EDITOR
{"character_count": 1620, "word_count": 285, "ccnet_language_score": [0.9890000224113464], "ccnet_perplexity": [1126.699951171875], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}
voted in the affirmative. IA
.voico:-" No, it was Cranston.' y
The entire democratic party,
then, almost to MANIA voice:
"Eyery man!'']---eyery man of
them voted to put in "thanks''
instead of"censure." /" Was not
that evidence that they did not
wish to vote in the spirit Of cen
sure---that they did not wish 10
degrade Cen. Taylor? ana Ttey
called on these wings to give a
similar vote, but could not get
them to come up TO it. They
could not be brought up to the
point No. But the wings
thought if they could only get
General TayIor's name before
the American people in such a
capacity as would leave the i'm
preston that they were the guar
dians of his fame, and the demo-
crats we're seekingto ceRsureand
disgrace him, and that the adj
ministration had entered into
conspiracy to sacrifice him, they
must make rich harvest of po-
litical capital out Of it! Butwhen


the thing was brought up to the
point-it was found that the de-
mocratic party gave an honest,
upright vote all the way through!
What was the democratic vote,


taken all together. First, they


voted thanks; ;second, they voted


a medal; third, they voted that


those victories ereacquired in a
Just, holy, and righteous cause; !;
fourth, they voted that they pass


ed no opinion on that act, of


which they knew nothing; fifth,


they voted that by that act they


meant no censure to General
Taylor, but thanks instead Of


censure. That was what they


had voted; and tie reverse of


these propositions was just what


the gentleman from Massachu-


sotts. and his co-operators had


voted by the series Of votes they


had given that day.