{"character_count": 1462, "word_count": 271, "ccnet_language_score": [0.9708999991416931], "ccnet_perplexity": [862.2000122070312], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}
E,,.ao columns and a half of the Ma |FsGgeneer, of this morning, are E with a speech, on the Deposite E. which was to heue been delivered Erse of Representatives by the Hon. N. ApAMs, but which vas suppress Es previous question. Ii is plefaeed Production, in which Mr. Adams \ 6s reasons for fesorting to thc Eo operation to give birth to his I He says that it was not until af. N unsuccessful attempts, on three s days, and atler an expostulation \ speaker as earnest as 1t was ne- B. int he was enabled to obtain any whatever for the legislature of Mas Ets. On Friday, tue 4th of April, F for the purpose of delivering the s5esch, but the speakers eye and sre in another direction, and he gave N b member from Virginia, who, Et.aat concerted out of the House, move the previous question. The Is question was pnt and carried, and bans they deprived of his right to ad- Re House. It strikes us that this con- inc part of the speaker, if correctly snsd, was not only unkind but un- btopa. The first Article of the

 rents to the Constitution expressly Iat Congress shall make no law re the freedom of speech j" and fongess cannot do by law, cannot Ny done, We should think by a mere Iby-aw of one branch of the Legis- r by the speakers construction of PaHaMentmia.

 Adams speech is unquestionably 'be best that have. or have not, been rd on this important subject--not Oquent in Reclamation, but close and

 a reasoning, and comprehensive Egh ened in It's views.