THE BANKRUPT Law.
{"character_count": 1864, "word_count": 337, "ccnet_language_score": [0.9713000059127808], "ccnet_perplexity": [1927.699951171875], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}
The repudiating papers are trying hard &c


make political capital out ofthe Bankrupt Law,
and endeavoring TO create prejudice against
those unfortunate men who were compelled to
take the benefit of that act. 1t is true that they
disclaim any intention of the kind but they hold
them up to the world as a-orse than repudiators.
They know that large number of honest men
and good democrats have availed themselves OF
this measure Of relief, and they try TO soothe
their feelings BY "sofl sawder'' at the same time
that they are publishing the names Of others who
took The benefit OF the law, in capital letters and
inSinuate that they worse than regulators.
This is desperate effort to create counter cur
ton, as the light OF truth QasheS upon the minds
of the people. But it cannot impose upon the
most ordinary mind that Will examine the sub
Ject. Whatever may be the policy of the Bank
rupt Law, is not for the unfortunate debtor to en-
quire. II is enough for him to know that il is
the law OF the land, and not only appearing upon
the statute books, but that it has gone through
the ordeal of the Judiciary, who have decided it
constitutional We believe, that without sim
gle exception, the Judges of the Supreme Court
of the U s. have so pronounced it in every in
stance in which it has arisen. We know that
Judge Caron, Mckinley. and perhaps some 9TH
ers, have declared it constitutional. w hat<blame
then is attached TO a man who honestly takes the
bankrupt law? Does the Guard which publish


ed several hundred bankrupts in the last year


really think those men culnahle1 If not why
does il compare them with men who have bor


rowed money, feasted upon it, now enjoy lis
benefits, and repudiate its repayment upon
technical bubble, which is declared groundless
by every one out of the State, and by every tri


bunal in the State, which can act upon itl