{"character_count": 813, "word_count": 143, "ccnet_language_score": [0.9406999945640564], "ccnet_perplexity": [1434.5999755859375], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}
No. 5. Howard ct al. as ad. V. Ball aud Men;fee. Appeal from Conway Circuit Court in Chaneery.

 Decree reversed. Opinion by Conway B. J.

 The respondent failing to answer the ale gations in the bill, will be taken as confess ed. and this court will proceed to inquire whether the facts so confessed, warrant the decree.

 An account against administrators in thelr individual capacity cannot he pleaded ss a set of to a claim due them as administfators. The administrators have not the care of the children of their intesiase, nor are they re- sponsible for their main.enanee; nor for other expenditures for their benefit. Claims due iu different rights cannot be sei off at law or in equity If the party has an adequate reme- dy al law he cannot come into equity for re- lief

 Ringo & Frarasihs eef appellants