fhs Sals of thr Gaz,tts to the Khigs.
{"character_count": 3104, "word_count": 572, "ccnet_language_score": [0.9674999713897705], "ccnet_perplexity": [1123.9000244140625], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}
In reply to an article in the Democrat, refer rcd to the saie by Mfr Woodruff of his paper to our political enemies. And in calling upon the Editor of the Cazette for the terms of the ''bargain and sala" made ailasion to article of the latter, in which he recommended upon the political treachery of she act, and alluded to the transfer, in manner by 10 means complimentary to his predecessor"

 The Gazette tells us 1t has never "aIiuded to the sis % far as to pronounce It of political trea ehery," and the Democrat boldly books him by say ing:

 ssWe pronounce the staie ent of the Banner to be fakae and we defy the Editor of the Banner to point to ms the paragraph, In which the Editor of te Gazette has used the language attributed to him. 1fhe cannot do this lei if he has the magnan- unity b make the amende honorable"

 Let the following paragraph. copied from the Gs- ssiss sf May 18th ls46, signed B. J. Borden. show who iarwe wrong. and what absurd qaibblins and special pleading Is attempted in the denial of our statement.

 i" Many have been the rumors in the country of my inteation to cell the Gazette, and need not dis Ruise the fact that libsral offer to purchase the establishment ras nade by MS Woodrgf and if l had eats esnsrtted my peeaniary faferesf, should psrhaps have been induced to seli but there were other and higher considerations In the way. It Bore too much the appearance of bctraying the whig standard, entrusted to my care, to the enemy. My feelings revolted at the idea ! rejected all offers from the quarter they me."-

 Who will not laugh upon reading the above, at the baseheed trickery by which the Democrat at tempts to evade the meaning of this. The '.lan- gusge ussd not that of the Gazette in precise terms, but must be dull indeed, who cannot that the present editor of the Gazette proeaims te sae of tie paper to him, by his predecessor, an act of political treachery. What do the words im- ply, "5e'rayiag the Wkig staRasr9 entrusted tO my care ta tae easay" but that if to make such sale on account of my private interests, as Mir. Woodruff made to me, should be betraying my party, and "my feelings reroed at the idea" the sale had not originally been made by Mir. Woodruff, spvefsssed democrat, to the Whig party, the words quetcd from the Gazete woui have been of hut aiie force. but as the sale of thai paper by hn to Mir WsedraG would have made tbe analogy complete, ths editor of the Gazette does n fact brand he trans fes of the Gazette to him betrayal ol the Demo cratic party. consequently c, Of politIca trrac- cry.

 The magnanimisy of an aaeade which the editor of the Demacsat requests. when dscovor our er- Fes, is therefore not needed as we have proven ha, car construction of the language was correct, and that is only could be distorted by mere quibble tssm ths meaning we gave to it. We do not ask ffom the editor f.Ae Democrat the ''magnanImity" te ackaowledge this, he has shown In many lnstan. ess recently that It was acamHodiiy of which he wa. totally destitute. The last shred parted with when he cold the Gazette to the Whigs-

 