{"newspaper_name": "Delaware patriot & American watchman.", "edition": "01", "page": "p2", "byline": ""}
{"character_count": 1287, "word_count": 220, "ccnet_language_score": [0.932699978351593], "ccnet_perplexity": [1750.199951171875], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}
negotiation. In your replies to Mr.. Russe,, -.
have aboured to prove. that the British no,So ua
ton given at that place, and their suh.sousa,
claims, extended to total exclusion Of tbs
of the United States from the whole Hshp"a'e hps"pe
while it is proved by the language of yuur r'ss, o
private letters from Client, and from the ,"a" Wv"
ments relative to the subsequent negotiation Wv.
their claims extended only to an exclusion Of ou.
fishermen from that portion Of the fisheries " . au'
ated within three miles of their shores wh;eh
the utmost extent to which they possess, or e~o'
claim exclusive jurisdiction" -"


Alter strong argument on the sub;ec, A.,
fourth letter comes to the following concius;o, w


"By facts, by the rights of your countr, anil
by your own assertions, we have proved, h. -.
the time of the negotiation at Client, the BraI. !.
Government possessed no territory on the Mss;s
spp, and that, consequently, that river was u,s wtt
in the exclusive jurisdiction of the United Stat.s
In supporting and voting for Mr.. Galla,ins nro'
position you therefore committed yiolatiohp p'Of ~
the very letter of your instructions; and your de.
clarations at the time, as we'll as subsequentv n
the British Government, prove that you did !.
knowingly"


ITO be continued.)