{"character_count": 1301, "word_count": 234, "ccnet_language_score": [0.9692000150680542], "ccnet_perplexity": [2261.39990234375], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}
Mr. Roor gave history of ths proceedings of
tie company, and sposc at lens,si in support of
the bill. He mad hored, he said, to see the road
made state work but as the majority would not
consent to this, he wished TO see the next best
course taken, He spoke of the injustice CT deny
ing to tbs southern counties any return for the In
juries they had sustained from the improvements
through the centre CT the state. He referred TO
facts to show tina, if this road were completed
it would be the mos. productive work in the state,
the Erie canal alone excepted, and weuld easily
pay off all the snor liens which this bill allowed,
and the three millions advanced by the state be-
sides.


Mr.. DIcX1ssos followed in supper, OF the same
-iews. and the bill was dehsted by different mem
be,s until the Senate, after an Executive session,
adjourned.


In ASSEMBLY, Mr. CHURCH reported in favor
of publishing. the repers OF the receiver of the
Commercial Bank of this city the report was
adopted.


Mr.. SopER introduced bill in relation to fees
of Surrogates The bill relative to criminal courts
in this city, was then referred Committee of the
Whole The bill to incorpate the Merchants In
surance Co., was then sent to e Select Committee
A number OF private bill. were then passed and
the House adjourned.