{"word_count": 85, "character_count": 721}
http://www.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/newsletter/07-02-10.htmLesenswerter Beitrag von Peter Suber. Auszug:two blogging scholars --Martin Weller and Michael Rees-- revived the idea of performing peer review only for OA journals, or refusing to donate labor to publishers who erect access barriers to research.  This is a a step beyond the boycott plans sketched in the UC letter, which would only apply to NPG journals.  Using data from a 2008 Research Information Network report, Weller and Rees estimate that scholars donate about £1.9 billion/year ($2.8 billion/year) in free labor as journal referees.http://goo.gl/V3bLhttp://goo.gl/wDv6http://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/story.asp?sectioncode=26&#38;storycode=402189 