No. l06.- JordAa V Ford and Dickinson. Appeal ron Bradley Cissuls Court.
{"character_count": 510, "word_count": 87, "ccnet_language_score": [0.9182000160217285], "ccnet_perplexity": [2266.60009765625], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}
Affirmed. Opinion by Johnson C, J.

 4 note endorsed to Myers is not admissi- ble tn evidence under count describing |, as endorsed to Mason. Notice Of demand and protest fer non-payment, given by the holder of bill or note will enure ,o the benefit oI all prior endorsers. A judgment in favor oi the holder against the maker and endorsers, with proof of payment by an intermediate endorser is evidence nf demand under tAs money counts agaias. prior endoFser

 Riugo & TrapnaIl, for appellants.

 Yell, contra.