For th< Arksaaas BaaHer. Mnaier Axhley VS. Dr. SyRtaL
{"character_count": 1387, "word_count": 238, "ccnet_language_score": [0.9545000195503235], "ccnet_perplexity": [1065.300048828125], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}
We are willing te conee4e that the U. S. Senate Is the balwark of the Coasssitation, there the noble bird of liberty viii find her lsss resting place. and all that-bas we utterly deny that s sdestined to be the palladium of the "King's English" Inc recent letter of Senator ASHLEY, to tho Editor of tho Democrat. poor in argamenss but horrid tn It's composition, bsts all such hope. Our abused, vic lated vernacuIar must fly to other sanctuary. "Umbvagsezs shale't. "Eqaine Horse": q d s1'ss SeaHs, make room for the Senator's !" RwEeTossfy siyaed by e considerable namber''. Does Col. Ash ley mean io say merely thai his petition was signed by ''eonsiderable numbcF''l Or does be intend to convey tn idea that was not only signed by con siderable number but that ''consid~rable number signed the petition nwmeToas aE'Hber ef firass The latter take to be the obvious import and in- ,ensiOR of his Ianguagc. However, we defer to the venerable PhilOlOgiss of te Democrat. and anxious ly await his explanatory critiqae.

 When heScnator was called upon for authority, ussd in the Texas speech in the Senate, he graVely replied " Webster's Dictionary" and such an n,i- macy did he exhibit with this indispensable standard of eur language, that We may well be astOnishcd that he should have embarrassed, by his inaceuEa- cies, what had been made quite plain upon other testimony. '. V. &E Co.