{"character_count": 1078, "word_count": 193, "ccnet_language_score": [0.9775999784469604], "ccnet_perplexity": [653.0], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}
SINGULAR DEvELoPE EMESTs-BuTT TRUE. "A writer in Cisi's .9dcertiser, in giving sketches of the .'First Settlement of Ohio,' states what has long been believed, that Burr and his aecomplices, on their trial in Virginia, were acquitted. Such Is not the case. Ano- ther writer in that valuable paper states the facts to be as follows, which are strictly true. He says:

 ~Now, by referring to the records of the Circuit Cour, of the United State for Vlr- giaia, he will find that Burr and his accom- piices were not acquitted; the Court de- cided, on motion of counsel, that they had not committed an overt act within the iuris- dic;ion of Virginia, and ordered that they should give bond to appear before the Cir euii Court of the United States for Ohio. The Grand Jury in Ohio found bills, but there was singular omission in the bond; al- though it required them to appear before the Circuit Court in 0aio, 4 did not specify rAen. Availiag themselves of this omssion, they did not appear, and tl.e case has not yet been tried, as will be found by an ex- animation of the records"