caes. sEaaass.s e,ara ana sias Ds.aeeraa.
{"character_count": 3081, "word_count": 556, "ccnet_language_score": [0.961899995803833], "ccnet_perplexity": [1488.0], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}


 Dne& sE&nAsrss Card and ehs Dssnecraa.

 We puhliahod iaat week. an address 10 the reo- pia ei Arkansas, from Capt. HvExER. commanding de setieF eompsny of volunteers. in which he eor. rnrts whaf appears b have been siandercus state msnls of the ianahef ia which portion fhis com. pasy and thssnfC Capt c. c Dahley .eondac,ea them. selves h relation to the killing cg the Peons The Dsmeerai is seems was the fEsf paper In which the Asss ssceuhi of ths matter reached him, and he, conSbqnsnsly. gives that ss his source Of inSorma tisn Fos shisvssy plain reIainn of fact. the Demo crai kicks up at Capt. HUnrsA. and cannot under. sinnd why 10 shoaid have made the extract from thai paper instead of frrA others equally guilty, and says .whsther or not the account be true given by CsPs. PfKE we have no means of deciding" It has been our impression that Capt. PIKE made q report of the affair more from mere rumor, endor- ssd ss ik vas, by the severe order issued hy Gen. TASLoh. than any knowledge of the facts from an authentic soaree; for he distinctly says he was 50 foies ef and makes the transaction public that his company nay De relieved from the disgrace which he attaches to IL. Capt. HusrER. with the same Iatensioh gives the decision of an investigating eeat held at the time. and transmits us the first in fosma'ien we have received. that Cen. TAIson, sAea ihs true state of facts become known to hin, nFomp.iy ressinded the harsh order reported by CTtF. Yet wiih all this before lim, and we have no dcabt rith the knowledge os Capt. Huxrsas high character. the edios of the Democrat hs no sneans of deciding" in regaid te the esntroversy. If our neighbov has not suissed his paiality 10 overcome his common senss. In considering the matter, old time has operstsd more deeply upon his brain than we imagined. And if he cannot, afier this, de- ee wheiher or not the disgF1ce attached tothe two eompasies. hy the report of Capt prxE. be rerised er got why "we opina hs will be forced to find an xsxcass for himself" by questioning Capt HuS. rxH's verscity, acknowledging that his prefer. 2 eaees were loo strong for his judgment 5

 And SOW. ss to our remark, that from those who had given currency to the report. representation cf facts was especially duer and which the editor eahesives upon our part attemptt to deceive the public this reply only will be necessary to show that he thought we bad adopted his course of never s acknowledging ourselves in error. When Capt HuNTER's letter reached us, we supposed that we bad aided in eirculating misrepresentation by pub hshing the letter relating the affair of the Peons and we gladly avaiied oursef of the opportunity tc Tsctfy it. feeling that 1t was especially due from these who had given t circulation. We were con. hsni that neither of the other papers of this city would give place to fl. and the result has shown that we were not disappointed. They were willing to pat Forth the bans. and leave to apply the amfi. dofs. We cheerfully assumed the task for the ere dit of the State and the hoaor of the regiment