Renewables: both short- and long-term, no. I don’t think we should dominate subsidy energy unless it’s cost-effective with no government subsidy and competes solely based on the full lifecycle cost and benefits. To answer the question [on] USA energy dominance: I think we can, if all energy competes in the open market. I don’t think the public has a decent enough appreciation of everything the free market brings, both in terms of innovation, and helping us understand what we don’t even know that we don’t know right now. And if we were to do that, I think it would actually be easy.