July Term. A. ID. IsA1.
{"character_count": 804, "word_count": 138, "ccnet_language_score": [0.9380999803543091], "ccnet_perplexity": [1531.0999755859375], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}
Stone vs. waggoner. Appeal from Independence c;reai court Parol evidence is inadmissibIe to es- tablish contract which has been reduced to wri- ting and if such evidence be given on the ,riol in voiving rigtt of property and it afterwards appear that there bill Of sale, the parol testimony should be excluded.

 When legal evidence is given of tine sale of pro- pefty ihe vendor is competent witness to prove tha: there was no fraud

 The fact. ,ha, bona hde purchaser of property at sherids sale. after possession loaned it to the defendant in the execution. does no, constitute fraud in law An absolute title to personal property may be conveyed without actual delivery, as in Cooke ys. Chapman.

 In sn action of troser the plaintiff must prove conversion by the defendant well as tttle in him. self.