Administration majority


THE People are, e,Con,i,,gt
Jpho cares for the CampbeNs ?

From the National Mfeliigencer.
{"newspaper_name": "Delaware journal.", "edition": "01", "page": "p2", "byline": ""}
{"character_count": 2292, "word_count": 386, "ccnet_language_score": [0.9526000022888184], "ccnet_perplexity": [1808.300048828125], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}



.1notter conspiracy against pubic Oirue detected
and erpoSed--We do not know whether the publl-
cation, recently made, OF the Letter OF Mr.. JET
FERsoN, to MIR. GILES, of Virginia, dated the 25th
December 1925, impressed our readers with the
conclusiveness of the proof which it exhibited of
the deliberate intention Of Mr.. Giles, in his publ-
cations of the last year, to deceive the Public, as
we'll respecting the history Of events in 807-8--9,
as concerning the true political character Of Mr..
ADAMS.


1t should be recollected that Mr. Giles, having in
has possession this letter Of Mr. jefferson, recently
published ,secreted and suppressedt, whilst he pub
lished letter of Mr. Jefferson upon other points,
dated on the very day following, (26th December,
l825) which he supposed he might WELD to some
| advantage against Mr.. Adams. Yes, he suppressed
this Letter, showing Mr.. Jeiferson's opinion of the
merit of Mr.. Adams and he suppressed, wtulIy or
heedlessy, other facts, ifnot other documents, the
publication of which would have put to shame STU
died hbels on the patriotism OF Mr. Adams
| 1t is melancholy to behold one, who has been, in
his time, useful public man, thus abandoning him
sefto the guidance Of passion, and ofirraonal and
ungovernable hate.


Since the publication of our exposition, on the
authority of Mr.. Adams, of the circumstances at
tending his indirect communications with Mr. JET
ferson, in 1903, Mr.. Giles has come out in the
Richmcnd Enquirer, and denies having either writ
ten Letters to, or received Letters from Mr. Ad
ans at that period. We are sorry to be obliged tc
say it, because we would willingly avoid the decla
ration ofa truth which it must be painful to receive
but, as the alternative to charge of deliberate
Efalsehood, we obliged 10 declare, that the me
mory of Mr.. Giles has altogether deserted him.


But, before we proceed further, let us quote fror
his letter in the Enquirer of Saturday last, the io
lowing extracts, towhch we wish to drectthe atter
i tcn of our readers. Assuming that Mr. Adams
Irresponsible for the explanatory remarks which at
|companed our republication Of the Letter of M
j. Jefferson, Mr. Giles says:
Sc "Mr Adams positively that Mr. Giles, and $
vera other members Of Congress- during thus session