{"word_count": 736, "character_count": 5859}
Argumentaire&#160;Comment analyser les nationalismes &#233;conomiques du courant du XXI&#232;me si&#232;cle ? Quel lien peut-on faire entre le nationalisme &#233;conomique et la transformation de la politique &#233;trang&#232;re des Etats ? Comment comprendre la r&#233;ticence anglaise &#224; la poursuite d&#8217;une coop&#233;ration &#233;conomique r&#233;gionale au sein de l&#8217;Union europ&#233;enne (UE) &#224; travers l&#8217;op&#233;ration BREXIT d&#8217;une part, et l&#8217;ambition chinoise d&#8217;&#233;tendre les domaines et les g&#233;ographies de sa coop&#233;ration &#233;conomique, &#224; travers notamment la r&#233;activation des routes de la soie, d&#8217;autre part ? Pourquoi certains Etats ou gouvernements pr&#233;f&#232;rent restreindre les domaines de leurs coop&#233;rations internationales, alors que d&#8217;autres cherchent plut&#244;t &#224; les &#233;tendre ?Ce panel souhaite accueillir des communications situ&#233;es &#224; la fronti&#232;re de l&#8217;analyse de la politique &#233;trang&#232;re et de l&#8217;&#233;conomie politique internationale. Consacr&#233; &#224; l&#8217;&#233;tude des nouvelles routes de la soie, comme un projet politique transnational r&#233;activ&#233; par le gouvernement chinois en 2013, le panel vise trois ambitions principales : th&#233;orique, empirique et &#233;pist&#233;mologique.Au plan th&#233;orique, il vise &#224; questionner les cadres explicatifs de l&#8217;action internationale chinoise consacr&#233;e au d&#233;veloppement de circuits commerciaux sur toute la plan&#232;te et d&#8217;en analyser les enjeux sur les d&#233;terminants, les manifestations et les ressources de la politique &#233;trang&#232;re des &#201;tats.D&#8217;une mani&#232;re g&#233;n&#233;rale, les communications escompt&#233;es doivent couvrir les aspects suivants :1- Politique &#233;trang&#232;re et transfert des normes et des exp&#233;riences2- Politique &#233;trang&#232;re et expression des nationalismes3- Les projets politiques transnationaux et objectifs de politique &#233;trang&#232;re4- Ressources, objectifs et rapports de pouvoir en politique &#233;trang&#232;re5- Les nouvelles routes de la soie et l&#8217;ordre mondial6- Les nouvelles routes de la soie et la place de la Chine dans le monde7- Les discours sur les nouvelles routes de la soie et l&#8217;&#233;conomie chinoiseModalit&#233;s de soumissionLes propositions de communications doivent comporter 500 mots au maximum. Elles doivent &#234;tre pr&#233;cises quant &#224; la question de recherche et dire quelle sera la m&#233;thodologie.Les contributions portant sur d&#8217;autres sujets seront &#233;galement consid&#233;r&#233;es. Si vous souhaitez soumettre une communication en vue de rejoindre notre panel, merci de prendre contact avec nous afin de nous organiser &#224; ce sujet.Date limite : 10 octobre 2019Pour votre information, vous retrouverez ici les r&#232;gles de soumission d&#8217;un papier :https://wc2020.ipsa.org/wc/submit-paperOrganisationDr Mireille Manga Edimo, IRIC, University of Yaounde II, Dept of International Politics (manmir2001@yahoo.com)Dr Julien Rajaoson, Chercheur associ&#233; &#224; UMR 5194 PACTE/CNRS/Sciences Po Grenoble (jrajaoson@hotmail.fr)ArgumentHow can be understood the 21st Century Economic Nationalisms? Is there any established relationships between States Economic Nationalisms and the current observed transformations of foreign policies? How to understand the British reluctance to pursue regional economic cooperation within the European Union (EU) through the BREXIT or the Chinese ambition to expand its economic cooperation through a wider extension of its commercial activities, especially as translated in the reactivation of the Silk Roads? Why, finally, do some states or governments prefer to confine their international domains of cooperation, while other seek to expand them? All these questions fall within multidisciplinary approaches of foreign policy, development diplomacy, economic diplomacy, political ideology and economic nationalism which the field of international relations of the late 20th Century, early 21st do not nevertheless encompass.So, this panel focuses on the way the international project of China related to the reactivation of the Silk Roads engaged in 2013 differently challenges, the international political economy, global political power configuration, sovereignty, foreign policy choice and decision-making process. Yet, states are much more inhibited by security threats, economic pressure and re-design their international trade strategies.The panel is open to interdisciplinary approaches but remains focused on three objectives:The first looks for empirical and theoretical knowledge about the policy framework of the Chinese international project on the New Silk Roads.The second relates to the tracing and mapping of social and political trajectory and geographies of the New Silk Roads as well as its effects on world&#8217;s politics.Thirdly, the panel wishes to develop a comparative approach by hosting diversified case studies.Broadly expected, are abstracts of 500 words maximum which cover any of the following aspects:1- Foreign policy and transfer of norms and experiences2- Foreign policy and translations of economic nationalisms3- The construction of transnational political projects as foreign policy objectives4- The resources, objectives and power relations in foreign policy5- The New Silk Roads and the transformation of world political order6- The New Silk Roads and Chinese world political power7- Discourses on the New Silk Roads and The Chinese International RelationsConvenorsDr Mireille Manga Edimo, IRIC, University of Yaounde II, Dept of International Politics (manmir2001@yahoo.com)Dr Julien Rajaoson, Chercheur associ&#233; &#224; UMR 5194 PACTE/CNRS/Sciences Po Grenoble (jrajaoson@hotmail.fr)