Decisions of the saprensc Court.
{"character_count": 448, "word_count": 74, "ccnet_language_score": [0.8934999704360962], "ccnet_perplexity": [1631.9000244140625], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}
No. e. Beebe V. IIershy Error to Pu- laski Circui, Court.

 Judgment affirmed Opinion by Oldham J,

 The defendant pleads par, payment, the plaintiff takes issue withou, signing judgment for the part unanswered = this is not a dis continuance of the acton. The common law rule upon lbai subject is technical and map plicable tn this State. where forms are made to yield 10 substantial justice.

 Watkins & Curran, for plaintiffs.

 Cunmins, contra.