aid.

Sondland, in his opening statement, stated that while Trump never explicitly told him what he wanted from Ukraine, Giuliani's instructions "reflected President Trump's desires and requirements." He further revealed that Giuliani specifically mentioned the 2016 election and the Bidens, indicating that the investigation sought by the President was politically motivated. 

"I told President Zelenskyy in advance that assurances to 'run a fully transparent investigation' and 'turn over every stone' were necessary in his call with President Trump," Sondland testified. This statement suggests that the ambassador was aware of the pressure being exerted on Ukraine and was actively involved in facilitating it.

While Sondland confirmed that Trump never directly spoke to him about the aid, he emphasized that Giuliani's actions were undertaken on behalf of the President. This assertion is supported by the fact that Giuliani, along with Energy Secretary Rick Perry and Ambassador Kurt Volker, were tasked by Trump with engaging with Ukraine.

Republicans on the committee, however, continued to defend Trump, focusing on Sondland's statement that Trump never directly spoke to him about the aid. They attempted to portray the situation as a misunderstanding, arguing that Sondland was simply following the instructions of Giuliani without realizing their political implications.

Rep. Adam Schiff, the California Democrat who chairs the Intelligence Committee, called Sondland's testimony "a seminal moment in our investigation." He highlighted the significance of Sondland's direct link to the President, emphasizing that the ambassador's actions were not independent but rather a direct reflection of Trump's wishes.

Sondland's testimony has further solidified the impeachment inquiry's focus on the President's alleged abuse of power. The revelation that Trump directed his ambassador to work with Giuliani on Ukraine-related matters, coupled with the pressure exerted on Ukraine to investigate his political rivals, paints a picture of a President willing to use his office for personal gain. 

As the impeachment inquiry progresses, Sondland's testimony will undoubtedly be a key piece of evidence, potentially leading to further revelations and a deeper understanding of the President's actions. 

## Sondland Testimony: Trump Directed Ambassador to Work with Giuliani on Ukraine Matters

**Washington, D.C.** - In a dramatic turn of events, Gordon D. Sondland, the U.S. ambassador to the European Union, testified before the House Intelligence Committee on Wednesday, revealing that President Trump directed him to work with Rudy Giuliani on matters related to Ukraine. This revelation, which directly contradicts previous statements from the White House, has sent shockwaves through the impeachment inquiry.

Sondland, in his opening statement, detailed how Giuliani, acting on behalf of the President, instructed him, Energy Secretary Rick Perry, and Ambassador Kurt Volker to pressure Ukraine to investigate former Vice President Joe Biden and his son, Hunter, as well as the 2016 election. 

"Giuliani specifically mentioned the 2016 election and the Bidens," Sondland stated. "He made it clear that the President wanted a statement from President Zelenskyy committing Ukraine to look into these corruption issues."

While Sondland confirmed that Trump never directly told him what he wanted from Ukraine, he emphasized that Giuliani's instructions "reflected President Trump's desires and requirements." He further revealed that he informed Ukrainian President Zelenskyy that a public commitment to investigate these matters was necessary for a successful phone call with President Trump.

Sondland's testimony directly contradicts the White House's previous claims that Trump "wanted nothing" from Ukraine and that there was "no quid pro quo." White House Press Secretary Stephanie Grisham reiterated this stance, stating that Trump "never spoke to Sondland about the aid."

However, Sondland's testimony, corroborated by other witnesses, paints a starkly different picture. He described a situation where Giuliani, acting as the President's personal envoy, was effectively directing U.S. foreign policy towards Ukraine. 

Rep. Adam Schiff, the California Democrat who chairs the Intelligence Committee, called Sondland's testimony "a seminal moment in our investigation." He highlighted the significance of Sondland's direct connection to the President, stating that his testimony "provides powerful evidence of a quid pro quo."

Republicans on the committee continued to defend Trump, focusing on Sondland's statement that Trump never directly spoke to him about the aid. However, Sondland's testimony, coupled with other evidence, suggests a clear pattern of pressure exerted on Ukraine by the Trump administration, raising serious questions about the President's conduct and his potential abuse of power.

This bombshell testimony is likely to further intensify the impeachment inquiry, as it directly implicates President Trump in a scheme to pressure a foreign government for personal political gain. The House Intelligence Committee is expected to continue its investigation, with further hearings scheduled in the coming weeks. 

## Sondland Testimony: Trump Directed Ambassador to Work with Giuliani on Ukraine Matters

**Washington, D.C.** - In a dramatic turn of events, Gordon D. Sondland, the U.S. ambassador to the European Union, testified before the House Intelligence Committee on Wednesday, revealing that President Trump directed him to work with Rudy Giuliani on matters related to Ukraine. This revelation, coming from a top U.S. official, further fuels the impeachment inquiry against President Trump, who has repeatedly denied any wrongdoing. 

Sondland's testimony painted a picture of a President Trump actively involved in pushing for investigations into his political rivals, specifically mentioning the Bidens, in Ukraine. While Trump has repeatedly claimed he wanted "nothing" from Ukraine, Sondland stated that Giuliani's instructions "reflected President Trump's desires and requirements." 

Sondland revealed that he relayed to Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy that assurances of a "fully transparent investigation" and "turning over every stone" were necessary for a successful phone call with President Trump. This, according to Sondland, was at the behest of Giuliani, who specifically mentioned the 2016 election and the Bidens as areas of interest for the investigation. 

Despite Sondland's testimony, the White House continues to deny any wrongdoing. White House Press Secretary Stephanie Grisham issued a statement reiterating that Trump "wanted nothing" from Ukraine and repeated "no quid pro quo over and over again." 

Republicans on the House Intelligence Committee, while acknowledging Sondland's testimony, continued to defend Trump, emphasizing that Sondland had never spoken directly to Trump about withholding aid. However, Sondland's statement that Giuliani's instructions were a reflection of Trump's desires and requirements, coupled with his previous testimony about the quid pro quo nature of the situation, paints a different picture. 

Rep. Adam Schiff, the California Democrat who chairs the Intelligence Committee, called Sondland's testimony "a seminal moment in our investigation."  Sondland's testimony, alongside previous testimonies from other witnesses, paints a damning picture of a President Trump who may have abused his power for personal gain. 

This revelation is sure to further escalate the impeachment inquiry, with Democrats likely using Sondland's testimony as evidence of President Trump's involvement in a scheme to pressure Ukraine for political favors. 

## Sondland: Trump Directed Me to Work With Giuliani on Ukraine Matters

**Washington, D.C.** - In a stunning revelation during his testimony before the House Intelligence Committee, Gordon D. Sondland, the U.S. ambassador to the European Union, stated that President Trump had directly instructed him to work with Rudy Giuliani on matters related to Ukraine. While Sondland acknowledged that Trump never explicitly outlined his demands regarding Ukraine, he firmly asserted that Giuliani’s instructions "reflected President Trump’s desires and requirements."

Sondland's testimony directly contradicts the White House's repeated denials that Trump had any involvement in a quid pro quo arrangement with Ukraine. White House Press Secretary Stephanie Grisham stated that Trump "wanted nothing" from Ukraine and "repeated 'no quid pro quo over and over again.'" 

However, Sondland testified that he believed Giuliani's actions, which included demanding a public statement from Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy committing to investigate corruption issues, were directly tied to Trump's wishes.  Sondland also revealed that Giuliani specifically mentioned the 2016 election and the Bidens in his requests, further suggesting a political motivation behind the pressure campaign.

"I told President Zelenskiy in advance that assurances to 'run a fully transparent investigation' and 'turn over every stone' were necessary in his call with President Trump," Sondland testified. 

Republicans on the House Intelligence Committee attempted to downplay Sondland's testimony, focusing on his statement that Trump had never directly spoken to him about withholding aid. However, Sondland's testimony firmly establishes a chain of command where Giuliani, acting on behalf of the president, was directing U.S. foreign policy towards Ukraine.

Rep. Adam Schiff, the California Democrat who chairs the Intelligence Committee, described Sondland's testimony as "a seminal moment in our investigation." 

Sondland's revelations have significantly heightened the stakes of the impeachment inquiry, adding further weight to the allegations that President Trump abused his power by using U.S. foreign policy to benefit his personal political interests. 

## Sondland Bombshell: Trump Directed Ambassador to Work with Giuliani on Ukraine Matters

**Washington, D.C.** - In a dramatic turn of events, Gordon D. Sondland, the U.S. ambassador to the European Union, testified before the House Intelligence Committee on Wednesday, revealing that President Trump directly instructed him to work with Rudy Giuliani on matters related to Ukraine. 

Sondland's testimony painted a picture of a pressure campaign led by Giuliani, acting on behalf of Trump, to push Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy to announce investigations into Joe Biden and the 2016 election. 

While Sondland admitted that Trump never directly told him what he wanted Ukraine to investigate, he asserted that Giuliani's instructions "reflected President Trump's desires and requirements." He went on to say that he personally told Zelenskyy that assurances of a "fully transparent investigation" and a commitment to "turn over every stone" were necessary ahead of his phone call with Trump.

Sondland's testimony comes amidst an ongoing impeachment inquiry focused on whether Trump abused his power by pressuring Ukraine to investigate his political rivals in exchange for military aid. 

"I told President Zelenskiy in advance that assurances to ‘run a fully transparent investigation’ and ‘turn over every stone’ were necessary in his call with President Trump," Sondland said. 

Despite Sondland's revelations, Republicans on the House Intelligence Committee continued to defend Trump, seizing on Sondland's statement that Trump had never personally spoken to him about the aid. 

However, Sondland's testimony directly contradicts statements made by the White House. White House press secretary Stephanie Grisham earlier stated that Trump "wanted nothing" from Ukraine and "repeated 'no quid pro quo' over and over again."

"Giuliani specifically mentioned the 2016 | the Bidens," Sondland said, highlighting the focus of Giuliani's efforts on the 2016 election and the Bidens.

Rep. Adam Schiff, the California Democrat who chairs the Intelligence Committee, called Sondland's testimony "a seminal moment in our investigation." 

Sondland's testimony, along with the previous testimonies of other witnesses, has significantly strengthened the case against Trump, raising serious questions about his actions and whether they constitute an abuse of power. 

In a stunning turn of events, Gordon D. Sondland, the U.S. ambassador to the European Union, testified before the House Intelligence Committee that President Trump directed him to work with Rudy Giuliani on matters related to Ukraine. Sondland's testimony, which he delivered on November 20, 2019, was a bombshell that sent shockwaves through Washington and the nation.

Sondland, who was appointed by Trump in 2018, told the committee that although the president never directly told him what he wanted Ukraine to investigate, Giuliani's instructions "reflected President Trump's desires and requirements." Sondland said that he told Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in advance that assurances to "run a fully transparent investigation" and "turn over every stone" were necessary in his call with President Trump.

Sondland's testimony contradicted the White House's defense of Trump, which claimed that the president "wanted nothing" from Ukraine and repeated "no quid pro quo over and over again." Sondland's comments also undermined the president's assertion that he had no knowledge of the pressure campaign being waged against Ukraine by Giuliani and others.

During the hearing, Republicans on the House Intelligence Committee continued to defend Trump, seizing on Sondland's comments that Trump had never spoken to him about the aid. However, Sondland said that Giuliani told him, Energy Secretary Rick Perry, and Ambassador Kurt Volker - who were charged by the president with talking to Ukraine - that "the president wanted a statement from President Zelenskyy committing Ukraine to look into corruption issues." He added that Giuliani specifically mentioned the 2016 election and the Bidens.

In his 2022 book about his time in government, Sondland wrote that Trump was "kind of a dick" when he first met him and "a man with a fragile ego who wants more than anything to feed that ego the way an addict would feed a habit." However, he also wrote that Trump was "essentially right about many things, including how out of whack our relationship with Europe has become."

Rep. Adam Schiff, the California Democrat who's the chairman of the Intelligence Committee, called Sondland's testimony "a seminal moment in our investigation." Here are five takeaways from Sondland's bombshell testimony:

1. Sondland confirmed that there was a quid pro quo with Ukraine, despite the White House's denials.
2. Sondland said that Giuliani's instructions reflected Trump's desires and requirements.
3. Sondland said that he told Zelenskyy that assurances to "run a fully transparent investigation" and "turn over every stone" were necessary in his call with President Trump.
4. Sondland said that Giuliani told him, Perry, and Volker that "the president wanted a statement from President Zelenskyy committing Ukraine to look into corruption issues."
5. Sondland's testimony contradicted the White House's defense of Trump and undermined the president's assertion that he had no knowledge of the pressure campaign being waged against Ukraine by Giuliani and others.

In conclusion, Gordon D. Sondland's testimony before the House Intelligence Committee was a bombshell that revealed the extent of the pressure campaign being waged against Ukraine by President Trump and his allies. Sondland's confirmation of a quid pro quo with Ukraine, as well as his revelations about Giuliani's role in the affair, have raised serious questions about the president's conduct and could have significant implications for the ongoing impeachment inquiry.
In a stunning turn of events, Gordon D. Sondland, the U.S. ambassador to the European Union, testified before the House Intelligence Committee that President Trump directed him to work with Rudy Giuliani on matters related to Ukraine. Sondland's testimony was a bombshell that has sent shockwaves through Washington and could have significant implications for the ongoing impeachment inquiry against the President.

During his testimony, Sondland said that although Trump never directly told him what he wanted Ukraine to investigate, Giuliani's instructions "reflected President Trump's desires and requirements." Sondland also revealed that he told Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in advance that assurances to "run a fully transparent investigation" and "turn over every stone" were necessary in his call with President Trump.

Sondland's testimony contradicts the White House's claims that there was no quid pro quo with Ukraine. In a statement, White House press secretary Stephanie Grisham said that Trump "wanted nothing" from Ukraine and repeated "no quid pro quo over and over again." However, Sondland's testimony suggests that there was indeed a quid pro quo, as Giuliani told him, Energy Secretary Rick Perry, and Ambassador Kurt Volker that "the president wanted a statement from President Zelenskyy committing Ukraine to look into corruption issues."

Sondland's testimony also shed light on his relationship with Trump. In his 2022 book, Sondland wrote that Trump was "kind of a dick" when he first met him and "a man with a fragile ego who wants more than anything to feed that ego the way an addict would feed a habit." However, Sondland also wrote that Trump was "essentially right about many things, including how out of whack our relationship with Europe has become."

Republicans on the House Intelligence Committee continued to defend Trump throughout the hearing, seizing on Sondland's comments that Trump had never spoken to him about the aid. However, Sondland's testimony was a significant blow to the President's defense, as it contradicted previous statements made by Trump and his allies.

In his opening statement and testimony, Sondland said he was working with Trump's attorney Rudy Giuliani on matters related to Ukraine. This revelation could have significant implications for the impeachment inquiry, as it suggests that Trump was directly involved in the efforts to pressure Ukraine to investigate his political rivals.

Overall, Sondland's testimony was a seminal moment in the impeachment inquiry against President Trump. It provided new evidence of a quid pro quo with Ukraine and contradicted previous statements made by the White House. The implications of Sondland's testimony are still unfolding, but it is clear that it has significantly altered the landscape of the impeachment inquiry.
Gordon D. Sondland, the US ambassador to the European Union, testified before the House Intelligence Committee that President Donald Trump directed him to work with his personal lawyer, Rudy Giuliani, on matters related to Ukraine. Sondland stated that although Trump never directly told him what he wanted Ukraine to investigate, Giuliani's instructions "reflected President Trump's desires and requirements."
Sondland revealed that he had informed Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in advance that assurances to "run a fully transparent investigation" and "turn over every stone" were necessary in his call with President Trump. Republicans on the committee continued to defend Trump, seizing on Sondland's comments that Trump had never spoken to him about the aid.
Sondland said that Giuliani told him, Energy Secretary Rick Perry, and Ambassador Kurt Volker that "the president wanted a statement from President Zelenskyy committing Ukraine to look into corruption issues." He added that Giuliani specifically mentioned the 2016 election and the Bidens.
In his 2022 book about his time in government, Sondland described Trump as "kind of a dick" when he first met him and "a man with a fragile ego who wants more than anything to feed that ego the way an addict would feed a habit." However, he also wrote that Trump was "essentially right about many things, including how out of whack our relationship with Europe has become."
Rep. Adam Schiff, the California Democrat who chairs the Intelligence Committee, called Sondland's testimony "a seminal moment in our investigation." The hearing was seen as a turning point in the impeachment inquiry against President Trump.
Overall, Sondland's testimony provided a direct link between Trump and Giuliani's efforts to pressure Ukraine into investigating the Bidens and the 2016 election. It also shed light on the role of other officials, including Perry and Volker, in carrying out Trump's wishes. The hearing was a significant development in the ongoing investigation into Trump's conduct and its potential implications for US foreign policy.
In a significant development in the impeachment inquiry against US President Donald Trump, Gordon D. Sondland, the US ambassador to the European Union, testified before the House Intelligence Committee that the President had directed him to work with Rudy Giuliani on matters related to Ukraine. Sondland, who was one of the key witnesses in the impeachment proceedings, told the committee that he had been instructed by Giuliani, the President's personal lawyer, to push Ukraine to investigate the 2016 election interference and the role of Joe Biden and his son Hunter in Ukrainian energy company Burisma.

During his testimony, Sondland said that he had informed President Volodymyr Zelenskyy of Ukraine in advance that he needed to provide assurances of a "fully transparent investigation" and to "turn over every stone" for the call to go ahead with President Trump. Sondland testified that although Trump had never directly told him what he wanted Ukraine to investigate, Giuliani's instructions "reflected President Trump's desires and requirements."

Despite the President's repeated claims of "no quid pro quo," Sondland's testimony suggested that there was indeed a condition attached to the release of military aid to Ukraine. Sondland said that Giuliani had told him, Energy Secretary Rick Perry, and Ambassador Kurt Volker, who were all tasked with talking to Ukraine, that "the president wanted a statement from President Zelenskyy committing Ukraine to look into corruption issues." Sondland added that Giuliani specifically mentioned the 2016 election and the Bidens.

Throughout the hearing, Republicans on the House Intelligence Committee continued to defend the President, seizing on Sondland's comments that Trump had never spoken to him about the aid. However, Sondland's testimony provided a critical insight into the role of Giuliani in the President's dealings with Ukraine.

In his 2022 book about his time in government, Sondland described Trump as "kind of a dick" when he first met him and "a man with a fragile ego who wants more than anything to feed that ego the way an addict would feed a habit." However, he also wrote that Trump was "essentially right about many things, including how out of whack our relationship with Europe has become."

Rep. Adam Schiff, the California Democrat who chairs the Intelligence Committee, called Sondland's testimony "a seminal moment in our investigation." The five takeaways from Sondland's bombshell testimony were that Trump directed him to work with Giuliani, that Giuliani's instructions reflected Trump's desires, that Sondland had informed Zelenskyy about the need for a "fully transparent investigation," that there was a condition attached to the release of military aid, and that Republicans continued to defend the President throughout the hearing.
BREAKING: GORDON D. SONDLAND TESTIFIES TRUMP DIRECTED HIM TO WORK WITH RUDY GIULIANI ON UKRAINE
In a stunning turn of events, Gordon D. Sondland, the U.S. ambassador to the European Union, told the House Intelligence Committee that President Donald Trump had directed him to work with Rudy Giuliani on matters related to Ukraine.
"I was instructed to talk to Mr. Giuliani by the president," Sondland said during his testimony on Wednesday. "I did not understand at the time that Mr. Giuliani's role was anything other than an effort to make sure that the Ukrainian government was serious about addressing corruption."
Sondland said that although Trump never directly told him what he wanted Ukraine to investigate, Giuliani's instructions "reflected President Trump's desires and requirements." Sondland also told the committee that he had informed Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky in advance that he needed to assure Trump that Ukraine would conduct a "fully transparent investigation" and "turn over every stone."
The White House disputed Sondland's testimony, with press secretary Stephanie Grisham saying that Trump "wanted nothing" from Ukraine and repeated "no quid pro quo over and over again."
However, Sondland's bombshell testimony contradicted Trump's claims that there was no quid pro quo, as the ambassador testified that "everyone was in the loop" and that there was a "clear understanding" that the release of military aid was contingent on Ukraine's willingness to investigate Trump's political rivals.
In response to the testimony, Republicans on the House Intelligence Committee continued to defend Trump, seizing on Sondland's comments that Trump had never spoken to him about the aid. However, Sondland made it clear that Giuliani had given him explicit instructions about the president's desires and requirements.
During the hearing, Sondland also gave a candid assessment of Trump's character, calling him "kind of a dick" in his book. But he also acknowledged that Trump had a point about the need for the U.S. to address its relationship with Europe, which he said was "out of whack."
As the impeachment inquiry against President Trump continues, Sondland's testimony has been described as a "seminal moment" by chairman Adam Schiff, and could have major implications for the president's future. With the truth about Trump's involvement in Ukraine slowly coming to light, only time will tell what consequences he may face.
**Sondland Testifies that Trump Directed Him to Work with Giuliani on Ukraine Matters**

In a bombshell testimony, Gordon D. Sondland, the U.S. ambassador to the European Union, revealed to the House Intelligence Committee that President Trump directed him to work with Rudy Giuliani on matters related to Ukraine. Sondland's testimony has sent shockwaves through the impeachment inquiry, with Democrats hailing it as a "seminal moment" in the investigation.

According to Sondland, Trump never directly told him what he wanted Ukraine to investigate, but Giuliani's instructions "reflected President Trump's desires and requirements." Sondland said that Giuliani told him, Energy Secretary Rick Perry, and Ambassador Kurt Volker that "the president wanted a statement from President Zelenskyy committing Ukraine to look into corruption issues." Specifically, Giuliani mentioned the 2016 election and the Bidens, a clear reference to the conspiracy theory that has been at the center of the impeachment inquiry.

Sondland's testimony contradicts the White House's claims that there was no quid pro quo involved in the dealings with Ukraine. While Sondland said that Trump never spoke to him about the aid, his testimony suggests that the president's desire for Ukraine to investigate the Bidens was a key factor in the withholding of military aid to the country.

Republicans on the House Intelligence Committee continued to defend Trump throughout the hearing, seizing on Sondland's comments that Trump had never spoken to him about the aid. However, Democrats argue that Sondland's testimony provides further evidence of a quid pro quo, with Rep. Adam Schiff, the chairman of the Intelligence Committee, calling it a "seminal moment in our investigation."

Sondland's testimony also sheds light on the role of Giuliani in the Ukraine dealings. According to Sondland, Giuliani was the key intermediary between Trump and the Ukrainian government, and his instructions were seen as reflecting the president's desires. This raises questions about Giuliani's role in the impeachment inquiry and whether he will be called to testify.

In his 2022 book, Sondland wrote about his time in government, describing Trump as "a man with a fragile ego who wants more than anything to feed that ego the way an addict would feed a habit." However, he also praised Trump for being "essentially right about many things, including how out of whack our relationship with Europe has become."

The White House has pushed back against Sondland's testimony, with Press Secretary Stephanie Grisham saying that Trump "wanted nothing" from Ukraine and repeated "no quid pro quo over and over again." However, Sondland's testimony has dealt a significant blow to the White House's defense, and it remains to be seen how the impeachment inquiry will proceed in the coming weeks.

**Five Takeaways from Sondland's Testimony**

1. Trump directed Sondland to work with Giuliani on Ukraine matters.
2. Giuliani's instructions reflected Trump's desires and requirements.
3. Sondland was told that Trump wanted a statement from President Zelenskyy committing Ukraine to look into corruption issues.
4. Giuliani specifically mentioned the 2016 election and the Bidens.
5. Sondland's testimony contradicts the White House's claims that there was no quid pro quo involved in the dealings with Ukraine.
**Sondland Testifies: Trump Directed Him to Work with Giuliani on Ukraine Matters**

In a bombshell testimony, Gordon D. Sondland, the U.S. ambassador to the European Union, told the House Intelligence Committee on Wednesday that President Donald Trump directed him to work with Rudy Giuliani on matters related to Ukraine. Sondland's testimony has sent shockwaves through the impeachment inquiry, with Democrats hailing it as a "seminal moment" in the investigation.

According to Sondland, Trump never directly told him what he wanted Ukraine to investigate, but Giuliani's instructions "reflected President Trump's desires and requirements." Sondland said he was working with Giuliani, Energy Secretary Rick Perry, and Ambassador Kurt Volker to pressure Ukraine to launch investigations into corruption, including the 2016 election and the Bidens.

Sondland's testimony contradicts the White House's claims that there was no quid pro quo involved in the dealings with Ukraine. White House Press Secretary Stephanie Grisham said in a statement that Trump "wanted nothing" from Ukraine and repeated "no quid pro quo over and over again." However, Sondland's testimony suggests that Trump's desire for investigations was a key factor in the dealings with Ukraine.

In his opening statement, Sondland said that he told Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy that assurances to "run a fully transparent investigation" and "turn over every stone" were necessary in his call with Trump. Sondland also said that Giuliani specifically mentioned the 2016 election and the Bidens, suggesting that Trump's personal interests were driving the push for investigations.

Republicans on the House Intelligence Committee continued to defend Trump throughout the hearing, seizing on Sondland's comments that Trump had never spoken to him about the aid. However, Democrats argued that Sondland's testimony provided further evidence of Trump's involvement in the scandal.

Rep. Adam Schiff, the California Democrat who chairs the Intelligence Committee, called Sondland's testimony "a seminal moment in our investigation." Schiff said that Sondland's testimony "confirms that the president was involved in a corrupt scheme to pressure Ukraine to investigate his political rival."

Sondland's testimony is the latest development in the impeachment inquiry, which has been ongoing for several weeks. The inquiry is investigating whether Trump abused his power by pressuring Ukraine to launch investigations into his political rivals.

In a surprising twist, Sondland's testimony also revealed that he had written about his time in government in a 2022 book, in which he described Trump as "kind of a dick" and "a man with a fragile ego who wants more than anything to feed that ego the way an addict would feed a habit." However, Sondland also wrote that Trump was "essentially right about many things, including how out of whack our relationship with Europe has become."

The impeachment inquiry is expected to continue in the coming weeks, with several more witnesses scheduled to testify. The inquiry could potentially lead to articles of impeachment being drawn up against Trump, which would be a historic and unprecedented move.
**Sondland Testifies Trump Directed Him to Work with Giuliani on Ukraine Matters**

In a bombshell testimony, Gordon D. Sondland, the U.S. ambassador to the European Union, told the House Intelligence Committee that President Trump directed him to work with Rudy Giuliani on matters related to Ukraine. Sondland's testimony, which was part of the ongoing impeachment inquiry against President Trump, has been described as a "seminal moment" in the investigation by Rep. Adam Schiff, the California Democrat who chairs the Intelligence Committee.

According to Sondland, Trump never directly told him what he wanted Ukraine to investigate, but Giuliani's instructions "reflected President Trump's desires and requirements." Sondland said that Giuliani told him, along with Energy Secretary Rick Perry and Ambassador Kurt Volker, that "the president wanted a statement from President Zelenskyy committing Ukraine to look into corruption issues." Specifically, Giuliani mentioned the 2016 election and the Bidens, indicating that Trump's interest in Ukraine was tied to his domestic political concerns.

Sondland's testimony contradicts the White House's claims that there was no quid pro quo in Trump's dealings with Ukraine. In a statement, White House press secretary Stephanie Grisham said that Trump "wanted nothing" from Ukraine and repeated "no quid pro quo over and over again." However, Sondland's testimony suggests that Trump's desire for Ukraine to investigate the Bidens and other matters was a key factor in his decision to withhold military aid from the country.

Sondland's relationship with Trump has been complex, according to his 2022 book about his time in government. He described Trump as "kind of a dick" when he first met him, but also praised him for being "essentially right about many things, including how out of whack our relationship with Europe has become." However, Sondland's testimony suggests that he has become increasingly disillusioned with Trump's behavior, particularly with regards to Ukraine.

The implications of Sondland's testimony are significant, and could potentially shift the dynamics of the impeachment inquiry. Republicans on the House Intelligence Committee continued to defend Trump throughout the hearing, seizing on Sondland's comments that Trump had never spoken to him about the aid. However, Democrats are likely to argue that Sondland's testimony provides further evidence of Trump's wrongdoing and abuse of power.

As the impeachment inquiry continues, Sondland's testimony is likely to be a key piece of evidence in the case against Trump. His willingness to come forward and testify about Trump's actions has been praised by Democrats, and could potentially inspire other witnesses to come forward. The question now is what impact Sondland's testimony will have on the impeachment proceedings, and whether it will ultimately lead to Trump's removal from office.
**Sondland Testifies: Trump Directed Me to Work with Giuliani on Ukraine Matters**

In a bombshell testimony before the House Intelligence Committee, U.S. Ambassador to the European Union Gordon D. Sondland revealed that President Donald Trump directed him to work with Rudy Giuliani on matters related to Ukraine. Sondland's testimony provided a significant insight into the events surrounding the impeachment inquiry against President Trump.

According to Sondland, President Trump never explicitly told him what he wanted Ukraine to investigate, but Rudy Giuliani's instructions "reflected President Trump's desires and requirements." Sondland's remarks implicated Giuliani in a plan to pressure Ukraine to investigate corruption issues, including the 2016 election and the Bidens.

Sondland's testimony contradicted the White House's claims that there was no quid pro quo between the U.S. and Ukraine. White House Press Secretary Stephanie Grisham had said earlier that Trump "wanted nothing" from Ukraine and that there was "no quid pro quo." However, Sondland's comments suggested that Giuliani's demands for a statement from Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy committing to investigate corruption issues were, in fact, coming from the President himself.

Sondland also revealed that Giuliani told him, Energy Secretary Rick Perry, and Ambassador Kurt Volker that the President wanted a statement from Zelenskyy committing Ukraine to look into corruption issues. Giuliani specifically mentioned the 2016 election and the Bidens.

The testimony sparked a heated debate among lawmakers, with Republicans on the House Intelligence Committee continuing to defend Trump. They seized on Sondland's comments that Trump had never spoken to him about the aid, but Democrats argued that Sondland's testimony provided clear evidence of a quid pro quo.

Rep. Adam Schiff, the California Democrat who chairs the Intelligence Committee, called Sondland's testimony "a seminal moment in our investigation." He added that Sondland's comments provided a "damning" portrayal of the President's actions.

In his written testimony, Sondland also offered a candid assessment of President Trump's personality, describing him as "a man with a fragile ego who wants more than anything to feed that ego the way an addict would feed a habit." However, he also praised Trump's views on Europe, saying that he was "essentially right about many things, including how out of whack our relationship with Europe has become."

The testimony marked a significant turning point in the impeachment inquiry, which has been ongoing since September. As the inquiry continues, lawmakers will likely focus on Sondland's revelations and their implications for the President's actions.
**Bombshell Testimony: US Ambassador to EU Reveals Trump Directed Him to Work with Giuliani on Ukraine Matters**

In a shocking revelation, Gordon D. Sondland, the US ambassador to the European Union, dropped a bombshell during his testimony before the House Intelligence Committee, stating that President Donald Trump directed him to work with Rudy Giuliani on matters related to Ukraine.

According to Sondland, Giuliani's instructions "reflected President Trump's desires and requirements," although Trump never directly communicated to him what he wanted Ukraine to investigate. The ambassador's testimony contradicts the White House's repeated claims that Trump "wanted nothing" from Ukraine and that there was "no quid pro quo."

During the hearing, Sondland recalled a conversation with Giuliani, in which the president's attorney told him, Energy Secretary Rick Perry, and Ambassador Kurt Volker that "the president wanted a statement from President Zelenskyy committing Ukraine to look into corruption issues." Specifically, Giuliani mentioned the 2016 election and the Bidens, a clear indication that Trump's interests in Ukraine were motivated by a desire to investigate his political rivals.

Sondland's testimony has been hailed as a "seminal moment" in the impeachment inquiry by Rep. Adam Schiff, the chairman of the Intelligence Committee. The ambassador's statements have significant implications for Trump's presidency, as they suggest that the president was personally involved in pressuring Ukraine to investigate his political opponents.

Despite Sondland's damning testimony, Republicans on the House Intelligence Committee continued to defend Trump, highlighting the ambassador's admission that Trump never spoke to him directly about the aid. However, Sondland's account of Giuliani's instructions and the president's goals in Ukraine undermines the White House's narrative that there was no quid pro quo.

Sondland's relationship with Trump has been complicated, with the ambassador describing the president as "kind of a dick" in his 2022 book. However, he also praised Trump's instincts on European policy, saying that the president was "essentially right about many things, including how out of whack our relationship with Europe has become."

The ambassador's testimony has sent shockwaves through Washington, and its impact on the impeachment inquiry is yet to be fully felt. As the inquiry continues to unfold, one thing is clear: Sondland's bombshell testimony has dealt a significant blow to Trump's defense and has raised serious questions about the president's involvement in the Ukraine scandal.