{"character_count": 881, "word_count": 165, "ccnet_language_score": [0.9876000285148621], "ccnet_perplexity": [2172.300048828125], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}
it entirely upon the ground of its moral frmness
for we are not arguing its consitutionality) John
Tyler deserves the thanks not only Of the Repub-
ican party, but Of every conscientious man OF the
w hig party.


Who is so hardened think, that rhe Presi
dent ought NOT have done, under oatA that which
he believed be right, is wanting in charity
as 10 affirm that what he thus did, he knew to be
wrong2 Would he not have been peIjured man,
entertaining the views which be did, to have acted
in any other way? Yet for this he has been OSsai-
ed has been denounced as traitor, has been burnt
in efigY. For what? Why, for abandoning prin-
ciples which they must have known Re never
held, and this has been done too by a party,
the leaders of whom could not be ignorant, that
they acting in disguise and had made no
exposition Of their sentiments for the "public eye'


WESTERN FARMER.