HOME INDUSTRY.
{"newspaper_name": "Delaware journal.", "edition": "01", "page": "p2", "byline": "A. NAUnAIs, Secy."}
{"character_count": 2498, "word_count": 424, "ccnet_language_score": [0.9474999904632568], "ccnet_perplexity": [1375.5999755859375], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}
OD our flrst page, the reader will find the pro
ceedings of meeting of the friends of Home Indus
try assembled in Philatelph elphia--consisting of near
ly one thousand persons. 1t will be perceived.
among other things, that this meeting do not entire
ly approve of the Tariff bill reported to Congress,
but they prefer the recommendations of the Harris
burg Convention, two thirds of whom were farmers
and wool growers, from 13 states in the Union The
bill lately reported to Congress political affar-
brough ght forward by men hostile to the AmercanSys-
TEN; because it contains, as a WHOLE such proyi-
slons az cannot pass, intended to pass, but
to distract and defeat the friends OF that gradual en-
couragement so desirable.


Following these proceedings, will be found the
Georgia doctrnes--and the refusal of the House Of
Virginia Dclegaes--l23 to Tito Join Gov. Giles
and Georgia in their plans Of resistance and disunop
What Jackson paper north of the Potomac, profess
ing to be friendly TO manufactures, has even censur
ed the Giles and Troops of the South?


| At meeting Of the Growers and Manufacturers
ofwoo, from various parts Of Massachusetts. ho-
den in Boston, Feb. IS, the bill recently reported
10 Congress- by the committee on Manufactures, was
disapproved, ON the grounds stated in the reso!u-
tions OF the Philadelphia meeting, published IN this
days paper but the recommendations of the Har-
rsburg convention, ON The subject Of wool ana
woolens, the entire appreciation ofthat meeting


Mr.. Niles, in his Register OF the S3d inst states
that, on the 31st of January, the Committee on
Manufactures at Washington reported bill to pro-
tect wool, without corresponding duty on woollen
manufactures and on the neat dag, in the Senate
of New York, proposition for such "correspond-


ing duties'' was negaticed-ll to 10.


! We have seen, in different papers, accounts OF
the particular interest Martin Van Buren, took in the
management of the report of the Committee on


Manufactures, and the above is one Of those strk-
ing coincdences which show that the hand of Mar
tin has been expert in this thing as in his cele-
brated method for the Improvement OF the press"


1t is deemed utterly impossible that the farmer


who grows the wool, should be encouraged in raising
it, if duties are not laid those foreign cloths COM


posed Of the quality of wool which we raise at
: home. If, therefore, the intention is to benefit the
American grower of wool, such duties must be laia