expected to come on. There is no such thing, perhaps, in that body ,as a clearly defined opposition or Administration party. but i there is sufficient eoitrarettjj y of opinion to furnish materials for de- bate on matters and things in general, land it can hardly be otherwise than that l it shall break out.- yNat. Lst.

 Speaking of Mfr. iEEAyNE's Speech, the N. Y. Enquirer says:-We snail not follow the example of some journal ists and personal followers, who attempt to draw comparisons between Mr. Web- ster and MT. Hayne. We have ahigher stake in the contest than the intellectu- l al vigor of either of those gentlemen; nor can it be of consequence to the American reader as to whose periods were the most delicately turneds or which of the two combatants was the most accomplished orator. We go at once to the principles, the doctrines and the objeetof each, and measure their ability by the effect produced on the public mind.

 Mr. Webster is avowedly the leader and head of the old federal party under some disguise, it is true, and has in his speech attempted to defend the motives and character of that party, under the garb of defending the people of New

 England. MT. iIayne has traced the course of that party from its earliest aay and n tthiemost fs has has told the story of wrongs which they had done the country-its character abroad

 its tranquility at home-its internal prosperity and happiness-and has pre- sented such q picture of political defor- mity and depravity as was calculated to impress upon the mind of the spectator lively abhorrence of the men and the unhallowed objects they had and now have in view. For this, the country has to thank thank a.f. ttIagse Gigantic son and in mind, as Mir. Webster is re- presented by his devoted followers to be-the Goliah of the East has been met and overthrown by the David of the South. History never errs in honest hands, and the "reminiscences of Mr.. Hayne teach us how easy it is to forget and forgive, when the daring plans of our opponents should have taught us to have done neither. The reception of so many federalits in our ranks has been a fatal error, but not too late to remedy. Such speech as MT. Haynes is like gold thrice purified, and admonishes us by the recollections of the past to guard well the future. Had the federal party in lSl3-i4 gained the aseendancy the. republic would have been lost. The speech of Mir. Hayne is remarkable for having achieved very important point in arresting growing hostility towards our Southern brethren, which had been nourished and cherished by the most willy arts of our opponents. His speech is circulating far and wide, and skeptics now ask themselves in perusing it, how could we for moment believe that the South was not the friend of t1nion-the friend of their country, and of constitu- tional liberty?'