{"character_count": 1684, "word_count": 310, "ccnet_language_score": [0.9509000182151794], "ccnet_perplexity": [1874.300048828125], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}
In our last paper we though. proper to ask lie
Editors Of the GreensboroUgh Patriot If they


would support Daniel Webster, in case he were


the nominee of Whig National ConveniOn


and their reply is as follows .....


"f the STANDARD will candidy inform US wheIb.
er he would have voted for Silas Wright If be had


lived to be the nominee Of the Democratic Nation.
. al Convention, we can answer his question more


understandingly."


We have no hesitation in answering the ADORE


question, simply because we have no cODcealnenls
10 make in our political course and because we
think more of our principles and of the rights Of
the South, as well ns Of the integrity Of the Union
than we do of any man, living or dead. We
trOnId H0t "hGUe vOted for SiIas Wright fh


had lived to be nominee of the Democratic NJ
tional Convention" unless he had taken grOupl


most decidedly and clearly, against the WiImd
Proviso. Will that do, Mr.. Patriot2 If So h
US have your answer in regard to Mr.. Webster.


The Patriot quotes and commends to the San
dard and to the country" the last paragraph n
Me-. Webster's late Spereh at Springfield. Why
did not that paper lay the schote Speech beor, lis
readers2 Why did il not tell the country I1t
Daniel Webster, in that Speech avows it to br bis
intention to cote against supplies for tie Merriam
War! And why did it omit to publish that para
graph, just before the one quoted, in which Mr.
Webster Proclaims to GrneraIs Scott and Taylor,
and all others engaged in the War, that they can
gain no credit in u contest going on as the result
Of" vicious motives" and that the solemn adlu-
of L.. & ~ 4 Iho ATJ.
MENT OF THE WORLD" is against them2