THE SCHOOL COMMISSIONER.
{"character_count": 1689, "word_count": 311, "ccnet_language_score": [0.9793000221252441], "ccnet_perplexity": [830.2999877929688], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}
The New London Advocate copies our article assigning the reasons why the whigs of Li,chfeld had long desired and often urged the removal of the present School Commissioned. and comments up on it at considerable length. The first reaScn the editor considers of little weight and utterly repudiates the doCtrine of " rotation" We think we could set him right on that point, were we so disposed; but a importe. He proceeds

 The other reasons offered by the Litch> field paper, are, however, of diferen char acier, and if they are well grounded in fact, the legislature ought not to hesitate in acts ing on them. There certainly is DO wisdom in keeping a locofoco in and good whig cut of an office in which that incumbent has acted as MT B. is charged with having done. It would be carrying party magna~ nimity too far, and Mr. B. ought by all means to be removed. Not, however, for the third reason enumerated in the list, for we can see nothing particularly reprehen> sve ill that. That gentleman has as good light to be a locofoco as we have to be whigs, and as good right to be the candi- date of his party for the office O. Governor, as any other man-but fine has prostituted his station to any such purposes as are charged upon him, we would walk him out of it the first time that our own party ass csndantly gave us the power 10 do so. We trust the legislature will, act in that behslt as kec0islls .t'u .der tie cigcumstanceS. We hope the majority wilsin this and all other cases. study the interests of the party they represents, so az they can do SO consistently with the still higher obltga tions they are under 10 lhe interests and the character of the whole state-and no farther.