{"character_count": 625, "word_count": 103, "ccnet_language_score": [0.9897000193595886], "ccnet_perplexity": [1236.0], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}
Well done, PRENTICE, for once. It was the old federal party, was it, < that brought it, (the old United States Bank into exist ence, and sustained its operations" Then to advocate the chartering of another United States Bank, is federal. Very candid, as well as very true. But there is another important admission in the above extract-it is this, that banks are intended mainly to benefit the stockholders. Seven-tenths of the stock was owned by Englishmen, and it was natural, therefore, that tic rcpa5Iican party should look with distrust upon the measure (the re-charter) that was mainly to benefit English men. KentuckiaR