{"character_count": 1015, "word_count": 179, "ccnet_language_score": [0.9876999855041504], "ccnet_perplexity": [2235.300048828125], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}
The Banner, in answer to that profound question proposed by" North Arkansas" of the Gazette, as to what Harrison would say, if he were alive y Sc, spoke not of the lamenled chieftain, but of that foul whig seeref committee, who, for aught we know, are all alive, and living disgrace to repub- lieanism It was they that suggested the weakness Of their candidate, in attempting to stand as private advisers to one who was aspiring for the Presidency of the United States and it is the editor of the Gazette that has committed sacrilege in calling for the opinion of the dedd, on matters that concern the living With how much respect he calls his name--eould he not have said Gen. eral Harrison--not, |" "what Harrison would say,n as though he were calling to some school-boy, by his nickname-eould he not have called him the ldte PreSidem, or even the lancnied or the renerabie Harrison'

 How much more respectful !--Speak not lightly of the venerable dead, it Is impious. Why, then, was his name mentioned at all !?