{"character_count": 1449, "word_count": 235, "ccnet_language_score": [0.949999988079071], "ccnet_perplexity": [738.0], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}
pusar yolce who were.not nresalsned to en- ieftain a preference for some prominent individual already ID nomination.

 The settled policy of the Opposition, if we may judge from she tone of their leading journals, contelnpIates the preservation of a thorough non-committal on the subject of the Presidential succession, until they have fairly measured their strength with the sup porters of the Administration, and oyer borne them, if possible, in the approaching Congressional elections. Snccess in this point would supersede the necessity of a concentration on theif part; as they might then scatter their votes among thirty indi- ylduals, and yet be sure that inc ultimate issue (being left to the decision of the House of Representatives) could not be materially adverse to them. If, however, the elections of the present. year should in sure the return of House iayora5te 10 the candidate of the Naitonal Convention, we presume that an efior viii then be made to concentrate the votes of the Opposition on some single candidate, though its stout ly (and with show, at least, of reason) affirmed by the Administration prlnts, that the "Whigso respectively of Massachusetts, of Ohio, of Yirginias and of South Caroli- na. can never be brought to unite with that cordiaity which is requisite to victory on any one individual, whoever he may be, and whatever his opinions and qualfica- lions. Time only can test the corrections of this presumption.