{"character_count": 880, "word_count": 163, "ccnet_language_score": [0.9045000076293945], "ccnet_perplexity": [1559.199951171875], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}


 No. 3s. Barraque ct al. nss, &c, V. Man. ueL Appeal from Pulaski Circuit csur,--in ChanceFy.

 Affirmed. Opinion by Conway B, J. Upon . bill, by B. $ M., to purchase i. morigage for a joint debt austhen, the court cannot make decree for separate debt due to B. if the same be not alledgsd tn the bal to be secured hy the morsgage; although ,A., fact may appear from the subsequent pro ceedings in the cause, for no relief can ,. granted for matters not charged m the ha. IT Ms entire interest in the mor,gaee haa ceased, he should not have been party complainant. A bill. il, eqaisys cannot he brought fos the use of third person nor although 1t may appear that the morgare was intended so secure the payment of a debt due from the defendant him, but which is not reeited in the mortgage nor alledsed in the bill.

 Watkins & Curran, for appellants.

 Ringo & Trapnall, contra.