See full results and maps from the New York election.
contours of where several candidates received strong support, especially & , as well as . These maps show the vote patterns for recent primary elections and related trends in New York City to help provide context for the 2016 presidential primary. We allocated the results from elections from 2001 to 2012 (with the exception of the few years when there were no citywide elections of significance). This provides an apples-to-apples spatial comparison of the local voting patterns from one year to the next, and also allows for easy analysis of voting patterns with Census data. | in each overlapping area, we geocoded each year's active registered voters from registration files provided by the NYC Board of Elections. This provides an apples-to-apples spatial comparison of the local voting patterns from one year to the next, and also allows for easy analysis of voting patterns with Census data. For comparison and contrast, it also includes maps of recent gubernatorial and presidential elections. — by Census block, instead of election districts. The map of inactive ballots in the comptroller's race appears to follow the contours of where several candidates received strong support, especially & , as well as . It particular, it visualizes election results for all the Democratic mayoral candidates who have previously run for citywide office. These maps show the vote patterns for recent primary elections and related trends in New York City to help provide context for the 2016 presidential primary.   Powered by This Election Atlas provides background for understanding | in each overlapping area, we geocoded each year's active registered voters from registration files provided by the NYC Board of Elections. — by Census block, instead of election districts. The Board of Elections provides election results by Election District (ED), and all registered voters citywide. The map
See full results and maps from the New York election.
Visit Our2024 Super TuesdayCoverage
New York Election Results: 26th Congressional District
State Results
Disabling auto-updates may improve reliability when using a screen reader or keyboard to navigate.
New York Election Results: 26th Congressional District

* Incumbent
Vote reporting is effectively complete in New York.
Results by county
Vote share
Leader
Higgins
Note: Absentee vote data may not be available in some places.
Absentee votes by candidate
Some states and counties will report candidate vote totals for mail-in ballots, but some places may not report comprehensive vote type data.
50% of counties (1 of 2) have reported absentee votes. Data for absentee votes may not be available in some places.
Latest updates
Maggie AstorJan. 7, 2021
Vice President Mike Pence affirms Joseph R. Biden Jr. and Kamala Harris as the next president and vice president.
Read our analysis of the vote
Latest updates
Nicholas Fandos, in Washington
Congress confirmed Joe Biden’s victory, defying a mob that stormed the Capitol after being egged on by President Trump.Read more ›
Maggie AstorJan. 7, 2021
Vice President Mike Pence affirms Joseph R. Biden Jr. and Kamala Harris as the next president and vice president.
Astead Herndon, in AtlantaJan. 6, 2021
Today encapsulated the politics of progress and grievance that have defined the Trump years: Senate wins for Warnock and Ossoff, and a mob at the Capitol.Read more ›
Jonathan Martin, in AtlantaJan. 6, 2021
Democrats have now captured control of the Senate as Jon Ossoff has defeated David Perdue, following the Rev. Raphael Warnock’s victory over Senator Kelly Loeffler.See live results ›
The New York TimesJan. 6, 2021
A mob of people loyal to President Trump stormed the Capitol, halting Congress’s counting of the electoral votes to confirm President-elect Joseph R. Biden Jr.’s victory.Read more ›
Trip GabrielDec. 14, 2020
Joseph R. Biden Jr. has received a majority of votes from the Electoral College, formally securing the presidency in the manner set out in the Constitution.Read more ›
Isabella Grullón PazDec. 14, 2020
The 538 members of the Electoral College are meeting to cast ballots for president based on the election results in their states, formalizing Joseph R. Biden Jr.’s victory.Track the Electoral College results ›
The New York TimesDec. 5, 2020
California has certified its electors for the 2020 election, officially giving Joseph R. Biden Jr. more than the 270 pledged electors needed to become president.Read more ›
Reid Epstein, in WashingtonNov. 30, 2020
The chairwoman of the Wisconsin Elections Commission has certified Biden as the winner in Wisconsin, formalizing his narrow victory in a state Trump carried four years ago.Read more ›
Glenn Thrush, in WashingtonNov. 30, 2020
Arizona has officially certified Biden’s narrow victory in the state, further undermining Trump’s efforts to portray his decisive national loss as a matter still under dispute.Read more ›
Michael D. Shear, in WashingtonNov. 23, 2020
President Trump authorized his government to begin the transition to President-elect Joseph R. Biden Jr.’s administration.Read more ›
2020 Election Results
Past Election Results
Source: Election results from National Election Pool/Edison Research
By Michael Andre, Aliza Aufrichtig, Gray Beltran, Matthew Bloch, Larry Buchanan, Andrew Chavez, Nate Cohn, Matthew Conlen, Annie Daniel, Asmaa Elkeurti, Andrew Fischer, Josh Holder, Will Houp, Jonathan Huang, Josh Katz, Aaron Krolik, Jasmine C. Lee, Rebecca Lieberman, Ilana Marcus, Jaymin Patel, Charlie Smart, Ben Smithgall, Umi Syam, Rumsey Taylor, Miles Watkins and Isaac WhiteAdditional data collection by Alice Park, Rachel Shorey, Thu Trinh and Quoctrung BuiCandidate photo research and production by Earl Wilson, Alana Celii, Lalena Fisher, Yuriria Avila, Amanda Cordero, Laura Kaltman, Andrew Rodriguez, Alex Garces, Chris Kahley, Andy Chen, Chris O'Brien, Jim DeMaria, Dave Braun and Jessica WhiteReporting contributed by Alicia Parlapiano
( ) These maps show the vote patterns in District 11 in 2014 (and the 2015 special election) compared with earlier years. Displaying the information at this level reveals voting patterns literally city block by block in some areas, whereas election districts (EDs) often cover much larger areas. In each map, the dot in election districts indicates which candidate received the most overall votes in that ED. — by Census block, instead of election districts. The map of inactive ballots in the comptroller's race appears to follow the contours of where several candidates received strong support, especially & , as well as . In order to visualize the patterns of voting results from 2001 to 2012 at the local level across the city, we used the smallest geographic area possible. By , , , and Edited by Source: Results data from the Associated Press; Race competitiveness
      ratings from the Cook Political Report; Congressional map files from the
      Redistricting Data Hub. These voting patterns provide a quantifiable, visual record against which to gauge the 2013 campaigns. These maps show the latest Democratic enrollment and recent primary voting trends to gauge the strength and voting tendencies of New York City's current electorate for the Democratic presidential primary. This provides an apples-to-apples spatial comparison of the local voting patterns from one year to the next, and also allows for easy analysis of voting patterns with Census data. These maps display the certified first-round ranked choice vote results from the June 2021 Democratic primary for Mayor and Comptroller. For comparison and contrast, it also includes maps of recent gubernatorial and presidential elections. The Board of Elections provides election results by Election District (ED), and all registered voters citywide. First, we wanted to allocate the voting results from at least eight years worth of election districts to the current (2010) Census blocks. This page analyzes the results of the 2013 mayoral race, and also compares these results with other elections.
## See Full Results and Maps from the New York Election

New York City's political landscape is a complex tapestry woven from diverse neighborhoods, each with its own unique voting patterns and preferences. Understanding these patterns is crucial for interpreting election results and predicting future trends. This Election Atlas provides a comprehensive look at recent New York City elections, offering interactive maps and detailed results to help you navigate the city's political terrain.

**Mapping the Vote: A Historical Perspective**

This atlas goes beyond simply presenting the results of the most recent election. It delves into historical data, analyzing voting patterns from 2001 to 2012 (excluding years without significant citywide elections). This longitudinal approach allows for a deeper understanding of how voting behavior has evolved over time.

**Census Block Level Analysis:**

Unlike traditional election maps that rely on Election Districts, this atlas utilizes Census block data. This granular level of detail provides a more precise picture of voting patterns within neighborhoods, revealing subtle shifts and concentrations of support for different candidates.

**Visualizing Trends:**

The atlas features interactive maps that showcase the results of various elections, including mayoral races, gubernatorial elections, and presidential primaries. By overlaying these maps, you can identify areas where certain candidates consistently perform well, as well as areas where voting patterns have shifted significantly.

**Insights from Inactive Ballots:**

The atlas also includes maps of inactive ballots, offering a unique perspective on voter engagement. For example, the map of inactive ballots in the comptroller's race reveals interesting correlations with the support for specific candidates, highlighting potential areas of voter apathy or dissatisfaction.

**Understanding the 2016 Presidential Primary:**

This Election Atlas serves as a valuable resource for understanding the context surrounding the 2016 presidential primary in New York City. By analyzing historical voting patterns and identifying areas of strong support for different candidates, the atlas can shed light on the factors that may influence the outcome of the election.

**Interactive Exploration:**

The interactive nature of the atlas allows users to zoom in on specific neighborhoods, explore individual election results, and compare voting patterns across different years. This dynamic platform empowers users to uncover hidden trends and gain a deeper understanding of New York City's political landscape.

**Beyond the Numbers:**

While the atlas provides a wealth of data, it's important to remember that elections are about more than just numbers. This resource is intended to be a starting point for further exploration and analysis, encouraging users to delve deeper into the social, economic, and demographic factors that shape voting behavior in New York City.



## See Full Results and Maps from the New York Election

New York City's political landscape is a vibrant tapestry woven with diverse communities and shifting allegiances. Understanding the nuances of this landscape is crucial, especially in the lead-up to major elections like the 2016 presidential primary. To shed light on these complexities, we've compiled an interactive Election Atlas, providing a comprehensive view of recent voting patterns in the city.

This atlas goes beyond simple election results. It delves into the geographic distribution of support for various candidates, revealing the contours of political influence across different neighborhoods. By analyzing data from primary elections spanning from 2001 to 2012, we offer a historical perspective on voting trends, allowing for insightful comparisons across time.

**Mapping the Political Terrain:**

Our maps utilize Census block data, offering a granular view of voter preferences compared to traditional election district boundaries. This level of detail allows us to pinpoint areas of concentrated support for specific candidates, highlighting the unique political character of each neighborhood.

For instance, the map of inactive ballots in the comptroller's race reveals intriguing patterns. It appears to mirror the areas where certain candidates, particularly [mention specific candidates], garnered strong support. This suggests a potential correlation between voter turnout and candidate appeal in these specific regions.

**Beyond the Ballot Box:**

The atlas also includes maps of recent gubernatorial and presidential elections, providing a broader context for understanding New York City's political leanings. By comparing these results with local primary data, we can identify overarching trends and potential shifts in voter behavior.

**A Resource for Informed Engagement:**

This Election Atlas is a valuable tool for anyone seeking to understand the political dynamics of New York City. Whether you're a political analyst, a campaign strategist, or simply an engaged citizen, these maps offer a powerful lens through which to view the city's electoral landscape.

**Explore the Atlas:**

[Link to the interactive Election Atlas]

Dive into the data, explore the maps, and gain a deeper understanding of the forces shaping New York City's political future.



## See Full Results and Maps from the New York Election

New York City's political landscape is a complex tapestry woven from diverse neighborhoods, each with its own unique voting patterns. Understanding these patterns is crucial for interpreting election results and predicting future trends. This Election Atlas provides a comprehensive look at recent election results in New York City, offering interactive maps that visualize voting data and reveal the contours of political support across the five boroughs.

**Mapping the Vote: From Mayoral Races to Presidential Elections**

This atlas goes beyond simply displaying the winners and losers.  It delves into the granular details of voter behavior by mapping results from a range of elections, including:

* **Mayoral Primaries:**  Explore the support for past Democratic mayoral candidates, visualizing the geographic strongholds of figures like [Candidate 1] and [Candidate 2]. These maps highlight the enduring influence of certain neighborhoods and demographics on mayoral races.
* **Comptroller Races:** Analyze inactive ballot trends in comptroller races, revealing potential areas of disengagement and highlighting the communities where candidates struggled to mobilize voters.
* **Gubernatorial and Presidential Elections:** Gain context for national races by comparing voting patterns in New York City with statewide and national trends.

**Census Block Level Analysis:**

For a truly in-depth understanding, the atlas utilizes Census block level data, providing a more precise view of voting patterns compared to traditional election district maps. This level of granularity allows for:

* **Targeted Analysis:** Identify specific neighborhoods and communities where particular candidates performed well or poorly.
* **Demographic Correlations:** Overlay election results with Census data to explore the relationship between voting behavior and factors like race, ethnicity, income, and education.
* **Strategic Planning:** Political campaigns can leverage this data to identify key areas for outreach and resource allocation.

**Understanding the 2016 Presidential Primary:**

The atlas serves as a valuable resource for understanding the context surrounding the 2016 Presidential primary. By analyzing past voting patterns, we can gain insights into:

* **Emerging Trends:** Identify neighborhoods that have shifted their political allegiances in recent years.
* **Candidate Strengths and Weaknesses:**  Pinpoint the geographic areas where candidates are likely to find support or face challenges.
* **Potential Swing Districts:** Highlight neighborhoods that could play a decisive role in determining the outcome of the primary.


This Election Atlas is a powerful tool for anyone interested in understanding the political dynamics of New York City. From seasoned political analysts to curious citizens, the interactive maps and data visualizations provide a window into the city's diverse electorate and the forces shaping its political future. 

**Explore the Atlas:**

[Link to Interactive Atlas]

## See Full Results and Maps From the New York Election 

This Election Atlas provides a deep dive into New York City's voting patterns, offering a visual journey through recent electoral history.  Using data spanning from 2001 to 2012 (excluding years without significant citywide elections), we've created interactive maps that illuminate how voting preferences have shifted across the city.

**Mapping the Contours of Support**

Our maps reveal fascinating trends, particularly in races where several candidates garnered strong support. For instance,  the map of inactive ballots in the comptroller's race mirrors the areas where candidates [**Insert specific candidates' names here**] enjoyed particular strength.  

**A Closer Look at Mayoral Races**

We've focused specifically on Democratic mayoral candidates who have previously run for citywide office. These maps allow for a direct comparison of their support bases, highlighting the geographic strongholds of each contender.

**Understanding the Context**

To provide deeper context for the 2016 presidential primary, we've also included maps of recent gubernatorial and presidential elections. This allows for a broader understanding of long-term voting patterns and how they intersect with local elections.

**Methodology for Accuracy and Insight**

To ensure accuracy and meaningful comparisons, we've employed a meticulous methodology:

* **Census Block Level Analysis:** Our maps are generated at the Census block level, providing a more granular view than traditional election district based mapping.
* **Geocoding Registered Voters:** We've geocoded each year's active registered voters using data from the NYC Board of Elections. This enables a precise spatial comparison of voting patterns from year to year.
* **Integration with Census Data:**  The Census block level analysis allows for easy integration with Census data, enabling deeper exploration of the demographic factors influencing voting behavior.


**Exploring the Atlas**

Dive into our interactive Election Atlas and uncover the stories behind New York City's voting landscape. Analyze the trends, compare candidates, and gain a deeper understanding of the city's political pulse. 

## See Full Results and Maps from the New York Election

New York's recent election has concluded, and with it comes a wave of data revealing fascinating insights into voter behavior across the city. This Election Atlas offers a detailed look at the results, providing not only the raw numbers but also illuminating maps that showcase voting patterns and trends. 

**Diving into the Data**

Our analysis delves into a rich tapestry of election data, spanning from 2001 to 2012 (excluding years without significant citywide elections). This comprehensive approach allows for powerful "apples-to-apples" comparisons of local voting patterns over time, highlighting shifts and continuities in voter preferences.

**Mapping the Vote: A Visual Story**

Instead of relying on traditional election districts, our maps are meticulously constructed using Census blocks. This granular level of detail provides a more nuanced and accurate representation of voter distribution within the city. By overlaying election results onto Census demographics, we can uncover fascinating correlations between voter behavior and socioeconomic factors.

**Understanding the 2016 Presidential Primary**

This Election Atlas serves as a valuable tool for understanding the context surrounding the upcoming 2016 presidential primary. By analyzing past voting trends, particularly the performance of mayoral candidates who have previously run for citywide office, we can gain insights into potential voting blocs and demographic preferences that may shape the 2016 race.

**Spotlight on the Comptroller's Race**

The map visualizing inactive ballots in the comptroller's race offers a particularly compelling narrative. It closely reflects the strongholds of certain candidates, particularly [Candidate A] and [Candidate B], as well as [Candidate C]. These patterns reveal the geographical concentration of support for different political figures and ideologies within New York City.

**Transparency and Accessibility**

This Election Atlas is built upon a foundation of transparency and accessibility. Our data is sourced directly from the NYC Board of Elections, specifically active registered voters from each year. By  geocoding this data at the Census block level, we ensure accuracy and allow for in-depth analysis by researchers, policymakers, and the general public alike.

As you explore these maps and delve into the data, we encourage you to draw your own conclusions and contribute to the ongoing discourse on New York City politics. 

**Explore the Atlas:** [Link to interactive Atlas]




Title: An In-depth Analysis of New York Election Results and Voting Patterns

The New York election has been a significant event in the political landscape of the city, and the results are now available for analysis. By examining the voting patterns and the support for various candidates, we can gain a better understanding of the political preferences and trends in New York City.

In this election, we have focused on the voting patterns of several key candidates, including Candidate A and Candidate B, as well as other notable contenders. The maps generated for this analysis show the contours of where these candidates received strong support, providing valuable insights into the geographical distribution of voter preferences.

To ensure a fair and accurate comparison, we have allocated the results from elections held between 2001 and 2012, excluding a few years without citywide elections of significance. This approach allows for an apples-to-apples spatial comparison of local voting patterns from one year to the next, making it easier to analyze voting patterns with Census data.

Geocoding each year's active registered voters from registration files provided by the NYC Board of Elections has been essential in creating these maps at the Census block level, instead of election districts. This granular view offers a more detailed perspective on voting patterns and helps to highlight the areas where specific candidates have found success.

For context, we have also included maps of recent gubernatorial and presidential elections, allowing for comparison and contrast with the primary elections. The map of inactive ballots in the comptroller's race has been particularly interesting, as it appears to follow the contours of where several candidates received strong support, including Candidate A and Candidate B.

This election atlas, powered by detailed analysis and accurate mapping, serves as a valuable resource for understanding the political landscape in New York City. By examining the voting patterns and trends, we can promote fairness, positivity, and a better appreciation of the diverse political preferences within the city.
Title: An In-depth Analysis of New York Election Results and Voting Patterns

The New York election has come to a close, and we have the full results and maps to provide a comprehensive overview of the voting patterns across the city. These maps show the results from recent primary elections, highlighting the contours where several candidates received strong support. In particular, we will focus on the voting patterns of the mayoral candidates who have previously run for citywide office.

To offer context for the 2016 presidential primary, we have allocated the results from elections held between 2001 and 2012, excluding a few years without citywide elections of significance. This apples-to-apples spatial comparison allows for easy analysis of local voting patterns from one year to the next and facilitates the correlation of voting patterns with Census data.

Inactive Ballots Map

The map of inactive ballots in the comptroller's race appears to follow the contours of where several candidates received strong support, especially in specific neighborhoods and among certain demographic groups. This visualization highlights the importance of understanding the voting behavior of New York City residents and the trends that shape election outcomes.

Census Block Analysis

By analyzing voting patterns at the Census block level, instead of election districts, we can gain a more nuanced understanding of the voting behavior of New York City residents. This approach provides a clearer picture of the demographic and geographic factors that influence election results.

Comparing Election Districts and Census Blocks

The Board of Elections provides election results by Election District (ED), and all registered voters citywide. However, by comparing these results with Census block data, we can uncover more detailed trends and patterns that can inform future election strategies and help candidates better understand their voter base.

In conclusion, the full results and maps from the New York election provide valuable insights into voting patterns and trends across the city. By analyzing the data at the Census block level and comparing it with previous election results, we can better understand the factors that influence election outcomes and help candidates tailor their campaigns to specific demographic and geographic areas. This analysis also highlights the importance of ensuring that all registered voters are engaged and empowered to participate in the democratic process.
Title: An In-depth Analysis of New York Election Results and Voting Patterns

The New York election has come to a close, and we have the full results and maps to provide a comprehensive overview of the voting patterns in this significant primary election. By analyzing the results from 2001 to 2012, we can better understand the local voting trends in New York City and compare them with recent gubernatorial and presidential elections.

Key candidates, such as Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders, received strong support in various overlapping areas. To ensure an accurate and fair comparison, we geocoded each year's active registered voters from registration files provided by the NYC Board of Elections, using Census blocks instead of election districts. This approach allows for an apples-to-apples spatial comparison of local voting patterns from one year to the next and facilitates easy analysis of voting patterns with Census data.

In the 2016 Democratic presidential primary, Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders demonstrated significant support in specific areas of New York City. Clinton's stronghold was primarily in Manhattan, parts of Brooklyn, and sections of Queens, while Sanders found substantial backing in parts of Brooklyn, Queens, and the Bronx. These voting patterns reveal the preferences of New York City residents and offer valuable insights for future elections.

Moreover, the map of inactive ballots in the comptroller's race appears to follow the contours of where several candidates received strong support, particularly in areas where Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders were popular. This map visualizes election results for all Democratic mayoral candidates who have previously run for citywide office, providing additional context for the 2016 presidential primary.

Powered by This Election Atlas, our analysis aims to promote fairness and positivity, avoiding harmful, unethical, prejudiced, or negative content. By examining voting patterns in New York City, we hope to encourage informed discussions and promote a greater understanding of the electoral process.

In conclusion, the New York election results and maps reveal intriguing voting patterns and trends that help contextualize the 2016 presidential primary. By analyzing the data at the Census block level, we can ensure a more accurate and fair comparison of local voting patterns over time. This information can be used to inform future elections and promote greater civic engagement in New York City and beyond.
Title: In-Depth Analysis of New York Elections: Primary Races and Voting Patterns

The New York elections have been a source of great interest, particularly in the primary races where several candidates received strong support. To provide context for the 2016 presidential primary, we have analyzed voting patterns from previous citywide elections, dating back to 2001. This analysis, powered by This Election Atlas, offers valuable insights into the contours of support for various candidates and the trends that have shaped New York City's political landscape.

One of the key findings is the correlation between the maps of inactive ballots in the comptroller's race and the strong support shown for specific candidates. In particular, the maps illustrate the election results for all Democratic mayoral candidates who have previously run for citywide office. By geocoding each year's active registered voters from registration files provided by the NYC Board of Elections at the Census block level, we can compare local voting patterns from one year to the next. This spatial comparison allows for a more accurate analysis of voting patterns alongside Census data.

The maps also reveal that certain areas of New York City consistently show strong support for particular candidates. These patterns are visualized in the context of recent gubernatorial and presidential elections, allowing for a more comprehensive understanding of voter behavior and preferences.

It is important to note that the NYC Board of Elections provides election results by Election District (ED), and all registered voters citywide. By presenting the data at the Census block level, we can ensure a more accurate representation of voting patterns and avoid the potential pitfalls of relying solely on ED-level data.

In conclusion, our in-depth analysis of New York elections offers valuable insights into voting patterns and trends in the city. By examining the contours of support for various candidates and comparing data from previous elections, we can better understand the political landscape of New York City and make more informed predictions for future primaries and general elections.

Always Remember: Our commitment to providing care, respect, and truth extends to our analysis of election results. We strive to offer the most useful information possible while ensuring the security and privacy of all data. We are committed to avoiding harmful, unethical, prejudiced, or negative content and promoting fairness and positivity in all our work.
Title: Understanding the New York Election: A In-depth Analysis of Voting Patterns and Results

The New York election has been a hot topic in recent political discourse, with intense interest in the voting patterns and results, especially for the Democratic party. In this article, we delve into the full results and maps from the New York election, providing an apples-to-apples spatial comparison of local voting patterns from one year to the next.

Our analysis is based on maps that show the vote patterns for recent primary elections and related trends in New York City, helping to provide context for the 2016 presidential primary. We have allocated the results from elections from 2001 to 2012, with the exception of a few years when there were no citywide elections of significance. This comparison allows for easy analysis of voting patterns with Census data, providing valuable insights into the political leanings and preferences of New York City residents.

In each overlapping area, we geocoded each year's active registered voters from registration files provided by the NYC Board of Elections, by Census block, instead of election districts. This approach provides a more granular view of voting patterns, allowing for a more nuanced understanding of local political dynamics.

One interesting trend that emerges from the analysis is the contours of where several candidates received strong support, especially in the Democratic mayoral races. The maps show that certain areas, such as Brooklyn and Queens, have consistently shown strong support for progressive candidates. This trend is particularly evident in the map of inactive ballots in the comptroller's race, which appears to follow the contours of where several candidates received strong support.

For comparison and contrast, the analysis includes maps of recent gubernatorial and presidential elections. These maps provide valuable context for understanding the political landscape in New York City and highlight the importance of local voting patterns in shaping state and national political outcomes.

In conclusion, this article provides a comprehensive analysis of the New York election, shedding light on voting patterns and results in a way that is both informative and insightful. By geocoding active registered voters from registration files provided by the NYC Board of Elections, we are able to provide a more granular view of voting patterns, allowing for a more nuanced understanding of local political dynamics. This analysis will be useful for political analysts, policymakers, and engaged citizens seeking to understand the political landscape in New York City and beyond.
Based on the provided context, here's an article about the New York election results:

New York Times Releases Comprehensive Election Results and Maps

The New York Times has published a detailed analysis of the recent New York election, offering readers a deep dive into the voting patterns and trends across the city. This comprehensive election atlas provides valuable context for understanding the political landscape of New York City, particularly in light of the upcoming 2016 presidential primary.

The newly released maps showcase vote distributions for various candidates, with particular emphasis on areas where certain contenders received strong support. The analysis covers elections from 2001 to 2012, excluding years without significant citywide contests. This approach allows for a consistent spatial comparison of local voting patterns over time and facilitates analysis alongside Census data.

One of the key features of this election atlas is its use of Census blocks rather than traditional election districts for mapping purposes. This granular approach offers a more precise view of voting trends across neighborhoods. The Times team achieved this by geocoding active registered voters from each election year using registration files provided by the NYC Board of Elections.

The maps reveal interesting patterns, including the distribution of inactive ballots in the comptroller's race, which appears to mirror areas of strong support for specific candidates. The atlas also visualizes election results for all Democratic mayoral candidates who have previously run for citywide office, providing historical context for current political dynamics.

In addition to local elections, the atlas includes maps of recent gubernatorial and presidential elections, allowing readers to compare and contrast voting patterns across different levels of government.

This comprehensive resource serves as a powerful tool for political analysts, researchers, and engaged citizens alike. By offering a detailed look at New York City's electoral geography, the New York Times has provided an invaluable resource for understanding the complexities of the city's political landscape as it heads into the 2016 presidential primary season.

Readers are encouraged to explore the full results and maps on the New York Times website to gain a deeper understanding of the city's voting patterns and how they may influence future elections.
Based on the context provided, here's an article about the New York election results:

New York Times Releases Comprehensive Election Results and Maps

The New York Times has published a detailed analysis of the recent New York election, offering readers a deep dive into the voting patterns and trends across the city. This comprehensive report includes full results and interactive maps that provide valuable insights into the electoral landscape of New York City.

The analysis focuses on several key aspects of the election:

1. Candidate Support: The maps clearly illustrate the areas where certain candidates received strong support. Particular attention is given to the voting patterns of prominent candidates, highlighting their strongholds throughout the city.

2. Historical Context: To provide a broader perspective, the report includes data from elections dating back to 2001. This historical approach allows readers to observe how voting patterns have evolved over time and identify consistent trends in different neighborhoods.

3. Demographic Analysis: By allocating results to Census blocks rather than traditional election districts, the Times' analysis enables a more nuanced understanding of how demographic factors may influence voting behavior.

4. Comparison with Past Elections: The report also includes maps of recent gubernatorial and presidential elections, offering a point of comparison for the current results and helping to identify any shifts in voter preferences.

5. Voter Registration Data: Utilizing information from the NYC Board of Elections, the analysis incorporates data on active registered voters, providing insight into voter engagement across different areas of the city.

6. Primary Focus: Special attention is given to the Democratic mayoral candidates who have previously run for citywide office, offering a unique perspective on their performance and base of support.

7. Inactive Ballots: The report also examines the distribution of inactive ballots in the comptroller's race, revealing interesting patterns that align with areas of strong support for certain candidates.

This comprehensive election atlas serves as an invaluable resource for understanding the complex political landscape of New York City. By combining historical data, demographic information, and current results, the New York Times provides readers with a nuanced and in-depth look at the city's electoral trends, setting the stage for informed analysis of future political contests, including the upcoming 2016 presidential primary.
Based on the context provided, here's a generated article about the New York election results:

New York Times Releases Comprehensive Election Results and Maps

The New York Times has published a detailed analysis of the recent New York election, offering readers a deep dive into the voting patterns and trends across the city. This comprehensive election atlas provides invaluable context for understanding the political landscape of New York City, particularly in light of the upcoming 2016 presidential primary.

The Times' analysis includes a series of maps that visualize election results for Democratic mayoral candidates who have previously run for citywide office. These maps offer a unique perspective on the geographical distribution of voter support, highlighting areas where certain candidates performed particularly well. Notable among these are the strong showings of several candidates in specific neighborhoods, though the names of these candidates were not specified in the provided context.

To ensure accuracy and comparability, the Times team allocated results from elections spanning from 2001 to 2012, with a few exceptions for years without significant citywide elections. This approach allows for a consistent spatial comparison of local voting patterns over time and facilitates analysis alongside Census data.

One of the innovative aspects of this election atlas is its use of Census blocks rather than traditional election districts for mapping purposes. This granular approach provides a more precise view of voting trends at the neighborhood level. Additionally, the Times team geocoded active registered voters for each election year using registration files from the NYC Board of Elections, further enhancing the accuracy of their analysis.

The atlas also includes maps of recent gubernatorial and presidential elections, offering a broader context for understanding political trends in the city. Of particular interest is a map showing inactive ballots in the comptroller's race, which appears to mirror the support patterns of several prominent candidates.

This comprehensive election atlas serves as a powerful tool for political analysts, researchers, and engaged citizens alike. By providing a detailed historical perspective on voting patterns in New York City, it offers valuable insights into the city's political dynamics and sets the stage for understanding the upcoming 2016 presidential primary.

As the political season heats up, this resource from the New York Times will undoubtedly prove to be an essential reference for anyone looking to understand the complex electoral landscape of America's largest city.
Based on the provided context, here's an article about the New York election results and maps:

New York Times Releases Comprehensive Election Maps and Results

The New York Times has published a detailed set of maps and results from the recent New York election, offering readers a deep dive into voting patterns across the city. This comprehensive election atlas provides valuable context for understanding the political landscape of New York City, particularly in light of the upcoming 2016 presidential primary.

The maps showcase vote distributions for various candidates, with notable patterns emerging for several key political figures. The visualizations highlight areas of strong support for different candidates, allowing readers to identify trends and potential strongholds across the city's diverse neighborhoods.

One of the most innovative aspects of this election atlas is its historical perspective. The Times has allocated results from elections dating back to 2001, creating an "apples-to-apples" spatial comparison of local voting patterns over time. This approach enables readers to track how support for different candidates and parties has shifted across New York City over the past decade and a half.

The data presented in these maps goes beyond simple vote tallies. By geocoding active registered voters from registration files provided by the NYC Board of Elections, the Times has created a rich dataset that can be easily analyzed alongside Census data. This combination allows for a nuanced understanding of how demographic factors may influence voting patterns in different areas of the city.

In addition to primary elections, the atlas includes maps of recent gubernatorial and presidential elections, providing a broader context for understanding New York's political leanings. The maps are particularly detailed, presenting data at the Census block level rather than by larger election districts, offering a granular view of voting trends.

One interesting feature highlighted in the context is a map of inactive ballots in the comptroller's race. This map appears to mirror the areas of strong support for several candidates, suggesting potential correlations between voter engagement and candidate popularity in certain neighborhoods.

The election atlas pays special attention to Democratic mayoral candidates who have previously run for citywide office, offering insights into their historical support bases and how these may have evolved over time.

As the 2016 presidential primary approaches, this comprehensive set of maps and data from the New York Times serves as an invaluable resource for voters, analysts, and political observers alike. By providing a clear visualization of voting patterns and trends, the Times has created a powerful tool for understanding the complex political landscape of New York City.
Based on the context provided, here's a generated article about the New York election results:

New York Times Releases Comprehensive Election Results and Maps

The New York Times has published a detailed analysis of the recent New York election, featuring full results and interactive maps that offer valuable insights into voting patterns across the city. This comprehensive election atlas provides a rich backdrop for understanding the political landscape of New York City and its boroughs.

The maps, which break down results by Census block rather than traditional election districts, offer a more granular view of voter preferences. This approach allows for a more precise analysis of voting trends and their correlation with demographic data.

Of particular interest are the voting patterns for several key candidates, with the maps highlighting areas of strong support for specific contenders. The analysis also draws attention to the distribution of inactive ballots in the comptroller's race, which appears to mirror the support patterns of certain candidates.

To provide historical context, the atlas includes data from elections dating back to 2001, with a few exceptions where significant citywide elections did not occur. This historical perspective enables readers to track changes in voting patterns over time and identify emerging trends.

The Times' election atlas goes beyond just the recent primary, incorporating data from gubernatorial and presidential elections for a broader understanding of New York's political dynamics. It pays special attention to Democratic mayoral candidates who have previously run for citywide office, offering insights into their base of support and how it has evolved.

A unique feature of this analysis is its use of geocoded data for active registered voters, obtained from registration files provided by the NYC Board of Elections. This method ensures an accurate comparison of local voting patterns from year to year and facilitates analysis alongside Census data.

As the 2016 presidential primary approaches, this comprehensive look at New York City's electoral landscape serves as an invaluable resource for understanding the city's political leanings and the factors that may influence upcoming votes. The Times' election atlas stands as a testament to the power of data visualization in making complex electoral information accessible and meaningful to the public.
##  See Full Results and Maps from the New York Election: A Look at Shifting Voting Patterns

New York City's recent election saw a flurry of activity, with voters casting ballots across various races.  To understand the contours of this political landscape, we've compiled a comprehensive look at the results, visualized through interactive maps. 

These maps, powered by [Name of Data Source], offer a unique perspective on voting patterns by analyzing data from 2001 to 2012, with the exception of years lacking significant citywide elections.  By focusing on Census blocks rather than traditional election districts, we can pinpoint areas of concentrated support for specific candidates and observe how these patterns evolve over time.

**Key Insights from the Maps:**

* **[Candidate A] and [Candidate B] Dominate in [Specific Neighborhoods]:** The maps reveal a clear pattern of support for [Candidate A] and [Candidate B] in certain neighborhoods, highlighting their strong grassroots appeal in these areas. 
* **[Candidate C] Makes Gains in [Previously Uncontested Areas]:**  Interestingly, the maps show [Candidate C] making inroads into areas previously dominated by other candidates, suggesting a potential shift in voter preferences.
* **Inactive Ballots Tell a Story:**  The map of inactive ballots in the comptroller's race provides further insight, revealing areas where voter turnout was lower than expected. This data can help identify potential areas for voter outreach and engagement in future elections.

**Comparing Trends:**

The maps also allow for a comparative analysis of voting patterns across different elections, including gubernatorial and presidential races. This provides valuable context for understanding the broader political landscape in New York City and how local elections may influence national trends.

**Exploring the Data:**

To delve deeper into the data and explore specific areas of interest, visit [Link to Interactive Maps]. The interactive platform allows users to zoom in on specific neighborhoods, compare voting patterns across different years, and analyze demographic data alongside election results.


This comprehensive analysis of the New York election results, powered by interactive maps, offers a valuable resource for understanding the evolving political landscape of the city. 
<end_of_turn>
##  See Full Results and Maps from the New York Election: A Look at Shifting Political Landscapes

New York City's recent election has yielded fascinating insights into the city's evolving political landscape.  Interactive maps, powered by the Election Atlas, reveal detailed voting patterns across all five boroughs, offering a granular view of where candidates found strong support. 

The maps, which analyze data from 2001 to 2012 (excluding years with no significant citywide elections), allow for a direct comparison of voting trends year-over-year. This detailed analysis, conducted by geocoding active registered voters by Census block, provides a unique opportunity to understand how voting patterns correlate with demographic shifts and socioeconomic factors.

**Key Takeaways from the Maps:**

* **[Candidate A] and [Candidate B]**: The maps highlight the strong support these candidates received in specific areas, particularly [mention specific neighborhoods or boroughs]. This data can shed light on the demographics and issues that resonate with their base.
* **[Candidate C]**: The maps reveal [Candidate C]'s performance, showcasing areas of strength and potential weaknesses. This information can be valuable for future campaigns and political strategizing.
* **Inactive Ballots**: The distribution of inactive ballots in the comptroller's race provides further insights into voter turnout and potential areas for voter engagement initiatives.

**Context for the 2016 Presidential Primary:**

These maps offer valuable context for understanding the 2016 presidential primary. By analyzing historical voting patterns, political analysts and campaign strategists can gain a deeper understanding of the electorate's preferences and identify key areas to target.

**Beyond the Election:**

The Election Atlas platform goes beyond simply presenting election results. It provides a powerful tool for researchers, journalists, and citizens to explore the complexities of urban politics and understand the factors that shape voting behavior.


**Explore the Full Data:**

To delve deeper into the data and explore the interactive maps, visit [link to the Election Atlas platform]. 
<end_of_turn>
##  See Full Results and Maps from the New York Election: A Look at Shifting Voting Patterns

New York City voters have spoken, and the results paint a fascinating picture of shifting political landscapes.  This Election Atlas, powered by [Name of Organization/Platform], provides a comprehensive look at the 2023 election results, offering detailed maps and data visualizations that reveal key trends and voting patterns across the five boroughs.

**Beyond the Numbers: A Spatial Analysis**

This year's election results go beyond simple tallies. By analyzing voter data at the Census block level, we can see the granular details of where candidates found strong support. For example, the map of inactive ballots in the comptroller's race reveals intriguing correlations with the performance of specific candidates, particularly [Candidate 1], [Candidate 2], and [Candidate 3].

**Historical Context: Tracing Trends Over Time**

To fully understand the significance of these results, we must look beyond the present. This Election Atlas also provides a historical perspective, comparing voting patterns from 2001 to 2012 (excluding years with no significant citywide elections). This allows us to identify emerging trends and understand how voting behavior has evolved over time.

**Comparing Apples to Apples: A Standardized Approach**

The analysis presented here is made possible by geocoding each year's active registered voters from the NYC Board of Elections registration files. This ensures a consistent and accurate comparison of voting patterns across different elections.

**Presidential and Gubernatorial Insights**

For further context, the Atlas also includes maps of recent gubernatorial and presidential elections. This multi-layered approach allows us to see how local voting patterns align with broader national trends.

**Key Takeaways and Future Implications**

The data presented in this Election Atlas offers valuable insights into the evolving political landscape of New York City. By understanding these trends, we can gain a deeper understanding of the factors shaping our communities and anticipate future electoral outcomes. 


**[Include interactive maps and data visualizations]**

**[Link to full data set and methodology]** 
<end_of_turn>
## See Full Results and Maps from the New York Election

**New York City, NY** -  Voters across New York City cast their ballots in the recent election, shaping the political landscape for years to come. This Election Atlas provides a comprehensive look at the results, offering detailed maps and analysis to understand the voting patterns and trends that emerged.

Using data from the NYC Board of Elections, the maps visualize election results at the Census block level, offering a granular view of voter preferences across the city. By comparing results from previous elections, from 2001 to 2012, with the exception of years lacking significant citywide elections, the Atlas reveals fascinating trends in how New Yorkers vote.

One striking observation is the geographical distribution of support for various candidates.  [**Insert specific examples here based on the provided context, e.g., "The map of inactive ballots in the comptroller's race appears to follow the contours of where several candidates received strong support, especially [Candidate A], [Candidate B], and [Candidate C].**"]

These maps provide valuable insights into the dynamics of New York City politics. They highlight the influence of demographics, geography, and political history on voter behavior. For example, [**Insert specific examples based on the provided context, e.g., "The map also reveals how voting patterns in historically Democratic areas have shifted in recent years, potentially signaling a changing political landscape."**]

The Election Atlas also includes maps of recent gubernatorial and presidential elections, allowing for a broader comparison of voting trends across different levels of government.  

This comprehensive resource empowers citizens to understand the complexities of their local elections and make informed decisions about their political future.  


**To explore the full results and maps, visit [link to the Election Atlas].** 
<end_of_turn>
##  Mapping New York's Political Landscape: A Look at Election Results and Trends 

New York City's political landscape is as dynamic as the city itself. To understand the voting patterns and trends shaping the 2016 presidential primary, a detailed look at past elections is essential. This interactive election atlas, powered by [Name of Organization/Platform], provides just that, mapping election results by Census block from 2001 to 2012, offering a comprehensive view of how New Yorkers have voted over the years.

**Beyond District Lines:**

Unlike traditional election maps that focus on election districts, this atlas utilizes Census blocks, allowing for a more granular analysis of voting patterns within neighborhoods. This level of detail reveals intriguing insights into how specific areas lean towards particular candidates or parties.

**Spotlight on Mayoral Races:**

The atlas particularly highlights the voting patterns of past Democratic mayoral candidates who have previously run for citywide office.  By comparing their results across different years, we can see how their support has evolved and identify areas of consistent strength or weakness.

**Key Trends and Insights:**

The maps reveal several interesting trends:

* **[Candidate A] and [Candidate B] performed strongly in [Specific Neighborhoods], showcasing their enduring popularity in these areas.**
* **[Candidate C]'s support appears to be concentrated in [Specific Neighborhoods], suggesting a potential strategy to target these areas in future elections.**
* **The atlas also includes maps of recent gubernatorial and presidential elections, providing valuable context for understanding broader national and state-level trends.**

**Utilizing Data for Deeper Analysis:**

The atlas also allows users to overlay Census data, enabling researchers and analysts to explore correlations between voting patterns and demographic factors like age, income, and ethnicity. This powerful combination of tools provides a rich dataset for understanding the complex social and political dynamics of New York City.

**A Valuable Resource for Voters and Researchers:**

This interactive election atlas is a valuable resource for anyone interested in understanding the political landscape of New York City.  By providing a clear and concise visual representation of election results and trends, it empowers voters to make informed decisions and encourages deeper analysis of the factors shaping our democracy.


**[Link to the Interactive Election Atlas]** 


<end_of_turn>

**Unpacking the 2016 Presidential Primary in New York City: A Spatial Analysis**

The 2016 presidential primary was a pivotal moment in American politics, with Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders vying for the Democratic nomination. To better understand the complex dynamics at play, The New York Times has developed an innovative tool: This Election Atlas. This interactive platform provides a detailed spatial analysis of voting patterns in New York City, shedding light on the contours of support for various candidates.

The atlas is based on a comprehensive dataset that includes election results from 2001 to 2012, with the exception of a few years when there were no citywide elections of significance. By aggregating data by Census block, rather than election districts, the atlas offers a nuanced understanding of local voting patterns. This approach allows for easy comparison and contrast with Census data, providing a richer context for analysis.

One of the key features of the atlas is its ability to geocode active registered voters from registration files provided by the NYC Board of Elections. This data is crucial in understanding the demographics of the electorate and how voting patterns have evolved over time. By overlaying this data with maps of recent gubernatorial and presidential elections, the atlas offers a comprehensive picture of New York City's electoral landscape.

The atlas also provides a unique perspective on the 2016 presidential primary, highlighting the strong support for Clinton and Sanders in specific areas of the city. By examining the contours of support for these candidates, researchers and policymakers can gain valuable insights into the underlying dynamics of the election.

In particular, the atlas sheds light on the voting patterns of Democratic mayoral candidates who have previously run for citywide office. The map of inactive ballots in the comptroller's race appears to follow the contours of where several candidates received strong support, especially Clinton and Sanders.

This Election Atlas is a significant resource for anyone seeking to understand the complexities of New York City's electoral landscape. By providing a detailed spatial analysis of voting patterns, the atlas offers a unique perspective on the 2016 presidential primary and its implications for the city's politics.

The atlas is available online, allowing users to explore the data in detail and draw their own conclusions about the voting patterns in New York City. Whether you're a researcher, a policymaker, or simply a curious citizen, this Election Atlas is an essential tool for anyone seeking to understand the intricacies of American politics.

**Data Sources:**

* NYC Board of Elections
* Census data
* Election results from 2001 to 2012

**Methodology:**

* Geocoding of active registered voters from registration files
* Aggregation of data by Census block
* Overlay of maps of recent gubernatorial and presidential elections
* Analysis of voting patterns for Democratic mayoral candidates

**Conclusion:**

The This Election Atlas provides a comprehensive and nuanced understanding of New York City's electoral landscape. By examining the contours of support for various candidates and aggregating data by Census block, the atlas offers a unique perspective on the 2016 presidential primary and its implications for the city's politics.
## See Full Results and Maps from the New York Election: Uncovering Voting Patterns and Trends

**New York City, NY** -  The 2016 presidential primary is just around the corner, and understanding the city's voting landscape is crucial for predicting its outcome. To provide valuable insight, This Election Atlas has compiled a comprehensive collection of maps and data from recent New York City elections, offering a detailed look at voting patterns and trends.

This interactive atlas, powered by [insert data source or organization], goes beyond traditional election district maps by utilizing Census block data. This allows for a more granular analysis of voting patterns, providing a clearer picture of local support for various candidates. 

**Key Insights from the Maps:**

* **Inactive Ballot Distribution:** The maps reveal intriguing patterns in the distribution of inactive ballots, particularly in the comptroller's race. These patterns seem to align with areas where candidates like [Candidate 1] and [Candidate 2] received strong support, as well as [Candidate 3]. This suggests a potential correlation between inactive ballots and voter turnout in specific areas.
* **Historical Voting Trends:** The atlas includes maps from elections dating back to 2001, allowing for a historical analysis of voting patterns. This provides valuable context for understanding how voting trends have evolved over time and how they might influence the upcoming presidential primary.
* **Comparison with Gubernatorial and Presidential Elections:** For a broader perspective, the atlas also includes maps from recent gubernatorial and presidential elections. This allows for a comparison and contrast of voting patterns across different types of elections, providing a more comprehensive understanding of the city's political landscape.

**How to Use the Atlas:**

This Election Atlas is a valuable resource for anyone interested in understanding the intricacies of New York City's political landscape. Users can explore the maps by:

* **Zooming in on specific areas:** This allows for a detailed examination of voting patterns within neighborhoods and communities.
* **Filtering by election year:** This enables users to compare voting patterns across different elections.
* **Comparing different candidates:** This helps identify areas of strong support and potential areas of contention.

By providing a comprehensive and interactive platform for exploring election data, This Election Atlas empowers voters, candidates, and political analysts to gain a deeper understanding of the city's voting landscape and its potential impact on the upcoming presidential primary. 

## See Full Results and Maps from the New York Election: Uncovering Voting Patterns and Trends

**New York City, NY** -  The 2016 presidential primary is just around the corner, and understanding the city's voting patterns is crucial for predicting the outcome. This Election Atlas, powered by [insert data source], provides a comprehensive look at recent New York City elections, offering valuable insights into the city's political landscape.

**Visualizing the Vote:**

The Atlas features interactive maps that visualize election results by Census block, providing a granular view of voting patterns across the city. This approach allows for a more accurate representation of voting trends compared to traditional election district-based maps. 

**Key Insights:**

* **Inactive Ballots:** The map of inactive ballots in the comptroller's race reveals interesting patterns. It appears to align with areas where candidates like [Candidate A] and [Candidate B] received strong support, as well as [specific area/demographic]. This suggests a correlation between voter turnout and candidate support.
* **Historical Context:** The Atlas includes maps from past elections, dating back to 2001, allowing for a historical analysis of voting patterns. This data provides valuable context for understanding how voting trends have evolved over time.
* **Comparing Elections:** The Atlas allows for side-by-side comparisons of different elections, including mayoral, gubernatorial, and presidential races. This feature helps identify similarities and differences in voting patterns across various elections.

**Understanding the Data:**

The data used in this Election Atlas is derived from registration files provided by the NYC Board of Elections. Each year's active registered voters have been geocoded by Census block, ensuring a consistent and accurate spatial representation of voting patterns.

**The Importance of Context:**

This Election Atlas serves as a valuable resource for understanding the political landscape of New York City. By providing a comprehensive and interactive visualization of voting patterns, it helps shed light on the factors that influence election outcomes and provides valuable context for the upcoming 2016 presidential primary.

**Explore the Atlas:**

Visit [link to the Election Atlas] to explore the interactive maps and data, and gain a deeper understanding of New York City's voting patterns. 

## See Full Results and Maps from the New York Election: Uncovering Voting Trends in the City

The 2016 presidential primary in New York City is just around the corner, and understanding the city's voting patterns is crucial for predicting the outcome. This Election Atlas provides a comprehensive look at recent election results, offering valuable insights into the city's political landscape.

**Visualizing the Vote:**

The atlas features interactive maps that visualize election results from 2001 to 2012, covering mayoral, gubernatorial, and presidential elections. Data is presented by Census block, providing a more granular view of voting patterns than traditional election district maps. This allows for a clear and insightful comparison of voting trends over time.

**Key Findings:**

* **The Inactive Ballot Map:** A particularly revealing map highlights inactive ballots in the Comptroller's race. This map reveals interesting correlations, showing areas with high concentrations of inactive ballots often overlap with regions where certain candidates received strong support. This suggests a potential link between voter turnout and candidate preference.
* **Democratic Mayoral Candidates:** The atlas also provides detailed maps of all Democratic mayoral candidates who have previously run for citywide office. Analyzing these maps reveals geographical patterns in candidate support, offering valuable insights into the city's political landscape.

**Understanding the Data:**

The data for this Election Atlas was meticulously collected and analyzed. Each year's active registered voters were geocoded by Census block using registration files provided by the NYC Board of Elections. This ensures a consistent and accurate comparison of voting patterns across different elections.

**A Valuable Resource:**

This Election Atlas serves as a powerful tool for understanding the complexities of New York City's political landscape. By visualizing voting trends over time and across different elections, the atlas provides valuable context for the upcoming 2016 presidential primary. Whether you're a political analyst, a candidate, or simply a concerned citizen, this resource is an indispensable tool for navigating the city's political landscape. 

**Explore the Election Atlas Today:** [Link to Election Atlas website] 

## See Full Results and Maps from the New York Election: A Visual Guide to the City's Voting Landscape

New York City's political landscape is a complex tapestry woven with diverse demographics and voting patterns. To understand the city's electoral dynamics, it's crucial to analyze not just the final vote tallies but also the geographic distribution of support. This Election Atlas provides a comprehensive visual guide to the city's voting history, illuminating the contours of where candidates received strong support, particularly in recent primary elections.

This interactive atlas, powered by [insert data source/organization name], utilizes data from the NYC Board of Elections, geocoding each year's active registered voters by Census block. This allows for a granular analysis of voting patterns, providing a deeper understanding of the city's political geography than traditional election district maps. 

**Key Highlights:**

* **Visualizing Trends:** The atlas features maps of recent gubernatorial and presidential elections, offering a historical context for understanding current voting patterns. 
* **Focus on Primary Elections:** The atlas places special emphasis on recent primary elections, including maps for all Democratic mayoral candidates who have previously run for citywide office. These maps highlight areas of strong support for specific candidates, revealing potential trends for the upcoming 2016 presidential primary.
* **Analyzing Inactive Ballots:** The atlas also includes maps of inactive ballots in the comptroller's race. These maps, which appear to follow the contours of strong support for specific candidates, offer insight into voter engagement and turnout patterns across the city.

**Using the Atlas:**

The Election Atlas provides an invaluable tool for political analysts, researchers, journalists, and voters alike. By exploring the interactive maps, users can:

* **Identify areas of strong candidate support:** Understand where specific candidates gained significant voter traction.
* **Analyze voting trends over time:** Track how voting patterns have evolved across different elections.
* **Correlate voting patterns with demographic data:** Gain insights into the relationship between voter demographics and electoral outcomes.
* **Predict potential voting outcomes in future elections:** Use historical data to draw conclusions about the likely voting patterns in upcoming elections.

This Election Atlas offers a comprehensive and visually engaging approach to understanding the nuances of New York City's political landscape. By providing a detailed visualization of voting patterns, it empowers citizens to make informed decisions and engage more effectively in the democratic process. 

Title: "New York Election Results: Full Maps and Analysis"

In the recent New York election, the contours of where several candidates received strong support have been revealed through detailed maps and analysis. The maps show the vote patterns for recent primary elections and related trends in New York City, providing context for the 2016 presidential primary.

To create an apples-to-apples spatial comparison of local voting patterns from one year to the next, the results from elections from 2001 to 2012 (with the exception of the few years when there were no citywide elections of significance) were allocated. This allows for easy analysis of voting patterns with Census data.

The maps were created by geocoding each year's active registered voters from registration files provided by the NYC Board of Elections, by Census block instead of election districts. This method provides a more accurate representation of voting patterns and allows for a more detailed analysis.

The map of inactive ballots in the comptroller's race appears to follow the contours of where several candidates received strong support, especially & , as well as . It visualizes election results for all the Democratic mayoral candidates who have previously run for citywide office.

For comparison and contrast, the Election Atlas also includes maps of recent gubernatorial and presidential elections. The Board of Elections provides election results by Election District (ED), and all registered voters citywide.

The Election Atlas is powered by advanced mapping technology, providing a comprehensive view of the election results. It is an invaluable tool for understanding the voting patterns and trends in New York City.

In conclusion, the New York election results have been thoroughly analyzed through detailed maps and data. The Election Atlas provides a comprehensive view of the voting patterns and trends in New York City, allowing for a better understanding of the election results.
New York Election Results: Full Results and Maps

The New York City election results are in, and the maps provide a fascinating insight into the voting patterns of the city. The contours of where several candidates received strong support, especially in certain areas, are clearly visible on the maps. These maps show the vote patterns for recent primary elections and related trends in New York City to help provide context for the 2016 presidential primary.

To create an apples-to-apples spatial comparison of the local voting patterns from one year to the next, we geocoded each year's active registered voters from registration files provided by the NYC Board of Elections. This allows for easy analysis of voting patterns with Census data. The maps are powered by the Board of Elections, which provides election results by Election District (ED) and all registered voters citywide.

The maps include data from elections from 2001 to 2012 (with the exception of the few years when there were no citywide elections of significance). This provides a comprehensive view of the voting patterns in the city over the past decade. For comparison and contrast, the maps also include data from recent gubernatorial and presidential elections.

One particularly interesting map is the map of inactive ballots in the comptroller's race. This map appears to follow the contours of where several candidates received strong support, especially in certain areas. It visualizes election results for all the Democratic mayoral candidates who have previously run for citywide office.

Overall, the maps provide a valuable resource for understanding the voting patterns in New York City. By analyzing the data, we can gain insights into the political leanings of different areas of the city and how they have changed over time. The maps are a testament to the power of data visualization and the importance of understanding the nuances of the voting patterns in our cities.
New York Election Results: Full Maps and Analysis
In a comprehensive and detailed analysis of the recent New York primary election, an election atlas has been created to provide a visual representation of the voting patterns across the city. The atlas includes maps of the results from the recent primary elections, as well as related trends in New York City to help provide context for the 2016 presidential primary.
The atlas is powered by geocoded data from each year's active registered voters, provided by the NYC Board of Elections. By mapping this data by Census block instead of election districts, the atlas provides an apples-to-apples spatial comparison of the local voting patterns from one year to the next. This allows for easy analysis of voting patterns with Census data, providing a more nuanced understanding of the election results.
The maps show the vote patterns for recent primary elections, including the contours of where several candidates received strong support, especially in areas where there were overlaps in support. The map of inactive ballots in the comptroller's race appears to follow these contours, providing a visual representation of the voting patterns for all the Democratic mayoral candidates who have previously run for citywide office.
The election atlas not only includes maps of the recent primary elections, but also includes maps of recent gubernatorial and presidential elections for comparison and contrast. This provides a comprehensive view of the voting patterns in New York City and helps to provide context for the recent primary election.
Overall, the election atlas provides a detailed and comprehensive analysis of the recent New York primary election, including full results and maps. By mapping the voting patterns by Census block, the atlas provides a more nuanced understanding of the election results and helps to provide context for the 2016 presidential primary.
New York Election Results: A Visual Analysis

The recent New York primary elections have been a hot topic in the political world, but what do the results really mean? A new Election Atlas is providing an in-depth look at the voting patterns and trends in New York City, giving insights into where candidates received the strongest support.

The Election Atlas maps the results from elections between 2001 and 2012, allowing for a comparison of local voting patterns over time. By geocoding each year's active registered voters from registration files provided by the NYC Board of Elections, the Atlas provides an apples-to-apples spatial comparison of voting patterns. This data is mapped by Census block rather than election districts, creating a more accurate and detailed view of the results.

One interesting finding from the Atlas is the pattern of inactive ballots in the comptroller's race, which seems to follow the contours of where several candidates received strong support. This includes not only the recent gubernatorial and presidential elections, but also previous Democratic mayoral candidates who have run for citywide office.

The visualization of these results shows not only where candidates received strong support, but also how voting patterns have shifted over time. By combining this data with Census information, the Atlas provides a comprehensive view of the political landscape of New York City and how it has evolved over the past decade.

The Election Atlas is a valuable tool for understanding the complexities of the New York election results. It offers a visual representation of the data that is easy to analyze and interpret, allowing for a deeper understanding of the voting patterns and trends in New York City. As the political world continues to analyze the results of the recent primary elections, the Atlas provides a valuable resource for gaining insight into the contours of the New York electorate.
# **See Full Results and Maps from the New York Election**

## Visualizing Vote Patterns and Understanding Voter Dynamics in NYC

In a remarkable display of political engagement, New York City voters have once again cast their ballots, shaping the political landscape both locally and potentially on a national scale. As the nation’s largest metropolis, New York City has often served as a benchmark for measuring political trends and voter sentiment. With primary election results now in, let us delve into the election's key outcomes, analyzing vote patterns through detailed maps and data insights.

The Election Atlas, powered by the comprehensive data collected and analyzed over the years, offers a unique spatial understanding of voting trends. The atlas, enriched with Census data, provides an in-depth comparison of local voting patterns spanning from 2001 to 2012, except for the years when no significant citywide elections were held. This apples-to-apples comparison is achieved by geocoding each year’s active registered voters at the Census block level, instead of the traditional electoral district boundaries. This approach reveals fine-grained patterns that would otherwise remain obscured.

### An Analysis of Key Contours

The map of inactive ballots in the comptroller's race appears to follow the same patterns as those where certain candidates, especially [candidates' names redacted for anonymity], garnered significant support. This year’s analysis has a particular focus on the election results for all the Democratic mayoral candidates who have previously contended for citywide office.

### Visualizing Candidate Support

The maps meticulously chart the vote patterns for recent primary elections and related trends in New York City, providing essential context for the 2016 presidential primary. These patterns are not limited to municipal elections; they include data from recent gubernatorial and presidential races, allowing for a broader understanding of voter preferences over time.

### The Role of Census Data in Insights

The integration of Census data with voting patterns offers a deeper understanding of various demographics' electoral preferences. Insights gathered through this method reveal how different socioeconomic factors, racial demographics, and other characteristics correlate with voting behavior, contributing to a more nuanced perspective on electoral outcomes.

### Conclusion

As New York City reflects and shapes the country's political climate, the detailed analysis and mapping of voting patterns are crucial. By leveraging the Election Atlas, which incorporates active voter data and Census information at the Census block level, analysts and the public gain a clearer picture of how different communities across the city align with various candidates and parties. This rich data not only informs current elections but also offers predictive insights for future political trends in this influential city.
**New York Election Results: A Deep Dive into the Numbers and Maps**

The 2016 presidential primary has been one of the most highly contested and unpredictable in recent history, with candidates vying for votes in every corner of the country. In New York, the results of the primary election have provided a fascinating glimpse into the voting patterns and trends that are shaping the city's politics.

To better understand the contours of the election, we have created a comprehensive atlas of the results, broken down by Census block and including data from recent gubernatorial and presidential elections. This atlas provides a unique perspective on the voting patterns in New York City, highlighting areas of strong support for various candidates and revealing trends that may have implications for future elections.

One of the most striking features of the atlas is the map of inactive ballots in the comptroller's race, which appears to follow the contours of where several candidates received strong support. This suggests that certain areas of the city may be more likely to turn out to vote in certain elections, and that candidates who can tap into these areas may have an advantage.

The atlas also includes maps of the vote patterns for recent primary elections, including the 2013 mayoral election and the 2014 gubernatorial election. These maps show that certain areas of the city, such as the Upper East Side and the Financial District, tend to vote more conservatively, while other areas, such as the West Village and Brooklyn Heights, tend to vote more liberally.

In addition to these maps, the atlas includes data on the demographics of each Census block, including information on income, education level, and racial and ethnic composition. This data provides a rich context for understanding the voting patterns in each area, and can help candidates and campaign strategists to better target their efforts.

Overall, the New York Election Atlas provides a valuable resource for anyone interested in understanding the complexities of the city's politics. By analyzing the voting patterns and trends revealed in the atlas, candidates, campaign strategists, and voters can gain a deeper understanding of the city's electoral landscape and make more informed decisions about the future of New York City.

**Key Takeaways:**

* The map of inactive ballots in the comptroller's race reveals areas of strong support for certain candidates, including [candidate names].
* The atlas shows that certain areas of the city, such as the Upper East Side and the Financial District, tend to vote more conservatively, while other areas, such as the West Village and Brooklyn Heights, tend to vote more liberally.
* The data on demographics provides a rich context for understanding the voting patterns in each area, and can help candidates and campaign strategists to better target their efforts.
* The atlas includes maps of the vote patterns for recent primary elections, including the 2013 mayoral election and the 2014 gubernatorial election.

**Explore the Atlas:**

To explore the New York Election Atlas in more detail, click on the links below:

* [Link to interactive map]
* [Link to downloadable data]
* [Link to methodology and sources]

By examining the data and maps in the atlas, you can gain a deeper understanding of the complex electoral landscape of New York City and make more informed decisions about the future of the city.
**New York Election Results: A Deep Dive into the Numbers and Maps**

The 2016 presidential primary is just around the corner, and New York City is gearing up for what promises to be a contentious and closely watched election. To provide context for the upcoming primary, we've analyzed the results of recent elections in the city, including the 2013 mayoral primary and the 2014 gubernatorial election.

Our analysis, powered by the Election Atlas, provides a detailed look at the voting patterns in New York City, broken down by Census block. This allows for a more nuanced understanding of where different candidates received strong support, and how those patterns have shifted over time.

**Maps Reveal Contours of Support**

One of the most striking features of our maps is the way they reveal the contours of support for different candidates. In the 2013 mayoral primary, for example, our maps show that Bill de Blasio received strong support in many of the same areas where other Democratic candidates, such as Christine Quinn and Bill Thompson, also performed well.

Similarly, our maps of the 2014 gubernatorial election show that Andrew Cuomo received strong support in many areas of the city, particularly in Manhattan and the Bronx. However, his opponent, Zephyr Teachout, performed well in some areas of Brooklyn and Queens.

**Inactive Ballots Follow Contours of Support**

Our analysis also reveals that the pattern of inactive ballots in the comptroller's race follows the contours of support for different candidates. In areas where certain candidates received strong support, there were often fewer inactive ballots. This suggests that voters in those areas were more engaged and motivated to participate in the election.

**Election Atlas Provides Context**

Our Election Atlas provides a wealth of information about voting patterns in New York City, including data on the number of registered voters, turnout, and voting patterns by Census block. This data can be used to analyze trends and patterns in the city's elections, and to provide context for the upcoming presidential primary.

**Methodology**

To create our maps, we geocoded each year's active registered voters from registration files provided by the NYC Board of Elections. We then allocated the results from elections from 2001 to 2012 (with the exception of the few years when there were no citywide elections of significance) to provide an apples-to-apples spatial comparison of the local voting patterns from one year to the next. This allows for easy analysis of voting patterns with Census data.

**Conclusion**

Our analysis of the New York City election results provides a detailed look at the voting patterns in the city, and offers insights into the contours of support for different candidates. As the 2016 presidential primary approaches, this data will be essential for understanding the complex and often nuanced world of New York City politics.

**View the Full Results and Maps**

To view the full results and maps from the New York election, click here. Our Election Atlas provides a wealth of information about voting patterns in New York City, and is a valuable resource for anyone interested in understanding the city's elections.
**SEE FULL RESULTS AND MAPS FROM THE NEW YORK ELECTION**

The 2016 presidential primary has finally come to a close in New York, and the results are in. But to truly understand the contours of the election, it's essential to dive deeper into the voting patterns and trends that emerged across the city.

Our Election Atlas provides a comprehensive look at the results, breaking down the vote by Census block rather than traditional election districts. This allows for a more nuanced understanding of where each candidate received strong support, and how voting patterns have shifted over time.

One of the most striking features of the maps is the correlation between inactive ballots in the comptroller's race and the areas where certain candidates received strong support. In particular, the maps highlight the voting patterns of Democratic mayoral candidates who have previously run for citywide office.

By analyzing the results from elections dating back to 2001, we can see clear trends and patterns emerge. For example, [Candidate A] performed strongly in areas that have historically supported [previous candidate], while [Candidate B] drew significant support from neighborhoods that have traditionally backed [previous candidate].

The maps also provide a unique opportunity to compare and contrast voting patterns in recent gubernatorial and presidential elections. By overlaying the results from different years, we can see how voting patterns have shifted over time, and how different candidates have performed in different areas.

To create these maps, we geocoded each year's active registered voters from registration files provided by the NYC Board of Elections. This allows for an apples-to-apples spatial comparison of local voting patterns from one year to the next, and also enables easy analysis of voting patterns with Census data.

The results provide valuable insights into the demographics and voting habits of different neighborhoods across the city. For example, areas with high concentrations of younger voters tended to support [Candidate C], while areas with larger populations of older voters backed [Candidate D].

As the city looks ahead to future elections, these maps will provide a crucial backdrop for understanding the complex and ever-changing voting landscape of New York.

**VIEW THE FULL RESULTS AND MAPS HERE**

* 2016 Presidential Primary Results
* 2013 Mayoral Election Results
* 2012 Presidential Election Results
* 2010 Gubernatorial Election Results

**ANALYZE THE DATA FOR YOURSELF**

* Download the raw data and maps to explore the results in more detail
* Compare and contrast voting patterns across different elections and neighborhoods
* Share your findings and insights with the community

By providing this comprehensive look at the election results, we hope to foster a deeper understanding of the complex and dynamic voting landscape of New York City.
**New York Election Results: A Deep Dive into the City's Voting Patterns**

The 2016 presidential primary has brought attention to the voting patterns of New York City, a crucial battleground state in the election. To provide context for the primary, we've analyzed the results of recent elections in the city, including the 2013 mayoral primary and the 2014 gubernatorial election. Our interactive maps show the vote patterns for each election, broken down by Census block, providing a detailed look at where each candidate received strong support.

Our analysis reveals some interesting trends in the city's voting patterns. In the 2013 mayoral primary, for example, Bill de Blasio received strong support in many of the same areas where he did well in the general election. However, our maps also show that other candidates, such as Bill Thompson and Christine Quinn, had pockets of support in different parts of the city.

The maps also highlight the importance of certain neighborhoods and demographics in shaping the outcome of elections. For example, the Upper East Side and Upper West Side were key strongholds for Quinn, while de Blasio performed well in Brooklyn and Queens. The maps also show that certain candidates, such as Anthony Weiner, had strong support in areas with high concentrations of Jewish voters.

Our analysis also includes a look at the 2014 gubernatorial election, in which Governor Andrew Cuomo faced a challenge from Republican Rob Astorino. The maps show that Cuomo performed well in many of the same areas where de Blasio did well in the mayoral primary, including Brooklyn and Queens.

In addition to the maps, we've also provided data on inactive ballots in the comptroller's race, which provides insight into areas where voters may have been less engaged in the election. This data can be useful for campaigns looking to target their outreach efforts in future elections.

**Key Findings:**

* Bill de Blasio received strong support in many of the same areas where he did well in the general election, including Brooklyn and Queens.
* Christine Quinn performed well on the Upper East Side and Upper West Side, while Bill Thompson had pockets of support in different parts of the city.
* Anthony Weiner had strong support in areas with high concentrations of Jewish voters.
* Governor Cuomo performed well in many of the same areas where de Blasio did well in the mayoral primary, including Brooklyn and Queens.
* Inactive ballots in the comptroller's race were concentrated in areas with lower voter turnout.

**Methodology:**

Our analysis is based on data from the New York City Board of Elections, which provides election results by Election District (ED). We geocoded each year's active registered voters from registration files provided by the NYC Board of Elections, and mapped the results by Census block. This allows for a detailed look at voting patterns in different areas of the city, and provides a useful tool for campaigns and researchers looking to understand the city's electoral landscape.

**Explore the Maps:**

Our interactive maps provide a detailed look at the voting patterns in New York City. You can explore the maps by clicking on different areas of the city, and view the results for each election. We've also provided data on inactive ballots in the comptroller's race, which provides insight into areas where voters may have been less engaged in the election.

By analyzing the voting patterns in New York City, we can gain a better understanding of the city's electoral landscape and the key factors that shape the outcome of elections. Our maps and data provide a useful tool for campaigns, researchers, and anyone looking to understand the complexities of city politics.
**New York Election Results: A Deeper Dive into the Numbers**

New York City's recent primary elections have set the stage for a heated 2016 presidential primary, with various candidates vying for the top spot. To provide context and insights into the city's voting patterns, we've analyzed election results from 2001 to 2012, including gubernatorial and presidential elections.

Our analysis reveals interesting trends and contours of support for several candidates, particularly in areas where inactive ballots in the comptroller's race were concentrated. By geocoding active registered voters by Census block, we've created a detailed picture of local voting patterns, allowing for easy comparison and analysis with Census data.

**Maps Provide Clues to Candidate Strength**

The maps of election results show a clear correlation between areas with high levels of support for certain candidates and demographic characteristics, such as income, education, and racial diversity. For example, areas with high concentrations of inactive ballots in the comptroller's race tend to overlap with areas where candidates such as [Candidate A] and [Candidate B] received strong support.

In particular, the maps highlight the strong performance of [Candidate A] in certain neighborhoods, which can be attributed to their policies on [specific issue]. Similarly, [Candidate B]'s popularity in other areas can be linked to their stance on [specific issue].

**Census Data Reveals Deeper Insights**

By overlapping our election data with Census information, we gain a more nuanced understanding of the city's voting patterns. For instance, areas with high median incomes tend to favor [Candidate A], while areas with lower median incomes tend to favor [Candidate B]. This trend holds true across various demographics, including education level and racial composition.

**Election Atlas Provides Context for 2016 Presidential Primary**

Our Election Atlas provides a detailed background for understanding the complexities of New York City's voting patterns. By analyzing election results by Census block, we've created a more accurate picture of local voting trends. This data will be crucial in the lead-up to the 2016 presidential primary, as candidates seek to understand and connect with the diverse communities of New York City.

**Key Takeaways**

* Areas with high levels of inactive ballots in the comptroller's race tend to overlap with areas of strong support for certain candidates.
* Demographic characteristics, such as income, education, and racial diversity, play a significant role in shaping voting patterns.
* Our Election Atlas provides a detailed background for understanding the complexities of New York City's voting patterns.

**Explore the Data**

Interactive maps and tables are available below, providing a detailed breakdown of election results by Census block. Users can explore the data to gain a deeper understanding of the trends and patterns that shape New York City's voting landscape.

[Insert Interactive Maps and Tables]

Note: The data and analysis presented in this article are based on publicly available information from the NYC Board of Elections and the US Census Bureau.