Candidates for Congress.
{"character_count": 1466, "word_count": 264, "ccnet_language_score": [0.9710000157356262], "ccnet_perplexity": [2296.699951171875], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}
At the head of our columns we have a
ticket--a good, staunch-sure enough
whig ticket. We ought TO have one
the Wing party ought to have one. We
like this ticket-but we will support ano-
ther fairly selected. We take 20 merit
in choosing ticket-the names had been
suggested by others. As we have had
aConvention, it seems unnecessary TO
have another for this purpose. The
Whig papers can make and agree upon
their selections, and in choosing men OF
high character, the end will be obtained
as we'll in this way--a ticket can easily
be agreed on by the press which will be
unanimously supported by all wings.


The fact is jackson Convention is
looked on with suspicion-this mode Of
selection will be dictated by the known
preferences OF the Wing people in The
several districts.


But one way or another we insist that
we must run ticket. We have done
what we could to district the State aud
obey the law of Congress, and have fail
ed TO effect it. Shall we then suffer the
focos to take advantage of their own
wrong, and run in one of their tickets?
A democratic" Congress will admit the
candidates elected to their seats. Ifthey
are rejected, it will not be our fault, and
whichever candidates are elected we
shall not then be msrepresented by
locos.


We are bound in selfdefence to run
a whig ticket, good and true--and the
whig party especially in this section,
can be united on no other. What say
our Whig friends in South Mississippi?
What says the Whig press?