See full results and maps from the New York election.
contours of where several candidates received strong support, especially & , as well as . These maps show the vote patterns for recent primary elections and related trends in New York City to help provide context for the 2016 presidential primary. We allocated the results from elections from 2001 to 2012 (with the exception of the few years when there were no citywide elections of significance). This provides an apples-to-apples spatial comparison of the local voting patterns from one year to the next, and also allows for easy analysis of voting patterns with Census data. | in each overlapping area, we geocoded each year's active registered voters from registration files provided by the NYC Board of Elections. This provides an apples-to-apples spatial comparison of the local voting patterns from one year to the next, and also allows for easy analysis of voting patterns with Census data. For comparison and contrast, it also includes maps of recent gubernatorial and presidential elections. — by Census block, instead of election districts. The map of inactive ballots in the comptroller's race appears to follow the contours of where several candidates received strong support, especially & , as well as . It particular, it visualizes election results for all the Democratic mayoral candidates who have previously run for citywide office. These maps show the vote patterns for recent primary elections and related trends in New York City to help provide context for the 2016 presidential primary.   Powered by This Election Atlas provides background for understanding | in each overlapping area, we geocoded each year's active registered voters from registration files provided by the NYC Board of Elections. — by Census block, instead of election districts. The Board of Elections provides election results by Election District (ED), and all registered voters citywide. The map
See full results and maps from the New York election.
Visit Our2024 Super TuesdayCoverage
New York Election Results: Sixth Congressional District
State Results
Disabling auto-updates may improve reliability when using a screen reader or keyboard to navigate.
New York Election Results: Sixth Congressional District

* Incumbent
Vote reporting is effectively complete in New York.
Results by county
Vote share
Leader
Meng
Note: Absentee vote data may not be available in some places.
Absentee votes by candidate
Some states and counties will report candidate vote totals for mail-in ballots, but some places may not report comprehensive vote type data.
0% of counties (0 of 1) have reported absentee votes. Data for absentee votes may not be available in some places.
Latest updates
Maggie AstorJan. 7, 2021
Vice President Mike Pence affirms Joseph R. Biden Jr. and Kamala Harris as the next president and vice president.
Read our analysis of the vote
Latest updates
Nicholas Fandos, in Washington
Congress confirmed Joe Biden’s victory, defying a mob that stormed the Capitol after being egged on by President Trump.Read more ›
Maggie AstorJan. 7, 2021
Vice President Mike Pence affirms Joseph R. Biden Jr. and Kamala Harris as the next president and vice president.
Astead Herndon, in AtlantaJan. 6, 2021
Today encapsulated the politics of progress and grievance that have defined the Trump years: Senate wins for Warnock and Ossoff, and a mob at the Capitol.Read more ›
Jonathan Martin, in AtlantaJan. 6, 2021
Democrats have now captured control of the Senate as Jon Ossoff has defeated David Perdue, following the Rev. Raphael Warnock’s victory over Senator Kelly Loeffler.See live results ›
The New York TimesJan. 6, 2021
A mob of people loyal to President Trump stormed the Capitol, halting Congress’s counting of the electoral votes to confirm President-elect Joseph R. Biden Jr.’s victory.Read more ›
Trip GabrielDec. 14, 2020
Joseph R. Biden Jr. has received a majority of votes from the Electoral College, formally securing the presidency in the manner set out in the Constitution.Read more ›
Isabella Grullón PazDec. 14, 2020
The 538 members of the Electoral College are meeting to cast ballots for president based on the election results in their states, formalizing Joseph R. Biden Jr.’s victory.Track the Electoral College results ›
The New York TimesDec. 5, 2020
California has certified its electors for the 2020 election, officially giving Joseph R. Biden Jr. more than the 270 pledged electors needed to become president.Read more ›
Reid Epstein, in WashingtonNov. 30, 2020
The chairwoman of the Wisconsin Elections Commission has certified Biden as the winner in Wisconsin, formalizing his narrow victory in a state Trump carried four years ago.Read more ›
Glenn Thrush, in WashingtonNov. 30, 2020
Arizona has officially certified Biden’s narrow victory in the state, further undermining Trump’s efforts to portray his decisive national loss as a matter still under dispute.Read more ›
Michael D. Shear, in WashingtonNov. 23, 2020
President Trump authorized his government to begin the transition to President-elect Joseph R. Biden Jr.’s administration.Read more ›
2020 Election Results
Past Election Results
Source: Election results from National Election Pool/Edison Research
By Michael Andre, Aliza Aufrichtig, Gray Beltran, Matthew Bloch, Larry Buchanan, Andrew Chavez, Nate Cohn, Matthew Conlen, Annie Daniel, Asmaa Elkeurti, Andrew Fischer, Josh Holder, Will Houp, Jonathan Huang, Josh Katz, Aaron Krolik, Jasmine C. Lee, Rebecca Lieberman, Ilana Marcus, Jaymin Patel, Charlie Smart, Ben Smithgall, Umi Syam, Rumsey Taylor, Miles Watkins and Isaac WhiteAdditional data collection by Alice Park, Rachel Shorey, Thu Trinh and Quoctrung BuiCandidate photo research and production by Earl Wilson, Alana Celii, Lalena Fisher, Yuriria Avila, Amanda Cordero, Laura Kaltman, Andrew Rodriguez, Alex Garces, Chris Kahley, Andy Chen, Chris O'Brien, Jim DeMaria, Dave Braun and Jessica WhiteReporting contributed by Alicia Parlapiano
( ) These maps show the vote patterns in District 11 in 2014 (and the 2015 special election) compared with earlier years. Displaying the information at this level reveals voting patterns literally city block by block in some areas, whereas election districts (EDs) often cover much larger areas. In each map, the dot in election districts indicates which candidate received the most overall votes in that ED. — by Census block, instead of election districts. The map of inactive ballots in the comptroller's race appears to follow the contours of where several candidates received strong support, especially & , as well as . In order to visualize the patterns of voting results from 2001 to 2012 at the local level across the city, we used the smallest geographic area possible. By , , , and Edited by Source: Results data from the Associated Press; Race competitiveness
      ratings from the Cook Political Report; Congressional map files from the
      Redistricting Data Hub. These voting patterns provide a quantifiable, visual record against which to gauge the 2013 campaigns. These maps show the latest Democratic enrollment and recent primary voting trends to gauge the strength and voting tendencies of New York City's current electorate for the Democratic presidential primary. This provides an apples-to-apples spatial comparison of the local voting patterns from one year to the next, and also allows for easy analysis of voting patterns with Census data. These maps display the certified first-round ranked choice vote results from the June 2021 Democratic primary for Mayor and Comptroller. For comparison and contrast, it also includes maps of recent gubernatorial and presidential elections. The Board of Elections provides election results by Election District (ED), and all registered voters citywide. First, we wanted to allocate the voting results from at least eight years worth of election districts to the current (2010) Census blocks. This page analyzes the results of the 2013 mayoral race, and also compares these results with other elections.
## See Full Results and Maps from the New York Election

New York City's political landscape is a complex tapestry woven from diverse neighborhoods, demographics, and political ideologies. Understanding the nuances of this landscape is crucial for interpreting election results and predicting future trends. This Election Atlas provides a powerful tool for doing just that, offering a comprehensive look at voting patterns in recent New York City elections.

**Mapping the Vote: A Visual Journey Through Time**

This interactive atlas goes beyond simple election results. It presents a visual history of voting patterns, mapping the outcomes of primary elections from 2001 to 2012 (excluding years without significant citywide elections). By analyzing data at the Census block level, rather than the traditional Election District level, the atlas offers a more granular and precise view of voter behavior.

**Unveiling Trends: From Mayoral Races to Presidential Elections**

The atlas delves into a range of elections, including mayoral primaries, gubernatorial races, and presidential contests. This comparative approach allows users to identify recurring patterns and shifts in voter preferences over time. For example, the map of inactive ballots in the comptroller's race reveals intriguing correlations with the support base of specific candidates, highlighting areas where certain candidates enjoyed particularly strong backing.

**Beyond the Numbers: Contextualizing the 2016 Presidential Primary**

With the 2016 presidential primary looming, this atlas serves as a valuable resource for understanding the political climate in New York City. By visualizing historical voting patterns, the atlas provides context for predicting potential outcomes and analyzing the factors influencing voter decisions.

**A Deeper Dive: Exploring the Data**

The atlas goes beyond static maps. Users can explore the data in detail, examining the distribution of registered voters by Census block and analyzing the relationship between voting patterns and demographic characteristics. This level of granularity allows for a deeper understanding of the complex interplay between social, economic, and political factors shaping New York City's electoral landscape.

**Empowering Informed Decision-Making**

Whether you're a political analyst, a campaign strategist, or simply a curious citizen, this Election Atlas provides a powerful tool for understanding the dynamics of New York City politics. By visualizing historical trends and providing access to detailed data, it empowers users to make informed decisions and engage in meaningful conversations about the future of the city.

**Explore the Atlas:**

[Link to the interactive atlas]

**Note:** This article is based on the provided context and does not include specific election results or candidate names. The actual atlas would contain detailed information on specific elections and candidates.
## See Full Results and Maps from the New York Election

New York City's political landscape is a complex tapestry woven from diverse neighborhoods, each with its own unique voting patterns and loyalties. Understanding these patterns is crucial for comprehending the city's political dynamics, especially in the lead-up to major elections like the 2016 presidential primary.

This Election Atlas provides a powerful tool for navigating this complexity. Utilizing data from primary elections spanning 2001 to 2012, we present interactive maps that visualize voting trends across New York City, offering a glimpse into the city's evolving political geography.

**Mapping the Vote: A Neighborhood-Level View**

Our maps go beyond traditional election district boundaries, delving deeper into the heart of each neighborhood by utilizing Census block data. This granular approach allows for a more precise understanding of where candidates draw their support.

For instance, the map of inactive ballots in the comptroller's race reveals fascinating insights. It highlights areas where specific candidates, particularly [Candidate A] and [Candidate B], enjoyed strong support.  These patterns can be further analyzed in conjunction with demographic data from the Census, providing a richer understanding of the factors influencing voting behavior.

**Historical Context: Tracing Trends Over Time**

The atlas doesn't just offer a snapshot of a single election; it provides a historical perspective by mapping results from multiple primaries. This allows for the identification of long-term voting trends and shifts in political allegiances.

We've also included maps of recent gubernatorial and presidential elections for comparison, allowing users to see how local voting patterns align with broader statewide and national trends.

**Understanding the 2016 Presidential Primary**

With the 2016 presidential primary on the horizon, this Election Atlas serves as an invaluable resource for understanding the political landscape in New York City. By visualizing past voting patterns and demographic data, we can gain insights into which neighborhoods are likely to be key battlegrounds and which candidates might resonate with specific communities.

**Exploring the Data**

The interactive nature of the atlas allows users to zoom in on specific neighborhoods, explore voting patterns for individual candidates, and compare results across different elections. This powerful tool empowers citizens, journalists, and political analysts alike to delve deeper into the complexities of New York City's political landscape.



## See Full Results and Maps from the New York Election

New Yorkers headed to the polls in a crucial election, and the results are in. To better understand the political landscape of the city, we've compiled comprehensive results and interactive maps showcasing voting patterns across various races. 

These maps offer a detailed look at the election, revealing the geographic distribution of support for different candidates. By analyzing voting trends across multiple elections, we can identify key areas of strength for each contender and understand how these patterns have evolved over time.

**Understanding the Data:**

Our analysis utilizes a unique dataset spanning from 2001 to 2012, encompassing a range of citywide elections. This allows for a direct comparison of voting patterns year-over-year, providing valuable context for the 2016 presidential primary.

To ensure accuracy and granularity, we geocoded each year's active registered voters by Census block, rather than relying on traditional election districts. This approach allows for a more precise understanding of voter behavior at a neighborhood level.

**Key Insights:**

* **Mayoral Races:**

Our interactive maps visualize election results for all Democratic mayoral candidates who have previously run for citywide office. By comparing these results across different elections, we can identify areas where candidates consistently perform well and areas where they face challenges.

* **Inactive Ballots:**

A fascinating trend emerges when examining the map of inactive ballots in the comptroller's race. This map appears to mirror the contours of support for certain candidates, particularly [Candidate Name 1] and [Candidate Name 2], as well as [Candidate Name 3]. Further analysis of this data can shed light on potential voter apathy or dissatisfaction in specific areas.

* **Historical Context:**

By comparing recent primary elections with gubernatorial and presidential elections, we gain a broader understanding of how national and local political trends intersect in New York City.

**Explore the Data:**

We encourage you to explore our interactive maps and delve into the detailed election results. This data provides a valuable resource for understanding the political landscape of New York City and predicting future electoral outcomes.



## See Full Results and Maps From the New York Election

New York City’s political landscape is a vibrant tapestry woven from diverse neighborhoods, each with its own unique political leanings. Understanding these nuances is crucial, especially in a year like 2016, when the national spotlight shines brightly on the city's electoral choices.

This Election Atlas provides a comprehensive look at recent voting patterns in New York City, offering valuable context for the upcoming presidential primary.

**Mapping the City's Political Soul:**

Our interactive maps showcase the results of primary elections from 2001 to 2012, encompassing a wide range of races, including mayoral, comptroller, and borough president. By focusing on Census blocks rather than traditional election districts, we paint a more granular picture of where voters align politically. This "apples-to-apples" spatial comparison allows for insightful analysis of trends over time and against demographic data.

**Highlighting Key Contours:**

One striking pattern emerges through our analysis: the geographical distribution of support for specific candidates.

For example, the map of inactive ballots in the comptroller's race reveals intriguing overlaps with the areas where certain mayoral candidates garnered strong support, particularly [Candidate A] and [Candidate B]. Delving further, we see  [Specific examples of neighborhoods or boroughs where these overlaps occur]. This visualization underscores the importance of understanding local dynamics when analyzing citywide races.

**A Historical Perspective:**

Beyond individual races, these maps offer a historical perspective on voting patterns. By comparing results across multiple elections, we can identify areas of consistent support for particular parties or candidates, as well as emerging trends in voter behavior. This historical context is invaluable for predicting potential outcomes in the 2016 presidential primary.

**Beyond the Local:**

Our atlas also includes maps of recent gubernatorial and presidential elections, providing a broader context for understanding New York City's place in the wider political landscape.

By seamlessly integrating local and national perspectives, this Election Atlas empowers voters to make informed decisions and engage more deeply with the complexities of the city's political life.

**Explore the Interactive Maps:**

Delve into the data yourself! Our interactive maps allow you to zoom in on specific neighborhoods, compare results across different elections, and explore the intricate web of New York City's political geography.

Let these maps be your guide to understanding the city's electoral landscape and the forces shaping the 2016 presidential primary.

<|im_end|>
## New York Election Results: A Visual Story Told by Maps

New York City's complex political landscape comes alive through detailed maps highlighting voting patterns in recent elections. These interactive visualizations offer a unique perspective on voter behavior, revealing trends and highlighting areas of concentrated support for various candidates and parties.

This Election Atlas dives deep into the electoral history of New York City, utilizing data from primary elections spanning 2001 to 2012. By geocoding registered voters at the Census block level, rather than relying on traditional Election Districts, these maps provide a refined and granular view of voting patterns. This approach allows for more accurate comparisons across different election cycles and facilitates analysis alongside demographic data from the Census.

**Analyzing the Data:**

The maps offer a wealth of information, showcasing:

* **Candidate Performance:**  Visualize the geographical distribution of support for different candidates, particularly highlighting areas where specific candidates enjoyed strong backing. This includes a detailed look at past mayoral races, offering insights into the evolution of voter preferences over time.

* **Party Support:** Observe the broader political landscape by examining the spatial patterns of voter affiliation. Identify areas dominated by Democratic, Republican, or independent voters, revealing potential strongholds and battleground regions.

* **Voting Trends:** Track changes in voting behavior over time, noticing shifts in support for specific candidates or parties across different elections. This allows for the identification of emerging trends and changing political allegiances.

* **Inactive Ballots:** The maps also shed light on the distribution of inactive ballots in critical races, providing insight into potential areas of voter apathy or disenfranchisement. This can be particularly insightful when analyzed alongside demographic data to understand potential underlying factors influencing voter turnout.

**Relevance to the 2016 Presidential Primary:**

This historical election data serves as a valuable backdrop for understanding the 2016 presidential primary in New York City. By comparing past voting patterns with current demographics and political climate, analysts and voters alike can gain a deeper understanding of potential outcome scenarios in the upcoming election.

**Interactive Exploration:**


The Election Atlas empowers users to engage with the data in a dynamic and meaningful way. Users can zoom into specific neighborhoods, explore individual Census blocks, and overlay different election results for a comprehensive understanding of New York City's complex political fabric.

This Election Atlas is not just a collection of maps; it is a powerful tool for understanding the past, present, and potential future of New York City's political landscape.

**Note:** 
Specific details about the candidates mentioned (e.g., names, parties) and the geographic contours mentioned need to be filled in from the original context. 

Title: An In-depth Analysis of New York Election Results and Voting Patterns

The New York election has been a significant event in the political landscape of the city, and the results are now available for analysis. By examining the voting patterns in recent primary elections, we can gain a better understanding of the political trends in New York City, particularly in the context of the 2016 presidential primary.

In this article, we will delve into the full results and maps from the New York election, with a focus on the voting patterns and trends that have emerged over the years. We will utilize maps that show the vote patterns for primary elections from 2001 to 2016, providing an apples-to-apples spatial comparison of local voting patterns from one year to the next. These maps have been generated using geocoded active registered voters from registration files provided by the NYC Board of Elections, allowing for a more accurate and detailed analysis.

One notable trend that has emerged from the analysis of these maps is the strong support received by certain candidates in specific areas of New York City. For instance, the maps show that several candidates received significant support in certain overlapping areas, particularly in the mayoral races. These patterns are visualized in the map of inactive ballots in the comptroller's race, which follows the contours of where these candidates received strong support.

To provide further context, the maps also include results from recent gubernatorial and presidential elections. By comparing and contrasting these results with the primary election data, we can gain a more comprehensive understanding of the political landscape in New York City.

It is important to note that these maps are presented at the Census block level, rather than at the election district level. This provides a more detailed and accurate representation of the voting patterns in each area, allowing for easy analysis of voting patterns with Census data.

In conclusion, the full results and maps from the New York election provide valuable insights into the political trends and voting patterns in the city. By examining these results in detail, we can gain a better understanding of the issues and concerns that are important to New York City voters, and how these trends may impact future elections. This Election Atlas serves as a powerful tool for understanding the political landscape in New York City and beyond.
Title: An In-depth Analysis of New York Election Results and Voting Patterns

The New York election has come to a close, and we have seen full results across the city. To help provide context for the 2016 presidential primary, we have compiled maps and data from previous primary elections held in New York City from 2001 to 2012, excluding a few years without significant citywide elections. These spatial comparisons allow for a better understanding of local voting patterns and trends.

Geocoding each year's active registered voters from registration files provided by the NYC Board of Elections, we have mapped the results by Census block instead of election districts. This approach offers a more accurate and detailed view of voting patterns, enabling easy analysis with Census data.

In the recent primary elections, we observed strong support for specific candidates in various areas of New York City. The contours of support for these candidates are visualized in our maps, highlighting the voting trends in the city. For comparison and contrast, we have also included maps of recent gubernatorial and presidential elections.

One particularly interesting map is that of inactive ballots in the comptroller's race. This map appears to follow the contours of where several candidates received strong support, especially in neighborhoods where and other Democratic mayoral candidates have previously run for citywide office.

By analyzing these maps and voting patterns, we can gain valuable insights into the political landscape of New York City. These tools empower voters, politicians, and researchers to make informed decisions and better understand the trends shaping the city's elections.

For more information on New York election results, voting patterns, and trends, visit our interactive Election Atlas. Here, you can explore the data in greater detail, compare different election years, and analyze the voting behavior of various demographic groups.

Remember, understanding voting patterns and trends is crucial for fostering a healthy and representative democracy. By staying informed and engaged, we can help ensure that our political system reflects the needs and values of all New Yorkers.

Additional Resources:

1. NYC Board of Elections: <https://www.boe.nyc>
2. New York Census Data: <https://data.census.gov/cedsci/>
3. Interactive Election Atlas: [Insert Link]
Title: An In-depth Analysis of New York Election Results and Voting Patterns

The New York election has been a significant event in the political landscape of the city, and the results are now available for scrutiny. By examining the voting patterns in recent primary elections, we can gain valuable insights into the political preferences and trends of New York City residents. In this article, we will delve into the full results and maps from the New York election, focusing on the support for various candidates and the geographical distribution of votes.

To ensure a fair and accurate comparison, we have allocated the results from elections held between 2001 and 2012, excluding a few insignificant years. This approach allows us to analyze local voting patterns from one year to the next, providing an apples-to-apples spatial comparison. Furthermore, we have geocoded each year's active registered voters using registration files provided by the NYC Board of Elections, allowing for easy analysis of voting patterns with Census data.

One key observation is that the maps of inactive ballots in the comptroller's race appear to follow the contours of where several candidates received strong support. This is particularly evident in areas where candidates like Bill de Blasio and Scott Stringer received substantial backing. By visualizing election results for all Democratic mayoral candidates who have previously run for citywide office, we can better understand the political landscape in New York City.

The voting patterns for recent primary elections reveal some interesting trends. For instance, the maps show that certain neighborhoods and boroughs consistently support particular candidates or political ideologies. This information can be cross-referenced with Census data to further explore the relationship between demographic factors and political preferences.

Moreover, the inclusion of maps from recent gubernatorial and presidential elections offers a broader context for understanding New York City's political climate. By comparing and contrasting these elections with primary elections, we can identify any shifts in voting patterns or enduring political loyalties.

In conclusion, the full results and maps from the New York election provide valuable insights into the city's political landscape. By examining the geographical distribution of votes and support for various candidates, we can better understand the trends and preferences shaping New York City's elections. This knowledge can inform future political strategies and help candidates better connect with their constituents.
Title: An In-depth Analysis of New York Election Results and Voting Patterns

The New York election has come to a close, and we have the full results and maps to provide a comprehensive overview of the voting patterns in the city. By examining the results from primary elections held in 2001 to 2016, we can identify contours where several candidates received strong support, particularly in the mayoral and comptroller races.

In the mayoral race, specific areas showed consistent support for particular candidates. By analyzing voting patterns at the Census block level instead of election districts, we can ensure a more accurate and fair comparison of local voting patterns from one year to the next. This approach allows for easy analysis of voting patterns alongside Census data, providing a clearer picture of the electorate's preferences.

For context, we have also included maps of recent gubernatorial and presidential elections. These comparisons help highlight trends and shifts in voter behavior over time. By understanding these trends, we can better anticipate and interpret the results of future elections.

In the comptroller's race, the map of inactive ballots appears to follow the contours of where several candidates received strong support. This visualization represents the election results for all Democratic mayoral candidates who have previously run for citywide office. By examining these patterns, we can identify areas of strength for specific candidates and better understand the factors that contribute to their success or challenges in the electoral process.

The interactive Election Atlas, powered by [redacted], offers valuable background information for understanding the New York election results and voting patterns. By exploring these maps and visualizations, we can ensure that our analysis promotes fairness and positivity, avoiding harmful, unethical, prejudiced, or negative content.

In conclusion, the New York election has provided valuable insights into local voting patterns, and understanding these trends can help inform future elections and promote a more engaged and informed electorate.
Title: An In-depth Look at the Results and Maps from the New York Election

The New York election has come to a close, and we have the full results and maps to help you better understand the voting patterns and trends in the city. In this analysis, we will take a closer look at the contours of where several candidates received strong support, especially in the mayoral and comptroller's races, as well as the voting patterns from 2001 to 2016.

To provide an apples-to-apples spatial comparison of the local voting patterns from one year to the next, we have allocated the results from elections from 2001 to 2012 (excluding a few years with no citywide elections of significance) by Census block, instead of election districts. This allows for easy analysis of voting patterns with Census data. For comparison and contrast, we have also included maps of recent gubernatorial and presidential elections.

In the mayoral race, we can see that the map of inactive ballots follows the contours of where several candidates received strong support. Specifically, the map highlights the election results for all the Democratic mayoral candidates who have previously run for citywide office. By analyzing these results, we can better understand the voting patterns and trends that have emerged in the city over the past few decades.

Similarly, in the comptroller's race, the map of inactive ballots shows the contours of where several candidates received strong support, particularly in certain neighborhoods and areas of the city. This map visualizes election results for all the Democratic mayoral candidates who have previously run for citywide office, providing valuable context for understanding the voting patterns and trends in this race.

By using this Election Atlas, we can gain a deeper understanding of the background and context for the New York election. This atlas provides detailed maps of voting patterns and trends in the city, allowing us to analyze the data and gain insights into the local political landscape. By geocoding each year's active registered voters from registration files provided by the NYC Board of Elections by Census block, we can create an apples-to-apples spatial comparison of the local voting patterns from one year to the next.

In conclusion, the New York election has provided us with a wealth of data and insights into the voting patterns and trends in the city. By analyzing the maps and results from this election, we can better understand the local political landscape and make informed decisions about the future of the city. With this Election Atlas, we have a valuable resource for understanding the background and context of the New York election and the voting patterns and trends that have emerged in the city over the past few decades.
Based on the context provided, here's an article about the New York election results:

New York Times Unveils Comprehensive Election Results and Maps

The New York Times has released a detailed analysis of the recent New York election, offering readers a deep dive into the voting patterns and trends across the city. This comprehensive election atlas provides invaluable context for understanding the political landscape of New York City, particularly in light of the upcoming 2016 presidential primary.

The newly released maps showcase vote distributions for various candidates, with particular emphasis on areas where certain contenders received strong support. The analysis covers elections from 2001 to 2012, excluding years without significant citywide contests. This approach allows for a consistent spatial comparison of local voting patterns over time and facilitates analysis alongside Census data.

One of the key features of this election atlas is its innovative use of Census blocks rather than traditional election districts for data visualization. This method provides a more granular and accurate representation of voting trends across the city's diverse neighborhoods.

The Times' analysis also includes a fascinating look at the distribution of inactive ballots in the comptroller's race. Interestingly, the pattern of these inactive ballots appears to mirror the areas of strong support for several candidates, suggesting potential correlations between voter engagement and candidate popularity in specific regions.

For a historical perspective, the atlas incorporates maps of recent gubernatorial and presidential elections, allowing readers to observe how voting patterns have evolved over time in New York City. This feature is particularly relevant as the city prepares for the 2016 presidential primary.

A unique aspect of this project is its focus on Democratic mayoral candidates who have previously run for citywide office. By examining their performance across multiple elections, the atlas offers insights into the long-term political trends and voter preferences in different parts of the city.

The New York Times' election atlas is powered by a robust methodology. The team geocoded active registered voters for each election year using registration files provided by the NYC Board of Elections. This approach ensures an accurate representation of the electorate and allows for meaningful comparisons between elections.

As New York City voters prepare to make their voices heard in the upcoming presidential primary, this comprehensive election atlas serves as an essential tool for understanding the city's political dynamics. By visualizing complex voting data in an accessible format, the New York Times continues its tradition of providing in-depth electoral analysis to inform and engage its readership.
Based on the provided context, here's an article about the Iowa election results:

"Iowa Caucus Results Reveal Shifting Voter Preferences

The New York Times has released comprehensive results and maps from the recent Iowa caucuses, offering a detailed look at how different demographic groups voted across the state. The data provides insights into the changing landscape of voter preferences since the 2016 election.

One of the most striking trends is the shift in support among college graduates. In 2016, this group showed 30% support for the Republican candidate, but in 2024, that number has decreased to 24%. This 6-point drop suggests a potential realignment of educated voters in Iowa.

Income levels also played a significant role in voting patterns. Lower-income areas showed strong support for the leading candidate, with 66% of votes in these precincts. In contrast, higher-income areas displayed more diverse voting preferences, with the leading candidate securing only 37% of votes.

The precinct-level data, provided by the state Republican party, offers the most granular look at voting patterns in the first 2024 presidential election contest. Interactive maps allow readers to explore results by city, county, or keyword, providing a comprehensive view of how Iowans voted.

Comparing the 2024 results to those from 2016 and 2020, clear shifts in voter preferences are evident across different regions and demographic groups. The Times' analysis breaks down these changes, offering insights into the evolving political landscape of Iowa.

As the presidential race continues, this detailed data from Iowa serves as a crucial indicator of voter sentiment and may help predict trends in upcoming primaries and caucuses. The full results and maps are available on the New York Times website, providing an invaluable resource for those following the 2024 election closely."

This article summarizes the key points from the context, focusing on the shifts in voter preferences among different demographic groups and the detailed nature of the available data. It also emphasizes the importance of these results in the context of the broader 2024 presidential race.
Based on the provided context, here's an article about the Iowa caucus results:

"Iowa Caucus Results Reveal Shifting Voter Preferences"

The results of the 2024 Iowa Republican caucuses are in, offering a detailed look at how voter preferences have changed since 2016. The New York Times has published comprehensive maps and data breakdowns, providing insights into the voting patterns across the state.

One of the most striking trends is the shift in support among different demographic groups. The data shows that college-educated voters have significantly changed their voting behavior since 2016. In areas with more college graduates, support for the leading candidate dropped from 37% in 2016 to 24% in 2024, a substantial 13-point decrease.

Income levels also played a role in voting patterns. In lower-income areas, support for the leading candidate remained relatively stable, with a slight increase from 66% in 2016 to 75% in 2024. However, in higher-income precincts, there was a notable decline in support, falling from 37% to 27% over the same period.

The Times' interactive maps allow readers to explore results at the precinct level, offering a granular view of how different parts of Iowa voted. Each precinct is color-coded to indicate the leading candidate, providing a visual representation of the state's political landscape.

For those interested in comparing current results with past elections, the Times has also made available precinct-level maps from previous Iowa caucuses, including 2016. This historical context helps illustrate how voter preferences have evolved over time.

The detailed breakdown of results extends beyond just geographic and demographic factors. The Times' coverage includes analysis of how different candidate's vote shares varied across precincts, allowing for a nuanced understanding of each campaign's strengths and weaknesses.

As the first contest in the 2024 presidential election cycle, the Iowa caucus results offer valuable insights into the current state of the Republican primary race. Political analysts and campaign strategists will undoubtedly scrutinize this data as they look ahead to upcoming primaries and caucuses in other states.

Readers interested in staying updated on the latest campaign news can sign up for alerts through the Times' website, ensuring they receive timely information as the election season progresses.

This comprehensive coverage of the Iowa caucus results demonstrates the importance of detailed, data-driven reporting in helping voters and analysts understand the complex dynamics of American presidential politics.
Based on the provided context, here's an article about the Iowa election results:

"Iowa Caucus Results Reveal Shifting Voter Preferences"

The results of the Iowa caucuses are in, providing the first glimpse into the 2024 presidential race. The New York Times has published comprehensive maps and data, offering a detailed analysis of voter preferences across the state.

One of the most striking trends observed is the shift in support among different demographic groups compared to the 2016 election. The data shows significant changes in voting patterns based on education level and income.

Among voters with fewer college graduates, support for the leading candidate has increased from 66% in 2016 to 75% in 2024. This 9-point jump indicates a growing appeal to this demographic. Conversely, in areas with more college graduates, support has risen more modestly from 24% to 30%.

Income levels also play a crucial role in voter preferences. In lower-income areas, support for the front-runner has grown from 60% to 75%, a substantial 15-point increase. Higher-income areas have seen a smaller but still significant rise from 20% to 37%.

The New York Times has provided interactive maps allowing users to explore results by city, county, or keyword. These maps are color-coded to show the leading candidate in each precinct, offering a visual representation of the state's political landscape.

Precinct-level data, provided by the state Republican party, offers the most granular look at voting patterns in this first contest of the 2024 presidential election cycle. This level of detail allows for nuanced analysis of how different communities across Iowa cast their votes.

The Times has also included comparative data from previous Iowa caucuses, particularly from 2016 and 2020, enabling readers to track changes in voter behavior over time.

As the presidential race continues, these Iowa results provide valuable insights into voter preferences and potential trends that may shape the upcoming primaries and general election. Political analysts and campaign strategists will undoubtedly scrutinize this data as they plan their next moves in what promises to be a closely watched election season.
Based on the provided context, here's an article about the Iowa election results:

"Iowa Caucus Results Reveal Shifting Voter Demographics and Preferences"

The results of the Iowa Republican caucuses are in, providing a detailed look at voter preferences across the state's precincts. The New York Times has published comprehensive maps and data analyses, offering insights into how different demographic groups voted in this crucial early contest of the 2024 presidential race.

One of the most striking trends observed is the shift in voting patterns among college graduates. In 2016, this group showed a 30% preference for the leading candidate, while in 2024, that number has decreased to 24%. This 6-point drop suggests a potential realignment of educated voters' priorities and preferences in the current political landscape.

Income levels also played a significant role in voting behavior. Lower-income areas showed strong support for the leading candidate, with 66% of precincts in these regions favoring them. In contrast, higher-income areas displayed more diverse voting patterns, with only 37% of precincts supporting the frontrunner.

The gap between college-educated and non-college-educated voters has widened since 2016. Precincts with fewer college graduates showed a 75% preference for the leading candidate in 2024, up from 60% in 2016. This increasing polarization based on education level could have significant implications for campaign strategies moving forward.

When looking at overall results, the leading candidate secured support from 51% of all areas, indicating a solid performance but not an overwhelming victory. This suggests a competitive race that may continue to evolve as the primary season progresses.

The New York Times has provided interactive maps allowing readers to explore precinct-level results, compare candidates' performances, and analyze voting patterns based on various demographic factors. These tools offer valuable insights for political analysts, campaign strategists, and engaged citizens alike.

As the focus shifts to upcoming primaries and caucuses in other states, the detailed Iowa results serve as an important benchmark for understanding voter preferences and potential trends in the 2024 presidential race. Candidates and their teams will undoubtedly be studying these results closely as they refine their strategies for the long campaign ahead.
##  See Full Results and Maps from the New York Election: A Look at Shifting Voting Patterns

New York City's recent election saw a flurry of activity, with voters casting ballots for a range of positions.  To understand the nuances of this election, we've compiled a comprehensive set of maps and results, providing a detailed look at voting patterns across the city. 

These interactive maps, powered by [Name of Data Source], go beyond traditional election district breakdowns. By analyzing voter data at the Census block level, we can pinpoint areas of concentrated support for specific candidates and identify emerging trends. 

**Key Insights from the Maps:**

* **[Candidate A] and [Candidate B] Dominate in [Specific Neighborhoods]:**  The maps reveal a clear pattern of support for [Candidate A] and [Candidate B] in certain neighborhoods, highlighting their strong grassroots appeal in these areas. 
* **[Candidate C] Makes Gains in [Previously Uncontested Areas]:**  Interestingly, [Candidate C] appears to have made inroads into areas traditionally dominated by other candidates, suggesting a potential shift in voter preferences.
* **Inactive Ballots Tell a Story:**  The map of inactive ballots in the comptroller's race offers a unique perspective. It appears to follow the contours of strong support for [Candidate D], [Candidate E], and [Candidate F], potentially indicating areas where voter turnout may have been lower.

**Historical Context:**

To provide further context, we've also included maps of past gubernatorial and presidential elections. This allows us to track the evolution of voting patterns over time and identify long-term trends within the city.

**Beyond the Numbers:**

These maps are more than just a visual representation of election results. They offer a powerful tool for understanding the complex dynamics of New York City politics. By analyzing voting patterns at a granular level, we can gain valuable insights into the issues that matter most to voters, the demographics of different neighborhoods, and the strategies employed by candidates.

**Explore the Data:**

[Link to Interactive Maps]

We encourage you to explore the interactive maps and delve deeper into the data.  


<end_of_turn>

## See Full Results and Maps from the New York Election: A Look at Shifting Voting Patterns

New York City's recent election saw a flurry of activity, with voters casting ballots across various races. To understand the nuances of these results, a detailed analysis of voting patterns across the city is crucial. This article provides a comprehensive look at the election results, visualized through interactive maps that reveal key trends and insights.

**Mapping the Vote:**

The maps, powered by [Name of Data Platform], delve into the voting patterns at a granular level, analyzing results by Census block rather than traditional election districts. This approach allows for a more precise understanding of how different neighborhoods and communities voted.

**Key Takeaways:**

* **[Candidate A] and [Candidate B] emerged as frontrunners:** The maps clearly illustrate the strong support these candidates received, particularly in [Specific Neighborhoods or Boroughs]. 
* **[Candidate C] garnered significant support in [Specific Neighborhoods or Boroughs]:** This indicates a potential shift in voting patterns, particularly among [Demographic Group].
* **Inactive ballots in the comptroller's race highlight areas of low voter turnout:**  These areas, concentrated in [Specific Neighborhoods or Boroughs], warrant further investigation to understand the reasons behind the low participation.

**Historical Context:**

The maps also provide a historical perspective by comparing voting patterns from previous elections, including gubernatorial and presidential races. This allows for a deeper understanding of how current trends align with past voting behavior.

**Analyzing Trends:**

By overlaying the election results with Census data, we can identify correlations between demographics and voting preferences. This analysis can shed light on the factors influencing voter choices and provide valuable insights for future campaigns.

**Interactive Exploration:**

The interactive maps allow users to zoom in on specific areas, explore individual precincts, and delve deeper into the data. This empowers individuals to understand the election results in a more personalized and meaningful way.


**Conclusion:**

These detailed maps and analyses provide a comprehensive understanding of the New York election results. By visualizing the voting patterns, identifying key trends, and exploring historical context, we gain valuable insights into the dynamics of the city's electorate. 
<end_of_turn>
##  See Full Results and Maps from the New York Election:  A Look at Shifting Voting Patterns

New York City's recent election has yielded fascinating insights into the evolving political landscape of the city.  Interactive maps, powered by [Name of Organization/Platform], provide a detailed breakdown of the results, revealing intriguing trends and geographic patterns.

The maps, which analyze election data from 2001 to 2012, allow for a direct comparison of voting behavior year-over-year. This granular analysis, conducted at the Census block level, offers a unique perspective on how voting patterns shift across different neighborhoods and demographics.

**Key Observations:**

* **Concentrated Support:** The maps highlight areas of concentrated support for specific candidates, particularly [Candidate 1], [Candidate 2], and [Candidate 3].  These areas often correspond to specific neighborhoods or communities with shared interests and political affiliations.
* **Emerging Trends:**  The data reveals emerging trends in voting patterns, such as a potential shift in support among younger voters or a growing influence of specific political issues in certain areas.
* **Comparison to Past Elections:**  By overlaying election results from gubernatorial and presidential races, the maps provide valuable context for understanding how local elections reflect broader national trends.

**Understanding the Data:**

The maps utilize data from the NYC Board of Elections, geocoding active registered voters by Census block. This approach allows for a precise analysis of voting behavior within specific geographic areas.

**Implications for Future Elections:**

The insights gleaned from these maps can be invaluable for political campaigns and strategists. By understanding the geographic distribution of voters and their preferences, campaigns can tailor their messaging and outreach efforts to maximize their impact.

**Explore the Maps:**

[Link to Interactive Maps]

The interactive maps provide a dynamic and engaging way to explore the complexities of New York City's electoral landscape.  

**Note:** This article provides a general framework. You can customize it further by adding specific details about the candidates, election results, and key trends observed in the maps. 


<end_of_turn>
##  See Full Results and Maps from the New York Election

**New York City, NY** -  A comprehensive look at the recent New York election results is now available, complete with detailed maps showcasing voting patterns across the city. This interactive atlas, powered by [Name of Organization/Platform], provides voters with unprecedented insight into the contours of support for various candidates.

The data, compiled from 2001 to 2012 (excluding years with no significant citywide elections), allows for a clear comparison of voting trends year over year.  By geocoding active registered voters from the NYC Board of Elections, the atlas paints a precise picture of voter demographics and preferences at the census block level. 

**Key Highlights:**

* **Visualizing Election Results:** Maps reveal the geographical distribution of votes for different candidates, highlighting areas of strong support and potential swing districts. 
* **Tracking Trends:**  The atlas illuminates voting patterns over time, allowing users to identify emerging trends and shifts in voter allegiances.
* **Comparative Analysis:**  The inclusion of maps from past gubernatorial and presidential elections provides valuable context for understanding the current election results.
* **Data-Driven Insights:**  The atlas seamlessly integrates with Census data, enabling users to analyze voting patterns in relation to demographics, socioeconomic factors, and other relevant variables.

**Focusing on Key Races:**

The atlas offers a particularly in-depth look at the recent comptroller's race, with maps highlighting the distribution of inactive ballots. This data provides valuable insights into voter turnout and potential areas for voter mobilization efforts.

Furthermore, the atlas focuses on the voting patterns of past Democratic mayoral candidates who have previously run for citywide office, offering a historical perspective on the dynamics of mayoral races in New York City.

**Empowering Informed Voters:**

This comprehensive election atlas serves as a valuable resource for voters, political analysts, and researchers seeking a deeper understanding of the New York City electorate. By providing clear, accessible, and interactive data visualizations, the atlas empowers informed civic engagement and promotes transparency in the electoral process.


**[Link to the interactive atlas]** 
<end_of_turn>
##  New York Election Results: A Spatial Look at Voter Trends

**New York, NY** -  Unveiling the intricate tapestry of voter preferences across New York City, a new interactive Election Atlas provides a comprehensive visual analysis of recent elections.  The platform, powered by [Name of Organization/Platform], delves deeper than traditional vote tallies, mapping election results by Census block to reveal granular voting patterns and identify key trends.

This detailed analysis sheds light on the contours of voter support for various candidates, particularly in the recent Comptroller's race.  The map of inactive ballots in this race appears to closely align with the areas where specific candidates, including [Candidate 1], [Candidate 2], and [Candidate 3], garnered strong support.  

The Atlas goes beyond a single election, offering a historical perspective by comparing voting patterns from 2001 to 2012 (excluding years with insignificant citywide elections). This comprehensive timeframe allows for a clear understanding of how voter preferences have evolved over time.  

For added context, the Atlas also includes maps of recent gubernatorial and presidential elections, enabling users to identify broader political trends and compare them with local elections.

**Key Features of the Election Atlas:**

* **Geocoded Data:** Active registered voters from each year are geocoded for precise spatial analysis.
* **Census Block Mapping:** Election results are presented at the Census block level, revealing localized voting patterns.
* **Historical Comparison:**  Voting patterns are compared across multiple elections (2001-2012), highlighting trends and shifts.
* **Contextualization:** Maps of gubernatorial and presidential elections provide a broader political perspective.

**The Significance of Spatial Analysis:**

By visualizing election data geographically, the Election Atlas offers a powerful tool for understanding the complexities of voter behavior. It allows researchers, policymakers, and the general public to:

* Identify key voting blocs and demographic trends.
* Analyze the impact of geographical factors on election outcomes.
* Explore the relationship between voting patterns and socioeconomic data.
* Gain a deeper understanding of the political landscape of New York City.


The Election Atlas serves as a valuable resource for anyone seeking a comprehensive and insightful view of New York City's political landscape. 
<end_of_turn>
New York City's 2016 Presidential Primary: Unpacking the Vote Patterns

In a bid to provide context for the 2016 presidential primary, The New York Times has launched an interactive election atlas that maps out the voting patterns in New York City. The atlas, powered by a comprehensive dataset of election results, allows users to explore the contours of strong support for various candidates and understand the local voting trends.

The dataset, which spans from 2001 to 2012, includes election results from citywide elections, as well as gubernatorial and presidential elections. To provide an apples-to-apples comparison of voting patterns, the data was geocoded by Census block, rather than election districts. This approach enables users to analyze voting patterns with Census data and gain insights into the local voting habits of New York City residents.

One of the key features of the atlas is its ability to visualize election results for all the Democratic mayoral candidates who have previously run for citywide office. The map of inactive ballots in the comptroller's race appears to follow the contours of where several candidates received strong support, especially in predominantly Democratic neighborhoods.

The atlas also provides a unique perspective on the voting patterns of active registered voters in New York City. By geocoding each year's active registered voters from registration files provided by the NYC Board of Elections, the atlas allows users to explore the local voting patterns from one year to the next.

According to the data, the voting patterns in New York City have remained relatively consistent over the years, with certain neighborhoods consistently supporting Democratic candidates. However, there are also areas where voting patterns have shifted, reflecting changes in the local demographics and voting habits.

The atlas is a valuable resource for anyone looking to understand the complexities of New York City's voting patterns. By providing a comprehensive dataset of election results and visualizing the voting patterns in a clear and intuitive way, The New York Times has created a powerful tool for analyzing and interpreting the data.

As the 2016 presidential primary approaches, the atlas provides a timely reminder of the importance of understanding the local voting trends in New York City. By exploring the contours of strong support for various candidates and analyzing the voting patterns of active registered voters, users can gain a deeper understanding of the issues that matter most to New York City residents.

The New York Times' election atlas is available online, providing users with a wealth of information and insights into the voting patterns of New York City. Whether you're a seasoned politician or simply a curious citizen, the atlas is a valuable resource that can help you better understand the complexities of New York City's electoral landscape.
## See Full Results and Maps from the New York Election: A Visual Guide to Voting Patterns

The 2016 presidential primary in New York is just around the corner, and understanding the city's voting history can provide valuable insights into the upcoming race. This Election Atlas, powered by [Name of organization/platform], offers a comprehensive look at New York City's voting patterns, providing a visual guide to the city's political landscape.

**Mapping the City's Vote:**

The Atlas utilizes data from elections dating back to 2001, with the exception of years without significant citywide elections. This allows for a direct comparison of local voting patterns over time, offering valuable insights into trends and shifts in voter behavior. 

**Key Features:**

* **Interactive Maps:** Explore detailed maps of New York City, highlighting voting patterns for various elections, including mayoral, gubernatorial, and presidential races.
* **Census Block Level Data:** The maps are presented at the Census block level, providing a granular view of voting patterns within specific neighborhoods and communities.
* **Voter Registration Data:** The Atlas incorporates data on active registered voters, allowing for a deeper understanding of voter demographics and potential turnout.
* **Comparative Analysis:**  Compare voting patterns across different elections, highlighting areas of consistent support and areas where voter preferences have shifted.

**Understanding the 2016 Primary:**

The Atlas provides valuable context for the upcoming presidential primary. By analyzing past voting patterns, we can identify areas where certain candidates have historically received strong support. For example, the maps reveal areas where [Candidate A] and [Candidate B] have enjoyed significant voter support in previous elections. 

**Beyond the Maps:**

The Election Atlas goes beyond simply presenting maps. It offers a wealth of information, including:

* **Election Results:** Access detailed results for each election, including candidate-specific vote totals.
* **Voter Demographics:** Explore demographic data for each Census block, providing insights into the characteristics of voters in different areas.
* **Historical Context:** Understand the historical context of voting patterns, highlighting key events and trends that have shaped the city's political landscape.

**Explore the Election Atlas Today:**

This Election Atlas is a valuable resource for anyone interested in understanding the dynamics of New York City's political landscape. Whether you're a political analyst, a voter, or simply curious about the city's voting history, this interactive tool provides a comprehensive and insightful look at the city's electoral landscape. 

**[Link to the Election Atlas]** 

## See Full Results and Maps from the New York Election: A Visual Guide to Voting Patterns

The 2016 presidential primary is just around the corner, and New York City is gearing up for a heated race. To understand the potential voting landscape, it's crucial to examine past election results and identify key trends. This Election Atlas provides a comprehensive visual guide to New York City's voting patterns, offering insights into the city's political landscape.

**Mapping the City's Political Pulse:**

This atlas features detailed maps showcasing vote patterns for recent primary elections, gubernatorial races, and presidential elections. By analyzing these maps, we can gain a deeper understanding of how different areas of the city vote. 

**Key Takeaways:**

* **Spatial Comparison:** The maps utilize Census block data, providing a more granular and accurate representation of voting patterns compared to traditional election district-based maps. This allows for a direct comparison of voting behavior across different years.
* **Identifying Trends:** The maps reveal the contours of support for various candidates, highlighting areas where certain candidates received strong support. For instance, the maps show the areas where [Candidate A] and [Candidate B] garnered significant votes, as well as regions where [Candidate C] enjoyed strong support.
* **Understanding Inactive Ballots:** The atlas also includes maps showcasing the distribution of inactive ballots in recent elections. Interestingly, the map of inactive ballots in the comptroller's race appears to align with the areas where [Candidate A] and [Candidate B] received substantial support. This suggests a potential correlation between voter turnout and candidate support.

**A Window into the 2016 Primary:**

By analyzing these maps and understanding the voting patterns of past elections, we can gain valuable insights into the potential outcomes of the 2016 presidential primary. This data can help strategists, candidates, and voters alike to better understand the political landscape and make informed decisions.

**Explore the Atlas:**

This Election Atlas provides a powerful tool for understanding the political dynamics of New York City. Explore the interactive maps and delve into the data to gain a deeper understanding of the city's voting history and the potential implications for the upcoming presidential primary. 

**Note:** The article uses placeholder names for candidates. You can replace these with the actual names of the candidates you want to highlight. 

## See Full Results and Maps from the New York Election: Uncovering Voting Patterns and Trends

**New York City, NY** -  The 2016 presidential primary is just around the corner, and understanding the city's voting patterns is crucial for predicting its outcome.  To help voters navigate the complex landscape of New York City politics, a new interactive election atlas has been launched, providing detailed maps and results from past elections. 

This comprehensive resource, powered by [Insert Name of Organization], offers a unique perspective on voting trends in the city.  It goes beyond traditional election district boundaries, analyzing results by Census block, allowing for a more granular understanding of voter preferences. 

**A Glimpse into the Past:**

The atlas includes data from citywide elections dating back to 2001, with the exception of years without significant elections.  This historical perspective allows for a direct comparison of voting patterns over time, revealing how local preferences have evolved.  

**Key Findings and Insights:**

* **Spatial Analysis:**  The maps highlight areas where certain candidates consistently received strong support, providing valuable insights into the geographic distribution of political ideologies.  For instance, the atlas reveals patterns of support for candidates like [Candidate A] and [Candidate B], as well as [Candidate C],  highlighting potential areas of focus for campaigns.
* **Inactive Ballots and Voter Turnout:**  The atlas also analyzes inactive ballots, providing insights into voter participation and potential areas where outreach efforts could be targeted.  The map of inactive ballots in the comptroller's race, for example, appears to follow the contours of where several candidates received strong support, suggesting a correlation between voter engagement and candidate preference.
* **Comparison with Gubernatorial and Presidential Elections:**  To provide further context, the atlas includes maps of recent gubernatorial and presidential elections, allowing for a comparison of voting patterns across different political contests. 

**A Resource for Voters and Analysts:**

This interactive election atlas is a valuable tool for voters, analysts, and anyone interested in understanding the complexities of New York City politics.  It provides a rich dataset and visually engaging maps that can help inform decisions and predict future election outcomes.  

**Visit [Website Address] to explore the interactive election atlas and delve deeper into the voting patterns of New York City.** 

## See Full Results and Maps from the New York Election: Uncovering Voter Trends and Geographic Patterns

The 2016 presidential primary in New York is just around the corner, and understanding the city's voting history is crucial for predicting upcoming trends. To provide context and insight, **This Election Atlas** offers a comprehensive collection of maps and data from recent New York City elections. 

This resource goes beyond simply presenting election results. It **geocodes** active registered voters by Census block, providing a granular look at voting patterns within neighborhoods and across the city. This allows for **apples-to-apples comparisons** between elections, revealing consistent voting tendencies and identifying shifts in voter behavior.

**Key Features of This Election Atlas:**

* **Visualizing Voter Turnout:** The Atlas maps voter turnout by Census block, offering a detailed view of areas with high and low participation.
* **Mapping Candidate Support:** The maps highlight areas where specific candidates received strong support, particularly in mayoral and comptroller races. This provides insights into the geographic distribution of candidate popularity.
* **Analyzing Inactive Ballots:** The Atlas examines patterns of inactive ballots, which can reveal areas with high voter suppression or disengagement.
* **Historical Context:** Data from elections between 2001 and 2012 (excluding years without significant citywide elections) provides a long-term perspective on voting trends.
* **Comparison to Gubernatorial and Presidential Elections:** The Atlas includes maps of recent gubernatorial and presidential elections, enabling comparisons with citywide races.

**Understanding the Data:**

The Atlas utilizes data from the NYC Board of Elections, which provides election results by Election District (ED) and overall citywide registration. By geocoding this data, the Atlas offers a more nuanced understanding of voting patterns within specific neighborhoods and communities.

**Implications for the 2016 Presidential Primary:**

This Election Atlas provides valuable context for understanding voter behavior in New York City, particularly in the upcoming presidential primary. It allows analysts and voters alike to identify key areas of support, potential voter suppression, and historical trends that may influence the outcome of the election.

**Explore the Data:**

Visit **This Election Atlas** to access the maps and data, and gain a deeper understanding of the complex and evolving voting landscape of New York City. 

## See Full Results and Maps from the New York Election: A Visual Guide to Voting Patterns

New York City's political landscape is complex and dynamic, with voting patterns revealing intricate social and geographic trends. To better understand these patterns and their potential impact on the upcoming 2016 presidential primary, a new interactive map, the "This Election Atlas," provides a comprehensive look at past election results. 

This tool goes beyond simple election district breakdowns, utilizing Census block data to paint a detailed picture of voter participation and preferences across New York City. By geocoding each year's active registered voters from 2001 to 2012 (excluding years with no citywide elections), the atlas offers an apples-to-apples comparison of local voting patterns over time. 

**Key Insights from the Atlas:**

* **The map of inactive ballots in the comptroller's race** offers compelling insights. The contours of inactive ballots strongly correlate with areas of high support for specific candidates, including **[Candidate Name]** and **[Candidate Name]**, as well as **[Candidate Name]**. 
* **Visualizing Election Results for Democratic Mayoral Candidates:** The atlas provides a unique perspective by visualizing election results for all Democratic mayoral candidates who have previously run for citywide office. This allows for deeper analysis of candidate appeal and voter preferences across different elections.
* **Comparison with Gubernatorial and Presidential Elections:** For a broader context, the atlas also includes maps of recent gubernatorial and presidential elections. This comparative analysis helps identify consistent voting patterns and any emerging trends.

**Using the Atlas for 2016:**

The "This Election Atlas" is a valuable tool for understanding the historical context of New York City elections. Its detailed visualizations can provide insights into potential voting patterns for the upcoming 2016 presidential primary. By analyzing the geographic distribution of voter participation, preferences, and candidate support over time, voters, political analysts, and campaign strategists can better understand the key factors influencing the electoral landscape.

**Powered by:** [Name of organization or project responsible for the atlas]

**Access the Atlas:** [Link to the interactive map]

**Note:** The specific names of candidates and the organization behind the atlas have been left blank for you to fill in based on the context you provided. 

Title: "New York Election Atlas: Full Results and Maps Unveiled"

In an effort to provide a comprehensive analysis of the New York election, an Election Atlas has been created, offering full results and maps from the recent primary elections. The Atlas provides a detailed look at the voting patterns in New York City, with a focus on the 2016 presidential primary.

The Atlas includes maps of the vote patterns for recent primary elections, as well as related trends in New York City. It also includes maps of recent gubernatorial and presidential elections for comparison and contrast. The maps are created by geocoding each year's active registered voters from registration files provided by the NYC Board of Elections, allowing for an apples-to-apples spatial comparison of the local voting patterns from one year to the next.

One of the most interesting features of the Atlas is the map of inactive ballots in the comptroller's race. This map appears to follow the contours of where several candidates received strong support, especially those who have previously run for citywide office. The map provides a visual representation of the election results for all the Democratic mayoral candidates, highlighting the areas where they received the most support.

The Atlas is powered by the NYC Board of Elections, which provides election results by Election District (ED) and all registered voters citywide. By mapping the results by Census block instead of election districts, the Atlas provides a more detailed and accurate representation of the voting patterns in New York City.

Overall, the New York Election Atlas is a valuable resource for anyone interested in understanding the voting patterns and trends in New York City. It provides a comprehensive look at the recent primary elections and related trends, and offers a detailed analysis of the voting patterns in the city. Whether you are a political analyst, a journalist, or simply a concerned citizen, the New York Election Atlas is a must-see for anyone interested in the New York election.
Title: New York Election Results: Full Maps and Analysis

The New York City Board of Elections has released the full results and maps of the recent primary elections, providing insights into the voting patterns of the city's residents. The maps show the contours of where several candidates received strong support, particularly in overlapping areas, and allow for an apples-to-apples spatial comparison of local voting patterns from one year to the next.

The Election Atlas, powered by the Board of Elections, includes maps of recent gubernatorial and presidential elections for comparison and contrast. The maps were created by geocoding each year's active registered voters from registration files provided by the NYC Board of Elections, allowing for easy analysis of voting patterns with Census data.

One notable map is that of inactive ballots in the comptroller's race, which appears to follow the contours of where several candidates received strong support. This map, in particular, visualizes election results for all the Democratic mayoral candidates who have previously run for citywide office.

The Board of Elections provides election results by Election District (ED), and all registered voters citywide. By mapping the results by Census block instead of election districts, the Election Atlas provides a more detailed and accurate representation of voting patterns in the city.

The maps also show related trends in New York City, providing context for the 2016 presidential primary. The results from elections from 2001 to 2012 (with the exception of the few years when there were no citywide elections of significance) were allocated to provide an apples-to-apples spatial comparison of the local voting patterns from one year to the next.

Overall, the full results and maps from the New York election provide valuable insights into the voting patterns of the city's residents and allow for a better understanding of the political landscape in New York. The Election Atlas is a powerful tool for analyzing voting patterns and trends, and will be a valuable resource for political analysts, researchers, and the general public.
Title: Full Results and Maps from New York Election Unveiled

In an effort to provide a comprehensive understanding of the recent New York election, a detailed election atlas has been released. The atlas, which includes full results and maps from the election, showcases the contours of where several candidates received strong support, particularly in overlapping areas. By geocoding each year's active registered voters from registration files provided by the NYC Board of Elections and mapping them by Census block instead of election districts, the atlas provides an apples-to-apples spatial comparison of local voting patterns from one year to the next.

The maps included in the atlas show the vote patterns for recent primary elections and related trends in New York City, providing context for the upcoming 2016 presidential primary. The data used in the atlas spans from 2001 to 2012, with the exception of the few years when there were no citywide elections of significance. This allows for easy analysis of voting patterns with Census data and comparison with recent gubernatorial and presidential elections.

One of the most striking maps in the atlas is the map of inactive ballots in the comptroller's race. This map appears to follow the same contours as where several candidates received strong support, including those who have previously run for citywide office. This visualization provides insight into the voting patterns of New York City and highlights areas of strong support for specific candidates.

The election atlas is powered by the NYC Board of Elections, which provides election results by Election District (ED) and all registered voters citywide. By mapping the results by Census block instead of election districts, the atlas provides a more granular view of voting patterns and helps to identify areas of strong support for specific candidates.

Overall, the election atlas provides a valuable resource for understanding the recent New York election and the voting patterns of the city. By showcasing full results and maps from the election, the atlas provides a comprehensive view of the election and highlights areas of strong support for specific candidates.
Title: New York Election Results: Full Breakdown and Maps Revealed

In a comprehensive and groundbreaking analysis, the New York Election Atlas has unveiled full results and detailed maps from the recent New York election. The information, presented in an easily digestible format, provides valuable insights into the voting patterns across the city's diverse neighborhoods. The maps highlight not only the distribution of support for the leading candidates but also reveal the nuances of the voting trends in New York City.

To create an accurate representation of the voting landscape, the Atlas has made use of data from the years 2001 to 2012, excluding periods that did not feature citywide elections of significance. This analysis has been made possible by geocoding the active registered voters from registration files provided by the New York City Board of Elections. This method ensures a consistent spatial comparison of voting patterns over the years and enables a detailed analysis of voting trends in conjunction with Census data.

The maps include results from recent gubernatorial and presidential elections, offering a comprehensive comparison and contrast. To achieve this level of detail, the analysis was conducted at the Census block level, rather than the traditional election district classification. This approach allows for a more granular interpretation of voting patterns and provides a clearer understanding of how the electorate is divided.

Interestingly, the map of inactive ballots in the comptroller's race aligns closely with the areas where certain candidates received significant support. This reveals underlying factors that might have influenced voter turnout and patterns. Moreover, the maps visualize election results for all the Democratic mayoral candidates who have previously run for citywide office. This comparison offers a unique perspective on the evolution and dynamics of New York's political landscape.

This Election Atlas has been made possible through cutting-edge technology and a collaborative effort between data analysts, cartographers, and political experts. It provides not only a snapshot of the current voting trends but also sets the stage for understanding the upcoming 2016 presidential primary.

In conclusion, the New York Election Atlas is an indispensable resource for anyone seeking a detailed understanding of the recent New York election. By presenting full results and maps that reveal voting patterns and trends, it offers crucial insights into the political landscape of the city. The analysis, which encompasses a wide range of data from multiple years, stands as a testament to the importance of historical context in analyzing contemporary political developments.

The Board of Elections' provision of election results by Election District, combined with the geocoded data of registered voters, has proved invaluable for conducting this analysis. As the 2016 presidential primary looms on the horizon, the insights and context provided by the New York Election Atlas will undoubtedly play a crucial role in shaping predictions and understanding the outcome.
Title: Mapping New York's Presidential Primary: Understanding Candidate Support and Voting Patterns

As the 2016 presidential primary approaches, New York's voting patterns and candidate support have been of significant interest to the political community. The interactive election atlas developed by the NYC Board of Elections provides voters with an in-depth look at historical voting data and helps to identify trends and key candidate support areas.

To gain a clearer picture of the state's voting patterns over time, the election atlas compiles data from elections held between 2001 and 2012, excluding years without substantial citywide elections. Geocoding active registered voters from registration files for each year, the atlas visualizes the local voting patterns on a Census block level rather than election districts. It enables a comprehensive look into voting trends and correlates them with demographical data available from the Census. 

The map of inactive ballots in the comptroller's race serves as an intriguing case study, revealing patterns in the support for several candidates, such as & and & . These candidates experienced a strong voter turnout in specific regions, as visualized by the map. In particular, the atlas provides a breakdown of the voting patterns for the Democratic mayoral candidates who have previously run for citywide office.

Comparative maps on gubernatorial and presidential elections also offer insights into voter preferences and help to identify common patterns. By mapping voting trends for previous elections, voters can assess the strengths and weaknesses of candidates within the New York electoral landscape. 

Furthermore, the election atlas presents a detailed analysis of the primary elections' vote patterns in New York City. The maps highlight where candidates have received significant support and outline local trends in the voting population. This information serves as crucial background for understanding the state's political landscape as the 2016 presidential primary nears.

By showcasing interactive voting maps and historical candidate data, the election atlas serves as a valuable resource for New York residents seeking to make an informed decision during the upcoming elections. The data provided not only helps citizens to better understand their state's voting patterns but also serves as a springboard for political discourse and engagement in local democratic processes.
**See Full Results and Maps from the New York Election**

The 2016 presidential primary has brought attention to the diverse voting patterns across New York City. To provide context for the recent election, we have created an interactive map that visualizes the vote patterns for recent primary elections and related trends in the city.

Our map allocates the results from elections from 2001 to 2012, with the exception of a few years when there were no citywide elections of significance. This allows for an apples-to-apples spatial comparison of local voting patterns from one year to the next, and also enables easy analysis of voting patterns with Census data.

We geocoded each year's active registered voters from registration files provided by the NYC Board of Elections, providing a detailed breakdown of voting patterns by Census block, rather than election districts. This level of granularity offers a more nuanced understanding of the city's voting trends.

The map reveals interesting contours of support for several candidates, particularly in areas where they received strong backing. For example, the map of inactive ballots in the comptroller's race appears to follow the contours of support for certain candidates. Our map also visualizes election results for all the Democratic mayoral candidates who have previously run for citywide office.

In addition to the maps, we have included data from recent gubernatorial and presidential elections for comparison and contrast. This provides a comprehensive understanding of the city's voting patterns and trends over time.

**Key Findings:**

* The map highlights areas of strong support for certain candidates, which can inform campaign strategies and voter outreach efforts.
* The data reveals trends in voting patterns over time, which can help identify shifts in public opinion and sentiment.
* The use of Census block-level data provides a more detailed understanding of voting patterns than traditional election district-level data.

**Explore the Maps:**

Our interactive map allows users to explore the voting patterns and trends in New York City in detail. Users can zoom in and out of specific areas, view data from different elections, and compare voting patterns across different years.

**Methodology:**

Our map was created using data from the NYC Board of Elections, which provides election results by Election District (ED) and all registered voters citywide. We geocoded each year's active registered voters from registration files provided by the Board of Elections, and allocated the results from elections from 2001 to 2012.

**Conclusion:**

Our Election Atlas provides a comprehensive understanding of voting patterns and trends in New York City. By visualizing election results and trends over time, we hope to inform campaign strategies, voter outreach efforts, and public discourse. Explore the maps and data to gain a deeper understanding of the city's diverse voting patterns.
**See Full Results and Maps from the New York Election**

The 2016 presidential primary has brought out a diverse range of voters across New York City, with various candidates receiving strong support in different neighborhoods and districts. To provide context for the recent election results, we have analyzed voting patterns from previous elections in the city, going back to 2001.

Our Election Atlas, powered by data from the NYC Board of Elections, provides a comprehensive look at the contours of support for various candidates in recent primary elections. By geocoding each year's active registered voters by Census block, we are able to provide an apples-to-apples spatial comparison of local voting patterns from one year to the next.

One notable trend that emerges from our analysis is the strong support for certain candidates in specific neighborhoods. For example, our map of inactive ballots in the comptroller's race shows a clear correlation with the contours of support for [Candidate A] and [Candidate B]. This suggests that voters in these areas may be more likely to support candidates with similar platforms or values.

Our maps also provide insight into the voting patterns of different demographic groups. By overlaying election results with Census data, we can see how different neighborhoods and communities have voted in recent elections. This information can be useful for candidates looking to target specific groups or areas in their campaigns.

In addition to our analysis of primary elections, we have also included maps of recent gubernatorial and presidential elections. These maps provide a broader context for understanding the voting patterns in New York City and how they may impact the 2016 presidential primary.

Some key findings from our analysis include:

* [Candidate A] received strong support in neighborhoods such as [Neighborhood 1] and [Neighborhood 2], which have historically voted Democratic.
* [Candidate B] performed well in areas with high concentrations of [Demographic Group 1], such as [Neighborhood 3] and [Neighborhood 4].
* The map of inactive ballots in the comptroller's race suggests that voters in certain areas may be more likely to support candidates with a strong track record on [Issue 1].

Overall, our Election Atlas provides a valuable resource for understanding the complex voting patterns in New York City. By analyzing election results and demographic data, we can gain a deeper understanding of the issues and candidates that resonate with different communities and neighborhoods.

**View the full results and maps from the New York election here.**

**Methodology:**

Our analysis is based on data from the NYC Board of Elections, which provides election results by Election District (ED). We geocoded each year's active registered voters by Census block, allowing for a more detailed analysis of voting patterns. We also overlaid election results with Census data to provide insight into the demographic characteristics of different neighborhoods and communities.
**Full Results and Maps from the New York Election: A Detailed Analysis**

The recent primary elections in New York City have shed light on the voting patterns and trends that will shape the 2016 presidential primary. To provide context for these elections, we have created an Election Atlas that maps the vote patterns for recent primary elections and related trends in New York City. Our analysis includes the allocation of results from elections from 2001 to 2012, allowing for an apples-to-apples spatial comparison of local voting patterns from one year to the next.

The maps, powered by our Election Atlas, provide a detailed breakdown of the vote patterns by Census block, rather than election districts. This approach enables a more nuanced understanding of the voting trends in each area, as well as easy analysis of voting patterns with Census data. We have also geocoded each year's active registered voters from registration files provided by the NYC Board of Elections, ensuring an accurate representation of the electorate.

One of the most striking features of the maps is the contour of support for several candidates, particularly & , as well as . The map of inactive ballots in the comptroller's race appears to follow a similar pattern, highlighting the areas where these candidates received strong support. Our analysis also visualizes election results for all the Democratic mayoral candidates who have previously run for citywide office, providing valuable insights into their strengths and weaknesses.

The Election Atlas includes maps of recent gubernatorial and presidential elections, allowing for comparison and contrast with the current primary elections. By examining these maps, voters and analysts can gain a deeper understanding of the trends and patterns that are shaping the electoral landscape in New York City.

**Key Takeaways:**

* The maps show a strong correlation between voting patterns and demographic trends, with certain candidates performing well in areas with high concentrations of specific ethnic or socioeconomic groups.
* The contour of support for several candidates, particularly & , as well as , is evident in the maps, highlighting areas where they received strong support.
* The map of inactive ballots in the comptroller's race follows a similar pattern, suggesting that these areas may be crucial in determining the outcome of future elections.
* The Election Atlas provides a valuable resource for voters, analysts, and candidates seeking to understand the complexities of the New York City electorate.

**Explore the Maps:**

To explore the maps in more detail, visit our Election Atlas, where you can interact with the data and gain a deeper understanding of the voting patterns and trends in New York City. By examining these maps, you can gain valuable insights into the electoral landscape and make informed decisions about the upcoming presidential primary.

**Methodology:**

Our analysis is based on election results from 2001 to 2012, with the exception of years when there were no citywide elections of significance. We allocated the results by Census block, rather than election districts, to provide a more nuanced understanding of voting patterns. We also geocoded each year's active registered voters from registration files provided by the NYC Board of Elections, ensuring an accurate representation of the electorate.
**New York Election Results and Maps: A Detailed Breakdown**

The 2016 presidential primary has been one of the most highly contested in recent history, with several candidates vying for the top spot. In New York, the election saw a significant turnout, with many voters casting their ballots for their preferred candidate. Now, with the results in, we can take a closer look at where each candidate received strong support and identify trends in the city's voting patterns.

Our Election Atlas provides a detailed breakdown of the election results, using maps to visualize the vote patterns for recent primary elections and related trends in New York City. The maps are based on data from the New York City Board of Elections, which provided active registered voters from registration files from 2001 to 2012. This allows for an apples-to-apples spatial comparison of local voting patterns from one year to the next, as well as easy analysis of voting patterns with Census data.

One of the most interesting trends to emerge from the maps is the contours of support for several candidates. In particular, the map of inactive ballots in the comptroller's race appears to follow the contours of where several candidates received strong support, especially [Candidate A] and [Candidate B]. This suggests that these candidates may have performed well in areas with high concentrations of inactive voters.

The maps also provide insight into the voting patterns of Democratic mayoral candidates who have previously run for citywide office. For example, [Candidate C] performed well in areas with high concentrations of registered Democrats, while [Candidate D] did better in areas with a more evenly split voter base.

In addition to the candidate-specific maps, our Election Atlas includes maps of recent gubernatorial and presidential elections. These maps provide context for the 2016 presidential primary and allow for easy comparison and contrast with previous elections.

To create the maps, we geocoded each year's active registered voters from registration files provided by the NYC Board of Elections by Census block, instead of election districts. This provides a more detailed and accurate picture of voting patterns in each area.

The full results and maps can be viewed below:

**Maps:**

* Map 1: Presidential Primary Election Results by Census Block
* Map 2: Gubernatorial Election Results by Census Block
* Map 3: Comptroller's Race Inactive Ballots by Census Block
* Map 4: Democratic Mayoral Candidates' Vote Patterns by Census Block

**Results:**

* Presidential Primary Election Results
* Gubernatorial Election Results
* Comptroller's Race Results
* Democratic Mayoral Candidates' Results

By analyzing these maps and results, voters and campaign strategists can gain a better understanding of the voting patterns and trends in New York City. Whether you're a candidate looking to target specific areas or a voter trying to make sense of the election results, our Election Atlas provides a valuable resource for understanding the complexities of the New York election.
**SEE FULL RESULTS AND MAPS FROM THE NEW YORK ELECTION**

As the 2016 presidential primary heats up, a new analysis of recent primary elections and voting trends in New York City provides insight into the contours of support for various candidates. By examining data from elections spanning over a decade, a comprehensive picture emerges of the city's voting patterns, highlighting areas of strong support for several key candidates.

**Uncovering Patterns in Voting Behavior**

To understand the dynamics at play, an Election Atlas was created to visualize election results by Census block, rather than traditional election districts. This approach allows for a more nuanced analysis of voting trends, enabling apples-to-apples comparisons between different years and facilitating the integration of Census data.

By geocoding active registered voters from registration files provided by the NYC Board of Elections, researchers were able to identify patterns of support for various candidates in recent primary elections. These maps show that certain candidates, particularly [candidate names], have received strong support in specific areas of the city.

**Analysis of Inactive Ballots**

Interestingly, an analysis of inactive ballots in the comptroller's race reveals that they tend to overlap with areas where several candidates have traditionally received strong support. This phenomenon raises questions about voter engagement and participation in local elections.

**Mayoral Candidates' Performance**

For context, the Election Atlas also includes maps of recent gubernatorial and presidential elections. Additionally, it visualizes election results for all the Democratic mayoral candidates who have previously run for citywide office, providing a comprehensive look at their performance in different areas of the city.

**Understanding Voting Trends**

The Election Atlas is a valuable tool for anyone seeking to understand the complex dynamics of voting behavior in New York City. By examining the spatial distribution of votes over time, researchers and analysts can gain a deeper understanding of the city's electoral landscape and the issues that drive voter engagement.

**Explore the Full Results and Maps**

To delve deeper into the data, explore the full results and maps from the New York election. Access interactive maps and data visualizations to gain a more nuanced understanding of voting trends in the city.