{"character_count": 876, "word_count": 164, "ccnet_language_score": [0.9704999923706055], "ccnet_perplexity": [1758.5999755859375], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}
The GRAVE ROBBERY AT NEw-ORLEAss.-
The yound man Connah, or Conner whose theft
of jewels from grave we mentioned some time
since, pleaded guilty to the charge on the l7sh
But a difficult question has arisen concerning the
measure of punishment or, indeed, whether the
law has provided any punishment at all for the Of
fence. 1t appears that the heir Of Madame Ter
nan, with whose corpse the jewels were buried,
sold the land IN which the tomb was constructed
some years 0g 9, and that the person to yhom he
sold it is dead. Now the question is, WIN has
been wronged by the robbery of the jewels Not
Madame Ternan, surely, for she is dead not her
heir, for ne sold the tomb and its contents. Had
the State property interest in the jewels And
if it had not, could it prosecute for the robbery
The whole question was to be argued before The
Court, on the motion to pass sentence.