Democrats. Rec0 |!
{"character_count": 1707, "word_count": 303, "ccnet_language_score": [0.9463000297546387], "ccnet_perplexity": [1302.4000244140625], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}
MR. KuBouRN- Believing that yoS have no desire to treat any one with inIustsce' beg leave lo ccrTecs an impression whicH is 10 some extent prevalent in this Sena.o- rial District, relative to Mr. Beecher, the candidate of the Liberty Party for the Sem ate. 1t has been intima,ed in your columns and positively asserted in our streets, that MT Beecner was not d -;;r2s Liberty man. This is not True, and he does not tn:nk any for using such arguments with view :" thereby obtaining for him the votes of the democratic party. He is firm uncompro- missing Liberty man-condemns the Anne'r. a;ion of Teras--is utterly opposed to the or igin, objects and prosecution of the present unhGly and miserable WGr I0ith Meric0- 0nd ABHoRs the SC, vile cOu'Se Cf the north ern democracy on the great question of slav> cry. In fact he has little or no sympathy with the democratic party as it is now cons sti.uted, and you may be sure he will in n" degree compromise his principles for the sake of securing democratic votes: for in- deed he DOES NOT WANT the support | of those who oppose those principles.

 A LIBERTY VOTER. Winchester, March 27, l947.

 We eheerfully publish the correction as given by our correspondent above; but if his statements be correct, land they appear to be fully confirmed by the last number of Charter Oak,) do they not place our demo cratic brethren in rather an awkward di- ,imma7 How can they consistently vote for man who is "utterly opposed" to the leading measures of their party, and who does no, want their votes" until they have first adopted his views! Will the demo- crats so ia: compromise with sheir princi- ples as to vote for an anli-Texas, anti war abolitionist? Wait and see