DR. rROrr,s LETTER.
{"character_count": 2831, "word_count": 521, "ccnet_language_score": [0.9879999756813049], "ccnet_perplexity": [726.2999877929688], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}
If will be remembered that the "Ashey Urgah charged Gov. Drew with having transmitted Prf vatc letter to the Department at Washington, which pr. Croft had written him. From the misstate- mcnts of the Democrat, pr. C. believed this to be true, and in commu nicaiion to the editor of that paper objected to Gov Drew's having used his tri- rate letters in the manner stated by the Democrat This was rich nut for the Editor, and he forth with expends half column of violent abuse upon Gov. Drew, and holds up the transaction in the most odioas light in which he could put it. twill be seen from the following that the letter sent to Washington in relation to the removal of Col. Mill Ter. and about which tho vir,uous indignation of the Democrat was so freely expended was to J. Banks Anthony, and neither of those written to Gov. Drew, were ever out of his possession

 tcorr.]

 WoLcorr ARK.

 May l7th ls41.} GAIT. ANTHONY,

 My Dear Sir:-I acknowledge the receipt of your kind and inquiring letter of the 7th inst. I am much pleased to hear of your health and pros perity. As regards the removal of Col Miller from the Land office, know nothing. l did not know he was removed. But was of the opinion that his term of service had expired and did not know that he would be an applicant for that office. do not recoliect of hearing of any charges being made against Col. Miller. think that this is about all that know if it is anything.

 signed a recommendation in favor of Col. Neil, which believed was nay right to do, and if reques- ted to do again, would do, or would recommend any good and worthy democrat who was competent to fill the office. My health has been bad for some time, consequently have been confined to home and give you information In relation to rais ing of Recruits in this section of the county. think 1t likely you could raise some, you try. In haste, but with due respect,

 am your ob't scrv't,

 c. B. CROFT. |A We have every reason to 5eleive that this was piece of wilfu injustice on the part of the Editor he had greater aeities for obtaining from Wash ingson copies of all the papers in relation to the restoration of Col Miller, than had, for a sim pie application from his friend, Col. Ashley, would have produced them. But he was of course slow in this and not over anxious to deprive himself by the proofs of an opportunity to vent his malice up on Gov. Drew. Indeed, he seems to have knowI that possessed copies of the papers, by his call ing on us for them, and might at least have satisfied himself of the facts before committing gross ar outrage Such attempts can only serve to elevate the character of Gov. Drew, when the true stat, of things is known, while every honest man mus condemn the unscrupuloas proceeding of his per l secutor.

 Will he have the "Hagsaai'siy'' to acknowledg, this !