{"word_count": 4472, "character_count": 36729}
EditorsGuilherme Ribeiro, Laura P&#233;aud and Archie DaviesArgumentIn the last fifty years, the field of the history of geography has moved from an approach dominated by National Schools to an attention to the circulation of knowledge in its multiple scales. The history of science and of geography have in the last decades incorporated concepts such as transit, networks, mobilities, the transnational, circulation, centre of calculation, spaces of knowledge, geographies of science, spatial mobility of knowledge, geographies of reading and geographies of the book (Latour 1987; Ophir &#38; Shapin 1991; Shapin 1998; Livingstone 2003; Secord 2004; Meusburger, Livingstone &#38; J&#246;ns 2010; Keighren 2010; J&#246;ns, Meusberg &#38; Heffernan 2017). More recently, a turn has emerged towards considering the dynamics and necessities of decolonizing the history of geography (Craggs &#38; Neate, 2019). This work is turning the field of the history of geography into one of the most dynamic areas of the discipline. Yet we suggest that questions of language and translation have remained under-determined in this new field. Translation and writing have not received the same attention as, for instance, departmental histories, sites of museums, laboratories, botanic gardens, and scientific societies, for example. We suggest, therefore, that new perspectives opened up by translation studies can open new windows on the history of geography. In general terms, the history of the Human Sciences have neglected the breadth and extent of the role of translation (Schulte 1992; Bachmann-Medick 2009). This begins from recognizing the singularity of translation, and rejecting the idea that it is merely a process of copying (Venuti 2004, 2009, 2013). Thus, if we are interested on how ideas, authors, and books travel, we cannot ignore the presence of language and translation.Given its ethical, political, and geopolitical content (Spivak 2004 [1993]; Cassin 2018 [2004], 2018; Ricoeur 2004; Mignolo 2012), the amnesia over translation is more grave because language and translation have been active processes in promoting scientific hierarchies through periodicals, research networks, congresses, and books. The hierarchical relationship between language worlds has led to some works being designated as central, and others as peripheral to knowledge production. Translation is a key vector in the academic division of labor. From this angle, both plurilingualism and translations are phenomena that could be explain in terms of dominant and dominated languages &#8212; Latin and French in the past, English nowadays (Casanova 2015). Joining geographers from different nationalities the role of translation and the effects of the English language on academic publications have been examined by a stimulating litterature (Minca 2000; Wright 2002; Cameron 2003; Garcia-Ramon 2003; Aalbers 2004; Desbiens &#38; Ruddick 2006; M&#252;ller 2007; Houssay-Holzschuh et Milhaud 2013&#160;; Novaes 2015; Germes &#38; Husseini de Ara&#250;jo 2016; Gyuris 2018). While these issues effect English native speakers in different ways, it is also worth highlighting the fractures within Global English itself, and the hierarchical practices inscribed in different modes of speaking and writing within one language. In practice, however, the criteria established by rankings, awards, and funding end up directing academic capital to papers and networks in the English language and in Anglo-saxon and European universities. The hegemony of English makes it difficult to question the canon (Keighren, Abrahamsson &#38; della Dora 2012), or to focus attention on other geographical traditions (Ferretti 2019). This state of things &#160;needs to be questioned in order to explore the dimensions of linguistic circuits and the resistance and fissures within Anglophone hegemony.Recognizing that these matters continue to elicit work by geographers around the world, and encouraging their exploration from different locations and perspectives, we introduce the special issue The politics and geopolitics of translation: the multilingual circulation of knowledge and transnational histories of geography proposed by Terra Brasilis. Revista Brasileira de Hist&#243;ria da Geografia e Geografia Hist&#243;rica [https://journals.openedition.org/terrabrasilis/1080]. The journal has been translating classic and contemporary geographers since its refoundation in 2012 and now seeks a wider conversation on translation, language, and circulation. &#160;&#160;&#160;We invite papers addressing the following questions:The politics and geopolitics of translation and its effects on the production of geographical knowledgeThe special issue seeks to question:&#160;The spatial dynamics and forms of translation in geographyLes traductions en zones frontali&#232;resTranslation in the border zonesThe circulation of knowledge produced by the work of translatingActors and networks of translation in geography &#160;&#160;The effects of domination and hegemony made visible through translationThe intersections between gender and translation, and feminist theories of translationPublications, readers and writings in the light of the transnational history of geographyHere the themes could be as follows&#160;:Hierarchies and asymmetries around the production of geographical knowledge in different languagesThe coloniality of geographical knowledgepostcolonialism and postcolonialiy of geographical knowledge: the role of language in the search for alternativesCommunication, muteness, and exchanges in the &#8220;international&#8221; conferences of geographyExperiences of teaching and research on multilingualismIndividuals, networks, travels, artifacts: transnational histories of geographyLanguage, geography and intersectionalityCross-cutting questions can also be envisaged, favoring an approach by minoritiesTranslation and writing in geography&#160;: issues of gender, race and classThe place of the Global South in the linguistic politicsHistories of translation and geography from the Global South: archives, journals, institutionsInformation for authorsIdioms: Portuguese, Spanish, English, FrenchDeadline: 20th August 2020Size: until 12 thousand words or 30 pagesFormatting: Times New Roman 12, space between paragraphes 1,5. More informations: https://journals.openedition.org/terrabrasilis/3441Email from editors:&#160; Guilherme Ribeiro [geofilos@msn.com], Laura P&#233;aud [laura.peaud@gmail.com], Archie Davies [archie.oj.davies@gmail.com] and Terra Brasilis [terrabrasilis@redebrasilis.net]. Please send to all four email adresses.ReferencesAalbers, M. B. (2004). Creative destruction through the Anglo-American hegemony: a non-Anglo-American view on publications, referees and language. Area 36.3, 319&#8211;322.Bachmann-Medick, D. The translational turn. Translation Studies, vol. 2, n.1, 2-16 (2009).Cameron, D. (2003). Foreign exchanges: the politics of translation. Critical Quaterly, vol. 45, issue 1-2, july, 215-219.Casanova, P. (2015). La langue mondiale. Traduction et domination. Paris&#160;: Seuil.Cassin, B. (2018). Translation as politics. Javnost - The Public, 1-9.Cassin, B. (2018 [2004]). Apresenta&#231;&#227;o da 1&#170; edi&#231;&#227;o francesa do Vocabulaire Europ&#233;en des Philosophies. Tradu&#231;&#227;o de Fernando Santoro. In: Cassin, B. Dicion&#225;rio dos intraduz&#237;veis: um vocabul&#225;rio das filosofias. Volume Um: L&#237;nguas. Organiza&#231;&#227;o de Fernando Santoro e Luisa Buarque. Belo Horizonte: Aut&#234;ntica, pp. 16-21.Craggs, R. Neate, H. (2019). What happens if we start from Nigeria? Diversifying Histories of Geography. Annals of the American Association of Geographers, 1-18.Desbiens, C., Ruddick, S. (2006). Speaking of geography: language, power, and the spaces of Anglo-Saxon `hegemony'. Society and Space 24, pp.1-8.Ferretti, F. (2019). Rediscovering other geographical traditions. Geography Compass, Volume 13, Issue 3, 1-15.Garcia-Ramon, M-D. (2003). Globalization and international geography: the questions of languages and scholarly traditions. Progress in Human Geography 2 7, 1-5.Germes, M., Husseini de Ara&#250;jo, S. (2016). For a critical practice of translation in geography. ACME: an international journal for critical geographies 15 (1), 1-14.&#160;Gyuris, F. (2018). Problem or solution? Academic internationalization in contemporary human geography in East Central Europe. Geographische Zeitschrift 106, 1, 38-49.Houssay-Holzschuch, M., Milhaud, O. (2013). Geography after Babel. A view from the French province. Geographica Helvetica, 68, 51-55.J&#246;ns, H., Meusburger, P., Heffernan, M. (Eds.). (2017). Mobilities of knowledge. Cham: Springer.Keighren, I. M., Abrahamsson, C., della Dora, V. (2012). On canonical geographies. Dialogues in Human Geography, vol 2 (3), 296-312.Keighren, I. M. (2010). Reading the messy reception of Influences of geographic environment (1911). In: Ogborn, Miles, Withers, Charles W.J. (Eds). Geographies of the book. Farnham: Ashgate, 277-298.Latour, B. (1987). Science in action. How to Follow Scientists and Engineers Through Society. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.Livingstone, D. (2003). Putting science in its place. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Meusburger, P., Livingstone, D., J&#246;ns, H. (Eds.).&#160; Geographies of science. Heidelberg: Springer (2010).Mignolo, W. (2012). Reflections on translation across colonial epistemic differences. Languages, media and visual imaginary. In: Italiano, F., R&#246;ssner, M. (edited by). Translatio/n: Narration, Media and the Staging of Differences. Bielefeld: Transcript Verlag.Minca, C. (2000). Venetian geographical praxis. Society and Space 18, 285-289.M&#252;ller, M. (2007). What&#8217;s in a word? Problematizing translation between languages. Area, vol. 39, n. 2.Novaes, A. R. (2015). Celebrations and challenges: the international at the 16th International Conference of Historical Geographers, London, July 2015. Journal of Historical Geography, Volume 50, October 106-108.Ophir, A., Shapin, S. (1991). The place of knowledge. A methodological survey. Science in context 4, 1, 3-21.Ricoeur, P. (2004). Sur la traduction. Paris: Bayard.Secord, J. (2004). Knowledge in transit. Isis 95, 654-672.Shapin, S. (1998). Placing the view from nowhere: historical and sociological problems in the location of science. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 23, 5-12.Schulte, R. (1992). Translation and the academic world. Translation Review, 38-39:1.Spivak, G. C. (2004 [1993]). The politics of translation. In: Venuti, Lawrence (edited by). Translation Studies Reader. London and New York: Routledge, 397-416.Venuti, L. (2013). Traduire Derrida sur la traduction: relevance et r&#233;sistance &#224; la discipline. Noesis, 21, 125-129. Translated by Ren&#233; Lemieux.&#160;Venuti, L. (2009). Translation, intertextuality, interpretation. Romance studies, v.27, n.3, july, 157-173.Venuti, L. (2004). How to read a translation. Words without borders. The online magazine for international litterature, july. Available on https://www.wordswithoutborders.org/article/how-to-read-a-translationWright, M. W. (2002). The scalar politics of translation. Geoforum 33, 413-414.Dire&#231;&#227;oSob a dire&#231;&#227;o de Guilherme Ribeiro, Laura P&#233;aud e Archie DaviesApresenta&#231;&#227;oNos &#250;ltimos cinquenta anos, de modo geral o campo da hist&#243;ria da geografia t&#234;m operado a passagem de uma abordagem centrada nas Escolas Nacionais em prol da circula&#231;&#227;o do conhecimento em suas m&#250;ltiplas escalas. Consequentemente, o l&#233;xico da hist&#243;ria das ci&#234;ncias e da geografia vem sendo progressivamente povoado por conceitos como tr&#226;nsito, redes, mobilidades, transnacional, circula&#231;&#227;o, transfer&#234;ncia, centrais de c&#225;lculo, espa&#231;os do conhecimento, geografias da ci&#234;ncia, mobilidade espacial do conhecimento, geografias da leitura e geografias do livro (Latour 1987; Ophir &#38; Shapin 1991; Shapin 1998; Livingstone 2003; Secord 2004; Meusburger, Livingstone &#38; J&#246;ns 2010; Keighren 2010; J&#246;ns, Meusberg &#38; Heffernan 2017). Mais recentemente, tem surgido um movimento que considera a necessidade de descolonizar a pr&#243;pria hist&#243;ria da geografia (Craggs &#38; Neate 2019), tornando este campo um dos mais din&#226;micos da disciplina. Entretanto, mesmo no interior desse quadro, temas como l&#237;nguas, tradu&#231;&#245;es e escrita n&#227;o t&#234;m recebido a mesma aten&#231;&#227;o em compara&#231;&#227;o a museus, laborat&#243;rios, jardins bot&#226;nicos e sociedades cient&#237;ficas, por exemplo. Ao recorrermos &#224;s recentes perspectivas abertas pelo dom&#237;nio dos translation studies, constatamos que as Ci&#234;ncias Humanas t&#234;m negligenciado o alcance e a relev&#226;ncia do papel das tradu&#231;&#245;es (Schulte 1992; Bachmann-Medick 2009). Neste contexto, &#233; preciso tom&#225;-las em suas m&#250;ltiplas singularidades recusando, antes de mais nada, o sentido de c&#243;pia insistentemente a elas rotulado (Venuti 2004, 2009, 2013). Assim, quando tentamos investigar como id&#233;ias, autores e livros viajam, n&#227;o podemos ignorar a presen&#231;a dos idiomas e das tradu&#231;&#245;es.Este tipo de amn&#233;sia torna-se ainda mais grave porque, dados os seus conte&#250;dos &#233;tico, pol&#237;tico e geopol&#237;tico (Spivak 2004 [1993]; Cassin 2018 [2004], 2018; Ricoeur 2004; Mignolo 2012), as l&#237;nguas participam ativamente das hierarquias e das assimetrias cient&#237;ficas respons&#225;veis pela constitui&#231;&#227;o de peri&#243;dicos, redes de pesquisa, congressos e obras tidos como centrais ou perif&#233;ricos no bojo da divis&#227;o do trabalho acad&#234;mico. N&#227;o por acaso, tanto os pa&#237;ses que mais traduzem quanto o plurilinguismo s&#227;o fen&#244;menos derivados de uma balan&#231;a na qual a maior parte dos idiomas s&#227;o considerados dominados em rela&#231;&#227;o a idiomas dominantes &#8212; latim e franc&#234;s no passado, ingl&#234;s no presente (Casanova 2015). Reunindo ge&#243;grafos de v&#225;rias nacionalidades, os pap&#233;is da tradu&#231;&#227;o e os efeitos da hegemonia da l&#237;ngua inglesa sobre a produ&#231;&#227;o geogr&#225;fica &#160;t&#234;m sido discutidos por uma cr&#237;tica e estimulante literatura (Minca 2000; Wright 2002; Cameron 2003; Garcia-Ramon 2003; Aalbers 2004; Desbiens &#38; Ruddick, 2006; M&#252;ller 2007; Houssay-Holzschuh et Milhaud, 2013; Novaes 2015; Germes &#38; Husseini de Ara&#250;jo 2016; Gyuris 2018). Uma vez que essas quest&#245;es afetam nativos falantes de l&#237;ngua inglesa de diferentes formas, &#233; importante sublinhar tamb&#233;m as fraturas no bojo do pr&#243;prio ingl&#234;s global, assim como as pr&#225;ticas hier&#225;rquicas inscritas em distintos modos de falar e de escrever no interior de uma l&#237;ngua. Na pr&#225;tica, por&#233;m, os crit&#233;rios estabelecidos por rankings universit&#225;rios, premia&#231;&#245;es e institui&#231;&#245;es de fomento acabam por valorizar muito mais as publica&#231;&#245;es em ingl&#234;s e as redes com o mundo anglo-sax&#227;o que com outros espa&#231;os. Referindo-se especialmente aos impactos sobre a hist&#243;ria da geografia, tal estrutura dificulta seja o questionamento dos c&#226;nones (Keighren, Abrahamsson &#38; della Dora 2012), seja o interesse pela busca de outras tradi&#231;&#245;es geogr&#225;ficas (Ferretti 2019). Tal situa&#231;&#227;o precisa ser interrogada se quisermos explorar tanto as dimens&#245;es dos circuitos idiom&#225;ticos quanto as resist&#234;ncias e fissuras no seio da hegemonia angl&#243;fona.Entendendo que tais t&#243;picos continuam a incidir sobre o trabalho de ge&#243;grafos ao redor de todo o mundo e que podem ser explorados sob os mais variados &#226;ngulos e a partir de diferentes lugares de fala, a Terra Brasilis. Revista Brasileira de Hist&#243;ria da Geografia e Geografia Hist&#243;rica [https://journals.openedition.org/terrabrasilis/1080] prop&#245;e o dossi&#234; &#8220;Pol&#237;ticas e geopol&#237;ticas de tradu&#231;&#227;o, circula&#231;&#227;o multilingue do conhecimento e hist&#243;rias transnacionais da geografia&#8221;. Se muito embora desde sua refunda&#231;&#227;o em 2012 a revista tem se dedicado de maneira pontual &#224;s tradu&#231;&#245;es de ge&#243;grafos cl&#225;ssicos e contempor&#226;neos, por meio do presente dossi&#234; ela buscar&#225; questionar de modo mais sistem&#225;tico os desafios envolvendo tradu&#231;&#227;o, l&#237;ngua e circula&#231;&#227;o.&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160; Sem querer esgotar todas as possibilidades, as tem&#225;ticas sugeridas s&#227;o as seguintes:Pol&#237;ticas e geopol&#237;ticas de tradu&#231;&#227;o e suas consequ&#234;ncias sobre a produ&#231;&#227;o de saberes geogr&#225;ficosNesta perspectiva, questionar-se-&#227;o, entre outros t&#243;picos:dispositivos espaciais da tradu&#231;&#227;o em geografiatradu&#231;&#245;es em zonas fronteiri&#231;ascircula&#231;&#227;o cient&#237;fica resultante do trabalho de tradu&#231;&#227;oatores e redes de tradu&#231;&#227;o em geografiaefeitos da domina&#231;&#227;o e da hegemonia vis&#237;veis atrav&#233;s das tradu&#231;&#245;esPublica&#231;&#245;es, leituras e escrita &#224; luz de uma hist&#243;ria transnacional da geografiaAqui, as quest&#245;es indicadas s&#227;o as seguintes:hierarquias e assimetrias ao redor da produ&#231;&#227;o geogr&#225;fica em diferentes idiomascolonialidade do saber geogr&#225;ficop&#243;s-colonialismo, p&#243;s-colonialidade, descoloniza&#231;&#227;o do saber geogr&#225;fico: o papel das l&#237;nguas na busca de alternativascomunica&#231;&#227;o, silenciamento e interc&#226;mbio nas confer&#234;ncias internacionais de geografiaexperi&#234;ncias de ensino e de pesquisa em plurilinguismoindiv&#237;duos, redes, viagens e artefatos no &#226;mago das hist&#243;rias transnacionais da geografiaL&#237;ngua, geografia e interseccionalidadeA fim de contemplar a necess&#225;ria agenda das minorias, aponte-se:quest&#245;es de g&#234;nero ao redor da tradu&#231;&#227;o e da escrita geogr&#225;ficaso lugar do Sul Global face aos desafios lingu&#237;sticoshist&#243;rias da geografia desde o Sul Global: arquivos, revistas, institui&#231;&#245;esNormas de submiss&#227;oL&#237;nguas: portugu&#234;s, espanhol, ingl&#234;s, franc&#234;sDeadline: 20 de agosto de 2020Tamanho dos artigos: at&#233; 12 mil palavras ou 30 p&#225;ginasFormata&#231;&#227;o: Fonte Times New Roman 12, espa&#231;o entre par&#225;grafos 1,5. Mais informa&#231;&#245;es: https://journals.openedition.org/terrabrasilis/3441Email dos organizadores:&#160; Guilherme Ribeiro [geofilos@msn.com], Laura P&#233;aud [laura.peaud@gmail.com], Archie Davies [archie.oj.davies@gmail.com] e Terra Brasilis [terrabrasilis@redebrasilis.net]. Favor enviar para os quatro simultaneamente.Refer&#234;nciasAalbers, M. B. (2004). Creative destruction through the Anglo-American hegemony: a non-Anglo-American view on publications, referees and language. Area 36.3, 319&#8211;322.Bachmann-Medick, D. The translational turn. Translation Studies, vol. 2, n.1, 2-16 (2009).Cameron, D. (2003). Foreign exchanges: the politics of translation. Critical Quaterly, vol. 45, issue 1-2, july, 215-219.Casanova, P. (2015). La langue mondiale. Traduction et domination. Paris&#160;: Seuil.Cassin, B. (2018). Translation as politics. Javnost - The Public, 1-9.Cassin, B. (2018 [2004]). Apresenta&#231;&#227;o da 1&#170; edi&#231;&#227;o francesa do Vocabulaire Europ&#233;en des Philosophies. Tradu&#231;&#227;o de Fernando Santoro. In: Cassin, B. Dicion&#225;rio dos intraduz&#237;veis: um vocabul&#225;rio das filosofias. Volume Um: L&#237;nguas. Organiza&#231;&#227;o de Fernando Santoro e Luisa Buarque. Belo Horizonte: Aut&#234;ntica, pp. 16-21.Craggs, R. Neate, H. (2019). What happens if we start from Nigeria? Diversifying Histories of Geography. Annals of the American Association of Geographers, 1-18.Desbiens, C., Ruddick, S. (2006). Speaking of geography: language, power, and the spaces of Anglo-Saxon `hegemony'. Society and Space 24, pp.1-8.Ferretti, F. (2019). Rediscovering other geographical traditions. Geography Compass, Volume 13, Issue 3, 1-15.Garcia-Ramon, M-D. (2003). Globalization and international geography: the questions of languages and scholarly traditions. Progress in Human Geography 2 7, 1-5.Germes, M., Husseini de Ara&#250;jo, S. (2016). For a critical practice of translation in geography. ACME: an international journal for critical geographies 15 (1), 1-14.&#160;Gyuris, F. (2018). Problem or solution? Academic internationalization in contemporary human geography in East Central Europe. Geographische Zeitschrift 106, 1, 38-49.Houssay-Holzschuch, M., Milhaud, O. (2013). Geography after Babel. A view from the French province. Geographica Helvetica, 68, 51-55.J&#246;ns, H., Meusburger, P., Heffernan, M. (Eds.). (2017). Mobilities of knowledge. Cham: Springer.Keighren, I. M., Abrahamsson, C., della Dora, V. (2012). On canonical geographies. Dialogues in Human Geography, vol 2 (3), 296-312.Keighren, I. M. (2010). Reading the messy reception of Influences of geographic environment (1911). In: Ogborn, Miles, Withers, Charles W.J. (Eds). Geographies of the book. Farnham: Ashgate, 277-298.Latour, B. (1987). Science in action. How to Follow Scientists and Engineers Through Society. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.Livingstone, D. (2003). Putting science in its place. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Meusburger, P., Livingstone, D., J&#246;ns, H. (Eds.). &#160;Geographies of science. Heidelberg: Springer (2010).Mignolo, W. (2012). Reflections on translation across colonial epistemic differences. Languages, media and visual imaginary. In: Italiano, F., R&#246;ssner, M. (edited by). Translatio/n: Narration, Media and the Staging of Differences. Bielefeld: Transcript Verlag.Minca, C. (2000). Venetian geographical praxis. Society and Space 18, 285-289.M&#252;ller, M. (2007). What&#8217;s in a word? Problematizing translation between languages. Area, vol. 39, n. 2.Novaes, A. R. (2015). Celebrations and challenges: the international at the 16th International Conference of Historical Geographers, London, July 2015. Journal of Historical Geography, Volume 50, October 106-108.Ophir, A., Shapin, S. (1991). The place of knowledge. A methodological survey. Science in context 4, 1, 3-21.Ricoeur, P. (2004). Sur la traduction. Paris: Bayard.Secord, J. (2004). Knowledge in transit. Isis 95, 654-672.Shapin, S. (1998). Placing the view from nowhere: historical and sociological problems in the location of science. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 23, 5-12.Schulte, R. (1992). Translation and the academic world. Translation Review, 38-39:1.Spivak, G. C. (2004 [1993]). The politics of translation. In: Venuti, Lawrence (edited by). Translation Studies Reader. London and New York: Routledge, 397-416.Venuti, L. (2013). Traduire Derrida sur la traduction: relevance et r&#233;sistance &#224; la discipline. Noesis, 21, 125-129. Translated by Ren&#233; Lemieux.&#160;Venuti, L. (2009). Translation, intertextuality, interpretation. Romance studies, v.27, n.3, july, 157-173.Venuti, L. (2004). How to read a translation. Words without borders. The online magazine for international litterature, july. Available on https://www.wordswithoutborders.org/article/how-to-read-a-translationWright, M. W. (2002). The scalar politics of translation. Geoforum 33, 413-414.DirectionSous la direction de Guilherme Ribeiro, Laura P&#233;aud et Archie DaviesArgumentaireDurant les cinquante derni&#232;res ann&#233;es, le champ de l&#8217;histoire de la g&#233;ographie a connu un mouvement de transformation de ces approches, passant d&#8217;une lecture par les &#233;coles nationales &#224; une appr&#233;hension par la circulation des savoirs et des connaissances &#224; diff&#233;rentes &#233;chelles. L&#8217;histoire des sciences et de la g&#233;ographe a ainsi incorpor&#233; des concepts tels que &#8220;transit&#8221;, &#8220;reseaux&#8221;, &#8220;mobilit&#233;s&#8221;, &#8220;transferts&#8221;, &#8220;circulations&#8221;, &#8220;centres de calcul&#8221;, &#8220;espaces de connaissance&#8221;, &#8220;g&#233;ographie des sciences&#8221;, &#8220;mobilit&#233; spatiale de la connaissance&#8221;, &#8220;geographies de la lecture et du livre&#8221;, etc. (Latour 1987; Ophir &#38; Shapin 1991; Shapin 1998; Livingstone 2003; Secord 2004; Meusburger, Livingstone &#38; J&#246;ns 2010; Keighren 2010; J&#246;ns, Meusberg &#38; Heffernan 2017). &#160;Plus r&#233;cemment, un tournant a &#233;merg&#233;, qui consid&#232;re les dynamiques et les n&#233;cessit&#233;s de d&#233;coloniser l&#8217;histoire de la g&#233;ographie et de la production de savoirs g&#233;ographiques (Craggs &#38; Neate 2019). Cette th&#233;matique appara&#238;t aujourd&#8217;hui comme l&#8217;une des plus actives dans le champ de l&#8217;histoire de la g&#233;ographie.Pourtant, dans ce context de renouvellement th&#233;matiques, la langue, la traduction ou l&#8217;&#233;criture n&#8217;ont cependant pas encore la m&#234;me importance que les lieux de savoir (mus&#233;es et mus&#233;ums, laboratoires, jardins botaniques ou soci&#233;t&#233;s savantes par exemple), qui restent les entr&#233;es majeures des historiens des sciences et de la g&#233;ographie. Or, il appara&#238;t pourtant que ces th&#232;mes s&#8217;int&#232;grent pleinement &#224; l&#8217;histoire des sciences : les r&#233;centes perspectives ouvertes par le champ des translation studies le montrent, tout en signalant que les sciences humaines et sociales ont pour l&#8217;instant n&#233;glig&#233; cette approche (Schulte 1992; Bachmann-Medick 2009; Venuti 2004, 2009, 2013). Il nous semble ainsi int&#233;ressant de consid&#233;rer les traductions et plus g&#233;n&#233;ralement les enjeux linguistiques, car de la m&#234;me mani&#232;re que les id&#233;es, les auteurs et les livres voyagent, les mots ont aussi leurs propres circulations.En consid&#233;rant par ailleurs leur aspect &#233;thique, politique et g&#233;opolitique (Spivak 2004 [1993]; Cassin 2018, 2018; Ricoeur 2004; Mignolo 2012), il est d&#8217;autant plus urgent de consid&#233;rer la mani&#232;re dont les langues et traductions scientifiques ont contribu&#233; activement &#224; l&#8217;&#233;laboration de structures et de hi&#233;rarchies scientifiques assez fig&#233;es. Que l&#8217;on consid&#232;re en effet les r&#233;seaux de recherche, les revues, les congr&#232;s ou les livres, toutes ces productions sont engag&#233;es dans une logique de concurrence, les pla&#231;ant selon leur langue dans une position centrale ou p&#233;riph&#233;rique dans le champ. Vus sous cet angle, &#224; la fois le plurilinguisme et la traduction peuvent &#234;tre compris dans une logique de domination par une ou quelques langues h&#233;g&#233;moniques &#8211; le latin, le fran&#231;ais hier ; aujourd&#8217;hui l&#8217;anglais (Casanova 2015). Hormis les g&#233;ographes anglo-saxons, nettement moins concern&#233;s par cet enjeu du fait de leur position h&#233;g&#233;monique, cette question engage les g&#233;ographes de toutes nationalit&#233;s et de toutes langues. Le r&#244;le de la traduction et les effets de l&#8217;anglais sur les publications acad&#233;miques ont en effet &#233;t&#233; bien d&#233;montr&#233;s par une litt&#233;rature r&#233;cente tr&#232;s stimulante (Minca 2000; Wright 2002; Cameron 2003; Garcia-Ramon 2003; Aalbers 2004; Desbiens &#38; Ruddick, 2006; M&#252;ller 2007; Houssay-Holzschuh et Milhaud, 2013; Novaes 2015; Germes &#38; Husseini de Ara&#250;jo 2016; Gyuris 2018). En pratique, les crit&#232;res de ranking, de r&#233;compense et de recherche de fonds favorisent les articles &#233;crits en langue anglais et les r&#233;seaux anglo-saxons et/ou europ&#233;ens plus que les autres. M&#234;me au sein de l&#8217;anglophonie, des effets de domination entre Am&#233;rique du Nord-Europe et reste du monde sont bien sensibles. Dans l&#8217;histoire de la g&#233;ographie, cette pr&#233;gnance linguistique de l&#8217;anglais rend difficile la remise en question des canons acad&#233;miques (Keighren, Abrahamsson &#38; della Dora 2012) ou l&#8217;int&#233;r&#234;t port&#233; &#224; d&#8217;autres traditions g&#233;ographiques nationales (Ferretti, 2019). De tels effets m&#233;ritent d&#8217;&#234;tre interrog&#233;s par l&#8217;histoire de la discipline, afin de montrer les invariants, la structuration des circuits linguistiques et de traduction et l&#8217;existence de poches de luttes, de r&#233;sistances et d&#8217;alternatives &#224; cette h&#233;g&#233;monie.Reconnaissant que ces enjeux linguistiques p&#232;sent, de mani&#232;re aussi bien historique que contemporaine, sur le travail des g&#233;ographes, et qu&#8217;ils peuvent &#234;tre interrog&#233;s selon un angle de vue renouvel&#233;, la revue Terra Brasilis. Revista Brasileira de Hist&#243;ria da Geografia e Geografia Hist&#243;rica [https://journals.openedition.org/terrabrasilis/1080] propose un num&#233;ro sp&#233;cial &#171;&#160;Politiques et g&#233;opolitiques de la traduction, circulation des savoirs et histoires transnationales de la g&#233;ographie&#160;&#187;. Depuis sa refondation en 2012, la revue se penche sur les enjeux de traduction, de mani&#232;re ponctuelle. A travers ce num&#233;ro, elle cherche &#224; questionner plus syst&#233;matiquement les enjeux de traduction, langage et circulation.De mani&#232;re non exhaustive, les articles pourront porter sur les th&#233;matiques suivantes&#160;:Les politiques et g&#233;opolitiques de la traduction et leurs cons&#233;quences sur la production des savoirs g&#233;ographiquesDans cette perspective, il s&#8217;agira entre autres de questionner&#160;:Les dispositifs spatiaux de la traduction en g&#233;ographieLes traductions en zones frontali&#232;resLes circulations scientifiques r&#233;sultant du travail de traductionLes acteurs et r&#233;seaux de la traduction en g&#233;ographieLes effets de domination et d&#8217;h&#233;g&#233;monie visibles &#224; travers la traductionPublications, lectures et &#233;critures dans une perspective d&#8217;histoire transnationale de la g&#233;ographieIci les enjeux soulev&#233;s pourront &#234;tre de plusieurs ordres&#160;:Les hi&#233;rarchies et asym&#233;tries autour de la production de la g&#233;ographie en diff&#233;rentes languesLa colonialit&#233; du savoir g&#233;ographiquePostcolonialisme et postcolonialit&#233; du savoir g&#233;ographique&#160;: la place de la langue dans la recherche d&#8217;alternativesCommunication, silence et &#233;change dans les conf&#233;rences internationales de g&#233;ographieExp&#233;riences d&#8217;enseignement et de recherche en plurilinguismeLes individus, les r&#233;seaux, les voyages et les artefacts au c&#339;ur des histoires transnationales de la g&#233;ographieLangue, g&#233;ographie et intersectionnalit&#233;Des questionnements transversaux peuvent &#233;galement &#234;tre envisag&#233;s, en privil&#233;giant une approche par les minorit&#233;s&#160;:Les questions de genre autour de la traduction et de l&#8217;&#233;criture de la g&#233;ographieLa place du Global South dans les enjeux linguistiquesHistoires de la g&#233;ographie depuis le Global South: archives, journaux et institutionsModalit&#233;s de soumissionLangues&#160;: Portugais, Espagnole, Fran&#231;ais, AnglaisDeadline&#160;: 20/08/2020Taille de l&#8217;article&#160;: jusqu&#8217;&#224; douze mille mots ou 30 pagesMise en page&#160;: Fonte Times New Roman 12, l&#8217;espacement entre paragraphes 1,5. Plus d&#8217;informations&#160;: https://journals.openedition.org/terrabrasilis/3441Adresses mail des coordinateurs&#160;: Guilherme Ribeiro [geofilos@msn.com], Laura P&#233;aud [laura.peaud@gmail.com], Archie Davies [archie.oj.davies@gmail.com] et Terra Brasilis [terrabrasilis@redebrasilis.net]. Merci d&#8217;envoyer &#224; tous les quatre en m&#234;me temps.BibliographieAalbers, M. B. (2004). Creative destruction through the Anglo-American hegemony: a non-Anglo-American view on publications, referees and language. Area 36.3, 319&#8211;322.Bachmann-Medick, D. The translational turn. Translation Studies, vol. 2, n.1, 2-16 (2009).Cameron, D. (2003). Foreign exchanges: the politics of translation. Critical Quaterly, vol. 45, issue 1-2, july, 215-219.Casanova, P. (2015). La langue mondiale. Traduction et domination. Paris&#160;: Seuil.Cassin, B. (2018). Translation as politics. Javnost - The Public, 1-9.Cassin, B. (2018 [2004]). Apresenta&#231;&#227;o da 1&#170; edi&#231;&#227;o francesa do Vocabulaire Europ&#233;en des Philosophies. Tradu&#231;&#227;o de Fernando Santoro. In: Cassin, B. Dicion&#225;rio dos intraduz&#237;veis: um vocabul&#225;rio das filosofias. Volume Um: L&#237;nguas. Organiza&#231;&#227;o de Fernando Santoro e Luisa Buarque. Belo Horizonte: Aut&#234;ntica, pp. 16-21.Craggs, R. Neate, H. (2019). What happens if we start from Nigeria? Diversifying Histories of Geography. Annals of the American Association of Geographers, 1-18.Desbiens, C., Ruddick, S. (2006). Speaking of geography: language, power, and the spaces of Anglo-Saxon `hegemony'. Society and Space 24, pp.1-8.Ferretti, F. (2019). Rediscovering other geographical traditions. Geography Compass, Volume 13, Issue 3, 1-15.Garcia-Ramon, M-D. (2003). Globalization and international geography: the questions of languages and scholarly traditions. Progress in Human Geography 2 7, 1-5.Germes, M., Husseini de Ara&#250;jo, S. (2016). For a critical practice of translation in geography. ACME: an international journal for critical geographies 15 (1), 1-14.&#160;Gyuris, F. (2018). Problem or solution? Academic internationalization in contemporary human geography in East Central Europe. Geographische Zeitschrift 106, 1, 38-49.Houssay-Holzschuch, M., Milhaud, O. (2013). Geography after Babel. A view from the French province. Geographica Helvetica, 68, 51-55.J&#246;ns, H., Meusburger, P., Heffernan, M. (Eds.). (2017). Mobilities of knowledge. Cham: Springer.Keighren, I. M., Abrahamsson, C., della Dora, V. (2012). On canonical geographies. Dialogues in Human Geography, vol 2 (3), 296-312.Keighren, I. M. (2010). Reading the messy reception of Influences of geographic environment (1911). In: Ogborn, Miles, Withers, Charles W.J. (Eds). Geographies of the book. Farnham: Ashgate, 277-298.Latour, B. (1987). Science in action. How to Follow Scientists and Engineers Through Society. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.Livingstone, D. (2003). Putting science in its place. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Meusburger, P., Livingstone, D., J&#246;ns, H. (Eds.).&#160; Geographies of science. Heidelberg: Springer (2010).Mignolo, W. (2012). Reflections on translation across colonial epistemic differences. Languages, media and visual imaginary. In: Italiano, F., R&#246;ssner, M. (edited by). Translatio/n: Narration, Media and the Staging of Differences. Bielefeld: Transcript Verlag.Minca, C. (2000). Venetian geographical praxis. Society and Space 18, 285-289.M&#252;ller, M. (2007). What&#8217;s in a word? Problematizing translation between languages. Area, vol. 39, n. 2.Novaes, A. R. (2015). Celebrations and challenges: the international at the 16th International Conference of Historical Geographers, London, July 2015. Journal of Historical Geography, Volume 50, October 106-108.Ophir, A., Shapin, S. (1991). The place of knowledge. A methodological survey. Science in context 4, 1, 3-21.Ricoeur, P. (2004). Sur la traduction. Paris: Bayard.Secord, J. (2004). Knowledge in transit. Isis 95, 654-672.Shapin, S. (1998). Placing the view from nowhere: historical and sociological problems in the location of science. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 23, 5-12.Schulte, R. (1992). Translation and the academic world. Translation Review, 38-39:1.Spivak, G. C. (2004 [1993]). The politics of translation. In: Venuti, Lawrence (edited by). Translation Studies Reader. London and New York: Routledge, 397-416.Venuti, L. (2013). Traduire Derrida sur la traduction: relevance et r&#233;sistance &#224; la discipline. Noesis, 21, 125-129. Translated by Ren&#233; Lemieux.&#160;Venuti, L. (2009). Translation, intertextuality, interpretation. Romance studies, v.27, n.3, july, 157-173.Venuti, L. (2004). How to read a translation. Words without borders. The online magazine for international litterature, july. Available on https://www.wordswithoutborders.org/article/how-to-read-a-translationWright, M. W. (2002). The scalar politics of translation. Geoforum 33, 413-414.