No. &. It is true that in controversies relating to the boundary between the two jurisdictions, the tribunal which is ulti- mateIy to decide, is to be established un- der the general government. But this does not change the principle of the case. The decision is to be impartialiy made, according to the rules of the constitution; and all tie usual and most efectual pre- cautions are taken to secure this impartial ity. Some such tribunal is clearly essen- tial to prevent an appeal to the sword, and q dissolution of the compact; and tiIat 1t ought to be established under the general, rather than under the local gov rrsmeIit i. or, to speak more properly, that 1t could be safely established under the first alone, Ia position not likely to be cqabstsA