COMMENTS.
CASE OF JOHN HARRIS.
{"newspaper_name": "Delaware journal.", "edition": "01", "page": "p2", "byline": ""}
{"character_count": 2247, "word_count": 388, "ccnet_language_score": [0.9810000061988831], "ccnet_perplexity": [2235.60009765625], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}
We abstract from letter written by Mr.. Isaacs,
a personal friend to General Jackson, and member
Of congress from Tennessee, the following account
CT Harris. He was about fifty gears Of age, and
consequently not subject to militia duty had tor
merly been coroner, and, as such, become embar-
rassed had been sued, and a judgement obtained
against him. and three others, his suretes for
hundred dollars, on account Of his delinquencies in
that Office. Being unable to satisfy it, and unwilling
TO involve his friends, he availed himself OF the pro-
visions of law of the State sus pending legal pro-
cess for debt against mihtiamen in active service in
order to delay the execution of the judgement, and
hired as a substitute in the place of man named
Sierr,u-He had WIFE & NINE CHILDREN !;
two of his sons were men, the eldest married and
living near him the second went into the army
with him. Harris youngest child was but four or
tire 1curs otd at the time of his execution. Harris
sometimes attempted to preach. above descrp-
ton of this unhappy man, coming as it does from
such authority, will, we presume, be unquestioned
nv the parza,is of the General, and be admitted as
correct.


Those ofthe public who have watched the move
-nents of the Jacks on Managers, must have observ-
ed that it has always been part of their policy, to
attempt to destroy the credblity of every witness
who has as yet, appeared against General Jackson
w offer to our readers to day, one whose veracity
we presume theg will not mpeach-itis is no less
parsonage than the General himself. We, therefore
ask the attention of all impartial men to the follow
ing-comparing the above record ofthe Court Mar
tal as returned to the War department by Genera
Jackson, in 1915, with those charges preferred b.
him, in his letter to Mr.--, Of Baltimore, pub
llsbed in the 4" Baltimore Republican," after it ha
been publicly announced,that the Records could nc
be found in the department at Washington, and wer
supposed either to have been lost OF returned


Tennessee.


The charges in General Jackson's letter, are six


number aud we shall despatch them succinctly


possible -


GENERAL. JACKSON, in his letter, says, th


ilsllis broke ePea The Ccmnssary store, knocked c