MAsnINaroN. Jan. 1q. 1884.
{"character_count": 1403, "word_count": 251, "ccnet_language_score": [0.9484999775886536], "ccnet_perplexity": [1225.699951171875], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}
aa WASHINGTON1 JaO IZt kos5R'

 think ] may safely and confidently assert, that the public deposits will not be changed; the long speeches which are made will not change many votes, and We may as well kno~ the worst at ouce. The deposits will not On- ly not be changed or restored to the United States Bank, but probably d seize .fdcios will be issued against the Bank. The only obsta- cle is. that the charter requires it to be done in Philadelphia. The President directs it to he done arre. The majority for the Bank in the Senate is strong; in the House of Repre- sentativcs il will be small against the Bank, say from 10 to 20. You probably, have nO- ticed the proceedings in Ohio. The Senate haye> recalled thcr resolutions against the Bank and Iald them on the table. The tenn

 per under which it was done was not Aatter- ing to K. c. nor much relished here they have hoasted too soon. The complaints from. the South and West efthe scarcity of money 1; the high premium on domesiic exchanges, are daily arriving. and cau,ioning Congress of,he unfortunate experiment now made, bot they have no effect here--go 0htod is the order of the day ,and the President assumes the respon- sibiity. Bot the scarcity ofmoney has pens- tratcd our Treasury. and instead of dispnting how to dispose of our surplus funds, the con troversy seems tO be how we shall repensh the national coffers. Star Correspondent.