10. not even fc people of South casp
10, not even thc people of South CaaD lima, as will be apparent by the result o5 the approaching election.

 This doctrine Of Eu!!i iyiagg or suspend ,;s-

 ing the operation oi a law of Congress.

 or of seceding from the union whenever

 a sovereign state shall feel disposed 50

 to do, IS not only novel in it's nature, but absolutely at variance with common |sensc and the nature ofour confederaey. The produce. of Ohio, Kentucky, Mis- souFi, Tennessee, Indiana and illinois. can only find its way to market through the Mississippi or by the lakes, onr ea- nal and the north river. Now let us suppose that the right of individual States to secede from the Union be ful- ly admitted, and that the States oI Lou- isiana and New York, in the exercise Of this right, establish themselves into separate republics, independent cf tho general government--what would bo the situation of the western states just named2 Would they not be deprived of their present markets for their produce, unless the governments of Louisiana and New York should think properto grant them as favor, what they now enjoy as right? Consequently-would notthe secession from the Union of New York and Louisiana, derive other states of the confederacy of certain unaliena- ble rights, secured to them by the reyoS =iution which senarafpd us from Gsroat Britain, and by the constitution of the United States, under the provisions of which they are entitled to uninterrupted intercourse with all parts ofthe Union! This is a fair illustration of what would be the facts of the South Carolina doc Urine, which is alike at variance with the permanancy of the confederacy and the rights of the individual members of it.