{"character_count": 2842, "word_count": 493, "ccnet_language_score": [0.9412000179290771], "ccnet_perplexity": [1375.300048828125], "fasttext_language": ["en"]}
duced to sign the rcnouslrance. Sueb b.,.
been the means employed by the +" Friems
Of Separation 10 effect their darling ol;ec,-
men who call upon God .o-witness The nm;
ty Of their notives-whose report is imnio,s
ly asserted 10 be g true as God is true'n


The Argus complains of the harshness ~
the epiihets we have employed in speaking Of
the measures OF some separationists IL wo
have called things by their right names. it's
not our fault If men will employ the mos,
barefaced taisebood, fraud and disbonestv
combined with the lowest cunning and mean.
ness to accomplish their object, let them no,
blame US for treating them and their meas.
ures with the scorn, derision and coptenn,
they deserve.


Our readers win be amply repaid for /,
careful perusal Of the aide +" Annadyers;ons
upon the Reply Of the Convention by their
committee" concluded in this days paper


Its reasoning is clear, convincing and unan.
swerablc.


We have published part of the An,lv.
sis of the report of the committee h
day, and shall give the remainder in our nert.
when we hope the discussion of this subject
will be closed, by the decision of the Lepn.


lature. The analysis is a mastery produe.


tion, written in a style oflogical precision.
| accuracy and discrimination seldom eoualed'
4 writer over the signature of " Levir in
the last Argus has endeavoured TO raise a
smoke under which the Rev. Mr.. Hooper Of
Paris, might escape from the responsibility
| attached To bis conduct as a Delegate at The
Brunswick Convention. He insinuates that
thepiere which appeared in our paper Of the
9TH inst. +" is intended as deadly blow at
tue Baptist order OF christians, and thus
10 avoid the discussion Of transaction
. which beggars all comment he raises the
cry OF persecution, and endeaxours to excite
| undue prejudices amongst different denomina.
tions OF christians. But this will not do
| for his conduc. a, the convention was either
right or wrong independent Of his sectarian
principles.--To destroy the happy union


which Of late subsists in many places, and


which bids fair eventually 10 terminate in
consarnma,ion OF the desires Of all good men,
that the period may soon arrive when sswatch-


men shall see eye to eye," is in character


with the Argus; but it is +" pitifal, wond rous'
pitiiul.", It's an unrighteous way TO support
an unrighteous cause, and ought 10 be dis
countenanced by every friend of christian
union.


We say thus much on this subject in JUS


tice TO the writer OF :. Oxford whose ami
madsersions on the conduct Of Mr.. Hooper
were founded on the reprehensible* part he
acted at the convention, without any regard
OF even aiiuaon to his being a baptist.
II Gny doubt The ppprieiy ef our using the isrn
repreansitIe, lei him read aaenfirely The 4nima&
rersisnsn and -4naysis" in thss days Gaste, an1
satisfy hinl'eJ.