WHOLE no. soy.
{"character_count": 1727, "word_count": 295, "ccnet_language_score": [0.944599986076355], "ccnet_perplexity": [2296.300048828125], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}
shall De able 70 change the climate snd the entire
nature OF the soil, that they can grow rice and
:. cotton on cur granite cliffs of New-Esgiandi


This remark ostrays worse moral feature than
tha, of ignorence. fos il imputes to Fourier and
his disciples puerility and shallowuess CT views,
| of which in not one OF their writings they have
been guilty. They wish TO establish an Associa-
tios so that the world can judge Of the principles
in practice on small SCALE and then spread and
r.nder then, universal. The Associations In differ
ent paris OF the globe will deal extensively with
each other,--exchangiug fheit predictions, &c,
and communication by travelling and other means
will De universal.


Bus Mr.. Brownson himself eon,radicts in the
November number of the same Periodical the
assertion which we have quoted above. He says,
speaking of the Brook Farm Association, that
Fourier proposes with malice atorethoushs' the
reorganization of society," In another place, that
the Brook Farm Community seems to him to es-
cape all the objections which he has raised against
Fourier. q 1t IS simple, unpre,erding, and pre-
sents itself by means grand plan of world
reform or OF socia! organz ation aud little lower
''No man among Us (speaking of Mr.. Ripley, the
founder of Brook Farm is better acquainrcdwih
the various plans of world-reform which have been
projected from Pla,os Republic to Fourier's Pha-
lanx"!.


We beg of Mr.. Brownson, for the sake of his
own reputation, to study the system ef Fourier be-
fore he talks freely Iii attracting the atten-
ton of the country far more than any system. OF
philosophy or any other plan of social reform, which


is naw advocated, and he should not be ighorant
OF it. B.