{"character_count": 768, "word_count": 137, "ccnet_language_score": [0.9735999703407288], "ccnet_perplexity": [818.7000122070312], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}
Parliamentary Language the House of Lords on the 22d of July, the Mar qnis of estmeath inquired of the Lord Chancellor. whether, if bill were introdu- ced for the purpose of preventing sIander- ous expressions in Parliament, he would support 1t! As the law now stood, a cer- tain person (Mr. OsConnelD had nothing to do but to pour forth cataracts of the

 most atrocious calumnies, and the only re- medy which was left for the objects of

 them was. to prosecute the printer. He knew no reason why members of Parlia- ment should possess q prerogative to utter faisehood which was denied to every one else. The Lord Ghaneellor sad that, so far from supporting such measure, he would most decidedly oppose it. He did not be- Ilieye 1t in the power of Parliament to pass