Errors corrected.
{"character_count": 2314, "word_count": 425, "ccnet_language_score": [0.984000027179718], "ccnet_perplexity": [1090.4000244140625], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}
The following letter reached ns by the last mail We know moi whether Col. NoLANp desired ias publication butas il eoreets statements from which wrong inEereaces have been drawn. both by the Democrat and oarself, We think it proper to place h before the public. of the letters to which Cot. Noland sIludes. written by him in behalf Of Col. MILLgA. we have 10 copy; but when all the papers come to our hands, expect. they shall be pub lished. So far as Col NEILL is concerned. we have heard no friend of Col. Miiler's. no one of those even who took most interest in his appointment. say word in Encouragement of that gentleman The sole ground of his removal seems to have been sn act of justice to Col NJ, and nOt want of ca Paeisy and integrity on iis part.

 BArssyILLE, ARK, Sept. '. 1T. /

 L.. J. REAaDoS. EsQ.-DeaT Sir; In the Publica- ton made by you, in the Banner, touching the re- mosai of Col. MILLKR, as Register of the Land Ot- Zee at this place. reference is made by the Commis- siOner of the General Land Office. to letter writ ten by me, and. as the same has not been published injustice has been done me. by seeking to convey NEIL. do no, charge this on yOu far from It, but on certain busy bodies in this quarter.

 My agency in the matter was simply this: After the death of Newiand. learning Col. Miller was an applicant for the office, wrote distinguished dem- ocrat in his behalf Subsequently and after his ap- pointmen,. learning that an effort was being made to remove him. wrote to the President of the Uni lsd States; but. in neither letter. did a word in disparagement of Mir. Neil. know both gentle men well; though politically opposed to. have ever been friendly with them and with Col. NJ. very in- timate.

 viewed Col. Mi!ier'N removal as an outrage. would have viewed Mir Neil's had he been appoin- ted in the first instance. Both unfinching dem ocrats. and either would have given satisfaction to the Lawrence Land District. Mir Woodruff is in error about the democratic convention in this county in lSl6. All the candidates ran on their own hook I voted for Mir. Neil; should nave done so under the then existing circumstances, if 20 whigs had been run. He voted for me expected it, and if he had not have done so, should have thought very little of him. Yours,

 C. F. M. HOLLAND.