The siudy off AgricuIture.
{"character_count": 1156, "word_count": 184, "ccnet_language_score": [0.9086999893188477], "ccnet_perplexity": [1284.699951171875], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}
I do not assert that a knowledge of military tao ties, of law. Is inconsistent with agriculture. On the contrary, a tompeteat knowledge of either, and particularly of the latter confers a yalle the character of country gentleman veTsant with agri- culture; but what do assert most strongly Is, that the most intimate acquaintance with either will ney substitute for ignorance of agriculture m country gentleman One evil arising iIom stu dying those exciting professions before agriculture is that, however short the lime spent in acquiring them, Il IS sufficiently long 10 create distaste to learning agriculture practically, for such task can only be undertaken, after the turn of life, by enthusiastic minds. But as farming is necessarily Me profession ot tbe country gentlemaa-for al hare a fsfm--it should be learned theoretically and practically, be fore his education should be considered finished II he so lhcne, he can aflerward enter the tented held, or exercise his forensic eioquence, when the tendency which have noticed in these professions VIII be unable to efface the knowledge of agricu- lure preyiously acquired. Sfspsens Book of tse Farm.