{"character_count": 1125, "word_count": 195, "ccnet_language_score": [0.9574999809265137], "ccnet_perplexity": [1104.0999755859375], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}


 The Editor of the Democrai, in his paper q iass week, gays, i've qaoie his words. } We cannot conceive how he (the Editor ol iht Banner can insist that Col. Miller should have been nosniaaled 10 the office of Regis- tes as Ba.essille, by the PresieIens, nsersls be- cause he was recommended, as his cores Potsdent informs hin, by SEVER, s:oB Jons- SON, Jsdge B. JoHxsox, Gor. DREw, HEap- STEAD, CoNwAY, CRoss and others.'s

 We will ieIIthe Editor why he might con ceive such thsng. Simply because these gentlemen are known throughout the length and breadth of the land as democrats ol strength and influence in tile party, and io6g tried devotion so its principles And we shall bf much surprised if the people do not sus- iaia our correspondent in coniending for the s.jasiiee and proprietyn of an appointment made by the recommendation of such men. In this, however, our neighbor will, no doubt, continue to differ wiih us, and, per haps, has already assigned 10 each of the above named democrats. his appropnate place eisher in the lis, oF .sfshy'' or 1sienderfoot- cd" We hope he will favor us with the classification.