{"character_count": 1117, "word_count": 192, "ccnet_language_score": [0.8507999777793884], "ccnet_perplexity": [1666.4000244140625], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}
The Times, of London, exDr4,,., utmost dissatisfaction and copteme, ss's s.l new Ministers, whom it denouDcefF Y ,a g beetle and insignificant personaess, .

 'sA gain We are bound in eeesc;.,.. honor to declare, that as a whole tbssJ ! not, and ought not to satisfy tha nssl| England. He warned Lord Y, this. Our fear was, and We call 10 win. our leading articles for three or t0ur ! past, that the paddings, lieings, wajdin the staytape and buekram, the scranl and sweepings of the ministerial sboD sn be resorted to and strong and seryicss materials excluded that old clotbes va be turned--eld holes darned-.raos l. drYed-and ancient calf-skin covers tip gilt and iettefed-and all this acknanst reformed or amended Cabinet, by vbj not even the infant pupils of our Snd schools would be imposed upon.a

 The Editor says, Lord Auckland is more competent for the head of the Nai tiiiaii the commonest parsef--ihat SM Rice, the Colonial Secratary, Is d man very moderate talents. The great som of regret of this journal appears 10 hedl Lord Durham and Mir. Abepromaieu men of that stamp, have been passed o'

 Ere. 4aE