{"word_count": 697, "character_count": 5099}
&#160;ArgumentThousands of people transmigrate daily between countries around the world. Amongst these daily transmigrants, many children and young people cross a national border as un/documented to receive an education. These &#8216;transfronterizos&#8217; are to be found in places as diverse as the borderlands between the USA and Mexico, China and Burma, or Malaysia and Singapore but also in many border refugee camps. In this volume this phenomenon is referred to as Education in the Borderlands (EiB). According to Passi (2011: 13), there are more than &#8220;300 land borders and scores of sea boundaries&#8221; between the 200 states or so that compose the world. This means that there are, in theory, as many possible cases of education in the borderlands.For Thomas Adam (2012: 1) even if national borders appear (increasingly) to be turned into fortified political borders, they are &#8220;certainly not impenetrable&#8221;.&#160;Wastl-Walter (2011: 2) adds that &#8220;borders are (&#8230;) complex spatial and social phenomena which are not static or invariable but which must be understood as highly dynamic&#8221;. Depending on the context, borders might be non-material or material (barbed-wire fence, a door, heavily-guarded, etc.) (ibid.).To understand borderlands as spaces of living and education requires a different understanding of border and space itself. Borderlands are not just a space where two politically constituted spaces meet each other but where these two also become intertwined, or as Heidegger would ask us to understand, where new forms of social relations and structures begin their &#8216;presencing&#8217;. It is this emerging of new forms that this volume is interested in identifying, exploring and understanding.In this volume we support the idea that politically constituted spaces do not always define peoples&#8217; space and the social, economic, historical, environmental and political ties and transnational identities that they have. This means that borderlands cannot be actually considered as a fringe where one entity changes into another but as its own space constituted and maintained by its own conditions. Such a spatial, contextual and dynamic understanding of the borderlands as spaces (Massey 2005; Paasi 2014) may be challenging to understand and explain institutionalized education that &#8211; as maintained by (nation) states &#8211; is expected to sustain specific ideas about space as physically and historically fixed and as an ethnically and socially coherent entity (Wimmer &#38; Glick Schiller 2002). Informal education, instead, in so far as not relying on the idea of the political national space, has a somehow different starting point, tools and aims in use. Whether institutionalized education can &#8216;make sense&#8217; of the lives in the borderlands depends on its ability to problematize the nationalistic and fixed understanding of space and the starting points and aims of institutionalized education.Apart from education in the borderlands between the USA and Mexico, very few studies have been published on the situation in other borderlands globally. Increase in cross-border education initiatives and with the current refugee crises in several parts of the world, there is a need for more research to be conducted and made available about this phenomenon of contemporary life.&#160;The purpose of this volume is to provide an authoritative, state of the art review of research on education in the borderlands worldwide. The authors may submit chapters dealing with, amongst others, intercultural, identity, pedagogical, and representational issues. Any context of education is of interest to the editors (kindergarten to adult education as well as from formal to informal and even non-formal education). In addition to empirical works the editors also welcome theoretical contributions exploring the problematics of education in borderlands.ReferencesMassey, D. (2005).&#160;For Space. London: SAGE.Paasi, A. (2014). The shifting landscape of border studies and the challenge of relational thinking. In Bufon, Milan et al. (eds.).&#160;The New European Frontiers: Social and Spatial (Re)integration Issues in Multicultural and Border Regions. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing. pp. 361-379.Wimmer, A., &#38; Glick Schiller, N. (2002), Methodological nationalism and beyond: Nation&#8211;state building, migration and the social sciences.&#160;Global Networks&#160;2(4), 301&#8211;334.Submission guidelinesAuthors are invited to submit a&#160;300-word proposal&#160;(+ a few lines about the author(s) in English to the editors (anna-leena.riitaoja@helsinki.fi,&#160;endhomework@gmail.com&#160;and&#160;fred.dervin@helsinki.fi) &#8211; please no pdfThe proposed book will be submitted to Routledge.TimelineAbstract of proposed chapter (300 words):&#160;15th&#160;Nov. 2016Full chapters to be submitted:&#160;1st&#160;May 2017Scientific editorsAnna-Leena Riitaoja, Professor, University of HelsinkiEtta Kralovec, Associate Professor, University of ArizonaFred Dervin, Professor,&#160;University of Helsinki