Extract Of letter from Sussex. Oct. 9th.
{"newspaper_name": "Delaware journal.", "edition": "01", "page": "p3", "byline": ""}
{"character_count": 1033, "word_count": 189, "ccnet_language_score": [0.9854000210762024], "ccnet_perplexity": [2100.60009765625], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}
Extract of letter from Sussex. Oct. 9th.


Some person has attempted, in the Patriot to
contradict the report Of Mr. M'l.ane's speech at
George Town, delivered in September. lpresume
the explanation came from Mr.. M Lane himself.
He can explain it as he pleases, but it will only
plunge him deeper in inconsistency, and lessen him
in the estimation of all candid men, who heard the
speech If the letter from Mr.. Bayard was written
in fact in February, 1901. (under Mr.. Adams ad
ministlation) Mr.. M'Lane ought to have said so in
his speech, This he surely did not He did not
mention the date of the letter. nor to whom 1t was
addressed, nor how he came by it. He may kick
at the report as much as he likes but, unless he
submits the identical letter to the gentlemen mem
toned in the Journal, | shall ever have my own
opinion ofits real character and Of his conduct Ev
cry gentleman with whom have conversed on the
subject, understood that part of Mr.. M'Lanes
speech precisely as did. He does not contradict
it in his explanation"