Our columnists and contributors give their rankings.
collective columnist celebrated junior prayer facilities bold twilight literary minor phase heroes locations celebrate editorial affordable foreclosure sorts captain cheaper atlantic neighborhoods feelings deemed southwest upcoming throwing closest dubbed flag faithful loyal teach publishers branch paintings sing producing filmmakers entering taiwan yeah iron mahmoud ideal churches nazi dying lowest payment moreover explanation absence larry sharing application conviction capture acknowledged tests motor testing blackberry notorious susan agrees describes liberals channels districts stance uninsured resident tip focusing proper substance hockey heritage exhibition pm meltdown exposed stress bonus raises parent photographs stable motion predecessor complaint org altogether merger rough regard beatles pointing document inner stolen lists scholar km carbon soil latino thailand delay indonesia milk midst stanley mutual blogs carriers handling logic cents earning taylor desert yahoo select | By Opinion columnists and contributors assess the candidates in Alabama. By Opinion columnists and contributors assess the candidates in Iowa. By Opinion columnists and contributors assess the candidates in Miami. By Times Opinion writers reflect on an extraordinary development in American political history. By Columnists and contributors assess who won and lost the debate and distill what stood out to them. By Opinion writers and outside contributors give their rankings of the Democratic contenders for "the second toughest job in America." By Here’s what our columnists and contributors thought of the opening night for Republicans in Milwaukee. By Our columnists and contributors give their rankings. By Times Opinion looks at the strengths and weaknesses of the South Carolina senator. By Times columnists and contributors evaluate the former president’s chances in the G.O.P. By Times Opinion wants to hear your takeaways. By Times Opinion wants to hear from you. By Your guide to the | of the custom entries you created on Stylebook Online. You can take the ’s. Pay attention if you are white
Our columnists and contributors give their rankings.
Comments
Winners and Losers of the Democratic Debate
ByThe New York Times OpinionDec. 20, 2019
Welcome to Opinion’s commentary for the Jan. 14 Democratic presidential candidate debate in Des Moines. In this special feature, Times Opinion writers rank the candidates on a scale of 1 to 10: 1 means the candidate probably didn’t belong on the stage and should probably drop out; 10 means it’s on, President Trump. Here’s what our columnists and contributors thought about the debate.
Read what our columnists and contributors thought of theNovember debate.
Amy Klobuchar
Jamelle Bouie(8/10) — To have any chance at the nomination, Klobuchar needs to win Iowa, and so she took aim at the candidate most in her way — Pete Buttigieg — presenting herself as the experienced alternative to a small town mayor with only a few electoral wins under his belt. It was compelling.
Jorge Castañeda(8/10) — Klobuchar was better than before, but still too earnest and self-centered, even by candidates’ standards. Her best moments were on Citizens United and how Trump quits when his peers make fun of him.
Gail Collins(8/10) — She’s been great at the clever, sensible answers for a while now. Time for an upgrade.
Ross Douthat(7/10) — Her most forceful, stage-seizing performance. The only question is whether enough Iowans liked the deliberate clash with Buttigieg.
Nicole Hemmer(7/10) — Klobuchar’s got jokes, but she’s also got jabs, and tonight she aimed almost all of them at Buttigieg, in an effective bid for voters looking for a non-wine-cave Midwesterner.
Nicholas Kristof(10/10) — Effectively presented herself as a unifier who can win elections, jousting with good cheer and optimism.
Robert Leonard(8/10) — If any debate is going to help her, this was it. She took some risks, dominated the conversation and aimed squarely at Iowa. Oh, and by the way, she’s from the Midwest. The Midwest.
David Leonhardt(6/10) — She’s getting better, but still sounds too much like a senator and not a president. She doesn’t need to mention all that legislation. Stay big.
Liz Mair(9.5/10) — Virtually flawless debate. She attacked effectively and came off as confident, experienced and presidential — and, yes, likable, something we’re told isn’t possible for female candidates but that she proved actually is.
Will Wilkinson(8/10) — The winnowing of the debate pack gave Klobuchar room to throw sharp elbows and make a compelling case for her electability and qualifications. She helped herself in Iowa.
Joe Biden
Jamelle Bouie(9/10) — Biden did extremely well tonight, although I’m not sure if he was actually good or if this is the soft bigotry of low expectations. Either way, this was exactly the kind of performance he needed to stay on top in the national race and even make up ground in Iowa and New Hampshire.
Jorge Castañeda(8/10) — Biden held his ground and did what he had to do: not lose points. He showed more emotion, especially on immigration and Afghanistan.
Gail Collins(6/10) — O.K., now we know he can just cope like a normal candidate. Please add just a tweak of magic?
Ross Douthat(8/10) — His best and most consistent debate. For the first time, he had real front-runner energy.
Nicole Hemmer(7/10) — For Biden, the bar is low — deliver coherent answers and show a bit of energy — but he cleared it ably tonight, something he hasn’t done in the past few debates.
Nicholas Kristof(9/10) — Biden’s best debate by far. Still no silver tongue, but solid for the first time, successfully conveying his experience as a strength.
Robert Leonard(8/10) — Maybe his best debate — because he faded into the background. No gaffes, other than a clumsy answer to the one spontaneous question. Stuck to his mantra — experience and electability.
David Leonhardt(8/10) — His best debate. He was passionate, mostly sharp and even funny. Although maybe a little less shouting next time.
Liz Mair(8/10) — Someone ate his Wheaties and drank his Red Bull. His final answer demonstrated Biden’s great strength — he really does love people, and that makes him really appealing.
Will Wilkinson(7/10) — Biden’s best performance to date. Trump’s scurrilous Biden-centric cover story for his corruption seems to have put some fighting pep in the former veep’s step.
Bernie Sanders
Jamelle Bouie(8/10) — If we were giving out awards then Sanders would get “most consistent player.” He’s always good! And since his heart attack in the fall, he’s more feisty and energetic than ever.
Jorge Castañeda(7/10) — He did what he does best: bring everything back to health care and the 1 percent. His opposition toU.S.M.C.A.was predictable but interesting.
Gail Collins(7/10) — Some good and quick responses, but he still does sound like a cranky uncle.
Ross Douthat(7/10) — If there’s a Warren-or-Sanders lane, he dominated it tonight.
Nicole Hemmer(8/10) — You always know what you’re getting with Sanders, but he’s so much better when — like tonight — he’s goofy rather than grumpy.
Nicholas Kristof(8/10) — Relentless, sharp and sometimes humorous, and extra credit for speaking empathetically about Palestinians.
Robert Leonard(7/10) — Bernie was, as always, Bernie, his great strength. He probably didn’t win any new converts, but he was comfortable, clear and consistent.
David Leonhardt(7/10) — I’m not a fan of universally free college, and I still thought his pitch for it — along with other universal public programs — was eloquent and effective.
Liz Mair(5/10) — You either love the Bernie show, or you wish he’d stop yelling already. It appears most Democrats don’t love it. But hey, maybe those that do will force a big fight on the convention floor and provide some entertainment for the nation next summer.
Will Wilkinson(8/10) — An under-the-radar contender in national polls was pugnacious, charming and made the clearest case so far that ordinary Americans would come out ahead with higher taxes but vastly reduced personal health care costs under Medicare for All.
Elizabeth Warren
Jamelle Bouie(6/10) — After taking a thrashing on Medicare for All and slipping in the polls, Warren is focusing on the anti-corruption part of her message. And like Bernie, she is relentlessly on message, able to tie almost any question back to the themes of her campaign. But she faltered in her confrontation with Buttigieg and lost some initiative.
Jorge Castañeda(7/10) — She is still on a downhill slope and peaked too early intellectually. I would have expected bolder stances on foreign policy, given her intellect. A missed opportunity.
Gail Collins(8/10) — If you’re a frontrunner just being fine is ... fine.
Ross Douthat(4/10) — Best one-liner of the night  “I’d be the youngest woman”); otherwise, strangely, almost a non-factor.
Nicole Hemmer(8/10) — She not only had the best one-liner of the night, she vibrated with passion, without drowning people in plans.
Nicholas Kristof(8/10) — Very effective in taking on the corruption of Trump and the system, but aggressively challenged Buttigieg, and it backfired.
Robert Leonard(7/10) — She stayed on message — and avoided the health care morass — but relied heavily on the same handful of talking points. She was best the few times she spoke with spontaneity and genuine feeling.
David Leonhardt(7/10) — She had the best line of the night (“the youngest female president”). Warren is sharp in laying out her vision. Mayor Pete effectively parried her no-big-donors argument.
Liz Mair(4/10) — Warren looked fairly desperate at points tonight, almost looked like she was going to cry twice and got roughed up pretty badly, mostly by Mayor Pete. She also nearly walked into another roughing-up at the end, eyes-wide-open and who knows why.
Will Wilkinson(7/10) — Warren made a muscular case for sticking up for the little guy and fighting corruption — including the soft corruption of Buttigieg’s fat cat spelunking.
Pete Buttigieg
Jamelle Bouie(5/10) — Buttigieg made an open defense of the extremely broken American campaign finance system, which is to say that “wine cave” is going to stick.
Jorge Castañeda(9/10) — He defended himself notably against Warren and Klobuchar. He is the best debater, but not the best candidate.
Gail Collins(8/10) — He was the target and he held up pretty darn well. If only he didn’t have to defend the fund-raiser in the wine cave....
Ross Douthat(4/10) — The knives went in at last. Though he can fight back just fine, in a fight the thin résumé looks thinner and the smirk comes out too quickly.
Nicole Hemmer(6/10) — The other candidates finally realized they could swing at Mayor Pete, and while it wasn’t a TKO, he took a body blow on wealthy donors. His wine cave is to 2020 what Romney’s car elevator was to 2012 — an image of out-of-touch wealth that people won’t soon forget.
Nicholas Kristof(10/10) — Buttigieg took incoming fire, particularly from Elizabeth Warren, and handled it ably: He faced his biggest debate test and passed.
Robert Leonard(4/10) — Points for composure in the face of jabs — even from Bernie! — at his inexperience, fund-raising and insider-outsider persona. But it’s hard to recover from Wine Cave Pete.
David Leonhardt(7/10) — High highs, but inconsistent. When replying to moderator questions, he resorted to anti-Washington cliches. When attacked, he was very good.
Liz Mair(6.5/10) — Not his best debate — he got roughed up by Klobuchar on his weakest point (not his fault; just his résumé). But he effectively attacked Warren, she deserved it, and a lot of people who think she’s grown increasingly smug, slippery and dishonest will be happy about it.
Will Wilkinson(6/10) — The mayor of Indiana’s fourth-largest municipality got seriously bloodied on wine cave fund-raisers and a paucity of relevant experience, but honey-tongued defensive maneuvers left him on his feet.
Tom Steyer
Jamelle Bouie(6/10) — Steyer has gotten much better at the debate game and much better at giving clear, concise answers. But he still doesn’t seem like he has the political skills to go toe-to-toe with his rivals, putting him on the periphery of most of the conversations and disputes.
Jorge Castañeda(7/10) — He had to shine, being an outsider, and didn’t. On climate change and not fighting among Democrats he excelled, but it was not enough.
Gail Collins(1/10) — Attention Bloomberg: Billionaire candidates need to sound like something more inspiring than ... a liberal billionaire.
Ross Douthat(3/10) — Seemed slightly more plausible than in past appearances, which isn’t saying much.
Nicole Hemmer(4/10) — Judy Woodruff didn’t seem to know who he was, and most voters don’t either. That he’s onstage instead of Cory Booker or Julian Castro makes the case that the Democratic Party needs to tweak its process.
Nicholas Kristof(6/10) — Smart, articulate and more forceful than in previous debates, but still seemed the weakest presence onstage.
Robert Leonard(4/10) — For the guy on the periphery, he was articulate in framing some major issues and gets points as the only one who took Trump’s racism head-on. Plus he repped California.
David Leonhardt(5/10) — Steyer is a force for good who doesn’t need to be on this stage. He could be doing so many other things to help beat Trump. His tie was fun.
Liz Mair(5/10) — Steyer did better than expected, but the competition was also tougher. He talked so much about having used his billions to build grass-roots movements, I was honestly surprised he didn’t mention having built one focused on disability rights.
Will Wilkinson(6/10) — This was Steyer’s best debate. He was unusually coherent, articulate and humane, but nevertheless superfluous.
A strong ideas leader in the Democratic Party, but he is not well known among voters in battleground states and lacks a convincing argument why it would have to be him instead of Harris, Shapiro or another Democrat with the profile, swing-state pedigree, celebrity or money to make the race. Newsom has steadily raised his profile with reliable Democrats, and he’s a flashy, agile debater on television. I am not especially impressed by Newsom, and I wonder if he could survive the vetting received by a candidate for national office. He has a compelling story but doesn’t have the national profile, political identity or money to catch fire (and he has Harris). He’s a pugilistic progressive from the Midwest and a billionaire who could put enormous resources into the race. The Trump team worries that his considerable wealth and blunt style could make him surprisingly formidable, but he’s relatively unknown nationally, and there’s less of a rationale for him than for Shapiro and Whitmer. Only Kentuckians and Democratic insiders have heard of him, though, and he’d need a compelling narrative for a serious presidential campaign. And Harris is a fundamentally weak candidate. Newsom’s red meat delights MSNBC viewers, but there’s nothing about him that helps win over swing voters. More charismatic but less moderate-coded than Whitmer, which is why many people like to imagine him as her vice president. One of the more thoughtful and outreach-oriented Democratic senators but neither a highly electable moderate nor an exciting firebrand, so probably not the right figure for this moment. He would also be a strong vice-presidential candidate, should Harris lead the ticket. But he’s not terribly well known outside Connecticut and hasn’t had a competitive election in more than a decade. Ms. Collins, whose career as a satirist nosedived when she couldn’t find anything funny to write during the Trump years, and Mr. Stephens, who almost got fired when the realized he was an actual Republican, are a breath of fresh air on the opinion page. Harris has a feeble electoral track record — she struggled badly in 2020 and barely, before then, won her first attorney general race in California — but she’ll benefit from a likely unified Democratic establishment, and she can forcefully press the case against Trump on abortion rights.
## Our Columnists and Contributors Give Their Rankings: The 2024 Presidential Race Heats Up

The 2024 presidential race is in full swing, and our esteemed columnists and contributors have been closely following every twist and turn. From the bustling streets of Miami to the heartland of Iowa, they've been analyzing the candidates, dissecting their policies, and offering their expert insights. 

**Alabama:** Our Southern correspondents have been keeping a close eye on the candidates' stances on key issues like education, healthcare, and the economy. They've also been assessing the candidates' ability to connect with voters in this historically conservative state.

**Iowa:** The Hawkeye State is always a crucial battleground in presidential elections, and our team on the ground has been tracking the candidates' every move. They've been analyzing the impact of the caucuses and evaluating which candidates are resonating with Iowa voters.

**Miami:** The Sunshine State is a melting pot of cultures and ideologies, and our Miami-based contributors have been exploring how the candidates are appealing to this diverse electorate. They've been examining the candidates' positions on immigration, climate change, and the economy.

**National Landscape:**

Our Times Opinion writers have been reflecting on the broader implications of this election, analyzing the state of American politics and the challenges facing the nation. They've been exploring the rise of populism, the polarization of the electorate, and the future of democracy.

**Debate Night:**

The recent Republican debate provided a platform for the candidates to showcase their ideas and spar with their opponents. Our columnists and contributors dissected the performances, highlighting the winners and losers, and identifying the key moments that will shape the race moving forward.

**The Democratic Field:**

Our team has been closely following the Democratic contenders, evaluating their strengths and weaknesses, and offering their rankings of who is best positioned to challenge the Republican nominee.

**South Carolina Senator:**

Senator [Senator's Name] has emerged as a key figure in the Republican race. Our columnists have been analyzing his record, his policy positions, and his chances of securing the nomination.

**The Former President:**

The shadow of the former president looms large over the Republican field. Our contributors have been evaluating his influence on the race, his chances of making a comeback, and the potential impact of his legal troubles.

**Your Voice Matters:**

We want to hear from you! Share your thoughts on the 2024 presidential race. What are the issues that matter most to you? Which candidates are you supporting? Join the conversation and let your voice be heard.

This election is shaping up to be one of the most consequential in American history. Stay tuned as our columnists and contributors continue to provide insightful analysis and commentary on the race for the White House. 



##  Our Columnists and Contributors Give Their Rankings: The 2024 Presidential Race Heats Up

As the 2024 presidential race intensifies, our esteemed columnists and contributors have weighed in with their expert assessments of the candidates vying for the highest office in the land. From the early primaries in Iowa and New Hampshire to the crucial battleground states like Florida and Pennsylvania, our team has been on the ground, analyzing the candidates' strengths, weaknesses, and potential paths to victory.

**The Hawkeye State Showdown:**

In Iowa, our columnists highlight the tight race between [Candidate A] and [Candidate B], with [Candidate A]'s strong grassroots organization and [Candidate B]'s appeal to moderate voters emerging as key factors. [Contributor Name] argues that [Candidate A]'s focus on [policy issue] resonates with Iowan voters, while [Contributor Name] believes [Candidate B]'s experience in [previous role] gives them an edge.

**The Sunshine State Scramble:**

Florida, a perennial swing state, is shaping up to be a fierce battleground. Our contributors point to [Candidate C]'s strong support among Latino voters and [Candidate D]'s appeal to seniors as crucial demographics in this crucial primary. [Contributor Name] emphasizes the importance of [Candidate C]'s stance on [issue] in swaying undecided voters, while [Contributor Name] highlights [Candidate D]'s ability to connect with voters on a personal level.

**Beyond the Early States:**

Looking beyond the early primaries, our columnists offer insights into the broader national landscape. [Contributor Name] analyzes the impact of [national issue] on the race, while [Contributor Name] explores the role of [demographic group] in determining the eventual nominee. 

**The Republican Field:**

On the Republican side, our contributors delve into the strengths and weaknesses of the various candidates. [Contributor Name] examines [Candidate E]'s appeal to the party's base, while [Contributor Name] questions [Candidate F]'s electability in a general election.

**The Democratic Contenders:**

Our columnists also offer their assessments of the Democratic field, analyzing the candidates' stances on key issues and their potential to mobilize voters. [Contributor Name] highlights [Candidate G]'s progressive platform, while [Contributor Name] praises [Candidate H]'s experience and electability.

**Your Voice Matters:**

As the 2024 presidential race unfolds, we encourage you to engage with our coverage, share your thoughts, and join the conversation. Your voice matters in shaping the future of our nation.

Stay tuned for continued analysis, insightful commentary, and in-depth reporting from our team of expert columnists and contributors as the race for the White House intensifies.


## Our Columnists and Contributors Give Their Rankings: The 2024 Republican Field

The Republican primary for the 2024 presidential election is heating up, and our esteemed columnists and contributors have been closely watching the candidates emerge and spar on the national stage. From the early contests in Iowa and New Hampshire to the crucial showdown in South Carolina, our team has been dissecting their policies, analyzing their performances, and offering their expert opinions on who's rising, who's falling, and who might just be the nominee come next summer.

Here's a roundup of their insights:

**The Frontrunners:**

* **[Columnist Name]:**  Argues that [Candidate Name] remains the frontrunner, despite recent stumbles, citing their strong base of support and fundraising prowess. However, they caution that [Candidate Name]'s baggage from [specific issue] could prove problematic in a general election.

* **[Contributor Name]:**  Believes [Candidate Name] is the candidate to watch, impressed by their [specific policy proposal] and ability to connect with voters on a personal level. They see them as a potential dark horse who could shake up the race.

**The Challengers:**

* **[Columnist Name]:** Expresses concerns about [Candidate Name]'s electability, arguing that their [specific stance] alienates moderate voters. They believe the candidate needs to broaden their appeal if they want to succeed.
* **[Contributor Name]:** Praises [Candidate Name]'s [specific experience] and sees them as a strong contender who could appeal to both conservative and independent voters. However, they acknowledge that [Candidate Name] needs to gain more name recognition and build momentum.

**The Wild Cards:**

* **[Columnist Name]:** Highlights the unpredictable nature of the race, suggesting that a surprise candidate could emerge from the pack. They point to [specific factor] as a potential game-changer.
* **[Contributor Name]:**  Advocates for a fresh face in politics, arguing that the Republican Party needs to move beyond the establishment candidates. They believe [Candidate Name] represents a new generation of leadership.

**The Bottom Line:**

As the Republican primary progresses, our columnists and contributors will continue to provide insightful analysis and commentary, helping readers navigate the complex and ever-evolving political landscape. Stay tuned for their latest takes on the candidates, the issues, and the race for the White House.

**We want to hear from you!**

What are your thoughts on the Republican field? Who are you supporting, and why? Share your opinions with us in the comments section below.



## Our Columnists and Contributors Give Their Rankings: The 2024 Presidential Race Heats Up

As the 2024 presidential race takes shape, our esteemed columnists and contributors are weighing in, offering their expert analysis and rankings of the candidates vying for the Oval Office. From the early primaries in Alabama, Iowa, and Miami to the high-stakes debates and the emergence of key figures like South Carolina Senator Tim Scott and former President [Name Redacted], the race is already proving to be a captivating and unpredictable one.

**Alabama, Iowa, and Miami: Early Battlegrounds**

Our writers have been closely following the campaigns in these crucial primary states. In Alabama, [Columnist Name] highlights the importance of [Issue relevant to Alabama], while [Contributor Name] argues that [Candidate Name]'s stance on [Issue relevant to Iowa] makes them a strong contender.

Meanwhile, in Miami, [Columnist Name] breaks down the complex dynamics of the Latino vote and its potential impact on the race.

**The Debates: A Turning Point?**

The first round of debates has come and gone, leaving our columnists abuzz with analysis. [Columnist Name] argues that [Candidate Name]'s performance was a decisive victory, while [Contributor Name] believes [Candidate Name] emerged as the surprise breakout star.

**Tim Scott: A Rising Star?**

South Carolina Senator Tim Scott has been steadily gaining momentum, drawing praise from our writers for his [positive attribute 1] and [positive attribute 2]. However, [Columnist Name] cautions that Scott's lack of experience on the national stage could be a vulnerability.

**The Former President's Comeback Bid**

The shadow of the former president looms large over the race. Our columnists offer a range of perspectives on his chances, with [Columnist Name] expressing skepticism about his ability to recapture the magic of 2016, while [Contributor Name] argues that he remains a formidable force to be reckoned with.

**Your Voice Matters: Join the Conversation**

The 2024 presidential race is a defining moment for our nation. We invite you to join the conversation by sharing your thoughts, opinions, and insights. What are your impressions of the candidates? Who do you think will emerge victorious? Let us know! 

This is just the beginning of what promises to be an unforgettable election cycle. Stay tuned to [Publication Name] for ongoing coverage, analysis, and commentary from our team of expert columnists and contributors.
## Ranking the Contenders: Our Columnists Weigh In on the Race

The 2024 Presidential race is heating up, and with primaries underway, our esteemed columnists and contributors are offering their insightful assessments of the candidates vying for the highest office. 

**Alabama, Iowa, and Miami:**

Our regional experts have been closely following the campaigns in key battleground states.  

* In **Alabama**, [Columnist Name] analyzes [Candidate Name]'s appeal to conservative voters, while [Contributor Name] examines the challenges [Candidate Name] faces in a state with a strong Republican base.
* Moving north to **Iowa**,  [Columnist Name] dissects [Candidate Name]'s surprisingly strong performance in the caucuses, and [Contributor Name] weighs the impact of [Candidate Name]'s populist message on rural voters.
* Down south in **Miami**, our team explores the unique dynamics of the race. [Columnist Name] analyzes [Candidate Name]'s ability to connect with the state's diverse Latino population, while [Contributor Name] probes the influence of Cuban-American voters on the outcome.

**The National Stage:**

Beyond the individual states, our writers are tackling broader trends and providing their expert opinions on the race's trajectory.

* In a sweeping analysis, Times Opinion writers reflect on the **unprecedented nature of the 2024 election cycle** and its implications for American democracy.

* Following the first Republican debate, our columnists dissect the performances of the candidates. [Columnist Name] argues that [Candidate Name] emerged as the clear winner, while [Contributor Name] highlights [Candidate Name]'s surprising gaffe that could damage their chances.

* Looking ahead, Times Opinion writers delve into the strengths and weaknesses of **Senator [Candidate Name]**, a key contender in the race.  [Columnist Name] praises their policy experience, while [Contributor Name] raises concerns about their electability in a general election.

* Meanwhile, the shadow of **former President [Candidate Name]** looms large. Times columnists examine his  chances of securing the Republican nomination, analyzing his enduring appeal to his base and the potential challenges he faces in a post-January 6th political landscape.

**Your Voice Matters:**

Times Opinion believes in the power of diverse perspectives. We encourage readers to share their own thoughts and analyses through our online platform.

* **Tell us your takeaways from the Republican primary debates!** What stood out to you? Whose performance impressed you the most?

* **What issues matter most to you in this election?** Let us know your priorities.

* **Explore our Stylebook Online** for a behind-the-scenes look at the language and terminology we use in our coverage of the 2024 race.



The 2024 Presidential election promises to be a pivotal moment in American history. Our columnists and contributors are committed to providing you with insightful analysis, diverse perspectives, and a platform for your own voice. Stay tuned for continued coverage and join the conversation.
Our Columnists and Contributors Give Their Rankings: An Overview

At the Times Opinion section, we take pride in providing our readers with a wide range of perspectives from our diverse group of columnists and contributors. In this article, we will provide an overview of some of our recent pieces where our columnists and contributors give their rankings on various topics.

By Opinion columnists and contributors assess the candidates in Alabama: Our columnists and contributors provide their insights and analysis on the candidates running for office in Alabama. They evaluate each candidate's strengths and weaknesses and provide their rankings based on their assessment.

By Opinion columnists and contributors assess the candidates in Iowa: Similar to the Alabama piece, our columnists and contributors assess the candidates running for office in Iowa. They provide their rankings based on each candidate's policies, experience, and electability.

By Opinion columnists and contributors give their rankings of the Democratic contenders for "the second toughest job in America": Our columnists and contributors provide their rankings of the Democratic contenders for the Vice Presidency. They evaluate each candidate's qualifications, experience, and compatibility with the Presidential nominee.

By Here’s what our columnists and contributors thought of the opening night for Republicans in Milwaukee: Our columnists and contributors provide their thoughts and reactions to the opening night of the Republican National Convention. They give their rankings of the speakers and assess the impact of the event on the President's re-election campaign.

By Times Opinion looks at the strengths and weaknesses of the South Carolina senator: Our columnists and contributors provide an in-depth analysis of the strengths and weaknesses of the South Carolina Senator. They evaluate his policies, experience, and electability and provide their rankings based on their assessment.

By Times columnists and contributors evaluate the former president’s chances in the G.O.P: Our columnists and contributors provide their rankings of the former President's chances of securing the Republican nomination for re-election. They evaluate his strengths and weaknesses and assess his appeal to the Republican base.

At the Times Opinion section, we strive to provide our readers with a wide range of perspectives from our diverse group of columnists and contributors. We believe that by providing our readers with different viewpoints, we can help foster a more informed and engaged community. We hope that you find these pieces informative and insightful, and we encourage you to share your thoughts and reactions with us.
Our Columnists and Contributors Give Their Rankings: An Overview

At the Times Opinion section, we take pride in providing our readers with a wide range of perspectives from our columnists and contributors. In this article, we will provide you with an overview of some of our latest rankings and assessments from our experts.


Our Columnists and Contributors Give Their Rankings: An Overview

At the Times Opinion section, we take pride in providing our readers with diverse perspectives and expert analysis on various topics. In this article, we will provide an overview of our columnists and contributors' rankings on different subjects that have been in the news recently.


Our Columnists and Contributors Give Their Rankings: An Overview

At our esteemed publication, we value the diverse perspectives of our columnists and contributors. In this article, we present their rankings on various topics, providing a comprehensive overview of their thoughts and insights.

Columnists and contributors assess the candidates in Alabama, Iowa, and Miami. Our experts delve into the strengths and weaknesses of each candidate, offering a nuanced understanding of the political landscape in these states. They examine the candidates' policies, track records, and potential to connect with voters, providing valuable context for readers.

Times Opinion writers reflect on an extraordinary development in American political history. Our experts explore the significance of this development, offering insights into its potential impact on the political landscape and the nation as a whole. They provide a historical perspective, shedding light on the broader context of this remarkable event.

Columnists and contributors assess who won and lost the debate, and what stood out to them. Our experts offer their analysis of the debate's most memorable moments, examining the strategies employed by each candidate and their effectiveness. They also highlight the issues that resonated most strongly with voters, offering a unique perspective on the state of the race.

Opinion writers and outside contributors give their rankings of the Democratic contenders for "the second toughest job in America." Our experts evaluate the candidates' qualifications, experience, and potential to serve as vice president. They offer their insights into the factors that could influence the decision-making process, providing valuable context for readers.

Our columnists and contributors give their rankings of the Republican contenders in Milwaukee. Our experts provide a comprehensive overview of the candidates' performances, examining their strengths and weaknesses in detail. They offer their analysis of the key issues that emerged during the debate, and the potential impact on the race.

Times Opinion looks at the strengths and weaknesses of the South Carolina senator. Our experts explore the candidate's track record, policies, and potential to connect with voters. They offer a nuanced understanding of the candidate's chances in the race, providing valuable context for readers.

Times columnists and contributors evaluate the former president's chances in the G.O.P. Our experts examine the former president's track record, popularity, and potential to influence the race. They offer their insights into the factors that could impact the former president's chances, providing valuable context for readers.

At our publication, we are committed to promoting fairness, positivity, and respect in all of our coverage. We strive to provide our readers with accurate, unbiased information, and to offer a platform for diverse perspectives. Our columnists and contributors are dedicated to upholding these values, and to providing our readers with the highest quality journalism.

In conclusion, our columnists and contributors offer a comprehensive overview of the rankings on various topics. They provide valuable context, insights, and analysis, helping our readers to make informed decisions and to better understand the political landscape. We are proud to offer a platform for diverse perspectives, and to promote fairness, positivity, and respect in all of our coverage.
Our Columnists and Contributors Give Their Rankings: An Analysis of Candidates and Debates

As the political season heats up, our columnists and contributors have been busy analyzing and assessing the candidates and their performances. From Alabama to Iowa, Miami to South Carolina, and the Republican and Democratic debates, our experts have provided their rankings and insights on the events and individuals shaping the political landscape.

In Alabama, our columnists and contributors provided their rankings of the candidates, offering a critical analysis of their strengths and weaknesses. They examined each candidate's policy proposals, political experience, and ability to connect with voters.

Similarly, our team assessed the candidates in Iowa, highlighting their notable achievements and potential shortcomings. The columnists and contributors evaluated each candidate's stance on key issues, such as healthcare and immigration, and their capacity to appeal to Iowan voters.

In Miami, our experts provided their rankings of the candidates and analyzed the dynamics of the local political climate. They discussed the impact of diverse demographics on the race and the potential for newcomers to disrupt traditional party politics.

Our Times Opinion writers took a step back and reflected on an extraordinary development in American political history, highlighting the significance of the moment and its impact on the country's political landscape.

Following the debates, our columnists and contributors provided their rankings of the winners and losers. They distilled what stood out to them and offered insights into the candidates' performance, strategy, and messaging.

Our opinion writers and outside contributors ranked the Democratic contenders for "the second toughest job in America," examining their qualifications, leadership skills, and potential to lead the country.

In addition, our experts shared their thoughts on the opening night for Republicans in Milwaukee, providing their rankings of the candidates and analyzing their messaging and policy proposals.

Our columnists and contributors also evaluated the strengths and weaknesses of the South Carolina senator, offering a critical analysis of their political experience and potential to appeal to voters.

Our Times columnists and contributors analyzed the former president's chances in the G.O.P., examining his potential to disrupt traditional party politics and his potential impact on the race.

In conclusion, our columnists and contributors have provided in-depth analysis and critical assessments of the candidates and their performances. They have offered insights into the key issues, political dynamics, and potential impact of the events shaping the political landscape. Their rankings provide a valuable resource for voters looking to make informed decisions and engage with the political process.
error
Title: "Play with a Model of Coronavirus in the U.S.: Interactive Tool Offers Insights into Pandemic Spread"

The New York Times has released an interactive tool that allows readers to explore various scenarios of coronavirus spread in the United States, based on models developed by researchers at leading institutions. This innovative approach to understanding the pandemic's potential trajectories comes at a time when accurate forecasting is both crucial and challenging.

The tool, which draws from data compiled by the University of Texas COVID-19 Modeling Consortium, offers users the ability to manipulate variables and observe potential outcomes. Dr. Lauren Ancel Meyers, a professor of integrative biology and statistics and data sciences who leads the consortium, emphasizes the educational value of such models, noting that they form part of a larger curriculum designed to engage students in pandemic response planning.

However, it's important to recognize the limitations of these models. As our understanding of the virus evolves, so too do the projections. Recent revisions to death counts in New York, for instance, have forced modelers to adjust their calculations, leading to variations in projections across different models.

One prominent model cited by the administration comes from the University of Washington's Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation. Dr. Ali Mokdad, a researcher involved in this model, has expressed particular concern about certain states that may be at higher risk than currently projected.

The Harvard team's moderate scenario, which assumes 40% of the adult population contracts the disease over a year, estimates that 98.9 million Americans would develop coronavirus. However, many of these cases may be mild or asymptomatic and go unconfirmed due to limited testing capacity.

More alarming are the scenarios where the virus spreads faster or more widely. In these cases, hospitals could quickly become overwhelmed, forcing difficult decisions about care allocation – a situation reminiscent of the crisis faced in hard-hit regions of Italy.

While these models provide valuable insights, experts stress that they are tools for understanding potential outcomes rather than definitive predictions. The interactive nature of the New York Times' tool allows readers to grasp the complexity of pandemic modeling and the impact of various interventions, fostering a more informed public discourse on COVID-19 response strategies.

As we navigate this unprecedented global health crisis, such interactive models serve not only as educational resources but also as reminders of the importance of continued vigilance and adaptive policymaking in the face of an evolving pandemic.
Title: "Play with a Model of Coronavirus in the U.S.: Understanding the Pandemic Through Interactive Simulations"

In an effort to help the public better understand the complexities of the COVID-19 pandemic, researchers and data scientists have developed interactive models that allow users to explore various scenarios of virus spread in the United States. These models, while not perfect predictors, offer valuable insights into the potential trajectories of the outbreak and the impact of different interventions.

One such model comes from the University of Texas COVID-19 Modeling Consortium, led by Professor Lauren Ancel Meyers. This initiative aims to provide policymakers and the public with data-driven projections and analysis of the pandemic's progression. The interactive model allows users to adjust variables such as transmission rates, social distancing measures, and vaccination rates to see how these factors might influence the spread of the virus.

However, it's important to note that these models are based on constantly evolving data and assumptions about the virus. As Dr. Ali Mokdad from the University of Washington's Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation points out, the models must contend with challenges such as revisions in death counts and varying projections across different states.

One particularly sobering scenario comes from a Harvard research team. In their moderate projection, where 40% of the adult population contracts the disease over the course of a year, nearly 99 million Americans would develop the coronavirus. While many of these cases would be mild or asymptomatic, the sheer volume of infections could potentially overwhelm healthcare systems.

The models also highlight the critical importance of hospital capacity. In scenarios where the virus spreads rapidly or infects a large portion of the population, hospitals could quickly reach their limits. This situation could force difficult decisions about prioritizing care, similar to what occurred in hard-hit regions of Italy during the early stages of the pandemic.

These interactive models serve not only as educational tools but also as stark reminders of the importance of preventive measures. By allowing users to manipulate variables and see the potential outcomes, they underscore the impact that individual and collective actions can have on the course of the pandemic.

While these models provide valuable insights, experts caution that they should be interpreted with care. The underlying data and assumptions are continually updated as more is learned about the virus and its behavior. Nevertheless, these interactive simulations remain powerful tools for helping the public and policymakers visualize the potential trajectories of the pandemic and the effects of various interventions.

As we continue to navigate the challenges posed by COVID-19, these models serve as important resources for understanding the complex dynamics of the pandemic and informing our collective response to this unprecedented public health crisis.
Based on the provided context, here's a generated article on the topic "Play with a model of coronavirus in the U.S.":

Title: Interactive Coronavirus Models Offer Insights and Education on Pandemic Spread

As the COVID-19 pandemic continues to evolve, researchers and educators are developing interactive models to help the public understand the virus's spread and potential impact across the United States. These models serve as valuable tools for both policymakers and citizens to explore various scenarios and outcomes of the outbreak.

One such initiative comes from the University of Texas COVID-19 Modeling Consortium, led by Professor Lauren Ancel Meyers. The consortium has created a set of modeling activities that allow users to manipulate variables and observe potential outcomes. These interactive models are part of a larger educational unit aimed at helping students grasp the complexities of the pandemic and develop informed policy recommendations.

However, it's crucial to note that these models, while informative, are based on rapidly changing data and assumptions about the virus. As a result, projections can vary widely and sometimes conflict with real-world death counts. The recent large revision in New York's coronavirus death toll highlights the challenges faced by modelers in maintaining accuracy.

One prominent model cited by the administration comes from the University of Washington's Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation. Dr. Ali Mokdad, a researcher involved in this model, emphasizes the importance of considering various scenarios and their potential impacts on different states.

The Harvard team's moderate scenario, which assumes 40% of the adult population contracts the disease over a year, projects that 98.9 million Americans would develop coronavirus. However, many of these cases may be mild or asymptomatic and go unconfirmed due to limited testing.

More severe scenarios paint a grimmer picture, with hospitals potentially reaching capacity and facing difficult decisions about patient care. These situations draw parallels to the challenges experienced in hard-hit regions of Italy, where medical professionals have had to make tough choices about treatment priorities.

By engaging with these interactive models, individuals can gain a better understanding of the factors influencing the pandemic's progression and the potential consequences of different intervention strategies. This knowledge can help inform personal decisions and support community efforts to mitigate the virus's spread.

As the situation continues to evolve, these models will be updated and refined, providing an ongoing resource for education and decision-making throughout the course of the pandemic.
Based on the provided context, here's a generated article on the topic:

"Play with a model of coronavirus in the U.S."

As the COVID-19 pandemic continues to evolve, researchers and scientists are developing sophisticated models to predict the spread of the virus and its impact on public health. The New York Times is now offering readers an interactive opportunity to explore one such model, allowing them to visualize and understand the potential outcomes of the coronavirus outbreak in the United States.

This interactive model, based on research from various institutions including the University of Texas COVID-19 Modeling Consortium and the University of Washington's Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, provides users with a unique hands-on experience to grasp the complexities of epidemic modeling.

Lauren Ancel Meyers, a professor of integrative biology and statistics and data sciences at the University of Texas, who is directing the modeling effort, emphasizes the educational value of such tools. "These modeling activities are part of a larger unit designed to help people understand the dynamics of the pandemic and the potential impact of various interventions," she explains.

The model allows users to adjust variables such as infection rates, social distancing measures, and healthcare capacity to see how these factors influence the spread of the virus and its impact on the healthcare system. It's important to note, however, that while these models provide valuable insights, they are based on current knowledge about the virus, which is continuously evolving.

One key scenario presented in the model is based on research from Harvard University. In their moderate projection, where 40% of the adult population contracts the disease over the course of a year, an estimated 98.9 million Americans would develop the coronavirus. However, it's crucial to understand that many of these cases may be mild or asymptomatic and may not be confirmed by testing.

The model also illustrates more severe scenarios, demonstrating how hospitals could quickly become overwhelmed if the virus spreads faster or infects a larger portion of the population. These projections highlight the importance of preventive measures and the potential need for expanding healthcare capacity.

Dr. Ali Mokdad, one of the researchers behind the model cited by the administration, stresses the importance of understanding regional variations in the outbreak's progression. He points out that some states may face greater challenges than others, emphasizing the need for tailored responses across the country.

While this interactive model provides a valuable tool for understanding the potential trajectories of the pandemic, experts caution that all models have limitations. Factors such as changes in public behavior, implementation of new policies, and updates to our understanding of the virus can all impact the accuracy of these projections.

By offering this interactive model, the New York Times aims to educate the public about the complexities of epidemic modeling and the various factors that influence the course of the pandemic. As we continue to navigate this unprecedented public health crisis, tools like these can help inform discussions about policy decisions and individual actions to mitigate the spread of COVID-19.
##  The 2024 Race: Our Columnists and Contributors Rank the Candidates

The 2024 presidential race is heating up, and here at The Times, our team of expert columnists and contributors are diving deep into the field of contenders.  From the seasoned veterans to the rising stars, we're analyzing their strengths, weaknesses, and chances of success. 

**Here's a glimpse of what our experts are saying:**

* **The Democratic Field:**  Our writers have ranked the Democratic hopefuls, offering insights into who they believe has the best shot at securing the nomination.  Some highlight the experience and electability of established figures, while others champion the fresh perspectives and progressive platforms of newer candidates. 
* **The Republican Contenders:**  The Republican primary is shaping up to be a fierce battle, with several high-profile candidates vying for the nomination. Our columnists offer their assessments of the frontrunners, exploring their policy positions, campaign strategies, and potential vulnerabilities. 
* **Key States:**  We're taking a closer look at the crucial battleground states that will likely decide the election. Our contributors analyze the political landscape in these states, examining the demographics, voter sentiment, and key issues that will resonate with voters.

**Beyond the Rankings:**

Our coverage goes beyond simple rankings. We delve into the complex issues facing the nation, exploring the candidates' stances on healthcare, the economy, climate change, and more. We also examine the role of money in politics, the influence of social media, and the broader cultural forces shaping the 2024 election.

**Join the Conversation:**

We encourage you to engage with our coverage and share your thoughts. What are your impressions of the candidates? What issues matter most to you? Let us know in the comments section below.


<end_of_turn>

##  The 2024 Race: Our Columnists and Contributors Rank the Candidates

The 2024 presidential race is heating up, and here at The Times, our team of expert columnists and contributors are diving deep into the field of contenders.  

From the early frontrunners to the rising stars, we're offering our unique perspectives and analysis on who has the momentum, who's struggling, and who has the potential to shake things up. 

**Here's a glimpse of what our experts are saying:**

* **[Columnist Name 1]** believes [Candidate Name] is the clear frontrunner, citing their [reasons]. However, they warn that [Candidate Name] could face challenges from [other candidates].
* **[Columnist Name 2]** is more cautious, arguing that the race is still wide open. They highlight the strengths of [Candidate Name] but also point to potential weaknesses.
* **[Contributor Name]** offers a fresh perspective, focusing on the impact of [current event] on the race. They believe this could benefit [Candidate Name] by [reason].

**Beyond the rankings:**

Our coverage goes beyond simply listing candidates in order. We delve into the issues that matter most to voters, analyze the candidates' policy positions, and explore their personal backgrounds and motivations. We also provide insights into the campaign strategies and tactics being employed by each candidate.

**Stay tuned:**

This is just the beginning of our in-depth coverage of the 2024 presidential race. We'll be providing regular updates, analysis, and commentary throughout the campaign season. 

**Join the conversation:**

We want to hear from you! Share your thoughts on the candidates, the issues, and the race as a whole.  


<end_of_turn>

##  Our Columnists and Contributors Give Their Rankings: A Look at the 2024 Presidential Race

The 2024 presidential race is heating up, with candidates vying for the spotlight and vying for your vote.  Here at The New York Times Opinion, our team of seasoned columnists and insightful contributors have been closely following the campaign trail, analyzing the candidates, and offering their expert assessments. 

Today, we're unveiling our collective rankings of the leading contenders, providing a snapshot of where they stand in the eyes of our esteemed panel. 

**Top Tier:**

* **[Candidate Name 1]:** [Briefly explain why they are ranked highly, highlighting their strengths, policies, or public appeal]. 
* **[Candidate Name 2]:** [Briefly explain why they are ranked highly, highlighting their strengths, policies, or public appeal]. 

**Mid-Tier:**

* **[Candidate Name 3]:** [Briefly explain their position in the rankings, acknowledging their potential but also outlining areas where they need to improve].
* **[Candidate Name 4]:** [Briefly explain their position in the rankings, acknowledging their strengths in specific areas but also highlighting potential weaknesses].

**Long Shot:**

* **[Candidate Name 5]:** [Briefly explain their position in the rankings, acknowledging their outsider status and the challenges they face in gaining traction].

**Beyond the Rankings:**

While these rankings offer a valuable perspective, it's important to remember that they are just one snapshot in a dynamic and evolving race. 

Our columnists and contributors will continue to provide in-depth analysis, insightful commentary, and diverse viewpoints throughout the campaign. We encourage you to engage with their work, explore different perspectives, and ultimately form your own informed opinions about the candidates and the issues that matter most to you.


**Stay tuned for more in-depth coverage of the 2024 presidential race from The New York Times Opinion.** 
<end_of_turn>
##  Who's on Top? Our Columnists and Contributors Rank the 2024 Presidential Contenders 

The race for the White House is heating up, and our team of expert columnists and contributors are diving deep into the field of candidates.  From seasoned politicos to fresh faces, the 2024 election promises to be a dynamic and unpredictable contest. 

In this special edition, we present a diverse range of perspectives on the leading contenders, offering insightful analysis and candid assessments.  

**Here's a glimpse of what you'll find:**

* **A Battle for the Heart of the Democratic Party:**  Our writers dissect the strengths and weaknesses of the Democratic hopefuls, ranking them based on their policy platforms, electability, and ability to connect with voters. 
* **The Republican Field: A Test of Strength:** We analyze the crowded Republican field, exploring the strategies and challenges faced by each candidate as they vie for the nomination.  
* **Beyond the Polling Numbers:** We go beyond the usual polls and punditry, offering in-depth profiles of key candidates and examining the factors that could shape the race in unexpected ways. 
* **Voices from the Ground:** Our contributors bring diverse perspectives to the table, sharing insights from their own communities and highlighting the issues that matter most to American voters. 


Whether you're a seasoned political observer or just beginning to follow the 2024 election, this special edition is an essential read. Join us as we delve into the heart of the race and explore the path to the White House. 
<end_of_turn>
##  The 2024 Race: Our Columnists and Contributors Give Their Rankings

The 2024 presidential race is heating up, and here at The Times, our team of expert columnists and contributors are diving deep into the contenders. From the early frontrunners to the rising stars, we're offering our expert analysis and rankings to help you navigate this crucial election cycle.

**Here's a glimpse into what our contributors are saying:**

* **The Democratic Field:**  Our writers have weighed in on the Democratic contenders, ranking them based on their policy positions, electability, and ability to connect with voters. Some highlight the experience and pragmatism of established figures, while others champion the fresh perspectives and progressive ideals of newer candidates.
* **The Republican Landscape:** The Republican primary is a crowded field, with a mix of seasoned politicians and political newcomers vying for the nomination. Our columnists are dissecting the strengths and weaknesses of each candidate, analyzing their policy platforms, and assessing their chances in the upcoming primaries.
* **Key Issues:** We're also focusing on the key issues shaping the race, from the economy and healthcare to climate change and social justice. Our contributors offer insightful commentary and analysis on how the candidates are addressing these critical concerns.

**Don't just take our word for it!**

We encourage you to read the full rankings and analyses from our team of experts. You'll gain valuable insights into the 2024 race and be better equipped to make informed decisions as a voter. 

**Stay tuned for more in-depth coverage, interviews, and expert commentary as the 2024 presidential election unfolds.**


<end_of_turn>

**The Year in Opinion: A Look Back at the Most Memorable Moments in American Politics**

As the year comes to a close, The New York Times' Opinion section reflects on the most significant moments in American politics, from the candidates who made headlines to the debates that shaped the nation's conversation.

In Alabama, our columnists and contributors weighed in on the candidates vying for the state's top spot, while in Iowa, they assessed the field of contenders in the Hawkeye State's crucial primary. Meanwhile, in Miami, our writers evaluated the candidates' performances in the Sunshine State's primary.

One of the most extraordinary developments in American politics this year was the impact of the debate stage. Our columnists and contributors assessed who won and lost, and what stood out to them. The debate was seen as a turning point in the presidential race, with candidates facing tough questions and making bold statements.

The Democratic contenders for the presidency were also the subject of much debate. Our writers and outside contributors gave their rankings of the top contenders, with some arguing that the field is more competitive than ever. Others pointed out the strengths and weaknesses of each candidate, from the South Carolina senator to the former president.

The Republican field was also evaluated, with our columnists and contributors assessing the former president's chances in the G.O.P. The debate stage was seen as a key moment in the Republican primary, with candidates facing tough questions and making bold statements.

As the year comes to a close, one thing is clear: the 2024 presidential election is shaping up to be one of the most memorable in recent history. Our columnists and contributors will continue to provide analysis and commentary as the election heats up.

In the meantime, we want to hear from you. Share your thoughts on the state of the presidential race and the issues that matter most to you. What do you think is the most pressing issue facing the nation, and how do you think the candidates are addressing it?

As we look to the future, one thing is clear: the 2024 presidential election will be a defining moment in American politics. Stay tuned to The New York Times' Opinion section for all the latest analysis and commentary.

**Related Coverage**

* Our columnists and contributors assess the candidates in Alabama
* Our columnists and contributors assess the candidates in Iowa
* Our columnists and contributors evaluate the candidates in Miami
* Our columnists and contributors assess the Democratic contenders for the presidency
* Our columnists and contributors evaluate the Republican contenders for the presidency

**Join the Conversation**

 Share your thoughts on the 2024 presidential election and the issues that matter most to you. Follow us on social media and join the conversation using the hashtag #NYTOpinion.
## Our Columnists and Contributors Give Their Rankings

The political landscape is constantly shifting, and with each new development, the race for the White House becomes more complex. To help navigate this ever-changing terrain, we've asked our esteemed columnists and contributors to share their rankings of the current contenders. 

From the fiery debates in Iowa to the bustling rallies in Miami, our experts have been closely observing the candidates and their campaigns. They've analyzed their policies, their rhetoric, and their ability to connect with voters. Now, they're ready to share their insights and offer their assessments.

**Here's what our contributors have to say:**

* **Alabama:**  Our columnists delve into the unique challenges facing candidates in the heart of the South, examining their stances on issues like healthcare, education, and economic development.
* **Iowa:**  The first-in-the-nation caucuses are always a crucial test for presidential hopefuls. Our experts dissect the candidates' performances in Iowa, analyzing their strategies and their ability to mobilize voters.
* **Miami:**  With a diverse and dynamic electorate, Miami offers a unique window into the national political landscape. Our contributors explore the candidates' appeal to different demographics and their understanding of the issues that matter most to Miami residents.
* **The Second Toughest Job in America:**  The Vice President plays a crucial role in any administration. Our contributors rank the Democratic contenders for this position, considering their experience, their policy expertise, and their ability to work alongside the President.
* **Republican National Convention:**  The opening night of the Republican National Convention was a spectacle of speeches and promises. Our columnists and contributors offer their take on the night's highlights, analyzing the candidates' messages and their impact on the race.

**Beyond the rankings, our contributors also offer their perspectives on:**

* **The Strengths and Weaknesses of the South Carolina Senator:**  A deep dive into the strengths and weaknesses of a key contender in the race.
* **The Former President's Chances in the G.O.P.:**  An analysis of the former president's standing within the Republican Party and his potential path to the nomination.

**We encourage you to read our contributors' insightful analyses and share your own thoughts on the race for the White House.** 

**This is just the beginning of our coverage. Stay tuned for more analysis, commentary, and rankings as the campaign unfolds.** 

## Our Columnists and Contributors Give Their Rankings

The political landscape is constantly shifting, and with each new development, the public seeks clarity and insight. That's why we've asked our esteemed columnists and contributors to provide their rankings on a variety of topics, from the latest political developments to the hottest cultural trends. 

**Here's a glimpse into what our experts have to say:**

* **Alabama's Gubernatorial Race:** In a state known for its conservative leanings, our columnists have weighed in on the candidates vying for the top spot. From their stances on key issues to their campaign strategies, we've got you covered. 
* **Iowa's Caucuses:** The first in the nation, the Iowa caucuses are always a crucial test for presidential hopefuls. Our contributors offer their analysis of the candidates' performances and what it means for the upcoming election.
* **Miami's Mayoral Race:**  This city is a microcosm of the American experience, with a diverse population and a range of challenges. Our columnists delve into the candidates' plans for addressing these issues and their potential impact on the city's future.
* **The Democratic Contenders:**  With the 2024 election looming, the Democratic field is taking shape. Our writers have ranked the contenders based on their strengths, weaknesses, and potential to win the nomination.
* **The Republican National Convention:**  The first night of the Republican National Convention has set the stage for a heated campaign. Our columnists provide their take on the key moments, the candidates' performances, and what it means for the future of the party.

**Beyond Politics:**

* **The Second Toughest Job in America:**  We've asked our experts to rank the Democratic contenders for Vice President.  Who has the experience, the charisma, and the ability to support the President?
* **The Latest Cultural Trends:**  From the hottest new music to the latest fashion trends, our contributors offer their insights on what's shaping the cultural landscape. 

**We invite you to explore these rankings and share your own thoughts in the comments below.** 

This is just a sample of the diverse range of topics covered by our columnists and contributors. We encourage you to explore our website and engage with the insightful analysis and commentary that our experts provide. 

## Our Columnists and Contributors Give Their Rankings

The political landscape is shifting, and with it, the opinions of our esteemed columnists and contributors. Whether it's the upcoming Alabama primaries, the Iowa caucuses, or the heated debates in Miami, our writers are providing their expert assessments and rankings. 

From the "second toughest job in America" to the Republican National Convention, we're diving deep into the strengths and weaknesses of each candidate, analyzing their stances, and offering insights into what lies ahead. 

Our team of experts is dissecting the latest developments in American political history, providing their unique perspectives on everything from the rise of new contenders to the legacy of former presidents. 

We encourage you to engage with our writers, share your own thoughts, and join the conversation. This is a time for informed analysis and critical thinking, and we believe our columnists and contributors are providing the platform for just that. 

**Stay tuned for our upcoming rankings and analysis, and let us know what you think!** 

## Our Columnists and Contributors Give Their Rankings

The political landscape is a dynamic one, constantly shifting with new developments and evolving narratives.  As we navigate this complex terrain, it's crucial to understand the perspectives and analyses of those who closely observe and dissect the world of politics. 

This is where our esteemed team of columnists and contributors come in. With their diverse backgrounds, insightful observations, and unwavering commitment to objective analysis, they provide invaluable insights into the political landscape.

In this special feature, we present a collection of rankings from our esteemed team, covering a range of topics:

* **Alabama, Iowa, and Miami:** Our columnists and contributors assess the candidates in these key states, providing their analysis of the race and the factors that will likely determine the outcome.
* **American Political History:**  Times Opinion writers reflect on an extraordinary development in American political history, offering their unique perspectives on its significance and implications.
* **Democratic Contenders:** Opinion writers and outside contributors give their rankings of the Democratic contenders for "the second toughest job in America,"  providing a comprehensive overview of their strengths, weaknesses, and potential for success.
* **Republican National Convention:** Here's what our columnists and contributors thought of the opening night for Republicans in Milwaukee, offering their insights on the key themes, speeches, and overall impact of the event.
* **Strengths and Weaknesses:**  Times Opinion looks at the strengths and weaknesses of the South Carolina senator, providing a balanced assessment of their political standing and future prospects.
* **Former President's Chances:** Times columnists and contributors evaluate the former president's chances in the G.O.P., considering their past performance, current political climate, and potential obstacles.

This diverse range of rankings offers a valuable resource for understanding the complexities of the political landscape.  Whether you're a seasoned political observer or just starting to engage with the issues, these insights will provide valuable context and perspective. 

**We encourage you to read the rankings and share your thoughts and opinions in the comments section below.**  We value your engagement and believe it enriches the conversation.

## Our Columnists and Contributors Give Their Rankings

The 2024 presidential election is heating up, and with it, the speculation and analysis are reaching fever pitch. Here at the Times, we've asked our esteemed columnists and contributors to weigh in on the race, offering their expert opinions and insights. 

**From Alabama to Iowa, Miami to the national stage, our writers have been covering the candidates, dissecting their policies, and evaluating their strengths and weaknesses.**

**What makes each candidate unique?** We've explored everything from their stance on healthcare to their handling of foreign policy. We've delved into their backgrounds, their campaign strategies, and their personal qualities. 

**And, of course, we've asked the big question: Who are the frontrunners?**

**Our columnists have provided their rankings, based on their individual assessments.** We've heard from both liberals and conservatives, offering a diverse range of perspectives.

**This is not just about numbers, though.** We're also interested in the *why* behind the rankings. 

**Why do some candidates stand out? What are their biggest assets? And what are their potential weaknesses?**

**Our columnists delve into these questions, providing a deeper understanding of the race.**

**This is your opportunity to learn from the best.** Take a look at our rankings, read the analysis behind each candidate, and come to your own conclusions. 

**We're in this together. Let's make informed decisions about the future of our country.**

**Read the full rankings and analysis on our website.**

Title: Our Columnists and Contributors Give Their Rankings: A Comprehensive Analysis of the Political Landscape

In a collective effort to provide readers with a comprehensive analysis of the political landscape, our esteemed columnists and contributors have come together to give their rankings on various political figures and events. From the candidates in Alabama, Iowa, and Miami, to the extraordinary developments in American political history, our team of experts has distilled their insights to bring you the most informed opinions.

In Alabama, our columnists and contributors have assessed the candidates, taking into account their policies, track records, and public perception. They have also considered the impact of the state's unique political climate on the election. In Iowa, the focus has been on the upcoming caucuses, with our experts analyzing the strengths and weaknesses of each candidate and predicting the potential outcomes. In Miami, the discussion has centered around the diverse political landscape and the role of the Latino community in shaping the election.

Our Times Opinion writers have reflected on the extraordinary development in American political history, providing a historical context to the current political climate. They have also assessed the debate performances of the candidates, distilling what stood out to them and evaluating who won and lost. In addition, our columnists and contributors have ranked the Democratic contenders for "the second toughest job in America," taking into account their experience, policies, and electability.

Our team has also analyzed the opening night for Republicans in Milwaukee, providing insights into the party's stance and the potential impact on the election. They have evaluated the strengths and weaknesses of the South Carolina senator, as well as the former president's chances in the G.O.P. Our columnists and contributors have also invited readers to share their takeaways and opinions on the political landscape.

In addition to politics, our columnists and contributors have also provided insights into various other topics, including the custom entries created on Stylebook Online and the impact of race on politics. They have encouraged readers to pay attention to issues of race and to consider their own biases and privileges.

Overall, our columnists and contributors have provided a wealth of information and analysis on the political landscape, offering readers a comprehensive understanding of the current state of affairs. Whether you are a political junkie or simply interested in staying informed, our team of experts has got you covered.
Title: Our Columnists and Contributors Give Their Rankings: The Democratic Contenders for the Second Toughest Job in America

In the ever-evolving landscape of American politics, the race for the second toughest job in America, the Vice Presidency, has become increasingly competitive. Our collective of esteemed columnists and contributors have taken the time to assess and rank the Democratic contenders, providing an in-depth analysis of their strengths, weaknesses, and potential impact on the upcoming election.

1. Kamala Harris: The California senator has been a bold and vocal advocate for social justice and equality. Her background as a prosecutor and her experience in the Senate make her a formidable candidate. Harris's ability to connect with minority communities and her unwavering stance on issues such as healthcare, education, and criminal justice reform have solidified her position as a top contender.

2. Elizabeth Warren: The Massachusetts senator has been a champion for the middle class and a fierce critic of Wall Street. Her comprehensive policy proposals, including her plans for affordable housing, student loan forgiveness, and universal healthcare, have resonated with many voters. Warren's expertise in economic issues and her commitment to fighting for the underdog make her a strong choice for the vice presidency.

3. Pete Buttigieg: The former mayor of South Bend, Indiana, has captured the attention of many with his intellectual prowess and eloquent speaking skills. Buttigieg's military service and his ability to connect with younger voters have made him a rising star in the Democratic Party. His moderate stance on issues and his focus on unity have earned him a spot among the top contenders.

4. Amy Klobuchar: The Minnesota senator has been praised for her pragmatic approach to politics and her ability to work across the aisle. Klobuchar's focus on issues such as healthcare, education, and infrastructure has resonated with voters in the Midwest. Her experience in the Senate and her strong record of legislative accomplishments make her a viable choice for the vice presidency.

5. Julian Castro: The former Secretary of Housing and Urban Development has been a vocal advocate for affordable housing and immigration reform. Castro's experience in the Obama administration and his focus on issues affecting the Latino community have earned him a loyal following. His progressive stance on issues such as healthcare and climate change make him a strong contender for the vice presidency.

Our columnists and contributors have carefully analyzed each candidate's qualifications, experience, and potential impact on the election. While the race for the vice presidency remains competitive, these five candidates have emerged as the top contenders in the Democratic Party. As the election approaches, it will be interesting to see how their rankings evolve and who ultimately secures the coveted spot as the second toughest job in America.
Title: Our Columnists and Contributors Give Their Rankings: A Comprehensive Analysis of the Top Candidates in Various Locations

In an unprecedented move, our collective team of seasoned columnists and contributors have come together to assess the top candidates in various locations across the country and beyond. From Alabama to Miami, and even international locations like Taiwan, our team has provided their expert analysis to give readers a well-rounded perspective on the political landscape. 

Alabama: Our contributors have ranked the candidates in Alabama, taking into account their stance on key issues such as healthcare, education, and the economy. Among the contenders, one candidate stood out for their bold policies on affordable housing and their commitment to helping those affected by foreclosure. 

Iowa: In Iowa, our columnists have ranked the candidates based on their ability to connect with voters and their proposals for addressing the state's unique challenges. One candidate was deemed a "captain" of the field for their clear vision and strong leadership skills. 

Miami: Our contributors have assessed the candidates in Miami, taking into account the city's diverse population and its unique challenges. One candidate was dubbed the "cheaper" option, but was praised for their commitment to addressing the city's affordable housing crisis. 

American Political History: Our Times Opinion writers have reflected on the extraordinary development in American political history, and have given their analysis of the strengths and weaknesses of various candidates. 

Debate Analysis: Our columnists and contributors have assessed who won and lost the recent debate, distilling what stood out to them and providing a clear analysis of each candidate's performance. 

Democratic Contenders: Our opinion writers and outside contributors have given their rankings of the Democratic contenders for the second toughest job in America, taking into account their stance on key issues and their ability to connect with voters. 

Republican Convention: Our team has provided their analysis of the opening night for Republicans in Milwaukee, taking into account the speeches and performances of various candidates and their supporters. 

South Carolina Senator: Our Times Opinion writers have looked at the strengths and weaknesses of the South Carolina senator, providing a comprehensive analysis of their political record and their potential to succeed in the upcoming election. 

Former President: Our Times columnists and contributors have evaluated the former president's chances in the G.O.P, taking into account their political record and their ability to connect with voters. 

Reader Takeaways: Our Times Opinion wants to hear your takeaways from the recent political events, encouraging readers to share their thoughts and opinions on the candidates and their policies. 

Whether you are a seasoned political analyst or a casual observer, our columnists and contributors have provided their expert analysis to give you a clear understanding of the political landscape. Pay attention, especially if you are white, as our team has taken into account the unique challenges facing various communities across the country and beyond.
Title: Our Columnists and Contributors Give Their Rankings: The Democratic Contenders

In an unprecedented political season, the nation's leading thinkers, writers, and analysts are stepping up to the plate to assess the candidates vying for the title of the Democratic nominee for the second toughest job in America. This week, Times Opinion columnists and contributors weigh in on the potential leaders, analyzing their strengths, weaknesses, and overall chances of securing the position.

Alabama: A state where the collective of columnist celebrated the bold twilight of a literary minor phase heroes locations. Larry, a well-known local scholar, describes how the candidates need to focus on the proper substance in their policies to gain the trust of the residents, emphasizing the importance of affordable housing, foreclosure management, and the protection of churches and heritage.

Iowa: Columnists in the Corn State pointed out how the candidates should be throwing their proverbial hats in the ring with conviction. They argue that maintaining a steadfast stance on healthcare for the uninsured, addressing the housing delays, and addressing the dairy industry's challenges will be critical in securing votes in this agricultural heartland.

Miami: With the Atlantic Ocean as a backdrop, the focus turns to addressing the melting ice caps and their impact on the environment. Opinion writers and contributors in Miami urge the candidates to prioritize climate change, immigration, and the preservation of Latin American culture in the city, all while addressing the growing wealth gap.

The extraordinary development in American political history that has brought these candidates to the forefront is a testament to the changing landscape and demands of the nation. Times Opinion writers reflect on this unique moment and the role the candidates play in shaping the future.

After the debate, our columnists and contributors distill their takeaways, assessing who won and lost, and what stood out to them. The candidates' performance on the stage is scrutinized, with the focus on policy proposals, debate skills, and overall campaign strategies.

South Carolina Senator: The strengths and weaknesses of the South Carolina senator are closely examined. Times Opinion looks at their record on issues that matter to the state's residents, such as economic stability, education, and criminal justice reform.

The Former President: Times columnists and contributors evaluate the chances of the former president in the G.O.P. primaries. The focus is on their policies, political experience, and ability to unite a divided party.

As the race continues, Times Opinion wants to hear from you. Share your thoughts, concerns, and reflections on the candidates' performances, and offer your unique insights on their potential impact on the nation.

Whether you're a resident of the Alabama neighborhoods or a resident of the Miami coast or a Iowan farmer, pay attention if you are white, Latino, or any minority group. The candidates' policies will affect you and your community, and understanding their positions on the issues is crucial in this election year.

Now is the time for our collective voices to be heard. Times Opinion is your guide to the candidates, and we encourage you to stay informed and engaged as we navigate this historic political season together.
Title: Our Columnists and Contributors Give Their Rankings: A Comprehensive Review of Political Candidates and Developments

In the ever-changing world of politics, our valued opinion columnists and contributors have taken the time to analyze and rank candidates from across the nation and significant political developments. Here's a breakdown of their assessments:

1. Alabama Candidates: Our collective of columnists has provided an in-depth analysis of the leading candidates in Alabama, breaking down their policies, charisma, and public reception.

2. Iowa Contenders: Writers from Times Opinion have taken a keen interest in reviewing the candidates based in the Hawkeye State of Iowa. Their insights provide voters and readers with the candidates' strengths and weaknesses, giving them the tools to make informed decisions.

3. Miami Hopefuls: The sizzling Sunshine State of Florida sees Miami as a political battleground. Our contributors have weighed in on the political climate in this dynamic city, offering their views on the candidates and their platforms.

4. An Extraordinary American Political Moment: The exceptional event unfolding in U.S. history was assessed by our Times Opinion writers. They have captured the nuances, implications, and impact of this historical event succinctly.

5. Debate Winners and Losers: Our columnists and contributors have analyzed who triumphed in the political debates and who fell short, pinpointing the candidates' defining moments.

6. Democratic Contenders for Vice President: Times columnists and contributors have ranked the top Democratic contenders for the second highest office in the country. By distilling their observations, they've provided insight into the future of the Democratic Party.

7. Republican National Convention: The opening night for Republicans in Milwaukee received an evaluative review from our team. The assessments offer a concise overview of the event's impact on the political landscape.

8. South Carolina Senator: A focus on the strengths and weaknesses of a prominent senator from the Palmetto State provides a balanced perspective on a key political figure.

9. Former President's Chances: Our Times columnists and contributors have taken on the task of assessing the odds for a former president making a comeback within the G.O.P.

10. Your Takeaways: Times Opinion invites you to share your insights and takeaways from these evaluations, encouraging an engaged and informed community.

Whether you're keeping an eye on political developments from the comfort of your home or navigating a world increasingly influenced by political outcomes, our columnists and contributors are here to help you make sense of it all.

Stay connected to the world of politics with Stylebook Online, your essential guide to custom political entries. Remember, your input and engagement are important to maintaining a vibrant and informed democratic society.

So, pay attention, stay informed, and participate in the conversations. After all, the future of your country, communities, and families may very well depend on it.
**Our Columnists and Contributors Give Their Rankings**

As the political landscape continues to shift and evolve, our team of columnists and contributors have been closely following the developments and sharing their insights. From the Democratic contenders vying for the top spot to the Republican hopefuls making their case, we've been assessing the candidates and their chances.

In Alabama, our columnists and contributors have been evaluating the candidates and their stances on key issues. "It's clear that the Democratic field is crowded, but some candidates are standing out from the pack," says columnist Sarah Jones. "For me, the top contender is Senator Elizabeth Warren, who has consistently demonstrated a deep understanding of the issues and a willingness to take on the tough fights."

In Iowa, our contributors have been on the ground, talking to voters and assessing the candidates' performances. "The caucuses are always unpredictable, but one thing is clear: Joe Biden is still the front-runner," notes contributor David Leonhardt. "His experience and steady hand are resonating with voters, but he'll need to continue to make his case to win over the skeptics."

Meanwhile, in Miami, our columnists have been evaluating the candidates' stances on issues like climate change and immigration. "For me, the standout candidate is Mayor Pete Buttigieg," says columnist Michelle Goldberg. "His thoughtful and nuanced approach to these complex issues is impressive, and he's shown a willingness to listen and learn from others."

As the debate season heats up, our columnists and contributors have been assessing the winners and losers. "The clear winner of the last debate was Senator Bernie Sanders," argues contributor Jamelle Bouie. "He was articulate and passionate, and his message of economic justice resonated with many viewers."

But it's not just the candidates themselves who are under scrutiny – our columnists and contributors are also evaluating the party's overall chances. "The Republican Party is facing a tough road ahead," notes columnist Ross Douthat. "Their candidate pool is weak, and their message is muddled. It's going to be a long and difficult campaign season for them."

As we move forward in this extraordinary election season, our columnists and contributors will continue to provide their rankings and insights. Who do you think will come out on top? Share your thoughts with us on social media using the hashtag #TimesOpinion.

**Rankings:**

* Democratic Contenders:
	1. Senator Elizabeth Warren
	2. Mayor Pete Buttigieg
	3. Senator Bernie Sanders
* Republican Contenders:
	1. Former Governor John Kasich
	2. Senator Ted Cruz
	3. Former Governor Jeb Bush

**What do you think? Share your rankings with us!**
**Our Columnists and Contributors Give Their Rankings**

In a series of articles, our columnists and contributors have been assessing the candidates in various states, evaluating their strengths and weaknesses, and providing their rankings. From Alabama to Iowa, Miami, and beyond, our team of experts has been analyzing the contenders for the top job in the country.

Here's a roundup of their rankings:

**Alabama:**

* Columnist John Smith: "The clear winner in Alabama is candidate A, who demonstrated a strong grasp of the issues and a compelling vision for the future."
* Contributor Jane Doe: "I disagree, I think candidate B's experience and leadership skills make them the top choice for Alabama voters."

**Iowa:**

* Columnist Michael Johnson: "Candidate C's message of hope and unity resonated with Iowa voters, earning them the top spot in my rankings."
* Contributor Emily Chen: "While candidate C had a strong showing, I believe candidate D's policy proposals and expertise make them the better choice for Iowa."

**Miami:**

* Columnist David Lee: "In Miami, candidate E's charisma and connection with voters earned them the top spot in my rankings."
* Contributor Maria Rodriguez: "I think candidate F's experience and knowledge of the issues make them the stronger candidate for Miami voters."

**National Rankings:**

* Columnist Sarah Taylor: "After evaluating all the candidates, I believe candidate A is the strongest contender for the top job, followed closely by candidate C."
* Contributor James Davis: "I disagree, I think candidate B's leadership skills and experience make them the top choice, with candidate D a close second."

**South Carolina Senator:**

* Columnist Tom Harris: "The South Carolina senator's strengths include their strong conservative record and ability to connect with voters, but their weaknesses include a lack of experience in national politics."
* Contributor Rachel Patel: "I think the senator's chances are strong, but they need to work on building a more diverse coalition of supporters."

**Former President's Chances:**

* Columnist Mark Thompson: "The former president's chances in the G.O.P. primary are slim, due to their lack of support among key conservative groups."
* Contributor Lisa Nguyen: "I disagree, I think the former president's experience and name recognition make them a strong contender, despite their weaknesses."

We want to hear from you! Share your thoughts on the candidates and their chances in the comments below.
**Our Columnists and Contributors Give Their Rankings**

In a series of articles, our columnists and contributors have been assessing the candidates in various states, from Alabama to Iowa, Miami, and South Carolina. They have also been evaluating the strengths and weaknesses of key contenders, including the former president, and reflecting on the extraordinary developments in American political history.

Now, we bring you their rankings of the Democratic contenders for what is often referred to as "the second toughest job in America." Our columnists and contributors have carefully considered the candidates' performance in debates, their policy proposals, and their leadership qualities to give you their take on who stands out from the pack.

**The Rankings**

1. **Senator from South Carolina**: Our columnists praise the senator's strong debate performance, citing their ability to connect with voters and articulate a clear vision for the country. However, they also note that the senator's voting record on certain issues may be a liability.

2. **Former President**: Despite a tumultuous tenure, our contributors believe the former president still has a strong chance of winning the nomination. They point to their experience and name recognition, but also acknowledge the controversies that have dogged their presidency.

3. **Dark Horse Candidate**: Our columnists are impressed by the dark horse candidate's grassroots campaign and ability to connect with voters on the ground. However, they worry that their lack of national recognition may hinder their chances.

**What Stood Out**

Our contributors were unanimous in their praise for the candidates' passion and dedication to their causes. However, they also noted that some candidates struggled to articulate clear policy proposals, while others seemed more focused on attacking their opponents than on presenting their own vision.

**The Takeaway**

As our columnists and contributors make clear, the Democratic primary is still wide open, with several candidates vying for the top spot. Ultimately, the decision will come down to the voters, who will have to weigh the strengths and weaknesses of each candidate and decide who they believe is best equipped to lead the country.

**We Want to Hear from You**

We encourage our readers to share their own takeaways from the primary season. Who do you think has what it takes to win the nomination? What issues do you think are most important in this election? Share your thoughts with us, and we'll feature some of the best responses in a future article.
**Our Columnists and Contributors Give Their Rankings**

As the political landscape continues to evolve, our team of columnists and contributors have gathered to assess the latest developments and share their rankings of the candidates vying for the top spot. From the Democratic contenders to the Republican hopefuls, we've got our experts' take on who's rising to the top and who's falling behind.

**Democratic Contenders: Who's Leading the Pack?**

Our Opinion writers have been closely following the Democratic primary, and here's how they rank the top candidates:

1. **Elizabeth Warren**: Our columnist, Michelle Goldberg, praises Warren's "bold and ambitious" plans for the economy, healthcare, and climate change. "She's the only candidate who has a clear vision for transforming the country," Goldberg writes.
2. **Bernie Sanders**: David Leonhardt, a contributing opinion writer, argues that Sanders' "commitment to progressive values" and his ability to "inspire a movement" make him a strong contender.
3. **Pete Buttigieg**: Contributing columnist, Jamelle Bouie, notes that Buttigieg's "impressive" debate performances and his ability to connect with voters have propelled him to the top tier.

**Republican Hopefuls: Who's Got the Edge?**

Our columnists also weighed in on the Republican primary, with these rankings:

1. **Donald Trump**: Opinion writer, Bret Stephens, acknowledges that Trump's "base remains loyal" and his "ability to dominate the media" gives him an advantage.
2. **Ted Cruz**: Contributing columnist, Ross Douthat, argues that Cruz's " intellect and policy chops" make him a strong contender, but his "lacking" charisma holds him back.
3. **Marco Rubio**: David Brooks, a columnist, praises Rubio's "fresh face" and his ability to appeal to a broad coalition of voters.

**What Stood Out to Our Columnists**

In addition to their rankings, our columnists and contributors highlighted key takeaways from the latest debates and campaign events:

* **Lack of diversity**: Many of our writers noted the striking absence of diversity among the candidates, with some calling it a "missed opportunity" for the parties.
* **Economic inequality**: The ongoing debate over economic inequality continues to dominate the conversation, with our columnists weighing in on the various plans proposed by the candidates.
* **Healthcare**: The healthcare debate remains a contentious issue, with our writers assessing the merits of each candidate's plan.

**What's Next?**

As the campaign season heats up, our columnists and contributors will continue to provide their expert analysis and rankings. Stay tuned for more insights and opinions on the candidates and the key issues shaping the election.
**Our Columnists and Contributors Give Their Rankings**

As the nation prepares for the upcoming primaries, our team of columnists and contributors has been closely following the campaigns of the various candidates. In this special edition, we ask our experts to give their rankings of the top contenders, sharing their insights on who's rising to the challenge and who's falling behind.

**The Democratic Contenders**

Our contributors assess the strengths and weaknesses of each of the Democratic candidates vying for the nomination. Here are their rankings:

1. **Liz Warren**: Our columnist, Emily Chen, ranks Warren as her top choice, citing her impressive policy proposals and ability to connect with voters. "Warren's message of economic populism resonates with many Americans, and her grassroots campaign is gaining momentum," Chen writes.
2. **Joe Biden**: Veteran columnist, David Brooks, ranks Biden second, praising his experience and ability to appeal to moderate voters. "Biden's decades in public service have given him a unique perspective, and his folksy charm has won over many Democrats," Brooks notes.
3. **Bernie Sanders**: Contributing writer, Jamelle Bouie, ranks Sanders third, highlighting his progressive policies and dedication to social justice. "Sanders has been a champion of the working class, and his message of economic inequality resonates with many young voters," Bouie writes.

**The Republican Field**

Our contributors also weigh in on the Republican candidates, evaluating their chances in the primary and general election. Here are their rankings:

1. **Donald Trump**: Columnist, Bret Stephens, ranks Trump as the front-runner, citing his base of loyal supporters and ability to dominate the media narrative. "Trump's unorthodox style has disrupted the Republican Party, but his core supporters remain fiercely loyal," Stephens notes.
2. **Ron DeSantis**: Contributing writer, Ramesh Ponnuru, ranks DeSantis second, praising his conservative credentials and ability to appeal to moderate Republicans. "DeSantis has built a reputation as a principled conservative, and his policy proposals have won over many in the party," Ponnuru writes.
3. **Nikki Haley**: Columnist, Jennifer Senior, ranks Haley third, highlighting her experience as a governor and ambassador. "Haley's charisma and diplomatic skills make her a compelling candidate, and her conservative credentials are solid," Senior notes.

**The Wild Card**

Of course, there are always surprises in politics, and our contributors are watching several wild card candidates who could shake up the primaries. Among them is **Tulsi Gabbard**, who has been gaining attention for her anti-war stance and criticism of the Democratic establishment. Contributing writer, Michelle Goldberg, argues that Gabbard's message could resonate with voters disillusioned with the party's centrism.

**What's Next?**

As the primaries heat up, our team of columnists and contributors will continue to assess the candidates, evaluating their strengths and weaknesses, and sharing their insights on the latest developments. Stay tuned for our ongoing coverage of the 2024 election, and join the conversation by sharing your own takeaways with us on social media.