SUPREME COURT
{"character_count": 1492, "word_count": 258, "ccnet_language_score": [0.8655999898910522], "ccnet_perplexity": [840.2999877929688], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}
This tribunal adjourned on the 2Oth ultimo.
The following Opinions have been delivered since
our last accounts: rs -. .. - -....T s.


By RuFFIN, G. ]. in Hatsfeld .. Grimstead, from
Currituck, reversing the judgment below. and di-
recting renire de moro Also, in Hurdle .. Rid
dick, from Perqumans, reversing the decree and
dismixsing the petition. Also, in Webb .. Dur
ham, from Rutherford, reversing the judgment be-
low. Also, in Smith .. Turner, in Equity from
Orange, declaring that there is in the orders
appealed from. Also, in Gordon .. Brown, in
Equity from Wilkes, directing decree for the
plaintiff. Also in State .. Valentine, from David
son, declaring that there is error in the judgment
below. Also, in State .. Broughton, f.om New
Hanover, declaring that there ought not to be a
uenire de moro. Also, in Jones p, Herndon, from
Granville, affirming the judsmen: below. -....


By DANIEL, ]. in State rel. Respass .. John
slon, from Martin; trial ordered. Also, in
State .. Patterson, from Greene, declaring that
there is error in the judgement below. Also, in
Clayton .. Liverman, from Washington; amend
ment 30 be made on payment of costs by plaintiff,
and then judgment TO be affirmed.


By NASH. J. in State .. Hathcock. from Stanlv,
declaring that there is error in the judgment below.
Also, in Lee et al .. Watson from Johnston, di-
rectng pefire de moro. Also, in State D. McIn-
tosh, (two cases) from Moore, reversing the judg-
ment and directing venire de nouo in each.