{"character_count": 1700, "word_count": 304, "ccnet_language_score": [0.9613000154495239], "ccnet_perplexity": [2135.800048828125], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}
Rrulr oF rm Conar MAHfsL-lhe salulln
Picket Guard publishes The fezull Of Tie inyosli-
cations Of the Court Martial IL the cases Of Gen
Lane; nnd Col Dowlcs, Of the "a Indiana regiment
II sppcar, that at the sullls Of Daena VISTA, Gen
Lane was Ia command of the 81 and 81 regiment
Of Indiana yoluAicesi aud that the % fss.mcuI
reiterated from The field without any order from
Gen Lane, but hat through the eKoriioas Of Gen.
Lanc and other officers from $50 10 200 o. them
were rallied sud attached to the Mississippi aud
30 Indiana regiment, arid remained with them Oh
the field Of battle inhng The remainder Of the day
The court attached no oensurc 10 the general, WHO
they say conducted himself as brave and gallant
officer


In relation TO The charges against Col ROwles,
Il Appeared from the evidence before the court
tina, Col B from III health, and absence on ao-
count Of VI health, was unaequainicd with the
company battalion OF brigade drills, and that act
ing under tho impression that the ARTILLERY bad
rlircated, when, ia fact, !, had gone 10 an nd-
saneed position gave his Older to cease firing and
retreat, w.,hou, my authority nom Gen Lane,
who was present for giving such order, and that
The ofdgf was given with The intention Of max.
ing hs regiment leave il position, but, that he
had not been particularly ordered 10 maintain
and defend that position. Tho court Therefore
was Of the opinion that Col Bowlcs throughout
lls battle cyinecd no want " personal courage OF
bravery, but that he did manifest want Of ca.
paoiy aud judgment as q commander, aud that
The causes above stated had IN some degree, pre-.
vented him from qualifying himself 10 discharge
ihc duties Of BIZ Office.