{"character_count": 1833, "word_count": 319, "ccnet_language_score": [0.9563999772071838], "ccnet_perplexity": [1272.5999755859375], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}
WASHINGTON June IS, lSf7.


SIn: In conjunction with several other members
of the Medical profession gave you, some years
since. q certificate Of the good qualitv Of your
Mineral Water. With "a commendable jealousy Of
your own works, lest confidence in their abiding
good reputation should have led to neglect you have
again applied To me for an analysis Of several spec
mems of Mineral Water. purporting to have been
made after different methods OF by different persons,
the particulars of which were not furnished the only
distinction apparent being in the color Of the bottles.
have examined the several specimens submitted
and find as follows: The water in the aohite glass
bottles is free from all impurities that in the gy1en
bottles contains sensible quantity OF phuric acid,
which is evident to the smell and taste, well as to
the proper chenical tests. From recent nspec-
ton OF your process, was led to the conviction that
the only impurities which could possibly gain access
to the water were lead and sulphurc acid. Of lead
find no traces whatevtr in any Of the bottles the
amount Of sulphuric acid present in the green bottles
though small is objectionable, and mus, be regarded
as an impuity. The Mineral Water Processes to be
! free from all such alnxures. | therefore certify


that The Mineral Water contained in the white bot
ties sent to me was pure, and in my opinion salrta
ry, while that in the green bottles impure am
| unfit for common beverage.


CHARLES G. PAGE,


Profess or Of Chemistry, National NJ dicsl College.
Mr.. A. FAvIER.


N. WASHINGTON June "a. ls47.


SIN: Upon testing tho water left with me by you
which was in the same kind Of bottles mentioned b,
Dr.. Page, l. have only confirmed the result of The
analysis made by. that gentleman.


THOMAS P. JONES,
! Mr. A. FAvIER. Prof. Of Chemistry \