{"character_count": 2126, "word_count": 337, "ccnet_language_score": [0.927299976348877], "ccnet_perplexity": [1156.9000244140625], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}
SOUTH CARoLINA.--From the New | ork Journal of Commerce we extract the fol- lowing details concerning the recent cleo tions in South Carolina.

 The elections in South Carolina, so far as received, show considerable gain in favor of the Union party. In Charleston the votes for Henry L. Pinckney, (Nulli- fer.l for Congress, were 1S32; for Alfred Haeer (Union) l24l. Notification ma iority, Al. For State Senator, General James Hamilton, (Nullifer, received 1873 votes, and his opponent, Henry Middleton, l251. Notification majority, l22. Last year the Notification majority for Senator was l55. All the Notification candidates in Charleston for Representatives to the State Legislature, Is in number, are elect ed by maorities averaging little over IVo.

 In Christ Church Parish, the Union Rep resentative received majority of 20 votes, and Mir. Huger for Congress, a majority of 27.

 In St. James, Goose Creek, the Union Representative received d majority of "A votes, and Mr. Huger. for Congress, the same.

 In Georgetown and precincts, the three Union candidates for Representatives are elected, by an average majority of about 20. This is hailed by the Unlcn papers as 9 oreat triumph. The same town gave PosteH, Union candidate for Congress, a majority of 35, and Dozler, Union candi- date for State Senator, majority of 23.

 Darlington district gave Postelf a maJo- rity of l2o and elected it's two Union Rep resentatives by about the same maJorl'y. Whole number of votes boiled l04s.

 Colleton district gave the Notification candidate for Senate majority of io5, ana elected three Notification Representatives without opposition. -, e. St. James, Santee. gave Plnckney' TOT Congress. 20 yotes-no opposition. Marion Court House gave the NulIflca- ton candidates majority of about 2s5.

 It is probable {but not certa.n) that the Null;6srs will have two-thirds of the mem hers in both Houses of the Legislature, in which case, we are informed they can, aoreeably to the State Constitution re-eacef tke Test Ooth .act, notwithstanding its belng decided to be unconstitutional hy the Su- preme Court of South Carolina