{"character_count": 1150, "word_count": 194, "ccnet_language_score": [0.9894999861717224], "ccnet_perplexity": [517.2999877929688], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}


 Who can account for the irritating difference, which exists in the Miller case. between the sage editor of the Democrat and the President of the U States The former calls for proof of the fact that Miller was democrat. He has copies of the pa pers, furnished to the President, upon which, his Excelleneies opinion was formed. He then says that the men who made such statements, have lied to the President. Mir. Polk tells him that he knows they may be conhded in, and throughout the length and breadth of the State. were always, recognized as men whose political principles and integrity, have never been questioned. The Editor begs that Col Ashley may have another hearing, that he can certainly make the matter satisfactory. but the Pre- sident very quietly, remarks, "tais is the second time fraud has been practised upon me, by your little faction. Once when Judge Crutch6eld was appointed Receiver, and his resignation held up and tempered with. unknown to him, and again when aokaoscledged misrepresentation were made to me. in the case of the Receiver at Batesyiile-would you have me subject myself, to imposition a tAird timeI No sirreei''