{"character_count": 1046, "word_count": 179, "ccnet_language_score": [0.9297999739646912], "ccnet_perplexity": [1536.199951171875], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}
No 80 Patton's hoin vs.. Ashley, Appeal
from Chieoi circuit court, in ehaneefy.


Reversed, Opinion by Oldham, J.


Agreement between Patton aud Ashley to 10.
cate lands. The iofmet furnished pre.smplion
claim, which was valued, and the price to be fe.
paid with interest to furnish numbers and descfp.
tons Of other adjoining lands The latter paid for
entering the pfe.emption claim, aud was 10 entef
the lands to be designaiodby the former with dona.
ton claims, aud to be repaid at specified prees
with interest, when the lands were sold, The pre-.
empiion claim furnished by Patton failed


Held, that Patton did no, loe his interest in the
lands 1eaied under the agreement, Decroed, that
the circuit court an account to be stated be-
tween the parties, according to their several rights
set forth IN the opnon, and allow the heits Of Pat
ton reasonahle time TO refund 10 Ashley the pay
meni. made by him, with interest. aud, upon tho
payment thereof, to decree partition Of The and.


kingo n lnpual. iof appellants


Pike & baldwin, contfa.