{"word_count": 509, "character_count": 3014}
- L and B (Children: Specific Issues: temporary leave to remove from the jurisdiction; circumcision) [2016] EWHC 849 (Fam) (Pour un commentaire: Frank Cranmer, "Religious circumcision and parental consent: L &#38; B" in Law &#38; Religion UK, 21 April 2016).- B and G (Children) (No.2) [2015] EWFC 3.- Re J (A Minor) (Prohibited Steps Order: Circumcision) [1999] 2 FLR 678 (Fam), [1999] 2 FCR 34 (mère chrétienne non pratiquante et père musulman non pratiquant); Affaire confirmée dans Re J (Specific Issue Order: Child’s Religious Upbringing and Circumcision) [1999] EWCA Civ 3022, [2000] 1 FLR 571 (CA).- Re S (Change of Names: Cultural Factors) [2001] 3 FCR 648 (Fam) (mère musulmane et père sikh, circoncision autorisée).- Re S (Specific Issue Order: Religion: Circumcision) [2004] EWHC 1282 (Fam); [2005] 1 FLR 236 (mère musulmane et père hindou jaïn). L'affaire a été portée en appel par la mère (dans S (Children) [2004] EWCA Civ 1257) mais l'appel a été rejeté.- KS v TS [2012] ScotSC 100 (père musulman et mère chrétienne).Autres affaires en droit de la famille et éducation religieuse:- C (A Child), Re [2012] EW Misc 15 (CC) (11 May 2012).- M.L. v. I.M.[2011] ScotSC 185 (30 November 2011).- M v H [2008] EWHC 324 (Fam) (21 February 2008).- N (A Child: Religion: Jehovah's Witness), Re [2011] EWHC B26 (Fam) (24 August 2011).- A Father v Lancashire County Council [2010] EWHC 2503 (Fam) (30 July 2010).- G (Children), Re [2012] EWCA Civ 1233.- E v The Governing Body of JFS &#38; Anor [2008] EWHC 1535 (Admin) (03 July 2008).- Siddiqui &#38; Anor v James and Charles Dodd (A Firm) [2006] EWHC 1295 (QB) (24 May 2006).- SS (Malaysia) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2013] EWCA Civ 888 (18 July 2013). - KC &#38; Anor v City of Westminster Social &#38; Community Services Dept. &#38; Anor [2008] EWCA Civ 198 (19 March 2008).- S (A Child), Re [2005] EWHC 1490 (Fam) (11 July 2005).- Williamson &#38; Ors v Secretary of State for Education and Employment [2002] EWCA Civ 1926 (12 December 2002).- R v Brown [1992] UKHL 7 (11 March 1993).Cas de faute professionnelle médicale: - Ahmed v. General Medical Council (GMC) [2001] UKPC 49 (19 November 2001).- Nicholas-Pillai v General Medical Council [2009] EWHC 1048 (Admin) (06 May 2009).- Malik, R (on the application of) v Waltham Forest PCT &#38; Anor [2006] EWHC 487 (Admin) (17 March 2006).En droit pénal:- R v. Barnes [2004] EWCA Crim 3246.Voir en particulier les commentaires de Lord Woolf CJ  sur le consentement aux opérations/ chirurgie au paragraphe 8.- R v. Brown [1994] 1 AC 212.Voir en particulier les commentaires sur la légalité de la circoncision rituelle de Lord Templeman.- Burrell v. Harmer [1967] Crim LR 169.- R v. Emmet [1999] EWCA Crim 1710.- Gillick v. West Norfolk and Wisbech AHA [1986] AC 112.-  Re: J [2000] 1 FCR 307.- Re: S (Specific Issue Order: Religion: Circumcision) [2004] EWHC 1282 (Fam).- St. George’s Healthcare v. S [1998] 3 All ER 673.- R v. Wilson [1997] QB 47.Marie FOX, Matt GIBSON et Sylvie LANGLAUDE.