LYMAN Votes.
{"character_count": 1373, "word_count": 241, "ccnet_language_score": [0.9901999831199646], "ccnet_perplexity": [1350.0], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}
Our readers will recollect that the Lyman
votes were rejected by the Brunswick COM
mittee men in consequence OF a remons,ance
got up, as it appears expressly for that pur-
pose. The selectmen Of that town feeling
themselves unjustly and wantonly DETAINED By
that procedure have taken depositions OF four
out OF six OF the sgners of that remonstrapce,
by which it appears that a mean and pitisul
fraud was practised to obtain their signatures
to paper which contained the most gross and
palpabe falsehoods, by one John Leu, J.
who induced them TO sign it, without reading.
or hearing it read. Low assuring them il
was. the same as another reInonstrance he
then had against the towns sending two dele.
gates to the convention.


by these deposilions, and another Of the
collector OF taxes in that town, it appears that
the papers signed by these remonstrants were
written by g lauyer Prebie of Saco"-that
John Low Junr was employed TO get them
sfgned and to look into the tax books to see If
the town could send Two delegales-that a
certain gentlemaE wished 10 know-and ,ha,
Low was paid for his trost5ie, that two of
the signess thus traudulertly obtained were
against separation-the other two had no,
made up their minds on the subject and of
these latter two, one was not present at the
town meeting, having moved into Lyman but
one week before he was thus iraudulently in