{"character_count": 1678, "word_count": 287, "ccnet_language_score": [0.991100013256073], "ccnet_perplexity": [995.2999877929688], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}


 itwould have required no answer: where he is known, that would have been sufficient evi- dence of it's falsity. 'i'he language made use nf, and tae sentiment (if sentiaseat ih may. be calledl there advanced, are wOrthy only Of the source from which they come. His object seems to be, in addition tO slandering individuals, to address himself to the sympa- thies of the old pensioners, and induce them, to believe that Andrew Jackson was the sole. cause of obtaining for them their pensions, can candidate for Governor. is the man who brought .forsvard, adrocated and sustained the law granting tO them tAe allowance which they now receive from Government. The writer of that article has formerly resorted to every mean artifice he could devise te obtain for himself or his party the votes of that ve- " worthy class of citizens. @&%s6

 The writer says. in inc article alluded 10. that the pensioners were told "that iheir pensions probably would nerer be paid again. Ithink probable the worthy Post master and Judge. aided by his candidate for representa- tive, wbo has been eleciiOneering for himself ithc monih past. reported such story with n view. of charging it upon the friends of the pensioners, upon those who have aided and assisted them. They were uniformly told by their friends thattheir money was sate, and would certainly be paid. though the payment mtght perhaps De attended with some delay. Hessays. "the pension certificates were sent to the Branch Bank and returned unpaid. ."- There is not a syllable of truth, in the asser- ton; they were never sent to the Branch Bank, neilhrr were they ever returned un- paid. He says also that S. H. ParsOHs wrote

 .L