{"character_count": 579, "word_count": 115, "ccnet_language_score": [0.9767000079154968], "ccnet_perplexity": [763.2000122070312], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}
Woodruff vs. TrapnaIl as att &e Vii, of nm damas' Before the repeal of that section of ,b. charter oi the State Bank allowing debts due to ,h. State to be paid in notes of that Bank debtor, ,o the State had 'he right to pay their debts in ,Vss notes. Such right. however. was mere sratasv or privilege extended to them by the State, .s8 might be revoked or withdrawn at any time.

 A debtor to the State, failing to pay before the r peal of such section, loses the right to pay in Ae notes of the Bank; that act did no, incofpo,,,. itself into the contract so as to become part o