{"word_count": 1566, "character_count": 12808}
Argumentaire&#192; la suite des trois rencontres de 2017, 2018 et 2019, l&#8217;enqu&#234;te sur Les formes de r&#233;glementation des m&#233;tiers dans l&#8217;Europe m&#233;di&#233;vale et moderne se poursuit pour un quatri&#232;me et dernier colloque international sur la dimension spatiale des normes professionnelles. Si l&#8217;Europe au sens large a &#233;t&#233; choisie comme point de d&#233;part, des contributions pourront envisager l&#8217;apport d&#8217;autres aires culturelles ou d&#8217;exp&#233;riences coloniales... Pour rappel, la r&#233;glementation est envisag&#233;e ici comme processus, depuis l&#8217;&#233;laboration de r&#232;gles jusqu&#8217;&#224; leur mise en application, sans se limiter aux formes &#233;crites et stabilis&#233;es des statuts, ni aux organisations de type corporatif&#160;: les ordonnances princi&#232;res ou municipales, la jurisprudence ou les coutumes non-&#233;crites peuvent faire partie de cet encadrement normatif des professions, de m&#234;me que des groupements non institu&#233;s peuvent se r&#233;gler &#224; travers la fabrication ou l&#8217;&#233;coulement de tel ou tel produit.La diffusion et l&#8217;ancrage spatial de ces diff&#233;rents types de droits dans les soci&#233;t&#233;s m&#233;di&#233;vales et modernes est donc &#224; interroger &#224; plusieurs &#233;chelles, du p&#233;rim&#232;tre souvent d&#233;battu des associations de m&#233;tiers locales jusqu&#8217;aux normes valables dans des territoires ou des r&#233;seaux plus vastes, comme la l&#233;gislation sur les prix et salaires adopt&#233;e par plusieurs royaumes &#224; partir de la fin du XIIIe si&#232;cle, les hanses, l&#8217;inspection des manufactures, les compagnonnages&#8230;1/ Comment se construisent les espaces juridiques&#160;: par polarisation autour d&#8217;un texte ou d&#8217;un acteur appliquant des normes non &#233;crites, par d&#233;limitation de fronti&#232;res spatiales, ou selon d&#8217;autres modalit&#233;s&#160;? Dans quelle mesure ces espaces sont-ils reli&#233;s &#224; ceux de juridictions, d&#8217;organisations de sociabilit&#233; (confr&#233;ries&#8230;), d&#8217;entreprises (mines et carri&#232;res, chantiers, manufactures, arsenaux, soci&#233;t&#233;s commerciales&#8230;), d&#8217;aires de march&#233; ou de r&#233;seaux &#233;conomiques&#160;? Il sera bienvenu d&#8217;aborder des espaces r&#233;put&#233;s marginaux sur le plan g&#233;ographique (for&#234;ts, marais, montagnes, littoraux, mer&#8230;), ou socio-juridique (les coll&#232;ges, les h&#244;pitaux, les couvents, les quartiers privil&#233;gi&#233;s&#8230;) o&#249; des travaux r&#233;cents ont mis en valeur la r&#233;gulation de professions.2/ Quelles sont les modalit&#233;s de diffusion ou de concentration des normes &#224; l&#8217;int&#233;rieur de ces espaces (publicit&#233;, renouvellement, conservation, contestation, application) ? Comment des p&#244;les de r&#233;glementation comme les foires et march&#233;s ou les manufactures s&#8217;articulent &#224; des lieux in&#233;galement contr&#244;l&#233;s comme les boutiques, les &#171;&#160;chambres&#160;&#187;, les faubourgs, les villages ou les espaces dits &#171;&#160;marginaux&#160;&#187; cit&#233;s ci-dessus&#160;? On pourra mettre l&#8217;accent sur les vecteurs concrets de r&#233;partition de la norme dans l&#8217;espace. Quels en sont les acteurs&#160;? Quels sont les m&#233;dias emprunt&#233;s&#160;? Si les sources sont parfois t&#233;nues, il semble important de replacer la formation de ces territoires r&#233;glement&#233;s dans le cadre large des circulations et communications du monde m&#233;di&#233;val et moderne.3/ Quelle est la circulation des normes professionnelles entre les espaces juridiques locaux ou nationaux&#160;? Dans quelle mesure existe-t-il des mod&#232;les dont s&#8217;inspirent plus ou moins explicitement d&#8217;autres r&#233;glementations, comme cela a &#233;t&#233; sugg&#233;r&#233; pour Paris ou Barcelone par une historiographie &#224; renouveler&#160;? Les r&#232;gles de certaines professions sont-elles emprunt&#233;es ou imit&#233;es localement par d&#8217;autres activit&#233;s&#160;? Des r&#233;seaux de textes semblables rapprochent-ils des activit&#233;s similaires bien qu&#8217;elles soient distantes spatialement&#160;?4/ Enfin, quel peut &#234;tre l&#8217;apport du spatial turn, entam&#233; dans d&#8217;autres champs historiques, quant &#224; la r&#233;glementation des m&#233;tiers&#160;? Doit-on retenir l&#8217;espace comme producteur m&#234;me d&#8217;une r&#233;glementation donn&#233;e&#160;? En quoi la ville ou le village peuvent-ils &#234;tre les supports m&#234;mes d&#8217;une labellisation des produits, des marchandises, en lieu et place des individus ou des m&#233;tiers qui les y confectionnent, qui les y vendent&#160;? Un espace peut-il s&#8217;auto-cr&#233;er par possession ou revendication d&#8217;une r&#233;glementation, autant qu&#8217;un collectif humain&#160;?Tous ces processus spatiaux sont dynamiques, ce qui implique de prendre en compte les conflits ou les coop&#233;rations, les dominations ou les accords, les innovations ou les restaurations qu&#8217;ils ont abrit&#233;s.Cette rencontre sera aussi l&#8217;occasion de dresser un bilan du projet men&#233; depuis 2017 sur les formes de la r&#233;glementation des m&#233;tiers.Modalit&#233;s de contributionLes rencontres auront lieu du 10 au 12 juin 2021, &#224; l&#8217;Universit&#233; Versailles Saint-Quentin en Yvelines. Un dispositif de visio-conf&#233;rence sera pr&#233;vu en cas de restrictions sur la mobilit&#233; des participants dues aux cons&#233;quences de la pand&#233;mie de Covid-19.Les langues utilis&#233;es lors de ces journ&#233;es sont le fran&#231;ais et l&#8217;anglais. Les communications seront de 20min suivies de 10min de discussion. Si vous souhaitez proposer une communication pour cette rencontre, veuillez faire parvenir &#224; l&#8217;adresse espace.reglementation@gmail.com un abstract d&#8217;environ 2500 signes (ou 400 mots) dans une de ces langues, ainsi qu&#8217;une courte biographie indiquant votre rattachement institutionnelavant le 2 novembre 2020.Comit&#233; d&#8217;organisation de la quatri&#232;me rencontreRobert Carvais (CTAD &#8211; Universit&#233; Paris Nanterre)&#160;;Catherine Rideau-Kikuchi (UVSQ-DYPAC)&#160;;Mathieu Marraud (CRH);Arnaldo Sousa Melo (Universidade do Minho);Fran&#231;ois Rivi&#232;re (Universit&#233; d&#8217;&#201;vry-Val d&#8217;Essonne-LaMOP-IDHES)Comit&#233; scientifique de l&#8217;ensemble des rencontresPhilippe Bernardi (Paris 1-Lamop)&#160;;Caroline Bourlet (IRHT)&#160;;Robert Carvais (CTAD &#8211; Universit&#233; Paris Nanterre)&#160;;Maxime L&#8217;H&#233;ritier (Paris 8-ArScAn)&#160;;Corine Maitte (Universit&#233; Gustave Eiffel-ACP)&#160;;Mathieu Marraud (EHESS-CRH)&#160;;Judica&#235;l Petrowiste (Universit&#233; de Paris-ICT)&#160;;Fran&#231;ois Rivi&#232;re (Universit&#233; d&#8217;&#201;vry-Val d&#8217;Essonne-LaMOP-IDHES)&#160;;Arnaldo Sousa Melo (Universidade do Minho- Lab2Pt)&#160;;Catherine Rideau-Kikuchi (UVSQ-DYPAC)&#160;;Jean-Louis Roch (Universit&#233; de Rouen-GRHIS)&#160;&#160;ArgumentAfter the three meetings in 2017, 2018, and 2019, the investigation into The forms of trade regulations in medieval and modern Europe continues with a fourth and final international conference on the spatial dimension of professional regulations. While Europe, in a broad sense, has been chosen as a starting point, papers could also consider other cultural areas or colonial experiences. As a reminder, regulations are viewed as a process, from the making of the rules to their implementation, without being restricted either to the written and stabilised forms of the statutes or to organisations of a corporative nature: royal or local orders, judicial precedents, or unwritten customs could also be part of the normative framework of trades, just as non-institutional groups could regulate themselves through the manufacture or sale of a particular product.The diffusion and spatial concentration of these different types of regulations in medieval and early modern societies can thus be investigated on various scales: from the much discussed area of influence of local trade associations to the norms that apply to larger territories or networks, such as the legislations on prices and wages adopted by several kingdoms after the end of the 13th century, the Hanseatic Leagues, the inspection of factories, journeymen&#8217;s associations, and so on.1/- How were legal spaces established: through a polarisation around a text or a stakeholder who applied unwritten rules, through the delimitation of spatial borders, or in other ways? How far were these spaces linked to those of jurisdictions, brotherhoods, firms (mines and quarries, building sites, factories, arsenals, trading firms, &#8230;), market areas, or economic networks? Reflections would be welcomed on spaces seen as &#8220;marginal&#8221; from a geographical point of view (forests, marshes, mountains, coastlines, the sea, &#8230;) or from a socio-legal perspective (colleges, hospitals, convents, privileged neighbourhoods), where recent research has highlighted the regulation of trades.2/- In what ways were craft rules disseminated or concentrated within those spaces (advertising, updating, preservation, questioning, enforcement)? How did centres of regulation such as fairs, markets, or factories interact with places that were not as evenly overseen, such as shops, outworkers&#8217; &#8220;rooms&#8221;, suburbs, villages, or the abovementioned &#8220;marginal&#8221; spaces? Attention could also be paid to the tangible vectors of spreading craft rules through geographic spaces. Which stakeholders were involved? Which means of communication were applied? While the sources available are sometimes overly scarce, it is still important to try to place the establishment of those regulated spaces in the broad context of the patterns of circulation and communication at work in the medieval and early modern world.3/- How were professional norms circulated between local or national jurisdictions? To what extent did models exist that were imitated by other regulations, more or less explicitly, as suggested by a dated historiography concerning Paris and Barcelona? Were the rules of some trades borrowed or locally imitated by other activities? Did networks of similar texts tend to bring together similar activities even when they were spatially distant?4/- Lastly, how might the spatial turn, already broached in other fields of history, contribute to the study of the regulation of trades? Should a space be seen as the producer of a given regulation? To what extent could a town or village provide the support for the labelling of products or goods, instead of the individuals who make and sell them? Could a space be self-created through possession or a claim to regulation as much as a human community?These spatial processes are all dynamic, which implies that the conflicts or cooperation, dominations or agreements, innovations or restorations associated with them should be taken into account.This meeting will also be an opportunity to assess the project that has been underway since 2017 on forms of trade regulation.The conference will take place from 10 to 12 June 2021, at Universit&#233; Versailles Saint-Quentin en Yvelines. As a precaution, a visio-conference system will be put in place in the event that travel restrictions are still in place due to Covid-19.Submission guidelinesThe languages used during the conference will be French and English. Papers should last 20 minutes, followed by 10 minutes of discussion. If you wish to submit a paper for this conference, please send an abstract of approximately 2,500 characters, including spaces (or 400 words) in French or English, as well as a short biography containing your institutional affiliation,before 2 November 2020:espace.reglementation@gmail.comOrganising Committee of this 4th workshopRobert Carvais (CTAD-Universit&#233; Paris Nanterre);Catherine Rideau-Kikuchi (UVSQ-DYPAC);Mathieu Marraud (CRH);Arnaldo Sousa Melo (Universidade do Minho);Fran&#231;ois Rivi&#232;re (Universit&#233; d&#8217;&#201;vry-Val d&#8217;Essonne-LaMOP-IDHES)Scientific Committee of all four workshopsPhilippe Bernardi (Paris 1-Lamop);Caroline Bourlet (IRHT);Robert Carvais (CTAD-Universit&#233; Paris Nanterre);Maxime L&#8217;H&#233;ritier (Paris 8-ArScAn);Corine Maitte (Universit&#233; Gustave Eiffel-ACP) ;Mathieu Marraud (EHESS-CRH);Judica&#235;l Petrowiste (Universit&#233; de Paris-ICT);Fran&#231;ois Rivi&#232;re (Universit&#233; d&#8217;&#201;vry-Val d&#8217;Essonne-LaMOP-IDHES);Arnaldo Sousa Melo (Universidade do Minho- Lab2Pt);Catherine Rideau-Kikuchi (UVSQ-DYPAC);Jean-Louis Roch (Universit&#233; de Rouen-GRHIS)