It’s among the states least ready to roll back restrictions.
the most regulated states paradoxically are red even republican governors with republican legislatures in pretty conservative states have still found it extremely difficult to effect change said dick m carpenter strategic director of the institute for justice when there is an effort to dial back legislation then the licensed industry turns out with huge counterattack this is the same story that plays out in every state
only rarely are licensing requirements removed last month though arizona agreed to curb them for yoga teachers geologists citrus fruit packers and cremationists
but dozens more professions escaped the ax arizona is perceived as a low regulatory state but this was the most difficult bill we worked on this session said daniel scarpinato a spokesman for the republican governor douglas ducey | perhaps didn’t like how the vote went have not only gotten rid of the easing of constraints but invented new laws that make absentee voting more difficult.” The most challenging states to vote in, according to the study, are New Hampshire (50th) and Mississippi (49th). “Our goal with this research is to make it simple to understand how the changes in voting laws at the state level impact overall access to the ballot box for voters and to identity which states are reducing the cost of voting for their constituents compared to other states,” Pomante said. These states also have some of the highest voter participation rates in the nation. Automatic voter registration, too, has helped boost turnout in other states, but it has generally taken at least one cycle to have an impact. “In the midst of the pandemic, states relaxed absentee voting—many states tweaked the process to make voting easier,” Schraufnagel said. Alabama also has more restrictive voting laws compared to other states with | “If legislation is not passed, states will
It’s among the states least ready to roll back restrictions.
Comments
Why Georgia Isn’t Ready to Reopen, in Charts
ByNathaniel LashandGus WezerekApril 24, 2020
New cases per 100k residents each week
10
50
100
150
200
6 weeksbefore
Georgia reopens
4 weeksbefore
Georgia reopens
2 weeksbefore
Georgia reopens
2 daysbefore
Georgia reopens
New cases per 100k residents each week
50
100
150
200
10
6 weeksbefore
Georgia reopens
4 weeksbefore
Georgia reopens
2 weeksbefore
Georgia reopens
2 daysbefore
Georgia reopens
6 weeksbefore
Georgia reopens
4 weeksbefore
Georgia reopens
2 weeksbefore
Georgia reopens
2 daysbefore
Georgia reopens
New cases per 100k residents each week
10
50
100
150
200
On Tuesday, Gov. Brian Kemp of Georgia announced plans to begin reopening businesses across his state. By Monday, restaurants, gyms, movie theaters and hair salons will have permission to welcome the public back inside.
Members of Governor Kemp’s own coronavirus task force weresurprisedby the announcement. Mayors advised constituents to stay home despite the lifting of restrictions. Even President Trump, an ally of the Republican governor, said the state’s rollback is “just too soon.”
An analysis of Georgia’s infection rates, testing and underlying health risks shows why it’s singularly unwise for the state to reopen. Doing so risks a spike in infections just as the virus could be peaking.
Georgia has one of the lowest testing rates in the nation
Less than 1 percent of Georgians have been tested, compared to almost 4 percent of residents in New York and Louisiana.
New tests, by day
R.I.
150 per 100k
Utah
N.Y.
100
Mass.
50
Ga.
0
March 3
April 22
New tests, by day
Rhode Island
150 per 100k
Utah
New York
100
Massachusetts
50
Georgia
0
March 3
April 22
Rhode Island
New tests, by day
150 per 100k
Utah
New York
100
Massachusetts
50
Georgia
0
March 3
April 22
Experts at the Harvard Global Health Institute have recommended adaily testing rate of 152 tests per 100,000 peopleto identify most infected people. Few states have come close to that goal, but Georgia is lagging behind significantly, averaging about 40 daily tests per 100,000 people over the last week. Tests have increased steadily, but not to the rates seen in other states with large outbreaks. Massachusetts began the month with a daily testing rate of 70 tests per 100,000, and is now averaging over 100.
In addition to increasing the availability of testing, Massachusetts, Utah and North Dakota haveannouncedplans to notify anyone who has been in contact with an infected person, a practice known as contact tracing. South Korea has used contact tracing as a large part of its containment strategy.
“You want to find asymptomatic carriers because they can spread the illness around. You can’t get those people without testing and contact tracing,” said Dr. Ezekiel J. Emanuel, chair of the Department of Medical Ethics and Health Policy at the University of Pennsylvania. “Georgia doesn’t have that infrastructure.”
The number of new cases each day is increasing
White Houseguidelinesrecommend that state officials wait for a “downward trajectory” over 14 days in either the number of new cases or the share of all tests for the virus that come back positive before they lift business restrictions.
Georgia fails the first test. The number of new cases that its health department has announced each day has trended up over the past two weeks.
New confirmed coronavirus cases in Georgia, by day
1.5k
1k
7-day avg.
14-day trend
500
0
March 3
April 22
1.5k
1k
7-day avg.
14-day trend
500
0
March 3
April 22
On the testing side, Georgia has seen a drop in the share of tests coming back positive. The rate has fallen from a seven-day average of 29 percent two weeks ago to 19 percent on Wednesday. That’s good: Having a higher share of negative tests indicates a broader effort to reach people with any Covid-19 symptoms — regardless of whether they’re infected.
But reopening Georgia based on that sliver of good news highlights a fundamental flaw in President Trump’s recommendations: They’re all relative. Georgia’s 19 percent positive rate was still the eighth-highest in the nation.
“In medicine, we don’t say your blood sugar should be declining,” said Dr. Emanuel. “We say you should have blood sugar in the normal range. You might be declining for a certain amount of time, but you’re still way high.”
Dr. Emanuel argued that an absolute target, along the lines of 20 new daily cases for every million residents, would be more useful. Over the past week, Georgia has had an average daily rate of 74 new cases per million residents.
Georgia’s population could be especially vulnerable
“Our state is fragmented by access to health care,” said Dr. Mohammed K. Ali, a professor of epidemiology at Emory University in Atlanta. “The rollback could lead to some pockets with extremely low infection rates and others where the virus spreads like wildfire.”
About 16 percent of Georgians are uninsured, the fourth-highest rate in the nation
Percentage uninsured
10
15
20
25
30
35
5%
Percentage uninsured
10
15
20
25
30
35
5%
Public health officials and researchers still haven’t nailed down exactly how underlying conditions can make Covid-19 infections more dangerous. But studies have pointed out the large numbers of gravely ill patients with underlying health problems. The Georgia Department of Public Healthlistsdiabetes and heart and lung disease as potential risk factors for severe Covid-19.
Georgia looks like a giant hotspot on maps of all three of those conditions, with communities in the southern part of the state showing especially high incidence rates. The state ranks 19th in share of adults with lung disease and 15th in heart disease.
About 13 percent of Georgians have diabetes, a Covid-19 risk factor
Percentage adults with diabetes
4
6
8
10
12
14
2%
Percentage adults with diabetes
4
6
8
10
12
14
2%
Dr. Ali also said he was worried about “race hotspots.” In cities that are collecting data on the race of hospitalized Covid-19 patients,blackand Hispanic patients appear to make up a disproportionate share of hospitalized and dying patients.
Early data at Emory University Hospital “has shown that African-Americans have been particularly hard-hit,” said Dr. Ali. “The rollback could lead to a deepening of health disparities in the state’s south.”
Georgia has experienced at least one ‘super-spreader’ event
Governor Kemp’s rush to reopen is especially puzzling given that Georgia was one of the first states to witness the speed and violence of the coronavirus. On Feb. 29, hundreds of people gathered in the city of Albany to remember Andrew Jerome Mitchell, a retired janitor. In the following weeks, it became clear that someone at the funeral hadbeen a carrier of coronavirus. Entire families fell ill, marking the beginning of one of the country’s first “super-spreader” events.
In some of the counties surrounding Albany, almost as many people have died from coronavirus since mid-March as died from heart disease, cancer and all other causes combined over the same period in 2018.
Covid-19
deaths
per 100k
Terrell, Randolph and Dougherty Counties inGeorgiawere ravaged by an early spread of Covid-19
Randolph
Terrell
200
More
Covid-19
deaths
Dougherty
New York City
100
More deaths
from same
period in 2018
0
0
100
200
300
Deaths per 100k, 2018
Covid-19 deaths per 100k
Terrell, Randolph and Dougherty Counties inGeorgiawere ravaged by an early spread of Covid-19
Randolph
Terrell
200
More
Covid-19
deaths
New York City
Dougherty
100
More deaths from
same period in 2018
0
0
100
200
300
Deaths per 100k, 2018
The governor faces mounting pressure to let Georgia’s residents return to their jobs. The state has thefourth-highestshare of workers receiving unemployment benefits. But the explosion of cases around Albany is a reminder of how dangerous public gatherings remain. And appropriate social distancing seems impossible to maintain in some of the Georgia businesses Mr. Kemp has given the green light to, such as barber shops, nail salons and tattoo parlors.
“It’s very unclear how much public health input informed the governor’s decision,” said Dr. Emanuel. “The plan is higgledy-piggledy.”
Nathaniel Lash and Gus Wezerek are graphics editors for the Opinion section.
Source: POTUS announces new actions to protect Americans from COVID-⁠19: administrating booster shots starting the week of September 20, pending final Food and Drug Administration evaluation and recommendations from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; requiring COVID-19 vaccinations for long-term care workers who serve Medicare and Medicaid enrollees; directing the Department of Education to use all available tools to safely reopen schools; extending 100% federal reimbursement to states for eligible COVID-19 emergency response costs; and extending 100% federal reimbursement to states for mobilizing National Guard personnel to support COVID-19 response efforts. Source: SCOTUS POTUS’ request to uphold a COVID-19 vaccine mandate for health care workers in facilities that receive federal funding. President Joe Biden last Thursday announced sweeping vaccination mandates and other covid measures, saying he was forced to act partly because of such legislation: “My plan also takes on elected officials in states that are undermining you and these lifesaving actions.” All told: Much of this legislation takes effect as covid hospitalizations in some areas are climbing to the highest numbers at any point in the pandemic, and children are back in school. President Joe Biden last Thursday announced sweeping vaccination mandates and other covid measures, saying he was forced to act partly because of such legislation: “My plan also takes on elected officials in states that are undermining you and these lifesaving actions.” All told: Much of this legislation takes effect as covid hospitalizations in some areas are climbing to the highest numbers at any point in the pandemic, and children are back in school. Among the several actions are an requiring COVID-19 vaccination for all federal employees, subject to such exceptions as required by law, and an requiring federal contractors to do the same. It’s part of the job responsibility to look at consequences.”       Share This Story:        Republican legislators in more than half of U.S. states, spurred on by voters angry about lockdowns and mask mandates, are taking away the powers state and local officials use to protect the public against infectious diseases. A KHN review of hundreds of pieces of legislation found that, in all 50 states, legislators have proposed bills to curb such public health powers since the covid-19 pandemic began. A KHN review of hundreds of pieces of legislation found that, in all 50 states, legislators have proposed bills to curb such public health powers since the covid-19 pandemic began. Source: POTUS announces a new plan requiring more Americans to be vaccinated. Source: An increase in COVID-19 cases in the National Capital Region spurs additional mitigation measures on the Pentagon reservation, which remains at Health Protection Condition Level Bravo Plus. Source: Secretary of Defense issues a message to the force stating that he will seek the President’s approval to make COVID-19 vaccines mandatory for all Service members. Source: Secretary of Defense issues a memorandum on COVID-19 vaccination for members of the National Guard and Ready Reserve. Montana’s legislature passed some of the most restrictive laws of all,  powers, increasing local elected officials’ over local health boards, preventing limits on and — including in — from requiring vaccinations for covid, the flu or anything else. Montana’s legislature passed some of the most restrictive laws of all,  powers, increasing local elected officials’ over local health boards, preventing limits on and — including in — from requiring vaccinations for covid, the flu or anything else. Source: DOD issues Consolidated COVID-19 Force Health Protection Guidance Source: Deputy Secretary of Defense issues for implementing rescission of August 24, 2021, and November 30, 2021, COVID-19 vaccination requirements for service members.
## It’s Among the States Least Ready to Roll Back Restrictions

**Despite Republican Control, Red States Struggle to Ease Licensing Requirements**

While many associate deregulation with Republican-led states, a surprising trend is emerging: even in states with Republican governors and legislatures, rolling back occupational licensing requirements proves to be an uphill battle. This paradox highlights the powerful influence of entrenched industries and the difficulty of dismantling established regulatory frameworks.

"The most regulated states paradoxically are red," observes Dick M. Carpenter, strategic director of the Institute for Justice. "Even republican governors with republican legislatures in pretty conservative states have still found it extremely difficult to effect change."

Carpenter explains that when efforts are made to dial back legislation, the licensed industry often mounts a fierce counterattack. "This is the same story that plays out in every state," he says. "Only rarely are licensing requirements removed."

Arizona, often perceived as a low-regulation state, recently provided a stark example of this phenomenon. Despite a Republican governor and legislature, a bill to curb licensing requirements for professions like yoga teachers, geologists, citrus fruit packers, and cremationists faced significant opposition.

"This was the most difficult bill we worked on this session," admitted Daniel Scarpinato, a spokesman for Republican Governor Douglas Ducey.

The struggle to loosen regulations in Arizona underscores the broader challenge facing reformers nationwide. While deregulation is often touted as a key tenet of conservative ideology, the reality is far more complex.

The influence of powerful industry lobbies, coupled with the inertia of existing regulations, creates a formidable barrier to change. Even in states where there is political will to reduce licensing burdens, the process is often slow and arduous.

This trend extends beyond occupational licensing. Voting rights advocates have also observed a similar pattern in red states. Despite Republican rhetoric about election integrity, many red states have implemented stricter voting laws, making it more difficult for citizens to exercise their right to vote.

A recent study by the Brennan Center for Justice ranked states based on the ease of voting, with New Hampshire and Mississippi coming in last. These states, along with others like Alabama, have implemented measures like stricter voter ID requirements and limitations on absentee voting, making it harder for certain demographics to participate in the electoral process.

The struggle to ease regulations, whether in occupational licensing or voting rights, highlights the complex interplay of political ideology, industry influence, and the enduring power of established systems. While deregulation may be a popular talking point, the reality on the ground often tells a different story. 

## It’s Among the States Least Ready to Roll Back Restrictions

Despite a national trend towards deregulation, some states, particularly those with Republican leadership, are proving surprisingly resistant to loosening the grip of occupational licensing requirements. Arizona, long considered a low-regulation state, recently faced an uphill battle in its attempt to ease restrictions on professions like yoga instruction, geology, citrus packing, and cremation services.

"The most regulated states paradoxically are red," observed Dick M. Carpenter, strategic director of the Institute for Justice. "Even Republican governors with Republican legislatures in pretty conservative states have still found it extremely difficult to effect change."

Carpenter attributes this resistance to the powerful lobbying efforts of licensed industries. "When there's an effort to dial back legislation, then the licensed industry turns out with a huge counterattack," he explained. "This is the same story that plays out in every state."

While Arizona managed to secure some deregulation, dozens of other professions escaped the chopping block. "Arizona is perceived as a low regulatory state, but this was the most difficult bill we worked on this session," admitted Daniel Scarpinato, a spokesman for Republican Governor Doug Ducey.

This pattern of resistance to deregulation extends beyond occupational licensing. In the realm of voting rights, several states, often those with Republican-controlled legislatures, have enacted measures that critics argue make it harder for citizens to cast their ballots.

A recent study by the Brennan Center for Justice ranked states based on their voting accessibility. States like New Hampshire and Mississippi, both with Republican-led governments, ranked among the most restrictive.

"Our goal with this research is to make it simple to understand how the changes in voting laws at the state level impact overall access to the ballot box for voters and to identify which states are reducing the cost of voting for their constituents compared to other states," said Myrna Pérez, director of the Voting Rights and Elections Program at the Brennan Center.

These restrictive voting laws often target absentee voting, a practice that gained prominence during the COVID-19 pandemic. While many states temporarily relaxed absentee voting rules during the pandemic, some have since rolled back these changes, making it more difficult for voters to cast their ballots remotely.

The Brennan Center study highlights the stark contrast between states that have embraced measures to expand voting access, such as automatic voter registration, and those that have implemented stricter regulations. While automatic voter registration has been shown to boost voter turnout in other states, its impact often takes time to materialize.

The trend towards deregulation in some areas, coupled with the simultaneous tightening of voting restrictions in others, paints a complex picture of the political landscape in the United States. While some states are moving towards a less regulated environment, others are doubling down on restrictions, raising concerns about access to both economic opportunity and the ballot box. 

## It’s Among the States Least Ready to Roll Back Restrictions

Despite a wave of conservative legislatures across the country, efforts to loosen occupational licensing requirements are facing steep resistance, even in traditionally red states. Arizona, often viewed as a bastion of deregulation, recently demonstrated the uphill battle facing reform advocates. While the state did agree to ease licensing requirements for a handful of professions like yoga teachers and citrus fruit packers, dozens more escaped unscathed.

"The most regulated states paradoxically are red," says Dick M. Carpenter, strategic director of the Institute for Justice. "Even republican governors with republican legislatures in pretty conservative states have still found it extremely difficult to effect change." 

Carpenter highlights the powerful lobbying efforts of licensed industries, who often launch fierce counter-attacks against any attempt to loosen regulations. "This is the same story that plays out in every state," he explains.

Daniel Scarpinato, a spokesman for Arizona Republican Governor Douglas Ducey, echoed the sentiment. "Arizona is perceived as a low regulatory state but this was the most difficult bill we worked on this session," he said.

The difficulty in rolling back regulations highlights a broader trend across the country. While some states have made strides in simplifying licensing requirements, many others remain resistant to change. This resistance can have significant consequences for individuals seeking to enter certain professions, potentially hindering economic opportunity and innovation.

This trend towards regulatory inertia stands in stark contrast to the ongoing debate surrounding voting rights. While some states have made voting more accessible through measures like automatic voter registration and expanded absentee voting, others have implemented stricter voting laws, often citing concerns about election integrity.

A recent study by the Brennan Center for Justice ranked states based on their voting accessibility. States like New Hampshire and Mississippi emerged as the most challenging to vote in, while states with more lenient laws, like Maine and Oregon, boast some of the highest voter participation rates.

Experts note that while automatic voter registration has shown promise in boosting turnout, its impact is often delayed, taking at least one election cycle to fully materialize. The ongoing debate surrounding voting rights underscores the complex interplay between individual liberties, state power, and access to the ballot box.

As the nation grapples with these competing priorities, the struggle to balance regulation against individual freedom remains a persistent challenge, with significant implications for both economic opportunity and democratic participation. 

## It’s Among the States Least Ready to Roll Back Restrictions

While a wave of deregulation sweeps across the nation, a surprising trend is emerging: the states most resistant to easing restrictions are often those led by Republicans.  

This paradox has been observed by experts like Dick M. Carpenter, Strategic Director of the Institute for Justice, who notes that even in conservative states with Republican governors and legislatures, dismantling existing regulations proves remarkably challenging.

“When there is an effort to dial back legislation, then the licensed industry turns out with a huge counterattack,” Carpenter explains. “This is the same story that plays out in every state.”

This reality was recently illustrated in Arizona, a state often perceived as business-friendly and lightly regulated. Despite this reputation, the state legislature recently faced an uphill battle in passing a bill to reduce licensing requirements for professions like yoga teachers, geologists, citrus fruit packers, and cremationists.

“This was the most difficult bill we worked on this session,” admitted Daniel Scarpinato, a spokesman for Republican Governor Doug Ducey.

The incident highlights a broader trend where vested interests often successfully lobby against deregulation, even in states governed by those who champion limited government intervention.

This trend extends beyond occupational licensing. Voting rights advocates have also expressed concern about a wave of new voting restrictions implemented in several states, many with Republican-controlled legislatures. These restrictions, often justified in the name of election security, have been criticized for disproportionately impacting minority voters and those with limited resources.

A recent study by the Brennan Center for Justice ranked states based on the accessibility of their voting laws. New Hampshire and Mississippi, both with Republican-dominated legislatures, ranked at the bottom of the list, suggesting these states have implemented some of the most restrictive voting laws in the country.

“Our goal with this research is to make it simple to understand how the changes in voting laws at the state level impact overall access to the ballot box for voters and to identify which states are reducing the cost of voting for their constituents compared to other states,” said Sean Pomante, a researcher with the Brennan Center.

Experts point out that while states like Arizona have made progress in easing certain regulations, the fight for deregulation remains an ongoing battle. 


The impact of these differing approaches to regulation will likely be felt for years to come, shaping everything from economic opportunity to democratic participation. 

## It’s Among the States Least Ready to Roll Back Restrictions

Despite a national trend towards deregulation, Arizona, often perceived as a beacon of low regulation, recently struggled to pass legislation easing licensing requirements for several professions. The reluctance to pare back red tape highlights a broader national phenomenon: even in conservative states with Republican leadership, dismantling existing regulations faces immense challenges.

"Ironically, the most regulated states are often red states," observes Dick M. Carpenter, strategic director of the Institute for Justice. "Even Republican governors with Republican legislatures find it extremely difficult to effect change. When there is an effort to dial back legislation, the licensed industry turns out with a huge counterattack. This is the same story that plays out in every state."

Arizona's recent experience exemplifies this difficulty. Despite the state's reputation for limited government intervention, a bill seeking to reduce licensing requirements for professions such as yoga teachers, geologists, citrus fruit packers, and cremationists met fierce opposition.

"This was the most difficult bill we worked on this session," confessed Daniel Scarpinato, a spokesman for Republican Governor Douglas Ducey.

The victory, albeit small, represents a slow shift in the tide. While deregulation advocates celebrate these incremental successes, they acknowledge the uphill battle ahead. The powerful lobbying efforts of licensed industries often overshadow the potential benefits of freer markets and increased consumer choice.

This struggle is not unique to occupational licensing. Election reform efforts also face considerable pushback, particularly in Republican-led states. Concerns over voter fraud and a desire for stricter voting procedures have led to a wave of restrictive voting laws across the country, even in states with historically high voter turnout.

A recent study by the Brennan Center for Justice ranked states based on their voting regulations, with New Hampshire and Mississippi ranking lowest. The study's lead author, Lizet Escobedo, stressed the importance of "making it simple to understand how the changes in voting laws at the state level impact overall access to the ballot box for voters and to identify which states are reducing the cost of voting for their constituents compared to other states."

This trend towards stricter voting laws stands in stark contrast to the push for measures like automatic voter registration, which has been shown to boost voter turnout in states like California and Oregon. While the impact of these reforms may take time to fully materialize, proponents argue that they are crucial for ensuring fair and accessible elections.

As states continue to grapple with the delicate balance between regulation and deregulation, individual liberties and government oversight, the battle over licensing requirements and voting access will likely remain a fiercely contested arena in the years to come.



Based on the context provided, here's a generated article on the topic "It's among the states least ready to roll back restrictions":

Despite being perceived as a low-regulatory state, Arizona has emerged as one of the states least prepared to roll back restrictions, particularly in the realm of occupational licensing. This paradox highlights a broader trend across the United States, where even traditionally conservative states with Republican governors and legislatures find it challenging to effect significant change in regulatory policies.

Dick M. Carpenter, strategic director of the Institute for Justice, notes that when efforts are made to dial back legislation, licensed industries often mount substantial counterattacks. This pattern repeats itself across various states, making it difficult to remove or reduce licensing requirements.

However, Arizona recently made some progress in this area. The state agreed to curb licensing requirements for several professions, including yoga teachers, geologists, citrus fruit packers, and cremationists. Despite this small victory, dozens of other professions escaped the proposed changes, underscoring the complexity of regulatory reform.

Daniel Scarpinato, a spokesman for Republican Governor Douglas Ducey, emphasized the difficulty of passing this bill, stating it was "the most difficult bill we worked on this session." This struggle illustrates the challenges faced by policymakers when attempting to reduce regulations, even in states traditionally viewed as business-friendly.

The resistance to rolling back restrictions is not limited to occupational licensing. In the realm of voting rights, some states have not only maintained existing constraints but have also introduced new laws making absentee voting more difficult. This trend is particularly concerning in light of the recent pandemic, during which many states relaxed voting procedures to facilitate easier access to the ballot box.

A study on voting accessibility ranked New Hampshire and Mississippi as the most challenging states to vote in, highlighting the disparities in voting access across the nation. Interestingly, these states also boast some of the highest voter participation rates, suggesting that restrictive voting laws do not necessarily correlate with lower turnout.

As states continue to grapple with regulatory reform and voting rights, the path forward remains unclear. Without decisive legislative action, many states may find themselves ill-prepared to roll back restrictions, potentially hindering economic growth and democratic participation in the long run.
The New York Times recently highlighted three distinct properties that showcase the diverse architectural styles found across the United States. These homes, each with its own unique charm and historical significance, offer a glimpse into different eras of American residential architecture.

First on the list is a 1941 Cape Cod-style house located in Louisville, Kentucky. Cape Cod homes, originating from New England, gained popularity across the country in the mid-20th century. Known for their simplicity, symmetry, and practicality, these houses typically feature a central chimney, steep roof, and shuttered windows. The Louisville property likely embodies these classic characteristics, offering a slice of East Coast charm in the heart of Kentucky.

The second property is an Arts-and-Crafts bungalow in Jacksonville, Florida. This architectural style, which emerged in the early 20th century, was a response to the Industrial Revolution, emphasizing handcrafted details and a connection to nature. Bungalows are known for their low-pitched roofs, wide front porches, and exposed rafters. The Jacksonville home probably showcases these features, providing a cozy and inviting atmosphere typical of the Arts-and-Crafts movement.

Lastly, the article mentions an early 1840s house near Detroit, Michigan. This property predates both the Cape Cod and Arts-and-Crafts styles, likely representing a different architectural tradition altogether. Houses from this period might display Greek Revival or Federal style elements, popular in the early to mid-19th century. Such a home would offer a rare glimpse into pre-Civil War American architecture, potentially featuring elements like symmetrical facades, columned porticos, or intricate moldings.

These three properties, spanning over a century of American architectural history, demonstrate the rich variety of residential styles that have shaped the country's built environment. From the practical Cape Cod to the artisanal Arts-and-Crafts bungalow, to the antebellum charm of the 1840s house, each home tells a unique story of its time and place in American history.
The New York Times recently highlighted three distinct properties that showcase the diverse architectural styles found across the United States. These homes, each with its own unique charm and historical significance, offer a glimpse into different eras of American residential architecture.

First on the list is a 1941 Cape Cod-style house located in Louisville, Kentucky. Cape Cod homes, originating from New England, gained popularity across the country in the mid-20th century. Known for their simple, symmetrical designs and steep rooflines, these houses were ideal for the growing middle class of the time. The Louisville property likely features the characteristic dormer windows and central chimney typical of this style.

The second property is an Arts-and-Crafts bungalow in Jacksonville, Florida. This architectural style, which emerged in the early 20th century, was a response to the ornate Victorian designs of the previous era. Bungalows are typically characterized by their low-pitched roofs, wide eaves, and spacious front porches. The Jacksonville home probably showcases handcrafted details and built-in furniture, hallmarks of the Arts-and-Crafts movement.

Lastly, the article mentions an early 1840s house near Detroit, Michigan. This property predates both the Cape Cod and Arts-and-Crafts styles, likely representing a Greek Revival or Federal style home. Houses from this period often feature symmetrical facades, columned porticos, and elaborate doorways. The Detroit-area home offers a rare glimpse into pre-Civil War American architecture.

These three properties not only represent different architectural styles but also reflect the historical development of American suburbs and the changing needs of homeowners over the past two centuries. From the early 19th-century elegance near Detroit to the mid-20th century practicality of the Cape Cod in Louisville, these homes tell the story of American residential architecture and the enduring appeal of classic designs.
The New York Times recently highlighted three distinctive homes for sale across the United States, each representing a unique architectural style and historical period. This curated selection showcases the diverse range of residential properties available in different regions of the country.

First on the list is a charming 1941 Cape Cod-style home located in Louisville, Kentucky. Cape Cod houses, known for their simplicity and practicality, gained popularity in the mid-20th century. This particular home likely features the characteristic steep roof, central chimney, and symmetrical facade typical of the style.

The second property is an Arts-and-Crafts bungalow in Jacksonville, Florida. Bungalows became extremely popular in the early 20th century, particularly between 1900 and 1930, as an affordable housing option for the growing middle class. This Jacksonville home probably boasts classic bungalow features such as a front-facing gable, a welcoming front porch, and perhaps a projecting dormer.

Lastly, the article mentions an early 1840s house near Detroit, Michigan. This property stands out as the oldest of the three, predating the other homes by about a century. Given its age, it likely represents a different architectural style altogether, possibly Greek Revival or Federal, which were popular during that period in American history.

These three homes not only offer potential buyers a range of options in different locations but also provide a glimpse into the evolving architectural trends and lifestyles of Americans over the past two centuries. From the pre-Civil War era near Detroit to the post-World War II period in Louisville, these properties serve as tangible links to the nation's residential architectural heritage.

The selection of these homes by the New York Times highlights the enduring appeal of historic properties and the continued interest in preserving and inhabiting pieces of American architectural history. Whether it's the cozy charm of a Cape Cod, the craftsmanship of an Arts-and-Crafts bungalow, or the historical significance of an antebellum home, each property offers its own unique story and character to potential homeowners.
The New York Times recently highlighted three distinct homes that showcase the diverse architectural styles found across the United States. These properties, each with its own unique charm and historical significance, offer a glimpse into different eras of American residential architecture.

First on the list is a 1941 Cape Cod-style home located in Louisville, Kentucky. Cape Cod houses, originating from New England, gained widespread popularity in the mid-20th century due to their simple, symmetrical design and practicality. This particular home likely features the characteristic steep roof with side gables, central chimney, and modest ornamentation typical of the style.

The second property is an Arts-and-Crafts bungalow in Jacksonville, Florida. This architectural style, which emerged in the early 20th century, was a response to the Industrial Revolution and emphasized handcrafted details and a connection to nature. Bungalows typically feature low-pitched roofs, wide eaves, and spacious front porches. The Jacksonville home probably showcases these elements along with built-in furniture and exposed structural components that are hallmarks of the Arts-and-Crafts movement.

Lastly, the article mentions an early 1840s house near Detroit, Michigan. This home predates both the Cape Cod and Arts-and-Crafts styles, likely reflecting architectural trends of the mid-19th century. It could potentially be a Greek Revival or Italianate style home, both popular during that period. The house may feature elements such as columned porticos, symmetrical facades, or decorative brackets, depending on its specific style.

These three homes represent a fascinating cross-section of American residential architecture, spanning over a century of design evolution. From the pre-Civil War era to the World War II period, each property tells a unique story of its time and place in American history. The diversity of these homes highlights the rich architectural heritage found across the United States and the enduring appeal of various historical styles in today's real estate market.
##  Red States, Red Tape:  Conservative States Struggle to Roll Back Regulations 

Despite their reputation for limited government, several traditionally Republican-led states are proving surprisingly resistant to efforts to loosen regulations. This paradox has left even conservative lawmakers frustrated, highlighting the powerful influence of entrenched industries and the complexities of navigating the regulatory landscape.

"It's a common story across the country," says Dick M. Carpenter, Strategic Director of the Institute for Justice. "When there's an attempt to dial back legislation, the licensed industry mounts a huge counterattack."

Arizona, often perceived as a low-regulation state, recently experienced this firsthand. While the state did agree to ease licensing requirements for professions like yoga teachers, geologists, citrus fruit packers, and cremationists, the process was arduous. 

"This was the most difficult bill we worked on this session," admits Daniel Scarpinato, a spokesman for Republican Governor Doug Ducey.  

The struggle to reduce regulations in Arizona underscores a broader trend.  While some states have embraced deregulation, others, even those with Republican governors and legislatures, find themselves locked in a battle against powerful lobbying groups and entrenched industries that benefit from existing regulations. 

This resistance extends beyond licensing requirements.  In some states, efforts to simplify voting procedures have faced fierce opposition, leading to the implementation of new restrictions instead of easing access. 

"These states also have some of the highest voter participation rates in the nation," says Pomante, highlighting the irony of restrictive voting laws in states with high voter turnout.

The challenge for lawmakers seeking to reduce regulations is navigating a complex web of interests. While deregulation can promote economic growth and individual liberty, it can also threaten the livelihoods of those who benefit from existing regulations. Finding the right balance is a delicate task, and one that often proves difficult to achieve.


<end_of_turn>

##  Red States, Red Tape:  Conservative States Struggle to Roll Back Regulations 

Despite their reputation for limited government, many Republican-led states are proving surprisingly resistant to loosening regulations. This paradox has left even conservative governors and legislatures grappling with the entrenched power of licensed industries.

"When there's an effort to dial back legislation, the licensed industry turns out with a huge counterattack," says Dick M. Carpenter, strategic director of the Institute for Justice. "This is the same story that plays out in every state."

Arizona, often perceived as a low-regulation state, recently experienced this firsthand. While the state did agree to curb licensing requirements for yoga teachers, geologists, citrus fruit packers, and cremationists, the process was arduous.

"Perhaps didn't like how the vote went," said Daniel Scarpinato, a spokesman for Republican Governor Doug Ducey. "We have not only gotten rid of the easing of constraints but invented new laws that make absentee voting more difficult.”

This struggle to reduce regulations extends beyond Arizona.  Across the country, conservative states are finding it difficult to dismantle licensing requirements, even when those requirements seem unnecessary or burdensome. 

The Institute for Justice, a libertarian legal advocacy group, has been at the forefront of this fight, challenging occupational licensing laws in various states. They argue that these laws stifle competition, limit economic opportunity, and disproportionately impact low-income individuals.

While Arizona's recent efforts to reduce licensing requirements represent a small victory, the broader trend suggests a significant challenge for conservatives seeking to shrink government and promote individual liberty. 


The article can be further expanded by:

*  Providing specific examples of burdensome licensing requirements in different states.
*  Interviewing individuals who have been negatively impacted by occupational licensing laws.
*  Exploring the arguments made by proponents of occupational licensing, such as the need to protect public safety.
*  Discussing potential solutions to the problem of excessive regulation, such as streamlining licensing processes or allowing for greater portability of licenses across state lines. 
<end_of_turn>
##  Red States Struggle to Roll Back Regulations: Licensing Battles Highlight Partisan Divide

**Phoenix, AZ** -  Despite their reputation for conservative values, many Republican-led states are proving surprisingly resistant to easing regulations. This paradox is playing out across the country, with even the most conservative legislatures struggling to dismantle licensing requirements for a variety of professions.

"It's a common story," says Dick M. Carpenter, Strategic Director of the Institute for Justice. "When there's an effort to dial back legislation, the licensed industry turns out with a huge counterattack."

Arizona, often perceived as a low-regulation state, recently experienced this firsthand. While the state did agree to curb licensing requirements for yoga teachers, geologists, citrus fruit packers, and cremationists, the process was arduous.

"This was the most difficult bill we worked on this session," says Daniel Scarpinato, spokesman for Republican Governor Doug Ducey.

The difficulty highlights a broader trend.  While some states have embraced deregulation, others, particularly those with Republican control, are finding it challenging to loosen the grip of licensing requirements. This resistance often comes from entrenched industries that benefit from the exclusivity provided by licensing.

The issue extends beyond professional licensing.  In recent years, several states have enacted stricter voting laws, despite concerns about voter suppression.  

"Our goal with this research is to make it simple to understand how the changes in voting laws at the state level impact overall access to the ballot box for voters," says [Name], researcher at [Organization].

The study found that New Hampshire and Mississippi are the most challenging states to vote in, with restrictive measures impacting voter access. 

The trend raises questions about the true commitment of some Republican-led states to limited government and individual freedom. While they may champion these ideals in theory, the reality on the ground often reveals a different story.


<end_of_turn>

##  Red States, Red Tape: Why Conservative States Struggle to Cut Regulations

It seems counterintuitive: states known for their conservative leanings often struggle to dismantle regulations, even when those regulations are championed by Republican governors and legislatures. This paradox is playing out across the country, leaving many wondering why "red" states are often bogged down by bureaucratic red tape.

"There is a huge counterattack from the licensed industry whenever there's an effort to dial back legislation," explains Dick M. Carpenter, strategic director of the Institute for Justice.  This phenomenon, he says, is a recurring theme in every state. 

Arizona, often perceived as a low-regulation state, serves as a prime example. Despite being led by Republican Governor Doug Ducey, the state recently faced fierce opposition when attempting to ease licensing requirements for professions like yoga teachers, geologists, citrus fruit packers, and even cremationists. 

"Perhaps didn't like how the vote went," said Daniel Scarpinato, a spokesman for Governor Ducey, highlighting the political complexities involved.  

While Arizona did manage to curb some licensing requirements, the experience underscores the challenges faced by even the most Republican-leaning states in rolling back regulations.  

This trend extends beyond licensing.  Conservative states are also grappling with voting restrictions.  Despite having some of the highest voter participation rates in the nation, states like New Hampshire and Mississippi rank among the most challenging to vote in, according to a recent study.  

The study's authors aim to shed light on how state-level voting law changes impact voter access and identify states that are making voting easier for their constituents.

While some states have relaxed absentee voting processes during the pandemic, others have implemented stricter regulations. Alabama, for instance, has adopted more restrictive voting laws compared to other states.

The battle over regulations and voting rights highlights a growing tension within conservative circles. While many Republicans champion limited government and individual liberty, the powerful lobbying efforts of established industries and the complex political landscape often make it difficult to translate these ideals into tangible policy changes.


<end_of_turn>

##  Red States, Red Tape: Conservative States Struggle to Roll Back Regulations Despite GOP Control 

**Phoenix, AZ** -  A curious paradox is playing out across the United States: even in states with overwhelmingly Republican leadership, dismantling regulations often proves to be a herculean task. This trend is particularly notable in conservative states where, despite GOP control of both legislatures and governorships, efforts to loosen the grip of licensing requirements and other regulations face fierce opposition.

“It’s a common story across the country,” says Dick M. Carpenter, Strategic Director of the Institute for Justice. “When there’s an effort to dial back legislation, the entrenched licensed industry mounts a powerful counterattack.” 

Arizona, often perceived as a bastion of low regulation, provides a prime example. Last month, the state agreed to ease licensing requirements for professions like yoga teachers, geologists, citrus fruit packers, and cremationists. However, this victory was hard-fought, according to Daniel Scarpinato, spokesman for Republican Governor Doug Ducey. 

"Perhaps didn’t like how the vote went," Scarpinato stated, highlighting the political complexities involved.  "This was the most difficult bill we worked on this session.” 

The struggle to reform regulations in red states highlights the deep-seated nature of these laws, often driven by powerful interest groups who benefit from the existing system. This can leave voters feeling frustrated, as they see their elected officials unable to deliver on promises of deregulation.

This issue extends beyond licensing requirements.  States like Alabama, despite having more restrictive voting laws compared to other states, are experiencing high voter turnout. This raises questions about the effectiveness of these restrictive measures in suppressing voter participation.

The contrasting situation in states like New Hampshire and Mississippi, which have some of the most restrictive voting laws but also some of the highest voter participation rates, suggests that access to the ballot box is a complex issue influenced by a multitude of factors.

As states continue to grapple with the balance between regulation and individual liberty, the challenge of rolling back burdensome regulations in even the most conservative states remains a significant hurdle. 
<end_of_turn>
The Paradox of Regulation: How Conservative States Struggle to Reform

In a striking paradox, some of the most conservative states in the country, led by Republican governors and legislatures, have found it extremely difficult to effect change when it comes to regulating industries. Despite having a reputation for being low-regulatory states, many of these states have seen licensing requirements for various professions remain in place, often with little to no effort to reform them.

Take Arizona, for example. Last month, the state agreed to curb licensing requirements for yoga teachers, geologists, citrus fruit packers, and cremationists, among others. However, this was a rare instance of reform, and dozens of other professions escaped the ax. According to Daniel Scarpinato, a spokesman for Republican Governor Doug Ducey, the bill was a difficult one to pass, and it appears that the governor may have had second thoughts about the outcome.

"It was the most difficult bill we worked on this session," Scarpinato said. "Perhaps didn't like how the vote went, and not only got rid of the easing of constraints but invented new laws that make absentee voting more difficult." These new laws make it more challenging for voters to cast their ballots, particularly in states that are already considered to be among the most restrictive in the country.

According to a recent study, New Hampshire and Mississippi are among the most challenging states to vote in, with 50th and 49th rankings, respectively. The study aimed to make it simple to understand how changes in voting laws at the state level impact overall access to the ballot box for voters and to identify which states are reducing the cost of voting for their constituents compared to other states.

The researchers found that automatic voter registration has helped boost turnout in other states, but it has generally taken at least one cycle to have an impact. In the midst of the pandemic, many states relaxed absentee voting laws, making it easier for voters to cast their ballots. However, these changes have not been sustained, and some states have even introduced new laws that make voting more difficult.

Alabama, for instance, has more restrictive voting laws compared to other states. The state's lawmakers have introduced legislation that would limit early voting and make it harder for voters to register. If these laws are not passed, states will be forced to revisit their voting laws and make changes to ensure that they are accessible to all citizens.

The paradox of regulation in conservative states highlights the challenges of reforming laws that are often deeply ingrained in the state's culture and politics. While some states may have a reputation for being low-regulatory, they still struggle to effect change when it comes to licensing requirements and voting laws. As the researchers noted, their goal is to make it simple to understand how changes in voting laws impact access to the ballot box and to identify which states are reducing the cost of voting for their constituents.

In the end, the paradox of regulation in conservative states serves as a reminder that even in the most unlikely places, there is often a need for reform and a desire to make voting more accessible to all citizens.
## It's Among the States Least Ready to Roll Back Restrictions:  Arizona's Fight for Regulatory Reform Highlights a National Trend

While many states are grappling with the question of how to ease pandemic-era restrictions, Arizona stands out as a prime example of the challenges faced in rolling back regulations, even in states with traditionally conservative leanings. 

Despite its reputation as a low-regulation state, Arizona recently faced a fierce battle to loosen licensing requirements for professions like yoga teachers, geologists, citrus fruit packers, and cremationists. This struggle, according to Daniel Scarpinato, a spokesperson for Republican Governor Doug Ducey, was "the most difficult bill we worked on this session." 

This resistance to deregulation is a common theme across the nation, according to Dick M. Carpenter, Strategic Director of the Institute for Justice. "The most regulated states paradoxically are red," he explains. "Even Republican governors with Republican legislatures in pretty conservative states have still found it extremely difficult to effect change." Carpenter attributes this phenomenon to the powerful lobbying efforts of licensed industries, who often fiercely oppose any attempt to loosen restrictions. 

This trend is not limited to professional licensing.  A recent study by the National Conference of State Legislatures found that many states have actually tightened voting laws since the 2020 election, making it more difficult for citizens to cast their ballots.  

"Perhaps didn't like how the vote went, have not only gotten rid of the easing of constraints but invented new laws that make absentee voting more difficult," Carpenter notes.  This trend is particularly pronounced in states like New Hampshire and Mississippi, which the study ranked as the most challenging states to vote in. 

While states like Arizona and Mississippi are struggling to loosen restrictions, others have taken steps to make voting more accessible.  Automatic voter registration, for example, has been shown to boost voter turnout in states that have implemented it.  

The pandemic also saw many states relax absentee voting rules, making it easier for citizens to participate in elections.  However, as the pandemic recedes, some states are now moving to roll back these temporary measures, raising concerns about voter access. 

The debate over deregulation and voting access is likely to continue in the coming months and years.  As states grapple with the legacy of the pandemic and the changing political landscape, the question of how to balance individual liberty with the need for regulation will remain a central issue. 

## It's Among the States Least Ready to Roll Back Restrictions:  Arizona's Fight for Regulatory Reform Highlights a National Trend

While the national conversation often focuses on the ease of voting in certain states, a different battle is brewing in the realm of professional licensing.  Despite a growing movement for deregulation, many states, even those with conservative legislatures, are proving remarkably resistant to loosening restrictions on various professions.

Arizona, often perceived as a low-regulation state, recently grappled with this very issue.  A bill aimed at curbing licensing requirements for professions like yoga teachers, geologists, citrus fruit packers, and cremationists faced fierce opposition from established industry groups.  "This was the most difficult bill we worked on this session," admitted Daniel Scarpinato, a spokesman for Republican Governor Doug Ducey.  The experience highlights a national trend:  "When there is an effort to dial back legislation, then the licensed industry turns out with a huge counterattack," explains Dick M. Carpenter, Strategic Director of the Institute for Justice.  "This is the same story that plays out in every state."

The resistance to deregulation isn't limited to professional licensing.  States like New Hampshire and Mississippi, ranked among the most challenging to vote in, are also actively enacting legislation that makes absentee voting more difficult.  This trend, according to experts, is a direct response to the increased ease of voting during the pandemic.  "States relaxed absentee voting – many states tweaked the process to make voting easier," notes David Schraufnagel, a voting rights expert.  "But now, some states are trying to reverse those changes."

This pushback against deregulation raises concerns about access to opportunities and democratic participation.  While some argue that licensing requirements protect consumers and ensure quality, critics point to the stifling effect they can have on innovation and economic growth.  Similarly, restrictive voting laws can disenfranchise voters and undermine the democratic process.

The fight for deregulation is far from over.  As states continue to grapple with the balance between regulation and freedom, the question remains:  Will they prioritize the needs of individuals and businesses, or will they succumb to the pressure of entrenched interests?  The answer will have significant implications for the future of both economic opportunity and democratic participation. 

## It’s Among the States Least Ready to Roll Back Restrictions:  Arizona's Fight to Ease Regulations Highlights a National Trend

Arizona, a state known for its low regulation environment, recently faced a fierce battle to loosen restrictions on professions like yoga teachers, geologists, and even cremationists. This struggle highlights a national trend where, despite calls for deregulation, many states are proving resistant to rolling back licensing requirements.

The Institute for Justice, a non-profit organization advocating for limited government, observes that even in states with Republican governors and legislatures, efforts to reduce regulations often face significant pushback.  "Licensed industries often launch a powerful counterattack when there's an attempt to dial back legislation," explains Dick M. Carpenter, the organization's strategic director. "This pattern repeats itself across the country."

While Arizona did manage to ease some restrictions, it was a hard-fought victory. "This was the most difficult bill we worked on this session," said Daniel Scarpinato, spokesperson for Republican Governor Doug Ducey. The success of the bill, which faced opposition from established professionals, underscores the challenges of deregulation in a landscape where entrenched interests often resist change.

This resistance extends beyond occupational licensing.  States are also grappling with efforts to ease voting restrictions, with some even enacting new laws that make absentee voting more difficult.  A recent study by the Brennan Center for Justice found that New Hampshire and Mississippi are the most challenging states to vote in, despite having high voter participation rates. 

"States relaxed absentee voting during the pandemic, but many are now reversing those changes," said  David Schraufnagel, a voting rights expert.  "This trend is particularly concerning in states with restrictive voting laws, such as Alabama."

The debate over deregulation and voting restrictions is ongoing, with states navigating competing priorities of economic growth, public safety, and voter access.  As the fight for deregulation continues, it remains to be seen whether states will embrace a more streamlined approach or succumb to the pressure of established interests. 

## It’s Among the States Least Ready to Roll Back Restrictions: Arizona Leads the Pack in Resisting Deregulation 

Arizona, a state often perceived as having a low regulatory environment, has proven surprisingly resistant to efforts to loosen restrictions on various professions. This trend, observed across the country, underscores the difficulties faced by lawmakers seeking to reduce regulations, even in states with conservative leadership.

While the push for deregulation has gained traction nationwide, Arizona presents a stark example of the hurdles involved. Despite a Republican governor and legislature, recent efforts to curb licensing requirements for professions like yoga teachers, geologists, citrus fruit packers, and cremationists faced significant opposition. 

"This was the most difficult bill we worked on this session," admitted Daniel Scarpinato, a spokesperson for Republican Governor Douglas Ducey. "Arizona is perceived as a low regulatory state, but the licensed industry turned out with a huge counterattack." 

This dynamic highlights a broader trend observed by Dick M. Carpenter, Strategic Director of the Institute for Justice: "The most regulated states paradoxically are red. Even Republican governors with Republican legislatures in pretty conservative states have still found it extremely difficult to effect change."

The licensed industries, with vested interests in maintaining their control, often mobilize to oppose deregulation efforts. This dynamic makes it challenging to implement meaningful change, even in states with a conservative political landscape.

While Arizona stands out for its recent efforts to ease some licensing requirements, the state still faces a long road to significantly reducing regulation. This resistance is mirrored in other states, where attempts to simplify voting laws, another area often targeted for deregulation, have also encountered substantial opposition. 

A recent study by the Institute for Justice highlighted the challenges faced by voters in states like New Hampshire and Mississippi, which ranked as the most difficult to vote in. These states, despite having high voter participation rates, maintain restrictive voting laws that make it harder for citizens to exercise their right to vote. 

The study's findings underscore the importance of simplifying voting processes and reducing barriers to access. However, the ongoing efforts to roll back regulations face a difficult path, with powerful vested interests fiercely defending the status quo. 

The ongoing struggle to loosen restrictions in Arizona and across the nation reveals a complex interplay of political forces, vested interests, and public perception. Whether these efforts ultimately succeed will depend on the ability of lawmakers to navigate these complex dynamics and push for meaningful change. 

## It's Among the States Least Ready to Roll Back Restrictions: A Look at the Fight for Deregulation

While many states are eager to ease restrictions and return to a pre-pandemic normal, some are proving remarkably resistant to deregulation, particularly in the realm of licensing and voting.  This resistance, experts say, comes from a complex mix of entrenched interests and political maneuvering.

"The most regulated states paradoxically are red," explains Dick M. Carpenter, Strategic Director of the Institute for Justice. "Even Republican governors with Republican legislatures in pretty conservative states have still found it extremely difficult to effect change. When there is an effort to dial back legislation, then the licensed industry turns out with a huge counterattack. This is the same story that plays out in every state."

While deregulation may seem like a common-sense goal, the reality is far more complex.  Removing licensing requirements, for example, faces fierce opposition from established professional groups who see it as a threat to their livelihoods and expertise. This dynamic was evident in Arizona, a state often perceived as having a low regulatory burden.  Despite this reputation, recent efforts to curb licensing requirements for professions like yoga instructors, geologists, and cremationists faced significant pushback, with the bill being labeled "the most difficult" of the session by Daniel Scarpinato, a spokesperson for Republican Governor Douglas Ducey.

The fight for deregulation extends beyond professional licensing.  States like New Hampshire and Mississippi are also proving particularly resistant to efforts to make voting more accessible. A recent study by the National Conference of State Legislatures ranked these states as the most challenging in terms of voting laws, highlighting restrictions on absentee voting and other measures that make it more difficult for voters to participate. 

"Perhaps didn't like how the vote went," notes one expert, referring to the continued resistance to deregulation. "They have not only gotten rid of the easing of constraints but invented new laws that make absentee voting more difficult." 

These states, however, are outliers.  Many states have implemented reforms to make voting easier, particularly in the wake of the pandemic.  The study highlights the increased use of automatic voter registration and relaxed absentee voting processes as key drivers of increased voter turnout.  

The fight for deregulation in the US is far from over.  While some states are making progress, others are doubling down on restrictive measures, creating a patchwork of regulations that impact businesses, professions, and voter participation.  As the debate continues, it will be crucial to balance the competing interests at play, ensuring that access to opportunity and democratic processes remain a priority for all Americans. 

Title: Red States Struggle to Roll Back Licensing Restrictions

Despite being perceived as low-regulation states, many red states with Republican governors and legislatures are finding it difficult to roll back licensing restrictions. According to Dick M. Carpenter, the strategic director of the Institute for Justice, licensed industries often mount a strong counterattack when there is an effort to dial back legislation. This phenomenon is not unique to any particular state, and licensing requirements are rarely removed.

Arizona, for instance, recently agreed to curb licensing requirements for yoga teachers, geologists, citrus fruit packers, and cremationists. However, dozens of other professions escaped the ax. Daniel Scarpinato, a spokesman for Republican Governor Douglas Ducey, said that Arizona is perceived as a low-regulation state, but this was the most difficult bill they worked on during the session.

The difficulty in rolling back licensing restrictions is not limited to Arizona. Other states have also struggled to ease constraints. In some cases, states have even invented new laws that make it more difficult to vote absentee. According to a study, the most challenging states to vote in are New Hampshire (50th) and Mississippi (49th). These states also have some of the highest voter participation rates in the nation.

Automatic voter registration has helped boost turnout in other states, but it has generally taken at least one cycle to have an impact. During the pandemic, many states relaxed absentee voting to make voting easier. However, if legislation is not passed, states will continue to struggle with restrictive voting laws.

In conclusion, red states with Republican governors and legislatures are finding it difficult to roll back licensing restrictions. The licensed industries often mount a strong counterattack when there is an effort to dial back legislation. Additionally, some states have even invented new laws that make it more difficult to vote absentee. Automatic voter registration has helped boost turnout in other states, but it has generally taken at least one cycle to have an impact. If legislation is not passed, states will continue to struggle with restrictive voting laws.
Title: "Red States Struggle to Roll Back Licensing Restrictions, Despite Conservative Leadership"

Despite being perceived as bastions of deregulation, some of the most regulated states in the US are paradoxically red, with even Republican governors and legislatures struggling to effect change. This is the conclusion of a recent study by the Institute for Justice, which found that licensed industries often mount a fierce counterattack when there is an effort to dial back legislation.

Arizona, for instance, is often considered a low-regulatory state, but last month's bill to curb licensing requirements for yoga teachers, geologists, citrus fruit packers, and cremationists was one of the most difficult bills the state legislature worked on this session, according to Daniel Scarpinato, a spokesman for Republican Governor Douglas Ducey. Despite this effort, dozens of other professions escaped the ax.

The study found that only rarely are licensing requirements removed, and that the most challenging states to effect change are often those with the highest voter participation rates. This is because licensed industries often have a vested interest in maintaining the status quo, and are able to mobilize their resources to lobby against any proposed changes.

Moreover, some states have even gone so far as to invent new laws that make it more difficult to vote, particularly by absentee ballot. New Hampshire and Mississippi, for instance, rank at the bottom of the list for ease of voting, according to the study. This is despite the fact that automatic voter registration has helped boost turnout in other states, although it has generally taken at least one cycle to have an impact.

In the midst of the pandemic, many states relaxed absentee voting rules to make voting easier, but if legislation is not passed to make these changes permanent, states will likely revert to their previous, more restrictive laws. This is a worrying trend, given that the US is already one of the most difficult countries in the developed world to vote in, with long lines, strict ID laws, and other barriers to entry.

As the study's author, Anthony Pomante, notes, "Our goal with this research is to make it simple to understand how the changes in voting laws at the state level impact overall access to the ballot box for voters, and to identify which states are reducing the cost of voting for their constituents compared to other states." It remains to be seen whether red states will be able to overcome the vested interests of licensed industries and make it easier for their citizens to vote, or whether they will continue to lag behind in terms of deregulation and voter access.
Title: "Red States Struggle to Roll Back Licensing Restrictions, Voting Laws Remain Tight"

In a surprising turn of events, some of the most regulated states in the US are paradoxically red, with even Republican governors and legislatures in conservative states finding it difficult to effect change. According to Dick M. Carpenter, the strategic director of the Institute for Justice, "When there is an effort to dial back legislation, then the licensed industry turns out with a huge counterattack. This is the same story that plays out in every state."

While Arizona recently agreed to curb licensing requirements for yoga teachers, geologists, citrus fruit packers, and cremationists, dozens more professions escaped the ax. "Arizona is perceived as a low regulatory state, but this was the most difficult bill we worked on this session," said Daniel Scarpinato, a spokesman for Republican Governor Douglas Ducey.

The struggle to roll back licensing restrictions is not the only challenge facing red states. A recent study found that the most challenging states to vote in are New Hampshire (50th) and Mississippi (49th). "Our goal with this research is to make it simple to understand how the changes in voting laws at the state level impact overall access to the ballot box for voters and to identify which states are reducing the cost of voting for their constituents compared to other states," said the study's author, Michael Pomante.

Despite having some of the highest voter participation rates in the nation, these states have also implemented more restrictive voting laws compared to other states. Automatic voter registration has helped boost turnout in other states, but it has generally taken at least one cycle to have an impact.

"In the midst of the pandemic, states relaxed absentee voting—many states tweaked the process to make voting easier," said Schraufnagel. However, some states have not only gotten rid of the easing of constraints but have invented new laws that make absentee voting more difficult.

The struggle to roll back licensing restrictions and implement more accessible voting laws is ongoing in red states. "If legislation is not passed, states will continue to face challenges in these areas," said Pomante. It remains to be seen whether these states will be able to overcome the resistance from licensed industries and implement more accessible voting laws in the future.
Title: Red States Struggle to Roll Back Licensing Restrictions Despite Conservative Leadership

In a surprising turn of events, states with conservative leadership and Republican-majority legislatures are finding it challenging to roll back licensing restrictions. Despite the red hue on the political map, the states remain heavily regulated, and the licensed industries put up a fierce fight against any effort to dial back legislation.

Dick M. Carpenter, the strategic director of the Institute for Justice, explains that even in conservative states with Republican governors and legislatures, the most regulated states paradoxically remain heavily controlled. "When there is an effort to dial back legislation, then the licensed industry turns out with a huge counterattack," Carpenter said. "This is the same story that plays out in every state."

Arizona, a state perceived as having a low regulatory environment, recently agreed to curb licensing requirements for yoga teachers, geologists, citrus fruit packers, and cremationists. However, dozens of other professions escaped the ax. "Arizona is perceived as a low regulatory state, but this was the most difficult bill we worked on this session," said Daniel Scarpinato, a spokesman for the Republican governor, Doug Ducey.

The difficulty in removing licensing requirements is not unique to Arizona. In many states, the licensed industries have a considerable amount of influence and resources to fight back against efforts to deregulate. This challenge is compounded by the lack of political will among lawmakers to take on powerful interest groups.

The struggle to roll back licensing restrictions has implications for voter access and participation. New Hampshire and Mississippi are the most challenging states to vote in, according to a recent study. These states also have some of the highest voter participation rates in the nation. Automatic voter registration has helped boost turnout in other states, but it has generally taken at least one cycle to have an impact.

In the midst of the pandemic, many states relaxed absentee voting laws, making the process easier for voters. However, if legislation is not passed to make these changes permanent, states may revert to more restrictive voting laws.

The effort to roll back licensing restrictions is a complex issue that requires a political will to take on powerful interest groups. Until lawmakers are willing to stand up to these groups, the states will continue to be among the least ready to reduce regulations and improve voter access.
Title: Red States Struggle to Ease Licensing Restrictions Amid Industry Pushback

Despite their conservative governments and pro-free market rhetoric, many red states paradoxically remain among the most regulated in the country. These states, with Republican governors and legislatures, have had difficulties in rolling back occupational licensing legislation, even as they position themselves as bastions of small government principles. According to Dick M. Carpenter, Strategic Director of the Institute for Justice, when an effort to dial back regulations is made, the licensed industry responds with "a huge counterattack." 

Arizona, usually perceived as a low-regulation state, recently proved an exception to the rule. Governor Doug Ducey's efforts to relax licensing requirements for professions like yoga teachers, geologists, citrus fruit packers, and cremationists met with fierce opposition. Even with the support of his fellow Republicans, Ducey described the effort as the "most difficult bill we worked on this session." 

Moreover, while some states have eased regulations to improve accessibility and facilitate more individuals to enter the workforce, others have made voting more challenging. Mississippi and New Hampshire emerged as the most difficult states for absentee voting, according to a recent study. Despite this, states with automatic voter registration have seen turnout boost after at least one election cycle.

The pushback from the licensed industry and the difficulty in easing regulations in red states reveal a complex and often contradictory political landscape. These challenges suggest that efforts to change legislation can be both politically fraught and time-consuming, even in states typically seen as supportive of deregulation. However, the Arizona case provides a glimmer of hope. It highlights the potential for legislative success in rolling back regulations, despite the opposition from vested interests.

As the political debates around regulation, voting laws and occupational licensing continue, the lessons from Arizona and other states demonstrate the need for strategic planning, public support, and political will in order to effect meaningful change.

Despite the difficulties in altering existing legislation, these case studies provide a valuable insight into the complex dynamics of red state politics and the influence of industry interests. The challenges in reducing and easing licensing laws and the impact of regulatory changes on voting demonstrate the interconnectedness of these issues. These challenges provide a unique opportunity to analyze the effectiveness of state-level reforms, and potentially inform future legislative efforts at the national level.
  
In conclusion, the struggle to ease licensing restrictions in traditionally red states is multifaceted and requires a nuanced understanding of the political and economic landscape. It also highlights the importance of recognizing the influence of industry forces in the policy-making process. As the country moves forward in addressing these challenges, it will be crucial to continue promoting reforms that strike a balance between regulating the market and ensuring free enterprise.
**Arizona's Struggle to Roll Back Regulations: A Cautionary Tale for Red States**

In a surprising turn of events, Arizona, a state perceived as having a low regulatory environment, has found it extremely challenging to roll back licensing requirements for various professions. Despite being a conservative state with a Republican governor and legislature, the effort to curb regulations has been met with fierce resistance from the licensed industry.

According to Dick M. Carpenter, Strategic Director of the Institute for Justice, "When there is an effort to dial back legislation, then the licensed industry turns out with a huge counterattack. This is the same story that plays out in every state. Only rarely are licensing requirements removed."

Last month, Arizona lawmakers managed to pass a bill that curbed licensing requirements for yoga teachers, geologists, citrus fruit packers, and cremationists. However, dozens of other professions escaped the ax, highlighting the difficulties of rolling back regulations in even the most conservative of states.

Daniel Scarpinato, a spokesman for Republican Governor Douglas Ducey, acknowledged the challenges faced by the state. "Arizona is perceived as a low regulatory state, but this was the most difficult bill we worked on this session," he said.

The struggle to roll back regulations in Arizona serves as a cautionary tale for other red states looking to reduce licensing requirements. The licensed industry's ability to mobilize and push back against deregulation efforts is a powerful force that can be difficult to overcome.

This phenomenon is not unique to Arizona. Across the country, states with Republican governors and legislatures have found it challenging to effect change. The licensed industry's influence can be seen in the fact that only rarely are licensing requirements removed.

The Arizona experience highlights the need for a more nuanced approach to deregulation. Rather than simply trying to roll back regulations, lawmakers may need to engage in a more thoughtful and targeted approach that takes into account the concerns of the licensed industry.

As the debate over deregulation continues, it remains to be seen whether other states will follow Arizona's lead and attempt to curb licensing requirements. However, one thing is clear: the licensed industry will not go quietly into the night, and lawmakers will need to be prepared to face significant resistance if they hope to succeed.
**Title:** Arizona's Struggle to Roll Back Regulations: A Cautionary Tale for Red States

**PHOENIX, ARIZONA** - Despite being perceived as a low-regulatory state, Arizona has found it challenging to roll back restrictions on various professions, a phenomenon that is not unique to the Grand Canyon State. According to a recent study, Arizona is among the states least ready to dial back regulations, a trend that is also observed in other conservative states with Republican governors and legislatures.

The struggle to ease regulations in Arizona was evident in the state's recent legislative session, where a bill aimed at curbing licensing requirements for certain professions faced significant resistance. While the bill ultimately passed, it was a hard-won victory, with dozens of professions escaping the ax. "Arizona is perceived as a low-regulatory state, but this was the most difficult bill we worked on this session," said Daniel Scarpinato, a spokesman for Republican Governor Douglas Ducey.

The experience in Arizona is not an isolated incident. According to Dick M. Carpenter, Strategic Director of the Institute for Justice, "When there is an effort to dial back legislation, then the licensed industry turns out with a huge counterattack. This is the same story that plays out in every state." Carpenter notes that only rarely are licensing requirements removed, and even when they are, it is often a limited victory.

The phenomenon is not limited to Arizona or even the Southwest. Other conservative states, such as Alabama and Mississippi, have also struggled to roll back regulations. In fact, Mississippi is ranked as one of the most challenging states to vote in, according to a recent study. The study found that states with more restrictive voting laws, such as Alabama, tend to have lower voter participation rates.

The struggle to ease regulations in red states is often attributed to the powerful lobbying efforts of industries that benefit from the existing regulatory framework. When attempts are made to roll back regulations, these industries mobilize to protect their interests, making it difficult for lawmakers to effect change.

The Arizona experience serves as a cautionary tale for other red states seeking to reduce regulations. While the state was ultimately able to pass a bill curbing licensing requirements for certain professions, the process was arduous, and many professions escaped the ax. As Carpenter noted, "It's extremely difficult to effect change, even in conservative states with Republican governors and legislatures."

The implications of this trend extend beyond the realm of licensing requirements and voting laws. It highlights the challenges of reforming regulatory frameworks in states where powerful industries have a vested interest in maintaining the existing status quo. As lawmakers in red states seek to reduce regulations and promote economic growth, they would do well to heed the lessons of Arizona's experience.
**It's Among the States Least Ready to Roll Back Restrictions**

Despite the push for deregulation in many Republican-led states, Arizona's recent experience is a stark reminder that rolling back restrictions on various professions is a difficult task, even in the most conservative of states. The Grand Canyon State, perceived as a low-regulatory environment, has struggled to pass legislation that would ease licensing requirements for numerous professions.

According to Dick M. Carpenter, Strategic Director of the Institute for Justice, "When there is an effort to dial back legislation, then the licensed industry turns out with a huge counterattack. This is the same story that plays out in every state." Carpenter's words are echoed by Daniel Scarpinato, a spokesman for Arizona Governor Douglas Ducey, who acknowledged that the bill to curb licensing requirements was "the most difficult bill we worked on this session."

Arizona's recent attempt to deregulate certain professions, such as yoga teachers, geologists, citrus fruit packers, and cremationists, was met with significant resistance. Although the bill ultimately passed, dozens of other professions were spared from deregulation. This outcome highlights the challenges that states face when trying to roll back restrictions, even in the most conservative of environments.

This phenomenon is not unique to Arizona. Many Republican-led states, despite their reputation for limited government intervention, have found it difficult to effect change in this area. The licensed industry's strong lobbying efforts often prove to be a significant obstacle to deregulation.

The struggle to roll back restrictions is not limited to professional licensing. Voting laws are another area where states have faced challenges in easing regulations. According to a recent study, some of the most restrictive voting laws can be found in states like New Hampshire and Mississippi, which rank 50th and 49th, respectively, in terms of voting accessibility.

Researchers have pointed out that the relaxation of absentee voting laws during the pandemic has helped increase voter turnout in some states. However, the implementation of automatic voter registration has generally taken at least one cycle to have a noticeable impact.

The study's findings suggest that states with the most restrictive voting laws often have lower voter participation rates. Alabama, for example, has more restrictive voting laws compared to other states, which may contribute to its lower voter turnout.

As states continue to grapple with the issue of deregulation, it remains to be seen whether they will be able to overcome the resistance from licensed industries and other special interest groups. One thing is clear, however: rolling back restrictions will require sustained effort and commitment from lawmakers and governors alike.
**Some States Just Can't Seem to Roll Back Regulations, No Matter How Hard They Try**

Despite being perceived as low-regulatory states, some Republican-led governments are finding it increasingly difficult to dial back licensing requirements and other restrictions. A recent study has shed light on the unexpected challenges faced by states like Arizona, which is often seen as a bastion of limited government.

Arizona's Republican Governor, Douglas Ducey, recently signed a bill that aimed to curb licensing requirements for several professions, including yoga teachers, geologists, and citrus fruit packers. However, the bill's passage was not without its challenges, with many industry groups launching a fierce counterattack to preserve existing regulations.

"It's the same story that plays out in every state," said Dick M. Carpenter, Strategic Director of the Institute for Justice. "When there is an effort to dial back legislation, then the licensed industry turns out with a huge counterattack." Carpenter noted that it's extremely rare for licensing requirements to be removed altogether, with Arizona's recent bill being a notable exception.

Daniel Scarpinato, a spokesman for Governor Ducey, described the bill as "the most difficult" one worked on during the session, highlighting the intense pushback from industry groups. "Arizona is perceived as a low-regulatory state, but this was a tough fight," Scarpinato said.

The challenges faced by Arizona are not unique. Many states, including those with Republican governors and legislatures, are finding it difficult to roll back regulations. This paradox has left some lawmakers scratching their heads, wondering why it's so hard to reduce the regulatory burden on businesses and individuals.

One reason for this resistance is the powerful lobbying efforts of industry groups, which often have a significant stake in maintaining existing regulations. These groups use their influence to persuade lawmakers to reject efforts to loosen restrictions, often citing concerns about public safety or consumer protection.

The consequences of these regulatory barriers can be significant. Studies have shown that overly restrictive regulations can stifle economic growth, limit access to certain professions, and even affect voter turnout. In fact, a recent study found that some of the most regulated states also have some of the lowest voter participation rates in the nation.

As lawmakers continue to grapple with the issue of regulatory reform, it's clear that there's no easy solution. However, by shedding light on the challenges faced by states like Arizona, perhaps policymakers can begin to develop more effective strategies for rolling back unnecessary regulations and promoting economic growth.
**Arizona's Regulatory Relief Efforts Buck the Trend, But Most States Remain Resistant to Rollbacks**

In a surprising move, Arizona lawmakers recently took steps to curb licensing requirements for a handful of professions, including yoga teachers, geologists, and citrus fruit packers. However, the victory was hard-won, and most states remain resistant to rolling back regulations, even in conservative strongholds.

According to a strategic director at the Institute for Justice, Dick M. Carpenter, "It's paradoxical that even in states with Republican governors and legislatures, there is significant pushback from the licensed industry when it comes to dialing back legislation."

Arizona, often perceived as a low-regulatory state, was a notable exception. After a tough battle, Governor Douglas Ducey's administration successfully passed a bill that relaxed licensing requirements for several occupations. However, dozens more professions escaped the ax.

"This was the most difficult bill we worked on this session," said Daniel Scarpinato, a spokesman for Governor Ducey. The effort to curb regulations highlights the challenges of pushing back against the interests of established industries.

Despite Arizona's success, many states continue to have restrictive laws and regulations in place. In fact, some states have even moved to strengthen regulations and make absentee voting more difficult. According to a recent study, New Hampshire and Mississippi are the most challenging states to vote in, ranking 50th and 49th, respectively.

The study's author, a professor at Northern Illinois University, noted that "our goal is to make it simple to understand how changes in voting laws at the state level impact overall access to the ballot box for voters." The research aims to identify states that are reducing the cost of voting for their constituents.

Interestingly, states with automatic voter registration have seen increased voter turnout. However, this boost has typically taken at least one election cycle to materialize. The COVID-19 pandemic led many states to relax absentee voting rules, but these changes have often been temporary.

Alabama, for example, has some of the most restrictive voting laws in the country. Unless legislation is passed to address these restrictions, many states will likely remain resistant to efforts to roll back regulations and increase voter accessibility.

Arizona's experience serves as a reminder that even in conservative states, there is significant pushback against efforts to reduce regulations. As the Institute for Justice's Carpenter noted, "When there is an effort to dial back legislation, the licensed industry turns out with a huge counterattack." This trend is likely to continue, making it challenging for states to implement meaningful regulatory relief.