Yours, &c.,

Deel.lon. Of the supreme Court.
{"character_count": 523, "word_count": 95, "ccnet_language_score": [0.9014999866485596], "ccnet_perplexity": [827.9000244140625], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}
Feb. S. No. 57. Adams ct al V. Roane ct al App peal from Johnson Circuit Court.

 Affirmed. Opinion by Johnson c. J. A written notice to sue, given by the se- curity, and served upon the clerk of the Trustees of the Real Es.ate Bank, is not sui ficient service, under the statute, upon the Trustees, to exoneraie the security upon suit brought after the thirty days nor, although the clerk informs one of the Trustees that such notice has been served upon Jim. D. Walker and English, for appellants. Pike & Baldwin, contra.