N.lzi6cation yEnsus .Dsosoeracy.
{"character_count": 2916, "word_count": 501, "ccnet_language_score": [0.9348999857902527], "ccnet_perplexity": [1979.9000244140625], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}



REpUsL1cANs Of North Carolina, who
are those That hold to and maintain the de-
raocratic doctrine Of Jef1erson, Madison and
t. kson, that the will Of the people must be
supreme? Are they the nulliiers and fed.
eralists, supporting Webster, or Harrison,
or White, as seapedaency may dictate z Or.
are they not the Democratic party. who
support Magtam .Yan Bnreaa? sss aE sc GE


Look abroad in other States who are
the supporters of Judge White2 Why,
the old federelst B. w. Leigh OF Virgin
ia, and the new nulllfer John G. Calhoun
of South Carolina.


And who are the friends and support
ers of Mr.. Van Burenq William c. Rives,
with the old sterling Republicans of Vir-
ginia and Gov. Bennett. with the whole
Union party Of South Carolina. @


Look at home who are the foremost
advocates of Judge Whites name? Why,
the old federalist and a,eao nuli6er Willie
P. Mangum-Ex.G Cows. Iredell and Swain.
and so ON. And who are the friends and
supporters of Mr.. Van Buren, Those
veterans of the Revolution and fathers of
the Democratic party, the Hon. NAT. Ma
CON and Col. RoBERT LOVE, (now Elec-
toral candidates on the Van Buren, ticket)
with Judge DANIEL, and others Of the old
and tried Republicans. a6


Let Republicans look into their neigh
borhoods, and carry their memories back
to the darkest hours Of the Republic, when
Federalism overshadowed the state, and
see if those who were then against their
country, are not now for judge White.
Recollect, at later period, when there
was an alarm and anxiety for the Union
and is not every man who then aided the
disunionists of South Carolina, a supporter
of Judge White now


In 1882, the following resolution against
Modification, was passed in our Legisla-
ture,; Ayes 40. Noes 9, viz. 5l,.f..'.~!


Resolved, Tha: the doctrine of Notification,
as held by the State of South Carolina, and late
ly promulgated in an ordinance, is isrevolutionary
in its character ani leads to dissolution Of the
Union"


Who were those that voted in the mega
tive on this resolution, and thus indicated
that they thought South Carolina was not
wrong in her revolutionary" measures
Why, NuLL1E1ERs, every soul ofthem, and
SoPPSi.StS VI 'uoSo 5" Ai'o oS "iil oS SSeAA
by the following


Noyes MesSrs. Bailey, Bell OF Camden, Car
son, Faison Of Northampton, Johnathan J. Lind
say, Matthews, Montgomery of Hertford Sted.
man, and Wellborn.


So in the proceedings of the Legislature
Of 1884, those who voted against the reso-
luton asserting the right to instruct, are
all now for Judge White


Thus it will be seen. that the Wing, or
combination party, who support Judge
White is made up of nullifers, disunion.
lists and federalists.-with no one princi-
pie in common to unite them, save COM
mon repugnance to the Democratic prin-
ciple of the supremacy of the people, and
a common hatred for all those eminent Re-
'publicans who have been distinguished by
the favor of the people