{"word_count": 3307, "character_count": 27564}
6-7 avril 2020, Universit&#233; Lyon 3 (UdL)MARGE (Lyon 3, UdL), Centre d&#8217;&#201;tudes Linguistiques (Lyon 3, UdL), EUR&#8217;ORBEM (Sorbonne-Universit&#233; &#8211; CNRS), LIRCES, Universit&#233; Nice Sophia Antipolis (UCA)ArgumentaireCe colloque s&#8217;inscrit dans la s&#233;rie des manifestations&#160;consacr&#233;es aux diff&#233;rents enjeux de l&#8217;autotraduction&#160;: d&#8217;abord, le colloque "Plurilinguisme et autotraduction: langue perdue, langue sauv&#233;e"&#160; organis&#233; &#224; Paris-Sorbonne/EUR&#8217;ORBEM en octobre 2016, suivi d&#8217;un s&#233;minaire inter-laboratoires qui s&#8217;est tenu en mars 2018 &#224; Lyon, ainsi que le colloque &#171;&#160;(Auto)traduction et communication des imaginaires des langues &#224; l&#8217;heure de la rebab&#233;lisation du monde&#160;&#187; en mai 2019 &#224; l&#8217;Universit&#233; de Nice Sophia Antipolis (UCA) et au CNRS.Comme l&#8217;ont montr&#233; ces manifestations, les textes traduits par leurs auteurs, ou en collaboration &#233;troite avec eux, gagnent &#224; &#234;tre envisag&#233;s en tant que ph&#233;nom&#232;ne litt&#233;raire, culturel et discursif qui offre un corpus de recherche original pour l&#8217;&#233;tude des probl&#233;matiques po&#239;&#233;tiques, narratologiques et traductologiques, mais aussi inters&#233;miotiques. L&#8217;ambition de ce nouveau colloque est de montrer la compl&#233;mentarit&#233; de ces perspectives.L&#8217;autotraduction, en tant que domaine d&#8217;&#233;tude par excellence interdisciplinaire, relie naturellement les champs de la litt&#233;rature compar&#233;e, de la traductologie, de la linguistique et de la sociolinguistique (les travaux men&#233;s par Christian Lagarde montrent le potentiel de cette approche), de l&#8217;histoire et de la sociologie de la litt&#233;rature (Rainier Grutman), et de la s&#233;miotique des transferts culturels. Elle peut &#233;galement nourrir l&#8217;&#233;tude de la circulation des savoirs par le biais d&#8217;une analyse des autotraductions d&#8217;essais et travaux de recherche.Nous souhaitons mettre &#224; l&#8217;&#233;preuve l&#8217;id&#233;e selon laquelle l&#8217;autotraduction fournit des outils analytiques &#224; ces divers domaines, qui constitueront les trois axes de ce colloque.Axe 1. L&#8217;autotraduction comme dispositif dialogique&#160;: perspectives intertextuelles et &#233;nonciatives&#160;Nous consid&#233;rons que l&#8217;autotraduction repr&#233;sente une pratique hypertextuelle d&#8217;une nature particuli&#232;re, qui conduit &#224;&#160;envisager les&#160;deux&#160;versions de&#160;l&#8217;&#339;uvre &#224; la fois comme&#160; transcriptions et variations au sens musical des termes. Ce colloque invite donc &#224; interroger la &#171;&#160;transtextualit&#233;&#160;&#187; propre aux textes autotraduits, au niveau &#233;nonciatif comme au niveau paratextuel (illustrations, titres, intertitres, &#233;pigraphes, pr&#233;faces, postfaces, commentaires, etc.)La prise en consid&#233;ration des modifications, aussi bien sur le plan linguistique qu&#8217;au niveau de la construction du r&#233;cit et du paratexte, peut mettre en lumi&#232;re le processus de dialogisation singuli&#232;re qui s&#8217;&#233;tablit entre les deux versions de l&#8217;&#339;uvre.Il serait int&#233;ressant de s&#8217;interroger sur la singularit&#233; des textes autotraduits en les &#233;tudiant &#224; travers le prisme des th&#233;ories du dialogisme (notamment la th&#233;orie &#233;labor&#233;e par Jacques Bres) et de la polyphonie, d&#8217;identifier et d&#8217;&#233;tudier les structures linguistiques qui permettent la dialogisation qui s&#8217;&#233;tablit entre deux (ou plusieurs) versions de l&#8217;&#339;uvre.Un autre aspect pertinent du point de vue linguistique consisterait &#224; &#233;tudier les contraintes qui se font jour lors du passage d&#8217;une langue &#224; l&#8217;autre, afin d&#8217;&#233;tablir les particularit&#233;s du style, de sa s&#233;mantique et de sa syntaxe. Le travail sur les diff&#233;rentes versions d&#8217;un texte permet de d&#233;gager la part intraduisible (Barbara Cassin) de l&#8217;&#339;uvre et offre l&#8217;occasion d&#8217;&#233;tudier l&#8217;impact de cet intraduisible, linguistique et esth&#233;tique.Sur le plan po&#233;tique, l&#8217;autotraduction en tant que &#171;&#160;double &#233;criture&#160;&#187;&#160;constitue une forme d&#8217;autocommunication : la dichotomie de l&#8217;alt&#233;rit&#233; et de l&#8217;ips&#233;it&#233; trouve ici une r&#233;alisation in&#233;dite. Se faisant l&#8217;interpr&#232;te de sa propre &#339;uvre, l&#8217;auteur adopte une &#171;&#160;attitude dialogique active&#160;&#187; face &#224; son texte, pour reprendre l&#8217;expression d&#8217;Alain Rabatel. C&#8217;est aussi pourquoi l&#8217;autotraduction peut &#234;tre examin&#233;e dans la perspective de la narration de soi (voir les travaux d&#8217;Alain Ausoni). Nous r&#233;fl&#233;chirons aux mani&#232;res dont l&#8217;instance auctoriale peut se d&#233;doubler lorsque l&#8217;auteur devient son&#160;propre&#160;traducteur.Ici le ph&#233;nom&#232;ne d&#8217;&#233;clatement identitaire&#160;sera &#224; interroger. En effet, propre &#224; toute &#233;criture plurilingue, la question du sujet est exacerb&#233;e dans le cas de l&#8217;autotraduction du fait de l&#8217;ambigu&#239;t&#233; de la position scripturale. De plus, la posture de l&#8217;autotraducteur est rarement neutre en ce qui concerne le choix des langues et le contexte de l&#8217;&#233;criture. Comment les pratiques d&#8217;autotraduction contribuent-elles &#224; r&#233;v&#233;ler, &#224; circonscrire et &#224; d&#233;passer les apories li&#233;es &#224; la multiappartenance et &#224; la dislocation du moi cons&#233;cutives aux processus migratoires et &#224; la probl&#233;matique de l&#8217;exil&#160;?On observera les manifestations textuelles du d&#233;doublement &#233;nonciatif, en examinant ses marqueurs formels (syntaxe, temps verbal&#8230;). On int&#233;grera &#233;galement la perspective g&#233;n&#233;tique, qui montre comment les diff&#233;rentes &#233;tapes du passage d&#8217;une langue &#224; l&#8217;autre se refl&#232;tent dans l&#8217;&#233;cart qui se creuse d&#8217;une version du texte &#224; l&#8217;autre, la premi&#232;re version devenant l&#8217;avant-texte de la deuxi&#232;me.Les &#339;uvres issues de ces pratiques incitent du m&#234;me coup &#224; r&#233;fl&#233;chir aux rapports de force entre les langues et les cultures impliqu&#233;es, ph&#233;nom&#232;nes du centre et de la p&#233;riph&#233;rie, comme au va-et-vient entre les statuts d&#8217;&#233;crivain et de traducteur endoss&#233;s simultan&#233;ment par l'auteur.Axe 2. L&#8217;autotraduction &#224; l&#8217;aune des transferts inters&#233;miotiquesSur le plan esth&#233;tique, les rapports des deux versions, dialogiques &#224; plusieurs titres, renforcent le potentiel performatif de l&#8217;&#339;uvre. Il n&#8217;est donc pas &#233;tonnant que l&#8217;autotraduction ait tendance &#224; engendrer de nouvelles interactions esth&#233;tiques, par exemple des mises en sc&#232;ne th&#233;&#226;trales multilingues bas&#233;es sur les deux versions de l&#8217;&#339;uvre. Nous pensons ainsi aux nombreuses mises en sc&#232;ne de Молодец / Le Gars de Marina Tsvetaeva. Ce type de transposition constitue une forme de r&#233;alisation concr&#232;te de la r&#233;ception active d&#8217;une &#339;uvre autotraduite que nous proposons de prendre en consid&#233;ration. Si ce type de transferts interm&#233;diaux est assez fr&#233;quent, en raison de la charge performative accrue des textes autotraduits, il est &#233;galement possible d&#8217;interroger les exemples de v&#233;ritables transactions esth&#233;tiques, c&#8217;est-&#224;-dire les cas de retour de l&#8217;auteur &#224; la version originale de son &#339;uvre en vue de la r&#233;&#233;crire &#8211; ou retraduire &#8211; , suite &#224; une exp&#233;rience de collaboration artistique pour des mises en sc&#232;ne th&#233;&#226;trales, ou suite &#224; un travail sur des sc&#233;narios et scripts, comme ce fut le cas pour certaines &#339;uvres de Beckett ou de Pirandello.On propose ainsi d&#8217;interroger les diverses fa&#231;ons dont les textes autotraduits s&#8217;inscrivent dans une dynamique interm&#233;diale propre aux pratiques artistiques contemporaines. En effet, l&#8217;autotraduction peut donner lieu &#224; des dispositifs hybrides, comme chez Elsa Triolet qui en profite pour ins&#233;rer des images au sein du texte qu&#8217;elle traduit. L&#8217;interm&#233;dialit&#233;, en tant que proc&#233;d&#233; artistique fr&#233;quemment reli&#233; &#224; l&#8217;autotraduction, incite &#224; envisager les &#339;uvres autotraduites &#224; l&#8217;aune d&#8217;autres dispositifs de narration concurrente, comme l&#8217;auto-illustration, ce qui nous renvoie une fois de plus aux perspectives paratextuelles et hypertextuelles.Ainsi, les perspectives po&#233;tique, narratologique, &#233;nonciative et inters&#233;miotique peuvent offrir des angles d&#8217;analyse compl&#233;mentaires pour &#233;tudier les diff&#233;rents types d&#8217;interactions qui s&#8217;instaurent entre les textes autotraduits, que ce soit au moment m&#234;me de la gen&#232;se du texte, ou lors des interactions engendr&#233;es par la r&#233;ception des &#339;uvres ainsi produites.Axe 3. Autotraduction et circulation des savoirs&#160;: perspective transculturelle&#160;Si l&#8217;autotraduction rel&#232;ve des transferts litt&#233;raires et inter-s&#233;miotiques, elle participe &#233;galement du transfert des id&#233;es, et cela depuis plusieurs si&#232;cles, qu&#8217;il s&#8217;agisse des travaux de Mikha&#239;l Lomonossov au XVIIIe si&#232;cle, des &#233;crits th&#233;oriques sur l&#8217;art de Vassily Kandinsky ou des essais critiques de Vladimir Weidl&#233; au XXe si&#232;cle.Plus r&#233;cemment, des ouvrages comme Narratologija, r&#233;dig&#233;e d&#8217;abord en russe par Wolf Schmid, autotraduite ensuite en allemand sous le titre Elemente der Narratologie, puis autotraduite &#224; nouveau en anglais sous le titre Narratology: An Introduction[1], t&#233;moignent de la fa&#231;on dont la communication scientifique multilingue, impliquant l&#8217;autotraduction, participe &#224; la mondialisation du savoir. Il s&#8217;agit l&#224; aussi d&#8217;exemples de pratiques &#233;ditoriales et traductives qui s&#8217;appuient sur une approche transculturelle.Le colloque invite ainsi &#224; scruter ce mode particulier de transfert des id&#233;es d&#8217;une culture &#224; l&#8217;autre, et de questionner les enjeux que repr&#233;sente l&#8217;implication de l&#8217;auteur dans le processus de la translation de ses travaux par le biais de l&#8217;autotraduction et de la traduction collaborative. Les difficult&#233;s terminologiques li&#233;es aux diff&#233;rences de traditions critiques et d&#8217;&#233;coles de pens&#233;e, ainsi que la port&#233;e des transformations et des ajustements, feront partie des probl&#233;matiques relevant du domaine de la circulation des savoirs.Ainsi, repla&#231;ant la litt&#233;rature au sein d&#8217;autres circulations de textes, le colloque vise &#224; embrasser les domaines des transferts litt&#233;raires, artistiques, mais aussi conceptuels, par le biais de l&#8217;autotraduction.Th&#233;matiques d&#8217;&#233;tudes&#160;:transtextualit&#233; des &#233;crits autotraduits&#160;: rapports intertextuels ; paratextualit&#233;&#160;;analyse de textes autotraduits comme outil d&#8217;analyse po&#233;tique&#160;et comme outil de travail pour l&#8217;&#233;laboration d&#8217;un appareil critique des &#339;uvres&#160;;approche &#233;nonciative et dialogique des textes autotraduits&#160;: h&#233;t&#233;rog&#233;n&#233;it&#233; &#233;nonciative (voix en dialogue) et ses marqueurs&#160;;contraintes linguistiques lors du passage d&#8217;une langue &#224; l&#8217;autre, l&#8217;intraduisible dans la s&#233;mantique et la syntaxe&#160;; changements stylistiques&#160;;autotraduction des travaux scientifiques&#160;: contraintes conceptuelles, &#233;pist&#233;mologiques et id&#233;ologiques&#160;;autotraduction des essais&#160;;collaborations artistiques, interm&#233;dialit&#233; et transactions esth&#233;tiques&#160;;mises en sc&#232;ne des textes autotraduits, transferts inter-s&#233;miotiques, l&#8217;&#339;uvre et ses adaptations&#160;;rapports de force entre les langues dans leur dimension socio-linguistique&#160;;l&#8217;autotraduction comme cons&#233;quence de l&#8217;exil et des processus migratoires, et ses enjeux identitaires.Modalit&#233;s de soumissionLa date limite pour l&#8217;envoi des propositions est prolong&#233;e jusqu&#8217;au 20 septembre 2019.Les propositions doivent &#234;tre adress&#233;es aux organisateurs&#160;:anna.lushenkova-foscolo@univ-lyon3.frmalgorzata.smorag-goldberg@sorbonne-universite.frmichael.oustinoff@univ-cotedazur.frolga.artyushkina@univ-lyon3.frComit&#233; scientifiqueARTYUSHKINA Olga, MCF, D&#233;partement d&#8217;&#233;tudes slaves, Centre d&#8217;Etudes Linguistiques, Universit&#233; Lyon 3 Jean Moulin.AUCLERC Beno&#238;t, MCF en litt&#233;rature fran&#231;aise, directeur-adjoint du groupe MARGE, Universit&#233; Lyon 3 Jean Moulin.BONNET Gilles, Professeur des Universit&#233;s, Litt&#233;rature moderne et contemporaine, MARGE, Universit&#233; Lyon 3 Jean Moulin.GALMICHE Xavier, Etudes Centre-Europ&#233;ennes, Professeur des Universit&#233;s, EUR&#8217;ORBEM, Paris-Sorbonne/CNRSGRUTMAN Rainier, Professeur titulaire (Full Professor), D&#233;partement de fran&#231;ais et Ecole de traduction et d&#8217;interpr&#233;tation, Universit&#233; d&#8217;Ottawa.HILSUM Mireille, Professeure &#233;m&#233;rite, MARGE, Universit&#233; Lyon 3 Jean Moulin.JURGENSON Luba, Professeur des Universit&#233;s, UFR d&#8217;Etudes slaves, Paris IV Sorbonne, Directrice de l&#8217;UMR 8224 EUR&#8217;ORBEM.KIPPUR Sara, Associate Professor of Language and Culture Studies Trinity College, Hartford (Connecticut), USA.LUSHENKOVA FOSCOLO Anna, MCF en langue et litt&#233;rature russes, D&#233;partement d&#8217;&#233;tudes slaves, membre du groupe MARGE, Universit&#233; Lyon 3 Jean Moulin.OUSTINOFF Micha&#235;l, Professeur des Universit&#233;s en traductologie, section d&#8217;Anglais, LIRCES, UNS (UCA).SAIGNES Anna, MCF HDR, Litt&#233;rature compar&#233;e, Universit&#233; de Grenoble.SHRAYER Maxim D., Professeur des Universit&#233;s (Full Professor), D&#233;partement des &#233;tudes slaves, Boston College, USA.SMORAG Małgorzata, Professeur des Universit&#233;s, Litt&#233;rature polonaise, EUR&#8217;ORBEM, Paris-Sorbonne.THELOT J&#233;r&#244;me, Professeur des Universit&#233;s, Litt&#233;rature fran&#231;aise, membre du groupe MARGE, Lyon 3 Jean Moulin.ZAREMBA Charles, Professeur des Universit&#233;s, linguistique polonaise, membre de l&#8217;&#233;quipe d&#8217;accueil ECHANGES, Aix-Marseille Universit&#233;6th-7th April 2020, Lyon 3 University (University of Lyon)MARGE (University of Lyon 3), Centre of Linguistic Studies (University of Lyon 3), EUR&#8217;ORBEM (Sorbonne University &#8211; CNRS), LIRCES, University of Nice Sophia Antipolis (UCA)ArgumentThe conference forms part of a series of events dedicated to various topics related to self-translation: the conference &#8220;Plurilingualism and self-translation: language lost, language salvaged&#8221; organized at Paris-Sorbonne/EUR&#8217;ORBEM in October 2016, followed by an inter-laboratory seminar held in March 2018 in Lyon, and the conference &#8220;(Self)-Translation and the Communication of Imaginaries in a Rebabelized World&#8221; organised in May 2019 by the University of Nice Sophia Antipolis (UCA) with the participation of MARGE (Lyon 3) and the CNRS.As the above events have shown, works translated either by the authors themselves, or in close collaboration with them ought to be considered as a literary, cultural and discursive phenomenon providing an original body of research material for the study of poiesis, narration and translation, as well as intersemiotic issues. The forthcoming conference should demonstrate the complementarity of these perspectives.Self-translation, as a field of study that is interdisciplinary par excellence, brings together the fields of comparative literature, translation studies, linguistics and sociolinguistics (Christian Lagarde&#8217;s research reveals the potential of this approach), the history and sociology of literature (Rainier Grutman), as well as the semiotics of cultural transfers. The analysis of self-translated essays and studies may also prove instrumental in exploring the circulation of knowledge.We wish to examine the claim according to which self-translation provides these fields with analytical tools, which form the three thematic axes of the conference.Axis 1. Self-translation as a dialogic tool: intertextual and enunciative perspectivesWe consider self-translation to be a particular hypertextual practice through which the two versions of a piece of writing are perceived as both transcriptions and variations in the musical sense of these words. The conference is, therefore, an invitation to examine the &#8220;transtextuality&#8221; typical of self-translated texts at both the enunciative and the paratextual level (illustrations, titles, intertitles, epigraphs, forewords, afterwords, comments, etc.).Through taking into account modifications - from the point of view of both linguistics and the construction of the narrative and of the paratext &#8211; we can bring to light the unique dialogue that opens up between the two versions of a piece of writing.It would be interesting to explore the singularity of self-translated texts by studying them through the prism of the theories of dialogism (in particular Jacques Bres&#8217;s theory) and of polyphony, and to identify and study linguistic structures that allow the dialogization between two (or more) versions of a literary work.Constraints related to switching from one language to another represent another linguistically relevant issue that could be explored in order to recognize the peculiarities of style, semantics and syntax. Through working with different versions of a text, we can identify its untranslatable parts (Barbara Cassin), and study their linguistic and aesthetic impact.From the poetic point of view, self-translation - as a &#8216;double writing&#8217; process &#8211; is a form of self-communication: this is where the dichotomy of otherness and ipseity finds its unprecedented actualization. Through interpreting his/her own work, the author adopts &#8211; as Alain Rabatel puts it - an &#8216;active dialogical attitude&#8217; towards the text. For the same reason self-translation lends itself to examination within the self-narrative perspective (see Alain Ausoni&#8217;s work). We shall reflect upon ways in which the auctorial instance may duplicate itself when the author becomes the translator of his/her own works.The phenomenon of identity explosion shall also be analysed. Indeed, due to the ambiguity of the author&#8217;s position, the question of the subject, which is typical of any multilingual writing, is heightened in the case of self-translation. In addition, when it comes to the choice of languages and the context of writing, the position of the self-translator is rarely neutral. How do self-translation practices help to reveal, to regulate and to overcome the aporiae related to the multi-belonging and the dislocation of the self resulting from migratory processes and exile?Furthermore, we shall reflect on the textual manifestations of the enunciative split through examining its formal aspects (syntax, verb tenses, etc.). A genetic perspective shall be taken into account through the analysis of how the different stages of the transition from one language to another are revealed in the gap that opens up between the two versions, with the first becoming the fore-text of the second.At the same time, the works that are the fruit of such practices invite us to reflect on the balance of power between languages and cultures, on the centre and the periphery, as well as the see-saw process between the author&#8217;s status as a writer and as a translator.Axis 2. Self-translation in the light of intersemiotic transfersAt the aesthetic level, relations between the two versions (which are dialogic in many respects), reinforce the work&#8217;s performative potential. It should, therefore, come as no surprise that self-translation tends to trigger new aesthetic interactions, such as multilingual theatre productions based on two versions of a particular piece of writing. Such transpositions are a concrete embodiment of the active reception of a self-translated work that we believe worthy of consideration. If this type of intermediary transfers is rather frequent owing to a greater performative charge of self-translated texts, one may also question examples of real aesthetic transactions, that is, situations in which the author returns to the original version of his/her work in order to rewrite - or retranslate &#8211; it, drawing from his/her experience with theatre production, the writing of a screenplay or a script as in the case of works by Beckett or Pirandello.Various ways in which self-translated texts become part of the intermedial dynamics typical of contemporary artistic practices could be examined. Indeed, self-translation can give rise to hybrid systems, as evidenced by Elsa Triolet&#8217;s practice of incorporating images within the texts she translates. Intermediality - as an artistic process often linked to self-translation - prompts one to consider self-translated works in the light of other instruments of competing narration, such as self-illustration, which brings one back to paratextual and hypertextual perspectives.Thus, the poetic, narratological, enunciative and intersemiotic perspectives tender complementary angles of analysis allowing the study of different types of interactions between self-translated texts, either at the very moment of the text&#8217;s genesis, or in the course of interactions fostered through the reception of works thus produced.Axis 3. Self-translation and the circulation of knowledge: the cross-cultural perspectiveWhile self-translation is a matter of literary and inter-semiotic transfers, it has also contributed to the transfer of ideas over the centuries, from the works of Mikhail Lomonosov in the eighteenth-century Russia to theoretical writings on art by Wassily Kandinsky or critical essays of Wladimir Weidle in twentieth-century Europe.More recently, works such as Narratologija, written by Wolf Schmid and published first in Russian, and subsequently self-translated into German as Elemente der Narratologie and ultimately self-translated into English as Narratology: An Introduction[2], show how multilingual scientific communication, which involves self-translation, contributes to the globalization of knowledge. Examples of editorial and translation practices that draw form a cross-cultural approach are also to be taken into account.The conference is thus an invitation to examine this particular mode of transferring ideas from one culture to another, and to question various problems related to the author's involvement in translating his/her own work in the process of self-translation and collaborative translation. Terminological difficulties stemming from differences in critical traditions and schools of thought, as well as the scope of transformations and adjustments are to be related to the issues at stake in the circulation of knowledge.Through considering the circulation of different kinds of texts, the conference will aim at embracing the fields of literary, artistic, as well as conceptual transfers through self-translation.Topics to be explored:transtextuality of self-translated texts: intertextual relations; paratextuality;analysis of self-translated texts as an instrument of poetic analysis and as a tool for the elaboration of a critical apparatus;enunciative and dialogical approach of self-translated texts: enunciative heterogeneity (voice in dialogue) and its characteristics;linguistic constraints encountered when switching from one language to another, untranslatability in the context of semantics and syntax; stylistic changes;self-translation of scientific works: conceptual, epistemological and ideological constraints;self-translation of essays;artistic collaborations, intermediality and aesthetic transactions;theatrical production of self-translated texts, inter-semiotic transfers, the literary work and its adaptations;power relations in the socio-linguistic dimension of languages;self-translation as a consequence of exile and migration processes; related identity issues.Submission guidelinesThe languages of the conference will be English and French. The deadline for proposals submission is extended tothe 20th of September 2019.The proposals are to be sent as abstracts (500-600 words) with a short bio-bibliographical note to:anna.lushenkova-foscolo@univ-lyon3.frmalgorzata.smorag-goldberg@sorbonne-universite.frmichael.oustinoff@univ-cotedazur.frolga.artyushkina@univ-lyon3.frScientific CommitteeARTYUSHKINA Olga, Associate Professor, Department of Slavic Studies, Centre of Linguistic Studies, University of Lyon 3 Jean Moulin.AUCLERC Beno&#238;t, Associate Professor in French Literature, Deputy Director of the MARGE group, University of Lyon 3 Jean Moulin.BONNET Gilles, Full Professor, Modern and Contemporary Literature, member of the MARGE group, University of Lyon 3 Jean Moulin.GALMICHE Xavier, Full Professor, Central European Studies, EUR&#8217;ORBEM, University of Paris-Sorbonne/CNRS.GRUTMAN Rainier, Full Professor, Department of French and School of Translation and Interpretation, University of Ottawa.HILSUM Mireille, Professor Emerita, member of the MARGE group, University of Lyon 3 Jean Moulin.JURGENSON Luba, Full Professor, Department of Slavic Studies, Univerisity of Paris IV Sorbonne, Director of Mixed Research Unit (UMR) 8224 EUR&#8217;ORBEM.KIPPUR Sara, Associate Professor of Language and Culture Studies Trinity College Hartford (Connecticut), USA.LUSHENKOVA FOSCOLO Anna, Associate Professor in Russian Language and Literature, Department of Slavic studies, member of the MARGE group, University of Lyon 3 Jean Moulin.OUSTINOFF Micha&#235;l, Full Professor in Translation Studies, Department of English, LIRCES research group, University of Nice Sophia Antipolis (UCA).SAIGNES Anna, Associate Professor (Hab.), Comparative Literature, University of Grenoble.SHRAYER Maxim D., Full Professor, Department of Slavic Studies, Boston College, USA.SMORAG Małgorzata, Full Professor, Polish Literature, EUR&#8217;ORBEM, University of Paris-Sorbonne.THELOT J&#233;r&#244;me, Full Professor, French Literature, member of the MARGE research Group, University of Lyon 3 Jean Moulin.ZAREMBA Charles, Full Professor, Polish linguistics, member of the ECHANGES research group, University of Aix-Marseille.[1] Wolf Schmid, Narratologija, Jazyki Slovjanskoj Kul&#8217;tury, Moscou, 2003 (2e &#233;d. 2008)&#160;; Elemente der Narratologie, Walter de Gruyter Berlin, 2005 (2e &#233;d. 2008)&#160;; Narratology: An Introduction, Walter de Gruyter, Berlin/New York, 2010.[2] Wolf Schmid, Narratologija, Jazyki Slovjanskoj Kul&#8217;tury, Moscow, 2003 (2nd ed. 2008); Elemente der Narratologie, Walter de Gruyter Berlin, 2005 (2nd ed. 2008)&#160;; Narratology: An Introduction, Walter de Gruyter, Berlin/New York, 2010.