{"character_count": 1564, "word_count": 285, "ccnet_language_score": [0.9498999714851379], "ccnet_perplexity": [1319.0999755859375], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}
tice towards us, No to suppose thai we scOEld sup
port eycn Wilmot himself We tbongbt we had
been sufficiently explicit this point long since
but we can answer the Register in such way
that there can be no mistake about 1t hereafter.
We will not support for the Office of President
any man who is not clearly and decidedly op-
posed TO the WiImot Proviso, no matter what "a
National Convention may say; though it gives US
pleasure to be able to inform the Register, that at
present there is no prospect that Wilmot Pro
visoist ,oiH be or can be the nominee Upon this
question the great body Of the Democracy Of the
Union IS sound; and in this assertion we are sus-
tanned by the testimony of-Daniel Webster him
self, gentleman whose words, as to matters Of
fact, ought to be good authority for the Register
and lis friends. a'r.-'4 1's.. III"


And now, will the Register answer the same
question for i.self1 Will that paper support for
the Presidency any man who is not clearly and
unequivocally opposed to the WiImot ProViso
Would Ii not suppor, Mr.. Webster or Mr.. Cor
win, provided they were nominated by Wing
National Convention2 These questions that paper


is bound, by its obligations to the South, to answer
at once and with perfect frankness; and VIC hope
we shall have no dodging behindthe military fame
OF General Taylor. We repeat what we said a
week or two since: Let that pnper take its stand
boldly and firmly, as we have done, upon the plat
form of Southern rights Il is no time to divide
when the enemy is laundering at tho gates of the
citadel"