{"character_count": 1189, "word_count": 210, "ccnet_language_score": [0.9304999709129333], "ccnet_perplexity": [1828.0], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}
EDITORIAL AnILlrY.-Newspapef writ.
Ing has grown 10 be an AT of Itself. Many
u literary man who ihoughl because the
"greaier includes the less" every author is
eT eticio qualified to be an editor. has sunk
back into the rear place Of the press. after
sams smart writings had shown his hookish
talent and his inability to deal with facts.
Others who eoald panr iorIh volumes. have
failed because they could not cope with the
hydraulic pressure, as promp, selection Of
salient point needed for the space and rapid
comment ofihe Journal. Take The best pa.
pcrs Of London or Paris, different as the
circumstances Of ihe case nay be, and you
must allow, that Il is not every body that
could seize the moral spirit Of passing his.
tory. The same may be said, v ilh equal
justice, Of The Ameaican press. People Of
some little talent, fancy they can edit a
newspaper, il they can DO any thing else;
but they essentially ind their mistake. Not
only is intellect, bu, knowledge of The
", ID, miscellaneous Information, tact. In
dusiry, rapidly Of thought, nervous style,
and a capacity al once to catch the strong
and weak points Of every subject, are 70.
quirel for good editor.


London Spectator.