{"character_count": 1016, "word_count": 166, "ccnet_language_score": [0.9577999711036682], "ccnet_perplexity": [1305.9000244140625], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}
When Andrew Dunlap, Mayor of the good old city of Dundee, died, his exeeu- tors resolved to appropriate to their own pc euliar benefit, the provision contained in a Godicil. which bequeathedto to the franer of an epitaph which should be endorsed upon his tombstone, the good round sum of ihif- " pounds Scotch. The executors wisely concluded that, to entitle them to an equal division of s'the spoils, the epitaph should be the joint product of their united inspita- tion5 and consequently, they (there were tieree of them3 voted, that an epifaph, prop Ter, should consist in a well aFransedffipie6s and heretofe, under the peeuiarlties of the case, 1t was quite proper that each executor should contribute a line er tenpore. Under this equitable arrangement, they conlnen- ced their poetic operations The inst eked out his line thus:

 ssAndrew Dunlap, Mayor of RG111ecc; , l The second, under a solemn sense of the Irecentafflieting dispensation of-Proyidence

 which had deprived Dundee of q civil head, continued