{"word_count": 717, "character_count": 4653}
André-Jean Arnaud died on December 25th 2015, aged 79. We are indebted to him for initiatives of the utmost relevance for the development of the sociology of law and socio-legal studies. More than that: he personified this development.André-Jean Arnaud already published several influential books on socio-legal topics in the 1970’s; among them: Essai d’analyse structurale du Code civil français (1973), Les juristes face à la société (1975), and La justice (1977). Taking advantage of the work preparing another book, Critique de la raison juridique I: Où va la sociologie du droit? (1981), he created in 1980 the Cerc­le de sociologie et nomologie juridiques – Cercle de cordialité, an informal grouping of French speaking socio-legal scholars, from France, Belgium, Canada, Switzerland, and French speaking African countries. This network, strengthened by fre­quent and intense meetings, and the special support of his friends Jacques Commaille and François Ost, provided the conditions for the implementation of an impressive set of scien­tific projects: in particular the launching of a journal, Droit et Société, in 1985, and, under the same heading, of a book series (Librairie générale de droit et de jurisprudence, since 1991), as well as the publication of a Dictionnaire encyclopédique de théorie et sociologie du droit (1988, 2nd ed. 1993).Arnaud’s concern was, from the beginning, to link this francophone dynamic to the broader international development of the field. This is why he took up the challenge of organizing the 1985 RCSL Meeting in Aix-en-Provence; why he participated in the con­cluding analysis of the world report published under the coordination of Vincenzo Ferrari, Devel­oping Soci­ology of Law (1991); and why – a crucial decision in his life course – he accepted in 1988 to be the first scientific director of the International Institute for the Sociology of Law in Oñati. This meant, in concrete terms, to invent the Institute; to invent a new type of instrument for global scientific cooperation. The long lasting success of the Institute, which celebrated its 25th anniversary in 2014, proves the accuracy of its institutional design. And this design was shaped, to a significant extent, by practices initiated by André-Jean Arnaud, according to a pro­gramme convincingly pre­sented by him at the inauguration ceremony he organized in May 1989.In the years after his time in Oñati, he gave a new impetus to the French speaking socio-legal com­mu­nity, by promoting the founding of the French Asso­ciation Droit et Société, and by creating the Réseau Européen Droit et Société, under the auspices of the French Centre National de la Recherche scientifique. Apart from numerous meeti­ngs and publications, a re­markable achievement of this network was the setting up of a website offering comprehensive and sys­tem­atically updated in­formation on socio-legal research world-wide (a web­site only very recently replaced by the scientific blog now complementing the journal Droit et société).Outside the French speaking world, his most signifi­cant recent contribution to the global devel­opment of the sociology of law relate to Brazil, one of his many homelands, the one he shared with Wanda Capeller, his partner in life and science for decades. It was the setting up of a MOST-UNESCO Pro­gramme on Econo­mic Globalization and Mercosur Law, and of a UNESCO Chair “Human Rights and Violence: Govern­ment and Governance”. Fruits of these initiatives were, among others, a Dicionário da Glo­balização (Rio de Janeiro, 2006) and his last book: La gouvernance, un outil de participation (2014).As an exceptional scientific entrepreneur, André-Jean Arnaud deeply shaped the organizational structures of our domain. He also left us intellectual challenges in tune with the complexity and uncertainty of our time, an input which was recognised last year 2015 with the Adam Podgòrecki Prize. In particular, his writings invite us to re-invent the role of socio-legal scholar­ship in the face of the profound transformation of structures of governance, on a local, national, region­al, and global level. And to give priority, in our theo­retical and empirical research agenda, to the under­standing of social forces and creative dynamics, beyond the social structures which these forces both require and have to transcend. A dialectical relation­ship he did not only discuss in his scholarly writings, but, above all, he intensely experienced – and helped those, many in number, who had the good fortune to work with him, experience – in practice.Pierre Guibentif* Ce texte est paru dans la Newsletter du RCSL, hiver 2015/12.