TIE GRAND TOURISTS.

q see them on their winding way. ,
{"character_count": 2252, "word_count": 402, "ccnet_language_score": [0.9685999751091003], "ccnet_perplexity": [1541.699951171875], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}


 Senators Sevier and Fulton, and Conway B, are taking the grand rounds, for the Pur- pose of having the proceedings of the hast Legislature in relation to the sale of the 500 bonds, expmged at the next session from the journals of the House. The last IN orth Arkansas gives Col. Sevier's speech at Batesville, in which he abuses the com mittce in that coarse En0ct-domn-and-drag- oM style, for which he is more distinguished than for any thing he has ever done-the sale of the 300 bonds excepted. The pa pers of the State catch portion ot hls magnificent slang 1rbaRgiRg, and amongst those he 'wools the Telegraph sonte' As the Telegraph does not live, like some syco- phantic spirits who could not live without 1t. by the smiles and patronage of any big bug. 1t will endeavor to survive this first touch of Senatorial denuneiation. We stand upon our own humble merits and the merits of our cause, and would spurn the prosper ity to be gained by swinging to the skirts of any distinguished Bond-seller.

 Washington TelegraPh.

 The above we have clipped from the Tel cgraph of the 18th inst. It purports 10 owe its origin to a statement made by Col Seyier, in his speech at Batesville, to wit: '.That the report of the Bank Committee was pub lished in the Telegraph, paper published in the vicinity of Red River, above the great raft, and of course on the borders of Texas" This Is the Wooling the editor refers to, and which has given to the editor pretext for his islanders

 The Colonel, no doubt, will rejoice to learn, that this mendicant who begged his aid so pitcously last fall, in his efforts to ob- tain subordinate clerkship from his friends in the legislature, is now in a condition to live without any such beggarly appeals in future; and if so, he will readily forgive him for his ingrattude, as the Col. is accustomed to such requitals.

 What the Col. said of his paper was true. He did publish the report referred to, and while still bearing at the head of his paper the flag of neutrality, the said ingrate, refused to publish the Col's defence of himself against that libel, even with every thing of a personal character taken from it Yes, he refused to publish it, whilst the Gazette and the Times $ Advocate gratuitously did so.