{"character_count": 1542, "word_count": 270, "ccnet_language_score": [0.9726999998092651], "ccnet_perplexity": [1341.300048828125], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}
! @bloRiag very just observations up

 arse of the French Chamber of

 in regard to tho indemnity treaty

 tinted States, are copied from the

 Daily Advertiser.

 d coareaiion.-It IS q curious in-

 tbe manner in which the prinei- l naaiity are disre garded Ill their

 n to the intercourse of nations, ] #ierfcent debate on the indemnity

 ahaa bill in the French Chamber of } gery little ailusion was made 10

 THf justice Of the clam. Several ] espressed their conviction, that a

 sun was due than that which was Zdobe appropriated; but t vas not } h iheir impressions were founded #ractual examination of the merits ] adect. One person maintained, I original claimants had parted with EA for a small consideration; as if, *r!bis to be the fact, itcould make Efnace as respected the obligation

 abtor. Another argued that Ame- Eprerty was lawful prize at the time \ spoIiations were made, because Died States could not at that time

 other nations 10 respect her flag; as ErOn charged with larceny could ex- \ himself by proving, that the indi- Rhom he pillaged was too weak to |ltethers from appropriating bis funds |aniar way. The great argument, |a seemed to be, that the United I |night be induced to receive a smal- |a and that tie consequences of a re- |Gmlnot be very serious. It IS quite |EaoIe, that one moral standard should HaPP for the regulation of the conduct individual, and another for that of 'ndl9daals; that so long as a person aIeae, he IS suhject 10 responsibility RB completely lost when he acts in it With others"