{"character_count": 1307, "word_count": 241, "ccnet_language_score": [0.9789999723434448], "ccnet_perplexity": [1873.0], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}
lsi2, 10 relation TO this fund and
they are therefore impelled 10 the con-
olusion, that tho Governor vas not
correct in the information which be
communicated 10 the Secretary Of the
Treasury ; and that the State Treasu-
rer was not authorized, by law, to
draw al moneys due the State from
"all sources" But as your commit
tee are uf opinion that the Secretary Of
the Treasury acted with reasonable
caution, and used due diligence in
this matter and that the money was
paid in good faith to our Treasurer,
the committee believe that It would be
unjust and improper, after the money
had been received into our Treasury,
to call upon The United Slatesto make
good the loss which our Slate was like
y to sustain by the smbezzlement
Of those funds BY our own officer.


But there is a further reason why it is
now too late to Sc. up this claim
The books Of the Auditor OF Public
Accounts, as we'll as those Of the
Treasury show that this money has
been received into the Treasury. BY
the advice Of the Governor aud atlOF-
ney General, the Auditor, on tho 2lst
DAY Of February, A. D. 1s43, issued
bis receipt warrant to the Treasurer,
which authorized him to receive this
money into the Treasury, and pass
the same TO the credit Of the State ;
which was accordingly done upon the
books Of the Treasury department