{"character_count": 856, "word_count": 137, "ccnet_language_score": [0.953499972820282], "ccnet_perplexity": [2129.699951171875], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}
The Attorney General of the Unted States, in an opinion addressed to the Sec retary of State, it is said, opposes the right of Arkansas 10 do more than propose q Constitution for the consideration of Con eress. The Attorney Generals political friends hold different doctrine with regard to Michigan, and urge the right of her Sen ators and Representative 10 take their seats unquestioned. Wherein the difference lies we cannot tell, except 1t be in thls-thai Arkansas has not gone so far in boarding the general government, as Michigan. The National lnteligencer says-alluding to this matter--s'if we mistake not, the same opinion has been considered by the Executive of the United States, applicable to both Territories"-leaying the inference that the President does not consider tne members of Congress from Michigan as entitled to their seats.--Mo. Rep.