{"character_count": 498, "word_count": 83, "ccnet_language_score": [0.947700023651123], "ccnet_perplexity": [1408.5999755859375], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}
No. 34. Hill and Sargent v. Cravey. Ap- peal from Union Circuit Court in Chancery

 Decree affirmed. Opinion by OlhamJ.

 Where the respondent answers the com planan,'s bill, he must give full and sutfi- cient disclosure 10 the questions asked, and cannot, in his answer, evade discovery Where the answer is adjudged insufficient aud full answer Is not made within such time as inc court shall direct, the bill will be taken as confessed.

 Rngo & Trapnall, for appellants.

 Pike X Baldwin, contra