From Me Hampaen (Mass.l Post.
{"character_count": 1840, "word_count": 324, "ccnet_language_score": [0.9729999899864197], "ccnet_perplexity": [2207.699951171875], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}
IS JOHN TYLER A DEMOCRAT?

 It is claimed by his friends that he is; but we must see better evidence of his democracy than we have yet seen, to admit the claim So far as his administration is concerned. we are disposed to yield a generous support to such of its measures as are purely democrat lc; and this, without in any way endorsing the democracy of the man. Beyond this. we cannot go. Should Mr. Tyler, through the residue of his administration, pursue a strictly democratic policy, he will scarcely atone for the defections of the past. For his vetoes of the bank bills we thank him: but the merit of these acts cannot sanctify his errors; nor can we, as yet, discover any very strong evidence of determination to make hls administration democratic one True.

 he has called two democrats to his Cabinet but the restless spirits of 1840 have still the preponderance there. True, he is appoint- ln99- democrats to office in different places put It IS equally true that, other qualifications oehg sufficient, In many instances 1t is re- equlslte that man be something more than a mere democrat to entitle him to favorable eohsfieration. In dispensing executive ia vors, instead of evincng his affinity to the whole democratic family, he evidently aims. III me nam, to conciliate but one branch of it. m New Hampshire, he has thrown himself. influence, patronage and all, into the arms of a !, man who has done all he could do to ruin the democratic party, and who is now wield- Ing the Presidential power to crush and pros trate the lron-nerved democracy of that mo- pie State. There, true and worthy democrats, who never bowed the knee to Baal, have been thrust from office at the beck of this same re- 'reant Others may. overlook this; we cannot.

 We cannot forget that Nr. Tyler acquiesced n the frauds and ialsehools, the miserable