For the Banner.
{"character_count": 3223, "word_count": 592, "ccnet_language_score": [0.9610999822616577], "ccnet_perplexity": [2014.0999755859375], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}
MR. EDlToR:-l see d second eiiusion from :. One Who 1hinks,o in the Gazette of the 25th inst, attempting to exonerate the Bank Committee, who censured Col. Sevier for retaining Sl4,00U, (not half the amount of his stock, which is not denied by any one, he was entitled to under the provision of the charter, the moment the bank went into op- eration.

 As have despaired of convincing ss One Uho Ihiaks of the similarity of the case of DeBaun and Sevier, will attempt to show to the public, that the cases are parallel-if any odds, 1t is in favor of Sevier.

 He says, ssbecause Sevier paid broker to aid him in the sale of the bonds, and gave him S5.000,o therefore, there Is no simiafi- ty,-DeBaun was no agent 10 sell, lis true, but he was an agent to deliver to the War Department 200 bonds already sold, and to receive the money for them, which he did, and out of that amount, which was the cap- ital of the State Bank, he retained a,500, then if DeBaun could retain S9,5Q0 of the eapi- tai of the State Bank, why could not Sevier retain halt the amount of his stock-llpon the same principle Eff neither had right un- der the charter, why < tchiteacdsh , DeBaun, a good whg, and clever man. and arraign Seyier in his absence, before an iaguiSitoriat con,mitee, and now refuse to allow him re- hearing before the next Legislature. You condemn public servant upon crparta tes- timony, and denounce him for asking a ner lriai. The Constitution, justice, and fair dealing, would allow the veriest vagabond in the State to be heard by x himself aud counsei." But if snap judgment can be ta- ken against a leading democrat, he is abused and blackguarded for asking for fair and im- partial trial, while thorough whig, for si- miar act, is excused without a hard word.

 ' ou ask me "rhy drag Hie name Of De- Baum bsforc He pu5ic2n How compass sionate you wings are , how sensitive, to see the name of one of your party brought to notice .-even if the object of the writer was not 10 censure-as most seriously avow- but only to show the parallel between the 1 acts of democrat and rhie, and the action on 2EIAsaa- =s===sier of this article has a much higher regard for Mr. DeBaun than :. One Who Thinks and his name is connect ed with the Hon. Senator's, to show to the people, that ''because ye. are not of my faith, ye are eondemned.n

 Will you answer oandidly, and with view to inform the public, whether the Sa,50o, re- tained by DeBann, was not the capital of the State Bank, and whether the charter allowed the loaning or retaining the capital of the Bank:

 If you answer in the affirmative, tell the public the difference between DeBaun's re- tamlng S9,5o0 of the capital of the State Bank, and Sevier's retaining Sl4,000 of the capitdf of the Real Estate Bank.

 Did the charter of either bank contemplate the loaning the capital of either, and if it was retained by DeBaun, to the amount of S9,500. why could not Seyier retain half the amount of his stock, which you admit was $30,0002

 know you to be man of too much can- dor, and good sense, to attempt an evasion of a fair and impartial investigation leave sigla for once of men and politics, and .Sgive unto Cesar he things that are Casar's.'' l ONE WHO KNOWS