{"character_count": 957, "word_count": 164, "ccnet_language_score": [0.9362000226974487], "ccnet_perplexity": [1702.300048828125], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}
The Editor of the Democrat in his '.aaswer to Cot. Roaae's qaere." admits that he has published .'irom time to ime- the islanders contained in the letters of anonymous writers agains, the Arkansas Regiment. but defends himself for so doing, upon the ground that as faithful joarnalists, he ..fet his duty" to copy these settlements as "items of nssss.r Does this .saithful journalist" consider the letter of Capt. Haa.sr's as "items Of news '' Does he Isel t his daiy. to let our citizens remain ia ixnssnes of ihe aspect which things are taking' iaEsssrd so most serious charge against portion sef ear Regipeals

 is not Capt. Hunters defence, . .'part of the histesy- which he feels 90 eonsciestousy bound to fasaish te the public? Alas fae the old mans con. rsisteaeys Had Capt Huater bat furnished the slixhtst insiaaaisa of scandal against the name Of ths iansaied Yell how gladly would the old gentle man hare giostsd oyer iss publication in tis psper