{"character_count": 1247, "word_count": 223, "ccnet_language_score": [0.9584000110626221], "ccnet_perplexity": [2182.39990234375], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}
The Guard takes supreme delight IN
searching out expressions used by US IN
times past, and setting them up as offsets 10
The anti,democratic remarks Of his brother
Brownson of the Democratic Review


The language extracted BY the Guard was
unguarded in US. and certainly does 90 be-
yond our long cherished opinions upon the
subject of the right of suffrage. That uni
versal suffrage has many evils cannot be de-
nied. for large portion Of every communi-
ty are incapable Of giving sound and in
telIigent vote, however honest may be their
intentions But notwithstanding the evils
of ii, we can never devise a voting qualifica-
ton which will not be liable 20 objections.
If it be one Of properly, many of our best
voters are poor. Ii of education, then will
many of our wealthy, and honest citizens be
excluded, while the most unprincipled in
solvents will be admitted In view of the
whole subject then, we know ofno plan un-
and would not disturb the
system of universal suffrage with all IFS evils.
But supposing our opinions 10 be as the
garbled extract of the Guard would seem
to imply, (Which they are not) it would be
bat The opinion of an individual, for which
the party is no more responsible, than the
Guard is for those of Mr.. Brownson.